The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 1994-06-14BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, June 14, 1994 7:30 P.M. AGENDA PUBLIC INPUT. To conduct an orderly, efficient meeting, individuals will be given a maximum of up to three (3) minutes to speak on topics which are pertinent to Town affairs. Any exceptions will be given at the discretion of the Mayor. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated May 24, 1994. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Works, May 26, 1994. ACTION ITEMS: 1.A. Public Hearing - Amended Plat of Lots 8 and 9, Arapaho Meadows, Mary Ann Kundtz Trust/Applicant - Continued from May 24, 1994. B. Public Hearing - Final Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Stanley Village Subdivision, Stanley Commercial Development/Applicant - Continued from May 10, 1994. C. Public Hearing - Final Plat of Lot 3, Stanley Historic District, FHK Co. Partnership/Applicant. 2. Rocky Mountain National Park Wilderness Act of 1994 - Discussion of Proposed "Wilderness Bill." 3. Park Entrance Estates Annexation - Review of Surveying Proposals. 4. Public Hearing - New Beer and Wine Liquor License Application filed by the Crown and Thistle, Inc., dba Matinee Cafe, Ltd., 206 E. Elkhorn Ave. 5. Town Administrator's Report - Projects. NOTE: The Board of Trustees meeting scheduled Tuesday, June 28, 1994 has been canceled. 1 Town of Estes Park, Larimer county, Colorado, . May.26 ....., 19.94 . Minutes of a . Regular Â· Â· meeting of the Board of Trusteee of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the . 24%4 . day of ... .ME ...., A.D., 19.94 . at regular meeting hour. H. Bernerd Dannels Meeting called to order by Mayor ......................... Present: Mayor Trustees: H. B. Dannels Robert L. Dekker, Mayor ProTem Susan L. Doylen, William J. Marshall, Michael E. Miller, Also Present: J. Donald Pauley Gary F. Klaphake, Town Administrator Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Tina Kuehl, i Absent: Deputy Town Clerk Absent: Stephen W. Gillette Mayor Dannels called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC INPUT. Frank Hix extended an invitation to the Trustees for the museum open house May 26 at 4:00 p.m. Lou Canaiy requested the Board reconsider the business license fee assessed to the Fire Department for their yearly craft show. Louis O'Riordan expressed the following needs: a Fire Department Appreciation Day, accessible handicapped spaces, creation of additional handicapped spaces through removal of reserved parking in the Town Hall lot, elimination of no benefit minimum wage jobs, elimination of the Recreation District, and subsidization of rent through the 4% I grocery tax. Administrator Klaphake reported that appreciation is extended to the Fire Department through various events. He further stated that ADA changes are underway through re-striping, new curb cuts, and repositioning of reserved parking spaces, and further changes will continue during the multi-year transition period allowed by ADA. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated May 10, 1994. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light & Power, May 12, 1994. B. Planning Commission, May 17, 1994 (acknowledgement only) . 4. Resolution #10-94 - Setting public hearing date of June 14, 1994 to consider New Beer and Wine Liquor License Application i filed by the Crown and Thistle, Inc., dba Matinee Cafe, Ltd., 206 E. Elkhorn Avenue. 5. Amended Plat of Lots 8 and 9, Arapaho Meadows, Mary Ann Kundtz Trust/Applicant - Continue to June 14, 1994. It was moved and seconded (Doylen-Pauley) the consent calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Planning Commission, May 17, 1994: Board of Trustees - May 24, 1994 - Page 2 A. Public Hearing - Final Plat of Tract 15. Fall River Addition. Edwards Investment Co./Applicant (continued from May 10. 1994). Mayor Dannels opened the public hearing. Director Stamey reported the owners of this subdivision are requesting an exception from the minimum lot size. This request will divide 1.88 acres into 2 lots of .94 acres each. The adjoining 29 tracts of the neighborhood were examined. The tract sizes range from as small as 15,750 sq. ft. up to 208,906 sq. ft. Sixteen tracts are larger, and 13 tracts are smaller than the proposed 41,000 sq. ft. for the resultant tracts of Tract 15. Therefore, by separating Tract 15, the new tract size will not be out of character. Applicant's representative Bill Van Horn stated that this area was included in the Fall River annexation at a time when there were no regulations regarding character of lot size. There being no further discussion, Mayor Dannels declared the public hearing closed. It was moved and seconded (Doylen-Marshall) the Final Plat of Tract 15, Fall River Addition be approved with conditions specified in Planning Commission minutes, April 19, 1994, and it passed unanimously. B. Public Hearing - Amended Plat. Lot 41. Fall River Addition. Frank & Alma Hix/Applicant (continued from May 10. 1994). Mayor Dannels opened the public hearing. Director Stamey reported the owners of this subdivision are requesting an exception from the minimum lot area. This request will divide 2.2 acres into 2 lots, 1.1 acres each. Applicant's representative Bill Van Horn stated that the lots will be accessed from a private drive, a portion of which is existing. These lots are somewhat secluded and are removed from views of nearby homes. Water line easement and sewer line easement issues have been resolved. Charlotte Miller expressed concern of overdevelopment. There being no further testimony, Mayor Dannels declared the public hearing closed. It was moved and seconded (Doylen-Dekker) the Amended Plat of Lot 41, Fall River Addition be approved with conditions as specified in Planning Commission minutes, April 19, 1994, and it passed unanimously. C. Public Hearing - Final Plat. Lots 1 and 2. Stanley Village Subdivision. Park National Bank/Applicant. It was moved and seconded (Pauley-Doylen) this plat be continued to June 14, 1994, and it passed unanimously. D. Public Hearing - Final Plat. Lot 3, Stanley Historic District. FHK Partnership/Applicant. It was moved and seconded (Pauley-Doylen) this plat be continued to June 14, 1994, and it passed unanimously. 2. Resolution #11-94 - Lake Estes Hike/Bike Trail Enhancement Proiect Funding. Attorney White explained that this resolution approves the $265,000 contract between Estes Park and Colorado Department of Transportation to secure 80%-20% funding (CDOT, 80%; Estes Park, 20%) for Phase I of the Hike/Bike Trail. Awarding of bids will be finalized when permits are obtained from the Bureau of Reclamation. The Town has the right to cancel the project at any time before construction is started. It was moved and seconded (Pauley- Doylen) that Resolution #11-94 be approved as presented, and it passed unanimously. 3. LA TI DA - New Beer and Wine Liquor License. Mayor Dannels opened a public hearing to consider a Beer and Wine Liquor License application submitted by LaVonna Sue Kenney, LA TI DA, 810 Moraine Avenue. LaVonna Kenney stated that her establishment is family oriented and will close at 9:00 p.m. Lou Canaiy requested that the Board place a moratorium on the Board of Trustees - May 24, 1994 - Page 3 issuance of liquor licenses. Attorney White explained that the Board does not have statutory authority for such control. Mayor Dannels declared the public hearing closed. The Board of Trustees finds that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are not met by the present liquor outlets in the neighborhood and that the desires of the adult inhabitants are for the granting of this liquor license. Based upon the above findings, it was moved and seconded (Dekker-Doylen) the new Beer and Wine License for LA TI DA be granted, and it passed unanimously. 4. Park Entrance Estates - Approval of Memorandum of Understanding. It was moved and seconded (Pauley-Doylen) the Memorandum of Understanding for Park Entrance Estates be approved as presented, and it passed unanimously. Completion of Annexation is expected by October. 5. Town Administratorls Report - Protects. The committee meetings have been changed to a 60-day cycle during the summer months. Eight Comprehensive Planning Workshops, Phase II, have been scheduled for the time periods vacated by this change. The Housing Authority meeting scheduled to follow the June 14th Board of Trustees meeting has been changed to July 12th. Phase I of cluster box installation is in operation and 254 of the 625 residents affected have registered for cluster box use. Phase II will commence in late June with neighborhood meetings. Town costs include paving of the turnouts and positioning of the pads; cluster boxes are being located in the existing right-of-way with no additional land costs involved. Attorney White reviewed the CML Legislative Update. Trustees were extended an invitation to the Holin' Through Luncheon, June 10, paid by the Town. It was moved and seconded (Doylen-Dekker) that appointments for the Stanley Historic District Technical Review Committee (Gary Klaphake, Art Anderson, Steve Stamey, Don Brandes, and Kerry Prochaska) and Architectural Review Committee (Roger Thorp and Dave Barrett) be approved, and it passed unanimously. