The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Utilities Committee 2004-05-13. 1 AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK UTILITIES COMMITTEE May 13, 2004, 8:00 a.m. Preparation date: 5/6/04 *Revision date: ACTION ITEMS 1. Request to Lease Windy Gap "Reuse" Water â€¢ Request from Continental Water Company 2. Cross Connection Control Program â€¢ Request to adopt by Ordinance and include in the Policy Manual 3. Water Shop Retaining Wall â€¢ Request to proceed 4. Habitat for Humanity Water Tap â€¢ Habitat request to waive fees REPORTS Light and Power 1. Light and Power Financial Data 2. Christmas Decorations Report Water 3. Water Department Financial Data 4. Fall River Tank Project 5. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) Snowpack Data 6. NCWCD CBT Quota 7. Water Department Projected Water Surplus - May 1St 8. Annual Water Quality Report - EPA/Town Note: The Utilities Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. VICK (E , AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK UTILITIES COMMITTEE May 13, 2004, 8:00 a.m. Preparation date: 5/6/04 *Revision date: ACTION ITEMS 1. Request to Lease Windy Gap "Reuse" Water â€¢ Request from Continental Water Company 2. Cross Connection Control Program â€¢ Request to adopt by Ordinance and include in the Policy Manual 3. Water Shop Retaining Wall â€¢ Request to proceed 4. Habitat for Humanity Water Tap â€¢ Habitat request to waive fees REPORTS Light and Power 1. Light and Power Financial Data 2. Christmas Decorations Report Water 3. Water Department Financial Data 4. Fall River Tank Project 5. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) Snowpack Data 6. NCWCD CBT Quota 7. Water Department Projected Water Surplus - May 1St 8. Annual Water Quality Report - EPA/Town Note: The Utilities Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. TOWN ofESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum May 11, 2004 TO: Utilities Committee 0*/ FROM: Bill Linnane SUBJECT: Request from Continental Water Company to Lease Windy Gap Water Town Attorney Greg White will attend the meeting to present the following request. Background: On behalf of a local group, Continental Water Company out of Loveland has contacted Greg White and requested to lease 1 A.F. ofWindy Gap water. The request is similar to Glacier View Subdivision's request to lease 1 A.F., providing a CBT unit to the Town in exchange, with the water to be used as augmentation for the existing property. The transaction would benefit the users ofboth Windy Gap and CBT water. Cost/Budget: Net effect: $0 Action: Staff recommends approval of the request. BL/lb 1-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum May 7,2004 TO: Utilities Committee 77 0 6Â»-/ FROM: Bob Goehring 4 ' and Bill Linnane L SUBJECT: Water Dept. Backflow Prevention Policy Background: In March 2003 I informed the Utilities Committee on published requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Colorado Department of Health regarding the necessity of having a Backflow Prevention Policy. Article 12 of the Colorado Primarv Drinkine Water Regulations requires that we have a policv to identify (inspect) any potentially hazardous service connections and then take action to protect our water supply form these potentially hazardous connections. In July of 2003 we hired Don Holbeck as our certified Backflow Prevention Specialist. Don and Jeff Boles, the Town's Water Superintendent, have worked on this to insure that our water system and customers are protected from potentially hazardous connections. Don will oversee the implementation of the proposed policy. The proposed policy is attached and needs to be adopted by ordinance. Cost/Budget: No additional costs at this time. Action: Staff recommends the proposed policy and its associated ordinance. BG/lb Attachments 2-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER DEPARTMENT CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM ORDINANCE DRAFT DOCUMENT SECTION 1 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL -GENERAL POLICY 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this ordinance is: 1.1.1 To protect the public potable water supply of the Town of Estes Park Water Department from the possibility of contamination or pollution by isolating or containing within the owner's internal distribution system(s) or the owner's private water system(s) such contaminants or pollutants that could backflow into the public water system. 1.1.2 To promote the elimination or control of existing cross connections, actual or potential, between the owner's in-plant/in-house potable water system(s) and nonpotable water systems, plumbing fixtures, and industrial piping systems. 1.1.3 To provide for the maintenance of a continuing program of cross-connection control that will systematically and effectively prevents the contamination or pollution of all potable water systems. 