Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Utilities Committee 2003-04-10
i VICKIE AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK UTILITIES COMMITTEE April 10, 2003 8:00 A.M. Preparation date: 3/27/03 *Revision date: 4/7/03 ACTION ITEMS Light and Power Department 1. Backhoe and Jackhammer - Request to purchase Light & Power equipment Water Department 1. Voluntary Conservation Program Recommended by Black & Veatch - Request approval to incorporate into the Town's Utilities Policy Manual 2. Marys Lake Campground and Glacier View Subdivision - Request for long-term lease of approximately 2 A.F. total REPORTS 1. Financial Report 2. Channel 39 Request for Proposal (RFP) 3. Water Rights/Supply Table 4. Projects Report Note: The Utilities Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. . . t. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum March 31, 2003 TO: Utilities Committee FROM: Bill I.innane (jUA Dave Ma•2Ri~ Bob Goehring /2 L 12(4 --il-.., SUBJECT: 2003 L& P Department Backhoe (93328) Replacement Jackhammer Purchase. Background: The Light and Power Department has budgeted for replacement of their backhoe 93328 (1989 John Deere 310C 4x4), this equipment has 14 years of service and 4,350 hrs of usage. This vehicle is within the Town's vehicle replacement parameters. Light and Power has also budgeted for a hydraulic jackhammer attachment for this Backhoe to help provide an easier way to dig holes for utility poles. Cost/Budget Backhoe: Jackhammer: Budget: $80,000 Budget: $25,000 Colorado Machinery: Colorado Machinery: $62,445.00 J/D 310SG 4x4 $14,948.00 $12,500.00 Trade-In $49,945.00 - Bid Price/John Deem willprovide a two-year rollover agreement on the backhoe equal to an annual cost of $8,450. Rollover is market-driven, There is no demand at this time for used backhoes, therefore higher cost unlike loader and bobcat agreements. (Not cost effective at this time 14 yrs = 118,300.00.) Ellen Equipment: Ellen Equipment: $80,179.00 Case 580 Super M 4x4 $23,850.00 $12,000.00 Trade-In $68,179.00 - Bid Price/Case does not offer a rollover program. Wagner Equipment: Wagner Equipment: Returned no bid Returned no bid Action: Staff recommends: Purchasing the backhoe from Colorado Machinery for a cost of $49,945.00, leaving rollover agreement open and reviewing rollover costs in two years to see if it becomes cost effective. Purchasing hydraulic jackhammer for backhoe from Colorado Machinery for a cost of $14,948.00. LP 1-1 f Mil 0,-Illigill",B~/8 <,H 00 f .:2 4 R .% 6 4 th o .4 .*.% 2% '44€ 2 1 1%0 u », . 4 3 6 4 % ~ e 20 :9 2 -% ~ % 4 -2 C)„ M 4 4 I ...lille -4 - % # 4~ f 65 4 -4 2 3 1.~E F £41 #<lu %1 El 1/il/95 f< .Rf 3//6 5 - Al O 4 k 0 a 2 Fi-i 8 2 43 &0 0«%* #4 k 8 * ¢11 44 k g R 2 5 1 2 -O U d -3 W £ 4% 1 LE BE 8 2 E 7 n 00 CD -C R d M th »'4 0 € 3-92 C W W 1 ~ 51 A %3 h t¢ 2 co -# 2 o Mgm § 5.0 3!€ A *-' ~ 1~ *~ . 2<004 -N w .g © 4 2 .N tz 0~ 2 E &89. tm,U 2 · M & 9 -2 4 -3 2 lu,•-9.6Vq •1 2 2 2 0 6 2 E B E B E ~ .5 692% 7 -3 = 0,1 U U / Yja.t> r BE k ago-Jymg% 2 = a 8 * # 8-' B '2 BEELL 0 1 1 5 f i 1 1. 4 '-s U= M 8 .Pr 3 8 '9 ;; 5 H · 0 3 4 ... w 60 U 8.M € 0 U C # 15 &0 1 322 4 0 2 . F.9 .M 611% *1 1 . M .gu . 44 90 g M vi 'bl * u 44 .m to 1*2 -2 Ap tE ··S % 3 1 :el A m 2 -g -M B ze 2 SC 0* - ce b R g t 0-1 0 Msgi 2 0 1 0 U .g x E-,v . u, g ~ * 0 ; u ce 0 9 cd -20 df-22 *8 1 04 8 Y *= d E E 44 U -1 96 -O .M *1 4 f N 4 8 4 4 0 - Z C u .0 c - 3 u #6 3 :M c OU CS 4 44 -g £ S 3 -2 € R 2 -1 d M 0 -1 OU 3 0 < A 4 144 V NOMM • O • 0 33 0 c g 1 33 E & 8 72 341 14?U 4?1?q?suodsM 'nrg uaq£ 4Uo • Voluntary Watering Days and THE TOWN OF ES water sup to its ul UO?1171135U0D 0;Unfult,03 /0 09939-4*H OSEqOInd 'XIpun op suq lit) d 53153 9-ZE (026) x watering o f trees, bushes, flowers WN OF ESTES PARK, :%CZ:e¥NY, he Dra~ed noX suous 00:IFP 01 0013 POJ OSEDId thout shuto ff valves for deep luouniEd¢ Hoses. Only use hoses sidewalks, d rlvewa s an • Hose Shu Valves. Equip hos Another photo taken during a tour of the NSERVATION make a difference o spEOI I[~J qsum pul; saoum[dde = -3~3233353:932,2 233353222222 E 0 y C 2=2i2i322332 C .El m -8 ¤ CD 2 0 > 0 & ,3 . 1 N18 0 +8 w co M CL. ~ Immuk-~Ot F O E--1 3 1 5 04 0-1 TEL -° 0 < 0% i -f 1 4 4 43 *1% A~ E 29 4-4 C € .- 2 -03 -8 g - . 444 { Er ~ 16&-1. 01 4-1 .% 52 2~ E 94 M -8 M 2141 /8 b P U; O tem 0 -6 -r .27 -8 = U EJE € a R CoE /6,9. M Begmas/ Solie M #90-2-2-*MU 41 d €92 2 M U) W 0 -- 14 W E k e O M 2 -0 0 0-1 24.0 g 1-* 4 4 50 u A 4-4 MOM w Demand Management Measures (NK;mat) (2~rate) (E y) NOUBAJOS Ia}BAX j JOI.po 041 UI uoponpol Xplt[ u puu posodard ocre SOInSEOIU UOU 03 XTE] ADTqDE pUE 4FUnUIC[IOD DIp JO DUCIE DIE SOJEJ JOIEAN trictions are in effect to reduce mbed water efficiency programs into the ·osn 301£1 El!dE:) :pd ur suononpoi luoue -uou pue IUmonns Ipoq Op ureINoid Slipuoq UILL,1-BUOI 041 Xq pal,BBLI} ST OBBIS SIqi :II ON",s • luOIUO~EUELU pUBIUDp 131 so}EI BUUSne SU anUOAOI Jo luno Jo 4rfqjssod 041 posBOIDIII 'SOInSEOUI IUmlorugs so213}S UOU[BAIOSUOZ) 331Ip DILL Xep~es*epsmul'XepuoIN 47 01 0 u! uipue SeSSedp Voluntary landscape/lawn non-watering between 10 a.m. & 6 p.m. ce of Mandatory landscape/lawn non-watering between 10 a.m. & 6 p.m. Limit lawn watering to 2 hrs per day or designated watering days Allow use of automated car washes that recycle wash water JeleM 4SeM eloADeJ OU op 1841 904Se,A JED pejewolne Jo esn Moll 3 'Xepsenl 6 01 9 ul UNUe SeSSeup t years, the Town of Estes Park has * Designate voluntary watering days aggressive stance in o n Designate mandatory watering days Impose water rate surcharge Prohibit new lawn seeding or sod Allow spray or bucket car washing SDJJnOS JOIBill DIp jO DUO JO S dep JeleM 88 JunioA 'suoUTpuo) I 91815 Ippun JOAODDJ . u o ! 18 6 !JJ ! JJ n 1 Mo l ly conservation Allow hand watering JUIES DI[1 JOAOODI 01 POSEDJOUI dnolp jug:un:> 341 '2uTA,ou Estes Park ID}El SU SUrejqo *Ed sols'£[ 30 S,UAl Ip 01 pa}JOUUOD p:)0 DIE So lupuu* ·joinos kid 341 g U 1 12 lou 681 10013 JOIDEZE) puu JOIAJOS 30 ino hav eno h w meas ensure the integrity of the Colora 51161[ SOOP OJOIL*X TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum March 27,2003 TO: Utilities Committee FROM: Bill Linnane ~~ SUBJECT: Voluntary Water Conservation Program by Black and Veatch Adoption into Utilities Policy Manual Background: I have attached a copy of the March Utilities Committee minutes and memo for your review. A draft of the Voluntary Water Conservation Program (V-WCP) was presented in March to the Utilities Committee by John Gallagher of Black and Veatch. The committee reviewed the report and recommended that the final draft be presented at the April Utilities Committee meeting. Upon approval, the VWCP would be incorporated into the Utilities Policy Manual, Water Department following the Bulk Rate Water Users Section. A three-day per week watering schedule, as recommended by the committee, is included in the report A summary of the VWCI? will be prepared and mailed as bill stuffers, news releases and also made available in brochure form for handing out to the public. Cosl/Budget N/A Action: Staff requests and recommends approval of the VWCP and incorporation