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Dannels adjourned the meeting at 9:12 P.M. .................. Mayor ................ Deputy Town Clerk BRADFORD.U.LISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee May 26, 1994 Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Doylen and Miller Attending All Also Attending: Public Works Director Linnane, Town Attorney White, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: None Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. WATER DEPARTMENT SHOP AND SAFETY EOUIPMENT - APPROVAL TO PURCHASE Director Linnane requested the purchase of the following shop equipment and supplies: Shop Equipment and Supplies Cost Per Item Quantity Description Total 1 Open Top Drum Containers, 55 gallon $65.30 $65.30 1 Open Top Drum Containers, 30 gallon $39.25 $39.25 1 Drum Ulter $87.10 $87.10 1 Drum Carrier for 55 Gallon Drum $347.90 $347.90 TOTAL $539.55 The budget Is $15,050.00; $7,396.57 was approved in April. The remainder of the equipment will be purchased as the information is received. Hazardous Containment Safety Supplies Cosl Per Quantity Description Item Total 8 Â· Full Face Respirators $167.95 $1,343.60 2 Rubber Coated Splash Aprons $16.00 $32.00 TOTAL $1,375.60 The budget is $17,300.00; $6,152.10 was approved in April. The remainder of the equipment will be purchased as the information is received. The Committee recommends approval of the purchase of shop equipment and supplies in the amount of $539.55 and hazardous containment and safety supplies in the amount of $1 ,375.60, and further recommends that the Public Works Director will be authorized to make future equipment and supply purchases, within budget, without being required to return to the Committee for approval. Chairman Gillette commended staff for the budget status reports. REPORTS The Committee reviewed the Customer Service Response and Monthly Water Reports for April. May 14-21 was National River Clean-Up Week. Director Linnane reported that 100 volunteers and 6 town employees, also volunteers driving town vehicles, collected 30 cubic yards of trash in the areas of Black Canyon, Fish Creek, Big Thompson, and Fall River. A-1 Trash donated the dump fees. BRADFORD PuaLISHING Co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee, May 26, 1994 - Page 2 A preliminary study has been conducted regarding the installation of a public Septic Dump Station. At present, the only dump stations are located at campgrounds and the rodeo grounds and are not offered to the general public. Upper Thompson Sanitation District has the required discharge permits to allow usage by the general public, but will require strict design guidelines. The use fees are approximately $.50/gallon. Because of this, no recommendations are forthcoming pending further investigation. State Department will overlay Moraine Avenue from Elkhorn to the Donut Haus on June 1, 2, or 6. This will require two days, and traffic control will be provided. Last year the light timing at the intersection of Highway 34 and 36 followed the winter schedule during the week and the summer schedule on weekends. This same schedule will be discussed with the State Department of Transportation for this year. Following completion of all agenda items, staff requested the Committee enter Executive Session to discuss contract negotiations with the Town Attorney. Committee consensus was reached to enter Executive Session, and Chairman Gillette adjourned the meeting at 9:45 a.m. -TL- k,JU Tina Kuehl, Deputy Town Clerk 8~AOFORD,uet.,SHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - May 17, 1994 - Page 2 Stating that there are a number of items missing =in~Ji e proposal, and that the easement is criti.2J.Â·00Â·ie!!0-'mirther consideration, it was moved and--eecEN;3- (A. Hix/Pohl) Development plan #94-~ialâ€¢rer553 to June 21, 1994, and it passed unanim-all@,1*~ff was directed to submit the easement to Tow~ble/ney White for his review and comment prior to the Jlp-nst meeting. SUBDIVISIONS. 3-Ir! Amended Plat. Lots 8 and 9. Block A. Arapaho Meadows 1.4. Applicant's representative, stated that the Applicant is Subdivision. Marv Ann Kundtz Trust/Applicant. Bill Van Horn, proposing to adjust the internal lot line between two existing lots. No additional building sites are being created, and this adjustment provides for improved building sites of slightly less than 1 acre/each. Community Development Director Stamey reviewed the staff report noting that Arapaho Meadows was originally approved as a P.U. D., with a 30 ft. setback from the west lot line, 25 ft. setback from the street property line, and 10 ft. setback from the side lot line. Mr. Van Horn confirmed that these setbacks will be shown on the plat. Mr. Van Horn stated that the owners will be building on Lot 9 and selling Lot 8. The Applicant is aware of the setbacks as noted. As there were no comments from the audience, it was moved and seconded (Thomas/Burgess) the Amended plat of Lots 8 and 9, Arapaho Meadows Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, noting the above-mentioned confirmation from Mr. Van Horn concerning setback delineation on the plat, and it passed unanimously. /.6. Stanley Commercial Development/ADplicant. Representative Van a,-f Final Plat. Lots 1 and 2. Stanley villaae Subdivision. Horn stated that the previous Stanley Village Subdivision created two lots, one each owned by the Park National Bank, and Stanley Village Development. The proposed subdivision enlarges existing Lot 1 (Park National Bank), by including a vacant area to the west of the bank. The bank will have ownership and will construct the next building on Lot 1. Mr. Van Horn confirmed that the total combined floor area of Lots 1 and 2 is not being increased; the 160,000 sq. ft. limitation will not be exceeded. Attorney White and Mr. Van Horn responded to a question raised on the prohibition of additional freestanding signs on Lot 1. Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report and clarified gross floor area calculations to ensure the 160,000 sq. ft. is not exceeded, and that floor area below grade is included in the 160,000 sq. ft. limit. Mr. Van Horn agreed and advised that if in the future Stanley Village Development desires to increase the combined area it was understood that approval must be obtained from EPURA and the planning Commission. There were no comments from the audience. As all nine staff recommendations had been met, it was moved and â€¢econded (Thomas/Pohl) the Final Plat of Lots 1 and 2, stanley Village Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, and it passed unanimously. ....FOF'PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - May 17, 1994 - Page 2 s ing that there are a number of items missing in the Pro al, and that the easement is critical for further consi ration, it was moved and seconded (A. Hix/Pohl) Develop nt Plan #94-5 be continued to June 21, 1994, and passed un imously. Staff was directed to submit the ease t to Town Att ney White for his review and comment prior the June 21st me 'ng. 3. SUBDIVISIONS. 