1.2 Responsibility The Town of Estes Park Water Department Superintendent shall be responsible for the protection of the public potable water distribution system from contamination or pollution due to the backflow of contaminants or pollutants through the water service connection. If, in the judgment of said Town of Estes Park Water Department Superintendent an approved backflow-prevention assembly is required (at the owner's water service connection; or, within the owner's private water system) for the safety of the water system, the Town of Estes Park Water Department Superintendent or his/her designated agent shall give notice in writing to said owner to install such an approved backflow-preven- tion assembly(s) at specific location(s) on his/her premises. The owner shall immediately install such approved assembly(s) at his/her own expense; and, failure, refusal, or inability on the part of the owner to install, have tested, and maintain said assembly(s) shall constitute grounds for discontinuing water service to the premises until such requirements have been satisfactorily met. 1.3 Authority THE AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT AND MAINTAIN A CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM IS CONTAINED IN THE FOLLOWING LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The Federal Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 ESTES CROSS CONN ORDINANCE 2-2 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER DEPARTMENT CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM ORDINANCE DRAFT DOCUMENT 2. Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) Section 25-1-114 and 25-1-114.1. 3. Colorado Primary Drinking Water Regulations (CPDWR) Article 12 Control of Hazardous Cross-Connections. 4. Colorado Cross Connection Control Manual, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, latest edition. 5. Town of Estes Park Municipal Code Chapter 13.24 Water Rules & Regulations Section 13.24.010 6. Adoption ofthis Town ofEstes Park Water Department Cross-Connection Control Program ordinance and related rules and regulations by the Town of Estes Park The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park may, upon recommendation by The Town of Estes Park Water Department Superintendent adopt by ordinance such supplemental rules and regulations as may be necessary to implement and administer the cross connection program. SECTION 2 DEFINITIONS 2.1 Definitions of terms used in this regulation are those contained in the Colorado Cross Connection Control Manual, Colorado Department of Health and Environment's latest edition unless otherwise defined as below: Approved Backnow Device - A backflow device or air gap meeting the standards and installation requirements of the A.S.S.E. (American Society of Sanitary Engineers), the latest edition of the Colorado Department of Health and Environment's Colorado Cross Connection Control Manual and/or the requirements of the Town of Estes Park Water Department. Approval by the Department will be dependant upon the hazard(s) assessed, but shall not be less than the Colorado Department ofHealth and Environment's Colorado Cross Connection Control Manual requirements for potable water system protection. "Approved" status shall also be contingent on inspection, testing and passing of such test by a Certified Cross Connection Control Technician. Any variation or exception may be by direction from the current edition of the Colorado Department of Health and Environment's Colorado Cross Connection Control Manual. Certified Cross Connection Control Technician - A person who has shown his/her competency, has passed and possesses a current certification for one or all of the following national certification council(s): American Society of Sanitary Engineers (A.S.S.E.), the American Backflow Association (A.B.P.A.), the American Boards of Certifications (A.B.C.) for backflow tester and repairer. Any variation or exception will be by direction from the current edition of the Colorado Department of Health and Environment's Colorado Cross Connection Control Manual. ESTES CROSS CONN ORDINANCE 5/11/2004 2-3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER DEPARTMENT CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM ORDINANCE DRAFT DOCUMENT Containment - The installation of an approved backflow device isolating the premises and all plumbing connections to the service connection therein from the public potable water supply. At the Departments discretion installation of the approved backflow device shall, at a minimum, be placed at or near the property line with all necessary equipment/enclosures to ensure uninterrupted service and meet all installation safety codes at the owner's expense. Cross Connection - A connection or potential connection between any part of a potable water system and any other environment containing other substances in a manner that, under any circumstances would allow such substances to enter the potable water system. Other substances may be gases, liquids, or solids, such as chemicals, waste products, steam, water from other sources (potable or nonpotable), or any matter that may change the color or add odor to the water. Department - The Town of Estes Park Water Department Service Connection - The terminal end of the water supplier service connection from the potable water distribution system to the threads on the corporation stop where the Town ofEstes Park Water Department loses jurisdiction and sanitary control and customer ownership begins. "Service connection" shall also include water service connection from a fire hydrant and all other temporary or emergency water service connections from the potable water system. SECTION 3 REQUIREMENTS 3.1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER DEPARTMENT 3.1.1 New Installations: The Department will provide on-site evaluation and/or plans review in order to determine type of backflow preventer, if any, that will be required as a condition of service. All new installations requiring a backflow device shall be inspected and tested by a Certified Cross Connection Control Technician. The Department does not waive the right to require a backflow device if future conditions require such. 3.1.2 Existing Installations: For installations (or premises without backflow device(s)) existing prior to the start of the Town of Estes