into the Utilities Policy Manual. BL/lb WD 1-1 ... RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Utilities Committee - March 13, 2003 - Page 2 The following bids were received: Truck 1 Truck 2 Truck 3 Budget: $38,000 Budget: $32,000 Budget: $22,000. Water Dept 4x4 w/Utilitv Body Backflow 4x4 Pickup L&P 4x4 Meter Vehicle Transwest GMC: 2003 GMC Transwest GMC: 2003 GMC Pro Chrysler Plymouth Jeep $37,371.00 $19,625.00 2003 Liberty 4x4 $ 7.509.00 Trade-In $20,275.00 $29,862.00 - Bid Price Burt Automotive: 2003 Ford $ 6.500.00 Trade -In $19,712.00 $13,775.00 - Bid Price Phil Long Ford: 2003 Ford $39,176.48 Phil Long Ford: 2003 Ford Estes Park Auto Mall: $ 6.750.00 Trade-In $19,761.00 No response $32,426.48 - Bid Price Estes Park Auto Mall Ferrero Auto Center Estes Park Auto Mall No response No response No response Burt Automotive: 2003 Ford $38,028.48 $4.000.00 Trade In $34,028.48 - Bid Price The Committee recommends: 1) Purchasing Truck 1 from Transwest GMC at a cost of $29,862.00; 2) Transferring Truck 3 trade-in to the Water Dept. in lieu of purchasing Truck 2 (the Water Dept. will transfer $6,500 to Light & Power to be used for the purchase of Truck 3 and delay a new vehicle purchase for approximately 3 years); and 3) Purchase Truck 3 from Pro Chrysler Plymouth Jeep at a cost of $20,275.00 ($6,500 transferred from the Water Dept. as noted above). C. Hwv. 34/36 Intersection Traffic Light Poles Painting Proiect - Request Approval. Director Linnane explained that the traffic light poles at the intersection of Hwy. 34/36 require repainting. CDOT does not provide pole repainting, thus the Town is responsible for this maintenance project. Cornerstone Engineering provided a cost estimate of $11,800 to repaint the poles, provide traffic control, and manage the project. The Budget includes $12,000 for pole repainting. The Committee recommends approval of the project at a cost of $11,800 as presented. WATER DEPT. A. Voluntary Conservation Program - Presentation. Acting upon a water conservation suggestion by the Mayor and Public Works Committee, John Gallagher/Black & Veatch submitted a draft conservation plan, to include recommended automatic drought stage rates, for Committee review. The recommended program includes suggestions for Stage 1, Stage 11, or Stag e 111 water supply conditions: I Stage I. Normal mode of operation. The voluntary water conservation measures listed in the report are suggested to encourage prudent water use. • Stage 11. This stage is triggered by the loss of one of the water supply sources and a likely reduction in the other supply source. Mandatory water restrictions are in effect to reduce water demands. Water rates are increased to recover the loss of revenue under Stage I conditions. A future emergency water rate increase would be required. • Stage 111. This stage is triggered by the loss of both water supply sources. Severe water restrictions are in effect and water rates are drastically increased to recover under Stage I conditions and to penalize unnecessary water usage. A J future emergency water rate increase would be required. The final draft will recommend a watering schedule of 3 days/week based on address WD 1-2 L . RECORD OF PNOCEEDINGS - Utilities Co'mmittee- March 43,2003 - Page 3 numbering. The Town has a limited supply (250)'of water savinD devices available. o the public (upon request). The Town will also offer commercial accommodation& guest door hangers that promote water savings. A full list of recorri~eridation, is - ; included in the report and will be summarized in upcoming months through rUs releases and bill inserts. Areas discussed include water rates, sources, and supply. The Committee concluded that a conservation plan was an excellent approach for potential emergency situations and directed Staff to incorporate the plan into the Utilities Policy Manual to be presented for Committee approval at the April meeting. REPORTS. Financial Report. The 2002 Year End Reports and February 2003 financial statements were reviewed. Termination of In-House Explosive Operations. Superintendent Goehring reported that in-house explosive operations have been terminated and all devices have been returned to the appropriate manufacturers. Advances in technology allow Staff to utilize equipment, in lieu of explosives, to achieve similar results. Cable Channel 39 Request for Proposal (RFP). Director Linnane reported that RFP's were mailed to interested parties to provide operation and programming of community Channel 39. The bid date is April 4th and Stdff will present bid result& at the April meeting. Olympus Dam Project. A project update will be presented atthe Aptil lmeeting. ~ Year-to-Date Water Use vs. Water Rights. Director Linnane reported that actual water use is within 9 acre feet of the projections for 2003. Water Dept. Backflow Prevention Program. Superintendent Goehring updated the Committee on newly published requirements from the State regarding the backflow prevention program. Line Superintendent Named. Director Linnane congratulated Todd Steichen who'was recently selected as the Light & Power Line Supt. He will be introduced at the March 25m Town Board meeting. Employee Suggestion. Superintendent Goehring expressed appreciation to Tom Oldham for his cost saving suggestion to retrofit existing light poles to accommodate new globe fixtures. This inventive idea represents a cost savings to the Town of $600/light and over $100,000 in the next few years. Decorative Light - Ribbon Cutting Ceremony. At the conclusion of the meeting, everyone was invited to attend a ribbon cutting ceremony for the new decorative light fixtures in Bond Park. Project Updates. None. There being no further business, Chairman Jeffrey-Clark adjourned the meeting at 9:00 a.m. Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC, Deputy Town Clerk IND 1-3 = 1. ./111 Town of Estes Park, Colorado Water Conservation Plan Introduction The Town of Estes Park (Town) is developing water conservation policies that include voluntary and mandatory measures to ensure the integrity of the Town's water supply. This report describes measures for the Board to consider in setting these policies. The Town obtains its water supply from the Colorado-Big Thompson (CBT) project and Glacier Creek. These sources are directly connected to the Town's treatment plants and do not include raw water storage. The Town could be without raw water if simultaneously the CBT project was out of service and Glacier Creek was not flowing. The current severe drought has potentially increased the possibility of this occurring. Water Conservation Stages Town staff have defined three water conservation stages that are triggered by the availability of water resources. These stages are as follows: Stage I This is the normal mode of operation. Voluntary water conservation measures are suggested to encourage prudent water use. Stage II This stage is triggered by the loss of one of the water supply sources and a likely reduction in the other supply source. Mandatory water restrictions are in effect to reduce water demands. Water rates are increased to recover same amount ofrevenue as existing rates recover under Stage I conditions. Stage III This stage is triggered by the loss of both water supply sources. Severe water restrictions are in effect and water rates are drastically increased to recover same amount of revenue as existing rates recover under Stage I conditions and to penalize unnecessary water usage. Water Conservation Measures Stage I Voluntary conservation measures are proposed in this stage to embed water efficiency programs into the fabric of the community and achieve permanent reductions in per capita water use. Long-term water demand management programs include both structural and non-structural measures. 