HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board 1993-08-24/ 4 BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, August 24, 1993 7:30 P.M. AGENDA PUBLIC INPUT. To conduct an orderly, efficient meeting, individuals will be given a maximum of up to three (3) minutes to speak on topics which are pertinent to Town affairs. Any exceptions will be given at the discretion of the Mayor. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated August 10, 1993. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light and Power, August 12, 1993. B. Planning Commission, August 17, 1993 (acknowledgement only). ACTION ITEMS: 1. Planning Commission: A. Public Hearing - Final Plat/Murphy Subdivision, Lot 20, Little Prospect Mountain Addition, Gary Murphy/Applicant. B. Public Hearing - Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Pine River Subdivision, Alan & Judith Kob/Applicant. C. Public Hearing - Amended Plat of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Quasebarth Subdivision, William & Vivianne Watson/Applicant. 2. Resolution - Proposed modification of the Estes Park Downtown Redevelopment Program (the Plan). 3. Town Administrator's Report - CIRSA Award.
q[ofult of ~istes ~lark, Larimer County, Colorado,.,........ ,......,..., 19,.,... August 10 93 Minutes of a ......Regular..... meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park on the . 10th day of ... ·August· ·······, A. D. 19..93 at regular meeting hour. H. Bernerd Dannels Meeting called to order by Mayor Present: Mayor H. B. Dannels Trustees: George J. Hix, Mayor ProTem, Norbert L. Aldrich, Robert L. Dekker, Susan L. Doylen, Also Present: Stephen W. Gillette, Richard D. Widmer, Assistant Town Administrator Gregory A. White, /*1+Y· Town Attorney Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Absent: Trustee Habecker Mayor Dannels called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC INPUT. There was no public comment. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated July 27, 1993. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Community Development, August 5, 1993. It was moved and seconded (Hix/Aldrich) the consent calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 1.A. Conversion Study Contract for Services with RRC Associates - Approval of S12.400 Expenditure. Community Development Director Stamey reported on said Contract which was favorably recommended by the Community Development Committee. The study will measure Summer and Fall travel markets which will in turn provide an efficient means for the Advertising Committee to place ads. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Hix) the Conversion Study Contract in the amount of $12,400 with RRC Associates be approved, and it passed unanimously. B. Museum Memorial Policy. Director Stamey reviewed said policy which establishes how memorial gifts to the Museum will be administered. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Doylen) the Museum Memorial Policy be approved, and it passed unanimously. 2. Presentation bv Talmev-Drake Community Survey Results. Director Stamey reviewed the background for the Estes Park Planning Survey and introduced Paul Harstad/Vice President and Jerry Pearson/Project Manager with Talmey-Drake. Mr. Harstad reviewed survey findings of both Town and "valley" residents, highlighting the following: • Residents are "very upbeat." • Estes Park is a unified community. • Should recognize the Town has an unusual agenda,
. Board of Trustees - Augsut 10, 1993 - Page 2 which is dominated by concern with housing, excess growth, traffic, and parking. • 67% say Estes Park is generally going in the right direction. • 45% say the quality of life in Estes Park is excellent. • 42% say life has generally improved during the last few years. The most important issues facing Estes Park were: Affordable Housing .. ........... 53% Excessive Growth ............... 35% Economic Problems .............. 28% Traffic/Parking 27% Education ............... ....... 16% Environment Protection ......... 14% Conditions in Estes Park - As Good as Can Be: Fire Protection 82% Cultural Facilities ............ 73% Space for Museum ............... 57% Environment Protection ......... 58% Preservation of Open Space ..... 51% Indoor Recreation Facilities ... 47% Falling Short: New Jobs ....... ................ 54% Traffic Flow ................... 65% Parking ........................ 72% Year-Round Housing ............. 81% Seasonal Housing ............... 90% 1 Mr. Harstad also reviewed various graphs, comparing current results with the study conducted in 1988. On the Rate of Growth question, 44% of the residents said Estes Park was growing at about the right pace. Tax resentment in the Town is less than that occurring ! statewide, and of those residing inside Town limits, 73% stated that if an election were held concerning excess sales tax dollars as they relate to Amendment 1, 73% would vote to allow the Town to keep the money for city services. In conclusion, Mr. Harstad stated results were encouraging. Comments were heard from Frank Hix, President/Museum Advisory Board (the survey question pertaining to fundina a new museum was worded incorrectly) and Lou Canaiy (questions were too long, the term "affordable" housing should be replaced. with "subsidized" housing). Mr. Harstad reported that the margin of error for this survey was 5-6%. Mayor Dannels expressed the Board's appreciation for the thorough presentation. 3. Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee Task Force - Appointments. Mayor Dannels submitted the following for appointment to said Task 1 Force: Dick Barlow,. Ned Bramwell, Jim Disney, Sue Doylen, Steve I Jackson, Gary Klaphake, Terry License, Howard MacMillan, Ed Pohl, Scott Pope, Ann Racine, Norm Ream, Sheridan Steele, Jerry Traeger, Scott Webermeier, Larry Wexler, and Ann Widmer. It was moved and seconded (Hix/Aldrich) the appointments be approved, and it passed unanimously. 4.A. Amended Plat of Lots 18. 22. and 30. Grand Estates Subdivision. Robert & Lois Jurgens/Applicant. Mayor Dannels reported that the ~ plat was incomplete. It was moved and seconded (Hix/Aldrich) the Amended Plat of Lots 18, 22 and 30, Grand Estates Subdivision, Robert & Lois Jurgens/Applicant, be tabled, with the public hearing ~ to be re-advertised when appropriate, and it passed unanimously. ......