Park Water Department Cross- Connection/Backflow Program implementation date the Department will perform on-site evaluations and/or plans reviews and inform the owner by letter of any corrective action deemed necessary, the method of correction, and the time allowed for correction as a condition of service. Up to 60 days will be allowed but may be shortened depending on the degree of hazard (pollutant or contaminant) involved. The Department does not waive the right to require a backflow device if future conditions require such. 3.1.3 Cross-Connection(s): The Department will not allow any cross-connection to remain unless it is protected by an approved backflow preventer that is tested at ESTES CROSS CONN ORDINANCE 5/11/2004 2-4 Â· TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER DEPARTMENT CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM ORDINANCE DRAFT DOCUMENT least annually by a Certified Cross Connection Control Technician using the latest test procedures as specified by one of the following councils (A.S.S.E., A.B.C., A.B.P.A), and is not a failed device. At the Departments discretion severing the service connection will be done if degree of hazard warrants such action in order to protect the public potable water supply. Discontinuance of service may be summary, immediate, and without written notice whenever, in the judgment of the Department, such action is necessary to protect the public potable water supply or the distribution system. At the Departments discretion backflow device testing shall occur as frequent as necessary depending on degree of hazard but not less than annually. 3.1.4 Failure to Comply: Ten calendar days after a first notice by letter or direct delivery of notice, the owner fails to comply with the Departments directive or fails to allow access to premises for inspection, immediate termination of service will be executed, or at the Departments discretion, allow no more than ten (10) days to comply with said directive. Failure to allow access by the owner (or those designated by him) to premises for inspection by the Department will automatically classify the premises as a high hazard risk to the public potable water supply and will be required to meet the backflow requirements as such by containment. 3.1.5 Record Keeping: The Town of Estes Park Water Department shall maintain records of all backflow device inspections and test results for a minimum ofthree (3) years. 3.2 OWNER 3.2.1 Cross- Connection(s): The owner shall be responsible for the elimination of or protection of all cross-connections (known or unknown by the Department) on his/her premises by an approved backflow device at his/her expense. Such backnow device expenses shall include installation, maintenance, protection, testing, repair, removal or replacement of said device(s) as required by the Department as a condition of service. 3.2.2 Backflow Device: The owner or those designated by him/her shall not bypass, disable, remove, or modify any backflow device without written consent by the Department. Any such modifications shall result in termination of service as described section 3.1.4. 3.2.3 All commercial accounts will have an approved backflow device installed, tested, and maintained at the owners expense for containment unless otherwise approved by the Department. 3.2.4 Fire Suppression System Design and Installation: The owner or those designated by him will comply with current N.F.P.A. standards and/or the current Water Department Policy Manual as Amended when designing, installing and maintaining any fire suppression system as a condition of service. 3.2.5 Failure to Comply: Ten calendar days after a first notice by letter or direct delivery of notice, the owner fails to comply with the Departments directive or ESTES CROSS CONN ORDINANCE 5/11/2004 2-5 . TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER DEPARTMENT CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM ORDINANCE DRAFT DOCUMENT fails to allow access to premises for inspection, immediate termination of service will be executed, or at the Departments discretion, allow no more than ten (10) days to comply with said directive. Failure to allow access by the owner (or those designated by him) to premises for inspection by the Department will automatically classify the premises as a high hazard risk to the public potable water supply and will be required to meet the backflow requirements as such by containment. Application to appeal shall be directed to the Public Works Director. The Application to Appeal process shall not stay the execution of the Failure to Comply order by the Department in order to protect the public potable water supply. The Failure to Comply order may be reversed if the appeal is upheld. 3.2.6 Testing/Reporting Requirements: It shall be the duty of the owner or those designated by him to have the air gap(s) or backflow device(s) on/in his/her premises tested and/or inspected by a Certified Cross Connection Control Technician using the latest test procedures as specified by one of the following councils (A.S.S.E., A.B.C., A.B.P.A) or as amended in the Colorado Department of Health and Environment's Colorado Cross Connection Control Manual, on a scheduled basis as required by the Department or at minimum, annually. It shall be the duty o f the owner or those designated by him to provide a copy or copies of test and/or repair results within 10 days of completion of said work to the Department. Failure to comply may result in actions described in section 3.2.5. The owner shall maintain copies of test results and/or repairs for a minimum of three (3) years. The foregoing