Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Utilities Committee 2003-06-12
, 1 AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK UTILITIES COMMITTEE June 12, 2003 8:00 A.M. Preparation date: 6/6/03 *Revision date: ACTION ITEMS Light and Power Department 1. 2003 Christmas Decoration Installation - Request approval of bid 2. Community Programming Channel 39 - Request to terminate RFP Process 3. Citizen Request to Underground Electric Service at Town expense -Request by George and Dorothy Gibbs, owners of Lots 12, 13 Stanley Heights Subd. Water Department No action items REPORTS Refer to the Reports Summary Memo at the beginning of the Reports Section of the Packet. The Summary follows the same order as the agenda. Light and Power Department • Monthly Financial Report • Black & Veatch Financial Plan update • 3Com Corporation grant application • Platte River Power Authority • Vehicle Replacement Policy • Misc. projects update Water Department • Monthly Financial Report • Black & Veatch Water Rate Study update • Misc. projects update Note: The Utilities Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum June 10, 2003 TO: Utilities Committee FROM: Bill Linnane ~~ SUBJECT: 2003 Christmas Decoration Project Background: The following sections are issues relating to this project A. Project bid The annual Christmas Decoration Project includes: 1) Setting up and taking down the Christmas figure displays. 2) Installing and removing the downtown"twinkle" lights. 3) Installing and removing the metal rebar pine tree decorations with lights along the highways. (Background - Continued on Page 2) Cos¢Budget Budget $57,750 Cost $52,500 Estes Valley Home and Garden Center base bid 15,000 Material $67,500 Total Excess: $9,750 to be funded from the capital account for vehicles (the backhoe and jackhammer were $40,000 under budget). Action: Staff recommends awarding the base bid of $52,500 to Estes Valley Home and Garden Center and using the vehicle capital account to fund the extra costs of the project as outlined above. 1-1 (Background - Continued./Pom Page 1) 4) .Installing and removing the multi-colored lights in the large pine trees in Bond Park. 5) Maintenance associated with wind and other elements from November through the middle of February. The project was bid in April and bids were reviewed on May 7th. We asked for an optional price to install and maintain the twinkle lights on a year-round basis. We received the following bids. The bids include performance bonding> but do not include the Town-supplied material at an estimate of $15,000. TA ENTERPRISES ESTES VALLEY HOME & GARDEN CENTER BASE CONTRACT, 1 THROUGH 5 2003 2004 2003 2004 $57,650 $60,039 $52,500 $54,500 YEAR-ROUND TWINKLE LIGHTS $95,325 $98,184 $8,900 $8,900 Estes Valley Home and Garden, Mike Atkins, is the low bidder. B. Year-round Twinkle Lights Staff bid the option to maintain the twinkle lights year-round. The wide range in bid prices suggests uncertainty with maintenance. The extreme wind conditions as well as the summer trees/leaves and maintenance aren't well suited for permanent twinkle lights. The Parks Department provides a streetscape beautification that really needs no twinkle light enhancement Staff does not recommend this option. C. Performing the Project In-house and/or Hiring a Full-time "Decoration" Employee The project requires 3 to 5 employees full-time during decoration set-up and removal. The Light and Power Department personnel's year-round workload is full assisting developers and citizens with construction of private service projects and also maintaining the Light and Power main lines and facilities. The manpower and equipment that would be dedicated to this project is better spent on these electric system projects. 1-2 Hiring a full-time employee to perform decoration duties would still require assistance from an additional 2 to 4 employees. In other words, it would be wiser to add a lineman, for example, that would fill in with decorations help. Also, we are currently in the process of filling retirement vacancies. An extra position is not recommended at this time. D. Miscellaneous Figure Displays As reported at the May Utilities Committee meeting, the Barlow Plaza area decoration and the Davis Hill decoration will not be installed this year due to their poor condition. For your information, Town Attorney Greg White agrees with removal of these decorations on a U.S. Constitution basis. The June 6,2003 memo from Greg is on file and available for your review. The Santa figure will be relocated from the Knoll property to the Chamber's Visitor Centef s front yard area. BL/lb 1 1-3 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum June 10, 2003 TO: Utilities Committee EROM: Bill Linnane ~,49~ SUBJECT: Channe139 RFP Project Background: In April, Staff received bids from two (2) contractors to operate the Town's Channel 39. Charter Communications objected to the project as outlined in a memo from Greg White (memo to be handed out at the committee meeting). The objection is based on commercial advertising and Attorney White recommends that we do not proceed with a 34 party operation using commercial advertising. In lieu of hiring a 3rd party operator, the Town could renegotiate a contract with Charter whereas Charter itemizes a cost on their billing to be used for the sole purpose of funding the operation of a Public/Educational/Governmental (PEG) Channel, Channel 39. As you see, the Town would be listed as being responsible for these extra costs. In other words, the cost would not be included in the lump sum base fee for services. Another option is that the Town operates Channel 39 with an existing in-house employee (adjusted job responsibilities) and/or by an additional employee possibly projected for the Enterprise fund/computer area. Cost/Budget N/A Action: Staff recommends termination of the 3rd party project The two (2) bidders would be informed immediately if the Board chooses to proceed with a Channel 39 operation project renegotiating the Charter franchise agreement may not be in the best interest of the Town. Staff recommends preparing an "in-house operation proposal" for your review. BL/mjs Attachment 2-1 Memo TO: Utilities Committee - Town of Estes Park FROM: Gregory A. White Date: June 11, 2003 RE: Telephone Conference with Charter Communication On May 13,2003, a telephone conference call was held among the following individuals: Paul Berra, Karen Bishop and Ruben Blackmon of Charter Communications; Greg White, Bill Linnane and Rich.ard Matzke of the Town ofEstes Park. The purpose of the telephone conference was to discuss the Town's desire to provide for community/governmental prograinming on the local CATV system and Charter' s concerns regarding the Town's plans for Channel 39. Based upon representations made by Charter during the conference call and the existing franchise agreement between Charter and the Town, it appears lhe Town may pIovide community/governmental/educational programming on Channel 39 either through its own personnel or a third-party contractor. The Town has the option of re-negotiating the *anchise agreement or entering into a separate side agreement with Charter that provides for Charter to supply the Town with certain funding to allow the Town to provide the programming. Section 12 of the current franchise agreement between the Town and Charter provides that community programming shall take place on a leased access channel or another channel as deemed appropriate by the Grantee (Charter). The Town may require the grantee to provide a channel to the Town for the Town' s exclusive use for governmental and community programming and the Town may contract with the third party to provide this conlmunity programming. Under the franchise agreement, if the Town is not satisfied with the community programming provided by Charter, Charter will furnish the equipment necessary for the Town to offer its own programming. This community programming can be supported by the sale of adveitising, grants or sponsorship so long as the Town onlv recovers its cost in providing the community programming. During the call, Paul Berra stated that federal regulation prohibits the Town from using commercial advertising on PEG (public/educational/governmental) channels. This is different *than the language of the franchise agreement. I do not have the legal expertise to advise the Town as to federal regulation of PEG channels. Charter has agreed to provide information on governmental programming on its other systems. Berra stated that would be in the form of a letter to myself the week of May 19, 0 t 2003. The letter was sent on March 26,2003 (copy attached). The letter does not contain any information on other cable system's arrangements for community programming. The letter only restates Charter's concerns regarding the Town's RFP solicitation. Charter is currently reviewing an