1 WD 1-4 Town of Estes Park, Colorado Water Conservation Plan Structural Measures Structural controls are "built into" each individual home or business and do not require a daily, conscious effort on the part of the consumer to save water. Landscape Criteria. Landscape criteria include the following measures to reduce water consumption: • Irrigated Turf Area - Reducing the amount of irrigated turf and making that irrigation more efficient will permanently reduce system-wide per capita water use. For example, to effect a 15 percent reduction in outdoor water use, the amount of irrigated turf area must be reduced by about the similar amount, depending upon the efficiency of the irrigation system. Setting targets for the amount of irrigated area per lot requires a cooperative effort of the general public, landscape design and construction firms, and area homebuilders. • Irrigation Control Systems - New and renovated irrigation systems could include rain or soil moisture sensors that automatically override the timer control of the sprinkler system. This would be a useful feature for parks and other public areas. • Drip Irrigated Area - Drip irrigation is more efficient than spray for many applications, especially those where bushes, flowers, gardens, and unusual shapes are being irrigated. • Sidewalk and Driveway Design - Lot design should be configured such that spray irrigation does not occur on both sides of the sidewalk. In addition, driveways should not consist of paved strips with irrigated area in between. While drip irrigation could be used in such strips, long-term water reduction goals favor the use of full width driveways. Sub-Metering. For multi-unit buildings, the Town should consider metering each customer rather than the structure as a whole. Experience shows that when each customer is accountable for paying the bill, water use goes down. However, the practicality and cost of sub-metering must be balanced against the potential water savings that may be realized. Another possibility is to install a separate irrigation meter so that part of the usage can be separately tracked and billed to the property manager. This may give property managers an incentive to conserve rather than simply allocating the irrigation usage and cost among all apartment or commercial units. Plumbing Code Revisions. The National Energy Policy Act of 1992 has done much to reduce indoor water consumption through the use of low-flow toilets, showerheads, and urinals. Manufacturers are also producing more water and energy efficient dishwashers 2 Town of Estes Park, Colorado Water Conservation Plan and washing machines. However, the following plumbing code revisions should be considered to further reduce unnecessary water use: • Hot Water Lines Insulation - Insulating hot water lines will reduce heat losses and the amount of time the water has to "run" before it gets to the proper temperature. For example, showers can run for extended periods before the water gets to a suitable temperature. Accordingly, pipe insulation can save both water and energy. • Thermostatic Mixing Valves - By running the hot and cold water lines into a single mixing valve, the person taking a shower can set and get the target water temperature much more quickly, especially when the hot water line is insulated. However, homeowners and plumbing fixture suppliers may object to limiting acceptable product lines to just those that use a single valve. • Water Saving Devices - Flow restrictors could be added to residential plumbing fixtures. The Town is providing free water savings devices (limit of one per lot, residential or commercial). • Multiple Shower Heads - Shower enclosures with multiple heads are now commonly seen in residential construction. If the multiple heads are set up in an either/or mode, then water use should not be increased by their presence. On the other hand, if more than one shower head is on at a time, it defeats the purpose of having low-flow fixtures. Mandating only one fixture per shower may be unnecessary and difficult to enforce. However, the Town should encourage, by education or code revisions, that only one fixture be on at a time. Water Audits. Voluntary non-residential water audits of large water users could be conducted by Town staff. Water Line Leak Detection, The Town has a very effective leak detection program that has considerably reduced the amount of unaccounted-for water. This program should be continued. Residential Fixture Leak Detection. Faucet drips should be fixed and toilet leaks could be detected by the addition of food coloring to the toilet tanks.. Non-Structural Measures Non-structural controls include public education, pricing system, and enforcement of restrictions that are imposed during drought periods. Public Education. This includes water conservation outreach programs to schools, homebuilders, landscapers, individual customers, the general public, and the media. Bill stuffers, special mailings, and other educational materials can be used to craft an effective public education program. Such outreach programs will change the way in which people 3 WD 1-5 .,., Town of Estes Park, Colorado Water Conservation Plan view water, which is key to making short-term behavior changes become permanent. Commercial guest room door hangers could educate guests on water conservation and request water conservation. The Town has a limited supply at no cost. Individual water conservation habits. • Bathroom. Turn off water while brushing teeth and shaving. Do not use toilets as trash can. Bathe using half-full tubs and take shorter showers. • Kitchen. Store drinking water in refrigerator and run dishwasher only when full. • Laundry. Purchase high efficiency appliances and wash full loads of laundry. • Voluntary Watering Days and Watering Hours of the Day. Adhere to Town's suggested voluntary watering schedule (see tabulation on Page 5). • Open Hoses - Only use hoses without shutoff valves for deep watering of trees, bushes, flowers and gardens. • Hose Shutoff Valves - Equip hoses with shutoff valve that requires hand pressure to open. • Exterior Cleaning - Sweep patios, sidewalks, driveways, and other hard exterior surfaces before final spray of water is applied, if needed. • Car Washing - Use spray from a hose equipped with a shutoff valve and/or a bucket of water to wash car. Pricing System. To encourage conservation and water use efficiency, many utilities have established increasing volume charge