The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Safety 2006-09-28Ei LE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA September 28,2006 8:00 A.M. PUBLIC COMMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT Action 1. Street Closure for Halloween Reports 1. Victim Advocates 6 month report 2. Scope of Services FIRE DEPARTMENT Action 1. None Reports 1. Pandemic Influenza Planning- update 2. All area fire restrictions have been lifted 3. Child passenger safety seat fitting station designation 4. Ground breaking for RMNP fire station 5. 2nd Quarter Reports 6. Scope of Services NOTE: The Board of Trustees (or Public Safety Committee) reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. t hp LaserJet 3015 HP LASERJET FAX invent Sep-25-2006 4:33PM Fax Call Report Job Date Time Type Identification Duration Pages Result 375 9/25/2006 4:29:09PM Send 5869561 0:36 1 OK 376 9/25/2006 4:29:50PM Send 5869532 0:49 1 OK 377 9/25/2006 4:30:44PM Send 5861691 0:53 1 OK 378 9/25/2006 4:31:42PM Send 6353677 0:48 1 OK 379 9/25/2006 4:32:35PM Send 5771590 0:57 1 OK Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Chairman Wayne Newsom and Public Safety Board Members From: Lowell Richardson, Chief of Police Date: September 25,2006 Re: Street Closure Request Background: The Police Department is again promoting the Downtown Halloween Program and youth safety by requesting the closure of Elkhorn Avenue to vehicular traffic from Spruce Drive to East Riverside Drive during the hours of 5:00 p.m. until approximately 9:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 31, 2006. Budget There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: Staff recommends approval of this road closure. 1 ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES July 2006 Report Agency Name Date Estes Valley Victim Advocates, Inc. July, 2006 Address P.O. Box 1287 City State Zip Phone Estes Park CO 80517 577-9781 Execulive Director Mary Mesropian Brief Program Description: Estes Valley Victim Advocates, Inc. provides advocacy to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, staking, other crimes and trauma. Victim Advocates are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. An advocate can support victims through the immediate crisis, medical exams, law enforcement interviews and the court process. Advocates provide information on victim's rights, the cycle of violence, victim's compensation, protection orders and the legal process as well as make referrals to safehousing. The director coordinates the advocate program by recruiting, training supervising, scheduling and evaluating victim advocates. A counselor is available to provide short-term 0-6 months) individual counseling and supportgroups to assist victims in recovering from the trauma ofthe incident. Objectives: Law enforcement, Estes Park Medical Center or other referral sources page victim advocates and advocates then provide services at the most appropriate safe location. After the services are provided to the victim, the victim advocate submits a written report. If an arrest has been made, a report is sent to the District Attorney's Office to use in considering bail conditions. A Court Advocate will attend court with the victim if requested. There are three areas ofadvocate assessment: Safetv. Options and Stabilitv. These questions are on every advocate case sheet and advocates must answer these questions on every call: Is victim(s) physically safe? (Not in immediate danger.) Victim knows options and rights and knows what to do next? Is the sitâ€¢Ation