Board of Trustees - Augsut 10, 1993 - Page 3 B. Final Plat Of Lot 30. Bonnie Brae Addition. Mountain Golf Villas/Applicant. Final Plat. Mayor Dannels opened the public hearing and Director Stamey reviewed the plat. Development of 30 single-family detached units are being proposed. Community Drive has been relocated and five adjacent property owners to the north now have driveway access to a public street. A portion of the old Community Drive will be deeded to the Applicant through a Deed, the Town will reserve an access/utility easement and this will be accomplished by ordinance. All Planning Commission requirements have been met, major improvements have been installed and an Improvement Guarantee for various repair problems has been received. There being no public comment, Mayor Dannels declared the public hearing closed. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the Final Plat of Lot 30, Bonnie Brae Addition, Mountain Golf Villas/Applicant be approved, and it passed unanimously. Ordinance #12-93. Town Attorney White read an ordinance authorizing the transfer of a portion of Community Drive by Quit Claim Deed. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Hix) the Ordinance be adopted, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Dannels declared the Ordinance duly passed and adopted, ordered it numbered 12-93 and published according to law. 5. Ordinance #13-93 Pertaining to Rollerblades. Based upon protection of pedestrians and complaints received, the Public Safety Committee favorably recommended adoption of the ordinance. Town Attorney White read the ordinance in full. Dave Thomas commented on the sport's popularity and suggested the Town discipline those using the rollerblades unsafely in - lieu of prohibiting their use by ordinance. Comments from Trustees relating to public safety issues, long-range planning to include design of paths for such use, and enforcement for irresponsible individuals were heard, and it was moved and seconded (Hix/Aldrich) the Ordinance be adopted, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Dannels declared the Ordinance duly passed and adopted, ordered it numbered 13-93, and published according to law. 6. Resolution #18-93 Supporting "The Fall River Visitor Center Act of 1993". Ass't. Administrator Widmer briefed the Trustees on said Resolution of Support which was requested by U. S. Representative Wayne Allard. Mayor ProTem Hix encouraged the community to take advantage of the opportunity of supporting a public/private partnership for RMNP by writing to Representative Bruce Vento, Chairman of the Subcommittee of National Parks, Forest and Public Lands. It was moved and seconded (Hix/Gillette) Resolution #18-93 be adopted, and it passed unanimously. 7. Town Administrator's Report. Ass't. Town Administrator Widmer reported that staff has devised a plan to manage approximately 70 buses connected with The Pope's visit to Estes Park. Temporary signs will be displayed urging buses to use the Transit Center as a passenger "drop-off" point. The buses will then be routed to various parking areas. In conjunction with Larimer County, the RMNP will be conducting a conference entitled "Gateways to the 21st Century" to identify and address the issues that affect the future of Rocky Mountain National Park and the lands surrounding the park. The conference is scheduled September 16-18. All were urged to attend. There being no further business, Mayor Dannels adjourned the meeting at 9:08 P.M. Mayor Town Clerk
BRADFORDPUSLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light & Power Committee August 12, 1993 Committee: Chairman Aldrich, Trustees Hix and Dekker Attending: All Also Attending: Ass't. Administrator Widmer, Light & Power Director Matzke, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Aldrich called the meeting to order at 10:00 A.M. 1993 ELECTRIC RATE STUDY - TIMETABLE FOR PROPOSED RATE CHANGES. In a memorandum dated August 11, 1993, Director Matzke reported that the contract with M. E. Kiburz & Associates included the following: 1. Incorporate the new PRPA seasonal rate into the Town's base electric rates. This will reset the purchase power rider to zero and index future purchase power rider calculations to the new PRPA seasonal rate. 2. Determine appropriateness of the Town's current seasonal demand rates and demand ratchet clauses, and evaluate the need to modify rate schedules with time-of-day demand rates. 3. Develop a Residential time-of-day rate with no demand change (promotes thermal storage heaters). 4. Develop a Security Lighting Schedule. Regarding Item #4, security lights would not be metered; the customer would receive a flat monthly charge including energy cost and maintenance/operation fees. Staff will discuss procedure for those customers with existing security lights with the consultant and report to the Committee in September. This lighting schedule is a standard service provided within the industry. Following is changes: a proposed timetable for consideration and implementation of rate 9/9/93 Presentation of decisive rate study, including recommendations, to the Light & Power Committee. 9/14/93 Town Board sets public hearing date of October 26, 1993 for consideration of rate changes. 9/17/93 Publish notice of public hearing and mail notification of public hearing to electric customers. 10/26/93 Town Board public hearing; consideration of ordinance adopting rate changes. 11/29/93 Rate changes become effective beginning with the first billing cycle following November 29, 1993. The Committee reviewed preliminary analysis supporting retail rate changes to integrate the cost impact of the April 1992 and 1993 PRPA Wholesale Rate Changes; however, staff confirmed that the net affect of the study is revenue neutral.