application from Curt and Cathy Gunther for a leased access channel. This leased access channel is similar to the contractual relationship between Charter and Nick Mo116 for Channel 8. This arrangement is between Charter and the applicant and depending on the terms and conditions of their agreement, would allow commercial advertising. Blackmon stated that it would be 60-90 days before Charter could respond to the current leased channel access application of the Gunthers. Charter claims to have no capacity for additional channels at this time. It is my recommendation that the Town discontinue its RFP solicitation. The Town may wish to explore other means ofproviding community programming. GAW/ldr S . <f Charter ~ COMMUNICATIONS A WIRED WORLD COMPANY™ March 27,2003 Mr. Gregory A. White Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29* Street Loveland, Colorado 80538 RE: Estes Park, Colorado - RFP On Channel 39 Operations and Programming Dear Greg: Pursuant to our phone conference of May 13, 2003, this letter is to provide you with information of alternative funding regarding the above subject matter. As we discussed, it is the position of The Helicon Group, L.P. d/Wa Charter Communications C'Charter") that Channel 39 is considered a non-commercial PEG actess channel. It is also clear under Section 12 of Charter's Permit Agreement . ("Agrfement") with the Town of Estds- Park, Colorado ("Town") that the Town can either be responsible for the channel on its own or utilize a third party in the production and cablecasting of such programming. This letter addresses potential methods of funding. 1. USE OF FRANCHISE FEES There are a number of local franchise authorities throughout the country who designate either all or a portion oF their franchise fees for the production and operation of its PEG access channelfs). The most prevalent use of franchise fees by communities is to allocate two (2) percent ofthe franchise fccs for PEG use. 2. SOLICITATION OF PROGRAMMING GRANTS This is the PBS concept of soliciting funds from the public or corporations so that the Town can produce PEG programming. Under this scenario, you can produce a PEG program, and at the start and ending ofthe program, you can announce, "This program has been produced through (funding or a grant) from XXX company"., As we discussed, howevet, that is the extent ofthe acknoftedgetient. You caluipt. in return.for. the~~ grant/fun-ding provide conin»cial hirspage in thc fotin of'couimercials. 12412 Powerscourt Drive, LL20 - St. Louis, Missouri • 63131*3660 www. charter. com • tel: 314,288.3700 • Au: 314.288.3790 6 ¥ 3. ONE-TIME GRANTS In some of our franchises, Charter will agree to language whereby we will provide a one- time grant so that communities call obtain either video equipment or facilitate the start-up of PEG access productions. The one-time grant can be considered an external cost under the FCC rules, and therefore may be passed on to Charter customers. The amounts vary based on the size of the community and term of the franchise. 4. MONTHLY PEG FEES PAYMENTS Again, in some of our communities, Charter will agree to monthly PEG fees for PEG access production. The amounts again vary on the size o f the community and term of the franchise. Generally, the fees start at $.10-.15 cents per subscriber per month and increase by $.05 every three years of the franchise term. As with One-Time Grants, these payments are considered external costs and may be passed on to the subscribers. Under FCC roles, they are also line itemed on the subscribers' cable bill. 5. COMBINATION Some of our communities in their franchise with us have a combination ofthe above. Most prevalent combinations are Alternatives 1&3 and 3&4. 6. OTHER ASSISTANCE If there truly is a need by the Town for community programming, a good manner to reduce cost is to work with the local high school, junior college or college in developing a work study/credit program. Many communities utilize students to staff and produce PEG access programming, whereby instead ofpaying for their services, they work with the educational institution so that the student receives appropriate academic credits for their work. I hope this has been useful. If you have some questions, please feel free to call me. As to the Channel 8/Leased Access issue, Ruben Blackmon is providing me infonnation on that matter. Once I have had an oppottunity to review the materials with our Corporate Legal Department, I will be more prepared to address the matter with you. It seems, however, that Media Guide, Inc. has offered to assist the Town on programming matters and that may be an issue that also needs to be addressed. .:. Once again, I appreciate your efforts as well as the Town to work cooperatively with Charter on this issue. Sincerely, 5>26 +6« Paul G. Berra Director o f Government Relations Cc: Ruben Blackmon, Charter Communications TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum June 10, 2003 TO: Utilities Committee FROM: Bill Linnane ~.0/~/- SUBJECT: Request by Owners of Lot 12 & 13, Stanley Heights Subdivision to Underground Private Service Line at the Town's Expense Background: Since 2000, George and Dorothy Gibbs have been requesting the Town pay to underground an electric service line across their property. Staff has been reluctant to fund the project due to Town policy. Private underground projects are not funded by the Town. After approximately two years of meetings with the Gibbs, owners of Lots 12 & 13 in Stanley Heights, last year a previous staff member reluctantly agreed to underground the service at Town expense in exchange for an easement from the Gibbs. Agreements such as this are usually reviewed and approved at the Town Board level, not Staff level, since Town policy is not to fund private service line underground projects. (Background - Continued on Page 2) Cost Budget Budget -0- Cost $5,000 Construction Cost (per January 2003 T.A. Enterprises bid) $1,500 Material Cost $6,500 Total To be funded out of the L&P Operation and Maintenance Account Action: Staff recommends approval of the Town funded project with the service line under grounded along the horse trail route. A new utility easement from the Gibbs' would be necessary. 3-1 (Background - Continued from Page 1) 0 Policy Issue It is Town Attorney White's opinion that an agreement may exist and approval of Town funds for the Gibbs' project will not set precedence resulting in a change of policy. This is a unique situation involving a long and drawn out Staff level agreement issue. • Service line Location Issue Staff originally asked for an easement along the existing line located across the Gibbs' property as shown on the attached sketch. The Gibbs refused and wanted it along the existing fence line, further removed from their property. After much discussion, the easement was granted for the fence line route. If the Town were to fund the project the Public Works Department recommends an alternate route. There is an existing pedestrian and horse trail located close to the fence line route as shown in the sketch. This route would result in fewer (4) tree root damage, as well as eliminate disruption of a currently "non-disturbed" vegetated area. It is also 50 feet shorter in length. This is the logical choice for the new line and one that most property owners would pick given a similar scenario. Staff recommends this route. The horse trail route and use is prescriptive and is not exclusive. Utilities can be located along the route. Construction activities can accommodate the users of the trail with minimal disturbance. The Gibbs would need to dedicate a new easement BL/mjs Attachments 3-2 Good Neighbors/Bad Neighbors GOOD NEIGHBOR We think that we, Dorothy & George Gibbs and before us Dorothy' s mother, Dorothy Scott, have been good neighbors to the Town ofEstes Park. Here's why: k In 1959 Dorothy Scott gave a forty foot easement along part ofthe southern boundary of her property and along all the western boundary of that property to "the county of Larimer and The Public" for a public road. 5~ On March 2, 1966 Dorothy Scott gave the Town ofEstes Park a permanent easement and right ofway to construct, maintain and repair a water line. This is the 12" water main that extends from the intersection ofNorth Lane and West Lane in Stanley Heights to Devil's Gulch Road and is congruent with the public road easement described in the preceding paragraph. 