The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 1993-03-23' BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, March 23, 1993 7:30 P.M. AGENDA PUBLIC INPUT. To conduct an orderly, efficient meeting, individuals will be given a maximum of up to three (3) minutes to speak on topics which are pertinent to Town affairs. Any exceptions will be given at the discretion of the Mayor. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated March 9, 1993, and Special Meeting dated March 15, 1993. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light and Power, March 11, 1993. B. Special Events, March 18, 1993. C. Public Safety, March 18, 1993. D. Planning Commission, March 16, 1993. 4. Liquor License Renewals: A. Philip & Christine Switzer, dba EAST SIDE FOOD STORE, 381 S. Saint Vrain Ave., 3.2% Retail Beer License. B. Michael & Winifred Krawchuk, dba LONGHORN LIQUOR MART, 1640 Big Thompson Ave., Retail Liquor Store Licanse. C. Richard A. Barlow, dba POPPY'S PIZZA & PUB, 342A E. Elkhorn Ave., Beer & Wine License. D. Estes Valley Recreation & Park District, dba ESTES PARK GOLF CLUB, Hotel & Restaurant License with Optional Premise, 1080 S. Saint Vrain Ave. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Light & Power Committee, March 11, 1993: A. Electric Rate Update Study - Approval of Contract with Max Kiburz, $8,000.00. 2. Special Events Committee, March 18, 1993: A. Agreements - Lions Club Concession Stand Colorful Colorado Quarter Horse Show Colorado Hunter-Jumper Horse Show. 3. Telephone Bids - Review and Acceptance. 4. Planning Commission, March 16, 1993: A. Public Hearing - North Ridge Meadow Condominiums Special Review - Richard Wille/Applicant - Applicant appeal of Planning Commission decision of denying density bonus. 1 Board of Trustees - March 23, 1993 Page Two 5. Public Hearing - New Hotel & Restaurant Liquor Application filed by The Event Center, Inc., dba THE EVENT CENTER, 470 Prospect Village Drive. 6. Ordinance concerning Electric and Barbed Wire Fences - Adoption. 7. Town Administrator's Report. 2 4 9[0(ult of jistes ~lark, larimer County. Colorado, .... .0 .. .., 19...... March 9 93 Minutes of a RegularÂ· meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park on the ,., 9th- day of March ., A. D. 19..93at regular meeting hour. ProTem George J. Hix Meeting called to order by Mayor Present: Mayor ProTem Hix Trustees: Norbert L. Aldrich, David Barker, Robert L. Dekker, Stephen W. Gillette, Also Present: Gary F. Klaphake, David Habecker Town Administrator Gregory A. White, Town Attorney AU.W. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Absent: H. B. Dannels, Mayor Mayor ProTem Hix called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC INPUT. Lou Canaiy commented that (1) combining both sanitation districts into one district is essential; (2) EPURA is to be commended for all improvements accomplished following the Lawn Lake Flood; however, time has come for the Authority to cease operation; (3) time has come for the Town to consider construction of a multi- level parking lot in lieu of purchasing additional property for parking lots (i.e. recent purchase of property along Moraine Avenue--$170,000). Trustee Aldrich expressed his appreciation to those fellow Trustees and Staff members who recently gifted him with a recliner/rocker. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated February 23, 1992. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Special Events, February 25, 1993. B. Community Development, March 4, 1993. 4. Liquor License Renewals: A. Mama Rose's Restaurant, 338 E. Elkhorn Ave., Beer and Wine. 5. Resolution #10-93 Intent to Annex Pine Knoll Addition (referred to Planning Commission). It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Habecker) the consent calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Special Events Committee, February 25, 1993: Theatrical Media Services Agreement. Director Scott reported that the Agreement, in the amount of $8,000, provides for the sound, lights, stage and stage roof, generator and two spotlights for the Rooftop Rodeo Concert. It was moved and seconded (Habecker/Gillette) the Theatrical f. Board of Trustees - March 9, 1993 - Page 2 Media Services Agreement be approved, and it passed unanimously. 2. Community Development Committee, March 4, 1993: Housing Authority. Administrator Klaphake advised that the Committee reviewed procedures and documents for implementation of the Estes Park Housing Authority. The Board of Realtors will circulate the petition and gather the required 25 signatures. Attorney'White reviewed procedure. The Board of Trustees concurred with the concept for the creation of the Estes Park Housing Authority as presented. 3.A. Amended Plat of Lots 4. 5. 22 and 23. Block 8. Country Club Manor Addition. William. Marv June and Edward W. Mvers /Applicant. It was moved and seconded (Aldrich/Dekker) the amended plat be tabled, and it passed unanimously. B. Amended Plat of Lot 8. DeVille Subdivision. Richard N. Statham/Applicant. Mayor ProTem Hix opened the public hearing. Clerk O'Connor confirmed that the Planning Commission favorably recommended approval contingent upon four (4) conditions. Paul Kochevar, Applicant's representative, identified the property and confirmed all conditions have been met. There being no further testimony, Mayor ProTem Hix declared the public hearing closed. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Gillette) the Amended Plat be approved, and it passed unanimously. 4. Show Cause Hearing - Mountain Dew Liquor. Mayor ProTem Hix opened a liquor show cause hearing for Mountain Dew Liquor, 182 S. Saint Vrain Ave., Retail Liquor Store License. Police Chief Racine presented the case, alleging Mountain Dew Liquor violated Section 12-47-128(a) of the Colorado Liquor and Beer Code--Sale to a minor. Owner, Robert Gappa, was present and did not deny the charges as presented. Gail Albers/PaCK, Inc. read a letter dated February 10, 1993 urging the Town to take a "hard line approach" with the offense. There being no further testimony, Mayor ProTem Hix declared the show cause hearing closed. It was moved and seconded (Barker/Aldrich) the following "finding" be approved: that the Licensee has violated Section 12-47- 128(a) of the Colorado Liquor and Beer Code, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon, Chief Racine submitted a recommendation for suspension of the license for 15 days. It was moved and seconded (Habecker/Barker) License #03-24557 issued to Mountain Dew Liquor be suspended for 15 consecutive calendar days, from 12:01 A.M. March 15, 1993 until 11:59 P.M. March 29, 1993, and it passed unanimously. 5. Town Administrator's Report. Administrator Klaphake commented that the first Community Breakfast held February 26th was successful; however, resident attendance was sparse. The March 26th breakfast has been canceled and will be replaced with two meetings in April--2nd and 23rd. Invitations will be increased from 20 to 30 residents. There being no further business, Mayor ProTem Hix adjourned the meeting at 8:04 P.M. Mayor ProTem ................ Town Clerk ' iI[ofult of listee $181Jit, Larimer County, Colorado, ............. .....,19...... 4 March 15 93 Minutes of a Special. . meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park 15th March 93 on the day of ,, ..., A. D. 19.. at regular meeting hour. H. Bernerd Dannels Meeting called to order by Mayor Present: Mayor H. B. Dannels Trustees: Norbert L. Aldrich, David Barker, Robert L. Dekker, Gary F. Klaphake, Stephen W. Gillette Also Present: Town Administrator Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Vickie O'Connor, *hAU: Town Clerk Absent: George J. Hix, Mayor ProTem David Habecker, Trustee Mayor Dannels called the special meeting to order at 2:00 P.M. 1. Go-Cart Track Outdoor Amusement. Lvnn Kinnie/Applicant. The special meeting was called to determine whether or not EPURA's decision of March 29, 1990 that Plan B did not conform to the applicable portions of the Urban Renewal Plan should be upheld. Mayor Dannels opened the public hearing, and Town Attorney White recapped the application leading up to the Court of Appeals decision to remand the case back to the Trustees for re-hearing. The sole question to be determined is whether or not EPURA's decision of March 29, 1990, that Plan B did not conform to the applicable portions of the Urban Renewal Plan should be upheld. EPURA Executive Director Anderson outlined EPURA's findings presented in Resolution 147, and submitted the following into evidence: transcript of 3/15/90 meeting, minutes of 3/15/90 and 3/29/90, Resolution 147, and copies of petitions containing 409 signatures. The Applicant was represented by Gilbert Goldstein/Attorney who commented that EPURA exceeded their jurisdiction, abused their discretion; and that their findings were not supported. Bill Van Horn presented the Applicant' s case, addressing Items A-F (community/commercial center use--"usual/everyday" needs, seasonal use, river corridor, entry areas/visual intrusiveness, development/redevelopment to be sensitive to and protect surrounding areas, fumes/pollution, year-round development, image problem) as contained in Resolution 147. Mr. Van Horn confirmed that the Honda GX120 carts meet the 1994 California Emissions Standards, the Planning Commission personally inspected/tested a go-cart and conditionally approved the amended application May 15, 1990. During the February 27, 1990 Town Board meeting the Applicant guaranteed that noise from the operation would never exceed the existing ambient noise level and, if the noise becomes a problem, the Applicant would mitigate the noise or cease -operation. Surrounding area photographs were presented. Discussion followed regarding landscaping, noise, light, fumes, and potential that the slide would be removed. Public comment was heard from: Louis O'Riordan, Bill Marshall, John Ramey, Frank Normali, Lou Canaiy, Frank Williams, Les Foiles/EVIA, Mary Lamy, Ned Linegar, Ben Lang, Jr., Steve Komito, Clark Spalsbury, Elaine Tanton, Margaret Linegar, Jim Brewster, President/EVIA and resident. Town Administrator Klaphake acknowledged receipt of the following: Special Board of Trustees - March 15, 1993 - Page 2 Petition containing 338 signatures, letters from William Bauer, D. Ned Linegar (2), Mr. & Mrs. Albert Murphey, Mr. & Mrs. Ford Nielsen, RMNP, Leonard Savory, Robert Sunderland, Mr. & Mrs. Ralph Guild, Mr. and Mrs. Fred Bertle, Helen Hondius, Villiers Gerd, Isabel.L. Lee, Bernie Holien, Mr. & Mrs. Ray Lindsey (2), Mr. & Mrs. Peter Marsh, Mr. & Mrs. John- Hazlitt, Lynn Kinnie and Tom Icenogle. Rebuttal was offered from EPURA Attorney Windholz who referred to the Court Decision where the Court of Appeals found EPURA had made no mistake of the law, and that EPURA had not denied property rights. EPURA serves as an "advisory board" to the Board of Trustees. Applicant Attorney Goldstein questioned and received confirmation that the Trustees had three (3) options available to them: (1) approve Resolution 147, (2) overrule Resolution 147 thus granting the right to the applicant, and (3) overrule Resolution 147 and grant approval subject to appropriate conditions. Town Attorney White's letter dated March 2, 1993 was also made a part of the record of the proceedings. Lynn Kinnie/Applicant offered closing remarks, adding that the Honda GX160 engine will be utilized which also meets the California standards as mentioned above. In addition, the operation will load 20 carts while 20 are on the track. There being no further testimony, Mayor Dannels declared the public hearing closed. Trustee comments/findings followed, with Attorney White confirming that the 12 conditions set by the Planning Commission on their approval of Plan B and the conditions adopted by the Town Board on June 26, 1990, which incorporated conditions imposed by the Town Board on February 27, 1-990, remained in place and applicable, including staff's interpretation of the ambient noise level. It was moved and seconded (Barker/Gillette) Resolution 11-93 stating that the proposed outdoor amusement on Lots 5A and 9, Prospect Village Subdivision, Town of Estes Park, is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Plan, subject to the condition that the existing residence west of Fun City be moved by the Applicant prior to July 1, 1993, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Barker, Dekker and Gillette. Those voting "No" Trustee Aldrich. Mayor Dannels expressed his appreciation to all in attendance and adjourned the meeting at 5:19 P.M. Mayor ................ Town Clerk BRADFOR/PUBLISHING.0. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee March 11, 1993 Committee: Chairman Aldrich, Trustees Dekker and Hix Attending: Chairman Aldrich, Trustees Dekker and Hix Also Attending: Light and Power Director Matzke, Assistant Town Administrator Widmer, and Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: None Chairman Aldrich called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m. 1993 ELECTRIC RATE UPDATE - AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT A study is requested to incorporate the new wholesale rates instituted by Platte River Power Authority into the base rates. The last study was completed in 1991 and was performed by M.E. Kiburz and Associates. Since this is only an update, this project will not be bid but will be offered to Kiburz and Associates at an estimated cost not to exceed $8,000. The 1993 budget for this update is $5,000. Since many of the issues to be addressed in the rate study will directly affect the energy efficiency programs, it Â» is requested that the additional $3,000 needed be funded from this budget. The Committee recommends that the Town contract with M.E. Kiburz and Associates to perform the rate study at a cost not to exceed $8,000 and that the study be funded as described above from the Rate Update and Energy Efficiency line items. The results of the study should be available within six to eight weeks, with presentation to the Committee in May and a public hearing in August. 1993 CAPITAL PROJECTS Hiqhwav 34 Rebuild: Greater capacity lines are needed to replace the existing lines south of Highway 34 from Vista Lane east to a location approximately 300 feet north of Highway 34 opposite of Roth's Restaurant. The cost of replacing the overhead wires is included in the 1993 budget. Because of a possible joint venture with U.S. West, some of the lines will be buried. The Committee recommends that property owners adjacent to the overhead portion of the project be informed and offered the opportunity to pay the difference in cost required to upgrade the circuit capacity and place the line underground, over and above the estimated cost ($36,000) of upgrading the circuit capacity using overhead construction. Joint Trench with U.S. West: U.S. West plans to extend telephone fiber optic cable from the south side of CO Highway 34 near Roth's Restaurant, north and east around Lone Pine Subdivision to Dry Gulch, and north along Dry Gulch to the Honda School entrance. The total length of this installation is approximately 14,000 feet. U.S. West offered the Town an opportunity to place a conduit in their trench during this project. The normal cost for a trench is $5 per foot, compared to $1.00+ per foot through the joint project. The Committee recommends approval of an expenditure, not to exceed, $25,000 for participation with U.S. West in this joint trench program. BRADIORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee, March 11, 1993, Page '2 REPORTS Financial Report: The Committee reviewed the January and February financial reports and associated graphs. Proiect Updates:. The master meter has been installed for the Honda School. Electrical testing of the bucket trucks was performed over a weekend, thus keeping all trucks in service during working hours. All trucks passed with minor recommendations. Platte River Power Authority: Assistant Town Administrator Widmer reported on possible bond refunding of'Series C, D, and H. This will reduce the overall bonded indebtedness and shorten the time length of the bonds. A special board meeting will be held to authorize this sale. There being no further business, Chairman Aldrich adjourned the meeting at 11:10 a.m. -TL- 1<JU Tina Kuehl, Deputy Town Clerk BRADFOR/PUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Special Events Committee March 18, 1993 Committee: Chairman Hix, Trustees Habecker and Gillette Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Special Events Director and Coordinator Scott and Hinze, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Hix called the meeting to order at 2:00 P.M. AGREEMENTS - APPROVAL: The Committee review standard agreements with the Lions Club of Estes Park (one-year lease for the concession stand), Colorado Quarter Horse Show June 17-20-93, and Colorado Hunter-Jumper Horse Show July 23-August 8, 1993. The Committee recommends approval of all three agreements. LONGS PEAK SCOTTISH-IRISH HIGHLAND FESTIVAL - RESPONSE TO OUESTIONS RAISED FEBRUARY 25. 1993. Chairman Hix reported he and staff are in the process of responding to those questions raised. "TOP HANDS" - APPROVAL OF CORPORATION. The Rooftop Rodeo Committee has endorsed a subcommittee plan to initiate a separate organization named the "Top Hands." Top Hands Representative Ed Allbright reported that the Top Hands would operate low-risk events surrounding the Rodeo, as well as related western theme winter events. The expenses and income from these events would remain with the Top Hands. Funds earned would be reinvested into the Rodeo and other western events which could allow flexibility in adding special or winter events. Such funds would be addition to those funds budgeted by the Town. Top Hands would operate in conjunction, and not in competition, with the Rooftop Rodeo Committee. This concept of a large volunteer-based auxiliary is used by other rodeos, including Cheyenne Frontier Days. Bylaws of the Top Hand Organization were submitted. The Top Hands have prepared a proposed 1993 schedule of events as follows: Rodeo Week Cowboy Poetry ..................... July 13 Golf Tournament ...... ............. July 17 Craft Show/Fairgrounds ............ July 16, 17 Winter Season Cowboy Poetry Getaway Weekend ..... Nov. 19-20 Rodeo Dance ....................... Feb. 19 Top Hands requested the following: 1. $5,000 seed money. 2. Authorization to install banners across Elkhorn Avenue one week preceding and during Rodeo Week. 3. Waive the sound curfew to 11:00 P.M. on two (2) nights, for the concert and proposed street dance. 4. Provide legal counsel for assistance in formation of an BRADFOR/PUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Special Events Committee - March 18, 1993 - Page 2 appropriate corporate entity. Discussion concerning budget constraints pursuant to Amendment 1, removal of the "banner" poles on Elkhorn Avenue when the Streetscape was constructed, with replacement of one set of poles being placed in the Football Parking Lot running parallel to Elkhorn, and the sound curfew which is currently 10:30 P.M. The Committee recommends: (1) a budget expenditure of $500.00 for 1993, suggesting Top Hands submit a budget request during 1994 Budget preparations; (2) denial of the banners across Elkhorn Avenue; (3) at Mr. Allbright's request, this item will be continued pending additional discussion with the Rodeo and Top Hands Committees; and (4) approval to provide legal counsel. Pursuant to insurance concerns, and in conjunction with approval of Item 04, the Committee directed Town Attorney White to include a Statement of Intent for Top Hands. SPECIAL EVENTS ANNUAL MEETING - REPORT. Special Events Coordinator Hinze reported on the annual special events public meeting was held March 3, 1993. The purpose of the meeting was to present new events, hear special requests for continuing events and provide a format for general discussion of current events. Rocky Mountain Folks Festival - Representatives are planning the third festival which will be reduced to two (2) days, August 28-29, 1993. Their goals are to arrange tent camping facilities for attendees and promote weekend lodging packages with accommodations facilities. Jazz Festival - This event is scheduled May 15-16, 1993. Planning for five (5) bands/day to include one major "draw" band or group. Sponsorship funding or budget increases are necessary to attract a larger Denver and Front Range audience. Goals are to obtain sponsorships for 1994 and lure Denver audience. Special requests include: block-off three (3) parking spaces on Riverside Drive south of "Subway" for truck , loading/unloading, a crosswalk guard during midday, continued advertising support through newspaper coverage in Front Range and posters. Winter Activities - Lee Kemper expressed a desire for additional weekend events immediately following the Christmas Parade through April. Suggested an Easter Parade, Mardi Gras Celebration (numerous costumes and atmosphere). Art Walk Weekend - This event has been extended one day, dates are May 14-16, 1993. A "year-round" advertising piece for the galleries has been added. Working with Rally'n The Rockies to provide an Art Walk Day August 28 for cyclists. The Art Walk and Jazz Fest work well together and they plan on retaining the same week of events. Special requests include continued support of Town advertising with ads in the Front Range newspapers and production of a poster. Jaycees, July 4th Fireworks & Halloween - Jaycees will continue to provide the fireworks display for 1993; donations were excellent. The Haunted House was successful and would like to continue. Special requests: continued improvement of traffic control July 4th, $500 donation from the Special Events Department for July 4th, and continued use of the Fairgrounds building during October. Cultural Arts Council - CACEP acts as a supporter of events; however, they did create the "Imagine This" event held BRADIOR/PUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Special Events Committee - March 18, 1993 - Page 3 February 20. Goals include projecting a positive image for arts in Estes Park, generate a sound fund raiser, and apply for additional grants. Special requests include continued advertising support and support from the Special Events Department. Valentine Weekend - Successful 1993 event. Suggested continued weekend events through February. Longs Peak Scottish-Irish Festival - This event continues to increase every year and has become an internationally known event. Special requests include: improved transportation to and from downtown to the field on parade day, field area improvements, improved coordination/merging of governmental entities regarding various approvals. The meeting was very successful and staff will conduct this meeting yearly. There being no further business, Chairman Hix adjourned the meeting at 3:00 P.M. di le.Ace- d7 8 h.w-424 J Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk BRADFORD PUILISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee March 18, 1993 Committee: Chairman Hix, Trustees Aldrich and Habecker Attending: Chairman Hix, Trustees Aldrich and Habecker Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Police Chief Racine, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: None Chairman Hix called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m. POLICE DEPARTMENT Handicapped Parking Zone: A request was received to create a handicapped parking space on the south side of East Elkhorn Avenue. It was suggested that either the east end of the Barlow Plaza truck loading zone or the north parking space in the Brownfield parking lot be designated as a handicapped parking space. The Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority will study this request and recommendations will be submitted to the Public Safety Committee. Handicapped Parking Enforcement -- Citizen Group: No represent- atives in attendance. Telephone System -- Bid Review and Acceptance: Telephone bids were open March 15th. Because of technical matters that require further investigation, and time restrictions, these bids will be submitted directly to the Town Board meeting on March 23rd. Signage Committee: A Signage Committee has been established to inventory the use of signs in the downtown area, particularly the Highway 34-36 intersection and the Moraine/Elkhorn intersection. Possible changes include: 1. Replacement of text signs with international symbol signs. 