The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Safety 2006-01-26ifi t.i,Â· 2..; L PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA January 26,2006 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT Action 1. Estes Valley Victim Advocates Contract Reports 1. Zone Summary 2005 - Sgt. Rose 2. Community Assessment - Officer Allen 3. Republic Parking 4. Pit Bull Study FIRE DEPARTMENT Action 1. Request for Fireworks Permit from Cultural Arts Council of Estes Park - presented by representative from C.A.C.E.P. Reports 1. Year End Reports NOTE: The Board of Trustees (or Public Safety Committee) reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. hp LaserJet 3015 HP LASERJET FAX invent Jan-20-2006 5:05PM Fax Call Report Job Date Time Type Identification Duration Pages Result 72 1/20/2006 5:00:55PM Send 5869561 0:38 1 OK 73 1/20/2006 5:01:38PM Send 5869532 0:49 1 OK 74 1/20/2006 5:02:32PM Send 5861691 0:54 1 OK 75 1/20/2006 5:03:31PM Send 6353677 0:49 1 OK 76 1/20/2006 5:04:25PM Send 5771590 1:11 1 OK PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA January 26,2006 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT Action 1. Estes Valley Victim Advocates Contract Reports 1. Zone Summary 2005 - Sgt. Rose 2. Community Assessment - Officer Allen 3. Republic Parking 4. Pit Bull Study FIRE DEPARTMENT Action 1. Request for Fireworks Permit from Cultural Arts Council of Estes Park - presented by representative from C.A.C.E.P. Reports 1. Year End Reports NOTE: The Board of Trustees (or Public Safety Committee) reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Chairman Wayne Newsom and Public Safety Committee Board Members Fem: Lowell Richardson, Chief of Police CC: Randy Repola, Town Administrator Date: January 19, 2006 Re: Estes Valley Victim Advocates contract for services Background Each year, the Estes Valley Victim Advocates receive funding from the Town of Estes Park for services rendered to crime victims who are residents of Estes Park. The police department has received and reviewed the contract presented with Town Attorney White. There are no concerns or recommended changes for this years contract. Budget/Costs $7,500.00 (as budgeted for 2006) Recommendations Staff recommends approval of the contract as presented for the year 2006. 1 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES TOWN OF ESTES PARK THIS CONTRACT, dated this day of , 2006, is by and between the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, STATE OF COLORADO, 170 MacGregor Ave., Estes Park, CO, a body politic and corporate (the "Town"). and ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES, INC. ("Contractor".) RECITALS WHEREAS, the Town plans to continue a project entitled, "ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES," and WHEREAS, the Town desires to retain the services of the Contractor to assist it in studies relative thereto and the planning and designing thereof as set forth in this agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, and for other good and valuable considerations, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Town and the Contractor agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: the "Contract Documents" shall consist of the following: a. This Contract b. The Scope of Services, attached hereto as Exhibit "A;" All of which are incorporated by reference as though set forth in full herein, whether or not attached hereto, and shall form an integral part of this contract. If there is any conflict between this Contract and the other Contract Documents, this Contract shall control. 2. THE WORK: The Contractor shall furnish the labor, equipment materials and supervision necessary for or incident to the complete and timely performance of everything described or reasonably implied from the Contract Documents (the "Work") except as provided for herein. 3. INSPECTION: The Town reserves the right to monitor and evaluate the progress and performance of the Contractor to ensure that the terms of this agreement are being satisfactorily met in accordance with the Town and other applicable monitoring and evaluation criteria and standards. Contractor shall cooperate with Town relating to such monitoring and evaluation. 4. PAYMENT: Upon satisfactory completion of the Work, and provided that Contractor is not in default of the Contract the Town shall pay the Contractor the firm fixed price of SEVENTY FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND 00/00 ($7,500) in quarterly fund distribution on or about January 2006, April 2006, July 2006 and October 2006, in equal increment payments of $1,875. 5. TERMINATION: The Town reserves the right to terminate this Contract, in whole or in part, with or without cause upon thirty (30) days written notice to the Contractor. In the event of termination, the Contractor shall incur no additional expenses and shall perform no further services for the Town under this Contract as of the date of receipt of the notice of termination unless otherwise specified by the Town. The Town shall pay the Contractor for all services satisfactorily performed prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for other services required by the Town to be completed prior to termination and satisfactorily performed. In the event of termination for cause, the Contractor shall be liable for any and all damages, including without limitations, the cost of procuring similar supplies or services and all other costs and expenses incurred by the Town because of such failure. 6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS, PAYMENT OF TAXES AND UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE: In performing the Work, the Contractor acts as an independent contractor and is not acting as an agent, servant or employee of the Town. The Contractor is solely responsible for necessarv and adequate worker's compensation insurance and shall be responsible for withholding and paving all federal and state taxes. The Contractor and its emplovees are not entitled to unemplovment insurance benefits unless unemployment compensation coverage is provided bv the Contractor or an entitv other than the Town. The Contractor understands and agrees that it is an independent contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As such, the Contractor is not entitled to employment or insurance benefits through the Town. Also, the Contractor understands and agrees that it is solelv responsible for all Federal and State income tax, FICA taxes and unemployment insurance taxes. The Contractor also understands and agrees that it is responsible for workers' compensation coverage and taxes for itself and anv emplovee. Z INDEMNIFICATION: The Contractor hereby agrees to and does indemnify, defend, save and hold the Town harmless from any and all liability, loss, costs, charges, penalties, obligations, expenses, attorney's fees, litigation, judgments, damages, claims and demands of any kind whatsoever in connection with, arising out of or by any reason of any violation of the contract or of any law, ordinance or regulation by the Contractor, his agents, employees, servants, subcontractors, business invitees; or by reason of any injury or damage however occurring to any person or persons whomever (including the Contractor, his agents, employees, servants, subcontractors, or business invitees) or to property of any kind whatsoever and to whomever belonging (including the Contractor, his agents, employees, servants, subcontractors or business invitees)- or from any cause or causes whatsoever arising out of the performance of services hereunder. 1. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS: a. The Contractor and its subcontractors shall purchase and maintain such insurance in a company or companies licensed to do business in the State of Colorado as will protect them from claims which may arise out of or result from operations under the Contract whether such operations be by themselves or by any Subcontractor or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. The insurance required by this Contract is set forth below: b. Comprehensive General Liabilitv: The Contractor shall procure and keep in force during the duration of this contract a policy of Comprehensive General Liability insurance insuring the Contractor and naming the Town as an additional insured against any liability for personal injury, bodily injury, or death arising out of the performance of services hereunder and against liability for property damage with a combined single limit of at least $1,000,000. The limits of said insurance shall not be a limit to the liability of the Contractor hereunder. c. Comprehensive Automobile Liability: The Contractor shall procure and keep in force during the duration of this contract a policy of Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance, insuring the Contractor and naming the Town as an additional insured against any liability for personal injury, bodily injury, or death arising from the use of motor vehicles and shall cover operations on or off the site of all vehicles controlled by the Contractor, whether they are owned, non-owned, or hired, with a combined single limit of at least $1,000,000. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, be a limit to the liability of Contractor hereunder. d. Other Insurance: The Contractor shall procure and keep in force during the term of this Contract, Worker's Compensation and such other insurance as may be required by any applicable law, ordinance or governmental regulation. e. Terms of Insurance: Insurance required shall be with companies qualified to do business in the State of Colorado with a general policy holder's financial rating of not less than that of "A" as set forth in the most current edition of "Best's Insurance Reports", and may provide for deductible amounts as the Contractor may deem to be reasonable for completion of the Work, but in no case greater than $20,000. The Contractor shall not do nor permit to be done anything which shall invalidate the insurance policies referred to in this section, and the Contractor shall immediately advise the Town in writing if a reduction in coverage or other modification of the insurance coverage occurs. Insurance policies shall be for the mutual and joint benefit and protection of the Contractor and the Town. Such policies shall be written as primary policies not contributing to and not in excess of coverage which the Town must carry. f. Proof of Insurance: Prior to the commencement of the Work, the Contractor shall furnish to the Town certificates of insurance policies evidencing the required coverage. Such certificates shall provide that cancellation of the policies in such insurance shall not be effective until thirty (30) days after written notice to the Town. The Contractor shall identify whether the type of coverage is "occurrence" or "claims made". If the type of coverage is "claims made" which at renewal, Contractor changes to "occurrence", Contractor shall carry a six-month tail. The Contractor agrees to insert the substance of these insurance requirements in all subcontracts. Furthermore, the Town will hold the Contractor responsible in the event the subcontractor fails to have adequate insurance. g. The Town reserves the right to approve variations in the above requirements upon request of the Contractor, in the Town's sole discretion. h. Nothing contained in this agreement constitutes a waiver of the Town's governmental immunity pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. 9. AMENDMENT: a. This Contract contains the entire agreement of the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and, except as provided; this Contract may not be modified or amended except by written agreement of the parties. b. The Town reserves the right to omit any of the tasks identified in the Scope of Services upon written notice to the Contractor. 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: Governing Law and Venue: This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado and venue shall be in the County of Larimer, State of Colorado. Assignabilitv: This Contract is voidable by the Town if assigned by the Contractor without the prior written consent of the Town. Survival Clause: The indemnification provision of this Contract shall survive the completion of the Work and the termination of this Contract. Compliance with the Laws: The Contractor shall observe and comply with all applicable laws. including but not limited to federal, state and local laws, regulations, rules or ordinances that effect those employed or engaged by it, the materials or equipment used for the conduct of the Work, and shall procure any and all necessary approvals, licenses and permits, all at its own expense. Severabilitv: If any provision in this Contract shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not invalidate any other part or provision hereof. Renewal: This contract is subject to renewal annually upon review and agreement of the Contractor and the Town. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract. TOWN OF ESTES PARK BY: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES, INC. ATTEST: BY: EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Term of Service: The term of this agreement shall be from January 01, 2006, through December 31, 2006, unless earlier termination pursuant to the Contract. This Contract shall be renewed and/ or modified as necessary before the beginning of a new grant term and prior to the termination date of the Contract. 2. Remuneration for Services: The Town shall pay Contractor the amount of $7,500 for immediate victim assistance as set forth in paragraph three ("Services Provided") herein. Providing services to victims of crime ($5,000) and crisis intervention ($2,500) in non-criminal incidents. The Town's obligation to Contractor shall not exceed a total of $7,500 for the entire term of this Contract. The Town shall also provide "in kind" contributions such as temporary use of a telephone and/ or office while in the service of victims at the Police Department. The Town will also continue to provide pagers for the advocates not to exceed the total cost of $35 per month. 3. Services Provided: CE!!RG_#h,lfproqide-thefoll&*f#g?=BiEE p -114-presdmativ@k to Â·.2@ii,bkidil*?FwdneÂ· efr.,Jii' +*sail.fbr: imniedia*..crikis.-1*WEZREimCI@Ef f3611*seli41 2=Fod#.actgGE'i,E~idUweiit,46Wliifmiaf~ '.Suf.repe*~0alse~.6.dhd/~dther.asita~ri-t~ lt#ittiins.of allcriineh2iiU'Â¢661Nihhceib the:14*s 61~ tiie Siate df.