stabilized? This includes emotional stability as well as their ability to take care oftheir own and their children's immediate needs. All victims are offered individual counseling and support groups. Assessments are completed by program participants in the form of victim assessment needs questionnaires. This year our program has been focusing on removing the blame from the victim and helping them see it is not their fault. Ten out often people answered that they strongly disagreed with the statement "I feel like I am responsible for what happened to me." Another positive note was that 100% of our clients responded that they would definitely contact us ifthey were ever in need of our services again. The 1 results ofthe survey were very positive and support the course that our program is following. We collaborate with Crossroads Safehouse, Alternatives to Violence and Larimer Center for Mental Health Sexual Assault Victim Advocates to keep our measurement tools appropriate and current. Future Objectives: We will continue our 24 hour/7 days per week victim advocacy services with the objective of continuing to have highly trained volunteer advocates delivering quality care, infonnation and referrals to victims as well as supportive services, i.e., individual counseling and support groups. Education to the community and in our schools on the issues of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and date rape are a top priority. We are still moving towards our new goal of adding a safehouse to our program. Our new building, which we have resided in for one year, will become not only our offices and outreach, but a safehouse for battered women and their children. Since 1988, when a battered woman needed safety in our community we have either had to refer her to another community for safehousing or house them in a hotel for up to 3 nights. Leaving the community is often difficult: jobs are lost; children need to change schools; friends, family and support systcms are left behind. If a victim of domestic violence is willing to leave the community, we often find that Northern Colorado safehouses are often filled to capacity. When we house someone in a hotel, not only are we using much needed financial resources but women and children continue to be isolated and receive no support from other women in the same situation. Many return to abusive situations because they feel they have no alternative. The Estes Valley Victim Advocates' board of directors began conducting a capitol campaign with the guidance ofa local consultant and grants are being prepared to purchase the building. The building committee is in the process of receiving estimates for repairs, ADA compliance upgrades and security measures. We have written grants for a fence to enclose the safehouse which will include a paiking area and children's play area. 2 ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES, INC. INCIDENT REPORT OVERVIEW JANUARY - JUNE 2006 FIRST CONT. PHONE TOTAL INCIDENT CONTACT CONTACT CONTACT CONTACTS Domestic Abuse 56 women 3 44 124 16 children 5 men Sexual Assault 8 0 3 11 Death 7 1 2 10 Assault 7 0 2 9 Stalking 5 0 1 6 Counseling 29 56 11 96 Group Counseling 15 75 0 90 Other - Crime 5 0 1 6 Other-Non-Crime 11 1 1 13 Latino Clients 12 0 0 12 Totals 176 136 65 377 Volunteer hours: 361 1 EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT LARIMER AND JACKSON COUNTIES V.A.LE 1875/ VICTIM ASSISTANCE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT BOARD August 10, 2006 MARY MESROPIAN ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES P.O. BOX 1287 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 RE: Grant #: 2005VL13 Agency/Project: ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES/CRIME VICTIM CRISIS ADVOCACY - AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES Dear Mary: At its recent meeting, the V.A.L.E. Board reviewed the evaluation that was submitted by your agency for the evaluation period ending July 17, 2006. The Board was impressed with your evaluation and I was asked to write you a letter thanking you for the wonderful job that Estes Valley Victim Advocates is doing in providing much needed victim services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and other crimes. Your obvious dedication and commitment provide endless benefit to crime victims, especially to battered women and their children so desperately needing safety. Thanks to yowend your agency for all that you do. Sincerely, ~ , Michael Ligkett V.A.L.E. Board President 201 La Porte Avenue, Suite 200 â€¢ Fort Collins, CO 80521-2763 â€¢ (970) 498-7200 â€¢ FAX # (970) 498-7250 =Â£2 *JA~-w 4,1.... ah <NO. 0 2 * a M 0,1 2 I. I - - r a I.:.=.0- 60&030 Â® I ./ / . 2 2 mesRE R g=Â£ C)&.t. C> . . . E g . r 82. 2 . 7 4 .1 1 r EME - 64 E 1. N - 2 8 LO . ~3: %~00-lfi ~2% Â§ %Â®&2:1~~fi@;Â£ '222 EE ff 21 11 N 9 1 2 gg 4 hi . 83 c &*E Cil . 48 132%03 *i % 2Â§%~ a C Â§ 0 J I Ek ./ /2 Ble: 2 1 1 1 i i 38*#048623 coguo lou)-r-C.Q! 8.32 . 8,82 ...0. $ t . I I $ $ 2 2 2 ENS *:89 224 4 0) 0, 0 =-=.2.-. -222 01 . I. (0 00*- --- d â‚¬A ew ./ ::= S SS g gg e a C - NIC' -- 04 - (4 an 8 2% p 22 (D 6 9 0%80.2 &25 5 E â‚¬a E SE 2 22 8 '2 2 :g EEg 22% E8 E@ 2 & i . . 2% f Man-â‚¬*EÂ· WORA â‚¬ 14 B E 2 = e & ge: 2 . 1 {f /fnae 2 $2 BE. S 38.= - /2E2** 6 611% .2-fiti ihi i~ U-i:imiall:Â·22%25*U milide ~Rgq (125, %94911ia .â€¢su)*22 55 2!8*12% 202006,00.9026=Egh /3~~2&-no ru 0 0 <- 9 C al//1122'22,2,2/,%25 m.241*3 23/131"34$32&34 NOT 1- ONk,OAS COLL â‚¬Q:UU Q. 86 68Zt %01Â·Â£9 (%~ I no data available 9Â£00 q eonpe Price: $1,885,643.00 $1,460,264.00 $1,539,16 $1,611,10 $1,758 463.00 $1,885,643.0 aiqe"ele mep OU al elleAe elip OU Iqelieie ejep ou se,nuiul g Aouetj,eule-uou) (se,null.U 9Â·Â£ 1.LS) alqepeAe elep ou eiqeiteAe ejep ou 2002 2003 2005 ( L 16 elep ou) (Aowetimwe-uou 91,Â·s) 11'Ae elep OU elqeiteAe elep ou eiqelieAe emp ou %6 /6 1988 %66/â‚¬Â»LE$ L/quo Ucense inspecitions mentation/Management Patro/ Investigations Restorative Justice Police Administration i Investigations 'Zl~t'~ Juvenile Crimes Leadership and izational Management e-Introduction Program edures Storage/Management/inventorv BEEPr ute & Assess Commun tion Surveys sonal Downtown Ser,ices nd Recommend Staffing Levels for Department (as needed for Town) SB-94 {grant funding) ommunity Presentastions lop Mutual Aid Agreeme pumnb~~~~idi~~mi~~~uy Cortections r patrol services Felony Crimes Inve'.St/Â©ics Juvenile Status Offenders 69-Z9Zt rson Investigations Studies Services Coalition gent Transportation 001 Resource Officer Fi~~e~~BAJns ejeW eouejeelo se r PBrs tion for Town uouebqsmul Clearer,ce Rate rime Clearence R lilli-~il OLD 0O 1- OLD N Ar h 00 9906 4- h w 41 .- 1- A h 10 0 a) 1.0 0% 2 4- 10 CD r- O It r- r- 2 0 --C 0 N . & N CO 0- a) 4 O 10 -2 00 C OLD 0 00 06 ~ Sh C) O, , 64.1 -010 2 00 GÂ°Ci 1.0 St, I P 7 9 0 mi Epa P 0 = 15 0 Â¢41 .:?gy 0 0 a> e R (D g 8 (D 029 -2 0 t < 0 g &02 EcE 1 -a)(00 6 .6 1 0 & 2 5 E -5 3 #3 11 0 : Fr* (1) m 6- rd E 0 C 0 r -- 0 EEC E A :35%gu = & ALL C 0 0 C E #:CZE:goed=31 2 0-ga, m.