2. Removal of redundant signs. 3. Consolidation of signs at the Moraine/Elkhorn corner and the Highway 34-36 intersection. 4. Identification of alternative parking areas in each parking lot. Recommendations will be referred to the Public Safety Committee. FIRE DEPARTMENT No items for discussion. REPORTS The report will be presented at the next meeting. STAFF The Colorado Association Chiefs of Police Accreditation program is continuing. An assessment team will finalize the accreditation and standardization of the Department within the next few weeks. Chief Racine commended Greg Sievers for his accomplishment in marking the handicapped parking zones, allowing better enforcement. There being no further business, Chairman Hix adjourned the meeting at 10:15 a.m. -7-L- Kl=-2 Tina Kuehl, Deputy Town Clerk BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission March 16, 1993 Commission: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners Wendell Amos, Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, Sue Doylen, Alma Hix and Larry Wexler Attending: Chairman Sager, Commissioners Amos, Brown, Burgess, Doylen, and A. Hix Also Attending: Community Development Director Stamey, Public Works Director Linnane, Trustee/Liaison G. Hix, Clerk O'Connor Absent: Commissioner Wexler Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 1:30 P.M. 1. MINUTES. It was moved and seconded (Brown/A. Hix) minutes of the February 16, 1993 meeting were approved as amended, and it passed unanimously. 2. CONSOLIDATED REVIEW Of North Ridge Meadow Condominiums Development Proposal. Northwest Corner of Raven Avenue and Drv Gulch Road. Richard Wille/Applicant. 2.A. B. Preliminary Plat/Amended Plat. Concept Plan. Special Review #93-2 - East Park Resubdivision to Combine 13 Existing Lots into 1 Lot. The Applicant submitted an Amended Concept Plan and Statement of Intent, reducing the number of dwelling units from 54 to 50, request for a density bonus of 6% which is 3 dwelling units, elimination of the Dry Gulch street connection, re-configuration of the buildings, which results in three 4-plexes at the northwest portion of the site (previously two 8-plexes) (the 8-plex at the center of the site has been amended to two 4-plexes), and provision for overflow parking areas for approximately 22 vehicles. Applicant's representative, Bill Van Horn, stated that the request includes three portions: amended plat, concept plan/special review and rezoning from C-0 to R-M, and the applicant is requesting that all items be considered concurrently. Planning Commission discussion included amending the building placement, street widths and trip generation, concern with placement of a portion of the buildings on some of the steepest portions of the site, off- site visibility/mass of the buildings as seen from the east, landscaping/screening, and elimination of the second roadway. Community Development Director Stamey summarized the major amendments to the application. Public testimony was heard from the following: Eric Blackhurst/Forward E.P. (supporting more housing), Frank Williams (no objection), Walter Dunn (reintroduced a petition by neighborhood residents opposing the amended plat density of the development, buffering, and placement of high density next to single-family) , Margaret Clark/EVIA (concern with density), Alan Aspinall/North End Property Owners Assn. (concern with the mass of buildings and density), and Harry French (concerns regarding traffic, parking location and building height). Director Stamey acknowledged correspondence in opposition to the density of the development from: Mr. & Mrs. Walter Dunn, Mr. & Mrs. Ron Dutton, Mr. & Mrs. Ron Harvey, and Rowland Retrum. Mr. Van Horn further addressed building height, driveways, traffic, plantings, location of parking stalls, and BeADFORDPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - March 16, 1993 - Page 2 handicapped unit designation. Designer David Habecker discussed the solar gain units and confirmed that a one-story building would be visible from the west, and two-story buildings would be visible from Devil's Gulch Road. Chairman Sager stated that the request for the bonus was not appropriate due to building mass, utilization of the site and neighborhood compatibility. Citing the Planning Commission's role for plan submittal and the opportunity this provides for improved planning (e.g. one residential lot), it was moved (Brown/Amos) the Preliminary Plat, and Concept Plan/Special Review be approved contingent upon Items 1-3 as identified in Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat dated February 11, 1993 Pages 2 & 3, and Items 1-14 identified in the Staff Report dated February 11, 1993 for the concept Plan, with the addition of the comments from the Public Works Department in their memorandum dated February 9, 1993, utility easements as requested by PSCO, provide phasing and construction management as required by staff, move parking stalls to the north, and furnish landscaping on the east side of buildings 4, 6, 8 and 10. The motion was defeated by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Commissioners Brown and A. Hix. Those voting "No" Commissioners Amos, Burgess, Doylen and Sager. Whereupon, it was moved and seconded (Burgess/Amos) the Preliminary Plat/Concept Plan be approved without the density bonus of 6%, thus approving 47 units (basis of special review application), plus those additional items as listed above, and it passed unanimously contingent upon the following: 1. Complete Street, Drainage and Grading Plan, and Utility Plan and Profile drawings. Applicant to meet with Public Works Director to finalize plan information and design criteria. Electric service to be extended underground to the site, as required by the Light and Power Department. 2. Private street label and maintenance note be added, and Homeowners document submitted addressing maintenance. 3. Development phasing be identified on Preliminary Plat. 4. Incorporate construction options for overflow parking areas that could be constructed (if needed) into street design. 5. Evaluate access alternative and verify Fire Department concurrence for elimination of Dry Gulch Road connection. 6. Waterline sizes and hydrants to be installed pursuant to Public Works, Fire Department, and ISO Standards. 7. Water service lines and main to be finalized with Public works. 8. Electric service to be extended underground pursuant to Light and Power Department requirements. 9. Sanitary sewer service installation pursuant to Upper Thompson Sanitation District requirements. 10. Final Drainage and Grading Plan be prepared. ./ADFORIPUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - March 16, 1993 - Page 3 Drainage Plan to address and resolve issues of crossing property under separate ownership (east of Dry Gulch Road). 11. Landscaping be considered to divide the mass of Buildings 4 through 8, as seen from Dry Gulch, and Buildings 2, 3, 5 and 6, as seen from property to the west. 12. Finalize development phasing and development completion schedule. 13. Pedestrian access along Dry Gulch Road be incorporated and constructed, with an appropriate timing mechanism (e.g.: after "x" units). 14. Mail-drop locations be incorporated/constructed in final site design. 15. Development Plan submittal be at a 1'=20' scale in order to adequately show final site design detail. 16. Seven (7) handicapped accessible units be designed. 17. Incorporate Public Works comments contained in the February 9, 1993 memorandum. Ron Harvey commented that a petition requesting the amended plat be denied based upon existing property owner rights had been submitted. Town Attorney White advised that the matter had been voted upon, adding that the Town Board will review the final plat during a public hearing when submitted--an opportunity for additional testimony would be provided. 2C. Rezoning Request. from C-0 Outlving Commercial to R-M Multiple Family. Chairman Sager opened the public hearing. The Applicant submitted a rezoning request as identified above, and the Comprehensive Plan has designated this area as ' residential. As there was no public testimony, Chairman Sager declared the public hearing closed. Discussion included covenants that would preclude garage conversion to a bedroom. Town Attorney White noted that the rezoning was in the interest of the neighborhood, if the Amended Plat were approved without the rezoning, there would be a large commercial lot next to the neighbors. It was moved and seconded (A. Hix/Brown) the rezoning request from C-0 to R-M be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, and it passed unanimously. 3. CONSOLIDATED REVIEW of Pine Knoll Addition. 3.06 acres. Martin & Beniamin Jelsema/Applicant. 3.A. Annexation. Rezoning Request and Preliminarv Plat. Applicant representative Bill Van Horn advised that this property has been an enclave for several years and is located between One Thousand Pines Addition and Pine Knoll Subdivision. Minimum "cut" is anticipated for the sewer line and drainage facilities. Director Stamey noted that the annexation and preliminary plat proposing single-family lots is in character with the adjoining neighborhood. Public testimony was heard from Bruce Weart supporting the four (4) lots as proposed. It was moved and seconded (Brown/Burgess) Pine Knoll Annexation be favorably recommended for approval to the Board of Trustees, to include the following conditions, and it passed unanimously: BRADFORDPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - March 16, 1993 - Page 4 1. All utility requirements be subject to final approval, as preliminary information/proposals have not been identified. 2. The subdivision be zoned E-Estate with exception being granted for the minimum lot area. 4. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. 4.A. Development Plan #93-2 The Event Center Parking (former Health Club Building), Lots 2 and 3. Prospect Village Subdivision. Edward & Gisela Grueff/Applicant. Paul Kochevar, Applicant' s representative reported that the proposal includes development of a parking lot for The Event Center on Lot 3, which is south of the existing commercial building (health club). The new lot would contain 43 spaces. The existing lot in front of the building would have 22 spaces (2/handicapped and 20/compact car). Mr. Kochevar stated that the development plan had been revised to incorporate staff comments. Parking demand for an occupancy of 150-200 people is typically 50-66 spaces, although nightclub use could generate higher demand. Discussion included signage, lighting, landscaping, overflow parking, and the designation for "compact cars." Mr. Kochevar requested the construction phasing schedule for paving completion be revised from June 1, 1993 to September 1, 1993. The Commission suggested the Applicant revise the drawing to eliminate the compact car designation and provide nine 9' parking spaces on the west side of the existing lot, and provide nine spaces along the east side; one parking space would be eliminated. Mr. Kochevar commented that this suggestion will be considered. There was no additional public testimony. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Doylen) Development Plan #93-2 be approved with the following conditions, and it passed unanimouslyl 1. Identify location of handicapped parking and access. 2. Provide berming on east and west, edges of parking lot. 3. Place a note on the Development Plan which states that Lots 2 and 3 shall be conveyed as one parcel. 4. Identify any proposed signage. It was moved and seconded (Brown/Amos) the request to amend the phasing schedule to September 1, 1993 be approved, and it passed unanimously. 5. SUBDIVISIONS. 5.A. Final Plat of Lot 30. Bonnie Brae Addition. Mountain Golf Villas/Applicant. The Commission approved the preliminary plat and development for 30 dwelling units August 18, 1992. Paul Kochevar reviewed the status of the subdivision proposal, and reported that a revised plat drawing had been submitted which incorporated staff comments. Director Stamey reported that final street and utility plan and profiles have been submitted and approved by the Public Works Department, and that the subdivision involves the vacation and relocation of Community Drive and the extension of Matthew Circle. There was no additional public testimony. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/A. Hix) the Final Plat of Lot 30, Bonnie Brae Addition be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees contingent upon the following, and it passed unanimously: BRADFOR/PUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - March 16, 1993 - Page 5 1. New Community Drive be constructed and accepted by the Town and the previous right-of-way vacated prior to recording of a final plat. 2. Outlot A Open Space, non-building site note be placed on the plat, and homeowners document to address this reservation and maintenance of the open space. 3. A utility and access easement be provided across the vacated right-of-way. 4. The private drives be labeled and the street names identified. 5. Utility easement be provided, pursuant to Light & Power Department and Estes Park Sanitation District. 6. If needed, an Improvement Guarantee for all improvements is required. 6. SPECIAL REVIEWS. 6.A. Special Review #92-2 Parking Plan for Elkhorn Lodge. Chairman Sager reported that, in his opinion, the parking plan as submitted is extremely inaccurate and that the submittal does not conform to the current standards. It was moved and seconded (Brown/Burgess) the Parking Plan be rejected, advising the Applicant resubmit a plan in accordance with current Town regulations, and it passed unanimously. Submittal of the Third Amendment for the barn was also found to be inadequate and it was moved and seconded (Amos/Doylen) said Third Amendment for the Barn be rejected and resubmitted, and it passed unanimously. Jerry Zahourek/Applicant, requested the following motion passed February 16, 1993 be amended: "...the Bunkhouse Building be approved contingent upon (1) all work on the pond, building, and parking be accomplished prior to moving the building on-site and (2) renovation be completed (including installation of restrooms and heating) in conformance to the Building Code, prior to occupancy..." Mr. Zahourek would like to proceed with the a sewer line installation for the bunk house and set the building on a foundation. A building permit has not been issued for the bunk house building due to the aforementioned motion. The Applicant confirmed that work on the bunk house would be completed prior to construction of the pond. Town Attorney White advised that the previous motion could be amended as long as the fee building work is completed; the Applicant would be allowed to begin work on the sewer and foundation, completing the foundation prior to moving the building on-site, placing said building on the foundation immediately, and bringing the bunk house into conformance with the Building Code (restrooms and heat) prior to any occupancy. A building permit is required for this work. It was moved and seconded (Brown/A. Hix) the Applicant complete the fee building in its entirety, complete the foundation for the bunk house and place it immediately on said foundation, and immediately bring the building into conformance with the Building Code (heating, plumbing) prior to any occupancy, and this work to be completed prior to beginning work on the pond excavation, and it passed unanimously. Â« 6 .1 J .,2 BRADFORIPUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - March 16, 1993 - Page 6 6.B. Amended Development Plan to Special Review #89-1. Lots 1. 2. and 3. Mountain Fairwavs Subdivision. Bill MacKinnon/Applicant. Paul Kochevar advised that the revised development plan alters the building and driveway configuration along Brodie Avenue, from two 4-plexes and one drive, to two 3-plexes, one duplex, and two driveways. Discussion included the proposed entry bridges onto the road, curb, "blind rise" relating to traffic. There was no public comment. It was moved and seconded (A. Hix/Amos) the Amended Development Plan for Special Review #89-1 be approved with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously: 1. Identify new utility services. 2. Place a note on the development plan stating that the Town of Estes Park is not responsible for maintenance or snow removal from the wood pedestrian connections to Buildings J, K. and I. 7. SUBMITTAL POLICY - REVISION. It was moved and seconded (A. Hix/Burgess) the Planning Commission adopt the following administrative procedure: If a submission to the Planning Commission is determined by staff to be incomplete, the submittal shall not be placed on the agenda for consideration. The deadline for revising a submission shall be the Thursday prior to the monthly Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. There being no further business, Chairman Sager adjourned the meeting at 4:24 P.M. 14 1/ 41.4-7 (0 -(4-kaÂ»J Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk . TOWN OF ESTES PARK MEMBER Pt <, Police Department rtÂ¥44 4,!, N JWL 4 74/,0.,c,A 19 WtesNeL) - 1â€¢4.,-/1 5(~Â£0&09- David J. Racine Â·Â·f Alc.' 1,77 Chief of Police Â»*~2319-~ 2**iNEFRYÂ·~~~~6;-r:.4. ;-~ .<42~-j/I.,7~y~5/6,4&2,.* 44~3:kf;: ti,ti~,~~- Â·4& L'U-r~ A##b.1 L â‚¬ 7*73&**,2 Â»k 4. w -Â· 7k .49)'.1 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 CM,341% K~Â» ''. -\ March 16, 1993 Mayor Bernerd Dannels and Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: PHILIP & CHRISTINE SWITZER d/b/a East Side Food Store SWITZER, PHILIP J. SWITZER, CHRISTINE E. SIGLER, MONICA 3.2% Beer Retail Mr. Mayor and Board Members: A records check based upon the names and dates of birth of the above named individual(s) has been made. East Side Food Store has a recent suspension on record for sale to a minor. There are no wants or warrants against the above named individuals. I would recommend approval of the license for PHILIP & CHRISTINE SWITZER, d/b/a East Side Food Store, noting this suspension, with the warning that future violations will be strictly prosecuted. Sincerely, 9 6-,3, : < c-LÂ£-ti- David J. Racine Chief of Police DJR/jo P. O. Box 1287 Telephone (303) 586-4466 904 *ij~ '1184â€¢ Â·i TOWN OF ESTES PARK Police Department -2Â¥489,610.37 # Â¢1924lk"C. -'pr~a. 1"1Â»Okt V *'-,MMU-- m.'.03.f 'f // k #=39 -1 - -a)4.0 1 44443#:; li 7~4,<i~ 7%~I~*3~ ..1 --ty:<-3->142,Adj~:61 . .9. 1%.--- 44-3=*70,1 March 10, 1993 Mayor Bernerd Dannels and Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Longhorn Liquor Mart Retail Liquor Store KRAWCHUK, Michael E. KRAWCHUK, Winifred M. Mr. Mayor and Board Members: A records check based upon the names and dates of birth of the above named individual(s) has been made. There have been no convictions, nor are there any wants or warrants against them. Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for Longhorn Liquor Mart. Sincerely, . 1, A David J. Racine Chief of Police DJR/jo (303) 586-4466 â€¢ RO. BOX 1 287 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (303) 586-4496 TOWN OF ESTES PARK Police Department Â»Â»L f. ./- ft I .Â·'- .22â€¢k- - le' 999ttr"-. 4 - *V %. 04 I %po- 1L+Â¥- I ------. T March 18, 1993 Mayor Bernerd Dannels and Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Richard A. Barlow d/b/a Poppy's Pizza & Pub Beer & Wine License BARLOW, E. Richard Mr. Mayor and Board Members: A records check based upon the names and dates of birth of the above named individual(s) has been made. There have been no convictions, nor are there any wants or warrants against them. Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for Richard A. Barlow, d/b/a Poppy's Pizza & Pub. Sincerely, 11-,L- t--1-, David J. Racine Chief of Police DJR/jo ' (303) 586-4466 â€¢ RO. BOX 1287 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (303) 586-4496 W h K , 9 Police Department TOWN OF ESTES PARK ir -- 19*I-,9+1 + , -- b 447 9..1-41...:r 1-"**66/3.4 1; ..'.: /1 March 18, 1993 Mayor Bernerd Dannels and Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Estes Valley Rec & Park District d/b/a Estes Park Golf Club GENGLER, Stanley C. GIMAR, Jean A. SHIPPY, Roger WIDMER, Ann RANGLOS, James P. REPOLA, Randy Mr. Mayor and Board Members: A records check based upon the names and dates of birth of the above named individual(s) has been made. There have been no convictions, nor are there any wants or warrants against them. Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for Estes Valley Rec & Park District, d/b/a Estes Park Golf Club. Sincerely, 4 I 0, -Â·ic,i; 0 &6.-L David J. Racine Chief of Police DJR/jo * DRAFY 03/10/93 M. E. KIBURZ and ASSOCIATES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, No. Estes 0393, is made this day of March, 1993, between M. E. KIBURZ and ASSOCIATES, 443 Sugarloaf Mountain Road, Boulder, CO 80302 (herein referred to as "Engineer"), and the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 (herein referred to as "Client"). Client requires certain consultations with regard to the 1993 Electric Rate Design Study and therefore the parties agree as follows: SCOPE OF SERVICES. Client hereby engages Engineer to perform the 1. following services: A. Incorporate the new (4/1/93) PRPA wholesale purchased power rate changes into the Estes Park rate schedules. To include adjusting the Estes Park Purchased Power Rider to make the current PRPA rate the schedule which becomes effective 4/1/93. B. The change in the PRPA's method of determining the monthly billing demands would be assessed as to the impact on the following rates and clauses in the Estes Park rate schedules. a) The appropriateness of the current seasonal demand rates. b) The appropriateness of the current demand ratchet clauses. c) Evaluate the need to modify the rate schedules with time of day demand rates. C. Evaluate and propose new rate schedules for the following types of service. a) Residential time of day with only a customer and energy rates. b) Security Lighting schedule which would include the cost of power and maintenance. D. Prepare cost comparisons of proposed and present rates to show the dollar impact on varying energy use for the various customer classes. E. Provide copies of computer software programs developed to make the analyses outlined in this Agreement for items A through D. The analyses will be prepared using the Microsoft Excel spread sheet computer software. DRAYY 03/10/93 COMPLETION DATE AND COST FOR REPORT FOR ITEMS A-E The completion date for the report summarizing the finding of the analyses in reference to Items A through E will be completed within eight weeks after receipt of study data from Estes Park, except for delays caused by the client in providing basic data or timely reviews of any drafts of the report. The cost of completing Scope of Service Items A through E will not exceed $5,500 excluding modifications to the Scope of Service. The cost estimate includes two (2) trips to Estes Park and fifteen (15) copies of the report summarizing the findings of Scope of Service Items A through D. PUBLIC HEARING PHASE A. Prepare and present testimony in support of the results of the 1993 electric rate design study at a public hearing. The completion date and cost of the public hearing phase of the Scope of Services will be subject to the dates set by the Town of Estes Park and the number of, if any, interveners. It is estimated that the cost of the public hearing phase will not exceed $2,500. The public hearing phase includes one trip to Estes Park. 2. COMPENSATION. For the services herein specified, Engineer shall receive compensation at the then current service rate, to be invoiced monthly, to cover and include any and all services of Engineer during the period of this Agreement. In addition, Client shall reimburse Engineer each ' month at cost for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Engineer in performing the services being provided hereunder, and for services of special consultants at cost plus ten percent (10%). All out-of-pocket expenses and charges for special consultants are included in the above non- to-exceed amounts of $5,500 and $2,500. 3. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. Engineer is an independent contractor for this agreement. Engineer is not an agent, representative or employee of the Client. Engineer represents that the services to be furnished under this Agreement will be in accordance with generally accepted professional practices. Any estimate of cost of equipment, construction, ownership or operation furnished by Engineer shall be Engineer's opinion based upon Engineer's professional judgment and experience. Engineer makes no other representation of warranty, express or implied. 4. Time Devoted to Work. In the performance of the services, the aforesaid services and the hours Engineer is to work on any given day will be entirely within Engineer's control, and the Client will rely upon Engineer to put in such number of hours as is reasonable necessary to fulfill the spirit and purpose of this Agreement. . DRAFY 03/10/93 5. Change in Scope. If the scope of services is modified so that more or less work or time is required, and such modification is approved in writing by the Client and Engineer, the compensation will be equitably adjusted. 6. Duration. The parties contemplate that this Agreement will run until suspended or terminated by either party. Client or Engineer may suspend or terminate any or all services covered under this Agreement at any time upon written notice, in which event the Client shall pay Engineer for all services rendered and expenses incurred to the effective date of such suspension or termination. 7. Notice. All notices relating to this Agreement shall be in written form, delivered in person or by registered or certified United States mail, postage prepaid, to Engineer or to Client at the above indicated addresses. EXECUTED on the day and year first above written. ENGINEER: CLIENT: M. E. KIBURZ and ASSOCIATES By URADFOROPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Special Events Committee March 18, 1993 Committee: Chairman Hix, Trustees Habecker and Gillette Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Special Events Director and Coordinator Scott and Hinze, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Hix called the meeting to order at 2:00 P.M. AGREEMENTS - APPROVAL: &1A. *-3, Estes Park Cone-year lease for the concession stand), Colorado The Committee review standard agreements with the Lions Club of / Quarter Horse Show June 17-20-93, and Colorado Hunter-Jumper Horse Show July 23-August 8, 1993. The Committee recommends approval of all three agreements. hONGS PEAK SCOTTISHIRISH HIGHLAND FESTIVAL - RESPONSE TO OUESTIONd RAISED FEBRUARY 25. 1993. Chair-*an Hix reported he and staff are in the process of resppking to thobiquestions raised. / '"POP HAND~' - APPROVAL OF CORPORATION. The Rooftop Â»deo Committee has endorsed a subcommiltee plan to initiate a sephrate organization named the "Top Hands. " Top Hands Representative gel Allbright reported that they'Top Hands would operate low-risk\events surrounding the Rodeo ,Â»s well as related western theme winber events. The expenses and income from these events would remaiâ‚¬with the Top Hands. *FUnds earned would be reinvested into the godeo and other western events which could allow flexibility in a'Ming special or wittter events. Such funds would be addition to th~e funds budgeted by the Town. Top Hands would operate in conjunction, and not in competition,' with the Rooftop Rodeo Committee. this concept of a large volunteer-based auxiliary is used by other\rodeos, including Cheyenne Frontier Days. Bylaws of the Top Hand fgabization were submitted. The Top Hands have prepared a proposed 1993 schedule of events as follows: Rodeo Week r Cowboy Poetry ..9........\ ......... July 13 Golf Tournament'...........xÂ·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· July 17 Craft Show/Fairgrounds .....1...... July 16, 17 11 Winter Season 3/ Cowboy Poetry Getaway Weekend ..1 . Nov. 19-20 Rodeo Dance .. ................... Feb. 19 Top Hands requested the following: 1. $154 000 seed money. 6 2. /Authorization to install banners across ElkhQrn Avenue 0/ one week preceding and during Rodeo Week. p . Waive the sound curfew to 11:00 P.M. on two (2) rlights, for the concert and proposed street dance. 4. Provide legal counsel for assistance in formation of 19 L 1 ~ *R#(177 TOWN OF ESTES PARK 9@*Aly *5 .4 14,A .- 1 VMY /&# ... 1.'A A --27 ,Â· .~'OrÂ« 2 \ -I . - jlvv:t:404 T.11#-lg,Ji . --d k<3 a %- March 23, 1993 TO: Mayor Dannels Town Board FROM: Greg Sievers ~~9 SUBJECT: New Phone System The 1993 Budget includes $58,200 for a new phone system for both the Police and Municipal offices. As outlined in the January 28, 1993, Public Safety Committee meeting, that purchase is funded by both the Light and Power and Police Departments. Eight RFP's were sent, and four proposals were returned: Carter Communication $48,909.00 Used AT&T System 25 $82,630.99 AT&T Merlin Legend $57,472.79 Executone I.D.S. $41,889.00 We are requesting to accept the low bid from Executone. To date, we have spent $3,290 from that budget for electrical upgrades, additional lines from US West and consulting fees, all in preparation for the phone system. We would also like to purchase their total lightning suppression system for $3,327.60, a five-year maintenance agreement for $14,625, and upgrade the quality of the phone sets for $3,101.10. We are also deleting their bid on battery backup of $1,194. Total expenditure is $61,748.70. This exceeds the remaining budget by $6,838.70. Executone has agreed to a deferred payment on one year of the maintenance agreement ($2,925) until January 1994. (303)586-5331 â€¢ RO. BOX 1200 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 8051 7 â€¢ FAX (303) 586-281 6 ADMIN ISTRATION â€¢ FAX (303) 586-6909 OTH ER New Phone System Page 2 March 23, 1993 Basic System $41,889.00 Lightning Protection 3,327.60 5-year Maintenance Agreement ($2,295/yr) 14,625.00 Upgrade Phones 3,101.10 January 1994 Expense (1.194.00) TOTAL EXECUTONE CONTRACT $61,748.70 Expenses to date (electrical, consultants, US West, etc) 3.290.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURE 65,038.70 Deferred until 1/94 (2.925.00) 1993 Expense 62,113.70 BUDGET 58.200.00 Over Budget $3,913.70 GS:ck 3/23/93 CORPORATION AT&T EXECUTONE System Name Merlin Legend Integrated Digital System 228 (I.D.S.) Cost (installed w/voice mail) $57,472.79 $41,889.00 Annual Maintenance Agreement $10,303.20 $2,925.00 24 hrs/day, 7 days/week 9 hrs/day, 5 days/week 6-year Investment Extended $108,988.79 $56,514.00 Service Calls $50/trip & $90/hour $35/trip; $70/hour Type System Digital Digital Size Capacity 80 lines + 144 extensions 228 universal ports Remote Diagnostics Yes Yes Service Response Time Cannot guarantee two hours 2-hour emergency; next day usual Dispatched Form Denver, Fort Collins, Englewood Loveland E911 Compatibility Yes Yes Data Transmission Yes Yes Battery Backup Supported by E911 batteries Supported by E911 batteries and the generator and the generator Voice Mail Capacity 12 hours, 300 users, 12 ports 6 hours; no max users, 8 ports Direct Inward Dialing (DID) 8-port; $1,250.75 8-port comparison $1,109.50 (Does not include US West costs) Surge and Lightning Protector Under maintenance with full Under maintenance lightning lightning protection included protection is $3,327.60 extra References 2 of 2 say good equipment and 3 of 3 say "excellent" for service; not user friendly 3quality and service software Wire Quality and Type 24-gauge twisted 4 pair teflon 24-gauge twisted 4 pair teflon; level 3 Rewiring Quantity Full rewire in building Full rewire in building BRADFOR/PUILISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission March 16, 1993 Commission: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners Wendell Amos, Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, Sue Doylen, Alma Hix and Larry Wexler Attending: Chairman Sager, Commissioners Amos, Brown, Burgess, Doylen, and,A. Hix Also Attending: Community Development Director Stamey, Public Works Director Linnane, Trustee/Liaison G. Hix, Clerk O'Connor Absent: Commissioner Wexler Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 1:30 P.M. Jr. MINUTES. It was moved and seconded (Brown/A. Hix) minutes of the February 16, 1993 meeting were approved as amended, and it passed unanimously. Gulch Road. Richard Willa/Applicant. 2. CONSOLIDATED REVIEW of North Ridge Meadow Condominiums Development Promosal. Northwest Corner of Raven Avenue and Drv 2.A. B. Preliminary Plat/Amended Plat. Concept Plan. Special Review #93-2 - East Park Resubdivision to Combine 13 Existina Lots into 1 Lot. The Applicant submitted an Amended Concept Plan and Statement of Intent, reducing the number of dwelling units from 54 to 50, request for a density bonus of 6% which is 3 dwelling units, eliminatidn of the Dry Gulch street connection, re-configuration of the buildings, which results in three 4-plexes at the northwest portion of the site (previously two 8-plexes) (the 8-plex at the center of the site has been amended to two 4-plexes), and provision for overflow parking areas for approximately 22 vehicles. Applicant's representative, Bill Van Horn, stated that the request includes three portions: amended plat, concept plan/special review and rezoning from C-0 to R-M, and the applicant is requesting that all items be considered concurrently. Planning Commission discussion included amending the building placement, street widths and trip generation, concern with placement of a portion of the buildings on some of the steepest portions of the site, off- site visibility/mass of the buildings as seen from the east, landscaping/screening, and elimination of the second roadway. Community Development Director Stamey summarized the major amendments to the application. Public testimony was heard from the following: Eric Blackhurst/Forward E.P. (supporting more housing), Frank Williams (no objection), Walter Dunn (reintroduced a petition by neighborhood residents opposing the amended plat density of the development, buffering, and placement of high density next to single-family), Margaret Clark/EVIA (concern with density), Alan Aspinall/North End Property Owners Assn. (concern with the mass of buildings and density), and Harry French (concerns regarding traffic, parking location and building height). Director Stamey acknowledged correspondence in opposition to the density of the development from: Mr. & Mrs. Walter Dunn, Mr. & Mrs. Ron Dutton, Mr. & Mrs. Ron Harvey, and Rowland Retrum. Mr. Van Horn further addressed building height, driveways, traffic, plantings, location of parking stalls, and BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - March 16, 1993 - Page 2 handicapped unit designation. Designer David Habecker discussed