The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Safety 2005-07-28. . PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA July 28,2005 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT Action 1. Photo ID Systems - Approval Requested Reports 1. Taser Presentation - Rick Life 2. 2nd Quarter NIBRS Reports FIRE DEPARTMENT Action 1. None Reports 1. 2nd Quarter Reports 2. Fire Danger - Larimer County Fire Ban NOTE: The Board of Trustees (or Public Safety Committee) reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. I ' Estes Park Police Department / Communications Memo TO: Chairman Wayne Newsom / Public Safety Committee From: Cherie Bartram, Police Dept. Support Services Manager CC: Lowell Richardson, Chief of Police Date: 7/25/05 Re: Photo ID systems Background From 1994 - 2001, the Police Department was responsible for creating photo ID's for all Town of Estes Park employees using an outdated and cumbersome ID system that consisted of a Polaroid picture and plastic laminate. Approximately four years ago, the camera became inoperable and unfixable. During the same time frame, the police department was looking to participate in a countywide computer system that included a photo ID module in the personnel section. Until the new computer system was implemented, police employees were issued photo ID badges using one of the employee's personal software and equipment. This service expanded over the following 3 years to include other employees within the Town as well as volunteers; however no system was in place for all Town employees. Recently the lack of ID's for certain departments has created problems for the employees in the public and a more permanent solution is being sought. The following options were researched: E.P.M.C. The medical center offers a high quality, full color one-sided card made of PVC plastic. The ID card service is currently at $10.00 per card. In order to provide a card for each employee as well as the volunteers and seasonal help, the initial price of this option would be approximately $2000. Additionally, the Town would have to incur costs when employees change names or new hires are brought on. Tiburon: The Tiburon CAD/RMS system shared throughout Larimer County was the original solution the police department was waiting for. However, after further investigation it was discovered that the ID portion is integrated with the employee numbers and call signs for police personnel only. This eliminated the possibility of using the Tiburon software. ID Maker Pro System: This system offered a dual-sided printer, ID Maker pro software, standard digital camera and backdrop. The ID Maker software that comes with this product from IDville does not offer any additional features such as signatures, fingerprints or hologram designs. Total for system is: $4999.00 (plus shipping costs if applicable) Budget / Costs DATA ID: This system, offered by Affinity Business Systems in Denver, offers a variety of options from individual purchases of each component to a package system. The system priced included a demo 1 t , SP55 full color printer with duplex printing, a fully integrated digital camera package (includes backdrop, tripod, camera and software), color ribbon and cleaning kit, 500 white PVC cards, the option for a signature pad (similar to what is used for banks and DMV) and 4 hours of on-site training. Additional Equipment: Regardless of the system chosen, one additional item that is needed is a heavy-duty slot punch. The punch machine we currently use will go through laminate and paper but is not sturdy enough to go through PVC for the new cards. This item will cost approximately $75.00. The total system is: $5075.00 (plus shipping costs if applicable) Recommendations My recommendation is to purchase the DATA ID system with the optional signature solution. The system and company are highly recommended by Larimer County Sheriff's Office, CSU, Jefferson County, City of Lakewood and Weld County Sheriffs Office. Although the holographic overlay is an appealing option, it is not a necessary item. Details of recommended product: Hardware: â€¢ SP55 Full color printer with duplex