Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Public Safety 2003-10-23
TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA October 23,2003 7:30 A.M. *Revision Date: October 20,2003 , 10:30 a.m. POLICE DEPARTMENT Action 1. Elkhorn Street Closure for Halloween Activities - Approval Requested *2. Cancellation of November and December Public Safety Meetings - Approval Requested Reports 1. E.P.P.D. Community Survey - Chief Lowell Richardson 2. Employee Disciplinary Review Board - Chief Lowell Richardson 3. Community Service Officer Program Meeting Feedback From Business Owners Presentation - Commander Mike van Deutekom 4. NIBRS 3rd Quarter Report 5. Citizen Complaint Letter - Chief Lowell Richardson 6. Restorative Justice Report - Executive Director Amanda Lee 7. Vehicle Noise Report - Chief Lowell Richardson FIRE DEPARTMENT Action A 1. Slash Disposal Site - Presentation by Tony Simons - ~ -,L 5 Reports 2/ 1 1 rd .1 1. j Wuarter Reports 2. Mutual Aid Training at Rawhide Power Plant 3. Homeland Security Grant Award for Decontamination Trailer 4. Child Safety Seat Inspections Report NOTE: The Board of Trustees (or Public Safety Committee) reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Estes Park Police Department . Memo To: Chairman Stephen Gillette and Public Safety Committee Board Members From: Gregg Filsinger, Police Commander Date: 10/20/03 Re: Street Closure Request Background: The Police Department is again promoting the Downtown Halloween Program and youth safety by requesting the closure of Elkhorn Ave to vehicular traffic from Spruce Drive to East Riverside Drive during the hours of 5 p.m. until approximately 9 p.m. on Friday, October 31, 2003. Budget. There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: Staff recommends approval of this road closure. 1_ Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Chairman Stephen Gillette and the Public Safety Committee Board Members From: Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Police Date: 10/20/03 Re: November and December Meeting Cancellation Background: The regularly scheduled Public Safety Committee Meetings for November and December of this year fall on Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Budget None Action: Staff recommends approval from the Public Safety Committee to cancel both of these upcoming meetings. 1_ Estes Park Police . 4 Department Memo To: Richard Wdmer, Town Administrator Fron. Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Police CC: Public Safety Committee Date: October 20,2003 Re: Community Survey In our efforts to provide Quality Services to Estes Park residents and to ensure employee performances achieve these quality service standards, staff is recommending implementation of a community service survey. The purpose for this request is to create a dual evaluation process for 06rfE,mance-QQd melit increases and create an organization where employees are accountable to one another and to organizational goals. There are two competing components within the evaluation process; how the individual employee performs and how the organization performs. Yet, when merit increases are distributed they are distributed based on the individual employees performance. It is contended the current merit system creates a void in achieving team/organizational goals and rewards individual accomplishment over organizational performance. Based on this assumption, staff has created a survey instrument to measure services received from all department employees. This service satisfaction survey would provide police management with objedive information to assess organizational and individual employee accomplishments annually. Distribution of merit increases are given equally, meaning if the organization receives a 90% satisfadion rating from the public all employees receive 50% of the available merit pool and the remaining amount is distributed on an individual employee basis. You will find attached a draft of the survey card to be used forthis process. 1 I J ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SATISFACTION SURVEY The Estes Park Police Department is proud to serve our citizens and guests alike. In our efforts to provide the highest in Quality Police Services we are interested in what you have to say in regards to services you have received. If you could, please take a moment to answer the questions below. The rating scale is: (1) Unacceptable Services (2) Acceptable Services (3) Above Average Services (4) Excellent Services (Circle the appropriate number rating the service you received) 1. Was you request handled in a timely manner'? 1234 2. Did you receive coulteous, polite, and professional services from the Estes Park Police representative? 1234 3. Was your request concluded satisfadorily? 1234 4. Based on this contact, would you call on the Estes Park Police Department for future services? 1234 5. Overall how would you rate services provided by the Estes Park Police Department? 1234 Would you be interested in attending the Estes Park Police Department Citizens Police Academy? If so, please leave your name and a phone number where you can be reached during the day. Thank you. Name: Phone Number: . Estes Park Police I I Department Memo To: Richard Widmer, Town Administrator Fmm: Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Police Date: October 20,2003 Re: Police Department Employee Disciplinary Review Board Please find attached a draft copy of a police department polidy to be implemented January 2004. This policy intends to incorporate an employee review process for disciplinary actions that may result in suspensions, demotions or terminations. The purpose of this policy is to ensure fair and consistent management practices are followed when disciplinary action is deemed appropriate. This employee board is advisory only to the Chief of Police. With your approval I am recommending to present this policy to the Public Safety Committee before adoption in 2004. 