1 In October 1998 Dorothy Scott Gibbs, heir and administrator of here mother' s estate, and her husband George Gibbs gave the Estes Valley Land Trust a conservation easement over a three acre lot adjacent to Devil' s Gulch Road that they had acquired in January 1978. This was done at the request ofthe Land Trust to help create a greenbelt along Devil's Gulch Road. BAD NEIGHBOR We think the Town ofEstes Park has been a bad neighbor. Here's why: k In 1966 the Wilking's house was constructed at 1220 Devil's Gulch Road. .The Town of Estes Park ran a overhead power line to the Wilking property, taking a short-cut directly from the transformer anti pole at the intersection of West Lane and North Lane in Stanley Heights across the NE corner of the Shageman property at 1081 West Lane , and diagonally across the Scott property at 1040 Devil's Gulch Rd. to a pole erected at the boundary between the Scott and Wilking properties. From this point the line was taken underground to the Wilking house. An intermediate pole was erected on the Scott property 40 some feet north ofthe south boundary with the Schageman property. No easement was requested or given! This action was taken during the same time frame that the Town requested and was given an easement for a main water line along the southern and western boundaries ofthe Scott property in order to extend the water main to Devil's Gulch Road. Had an easement been requested we are confident it would have been granted - not for an overhead line diagonally across the property, but for an underground line that would share the easement given for the water main. Having paid to have her own electrical service buried, it is highly unlikely 3-3 that Mrs Scott would have permitted a pole to be erected on her property to carry an overhead power line diagonally across her property to service a neighboring house. To add insult to injury, the town then rented to the telephone company the right to string a telephone line diagonally across the Scott property using the poles erected by the Town. Later, in 1990, the Lober house was build at 1230 Devil's Gulch Rd. and another power line was added and the telephone rented the right to add an additional line. Then the television company rented the right to string television cable across to the two houses. This was followed in 1998 by the Charter Pipeliine to carry highspeed internet access. 3-4 Important Dates.txt 1230 & 1240 DEVIL'S GULCH RD. 1958 Purchased from Fi rst National Bank of Denver (Trustee) 8/29/58 1959 Electric Line Extension Contract w/ Town of Estes Park Light and Power Department 6/8/59 1959 Road easement to 'THE PUBLIC and County of Larimer'. 10/13/1959 1966 Water line easement to Town of Estes Park. 3/2/1966 1966 wilking house constructed. (1220 Devil's Gulch). Power line extended overhead from intersection of North Lane and West Lane across corner of Schageman property and diagonally across Scott pfoperty to boundary with Wilkings'. Pole erected mid-way 40 some feet north of our south boundary. All lines go underground after reaching boundary of neighkoring property. 199Q . - Lober house constructed. (1230 Devil's Gulch). ;23!*0 :ttkt 29th Conservation easement to Land Trust. Call to Power & Light re Charter Pipeline 1-JO March 31st - Letter to Matzke 2001 May 3rd - Letter to Matzke 2002 Jan 21st - Letter to Matzke 2002 June 4th - Encountered Matzke at Town Board-open House. 2002 Sept 20th - Utility easement to Town of Estes Park. 2003 Feb 18th - Letter from Linnane re Board action. 3-5 NI .@Ze RCPTN # 2002107474 10/10/2002 08:00:00 # PAGES - 2 FEE - $11.00 M RODENBERGER RECORDER, LARIMER COUNTY CO STATE DOC FEE - $.00 GRANT OF EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY This Grant of Easement and Right-of-Way is granted by _ Jeoffrev Jack Schageman, Grantor, to the Town of Estes Park, a municipal corporation, Grantee, this 2416- day of St pif Ah 20 6 1 NOW THEREFORE, in payment of One Dollar ($1.00) and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Grantor hereby conveys and grants to the Grantee, its successors and assigns a permanent easement and right-of-way, including the perpetual right to enter upon the real estate, herein described, at any time that it may see fit, to construct, operate and maintain its underground electric distribution lines, with all cables, wire, fixtures and devices, used or useful in operation of said line, through and along a course as said line may be hereafter constructed in, under, through, over and across the following described property located in the County of Larimer , State of Colorado, to-wit: LOT 9, STANLEY HTS. 5-12 -/9 N.W. Said easement is described on "Exhibit A," attached hereto. Together with the right to enter upon said premises, survey, construct, maintain, operate, control and use said electric distribution lines and to remove objects interfering therewith, including trimming and removal of bushes, trees and other vegetation, and the right to permit the installation of buried cables of any electric or communication utility. The Grantor reserves the right to cultivate, use and occupy said premises for any purpose consistent with the rights and privileges above granted. The Grantor hereby warrants title to the easement herein granted and conveyed to the Grantee and agrees to protect and defend the title of the Grantee from and against all persons whomsoever. Said warranty shall be subject to all liens, encumbrances, restrictions, reservations, and rights-of-way ofrecord on the date hereof. 4-«3-.9-56»9 7 l 1-4 6&- (Date) , (Date) (Date) STATE OF COLORADO) SS. County of ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 0\-93 day of il?jlt?/D~18110 , A.D. 20 02 : by .Igr}'f,8- 93A<4<#Mn My commission expires: (*CL bioc)04 in# dp ,20 U , MARIA RAMIREZ ~ /---.3 (Seal) 01 1 C 24 1 j Notary Public, Slate of Texas >x b,U.,2, My Comm. Expires April 3,2004 , 9 1 >P ..'I:. 4,/l 1,/ 1 0 ki -044,-)1/1 I l ,// UT Ut y 22€228228222- ~0, Notary *lid--- - 3 PLEASE RETURN TO CITY OF ESTES PAR~ ATTN: #AiLUL L & P DEPI, R 0. BOX'1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 3-6 EXHIBIT"A" EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: A ten-foot strip adjacent to the north property line of Lot 9, Stanley Hts., beginning at the east property line and extending 262.75 feet west. 1 L /-1 h -1 0 61- LD GIBBS LiJ k-- 1 LOT 12 D O lf) A -1 CLI 2519205012 . : yelat.~~t~€1A~:·y*~k~~~~~~ --- SCHAGEMAN LOT 9 2519205009 3-7 RCPTN # 2002124026 11/19/2002 08:41:00 # PAGES - 2 FEE - $11.00 $.00 M RODENBERGER RECORDER, LARIMER COUNTY CO STATE DOC FEE - GRANT OF EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY This Grant of Easement and Right-of-Way is granted by . Emmett E. Duemke and Marsha R. Duemke, IL# 01_ Grantor(shvo the Town of Estes Park, a municipal corporation, Grantee, this if day of 0»-a,6 e_-C , 20 0 ~ · NOW THEREFORE, in payment of One Dollar ($1.00) and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency o f which are hereby acknowledged, the Grantor hereby conveys and grants to the Grantee, its successors and assigns a permanent easement and right-of-way, including the perpetual right to enter upon the real estate, herein described, at any time that it may see fit, to construct, operate and maintain its underground electric distribution lines, with all cables, wire, fixtures and devices, used or useful in operation of said line, through and along a course as said line may be hereafter constructed in, under, through, over and across the following described property located in the County of Larimer_ , State of Colorado, to-wit: LOT 11, STANLEY HTS. Said easement is described on "Exhibit· A," attached hereto. ST 12- I 9 At .\d. Together with the right to enter upon said premises, survey, construct, maintain, operate, control and use said electric distribution lines and to remove objects interfering therewith, including trimming and removal of bushes, trees and other vegetation, and the right to permit the installation of buried cables of any electric or communication utility. The Grantor reserves the right to cultivate, use and occupy said premises for any purpose consistent with the rights and privileges above granted. The Grantor hereby warrants title to the easement herein granted and conveyed to the Grantee and agrees to protect and defend the title of_ihdlrantee from and against all persons whomsoever. Said warranty shall be subject to all liens, cacumbmnkes,•egrEIZilhns-resdvations, and rights-of-way ofrecord on the date hereof. . , 9 dtr-8,2-- (Date) jkilaq 1 4 0 i r o Q (Date) (Date) STATE OF COLORADO) SS. County of.Arqp* hee ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /4/441 day of Ot*k , A.D. 20 OR~ , by ~mink Strr My commission expires: 71,1,™~~- li , 20 OU (Seal) _, 6 AMINTA BURR d¢423 *«__ STATE OF COLORADO Notary Public NOTARY PUBLIC | PLEASE RETURN TO CITY OF ESTES PARK ~ ATTN: ~04•4 L & P DEPI, 1. BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 3-8 EXHIBIT"A" EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: A ten-foot strip adjacent to the east property line beginning at the south property line and extending north 130 feet ofLot 11, Stanley Hts. df r-1 0 1-11 ....1 ~ GIBBS LOT 12 D [3 Lf.) A J ELI 2519205012 1i SCHAGEMAN 1- LOT 9 2519205009 3-9 1 1 /~ RCPTN # 2002107468 10/10/2002 08:00:00 # PAGES - 2 FEE - $11.00 $.00 M RODENBERGER RECORDER, LARIMER COUNTY CO STATE DOC FEE - GRANT OF EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY This Grant of Easement and Right-of-Way is granted by _ Dorothy Scott Gibbs and George Minnis Gibbs, Grantor(s), to the Town of Estes Park, a municipal corporation, Grantee, this 34.Jityl day of e---2 V - 4-144.4*- ,100 9- NOWTHEREFORE, in payment of One Dollar ($1.00) and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt |/0~ and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Grantor hereby conveys and grants to the Grantee, its successors and assigns a permanent easement and right-of-way, including the perpetual right to enter upon the real estate, herein described, -0 3> -0 at any time that it may see fit, to construct, operate and maintain its underground electric distribution lines, with all cables, DZ=ir wire, fixtures and devices, used or useful in operation of said line, through and along a course as said line may be hereafter D A * constructed in, under, through, over and across the following described property located in the County of Larimer , State of Colorado, to-wit: 3 ·C ...,- ...... 