printing, demo machine lightly used. Savings of $3,750 over new. â€¢ Tru Photo Solution - Fully integrated digital camera, backdrop, and tripod. â€¢ Full color ribbon kit - will produce approximately 300 images â€¢ 500 blank PVC cards - white Software â€¢ Software required for digital camera, Tru-Photo solution â€¢ ID Works Standard v 5.1. This is the actual software needed to design ID cards. Cards may be designed with horizontal or vertical display, full color front, and black and white back. Training â€¢ Installation and training - Four hours of on-site professional installation and training of system â€¢ Page 2 Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Chairman Wayne Newsome and Public Safety Committee Board Members From. Lowell Richardson, Chief of Police ~ CC: Randy Repola, Town Administrator Date. July 27,2005 Re: Change Order #1 Parking Study Backaround On July 26~h Chief Richardson and Brian Kern (Republic Parking Regional Manager) attended a local business owner roundtable meeting (hosted by Trustee Pinkham and CVB Director Pickering) to present on the parking study being conducted by Republic Parking Management systems. In that meeting the local downtown business owners suggested extending the hours of the study to 9PM on the weekdays of the study. Their rationale for the recommendation is because of the concerts held at Performance Park. They believe it increases parking lot usage and increases downtown foot traffic. The study begins July 27~h and ends August 1St . BudaeVCosts Estimated costs not to exceed $4500.00 increasing overall project total to $27,000.00. The Police Department budget can absorb this increase through personnel space savings. Recommendations Staff recommends approving the change order request not to exceed the amount of $4500.00. The events held at Performance Park suggests evening demographics are changing and is a critical component to the Parking Study. 1 . 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total NIBRS reportable crimes 808 867 764 701 772 includes A&B offenses Total residents 5413 # of Crimes for every 50 residents 7.13 Ratio of Crimes per resident 0.14 108.26 gg gg Â£ f g m Eggig g 00 O N Â¢9 . N 0000 -â€ž-- 000. m N - . O (9 - NO O 0-h-*eCNI 000- câ€¢>c~1 -A -- I N. % - 0<01-*Â¢9(4 0000 00 -O 00 0 00 0 0 000000 - 0 0 0 0) M N {N Â¢9 N % I N N 4-) N 00..acy W 044 r iggi 0% at 32 32 g figgi i .* 000- -O g Â©= . m 4 Â®moo . p- -r N - - - O - O 0 - . 0 0 - p lAi O O--*.- - p 3--O .- Ce . M <O . .. . p Lo -UDG}to.- 2 - r - N N 0000 00 00 00 0 000 00 0 000000 0 N - - 0 C} r (0 . m <D I -le -4-3 - -UD)UD-- p N Â£ Immil; limitl; 2 15% En m//mm p â€žre-- - p r-- ---- p -0.Ne â‚¬Nr-0-CD N -,-O- -- CD(DICD- p " p -O.-r .0--- N . m m O â€¢- r em,-co- N â€žâ€ž O 00000 00000 O 0000 00 00000 0 - -INN- YON-l N .m.O -- m m & . r P. g Iggig 0000 p--- *gg Â£323232,236#32 g 'gat ,2403.320 Â¥0000*28 M 22% 93218*20 O O C) N <O - O - to .0000.-- - ..M rn,Or,N-Op - - C) {4 <0 - - 10 N â€¢0 - - - O Â®CN N M .Nrn Wh-*enrn-â€¢r, N h 0 00000000 00000000 0 000 0000000 - r- 0-) N 0 - - tr) N 0---COÂ®CNICN M N N Â¢9 cor-~câ€¢}co.-10 N r- N & m= CO S2~~FQÂ» E EEd~*2 43%Rh; =0>-g - RE@05 mpeau/d55 -a Te i 52=822 2225>wox.zv,JL_LI-& ," >3Â£1&!zong': 222â‚¬8*~2.KILIr'J <51<bef88Â£@EitygggEgg Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Reported Unfounded ual Cleared Clearance Rate Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance 100% 2005 2004 2002 P LE 29 Et zz zz %49 Â£+ 29 0 % LY LE SEXUAL ASSAULTS EHICLES RETENSES/SWINDLE N Onag STRUCT OFFENSE CHARGED 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 90A-BADCHECKS 0 0 1 0 90B - CURFEW/LOITERING/VAGRANCY VIOLS 0 0 0 0 90C - DISORDERLY CONDUCT 4 0 1 4 0 90D - DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 10 6 9 13 10 90E - DRUNKENNESS 0 1 1 3 90F - FAMILY OFFENSES, NONVIOLENT 1 0 0 0 0 90G - LIQUOR LAW VIOLATIONS 17 5 11 15 27 90H - PEEPING TOM 0 0 0 0 901 - RUNAWAY 0 2 6 2 90J - TRESPASS OF REAL PROPERTY 4 0 0 3 0 90Z - ALL OTHER OFFENSES 19 12 8 9 10 Total 55 23 32 52 52 2005 2004 2003 TOTAL ARRESTEES: 81 23 32 TOTAL ADULTS: 69 15 20 TOTAL JUVENILES: 12 8 12 TOTAL JUVENILES HANDLED: 0 0 6 TOTAL JUVENILES REFERRED: 12 8 6 aS C> 1, L 0 - .1 0 go * Of the 69 adults arrested in 2nd qrt 37 were between the ages of 30 - 49. 