ordinance was first read at the meeting of the (name ofgoverning body) of the (city, county, state, or province) of on the day of , 20 and adopted by the following called vote on motion of (o#icial). Ayes: No's: Abstaining: Absent: Approver (Official Title) ATTEST (Clerk or Secretary) ESTES CROSS CONN ORDINANCE 5/11/2004 2-6 IWInu TO: Bill Linnane From: Jeff Boles CC: Date: 4/15/2004 Re: May Utilities Committee Meeting, Bids for Retaining Wall at Water Shop Background: Utilities Committee approved Cornerstone Engineering Scope for Design and Construction Management of the retaining wall at the February Committee Meeting. Bids were not received in time for the April Committee Meeting as requested. Cost/Budget: 2004 Budget: $57,000.00 Bids Solicited and Received: Cornerstone Concrete, Inc. - $32,255.00 Mountain Concrete Construction, Inc. - No Bid Received Bryson Concrete Construction - No Bid Received Recommendation: Approval of bid received from Cornerstone Concrete, Inc. in the amount of $32,255.00. 1 3-1 CORNEASTONE Estes Park, CO 80517 437 South St. Vrain (970) 586-2458 Fax (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & ~(1 7~~ SURVEYING, INC. E-mall: ces@charter.net April 12, 2004 Mr. Jeff Boles Water Superintendent , Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Town of Estes Park Watershop Retaining Wall Dear Jeff: Please find enclosed the bid' results for the above noted project. The bid opening was held on Thursday, April 8,2004 at the office of Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES). Bids were received from only one contractor for the project. The results of the building contractor and bid amount is listed below: Contractor Bid Amount Cornerstone Concrete, Inc. $32,255.00 Unit price extensions to the bidder have been verified by CES. The initial engineer estimate for the work was $32,490. CES also solicited invitation's to bid to Mountain Concrete Construction, Inc. and Bryson Concrete Construction. Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. recommends awarding a construction contract to Cornerstone Concrete, Inc. for $32,255.00 for the construction of the retaining wall. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. ,/4/Za-- Michael S. Todd, PE Principal 3-2 0 88 g is- 8,/ is. i 890880 Â·41 42 Z 0 5% N 11 *8 64 Q g Wh 000 00 00 000.20Â© 00 4 g d N O 41 2 2 2 ug & a 0.) Al 64 64 9 ~ 5.8. Lfi M l.0. 00 0 R g Q â‚¬2 aaS 2 47 2 - 28Â§88.8.3~8. u> &4 44 - 6) 64 04* 09 64 te -8 9 g Â§ 8 2 -32 N p N 4%%*~ui~.8.~.zo JOO dj-i.j -1,- r N (9 ~r to O h Co C,~2 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE EXTENSION PRICE EXTENSION Mobilization $300.00 $300.00 $2,500,00 $2,500.00 Excavation 1,250.00 $3,000.00 Import Embankment $2,760.00 Structural Concrete 1,550.00 $14,400.00 CORNERSTONE CONCRETE, INC. ENGINEERS ESTIMATE 00.000'Â£$ 00*000' Bu!Pees 00'009'ES Sllog MOOM 00-992'ZES IleAA Buiu!,eleki d04S JeleAA 1V1O1 - 00Â£00 UO!1036 +0/9 WE WATER SHOP RETAINING WALL 2004 TOWN OF ESTES PARK eouad Jasekl pue eAOU.labl IealS Bu!010JU!08 10)luele uo! jualoal 1!06 (9 sse]O) es.Inoo eseg RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Utilities Committee - February 12, 2004 - Page 3 An intergovernmental agreement (similar to previous years) would be prepared by Town Attorney White and signed by all parties. The lease would be contingent upon available water supplies and made part of the agreement. Revenue from the lease would be $3,750 (75 a.f. at $50/foot). The Committee recommends approval of the EVRPD/School District request to lease 75 a.f. of Town-owned water rights at $50/a.f., as outlined above. Water Shop Retaining Wall Proiect - Approval Request Director Linnane reported that annual spring runoff causes embankment loss along the north property line at the Water Shop. Cornerstone Engineering submitted a Scope for Design and Construction Management at a cost of $5,132 for a concrete retaining wall project that will stabilize the existing embankment. The 2004 Budget includes $60,500 for this project ($3,500 for engineering and $57,000 for construction). Staff will return to Committee with construction bids at the April meeting. Due to the relatively small size of the project, a longer construction period of 90 days will be included in the specs; this may attract more bidders. The Committee recommends approval of the $5,132 Cornerstone Engineering Scope for Design and Construction Management of the retaining wall project as presented. Water System Vulnerabilitv Assessment Scope of Services - Approval Request Federal regulations mandate that all public water systems serving between 3,300 and 50,000 people complete a Vulnerability Assessment and develop an Emergency Response Plan by December 31, 2004. All aspects of the system, including computer system security and physical security of the water plants are to be evaluated. Cost summations were received from the following: Versar, Inc. Vulnerability Assessment $14,800 Emergency Response Plan $ 5,000 Total: $19,800 Pinkerton Consulting and Investigation Services Vulnerability Assessment & Emergency Response Plan $ 9,900 Total cost: $ 9,900 The 2004 Budget includes $25,000 for this project. Concluding all discussion regarding federal mandates and funding reimbursement, the Committee recommends approval to proceed with the Vulnerability Assessment and Emergency Response Plan from Pinkerton Consulting and Investigation Services at a cost of $9,900. 