1 4 . , ' Estes Park Police Department Policy & Procedure Employee Disciplinary Review Board Page 1 of 2 A. Purpose To ensure fair and consistent practices are used to manage employee disciplinary issues an Employee Disciplinary Review Board is established. The sole purpose of the employee review board is to provide all employees with the opportunity to grieve disciplinary action before a panel of their peers. B. Policy a. January each year, the Chief of Police shall appoint three members and two alternate(s) to the "Employee Disciplinary Review Board." These appointments shall be based on employee interest and supervisor recommendations. All appointed members shall be line employee(s) from each of the three operating units within the department. b. Those employees assigned to the review board will be required to attend one annual training session regarding roles and responsibilities. This training shall consist of at a minimum; Town of Estes Park Policies and Procedures, Estes Park Police Department Policies and Procedures, and legal training presented by the Town Attorney or other appropriate legal professional. C. Procedure a. The disciplinary review board shall convene at the request of an aggrieved employee who may be subject to suspension, demotion, or termination as possible disciplinary action. The following steps shall be enacted once the request is made: 1. The aggrieved employee shall sign the waiver of confidentiality releasing the Town of Estes Park and police department management from all liabilities for disclosure of the facts presented from an internal investigation or personnel action initiated by department management. The aggrieved employee will allow board access to their personnel file. 2. The review board shall be convened within (3) working days of the request made by the aggrieved employee. 3. Each board member shall sign a document of confidentiality that holds each member responsible to, not disclose information regarding the aggrieved employee(s) alleged misconduct or contents of their personnel file. 4. The review board shall meet to review the internal investigation file at a predetermined location determined by the Chief of Police. 5. At this meeting the Chief of Police shall present the facts of the investigation and the recommended disciplinary action to be taken. 6. The review board shall be given (3) three working days to conclude their review of the internal investigation and present their recommendation to the Chief of Police. Draft . Estes Park Police Department Policy & Procedure Employee Disciplinary Review Board Page 2 of 2 7. A written and signed recommendation by the review board shall be submitted to the Chief of Police. This document is permanently retained by police administration. D. Disposition of Review a. The board recommendations provided to the Chief of Police are recommendation(s) only. The Chief of Police shall make final determination regarding disciplinary action to be administered. However, the Chief of Police when considering the type of disciplinary action shall follow all appropriate Town of Estes Park policies and procedures. b. If the aggrieved employee does not agree with the decision selected, they shall follow all Town of Estes Park grievance policy and procures. c. In the event conflicting policies exist between Police Department policy and Town of Estes Park policy, the latter shall supercede. Draft .. Estes Park Police Department Employee Disciplinary Review Board Release of Liability Waiver As required by Estes Park Police Department policies and procedures I have received notification that I am under investigation for alleged employee misconduct. I have been advised if the internal investigation sustains the complaint against me that disciplinary action taken will include one or a combination of the following; suspension, demotion or termination. As an employee of the Town of Estes Park Police Department I understand I am afforded the opportunity to request the Chief of Police to convene the Estes Park Police Department "Employee Disciplinary Review Board" before any disciplinary action is taken. I understand the review board member(s) do not hold the authority required to determine the outcome of the disciplinary process, but are a recommending body to the Chief of Police. I understand the "Employee Disciplinary Review Board's" primary function is to determine: 1. That Estes Park Police Department and Town of Estes Park polices and procedures were followed throughout the internal investigation. 2. That the internal investigation resulted in violation(s) of Estes Park Police Department policies or violations of the Town of Estes Park policies. As an employee of the Town of Estes Park Police Department I understand my right to confidentiality related to my personnel files and the information contained within the investigation. Understanding these rights I willingly and knowingly waive those rights for the purpose of this disciplinary review and I release the Town of Estes Park and their representatives of all liabilities in this matter. This release of liability is for the sole purpose of allowing the members of the "Employee Disciplinary Review Board" to view all relevant information pertaining to this investigation and any recommended disciplinary action. 1 understand findings of this board are advisory only and are presented to the Chief of Police for final disposition. Employee Date Estes Park Police Department Employee Disciplinary Review "Agreement of Confidentiality" As a member of the Estes Park Police Department "Employee Disciplinary Review Board" 1 understand the personnel information I am to review is confidential information. Therefore, any information reviewed to determine employee misconduct cannot be discussed with person(s) outside the confines of the "Employee Disciplinary Review Board" too include the aggrieved employee. My signature below signifies acknowledgement of that confidentiality requirement and that I am subject to appropriate disciplinary action if I violate any portion of this confidentiality agreement. Employee Date I J Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Richard Wdmer, Town Administrator F.= Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Police CC: Public Safety Committee Date: October 20,2003 Re Community Service Officer program Downtown Business Owner Meeting Outcomes The police department held a meeting with the downtown business owners to discuss the Community Service Officer program changes implemented for the 2003 summer. You will find attached a list of topics discussed at that meeting. The primary objectives of the meeting was to present the changes made, the justifications forthose changes and what the business ownefs required from the Community Service Officer program. A quick review of the CSO program changes implemented revealed the following: • Removing the CSO's from the intersections for vehide traffic control reduced accidents in the downtown corridor by 19% in comparison to the three previous years combined. • By increasing foot patrols with CSO's at Riverside Plaza and within the downtown area police service demands were reduced by 77% over a three year period. Three main points of interest presented by the business owners were: • The impads of pedestrian foot traffic on vehide traffic when pedestrians failed to observe the crosswalk regulations. • The timing of the traffic lights for eastbound traffic on Elkhom at Moraine and southbound traffic on Bighom at Moraine. • Reducing the time spent by CSO's contacting store owners. Based on the meeting outcomes staff recommends the CSO program to provide the following services for the 2004 summer season: 1. Station a CSO at the comer of Elkhom and Riverside and Elkhom and Moraine to control pedestrian foot traffic and provide assistance as required by the visiting population. 2. Continue to work with Public Works and CDOT personnel to ensure the tramc control devices currently used are sequenced properly to control vehicle traffic during the high visiting season. 1 · 3. Continue the foot patrol presence of CSO's in the downtown area to maintain the reduction in crime and disorders issues effedively reducing service demands on the police department. 4. Assign the Administrative Commander and Chief of Police to attend the downtown business owners meeting from May through September. •Page 2 . 4 Suggestions/Comments from the CSO Meeting 10/8/03 1. (l) CSO in the intersection at Elkhom/Moraine intersection. 2. The "best" idea for traffic control has been having CSOs in the intersections. 3. Having CSOs in the intersections helped drivers make turns. 4. The light at Bighom/Elkhorn is too short causing congestion and backups. 5. Elk are a hazard. 6. Sequencing of lights in the downtown area would help. 7. Removing the southbound tum lane (going down Bighom onto Elkhorn) could be removed on a seasonal or high-traffic basis. 8. Informational voice recordings on the pedestrian crossing signals would be better than the chirping signals (explaining you may cross directly across to any comer). 9. Diagonal crosswalks. 10. More informational signs on the light poles for crossing information. 11. Additional informational signs for drivers as they approach Estes Park to help drivers avoid the downtown area. 12. Check on the proposal to eliminate access to lower Wiest by Bob's Amoco. 13. CSOs spent too much time grouped up and talking among themselves. They did not give a lot of help/information to the tourists. 14. Fall traffic is becoming a problem without CSOs. Possibly use the volunteer unit? 15. The CSOs had a tad attitude" this summer. (Described as "gestapoD 16. Some business owners would be willing to volunteer their time to sit in on the interviews for the CSO recruits next spring. 17. The CSOs who were police academy graduates voiced complaints to the merchants that they did not have any authority. 18. Everyone felt that there were an excessive amount of store visitations and that this became distracting for the merchants. Asked for elimination of this part of the program. 19. Having a uniformed patrol bike officer in past years seemed to keep the CSOs in line and the bike officer was more accessible to the merchants. 5531 5 k £ Mitgfggg 32 ## A O O 0 0 128 COON V r V-10(0 r- r O 0 „000„ 0 9-1-(9 0 00 0 010,·-09·07000 0 (n <N Or- 0 0 0 0 O 0 -000,- 0 (O r- 9- r- O 0 N 00 0 CON 03 (N (D CO E- CNI 01 9-000100 0 0 9- 0 „r r- r- 0 0 00000 O 000 0000 0000000000 O 000000 0 0 O 0 -000" 0 0 9- 9- 1-- 0 0 04 00 000 (NI (73 EN CO CO V N Al VOIO)00 0 0 <D r r- r-,- ae ze 0:£ 03 32 5 5 # ¢9 2=28 88 CO . N r.- 0 0 00.-r 0 (NLON 00061 0)00(9(9000(Der·-00 (N r 0 -0 0 0 0 r- 0 0 00„„ O tr) 0 0> O 00 0> (9 0 (9 1.0 # O 10 01 4· <9 01 r U-) Olror-00 0 0 9- r r 0 0 0000 O 000 0000 0000000000000 000000 0 0 O 00.-r O 0(00) 00003 <90(910t0lt)(N~-(r)(Nrtf) Clroroo O 0 a. r. . r r. @Ittl Z Mezo LUOJ daLLIEOB- CO &89 2€02 + 2 0 8 2 0 M!$35@0 m Z BEE =Eiggemi ME Wasm' m BES@* i *2* E me 2 Uns*migmet#*R izEW E E Ill )05--1 2 Z k Lunrofel--EoNIM =923&!<U. 0 < <lumj O~TOC4O 0 0 04 0 0 0 0 CO 01 r r- 0 00 00 r O lf) r / N ¢9 01 O r- t. O co E- r- (9 01 0 01 r CO CD O M r- C) r N 000 0„000 .-000000000 00000 lr) r * A 9 01 CD r (I) CD 00 7 r- (9 01 6 (N r CO O CO 00 r- 0 * I. N O 12>t 1~ 250 2 2 1- Z m"m%=m=*232 - -== 0= 0 m 8% 051% S TE 8%%5%Esigzaf it fER 2*gz m a Fola@M/aBOV 2 t. 01 CD . Z 111 <lux 0-01- §-&i*i%ZBE§4MEEiB2Z*§==**2 3 2 8<4011. a U}¤0 s 0 6 Reported Unfoundec Actual Cleared Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate Reported Unfoundeo Actual Cleared Clearance Rate NSE/OFFENSE 100% EHICLE FONDLING 100% %09 %006 2003 2002 2001 1.002 Zooz 3rd Qrtr NIBRS Crime Summary-Grp A ,2002,2001 KIDNAPPING/ABDUCTION 0 D ASSAULT 3Ok!03/ON 1 MPLE ASSAUL HOMICIDE ITING/FORGERY OFFENSES TEN/SWINDLE ASSAULT DE>NDOd-13 ASSAULT OFFENSES 5 OFFENSE AlbladOWd N31019 313AA CODE kIO:1 -1¥MGOd SU IN M)N V Si SIHI 03Sn EVM 1VHM MOU) 1VVIHOd Nak:133310 V Sl TED ASSAULT BUILDING P MACHINE TIC OFFENSE TR CTION/VANDALISM PROPERTY 'LOOZ ONV ZOOZ Nt Egg 000 ,- r- T- 9 A A 000 0 0 0 0 r 91·-th· 000 0 0 0 0 0 000 00( 0 0 0 0 0 11'%1- OCDO O 0 0 Or- 89 y y 888 r- I- r- 1 <09,61 000 0 0 0 0 09¢64 000 0 0 0 0 0 000 OCDCD 0 0 0 0 0 E 1 1 2 51 (D . 