structures. As usage increases, the incremental cost of water increases. Enforcement. Since Stage I encourages voluntary water conservation practices, enforcement provisions are not necessary. Stage 11 Immediate action is necessary in Stage II to reduce water demands. The Town's primary tool for achieving short-term reductions in water use is to declare that Stage II conditions exist and to enact restrictions to reduce water consumption until adequate supplies are available. The goal of the restrictions is to assure that water is continuously available to all customers for minimal irrigation and essential uses that protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. The tabulation on the next page shows suggested demand management measures that correspond to Stage II. 4 Town of Estes Park, Colorado Water Conservation Plan Stage 111 Immediate action is necessary in Stage III to drastically reduce water demands. The Town's primary tool for achieving short-term reductions in water use is to declare that Stage III conditions exist and to enact restrictions to drastically reduce water consumption until adequate supplies are available. The goal of the restrictions is to assure that water is continuously available to all customers for only essential uses that protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. The tabulation on the next page shows suggested demand management measures that correspond to Stage III. Town of Estes Park, Colorado Water Conservation Restrictions Stage I Stage 11 Stage 111 Demand Management Measures (Normal) (Moderate) (Emergency) Impose water rate surcharge No No Yes Allow turf Irrigation Yes Yes No *Designate voluntary watering days Yes N/A N/A Designate mandatory watering days N/A Yes N/A Voluntary landscape/lawn non-watering Yes N/A N/A between 10 am and 6 pm. Mandatory landscape/lawn non-watering N/A Yes N/A between 10 am and 6 pm. Limit lawn watering to 2 hours per day NA Yes N/A on designated watering days Prohibit new lawn seeding or sod No Yes Yes Allow hand watering Yes Yes Yes Allow spray or bucket car washing Yes Yes NO Allow use of automated car washes that Yes Yes No recycle wash water Allow use of automated car washes that Yes No No do not recycle wash water *Voluntary Water days Street addresses ending in 0 to 4: Monday, Thursday, Saturday Street addresses ending in 5 to 9: Tuesday, Friday, Sunday 5 WD 1-6 , TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum March 27,2003 TO: Utilities Committee FROM: Bill Linnane (6/0,- SUBJECT: Requests for two long-term Windy Gap leases of 1 A.F. from 1) Bureau of Reclamations Marys Lake Campground (MLCG) 2) Glacier View Subdivision (west of Marys Lake Road - GVS) Background: Please refer to the attached location map. Town Attorney Greg White received a lease request from MLCG and GVS. Both are currently on wells and are required by the state to provide augmentation water. Greg White supports the requests. Documentation is attached. Greg has discussed the requests with the attorneys and they are requesting 10-year leases, renewable for another 10 years. The Town has a policy to assist local water-user groups since we are the only owners of Windy Gap water within Estes Park. If approved by the committee, agreements will be prepared and approved. At a minimum, the following will be included in the agreements: 1) When a water main is adjacent to their properties, the owners will purchase a water tap. 2) The Town will not guarantee a water supply at all times and potable water-users have the first priority. Cos¢Budget Lease: Current market value of $350/year. Action: Staff requests and recommends approval of the leases. Agreements will be approved by Greg White with a minimum of the two stipulations. BL/lb WD 2-1 - -<-9- c.•,i. d ,--_ i_-I I.:£:Ki@*4*I•*i.vM.WiR '-" ...'.' e- VVIUHM.£11'121111111 ,.ch·n t' .... A:/.1>P '/% 7*i . E-<322 ' r 4 1 - - . . , ' 4,5 U " . 1 .3, I - " ' i 'Wr,LE 1.. SPEt/.., 6 -I,vIA,oE lv" 1 ' . .IrI •De. 1.-1 . " I . 1 22[37&.- I 1 - •,ll . •22™4 i *" - ' , 1.. 7,1.:t.~i 1 ....... . I. L.0"11 -=2.-4..... 'IN: L.. /7 , 522. -<: Mos/,TAL •00· f~ 4 UVE.»ZE+6>l, i . . -A If--1 / 01 J ... 25#nA i M. r- . u . - .k/.1 1 „ .... · 0 -CJ I .:CRE C . 4,7 7:,511, ·i¥1!Ei~ 221: r.-124/- E * I It: . , .la , Al.O. 12.1&.5•"NALSL, an 4~111]RS---\1 -12/2/al . C....4. 9.:. „mi I 4 +OH' 7 , . F. :..- .....:»59 :0:**A= -I:li BEAVER POINT I , * , „ 8 0, ,- I '14 vEYER A - 1121 ~ *L . , I. |,im /88.- m...1, . - A /9 + I . +OVM - ' 27 \ 9~*~T **t ..1 - 4 .1,» . Sue. , -.s >9:i:,ri - . I .ODITION . ... 5 TR•.64 & 1 DE-7 i.,. . „. \I 'i' tr -. - , ., ··07 '" 44# P. L STAT~ON ' =3-; f „ POINT. . I 0~ *2*. Ark ICE , . ~~* ~ ~~ ES ATES' ' ,0 - '* 00 " AIN~S ~ ~~ ...... EL. , . .1. •0 . ..... - r '. 6" ADD a - - - 25 JO . 1 r . 1. I -1, 26 -25 ~' - I -21 36 31 as 35 3.It-1 . "O.. 1 . 1 SECOND - r--7, ./tp¢<.< 1/'. 2 i ..1 5 . 1 · , )4.-_ r-41.9.5204 mE-IR , ADDITION " ~ SUMI ZIV,LIA ~h~ N , NJ,00 ..1. 0. « E r--- =23 ' . POINT #I-*r ~ CO.C.. ...." / m, il-L- 1.6:L. 10'Ur-7-.Zzhl 62 6--13tk :=: " ix ':94*€* '441"rs. i 1 - - f.-mm-- s;: 4 9 /7 " 6 - 1 - .0. · XI "1" 1„k-2, . 4 \-LA e- r. 4 Mul %06 •L H.L 7..0 r -il -1: - I.-. . . 11 1~ 1. . 1. .... , C. I . DO 4 . . . . " I . . . I ..00 0 J .. H GHTS - -, I. M /0.1 I I .11 . , 1.1 „ . I I ... .-/ I . .*.'Il. 1 0 r " \ .&0 - . " FAMS,- '0 - ~0 7~ I ,"92 . 4 n K.ut $ L.Ate.£. C A C.- *. 'El MS , F ION . , f - I. j. . . . 1. .. .. . D . . n J- -ir---r-1-2- -I , 21_U . ..0..CT L. : 891';g 0 - ..' sue. , PROSPECT i _1 © .... 'I " . Vt.i . C..Ra :E,GAS 7. ; 2 - - ourlov *'EM . ., 2. ESTATES ~ . lilli /O •• i. " . 4bli , t . .'<'W.66 11.- / ADDITION 2• .... 1% ,=.-1. 1 . - 1 VENMER . ouv,ov L *..., 4-·. · 29 5 . * ~~~ „ - '0 1 , ./-- ..01 1 . 0 11 ..0. lili . I I OUTLOT . f- 93 2.-9.4-f .1.. 1,1 1 11 - 1 . ...... . 30 11. .'..... i D £ 3, ,~t, L # 2 ... s ~ #2 k- I. . 1 IiI 111 - .. .. " 1 '. 2 1. I " " ... 1 . 1... 10 . . I I 1 11 - f 2 p 1 - .. S ' " RANCH . ' I Ar I - . a, EL I '..421 ' r' 1. „ V'f. I . % E .... 411. .f " S 0 " „ PECT S ". I h . . 10 -LI- - 35.36 * I • • 2 ' CHERO EE, 1 . ow", sue -2: : I . , 5 4 -.- C ' U L *: l.' , N. 4,4 +4 4 Yid 1 +ir i 1., .ru ' 2 1 1, M -Tf\.\ . 6 ./ 2 1 1 A. --- ~112.2. .7, 1.RAA.41 . 1, 12 1 ...e. 2 ~ ' Md ~ ~ . .4 SH/O-/Ell \,~ ESTATES " " Joi 2 1. . 67 4,4 twi 54'2 ./ 1 1, 11 . 122 4 , i .46--- W..e'-=liff,Zirri)- - * .A . . ., 1 4/ 'Phal. \ 71,4 /*.41 7 / Afl A)-9 1 UTE 1 , Es TES . \ A. - . I .4. 1 1 , 7 ~< 0. . 1 ..Irs . .0 - *J I , al...'. ~ sue. I. \ A.2 . 1 ... /"/ a ./ ./ 7 1 I . 1 1. ' , 2'. . D. 1 , . . . 1 - . A , 1.~ .:·ck ' • ., . 4 , 'S J ---- -,C. . '. -- S -7 '1. 0 s , MARY'S LAKE , ..,0 " '. 4 2 D . ..:2€90234 " 1 , ESTATES 2 1 13 GREY , „ i. 1 „ 1 / -; s: -: i, °.¥F-IE?*fi~ n-'u-l_/ *\ 1 VID 2-2 1 FoX\ #. 1.1 1. 1.,0,1 4 3 K.29 ~ / --1 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law Notth Pack Place 1423 West 298 Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 : Fax 970/667-2527 .