â‚¬016rmloj 4. INDEMNIFICATION: By accepting referrals from the Town to Estes Valley Victim Advocates, Inc., Contractor hereby agrees to fully comply with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Contractor agrees to be fully responsible and liable for making counseling and support programs available for use by disabled participants. Contractor agrees to and does indemnify and hold the Town and its agents and employees harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, injuries, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees relating to or arising out of Contractor's failure to comply with the ADA. 5. POLICE RECORDS RELEASES: By accepting copies of official and confidential Police Reports, Contractor agrees to not release these reports, or any information contained therein, to anyone except its own agents/representatives who are acting in the capacity of providing the aforementioned services to the Town. Contractor assumes full responsibility for any and all breaches of confidentiality or security of records; and agrees to and does indemnify the Town for any and all liability, loss, damage, costs, expenses and attorney's fees resulting from said breach by Contractor, its agents, servants, and employees. 6. BI-ANNUAL AND ANNUAL REPORTS: Contractor shall provide the Town with bi-annual reports on the type and total number of crimes responded to through the Project. These statistics shall include whether the victim was initially contacted at the time the crime occurred, noting if response was either in person, at the scene, or by phone at the scene. If initial victim contact transpires at a later time, the statistics shall indicate whether the victim was contacted in person, by phone, or by mail. Contractor shall provide the Town with bi-annual reports and adequate documentation referencing any paid positions within their organization maintained in whole or in part by grant monies obtained by the Town. Depending upon the term and conditions of the grant, Contractor shall also provide the Town with the total final statistics that in turn will be submitted to the grantor for any required reporting period. Zone Policing 2005 Review Presented By; ,Sergeant Eric V. Rose Estes Park Police Departinent Community Within â€¢ A zone is essentially a community within a communinÂ·. â€¢ Zone policing is the applic:ition of assigning an officer to a designaled arÂ·ca for policing duties. â€¢Officers teaming witli cominunity members within their zones to address concerns ati issues. Zone Designation â€¢ IÂ·<stes P>iii: PI) is divided into two areas, termed 1)istrict c )tic and 1)istrict Two. Disnict C )ne include zones 1&2 and District Two, zones j, 4,5 & 6. . 1 =4 4.- .90 I h i, i i ,~f~--'~'~Â¢' 7,.-2:~ :.ir . ' 41'Â¢~f'ya - .4 : 1 63,1 'r~.1.=~~t-6.~Â·t-Â·~>~Â·.Â·Â·:, ,. ~- ...4, -2-5 ~-,~~:. i h 1 Zone Initiatives â€¢ \ Zone Initiative adliresses a C,)]lill]Ullity concern or issue. c )fti-crs work wirli Communitv mcmbers n) S{)lve Zonc hliti.wives. â€¢ 1<\;impics :11'C: m Speed -'[-i.it-fic problcm 0 \,Â·ighbor Problein m \.lticlcluÂ·cal, ins I S.ifi-1, concerns Zone Initiatives 2005 .Z one 1-2 Neighbor proble.ms, 1 Pedestrian Safco- issue â€¢ Zone 2- 1 Public nuisance, 1 Speed issue â€¢ Zone 3- 1 Noise issue, 1 Traffic problem â€¢ Zone 4- 1 Speed issue â€¢ Zone 1- z Speed issues. 1 Traffic Problem .Z unc 6- 1 Noise complaint 2 3 2.5 1~ 9..1-I.:5. . 3..1.1..11. j..1 1.11 Zone Improvements Zone 1 â€¢ Neighbor Problem. animals :11 large/ waste removal - resolved through homeowners Covellant rest 1-ictions â€¢ Neighbor Problem, public nuisance - resolved with assistance from Estes Park I Ioushic 2-, \L11 11(Dritv â€¢ Pedestrian/Traffic Problem, Crosswalk safety, -Poiding Excerpt from Zone 1 Initiative "Based on the information in this stull\Â· to Clitilill:itc these No cross\VIL]ks would not unly inclÂ·C.l:c the s.ifrn fur the prilistrians but wmild aIM assist in tlic tlow of traffic through the downtown area. It is our go.al to provide a place wlicrc visitors and communitv members cÂ·,in go .md expericilce the best that IÂ·'StiÂ·: Park has to offer. 1(litnin,iting rhesc crosswalks would provide a satur alternative to pedestri.ins thus m.iking there experience in Estes Park a good (Mic". -Sergeant Robert Schumaker 3 Zone Improvements Zone 2 â€¢ Pul,lic nuisance. Suspicious .Activity - resolved with assistance from Estes Park Housing Authoritv. â€¢ Speed Issue, Moraine ave. Conducted speed study, indicated lower than speed limit average- 22-23 mph (35mph zone) Extra patrols allotted for the area. Zone Improvements Zone 3 â€¢ Noise Issue, Motorcycles racing on Dry Gulch, Resolved by extra p:itiols including Lailiner County SC) and Colorado State Patrol. â€¢ Traffic Problem, motorists not obeyingÂ· stop sign- resolved with assistance from Estes Park Streets delD:irtinuit, resurfacc white swp lme. Minimal extra patrols. Zone Improvements Zone 4 â€¢ Speed Issue, 31,1 :ind 4'11 streets, iletermiticd tliat speeders lived within the area, officers distributed ilyers regarding traffic safety for the children in the neighborhood - issue resolved. 4 Zone Improvements Zone 5 â€¢ Spred Issue, Prospect.\Im Dr. refu,-inÂ·d tâ€ž(Joillity â€¢ Specil Issue, 1]w> 7. Speed study conducted, deterinined minitn;11 spred vic,istions existed (5-7 mph over posted limit. aniend lic,sted signs for con:ist,Â·nci, extrn patrols â€¢ Traffic PiÂ·oblcin. iÂ·,sidents Concel'llcd t|lat llci w.ilking path existed on \Vest side of road. crossw;ill: examined for lighting (.1)( )T determined ci-osswilk is within s k fut) guidelillÂ·:, extra patiÂ·01: d ili-in,g beforc :uid :after school 11()111-S. Zone Improvements Zone 6 â€¢ Noise Issue, homeouÂ·nciÂ·s .irc concerned with noise for Mary's Lake Lodge, officer ficilit:itcd community meeting, compromises regarding noise limits during functions reached via 'Iown meetings. 5 NEIGHBORHOOD PORTFOLIO EXERCISE Y V. -Pr. r f),49 'f?21 Presented by Molity Allen Welcome to Our MqI-.~. Community 22 .Aâ€¢ 14='at , .a- J K. 7: .- . :03.76.a - Estes Park, CO . %.-- - Homeless Population Types: Homeless family/low income r. 7 - Single parent families/low , FIL income Single low income Family no income (very rare) Single no income (Transient) Â»2 4% : PC/'I'/IDÂ·8 1 5 5,6 rark 90: a ~ert Â·cÂ·,- or. . I. , 1 Public's Perception 1 1-4 037 'Eg'Â·37 1 11 +43 C , =-/1434+ /37-322, 931- ';49 p All homeless sleep on the street EN,d~ Â·.'~ME-0 ni-,31 z Homeless areup tonogood ~ -Â°~r ;J f' . They're all thieves , They all want money for "booze" m They're all drunks â€¢ All homeless are uneducated u IF YOU IGNORE THEM, THEY WILL LEAVE Realitv c 44% Have chronic medical illnesses a 23% Have mental illnesses . 65% Have addictions to Alcohol/Drugs (Most can't keep jobs due to the addiction) c Getting placed into the system only hampers future long term solutions â€¢ ALL WANT HELP Where Do They End Up? JAIL GOVE RNMENT ASSISTANCE MENTAL - N&.I- Â· DEAD !1!! HEALTH DETOX -r i , g ;44: NQ. 14%?F. Approximately 90% of homeless adults enid up in the system because there are agencies that don't have resources to deal with them or choose not to use their rescufees 2 Problems with the Current Solutions w There are no records of the Transient 161 population (Where, When, Number - 11 contacted?) s Over crowding in jails =Â· Takes man power: Medical, Courts, Police o Financial responsibility: court costs, fines, etc. m False perceptions of the Police m Jail is better than current life style â€¢ DOESNT SOLVE THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM Nature of Calls s Thefts N Â·, Suspicious calls =l : Trespass ,Â· Drug and Alcohol ~04~ 9 Harassment â€¢ Panhandling . Medical m Mentally Ill Subject a Disorclefly Conduct ~ 5-S i f -946-6 / , i.. / 81 / .72.. U .../h//1//"Â£ . --- - .69 lili +' i 7,7 7&:A ---. 54 0 *tvme# -6- 4-*.1-7 To Bculdef 1- -- m a 6, C.....xm 3. .=m- 3 F*ril Why Estes Park ? 5 Easy Access (Hwy 7, Hwy 36, Hwy 34) ...'.- .7%*f@*45# â€¢ Scenery , ~ 06.m. - m Climate c Solidarity -U...1 -- m Misconceptions . ~~L'. .1'4 â€¢ Misc. ..9,/ f./~ . t.ji, 4 h. 4 ' 2-2*4429//2. ~ i 6: ~~- -~ '~"'lfip.1'-4 Â¢4190~..~ Economical Issues From the Criminal Aspect - --6- - e Thefts from Businesses m 90-â€ž. 1 . Cost to Transport lili 1..... .. â€¢ Unpaid Court Costs Wts*/FF c Cost of Housing (Unable to bail out) R.lumn c Cost of Man Hours (Contact, re-contact, transport, legal staff) : Clean up Costs â€¢ Repair Costs Avelage CoM to the tax payers: 51504300 per initial cont,ict a,id 1 I; 0;'4; at tlie DC (does not include ret,lbullon) Resources Available In Estes Park - Cross Roads Ministry 'FRE 31' Vouchers (for hotel rooms) TIO 4 Salvation Army Field Identification Cards 4%9 Larimer Center For Mental Health 4/1-7 4 17.</ 4 RESOURCES Needed to solve the underlying problem a SHELTERS (Boulder Homeless Shelter, Open Door Mission, Atwood Shelter Family Assistance) u REHAB (Alcohol, Drug, Other Addictions) j EMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE (Larimer County Work Force) m TRANSPORT (Vouchers for taxj services) u COUNSELING (Mental, Employment, Housing, Education) Overlooked Issues - Makes the town appear dirty o Current solution raises crime rates u Public perceptions (Tourist opinions, store owner opinions, Residence opinions) u Transient population is on the rise a Estes Park does not have available resources What Now? Future Actions and Resources - Keep statistics of Transients -1=../ I COntaeted (Multiple contacts, Number of i=~. '. f..'. Transients contacted, Number of vouchers given ,* 4,4~~.*, : by Officers, Continued research) c Tile Boulder Homeless Shelter (Better 0@721 than a voucher, Can give additional assistance) i Salvation Army (Keep records of who has Â».Y,/1 had a voucher, Offer vouchers for rides) m Auxiliary Officers (The resources are available to everyone not just sworn officers) s Atwood Shelter (For families and females) . Combined Resources (Do what it takes to eliminate the problem for the long term) 5 . Benefits e Saves tax dollars u Gets needed help to subject u Fewer contacts for Emergency Services 2 Positive public perceptions , Eliminates excessive man hours QUESTIONS? 6 Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Chairman Wayne Newsom and Public Safety Committee Board Members From: Robert Hirning CC: Randy Repola, Town Administrator Date: January 24,2006 Re: Chinese New Year Celebration Background The Cultural Arts Council of Estes Park is sponsoring the Chinese New Year Celebration on January 29,2006 from 4:30pm-5:15pm. The event will include a children's parade. There will be four barricades to block MacGregor Ave., Park Lane and Virginia Drive. The parade will begin in the bus lane in front of the Municipal building, proceed along Elkhorn on the sidewalk to Park Lane, Virginia Drive and end in Bond Park. The Police Department will provide an officer for traffic. Budget There are no budget implications associated with this request. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of event. 1 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Year End Report - 2005 - : "-p~)1 1_~ - Â¥ ... , 1 * , 7- Ek ./ -1 E # . R .. F Â·- J L ---I /4/' 9. - 1 S '' . . 6 . --8. 0,Es p444. ESTES PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT 2005 :9:Â£,f COLORADO 2005 ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT YEAR END REPORTS â€¢ ELECTION OF OFFICERS â€¢ FINANCIAL REPORT â€¢ TRAINING REPORT â€¢ INCIDENT RUN REPORTS Submitted By U>a h---6 /1- ay~i.9 Scott Dorman, Fire Chief Will Birchfield,j~ecretary 0Â»44_~-Â«_ 1UBY# Shannan, Treasurer ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2005 ELECTION OF OFFICERS REPORTS 0-44*Il~Plpi Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department APZ~Z(-Mt PO Box 1200 1~ Estes Park, Colorado 80517 ~ (970) 577-0900, fax 970 577-0923 January 20,2006 Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Town Board Trustees: Our annual election of Officers was held at our December 6,2005 business meeting. The results of that election are as follows: â€¢ First Assistant Chief- Daryl McCown â€¢ Second Assistant Chief- Robert Hirning â€¢ Secretary- Will Birchfield â€¢ Treasurer- Dave Shannan We respectfully request your approval of these Officers we have chosen to lead us in 2006. Sincerely, Scott Dorman, Chief Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2005-YEAR END FINANCIAL REPORT 2:16 PM Estes Park Fire Department 01/19/06 Balance Sheet Cash Basis As of December 31, 2005 Dec 31, 05 ASSETS Current Assets Checking/Savings First National Bank Checking 2,512.04 First National Bank Money Ma... 36,987.03 Total Checking/Savings 39,499.07 Total Current Assets 39,499.07 Other Assets Petty Cash 200.00 Total Other Assets 200.00 TOTAL ASSETS 39,699.07 LIABILITIES & EQUITY Equity Opening Bal Equity 105,362.52 Retained Earnings -49,829.59 Net Income -15,833.86 Total Equity 39,699.07 TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 39,699.07 Page 1 2:16 PM Estes Park Fire Department 01/19/06 Profit & Loss YTD Comparison Cash Basis December 14 - 31, 2005 Dec 14 - 31, 05 Jan - Dec 05 Ordinary Income/Expense Income Assistance to Firefighter Grant 0.00 93,814.00 Cheley Burn Camp 0.00 19,544.00 Co. State Forest Service Grant 0.00 2,028.66 Convention Golf Tournament Income 0.00 660.00 Total Convention 0.00 660.00 Crafts Fair 0.00 30,245.00 Dive Truck 0.00 7,191.18 Donations 10,100.00 39,617.00 Equipment Income 0.00 1,400.00 Gift Collection Income 0.00 225.00 Golf Tournament Income 0.00 300.00 Grant Larimer County 0.00 5,881.57 Interest Income 83.15 828.78 MDA Boot 0.00 16,948.07 Other Income 60.00 3,800.65 Wildland Fire Equipment NPS ... 0.00 45,778.00 Total Income 10,243.15 268,261.91 Expense Burn Camp Scholarship 0.00 20,564.00 Contributions 0.00 750.00 CPR Expenses 0.00 72.00 Craft Fair Expense 0.00 1,086.27 Dive Team 0.00 3,528.66 Dues/Memberships 0.00 1,847.50 Equipment 0.00 153,145.20 Equipment Maintenance 0.00 690.62 Fire Acadamy 0.00 578.47 Fire Incident Expense 0.00 147.00 Fire Prevention Equipment 0.00 4,952.88 Fire Prevention Materials 0.00 3,250.91 Firefigher Fuel Reimbursement 0.00 7,636.00 Firehouse Equipment 0.00 669.82 Firehouse Maintenance 0.00 546.25 Food Expense 0.00 75.90 Fundraising Expenses 0.00 370.00 Gifts 0.00 314.54 Hurricane Katrina 0.00 8,539.04 Incentives Volunteer/F Fighters 0.00 7,003.64 Insurance Policies 0.00 7,831.00 2:16 PM Estes Park Fire Department 01/19/06 Profit & Loss YTD Comparison Cash Basis December 14 - 31, 2005 Dec 14 - 31, 05 Jan - Dec 05 MDA Contribution Expense 0.00 8,529.03 Miscellanious Expenses 0.00 288.59 Office Supplies 0.00 600.50 Operating Supplies 0.00 3,024.59 Other Expenses 0.00 310.12 Pagers 0.00 3,882.06 Photography 0.00 94.50 Postage 0.00 31.04 Public Relations Expense 0.00 550.87 Software 0.00 704.95 State Convention Expense Other Expenses 0.00 663.80 Registration 0.00 320.00 Total State Convention Expense 0.00 983.80 Tax Preparation/Audit 0.00 455.00 Telephone 0.00 53.65 Training 0.00 8,087.73 Truck Maintenance 0.00 133.01 Truck Purchase 25,000.00 25,000.00 Uniforms 0.00 6,587.80 Volunteer Cerficiation 0.00 210.00 Volunteer Expense 0.00 751.34 Website 0.00 108.72 Wildland Training 0.00 108.77 Total Expense 25,000.00 284,095.77 Net Ordinary Income -14,756.85 -15,833.86 Net Income -14,756.85 -15,833.86 Income and Expense by Month IIncome January through December 2005 lExpense $ in 1,000's 120 100 60 2 1 40 20 Jan05 Mar05 May05 Ju105 Sep05 Nov05 Feb05 Apr05 Jun05 Aug05 Oct05 Dec05 Expense Summary IEquipment %53.91 January through December 2005 11Truck Purchase 8.80 . Burn Camp Scholarship 7.24 IHurricane Katrina 3.01 IMDA Contribution Expense 3.00 ITraining 2.85 iInsurance Policies 2.76 IFirefigher Fuel Reimbursement 2.69 IIncentives Volunteer/F Fighters 2.47 IUniforms 2.32 iltiâ€ža,z ~~3 '7+i.