the solar gain units and confirmed that a one-story building would be visible from the west, and two-story buildings would be visible from Devil's Gulch Road. Chairman Sager stated that the request for the bonus was not appropriate due to building mass, utilization of the site and neighborhood compatibility. Citing the Planning Commission's role for plan submittal and the opportunity this provides for improved planning (e.g. one residential lot), it was moved (Brown/Amos) the Preliminary Plat, and Concept Plan/Special Review be approved contingent upon Items 1-3 as identified in Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat dated February 11, 1993 Pages 2 & 3, and Items 1-14 identified in the Staff Report dated February 11, 1993 for the concept Plan, with the addition of the comments from the Public Works Department in their memorandum dated February 9, 1993, utility easements as requested by PSCO, provide phasing and construction management* as required by staff, move parking stalls to the north, and furnish landscaping on the east side of buildings 4, 6, 8 and 10. The motion was defeated by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Commissioners Brown and A. Hix. Those voting "No" Commissioners Amos, Burgess, Doylen and Sager. Whereupon, it was moved and seconded (Burgess/Amos) the Preliminary Plat/Concept Plan be approved without the density bonus of 6%, thus approving 47 units (basis of special review application), plus those additional items as listed above, and it passed unanimously contingent upon the following: 1. - Complete Street, Drainage and Grading Plan, and Utility Plan and Profile drawings. Applicant to meet with Public Works Director to finalize plan information and design criteria. Electric service to be extendedÂ·underground to the site, as required by the Light and Power Department. 2. Private street label and maintenance note be added, and Homeowners document submitted addressing maintenance. 3. Development phasing be identified on Preliminary Plat. 4. Incorporate construction options for overflow parking areas that could be constructed (if needed) into street design. 5. Evaluate access alternative and verify Fire Department concurrence for elimination of Dry Gulch Road connection. 6. Waterline sizes and hydrants to be installed pursuant to Public Works, Fire Department, and ISO Standards. 7. Water service lines and matin to be finalized with Public works. 8. Electric service to be extended underground pursuant to Light and Power Department requirements. 9. Sanitary sewer service installation pursuant to Upper Thompson Sanitation District requirements. 10. Final Drainage and Grading Plan be prepared. e./.FOROPUILISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - March 16, 1993 - Page 3 Drainage Plan to address and resolve issues of crossing property under separate ownership (east of Dry Gulch Road). 11. Landscaping be considered to divide the mass of Buildings 4 through 8, as seen from Dry Gulch, and Buildings 2, 3, 5 and 6, as seen from property to the west. 12. Finalize development phasing and development completion schedule. 13. Pedestrian access along Dry Gulch Road be incorporated and constructed, with an appropriate timing mechanism (e.g.: after "X" units). 14. Mail-drop locations be incorporated/constructed in final site design. 15. Development Plan submittal be at a 1'=20' scale in order to adequately show final site design detail. 16. Seven (7) handicapped accessible units be designed. 17. Incorporate Public Works comments contained in the February 9, 1993 memorandum. Ron Harvey commented that a petition requesting the amended plat be denied based upon existing property owner rights had been submitted. Town Attorney White advised that the matter had been voted upon, adding that the Town Board will review the final plat during a public hearing when submitted--an opportunity for additional testimony would be provided. 2C. Rezoning Request. from C-O Outlving Commercial to R-M Multiple Family. Chairman Sager opened the public hearing. The Applicant submitted a rezoning request as identified above, and the Comprehensive Plan has designated this area as residential. As there was no public testimony, Chairman Sager declared the public hearing closed. Discussion included covenants that would preclude garage conversion to a bedroom. Town Attorney White noted that the rezoning was in the interest of the neighborhood, if the Amended Plat were approved without the rezoning, there would be a large commercial lot next to the neighbors. It was moved and seconded (A. Hix/Brown) the rezoning request from C-0 to R-M be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, and it passed unanimously. 3. CONSOLIDATED REVIEW of Pine Knoll Addition. 3.06 acres. Martin & Beniamin Jelsema/Agglicant. 3.A. Annexation. Rezoning Request and Preliminary Plat. Applicant representative Bill Van Horn advised that this property has been an enclave for several years and is located between One Thousand Pines Addition and Pine Knoll Subdivision. Minimum "cut" is anticipated for the sewer line and drainage facilities. Director Stamey noted that the annexation and preliminary plat proposing single-family lots is in character with the adjoining neighborhood. Public testimony was heard from Bruce Weart supporting the four (4) lots as proposed. It was moved and seconded (Brown/Burgess) Pine Knoll Annexation be favorably recommended for approval to the Board of Trustees, to include the following conditions, and it passed unanimously: . MAR 1 9 1993 .t.61 43 0//; 'tway, 41\'.4.\I - i~{442_,322-1- -Ir- Cl LAND SURVEYS - ---4-2' 79'31Â£. 6.7Â» ---1-42 F - '42 3 -S. *f -49*' - - SUBDIVISIONS - DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IMPROVEMENT PLATS ,~ VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SANITARY ENGINEERING ~ 1/ WILLIAM G. VAN HORN - COLO. PE & PLS 9485 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING ( March 19, 993 Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Board Members, I am writing on the behalf of Richard Wille who has made application to develop North Ridge Meadow Condominiums. Sec. 17.20.020 of 'the code provides incentives in the form of increased units to those who have planned their site to be energy efficient, save vegetation, and minimize off site impact. As explained in the Statement of Intent, Mr. Wille has done that and is asking for approximately one third of the possible allowable increased units. His position will be more completely explained at the meeting. Sincerely, /. MAA<7 / Uj V-SUM Liane=6Â»+ 1043 Fish Creek Road â€¢ P.O. Box 456 â€¢ Estes Park, Colorado 80517 â€¢ 303-586-9388 1 AMIÂ·:NI) 1Â·:1) STATEMENT OF INTENT, North Ridge Meadow Condominiums It is the intent of this project through efficient land use and innovative planning to provide economical housing for the increasingly acute housing shortage in Estes Park. The project is owned by and will be built by Rich Wille who has considerable experience in this type of project in Estes Park. The site consists of 8.1 acres along Dry Gulch Road. The average slope of the site is 19%. The zoning of the site is C 0. It is requested to be changed to RM to be com'patible with the proposed use and with the adjoining property. Standard lot size is 18,000 sq. ft.. Due to average slope of 19% this must be increased by 7,000 sq. ft. to 25,000 sq. ft. Because this is multi-family the basic size is .3 of the standard size or 7,500 sq. ft. This results in 47 allowable units. Section 17.20.020.8.6. c&d allow for this number to be increased by up to 20%. This amended plan has 50 units. The Planning Commission determined that the design and orientation of the units did not qualify for a bonus on the basis of solar gain even though an obvious effort has been made to gain and conserve energy through design. The requested bonus is 6%. It is felt by the applicant that the plan still does qualify for a bonus allowed by Sec. 17.20.020.B.6.c which allows for an increase of up to 10% for a plan that "utilizes topography and site vegetation to generally locate buildings where least obtrusive from off-site". Changes to the original plan now reflected in the current plan strengthen this position. a) Both the drive and the buildings have been pulled away from the property line as much as possible on the northerly portion that abuts single family lots. b) The new buildings will be more than 160 ft. from existing or future single family residences, more than five times the zoning setback of 30 ft. for mixed use zones and bonused projects. c) A setback of more than 100 ft. (over six times that required by zoning) is being provided on the south which is the most visible from the highway and the street. d) The new buildings will be more than 30' lower than the single family neighborhood and will not intrude on any skyline. e) .The buildings will be built into the slope so as to appear as being single story from the neighborhood. f) Through the reduction of units the northerly buildings are now reduced to four-plexes with greater spaces between them (please compare to the mass and spacing of existing units in neighborhood). g) The plan has taken care to save nearly all of the existing trees and willows and uses the same on the southerly and central portions to screen buildings. Landscaping will be added east of building #10 to help screen that building from Dry Gulch Rd. h) The elimination of the Dry Gulch access will save significant disruption of the site. i) The buildings have been located along the contours to minimize steps within a building and retaining walls. The axis of the units is slanted to the slope and to the drives to reduce cut and visual depth. Consideration is requested regarding the normal boundary planting requirements since all of the adjoining developable property has been developed, some at a higher density than this property and will not benefit from the effort. The units of this project will orient away from the existing neighborhood. Phasing of the project will begin from the south with the first building, (building #1) on the private drive being started in 1993 or 1994. It is anticipated that the last units in the northeast corner (building #10) will be completed by the year 2000. It is anticipated that buildings will be built in numerical sequence at a rate of one or more per year depending on market conditions. After building #3 is built and before a permit is issued for building #4 the entire interior street shall be built. Relative to 17.36.030.F regarding review criteria, the applicant presents the following responses by section: 1.a. Nearby land uses are residential with multi-family adjoining on the southerly portion and single family adjoining on the north. The exisiting single family now adjoins existing multi-family. The proposed project with its change in zone will be more compatible with existing adjacent land use than most any use by right under the existing CO zone. 1.b. Existing roads are adequate. The development will use approximately 200' of Raven Avenue and the balance of the use will be Dry Gulch Road, a County Collector classified road. Normal traffic to and from the site will not pass through any other residential areas. Water will be served by replacing the main on the western edge of the property, thus providing better service to the existing neighbors. Sewer will be from the new Honda School extension. Drainage goes directly to Dry Gulch Stream without crossing any developable land. 1.c. The site is a previously disturbed site having been stripped for the material to build Olympus Dam in the 1940's. It has since revegetated and the proposed plan preserves most of the existing trees. No adverse consequences to the public or the environment have been identified. page 3 2.a. The adjacent buildings are above and generally face away from this site. They are also upwind and at a higher elevation. All of these factors reduce the visual and noise intrusion of the project. 