01 O<30 0000" h. 0: € 3 illud * 28* m 00- @%8 Z * 34! Em ig ige - DESTRUCTIO 22 18% 36 36 11 % WEAPON VIOLATIONS 100% 100% Unfounded Actual Clearance Rate Reported Unfounded Actual Clearan De Rate 3rd Qrtr NIBRS Crime Summary-Grp A GRAND TOTALS 10 0 107 38 2003,2002,2001 TUTORY RAPE PORNOGRAPHY/OBSCENE GAMBLING OFFENSE PROSTITUTION OFFENSE: DRUG BRIBERY 3rd Quarter NIBRS Crime Summary Group B July - September 2003,2002,2001 OFFENSE CHARGED 2003 2002 2001 90A - BAD CHECKS 0 0 0 90B - CURFEW/LOITERING/VAGRANCY VIOLS 0 0 0 90C - DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1 7 10 90D - DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 11 13 12 90E-DRUNKENNESS 1 3 0 90F - FAMILY OFFENSES, NONVIOLENT 1 0 0 90G - LIQUOR LAW VIOLATIONS 9 25 12 90H - PEEPING TOM 0 0 0 901 - RUNAWAY 2 9 0 90J - TRESPASS OF REAL PROPERTY 0 0 4 90Z - ALL OTHER OFFENSES 10 20 27 TOTAL ARRESTEES: 35 TOTAL ADULTS: 23 TOTAL JUVENILES: 12 TOTAL JUVENILES HANDLED: 5 TOTAL JUVENILES REFERRED: 7 NIBRS STOLEN RECOVERED PROPERTY 3RD QUARTER JULY - SEPTEMBER 2003 PROPERTY CODE BURNED COUNTERFT PAMAGED RECOVERED SEIZED STOLEN ALCOHOL AUTOS 1500 70000 10600 BICYCLES 765 CLOTHES 600 COMP EQUIP CONSUMABLE GOODS 899 437 120 DRUGS DRUG EQUIP 3 FIREARMS 200 CONSTRUCTN EQUIP 10 HOUSEHOLD GOODS 95 95 JEWELRY 4388 MERCHANDISE 1355 1004 3819 MONEY 20 30 6611 NEGOTBLINSTMNTS 100 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 15 OTHER VEHICLES 110 PURSES RADIOS/TVs 2085 RECORDINGS 470 4430 STRUCTURE/SINGLE STRUC/OTH DWELLG STRUC/COMMERCIAL 1600 STRUC/STORAGE 300 STRUC/OTHER TOOLS VEHICLE PARTS 4535 20 OTHER 1574 30 887 GRAND TOTAL 120 12243 71129 233 34982 2245*fu 4 424 t.. 6.· *ST 4,4". . 1 0?24&4 .. - , .. -· ~ or Carolyn Bucior Alfvin 4500 N. Bartlett Avenue . 6 J: Shorewood, WI 53211 (414) 332-2363 August 25,2003 Xaiver Wolf General Manager Stanley Hotel 333 Wonderview Ave. Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Wolf, On August 22, my 10-year-old son and I took a 6 p.m. ghost tour, lead by Diego, then stayed overnight in your hotel. I want to call to your attention one very upsetting aspect of our stay. Two extremely drunken individuals were on the tour -- a man and, I suspect, his girlfriend, about 30 years old. They upset the first half of the tour, as they were busy arguing. The man left after the Billiards Room. During the second half, the woman, obviously drunk by way of actions and smell, was extremely disruptive. When a hotel guest allowed the tour to enter her fourth floor room, the woman splayed on the bed, then went to the bathroom where she acted up again. Diego tried his best to minimize her interruptions. But some of us were hoping he would call security and let the tour continue peacefully. My son and I left the tour before it ended because of this. We stopped in the restaurant/bar for a sandwich, where the bartender was serving the woman and her boyfriend. (The woman was telling the bartender that she, too, was a bartender and worked on a boat-bar.) I was appalled that these people, obviously drunk, were being served more liquor. I am not familiar with Colorado law, but know that in Wisconsin serving an inebriated person more liquor is against the law for safety reasons. The only positive thing I could squeeze from this was a discussion with my son about the things he saw that frightened him. -r &:,_r'·':4 ,/.'·tit·· 4 - -r spoke with your desk clerk the next morning and she assured me you would want to know about this. Sincerely, (diA GLYA *~p Carolyn Alfvin CC: Zaq Hanks, Restaurant Manager, Stanley Hotel Manager, Stanley Museum Lowell Richardson, Chief of Police, Estes Park ' t Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Public Safety Committee Fron. Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Police CC: Amanda Lee, RJ Director Date: October 21, 2003 Re: Case Updates Since February 2003, thirty-four cases were referred to Restorative Justice, of these seven offenders were referred back to municipal court for disposition. Currently, Restorative Justice has managed 27 cases, of which 19 have successfully completed their community agreements, four are pending completion, and four failed to complete their community agreements. To date Restorative Justice has realized a success rate of 70%. Meaning the offender has completed their agreement and since completion has not re-offended. * A special note, based on our research the EVRJP (Estes Valley Restorative Justice Partnership) is the only Restorative Justice program in the United States currently managing alcohol violation cases. What we have discovered is other communities are taking the position that this is a victimless crime. Currently, 72% of all juvenile crimes reported through the Restorative Justice program are Underage Alcohol violations. The EVRJP board believes community members are adversely affected by underage alcohol violations and will continue to address this juvenile issue. 1 Restorative Justice Cases and Outcomes Incident/CGC Description CGC CGC Co- Community Agreement Successful date of Incident I Facilitator I Facilitator Representative i Deadline Completion (1) 03-75/ Paintball ! Amanda I Shellie Cristina 5-31-03 Yes, yes % 2-27-03 (2) (2) 02-2746/ MIP N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A DIS (3) 02-2673/ MIP (3) Amanda Rich Joyce, Bonita, j 8-1-03 No,Yes, 3-1-03 1 Cristina j Yes (4) 02-2930/ Road i N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 DIS Rage/ Disturbing the peace (5) 03-208/ Theft of N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A DIS 1 pen ! (6) RJ 1798/ Possession I Amanda Helen Steve P., 1 8-15-03 No 4-15-03 1 of drug Patrick, Steve M. i par. (7) RJ 2416/ MIP (2) Amanda Pat Betty i Graduation Yes, yes 4-16-03 (Sa) 03-128/ MIP (2) I Helen Amanda Joyce, Chuck 7-31-03 No, Yes 5-13-03 1 1 (80 03-128/ I MIP (3) 3 Helen Amanda Gib, Chuck 8-15-03 Yes, Yes, B., Joyce Yes 5-15-03 I (9) 03-242/ ; MIP (3) i Pat Amanda I Chuck B., : 8-1-03 j Yes, Yes, 5-22-03 r 1 1 Chuck L., 1 No Jean (10) RJ 03 1 MIP Amanda i Shellie T. I Jessie Mae, 10-1-03 Yes 0336/6-2-03 1 ~ ! Earl, Steve M. (11) RJ 3767/ Theft @ Amanda Betty i Chuck L., ; 7-15-03 Yes Steve P. 6-12-03 , Safeway (12) RJ 03- MIP ' Betty Amanda Rich, Bonnie 6-16-03 I N/A 542ADIS ' 2 (13) RJ 03- i MIP (3) Helen ~ Amanda i Mike S., Alice 8-23-03- 1 Yes, yes, 4342/6-23-03 changed to yes 9-23-03 * (14) RJ 5833/ False Amanda Helen ' Scott D., ~ 11-01-03 f 8-25-03 Reporting : Jessie Mae, Steve M. (15) RJ 7349/ MIP (1) i Amanda i Betty Dennis, Chuck i 8-29-03 Yes B., Jim K., 8-4-03 (15b)RJ7349/ 1 MIP (2) 1 Amanda i Pat Steve M., 12-31-03 :.............ma=Il:•1- ·:· ·····All ·I .6 · in.*I..22*2/.*Fll//Ir...........le...):R..e.*.....*44-2.=.4 tal-Il .*al.IN#SI.'%24ND<KE:tea25...../-5...............I-.Ill....'UOF; ../.... ........1...............'Ill.&....... ...#Ill....1~~ .......&9.«I .................Illy,mak@0.............%.../......:/I'll, AN...., .t.¥ .....?sl ....2,·A,-·•72•:.0 ri>€226.