4- ~« A LOT 12 & 13 ILESS BK 1483 PG 533 &LESS PUBLIC RD AS DESC IN 1105-42,'STANLEY HTS> ~ ~~ Said easement is described on "Exhibit A," attached hereto. 5 -11-19 Al.\d. 20 Together with the right to enter upon said premises, survey, construct, maintain, operate, control and use said electric distribution lines and to remove objects interfering therewith, including trimming and removal of bushes, trees and ; R other vegetation, and the right to permit the installation of buried cables of any electric or communication utility. The Grantor reserves the right to cultivate, use and occupy said premises for any purpose consistent with the rights and privileges , above granted. A 4 t - The Grantor hereby warrants title to the easement herein granted and conveyed to the Grantee and agrees to protect "- ' ' and defend the title of the Grantee from and against all persons whomsoever. Said warranty shall be subject to all liens, encumbrances, restrictions, reservations, and rights-of-way of record on the date hereof. -*Efst:3" A<4*AMU g.7£ 10,0-.-00 3- 9,84 -b ~OX~* 5. G-ZAL-4 5 4 - 2-0 1 1- aol. (Date) (Date) 0- STATE OF COLORADO) SS. 4 County of ,AD,414 /nga) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 44 1 ~¥*arnloet ,A.D. 20551 ,by ,€Pylcaoc,7 u],7. t6a-·1¢-6.-2 My commission expires: Or' vot. 639 , 20 OA (Seal) i 1! k C // 2*fl,t.,1. 9--·0'U ' '#fa* BARCLAY W, SMITH ~ ,•~,AtyrAR1>·..'~ NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Public L 2.1.te;, STATE OF COLORADO - '42% c**' My Comm. Exp. 9/9/2006 3-10 /lava 03103 Luok AU 1;Vd S3193:10 10 EXHIBIT "A" Easement Description: A ten-foot strip adjacent to the south property line beginning at the west property line and extending 252.75 feet east, and a ten-foot strip adjacent to the west property line beginning at the south property line and extending north 130 feet of Lots 12 & 13, less BK 1483 Pg 533 and less public road as described in 1105-42, Stanley Hts. 1 K rl 0 'W- g i - GIBBS | Ld H- ~ LOT 12 ID 0 10 ~ A -1 01 2519205012 .1 eR'»9494*+9,· •44-,k··4,1 - SCHAGEMAN LOT 9 2519205009 3-11 1 RCPTN # 2002107481 10/10/2002 08:00:00 # PAGES - 2 FEE - $11.00 M RODENBERGER RECORDER, LARIMER COUNTY CO STATE DOC FEE - $.00 GRANT OF EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY This Grant of Easement and Right-of-Way is granted by Frank Wallace Schageman, Grantor, to the Town of Estes Park, ,a municipal corporation, Grantee, this 2 6.\ rk day of S ¢U , te -6) ex- 20 01 NOW THEREFORE, in payment of One Dollar ($1.00) and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Grantor hereby conveys and grants to the Grantee, its successors and assigns a permanent easement and right-of-way, including the perpetual right to enter upon the real estate, herein described, at any time that it may see fit, to construct, operate and maintain its underground electric distribution lines, with all cables, wire, fixtures and devices, used or useful in operation of said line, through and along a course as said line may be hereafter constructed in, under, through, over and across the following described property located in the County of Larimer , State of Colorado, to-wit: LOT 9, STANLEY HTS. 4-72 -/9 4. W. Said easement is described on "Exhibit A," attached hereto. Together with the right to enter upon said premises, survey, construct, maintain, operate, control and use said electric distribution lines and to remove objects interfering therewith, including trimming and removal of bushes, trees and other vegetation, and the right to permit the installation of buried cables of any electric or communication utility. The Grantor reserves the right to cultivate, use and occupy said premises for any purpose consistent with the rights and privileges above granted. The Grantor hereby warrants title to the easement herein granted and conveyed to the Grantee and agrees to protect and defend the title of the Grantee from and against all persons whomsoever. Said warranty shall be subject to all liens, encumbrances, restrictions, res~v'tions, and rights-of-way of record on the date hereof. " 4 1 29/ Ok- (Date) A U (Date) (Date) STATE OF €ebeR*B@ ) SS. County of 14*Lit.io j The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14 40 day of 'MBAJ ,A.D. 20 OL ,by 2»a-- (tj. My commission expires: (,dz- 5-5- '10 0 11 4 lfj, /. (Seal) 2 . LOUISE F. ZARRO ~~Uj¢- ki~ AN 1, -*(75:r?4 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ~ 1 44.,if.- August 22,2004 w , Notary P®}fc l 21.908 00 '>18Vd S31S3 00EL X08 '03 / 'ld3O d 91 ~.'rvabo :N.U.V " "Myd S31S3 30 All001 Nklnl3U 3SV31d 3-12 (31/ EXHIBIT " A" EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: c A ten-foot strip adjacent to the north property line of Lot 9, Stanley Hts., beginning at the east property line and extending 262.75 feet west. -* 1 h 0 IJJ ....1 ~ 16 4 Cd GIBBS X (b 6.11- „-1 LOT 12 D [3 lf) A J ELI 2519205012 SCHAGEMAN LOT 9 1- 2519205009 3-13 . A-1 Ng &'. J.. FENCE i--- Ill~~ - X -- 1 IVEI-L 3SUOH 4 ... ./ LU D UNDERGROUND LINE RELOCATION 31IS GIBBS 1 inch = 70 feet it 907 ...... ...................~. FOOT WIDE EASEMENT ELECTRIC POLE 4/82/AG 04,94610 NVI\139VHO // 0 1---- 41~~ £ g Im././.Epin'. ly,9 J 2 --4 . .le 1 y "fi Of 1 4 r 0.1//1- 9 '*: m 0 -/4,4.04.-+a 'Ni 1 11 ,/£-1.':,¥,ar-re~ 7 - CD . I. 0 C hy'-I'-I'll 1 : .- - f 7, .. . . d ... Nt 7, D E .. ./. Pr FENCE -X ... 1 11 \ ll¥81 3SBOIL ,i 6 '· .Ili.» r , , 0 4 ... y 1 .......Ill" 1-27...... - LO 25 -~ X LU u.1 EXISTING OVERHEAD LINE /POLE LOCATION ~20 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT EXISTING 1 GIBBS £ 9NllSIXEI ~ · ~LF,~! V 9NllSIX3 St' ELECTRIC POLE NG XI I OVERHEAD Legend 87% DUEMKE W r.--- 137- + Ii---1------ '-f- im hk 3.~-, 97#14*- - 'j<M'Mil/lif/- #JE/,ijal/7/91/I € I . i '~, .9 4 46=1 1/'1~ . 4. a I . .r' 1 1~ 1- I Z LU LU 00 k LU . CD % -7 2 6 1 ./ f 0 r. zazm. 4¥ .-# - - - . . 1. '/1., 4 I . - '~a/£93,9~/'ES' 4 ll¥81 3SBOH l. ,. 2, 0'. 4*7 ,.* -9. t ·i € -f 422 ................ I- .44 .' -4 - 1 Wl. , 4 - N LU ' - 1 R - ~ FENCE 4 PROBLEMS WITH EXISTING FENCE 1 2 30NEI=1 DOT WIDE EASEMENT DTRIC POLE ...................... NVW39Vk 8 30NEI=1 4 ·. -tu»f .,14*lfri. ¢.. * 1 14 1 f=&-14 31.;74 £. I I.:t#43=/ 'ig 44* _ 7. 25:~3)'. t- -1ii *74•564 V 4 +mI„,t J , Ty 'Tai ,(0,4 4 . I ·.9*86,t 'r/41 . 4 LA )/1/a/r/:i" p.41,6 4, J J .1,4 1. J ,1, . - ./b 47,1./. J I r 1 1 9, 3.7< 9/ t. 4 47 ' ' Sk #.1.- · I F.·f :CJ . "t lit tig' V /1 r. :h,Mt/, ~. k c .4 4 1. »1 -*41 4 ...44411 .' ..'14~:till' · , , 11•a.:.3·1(LA .3{ tf, -. ' '; '4 .. 6 - - Thpb ·494#-: C • .. *,1.7.k %1.16 j" 7 4 0 ' I a. A. 31~#La. f i 240 *-44*AL, ..t: I .. ' r ii,b .....1 , 01 0 .1 992-,#41 ~t< ~ 0.14 $ *R: i / 11 '' * /44% -9144/.' 6 .. tgfp,tif ' 73*47 4 . . . ill . . 2 8 • &'. I . J.. ... FENCE X. • --- I. . CA IVU1 39 H . 1 , ./ A 4 \1; re:,Jrfic:"lii~fi*1i~ifisiJilillrilli 44 e , , .4 (11' ..4 #lidizz,&. 25-_€ 1 J . h.. ; t) f K~~ 'i -E . 14'· \. 15=t. 1 -69- # 3 u 123 1**'=.-- *41Ii.*Vit ' .A 6,.4/48' *.: - 5 - iv f - 4% 4 ,,1' , . it<r ··2 h..1 .4 . 0- \El.-A , I , r., ·' e . I : r , lit.! . #024.,aff. ~ , .,1, WN 4 4.4 h 16, .- v.1. - 4 , I 1- , JUR_.6-777~ 1 .1,·- 111.- i~ i=.9 ~ . .