3-4 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum May 11, 2004 TO: Utilities Committee FROM: Bill Linnane 6/k/ SUBJECT: Habitat for Humanity Request for Single-Family Residential Tap Fee Waiver - Lot 4, Mangelsen Subdivision, 652 Halbach Lane Please see the attached letter of request. Background: Habitat for Humanity has requested a single-family residential water tap fee waiver for a yet-to-be completed new home at 652 Halbach Lane. The request is similar to the previous five requests Habitat for Humanity has made in the past 10 years. They will agree to repayment of the tap fee if the property is sold on the open market prior to the passage of 10 years. They also agree to comply with all Town ordinances, codes and other Town requirements. In additional, no commercial use of the property is permitted. Cost/Budget: Cost: Tap fee - $7,600 (single-family residential) Budget: Not budgeted; ifnecessary, the budget will be supplemented. Action: Staff recommends approval of the request. BL/lb Attachment 4-1 Habitat for Humanity of Estes Valley Building houses in partnership with God's people in need PO. Box 2745 â€¢ Estes Park, Colorado 80517 â€¢ (970) 586-8301 April 11, 2004 Bill Linnane, Director Public Works Department Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 4*#21<Â£~A -TIr fet \NAL, *A : 651 P,046%(4- LA - Dear Bill, In the very near future Habitat for Humanity of Estes Valley, Inc. will be applying for a building permit for affordable house number nine. Habitat is asking for the Department of Public Works to recommend granting a waiver of the cost of a water tap for this home. The requirements by the Town of Estes Park for this waiver will be stated in the mortgage papers. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. lA)24#LLL.. fi 0/02 C.*ke,1.1.--601 , Wendell Amos, President Habitat for Humanity of Estes Valley, Inc. TAr . 1~& Printed on Recycled Paper 4-2 Electric Financials.xls 5/11/2004 LIGHT AND POWER FUND 2003 VS. 2004 MONTH-TO-DATE CASH FLOW COMPARISON APRIL APRIL 2003 2004 Difference Revenues Utility Sales $ 614,281 $ 713,518 $ 99,237 Other 95,191 8,447 (86,744) Total Revenues $ 709,473 $ 721,965 $ 12,493 Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 314,475 $ 324,832 $ 10,357 Distribution and Maintenance 91,999 180,172 88,174 Customer Billing and Accounts 43,578 60,031 16,453 Administration and General 105,562 90,987 (14,574) Transfer to Vehicle Fund 2,617 4,240 1,624 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 558,230 $ 660,263 $ 102,033 Debt Service 24,917 25,170 254 Capital 94,446 15 (94,431) Transfers to General Fund and Museum 59,573 72,322 12,749 Total Expenditures $ 737,165 $ 757,770 $ 20,605 Total Surplus (Deficiency) $ (27,692) $ (35,805) $ (8,112) Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. R L&P 1 Electric Financials.xls 5/11/2004 LIGHT AND POWER FUND 2003 VS. 2004 YEAR-TO-DATE CASH FLOW COMPARISON YTD YTD April April 2003 2004 Difference Revenues Utility Sales $ 2,762,862 $ 3,064,074 $ 301,212 Other 148,809 75,902 (72,907) Total Revenues $ 2,911,672 $ 3,139,977 $ 228,305 Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 1,404,778 $ 1,520,769 $ 115,991 Distribution and Maintenance 372,804 477,077 104,273 Customer Billing and Accounts 213,651 232,568 18,916 Administration and General 352,610 366,096 13,486 Transfer to Vehicle Fund 10,467 16,961 6,494 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 2,354,310 $ 2,613,471 I $ 259,161 Debt Service 99,667 100,682 1,015 Capital 221,888 36,111 (185,777) Transfers to General Fund and Museum 238,291 289,288 $ 50,997 Total Expenditures $ 2,914,155 $3,039,551 $ 125,396 Total Surplus (Deficiency) $ (2,483) $ 100,426 $ 102,909 Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. R L&P 2 Electric Financials.xls 5/11/2004 LIGHT AND POWER FUND 2004 TOTAL BUDGET VS. ACTUAL YTD CASH FLOW ANALYSIS YTD Budget April YTD % of Target 2004 2004 Budget % Revenues Utility Sales $ 8,868,949 $ 3,064,074 35% 36% Other 391,835 75,902 19% 33% Total Revenues $ 9,260,784 $ 3,139,977 34% 36% Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 4,440,000 $ 1,520,769 34% 35% Distribution and Maintenance 1,580,649 477,077 30% 33% Customer Billing and Accounts 713,137 232,568 33% 33% Administration and General 1,206,092 366,096 30% 33% Transfer to Vehicle Fund 50,883 16,961 33% 33% Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 7,990,761 $ 2,613,471 33% 33% Debt Service 302,045 100,682 33% 33% Transfers to General Fund and Museum 867,863 289,288 33% 33% Capital 735,254 36,111 5% 33% Total expenditures $ 9,895,923 $ 3,039,551 31% 33% Note 1) Charge for Services and Source of Supply target % based on historical data. R L&P 3 4 .1. 9 1 44 4 . 4. . * . A. 4 . 4 - 1 4 0 . M 4 1,%44/ --~ -â‚¬% 4 e - . 21 :â€žt L / + 1:'46*: 1~~ ., 'Fl j #t i k , ..â‚¬4 + 2 *4 f. i. 4% 0, i 1 0 - 0 , I Â¥ I f IF 11 k * w . 1 hr 1. . .4 . I ve ' 1 *0 6, 1. ~ r . I. -4 14. 2 - 1. 4 . . a '4, 4.> Â¢ $ V , Â· 7/' Â· , . 42 , j 4, t- - 1; W Z .*lit 9 + . .... i 1 + I . 0 64 . ... E + 1 /1 4, , - 0,>,7, O. Â¢ 1 1 I. ./ 4, â€¢ '6â€¢ % J r I I. T : 4 1 04 6. ./ ./ '- I 4 abk, I 1 L. ~')404#Act i . 4.1 Pr).11 .bi,y .1 'd. 2 14 # .....D . b , . i& T \41.,4 1. 1 4, i , ts 4 I -- 1 1 0 9% 41,- â€¢ 4.,ct . I & i . 4 + I L 1 ~ 14. , 0=- DO . 1 . i .3 - â‚¬ 1 0 ./ I Z 4 " 1 * . . 4 - 3Â£< ,/ i, - 4 ..6 1 , 0 4.. I I :41Â¢/. 4 * 1 1 030 +I , , . 0.02 Â¥ 't 4*. * I. Ill LU i 4 ..3 14\. 0 3 4 4 4 *10@'. T-k r . u, O, *7,4' Â·1 12 r ILL- CL -1. .. * .- O'Lu 1 $*t Â·4 . Â· 1 4 g g Â§Â¥ C - 21 ~ t 4: ': 0 I I I. 16.1 64=:, ic . Z 99 L ' (N N CNI . -1 .BE % I 14 0 0. . 1- or I I 1 41 1 I. *, 0 -1 1 49. 6 - V ,0 1 . . 4. , r . e : 1 & . * 4 . 1 4 . I ,% . t * 14 + i,~ ~ ~1 J.>4 , . 4 - r .4 4 f\ . I -* 6 99 1 /1 .r ,-4- 7 .Cl ., It- 41 ir : - i ., 9 '.1 1 1.* & 441 14 t ..,4 P t. .2. 7 4 01 1 4 t. I . ,.. V 4- ' < I - ' 5.