•'ll....9·1./.I+. I. , Restorative Justice Cases and Outcomes 8-11-03 I Shellie D., i : Frank S. (15c)R!7349/ 1 MIP (1) Amanda Chuck B., 11-07-03 Yes 8-7-03 -- i (15d)RJ7349/ I MIP (1) Amanda Chuck B. Steve M., 1 1-30-03 8-14-03 (16) 1 Possession Amanda Helen Failure To N/A 9-22-03 of drug 1 Appear For par./<1 oz. 1 Conference i ! Theft of Betty Chuck B. Shannon, Pat, i Failure To N/A (17)03-962/ i Badge t Kurt, Jim Appear for i 9-11-03 1 ! I Conference 1 Possession Betty Pat Joyce, i (18)RJ10744/ i ofdrug ~ Joannie, 10-20-03 ----=...-1////W*/Ill-In=~=-S=-='&=* Outcomes: (1) 8 hours repayment work at rent-all, auto mall, school, youth center; apology letters to each other' s parents; restitution for school sign (2) Referred back to coun; re-offended prior to conference date (3) Public presentation or letter of apology to community; 10 hours community service (3 on river clean-up with Steve Misch); view and discuss "Life Around the Corner" with Amanda; research paper (4) Referred back to court; Failure for juvenile to take responsibility (5) Dismissed charges; Developmental Disabilities suffered by offender (6) Research on illegal drugs and alcohol and their effects to make poster, watch "Life Around the Corner video and discussion, 15 hours service at Prospect Park Living Center, AA meeting with Steve (7) Make 5-10 minute video about: interviewing AA members, Bonita Shippy, Judge Brown/police officer, preview showing to restorative justice volunteers, make available to police department (8) Make 2 posters: one on physical effects of alcoholism; one on effects of minors drinking; After watching "Life Around the Cornef' and working with "Alcohol 101" CD. Also interview a doctor about effects of alcohol on the body. Write a Restorative Justice Cases and Outcomes letter to yourself: + and - of drinking, what you appreciate about your parents and the way they raised you, what effects this has on them, what was your personal experience, what is different, recognize the impact, "ripple effect" (8b)20 hours completed in: work with Kreative Kids, Senior Center, coach baseball team, work at roundhouse, individual child one-on-one, campout with Lynne's class; 2 hour work project with Gib Dolezal; Up to three hours with Basil discussing options, alcohol, police work, etc. (9) Write 10 questions for each individual to be interviewed (based on profession) and submit this when watching video. Get statistics on drinking and driving and underage drinking in Estes Park, Schedule appointment and watch 2 videos with Amanda. Given names and numbers, the three of you go together and interview the town mortician, police officer, tow truck driver, and parent who has lost a child to drinking and driving. (10) Partner with police department regarding alcohol awareness in September at High School and be involved as student representative with pre-planning in Summer; Family will meet for one hour/week for 10 wks. and she will set the agenda for discussion; essay on overall experience including how to deal with peer pressure and the impact it had on her family. (11) Attend VEO class; Volunteer as bell-ringer over July 4~h weekend in front of Safeway for a minimum of 6 hours, write a descriptive personal story of what happened, the cost of shoplifting, and an apology appropriate for newspaper publication and meet with Amanda to contact newspaper. (12) Referred back to court due to failure to show up for conference. (13) Attend VEO class; Work with Youth Corp for 20 hours (in Nederland, their community), prepare, attend, and present at Roundtable Discussion (youth center in Nederland on Tue nights) on the consequences ofwhat you did-what happened, and what could have happened. Write a letter to parents discussing what steps need to be taken to earn back trust from parents, discuss incident and effects thereof. Restorative Justice Cases and Outcomes (14) 2 hours with dispatch, 2 hours work at fire station, write article on effects ofprank calling and submit to Middle School for publication in Paw Prints, submit to student council at High School (15) Attend Victim Empathy for Offenders class, Research effects of alcohol using the interactive CD, interviewing a recovering alcoholic, a parent who lost a child to alcohol; write and turn in a 4-5 page paper about knowledge gained from these sources and changes in your attitude about alcohol. a. (15b)Attend Victim Empathy class for offenders, Spend at least 4 hours with interactive CD with family and complete community service log, will participate in a weekly family conference (at least 30 minutes) for three months and write a one page summary, will write letters of apology to parents, siblings, and the Robertsons b. (15c)Do research on underage drinking laws, consequences of breaking those laws, and the civil rights of persons under the age of 21. Include 5 things that can happen when you drink under the age of 21. Distribute brochures created to two youth groups. Attend VEO class. c. (15d)Attend VEO class, Newspaper article based on research in underage drinking: CD viewed and studied, Colorado comparison, goes into Trail Gazette, EP News, School paper. Development of youth survey given to Amanda, Amanda agrees to partner, article includes analysis of survey. (16) Referred back to court due to failure to show up for conference. (17) Referred back to court due to failure to show up for conference. F 1 Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Richard Vgdmer, Town Administrator Fron• Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Police Date: October 20,2003 Re Loud Vehides A follow up regarding the memo received concerning loud vehides. A review of the following communities revealed: 1. Boulder Police Department a. Their Public Works Department Code Enforcement Unit enforces all stationary noise pollution violations. The Police Department has two trained officers who enforce all vehide noise violations. These officers are specially trained. b. They use a decibel meter for all enforcement efforts. c. They do not adively pursue loud motorcycles. d. Areas of enforcement are differentiated by distrid definition, residential, commercial and special districts. These definitions determine the acceptable noise levels. e. All city events are exempt from noise ordinance enforcement. 