- February 11, 2003 MR BILL LINNANE TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK CO 80517 Dear Bill: Enclosed please End two letters both dated February 7,2003, from the attorney representing the Glacier View Water System and the Bureau o f Reclamation. Both letters request that the Town lease Windy Gap water to the organizations in order to provide water for augmentation plans of the organizations. Both of the locations for the use of this Windy Gap augmentation water are within Estes Park. Both of the requests are for less than one (1) acre- foor of Windy Gap water per year. However, pursuant to Municipal Subdistrict Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District policies Windy Gap water cannot be used on less than an acre-foot basis. I have the following comments with regard to both of thcsc rcquests. 1. Both of these requests meet the criteria established by the Town with regard to providing Windy Gap water for small augmentation plans within Estes Park. As it has been stated in previous discussions with regard to these small augmentation plans, Windy Gap water is the only water available in Estes Park for augmentalion plans and the Town is the only owner of Windy Gap water within Estes Park. 2. The lease cost of an acre-foot of water should be sufficient to cover the Town's actual cost for pumping and delivering one (1) acre-foot of Windy Gap water (approximately $55.00 per year) plus any necessary administrative expenses in providing the water. 3. The leasing of the two acre-feet of Windy Gap water will have no disceinable impact on the Town's water supply for 2003 or in the future years. If you have any further questiAs, please do not hesitate to call. ~Niytiollyputs, / i , L . u~tpf \ tr # l / Gre£104 A. White GAW/ldr i WD 2-3 4. 4. .......r d-+2/7414/) 12$251211.9:11//11~4 /oME,r"32//i,2/2399 United States Department of the Interior / 0.1, A <~filifill~~~Il:.1.2.:g,%.1 \ 381•!4:17. / BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Eastern Colorado Area Office 11056 West County RD 18E IN REPLY Lowland, Colorado 80537-9711 REFER TO: EC-1340 (MWilson) FEB -7 7003 Gregory White Attorney for the Town of Estes 1423 West 29* Street Loveland, CO 80538 Subject: Augmentation Water for Marys Lake Campground Well, Marys Lake, Colorado-Big Thompson Project, Colorado Dear Mr. White: We are writing to request an agreement with the Town of Estes to provide augmentation water for the well at Marys Lake Campground. Pursuant to your January 24,2003, conference call with Alice Johns and Malcolm Wilson of our office, we understand that the Town may be willing to enter into an agreement with the Bureau of Reclamation to provide augmentation water for the campground well from Windy Gap shares, which are owned by the Town. The amount of augmentation water required by the campground well is approximately 0.44 acre-feet per year, We recognize, however, that per the Windy Gap rules, we may need to enter into an agreement for a minimum of one acre-foot per year. Given the drought that Colorado is facing, we are anxious to resolve the Marys Lake campground well augmentation issue as soon as possible. Hopefully, this will prevent any curtailment of the well and ensuing loss of recreational opportunities at the campground. Please let us know if there is additional information we can provide, and what further steps we may take to pursue an agreement with the Town. Should you have any further questions, please contact Malcolm Wilson at 970-962-4362. Thank you for your consideration in this important matter. Sincerely, /1 Brran person· Area Manager CC: Dave Gehlert, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, 999 18th St., Suite 945 North Tower, Denver, CO 80202 WD 2-4 CILIBERTO & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys and Counselors at Law Carrie L. Ciliberto, Esq. Sheela S. Parameswar, Esq. Judy Hernandez, Legal Assistant Traci D. Rinker, Legal Assistant February 7,2003 yia Facsimile: (9701 667-2527 & US. Mail Town of Estes Park Public Works Committee 96 Greg White~ Esq. 1423 West 29 Street Loveland, CO 80538 Glacier View Water System's Proposal To Lease Aullmentation Water From the Town of Estes Park Ladies and Gentlement Glacier View Water System is in the process of submitting an application for approval of a plan for augmentation and is in need of augmentation water to replace depletions for domestic and irrigation uses. Glacier View,Water System was formed in 1968 as a Colorado nonprofit corporation, for the purpose of supplying domestic water to eight lots within the Glacier View Subdivision. The subdivision is located approximately 1 7 miles southwest of Estes Park and approximately M mile south of the Big Thompson River. The subdivision consists of twelve lots; Lots 1 through 4 are served by the Town of Estes Park's municipal water lines and Lots 5 through 12 are served by a domestic well (Permit No. 19735) located in the southeast portion ofLot 11;. , ''* ' The annual:water demands and consumptive uses are shown in Table 1 (enclosed) As you will see, the total annual demands are approximately 2.66 acre-feet per year and total consumptive uses are approximately 0.35 acre-foot per year The Upper Thompson Sanitation District provides wastel*ater idatment forl,ots 5 through 8. Therefore, approximately 95% ofall in-house uses Will b'd 'r6turned tb'the stream system through the Lincoln Center, 1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 1700, Denver, Colorado 80264 (303) 861-4300 • Fax (303) 861-4333 ciliberto@qwest.net, parameswar@qwest.net, trinker@qwest.net WD 2-5 CILIBERTO & ASSOCIATES, LLC Gla,icr View Prope5al February 7,2003 Page 2 of 2 Sanitation District resulting in 5% consumptive use for the in-house portion of the water requirements. The Sanitation District discharges return flows into the Big Thompson River approximately 1/3 mile downstream from Olympus Dam, below Lake Estes. The irrigation demands have been recorded by Glacier View and are considered to be 85% consumptive, which results in a del)letion of 0.12 acre-foot per year. Total consumptive use for in-house and irrigation uses is 0.25 acre-foot per year. Therefore, Glacier View is seeking a long-term lease from the Town of Estes Park for the use o f approximately 0.25 acre-foot per year of augmentation water. Any assistance from the Town ofEstes Park would be greatly appreciated. As you are aware, Glacier View is in close proximity to the Town of Estes Park. It would be ideal ifwe had your assistance. Thank you for your time and consideration. Ifyou have any questions, or ifyou require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regaIds, 1 k"-.4.