-1. I & B . 0 i 1 . . i . :.hi . . . 4 . 1 7, r % p ' %* 1 4 ' 1 UL 4. t I X 1 I 1, t , ' I-#. ta .4 ' 00â€¢ . b. â€¢c . 40 6 1 1 ,# m ' > 4 Ir. 'I ./ i 0 t .0 O . cr 0. 0 0 0. O 0 1,0 0 0 0 04 - O 00 14 , 0, 4-4 Â¢ M 01 r- â€¢ Â¥ 4. 0' . 1 MAWalsAS L $. I 4 Â¥* 1 .'. e 'e i . 1 1 1. . 4 ,. 1 K. Loadh99.xls 5/7/2004 4 des 9-d91 N 26000 - 24000 -- * STS*%8*s*$*%$4%%8*$$98%**%*%8%*%4%6**4*= 3 Ii>i 1 ,:.':'t,Jmpâ€ž~--- I tr...#1~illili/ililillilli*N***SRRitk~EMM"MM/*MM:*M:*M ~ *FL<~/All-.Id 1 1 1*7*****8%*Â§*MS**Â§69*$Â§=~ f ' _ 441lmylAilililll .1 r37,1////////////////////// k%*83*%8333*Â§8**66$8*$83***3*38%8**$$8Â§***SMSRNS** 1 1 ' 1*888888888888888888888888888888$88$888888888888888888888888888888888888* ' 1*r**s*rss*Edmr#vSS**RB*%%***8%8**8*8**%6* 2- M88%8*8888888888*888888888888888888*98*8%%**%88$8888*8*8* 1*i*%$%8%8%8%8*%*%8***S*S*%*%***Â§*Â§8*%8*9****Â§ 1 *88*)989888(trite":ish>J.Q.Q.ji'>**833@~r~*rr*T***~~~te 17*3%*11 Â·q*$*6*****Â§*se**XV**&*Â§8*99SX \2 E 1 1/MI'lli- 1 1 Â£~Â§Â§*Â»sk*$44~ .04/~lil#,I/*%**Â§**C'*%98*** g 0 Alf.0.&.ReÂ» 2,40"llilli HAAW *14;uoW Loadh99.xls 5/7/2004 02002 Â£001 0 fooz m MONTHLY ENERGY PURCHASES Z-d91 hi XeIN Jel/\1 12000 - 10000 - 8000- - 3 --0009 000* ,# 4 *- 0001 -r . , 4 . 388. ' . 1, + 1 *% 1 74. 4 6 /0 CD CD * . . 0, CV CV W / .0 + 16 - . 00 8-9 2 - 1 9 1 . ..Ne:. /1 1 4 7 - , f t****8**4*8*****ai****Us$$933**Â·2 4 - *4 0 $ I . I ... 4,32 . ir 1 , A ./ - Â¥ %4 9 * L.* I k 7. . ~ ~8**%8%68****%****3*%*8**%8*%***%*8****SRRÂ§ ?74@ ' t. . . S k 4 TÂ» Â·t~ *# 4 , j , Â·r 4 ?.4 % 4 ...7 1 I. 1 K . I ./#/8.7....ir##0#r#00...ill...T~'.~i.'.~01.......4.4./.~0~~i'.0.2;00/7~6*00#0~li#.00/* ;824 Â· 1 /4 12 ' . - f . 4 1 - I. ' 4 - ...# I I '444 . I *T t. F 44 4 1. 4 1. â€¢ 01 t...r , , I. U I .1 4 A ' ' Okkt....4.~#,li.,0,8%88*888iMS*%8%8**3*:*r.,1.~likk -:3: J At .: A- . ,.4 1 , .36 , 04 4 . t . 4 0 1 '4 M . 1, r.,9 :* , 9> #t> ' 1 , . Al 414 # 4 , - I %. â€¢ " I*%85***96*%8%6%8*8*%*38***$9**89 4 1 94 - 4 : ./ * . 6 0% -r A 1: - l H 02 tAi 4 0 - Tr ~ 6 4~ r #8%*FAVAS*Ar$*&3~WEEE*&94*YAWAWAYFi ~ I .+4 i 04 >4 ; . 6.'* I %4 * ... 4 *1 . 14 F ELI 05 1 . 04 r ... 4 ' - 1" . CIr. 1 /2 , . I 2*'ll *.' . 4 - 81â€¢1 J.t L 1 a. 0 CD â€¢ .i ,<. 1 , ~ N v 1 r. p . /.3 , r. ./. /6.0r . T '1 1â€¢ > I ./ .' dty k .M *< * tr~ . R : 41â€¢ O , $ I illixilij - 4,% 6. 1 * 1 e 0 1. i,1111111111111 -1-1-~ -4 CO 0 4 1 .N + 1*N N:**S$99*99$96 45 ./ a 6 . /. 4 2 //4 1 . . 4 . 4,- . I Â¥ I I . ... 1% /4 - . ./ > Ik . , .' fÂ·.-Â·-.---- 4 1 . -mtiffswlsfm I * . D I : 0 94 6 r. . Llit . g - 87 1 r I f - 4, 414 '. IL . .. 1 . Pr,1 4 4 Â»,ek y. . 1, 1 1.1 r . tro ., O 1. 0, 4 0 i. R# 4 t O 0 -' . , 0 2 8 0, 0 0 0 0 o CON W M ... 4 f. .9 pese431nd HAAIN a-LA A . . 1% + 1 - O I . 1 6 10#. 1 4 -2 - - . I. r - ./.-2 - 9- Loadh99.xls 5/7/2004 8-d91 hi 4uer * . 12000 --4 . , I . t N (9 91.- . 11 + . .. 000. .:* e , '92 1,9 -4. 0 0 9 4.i, ** .4 4. 0,4 '2 â€¢ ' I * liN . N (31 .1 . 1 r , . 2 8.0 .i b ":,4.~-le * 2.1 4 - 4 /4 li I I 4 34 + 1 1/ . 1 "0 0, & 1 r 42 ./r F.AN#'~71*W"a-Q'Q'ROA'00@ ~ 5 *41 - 4 . 1 , - 4, -5 6 1 .. .r. 4 1. - r. 2,000.~.-1,5 , Z .. $ 6 1%* ./ t. ta Â¥ b. I I .. 4 I 4 . 3% - , A Â·M,WAS<*AW,/*TATTO#*mi,ggiQM,amiwmidE+NAg: &>4 1. . ..3 4 4 6 : i . 4 1 - w ? 1.. . 1. 1 3 01 1. , -4,9 4 4 4. Ii. I I a. 4% . ; 41'. 4 , ... I. 1 ./ lib . 5 , iff '!It' 1 Z -2 .4. < 6 .t : : * L .. 7 + -,1; :,pi . ' '94 T , . * I F 4 . , 4 . 0.1 , , 4,4 1 4 + '.% . al Â¥ 4 -- -F - 4 ... 7, * r , .: h >%2 F I ..4 + 2 i'PO, . P'*,9~..'e' g 8,. 1 ... * 4Â· m,Im C . 4 . 4, r ./ttl 9 I 1!! .00 * t . I r 73 / ~ . , > * 4 -A. , 1 4 , r Â·Â» fit* Â·Â·f: C. 4 - A 1 C . :17 N22%44,@â€¢â€ž494-,R514**4-8*VAA#240@6;:22Â»m 4 LU p Uf ' b. 4L 4 0 1 - 9 - e Z ' & e. ' .% Â· , A ~ a 1,air fiff<<494<.92Â«44,<9,9;4md~ 'Ag , ti I. 1,4 1 -lt I k * * - 1-"Â· i, -- ht I . , . 14 4 - ..2 . 4 . 4. , f 4 1*Ng@..1000*02*il,*2/79*Al,21* 2. I ' 4 f * ' 0 - 4-0. & 0*' te : " 1.'.Â¥,K , . .P.. 4 441, . I 4 , 7 4 t..................+ +..++.++...+ 1 01 Â·*48: 4 I ./ .1 * # . . b -M. 4 1. m . r- t. L 1*f ... 1 5 - ~ *14;%24,/24,&%/MARAPP+W,ra@Og,Ng,@IariggrirdrAA @.; ..1 ' *C t , 4 1 1 4 12 , 4 't 1% .0 4 + .,2 " -1 C 1 -1 -1 77999999947474 'F t 1- . 1 I I 4 . Â£ - ./ .1. 4, . 1 /1 64 1. *11% t. . 0 f . 66. * . O 256 Â¢ 8 0 1 %1 0 1 â‚¬ $ 0-/. O, .4 di 0 . CR q . ... Ek O. 2. b o bÂ¢t (S) Silvs A1H1NOVU 1, . 1, I - PA. D . . . D .Al / . 1Â¢ I' Â® * . + . 0, r , 4 , SALEHIST.XLS 5/7/2004 ECTRIC SALE ONTH 6-691 M â€¢ leIN 900,00 ' -'boo'009 -/ , 1 14 t.,1 . 4 4 . 4.. . , 1, . I. * T'..f. . /. 4 .8 4 ' ..T , N CO , 1 m. 4 t ~* 0 0 0. 71 fit 00 . - t. h %,1 1 1, : I ., 3 . â€¢ 1 798 K. 84 , , diÂ»<%<%060Â©09Â·Â«NxÂ·Â« ' |_1. 8-'2@* 41> Yx'*/QtpATY 2. N Â· .1 % t41 F n I <1 4 N . I .. 41 . 2 k i 1 43 1 4 7- ' 4% ./ i . IxtiÂ«prÂ»\444\Â»Pr\NNY'N\'PENY'NENÂ»# 8 ' 41 42 . I .. . .4 * 4 - A + 4. , I . ~94Â©Â·AvvvÂ«xvÂ«VÂ»Â«Â»rÂ«VV~Â«%rhfvx"'rÂ·6 9 CCU I ./ 2,/1 4'' 4 I * 1 4. 'E 1 4 b 4 - t -4 -' 1 . I g-50 ; 0 M 4 2* -4 ,1 r . n re. 41 V.. , r J,lh, 1 4 /' I : e I. , '.4 4 I 1, 1 - P I 4 : , 4 1. |** L 4 ~ 4 * p . ' .1 .. 40 * 4 1 + I 4 Â· '4 4 '46 I 1 % 1 1 ke .Â»1 7. 4 9 4 + Art - ' Â·Â¥kÂ»tr~Frd<1,<P#..<Vt,<Cri,<c J *,1= *02.M * I -0 1 4 , h .1 , . -1 - 1 U.10 r-1, *1,0 , 16 L , 44.- - 4 4 1 */ I 9.- . I 0 Â» 05 ' Ull .1 (0 ''.4 11 - 1 U,i , OR. + O. 1 htlxÂ»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»~ 4, . . # Z A . i.* b .. . . Â¥ . .' K " <Nk*xkvÂ« rk <fr4<FY W.* .4 - .5 - 1 0 #- P .Al ' t, . â‚¬ 0% + w ~rI., I 'r 91- 09 A '1 a L .4 f * it % Â§ ,Â· IwwriesÂ·eeeed-,49-#7 0 i i, C p 4 # 4 5 M . I - 94 + 16.144 d I Ilâ„¢ 6.,1 * - *2 $ *00*0*00 . ...lei .6 .5 . . â€¢ 1 1 N>\466006Â©4 4 11 141 1â€¢ I /. I l . 