3.A. Amended Plat. L s 8 and 9. Block A. avaho Meadows Subdivision. Marv Ann K tz Trust/Applica . Bill Van Horn, Applicant's representati stated tha the Applicant is proposing to adjust the inte al lot li between two existing lots. No additional buildin sites re being created, and this adjustment provides for m ved building sites of slightly less than 1 acre/each. Community Development Direc r Sta reviewed the staff report noting that Arapaho adows was iginally approved as a P.U.D., with a 30 ft. s ack from the t lot line, 25 ft. setback from the street operty line, and ft. setback from the side lot line. Mr Van Horn confirmed th these setbacks will be shown on th plat. Mr. Van Horn st d that the owners will be build g on Lot 9 and selling Lo 8. The Applicant is aware of the s backs as noted. As there re no comments from the audience, it was mov and seconde (Thomas/Burgess) the Amended Plat of Lots 8 a 9, Arapa Meadows Subdivision be favorably recommended to e Boa of Trustees, noting the above-mentioned confirmati fr Mr. Van Horn concerning setback delineation on the plat, d it passed unanimously. /,05. Final Plat. Lot 3. Stanley Historic District - Stanlev Views Subdivision. FHK Company Partnership/Amplicant. Applicant's representative Bill Van Horn stated that development of this site is subject to the Stanley Historic District Master Plan and Development Agreement. The proposal has evolved from multi-family with an allowable 50 multi- family units to a single-family development with 20 single- family lots; the owners have agreed to a significantly less dense development than allowed by the Development Agreement. Although the Applicant will attempt to minimize the impact, an equestrian trail easement has been provided for the historical trail rides through the area. The sites have been arranged so as to require minimum earth movement. Administrator Klaphake reported on a meeting with the Stanley Hills Homeowners Association who reside to the east and north of this proposal. The following issues were discussed: (1) zoning impact with the site currently zoned RM - staff is recommending a note be added to the plat limiting each lot to a single-family residence; (2) open space - the Applicant has agreed to set pins to delineate the setback/open space areas; (3) existing access to Stanley Hills - the Town has agreed to provide a physical barrier on this access; (4) the previously graded scarred area overlapping into Stanley Hills - the Applicant has agreed to furnish top soil to reclaim this site; and (5) access for fire safety - due to the configuration of the cul-de-sac serving the development, the roadway meets with the approval of the Fire Chief. Other than one objection, the Homeowners Association will support the proposal. TRADFORD/JOLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - May 17, 1994 - Page 3 Administrator Klaphake added that in order to expedite this proposal, a compromise was reached by both the Owner and the Town in two areas: Open space - the Master Plan states that 30% open space is required, exclusive of lotted area. Through negotiations, an alternative has been proposed which allows for the open space to be included within the lots; however, it must be protected by an open space easement which prohibits disturbance, buildings, fences, patios, etc. This reserved area is 30.1% of the site. The open space is primarily on the perimeter of the subdivision. A 40 ft. wide strip of open space abuts the Stanley Hills open space. Cul-de-sac - the Code provides that no more than 12 residences may be served by a cul-de-sac. Due to configuration and negotiation, it is reasonable to allow the cul-de-sac to serve 20 residences. The Technical Review Committee Will Still review all development and there will be no overlot grading, fencing (except for patio areas), and a maximum of 2-car garages (attached). The landscape plan must also be approved. The proposal includes a gated access on the private cul-de-sac (street), and it will be built to Town standards. The Planning Commission's role in this proposal, pursuant to the Development Agreement, is to consider platting or replatting Of the parcels, such as this proposal. Administrator Klaphake restated conditions to be considered for approval: (1) Fire Chief approval of the access, (2) setting of the property pins delineating the setback and open space areas, (3) approval is not a precedent-setting in terms of the Master Plan and modifications thereof. Commissioner comments/questions included: Gated access. Staff confirmed that the cul-de-sac is a private street that must be constructed to Town standards - the Fire Chief will need to approve the design of the gated access. Rationale for the gated access was provided by Mr. Van Horn who stated that this type of security is common place throughout urban areas and it should serve as a desirable marketing tool. The gate will feature a "call button" for use by the residents for their guests; however, the access does not include a gate house and guards. Pedestrian/Horse Trail. As it was determined that the cul-de-sac did not require a pedestrian system, the Town did not require such. The Technical Review Committee will consult with both the Applicant and Stable Owners and the relocation of the trail will be mutually acceptable. The trail will exist whether or not the stable continues to operate. Mr. Van Horn explained that the Applicant does not desire to limit the trail to horses, that the area will be of sufficient size to accommodate both pedestrians and horses, and that the Applicant has recognized the possibility of conflicts with the gated entry and horses. The Applicant is hopeful that in the foreseeable future, the trail will emerge into strictly pedestrian use by the residents. Comments from the audience were heard from Karen Zipser, President/Stanley Hills Association. Ms. Zipser stated that she represented most, but not all, of the residents bordering Parcel 3. Residents are relieved that only 20 single-family homes are being proposed; she was aware of the compromise 8~â€¢OF'.0 PUIMISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - May 17, 1994 - Page 4 issues, however, this plan is much better; and she expressed her appreciation to staff for making this proposal possible for them. Stating that the plat, as presented today, exceeds the spirit of the letter of the Stanley Historic District Master Plan, and that she is satisfied with the requirements of the Master Plan will control the construction of the dwellings and future development, it was moved and seconded (A. Hix/Burgess) the Final Plat of Stanley Views Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following conditions, and it passed unanimously. 1. The Fire Chief provide acceptance of the private access, stating such is adequate for fire protection. 2. Property pins be set by the Applicant for the open space perimeter. 3. Approval of this proposal is non-precedent setting, only applies to this site. 4.A. Controlled access points are not compatible with public streets. Findley Court should be designated as a private street, and if, in fact, Findley Court is to be a private street, the following dedication statement should be used: "Do hereby subdivide the same into lots and blocks, open space easement areas, right of way, private streets, utility and other easements as shown on this plat, and do hereby designate and dedicate all such utility easements to and for the public use for the installation and maintenance of utility, irrigation and drainage facilities." B. Prior to acceptance of the final plat, a private homeowners association must be in place to maintain the open space easements. C. A note be added to the plat indicating the legal status of the horse trail. 5. The compromises, a identified above, are a reasonable modification of the Stanley Historic District Master Plan. 6. A note be added to the plat limiting each lot to a single-family residence. 2*-unity Development Director Stamey requested the Commia/ion renihn after the meeting to discuss the summer meetin ule. There beifiD080 further business, Chairman c-ar adjourned the meeting at 2: 2M. f L 3-7.-1-Ac. t. ickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk NOTE: The Planâ€¢'R~ Commission meeting -bahedule for June, July, August and -//Eember, will be as follows: P+d sl/61, Session: 8:00 A.M., Room 203 ~00!@eting: 9:30 A.M., Board Room (Room 103)100, . c TOWN OF ESTES PARK Gary F. Klaphake Town Administrator _*~r-.Â· e.:29)jur #74â‚¬ 23- b 'ey5449>1~21. ~.Am#LE<<,-~479,7. j~~*p#EFF m .,Â·~ .-it: 3 p.>4*2#%3'gkfÂ· 0 .9 4. f /- - I ..rx-Â·i,â€¢.er 02'10,+ fumrh ~421/t~ ~,Â¥4#74) ' ~,-4-1,-7-:Flg/v / 9-J . =,17-- . 4-16 Al,1.-ke-Â·ro.3~6*t.,Ah. -. -A. ~,~â€ž 400~6,44~B- 4~//741"~44;-'~'~ 7 3-' 4 74. &21. **4041 .,2, C ~Â»24 4-<; Estes Park, Colorado 80517 May 27, 1994 TO: Honorable Mayor Dannels Board of Trustees FROM: Gary Klaphake ~57-P--- Town Administrator RE: CONGRESSMAN ALLARD'S REQUEST FOR COMMENT ON THE WILDERNESS BILL FOR RMNP On May 6, 1994, Congressman Allard addressed a letter to the Mayor requesting input from the Town Board concerning the Wilderness Bill and wilderness designation of RMNP. This memo is intended to collect our thoughts on the subject and establish a position on the Wilderness Bill. PROS . Protect RMNP from future inappropriate uses. Simplify administration of these areas for the Park Service. Reflect reality, since the Park has been managed as a wilderness area since 1974. P. O. Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586-5331 Town of Estes Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Wilderness Bill -2- May 27, 1994 CONS Â· May be unnecessary legislation -- what does this legislation provide that designation as a national park does not already include? Why can't the Park continue to be managed as it has been the last 20 years? â€¢ The proposed legislation overlays existing federal reserved water rights with an additional reserved water right for wilderness purposes with a priority date as of the date of enactment of the proposed legislation. This is unnecessary and costly to taxpayers, as future litigation will be necessary with regard to the meaning of this provision. Congressman Skaggs' office has indicated the purpose of this language is to establish a precedent for downstream wilderness areas. â€¢ Creation of the wilderness designation indicates a desire to decrease the use of the Park, which may, in turn, have an adverse economic impact on the Town. Even . though the Wilderness Bill appears on the surface to be "Motherhood and Apple Pie", there remain many serious unanswered questions: 1. Why now? Why is it not sponsored by our Congressman? 2. What is the impact on water rights? 3. What are the future impacts of the designation in terms of Park use and adjacent property? RECOMMENDATION The Wilderness Bill may be in our best interest but before we rush off to support or not support the Bill, we need more discussion and clarification on present and future inputs. The Town Board does not support the Wilderness Bill for RMNP at this time. COMMITTEES: WAYNE ALLARD 4TH DISTRICT, COLORADO MAY 9 1994. BUDGET 422 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING â€¢ AGRICULTURE - WASHINGTON. DC 20515-0604 â€¢ NATURAL RESOURCES (202) 225-4676 U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 6, 1994 The Honorable Bernerd Dannels Mayor of Estes Park Post Office Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Mayor Dannels: This letter is to follow up on a correspondence I sent you on March 14, 1994, regarding the concept of designating Rocky Mountain National Park a wilderness area. As you may know, this week Congressman Skaggs introduced a bill which would designate as wilderness, a total of 240,650 acres in four separate areas of Rocky Mountain National Park. Since the majority of the park is in the Fourth District, I am committed to making sure the bill reflects the interests and concerns of those of you living in the surrounding area. In my opinion, there are several major questions that need to be addressed concerning this billi including what additional benefits a wilderness designation provides, and how such a change affects water and private property rights in and around the park boundaries. There may also be significant economic consequences, especially to nearby communities such as Estes Park. I was not involved in the drafting of the bill nor have I embraced the concept of making the Park a wilderness area. As I stated in my previous letter, your input and issues of concern are very important to me. Before I take a formal stand on this bill I would like to hear your comments. Your earliest reply would be most helpful. Again, thank you for your time and interest in this matter. I have enclosed a copy of the bill for your review. Sincerely, Wayne All)/d O FORT COLLINS OFFICE O GREELEY OFFICE I SOUTHEAST OFFICE NORTHEAST OFFICES ROCKY MOUNTAIN BLDG., SUITE 307 GREELEY NATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 350 19 WEST 4TH AVE. 0 705 So. DlvisioN AvE. 0 212 E. KiowA 315 WEST OAK 822 7â„¢ STREETr LA JUNTA, CO 81050 STERLING, CO 80751 FORT MORGAN. CO 80701 FORT COLLINS, CO 80521 GREELEY, CO 80631 (719) 384-7370-FAX 384-6536 (303) 522-1788 (303) 867-8909Â·FAX 867-2583 (303) 493-9132Â·FAx 493-9144 (303) 351-7582Â·FAX 351-7585 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER MIvl m' Wilaerness plan too severe By Ul SEN. HANK BROWN Colilillelltary ' 42.Â£ Eff/1 4 < 1ltlzs: g::D :mybl~-,of' In 1872, President Grant per- - - The water issues associated suaded Congress to create the with the wilderness areas desig- Yellowstone, the world's frst na- nated in 1993 were particularly tional park open to everyone. difficult to resolve because of the There had been parkg and re- We ought to be looking for ways to strong and diametrically opposed serves in Europe, but access was . views held by many members of ~imited to the elite, the royal and expand recreation opportunities inthe . the water user and environmen- the rich. Â· ~1 tai communities. :- ' dift - - 1 What made American national parks unique wu mat me, were ~ F'~ reduce therr;" Â· t Â· Fortunately. we wers able to produce water language that was meant for the enjoyment of every a true compromise that does not citizen Â°by such means as will ' . 2 Injure the fundamental principles leave them unimpaired for the - Sen. Hank Brown that have much value for Colorado enjoyment offuture generations.Â» = protection of wild lands and Recently, without little or no , Â· protection of Colorado's future consultation with the members of Wilderness is a unique desig- 6 shing, hunting and camping. Â· ability to develop and use all of its Congress whose districts contain nation in that it prohibits any - When I was elected to the Sen- interstate water entitlement. '~- 4 most of the land, Congressman commercial utilization of the ate in 1990, I committed to work ,-The Skaggs Rocky Mountain [David] Skaggs introduced a bill land, as well as any motorized to end a decade-long stalemate on National Park wilderness bill to deignate 91 percent of Rocky access. designating additional Colorado would provide for federal control Mountain National Park as Fire prevention and disease wilderness. of water rights that is unprece- 1 wilderness. control methods used in the na- Last August, President Clinton dented in Colorado and estab- All of the ground within the tional forests are prohibited. In- signed into law legislation I spon- lishes a precedent that could en- Park's boundaries i8 already pro- deed, wilderness was created to sored designating 611,730 acres danger Colorado's water rights. tected. The basic mission of the provide a natural experience in 19 areas throughout Colorado The idea of designating large National Park Service is to pre- which shows nature's beauty and as wilderness. An additional portions of Rocky Mountain Na- serve, protect and interpret natu- its harsh indifference to human 99,440 acres comprising the tional Park was considered by ral, cultural and historic aspirations. Â· Roubideau, Tabeguache and our congressional delegation resources of the nation for the Wilderness designation of 91 Piedra areas will be managed as when we put together the Col- , public. 2 percent of the Park would tend to wilderness. ,r Â· .1 orado Wilderness Bill that passed The authorizing legislation for restrict the recreational use of the , The bill also creates two spe- - last year. That compromise, the National Park Service re- Park. . cial management areas, the Fos- ' which was agreed to by all the quires that the service promul- Â· The national parks contribute sil Ridge Recreation Management congressional delegation, exclud- , gate regulations to 'provide for to meeting the public demand for Area and the Bowen Gulch Pro- ed the Park wilderness idea. 3 the preservation, from injury or certain types of outdoor recre- tection Area, which comprise an The question was considered spoilation, of all timber, mineral ation opportunities. - additional 55,500 acres. - f i . and dealt with. deposits, natural curiosities, or. Rocky Mountain National Park The land management plans Rocky Mountain National Park wonders within said park, and is Colorado's number-one tourist for these areas were crafted to al- is a very special place. their retention in their natural attraction, with more than 2.9 low for recreational activities â€ž From the time I attended camp . condition: million visitors last year. Â· ' while enhancing the scenic, nearby in the late 19408, it has Rather than giving the Park We ought to be looking for , wildlife and other natural re- been an area that epitomizes to Service easy ways out of its re- ways to expand recreation oppor- source values ofthe areas. _-__- me the special beauty of Col- , sponsibilities, we should demand tunities in the Park, not reduce It is important to realize that orado. Â· Â·j that the Park Service do its job. them. ..Â· Â·.~ , : Â·i the 1993 Act was possible be- I have ted the efforts in When Congress passed the Na- There is no shortage of wilder- cause of the countless groups and Congress to expand the Park's tional Wilderness System in ness in Colorado. individuals who worked together borders, with the addition of the 1964, however, the intent was In 1964, Congress set aside for more than a decade to develop MacGregor Ranch addition in quite different. Wilderness areas some 493,000 acres of Colorado the boundaries for these areas. 