BRADFORD PUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee - August 12, 1993 - Page 2 PROSPECT MOUNTAIN LEASE AGREEMENT - REPORT. Director Matzke advised that the lease agreement (renewal) with Mr. and Mrs. Robert Heron for the Town's communications equipment was favorably recommended for approval in July. However, the owners have requested additional information and a meeting with .all entities who have such equipment installed on Prospect Mountain. Staff anticipates submitting a revised agreement to the Committee in the near future. REPORTS. The Financial Report was unavailable at this time; staff will provide the information when received. Project Updates: All electric utilities have been installed at the Mountain Golf Villas site. The Committee authorized a joint project with US West for the installation of conduit from the south side of Highway 34 near Roth's Restaurant, north and east near Lone Pine Acres to Dry Gulch Road, and north along Dry Gulch to the Honda School entrance. Project costs at this time are $14,000 and 4,000' of conduit has been installed. The Committee reviewed a site plan for the Honda School and staff identified those buildings connected to the system; all transformers and primary have been installed. PRPA Report. Ass't. Administrator Widmer reported that new PRPA Board of Directors are: Chairman, Jeff Gould/Longmont and Brian Moeck/Loveland-Vice Chairman. Pursuant to action by Moffat County, PRPA has agreed to perform an additional Impact Study for the Craig Station to determine whether there are any additional identifiable impact fees still owed said County. The Committee received a summary of debt refinancing plan results from Smith Barney. PRPA and its members are currently working on a Final Integrated Resource Plan required by WAPA. Each member city will conduct a public hearing to present their findings. The Plan is due by October, 1994. There being no further business, Chairman Aldrich adjourned the meeting at 11:01 A.M. 0 ,(06.6- 4(/ litg....1.7 Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk
BRADFORDPUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission August 17, 1993 committee: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners Wendell Amos, Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, Alma Hix, Michael Miller, and Edward Pohl Attending: All Also Attending: Trustee Doylen, Community Development Director Stamey, Public Works Director Linnane, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 9:30 A.M. 1. MINUTES. Minutes of the July 20, 1993 meeting were approved as submitted. 2. SUBDIVISIONS. 2.A. Preliminary Plat - Replat of Lot 26. Block 1. Fall River Estates. Second Addition. D. A. Lienemann/Applicant. Applicant's representative, Paul Kochevar/Estes Park Surveyors, advised that the 5.684-acre lot is currently zoned R-M Multi-family and the applicant is proposing to divide the lot into five single-family lots. For access, Fall River Court (a private road) now serving the Town's water tank will be extended, widened, and paved to Town standards. Director Stamey reviewed the staff report noting that the Applicant's Statement of Intent provides a detailed analysis of proposed minimum lot area and development potential; confirmed the site is zoned R-M; the Applicant could develop up to 20 units; the National Park 25' "buffer" is favorable; access has been provided; and each lot will require an individual pressurized water system. There were no comments from the audience. Commissioner comments included: ensuring that improvements could not be constructed within the 25' buffer; potential qualification for wildfire mitigation (Mr. Kochevar confirmed the site was not within the wildfire hazard area); suggestion that the Owner consider inclusion of Items A-F as contained in the RMNP letter dated August 9 from RMNP in protective covenants; and confirmation of the outlot location. Finding that there are special circumstances or conditions affecting this property; that the exception is necessary for the preservation and the enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner; and that the granting of the exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood in which the property of the petitioner is situated or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of this title, it was moved and seconded (Amos/A. Hix) the Preliminary Plat of Lot 26, Block 1, Fall River Estates, Second Addition be approved, subject to the following conditions, and it passed unanimously: 1. A private street be constructed, or installation guaranteed, prior to Town Board approval. 2. Gated-access to the water tank be provided by the developer. 3. Suggestion that the Developer give consideration to the suggestions made by RMNP (further identified above).
BRADFORDPUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 17, 1993 - Page 2 2.B. Final Plat of Murphv Subdivision for Lot 20. Little Prospect Mountain Addition. Gary Murphy/Applicant. Kevin Kielb/Applicant' s representative, advised that the preliminary plat was approved by the Commission on July 20, 1993. Lot 1 is proposed as a single-family lot, with Lots 2 and 3 being proposed for duplex lots. Adjacent property owner Ben Slater had no objection to the housing units provided zoning remain R-S Residential, consideration should be given to parking and the proposed installation of the cluster mail boxes--the road should be expanded. Director Stamey reviewed the staff report confirming that easements will be obtained for the mail boxes and these easements have been discussed during neighborhood meetings. The status of the road crossing Lot 1 has been determined and the road has been eliminated. There were no further comments from the audience. Commissioner comments included: mail box easements and whether consideration has been given to their placement so as not to conflict with driveways. It was moved and seconded (Brown/Burgess) the Final Plat of Murphy Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Town Board, with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously: 1. Prior to Town Board approval, water service must be extended to Lot 1, or the extension guaranteed with an Improvement Guarantee. 2. Provide two easements for home mail delivery boxes and access to same. 2.C. Amended Piat of Lots 1 and 2. Pine River Subdivision. Alan & Judith Kob/Applicant. Applicant's representative, Kevin Kielb, stated that the Applicant is proposing to combine 2 existing lots into 1 lot. The property is zoned C-0 and consists of 0.945 acres. Buildable area will be created without encroaching into the floodplain. A development plan is being prepared and it will be submitted in the future. There were comments from the audience. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Brown) the Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Pine River Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Town Board, subject to the following: 1. Modify the easement note. 2. Add a hatched border, adjoining lot information and bearing basis to the plat. Items discussed during the pre-conference meeting, including a potential wetlands issue, will be addressed when the development plan is presented. 2.D. Amended Plat of Lots 1. 2. 3. and 4. Ouasebarth Subdivision. William & Vivianne Watson/Applicant. Chairman Sager declared a conflict of interest with this Amended Plat and subsequent Development Plan, stated he would not participate in discussion nor vote, transferred the gavel to Vice Chairman A. Hix, and vacated the room. Bill Van Horn/Applicant' s representative, advised that the Applicant is proposing to combine 4 lots into 1 lot. Combining of the lots is contingent upon the project proceeding. Mr. Van Horn reviewed the site location and correction of Dunraven Drive to Dunraven Street has been accomplished. There was no public comment. Commissioner comments were: EPURA review as it relates to curb and gutter installation, and drainage. It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Brown) the Amended Plat of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Quasebarth Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Town Board, and it passed unanimously with Chairman Sager
BRADFOROPUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 17, 1993 - Page 3 Abstaining. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. 3.A. Development Plan #93-9. Lots 1. 2. 3. and 4. Ouasebarth Subdivision. William & Vivianne Watson/Applicant. Commissioner Pohl requested that section of the EPURA minutes dated July 22, 1993 pertaining to the Watson Development Plan be accepted into the record. This request was granted. The Applicant is proposing to construct 3 self-storage buildings with a total floor area of 8,800 sq. ft. One access point is proposed from Dunraven Street. The property line is proposed to be fenced with a 6' high chain-link fence. Mr. Van Horn, Applicant's representative, discussed impervious coverage; access from Dunraven Street; a request that the 15' landscaping area not be required on both Stanley Avenue and Dunraven Street (the Applicant desires to install the landscaping area only to Stanley Avenue); the entire area has historically been used for industrial purposes; the proposal fulfills a neighborhood need; the gate will be operated by a magnetic card; lighting will be subtle, contained on-site, and directed "downward"; and a sign will be placed at the entrance/gate area; the owner is willing to install landscaping along both streets if he is allowed to deed same to the public; and the fence, which cost $14,000, is being colored which has significantly added to the cost. Director Stamey reviewed the staff report: The Applicant has requested a waiver of the landscaping on Dunraven Street; staff cited Section 17.24.020 C. addressing street planting buffer criteria as it relates to the recommendation that the fence be installed behind the landscape buffer; stored materials to be maintained one foot below the height of the sight impervious portion of the fence; and drainage plans must be finalized. Mr. Van Horn stated the drainage plan has been - reviewed by the Public Works Director--the area will be - protected, any drainage to the existing retaining wall will be 4 the Applicant's responsibility, and the Applicant's desire to protect his investment (landscaping) by placing the fence - streetside. A thorough discussion followed regarding " landscaping, drainage, screening height, type of storage being proposed (confirmation of RV's, vehicles, pick-up trucks, boats/trailers), and improvement of the site as it exists today with tractor trailers. Commissioner Amos commended the Applicant for substantially improving the area which may compel others to also improve their property. Public Works Director Linnane confirmed that design for the timber retaining wall structure has been received, however, the design and erosion control plans need to be finalized. Public comments were heard from Bill Watson, Jr. (fence placement--would be best placed inside the buffer zone to protect landscaping from storage patrons and wildli fe--owner' s right to protect his investment). Bill Watson/Applicant (reiterated the necessity of placing the fence inside the buffer zone; the fence could be eliminated altogether; and accepted to the request that storage materials be maintained at 1' below the height of the fence). Commissioner comments concerned confirmation of construction materials (gabled roof, enamel-covered steel, subdued color scheme); protection of the landscaping; drainage/historic runoff; fencing to protect landscaping from wildlife may not be credible; sidewalk requirements; and potential of "ponding" of water.
BRADFORIPUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 17, 1993 - Page 4 It was moved and seconded (Brown/Amos) Development Plan #93-9, Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Quasebarth Subdivision be approved with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously with Chairman Sager Abstaining. 1. Perimeter fence be provided and located a minimum of 11' from the Stanley Avenue and Dunraven Street property lines. Along Dunraven Street that the westerly 100' be fully landscaped in accordance with Town Code, and the remaining 100' provide the 15' wide grassed area, as shown. 2. Identify plant materials. 3. Stored materials to be held 1' below the height of the sight impervious fence unless they are motor homes, boats, RVs, camper trailers, passenger cars/vans or pick-up trucks. The fence height is limited to 6'. The existing Ponderosa pine trees on the north lot line are to be preserved. 4. Indicate any proposed outdoor lighting, signage, and existing Ponderosa pine trees. 5. The Applicant continue to work with the Public Works Director regarding drainage--all plans to be approved by said Director. In particular, no fill , will be allowed to encroach outside the property boundaries, and adequate slope be maintained to prevent erosion in those areas. Discussion to include grading/retaining wall detail along the north lot line. Commissioner Pohl requested and received clarification that the 11' fence setback from the property line must be maintained. Chairman Sager resumed his position on the Commission and granted a three-minute recess at 11:20 A.M. The meeting reconvened at 11:23 AM. 3.B. Develobment Plan #93-7. Lot 30. Grand Estates Subdivision (Comfort Inn Motel). Robert & Lois Jurgens/Applicant. Bill Van Horn noted that the Applicant is proposing to construct a new 2-story building containing 22 accommodation units in front of the existing u-shaped building immediately south of the pool. The building would be constructed on the existing parking area. New driveway access is proposed along the east lot line, with a new parking area north of the existing u- shaped building. Existing units will be remodeled. A total of 77 units will exist, plus one manager's unit. CDOT has commented that the State Highway Access Code allows only one access point-the Applicant has been so advised. The Applicant contends traffic will not be increased by 20% and will meet with CDOT to resolve this issue. Mr. Van Horn requested the balance of the proposal be approved as the CDOT issue is an independent matter from the Commission. Director Stamey advised that the Commission could approve the development plan subject to CDOT approval. The Commission could review the plan again when CDOT approval is issued. Commissioner comments consisted of: the 25' buffer/frontage access; pedestrian/traffic circulation; driveway width; ingress/egress; number of handicapped parking spaces; handicapped accessibility to new construction (5 units); accessibility to the rear units; size of the proposed meeting
BRADFORD PUBLISH1NG CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 17, 1993 - Page 5 facility-does it 'meet ADA guidelines and will it impact parking. The Planning Commission expressed significant concern regarding the adequacy of the internal circulation system, and in particular, circulation at the northeast and northwest corners of the site. Applicant's representatives Messrs. Van Horn and Habecker advised that the best pedestrian/traffic circulation pattern has been submitted and they will debate this issue with CDOT; 2 handicapped parking spaces have been designated, however, should the Commission desire additional such spaces, such could be provided; the meeting space contains 240 sq. ft. and it may be preserved for future use--exact usage for this space is undefined at this time. Mr. Habecker requested the Commission advise CDOT of their preference of the plan with two curb cuts. Mr. Van Horn stated circulation does meet standards and items that are, in his opinion "operational" are not within the Commission's purview. Mr. Habecker stated excavation is scheduled to commence October l, CDOT and Planning Commission approvals are separate and he urged the project not be delayed as the best proposal has been submitted. There were no comments from the audience. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Burgess) Development Plan #93- 7, Lot 30, Grand Estates Subdivision be approved, subject to the following, and it passed unanimously: 1. Modification of the drainage plan (Public Works). 2. Resolution of the driveway access (CDOT). If any changes are made to the access, the development plan must be resubmitted to the Commission. The Applicant and/or engineer are to keep Town staff advised on this issue in a timely manner. 3. Proper sizing/upgrade Of water and electric services. Commissioner Brown noted that circulation, ingress/egress, and functionality concerns expressed by the Commissioners were extremely valid and appropriate. Commissioner Amos took exception to and addressed the paragraph included in the Applicant's Statement of Intent whereby the Agent requested a constructive and favorable review with a minimum of delay, stating the planning Commission operates in this manner and gives timely consideration of all complete submittals. 4. ANNEXATIONS. 4.A. Lake Estes Addition. immediately south of Lake Estes Best Western Motel and west of former drive-in theater site. Iona C. Zittrauer/Applicant. Commissioner Brown cited a conflict of interest, stated he would not participate in discussion nor vote, and vacated the room. Paul Kochevar, Applicant's representative stated the site contains 2.96 acres and is zoned R-2 (County) which allows one and two-family dwellings. Zoning to the east and north is commercial. The site abuts Lake Estes on the south and Grand Estates on the east. Proposed zoning is C-0. Community Development Director Stamey reported the Commission received copies of the Annexation Petition and Resolution stating the property is appropriate for annexation. The access easement noted by staff will be addressed during the development plan. There were no comments from the audience. Finding that the property is appropriate for annexation, it was moved and seconded (A.Hix/Pohl) the Lake Estes Addition annexation be favorably recommended to the Town Board to include C-0 Zoning, and it passed unanimously,
BRADFOROPUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 17, 1993 - Page 6 with Commissioner Brown Abstaining. Applicant was advised that adequate access and water service must be provided prior to any development. 5. COUNTY REFERRALS. 5.A. National Park Village North Redevelopment. H. W. Stewart. Inc.-Rockv Mountain National Park/Applicant. Fall River entrance to RMNP. Larry Gamble, RMNP representative, reported that H. W. Stewart, Inc. desires to rebuild the former National Park Village North site which incurred total fire destruction and that the firm approached RMNP for a joint venture to construct a visitors center. The Scroggin Trust will provide $1.25 Million for the project which includes reconstruction/construction of a restaurant, gift shop, livery, convenience store/gas station, amphitheater and accommodations. A "western" family experience theme is being proposed; and RMNP has obtained a landscape architect to assist Thorp Associates/Architects. The Applicant intends to retain as many trees as possible. The miniature train will be removed from the site. The construction schedule includes two phases; however, an exact date is difficult to determine as the RMNP must have legislative approval to join the public/private partnership. Director Stamey noted that the Town Board recently approved a Resolution in support of the project. Mr. Gamble confirmed that the Applicant is satisfied with the number of parking spaces around the visitors center, but that they are reviewing the arrangement. Larimer County requires 30% of the setback and this will be coordinated with what CDOT allows in the highway right-of-way. Fencing will be retained for the livery and corral--such is not a requirement of RMNP. Wildlife corridors, Town standards concerning frontage landscaping/separation and accel/decel lanes, impervious coverage (70% ratio is the Town requirement), , pedestrian safety in crossing the highway to the convenience store were also reviewed. There were no comments from the audience. It was moved and seconded (Brown/Amos) Larimer County be advised that the Planning Commission supports the concept as presented, endorses the public/private partnership, and request the Applicant submit final drawings for additional review, and it passed unanimously. 5.B. Eagle Rock School Property-American Honda. Director Stamey reported that this proposal is for minor land development. American Honda refused to accept this 10-acre piece from the State Land Board due to its use as a landfill. The 10-acre parcel is being divided to be used by Sombrero Stables for trail rides (cookouts, over-night camping), and private open space. The site was formerly used as a disposal site for debris from the Big Thompson Flood. The area will be covered by a conservation easement and will not be used for a dwelling or any other development. The only existing access is an easement or trails through the Honda property. Discussion included sanitation relative to the over-night camping, fire pits/fire protection. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Brown) Larimer County be advised that the Planning Commission support the minor land development provided Larimer County give consideration to adequate sanitation, fire protection, erosion control, carrying capacity of the site relative to use of the site, and it passed unanimously. Following completion of all agenda items, Chairman Sager noted the Gateways Conference being held September 16-18 which is being sponsored by Larimer County and RMNP and the APA Regional Conference September 30-October 2.
BRADFOROPUBLISH1NGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 17, 1993 - Page 7 Director Stamey distributed copies of the Talmey/Drake survey recently conducted as a portion of the Comprehensive Plan which is being updated. Commissioner Amos requested Director Stamey advise the Commission when, in his opinion, the Commission is dealing with issues outside their purview. All members concurred, as did Director Stamey. Planning Commission meetings will return to their standard meeting schedule of 12:00 study session and 1:30 meeting effective September 21, 1993. There being no further business, Chairman Sager adjourned the meeting at 1:15 P.M. 1-1-„O· 4._al Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk
BRADFOROPUSLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 17, 1993 - Page 2 2.B. Final Plat of Murphy Subdivision for Lot 20. Little I.A, Prospect Mountain Addition. Gary Murphy/Applicant. Kevin 93> Kielb/Applicant' s representative, advised that the preliminary plat was approved by the Commission on July 20, 1993. Lot 1 is proposed as a single-family lot, with Lots 2 and 3 being proposed for duplex lots. Adjacent property owner Ben Slater had no objection to the housing units provided zoning remain R-S Residential, consideration should be given to parking and the proposed installation of the cluster mail boxes--the road should be expanded. Director Stamey reviewed the staff report confirming that easements will be obtained for the mail boxes and these easements have been discussed during neighborhood meetings. The status of the road crossing Lot 1 has been determined and the road has been eliminated. There were no further comments from the audience. Commissioner comments included: mail box easements and whether consideration has been given to their placement so as not to conflict with driveways. It was moved and seconded (Brown/Burgess) the Final Plat of Murphy Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Town Board, with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously: 1. Prior to Town Board approval, water service must be extended to Lot 1, or the extension guaranteed with an Improvement Guarantee. 2. Provide two easements for home mail delivery boxes and access to same. 1.6. 2.C. Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2. Pine River Subdivision. ~, Alan & Judith Kob/Applicant. Applicant's representative, Kevin Kielb, stated that the Applicant is proposing to combine 2 existing lots into 1 lot. The property is zoned C-0 and consists of 0.945 acres. Buildable area will be created without encroaching into the floodplain. A development plan is being prepared and it will be submitted in the future. There were comments from the audience. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Brown) the Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Pine River Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Town Board, subject to the following: 1. Modify the easement note. 2. Add a hatched border, adjoining lot information and bearing basis to the plat. Items discussed during the pre-conference meeting, including a potential wetlands issue, will be addressed when the development plan is presented. 1. t. 2.D. Amended Plat Of Lots 1. 2. 3. and 4. Ouasebarth Subdivision. William & Vivianne Watson/Applicant. Chairman Sager declared a conflict of interest with this Amended Plat and subsequent Development Plan, stated he would not participate in discussion nor vote, transferred the gavel to Vice Chairman A. Hix, and vacated the room. Bill Van Horn/Applicant' s representative, advised that the Applicant is proposing to combine 4 lots into 1 lot. Combining of the lots is contingent upon the project proceeding. Mr. Van Horn reviewed the site location and correction of Dunraven Drive to Dunraven Street has been accomplished. There was no public comment. Commissioner comments were: EPURA review as it relates to curb and gutter installation, and drainage. It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Brown) the Amended Plat of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Quasebarth Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Town Board, and it passed unanimously with Chairman Sager 62444/7
RESOLUTION WHEREAS, a proposal has been presented to the Board of Trustees by the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority requesting the Board modify the Estes Park Downtown Redevelopment Program (Plan) by amending plans, guidelines and proposals for land uses and development in the Stanley Historic District; and WHEREAS, the Board has been advised by the Town Attorney and has determined that the proposed modification constitutes a substantial change to the Plan, as provided in the Colorado Urban Renewal Law; and WHEREAS, the Board hereby finds that, in accordance with the Urban Renewal Law, it is necessary to submit such proposed modification to the Estes Park Planning Commission for its review and recommendation as to conformity with the Estes Park Comprehensive Plan for the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: 1. The Board hereby finds that the proposed modification substantially changes the Estes Park Downtown Redevelopment Program (Plan). 2. In accordance with the Urban Renewal Law, this proposed modification shall be submitted to the Planning Commission effective September 21, 1993. The Planning Commission shall consider, review same, and make recommendations to, the Board regarding the conformity of such modification with the general plan for the development of the municipality as a whole. 3. A public hearing shall be held before the Board of Trustees regarding such modification of the Plan on the 12th day of October, 1993, at 7:30 P.M., in the Board Room (Room 103), 170 MacGregor Avenue. 4. Notice of such hearing shall be provided in compliance with the Urban Renewal Law. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED THIS DAY OF , 1993. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk
HAMMOND, CLARK AND WHITE LAW OFFICES BANK ONE BANK BUILDING. SUITE 418 LYNNA. HAMMOND 200 EAST SEVENTH STREET ALFRED R DAVIS ROGER E. CLARK OF COUNSEL LOVELAND, COLORADO 8OS37 GREGORY A.WHITE MARTHA P. ALLBRIGHT 303-667-1023 TELEFAX 303-669-9380 AUG13 1993 August 12, 1993 Mr. Gary Klaphake Town Administrator Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Stanley Master Plan Dear Gary: I have reviewed the memorandum of August 10, 1993 to Mayor Dannels and the Board of Trustees regarding the modification of the Estes Park Downtown Redevelopment Program. I am in concurrence that the proposed modification of the plan is a substantial modification and triggers the provisions of Section 31-25-107, C.R.S. I have reviewed the proposed resolution and it is satisfactory. If you need anything further, plea~ do not hesitate to give me a call. Very~ truly yours, rego y A. White GAW:jc
epura -TO ' T. B PLANNED PROGRESS August 10, 1993 TO: Mayor Dannels Town Board of Trustees FROM: Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority RE: REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION AND MODIFICATION OF THE ESTES PARK DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (PLAN) The Town of Estes Park and the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority have been in negotiation with owners of property located in the area described in the Plan as the Resort Area/Stanley Hotel regarding land use and future development. A Master Plan has been negotiated with the three owners of the property referred to as The Stanley Historic District. A Development Agreement between the Town and the owners will be signed as part of the Town approval of the Master Plan and associated documents. An Executive Summary of the differences between the Plan and Development Agreement is attached. When the EPURA Plan was adopted in 1983, the ownership of the Resort designated area was under ownership of one entity. It is now under the ownership of three entities with different development goals. The EPURA Board of Commissioners respectfully requests that the Town Board initiate the process of modifying the Redevelopment Program (Plan) so that it is consistent with the negotiated Stanley Historic District Master Plan, Development Agreements, and Design Standards and Guidelines. This consistency can be attained by inclusion of the Master Plan and Design Standards and Guidelines in the Plan and deletion of existing/specific references to The Stanley Hotel Resort District. These references are in the Plan section entitled "Urban Design" and are located on the following pages. Page 109: Figure 31 - Urban Design Districts, defines The Stanley Historic District Open Space/Resort District.