1, h. 6 * ' 9. L ' I â‚¬ 1 4 â€¢IA LLE <dU t A 71. 1 , +i 1, 4, ..1 r 0% A .ZÂ»N'â‚¬'...06 4, . 1 .1! 4. ./ 4 4 4 7 .1 4 j>j r 1 14 li. 'p, 7 'tt~ 6 .9 ...,91.rÂ·,f Ji 1 rs i.f...~* 4. I I + 4 4: , & 4 1 1.1 - 0'.10 8,. 8 - 0 h e 0 5.N .6 -. \33- . * 61 6 4 , le. â€¢,6 .Â» 4 Â¥, r ' - b , 0 0 O 0 2,$ 0 + O,- co â€¢ Â«5 ed#' . I W 4 24 7 r â€¢A 4 . 16 . . ($) Â§3]VS 31Â¥a 01 hIVEA, .0 . 4Â¢ . + r 're M $ 4 1, . , P SALEHIST.XLS 5/7/2004 , $!.,6 4 desr , Je'Al. $ Flad' OL-d91 hi AYEAR TO DATE-ELE ,000,000 - 000'000'9 0 1,000,000 1 Â¥2 0,000&000 1 :*900'000'z 06'000'* 0'000'Z 5/7/2004 2004 Year-to-Date - ~ , Electric Revenues Vs BudgetÂ» . . I . 4 4 Â¢ @ . I V , 10,000,000 7 14. . I 4- 1 9 4 â€¢ I %000,000 . ... r - r ... o + 1/ 6,000,000 Budget --- . . 4.- - 4 -- 4 Â· 4,000,900 - - _ _ - _ __ ic I Actual ' . 1.. , A .... 2,000,000 + Â· -lf 1- - - ---=1 - 11, 1 Â¥ .. *. t . 0. C . .i '4 1 1 1 1 1-1 1 1 1 6- 6- A c '8 > w a.' 5 > O * Â· : ' 1 6 2004 Yeat-to-Date $ e , PRPA Invoices vs: Budget re . -S . I 5,000,000 A A ..4 44 4 4 4 4, , I 1. . 4 4,000,000 .1 0 . -â€¢- P -2 -9 g !4* i ' , le. Il 3,000,000 - 7 - 0 Budget I .4 - 2,000,000 - , , , 4 - I Actual 1 Â¥ I. :le , ~'. r. 1,000,000 11 1 - 11. -------- 1 .4 4* 1 .4 , 2> . 0 ig th ' 5: lit 5 / 4, 9: e ' t3 ' g: 2 .*j r 1 2 2 < S - *' < 0 0 Z .1 1.-1 ' I I R L&P-11 Water Financials.xls 5/11/2004 WATER FUND 2003 VS. 2004 MONTH-TO-DATE CASH FLOW COMPARISON APRIL APRIL 2003 2004 Difference Revenues Water Sales $ 99,238 $ 149,646 $ 50,408 Plant Development Tap Fees 28,358 37,084 8,726 Water Rights Tap Fees 36,580 90,680 54,100 Other 9,087 7,116 (1,971) Total Revenues $ 173,263 $ 284,526 $ 111,264 Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ - $ -$ - Purification 43,873 46,622 2,748 Distribution and Maintenance 67,376 56,974 (10,402) Customer Billing and Accounts 17,841 11,006 (6,835) Administration and General 62,099 43,796 (18,303) Transfer to Vehicle Fund 396 1,167 771 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 191,585 $ 159,565 $ (32,020) Debt Service 25,348 24,492 (857) Capital 363,327 22,074 (341,252) Transfer to General Fund 6,199 6,199 Total Expenditures $ 580,260 $ 212,329 $ (367,930) Monthly Surplus (Deficiency) $ (406,997) $ 72,197 $ 479,194 Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. RW1 Water Financials.xls 5/11/2004 WATER FUND 2003 VS. 2004 YEAR-TO-DATE CASH FLOW COMPARISON YTD YTD April April 2003 2004 Difference Revenues Water Sales $ 509,938 $ 570,659 $ 60,721 Plant Development Tap Fees 118,241 54,254 (63,987) Water Rights Tap Fees 135,805 139,500 3,695 Other 60,349 24,084 (36,264) Total Revenues $ 824,332 $ 788,497 $ (35,835) Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 75,619 $ 98,057 $ 22,438 PuMfication 141,141 140,280 (861) Distribution and Maintenance 172,744 170,033 (2,711) Customer Billing and Accounts 40,559 58,149 17,590 Administration and General 235,541 203,095 (32,446) Transfer to Vehicle Fund 1,583 4,667 3,083 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 667,187 $ 674,281 $ 7,093 Debt Service 101,392 97,966 (3,426) Capital 622,587 39,739 (582,848) Transfer to General Fund 24,796 24,796 Total Expenditures $ 1,391,166 $ 836,781 $ (554,385) Annual Surplus (Deficiency) $ (566,834) $ (48,284) $ 518,550 Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. RW2 Water Financials.xls 5/11/2004 WATER FUND 2004 TOTAL BUDGET VS. ACTUAL YTD CASH FLOW ANALYSIS YTD Budget April YTD % of Target 2004 2004 Budget % Revenues Water Sales $ 2,047,000 $ 570,659 28% 25% Plant Development Tap Fees 200,000 54,254 27% 25% Water Rights Tap Fees 300,000 139,500 47% 25% Other 100,842 24,084 24% 25% Total Revenues $ 2,647,842 $ 788,497 30% 25% Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 130,000 $ 98,057 75% 90% Purification 411,825 140,280 34% 33% Distribution and Maintenance 499,592 170,033 34% 33% Customer Billing and Accounts 219,647 58,149 26% 33% Administration and General 640,874 203,095 32% 33% Transfer to Vehicle Fund 14,000 4,667 33% 33% Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 1,915,938 $ 674,281 . 35% 33% Debt Service 293,898 97,966 33% 33% Capital 1,166,020 39,739 3% 33% Transfer to General Fund 74,387 24,796 33% 33% Total Expenditures $ 3,450,243 $ 836,781 24% 33% Note 1) Charge for Services target based on previous years data. Note 2) Source of Supply target based on previous years NCWCD invoices. Note 3) All other targets based on % of Year complete. RW3 4 r N.,1,11111,1,011#181'. ' 4 :% li I. + 70...................... I , * 1 N "111,1,1,1,11,1,1,1,1,1,#,O ' 5 to I \111111'll'll,11,1,1,11*11,11*111*111. 'Al." 19 y .4 ... 7 1. ' 9." 5 1 ..1 . , 6 + . r â€¢ 4 4 e 14 ./ 4 0, 4, I * , 91 , 4 1 4 1 + ' . . ' 2 . + - *!110,1,0111110,1,10,1,11101,6 '1 1 ~ . . 1 ,/ 4 s. b ./ - ..:. /.19 % I I I e 1 .a f . . Â©NeeÂ«NeeÂ»Â»Â»Â»Ne . 4 1 â€¢r - */Ti//02'X'Z/"*XÂ«4Â»*N * 41 ./ 1 r 9% 1 1 I I. 9- hÂ»00.Â»Â»Nee#'i Â»Â»Â»20 ~. 70/1,5,1,1,1,11'lillia NN~~*N<Â»XÂ»XÂ©Â©4Â»Â»000Â¢ , .N/#ff#ffill//1/#/1/1* 1 * 0 Sales.xls 5/7/2004 Â¤2002 â‚¬0010 000'09L f001 0 ' 000 AON WO des 6nv Inf unr XeIN Jdv Jeni qed uer '40 @. Water Sales by Month 9Mhl 300,000 250,000 200,000 - 000'001. - - - 000'09 + I 0 1 4.%' 1- ' . k E- 4 ' U, M i f 1 11\\ u'll"ll,/'ll,/ill"ill"Ill/"ll,I,\ , 1 .1 YA '04- 1 4- 1 1 *J/l#0#illill#lill##lillililliUUA , â‚¬ 14 4 r b 4 VJ/*111~#~1*111***1555*5***11#* 1 1 . I. 4 - 'f . , kÂ¥ 7 ' 'I ' I I. 5 90/111*illififill/*14 1 I D , 1. R:.1 . . k W I d ..be ./ 1 / ..?,1 ent) 4 - OOOU O 0 0 J-: >09Â»Â»Â»2Â« b . ..1, . 38 U.,@OBI hee , 9,0,",2,0. 00 N EN < 1 / 1 h n ,/ I I a - ' 1 4Â¥Â« ./ . . 