1983 and the Lily Lake addition were supposed to be "where the for wilderness preservation. Thousands of conflicts created by .in 1989. r Earth and its community of life By 1980, 2.64 million acres of private property, mining claims, '~ ~ Permanently restricting recre- are untrammeled by man,, where Colorado wilderness had been water rights, oil and gas leases, ational use of 91 percent of the man himself is a visitor who does designated by Congress for future timber-suitable areas and exist- Park is not a well thought out not remain.Â» , generations to use for hiking, ing access trails were-carved out idea. Â· r - , 1 ..iÂ· 3,: I . , Al D K. I i F:\M\SKAGGS\SKAGGS.039 H.L.C. [DRAFT] APRIL 29,1994 1031) CONGRESS 2D SESSION H.R. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Mr. SKAGGS introduced the following billi which was referred to the Comnittee on A BILL To designate certain lands in Rocky Mountain National Park as wilderness, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of thÂ£ United States ofAmâ‚¬Wca in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 4 This Act may be cited as the "Rocky Mountain Na- 5 tional Park Wilderness Act of 1994". 6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES. 7 The Congress finds thatr- April 29. 1994 (8:51 a.m.) F:\M\SKAGGS\SKAGGS.039 H.L.C. 2 1 (1) it is in the national interest to include cer- 2 tain lands in Rocky Mountain National Park within 3 the National Wilderness Preservation System so as 4 to protect those lands' enduring scenic and historic 5 wilderness character and unique wildlife and to pre- 6 serve the lands' scientific, educational, recreational, 7 and inspirational resources and challenges; 8 (2) to fulfill the purposes of the wilderness des- 9 ignation of those lands, as expressed in this Act and 10 the Wilderness Act of 1964 (16 U.S.C. 1131 et 11 seq.), it is necessary for the United States to have 12 rights to water within Rocky Mountain National 13 Park; and 14 (3) the existing rights of the United States to 15 water within Rocky Mountain Park for national park 16 purposes, which are being adjudicated in the eourts 17 of the State of Colorado, may be sufficient to fulfill 18 the purposes of the wilderness designation of those 19 lands. 20 SEC. 3. WILDERNESS DESIGNATION AND MAPS. 21 , (a) DESIGNATION.-(1) In furtherance of the pur- 22 poses of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), eer- 23 tain lands in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, 24 which comprise approximately 240,650 acres, as generally 25 depicted on a map entitled "Rocky Mountain National April 29,1994 (8:45 a.m.) F:\M\SKAGGS\SKAGGS.039 H.L.C. 3 1 Park Wilderness-Proposed" and dated May 1994, are 2 hereby designated as wilderness and, therefore, as compo- 3 nents of the National Wilderness Preservation System, 4 and, together with the lands referred to in paragraph (2), 5 shall be known as the Rocky Mountain National Park Wil- 6 derness. 7 (2) Those lands within the Indian Peaks Wilderness 8 (as designated by Public Law 94-450 (92 Stat. 1099)) 9 that were transferred to Rocky Mountain National Park 10 by section 111(a) of Public Law 96-580 (94 Stat. 3272), 11 which comprise approximately 2,917 acres, shall be in- 12 cluded in, and administered as part of, the Rocky Moun- 13 tain National Park Wilderness designated by paragraph 14 (1). 15 (b) MAP AND DESCRIPTION.-As soon as practicable 16 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 17 the Interior shall file a map and a boundary description 18 of the area designated as wilderness by this section with 19 the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States 20 House of Representatives and with the Committee on En- 21 ergy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate. 22 That map and dese,ription shall have the same force and 23 effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary 24 is authorized to correct clerical an.d typographical errors 25 in such map and description. That map and boundary de- April 29,1994 (8:45 a.m.) , F:\M\SKAGGS\SKAGGS.039 H.L.C. 4 . 1 seription shall be on file and available for publie inspection 2 in the offee of the Director of the National Park Service, 3 Department of the Interior. 4 SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS. 5 (a) IN GENERAL.-Subject to valid existing rights, 6 lands designated as wilderness by this Act shall be man- 7 aged by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with 8 the Wilderness Act and this Act, except that, with respect 9 to the wilderness area designated by this Act, any ref- 10 erenee in the Wilderness Act to the effective date of the 11 Wilderness Act shall be deemed to be a reference to the 12 date of enactment of this Act. 13 (b) RE&EBVED WATER RIGHTS.-(1) Within the area 14 designated as wilderness by section 3(a)(1), there is here- 15 by reserved a quantity of water sufficient to fulfill the pur- 16 poses of that wilderness designation. 17 (2) The priority date of the water rights reserved in 18 paragraph (1) shall be the date of enactment of this Act. 19 (3) The Secretary of the Interior and other appro- 20 priate officers of the United States shall take all steps nec- 21 essary to protect the rights reserved by paragraph (1), in- 22 cluding the filing by the Secretary of a claim for the quan- 23 tification of such right in any present or future appro- 24 priate stream adjudication in the courts of the State of 25 Colorado in which the United States has been or is here- ApMI 29, 1994 (8:45 a.m.) . , F: \M\SKAGGS\SKAGGS.039 H.L.C. 5 1 after properly joined in accordance with section 208 of the 2 Act of July 10, 1952 (43 U.S.C. 666), commonly referred 3 to as the "McCarran Amendment". 4 (4) The water rights reserved by paragraph (1) shall 5 be in addition to any water rights which may have been 6 previously reserved or appropriated by the United States 7 in the State of Colorado before the date of enactment of 8 this Act. 9 (5) In the case of any lands designated as wilderness 10 by section 3(a)(1) for which the United States has re- 11 served rights for national park purposes to all the water 12 within those lands that was unappropriated at the time 13 those lands were included in Rocky Mountain National 14 Park, those existing rights shall be deemed sumcient to 15 fulfill the purposes of the wilderness designation of those 16 lands made by section 3 (a) ( 1). 17 (c) COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT.-(1) This 18 Aet shall not be construed to prevent or impede activities 19 under the surface of lands designated as wilderness by this 20 Aet to operate, maintain, repair, or replace the Alva B. 21 Adams Tunnel of the Colorado-Big Thompson Project. 22 (2) Section 1 of the Act of January 26, 1915 (16 23 U.S.C. 191; 38 Stat. 798), is amended by striking the last 24 sentence. April 29, 1994 (8;45 a.m.) ~ 4~27~ TOWN OF ESTES PARK -=am â‚¬16., er,4 .22/9,2.,4..... ~#4, 5~.a--- :3 . Â©Ctiy'9**' ../ ./ I 0~94]~i:#.'41~Â·#11~i.~ 9 Â¥ 4TE*k, ,~-Â·4Â¥ 2 t~:~ ~%1Â¢}t >- 2 -- ..v . ' 4.- Â· drÂ· LS' '' 9 MEMORANDUM June 7, 1994 TO: Mayor Dannels Town Board of Tt2stees Lr Â· o FROM: Rich Widmer 7-Â»L- SUBJECT: Park Entra~ge'Estates Annexation - Survey Proposals The Town received proposals for the surveying, monumentation and drafting of the Park Entrance Estates annexation map, as follows: 1. Estes Park Surveyors $3,000 2. Rocky Mountain Consultants $9,920 3. Van Horn Engineering No Submittal A map is attached showing the boundaries of the proposed annexation. The low bidder, Estes Park Surveyors, has performed many past projects for the Town, including annexation maps. All past work has been done in a very satisfactory manner. I have reviewed these proposals, and recommend award of the purchase order for the preparation of the annexation survey and map for Park Entrance Estates Addition to the low bidder, Estes Park Surveyors. (303)586-5331 â€¢ RO. BOX 1200 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (303)586-2816ADMINISTRATION â€¢ FAX(303)586-6909 OTHER 1 1 1 1 1 .r- 1 PAR,c â‚¬â€¢,1*4â€¢,ct ES1Alâ‚¬& ~0617/ON 11 1 1 .. 2 /.05 NYA 1 1 .- 2 11 5 2 : 00=yflee 'LARIME 11 - \ 11 \6 4 0 11 , l RANGE VIEW , \ It ~ V 1 7- =,= 3 f. , 3 3 TERMINAL ~*.~94,2.8 7 JUNIF '3 - 7 2 â€¢ â€¢ 10 '0 1 Akef '10 .,4, O \ 2 3 - 1. 1 TOWN SHOPT 2 22 14 25 111- PARK 3 HI~H <â€¢ DRIVE' 2 111 0 - 1 1 1 3- 3 23 20 li 11 50 14\1 4 Ut>\, 5 0 ,1.0 111 - -79 ' 1 61&. .P:vefÂ¢4 G | ' =Â£2uet'A Yâ€¢,>10~- i. s 1. Â»34M0 \971:i-6-7- 10 11 T. ENTR NCE , S. , lk,pf~~HEIGH TS-17\0 . , / PI,Â£--A 9 ,â€¢ ~l~4~~~wz~O S â€¢ , . , LA ELM / 3/4, TES I RD. 1 . ~ At32 4 . il 1 27 2L_ I , 0/ 7 1 0 59 32 35 -*-34 1-6 11 1 1 Is . 1. 1 -EWTV-F----1 . 