16 were between the ages of 20 - 8 were between the ages of 18- 70 (6 for liquor violations) * Of the total adults arrested: 53 were male and 16 were female. 60 * Of the 12 juveniles arrested in 2nd qrt 50 10 were 16 & 17 years old 2 were 13-15 years old :SE-IINE~~~9101 :siinov ivioi :9331 $~21~kIV 1Â¥101 2nd Quarter Arrests 2003 - 2005 / All Adults and Juveniles Interesting Facts: 2005 : 2005: St El *002' 69 Le 9001 0 ZE COOZO 80 40 0Â£ - 01 0L ] 1 1 .1 L 00 saul!Â·lo lejol Group B crimes include crimes such as (not an all di~~~I~yvec~sn~: bt~~ ~hU~;Fk:;1:~yrf Miso~as~i~or Law violations, trespasses & runaways. Group B Totals 99 9002 0 Â£2 *002' ZE Coozo 50 40 30 20 U) M M N CO Â¥ 2 'Ii/@=A. ig g C) . r Saul!JO JO Jeq UIn N "Serious Crimes" or "Group A crimes" include the more serious violations such ~;stehxeu#a~ af~~~~Ites (inc~uzd:z~~rlt'terJr::rand ejek! eoueieelo pejeelo pepodekl %6* 9001 0 %8Â£ 01' *002 I % W w COOZ m %ZE 91 16 ZOOZ I vandalism, drug cases and weapon violations. assaults, burg 60 - - 40 - - - 0Z 100'- , Phone Statistics / Estes Park Police Department Workbook: Phone Stats Prepared by: Cherie Bartram Date: 21-Jul-05 Purpose: The purpose of this workbook is to keep an accurate, on going count of phone calls received by the Estes Park Dispatch Center between the years of: 2000 - present. Data Source: Data has been taken from the Magic computer 0 - 'hkA- 0 1- . r- 1- . P 0 9*8ZZ 99ZZZ 9Zzt'Z 89L1Â·Z toozo 9Â£902 99Â£ZZ Â£*81.Z 1.9081. 1001' Â£6Â£1 1. Lt'8Â£Z ZE*01 00*ZZ Â£001' ELSSE 9/6Â£Â£ Zzt'ZE *98Â£2 *001 0 Administrative Phone Calls / Quarterly Comparison 2001 - 2005 PJE pul 0860Â£ 8899Z 9001' 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 - 15000 - - 0000L - 0009 - Il r N ~ .- U) 0 4it' 8.,10 EZOIÂ· Looi 9801. Â£601 6*El SZ 1. 1. Zooi 0,8 01.91. 6901, 969 E00i 1500 1000 - 009 4 ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT NON-LETHAL FORCE AND USE OF NON-LETHAL WEAPONS CACP Standards: 20.1, 20.7 Issued: 11-01-2004 Page 1 of 3 A. ...r Purpose To 6stablish procedures governing the use of non-lethal force and non-lethal weapons. B. Policy Non-lethal force and the use of non-lethal weapons refers to those applications of physical force that are of a non-deadly nature or that normally do not result in the death of a subject. Police officers are often confronted with situations where physical control of another is required to make an arrest or to protect the public safety. Where possible or practical, initial attempts -at control shall be â‚¬ made through gverbal .means. F However, in situations. where physical resistanceD,or a threat of bodily injury is encountered, and reasonable alternatives to physical force have failed, physical force may be used. Physical force shall be defined as any degree of force exceeding verbal persuasion. :The' application and degree ofsuch force shall be consistent with Colorado:Revised Statures. C.*:4 R#Bortind th@ Wselof,Forcd Any time an officer applies :physical force in making an arrest, gaining control over a resisting, threatening or violent subject, or in protection of them self or another from physical force of a subject, the offiger shall>oote the fact in their report iof the incident. O The officer will complete a Estes Park Police DepartmenCUse -of Force" form and Submitâ€ž the completed form to their immediat6 supervison D. Non-Lethal Weapons 1. Non-lethal weapons may be used in the application of physical force, consistent with an officer's training and assessment of the situation being dealt with; except that the use of blackjacks, saps, sap gloves, PR24 Batons, Stun Guns, and KOGA Batons is prohibited. 