-4 r»,r,cu *-1 Sheela S. Parameswar Enclosure WD 2-6 .. TABLE 1 - CONSUMPTIVE USE Glacier View Water System Larimer County, NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 35, Township 5 North, Range 73 West TABLE 24 PROJECTED IN-HOUSE CONSUMPTIVE USE FOR GLACIER VIEW In-House Demand (afer) In-House Demand Consumptive Type of Use No. of Units Per Unit (af/yr) Use (afj,0 m Single Family Dwelling 8 0.31 2.61 0.13 Total In-House Consumptive Use 0.13 Caloulation Anturnotiofic: (1) In-House consumptive use assumes 556 loss ta wastaw,ter treaonent TABLE 28. PROJECTED IRRIGATION CONSUMPTIVE USE FOR GLACIER VIEW Irrigation Demand Irrigation 040 Consumptive Use Irrigated Landscape Type m No. of Units m (af¥) Ornamental Trees 3 0.15 0.12 Total Irrigation Consumptive Use 0.12 (2) Ne lawn ifrigation. Thrie ofthe eight homol irrigate ornament,I trges. (3) Irrigation amount as re©oided by Glacier View Water Sy*m. TOTAL CONSUMPTIVE USE In-House Consumptive Use anyr. Irrigation Consumptive Use af\yr: 0.13 Total Coneumptive Use af\yr. 0.12 0.25 2/712003 Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. Job Ne. 538.1 17D 2-7 LIGHT AND POWER FUND 2002 VS. 2003 MONTH CASH FLOW COMPARISON MARCH MARCH 2002 2003 Difference Revenues Utility Sales $ 656,723 $ 684,048 $ 27,325 Other 16,679 (3,803) (20,482) Total Revenues 673,402 680,245 6,843 Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 385,919 $ 367,338 $ (18,581) Distribution and Maintenance 88,933 84,663 (4,270) Customer Billing and Accounts 46,193 40,544 (5,649) Administration and General 111,117 63,748 (47,369) Transfer to Vehicle Fund 368 2,617 2,249 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 632,530 $ 558,910 $ (73,620) Debt Service 25,145 24,917 (228) Capital 74,222 35,134 (39,088) Total Expenditures $ 731,897 $ 618,960 $ (112,936) Surplus (Deficiency) Before Transfers $ (58,495) $ 61,285 $ 119,779 Transfers to General Fund and Museum 61,396 65,661 4,264 Surplus (Deficiency) After Transfers $ (119,891) $ (4,376) $ 115,515 Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. Note 2) March 2003 utility sales include three cycles instead of the usual two. Note 3) The Revenues - Other category is negative as a result of a one-time adjustment made to change the method used to account for investments. The past method used was the amortized method, to be consistent with current GAAP the method has been changed to the fair value standard. R 1-1 LIGHT AND POWER FUND 2002 VS. 2003 YTD CASH FLOW COMPARISON YTD YTD March March 2002 2003 Difference Revenues Utility Sales 2,117,632 2,148,582 $ 30,950 Other 56,136 37,535 (18,601) Total Revenues 2,173,768 2,186,117 12,349 Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply 1,130,993 1,090,303 $ (40,690) Distribution and Maintenance 273,161 271,931 (1,230) Customer Billing and Accounts 150,004 170,073 20,069 Administration and General 294,335 248,016 (46,319) Transfer to Vehicle Fund 1,104 7,850 6,746 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense 1,849,597 1 1,788,173 (61,424) Debt Service 75,434 74,750 (684) Capital 200,569 127,442 (73,127) Total Expenditures 2,125,600 1,990,365 (135,235) Surplus (Deficiency) Before Transfers 48,168 195,752 147,584 Transfers to General Fund and Museum 184,189 196,983 12,794 Surplus (Deficiency) After Transfers (136,021) (1,231) 134,791 Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. R 1-2 LIGHT AND POWER FUND 2003 TOTAL BUDGET VS. ACTUAL YTD CASH FLOW ANALYSIS YTD Budget March YTD % of Target 2003 2003 Budget % Revenues Utility Sales 8,019,012 2,148,582 2796 2896 Other 378,180 37,535 10% 25% Total Revenues 8,397,192 2,186,117 26% 28% Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply 4,219,944 1,090,303 26% 2896 Distribution and Maintenance 1,153,430 271,931 2496 2596 Customer Billing and Accounts 862,685 170,073 20% 25% Administration and General 1,187,438 248,016 21% 2596 Transfer to Vehicle Fund 31,400 7,850 25% 25% Total Operation and Maintenance Expense 7,454,897 1,788,173 2496 2596 Debt Service 299,000 74,750 2596 2596 Transfers to General Fund and Museum 787,930 196,983 25% 2596 Capital 1,057,380 127,442 12% 2596 Total expenditures 9,599,207 2,187,348 23% 25% Note 1) Charge for Services target 96 based on previous years data. Note 2) Source of supply Target 96 based on previous years PRPA invoices. Note 3) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. R 1-3 .. WATER FUND 2002 VS. 2003 MONTH CASH FLOW COMPARISON MARCH MARCH 2002 2003 Difference Revenues Water Sales $ 198,655 $ 137,841 $ (60,814) Plant Development Tap Fees 22,970 10,470 (12,500) Water Rights Tap Fees 24,900 12,255 (12,645) Other 5,900 907 (4,993) Total Revenues $ 252,425 $ 161,473 $ (90,952) Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ - $ -$ - Purification 22,259 29,447 7,188 Distribution and Maintenance 30,707 29,223 (1,484) Customer Billing and Accounts 10,177 5,635 (4,542) Administration and General 41,084 37,108 (3,976) Transfer to Vehicle Fund 1,781 2,375 594 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 106,008 $ 103,788 $ (2,220) Debt Service 25,564 25,348 (216) Capital 10,543 176,314 165,771 Total Expenditures $ 142,116 $ 305,450 $ 163,334 Annual Surplus (Deficiency) $ 110,309 $ (143,977) $ (254,286) Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. Note 2) March utility sales included three billing cycles in 2002. R 1-4 WATER FUND 2002 VS. 2003 YTD CASH FLOW COMPARISON YTD YTD March March 2002 2003 Difference Revenues Water Sales $ 432,355 $ 410,700 $ (21,655) Plant Development Tap Fees 41,940 89,883 47,943 Water Rights Tap Fees 46,652 99,225 52,573 Other 21,943 43,527 21,584 Total Revenues 542,890 643,335 $ 100,445 Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply 75,958 75,619 (339) Purification 55,109 97,380 42,271 Distribution and Maintenance 89,677 105,398 15,721 Customer Billing and Accounts 24,809 22,718 (2,091) Administration and General 125,999 173,442 47,443 Transfer to Vehicle Fund 1,781 2,375 594 Total Operation and Maintenance Expense 373,333 476,932 103,599 Debt Service 115:040 76,044 (38,996) Capital 263,666 259,261 (4,405) Total Expenditures $ 752,039 $ 812,237 $ 60,198 Annual Surplus (Deficiency) $ (209,149) $ (168,902) $ 40,247 Note 1) Transfer and debt service are annual amounts accrued on a monthly basis. Note 2) March utility sales included three billing cycles in 2002. R 1-5 ... WATER FUND 2003 TOTAL BUDGET VS. ACTUAL YTD CASH FLOW ANALYSIS YTD Budget March YTD % of Target 2003 2003 Budget % Revenues Water Sales $ 2,183,040 $ 410,700 19% 18% Plant Development Tap Fees 175,000 89,883 5196 18% Water Rights Tap Fees 330,000 99,225 30% 18% Other 100,013 43,527 44% 18% Total Revenues 2,788,053 643,335 2396 18% Expenditures Operation and Maintenance Expense Source of Supply $ 125,000 $ 75,619 60% 80% Purification 398,351 97,380 24% 25% Distribution and Maintenance 561,408 105,398 19% 25% Customer Billing and Accounts 248,686 22,718 9% 2596 Administration and General 782,075 173,442 22% 25% Transfer to Vehicle Fund 9,500 2,375 25% 25% Total Operation and Maintenance Expense $ 2,125,020 $ 476,932 22% 2596 Debt Service 304,176 76,044 25% 25% Capital 1,269,135 259,261 2096 25% Total Expenditures $ 3,698,331 $ 812,237 22% 25% Note 1) Charge for Services target based on previous years data. Note 2) Source of Supply target based on previous years NCWCD invoices. Note 3) All other targets based on % of Year complete. R 1-6 ¥. I. At : 7* a '' 0 4, ¥ 9 - 7 9 - 4 .- j \ .te. I 06 r -1% - 4 1. ' 4 1 / 1 * 1 1 . 4 4 .4 . - t' 1. , i " 0 > 6 i f.,1 16 4 I : 27 - f h 0 0, t. . 1, 14. 4..14. 2\4 4 + r ' i , 1~ 1 , 11~ 14, , . + V . t . I . 4 , Z,-1 .. 0. 1 r r . t., .. .,.4 4 44 4 4 I I . ... 4. I. 4 1 J .- 1· , ~ } *t *** r ./. ¥ - I I . f, .Y j i I .:I-r' s . 8 0 42 . - t ' 4. *1 + '' 6 *. 