-- ~~ 7~ ~Other 10.97 Total $284,095.77 By Account ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2005-YEAR END TRAINING REPORT 2005 TRAINING REPORT January 19, 2006 Town Board of Trustees Estes Park, Colorado Training hours for Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department and Dive Team during 2005 totaled 5,535 hours. Training in 2005 included the following: Fire behavior Fire streams Fire extinguishers Fire hose Incident command system Water supply Personal protective equipment Salvage and overhaul Vehicle fires Vehicle extrication Ventilation CPR/AED Dive Rescue Ice rescue Child Passenger Safety Seats Hazardous materials Electrical Fire Safety Fire Control Hose testing and inspections Table Top Scenarios Ladders and aerial operations Wildland fire red card Defensive driving Ropes & knots Live fire scenarios Search & Rescue Pumper/engineer Inspections & Prevention Interior fire attack Forcible entry Instructor training Wellness/fitness Building construction Swift water rescue Sprinkler systems Low angle rescue Safety standards Emergency management Air Bag Systems Hybrid Vehicles EMT Paramedic Juvenile Fire Setters Evidence recovery Respectfully submitted 4301~ Scott Dorman, Chief Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2005-YEAR END INCIDENT RUN REPORTS , h '4 lb, J * 1 94 0/ - 40 40Â®Cy 4 6, '/4,6>VS, /0 0- G 9 e, 4# 42> -le 0 24 4 99 4% 1, e Â¥12/ %b D O% 95 10 + 9 4 Â£ fdfl 9 G. - 40. i 41> ed' 1 95 4 90- 44" 0 04 -81 + 4 -%9 M.Â§20 b r- Slleo JO JeqUInN 12003 02004 02005 Comparison of calls by type lies 50 adAL 250 Comparison 2003,2004,2005 - Type of calls by number Type of Call 2005 2004 2003 Fire 29 31 32 Overpressure Rupture, Explosions 3 0 1 Rescue & Emergency Service Incidents 191 187 132 Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 81 82 76 Service Call 10 21 29 Good Intent Call 69 86 105 False Alarm & False Call 41 46 51 Severe Weather & Natural Disasters 0 1 4 Special / Unknown Incident Type 0 7 11 Totals 424 461 441 (V) O 0 O Overpressure Rupture, Explosions 69 . C Rescue & Emergency Service Incidents O Hazardous Conditions (No fire) ileo eouues I O Good Intent Call 1183 @Sled 9 U]Jelv esled O Sie}Ses,Cl leinjeN 9 Je4;eeAA ejeABS m L61, 01. edAL juappUl UMOU>lun / lepeds 0 2005 Number of calls by type of call 41 29 0 Fire L8 r- Elf)9000 N LO O 0 LO O O M 0 0 - 0 0 1 3 (9 CO r (0 .t Count Man Hou rs Ci~i~i Outside Dollars Lost Dollars Saved Type of Fire Call ts City Limits (est.) (est.) Fire 29 519.77 14 15 128,520 5,276,780 Overpressure Rupture, Explosions 16.03 1,000 431,900 Rescue & Emergency Service Incidents 91 1090.88 106 85 478,710 300,600 Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 745.53 191,650 1,413,350 Service Call 87.09 25,300 100,000 False Alarm & False Call 246.53 1,200 553,800 00'0Â£*'910'8 $ 00'08Â£'928 $ 881. 9Â£/ 00'9862 tz/ siejol 2005 EPVFD Run Report Totals Good Intent Call . 280.17 00.0 SJe}SeS!Cl leinleN 9 Je4}eeM ajaAes 000 edil. jueppul UMOU>lun / lepeds Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) Alarm Date Between {01/01/2005} And {12/31/2005} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 1 Fire 100 Fire, Other 1 0.23% $10 0.00% 111 Building fire 7 1.65% $80,210 9.70% 113 Cooking fire, confined to container 2 0.47% $500 0.06% 114 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 116 Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 131 Passenger vehicle fire 6 1.41% $32,300 3.90% 132 Road freight or transport vehicle fire 1 0.23% $15,000 1.81% 137 Camper or recreational vehicle (RV) fire 1 0.23% $500 0.06% 141 Forest, woods or wildland fire 6 1.41% $0 0.00% 143 Grass fire 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 154 Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle 2 0.47% $0 0.00% 29 6.83% $128,520 15.55% 2 Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat(no fire) 240 Explosion (no fire), Other 1 0.23% $1,000 0.12% 251 Excessive heat, scorch burns with no 2 0.47% $0 0.00% 3 0.70% $1,000 0.12% 3 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 117 27.59% $0 0.00% 321 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with 20 4.71% $0 0.00% 322 Motor vehicle accident with injuries 30 7.07% $306,500 37.08% 323 Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 4 0.94% $0 0.00% 324 Motor Vehicle Accident with no injuries 6 1.41% $35,200 4.25% 331 Lock-in (if lock out , use 511 ) 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 351 Extrication of victim(s) from 1 0.23% $5,000 0.60% 352 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 11 2.59% $132,010 15.97% 381 Rescue or EMS standby 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 191 45.04% $478,710 57.92% 4 Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 6 1.41% $0 0.00% 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 17 4.00% $1,000 0.12% 422 Chemical spill or leak 3 0.70% $0 0.00% 424 Carbon monoxide incident 9 2.12% $0 0.00% 441 Heat from short circuit (wiring), 2 0.47% $0 0.00% 442 Overheated motor 4 0.94% $200 0.02% 443 Breakdown of light ballast 3 0.70% $50 0.00% 445 Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 2 0.47% $0 0.00% 01/17/2006 11:51 Page 1 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) Alarm Date Between {01/01/2005} And {12/31/2005} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 4 Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 451 Biological hazard, confirmed or suspected 2 0.47% $0 0.00% 462 Aircraft standby 5 1.17% $0 0.00% 463 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 28 6.60% $190,400 23.04% 81 19.10% $191,650 23.19% 5 Service Call 531 Smoke or odor'removal 2 0.47% $300 0.03% 551 Assist police or other governmental agency 5 1.17% $25,000 3.02 i 561 Unauthorized burning 2 0.47% $0 0.00% 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 10 2.35% $25,300 3.06% 6 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, Other 3 0.70% $0 0.00% 611 Dispatched & cancelled en route 19 4.48% $0 0.00% 622 No Incident found on arrival at dispatch 3 0.70% $0 0.00% 632 Prescribed fire 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 650 Steam, Other gas mistaken for smoke, Other 1 0 .23% $0 0 . 00% 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 11 2.59% $0 0.00% 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be 11 2.59% . $0 0,00% 653 Smoke from barbecue, tar kettle 6 1.41% $0 0.00% 661 EMS call, party transported by non-fire 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 671 HazMat release investigation w/no HazMat 13 3.06% $0 0.00% 69 16.27% $0 0.00% 7 False Alarm & False Call 700 False alarm or false call, Other 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 711 Municipal alarm system, malicious false 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 715 Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 3 0.70% $0 0.00% 733 Smoke detector activation due to 5 1.17% $0 0.00% 735 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 7 1.65% $0 0.00% 736 CO detector activation due to malfunction 1 0.23% $0 0.00% 741 Sprinkler activation, no fire - . 1 0.23% $1,000 0.12% 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire - 5 1.17% $200 0.02% 744 Detector activation, no fire - 4 0.94% $0 0.00% 745 Alarm system activation, no fire - 10 2.35% $0 0.00% 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 3 0.70% $0 0.00% 01/17/2006 11:51 Page 2 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) Alarm Date Between {01/01/2005} And {12/31/2005} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 41 9.66% $1,200 0.14% Total Incident Count: 424 Total Est Loss: $826,380 01/17/2006 11:51 Page 3 92& '32 9 96 -% 0 /4 1-1 23 % 44% %>de 17. 0 56, -,4. Â« e 'e 4% 0 - 50, -L........I".1 We - Â«094 *94/ - t.- % .400 Ob. % 2 4 Nk '9* 19 + 0% 93. 9g .<1 Â®. O 1.. I in city â€¢ out of city 2005 Calls -within/outside city limits 120 - slieo Jo adAL 100 80 Number of calls 60 40 0Z 2005 City Limits Detailed Incident Type Report (01/01/2005) - (12/31/2005) Incident type City Limits IN OUT Fire 100 Fire, Other 1 0 111 Building Fire 4 3 113 Cooking Fire 1 1 114 Chimney Fire 0 1 116 Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire 0 1 131 Passenger Vehicle Fire 3 3 132 Road freight or transport vehicle fire 1 0 137 Camper or recreational vehicle (RV) fire 1 0 141 Forest, woods or wildland fire 0 6 143 Grass fire 1 0 154 Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle 2 0 Overpressure Rupture, 240 Explosion (no fire), other 0 1 Explosion, Overheat 251 Excessive heat, scorch burns with no fire 2 0 (no fire) Rescue & EMS 311 Medical Assist 73 44 321 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident w/injury 11 9 322 Vehicle accident with injuries 12 18 323 Motor vehicle/ped accident (MV Ped) 4 0 324 Motor vehicle Accident with no injuries 1 5 331 Lock-in 1 0 351 Extrication of victim(s) from building or structure 0 1 352 Extrication of victims from vehicle 4 7 381 Rescue or EMS standby 0 1 Hazardous Conditions 410 Flammable gas or liquid condition, other 0 0 (No fire) 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 4 2 412 Gas Leak (natural gas or LPG 10 7 422 Chemical spill or leak 1 2 424 Carbon Monoxide incident 5 4 441 Heat short circuit (wiring), defective/worn 2 0 442 Overheated motor 4 0 443 Breakdown of light ballast 3 0 445 Arching, shorted electrical equipment 1 1 451 Biological hazard 2 0 462 Aircraft standby 0 5 463 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 13 15 Service Call 531 Smoke or odor removal 2 0 551 Assist Police or other gov. agency 3 2 561 Unauthorized burning 0 2 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 0 1 January 2005 Incident type City Limits IN OUT Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, other 0 3 611 dispatched & canceled en route 4 15 622 No incident found on arrival at dispatched location 1 2 632 Prescribed fire 1 0 650 Steam, other gas mistaken for smoke, other 0 1 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 3 8 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 4 7 653 Barbecue, tar kettle 4 2 661 EMS call, party transported by non-fire 1 0 671 Hazmat release investigation w/no hazmat 11 2 False Alarm & 700 False alarm false call 1 0 False Call 711 Municipal alarm system, malicious false 1 0 715 Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 2 1 733 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 5 0 735 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 7 0 736 CO detector activation due to malfunction 1 0 741 Sprinkler activation, no fire 1 0 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire- unintentional 2 3 744 Detector activation, no fire- unintentional 3 1 745 Alarm system sounded, no fire - unintentional 10 0 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation , no CO 2 1 Severe Weather & 0 0 Natural Disaster Special Type 0 0 of incident, Other TOTAL 236 188 TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 424 January 2005 G : b REPUBLIC 7 PARKING SYSTEM Town of Estes Park Parking Study Ct /6 -1. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Estes Park Colorado ,â‚¬94.k./ 1*38452Rf#46646;Li.- 7 -U,~, C/?jj/5668 3 76-f. : .. 1.1-:1- 7,6 -4 Prepared For: The Town of Estes Park Prepared by: Republic Parking System 1331 17~h Street, Suite 608 Denver, CO 80202 303.382.0880 303.295-9157 info@republicparkina.com www. republicparking.com 7.? - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. PURPOSE OF STUDY 3. PARKING SUPPLY Parking Space Breakdown .. 4. PARKING DEMAND 5. UTILIZATION ANALYSIS American Legion I nt Big Horn I nt Brownsfield I nt Children's Park I nt Coffee Bar I nt Dark Horse I nt Del's A&W I nt Ice House I nt Municipal I nt Old Lumber Yard I nt Post Office I nt Tregent Park Lot Weist I nt Big Horn Drive Cleave Street East Elkhorn Avenue East Riverside Drive MacGregor Ranch North MacGregor Ranch South Moraine Avenue Park Lane Virginia Drive Weist Drive West Elkhorn West Riverside Drive City Analysis Open Space Report - July 27,2005 Open Space Report - July 28,2005 Open Space Report - July 29,2005 Open Space Report - July 30,2005 Open Space Report - July 31, 2005 Average Open Space Report - All WPAk Summary Length of Stay Report - By Vehirleg Length of Stay Report - By Percentmgpq Employee Vehicles Utilization Summary 6. OWNER SURVEYS Do you believe there is a parking problem in Estes Park? What complaint do you hear the most in regards to parking?. Where do you currently park? Where do your employees currently park? Page 2 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEN Are you in favor of paid parking on the lots? 78 Shuttle Questions: 79 Do you believe a shuttle operation from a remote lot 1 mile away would help the parking situation, 79 Would you be willing to ride a shuttle? 79 Would you encourage your employees to ride a shuttle? ....... 79 What do you feel needs to be done to improve parking in Estes Park? 80 7. VISITOR SURVEYS RO How long did it take you to find a parking space? 83 How many lots did you try to park in before this lot? 83 Would you be willing to pay for parking if it meant quicker access to a parking space?............... 85 Would you be willing to ride a shuttle from a remote lot one mile away from downtown?............ 86 How often do you come to Estes Park? 88 Please rate the overall parking situation in Estes Park? 89 8. RECOMMENDATIONS 90 9. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 99 Page 3 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM 1. INTRODUCTION The availability of downtown parking is a significant issue for many municipalities. Parking problems are often a sign of success of a downtown area. The demand for parking is directly correlated to growth or decline in the availability of business, employment, shopping, and dining opportunities. Due to the efforts and investments of property owners, merchants and the municipality, the Estes Park downtown area continues as a vibrant economic core of the City. The provision of ample and convenient parking to accommodate the needs of the business and other activities is key to the continued vitality of the downtown. There is currently a perception that the parking is currently a problem in the Estes Park downtown area, especially during the peak season. Merchants and property owners in the downtown area have indicated to the Estes Park City Council that parking is a problem. Page 4 of 94 REPUBLIC 'q PARKING SySTEM PURPOSE OF STUDY The following study was prepared by Republic Parking System and is intended to provide an inventory and analysis of parking in the downtown area of the City of Estes Park. The primary purpose of the study is to create a comprehensive and integrated system of downtown parking that provides convenient and safe parking in a cost effective manner for visitors, employees and residents that is consistent with the vision for a vibrant and active downtown. The study focuses on the following principles: Parking should be supplied, managed and operated in the most comprehensive way possible and be considered a kind of downtown infrastructure. On-street parking should be maximized as the most valuabie space to give a boost to street level activities in the downtown area. Creative and convenient ways to reduce regular single car occupancy travel to downtown should be part of an overall accessibility strategy. Any provisions of a new parking facility should be done in such a way to reduce the loss of historic structures, be in keeping with good urban design factors such as size and scale, and enhance the likelihood of complementary private development and be financially sound. STUDY PROCESS Upon selection of Republic Parking System as the primary consultant on the study, the Republic Parking team began receiving and analyzing a range of existing data on all aspects of current parking resources, management and operations. A study methodology that combines statistics, perspective and experience was employed. Republic Parking re-evaluated existing parking supply use and operations through an examination of previous parking studies, current parking supply and use of data through field surveys with the visitors, residents, and business owners of the area. In addition, focus group meetings were held with a variety of downtown stakeholders such as employers, public work, police department staff, transit operators and property owners. From these interviews, issues as well as potential solutions were fleshed out. A series of follow up meetings, interviews and data clarifications then lead to the findings and recommendations of this report. I REPUBLIC, I PARKING SYSTEM 3. PARKING SUPPLY 1 4 6 f -->f L f f_flÂ« i N ~ NCRTH ENTRANCE ROCKY Nay MOU~ITAIN NATIONAL PAF*< Â·~ li 1 C Elf 29:9Â« 1 1--11Â»1 049- *li FALL p \ y // e 6 Lf /0/ 1 Tr als,- 4 h~ 5 8 3 -- V\ESTEU<HCRN 1 -) ~ NCRT}-1 ENTRANCE ROCHY 6 1Â¢1.Â¢Â» 9 MOLNTAIN NATIaVAL PAA< ~\ +791*9 -7 14\ ID all U _fITIT gati /Â«01 34 PUBLIC PARKI NG MAP A O 24 REPUBLIC 7 PARKING SYSTEM I PARKING SYSâ„¢Al Parking Space Breakdown TOTAL AVAILABLE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL MAP # PARKING LOT # OF SPACES HC 30 MINUTE 3 HOUR RV 1 OLD LUMBER YARD 86 4 2 ICE HOUSE 44 1 3 TREGENTPARK 20 1 4 BIG HORN 41 1 5 COFFE BAR 20 1 19 6 MUNICIPAL 279 8 2 7 7 WEIST 121 2 3 8 AMERICAN LEGION 48 1 9 DEL'S/ A&W 43 2 10 WEST RIVERSIDE 38 1 11 POST OFFICE 94 3 31 60 12 DARK HORSE 97 2 95 13 CHILDREN'S PARK 52 2 14 BROWNSFIELD'S 6 1 1 TOTAL 989 30 33 174 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL STREET PARKING # OF SPACES HC 30 MINUTE 3 HOUR RV A BIG HORN DRIVE 35 1 34 B WEST ELKHORN 18 C WEIST LOT 18 D MORRAINE AVE 35 35 E MACGREGOR AVE N 124 F VIRGINIA DRIVE 19 19 G PARK LANE 41 1 H EAST ELKHORN AVE 6 1 6 1 CLEAVESTREET 43 J EAST RIVERSIDE DRIVE 6 6 MACGREGORAVES 32 3 TOTAL 377 6 54 46 0 Page 7 of 94 ~ REPUBLIC'~ I PARKING SYSTEM 4. PARKING DEMAND BLUE SKY DRAGON FLY THE GOLD MINE THE SHIRT SHOP WILD BIRD UNLIMITED FALL RIVER JEWLERY MOSSIES BEAR FACTORY THE MAD MOOSIE WAY TO WEIST LOT BELLS BOOKS AND CANDLES SPORTS HOUND GEPPETTAS TOYSHOP WILD SPIRITS CANYON LANDS INDIAN ART CHIMAYO IMPORTS ALPINE ACCENTS WESTERN HERITAGE THE CRUB STEAK MEMORIES OLD PHOTOS DMS GALLERY HIGH COUNTRY GIFTS BOB & TONY'S PIZZA BLAKE TRADING CHICAGO 8EST KELLI'S LOUNGE LONIGANS SALLOON =R d OLD FASHION CANDY INDIAN VILLAGE INDIAN VILLAGE INDIAN VILLAGE MORRAINE STREET GAS LIGHT SQUARE SHOPS ~ ~ -4 STAGE WESTERN 3 i FUDGE WORKS ~| ~ THE COPPER PENNY ~ m CARMEL CRISP e THE HIKING HUT 0 3 PARK THEATRE MALL ~ 3 14'ERS CAFE WYN BRIER MOOSEYLY T SPORTS RKY MTN TRADERS HUMMING BIRD GLASS BLOWER NATIVE IMIAGES MUNCHIES HOUSE EVEYBODIES BUSINESS THE WHEEL BAR JUST T'S FOR ALL MOUNTIAN MERCHANTILE CARMEL CORN MCDONALD'S BOOKSHOP OUT DOOR WORLD HEAVEN ON EARTH COLORADO BIKING THE PARROT $ STONE SHIFT WORKS ELK MOUNTIAN GIFTS RIVERSIDE DRIVE PARKING LOT DAIRY QUEEN BELLA CREATIONS ART OF COLORADO SHIRT SHACK KIRKS FLY SHOP CENTURY 21 (PARKING ATTACHED) RANGE REALITY (PARKIGN ATTACHED) E)NIEBWI 13 >1308 101 Â©Ni>lk!Vd 3113ZV9 1SOd ON 101 ON[>IBVd 39Nn01 S.*11001 INVOVA 1NVkdnlS3hl S.Allow dOHS 318I8 10839 ONV GBOMS 99NiHlln:â„¢3ON 31'110 ONV 3A1=1 MOOSE CREEK ROCKY MTN KNIFE dOHS *HdOhil NDIS30 BIVH dhIVM BINI-1 3H1- QWEST BUILDIN( Page 8 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM 5. UTILIZATION ANALYSIS A prelude to effectively enhancing any parking operation is a thorough analysis of the locations to determine the exact trends and activity levels associated with each customer group. In this section, we have shown a Utilization Analysis for each location that reveals the daily parking trends including the exact number of daily customers in each facility by the hour and the maximum number of spaces occupied by daily customers at the facility's peak hour of activity. Before the study began, Republic Parking System completed an inventory of all the on-street and off-street parking in the study area. Through this inventory, the total parking supply, location, type of parking (on-street or off-street), use restrictions and total accessible parking were determined. To establish the amount of daily traffic each lot generates on a regular basis, Republic Parking System used the data that was accumulated through daily lot checks completed during the period of July 27 through July 31'2005. Our main objective was to determine how many vehicles were parking on the lots during each day of the study. To accomplish this, we wrote down the license plate numbers for all vehicles on each lot around 9:00am each day. Subsequent license plate checks were then completed making note of any new vehicles that entered the lots since the first check. Depending on the day, there were a total of 4 to 8 checks completed on each lot. By completing these checks, we were able to verify the total number of patrons occupying a parking space, the average number of vehicles parked at each hour and the time of the day in which the lot was the most occupied (peak period). We then used this information to compute the occupancy percentage and turnover ratio for each lot. The license plate checks also allowed us to determine the amount of time each individual vehicle was parked on the lot which was useful in helping determine how many of the vehicles were likely employees or owners of a business. We have listed the locations separately to help illustrate how the lots and streets performed during each day of the study. We then compiled an overall analysis of the city as a whole, all locations combined, and have shown it at the end of this section. The surface lots are listed in alphabetical order followed by the streets. Page 9-6f-94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING S VSTE/ American Legion Lot American Legion Lot 48 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot a. M 7/27/2006 33 33 35 37 + 43 43t 43 1 7/28/2006 26 32 37 Â· 48 1 47 47 44 7/29/2006 40 40 44 , 48 1 47 47 40 7/30/2006 27 45 47 47 1 48 - 1 46 46 7/31/2006 33 33 41 f '48 * 47 47 44 AVERAGE 32 37 41 46 46 46 43 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 PM IAId 69:ZI.-INd 00:El V\Id 69: L - MId 00: L INd 69:Z-MId 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Page 10 of 94 - REPUSLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 14 63 16 8 15 2 4 122 7/28/2006 35 57 51 1 13 6 11 174 7/29/2006 16 97 28 4273 157 7/30/2006 37 13 82 50614 157 7/31/2006 28 0 47 0 0 17 0 92 TOTAL 130 230 224 18 30 38 32 702 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 11% 52% 13% 7% 12% 2% 3% 7/28/2006 20% 34% 29% 1% 7% 3% 6% 7/29/2006 10% 62% 18% 3% 1% 4% 2% 7/30/2006 24% 8% 52% 3% 0% 4% 9% 7/31/2006 30% 0% 51% 0% 0% 18% 0% AVERAGE I 19% 31% 33% 3% 4% 6% 4% 100% Space Utilization American Legion Lot Peak Average Total Spaces 48 48 Less: Daily Parkers 32 28 Employees 16 12 Open Spaces 0 8 Occupancy Percentage 100.00% 83.33% SUMMARY - REPUBLIC~ ~ PARKING SYSTEM Big Horn Lot Big Horn Lot 41 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 7/27/2006 29 29 32 i ,"35. 35 1 34 33 7/28/2006 24 36. 37 ' 37 37 1 36 33 7/29/2006 35 35 36 3 37 37 1 34 33 7/30/2006 24 37 37 37 37 37 , 39â€¢ 7/31/2006 17 25 33 1.37 37 1 36 36 AVERAGE 26 32 35 37 37 35 35 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 P Mid 69:EL-Mid 00:ZI d 69:1Â· -Mid 00:1. Mid 69:Z-Mid 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Mid C Page 12 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTE/ LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 13 11 4 4 7 2 22 63 7/28/2006 3 36 8 0 7 5 27 86 7/29/2006 24 27 11 9132398 7/30/2006 15 4112502865 7/31/2006 12 0 25 0 12 0 0 49 TOTAL 67 78 59 15 32 10 100 361 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER Total 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 21% 17% 6% 6% 11% 3% 36% 7/28/2006 3% 43% 9% 0% 8% 6% 31% 7/29/2006 24% 28% 11% 9% 1% 3% 23% 7/30/2006 23% 6% 17% 3% 8% 0% 43% 7/31/2006 24% 0% 51% 0% 24% 0% 0% AVERAGE I 19% 19% 19% 4% 10% 2% 27% 100% Space Utilization Big Horn Lot Peak Average 1 Total Spaces 41 41 Less: Daily Parkers 14 12 Employees 25 20 Open Spaces 2 9 Occupancy Percentage 95.12% 78.05% SUMMARY Page 13 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Brownsfield Lot Brownsfield Lot 6 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 7/27/2006 , 5.1 4 3 4 5 1 4 3 3 7/28/2006 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 76{ 5 5 7/29/2006 5 5 4 7 6 6- 6 6 6 6. 15 4 7/30/2006 536 6 6 6 | 5 1 6, 6 6.61 5 R 7/31/2006 5 5 ~.~ 6 6 -6 6 1 AVERAGE 45555555555 w 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM ~Id 69: L - UUd 00:1Â· Mid 69:Z-Mid 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Mid E INd693-INd 00* Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9 INd 69:9 - INd 00:9 m Mid 69:Z - INd 00:Z Page 14 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 3 5 8 0 1 0 0 17 7/28/2006 3 11 2 3 1 0 0 20 7/29/2006 3 5 5 0 3 0 0 16 7/30/2006 4210201028 7/31/2006 6 5 0 6 0 0 0 17 TOTAL 19 47 15 11 5 1 0 98 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER Total 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 18% 29% 47% 0% 6% 0% 0% 7/28/2006 15% 55% 10% 15% 5% 0% 0% 7/29/2006 19% 31% 31% 0% 19% 0% 0% 7/30/2006 14% 75% 0% 7% 0% 4% 0% 7/31/2006 35% 29% 0% 35% 0% 0% 0% AVERAGE 20% 44% 18% 11% 6% 1% 0% 100% Space Utilization Brownsfield Lot Peak Average I Total Spaces 6 6 Less: Daily Parkers 3 4 Employees 3 1 Open Spaces 0 1 Occupancy Percentage 100.00% 83.33% SUMMARY Page 15 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Children's Park Lot Children's Park Lot 52 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 7/27/2006 .51 .' T 51 -51' ' 51 511 50 49 ~ 7/28/2006 47 47 49 ; 51 - 51 I 50 50 1 7/29/2006 51 51 1 52 52 : 52 1 51 50 f 7/30/2006 33 1, 51 -51 51 51 1 50 48 7/31/2006 37 50 50 49 k 52 . 52 520 Z AVERAGE 44 50 51 51 51 51 50 ! 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 PM INd 69:ZIÂ·-INd 00:El INd 69:1Â· - 1/Ud 00:10 INd 69:Z-INd 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Mid Â£ Page 16 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 32 34 23 23 2 0 26 140 7/28/2006 35 59 13 18 16 8 19 168 7/29/2006 30 93 48 4 15 1 20 211 7/30/2006 25 48 70 13 9 0 18 183 7/31/2006 31 65 10 9 5 17 0 137 TOTAL I 153 299 164 67 47 26 83 839 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER Total 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 23% 24% 16% 16% 1% 0% 19% 7/28/2006 21% 34% 8% 11% 10% 5% 11% 7/29/2006 14% 44% 23% 2% 7% 0% 9% 7/30/2006 14% 26% 38% 7% 5% 0% 10% 7/31/2006 23% 47% 7% 7% 4% 12% 0% AVERAGE I 19% 35% 18% 9% 5% 3% 10% 100% Space Utilization Children's Park Lot Peak Average 1 Total Spaces 52 52 Less: Daily Parkers 32 30 Employees 20 18 Open Spaces 0 4 Occupancy Percentage 100.00% 92.31% SUMMARY Page 17 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Coffee Bar Lot Coffee Bar Lot 20 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 7/27/2006 19 19 1 20 I 19 19 18 18 15 14 14 7/28/2006 16 16 ' 171 , 17 1 16 14 16 I lz, 4 15 16 ? 17 -17. i 7/29/2006 15 15 17 19 0 20 20 9 19 19 18 19 16 16 7/30/2006 13 16 19 18 19 19 J 20 20 . 20 20- Â·1 19 7/31/2006 6 15 15 ' 19 19 19' ~ 19, 1 AVERAGE 14 16 18 18 19 18 18 18 17 17 17 17 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM 1:00 PM - 1:59 PM Uld 69:Z-Mid 00:Z INd 69~Â£ - INd Â£ IAId69:*-Mid 00:* MId 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:Z - Mid 00:Z Mid 69:8 - INd 00:8 Page 18 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT ' UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 10 18 16 7 2 2 4 59 7/28/2006 12 36- 9345271 7/29/2006 11 46 12 7 3 1 5 85 7/30/2006 14 40 8 4 1 6 3 76 7/31/2006 16 0 19 0 0 0 3 38 TOTAL 1 63 140 64 21 10 14 17 329 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER Total 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 17% 31% 27% 12% 3% 3% 7% 7/28/2006 17% 50% 13% 4% 6% 7% 3% 7/29/2006 13% 54% 14% 8% 4% 1% 6% 7/30/2006 18% 53% 11% 5% 1% 8% 4% 7/31/2006 42% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 8% AVERAGE 21% 38% 23% 6% 3% 4% 6% 100% Space Utilization Coffee Bar Lot Peak Average I Total Spaces 20 20 Less: Daily Parkers 11 11 Employees 9 6 Open Spaces 0 3 Occupancy Percentage 100.00% 85.00% SUMMARY Page 19 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Dark Horse Lot Dark Horse Lot 97 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 7/27/2006 45 45 92 94 94 t 95 1 93 89 89 89 7/28/2006 75 75 83 91 94 2 96 1 92 88 84 88 88 7/29/2006 59 59 87 ; '97 I 96 96 94 91 87 94 92 7/30/2006 24 73 84 :, 94 I 91 91 82 87 92 93 1 94 I 7/31/2006 55 55 87 i 97 - 97 1 96 84 AVERAGE 52 61 87 95 94 95 89 89 88 91 91 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM Mld 69:10 - Mid 00:1. Mid 69:Z-Mid 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Mid Â£ 1/Ud69:*-1Ald 00:* INd 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:9 - INd 00:9 Mid 69:Z - Mid 00:Z Page 20 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 60 90 105 32 11 6 8 312 7/28/2006 70 137 106 40 38 6 3 400 7/29/2006 83 124 190 24 19 4 1 445 7/30/2006 74 87 187 8 28 0 4 388 7/31/2006 52 171 19 36 970 294 TOTAL 1 339 609 607 140 105 23 16 1839 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER Total 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 19% 29% 34% 10% 4% 2% 2% 7/28/2006 17% 33% 27% 10% 10% 2% 1% 7/29/2006 19% 28% 43% 5% 4% 1% 0% 7/30/2006 19% 22% 48% 2% 7% 0% 1% 7/31/2006 18% 58% 6% 12% 3% 2% 0% AVERAGE 18% 34% 32% 8% 6% 1% 1% 100% Space Utilization Dark Horse Lot Peak Average Total Spaces 97 97 Less: Daily Parkers 82 73 Employees 15 12 Open Spaces 0 12 Occupancy Percentage 100.00% 87.63% SUMMARY Page 21 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Del's A&W Lot Del's A&W Lot 42 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 0- 0, IR 1 1 1 0 9 ' P 1 7/27/2006 0 4 .18 18 I 7 7/28/2006 1 6 11 11 i 10 7/29/2006 1 1 4 6 : 28 1 22 16 7/30/2006 2 5 7 29 29 1 38 I 33 : 7/31/2006 1 1 15 : 32 - 32 - 32 I 28 AVERAGE 12515242419 8:00 AM -9:59 AM = 0 10:00 AM -10:59 AM - 0 11:00 AM-11:59 PM Mid 69:11.