1 , '0, #i # , i , I 1 , 12 â€¢ e bil", 6 T~ e . ..2 1- *16 /1 . . : I . L. 4 4 *.1 . I ... 1 0 0 0 O oe Cl AON 100 aeS DnV Inf unr Ael/\1 lei/\1 qe=1 uer ;#5% 14.. I 43â€¢ , 1 11//1/11/1/1/11/1/1/11/1/1/1/11/1//1/1//:arj 2. 4 1,1 . 11,1/1/1//1/1/1/1/1/1/1//1//1//11/1/1/1'NJN P + 1. e . 4. I 1, 1 L 4 . 24 . .4 11 > ILl \,11/11/1/1/11/1/1/11|111|1111|11"' PO . 0 4 â€¢ , A ' 6 B . 1. B t > ..Al 4. â€¢ I , .Â» Ullillillillillillillillillill. des 1 ., .' v - t. -- I , - ./ 4 . ./ . . it . Â· , Sng *r. 141, ' 9<#tititic//tilliti//jitifil * - .1-I- - . 1, ... - 'l!llllllllllilllllll* 4 ' f- i. 10-7 - . 44 4, unr ., 111':, * 1 3"lllllllllllll* 1,9 1 : .1 1 r I Â· .4 - I . , k P .1 Xe'Al : , W; 7 5555%45995>55 I. . 4 f" f L V./.,/,1,2 4 1. C. 4 " S 9. 4 L , ' 4 , 4, 1. I 54*545* JeW . I /' - 1> . V,", e a 9 - . 'If /:57 M :'. I ih I . . 179 uer I ./ 0 B Bud et Â¤Actu~al YTD Water Sales Vs Budget 2 AAM 2,500,000 . --, 2,000,000 1,500,000 000'000' L 000'009 Snowpack and Streamflow Comparisons W~$-api,~h=-- May 1st, 2004 - Snow Water Content % of Average Colorado's Statewide Snowpack 1 70% Upper Colorado River (1) 50% South Platte Tributaries (2) 67% Snow-Water Content Comparisons (inches) May 1st, 2004 May 1 Comparative Snow-Water Content Snow-Water Content Watershed 2004 Average 1 % Avg 2003 2002 2001 2000 Blue River 8.4 12.9 65% 16.0 4.0 10.7 11.8 Upper Colorado River 3.7 11.2 33% 12.6 2.3 5.9 8.4 Willow Creek 3.8 7.1 54% 11.2 2.0 5.3 7.9 Fraser River 5.8 11.9 49% 15.5 3.1 10.4 11.4 Poudre River 7.7 13.1 59% 14.9 5.6 9.5 11.8 Big Thompson River 10.7 14.9 72% 16.4 5.3 11.1 12.9 St. Vrain River 7.1 9.7 73% 11.2 2.2 6.0 9.5 Boulder Creek 77 11.5 67% 14.3 1.5 7.3 6.6 i #S# I. Aer-Jul Maximum. Minimum and Most Probable Streamflow Forecasts (1000 afl Forecast Most Forecast Apr-Jul Most Prob Watershed Minimum Probable Maximum Average % Average Blue River 177 200 223 275 73% Upper Colorado River 104 120 136 220 55% Willow Creek 25 30 35 48 62% Fraser River 62 71 80 113 63% Poudre River 95 120 145 227 53% Big Thompson River 60 70 80 94 75% St. Vrain River 51 61 71 91 67% Boulder Creek 28 33 38 51 65% |South Platte Tributaries 1 234 1 284 | 334 1 463 ~ Precipitation Totals Average 1 % Average April 1.55 0% , November-April 2.70 0% (1) Includes the Colorado, Willow Creek, Fraser and Blue River Watersheds (2) Includes the Poudre, Big Thompson, Saint Vrain and Boulder Creek Watersheds http://www. ncwcd.org/data&reports/snowpack/snowpack. pdf R W-5 r *L ~ Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District 220 Water Avenue â€¢ Berthoud, CO 80513 â€¢ 970-532-7700 â€¢ fax 970-532-0942 April 9,2004 NOTICE TO ALLOTTEES AND CARRIER DITCH COMPANIES Enclosed is the first supplemental quota certification list for all Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District water allottees. By action of the Board of_Directors on April 9,2004, the Colorado-Big Thompson Project 2004 quota has been increased from 50 to 60 percent. This makes an additional 31,000 acre- feet of Colorado-Big Thompson Project water available for use. In making this determination, the Board has taken into consideration the existing storage reserves within the Colorado-Big Thompson Project available for delivery. The Board, however, strongly encourages all water users to be prudent in the beneficial use of all available water supplies, including this additional Project water. The Board of Directors will continue to monitor the water supply outlook and conditions. Future Board consideration of making additional Project water available to allottees will be le A dependent on water supply availability, input from allottees, and other pertinent factors that affect the appropriate and prudent management and administration of Colorado-Big Thompson Project water supplies. It should be noted that, unless project water supply conditions change appreciably, it is unlikely the Board of Directors will increase the 60 percent quota, declared April 9 during the remainder of the 2004 water year. ~443. 0_51~ ERIC W. WILKINSON, GENERAL MANAGER nk Enclosure R W-6 Al CIALLLI 2004 I.Â». Projected Water Rights Surplus (A.Ft.) Â£11 0 m Ml fil actual projected projected projected projected water rights water rights water rights water rights water rights owned available use (3) lease surplus (A.Ft.) (A.Ft.) (A.Ft.) (A.R.) (A.Ft.) (C2-C3-C4=C5) USA 500 500 500 0 0 WG 300 300 (1) 121 0 10 (5) 169 CBT 1207 @ 60%= 724 (6) 200 75 (4) 449 TOTAL 1524 821 85 618 Note 1: Ordered 300 of 300 Town owned Windy Gap Units Note 2: Projected use of WG = Glacier Creek projected use (1106 af) multiplied by the Aug Plan depletetion factor (0.15) = 132 af Note 3: Projected 2004 use is based on conservatively high water use in 2002 plus 5% =Glacier Creek 1106 al+ USA500+CBT200=1806 af Adjusted by April YTD actual use. Note 4: Rec/School Districts Lease 75 AF Note 5: Glacier View 1 AF MacGregor Mountain Lodge 1 AF Continental Water Bank 8 AF 85AF Note 6: Quota increased from 50% to 60% at the NCWCD Meeting in April 2004 Projected Water Use With Actual Up To Date Monthly Use Estimate L_ Estimate Estimate Depletion Depleted | USA WG CBT CBT Actual Actual factor Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Marys Glacier Glacier Glacier (Replacement) (Carryover) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) 2003 Oct 0.08 0 . Nov 0 87 0.06 5 2 0 0 0 Dec 87 1 0.06 0 61 26 0 0 2004 Jan 88 0 0.06 0 88 0 0 0 - Feb 87 0 0.06 0 87 0 0 0 March 98 0 0.06 0 98 0 0 0 April 92 0 0.07 0 92 0 0 0 May 73 54 0.12 6 45 25 0 June 60 67 0.17 11 27 25 20 July 63 184 0.13 24 0 25 55 Aug 60 190 0.11 21 0 15 55 Sept 60 150 0.1 15 0 5 40 Oct 0 121 0.08 10 0 30 TOTAL 769 853 93 500 121 200 0