%==-ayz ma M u, 0.2.EN<5Â®210%52*xg *SO.MOLLIOf<LU<a>LUO. LULLI, Town Population* 5576 5707 5822 2002 2003 2004 2006 Police Communication Expenses $456,673 $556,411.0 $555,969.0 $615,406.0 %66/2 90 L $ %66/0 L -Z6$ ~6/179'011"$ 6Â£ 9/ L /066/6Z-Â£9$ 12/Im.Ii- ESLSS 6- Les 7 6ZZ9LL 19469 00996 jueluetje 0L6Â£ 4904 GOZZ 14901 69911 92091 9901 *OLZ L961 juelue5 8 Z L in04 Jed Z EL in04 Jed 6 6 in04 Jed 6 d 69 inoil Jed Lk Jn04 Jed Â£,- in04 Jed 89 Jed Â£â‚¬'g Xep Jed gg'g Aep jed Zg Xep Jed 8 Price: (Four Y $526,689.00 Radio Communications (EPPD, EPFD, LCSO, EPMC, GHFD, RMNP) Fingerprinting (government, child providers, day camps, schools) 911 Services (Estes Valley) Department Quarter Reports Document Photocopying Records Management Crime Data E Department Annual Receive Walk-In Customers 4- r~11 1 - -1 CBI Monthly Animal Control : p r- T- .2 'Bjr ctivenes Â·4 m 1Â¥3.- i. -841: 4. 'if:t 0 Fil 0 4. a) E & a) le. 1@*. . . fe= - *1 .-It 5 4 fl 32 ; 32Â·n~ &2 32 32 ~ 0 **1 o, r.l. 0 4,di LO 0 00 0 -te, 4 1 M < (n iRA 3 1 fits Ott 1 ,Â·3* 12 *9 #Zi, 1,3 1 'MI , f.* 122, M. 1 1, -O 3R itt~ i-32. 32 ./ 32 3~ 61 1 atom g / Â£ f y M 2% - Ltâ‚¬9 j tuw -Di, U iÂ¥; 241 .g i 1 *4&. - 11 01:; 3 i ./ D. 1 001 1 N N . r . 1 1 I - yi 1 i 062 6 61 0, 9*9 0 1Â· t., m P 84> ~032 Ck . 71 I .5 0. M ft 05% R Â«7 2! 32 01 i. 3 0 *9. M Â» CD *1 t. 22 //1/ 0/1 M 2 37 4 50 4 i 4 3 rit' If 44 4,1 , m K Â£ 1 '3 23 -s <44 Â·Â· 4 3 , 1 Â¢10 *V 2 j 1 -42= % 1%30 = 4 901 44 4 1 9% 1 2 -ay 39# 2.11 2 -1 1 1 ..R 4 - 82 27 44 039 a k. ,ll C - 4 Eo -- emie 0 Â£* 6- 90 Ed = CIO 1 E (. E Pe 0 Â·E * C t, P J 14= m = 0 i C i , 4 -8. if,.O Cla 0 2 b o, 0 b - 910 p ; 14 CE i 0 ' E 1 33 U 0 NA_NE_ma-i R 16 3 W co 0 0 (0 2 0 (0 2 8 -E q 3*-O-<o-D$,ggoo- Â· < E W lili 85% -I..--- ' 3Â¢mzw~ 14"mp-- ~ L -f*te:&83 < # 6 ,,' 9 Ail E 4 R n s/90% Population data provided rapherthrough 2004,2005, nd 2006 are estimates based upon growth rate trend. .<11 V Nve t'*2. 9*M ~ '+ *9 ~~ ' pu . U . 06 Quow el# lo pue Aq pe#Il.uqns pesseooid SUodei lie) spodebl peSSeOOJd dmin Calls (answer by 4th 6uu pul Aq JeAAsue) slieo L pjepums leuoileu Jeelu) VO aIN Customer S 4* IE gia 2 1 lo 0 .1 h Or C e NO CD w r to 00 0 4- 0) 6 & ..T CNI 00 N 52 2 -14 0 10 0 a, 0 @ 01 junOUIV 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Budgeted Dollars 1912395 2095573 2 2288615 2414718 el Costs 1741998 1868918 1976620 2107953 2208923 O&MCosts 143787 1 161662 148795 Slsof) leUUOS]ed -m- 000OL Capital Costs ~ pejeSpnEI -- 1 00000L 91$03 IAI9O 000L Capital Costs 19000 9001 9001 *001 Â£001 1001 1000000 OOL 0L 10000000 ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2006 - SECOND QUARTER INCIDENT RUN REPORTS Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) Alarm Date Between {01/01/2006} And {06/30/2006} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 1 Fire 111 Building fire 3 1.63% $390,000 60.96% 113 Cooking fire, confined to container 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 114 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney 1 0.54% $100 0.01% 118 Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 0.54% $10 0.00% 131 Passenger vehicle fire 2 1.08% $5,400 0.84% 141 Forest, woods or wildland fire 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 142 Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 143 Grass fire 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 160 Special outside fire, Other 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 15 8.15% $395,510 61.82% 3 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 300 Rescue, EMS incident, other 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 41 