2. Authorized Non-Lethal Weapons EPPD Policies and Procedures 11-01-2004 ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT NON-LETHAL FORCE AND USE OF NON-LETHAL WEAPONS CACP Standards: 20.1, 20.7 Issued: 11-01-2004 Page 3 of 3 1. Taser Only department issued Taser equipment shall be used by sworn members or those authorized by special directive from the office of the Chief of Police shall authorized to carry the Taser arrest control tool. All members authorized to carry the Taser shall follow the standardized training requirements as prescribed by Taser International's course of instruction. J. Non-Weapon Control Technique Each officer shall receive training in basic arrest control and self-defense techniques. Such training shall include weapon and non-weapon applications. The Use of Force Training personnel shall maintain a record of each officer's training records. A copy of these records shall be forwarded to the Administrative Assistant to the Chief of Police where a file of each officer is maintained. The administrative assistant shall forward a copy of these training records to the Town of Estes Park Human Resource contact person where a copy of these records shall be maintained in the officer's personnel file. EPPD Policies and Procedures 11-01-2004 ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT TO: CHIEF LOWELL RICHARDSON L -i FROM: SGT. COREY P. PASS 37 SUBJECT: TASER DEPLOYMENTS FROM 010103 TO PRESENT DATE: JULY 18, 2005 CC: I was able to research how many times we have deployed the Taser in either a drive stun capacity or by the use of the cartridge. The case numbers are listed below: 2003 1569 deployed by Trenholm 1569.s2 deployed by Dring 1737.sl deployed by Marciniak 2004 302 deployed by Trenholm 2QQi 738 our case but deployed by LCSO 873.sl deployed by Marciniak 84.s3 deployed by Gliva 1028.sl deployed by Life 510 deployed by Gliva 933.sl deployed by Rose Aja I *AJE- Js- 2& J, Ewde 4 4- *-\Â·inÂ© 67 0 Electrical 101 r Â· "It's not the volts*slhe-amp. at are dangerous..rfy-1 09% 1*y : â€¢ High voltage: T 50.,9#%28#406.4% â€¢ Low Ampe~48Â¥: M?6;&*2Â¢%*004 amps Â· Safe energÂ¢OM20*A*Alilleijiw pulse R-19(262*6615&~iolli@*02'pulse - Cardiac' derpnliketsfaremfeatiarthan .150- 400 joule*067, pul*Z~Wit~ â€¢ High voltaga- 4..Low Amperage?*Safe & 144$"0&<-*4 1 -t,4 Â». u Effective weap#11,151Â£.,24*4/: ' OCIP),WI101&2:247AIERII,i--,I# Alll0Â»li/'7/ â€¢ It's not the volts that are dangerous; it's the amps that determine safety â€¢ The electrical output of the TASER is 50,000 Volts. The voltage may seem high, but the amperage on both systems is well below dangerous levels. 41 â€¢ ADVANCED TASER M26 output is 3.6mA average current (0.0036 amps) The X26 output is 2.lmA (0.0021 amps). â€¢ The output ofthe M26 into a human body is a fraction ofthe dangerous level. â€¢ High voltage + High Power + Low Amperage = Safe & Effective weapon â€¢ (voltage is a measure ofhow far an arc of electricity can travel through'the air.) * M26 instructors will note that the weapons ard rated in average amperage rather than root mean square (Irms) amperage as had been done previously. Due to the complex shape of the X26 waveform, and based on the results of our safety testing, we believe that average amperage is the more relevant metric. 27 Version 12 11/04 REDUCE OFFICER AND SUSPECT INJURIES BY STOPPING THREATS FROM A SAFE DISTANCE Reduction of Del,uty Injuries Orange County, Florida 120 I , 100 Â»2-~---' . 60 ./- 20.' ~ 0 2000 200i 4 .' *02 . Example: Orange County, FL Sheriff's Dept Injuries to Deputies Dropped by BO%After Deploying the M26* *Source: -TASER Works, so its use increases," Ripple, Amy C.. Oriando~Sentinel, July 29,2002 The Orange County Sheriffs Office deployed the M26 starting in 2001. By 2002, Deputy Injuries had fallen by 80%. In fact, the number of force related incidents increased during this time period by 72% from 410 force incidents in 1999 to an annual rate of 708 force incidents in 2002. If you look at the injury rate, it actually fell by 88%. 1999: 120 injuries / 410 force incidents = 0.29 injuries per force incident 2002: 24 injuries / 708 force incidents = 0.03 injuries per force incident (0.29 - 0.03) / 0.29 = 88% reduction in injury rate. 132 Version 12 11/04 # of Injuries 80% Cincinnati PD Field Results 1,050 TASER X26's Deployed 01/04. 