-Mid 00:ZI. LAId 69:Z-Mid 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Mid Â£ Page 22 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 4 7 4 1 0 0 0 16 7/28/2006 2 0 14 0 4 1 0 21 7/29/2006 0 28 6 0 3 1 0 38 7/30/2006 12 2 63 0 0 5 0 82 7/31/2006 25 0 14 0 1 0 0 40 TOTAL 43 37 101 1 8 7 0 197 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER Total 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 25% 44% 25% 6% 0% 0% 0% 7/28/2006 10% 0% 66% 0% 19% 5% 0% 7/29/2006 0% 74% 16% 0% 8% 3% 0% 7/30/2006 15% 2% 77% 0% 0% 6% 0% 7/31/2006 63% 0% 35% 0% 3% 0% 0% AVERAGE 23% 24% 44% 1% 6% 3% 0% 100% Space Utilization Del's A&W Lot Peak Average I Total Spaces 42 42 Less: Daily Parkers 37 10 Employees 1 1 Open Spaces 4 31 Occupancy Percentage 90.48% 26.19% SUMMARY Page 23 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Ice House Lot Ice House Lot 44 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 7/27/2006 8 17 25 37 37 41 1 34 7/28/2006 7 23 i 44 1 43 43 40 40 , 7/29/2006 14 14 35 40 1 44 1 39 41 7/30/2006 6 22 33 43 ' 44 44 1 43 , 7/31/2006 2 18 34 40 40 1 43 43 1 AVERAGE 7193441424140: 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 PM INd 69:ZIÂ·-Mid 00:ZIÂ· 1/Ud 69: L - INd 00: L Mid 69:Z-Mid 002 Wd 69:Â£ - INd Â£ Page 24 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 19 50 13 4 2 6 4 98 7/28/2006 19 59 46 0 28 3 5 160 7/29/2006 64 56 30 11 33.6 173 7/30/2006 35 27 78 2 8 2 7 159 7/31/2006 35 0 32 0 2 0 0 69 TOTAL 172 192 199 17 43 14 22 659 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER Total 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 19% 51% 13% 5% 2% 6% 4% 7/28/2006 11% 37% 30% 0% 17% 2% 3% 7/29/2006 37% 32% 17% 6% 2% 2% 3% 7/30/2006 22% 17% 49% 1% 5% 1% 4% 7/31/2006 51% 0% 46% 0% 3% 0% 0% AVERAGE 28% 27% 31% 2% 6% 2% 3% 100% Space Utilization Ice House Lot Peak Average I Total Spaces 44 44 Less: Daily Parkers 36 29 Employees 8 5 Open Spaces 0 10 Occupancy Percentage 100.00% 77.27% SUMMARY Page 25 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTE. Municipal Lot Municipal Lot 279 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 7/27/2006 140 182 236 236 P 247 . 24* 247 1 207 207 207 7/28/2006 133 157 180 217 1. 253. ! 237 220 195 177 177 177 7/29/2006 184 184 220 256 1,258 258 I258 - 258 i 197 208 218 7/30/2006 112 184 218 252 258 1 263 1 229 195 222 222 190 7/31/2006 100 100 145 190 190 190 i 222 | AVERAGE 134 161 200 230 241 239 235 214 201 204 195 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM Mid 69:1Â· - Mid 00: L Mid 69:Z-Mid 00:Z Mid 69:E - Mid E INd69:*-INd 00:* Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9 INd 69:Z - Mid 00:Z Page 26 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSWI LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 101 147 140 78 20 0 64 550 7/28/2006 134 206 140 73 37 23 61 674 7/29/2006 157 0 257 0 165 0 7 586 7/30/2006 133 285 227 79 5 35 39 803 7/31/2006 154 40 130 0 38 0 0 362 TOTAL 1 679 678 894 230 265 58 171 2975 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER Total 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 18% 27% 25% 14% 4% 0% 12% 7/28/2006 20% 31% 21% 11% 5% 3% 9% 7/29/2006 24% 0% 40% 0% 25% 0% 11% 7/30/2006 17% 35% 28% 10% 1% 4% 5% 7/31/2006 43% 11% 36% 0% 10% 0% 0% AVERAGE 24% 21% 30% 7% 9% 1% 7% 100% Space Utilization Municipal Lot Peak Average Total Spaces 279 279 Less: Daily Parkers 180 146 Employees 83 58 Open Spaces 16 75 Occupancy Percentage 94.27% 73.12% SUMMARY Page 27 of 94 - I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM Old Lumber Yard Lot OLD LUMBER YARD 86 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 7/27/2006 9 12 11 9 12 r.15Â·1 12 8 7/28/2006 7 9 9 18 26 30 26 22 42 ; 62 4 52 42 7/29/2006 9 9 13 19 24 27 30 21 23 1 54 54. -'54 1 7/30/2006 11 10 19 27 43 1' 59 1 54 49 55 55 29 7/31/2006 4 13 22 40 r 58 r 58 -58 1 AVERAGE 7 10 15 23 32 37 37 26 32 45 45 48 0 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM 1:00 PM - 1:59 PM Mid 69:Z-Mid 00:Z INd 69:Â£ - Mid Â£ INd69:â€¢-Mld 00:* Mid 69:9 - INd 00:9 INd 69:9 - Mid 00:9 co INd 69:Z - INd 00:Z Mid 69:8 - Mid 00:8 Page 28 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING Sys-Al LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 6 18 7 2 1 1 2 37 7/28/2006 12 84 13 10 3 2 2 126 7/29/2006 65 30 14 4 2 3 2 120 7/30/2006 29 12 85 0 19 0 3 148 7/31/2006 50 3 21 0 1 0 0 75 TOTAL I 162 I 147 I 140 I 16 I 26 I 6 I 9 I 506 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 16% 49% 19% 5% 3% 3% 5% 7/28/2006 10% 66% 10% 8% 2% 2% 2% 7/29/2006 54% 25% 12% 3% 2% 3% 2% 7/30/2006 20% 8% 57% 0% 13% 0% 2% 7/31/2006 67% 4% 28% 0% 1% 0% 0% AVERAGE 33% 30% 25% 3% 4% 2% 2% 100% Space Utilization Old Lumber Yard Lot Peak Average Total Spaces 86 86 Less: Daily Parkers 57 27 Employees 5 3 Open Spaces 24 56 Occupancy Percentage 72.09% 34.88% SUMMARY Page 29 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Post Office Lot POST OFFICE LOT 94 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 7/27/2006 37 37 37 4 89 ' 1 84 78 59 7/28/2006 33 33 50 67 70 " 73 1 67 1 7/29/2006 45 45 70 82 1 r 87 87- 1 85 4 7/30/2006 21 30 72 72 ; -91 I 84 84 1 7/31/2006 18 18 49 93 I 89 85 74 AVERAGE 31 33 56 81 84 81 74 ( 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM Mid 69:ZIÂ·-INd 00:El Mid 69:1Â· - Mid 00: L Mid 69:Z-MId 00:Z Mid 69:E - Mid Â£ - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 36 162 0 14 9 6 10 237 7/28/2006 24 95 75 17 13 7 7 238 7/29/2006 104 193 62 17 13 0 8 397 7/30/2006 78 12 101 57 683 265 7/31/2006 39 103 77 18 2 1 0 240 TOTAL I 281 565 315 123 43 22 28 1377 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 15% 68% 0% 6% 4% 3% 4% 7/28/2006 10% 40% 31% 8% 5% 3% 3% 7/29/2006 26% 49% 16% 4% 3% 0% 2% 7/30/2006 29% 5% 38% 22% 2% 3% 1% 7/31/2006 16% 43% 32% 8% 1% 0% 0% AVERAGE 19% 41% 23% 10% 3% 2% 2% 100% Space Utilization Post Office Lot Peak Average I Total Spaces 94 94 Less: Daily Parkers 77 50 Employees 16 13 Open Spaces 1 31 Occupancy Percentage 98.94% 67.02% SUMMARY Page 31 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Tregent Park Lot Tregent Park Lot 20 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Lot 7/27/2006 9 12 14 18 18 19 1 18 7/28/2006 0 12 18 19 19 ' 20 1 19 7/29/2006 16 16 19 19 19 16 19 1 7/30/2006 8 14 17 20 20 - 20 20 L 7/31/2006 7 12 17 . 19 19. 19 . 19' 1 AVERAGE 8 13 17 19 19 19 19 1 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM Mid 69:ZI.-INd 00:ZI. Mid 69: L - INd 00:1Â· LAId 69:Z-1/Ud 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Mid Â£ Page 32 of 94 - REPUSLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 11 23 17 441060 7/28/2006 12 36 20 0 15 0 0 83 7/29/2006 37 46 13 8110 106 7/30/2006 21 8 34 1 8 4 1 77 7/31/2006 16 414030037 TOTAL 1 97 117 98 13 31 6 1 363 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 18% 38% 28% 7% 7% 2% 0% 7/28/2006 14% 44% 24% 0% 18% 0% 0% 7/29/2006 35% 43% 12% 8% 1% 1% 0% 7/30/2006 27% 10% 44% 1% 10% 5% 1% 7/31/2006 43% 11% 38% 0% 8% 0% 0% AVERAGE 27% 29% 29% 3% 9% 2% 0% 100% Space Utilization Tregent Park Peak Average i Total Spaces 20 20 Less: Daily Parkers 18 16 Employees 2 1 Open Spaces 0 3 Occupancy Percentage 100.00% 85.00% SUMMARY - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Weist Lot Weist Lot 121 Total Spaces Vehicles Parking in Lot 7/27/2006 57 57 72 87 94 1. 100 ! 88 76 76 76 7/28/2006 30 46 61 111 ' 113 113 ~ 108 95 106 106 101 7/29/2006 69 69 106 1 115 1 111 106 104 104 85 82 82 7/30/2006 21 67 90 112 ; 1157 1153 113 114 1 115 i. 115 1151 7/31/2006 33 72 ; 111 1 110 110 99 99 AVERAGE 42 62 88 107 109 107 102 97 96 95 99 INV 69:6- INV 00:8 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 P 12:00 PM-12:59 PM 1:00 PM - 1:59 PM INd 69:ZiNd 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Mid E INd69*-INd 00:* Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:Z - INd 00:Z Page 34 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SysrEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 51 114 39 16 25 2 19 266 7/28/2006 76 87 113 3 37 13 20 349 7/29/2006 50 242 94 0 20 4 15 425 7/30/2006 95 95 99 5 0 19 21 334 7/31/2006 66 0 98 0 0 27 0 191 TOTAL 1 338 538 443 24 82 65 75 1565 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 19% 43% 15% 6% 9% 1% 7% 7/28/2006 22% 25% 31% 1% 11% 4% 6% 7/29/2006 12% 56% 22% 0% 5% 1% 4% 7/30/2006 28% 28% 30% 1% 0% 6% 6% 7/31/2006 35% 0% 51% 0% 0% 14% 0% AVERAGE 1 23% 30% 30% 2% 5% 5% 5% 100% Space Utilization Weist Lot Peak Average Total Spaces 121 121 Less: Daily Parkers 80 67 Employees 35 24 Open Spaces 6 30 Occupancy Percentage 95.04% 75.21% SUMMARY - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Big Horn Drive Big Horn Drive 35 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street f 7/27/2006 8 8 11 14 18 1 21 1 20 19 7/28/2006 6 9 14 19 18 17 18 18 4 7/29/2006 12 12 14 16 . 24. 24 1 20 21 7/30/2006 8 15 27 27 Â·' 32 1 27 29 29 7/31/2006 5 8 11 24 24 7 27 27 AVERAGE 8 10 15 20 23 23 23 22 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM INd 69:11.-1&1 00:810 69:1Â· - INd 00:1. INd 69:Z-INd 00:Z INd 69:E - INd Â£ MId69*-Mid 00* Page 36 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 3 15 3 4 1 4 6 36 7/28/2006 61120152550 7/29/2006 12 16 6242951 7/30/2006 17 19 20 260771 7/31/2006 23 0 8 0 4 0 0 35 TOTAL I 61 61 57 9 20 8 27 243 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 8% 42% 8% 11% . 3% 11% 17% 7/28/2006 12% 22% 40% 2% 10% 4% 10% 7/29/2006 24% 31% 12% 4% 8% 4% 18% 7/30/2006 24% 27% 28% 3% 8% 0% 10% 7/31/2006 66% 0% 23% 0% 11% 0% 0% AVERAGE 27% 24% 22% 4% 8% 4% 11% 100% Space Utilization Big Horn Drive Peak Average Total Spaces 35 35 Less: Daily Parkers 21 11 Employees 11 7 Open Spaces 3 17 Occupancy Percentage 91.43% 51.43% SUMMARY - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Cleave Street Cleave Street 43 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 22 26 30 , 32 32 1 23 23 23 7/28/2006 16 28 30 4 . 31'. 1 30 29 28 27 7/29/2006 30 30 30' 30 1 28 ; 30 1 29 29 7/30/2006 20 3 28 28 28 ] 27 25 27 5 28 7/31/2006 19 20 21 E 31 31 3 28 28 AVERAGE 21 26 28 30 30 27 27 27 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 P Mid 69:ZIÂ·-MId 00:El INd 691 - INd 00:1Â· Mid 69:Z-INd 00:Z INd 69:Â£ - 1/Ud Â£ 1/lld69*-INd 00:t - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SVS-Al LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 9 5 7 2 8 0 18 49 7/28/2006 3 12 6 0 10 4 18 53 7/29/2006 11 541431038 7/30/2006 0 2 8 2 0 3 11 26 7/31/2006 9 0 6 0 6 0 0 21 TOTAL ' 32 24 31 5 28 10 57 187 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 18% 10% 14% 4% 17% 0% 37% 7/28/2006 6% 22% 11% 0% 19% 8% 34% 7/29/2006 29% 13% 11% 3% 11% 8% 26% 7/30/2006 0% 8% 31% 8% 0% 12% 42% 7/31/2006 43% 0% 29% 0% 29% 0% 0% AVERAGE I 19% 11% 19% 3% 15% 6% 28% 100% Space Utilization Cleave Street Peak Average Total Spaces 43 43 Less: Daily Parkers 9 11 Employees 23 13 Open Spaces 11 19 Occupancy Percentage 74.42% 55.81% SUMMARY Page 39 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ = PARKING SYSTEM East Elkhorn Avenue East Elkhorn Avenue 6 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 7/28/2006 7/29/2006 5 5 5 554.6 6.. 6 5. 6 7/30/2006 1,: 6 6 6 .6 , 61 51 .6 6 -6, 7/31/2006 0 4 4i er 6- 6 - 61 AVERAGE 2556666666 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM 1/Ud 69: L - Mid 00:1Â· INd 69:Z-INd 00:Z INd 69:Â£ - Mid Â£ IMId69:~-Mid 00:4 INd 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:9- Mid 00:9 Page 40 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 7/28/2006 7/29/2006 41611000031 7/30/2006 6 1 12 5 0 0 0 24 7/31/2006 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 12 TOTAL I 16 17 29 5 0 0 0 67 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 7/28/2006 7/29/2006 13% 52% 35% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7/30/2006 25% 4% 50% 21% 0% 0% 0% 7/31/2006 50% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% AVERAGE 29% 19% 45% 7% 0% 0% 0% 100% Space Utilization East Elkhorn Avenue Peak Average I Total Spaces 6 6 Less: Daily Parkers 6 5 Employees 0 0 Open Spaces 0 1 Occupancy Percentage 100.00% 83.33% SUMMARY Page 41 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ ~ PARKING SYSTEM East Riverside Drive East Riverside Drive 6 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 5 .5 5L . i 5 7/28/2006 56 5 5 5 .5 1 4 4 4 7/29/2006 555 516 6 615t6 6] 7/30/2006 6 6 -6 6Â£ 1 I 6 . 6 615 5 4 7/31/2006 b -5 5- 50 5 5-51 AVERAGE 55555655555 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 P 0, 0, 0 12:00 PM-12:59 PM 0, e 1:00 PM - 1:59 PM MId 69:Z-INd 00:1 0 LO INd 69:Â£ - INd Â£ INd69:*-INd 00* r INd 69:9 - INd 00:9 * Mid 69:9 - INd 00:9 * Mid 69:Z - Mid 00:Z ,-Page43Zf9-4- - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER= UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 4 8 10 1 0 0 0 23 7/28/2006 4 10 2 3 0 1 0 20 7/29/2006 6 12 6 0 3 0 0 27 7/30/2006 4 0 17 0 0 0 0 21 7/31/2006 2 18 0 1 0 0 0 21 TOTAL 20 48 35 5 3 1 0 112 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 17% 35% 43% 5% 0% 0% 0% 7/28/2006 20% 50% 10% 15% 0% 5% 0% 7/29/2006 22% 44% 22% 0% 11% 0% 0% 7/30/2006 19% 0% 81% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7/31/2006 10% 86% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% AVERAGE ' 18% 43% 31% 5% 2% 1% 0% 100% Space Utilization East Riverside Drive Peak Average Total Spaces 6 6 Less: Daily Parkers 5 4 Employees 1 1 Open Spaces 0 1 Occupancy Percentage 100.00% 83.33% SUMMARY - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM MacGregor Ranch North Macgregor Ranch North 124 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 25 28 30 372 441 43 41 32 7/28/2006 27 28 29 39 ' 49' 39 29 30 7/29/2006 37 37 37 55 72 i 96 '96 96 7/30/2006 14 14 39 61 83 85 86 72 7/31/2006 22 22 42, 62 62 62i 57 AVERAGE 25 26 35 51 62 65 62 58 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 P Mid 69:EX-INd 00:ZI. INd 69: L - INd 00: L INd 69:Z-INd 00:Z INd 69:Â£ - INd Â£ INd69*-Ed 00* - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT 'UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 6 16 15 22 1 4 14 78 7/28/2006 13 46 5 11 10 7 13 105 7/29/2006 23 0 18 0 53 0 17 111 7/30/2006 19 49 69 28 11 8 14 198 7/31/2006 36 6 48 0 13 0 0 103 TOTAL I 97 I 117 I 155 I 61 I 88 I 19 I 58 I 595 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 8% 21% 19% 28% 1% 5% 18% 7/28/2006 15% 41% 10% 5% 10% 7% 12% 7/29/2006 21% 0% 16% 0% 48% 0% 15% 7/30/2006 10% 25% 35% 14% 6% 4% 7% 7/31/2006 36% 6% 46% 0% 12% 0% 0% AVERAGE 18% 19% 25% 9% 15% 3% 10% 100% Space Utilization MacGregor Ranch North Peak Average 1 Total Spaces 124 124 Less: Daily Parkers 73 28 Employees 23 16 Open Spaces 28 80 Occupancy Percentage 77.42% 35.48% SUMMARY Page 45 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ ~ PARKING SYSTEM MacGregor Ranch South Macgregor Ranch South 32 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 16 17 18 21, f 23 i 16 22 22 18 18 7/28/2006 9 9 17 22, 22 I 16 18 19 15 18 20 7/29/2006 20 20 20 20 23 Z 29 29 ' 29 -29 1 24 24 7/30/2006 17 19 21 i- 30 1 27 29 29 29 23 23 23 7/31/2006 12 12 15 18 25 25 1 26 4 | AVERAGE 15 15 18 22 24 23 25 25 21 21 22 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM INd 69:1Â· - Mid 004 Mid 69:Z-Mid 00:Z Mid 69:E - Mld E INd69*-1Ald 00* MId 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Ed 69:Z - Wd 00:Z Page 46 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 14 18 21 10 22269 7/28/2006 17 45 12 660086 7/29/2006 25 14 0 0 17 0 7 63 7/30/2006 21 10 33 27 03296 7/31/2006 25 3 30 0 0 0 0 58 TOTAL I 102 I 90 I 96 I 43 I 25 I 5 I 11 I 372 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 20% 26% 30% 14% 3% 3% 4% 7/28/2006 20% 52% 14% 7% 7% 0% 0% 7/29/2006 40% 22% 0% 0% 27% 0% 11% 7/30/2006 22% 10% 34% 28% 0% 3% 2% 7/31/2006 45% 0% 55% 0% 0% 0% 0% AVERAGE ~ 29% 22% 27% 10% 7% 1% 3% 100% Space Utilization MacGregor Ranch South Peak Average 1 Total Spaces 32 32 Less: Daily Parkers 27 20 Employees 3 1 Open Spaces 2 11 Occupancy Percentage 93.75% 65.63% SUMMARY Page 47 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Moraine Avenue Moraine Avenue 35 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 15 21 21 14 ' 23; 23 1 20 7/28/2006 11 16 20 18 26 26 1 25 7/29/2006 11 11 18 24 27 7 30 I 16 19 7/30/2006 10 26 30 1 34 34 34 34 L 1 31 7/31/2006 16 16 24 7 31 1 30 30 24 AVERAGE 13 18 23 24 28 29 24 27 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM Mid 69:21.