2. Colorado State Patrol a. Does not enforce loud mufflers. b. They state their staff is not trained for inspedion of altered mufflers nor do they know how to inspect for a correct factory muffler. c. They do not carry decibel meters with them. 3. Loveland Police Department a. Their police officers enforce loud music from cars; however the noise must be audible at a distance of 25' or greater. b. Loud vehide enforcement requires decibel meter confirmation for enforcement at varying RPM levels. 1 - 4 I . I 4. Ft. Collins Police Department a. Their Code Enforcement Officers enforce all fixed noise violations using decibel meters for confirmation of noise violations. b. Police Officers are given instruction they may stop vehides they believe emit excessive noise. They do not use decibel meters, each stop is based on the subjedive criteria of the individual officer. c. They have recently received an influx of noise complaints regarding motorcydes. Officers are using the same criteria as above to stop motorcydes. According to the staff member from Ft.Collins they are having little success in regulating motorcyde noise. d. Officers are to elicit incriminating statements from owner/operators of loud vehides. Research of Current Laws Colorado Revised Statutes, the Model Traffic Code and the Town of Estes Park Municipal Ordinances were reviewed. That research revealed: • Colorado Statutes allow for enforcement if the exhaust system is alter*d from original manufacture specifications and it requires the system to be properly maintained preventing any unusual or excessive noises. • Colorado Model Traffic Code paraphrases state statute, the Model Traffic Code exists to allow local courts to adjudicate specific traffic violations, which indudes exhaust systems. • The Town of Estes Park Municipal Ordinances allow for enforcement based on distances from originating source location. Critical Issues to Effectively Enforce Noise Violations • Adequate resources; staffing, overtime dollars and training to effedively enforce • Effective strategic enforcement efforts to minimize noise violations • Adequate noise ordinances that standardize acceptable noise levels within the community • Meeting the needs of the community Staff Recommendations The Estes Park Police Department typically receives noise complaints for loud music emanating from cars and loud exhaust systems emanating from motorcydes. Since the law on noise allows for broad interpretation on the part of an officer or a citizen, enforcement becomes a subjective process creating conflict for when enforcement should occur. This requires mechanical knowledge on the part of the officer. Damaged exhaust systems in need of repair typically are noticeable; therefore enforcement can objectively be accomplished. To accomplish objective and reasonable enforcement of noise violations and altered exhaust systems staff recommends the following: 1. The adoption of Town ordinances that specify acceptable noise levels by appropriate decibel levels and distances. • Page_2 ·2. The posting of noise enforcement signs on each main roadway entrance into the town limits of Estes Park. 3. Purchase three decibel meters forthe police department. 4. Train all patrol officers in the proper use of the decibel meter equipment. 5. Train officers to properly inspect exhaust systems for alterations 6. Formalize enforcement standards and develop internal department policy on noise enforcement issues. These recommendations do not guarantee complete eradication of the loud vehide noise issues currently facing the Town of Estes Park. Due to the volume of vehicle traffic Estes Park receives each year and the time of year when these violations occur creates obvious enforcement difficulties for the police department. As calls for service increase, nearly 35% between June and August, routine patrolling efforts are reduced. However, through effective planning and implementing of strategic noise enforcement practices, opportunities exist to reduce vehide noise pollution and improve the quality of life for residents and guests within the Town of Estes Park. I. L To: Richard Widmer From: John Baudek g 8. Subject: Loud Vehicles Date: September 2,2003 CC: Town Board I have received several complaints regarding loud motorcycles this summer. I have also observed several times this summer when motorcycles have come through town where they were so loud you could hear them from blocks away or when sitting in my house. I realize that there is difficulty in determining how loud a vehicle is in decibels, however in some ofthese situations I am sure that the motorcycle did not have a functioning muffier as required by state law. C.R.S. 42-4-225 Muffiers- prevention of noise. This section goes on to say that the muffier must be in constant operation and properly maintained to prevent any excessive or unusual noise. Sitting up town one afternoon just to observe what was going on in town I saw and heard two motorcycles go back and forth on Elkhorn Avenue at least six times with them being so loud that people were turning to see what was coming each time they passed. With regard to the noise, one person told me, "When you have to stop your conversation when the motorcycle is 100 feet away something is wrong." I think this just hurts the entire atmosphere that we all want here in Estes Park and there should be something that we can do about it. The same problems exist with some cars which have the radios or CD players so loud that when sitting in a car near them your vehicle actually vibrates. I would like staff to check with other jurisdictions in the front range to see what if anything they are doing about these types of situations and perhaps report back to the Public Safety Committee. I , e . 