* I I - I GIBBS 1 inch = 70 feet 9 Hl¥d 347 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT ELECTRIC POLE XISTING OVERHEAD NVIN39¥HO ......... DUEMKE RECOMMENDATION cont'd STAFF PATH8 A Public Works Director's Report Summary Date: June 10, 2003 To: The Utilities Committee HAS'ES PAi4, From: Bill Linnane LIGHT AND POWER DEPARTMENT • MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT The Financial Tables are included for your review. The budget target figures are acceptable. • BLACK & VEATCH FINANCIAL PLAN Staff has submitted a 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan to B&V. A rough draft is scheduled to be received by mid-July. The final report will be presented at the August Utilities Committee meeting. • 3COM CORPORATION GRANT APPLICATION The Town did not receive funding as the attached letter explains. • PLATTE RIVER POWER AUTHORITY The PRPA rates willincrease by 3.9% next year. PRPA Staff prepared the attached memo which provides useful rate information. • VEHICLE REPLACEMENT POLICY At the March Utilities Committee meeting, Staff was requested to review the Vehicle Replacement Policy. Fleet Superintendent Dave Mahany, reviewed other municipalities' policies. Estes Park's policy is providing current industry standards. Mr. Mahany will present his findings. • MISCELLANEOUS PROTECT UPDATE 1) MacGregor Ranch Project 2) Misc. 1 WATER DEPARTMENT • MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - WATER The financial tables are included for your review. • BLACK & VEATCH WATER RATE STUDY UPDATE A rough draft has been submitted. Staff has just sent comments back to B&V. Their report is scheduled to also be presented at the August Utilities Committee meeting. • MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS UPDATE 1) Water leasing: $40,000 leased out to date. 2) Voluntary Water Conservation Report 3) Annual Residential Chemical Clean-up Day: 9 a.m. - 2 p.m. Saturday, June 14th at the Water Department 577 Elm Road. Sponsored by Larimer County Natural Resources and the Water Department. 4) Water Rights projections update. 5) Misc. 2 LIGHT AND POWER FUND 2002 VS. 2003 MONTH CASH FLOW COMPARISON MAY MAY 2002 2003 Difference Revenues Utility Sales $ 561,160 $ 639,385 $ 78,225 Other 9,948 1,035 (8,913) Total Revenues $ 571,108 $ 640,420 $ 69,312 Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 279,724 $ 289,350 $ 9,626 Distribution and Maintenance 156,060 132,359 (23,701) Customer Billing and Accounts 51,108 57,308 6,200 Administration and General < 158,020 47,171 (110,849) Transfer to Vehicle Fund 368 2,617 2,249 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 645,280 $ 528,805 $ (116,475) Debt Service 25,145 24,917 (228) Capital 59,232 295,061 235,829 Transfers to General Fund and Museum 61,396 65,661 4,264 Total Expenditures $ 791,053 $ 914,443 $ 123,390 Surplus (Deficiency) $ (219,945) $ (274,023) $ (54,078) Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. R L&P 1 LIGHT AND POWER FUND 2002 VS. 2003 YTD CASH FLOW COMPARISON YTD YTD May May 2002 2003 Difference Revenues Utility Sales $ 3,291,410 $ 3,402,248 $ 110,838 Other 78,409 149,844 71,435 Total Revenues $ 3,369,819 $ 3,552,092 $ 182,273 Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply 1,718,645 1,694,128 $ (24,517) Distribution and Maintenance 519,388 505,163 (14,225) Customer Billing and Accounts 244,901 270,959 26,058 Administration and General 522,190 400,652 (121,538) Transfer to Vehicle Fund 1,840 13,083 11,243 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 3,006,964 $ 2,883,985 $ (122,979) Debt Service 125,723 124,583 (1,140) Capital 418,228 516,949 98,721 Transfers to General Fund and Museum 306,982 328,304 21,322 Total Expenditures $ 3,857,897 $ 3,853,822 $ (4,075) Surplus (Deficiency) $ (488,078) $ (301,730) $ 186,348 Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. R L&P 2 LIGHT AND POWER FUND 2003 TOTAL BUDGET VS. ACTUAL YTD CASH FLOW ANALYSIS YTD Budget May YTD % of Target 2003 2003 Budget % Revenues Utility Sales $ 8,019,012 $ 3,402,248 42% 43% Other 378,180 149,844 40% 42% Total Revenues $ 8,397,192 $ 3,552,092 42% 43% Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 4,219,944 $ 1,694,128 40% 42% Distribution and Maintenance 1,153,430 505,163 44% 42% Customer Billing and Accounts 862,685 270,959 31% 42% Administration and General 1,187,438 400,652 34% 42% Transfer to Vehicle Fund 31,400 13,083 42% 42% Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 7,454,897 $ 2,883,985 39% 42% Debt Service 299,000 124,583 42% 42% Transfers to General Fund and Museum 787,930 328,304 42% 42% Capital 1,057,380 516,949 49% 42% Total expenditures $ 9,599,207 $ 3,853,822 40% 42% Note 1) Charge for Services target % based on previous years data. Note 2) Source of supply Target % based on previous years PRPA invoices. Note 3) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. R L&P 3 . ~ . L . 1 '* •M •,t ' 4 i 1 . I ./ 4 4. , 6 . 1 , I 1 . A . h I I 4. . 11 I. -1 k '44: , + . .4 14 . € . I . / . 6 1 4 I. ...4 Z ' 1 . I . $ I . \ - 4. 1. 4 1 ¥ I . -i k .. I . .0 1 ¥ I.% I . 6 1 4 k $. I . L. D 1 ' 6 -10 .,1 ¥. , 1% * 4 L 4 + 41 .t ' 4 * 1.,6 f , I . ... A D 0 . . . 0. Z , I. 4 + 11. 7 7 4 1 + .F L 1 0< U.4 41 . * I / *4 0 A 7 , 3 '.' 4 ILI 1 f . 1 -- ,- '03, 00 LU A '0 1.1- 4% '0 / ,~ Nce * . i i Z.+ * 4 0 - 00 ~* *C z s . 0 0 -, 4 .3 04 0\1 ' 1 7 411; * $,1 A . 1,/ B . I r . 6- 'i 4 4 00*. r .8 L .4 C . 4: . G ' . I '4 14. & . .. . P k .¥ I ¢ i IS. .i 9. 5 r ...& .. .A *IM . 0 7 1 . > k I ... I , I- 1 . 4. . $ ~' .* + 61 . 4 * a ..4 4 ¢ 4 46 ..,71, 4... . t 21 "* 44~ 1 16* h *'* 41! ,#. * . I. I & 4 I I ... * 4.·t *< 31 . . 44 + 4,4 - 1 - - 4. L 6 1 + 4 C 1 9 6 , L 4 -f 0 1 O 0 0- 00 I . -A I , 1¢ € I. 3., 'i /4, 1 - a - 0 1.0 - 1 '0 - 4 - F , 4- 4 1 1 4 0 MM WalSAS :i 4 I. , . -4 el» . I ¥ *Fj f I .0 1 1. 4. -,6 4 Loadh99.xls 6/9/2003 bea PO . . 981 1 - 184 8 1 1 - 4 (141 l 4- './." 1 ' des CHASf POWER-D 20009 2001 9-d91 B 23000 - ,22000 *re 21000 - - * - 0009 L >19000 , f- . * 002 D - - boot, L 13***%1:*Allillillill,#li.22*§8§8%**%***illi.#illit.*I##It#~.~ili~.E 8 138*6*$**3*§9*%8$%**%*89%8**§****S*%*R*$33%*$99&*9% 0 ~ is~1_.TI YA , „„„,*,~01* ' 39 ' . 11 1 61:7 1 $*$§8*$8%8%8%8§$663**%8*%8*8*9*SMS***38%& (01 1 19**S*%8383*%88****669**%68****%8%8%**$$*$93** A 1 14 &36&*19&§&**ta*$**6&:6*&*&*&96$i&**&*&*61* g 1 i SMS***%8%6$33%89$%SS*99**§8**§*§8*§*§*§*8§ 1 111 - 1*888888888888888888888888888888?8888888*088888$84**888888888*** 1§*%833**6$***6$*k*§**%88§8*0**$68%****93* ' 1 19 2#44*1444*/4444·it·U*/*t*h*14;444:WAY:tid#*triciddd:t.,tti*i·i44444*t.t:t:14, 1~ 11 : *88888*8888888*888888888888888@8888888888$88*9888*8888$8398%888*88888%1*9 £*93**§**§*%***em**§*S*§44****%46$4 . *888**88888888*8888888*8*88*%*8888&*8%88888888*8888*88#888888*>ft 12&**%*%**§8§*§2§8§**§$&645*WS**sss**§8$§*Mt** ' kk*§6**:**S*3§*99*8*MiSMS****R*$**SRNS*SMS**$:2%*§$$$§8$&§ · 1 1 1 1 '. 8 e 21. - 51 - ... 0 -2-- ¥ . P 11 1. 2 - € Il.¥1 k. 6 1/ Loadh99.xls 6/9/2003 02000 Zooz 0 £001 a 2-d91 B 1 . ,- - I . 3, El 4 '4 1 ** A-he. . -* . 1 - 6 - . I J .. Irs/0/*~I~~iIi~*IllirAi~bli~i~r/#./til.lilli~ii</A/§*ili~ili~./*,#il~#~A~:ilsis***sit~d L- •66 It t A ,*7 . 4 Inre***e**8»9%*4********%66§ tri - 0 , . 1.~ I '. . . i · fl - 1 *i 1. - + 1- I 4 1.* . r 1.1 & .'1 * 0 1 1 '1 * 1 1.k I i A. 9 kk%%444# irt#.tift#~%%24*424%44,0,~...4.,4..#0*#f~k%*4k444»4 58 4 * 6/1 1 1 1. . .1 ¥ . . . - 6 -4 , 'I 4 , 1 . ,= 13 1 fit * ,%, 9, . .1 44 1 . 4. *UF . 1*§$*SMS*§&**§*§*9§8*§**$%*3* g ' ' 4 1 6 5, 4 T .6 - '.6. 2 1 - i.4. E- 4 f . . I. 4 112** a *4 1, 4 + r 1****s***%80808*****§8%68** 1 4 1 * I ~'1 1 1 4 . 45, I I D - .6 1 ' b'~ 81~ 44 •d 1 . - **63&*SEFFLAJWS#AMYbarMS*SM* 1 51 * y 4 1 , * , 4 + C 4 . + *d ·. i ./. 14 0 *4. a >¥ Le<~<i~:':'~''''C~ f~~~r~<64 ''~ , al 4 0 0 3 . -34 31 *,7.0,76 a,¥ 6 9 N - 1 4 , I 4 - *. 7 L. ¥ 4 + . 1 1¥~~, . 4 46 1 £' : . 1. 4 % 0 - m##*Ard*AwaWS# J - . 4 * . . 1, . *1 $ 4 - · BERE:**RS:24*: ,92 . r . 1 66- 4 . , b . " Ar '4 4 -1 '-r 1-14 * 2 t l 1 6. l I . 44. ., b 1 1 4 04 - 0 4 , 0. 18: 4 ... g g., 0 Ot 4 -. 0. 0 0 4 8 0 0 9 2 O 00 + I CO 4 1 * f . pese,43nd'HAAIN OLA 'r, .1. I 1% 1 - 4 - <4 1 1 4 .-# + r 4 , 0 + A . 4 - Loadh99.xls 6/9/2003 ' 02001 ZOOZ 0 £001 m ENERGy PURCHASES YEAR TO DAT 9-d91 hi D VS 2002 ~ + 2 . 1 '1 120 00 - r-,- - rn, 4 . A. . 0 0 + 4 16 4, '0 g ~ 04 . 0 8 t. . 4 1. i . 3. 4 W g - 1 . k ' I. 8 . 1 -9 - 1 L , f 14/fed'<%ForAXP444*PJ'&*PV'JV/%049#*PtiN~*4* ar 1 f 11/& 4' * 1/ . 4. I ttil • . .4 4% F f , 1, I · i A ' A . 4 I . - 0 , 4 . . # * ~*' |*;22,AM,mAP#11~99*98,0 N . . F 21 , 061 0 . J 4 . 1 . ., 4 1 - *f 1 |~ i 3~1,#Ippe;N<MN.NQ-% B I , 4 .4 I / I 1 1 % * X I . -/ 4 1 . 1 4. 1~9414,7116/6,77*APAP,722'278* *9· * 1 .X .fr .1 i XZ . 0 I :. 1. -f ... Or ..4 , . • I. :4 '4 1 - * V, 2% . 1 U.1 · L if * * r Xk, 4 4 . , p. 4 + 1,44-844448.~.91442/000012 .~ I 1 U.. 0 * 0 1 Ill 2 · h ...++0+++00+++++++.......+ f Ir,4,4,42'JUNI,liiii#Pliemilimibi:010/$:% ism 1- 1. I.+ ** , - 41 1. 1, . ft. . 4 I., HI l I '' 1 4 0 r......................... 4 1 9@REAWNNYAY#'*MWNY#TR)72,4,777/ * 1 I . T . 1 ·,1 . *- 1 , . 4 4 1 1··773777:+ ....................... Il L * , 4 . . 46 , IVQ'kM@M@~@R@W@4~Ki#vff<%44$1%44/9 1 0 : .. 11 1 2 . 1 t. S 1 - .+lillil'..t'.+..... I L - . 4 - . PWN#74-*AT*2*2*4022#N'24~*¥*#42*2414 S~. 1 1 - 1 f 11 A . . . . 4 - 1. . 1 -24 -4 , 1 .Ve . lili ...7. K .......'..............'..........'ll ~, ~*~*424*4*4**ge••N•64@«12,2,2,Xt***4*42,~ .% . , 1 . . . -4 1 4 , 21 1, 12 ' c# ' d ch t, . 0 .4. 0\' 0 0 0. ' .O 0 46 O -,t 00000 0.. ·4 . 4 CO t -/ ./ * ,- U) V I d '264.- LU t 4 0 0... 0 O 0 2. 0: 0> 0 0. 