2.b. Proposed buildings are located generally along existing contours to avoid excessive stepping of buildings and the associated retaining walls and excessive overlot grading (see site sections). Buildings are canted to the slope and to the road to minimize site impact. Most all of the existing trees are preserved by the design. 3. Probably the most pressing social need in Estes Park is affordable housing. This project is not being designated as such but this developer with similar units has consistently marketed his units in the designated affordable range. The project has an economic impact beyond affordable housing in that it will provide a major activity in the local building industry which next to tourism is the mainstay of the local economy with purchased materials, jobs, taxes, etc. 4. The project is consistent with the district goals for the the reasons above stated. In summary, there is probably not another site in the Town that can so nearly meet Town Standards to provide maximum density with as little impact to present and future development. The project has the size to be able to provide significant economy of scale and to develop its own identity. If allowed to develop as planned the project will be a major step toward the solution of one of the main problems we face today. A d ,.1 no Richard H. Wille, Trustee Richard H. Wille Trust Ron S. Harvey 1830 North Ridge Ln. MAR 1 9 1993 ' Estes Park, CO 80517 3/19/93 Bernie Dannels, Mayor Board of Trustees Estes Park, Colorado Re: Appeal of Density Bonus on Special Review 93-2 Mr. Mayor and Trustees, It has been brought to my attention that Mr. Wille is on the agenda for your March 23, 1993 meeting to appeal the Planning Commission recommendation that a density bonus be denied on his preliminary Development Plan for North Ridge Meadows Condominiums. The adjoining Lone Pine Acres, when fully developed, will have a maximum of 76 units on 35 acres. Of this, the 26.2 acres zoned single family will have 37 units as compared to 50 to 54 units on the 8.1 acre project. This project would be almost five time more dense. The 9.4 acres multi-family portion of Lone Pine can have a maximum 39 units as compared to the proposed 50 to 54 units on the 8.1 acrd parcel (almost 1.5 times more dense). A petition signed by 54 property owners in Lone Pine Acres, along with another fifty or more other concerned residents of the valley, has been submitted in opposition to the re-plat of the property because of the density of this proposed project. We would like to believe that this petition, letters and citizens in attendance at the two Planning Commission hearings on this proposal were supportive of the commission's views. Therefore, I respectfully request that you deny the applicant's request for any density bonus and allow the Planning Commission recommendation to stand. Sincerely, , Ron S. Harvey . PROCEDURE FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR NEW LIQUOR LICENSE 1. MAYOR - The next order of business will be the public hearing on the application of Edward J. & Gisela Grueff, dba THE EVENT CENTER for a new Hotel and Restatirant license located at 470 Prospect Village Drive , Estes Park, Colorado. 2. MAYOR - The application was filed February 12, 1993 and, at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on February 23, 1993 the public hearing thereon was set at 7:30 P.M. on the 23rd day of March , 19 93 , and the neighborhood boundaries for the purpose of this application and hearing were established to be 2.98 miles. 3. MAYOR - This public hearing will be conducted in the follow- ing manner: The applicant will be first allowed to state his case and present any evidence he wishes to support his application. The opponents will then be given an opportunity to state their case and present any evidence in opposition to the application. The applicant will be allowed a rebuttal which will be limited to a rebuttal of the evidence presented by the opponents. No new evidence may be submitted. The opponents will be allowed a rebuttal which may only rebut the evidence of the applicants. No new evidence may be offered. Members of the Board Of Trustees may ask any questions of any person speaking at any time during the course of this hearing. 4. MAYOR - At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consid- er the facts and evidence determined as a result of its investigation, as well as any other facts, the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood for the type of license for which application has been made, the desires of the adult inhabitants, the number, type and availability of liquor outlets located in or near the neighborhood under consid- eration, and any other pertinent matters affecting the qualifications of the applicant for the conduct of the type of business proposed. 5. MAYOR - Ask the Town Attorney to present the application and all other documents. 6. TOWN ATTORNEY - (X = Received) X (A) The application has been received and is complete. X (B) The Town has received payment of all neces- sary fees and hearing costs. (C) The applicant has submitted a copy of a: X Lease Warranty Deed Rental Agreement as evidence that the applicant is entitled to possession of the premises. -2- .. X (D) The applicant has submitted plans for the interior of the building. X (E) I have received three letters of character reference for each applicant. (F) The applicant is: An Individual A Partnership and they have submitted a Part- nership Agreement x A Corporation and they have submitted a copy of the Certificate and Articles of Incorpo- ration. X (G) There is a letter from the Building Official stating the property is zoned C-0, Commercial Outlying , which allows this type of business as a permitted use. X (H) There is a proof of publication of the notice of hearing stating that the notice of hearing was published on March 12, 1993 in the Estes Park Trail Gazette. X (I) There is a letter from Greg Sievers stating that the premises was posted on March 12, 1993 X (J) There is a report issued by the Chief of Police with regard to investigation of the applicant. [ read pertinent parts of the report ] -3- X (K) Town Administrator submits the map indicating all liquor outlets presently in the Town of Estes Park. X (L) The Board Of Trustees has a copy of all pertinent documents in their packets: 7. MAYOR - Ask whether any member of the Board of Trustees has any questions regarding the application and the accompanying submittals. OPTIONAL 8. [MAYOR - Each person who wishes to speak in "favor" of, or in "opposition" to the application should step forward and stand at the speaker's podium in front of the Council table. Please state your name and address. Please speak clearly and only one person at a time should speak, for these proceedings are being recorded.] 9. MAYOR - The applicant may now present his evidence. If the applicant is represented by an attorney, would he please conduct the presentation of evidence. 10. MAYOR - The opponents may now present their case and if the opponents are represented by an attorney, would he please conduct the presentation of evidence, or if there is a spokesman for the opponents, would he please conduct the presentation of the opponents' evidence, otherwise, I will call on such persons as raise their hands to indicate a desire to speak in opposition to the application. -4- 11. MAYOR - Have you received any communications in regard to the application? 12. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR reads letters and other communications. 13. MAYOR - The applicants may now offer any rebuttal evidence they may have. (If there is none, proceed as follows.) 14. MAYOR - The opponents may now offer any rebuttal evidence they may have. (If there is none, proceed as follows.) 15. MAYOR - Ask the Board if there are any further questions. 16. MAYOR - Indicate that all evidence presented will be accept- ed as part of the record. 17. MAYOR - Ask the Board if they have any comments. 18. MAYOR - Declare the hearing closed. Suggested Motion: The Board of Trustees finds that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood (are/are not) met by the present liquor outlets in the neighborhood and that the desires of the adult inhabitants (are/are not) for the granting of this liquor license. Based upon the above findings, I move that this license be (granted/denied). -5- . l /64.4 TOWN OF ESTES PARK ' 1 r,i XI 5#â€¢f.Ry.xy Police Department ---ga*<# P 31Â©12>9,01 . , Â£31Â»124*34 %49/ f,~ 11"4'* Lin"*ftÂ·folÂ¥Â»Â»- Â· -0 4 -1 ly.,h, v //00\\E" 1''h~ ly.'~FlÂ»-Â»-*::-Â·, :47 - f e. /7 1 _ â€¢ . .4 -14'. 1 41: 1 Al. / March 3, 1993 Mayor Bernerd Dannels and Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: The Event Center, Inc. d/b/a The Event Center Hotel & Restaurant Grueff, Edward J. Grueff, Gisela Mr. Mayor and Board Members: A records check based upon the names and dates of birth of the above named individual(s) has been made. There have been no convictions, nor are there any wants or warrants against them. Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for The Event Center, Inc., d/b/a The Event Center. Sincerely, ~ , 63Â»fs Favid J. Racine Chief of Police DJR/jo (303) 586-4466 â€¢ RO. BOX 1287 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (303) 586-4496 DR 8404 (02/91) COLORAODO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Liquor Enforpement Division 1375 ShetÂ¥nan St. [Â¥Mver CO 80261 COLORADO LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION IMPORTANT: For those retail licenses described in Column A below, this application and all License Issued Through Use License Account No. supporting documents must FIRST BE FILED IN DUPLICATE WITH, AND APPROVED BY, THE (Expiration Date) for all reference LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (CITY, TOWN, COUNTY). Applications will not be accepted unlessall applicable questionsare fully answered, allsupporting documentscorrespondexactly with the name of the applicant(s), and proper fees are attached. : LIABIUTYINFORMATION You may attach separate sheets or additional documents if necessary to fully complete this i CounÂ¥ City indusly Type Liability Date application. All documents must be typewritten or legibly printed in black ink. Form DR 8404-1, "Individual History Record- must be completed and filed in duplicate by the following: ' a:> -Â·FEE PAID Â· Each applicant Â· Over 5% limited partners y Â· => - Â· All officers/directors of a corporation â€¢ Managers Cash Fund E ... 84._E 914: 1 3 Counly Â·Â·lilli 1 444Â· Â· All stockholders of a corporation not subject â€¢ Each person required to file form 66-1x . 414 7 274 I .4941 to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 DR 8404 -1 must submit fingerprints â€¢ Over 5% stockholders of a corporation subject to the Local Licensing Authority. to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 â€¢ Please note: Fingerprints submitted will Â· All Umited Uability Company members andmanagers be used to check criminal history i Â· All general partners records with the FBI and CBI TorAL : '* Reg 1 Ext Hrs E ExtHr$ . R... 4144 G :<51:*97,1 7. 