-MId 00:El INd 69:1Â· - INd 00:1Â· Mid 69:Z-INd 00:Z INd 69:Â£ - INd Â£ Ulld65Â·V-INd 0047 N N Page 48 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 5 41 9 6 0 0 2 63 7/28/2006 17 37 30 0 11 1 3 99 7/29/2006 14 66 10 420298 7/30/2006 26 30 26 28 206 118 7/31/2006 23 0 46 0 0 1 0 70 TOTAL 1 85 174 121 38 15 2 13 448 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 8% 65% 14% 10% 0% 0% 3% 7/28/2006 17% 38% 30% 0% 11% 1% 3% 7/29/2006 14% 67% 10% 4% 2% 0% 2% 7/30/2006 22% 25% 22% 24% 2% 0% 5% 7/31/2006 33% 0% 66% 0% 0% 1% 0% AVERAGE I 19% 39% 28% 8% 3% 0% 3% 100% Space Utilization Moraine Avenue Peak Average I Total Spaces 35 35 Less: Daily Parkers 28 18 Employees 6 3 Open Spaces 1 14 Occupancy Percentage 97.14% 60.00% SUMMARY Page 49 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 i PARKING SYSTEM Park Lane Park Lane 41 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 11 26 3 40 i 38 36 32 28 28 27 27 7/28/2006 11 23 34 35 35 30 32 33 29 24 "37 ' 7/29/2006 c40 40 40- 40 40 1 39 2 40 40 - 40 1 39 39 7/30/2006 12 26 r 40'~ 1 38 38 38 36 36 36 38 39 7/31/2006 22 22 33 33 i 37, 37 37 I AVERAGE 19 27 37 37 37 35 35 34 33 32 38 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM d 69:1Â· - Wd 00:1Â· INd 69:Z-Mid 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Mid Â£ INd69:0-INd 00:14 INd 69:9 - INd 00:9 INd 69:9 - INd 00:9 INd 69:Z - INd 00:Z Page 50 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ ~ ~PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT ' UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 21 23 41 11 750 108 7/28/2006 30 59 27 9523 135 7/29/2006 38 0 35 0 34 0 6 113 7/30/2006 29 59 44 18 211 154 7/31/2006 31 0 43 0 8 0 0 82 TOTAL 149 I 141 I 190 I 38 I 56 I 8 I 10 I 592 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 19% 21% 38% 10% 6% 6% 0% 7/28/2006 22% 44% 20% 7% 4% 1% 2% 7/29/2006 34% 0% 31% 0% 30% 0% 5% 7/30/2006 18% 37% 31% 11% 1% 1% 1% 7/31/2006 38% 0% 52% 0% 10% 0% 0% AVERAGE 26% 20% 34% 6% 10% 2% 2% 100% Space Utilization Park Lane Peak Average Total Spaces 41 41 Less: Daily Parkers 32 31 Employees 8 3 Open Spaces 1 7 Occupancy Percentage 97.56% 82.93% SUMMARY Page 51 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ ~ PARKING SYSTEN Virginia Drive Virginia Drive 19 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 8 16 17 : 18 I 17 17 14 9 7/28/2006 8 8 9 10 12 - 14 2 13 11 , 14 ] 7/29/2006 10 10 12 15 . 18 ' 16 16 16 14 7/30/2006 4 11 < 18, .18 18 18 ! 17 17 17 7/31/2006 5 5 14 14 17 ' 18 18.< AVERAGE 7 8 14 15 17 17 16 15 14 00 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 P Wd 69:ZIÂ·-Ed 00:ElÂ· INd 69: L - Mid 00:1. Mid 69:Z-INd 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - INd Â£ INd69:*-INd 00:* Mid 69:9 - INd 00:9 Page 52 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 5 5 7 0 2 2 9 30 7/28/2006 5 14 13 5 0 4 1 42 7/29/2006 9 29 9 7 1 2 3 60 7/30/2006 10 34 13 1 0 2 4 64 7/31/2006 11 0 13 0 0 0 4 28 TOTAL I 40 82 55 13 3 10 21 224 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 17% 17% 23% 0% 7% 7% 30% 7/28/2006 12% 33% 31% 12% 0% 10% 2% 7/29/2006 15% 48% 15% 12% 2% 3% 5% 7/30/2006 16% 53% 20% 2% 0% 3% 6% 7/31/2006 39% 0% 46% 0% 0% 0% 14% AVERAGE 20% 30% 27% 5% 2% 5% 11% 100% Space Utilization Virginia Drive Peak Average Total Spaces 19 19 Less: Daily Parkers 13 9 Employees 5 4 Open Spaces 1 6 Occupancy Percentage 94.74% 68.42% SUMMARY - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTE. Weist Drive Weist Drive 18 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 8 11 13 14 3 15 1 14 12 12 12 7/28/2006 4 7 9 1 17 - 17 17 ! 16 14 16 16 15 7/29/2006 13 13 15 15 17 i 18 18 18 18 1 13 13 7/30/2006 13 i .18 1 17 16 17 17 16 17 B -18 18 18 1 7/31/2006 10 13 16 f 17 17 ' 17 17 I AVERAGE 10 12 14 16 16 17 16 15 16 15 15 oo 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 P 12:00 PM-12:59 PM 1:00 PM - 1:59 PM Mid 69:Z-Mid 00:Z Mid 69:E - Mid E INd69:*-1Ald 00:V Ed 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:9 - INd 00:9 INd 69:Z - Mid 00:Z Page 54 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SVSTE. LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 6 12 5 2 3 1 1 30 7/28/2006 7 8 11 0 4 1 2 33 7/29/2006 3 11 7 0 1 0 0 22 7/30/2006 12 7 22 0 0 4 3 48 7/31/2006 14 0 20 0 0 3 0 37 TOTAL I 42 38 65 2 8 9 6 170 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 21% 42% 14% 5% 8% 2% 8% 7/28/2006 24% 24% 30% 1% 10% 5% 7% 7/29/2006 13% 46% 29% 0% 4% 0% 8% 7/30/2006 25% 15% 46% 0% 0% 8% 6% 7/31/2006 38% 0% 54% 0% 0% 8% 0% AVERAGE 24% 25% 35% 1% 4% 5% 6% 100% Space Utilization Weist Drive Peak Average ' Total Spaces 18 18 Less: Daily Parkers 16 13 Employees 2 2 Open Spaces 0 3 Occupancy Percentage 100.00% 83.33% SUMMARY Page 55 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM West Elkhorn West Elkhorn Drive 19 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 17. 17 ~'177 17 --17' - 174 16 14 14 14 7/28/2006 11 : 17 17 1 16 : 17 17 I 16 15 16 16 15 7/29/2006 15 15 15 16 3 18 1 16 16 16 14 13 13 7/30/2006 16 17 2 18 18 18 18 18 18 1818I 18' I 7/31/2006 18 18, 18<' 18, i 17 17 15 AVERAGE 15 17 17 17 17 17 16 16 16 15 15 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM INd 69:1. - INd 00:1Â· Mid 69:Z-Mid 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Mid Â£ 1/Ud69:*-Mid 00:â€¢ Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:Z - Mid 00:Z Page 56 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ ~ PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 11 23 0400038 7/28/2006 13 37 9300668 7/29/2006 34 25 6221070 7/30/2006 15 24 12 16 00168 7/31/2006 12 0 15 15 0 0 0 42 TOTAL 1 85 109 42 40 2 1 7 286 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 29% 61% 0% 11% 0% 0% 0% 7/28/2006 19% 55% 13% 4% 0% 0% 9% 7/29/2006 49% 36% 9% 3% 3% 1% 0% 7/30/2006 22% 35% 18% 24% 0% 0% 1% 7/31/2006 29% 0% 36% 36% 0% 0% 0% AVERAGE 1 30% 37% 15% 16% 1% 0% 2% 100% Space Utilization West Elkhorn Drive Peak Average 1 Total Spaces 19 19 Less: Daily Parkers 15 14 Employees 3 2 Open Spaces 1 3 Occupancy Percentage 94.74% 84.21% SUMMARY '7ageETZEr - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM West Riverside Drive West Riverside Drive 38 Total Spaces Vehicles Parked in Street 7/27/2006 23 23 25 27 2 31 31 1 28 26 24 11 7/28/2006 20 20 21 24 27 26 24 28 1 32 I 22 12 7/29/2006 19 19 18 31 34 436 1 31 26 21 19 16 7/30/2006 16 24 34 34 34 736, { 33 33 33 33 14 7/31/2006 16 20 23 30 30 30 22 AVERAGE 19 21 24 29 31 32 28 28 28 21 14 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM Mid 69: L - Mid 00:1Â· Mid 69:Z-Mid 00:Z Mid 69:Â£ - Mid Â£ INd69:*-Mid 00:â€¢ Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9 INd 69:9- Ed 00:9 INd 69:Z - INd 00:Z Page 58 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM LENGTH OF STAY REPORT UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES 7/27/2006 2 19 6 8 8 6 6 55 7/28/2006 511182631257 7/29/2006 3 30 8 11 1 5 13 71 7/30/2006 63051181750 7/31/2006 7 0 2 0 9 0 13 31 TOTAL I 23 63 34 26 25 32 61 264 BY PERCENTAGES UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS 7/27/2006 4% 35% 9% 15% 15% 11% 11% 7/28/2006 9% 19% 32% 4% 11% 5% 21% 7/29/2006 4% 42% 11% 15% 1% 7% 18% 7/30/2006 12% 6% 0% 10% 2% 36% 34% 7/31/2006 23% 0% 6% 0% 29% 0% 42% AVERAGE 10% 20% 12% 9% 12% 12% 25% 100% Space Utilization West Riverside Drive Peak Average Total Spaces 38 38 Less: Daily Parkers 14 7 Employees 22 17 Open Spaces 2 14 Occupancy Percentage 94.74% 63.16% SUMMARY - REPUBL#C~ I PARKING SYSTEM City Analysis Open Space Report - July 27,2005 LOCATION NAME AMERICAN 15 15 13 11 5 14 20 27 49 BIGHORN 12 12 9 6 6 7 8 10 16 16 2@0 6 4Â·.al# @Ar.,37,1 BIG HORN DRIVE 27 27 24 21 17 14 15 16 19 19 ~20 BROWNSFIELD 3123212333 4:26*~ U CHILDRENS 1111123422 :*FÂ«{Â·j CLEAVE ST 21 17 13 11 11 20 20 20 24 24 4484 COFFEE BAR 1101122566 DARK HORSE 52 52 5 3 3 2 4 8 8 8 fl# ,- Â·I-:A.'* DEL'S'S A&W 43 43 43 39 25 25 36 41 40 39 373 EAST ELKHORN -%4-â‚¬<?r EAST RIVERSIDE DR 1110001222 0=359 WEST RIVERSIDE DR 15 15 13 11 7 7 10 12 14 27 ..112 1 787# 4;*07Â¥7 ICE HOUSE 36 27 19 7 7 3 10 13 17 17 i*46 49Â«45 MACGREGOR N 99 96 94 87 80 81 83 92 101 101 39Â¥+ MACGREGOR S 16 15 14 11 9 16 10 10 14 14 13 MORAINE AVE. 20 14 14 21 12 12 15 14 20 27 17 MUNICIPAL 139 97 43 43 32 32 32 72 72 72 63 LUMBER YARD 80 77 74 75 77 74 71 74 78 78 76 PARK LANE 30 15 1 3 5 9 13 13 14 14 12 POST OFFICE 57 57 57 5 10 16 35 23 23 34 32 TREGENT PARK 11 8 6 2 2 1 2 3 6 6 5 VIRGINIA DR 11 11 3 2 1 2 2 5 10 10 6 WEST ELKHORN 1111112444 24. WEIST DRIVE 10 10 7 5 4 3 4 6 6 6 dâ‚¬â‚¬â‚¬ WEIST 64 64 49 34 27 21 33 45 45 45 04531 TOTAL OPEN SPACES 765 677 506 403 345 356 418 509 564 601 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 12:00 PM-12:59 PM 1/\Id 69: L - INd 00:1Â· LO Mid 69:Z-Mid 00:Z 0 1/\Id 69:Â£ - INd Â£ MId69*-Mid 00:4 U\Id 6929 - 1/\Id 00:9 Mid 69:9 - Ulld 00:9 Mid 69:Z- Mid 00:Z INd 69:8 - Mid 00:8 39483AV Page 60 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Open Space Report - July 28,2005 LOCATION NAME AMERICAN 22 16 11 BIGHORN 1754445 8 11 9 8 14 21 99.3 BIG HORN DRIVE 29 26 21 16 17 18 17 17 13 13 21 21 319% .Eve BROWNSFIELD 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 4724 CHILDRENS 5 5 3 1 1 2 2 2 4 3 2 2 --3 1 ' CLEAVE ST 27 15 13 12 13 14 15 16 19 23 27 32 49) COFFEE BAR 4 4 3 3 4 6 4 3 5 4 3 3 ..4*r 9 13 t~t' DARK HORSE 22 22 14 6 3 1 5 9 13 9 5916**1 DEL'S A&W 42 42 42 37 32 32 33 37 41 41 41 41-583 EAST ELKHORN .:j34*f ?Ellp.t' EAST RIVERSIDE DR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ' ~-11.27 WEST RIVERSIDE DR 18 18 17 14 11 12 14 10 6 16 26 26 162 ICE HOUSE 37 21 0 1 1 4 4 4 5 6 10 15 -93 MACGREGOR N 97 96 95 85 75 85 95 94 94 99 104 104 94. MACGREGOR S 23 23 15 10 10 16 14 13 17 14 12 12 .15 MORAINE AVE. 24 19 15 17 9 9 10 12 14 13 13 13 1,4 MUNICIPAL 146 122 99 62 26 42 59 84 102 102 102 102 8~- LUMBER YARD 79 77 77 68 60 56 60 64 44 24 34 44 57. PARK LANE 30 18 7 6 6 11 9 8 12 17 4 4 1 10' POST OFFICE 61 61 44 27 24 21 27 33 38 44 52 60 41 TREGENT PARK 20 8 2 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 3 VIRGINIA DR 11 11 10 9 7 5 6 8 5 8 11 11 9 WEST ELKHORN 7 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 3 3 .22 WEIST DRIVE 14 11 9 1 1 1 2 4 2 2 3 3. 24 WEIST 91 75 60 10 8 8 13 26 15 15 20 20 30 TOTAL OPEN SPACES 829 699 565 395 318 353 407 467 470 473 522 562 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 0 12:00 PM-12:59 PM INd 69:1.-INd 007 - INd 697-Wd 00:Z r 1/Ud 69Â£ - MId Â£ 9- INd69*-1/Ild 00* w Mid 69:9 - Wd 00:9 N Mid 69:9 - Ed 00:9 rÂ·- INd 69:L- Ed 00:Z h INd 69:8 - LAId 00:8 r- 39Â¥h13/\V Itt- /7/ '. Page 61 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Open Space Report - July 29,2005 4 8 4 g r LOCATION NAME o AMERICAN 8 15 19 19 19 19.10 BIGHORN 665 7 8 8 9 13 8 8 (*Â·Â· BIG HORN DRIVE 23 23 21 19 11 11 15 14 16 22 22 22 :Â·.18 BROWNSFIELD 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2.-45 CHILDRENS 110001211234 10 CLEAVE ST 13 13 13 13 15 13 14 14 15 24 24 24 *4 COFFEE BAR 5 5 3 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 4 4 ~ 2~ DARK HORSE 38 38 10 0 1 1 3 61035 5 r-~49 DEL'S A&W 42 42 39 37 15 21 27 39 40 41 41 41 35r EAST ELKHORN 111110001001 :142 jj'>Arr EAST RIVERSIDE DR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 c.i u WEST RIVERSIDE DR 19 19 20 7 4 2 7 12 17 19 22 27 71'5, f.Â· ..,Â·1- J ICE HOUSE 30 30 9 4 0 5 3 5 14 12 1 1 ~*60% MACGREGOR N 87 87 87 69 52 28 28 28 28 86 86 86 ~403'4 MACGREGOR S 12 12 12 12 9 3 3 3 3 8 8 8 Â·74- i MORAINE AVE. 24 24 17 11 8 5 19 23 21 19 19 19 - ~171 MUNICIPAL 95 95 59 23 21 21 21 21 82 71 61 61 53Â· LUMBER YARD 77 77 73 67 62 59 56 65 63 32 32 32Â·504 PARK LANE 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1Â» POST OFFICE 49 49 24 12 7 7 9 25 40 40 12 19 24 TREGENT PARK 4411141140002 VIRGINIA DR 9974133357775 WEST ELKHORN 3332022245553 WEIST DRIVE 5 5 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 -1*47 WEIST 52 52 15 6 10 15 17 17 36 39 39 39 .28 TOTAL OPEN SPACES 606 606 430 298 226 212 249 305 432 472 428 442 00 8:00 AM -9:59 M * 11:00 AM-11:59 PM 4 0 12:00 PM-12:59 PM d 69: L - Ed 00: L - 4- Mid 69:Z-INd 00:Z .- Wd 69:Â£ - U\Id Â£ CO INd69:*-INd 00:* INd 69:9 - lAci 00:9 Mid 69:9 - INd 00:9 UUd 69:Z - INd 00:Z INd 69:8 - Mid 00:8 39Vh13AV - REPUBLIC~ ~ PARKING SYSTEM Open Space Report - July 30,2005 E LOCATION NAME AMERICAN 21 BIGHORN 17 4 4 BIG HORN DRIVE 27 20 8 8 3 8 6 6 10 10 BROWNSFIELD 1000010000 CHILDRENS 19 1 1 1 1 2 4 3 3 3 CLEAVE ST 23 15 15 15 16 18 16 15 15 15 COFFEE BAR 7412110000 DARK HORSE 73 24 13 3 6 6 15 10 5 4 DEL'S A&W 41 38 36 14 14 5 10 15 13 13 EAST ELKHORN 5000001000 EAST RIVERSIDE DR 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 WEST RIVERSIDE DR 22 14 4 4 4 2 5 5 5 5 ICE HOUSE 38 22 11 1 0 0 1222 MACGREGOR N 110 110 85 63 41 39 38 52 67 79 MACGREGOR S 15 13 11 2 5 3 3 3 9 9 MORAINE AVE. 25 9 5 1 1 1 1 4 8 8 MUNICIPAL 167 95 61 27 21 16 50 84 57 57 LUMBER YARD 75 76 67 59 43 27 32 37 31 31 PARK LANE 29 15 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 POST OFFICE 73 64 22 22 3 10 10 28 11 11 TREGENT PARK 12 6 3 0000011 VIRGINIA DR 15 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 WEST ELKHORN 2100000000 WEIST DRIVE 5012112100 WEIST 100 54 31 9 6 6 8 7 6 6 TOTAL OPEN SPACES 922 596 382 242 175 156 213 287 257 267 8:00 AM -9:59 AM w 10:00 AM -10:59 A = 11:OOAM-11:59 PM INd 69:ZI.