22.28% $0 0.00% 321 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with 3 1.63% $0 0.00% 322 Motor vehicle accident with injuries 14 7.60% $90,600 14.16% 323 Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 324 Motor Vehicle Accident with no injuries 11 5.97% $62,500 9.77% 341 Search for person on land 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 342 Search for person in water 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 352 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 2 1.08% $76,000 11.88% 353 Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 79 42.93% $229,100 35.81% 4 Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 2 1.08% $200 0.03% 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 12 6.52% $0 0.00% 413 Oil or other combustible liquid spill 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 421 Chemical hazard (no spill or leak) 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 422 Chemical spill or leak 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 424 Carbon monoxide incident 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 440 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, Other 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 445 Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 3 1.63% $0 0.00% 463 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 6 3.26% $14,700 2.29% 30 16.30% $14,900 2.32% 5 Service Call 00 Service Call, other 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 531 Smoke or odor removal 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 09/25/2006 09:53 Page 1 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) Alarm Date Between {01/01/2006} And {06/30/2006} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 5 Service Call 542 Animal rescue 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 551 Assist police or other governmental agency 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 561 Unauthorized burning 3 1.63% $0 0.00% 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 10 5.43% $0 0.00% 6 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, Other 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 611 Dispatched & cancelled en route 7 3.80% $0 0.00% 622 No Incident found on arrival at dispatch 3 1.63% $0 0.00% 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 5 2 . 71% $0 0 . 00% 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be 2 1.08% $0 0 . 00% 653 Smoke from barbecue, tar kettle 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 671 HazMat release investigation w/no HazMat 8 4.34% $0 0.00% 28 15.21% $0 0.00% , False Alarm & False Call 721 Bomb scare - no bomb 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 733 Smoke detector activation due to 7 3.80% $200 0.03%- 735 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 736 CO detector activation due to malfunction 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire - 4 2.17% $0 0.00% 744 Detector activation, no fire - 1 0.54% $0 0.00% 745 Alarm system activation, no fire - 5 2.71% $0 0.00% 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 2 1.08% $0 0.00% 22 11.95% $200 0.03% Total Incident Count: 184 Total Est Loss: $639,710 09/25/2006 09:53 Page 2 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Dollar Value Saved & Loss Analysis Alarm Date Between {01/01/2006} And {06/30/2006} a Count Total Total Total Percent Percent Incident Type Values Losses Saved Lost Saved 111 Building fire 3 $1,101,400 $390,000 $711,400 35.41% 64.59% 114 Chimney or flue fire, 1 $75,000 $100 $74,900 0.13% 99.87% 118 Trash or rubbish fire, 1 $600,000 $10 $599,990 0.00% **. ** % 131 Passenger vehicle fire 2 $7,000 $5,400 $1,600 77.14% 22.86% 322 Motor vehicle accident 12 $105,500 $90,600 $14,900 85.88% 14. 