661,Titl \ __00~~00~~~; SECOND *EAVER ' IN T.. 7.3. ~ POINT ILA~-- w IGHTS 3 2, 4 1 BEAVER 7' ADDITIO \ Dr n.. 1 09 LAKE 1 1 , 1 0.1 3. 1 G#/ ADDÂ· A 1 SPRUCE / c~ - ./N ' ,7 , ~r: 2:ir fai ' ~~~j.33!Ii 32 1 S. S. -- - -Ul/O 'ANIER â€¢ 12 5 . 1 0 1 40/1 1 01. 7 ' r;xvi- WO /O 9/7 SUB. 5 1, m , N.L /q REED'S 3 24 1. 20 â€ž L.....'COLE| ~ ~ ~~~ * .13 12 A-\14 3 12 1 22 2. I SUB. 1 14 5 21 13, 40 4, *:j .3 -HAY O E N 6 23 BROADVI W -1 u ' d. 2_ 29 23 23 22 ~ E-SUB. 91/01,1/0 Sus. \ - 1 2/ 1 1 27 FAR\GSO N'i 9 1 /01 \ Phtkul 1--,5 1 /4 1 / â€ž i /4 , 1 /~~~7~ 138 3,1,6 1 35 34 2â€¢ 25 ' .C 31 11 ---1 June, 1993 PROCEDURE FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION NEW LIQUOR LICENSE MAYOR. The next order of business will be the public hearing on the application of The Crown and Thistle, Inc., dba MATINEE CAFE LTD. for a New Hotel & Restaurant Tavern X Beer & Wine 3.2% Retail Beer Liquor-Licensed Drug Store Club license located at 206 E. Elkhorn Avenue TOWN ATTORNEY. The application rwas filed May 11, 1994 and, at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on May 24, 1994 the public hearing thereon was set at 7:30 P.M. on June 14 , 19 94 , and the neighborhood boundaries for the purpose of this application and hearing were established to be 2.9 miles. This public hearing will be conducted in the following manner: The applicant will be allowed to state his case and present any evidence he wishes to support his application. The opponents will then be given an opportunity to state their case and present any evidence in opposition to the application. The applicant will be allowed a rebuttal limited to the evidence presented by the opponents. No new evidence may be submitted. The opponents will be allowed a rebuttal which may only rebut 1 the evidence of the applicants. No new evidence may be offered. The Board of Trustees may ask any questions of any person speaking at any time during the course of this hearing. At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consider the facts and evidence determined as a result of its investigation, as well as any other facts, the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood for the type of license for which application has been made, the desires of the adult inhabitants, the number, type and availability of liquor outlets located in or near the neighborhood under consideration, and any other pertinent matters affecting the qualifications of the applicant for the conduct of the type of business proposed. TOWN ATTORNEY will present the application and confirm receipt of the following: X Receipt of all necessary fees and hearing costs. The applicant is filing as an: An individual. A Partnership. X A Corporation. X The property is zoned X C-D Commercial Downtown or C-0 Commercial Outlying, which allows this type of business as a permitted use. x The notice of hearing was published on June 1. 1994 Â· X The premises was posted on June 3, 1994 . 2 X There is a police report with regard to the investigation of the applicant. (There is a map indicating all liquor outlets presently in the Town of Estes Park available upon request.) The Town Attorney asks whether any of the Trustees have any questions regarding the application. Mayor Applicant please present your evidence. Ask the Town Clerk whether any communications have been received in regard to the application. The Town Clerk reads all communication. Ask the Board if there are any further questions. Indicate that all evidence presented will be accepted as part of the record. Ask the Board if they have any further comments. 4" MAYOR. Declare the public hearing closed. SUGGESTED MOTION: Finding. The Board of Trustees finds that the reasonable 3 requirements of the neighborhood are/are not met by the present liquor outlets in the neighborhood and that the desires of the adult inhabitants are/are not for the granting of this liquor license. Motion. Based upon the above findings, I move that this license be granted/denied. 43& 4 DR 8404 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 COLORADO LIQUOR OR 3.2 % FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION 1. Applicant is a Date filejl with Local Authority ~ Corporation (Attach DR 8177) ~ Individual (Attach DR 8404-1) 57,1 194 F.E.I.N. U Partnership (Attach DR 8441) U Limited Liability Company (Attach DR 8405) 94 -1265393 1 a. Name of Applicant(s) If partnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation Social Security No. 1~146 6Â¥20 NA A Al Tz> Th11 6-TR- E, 1 kt-. ( 9 11 Â· 54-Â· 3 0 9 ~) 2. Trade Name of Establifhment (DBA) State Sales Tax No. Business Telephone Iv\AFT, CEâ‚¬ CA-f~TE- i LTD . 23-060 4:3 30 9.5-9 6 10 30 3. Address of Premises (specify exact location of premises) 20 6 6.=4 24-+T E=u.44*Â©-W-El City County 1--A-El ( 1/1 BR State ZIP Code - 624-rEâ‚¬4 -FA4224 55<2 S ),7 4. Mailing Address (Number and Street) City or Town State ZIP Code P, C Â· 73 0>4 1 6114--7 â‚¬1167'AR~ CCE 90 S) /7 5. If the premises currently have a liquor or beer license, you MUST answer the following question: Present Trade Name of That Establishment (DBA) Present State License No. Present Type of License Present Expiration Date %/A . 6. ~h~7&'2~Y '~f~12f.Prz?fot~~pnartgn~rr~J'lifd~rptah~~~'~P,~eenmW~oerseoyre~r~~ager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockhold- 13 Â·Ey 7. Has the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockhold- ers or directors if a corporation) or manager ever; (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? 0 20 (b) had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? m ar, (c) had interest in another entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? m %1/ If you answered yes to 7a, b or c, explain in detail on a separate sheet. 8. Has a liquor license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding two years? If 'yes," explain in detail. m W 8a. Has a 3.2 beer license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding one year? If "yes," explain in detail. m V 9. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or parochial school, or the principal campus of any college, university or U Â·*1' seminary? '10. Has a liquer or beer license ever been issued to the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation)? If yes, identify the name of the business and list any 0 2/ current financial interest in said business including any loans to or from a licensee. 11. Does the Applicant, as listed on line 1 a of this application, have legal possession of the premises for at least 1 year from the date that / this license will be issued by virtue of ownership or under a lease? (If yes, attach a signed copy of deed or lease.) B n ~ Ownership .*' Lease m Other (Explain in Detail) a. If leased, list name of landlord and tepant, and glate ot,expiration, EXACTLY ai they apimpr on the lea9e: Landlord MA,cÂ·T, /AÂ· ktMAA Tenant -PNE 64'4JIC *16 /m-+ 43**2*:IM/milifIL-Faic taN\Faff . -. 9. 8/1. \Ct;kY+42 Expires 5 ' i 51 96; Attach a diagram of the area to be licensed (including dimensions) which shows the bars, walls, partitions, entrances, exits and what each room shall be utilized for in this business. This diagram should be no larger than 8 1/2" X 11: (Doesn't have to be to scale) _ 12. Who has (including persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies) or will loan or give money, inventory, furniture or equipment to or for use in this business; or who will receive money from this business. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NAME ADDRESS INTEREST , te e . B EÂ¥- 51- 551 20 4 A,4 04 EQuiFI\4â‚¬16 Â·-FA i=G RA-nin; JA/-BArJK EÂ»<94 424Â¢2-44 KA Attach copies of all notes and security instruments, and any written agreement or details of any oral agreement, by which any person (including partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, etc) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment, and any agreement relating to the business which is contingent or conditional in any way by volume, profit, sales, giving of advice or consultation. 