0 MEMORANDUM To: Public Safety Committee From: Fire Chief Scott Dorman ILA I)ate: October 7,2003 Subject: Slash disposal program- site location Background: Larimer County, Colorado State Forest Service and the Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department have combined efforts in the last few years to promote wildfire mitigation work. This mitigation work, performed by homeowners, is to lessen the effects of a wildfire on the private property and forests in our area. The interest from property owners toward this effort has been exceptional, although one concern keeps recurring, "what can be done with the slash, it' s too expensive to take it to the landfill." A slash collection site is needed. This site will motivate property owners to perform wildfire mitigation work by making it more cost effective. A contractor would be hired (by the County) to chip/grind the slash and remove the material. Budget: All costs will be paid by a County wildfire mitigation grant. This grant is a matching grant with the town's match being made through in-kind services (i.e. firefighter labor at the collection site). The only expense to the Town of Estes Park would be in providing a front-end loader, for a day, to remove the material. The County currently has up to $25,000 of grant money available for this type ofproject. Recommendation: The Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department recommends opening a collection site as a pilotproject. The requested site location is on the Fairgrounds property, the drop offarea is fenced offand behind a gate. Fire department personnel would monitor the site during the drop offtimes. Drop off times would be on Saturdays from 9:00 am until 3:00 pm starting November 1St through November 20 or until the site is maximized. The material would be chipped/ground by December 15th and removed by January 15, 2004 (contractor availability and weather permitting). By providing a collection site we will be partnering with the area residents in protecting the properties and forests in and around Estes Park, thereby helping to preserve our pristine area. ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2003-THIRD QUARTER INCIDENT RUN REPORTS (07/ 01/ 2003) - (09 /30/ 2003) Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) Alarm Date Between {07/01/2003} And {09/30/2003} Pct of Total Pct of ncident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses Fire 00 Fire, Other 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 11 Building fire 4 2.50% $109,900 54.40% 13 Cooking fire, confined to container 2 1.25% $0 0.00% 14 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 18 Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 31 Passenger vehicle fire 1 0.62% $500 0.24% 32 Road freight or transport vehicle fire 1 0.62% $500 0.24% 40 Natural vegetation fire, Other 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 41 Forest, woods or wildland fire 3 1.87% $0 0.00% L51 Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 1 0.62% $0 0.00% L54 Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle 1 0.62% $0 0.00% L60 Special outside fire, Other + 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 18 11.25% $110,900 54.90% 2 Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat -no fire 212 Overpressure rupture of steam boiler 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 3 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 300 Rescue, emergency medical (EMS) call, Other 4 2.50% $0 0.00% 311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 32 20.00% $0 0.00% 322 Vehicle accident with injuries 7 4.37% $52,000 25.74% 352 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 1 0.62% $1,500 0.74% 44 27.50% $53,500 26.48% 4 Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 3 1.87% $0 0.00% 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 3 1.87% $0 0.00% 422 Chemical spill or leak · 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 440 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, Other 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 445 Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 463·Vehicle accident, general cleanup 8 5.00% $37,600 18.61% 17 10.62% $37,600 18.61% 5 Service Call 500 Service Call, Other 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 510 Person in distress, Other 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 10/14/2003 09:50 Page 1 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) Alarm Date Between {07/01/2003} And {09/30/2003} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 3 Service Call 542 Animal rescue 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 551 Assist police or other governmental agency 3 1.87% $0 0.00% 561 Unauthorized burning 3 1.87% $0 0.00% 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 2 1.25% $0 0.00% 11 6.87% $0 0.00% 6 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, Other 2 1.25% $0 0.00% 611 Dispatched & canceled en route 12 7.50% $0 0.00% 631 Authorized controlled burning 4 2.50% $0 0.00% 650 Steam, Other gas mistaken for smoke, Other 4 2.50% ' $0 0.00% 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 9 5.62% $0 0.00% 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be 9 5.62% $0 0.00% 653 Barbecue, tar kettle 4 2.50% $0 0.00% 671 Hazmat release investigation w/ no hazmat 5 3.12% $0 0.00% 49 30.62% $0 0.00% 7 False Alarm & False Call 700 False alarm or false call, Other 3 1.87% $0 0.00% 735 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire - 3 1.87% $0 0.00% 744 Detector activation, no fire - 5 3.12% $0 0.00% 745 Alarm system sounded, no fire - 3 1.87% $0 0.00% 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 2 1.25% $0 0.00% 17 10.62% $0 0.00% 8 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 812 Flood assessment 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 1 0.62% $0 0.00% 9 Special incident type 900 Special type of incident, Other 2 1.25% $0 0.00% 2 1.25% $0 0.00% Total Incident Count: 160 Total Est Loss: $202,000 10/14/2003 09:50 Page 2 0 8 2 1 0 . pl '1 t. :22.' • Overpressure rupture, explosion (no fire) O Rescue & EMS Incidents O Hazardous Conditions (No Fire) lieO Well'l POOD 0 Jewes!a lenleN 9 Je4}eeM JaAes O I Special incident type 2003 THIRD QUARTER - number of calls by type of call 1 2 18 LL LL Ileo esle:19 uueiv asied I „ -, 64 17 28 ·· Elf. '1 C 09& Wy@> % 24.. €2Astf. · -» Ft -904* [ le . 99% 4%> O 4 40 +b .0 /4 % 1,4, e 24 /6 6 4 -% L 4% 0 - %4 e ®»48- Ar? IJ *411 e 3% V 1 i 441 - 0. Ak:Kj 91 e<, *9 - gh O <0 %ip: 16/12 - 70 9 0% 1 % N €401 /3 12- 9%* 4©39 i. «,F: _ Ve 19 »32 '44~ €(!*·id I .~49.,r ¥41. 00 e 1 0 gepin< 0 0 to 0 10 0 .O 0 M M M N - r. 1 0 sligo Jo JequlnN hin City Limits tside City Limits 2003 THIRD QUARTER- within / outside city limits slieo Jo adAi 40 .