6 enura I PLANNED PROGRESS Modification of EPURA Plan -2- August 10, 1993 Page 111 under the Design Recommendations by District heading. "Open Space/Resort District: This district is characterized by a large, undeveloped natural landscape containing major destination resort facilities. "Three Open Space/Resort districts are identified. Each is associated with a Downtown entry and function visually to separate the Downtown structure from adjacent development. In addition, these districts provide a visual transition to the more natural hillsides, forests, and mountain landscapes of the surrounding area and are compatible middle ground for the magnificent views of the high mountain peaks and ridges. "Elements which detract from the quality of this district include encroachment of unrelated facilities, and development practices which detract from the natural landscape conditions. "ENCOURAGE THE RETENTION OF LARGE NATURAL LANDS CAPE CONDITIONS AROUND RESORT FACILITIES, AND RECOGNIZE THESE NATURAL AREAS AS PART OF THE TOWN ENTRY EXPERIENCE." Page 112 - Figure 32. Urban Design Concept Plan which refers to the entire Stanley Historic District as the "Resort Zone", Resort Accommodations. The Urban Renewal Law of Colorado provides for modification of an urban renewal plan by the Town Board through the following process (CRS 31-25-107(7): An urban renewal plan may be modified at any time... Any proposed modification shall be submitted to the governing body for a resolution as to whether or not such modification will substantially change the urban renewal plan in land area, land use, design, building requirements, timing, or procedure, as previously approved, and, if it finds that there will be a substantial change, its approval of such modification shall be subject to the requirements of this section. CRS 31-25-107: (2) Prior to its approval of an urban renewal plan, the governing body shall submit such plan to the planning commission of the municipality, if any, for review and recommendations as to its conformity with the general plan fer the development of the municipality as a whole. The planning commission shall submit its written recommendations with
enura I PLANNED PROGRESS Modification of EPURA Plan -3- August 10, 1993 respect to the proposed urban renewal plan to the governing body within thirty days after receipt of the plan for review. Upon receipt of the recommendations of the planning commission or, if no recommendations are received within said thirty days, without such recommendations, the governing body may proceed with the hearing on the proposed urban renewal plan prescribed by subsection (3) of this section. (3) The governing body shall hold a public hearing on an urban renewal plan or substantial modification of an approved urban renewal plan after public notice thereof by publication in a newspaper having a general circulation in the municipality. The notice shall describe the time, date, place, and purpose of the hearing, shall generally identify the urban renewal area covered by the plan, and shall outline the general scope of the urban renewal project under consideration. (4) Following such hearing, the governing body may approve an urban renewal plan if it finds that: (a) A feasible method exists for the relocation of individuals and families who will be displaced by the urban renewal project in decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling accommodations within their means and without undue hardship to such individuals and families; (b) The urban renewal plan conforms to the general plan of the municipality as a whole; and (C) The urban renewal plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the urban renewal area by private enterprise. Consistent with the Urban Renewal Law, it is the Authority's opinion that the proposed change is a substantial change to the Plan regarding land use. It is respectfully requested that this proposed Plan modification be processed through the Planning Commission and Town Board in coordination with the Master Plan for The Stanley Historic District in compliance with the procedures of the Urban Renewal Law. Also enclosed is a draft resolution for the Town Board's consideration, subject, of course, to the Town Attorney' s review and approval regarding a finding that the proposed modification is a substantial change to the Plan. I I ..1.. -1--i- . 1
PROPOSED CHANGES ESTES PARK DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Executive Summary highlights the proposed changes to the Estes Park Downtown Redevelopment Program. Land Use Plan: Resort Proposed: Resort, accommodations, single family, multi- family, retail commercial and office uses. Land Platting Plan: One usage; property had been previously illegally subdivided. Proposed: Nine parcels and dedicated street right-of-way are established. Development Density Plan: Not addressed. Proposed: Development density is defined in each parcel. Design Guidelines Plan: Limited application to resort areas. Proposed: Design standards and guidelines defining site design, site preparation, architecture, landscaping, setbacks will be adopted.
N Sun., Aug. 22,1993 ·Rocky Mountain News Cities say the amendment al- ~ Cities s-6-*k j revenues from the spending limits , lows them to remove some of their ' with voters' approval, although to bypass 6 amendment also lets cities create they expect Bruce to challenge that assertion in court. The tax limits exempt "enterprise funds" for services or facilities supported pri- marily by fees or revenue bonds. In Boulder, where residents vot- Growing list of entities ed 2-1 against Amendment 1 last fall, the proposal to "de-Bruce" to ask voters to override ~ sales, use and hotel taxes and Amendment 1 restraints If the Boulder election is suc- grants is expected to pass. - j Associated Press " , cessful, Boulder will have about i $530,000 more to spend in 1994, AURORA - More and more City Manager Tim Honey said. Colorado cities and counties are In Vail, town officials plan to ask planning to ask voters in Novem- voters to exempt all revenues ex- ber to override Amendment l's cept property taxes from the limi- limits on their taxes and spending. tations. ~ ~ ~~, -J s -~ . .: The effort has been dubbed "de- Bruce" or "un-One." The spending hmits "don't fit a resort economy," said Steve Bar- Among them are Commerce wick, Vail's administrative aser- City, Boulder, Vail, Cortez, La- r vices manager. "We have good mar, Federal Heights, Salida, Win- snow some years and bad snow ter Park and Chaffee County, ac- other years, and it affects our rev- cording to Boulder City Attorney - enues. For new taxes, we'd still Joe de Raismes. have to go to the voters, and that's De Raismes told the Colorado what most people think they voted Municipal League conference on I on with Amendment 1." Friday he expects the list to grow. Sam Mamet, the municipal Mayors, finance directors and league's associate director, said, other local government employees "It's our job to help our cities and from across Colorado attended the . towns implement Amendment 1, conference to learn nnore about and that means showing them how coping with Amendment 1. - , The amendment, sponsored by , - to take advantage of enterprise funds and elections." Colorado Springs lawyer arid real estate investor Douglas Bruce, ; "But we're not going through limits spending increases for most this with a fine-toothed comb look- local governments to a combina- ~ ina for everv w,vinder the sun to tion of population growth and Ela- *Adi&921.:,r4 ~. * I tion. It allows new taxes only with . a vote and dictates when those elections can b6 held; it also re- quires cities to keep a 3% cash reserve for emergencies.