13. Optional Premises or Hotel and Restaurant Licenses with Optional Premises All Optional Premises applicants must attach a copy of the local ordinance or resolution authorizing the issuance of Optional Premises licenses. Number of separate Optional Premises areas requested. DR 8404 (2/94) Page 2 14. Liquor Licensed Drug Store applicants, answer the following: Yes No (a) Does the applicant for a Liquor Licensed Drug Store have a license issued by the Colorado Board of Pharmacy? COPY MUST BE ATTACHED. m m 15. Club Liquor License applicants answer the following and attach DR 8177: (a) Is the applicant organization operated solely for a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political or athletic purpose and not for pecuniary gain? m El (b) Is the applicant organization a regularly chartered branch, lodge or chapter of a national organization which is operated solely for the object of a patriotic or fraternal organization or society, but not for pecunialy gain? 00 (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant occupied the premises (Three years required) to be licensed as a club? 16. Colorado Manufacturer, Wholesaler or Limited Winery applicants, answer the following: (a) Will the applicant store or sell alcoholic beverages at more than one location in Colorado? If "yes," provide the address of each location and explain the activity to be conducted at each location (e.g., warehouse, salesroom, etc.) (Attach DR 8438 for each location) m Il (b) If applicant is a wholesaler, does or did any owner, partner, shareholder, director, officer, member or manager have any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler, retailer, manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State 6f Colorado to sell malt, vinous or spirituous liquor? If yes, attach explanation in detail. m El (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit or Brewers Notice? If *yes," attach a copy; if "no," explain whether one has been applied for. mo 17. Nonresident Manufacturer (3.2% beer or malt liquor) or Importer (3.2% beer, malt, vinous or spirituous liquor) applicants, answer the following: (a) To what Colorado licensed wholesaler do you intend to ship your merchandise? (b) Does or did any owner, partner, shareholder, director, officer, member or manager have any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler, retailer, manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado to sell malt, vinous or spirituous liquor? If yes, attach explanation in detail. m El (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit or Brewers Notice? If "yes," attach a copy; if "no," explain in detail. 00 (d) Are you the primary source of supply in the U.S.? If "no," explain. 00 (e) Are all your products registered in Colorado? If "no," attach DR 8440 and register said products. 00 18. Name of Manager (If this is an application for a Hotel and Restaurant License, the manager must also submit a Manager Registration Form Date of Birth (DR 8367) and Individual History Record (DR 8404-1). ..' - %3' 4.:'- OATH OF APPLICANT I 4{9, I. 1 ?Â§ ... I declare under penalty of perju#TR the second degree that this application and all Â¥tachments are true, correct, and *~e bes~8~1 91Ntite. 94 L C/Litliatizil Date 1 J . '51 10 .9 + , ,=ct!,0.Wlk.L~/ /1 (42~246,1- l- U:to â‚¬72LLLA-~C MUL }ALâ‚¬ I REPOF~ AND APPROVALOF LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY*. 04 Â· 1.:1: 36< 4 f I. . .g (Manufacturers, nonresident manufacturers, importers, wholesalers, limited wineries, and publictranhportation licensees, < ~ 4 , ~i disregard the section below.)Â» : 't. I '4 - -Â· 2?r Is this application for a: 8 New License El Transfer of Ownership U Other (specify) Each person required to file DR 8404-I: Yes No Has been fingerprinted 00 Background, NCIC and CCIC checked 00 The liquor licensed premises is ready for occupancy and has been inspected by the Local Licensing Authority. 00 If "no," the building will be completed and ready for inspection by (date) The foregoing application has been examined; and the premises, business to be conducted, and character of the applicant are satisfactory. We do report that such license, if granted, will meet the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, and will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 46 or 47, C.R.S. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Local Licensing Authority for U TOWN, CITY El COUNTY Signature Title Date Signature (attest) Title Date If premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk, if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerk to the board. If, by ordinance or otherwise, the local licensing authority is some other official, then such approval should be given by such official. DR 8177 (02/94) CORPORATE APPLICANT COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET ROOM 600 INFORMATION AND . DENVER CO 80261 CORPORATE REPORT OF CHANGES (303) 866-3741 Liquor and 3.2 Beer License Submit to Local Authority (Local Authority will submit to State) DO NOT USE THIS FORM TO REFLECT A CHANGE IN PARTNERSHIP. IF THERE IS A CHANGE IN PARTNERSHIP, USE THE DR 8404 AND FILE A CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP WITH YOUR LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY. Attach the following documents to this applicant information: g] Certificate of Incorporation if incorporated more than 2 years Â® Corporate minutes reflecting election of the U Certificate of Good Standing dated within the last two years current officers, directors and stockholders. U Certificate of Authority if a foreign corporation NOTE: All Officers and Directors of the ApplicanULicensee must fill out a DR 8404-1 (Individual History Record). All stockholders with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in the Applicant must also fill out a DR 8404,1 (Individual History Record). Corporate Applicant Name State Tax Acct. Number State Liquor License Number -n\â‚¬ CE:26 vad *4Â»141srua, 14&, 48 - 0604-3 Trade Name Telephone Number 774â‚¬ M #Fi-i Al ge CLAÂ·FE , L-rD , 803- 506 - iD *) Address of Ucensed Premises City State ZIP Code 2 0 + 99457- Et.-&4kA-K~ 66TEA -~FA 22 d.Â£) *7 51/7 CHANGE OF CORPORATE STRUCTURE You MUST attach a certificate of Good Corporate standing; and a Copy of ~~ :Minutes. All Officers and Directors of the Applicant/Ucensee must fillout a DR 8404-1(Individual History Record). All stockholders ~ with a10% (or more) ownership interest in the Applicant must also fill out aDR 8404-1 (Individual History Record) . ic u .fe -3 4 CURRENT CORPORATE OFFICERS , / Name Home Address Replaces President MAz-6'g:zg-i- P ARÂ¥VANINWFL -BeS aVECE,IDS bâ‚¬. 79&~7 Vice-President PHIL- (1, l--06-K' Wexpb SAAUL 45 4200Â£ 1012*4 Treasurer *14864-â‚¬a- M. A) 2*iâ‚¬p .1 116 fyi Secretan: 43+W- (L Â· 1-0 ck< \Ajoch ~'' %6 |410,'DJ . r, 9 /9 '$ NEW STOCkHOLDERS/TRANSFER OFCAPIT~L STOCK Is this Jrporauoh subject tolherepoding requirementsoftt#Seculitiedand: Emhange Actof 1934?(Publidytraded) ~* Yes m Nkf f-]istonlylhdse stodÂ¢dders owpu~.1056(ormorejofbieiÂ»d pstock. If no, list allstockholders.. >~Â»p ~ , ,Â·2 : 9 :4 .....h. %/4 .4. . CURRENT STOCKHOLDERS/TRANSFERS OF CAPITAL STOCK Name Home Address DOB. % of Stock Now Owned MA-zeA-eal-M VAA- DÂ¥14 -386- 12, \AFES IDE 1]19 7/07 , Coeh CURRENT DIRECTORS Name Home Address DOB Replaces Registered Agent Address For Service OATH OF APPUCANT L. ./-3... 321 , . , 2 6. 8.. 9 2 -9'.3.9 + a> Â»: f:*3~.: Wi: 1.m e By% 7 i I declam.wader penalty o[Deriuygin the seeÂ¢~degree that this application and all attachments are true, *rect, and complete to the best of ffknow)edge. V Title -~2 (LU-1 2,2 -40 45/2/9+ ' Date /// il ..4 I ./ i * . Â·Â·/ 5.. # Theforegoingchanges havebeen receivedand bxahiined bytlietotal. REPORT OF LOCAL.ILICINSINGTAUTHORITY Licenlitig Authott~i. - 9 441. . tr, I 2 . ..22% 1. 7.9 Local Licensing Authority For El County 1 Town/CitÂ·/ Signature Title Date Attest Date NOTE: Local authority, for all changes in Corporations, please submit all copies to the Liquor Enforcement Division. One copy will be returned to the applicant and one to the local authority upon acknowledgment. DR 8404-1 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE .LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION - - 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAGING members, or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant license. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary forthe licensing authorities investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name of Business Dote Social Security Number(s) MA-il K)66 (01 Ar-2 Drb i ~ 2 94- .511- 64 -3 15- 1 2. Your Full Name (last, first, middle) 3. Also Known As (maiden name/nickname, etc.) VARI Zik'Â« RZe , A1A72*A-28*r /11, Ala-Ei 4. Mailing Address (if different from residence) Home Telephone F' O. 60 Â·>c 19 47 8 c 8 - 56 6- 0925- 5. Residence Address (street and number, city, state, ZIP) -5 9 G Â« 1 Ve-2-6-1 T>a 'Th#<1 VIE; Ed:Ii-~; 7A-620â‚¬, C~ goS//7 6. Date of Birth Place of Birth 7. U.S. Citizen? 7- 18Â· +1 7:5 Â£ u.-//~6 6 ; M 1 EMs [3 No If Naturalized, state where When Name of U.S. District Court Naturalization Cenificate Number Date of Certificate 11 an Alien, Give Alien's Registration Card Number Permanent Residence Card Number 8. Height Weinht Hair Color Eye Color Sex Race 9. Do You Have a current Driver's Ucense? If yes, give number, & state 6, 67/ I bo*- 82orjtv Ejaxd2 FEMALE (14}21(1 , EYes UNo KA-7 417#31 d.2 10. Name of Present Employer 11. Type of Business or Employment- 6El-9 Ra#-7-Au A Â»44- 12. Address of Business Where Employed (street number, city, state, ZIP) Business Telephone 10 4 EAâ‚¬r G Â¥c KIJ, ESTES -FLE.,2 303 -SeC- 1030 13. Present Position (fi 8O15ir7 O N Al Eia_- 14. Marita~*; 06 l.