0 CD, it NF CD tO, 2 e X 1 41 ($) S~IVS A-IH.1.NON' PA + 49 1 0 1 ' 0 6 * 4. + 9. 6 1-9 - SALEHIST.XLS 6/9/2003 ~ELECTRIC SAL 6-d91 hi 00,000« ' ¥.. 4 .4 0 4 + i . I 16 1 0 r N ¤i. r , 6 -2 O 0 0 "16.2 f 4. G 0 0 O 3 . 1 1 - . N N 01 .,1. 'I y- 2- ¢ -Id 1 0 8 141 N 4 0 El: 0.- i + Apprfpri & 11 - 1 0.' I + 1 + 4,4 , ¥ C '4 '. I £ . 1 1 ./.1 0 ktr««'X~XvvY»«9«9«99\:02»«Vta,f>Ver:« 1 . . 4 - . e . 1 0- I . . . I 1 - 1 9 - / ./ .k L . .8 -- ' 69*~,4 . ' 1 r . 1 .1 h r i 0.11.44 1 6 4,4 */ 2 - holort©92*RN\*xic»0>x*4·0«>©rt€99~ 4 * . $ 1 . 1 1 .. . . '~)YYf#ANE.:ANNYYX\\919'Yri ... 9 1 f . tr ,1 1 ' ¢ 40 , .A r 4 i.6 ~Ze «»fvxv»*'p,Y*<,f''t''trick)<rt<.2'© ~4* C . 4 1 c h ~*~, 4 ,- 4,9. $ % D S % . I -149«4469«««««« 0 /1 . W |-Soved¥*©VS-5-ree=> . i - $ 1 4 .S 1~xk \V©'»·»·,«0/»69«··/9,0 , . •4 -4 1 4 1 1 11 I : & : t.:fedrilrwru.ST/FUMUYET'W'.. f k ¢ .Ul 'way. . . /.4 ' 3 ' ~ p<»:X9€x»»19»43 1 4. : .7941, 4 e .-1 - I / • 1 .4. F :4 IX»N\Nk»f»f, , 1.» . *' t A 4 . ./ ~. 4 ./ 1 - 1 4 4 . 4 9 92"14,29/F/BAr f. C) . 1 ... 1 '1 1 . 1 4 - , . - . I + 1, 1 19 · 1/ - 1-,2-1.-.1 ¥ 1 #4 , V W 4- . 7 •e'- & C * 1. , 1 . 1,1 1 . . . 9 . a 1 . . . = 1 0 loan 0 9 42 * a .o 31 + 84& 8 8, 1 3- 2. 2 0, 0 0 a O 0 0 04 , 6 04 0 0 0 0, O,0 CD -4 f. F 4 16. r- I.. , r ... Ir . ~ves-475--v,-tra 4 1 04 Ci 9, 0 0 4 0 00.0 0 ..4 0 oci - 4 - - - 10 4- M - 15 . ($) *33¥9 3.1-VO 01 kIVBA v *2® r " It r F h .... . 0 I . 4 r -/* /*· , . % ,-0 . I - - * -----1---&- * SALEHIST.XLS 6/9/2003 AON deS ,On¥ nr 68 Jd ' Jel/\1, OWN QFESTES ARK R TO DATE ELECT IC SALES 8,019,011~ OL-d91 21 . ~ aiw gooz g,go·. ZOOZ SA 6,000,00 6/9/2003 2003 Year-to-Date Electric Revenues vs Budget d.: & • 9,000,000 8,000,000 i I 7,000,000 -*j 6,000,000 5,000,000 0 - - - - - 0 Budget 4,000,000: 0 - - - -* i Actual 3,000,000 --- I * 21000.000 fl-J-~ 2---- 1,000,000 - - - - - 1, 111111 1.1 1 1 . 4.3 2 4 2 4 3. f 3 8 8 - Z }. . A 2003 Year=to-Date PRPA Invoices vs: Budget i • 2 4,500;000 - 4,000,000 3,500,000 --i- . 3,000,000. * - p--- , 2,500,000 - - ---- O Budget - 2,000,000i =- - - - - - - - ' IActual 1,500,000 4. 1,000,000 - ..' 500,000 I! 1.111 I . 19 2 /2 Jt Ar 4 leff 11 N a g 4 - 2 KZO- R L&P-11 dea (3/ uu 1 UU E Of ./3 ,1/0 7- Or· 0 /Ul A le &- T {-1 € S C U -r e,~/ ti 3C0m L,Jt L L C. cr APP l. 9 r J/L T- 4-25- /UU J es,v~ /3 e rt- AV·'AA O S. Larry Geller 3Com Urban Challenge 42 0 3Com Corporation 5500 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, CA 95052 May 22nd 2003 Dear Urban Challenge applicant, Thank you for your application to the 3Com Urban Challenge program. Unfortunately, due to the large number of applications, we were not able to provide a grant to your city/organization. 3Com and our partner, The United States Conference of Mayors, are delighted by the high quality and number ofapplications. We felt the applications represented some of the most innovative thinking in how public/private partnerships can help bridge the Digital Divide. We encourage you to reapply for future Urban Challenge awards. The next deadline will be Monday November 3rd, 2003. Please go to www.3com.com/urbanchallenge for more information. Thank you once again for your application. I f you have specific questions about your application, please call me at (408) 326-8179. Sincerely, Larry Geller Digital Opportunities Program Manager 3Com Corporation ~ PLATTE RIVER POWER AUTHORITY L--##pa>*F·*.21*al?.?@41~ii;69*ti.4, 4. 1 MEMORANDUM June 2,2003 To: Board Of Directors From: Brian Moeck Subject: Rate Increase Speaking Points In order to provide your staffs and the general public with consistent information regarding Platte River's upcoming rate increase, we have put together the following speaking points: Effective January 1, 2004, Platte River Power Authority will raise its wholesale rate to the owner cities 3.91%. > The rate paid by the cities has remained stable since 1984. > Since 1984, the consumer price index has increased over 70 percent. Reasons for the increase: > Revenues are flat due to increased member electricity use and a corresponding reduction in firm surplus sales. Generally, firm surplus sales have been made at higher rates than those charged to the member utilities. > Key operating expenses are increasing. Rates for hydropower from WAPA's Salt Lake Integrated Project (SLIP) increased 17% in 2002, and are expected to increase another 15% this fall. Rates for hydropower from WAPA's Loveland Area Project (LAP) are expected to increase 15% in 2004. Coal costs for Rawhide have increased 35% since 2002. > Spending on generation and transmission infrastructure has increased dramatically due to growth in member electricity needs. > Debt service costs are scheduled to increase due to recent financings associated with new peaking generation. Details of the increase: The increase will be divided into two parts: > The first part will be effective January 1, 2004, and a second part (if necessary) will be effective January 1, 2005. > The increase is being divided so that the total effect can be minimized. Some key future costs (e.g. hydropower rate increases from WAPA) and future revenues (e.g. dxtended firm surplus sale to XceD may not be known until after Jan. 1, 2004. Platte River does not want to increase rates any more than necessary. > The current preliminary estimate of the 2005 adjustment is between 3.9% and 6.9%. A final decision will be made by the Board at about this time next year. Memorandum June 2,2003 Page 2 Perspective: > Platte River will continue to be a very competitive, low-cost provider. > The electricity supplier to neighboring rural electric associations has increased its rates 17.8% since January 2002. > This July, the neighboring investor-owned utility will enact its third rate increase in six months. The resulting total increase will be approximately 20% for an average residential customer, and 30% for an average industrial customer. Bill Linnane From: Moeck, Brian [MoeckB@prpa.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 03,2003 4:30 PM To: Richard Widmer CC: Mayor Baudek; Bill Linnane; Dahl, Mike Subject: Fiberto Estes... Rich. .... Toward the end of May we received a cost estimate to install fiber optic cable on the WAPA transmission line from West Substation in Loveland to Estes Park. The installation cost was $400,000. We estimate that the fiber cable cost (probably 98 fibers) would be about $200,000, putting that part of the project at $600,000. That cost of the electronics for a gigabit of bandwidth would be about $15,000 and would use two fibers. At about the same time that we got the contractor estimate, Bruce Reynolds found out that the Bureau of Reclamation has money in their budget to replace their old microwave system to Estes Park. Western Area Power Administration is currently trying to convince the Bureau to spend their money on a fiber installation project rather than new microwave equipment. Poudre Valley Hospital is also interested, we believe, in participating in the cost of the project to connect to the hospital in Estes Park. And, the No. Colorado Conservancy District has said they might be interested in participating in fiber to Estes. So the cost of the project could conceivably have several participants that would make it more cost effective to the Town to get a fiber connection. We can have a more detailed discussion when we are up at you place next Tuesday afternoon. Best regards...Brian Brian H. Moeck, General Manager Platte River Power Authority 2000 East Horsetooth Road Fort Collins, CO 80525-5721 (970) 229-5200 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum May 27,2003 TO: Bill Linnane, Utilities Committee FROM: Dave Mahar~T.~~~*~3 SUBJECT: Report on Vehicle Replacement Policy Review Ba®aund: In January 1999, a "Vehicle Replacement Policy" was written by the Fleet Department and adopted by the Town Board. This policy has been monitored annually since its acceptance. The Utilities Committee has requested an additional review of this policy. The review findings are attached. Castmudget N/A Actian/Sllmmaly Report only at this time. The Fleet Department does not recommend any changes to the "Vehicle Replacement Policy". All vehicles appear to be within a normal replacement schedule, monitoring the costs annually. The current "Vehicle Replacement Policy" assures me that the Town of Estes Park's vehicle replacement is within normal cycle replacement perimeters. Attachrnent DM/mjs 0 64 . . 0 64 0 0 1 2 2 9 :@ M M#-5 1.-8 m ah:' 2 8 2 8 .2 0 0 8 c,j ©Oveog 0 0. 1.- 0 6 0 0 1 -00 >ho C WO 4) 0-0 ~ O-0 1 9 A AE O 4 0 0.-3 + 8 - a ¢7 3 1 8 18. 22 8. 22 0. 2 5 ir 2 5 N.o N E >a=fo Ao O C M. gl - - "- C). O . a, 34 0/. US A 2 4 2 1 6.dh-- ove-*n 1 0 0% ~ O-91 m .0 - 8 8§2 1 280 :3 0 5 1 00= 0 0 -7 A >• d 8 1 1 &1 1 00 00 ' 31 ho. 2 ho-'M : - 40 0 0 0 00 2 91 1.181 1 1 i U 1 A : U A U Ch -9 ' 0 pl 20 - 1 0- 2 9 Ca 0 -A 1 1 1 lei 1 1 1 0 %0 40 0 li V U 82-9 - ceo U i UO= i 0.