7 0-· i, 6 ,1.0 + 4 h * 0 L ¥ - 1 + I L = - 40 0 . 4 , . . ~, . 4 Z . E < S . ' . 1 1 , . 1 .-- I. I I i + . , 5 h ..fi ¢ O.1 0 , 4 ' 6 4 £ c col]2. 2 7 , U.11.11 .*1 * 14 *7 .0 4 , e 3% 0 . Ing N co - 5.*606,1~1 , I Uj 3 2 .2, % j 4~ ~t:t, , ~ - t.1- 0- 4 1 . 4 CE . ': . 4 O 4111 4 6 1 , I a 0 C f . . + « - ..5 3,2 I , 6 - *O L T.. . .'1 1. , 4 * fl 6 ' ,* 6 4 0 --4 . 24, , 1 . m.1 . . 0*,4 + 4, I · f I 4 -- 1 . I? . * a i '* r . .i- 4 41,1 . Ill 1% 4 4 17 r NA + 000 i 9 ~ i . r .6 '10 0 0 L 1 01 M N i+41+ - - - . .:*, 1 D I . 6 11: 4 . , ..r, . . 1 , & :~ * , 4 .0 r & 4,0 1 4 1 ' 1. 9 0 / 8 ..1 4 1 4, I 4 i 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 8 .1 A , 0 4 04 f . 9,1 1 . b i 4 i e 4 4 1 4 - 44 (AMINjELSXS i... .-/ , i 1 0 + I 4 -'. 4 j . Loadh99.xls 4/7/2003 40 100 ueG PURCHAS 0 23000 - /19000 - 4 -* - 0008 L 000ZL 600091/94 2 000* L L 1-- i 't 1&4***4*********an**m**9*2**4%=99%83% 121 | 1 1 1 1*83%899*%*%%**%8$**8%8***%**%8***%8%8§****SM 0 ' 1 + :1:11 1 1 429 .,4*:. 5/1//1~~1%31".~.#2~%1//////////r**%8%83**SR//rAS*S/***%8%81~~,ri 1~k 1 11¥44 t . {Ird 1 = it 1 1 1%*%8*3*§$*S*%8%8%88%8%89$$*%8*83./.It.*0*00.*Str#.tix....Blfiti 'i ' -;l '7~*%8%89*8**%8$68**3*SWES*%82*8**SESS*S*$9% 1 il I &%%83$$8*8*%**%8*8*%8*%89%6&%8%8%8%$&%8*8*%8**R 1%88*8$$99%8§8****%*****$3**$8**3*9%85****3% ' 1 - 13333%**$*%8******SS**%839%*8§82*§8**9$**k : 1 1 k**S*****§**%8*%8**%*3*9***22**%83**§**%&**99$$ ' 1 1 4 *8888888888888888888888888888*8888888888888888888888888888888888888%8888888888* 1&*8%893%63SRESS**%*%8%*§8%%§*%83%*SRRM**MS***%**** 7 1%8*~~%8*3$*$$%8*3***3*83%6$**$&R*SMS*$*i*%16**SS***RN · 1 1 1 1 - 4, 1 m, 0, '':w 'ii,le,i:*402*4{2'& ' - , : rivAl Fil lia 0 I U.Lil 1,1 [N >, t:i·C'tw.€~~ 111 1 , 11 1 6 1,1 C,11)¢.11 1 :1'A,£'fll" !11''lkMfiti.?1f ~it'~~4 ''3'. 4 .~~"' I, ~,,I,:~9Jitt ~41.,.1 '·12,*i~ ·d; 1 1 11 1 *14 114:1 - r 1 11 1 Loadh99.xls 4/7/2003 02000 1002 0 GOOZ B EL- LB A 1 * 4 ·4 'i . ,. 01 N , 4 .#2 R 1-%,0 S + X A .. 6 . . I 1 6 1. 1 0. i. ..4 1 v, I 1 2.1 .4 V. 4 . , ,% I . 4 4 5, 2 ; . , 9 ~'7*%***%******»4********%*man*****%*% '3 6 I ·1• - ' I . 49 b 14 /4 * 4 .1 6441 -0 - 1 17, 0 1 1 e , 1 1 I + ., 53%8***S*%8***MS*****§8*%$%80**69*$$**%6*:§ g * 4 .,4 9 1 . t I L * , 1 %1 i 18%%%%%8*%8%8%883***%8%*%8%818*8%83**§*% 9 . . i.,1 : J :- .• , 4 9 14 14 .. 4 - . F. % - 0 4 4 M > • LU *Ax, ** ~ ¥ ~ |~8*SMS*****%8*3*93%**%8*****3338* R 11% 1- 4.I , . .B. 04 ' ¥ g.\ 3 -1 A - ..J 2 4 #: +P >:1kk r , t 4„ 1 A. ... . -- .14*94 *. e 4. - : O- . 1 9,4 •1***%**%8%8**Sill.~Ill#.0*0.4.04..4/*Sk. i X. 1 i 1 + .4 4 4 1 P 1 UJ . 1 i .1 1****ds***93*****%68§* S. I 4 5 &. t. t< 1 2 f * 4. 1 4 4 .4 -6 I 0 J Nt 6, 1 ,i1 . 4 f. i I . 4 * * F'' , t*%*maeRNSX . Ng€&42 13 1 1 . 4 - 61 + 4~ »E*EXOXGX<*eX·~·:·>k * S Ika/**63§24 (DI /.0. 1 . I £ I 4. e. Emet€ m 1 + 'n / 1 4 + . 1 ... i 4 .O t. 0, 0 f e * 0 , a % g 18 .. 0 k-t l O 0 0 0 (C) * I. Chi r . * 0 . A 4 0 Kese40¢nd-HAAW 01* ~ 1 r # .41-g.* Ir G> , Pr/4 - ~ .* 9 1 - 38 ' 2 1 . 1 4 . . 0. 4.* 14 . . Loadh99.xls 4/7/2003 ' £001 I - ENERGY ' Jd'V '9>,-4 2002 SA Gooz- 1-- 100000*- - 809 0- - r N CY) • .0 0 CD h .....1 r ' . Ill: 0 0 0 49 4 + 14 01 NV 1 % .Ettem - 16 *t l · Plt 41 - P ' . * 11* * . . ¥ , 1 4 'b . I . . 1 1 I I + .0 ¥ I ' >r 1%,2,;~A*11Aaaa;P0~912~717;NI~@4a*29@9* . 0~ * . , 4 . I & ., .4-* . 1%* r. . 4 i " & , ,$> 1 .k , . .1 * 3 1 .I -- 1 4 4. . 4 - 3% •i' i ; 1 4 6 .' 1*,m*»»m»* 3-: U . 4 1 + * 1, 6 a £ # : $ 4 *1' . 1 9 .0,1 #,77 *w :Ap,)7*t»2*1*wear<49, g '' ./ 4 1 ® . 4 . I , , 11 -\ 4 »107700*0999999NOUg<*%*%%PAM > . 1 4< . 1. -3 7 :L I . . 1 , 1 4 i I 1 .2 1.-1 1 - I -S., 1- B . |"AP'Wxpq<*PV*MiNWA.NIMWAX#9% 24 i 4w , 11 'A ... '41: 1 . & . I. ·-ft . 10 E i %0* ¥ * . . 0 4. - ' ,74 1 1 r 0 1 IK LI 1,)*A.* : 74,75*1212*22~9*54 1 1 154 4 1 A .4 * I + h .~4%%%94#i·>,NU; AMM94%9@M@5 ,.i~ i - I -4 I I , 4 : i t . e. 11 . .. .1 , , ./ I. ./.4 -L 6.9 . 0 '. 24' 4 ... 4 0 1 '.< 1 7,44444,120'M21007,441'W'grie p y. 2% r % 1, e . 4, 1 1 , 4 . , .' . 46 . I. :4* ........................- . ......................+ . 196,6,6779994,4,6,6,4,64,mk*4444*&6 1,2 6 L - a - Il 1 1 f K r. ' i 4 - . * 1*gurd<'11,*rati<Fil'Fird'4821'40,7,220 £_ f . |76 0/ 1 1 I + $ 21 ............. ./..... + + + + + + +6- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . .: :- R*&,4,94%*,6,;r<Mi/94%96916904.6.691Q .. 4464442*4• 4 1 /1 1 ..1 - 9 1 141 4.1 -14 0 0, ./ 1. 1 * I ./ 0 0. .'· .Oil ' O 0 08 0 0 - 8 0,0 0.0 1, f 00 p- LO, * 7, 47 'k'. 1 ($) 141¥9 A-IH+N(}01 4 ,-,- 4 , ,!... j I . 7.5 I . . I SALEHIST.XLS 4/7/2003 A Aff. , Fy I ELECTRIC SAL ES BY MONTH TOWN OF ESTES #ARK 4 Sn ,# ~ nr - .unr '000'00£ 00,000*- ' - - - - I - - . I ., * i - 0 + + I ; N, f I , . 4./ I. 4 ' 'Try* » 1 1 0 - 4 - 1 4 N *,34 5 1 4 1 I ..£ 0 a>. M. W, O I 0 ktht«300©t©x\\NNYN> Ig: 212 <\f\'»Nx» 0* 0 4/4 $ j , 1 .. 1 N . I. . J i " + 4 + . 46 .1 1 .1 ' 1 ¥& > 1 k>\6600¢€9€x>NN\9\600004».'xY'..VVY' <Pri:fxk + 0 ¥Z i. . t ., 1 - 1 4 . 4 1 -1, 7 fl 4. A .le I J 4 + ~49'»249·,f'·fvV'·/V«'·/'VvNA/V»th/vt»jvNA/~€'©44%*, I .. . . 2 , t,. '4:kil f i . 5. »· 1* 11 . ' i>F,•4; ' 4. - 4 ® ~ * 1 *~rrY'<*2·~«44,<kxh<Not<%<*X*N><1.AivY#,·<«,f.%.*ik./>,2.4.k. 91 - 1 4 . i i . 1 1 -, LW ·- it«\>%0««N«~<9·«N\\Nt»N»<»~: 111 3 4 A . 0 4 :. 1/ ,< 9 . . * * t:<1<"."fkf''c'<*.'·<'~«'YEY<'r'rp'XEFY'x> 1 -1 4. . , d- , i WN¢,e UJ - 94..4 -- 7 1*. J . 23 LU * . 6 1- . I t '. 041 2 , 0 ~: 1,f'<4**9'~044'99\49\99\49 *20 * 11 I A 2 , 1 i. 1. 4 . ..6 ¥ 4 '*, % 4 2 9,4 - C 1, *ra I 4 1 I . . : i. *:... ' h. '* 1 P. 1 k . .4/1 i. 2 * r'.. f. + 1¥0 + - 1% 41 + ; 4 6 ..0 0 0 * *16= * G C ©© * 6- 8 4 0 , 011 I 1 * A 0 A > L * 4 + 72./.:/**&17£5 1 . 2 1 , I • 0 1 EL . 1 -. . 1. . 1 .11 , g S 44 . €/. m.# f , e & 1 0 1 . 4 1....%. 4,% . I 1 1, , 4 12 6 f. · · 1 , r 41.-60« m U 4 0, 54 0 0- * 1. .IT ' ' 41 * 1 . + I I . 41 1.. 1. . 2 o > 8. * 81.8 0 a 07 + 0 0 . 0 04 I - O, O 0 d ' O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O.*k . 0 0 O-* O- . O * 0, 'Sl¢ * t.rf ./ M * 491 " ·* 4 $ 1. 1 1 1+ 1 + * 0 1- - 19\Nk€f\,<f,7<4<,g:vj<,C,wi'.b<11 < F€*x»»wrd<.4 g - 1 11 , 4 ($).93-IVS 31.Va 01 ZIVEA . , . 1 · 1 i i 4. e *_S . I. 4 SALEHIST.XLS 4/7/2003 LOOZO • 1001 EEZ340 145 * des. JinD . · 1.Inf 0 unr j X · id ' 9L-LB YEAR TO DA EL CT .LA EOOZ %01'Z 4/8,000,0004.-L-t 7,000,00-0 , 'A 4/7/2003 = 2003 Year-to-Date .e Electric Revenues vs Budget 6 f . .: r 9,000,000 1 -6 8,000,000 7,000,000 - -- :* 0 6 - 6,000,000.' · ~~ # 5,000,000 · _ - - - - = 0 Budget 4,000;0001 . ~ - - - -* I Actual 3,000,000. 2,000,000 f ' 1,000,000 ~11 --Ill- a. 5 > 42222*.1&9)202 * <C . I - 1 i * . 2003 Year-to-Date PRPA In*oices vs. Budget t.1. . . I I. r. 7 . 4 Y . 4,500,000 4,000,000 . 3,500 000 7 4 .• 3,000,000 2,500,.000 - 1 - . -7 -- - 0 Budget ' :D 2,000,000 --- - - - -- --- -·, I Actual 1,500,000 --- 11000,000 , a I '. ----*# ...*-- *.%*K---- 500,000 ------- . 1 . 1 ... 1 n.t i ~St M < ·# i *~ f- 3- ~ 33 ~ M ~ 1 f LE $ U Z. O * . I Rl-17 1 080 1 1 11 1 NOSINNn9 ' NVOUOIN 1803 4 ON¥13Aol . 