* ia» y 4 0 ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2003-YEAR TO DATE INCIDENT RUN REPORTS (01/ 01/ 2003) - (09 /30/ 2003) . Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) . Alarm Date Between {01/01/2003} And {09/30/2003} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 1 Fire 100 Fire, Other ,2 0.57% $0 0.00% 111 Building fire 7 2.01% $384,900 66.74% 113 Cooking fire, confined to container 5 1.43% $0 0.00% 114 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney 3 0.86% $0 0.00% 116 Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 118 Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 131 Passenger vehicle fire ·2 0.57% $500 0.08% 132 Road freight or transport vehicle fire 1 0.28% $500 0.08% 140 Natural vegetation fire, Other 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 141 Forest, woods or wildland fire 5 1.43% $0 0.00% 151 Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 154 Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle 2 0.57% $200 0.03% 160 Special outside fire, Other 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 32 9.19% $386,100 66.94% 2 Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat -no fire 212 Overpressure rupture of steam boiler 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 3 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 300 Rescue, emergency medical (EMS) call, Other 6 1.72% $0 0.00% 311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 75 21.55% $0 0.00% 321 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 322 Vehicle accident with injuries 19 5.45% $106,500 18.46% 342 Search for person in water 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 352 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 1 0.28% $1,500 0.26% 355 Confined space rescue 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 371 Electrocution or potential electrocution 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 105 30.17% $108,000 18.72% 4 Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 5 1.43% $0 0.00% 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 10 2.87% $0 0.00% 413 Oil or other combustible liquid spill 2 0.57% $0 0.00% 421 Chemical hazard (no spill or leak) 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 422 Chemical spill or leak 2 0.57% $0 0.00% 440 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, Other 4 1.14% $0 0.00% 441 Heat from short circuit (wiring), 1 0.28% $1,000 0.17% 10/14/2003 09:52 Page 1 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) . Alarm Date Between {01/01/2003} And {09/30/2003} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 4 Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 442 Overheated motor 2 0.57% $0 0.00% 443 Light ballast breakdown 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 445 Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 4 1.14% $0 0.00% 461 Building or structure weakened or collapsed 1 0.28% $0 0-00% 463 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 24 6.89% $81,600 14.14% 57 16.37% $82,600 14.32% 5 Service Call 500 Service Call, Other 2 0.57% $0 0.00% 510 Person in distress, Other 3 0.86% $0 0.00% 520 Water problem, Other 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 542 Animal rescue 2 0.57% $0 0.00% 550 Public service assistance, Other 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 551 Assist police or other governmental agency 3 0.86% $0 0.00% 561 Unauthorized burning 5 1.43% $0 0-00% 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 3 0.86% $0 0.00% 20 5.74% $0 0.00% 6 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, Other 10 2.87% $0 0.00% 611 Dispatched & canceled en route 31 8.90% $0 0.00% 631 Authorized controlled burning 8 2.29% $0 0.00% 650 Steam, Other gas mistaken for smoke, Other 5 1.43% $0 0.00% 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 11 3.16% $0 0.00% 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be 11 3.16% $0 0.00% 653 Barbecue, tar kettle 5 1.43% $0 0.00% 671 Hazmat release investigation w/ no hazmat 5 1.43% $0 0.00% 86 24.71% $0 0.00% 7 False Alarm & False Call 700 False alarm or false call, Other 10 2.87% $0 0.00% 735 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 2 0.57% $0 0.00% 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire - 5 1.43% $0 0.00% 744 Detector activation, no fire - 9 2.58% $0 0.00% 745 Alarm system sounded, no fire - 4 1.14% $0 0.00% 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 5 1.43% $0 0.00% 10/14/2003 09:52 Page 2 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) . Alarm Date Between {01/01/2003} And {09/30/2003} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 35 10.05% $0 0.00% 8 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 812 Flood assessment 3 0.86% $0 0.00% 814 Lightning strike (no fire) 1 0.28% $0 0.00% 4 1.14% $0 0.00% 9 Special incident type 900 Special type of incident, Other 8 2.29% $0 0.00% 8 2.29% $0 0.00% Total Incident Count: 348 Total Est Loss: $576,700 10/14/2003 09:52 Page 3 2-2 a) L== >0 0C 14.. f .. 4 2003 YEAR TO DATE- number of calls by type of call ressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat - O Rescue & EMS Incidents O Hazardous Conditions (No Fire) 1190 go!/Ues. ileo Jumul poe o lies age:118 uueiv asie:Il Je}Ses!Cl lenleN 19 J04}eam JaAes O LS ed*i Jueppu! iepedsi B Fire 105 32 35 99 0Z E 1 0 C *6 m. Qb 4_ -1% OP - '5 % 4 16 4% - Rs, 0 49% 01,5 I. ·~*~14' 94> 4 /*'Et 644% 42 L_ 4 0 34%?b O f«.~ 002 , 9336 *09' 10 e 91 K e 4,3, 11'11 (6 24.. .9. - %7% 9, Co 34. 0 -1,/ %, 4 1 % N e *til - 00 %4- 04:41%, 9%6 1,4 e '0, 4 60 , -ik 0000000 O.04·WN ,@44% e e 10 siieojo,equunN 4 side City Limits 2003 YEAR TO DATE - within /outside city limits leo,o *14 Arai De(4- · ..» · J t PINEWOOD AREA CEDAR PARK/SPRINGS Collected over 1200 cubic yards Collected over 2000 cubic yards - RIST CANYON BURN SITES Collect over 2200 cubic yards ././././../ 1 Big Elk Meadows Burn Site Ill.Iliallililirt) $ -6 » iliM"*IMIi<W * \2£02/6 Z,JEw 9!~ -I.' ' 1......I...J...........I L- ~ G-»-U.1 nrimbEZIMA;JX#N'll'll /4,4.9 .--/4 M ubic;art :~,cl: ·lii ,/'112/Imiwai.RWI'lliwillillill'll:ill ./.-I'Ir i Imil#bilf'/47 Q,/HU-limil.*9/ average one C -- homeowners/landownedime to,42» cut/gather, load, transport and unload / each cubic yard 61 sla€h·collected 2 External Media Located Here 1 M-011686 RMMI