= i :: (28.g UO= 1 00 h -- en h 08 1 1 - ~ - I 1 : 1 1 1 W 1 5 1 50 20 . O 29 - 8 8@ 1 kg@ 1 AL- 1 2.m-=2 0 0-2 5 1-=9 1 1 002 : 4 97 i ONE , h _ 00 -r- -- 00 1 ' ' CS ' ' 1 tiul 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 11 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6. /1 1 1 1 =h 1 1 1 INZ 11 1 A C= A > O 4 0 P @ 203 1 60 er- E-4 0= M £3 3 ¢ b :35 889 M M P & 8 8 3 1 .1 t . ID 21= M (9 .= ail-0 lt4 whaeig ia e#34& 8.5 f Et i 2% :3 8.:; 9 &% 9 &%28&6 9 - 0 u 0.1 0 9 0 0 0, *2 4 45 & 05 3 89 2 M C' 58 &:2 8 & Et' 5 05 AS & ED Sle@ Sle@X f Sle@X £ Steamboat Castle Louisville Lafayette Golden Commerce Nevada Estes Park 10 years 10 years 10-16 years 1OBOyeOaOr~-or sinOII 90,060 Vehicle Replacement Policy Guidelines 10 years --- SJUOX 02-5 I JO: 9@Flu 000'08 sle@X OI 000'OZI ---0-- ------ SOITUI Springs Rock ------ ------ IH ABOH 1 Heavy . 0 .0 8,8 0 4. A 0 83 28 b O 4, O . - ca 2 q 2 0 ca O 0 r.4 ~ bo >.O. B B: MCPB >.2> 3 ed= 0 be C M U O M.8 2 M O K 8 2 .t: - >bo Ev= 9 43 = -2 1 AO 0 01 M t-Lb 00 O . 50.g 0 12 A -00 - 00 13 8:a ace 3 lo li i A : 1 1 ca 1 1 ' tx 0 0 S 0 1 0 49 41 i U /1 1 U 1 -04 1 1 1 1 G d 8 04 + e .8 5 2 E E 6. O ch . O . 0 Ca 0 . ~ 9 2 6- O 1 6. O 883 g= 1 8= O Q cts--2 MS: 1 18 'r) 2 € B Z @.% 3% M 1 >ho ho ho .2 41 C .= ro -0 0 w .9 ok| M .60 04 01 >E O .m .O =O m 1 0 1 -§ 2 416 :9: O d - U 1331 1 1 C/2 CO 1 t< O 0 ' O 0 1 CO O 0 0 0 11 .4 g .2 MA . 194-2 o C ce -0 .M -53 1 ' 60.- M C A-,Cdo 8 6 $ E N '0-. F * 4 i Et; 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 E N O - U 1-, 8 13 1 3 b ca 1 U 1 0,~ h -Ut, - A O /2 5 + Q .* 41 ./ 2 0 0 .0 0 > 6,·1 O * 4. t- ~~S~302§iP~%SP~&3203&3~ Steamboat Cas Louisville Lafayette Golden Commerce Nevada Estes Park 00UUU@*I slSOO 1!pdal Xqp@~do.I PoutqUIOO AJESS@O@U SU pU@UIUIOO@.I @OUEU@lu!EUI 5 years ------ Monitor ...... 6-10 years 10 10 years or Monitor ------ 15-20 years 17 years 101!UOW JUOUIJO ki@IA@1< luouud!nba w pasn Xono SlUOUICIO) Vehicle Replacement Policy Guidelines Repl ace as ------ needed popoqu 9 paJOUUOUI SlSOO J 79 @SE jO @Susn SA OSE UIOO @UIT,JUMO .I@:PUI 41!AA Springs 12-14 years SJOAAO ----- SU "BICIAI ------ ------ Iguoseas) Mact:regor 1<anch x'x Muriel L. Macaregor Charitable Truat Post Office Box 4675 - Estes Park, CO 80517 June 10, 2003 Bill Linnane Director Public Utilities Department Town of Estes Park Dear Bill Linnane: Subject: Underground power line project On behalf of the Muriel L. MacGregor Charitable Trust, I am requesting that the participating amount of $34,000 from the Town of Estes Park towards the underground power line project at the MacGregor Ranch be rebudgeted in your fiscal year 2004 budget. The MacGregor Ranch greatly appreciates your assistance in the completion of this important project. Once this project is completed the historic viewscape will allow all children and visitors to see a true "window into the past" as they arrive at the ranch. We very much look forward to working with you next year. Tharkyoud , 0 jw William Van Horn Chairman Muriel L. MacGregor Charitable Trust EA Voice: (970) 586-3749 • Fax: (970) 586-1092 • e-mail: macgregorranch.org ~ WATER FUND 2002 VS. 2003 MONTH CASH FLOW COMPARISON MAY MAY 2002 2003 Difference Revenues Water Sales $ 179,933 $ 134,335 $ (45,598) Plant Development Tap Fees 31,300 19,702 (11,598) Water Rights Tap Fees 38,555 34,320 (4,235) Other 14,389 5,585 (8,804) Total Revenues $ 264,177 $ 193,942 $ (70,235) Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 951,944 $ 150 $ (951,794) Purification 44,292 40,059 (4,233) Distribution and Maintenance 50,808 43,245 (7,563) Customer Billing and Accounts 12,082 8,131 (3,951) Administration and General 59,937 34,403 (25,534) Transfer to Vehicle Fund 417 792 375 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 1,119,480 $ 126,780 $ (992,700) Debt Service 25,564 25,348 (216) Capital 15,037 43,800 28,763 Total Expenditures $ 1,160,081 $ 195,928 $ (964,153) Annual Surplus (Deficiency) $ (895,904) $ (1,986) $ 893,918 Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. Note 2) May 2002 includes water rights purchase ($950,000) RW1 WATER FUND 2002 VS. 2003 YTD CASH FLOW COMPARISON YTD YTD May May 2002 2003 Difference Revenues Water Sales $ 729,545 $ 644,273 $ (85,272) Plant Development Tap Fees 87,600 137,943 50,343 Water Rights Tap Fees 104,887 170,125 65,238 Other 43,009 63,043 20,034 Total Revenues $ 965,041 $ 1,015,384 $ 50,343 Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply 1,077,902 75,769 (1,002,133) Purification 132,236 165,163 32,927 Distribution and Maintenance 175,114 209,555 34,441 , Customer Billing and Accounts 43,074 47,950 4,876 Administration and General 213,256 259,398 46,142 Transfer to Vehicle Fund 2,083 3,958 1,875 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense 1,643,665 761,793 (881,872) Debt Service 127,822 126,740 (1,082) Capital 327,105 666,387 339,282 Total Expenditures $ 2,098,592 $ 1,554,920 $ (543,672) Annual Surplus (Deficiency) $ (1,133,551) $ (539,536) $ 594,015 Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. RW2 WATER FUND 2003 TOTAL BUDGET VS. ACTUAL YTD CASH FLOW ANALYSIS YTD Budget May YTD % of Target 2003 2003 Budget % Revenues Water Sales $ 2,183,040 $ 644,273 30% 31% Plant Development Tap Fees 175,000 $ 137,943 79% 31% Water Rights Tap Fees 330,000 $ 170,125 52% 31% Other 100,013 $ 63,043 63% 31% Total Revenues $ 2,788,053 $ 1,015,384 36% 31% Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 125,000 $ 75,769 61% 90% Purification 398,351 $ 165,163 41% 42% Distribution and Maintenance 561,408 $ 209,555 37% 42% Customer Billing and Accounts 248,686 $ 47,950 19% 42% Administration and General 782,075 $ 259,398 33% 42% Transfer to Vehicle Fund 9,500 3,958 42% 42% Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 2,125,020 $ 761,793 36% 42% Debt Service 304,176 126,740 42% 42% Capital 1,269,135 666,387 53% 42% Total Expenditures $ 3,698,331 $ 1,554,920 42% 42% Note 1) Charge for Services target based on previous years data. Note 2) Source of Supply target based on previous years NCWCD invoices. Note 3) All other targets based on % of Year complete. RW3 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 June 4,2003 Town of Estes Park Bill Linnane P O Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Water Transfer Checks Dear Bill: Enclose please find the checks made payable to the Town of Estes Park for the CBT Water Transfer customers. Also enclosed please find a spreadsheet including names, addresses, phone numbers, and the number of acre feet purchased by each customer for your information. If you have any questions, 1~ase do not hesitate to give me a call. ery TryQ Yours, A7U GAW/ldr f ~ A. White Enclosures v r- r--r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r- N 10 g T& O 9 0>0 2 w &1 2 o i {152*R stem =3~*%22%%3 Er N 10 N 10 4- - t_ p- Lr) 9 8 a .· 00 U w „ cV 22 ¢9 9'-W g™"te 23 NAME ADDRESS PHONE # OF ACRE FEET WATER TRANSFER INFORMATION David C. Stevens 3712 Valley Oak, Loveland, CO 80538 970/667-5119 Kenneth J. Onulak 6139 Panoramic Drive, Loveland, CO 80537 970/593-9620 Carl L. Buchanan 1004 S. County Road 29, Loveland, CO 80537 970/667-0974 Nancy A. Audino 206 Willow Drive, Mead, CO 80542 970-535-4341 David Schultz 117 Mallard Court, Mead, CO 80542 970/535-9003 Mike Brown Gary Drive, Berthoud, CO 80513 303/444-4545 Paul Nellis Willow Drive, Mead, CO 80542 303/538-7228 Jim Hamilton ue Heron Court, Mead, CO 80542 303/356-6918 Jeff Wikre 721antr,=2'23,2222ved'72~; CAU5730537 gzag Heide Feula 128 Hunters Cove Road, Mead, CO 80542 970/535-9027 Sandy Santeramo 122 Mount Massive Way, Longmont, CO 80501 970/535-4049 96€6-9£9/026 03 'peelAI 'Z Pem:1 00 PleM 81.914 euerea Iwer Z610-8ZZ/026 2£909 OO 'pueleA01 'eA!JO ;seJO )10!snIN iee40!1/\1 Z616-9£9/026 2£908 oo 'pueleAol 'Unoo Suelu 146!JAA.le6!l Xpue>1 619£-699/026 2£908 00 'pueleAol 'eoeld P]!CIP ssohl epnelo 298 L-L9*1026 2£908 OO 'pueleAol 'GA!]a uoS isjnH pe]8 992*-Z99/026 2£908 OO 'pueleAol 'PAI Jeliee P!Aea 6£ L6-868/026 8£908 oo 'pueleAol ~s~e~~Vg12' ZE=6 =81=Un 0926-9£9/026 14908 oo 'pee'Al 'eAND elino!JusH Xprul 1916-9£9/026 1*908 OO 'Peew 'e'01!0 uo ie uel16neA Xpu!3 9 eon]8 *9*£-299/026 8£908 OO 'pueleA01 'eA!]Cl M elleA 600€ UAAOJ8 Uqof 949£-1£9/026 EL 908 OO 'pnollue8 'unoo JeUAel 901 ueingueA euepea Gwen Hawley Peqq!H epu!1 r."r-r- p r-- rr-r- pr-r-r-r--r- U) 5% w £ I :% ·2 g c LU .E 0 li ZO ': 1m E Ji & mt im W i 1 mi ift. -j i 0 - A- 24 (1) A > O 2 9 - -,4023 Emc ORMOI- 1201 ADDRESS PHONE # OF ACRE FEET WATER TRANSFER INFORMATION 27847 Arikaree Road, Loveland, CO 80537 970/213-1951 1208 King Drive, Loveland, CO 80537 970/669-7591 Charles Castaldo 514 Valley View Drive, Loveland, CO 80537 970/669-2992 1248 King Drive, Loveland, CO 80537 970/667-5391 8231 Firethorn Drive, Loveland, CO 80538 970/898-7197 103 Grandview Circle, Mead, CO 80542 303/238-7041 938 Road Runner Court, Loveland, CO 80537 970/667-9207 218 Mulligan Lake Drive, Mead, CO 80542 970/535-0647 6801 Commanche Court, Loveland, CO 80537 970/669-4053 2704 Virginia Drive, Loveland, CO 80538 970/669-9828 3601 Fox Drive, Loveland, CO 80537 970/593-5647 110 Hunters Cove Road, Mead, CO 80542 970/535-4544 1861,-9€9/026 L L MOM 869*L 88£0-9€9/026 tur 22.23'7 pielievy XLL !