-INd 00:ZI. r- XI- INd 69: L- Ed 00: L o r INd 69:Z-INd 00:Z 01 4- INd 69:Â£ - INd Â£ 01 01 INd69*-IAId 00* 0 01 Mid 69:9 - INd 00:g CD CO Mid 69:9 - INd 00:9 CO CO Page 63 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Open Space Report- July 31, 2005 LOCATION NAME AMERICAN 15 15 BIGHORN 24 16 8445 BIG HORN DRIVE 30 27 24 11 11 8 BROWNSFIELD 110000 CHILDRENS 15 2 2 3 0 0 CLEAVE ST 24 23 22 12 12 15 COFFEE BAR 14 5 5 1 1 1 DARK HORSE 42 42 10 0 0 1 DEL'S A&W 42 42 28 11 11 11 EAST ELKHORN 622000 EAST RIVERSIDE DR 1 1 1 1 1 1 WEST RIVERSIDE DR 22 18 15 8 8 8 ICE HOUSE 42 26 10 4 4 1 MACGREGOR N 102 102 82 62 62 62 MACGREGOR S 20 20 17 14 7 7 MORAINE AVE. 19 19 11 4 5 5 MUNICIPAL 179 179 134 89 89 89 LUMBER YARD 82 73 64 46 28 28 PARK LANE 19 19 8 8 4 4 POST OFFICE 76 76 45 1 5 9 TREGENT PARK 13 8 3 1 1 1 VIRGINIA DR 14 14 5 5 2 1 WEST ELKHORN 000011 WEIST DRIVE 852111 WEIST 88 49 10 11 11 22 TOTAL OPEN SPACES 898 784 515 297 269 282 8:00 AM -9:59 AM INV 69~01.- INV 00~01. iNd 69:1.1.-INV 00: 1.1. h. Ed 69:ZI.-INd 00:El. 0 Ed 69:10 - Ed 004 " Uyd 69:Z-INd 002 " - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Average Open Space Report - All Week LOCATION NAME AMERICAN 16 11 5 10 12 14 10 13 BIGHORN 15 9 6 446689108 15 BIG HORN DRIVE 27 25 20 15 12 12 12 13 15 16 18 22 47 BROWNSFIELD 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 CHILDRENS 8211112333333 CLEAVE ST 22 17 15 13 13 16 16 16 18 22 27 28 - 19 COFFEE BAR 6 4 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 3- DARK HORSE 45 36 10 2 3 2 8 8 9 6 6 9.12 DEL'S A&W 42 41 38 28 19 19 24 33 34 34 36 41 32 EAST ELKHORN 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 -ff EAST RIVERSIDE DR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2222 jit Â·â€¢4. WEST RIVERSIDE DR 19 17 14 9 7 6 10 10 11 17 24 27 :141 ICE HOUSE 37 25 10 3 2 3 4 6 10 9 5 8 6:10% MACGREGOR N 99 98 89 73 62 59 62 67 73 91 94 95 11804 MACGREGOR S 17 17 14 10 8 9 7 7 11 11 10. 10 944;4 MORAINE AVE. 22 17 12 11 7 6 11 13 16 17 13 16 343 MUNICIPAL 145 118 79 49 38 40 44 65 78 76 84 82 275: LUMBER YARD 79 76 71 63 54 49 49 60 54 41 41 38 %56% Al:.23 PARK LANE 22 14 4 4 4 6 6 7 8 9 3 3 :*9Â£*f' -0-4,1:1 POST OFFICE 63 61 38 13 10 13 20 27 28 32 23 40 :91% :,Â·ff,Â· 3* TREGENT PARK 12 7 3 11112321 1 '.11 VIRGINIA DR 12 11 5 4 2 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 6 joe>.. 1 WEST ELKHORN 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4,2 WEIST DRIVE 864221232334 WEIST 79 59 33 14 12 14 19 24 26 26 22 30 30 TOTAL OPEN SPACES 806 673 480 327 267 272 318 392 431 453 444 503 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 A -4 11:00 AM-11:59 PM M 12:00 PM-12:59 PM Mid 69: L - INd 00: L N INd 69:Z-Mid 00:2 04 1Ald 69~Â£ - INd Â£ INd69:*-Mid 00* INd 698 - Wd 00:9 Mid 6929 - Mid 00:9 Mid 69:Z - INd 00:Z Mid 69:8 - INd 00:8 39Â¥hIEIAV w %'co - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Summary Vehicles Parked in Lots/Streets . I . ... 0- - -0 - 0 - 0 July 27,2005 595 683 854 957 1015 1004 942 851 796 759 July 28,2005 531 661 795 965 1042 1007 953 893 890 887 July 29,2005 760 760 936 1068 1140 1154 1117 1061 934 894 July 30,2005 444 770 984 1124 1191'~210~1153 1079 1109 1099 July 31, 2005 468 582 851 1069 1097 1084 1066 Open Space Counts - July 27,2005 765 677 506 403 345 356 418 509 564 601 July 28,2005 829 699 565 395 318 353 407 467 470 473 July 29,2005 606 606 430 298 226 212 249 305 432 472 July 30,2005 922 596 382 242 175 Â£156 213 287 257 267 July 31, 2005 898 784 515 297 269 282 300 8:00 AM -9:59 AM 10:00 AM -10:59 AM ' 11:00 AM-11:59 PM INd 69:EPINd 00:ZIÂ· Mid 69: ~ - Mid 00: I Ulld 69:Z-INd 00:Z INd 69:E- INd E INd69:f-Ulld 00:* Mid 69:9 - Mid 00:9~ INd 69:9 - Ed 00:9 Page 66 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTE~ Length of Stay Report - By Vehicles LOCATION NAME UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER TOTAL 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS VEHICLES AMERICAN 130 230 224 18 30 38 32 702 BIGHORN 67 78 59 15 32 10 100 361 BIG HORN DRIVE 61 61 57 9 20 8 27 243 BROWNSFIELD 19 47 15 11 5 1 0 98 CHILDRENS 153 299 164 67 47 26 83 839 CLEAVE ST 32 24 31 5 28 10 57 187 COFFEEBAR 63 140 64 21 10 14 17 329 DARK HORSE 339 609 607 140 105 23 16 1,839 DEL'S A&W 43 37 101 1 8 7 0 197 EASTELKHORN 16 17 29 5 0 0 0 67 EAST RIVERSIDE DR 20 48 35 5 3 1 0 112 WEST RIVERSIDE DR 23 63 34 26 25 32 61 264 ICE HOUSE 172 192 199 17 43 14 22 659 MACGREGORN 97 117 155 61 88 19 58 595 MACGREGOR S 102 90 96 43 25 5 11 372 MORAINE AVE 85 174 121 38 15 2 13 448 MUNICIPAL 679 678 894 230 265 58 171 2,975 LUMBER YARD 162 147 140 16 26 6 9 506 PARK LANE 149 141 190 38 56 8 10 592 POST OFFICE 281 565 315 123 43 22 28 1,377 TREGENTPARK 97 117 98 13 31 6 1 363 VIRGINIA DR 40 82 55 13 3 10 21 224 WEST ELKHORN 85 109 42 40 2 1 7 286 WEIST DRIVE 42 38 65 2 8 9 6 170 WEIST 338 538 443 24 82 65 75 1,565 TOTAL VEHICLES 3,295 4,641 4,233 981 1,000 395 825 15,370 Page 67 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Length of Stay Report - By Percentages LOCATION NAME UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER UNDER OVER 1 HR 2 HRS 3 HRS 4 HRS 5 HRS 6 HRS 6 HRS AMERICAN 19% 31% 33% 3% 4% 6% 4% BIGHORN 19% 19% 19% 4% 10% 2% 27% BIG HORN DRIVE 27% 24% 22% 4% 8% 4% 11% BROWNSFIELD 20% 44% 18% 11% 6% 1% 0% CHILDRENS 19% 35% 18% 9% 5% 3% 10% CLEAVE ST 19% 11% 19% 3% 15% 6% 28% COFFEE BAR 21% 38% 23% 6% 3% 4% 6% DARK HORSE 18% 34% 32% 8% 6% 1% 1% DEL'S A&W 23% 24% 44% 1% 6% 3% 0% EAST ELKHORN 29% 19% 45% 7% 0% 0% 0% EAST RIVERSIDE DR 18% 43% 31% 5% 2% 1% 0% WEST RIVERSIDE DR DR 10% 20% 12% 9% 12% 12% 25% ICE HOUSE 28% 27% 31% 2% 6% 2% 3% MACGREGOR N 18% 19% 25% 9% 15% 3% 10% MACGREGOR S 29% 25% 24% 9% 8% 1% 4% MORAINE AVE 19% 41% 30% 5% 3% 1% 3% MUNICIPAL 24% 15% 36% 5% 11% 1% 7% LUMBER YARD 33% 36% 20% 5% 2% 2% 2% PARK LANE 26% 14% 36% 8% 10% 2% 2% POST OFFICE 19% 42% 25% 5% 5% 2% 2% TREGENT PARK 27% 38% 24% 3% 7% 1% 1% VIRGINIA DR 20% 27% 27% 10% 2% 4% 10% WEST ELKHORN 30% 36% 18% 11% 1% 1% 3% WEIST DRIVE 24% 25% 35% 1% 4% 5% 6% WEIST 23% 31% 30% 2% 6% 5% 4% AVERAGE 23% 29% 27% 6% 6% 3% 7% Page 68 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Employee Vehicles EMPLOYEE VEHICLES 7/27/2005 7/28/2005 7/29/2005 7/30/2005 7/31/2005 AVERAGE American Legion 8 16 10 12 12 12 Big Horn 23 25 25 19 9 20 Big Horn Drive 9 5 11 9 3 7 Brownsfield 0 3 1 0 0 1 Childrens 17 20 19 17 18 18 Cleave 18 23 12 9 4 13 Coffee Bar 2 8 9 8 3 6 Dark Horse 14 13 12 15 6 12 Del's A&W 0 1 1 1 0 1 Ice House 4 7 8 5 1 5 East Riverside 0 1 1 0 0 0 Morraine 2 6 3 3 0 3 MacGregor North 0 16 23 15 9 13 MacGregor South 0 0 3 0 0 Â· 1 Municipal 65 83 75 45 23 58 Old Lumber Yard 2 5 5 5 0 3 Park Lane 1 2 8 4 1 3 Post Office 16 15 12 15 6 13 Tregent Park 0 2 1 1 1 1 Virginia Drive 4 4 5 2 3 4 Weist Lot 21 35 21 26 17 24 Weist Drive 0 0 0 2 1 1 West Elkhorn 0 3 1 2 1 1 West Riverside 14 17 22 20 12 17 TOTALS 220 310 288 235 130 237 Page 69 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 Ill PARKING SYSTEM Utilization Summary Page 70 of 94 Illl REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM 6. OWNER SURVEYS This section contains information that was collected from a survey of the business owners in the area. Some of the owners were unavailable, and in that instance the information was provided by the manager of the business. For the purpose of this report the term "Owners" will include any manager who spoke on behalf of the business. The questions that were asked are as follows: 1) Do you believe there is a parking problem in Estes Park? 2) What complaint do you hear the most in regards to the parking? 3) Where do you currently park? 4) Where do your employees park? 5) Are you in favor of paid parking on the parking lots? 6) Do you believe a shuttle operation from a remote lot 1 mile away would help the parking situation? 7) Would you be willing to ride a shuttle? 8) Would you encourage your employees ride the shuttle? 9) What do you feel needs to be done to improve the parking in Estes Park? Name of Store: Location: Store Hours: Store Square Footage Total Employees Needing Parking Page 71 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM Do you believe there is a parking problem in Estes Park? Yes 114 82% No . 25 18% 139 100% The first question on the survey; "Do you believe there is a parking problem in Estes Park?" Out of those surveyed, 82% of the owners felt that there is a parking problem, while the remaining 18% felt that there was no problem. Page 72 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM What complaint do you hear the most in regards to parking? In conjunction with the first question the owners where then asked, "What complaints do you hear most in regards to parking?" The complaint with the highest percentage was "not enough spaces" at 34%. The other top complaints; 7% said that the 3 hour time limit was to short, 7% said customer complain bout having to drive around looking for a space, 6% said the customers have to walk to far, and 6% said that their was inadequate signs directing customers to the parking lots. Finally, 9% of the owners said that they do not hear any complaints about parking. PARKING COMPLAINTS 6.74% I Not Enough. 1 Have to walk to far. O Driving around to find a spot multiple lots. 03 Hour time limit to short. 34.20% â€¢ Signs directing to lots hard to see. 7.25% ~ Here is a list of all of the complaints that were mentioned on the surveys and what percentage of the owners stated them. What complaint do you hear the most in regards to parking? Not Enough. 66 34.20% Have to walk to far. 12 6.22% Driving around to find a spot multiple lots. 14 7.25% 3 Hour time limit to short. 14 7.25% Signs directing to lots hard to see. 13 6.74% Page 73 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Tickets not universally enforced. | 6 3.11% No tickets should be given. 8 4.15% Not enough employee only parking. 3 1.55% Need employee parking close in. 4 2.07% Elderly can't find close spots. 2 1.04% Not enough handicapped spots. 2 1.04% Employee Misuse time limits. , 5 2.59% Employees/Owners should park farther out. 4 2.07% Spaces to small or hard to back out of. 3 1.55% Roads to congested to get to lots. 3 1.55% Special Event staff and vendors need to shuttle in. 3 1.55% Long time repeat customer leaving becase of lack of parking. 4 2.07% Tickets should be for locals or employees only not visitors. 1 0.52% Employees should be exempt from 3 hour parking. 1 0.52% Tourist should be using remote lots 1 0.52% Owners and Locals only complain no customers 5 2.59% Double Parking 1 0.52% Do not hear any complaints. 18 9.33% 193 100.00% Survey Responses by Percentage 4.00 % - f 45 11 ,&.-:'.2.blt-;Et.i~ 3.t:~'.%?023V,&9*74093iSTB:,PA#:fâ‚¬f~ ~?:%-255.2?4Pftdt:*'.,eriz:~5 b - ., ..z~ :..Re..-0.4.-mÂ·, r.:..j-,Â·.*Â·: 7-Â·.i,-,wa~Â·2'02'2*Â£:RY*1*73-4:..2,ial*42Â·'~i,:~242~,~Iv:2*. 3.50% -#9.3, 0**0*0.13**2*924%3*REE?%**5 M/& t.*// 4*&6%*b*41a,&9/2/..61.2.:4:%922.i*N..sÂ·,91*126:~~JAC),smbje)* 3.0090 -#. 11 f-ft**tÂ¥Â¥821~~lt?ild?IFEC142.}53~aij:;r~':i5~4?%~ 2 / 4,- ht,9221:.~ 355:*lf,k'fi Â·%361323 :.it.I:4Â·k.FOI.h j..92.39.5Â¥3,341%i*--4 2.00% '95?Â·4.':il WÂ·~'Â·52Â·-7Â·67...:... ,~ 1 .'.1 4- ........1 . '.=V."U ?.f<.444Kft:id:Â·'.ic Y: 7.92 -~ I' 943: f>349-,5 /;-f It i...-:~'.~':'- f--2#'.'#-:RZ':7; 'Â·;., 52,f~.-~ : V.*. 1.50% -sl ~lit-r.i 14%4:i> 3 +1 li< &44%3~y;43 1 IF ..1 1 1 1 4 10 + 1 - 11*11 1111111111111111111111 liE 0.50%-/ 0.00%- '"-1- T-' 3 i f 4 1 # 1 F 11# 1â‚¬ 1 45- 1 6 1 E- 1.r l:.IE I 0 1.6- I--~ r i f f i i i I i i i ig !1 11 L i t i i i i i i Â£ S e. E 8 .4 1/ :i :f f 31 1 1 1 1, 1% i i: ai 13 18 ; 11 1 i t 1 1 i 1 1 j 1 1 P H H P 1 7 8 3 lidlijill, il gill Z Page 74 of 94 I REPUBLIC , I PARKING sysTEA Where do you currently park? Private Space 40 28.78% Walk 9 6.47% Park Farther out to save room for customers. 8 5.76% Park as close as possible. 79 56.83% No answer 3 2.16% 139 100% OWNERS PARKING m Private Space 28.78% m Walk o Park Farther out to save room for customers. m Park as close as 5.76% possible. Page 75 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM Where do your employees currently park? No employees 36 26.47% Private Space 6 4.41% Walk 11 8.09% Park Farther out to save room for customers. 6 4.41% Park as close as possible. 77 56.62% 136 100% EMPLOYEE PARKING 4.41% 8.09% m Private Space A 4.41% I Walk Â¤ Park Farther out to sam room for customers 1 Park as close as possible Page 76 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM Where do They Park? 25.00% r Â¢42Â·**33%93~43%3~1?~9*?43*%332***rf:fft-:i ; r:ArÂ·Â·9;tFâ€¢29*~ AerÂ·':?-1 ?-Â·423263:Â·3:A. 9,- t ,Â© jiÂ·' Â·' YUÂ·Â·Â·4 -*:Â·0 It Â·hffÂ·.F ~ ~AF'Â·~321-69#Â·92 ?44%~e~i~Â·z.Â·fÂ·-Â·~ i 7.: Â·;...9284*%4%94394%92'-4 'CEÂ·:W. ~Â·I.";%.Â·3:~333. ~~Â·~ . -f 1. 1 4 -:1.1 0, -- ..1 ftâ‚¬:.Â·.0Â·;'.Â·2 -* . ~~.4 .:. .If...v 24: :difi~.44<tlyÂ»93:39-146:.-.-' + 32:1.f~Â·~Â·~Â· ~Â· -.. - -Â· Â·-~t ~S hic:T'Â£.Â·-~:~Â·rÂ·&;i,%:~ 7,:, , 1 1 Employers m Employees ...1 Â·Â·'Â·Â·'Â·P'Â·-t~' ~ '~it.:(:3:':i 1 I .7,111.~ 1~fit.'IFf Â·'ft,t.5% 1.t : .33. ....... . 1 :- ft' t | '-:Rd/' ' 0.00% , I I J I I I I I I I I I ! I 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 'Mage 77of94- I PARKING SYSTEM Are you in favor of paid parking on the lots? YES 56 40.88% NO 81 59.12% 137 100% The next issue that the survey addressed was paid parking. When the owners were asked if they were in favor of paid parking on the lot,s 59% said that they were not in favor of paid parking and 41% said that they would support paid parking in the lots. In addition, several comments where made by some of the owners. Those comments are listed below. Comments Where would the money go? 1 2 If it wasn't too much 7 No, it would drive people away 5 Only tourist should pay, not locals 1 2 Only in a garage 22 For close in lots only 1 5 On-Street parking only (meters) 3 Page 78 of 94 I PARKING SYSTEM Shuttle Questions: Do you believe a shuttle operation from a remote lot 1 mile away would help the parking situation? YES 95 69.34% NO 42 30.66% 137 100% Would you be willing to ride a shuttle? YES 72 53% NO 65 47% 137 100% Would you encourage your employees to ride a shuttle? YES 73 63% NO 43 37% 116 100% In conjunction with the question of paid parking on the lots, the owners were asked some questions regarding a shuttle operation. First, they were asked if they felt a shuttle operation could help the parking situation. Most of the owners (69%) felt that a shuttle operation from a remote lot 1 mile away from downtown would indeed help the situation. However, thirty-percent (31%) felt that it would not help solve the problem. The owners were then asked it they would utilize the shuttle and whether they would encourage their employees to utilize the shuttle. Of the owners who support the shuttle, 53% said they would take advantage of the shuttle and 63% of the owners said that they would encourage their employees to utilize the shuttle. Out of the 69% that would support the shuttle, the following comments were made. â€¢ The shuttle needs to run consistently and with frequent stops. â€¢ It should be used for Visitors only. â€¢ It should be used for special events or season only. â€¢ It should be used for employees only. â€¢ It should have operating hours that are a half hour before opening and 1 hour after closing. â€¢ Some owners stated that they support the shuttle but that they would not be able to use it because they need quick access to