49-1 NOTE: License status will not be given over the telephone. License will be mailed by the Liquor Enforcement Division to the Local Ucensing Authority upon issuance. ALL ANSWERS MUST BE PRINTED IN BLACK INK OR TYPEWRITTEN APPUCANTS FOR#RAND*WLICENSES, OR TRANSFERS OF OWNERSHIP MUST CHECK THEAPPROPRMTE BOXESBELOW IN EITHER COLUMN A OR COLUMN B . I ' : ANDMUST ALSO CHECK:EITHER BOX 08) OR (19) 41 -9 (3) COLUMN A STATEFEES # 41 - 9 (3) COLUMN 8 STATE FEES 18 M Application Fee for New License $450.00 18 0 Application Fee for New Ucense $450.00 19 0 Application Fee for Transfer of Ownership "450.00 19 0 Application Fee for Transfer of Ownership 450.00 20 U Retail Liquor Store Ucense - City 202.50 26 0 Public Transponation License each $50.00 20 El Retail Liquor Store License - County 287.50 27 0 Manufacturer's Ucense-Brewery , 275.00 21 0 Uquor Ucensed Drugstore - City 202.50 28 0 Manufacturer's Ucense-Winery 275.00 21 0 Uquor Ucensed Drugstore - County 287.50 29 El Manufacturefs Ucense-Distillery or Rectifier 1025.00 22 0 Beer & Wine License - City 177.50 31 0 Wholesale Uquor License (Vinous & Spirituous) 1025.00 22 0 Beer & Wine License - County 262.50 32 0 Wholesale Beer License (Malt Uquor) 525.00 23 0 Hotel & Restaurant Uc. N City D County 326.25 37 0 Importers License (Malt Uquor) 275.00 24 C Hotel & Restaurant Uc. 38 0 Importer's Ucense (Vinous & Spirituous Uquor) 275.00 w/Optional Premises Â£ City O County 326.25 43 m Umited Winery Ucense 45.00 25 0 Club Ucense Il City m County 135.00 44 E Nonresident Manufacturer's Ucense (Malt Liquor) 275.00 40 0 Tavem Ucense O City m County 326.25 41 0 Arts License O City O County 135.00 42 0 Racetrack License O City O County ' 326.25 45 0 Optional Premises Lic. O City O County 326.25 El Extended Hours - Special License 170.00 1. Name of Applicant(s): If partnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation: Date filed with Local Authority: -7-HE EVENT O.EAnEE g[-AL, 2 -/2 -93 la. Applicant is a: F.E.I.N.: 12' Corporation O Individual U Partnership U Limited Liability Company 2. Trade Name of Establishment: (DBA) State Sales Tax No Â· Social Security No.: -rHE 'EVERT EFATE,L Applied -Ry 3. Address of Premises:(Spedfy exact location of premises. Diagram of premises must accompany this aoplication.) Business Telephone: Â£+70 PRospeer U, LLAGE 7 UUE,ESies PAra.k. Â·586-541\ City:_ County: State: Zip Codi ES-TES PAR.l<- LAR- i NER 20 80511 4. Mailing Address: (Number and Street) City or TownÂ· State: Zip Code: 12 0,735Â£ 2-/ 6 f ES-92& 912-k 0-D , los-)-7 5. If this is a transfer of ownership or renewal application, you MUST answer the following questions about this business: Present Trade Name of That Establishment (DBA): Present State License No.: Present Type of License: Present Expiration Date: YES ' NO /. 6. Is the applicant, or any of the partners, or officers, stockholders or directors of said applicant (if a corporation),or manager, 0 2 under the age of twenty-one years? 7. (a) Has the applicant, or any of the partners, or officers, stockholders or directors of said applicant (if a corporation) ever m Bil been convicted of a crime? If answer is yes," explain in detail. Exclude minor traffic violations. (b) Have persons lending assistance or financial suppon to the applicant, or the manager, or employees, ever been m Arl convicted of a crime? If answer is yes," explain in detail. Exdude minor traffic violations. 8. Has the applicant, or any of the partners, or officers, directors or stockholders of said applicant (if a corporanon), or manager, ever: (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? ZE (b) had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? (c) had interest in an entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? If yes,0 explain in detail on = separate sheet. 9. Has a liquor license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding two years? If 'yes," explain in detail. m FEW 10. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or parochial school, or the p,incipal campus of any college, n W university or seminary? 11. Does or did the applicant, or any of the partners, or officers, directors or stockholders of said applicant (if a corporation) have a direct or indirect interest in any other Colorado Uquor Ucense (include loans to or from any licensee, or interest in a Fil'El loan to any licensee)? If"yes," explain in detail. 87& (AOT/A~, -3702 ' t n--STA-TE * 071 2639 d6 a_ Eds L a &-r, AA 3-ou),3 * 1 E-7 4 12. State whether the applicant has legal possession of the premises by virtue of ownership or under a lease. Attach a copy of M m deed or lease. If leased, list name and address of landlord and term of lease. Attach a copy of diagram of premises. 13. Identify the persons, firms, or corporations who now, or will, have a financial interest, evidenced either by loans or equity ownership in the business for which this license is requested. State the names and addresses of any such persons, and the amount and source of such financial interest expressed in dollars or other items of value, such as inventory, furniture or equipment (i.e., bank, relatives, friends, previous owners, etc.). Use separate sheet if necessary. NAME ADDRESS INTEREST 14. List the names and addresses of all liquor businesses in which any of the persons in the previous question are materially interested. Use separate sheet if necessary. NAME BUSINESS ADDRESS Attach copies of all notes and security instruments, and any written agreement or details of any oral agreement by which any person (including a corporation) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment and any agreement relating to the business which is conengent or conditional in any way by volume, profit. sales, giving of advice or consultation. Page 2 of 4 . 21. If the applicant is a corporation, answer the following: (a) Corporation is organized under the laws of the State of: ~02-0/2/?DO Date of Incorporation: / - 27- 9-3 (Attach Certificate of Authority (b) Out-of-state corporations, give date authorized to do business in Colorado: from Colo. Secretary of State) (c) Date of filing last annual corporate repon to the Secretary of State: (d) Name of each officer listed below: Home Address, City and State: Social Security # Date of Birth: President: Eot.OARD QR.WEEP f 074 P,Aft kkolibrt Est-es PM. 323-44-6101 1/-7-So Vice-President â‚¬0' Treasurer: s_arfÂ·G ISELA & R.REPF SAA'(BE 32-5-44-8'119 2-4- 60 (e) Name all 5% or greater stockholders; Home Address, City and State % of stock Date of Birth: include actual owner or pledaee (f) Name of all Directors or Trustees of Home Address, City and State Corporation: 22. Manager: OATH OF APPUCANT I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my kng*ledge. Authortz,**6.u.: Date: Â«2Â·adettio w..27 (Rul-44 - 1 A -/A- 23 *~0***;,~Ag#Â£68*1*Nm~G *Uj~A~iÂ« > d (Menulac:urer*, nom'astd~nima#Â¥hduli* Im~#4&holesale,k,Nmite@*hmdes, andpublic 1,anâ€¢#onation Ikensees . .. . ~* d&*ager#*e:section.6*6441 Is this application for a: ~ New License ~Transfer of Ownership ~ Other (specify): YES NO Each person required to file DR 8404-1: Has been fingerprinted m El Background NCIC and CCIC checked U El The liquor licensed premises is ready for occupancy and has been inspected by the Local Licensing Authority. 00 If 'no," the building will be completed and ready for inspection by (date) The foregoing application has been examined; and the premises, business to be conducted, and character of the applicant are satisfactory. We do report that such license, if granted, will meet the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, and willcomply withtheprovision of Ttle 12, Article 47, C.R.S. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Local Licemang Authorlly for. ~ TOWN, CITY 2 COUNTY Signature: Title: Date: Signature (attest): Title: Date: If premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk, if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerk to the board. If, by ordinance or otherwise, the local licensing authority Is some other official, then such approval should be given by such official. Page 4 of 4 INADmlg PUSLIBWING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 4:- .60.. J Administrative Committee 2 -,1-e January 25, 1993 - 122. Committee of the Whole: Mayor H. B. Dannels, Chairman Board of Trustees -iff. t-.l Attending: Mayor Dannels, All Trustees Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Ass't. Administrator Widmer, Town Attorney ,/.1 White, Department Heads Linnane, 9-4-- O'Connor, Scott, Stamey, Swain, and Vavra . 6- 99,Â· Absent: None 9..t: .4 Chairman Dannels called the meeting to order at 10:00 A.M. Rk .... CARRY-OVER RESOLUTION - APPROVAL. / AS, Financq Officer Vavra requested approval of a resolution reappropâ‚¬iating 1992 encumbered funds to ~e 1993 Budget, as -Wt 4 follows: ~ %,A Fund 1 Encumbrance Revised 1993 Budget ...1 4 / -$44% t. General Fund ~ $ 51,155 /~ $6,465,792 Museum 30Â« 161,637 Light & Power -L.1 72,Â»3 6,286,883 =â‚¬r- 637 Water ~~750 1,873,478 The Committee recommends approval of the resolution. Artâ€¢-* / 1 ::.4.4 FIRE PENSION STUDY ACTUARIAL STUDY -APPROVAL TO CONDUCT ACTUARIAL STUDY. The Fire Pens i,0A Board has recommended the + Town conduct an actuarial stu~Â¥ every two/three years to deterdinE if sufficient funds are available to pay retirement benefits to present volunteer fire fight/rs as well as those currently receiving bekeâ‚¬*ts. The most regeÂ¥,t study was performed in 1991 by William M. MerceE, Inc. S... The 1903 Budget contains $3,000 for a new study, and Willhm M. --4 4, Merget has submitted a proposal not-to-exceed $2,600. Ntle CoÂ»nittee recommends approval of the proposal submitted by WilliEâ€¢K~ )E Mercer, not-to-exceed $2,600. \%1 - I.t ELECTRIC/BARBED-WIRE FENCES - REOUEST TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 4 4 . . PROHIBITING SAME. 1 1 Lee Hartland has requested the Town prohibit electric, barbed-wire and razor wire fences. In Mr. Hartland's opinion, such fences have 0â‚¬W' .. . ..__ injuring humans and animals. In discussions with EVIA and others, 46 no place in any heavily populated area due to the possibility of , ,>'- Mr. Hartland received a consensus that the aforementioned fences should be prohibited. Administrator Klaphake reported that Mr. Hartland's concerns were conveyed to the Planning Commission and they have stated that such a regulation is not within the Commission's jurisdiction. Following discussion, the Committee , recommends the Town Attorney be authorized to prepare such an ordinance prohibiting the use of electric and barbed-wire fences, with research into appropriate exceptions. The Committee expressed their appreciation to Mr. Hartland in bringing this item to their attention. Â¥ .. - I :Ntâ€žN t" ... 4, ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 14.08.030 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, WITH REGARD TO ELECTRIC AND BARBED WIRE FENCES WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined that it is necessary to add Section 14.08.030 to the Municipal Code. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO. Section 1. Section 14.08.030 is hereby added to read as follows: 14.08.030 Electric and Barbed Wire Fences. A. No electrically charged fences shall be installed on any property within the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. B. No barbed wire, razor wire or other sharp-pointed fences shall be installed on any property within the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, except in the CO, CH and I-1 zones, subject to the following conditions: 1. The lowest strand of barbed wire is maintained at least six (6) feet above the adjoining ground level outside the fence. 2. No more than three strands of barbed wire shall be used. 3. Prior to construction of said fences, a permit must be obtained from the Building Inspector of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. C. Any electric fence existing within the Town of Estes Park, Colorado shall be removed on or before the 1st day of April, 1994. D. Any barbed wire, razor wire or other sharp pointed fence existing within the Town of Estes Park, Colorado which does not conform to Paragraph B above shall be removed on or before the 1st day of April, 1998. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. 4, PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO THIS DAY OF , 1993. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 1993, and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado on the day of , .1993. Town Clerk -2-