6 Months Results Below. Officer Injuries AS uÂ®ect< InjurieÂ£%2~Officer Assaults I/.1,7 41 1 40Â· ~t-Al,Ii/-9-,g: p' -1,/Dl-21, , 9 4 1% ID= Citizen Cdmb#titit~@Rettibt~06Â»f Force -4,4,jz-~ IC,01:WI110M0DITABER*11,-0,-â„¢Â£ /N,10ki-d As ofJune 30,2004, Cincinnati PD deployed and equipped 1,050 officers with TASER X26s. 798 out of 1,050 officers volunteered to feel the effects of 5-second cycle with no negative effects. In the first six months of 2004, CPD had over 300 deployments ofthe TASER X26 since it began its field deployment on January 26,2004. 135 Version 12 11/04 . I Seattle & Miami PD: 12+ Months Without A Single. Fatali:Shdoting 9/1/*~da/...1~(6424%94. ro #83..21.'94Â»/ fi, '~~~ â€¢ For the firstjinibiR<1596+Sehttle Police had no fatal offi66Â¢,ii:,Ggi#A Sti62*46 jA 2003 Â· During 2003:2004<{MIEihii Police omcers went 19 EY*326%,Xe ..'*Â¥4..r 4-9 94* tipÂ¢Â¢ months withoutifigng la firearmaRrior to patrol level issue 04*SEFE;~ElihRIOgy*Miami Police fired firearms ihiaveragetoT,15*mes a year I. . ' U f.493.- /13*522&r Â· ...f:yf from 1990 to 200]Â·:2 ir* 4*fgÂ«~ 4- 44%.99.- I.-1:0,5:7,- Ocollidil@*2004 TASERI/*ir-k,W. In, A~l*,Rii--I Source: 2/4/04, The Seattle Post-Intelligencer: As of last week, 16 patrol officers began carrying the new weapons (TASERs), the final stage of a plan to give police options besides deadly force when dealing with mentally ill, drugged or just plain violent people. "The whole less-lethal program has been phenomenal for us," police Chief Gil Kerlikowske said, noting that there were no fatal shootings involving police omcers in Seattle last year. "That's the first time in 15 years," he said. Source: 8/03/04 Miami Herald: Officers haven't fired a shot in months The Miami Police Department, once plagued by an abundance of shootings, has not pulled the trigger in 19 months. Police brass credit new rules and training. BY SUSANNAH A. NESMITH 137 Version 12 11/04 I . ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2005 SECOND QUARTER INCIDENT RUN REPORTS Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Â· Incident Type Report (Summary) Alarm Date Between {01/01/2005} And {06/30/2005} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 1 Fire 100 Fire, Other 1 0.56% $10 0.00% 111 Building fire 4 2.27% $26,710 7.09% 113 Cooking fire, confined to container 1 0.56% $500 0.13% 114 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 131 Passenger vehicle fire 1 0.56% $1,000 0.26% 141 Forest, woods or wildland fire 4 2.27% $0 0.00% 154 Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 13 7.38% $28,220 7.49% 2 Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat -no fire 251 Excessive heat, scorch burns with no 2 1.13% $0 0.00% 2 1.13% $0 0.00% 3 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 47 26.70% $0 0.00% 321 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with 9 5.11% $0 0.00% 322 Vehicle accident with injuries 12 6.81% $120,500 32.01% 331 Lock-in (if lock out , use 511 ) 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 352 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 6 3.40% $85,010 22.58% 75 42.61% $205,510 54.60% 4 Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 4 2.27% $0 0.00% 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 7 3.97% $1,000 0.26% 422 Chemical spill or leak 2 1.13% $0 0.00% 424 Carbon monoxide incident 7 3.97% $0 0.00% 442 Overheated motor 3 1.70% $200 0.05% 443 Light ballast breakdown 1 0.56% $50 0.01% 463 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 16 9.09% $141,400 37.56% 40 22.72% $142,650 37.90% 5 Service Call 551 Assist police or other governmental agency 2 1.13% $0 0.00% 561 Unauthorized burning 2 1.13% $0 0Â·00% 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 5 2.84% $0 0.00% 07/18/2005 14:11 Page 1 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) Alarm Date Between {01/01/2005} And {06/30/2005} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 6 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, Other 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 611 Dispatched & canceled en route 15 8.52% $0 0.00% 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 5 2.84% $0 0.00% 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 671 Hazmat release investigation w/ no hazmat 7 3.97% $0 0.00% 29 16.47% $0 0.00% 7 False Alarm & False Call 715 Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 2 1.13% $0 0.00% 733 Smoke detector activation due to 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 735 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 3 1.70% $0 0.00% 736 CO detector activation due to malfunction 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire - 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 744 Detector activation, no fire - 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 745 Alarm system sounded, no fire - 1 0.56% $0 0.00% 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 2 1.13% $0 0.00% 12 6.81% $0 0.00% Total Incident Count: 176 Total Est Loss: $376,380 07/18/2005 14:11 ' Page 2 76. -a ta ire 7% False Alarm & False Call 7% %Â£ lieo 00!ANDS %Â£4 Sluep!jul 80!Ales leS!pelN XoueBJeula 9 enosea Alarm Date B~lrd~enn yp~~d06/30/2005} ood Intent Call 16% Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 23% %L 814 ou- jeetpeAO 'Uoisoldxa 'einldny ainessid.leAO , I G 140 94 4%,4- /Â® 4 0 9% ~'Â§ 4% 16) e = 0 g/96 - 00 3 :::ill: 1,42, 0 'S {D R \ e 1 1 4 0 0 - 4 0 04 .... -%60 0% 1 4 e 16 I 62 <92' 93, t 905- Â®10% e 0 %9 *26 4 * e 000000 LOMMNY '0 slieo,o JequinN 12005 a 2004 Il 2003 2nd Quarter Comparison of Calls by Type 90 80 70 60 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incidents by Zone (Summary) Alarm Date Between {01/01/2005} And {06/30/2005} Pct of Pct of Zone Count Incidents Est Losses Losses IN In city limits of Estes Park 93 52.84 % $81,970 21. 78 % OUT Out of city limits of Estes Park 83 47.15% $294,410 78.22 % Total Incident Count: 176 Total Est Losses: $376,380 07/18/2005 14:10 Page 1 C e /%6 i.0 156 6) /4 G Ve- 70 'P 99 4% eb, i -5 1 0 L. - .40% % 43 4 4 1) 09/6 1% . 1kM 90 .44.,9. 9/72 L V -a_ &42/* 9> 0- UÂ® 94.0 11, 7--1 .4 1 0 O tO O LO OLD O 10 O tOo 0 i out of city 2005 2nd Quarter Calls -within/outside city limits FA.*. , 2005 City Limits Detailed Incident Type Report (01/01/2005) - (06/30/2005) Incident Type City Limits IN OUT Fire 100 Fire, Other 1 0 111 Building Fire 3 1 113 Cooking Fire 1 0 114 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney 0 1 131 Passenger vehicle fire 1 0 141 Forest, wood or wildland fire 0 4 154 Dumpster or outside trash receptical 1 0 Overpressure Rupture, 251 Excessive heat, scorch burns with no fire 2 0 Overheat -no fire Rescue & EMS 311 Medical Assist 27 20 321 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident w/injury 7 2 322 Vehicle accident with injuries 7 5 331 Lock-in 1 0 352 Extrication of victims from vehicle 2 4 Hazardous Conditions 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 3 1 (No fire) 412 Gas Leak (natural gas or LPG) 3 4 422 Chemical Spill or leak 1 1 424 Carbon Monoxide incident 3 4 442 Overheated motor 3 0 443 Light ballast breakdown 1 0 463 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 5 11 Service Call 551 Assit Police or other governmental agency 2 0 561 Unauthorized burning 0 2 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 0 1 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, other 0 1 611 Dispatched & canceled en route 2 13 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 2 3 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 0 1 671 Hazmat release investigation w/no hazmat 6 1 False Alarm & 715 Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 1 1 False Call 733 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 1 0 735 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 3 0 736 CO detector activation due to malfunction 1 0 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire- unintentional 0 1 744 Detector activation, no fire 1 0 745 Alarm system sounded, no fire 1 0 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 1 1 TOTAL 93 83 TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 176 July 2005 . Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department 2nd Quarter Training Hours Date Between {01/01/2005} And {06/30/2005} Month Fire Dive Rescue EMS January 243.75 64 157.5 February 236.2 96 70 March 223.15 65.5 423.5 April 704.4 43 169.5 May 544 56 321 June 297 306 104.5 Total Man Hours 2248.5 630.5 1246 Total Training Hours: 4125