their vehicle to move merchandise. â€¢ Some feel the shuttle should resemble the trolley. The owners that would not recommend the shuttle to their employees had the following reasons. â€¢ They would not want their older staff to ride. â€¢ They would not want late night employees to ride. â€¢ They have concerns that it would make employees late for work. Page 79 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM What do you feel needs to be done to improve parking in Estes Park? The final question on the survey "what do you feel needs to be done to improve the parking?" had numerous answers. To begin, 36% of the owners felt that a parking garage was the best solution to the city's parking needs. In addition, the following chart illustrates the owner's recommendations for possible locations. GARAGE LOCATIONS Post Office, Cleave Street, 2.04% 4.08% Municipal Lot, ~ ~ 10.20% ~ Weist Lot, In addition, the following comments were made about a parking garage. â€¢ To expensive to build â€¢ Traffic entering and exiting the garage will cause more problems â€¢ Need to build the garage underground or have a low profile garage â€¢ Need to build more than one garage â€¢ Have a garage with retail space on bottom and sales tax can pay for it â€¢ Build the garage out of downtown The second recommendation from the owners was regarding parking enforcement. A small amount of the owners (2%) felt that there should be no time limit on any of the parking lots. However, some felt that the time limits should remain and all the lots should have a 3 hour limit. In addition, some of the owners felt that we should not ticket patrons who are violators. If the ticketing system must remain in place, then many feel that the ticketing needs to be more consistent and there should not be any exceptions to the rules. Also, some believe that the visitors should not be ticketed at all and it should only be enforced with the locals who violate the parking guidelines. Page 80 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM The third recommendation from the owners concerned management of existing spaces. For instance, better advertising of existing parking on websites, brochures, etc. Some additional comments are: â€¢ Better signage directing visitors to parking lots â€¢ Use the police to direct visitors to parking lots â€¢ Re-stripe lots to better utilize space â€¢ Use full signs on lots to eliminate visitors having to drive around â€¢ Stop taking parking spaces away in order to add more retail space â€¢ Charge for parking on closer lots and use this money to build a parking structure â€¢ Relocate all RV parking outside of downtown area â€¢ Make parking lot repairs to make lots safer â€¢ No more extension of river-walk â€¢ Lots are not really full, need better utilization before building any new parking spaces take place â€¢ Change traffic flows to parking lots â€¢ Make Elkhorn Pedestrian Only Page 81 of 94 - REPUBLIC'~ I PARKING SYSTEM 7. VISITOR SURVEYS The following information has been collected from surveys that were completed by visitors of Estes Park. The majority of the customers who responded to our surveys were conducted in the parking lots surrounding the downtown area; however, some were conducted by walking down the streets of the downtown area and asking visitors. The questions that were asked are as follows: 1) How long did it take you to find a parking space? 2) How many lots did you try to park in before this lot? 3) Would you be willing to pay for parking if it meant quicker access to a parking space? 4) Would you be willing to ride a shuttle from a remote lot 1 mile away from downtown? 5) How often do you come to Estes Park? 6) Please rate the overall parking situation in Estes Park: DATE: TIME OF DAY: # 1N PARTY Adults Kids LICENSE PLATE # LOCATION: Page 82 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM How long did it take you to find a parking space? 1-4 min 135 56.02% 5-9 min 47 19.50% 10-14min 27 11.20% 15-19 min 16 6.64% 20-24 min 9 3.73% 25 min+ 7 2.90% 241 100.00% How many lots did you try to park in before this lot? 0 Lots 87 36.10% 1 Lot 82 34.02% 2 Lots 45 18.67% 3 Lots 20 8.30% 4 Lots 6 2.49% 5 Lots 1 0.41% 241 100.00% The first question that the visitors were asked was, "how long did it take you to find a parking space?" The majority of the visitors, 56%, found a space with in 4 minutes. The second question was, "how many lots did you try to park in?" Out of those that found a space within 4 minutes 36% of them said they were able to park in the first lot that they tried. The second highest percentage of visitors, 190/0, claimed that it took them between 5 to 9 minutes to find a space, and 34% of them tried one lot before the one they found a parking space in. The third highest, 11% of the visitors claimed that it took 10 to 14 minutes to find a parking space and 18% claimed to have tried 2 other parking lots before finding a space in the third lot. The charts on the next page will show the full results of the first two survey questions. Page 83 of 94 I REPUBLIC V Illl PARKING SYSTEM How long did it take you to find a space? 60.000/0-/". ..,, ,;~~,-'-4.Â·.1 f.-Â·. ' ' , 50.0096- .':61-- -10' I %. 40.00% - .:Â·:'-5 E al: 4 46:4.i; - t -'j f . 1. " klrip*269.-25:. Â· 30.00Â°/6-53â‚¬ i &44 1/M-:c airÂ·.' ~:773.' 8Â·3:' - <'4 97% 93Â·:'47:. 19â‚¬,6.?14. AP.; Â¢*3 %:k.Ef~~-:9-344%-44.:i:Â£:....i:-py*..:iÂ·Â·... -u .--(4.i.Â·.4-r:stz-f.<Â·. , 93*9-4.. i ....2. 1 .... J oue'l 20.00%-6*i 01:'P,Â·.4 ..' '4.... f . 4/ Â·'.t I.Â·7'.:1/â€¢-:;',â€¢'.. I . .0.â€¢ .Â· . , , 9.24Â·:'*Â·Â·eÂ·>.Â·4+4 -~ 9* i F*72=5*G fieitil-;4 i:';. Â·~- ,-'f ,~.: Â·.Â·r 'Â·'2l-â‚¬e :, -'. M....1 :r:Â«~Â·,Â·A:f-M I.t-e~â‚¬.ttÂ· 68 2.-< ; 1 : K. r V +101 3 -444 2734:f,42204â‚¬3 461.~{Â·. i<~Â·~ ... 8.24 10.00% - Â·Â·i#* 1 ti*%*. :>-:4*) 22â‚¬ *-P.49,*f:.: if *:: 1.'P:~~1,1 =- 2 44.-d, ..bl......a'*c./.,Â·.Â·4/ .Câ‚¬503.f ' f.--5 -94 . -- Ky, 0.00% ' 4 2 + e rp e & e % 49 45 '9 Time How many lots did you try to park before this one? Â· 40.00% ~~~~~~'~~)~~,~~~~:'~j'Â·'~~â‚¬'fit~"~~1-14%442443{f#fiff~~~--t-~~~j?i:-~ ~~~~::--~---t.-:j-,{---if*~ &44%Â£Â£94Â£*Alimj..@1~2'2 (2(.LRS*jÂ·'2Â·~~ j**li'Â·2,414idÂ·ltÂ·~Â·0,3 Â·.1.,~1*Q 35.00%- E kft:, 1 - . Fsqv ~22:4401<1.1:j~~~.#*At, I Â·. f,)47.-~.i~jal-2., e I ./ . e 4 I Â¥U-22 :-p... i.47 *fei39. fÂ·> 2.1-*Â·.lff.5 11.33:i>94*1 -Tf-*.:Â·;drÂ·, - 9:'Â·>~Â· 2~1 1 1: t'.1, f , ...../,8. ' .:%'#*1*6 ..~ -slqRK-j,r iÂ·:.333- -6.%~384.37R**4 0%4?3 4- ~Â·i y~.4 44.7. \ i:2?13 t t.4 F... -1 ' t 30,00%-Q.' -'Â·,1 Ab 9 h..1-eL.L. ' 25.00% -*291 ? L C..iÂ« 9.<11.02 / 1 1.9. 3. 20.00%-4.-~ Ff: - Â·Â· 44?.41 ,: i I ' 1 . 15.00%-31 2-1 ; 2674.'y 4 '- ~- Abrril. ...1 c..22., - tfÂ·..tÂ·:51~90*h-.6.KW5--2......Â· ... Â·g.# .= 10.00%-Â· 2.-' " J e. Â·QI ~*1-4 . 0.00% 0 Lots 1 Lot 2 Lots 3 Lots 4 Lots 5 Lots Number of Lots 397 14* 54 - I REPUBLIC 7 PARKING SYSTEM Would you be willing to pay for parking if it meant quicker access to a parking space? YES 111 46.06% NO 126 52.28% NOT SURE 4 1.66% 241 100.00% The third question asked was, "would you be willing to pay for parking if it meant quicker access to a parking space~ The results showed that 52% said that they would not be willing to pay while 46% said they would be willing to pay for parking. Would you be willing to pay for parking if it meant quicker and easier access? NOT SURE, 1.66% Page 85 of 94 REPUBLIC 7 PARKING SYSTEM Would you be willing to ride a shuttle from a remote lot one mile away from downtown? YES 137 56.85% NO 102 42.32% NOT SURE 2 0.83% 241 100.00% The next question, "would you be willing to ride a shuttle from a remote lot one mile away from downtown" 56% said that they would ride a shuttle while 42% said that they would not ride a shuttle. Would you be willing to ride a shuttle from a remote lot one mile away from downtown? NOT SURE, 0.83% Page 86 of 94 I REPUBLIC'~ I PARKING SYSTEM Paid Parking Breakdown The surveys were broken down even further by separating the results on the question "would you be willing to pay for parking?" Based on those that were willing to pay for parking and those that were not willing to pay, the results are the following. On those that are willing to pay for a parking space 51% of them found a space within 1to 4 minutes and out of those 32% got a space in the first lot they attempted to park in. In addition 68% of those willing to pay for parking are also willing to ride a shuttle from a remote lot 1 mile away from downtown. These same visitors 74%, rated the overall parking situation in Estes as Good to Fair. Furthermore, 49% of these visitors visit the Estes Park area at least one time a year, 23% visit 2-4 times a year and 10% are residents. On those that are not willing to pay for a parking space 60% of them found a space with in 1-4 minutes and 29% found a space between 5-14 minutes. In conjunction, 43% found a space in the second lot that they attempted to park in. The number that found a space in the first lot they attempted was 35%. In addition, those that were not willing to pay for parking, 51% said they would not ride a shuttle while 48% said they would. These same visitors, 41% rated the overall parking situation as Good. Furthermore 38% of those that oppose paid parking visit Estes at least once a year and 240/0 between 2 and 4 times a year, and 23% more than 5 times a year. The residents accounted for 13%. Shuttle Breakdown The surveys were broken down even further by separating the results on the question "would you be willing to ride a shuttle." Below are the results of those willing to ride a shuttle and those that are not willing to ride a shuttle. Out of the 56% that are in support of a shuttle operation 61% were able to find a parking space within 1to 4 minutes and 18% within 5-9 minutes. In addition, 37% found a space in the first lot they attempted to park in and 35% in the second lot that they attempted to park in. In addition 52% of those that are in support of a shuttle are also in support of paid parking. Further more, these visitors ranked the overall parking as follows: 16% Excellent, 39% Good, 26% Fair, and %16% Fair. In connection with the over all rating 45% of the visitors visit the Estes area at least once a year, 24% 2-4 times a year, 19% 5 times or more and 9% are residents. Out of the 42% that are not in support of a shuttle operation 51% were able to find a space within 1 to 4 minutes, 21% 5 to 9 minutes and 11% 10 to 14 minutes. In addition 37% found a space in the first lot they attempted to park in, 34% in the second lot attempted and 16% in the third lot. Subsequently, out of those that do not support the shuttle 63% also do not support paid parking while 35% do support paid parking. Furthermore, these visitors rated the parking situation in Estes as follows: 9% Excellent, 42% Good, 36% Fair, and 11% Poor. The majority of these visitors visit the area once a year, 41%. Those that visit between 2 to 4 times a year made up 26%, 5 times or more 17% and 15% are residents. Page 87 of 94 I REPUBLIC~ I PARKING S.STE. How often do you come to Estes Park? 0-1 x's yr 106 43.98% 2-4 x's yr 62 25.73% 5+ x's yr 44 18.26% Resident 29 12.03% No Answer 0 0.00% 241 100.00% How often do you come to Estes Park? 45.00% .-0..--9..PÂ·z- 5 StÂ·. Â· 0Â·,MÂ·Â·th,:i.'t:<:Â·;C>,24-" .*Â· '- 'Â· ' Â·' 40.00%-,Â·<1*4. 68.-:1 1Â£0 6 52Â·063--VI'-IÂ·j:R*UNL ': ....i . 35.00% - .f 2Â£;di' : l.-ilÂ«.F %39.6121Ed.626{232@64376*?-f..Â·i~Â·:JÂ·~ 3;Â·449Â·;I'EfÂ· -Â·fg*3?..~Â· 922. 30.00%-~~j~~~ 61942 2%3%33-f' &~ ;~#293;3044;I, i~~f~:-I ..i-~~~*~~~9ftj31~j4fQ.Â·,Â·ff~Â·t'~iti.;.Â· 25.00%-~96"f &02:Â·i,t Â·Â·c ~ M 3%.te:kiekÂ·'le .......iÂ·Â·Â·Â·Â·- 'Â·.Â·c, 4*X:-*.â€¢-:;cret "r':r.Â·1 3.E.Â·.48.1.Â·9' â€¢Â·Â·**Â·Â·Â·Â·,-i<i CÂ·Â·Â· ..Â· :71': .8;7:'.-r CkÂ· .,6-2-.9'Â¢.15Â·: y T Â· -1'.i U'?<' .re.L,:..,742Â· Â·Â·"': fÂ·. Â·: :cka.Â·,Â·..~ . -4"y: 70 4 0 .FF '..Â·Â·IZ.-I f0Â·=.Â·Â· . I n -f:..$:F.~.2 *22 0.:.30#P Â»F,h: i>Â¥Â·i:*24{â‚¬25?tÂ·,. 20.00% 42Â·839 4 635.4.19 1*422Â»44.j.1432 * 042*41 #247.*1 e 15.00%0-4:E:~~5~' ,Â¥.S;*722 ............:. 24*awa, 5 FÂ«Â¢Â¥ 2 02.*/1 *Â©tÂ»1 , =p.,i.p-.4*:.3 R . Â·Â·Â·-3 E 3 4'' 5.4,6,1.2 10.0096 -1.*79* &3*FF:..2 4.2.;.Â·D:' 1.0 ..1 ;42.Â¢3 ,~ 48#Â·18. 5.00% -9339, 8 Â·24Â·' D Â·Â·.t:'22')Â·14:z.Â·qua P #A.Â·.6 Gruti "14> 0.00% 0-1 x's yr 2-4 x's yr 5+ Es yr Resident Times Visited per year ..9, f ft â€¢ f Page 88 of 94 I REPUBLIC 7 I PARKING SYSTEM Please rate the overall parking situation in Estes Park? Excellent 32 13.28% Good 96 39.83% Fair 76 31.54% Poor 35 14.52% No Answer 2 0.83% 241 100.00% Overall Rating 35.00% -Â·2:-Â·~Â·;- ::Â·4%>~~Â·?1.~;:*) ~4*?.ff.ihiv.' ,?)2 ;,4 3:'2*:-1 Â·~. Â· ' . .-f.... ./ :.... 1.f'â€¢'. 'S...Â· .Â· Â· tÂ·./,Â·? . 9931 ) 4.1-9 29â‚¬82.Â·MiÂ·'4.. 9,Â·12 , *. L i ...9. - 9-,Â·'Â· 0 9.!2:,3..ti:y:I=.394349;'3143Â·93 ...::.' 431-~. ,-t;-,f t.,;':: AF.7.*.. 30.00%---,1 .i'M Â·Arl'?Â·Y-39(*Yf'~ Or. -3:(Â·-- 1.- ..:1Â·'.Â·i.~rÂ·t~Q 25.00%-<<f'.~,i,Â·P. it'*'-Â·I''f'.1.:Â·*ffi';.60.6 -:142Â« r 1.--.71Â·11.2-4: 1,1 , ;,IRIt- ... 1. .; i. 1 1.1 20Â·4'/. r /11.12.~ 4 ..,LIla tâ‚¬>, 1.:':? 1 I 20.00%-Â·07.-:fi .'' r.45. Il~%8Â·rif'.22Â·143< 2-6-â‚¬:tk Â·9.--~1Â·,2 +,â€ž,.I/fty.~fAI 1,11..rvi .1,1 .0 1 1 41 , a Â·r#:6935*If': 22 :'..itili*j~~ly'f~.Wi ks:-4f~?0 .. ~/. .%'40: t/,4. ihtti.4.621*2.i: f:.~~,c:...e i>,:. 4-:., 15.00%-1..4 fÂ·*3 4': 4%&*.43 4. 6*"9, 43 49%*21 ~~Â·? ~':9~'Â·'4: 4~~'oj.- U.;.1.--44 Â»~ 0%#'24â‚¬ S.Â·Â· ,- . - ,Â·Â·,c %*%.SE ZÂ«*0.-4 34:kta *.'Â·9322563 -.99:~i/.1-file. 10.00%-i, 2,?*69 gafe,i.32 2.913 0514:*922'~34-- 42*44 Fi.:2444 . 44"..s.*Â·*?,.AC, e.,1 4 9.3..tÂ·':-1Â§ -'Â·Â·%.-0 ,=C?t,6/04* 51':,0*1Â¥4 2'WAr/**pm, 23%1 77.*4. 5 m345.al:Â·-A 5.00% - ~94:~ ~ ~32 1-*St.,4 -3-i-:t: 913= L#*44,-A~'94Â»AL'' ri: 1 2....04:&1 ;1;1~t Â»..Â¢ <9* th . ...45Â¥ F 0.00% No Answer Excellent Good Fair Poor m Seriesl 13.28% 39.83% 31.54% 14.52% 0.83% 1 REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS â€¢ Create Valet Parking in Weist Lot â€¢ Visitor shuttle from Fairgrounds All Days Certain Days During Week (Thur, Fri, Sat) Event Days â€¢ Employee Shuttle from Fairgrounds â€¢ Golf Cart Shuttle on Macgregor Avenue North â€¢ Elimination of 3 hour parking â€¢ Designate Certain Lots for Employee Parking Only A&W Old Lumber Yard â€¢ Create Parking Policy for continuous (3 or more days) all day parkers To Alleviate employees parking in high demand lots â€¢ Create new enforcement program using handhelds â€¢ Install 30 minute meters on streets â€¢ Improve signage â€¢ Create Parking Permit program in neighborhoods â€¢ Create Paid Parking Program on a few of the main lots â€¢ Create Validation Program â€¢ Study the feasibility of new parking structure on Big Horn Lot â€¢ Create a rea for RV pa rki ng â€¢ New layout (restripe) certain lots - start with Weist â€¢ Create a few short term (30 minute) employee spaces on each or certain parking lots i Page 90 of 94_ I REPUBLIC' I PARKING SYSTEM Page 91 of 94 - REPUBLIC~ I PARKING SYSTEM 9. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Page 92 of 94 I PARKING SYSTEM Page 93 of 94 - REPUBLIC'~ I PARKING SySTEM F v Page 94 of 94