12 % 324 Motor Vehicle Accident 8 $128,500 $62,500 $66,000 48.64% 51.36% 352 Extrication of victim(s) 2 $76,000 $76,000 $0 100.00% 0.00% 411 Gasoline or other 1 $10,000 $200 $9,800 2.00% 98.00% 463 Vehicle accident, general 4 $37,000 $14,700 $22,300 39.73% 60.27% 733 Smoke detector activation 1 $0 $200 - $-200 0.00% 0.00 % Grand Totals 35 $2,140,400 $639,710 $1,500,690 Total Percent Lost: 29.89% Total Percent Saved: 70.11% 09/26/2006 14:31 Page 1 :Iii A.U %8 84=1 Incident Type Summary Alarm Date Between {01/01/2006} And {06/30/2006} Good Intent Call 15% %96 (end ON) uomplloo 6"93 e C t. . 32<> P * V<992 2 % Â®ft, ~.bev /4 5 Jnismv P 0 9% Â®4, 41* iÂ® e 1 42) 58) 1 Abe e %b <O 1 4 t<. 01 % 1 Â·0 ab 4 e 13, Ved 14 9 G 0 %1 el G 0 e j:) 0 0000 0 0 to V M N sleo,o JequlnN a 2003 a 2004 12005 m 2006 2nd Quarter Comparison of Calls by Type Heo JoediL 3Â¢03 90 80 70 60 [JU- OL Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incidents by Zone (Summary) Alarm Date Between {01/01/2006} And {06/30/2006} Pct of Pct of Zone Count Incidents Est Losses Losses IN In city limits of Estes Park 84 45.65% $58,310 9. 12 % OUT Out of city limits of Estes Park 100 54.34 % $581,400 90.88 % Total Incident Count: 184 Total Est Losses: $639,710 09/26/2006 14:35 Page 1 0 C g G 9 4%0 '46 b % /4 M-%% 960 48/tre 9% A 1 - 0 96 9 e - 9& / 4be .4 0 % .44 Â® -'rmar-r Â·. p 1 - 40% <46 ., fu?Zh -I'.I-..%/I/ 5...... ,...Ill #45* 0 94000 -04 44+64 0% 9Â® 9% LO O 0 i 0. â‚¬6 Number of calls 25 lout city 2006 2nd Quarter Calls -within/outside city limits 50 sueo Jo edAL 45 40 35 30 20 15 10 1 2006 City Limits Detailed Incident Type Report (01/01/2006) - (06/30/2006) Incident Type City Limits IN OUT Fire 111 Building Fire 1 2 113 Cooking Fire 0 2 114 Chimney Fire 1 0 118 Trash or rubbish fire 1 0 131 Passenger vehicle fire 1 1 141 Forest, woods or wildland fire 0 2 142 Brush or brush-and grass mixture fire 0 1 143 Grass fire 1 1 160 Special outside fire, other 1 0 Rescue & EMS 300 Rescue, EMS incident, other 0 2 311 Medical Assist 26 15 321 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident w/injury 2 1 322 Vehicle accident with injuries 3 11 323 Motor Vehicle/Pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 1 0 324 Motor Vehicle Accident with no injuries 1 10 341 Search for person on land 1 1 342 Search for person in water 0 1 352 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 0 2 353 Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 2 0 Hazardous Conditions 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 1 1 (No fire) 412 Gas Leak (natural gas or LPG 6 6 413 Oil or other combustible liquid spill 1 0 421 Chemical Hazard (no spill or leak) 1 0 422 Chemical spill or leak 1 0 424 Carbon Monoxide incident 1 1 440 Electrical wiring/ equipment problem, other 0 2 445 Arcing, Shorted electircal equipment 3 0 463 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 2 4 Service Call 500 Service Call, other 0 1 531 Smoke or odor removal 1 0 542 Animal rescue 0 1 551 Assist police or other governmental agency 1 1 561 Unauthorized burning 1 2 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 0 2 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, other 0 1 611 Dispatched & canceled en route 1 6 622 No Incident found on arrival at dispatch 1 2 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 3 2 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be 2 0 653 Smoke from barbecue, tar kettle 0 2 671 Hazmat release investigation w/no hazmat 5 3 September 2006 .. 