1NOADN01 SNI1100 1803 ' 330*1OH V- S9NIWdS 00¥80100 831N30 N3dSV NOI1VI0OSS¥ 0I810313 A311VA 3BOROd r + NALXVH NOI1VIOOSS¥ DIU103-13 99080 *1011 My¥d 93163 * uC ~ 4 X t Lifjl S9NIWdS 000MN319 - S>IHOM13N ¥llnov N011¥100SSV Ol&110313 U3Albl 311HM NOUVIOOSS¥ OIE!10313 3NllHDIH 1~ NI¥1NAOd > ¥38 NIVINnol,8311411 NOI1¥IOOSS¥ 01810313 A311VA ¥dINVA i# Im 1 SVININV S¥-1 A983N3 130X 0 1 SNIEW 1 w¥01¥1 CE N0I1¥IOOSS¥ DIH10313 M-A <C D 1- 9808$31rf Z < [ ' ¥0¥NVID - 00 7 1 . SNOil ATIOH 1 AVWM 2 ONI 83Mod 031INn NSS¥ Oly)10313 A-LNROO NOSINNA9 1 4 01313914'Uds ~ 333803¥0 F 1 vnnw ~ 30830383 018103-13 S>IHVd NI¥1NnOIN ¥1Nnr ¥1 83M0d 1¥Wny A311¥A ON¥89 7 N019NI-1809 I ¥1130 ~ OVOINIWI 4 Nolvy NOIIVIOOSS¥ 0IW10313 03 NOI1VI0OSS¥ 0IU103-13 3Wld013 NSS¥ 0IW10313 36081NOIN-¥1130 N0I1¥IOOSS¥ 0IU103-13 M3IA NIVINAOK N011¥100SSV 83M0d 1309IIN NVS ¥38 UNROO N¥98001 Ql *311¥A SIM NVS NOI1¥IOOSS¥ W3M0d 00¥80100 1S¥3HlnOS 01300 €6 OOU)# -Z 00-1-1<row LL O I NOO M R I $70 - SOURCES CAMU INDEPENDENT SURVE MUNICIPAL VESTOR OWNED UTILITIES - 01/03 INVESTOR OWNED REA $80 - COST FOR 700 KWH RESIDENTIAL USE RURAL ELECTRICS, MUNICIPALS AND $90 - CAMU RATE OMPARISON 1 : 1 lino$ 2003 WATER USE PROJECTIONS / ACTUAL CONSUMPTION EstimatedLkaliRLj Estimated Actu-al I Depletion Estimated Usage Usage Usage Usage Factor Depleted USA WG CBT Marys Marys Glacier Glacier Glacier Glacier (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) Nov-02 0 0 102 95 0.06 6 0 6 0 Dec-02 68 87 39 12 0.06 2 68 2 0 Jan-03 102 97 0 0 0.06 0 102 0 0 Feb-03 94 87 0 0 0.06 0 94 0 0 Mar-03 0 62 107 29 0.06 6 0 6 0 Apr-03 0 111 0.07 8 0 8 0 May-03 0 159 0.12 19 0 19 0 Jun-03 79 146 0.17 25 79 25 0 Jul-03 42 229 ~ 0.13 30 42 30 0 Aug-03 7 222 0.11 24 7 24 0 Sep-03 0 175 0.1 18 0 18 0 Oct-03 0 , 121 0.08 10 0 10 0 TOTAL 392 L _-333 141ll 136 148 392 148 0 2003 WATER RIGHTS 2003 2003 2003 projected projected projected Water acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet Rights available used unused USA 500 500 392 108 WG 300 200 * 148 52 CBT Units 1207 228** 0 228 CBT carryover 110 0 110 TOTAL 1038 540 498 For Reference only: * Ordered only 200 acre-feet out of available 300 acre-feet ** Calculated based on 30% quota minus Windy Gap collateral water (1207 * .3) - (200 - 66 Nov. to June prepay carry over water) = 228 R 1-7 . I 2003 WATER USE PROJECTIONS Depletion Estimated Estimated Estimated factor Depleted USA WG CBT Marys Glacier Glacier Glacier (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) 2002 Nov 0 102 0.06 6 0 6 0 Dec 68 39 0.06 2 68 2 0 2003 Jan 102 0 0.06 0 102 0 0 Feb 94 0 0.06 0 94 0 0 March 0 107 0.06 6 0 6 0 April 0 111 0.07 8 0 8 0 May 0 159 0.12 19 0 19 0 June 79 146 0.17 25 79 25 0 July 42 229 0.13 30 42 30 0 Aug 7 222 0.11 24 7 24 0 Sept 0 175 0.1 18 0 18 0 Oct 0 121 0.08 10 0 10 0 TOTAL 392 1411 148 392 148 0 2003 WATER RIGHTS 2003 2003 2003 projected projected projected Water acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet Rights available used unused USA 500 500 392 108 WG 300 200 * 148 52 CBT Units 1207 228 - 0 228 CBT carryover 110 0 110 TOTAL 1038 540 498 For Reference only: * Ordered only 200 acre-feet out of available 300 acre-feet ** Calculated based on 30% quota minus Windy Gap collateral water (1207 * .3) - (200 - 66 Nov. to June prepay carry over water) = 228 R 1-8 Snowpack and Streamflow Comparisons April 1 st, 2003 -44341- -1,©".r Snow Water Content % of Average Colorado's Statewide Snowpack | 94% Upper Colorado River (1) 119% South Platte Tributaries (m 130% Snow-Water Content Comparisons (inches) April 1 st, 2003 April 1 Comparative Snow-Water Content Snow-Water Content Watershed 2003 Average 1 % Avg 2002 2001 2000 1999 Blue River /15.2 13.0 117% 9.2 12.7 13.2 11.6 Upper Colorado River l.14.1 12.0 117% 7.4 9.8 12.6 9.4 _~ Willow Creek 11.6 9.2 127% 5.9 8.1 10.8 7.1 Fraser River 14.1 12.0 118% 7.2 11.3 12.2 11.8 Poudre River 14.7 12.8 115% 8.4 9.2 12.8 10.1 g Big Thompson River e 18.0 14.8 121% 9.3 11.3 15.7 11.6 4- St. Vrain River 13.5 8.6 157% 4.6 5.8 9.5 6.4 66 Boulder Creek 15.8 11.5 137% 6.0 9.6 11.8 7.6 Apr-Jul Worst Case, Minimum and Most Probable Streamflow Forecasts (1000 af) (3) Worst Forecast Most Apr-Jul Most Prob Watershed Case (4) Minimum Probable Average % Average Blue River 124 250 284 274 104% Upper Colorado River 149 191 217 221 9896. -r ue,re,-orr Willow Creek 13 48 55 49 112% -r=--- Fraser River 93 97 111 115 97% Poudre River 178 193 227 231 9896: AAErr ·s•-48' Big Thompson River 73 83 97 96 101% a ·44* St. Vrain River 60 71 84 94 9056: Boulder Creek 40 42 48 53 9296- South Platte Tributaries 351 | 389 | 456 | 473 96% Precipitation Totals Average ~ % Average March 3.23 1.02 317% November-March 4.36 2.69 162% (1) Includes the Colorado, Willow Creek, Fraser and Blue River Watersheds (2) Includes the Poudre, Big Thompson, Saint Vrain and Boulder Creek Watersheds (3) The forecasts were adjusted to reflect poor soil moisture conditions that could affect runoff (4) The Worst Case Plan assumes a similar loss in snowpack as in April 2002 ~gr-• I. Town ofEstes Park Residential Electric Rate Options Effective 2/1/2003 Residential Rate 6,982 customers Monthly Customer charge $4.00 per month Monthly Energy charge $0.06663 per kWh This is our standard rate for residential customers. Over 74% of our residential customers receive service at this rate. This rate is available to all residential customers. Customers with electric heat may receive service at this rate provided their annual consumption does not exceed 25,000 kWh. Electric Heat Rates Residential Basic Time-of-Day Energy Rate 2 customers Monthly Customer Charge $5.00 Monthly On-Peak Energy Charge $0.07995 per kWh (September through April) Monthly Off-Peak Energy Charge $0.06330 per kWh (September through April) This is a new rate available to all residential customers. On-peak hours are 4 to 7 p.m. weekdays, All other hours during the week are considered off-peak. All hours on the following holidays are considered off-peak: January 1St, Memorial Day, July 48, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. During the months May through August on-peak and off-peak hours are billed at the Residential Rate energy charge. Residential Time-of-Day Energy Rate 192 customers Monthly Customer Charge $5.00 Monthly On-Peak Energy Charge $0.08066 per kWh Monthly Off-Peak Energy Charge $0.02850 per kWh This rate is available to all residential customers with electric thermal storage heating systems, On- peak hours are 6 a.m. to 1 p.m. and 3 to 10 p.m. weekdays. All other hours during the week are considered off-peak. All hours on the following holidays are considered off-peak: January 1St, Memorial Day, July 48, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. Residential Demand Rate 473 customers Monthly Customer Charge $5.00 Monthly Energy charge $0.063 per kWh (September through April) Monthly Demand charge $7.15 per kW (September through April) This rate is available to all residential customers, but is most economical for customers with electric baseboard heat or radiant ceiling heat and have a demand controller installed in the residence. Monthly demand is the highest 15-minute average electric load occurring each month. During the months May through August energy consumption is billed at the Residential Rate energy charge and there is no demand charge.