-19 15. Name of Spouse (include maiden name if applicable) 16. Spouse's Date of Birth Spouse's Place of Birth 17. Spouse's residence address, if different than yours (street and number, city, state, ZIP) 18. Spouse's Present Employer Occupation 19. Address of Spouse's Present Employer 20. List the name(s) of all relatives working in or having a financial interest in the liquor industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER LOCATION OF EMPLOYER 21. Do you now, or have you ever held a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer License, or loaned money, furniture, fixtures, equipment or inventory, to any Colorado Liquor or Beer Licensee? If yes, answer in detail U Yes ~ No CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE DR 8404-1 (2/94) Page 2 22. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in criminal or military court? (Do not inclade traffic violations, unless they resulyd in suspension or revocation of your drivefs license, or you were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcoholic beverages.) If yes. explain in detail. 0 Yes Jo 23. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation, or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes, explain in detail. ~ Yes No 24. Military Service (branch) From To Serial Number Type of Discharge 25. List all addresses where you have lived for the past five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary) STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO 1 Z q 5 -52>ull-1 1 VY WAY beR Vaiâ‚¬, 00 20 294 6~91 4 113 64 30 EAâ‚¬r--:Sev'Bed -FL, -DE/44612-,20 â‚¬00.3-0 9 lod &)~91 26. List all former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary.) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO -r\\E\Lo --be eÂ£ Aaedew L~54- AM=Jagl_43Â»1*i(10 O4tleÂ¢i qle (+2, 504 27. What is your relationship to the applicant? (sole owner, partner, corporate officer, director, stockholder, member or manager) 6012Lripg Arre OAA G-aA 28. If stockholder, number of shares owned beneficially or of record Percent of outstanding stock owned 29. If partner, state whether m General D Limited Percent of Partnership Owned If Limited Liability Company (percent owned) 30. Total amount you will invest in this business, including notes, loans, cash, services or equipment, and operating capital. (Reg. 46-106.1 and Reg. 47-107.1) Amount $ go,000 31. Identify the sources of all funds you will invest in this business as listed in 30 above. List all bank names, account numbers and the amount derived from such source. Also identify all persons authorized to sign on, or who are partowners of said account. (Attach copies of all your notes or loans used in or for this business.) Names on accounts or person who can Amounts Sources - Account Numb,ers sign on this account 3075-7/ $ '-RD . 000 laed k]Al-iod A~ BA2 k -LoAA MAâ‚¬eWREFF-- 11. \AO 'ID * ME $ '1 - -14- 10 16 FAThoAN- - AA,Â¥n ABE 4-Prâ‚¬E 3 / 1-:rb, 90 , 000 9Â«as 7*AL BUIC- 608 MAger.Re--~ Ali\AN bY/li, $ $ Oath of Applicant * .,8, I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. AutbdFiz~)Signature n'jail. -4WL bil Date , 33/1 1.40'. - jt .T K 1,9 Lt U = DR 8404-1 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - ' LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAGING members, or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant license. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary forthe licensing authorities investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name of Business Date Social Security Number(s) MATIN EE CAFE 5.-10 -7 9 Ell-iz-724,9 2. Your Full Name (last, first, middle) 3. Also Known As (maiden name/nickname, etc.) LocK~oob , PRILL/P CARL 4. Mailing Address (if different from residence) â‚¬3%75%4.0919 RO. Box /947 5. Residence Address (street and number, city, state, ZIP) 385 R/Veasibe 132 257-ES PARK CO 805/7 6. Date of Birth Place of Birth 7. U.S. Citizen? I 0-10-1\ TOPEKA , KANSAS NYes CJ No If Naturalized, state where When Name of U.S. District Coun Naturalization Certificate Number Date of Certificate If an Alien, Give Alien's Registration Card Number Permanent Residence Card Number 8. Height Weight Hair Color Eye Color Sex Race 9. DO You Have a current Drivers License? If yes, give number, & state d 1" 107 WHITE BLUE M U No COLO R-/66092- 10. Name of Present Employer 11. Type of Business or Employment SELF EmPLoYEb ART GALLERY 12. Address of Business Where Employed (street number, city, state, ZIP) , FSTE5 PA#14< Busines, Telephone 194 E ELK1402k] 5 01 TE 'J Ce 8091-~ 503) 58-6 - 45-28 13. Present Position PART-kIER- 14. Marital Status lia 15 Name of Spouse (include maiden name if applicable) % EPEIZA rgb Yes J-AcKIE . H. LocKwoo b 16. Spouse's Date of Birth Spouse's Place of Birth 17. Spouse's residence address, if different than yours (street and number, city, state, ZIP) 01 787 5'e N lu y 99 R/Pod,CA 95-3 6 6 18. Spouse's Present Employer Occupation SELF PRO DOG MAAJDLER + MEAJAJEL 19. Address of Spouse's Present Employer SAME AS Aaove 20. List the name(s) of all relatives working in or having a financial interest in the liquor industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER LOCATION OF EMPLOYER 21. Do you now, or have you ever held a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer Ucense, or loaned money, furniture, fixtures, equipment or inventory, to any Colorado Liquor or Beer Licensee? If yes, answer in detail E Yes FiNo CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE â€¢,1 â€¢ w,v-T-, ,Â£--9, raye Z 22. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in criminal or military court? (Do not include traffic violations, unless they resulted in suspension or revocation of your drivers license, or you were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcoholic beverage.) If yes, explain in detail. D Yes N'No ~ 23. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation, or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U,S.? If yes, explain in detail. El Yes Â¤ No 24. Military Service (branch) From / Serial Number Type of Discharge 4 1 4 FORCE *m- 1/7/45- *9fyÂ« /-70Â¥65-67 HONDRABLE 25. List all addresses where you have lived for the past five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary) STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO 37 UkIE NO\,~ RT 3 Bok 3613 02(.AMO ,04 95963 97 9 / N e V A emt 3.10 LEYbED DEuvE /1 20 91 93 808. MAY 395 Riven. SiDE b R ESrE5 PARK Ce 909/7 9 3 9 4 26. List all former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary.) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO RETIRED BRASS r â‚¬Lb PAR-ru (3/1- G,ULâ‚¬47 19 4 2=- ELICH-â‚¬)/2~,u 90,7â‚¬ J FA/27-Al 2/2.Al,~<L /~447 ES res PA,1/1 6 90 57 7 27. What is your relationship to the applicant? (sole owner, partner, corporate officer, director, stockholder, member or manager) 6 EC -19 gl--AC.>f 'TZ) rE>u gr'F~tiE AFF-1,7 6.3 28. If stockholder, number of shares owned beneficially or of record Percent of outstanding stock owned 29. If partner, state whether El General Il Limited Percent of Partnership Owned If Limited Liability Company (percent owned) 30. Total amount you will invest in this business, including notes, loans, cash, services or equipment, and operating capital. (Reg. 46-106.1 and Reg. 47-107.1) Amount $ 31. Identify the sources of all funds you will invest in this business as listed in 30 above. List all bank names, account numbers and the amount derived from such source. Also identify all persons authorized to sign on, or who are part owners of said account. (Attach copies of all your notes or loans used in or for this business.) Amounts Sources - Account Numbers Names on accounts or person who can sign on this account $ $ $ $ 7. ' A- ' p Oath of Applicant :%V - #' I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Authorized Signature Title Date 0-21% 0 36-~-L-oP 6 6 C 12 6 -7-79 Ar o F CO R P . 5/l O /2 F ft 1 1 1 --al 1% 1 2 1:c "2* 1 - f -no A A 43 ~\\ 1 + 4: - mi -2 - 1 j 31 4 4 42 \ 1 dll t' -=a= J ti t in - 41 7/, 41 A- 111 - -2 8 21 1.1 i -2/~# 1 1 kÂ©Kfl . ~ â‚¬224 - .1 1 34.1 J 1 -153 i k % N f 13 i ,0 1 Lf 2 8 Q EM L k qi Q 9 33 1 1 - lit d 91 0 Â¢ N 1 1, 9 1 - U 1 f 1 11 4 3 V) 1 0 14- -3( 0 11. s \ 91 -:14 ' I. EL h Â· JI ~ tii 4 1 3 J V. r- 1 V-- 4 -1 f, A. i ' --- '21 - CLBED =:0 w s,27 --) OHOW<' ~i71 -" - ~i~22~00*~"1. 1 - ... -% 1 .... - -I, 12300 64915