>ISUOMel li]!r 19~-9£9/026 14908 OO 'peeIN '8A!Jo eyel ue6!I'nIN 921 3!qjea inquv 21/1591995 31:86 978-737-2427 12*4 .CE GILCREST PAGE 81 ; / TOWN OF liliGU©rest 1,0. COUXENDO fenningTomards tbe Futute P.O. Box 128 * Gibest, ©0101'ado 80623 ~ €970) 737-2426 June 2,2003 Town of€*es Pmk eag milm 1423 W 2f Sbed #*400 80538 8,7 Wae, Lease Deaf Mr. It Pursuant ta our phon,conve,saion eigilerthls muming; ENs le*ersenes = veriNc*#an that **TOM«QUawanieme56*F.,of CanNE&er *artagmedupen prwa er,358ml~ A,P. Enclos,d, herew#b Js Ck# 15724 18 -W,e alnet* of $17,590. Please #1:=liar the Water to Car*aMAMd Countv Water Dist,tdcoang *,a~ a ls,oe the 'rovm of goest, Thank you andshoutd ¥04 haveam¢questionsoricon~s,please %0102914£00!adineduling ingular business hours. 5105#*f 09206 Unda Choia, CMC Town Clerk WATER CONSERVATION PLAN Town of Estes Park, Colorado The Town of Estes Park has adopted a Water Conservation Policy that includes voluntary /:6 + I t » t ek and mandatory measures to ensure the integrity of the ***'f 4' * * ** 14.* Lff itif ' 4 4 Town's water supply. .. At the Stage I level (normal FA. 4 :.. 41. 14 : ...a:* . . water conditions), all reductions J:.. . in water use are voluntary measures, intended as tools for - --": *21&14·"· + ··•·M - · r.·v *- · ·.7.ir,0.-· + increasing the community's ~-... -, ' + awareness, rather than imposing . ..... restrictions. It is only in Stages II . k + 1 I. ... I. . ...:1... 4 . I. ... and III that restrictions become . ..:+ , I 4 mandatory in nature. . I 4.- + I The Town obtains its water 0 14 3~ 431 4. ··'.~ . ..4 40. 4 . supply from the Colorado-Big dils m..4.. Thompson (CBT) project and As part of its ongoing efforts to provide for the community's future water needs, the Glacier Creek. These sources are Town of Estes Park is one of the owners of Windy Gap Reservoir in NW Colorado. directly connected to the Town's water demands. Water rates are and non-structural measures. treatment plants and do not increased to recover the same include raw water storage. amount of revenue as existing Structural Measures The recent drought has rates recover under Stage I Structural controls are "built increased sensitivity toward our conditions. into" each individual home or water sources and the drought's impact upon them. business and do not require a Stage 111 This stage is triggered daily, conscious effort on the by the loss of both water supply part of the consumer to save Water Conservation sources. Severe water restrictions water. Examples of such devices Stages are in effect and water rates are can include such simple items as drastically increased to recover low-flow shower heads, water Town staff has defined three same amount of revenue as faucet aerators and toilet tank water conservation stages that existing rates recover under banks. are triggered by the availability Stage I conditions and to of water resources. These stages penalize unnecessary water are as follows: Non-Structural Measures usage. Non-structural controls include Stage I This is the normal mode public education, pricing of operation. Voluntary water Water Conservation systems, and enforcement of conservation measures are Measures restrictions that are imposed suggested to encourage prudent Stage I Voluntary conservation during drought periods. water use, but none are measures are included in this mandated. stage to embed water efficiency Stage 11 Immediate action is Stage 11 This stage is triggered programs into the fabric of the necessary in Stage II to reduce by the loss of one of the water community and achieve water demands. The Town's supply sources and a likely permanent reductions in per primary tool for achieving short- reduction in the other supply capita water use. Long-term term reductions in water use is source. Mandatory water water demand management to declare that Stage II restrictions are in effect to reduce programs include both structural conditions exist and to enact restrictions to reduce water shaving. Do not use toilets valves for deep watering consumption until adequate as waste baskets. Bathe of trees, bushes, flowers supplies are available. The goal using half-full tubs and and gardens. of the restrictions is to assure take shorter showers. • Hose Shutoff Valves. that water is continuously • Kitchen. Store drinking Equip hoses with shutoff available to all customers for water in the refrigerator valves that require hand minimal irrigation and essential and run the dishwasher pressure to open. uses that protect the health, only when full. • Exterior cleaning. Sweep safety and welfare of the public. • Laundry. Purchase high- patios, sidewalks, efficiency appliances and driveways, and other hard wash fullloads of exterior surfaces before How can I make laundry. the final spray of water is a difference ? • Voluntary Watering Days applied, if needed. and Watering Hours of the • Car Washing. Use spray Individuals can make a difference during periods of Day. Adhere to the from a hose equipped drought simply by improving Town's suggested with a shutoff valve conservation habits. Here are voluntary watering and/or a bucket of water some simple ideas: schedule. to wash car. I • Bathroom. Turn off water • Open Hoses. Only use while brushing teeth and hoses without shutoff Town of Estes Park, Colorado Water Conservation Plan (Note: Stage I measures are voluntary) Stage I Stage 11 Stage 111 Conservation Measures (Normal) (Moderate) (Emergency) Impose water rate surcharge No No Yes Allow turf Irrigation Yes Yes No Voluntary watering days are designated Yes N/A N/A Mandatory watering days are designated and should be observed N/A Yes N/A Voluntary landscape/lawn non-watering between 10 am and 6 pm. Yes N/A N/A Mandatory landscape/lawn non-watering between 10 am and 6 pm. N/A Yes N/A Limit lawn watering to 2 hours per day on designated watering days N/A Yes N/A Prohibit new lawn seeding or sod No Yes Yes Allow hand watering Yes Yes Yes Allow spray or bucket car washing Yes Yes No Allow use of automated car washes that recycle wash water Yes Yes NO Allow use of automated car washes that do not recycle wash water Yes No No Watering days - Voluntary in Stage 1, Mandatory in Stages 11 and 111 Street addresses ending in 0 to 4: Monday, Thursday, Saturday Street addresses ending in 5 to 9: Tuesday, Friday, Sunday Please direct questions to: Town of Estes Park Water Department P.O. Box 1200 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 Telephone: 970/577-3588 \21_ES '63" FAX: 970/586-6909 Message Page 1 of 1 Bill Linnane From: Bob Goehring Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:29 PM To: Bill Linnane Subject: Hazardous Waste Cleanup FYI The Division of Natural resources for Larimer County will be having their annual Residential Hazardous Waste Cleanup Dav on June 14 at the water shop, 577 Elm Rd. 9:00 am till 2:00 pm. 5/29/2003 114. 82'!'9.0'&~%*~~WPR:k -6-*42-99~ku-St¥~*•R-••A-402*2 1 ¥ tk- ...4 e#4 1,64¥-'4=*43# -z:2 p : i, *'i ~€33 4,0&01021 200 . · 2/ At 5REIm Roa¢*Estes #ari{ Water Delartment . * ./'' 1 & 641 25 4 4 4 h f. Pkil/ I *r.t A A . Transfer · Make sure containers are -/ry ./*. ». - 2 -*111 1~4 ' st tion labeled and not leaking. Ebt m-Bre,information, call ©tit&%**e¥'Co-unty , -I -~~~ · Nothing larger than 5 gallon 577 Ah, Rd. 4043£4~6nt of Natural Resources at 498-5760 or A-1 8477€h'« containers. Trash at 586-5740 ----09-~ · Commercial Waste will not be accepted! Sponsored by Estes Park Water Department and Larimer County Natural Resources 2003 WATER USE PROJECTIONS Actual (rt) Actual (rt) Actual(rt) and and Depletion Est. (left) Est. (left) Est. (left) factor Depleted USA WG CBT Marys Glacier Glacier Glacier (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) 2002 Nov 0 25 0.06 6 0 6 2 Dec 87 12 0.06 1 87 1 9 2003 Jan 97 9 0.06 2 27 2 9 Feb 87 0 0.06 9 87 9 9 March g 22 0.06 2 2 2 0 April 0g 0.07 6062 May .73 54 0.12 0 72 # 2 June 79 146 0.17 25 79 25 0 July 42 229 0.13 30 15 30 0 Aug 7 222 0.11 24 0 24 0 Sept 0 175 0.1 18 0 18 0 Oct 0 121 0.08 10 0 10 0 TOTAL 534 1168 127 500 128 0 2003 WATER RIGHTS 2003 2003 2003 2003 projected projected leased projected Water acre-feet acre-feet water acre-feet Rights available used (minus) unused USA 500 500 500 0 WG 300 200 (Note 1) 141 59 CBT Units 1207 482 (Note 2) 0 141 341 (Note 4) CBT carryover 110 0 0 (Note 3) TOTAL 1292 641 400 Note 1 ordered 200 AF of 300 owned Note 2 40% quota minus (W.G. Collateral water = 0) (1207*.4) = 482 Note 3 Canyover water not available after April. Must use USA water first. Note 4 School Lease 135 AF Prospect Mtn Water 4 AF Glacier View Subd 1 AF B of R 1 aAF 141 AF