2006 City Limits Detailed Incident Type Report (01/01/2006) - (06/30/2006) Incident Type City Limits IN OUT False Alarm & 721 Bomb Scare - no bomb 1 0 False Call 733 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 1 6 735 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 0 1 736 CO detector activation due to malfunction 0 1 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire- unintentional 3 1 744 Detector activation, no fire- 1 0 745 Alarm system activation, no fire- 3 2 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 2 0 TOTAL 84 100 TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 184 September 2006 .4 4 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department 2nd Quarter Training Hours Date Between {01/01/2006} And {06/30/2006} Fire Dive Rescue EMS Monthly Total January 348 42 73.5 463.5 February 303 8 126 437 March 158 43 55 256 April 165 20 0 185 May 922 40 6 968 June 134.5 0 10 144.5 Total 2030.5 153 270.5 Total Training Hours 2454 . too to RIâ€¢00 5% ;28225}g 0 0 28 2 N 2 8 A. r (9. n "01 (q - -h O C) CON O) LO- UT N If) O O r- 9- C\,1 44 66 66 te .- Lf) O 0 0 0 r 00 9- O 1.0 r- - CNI 0 h ib 55 r-r M*0*M-u- U 01% 10*1000 VENg 867&29 10 N 1.0 00 to N r- 23 *a %28N O 0) 09 20 W R 4- cv 1- CO th.- A-r- ee 0 4 - .0 rs V l.r) 000 C Lo O 10 web Q. 68 64 r- Y (\1 66 â‚¬4 AcvÂ©001Â·00001~(D "CNIC)'- -- 0 52 â€¢ece 00 xi- 91-00 000('DN RgnED ~-Â£0 10-1. 4-LOG)LO O9008ig@ 00 N CD CNN %~5#3 Â§#EN 00 N 10 r 91- C) 91- 64 64 r- 01 64 64 "%25/3/5= 51 %5 13 REW 2 2 22~ 00 CD N r- 1.0 â‚¬ R r le r- a)- â€ž LC) 0 r- 9- 0 01 co Eboo 0 Q te e 64 64 co .0 4 5 E .2 3.0 4 ACDOOLOOr,-00 CONâ€¢-00 en r- CNI .C V, 4 1-=C-)NO)00) r--(9 O(90)N :839Nci 51- D C ~ 3, ~ 4~ 10 (N OO MMNEW 10 00 91- 00 (0 % LU r CNI 00 * r- 1.0 G E-C E:@Q:OS 4- 00 A C) G (D 1.0 r O /0 00 0) (9. - 3.13 2 2 3 !:i ~ 2 -3 2 4 60 r. DQ-LEOSI- *100-LL 03 00 N 41 r N 64 66 C 2 2 C 3 8 .C H> 3 ch ch 2 -9 3: b:,0 Â§-a W Â£% 80 Co x x U) . Â£ 06 i#.glf ELLILLI 5 12.SED [2 -0- * 13- ffÂ£ 34 % 2 & &.1-./ E B & B Â©a 0 4 000- B (D Â® 2 1.11 2- 2 3 < Â·e k (D (D -0 - g. D w. (13 31 v 41 00T O.6.- 01-M 1 020*[ECELL13&'nUI~CELL.1 1- LL LL 1- LL Q. O.1- U=M: *A 08 96 10/AID# Response Services cation/Outreach Records Management & mitigation Personnel/Training 5571 5576 5754 Fire Suppression blic fire safety Incidents 77,010 erns unteers Scope oiServicesÂ° Eke -enadment Rescues irefighter edu ation senuebe je410 o 2002 Hazardous material spills JeejunIOA/Sin JeejunloA/sjnoW 4oee#no ant flow tests â‚¬31 Water Supplies hours 00 0 0 00 Md 0 N 00 1 32 r-N C E 0 r- Â¤- a) 16 iii lB & -~g 3~3~Lia#IW C\1 *A (2) Goal 312.70 Actual 304.86 349.60 298.16 298.35 210.22 10m/80% 10m/80% 231.33 193.06 181.14 224.24 Response time 10m/74% uoilenleA >ioowesuedxa 838 9002 pue 9002 :,002 46noilll JelldeJBoulea elels ell] Aq pejew#se S! ejep uo!;eindod. Total Hours/volunteer â‚¬9Z ZgZ 90, pue-4 le41 uo n peseq sejelul]se >1001. / ue~je~neiABA~e~Ad~Id pessesâ„¢ { 2 ponse time (3) Per NFPA 1720 table 4.3.2 se!1!0 uospedwoo Jo Xeruns uo paseg (4) Effectiveness slunolue peleluilse - enig Town Clerk's Office Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Repola Media From: Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk Date: August 21, 2006 Subject: Meeting Cancellation - Public Safety Committee The Public Safety Committee meeting scheduled this Thursday, August 24~h at 8:00 a.m. has been cancelled.