Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Public Safety 2003-07-24
, TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA July 24,2003 7:30 A.M. *Revision Date: July 21, 2003 4:55 p.m. POLICE DEPARTMENT Action 1. Faith Base and Community Partnership - Approval Requested 2. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 9.28 Regarding Drug Paraphernalia - Approval Requested 3. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 9.18 Regarding Skateboards, Rollerblades, and Bicycles - Approval Requested 4. An Ordinance Repealing Concealed Weapons Permits From the Municipal Code - Approval Requested 5. An Ordinance Amending Kennel Restrictions Chapter 7.12.080 - Approval Requested 6. Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority Resolution - Approval Requested Reports 1. NIBRS 2nd Quarter Reports *2. C.S.O. Update FIRE DEPARTMENT Action 1. Donation of Zodiac Dive Boat, Motor and Trailer to Thompson Valley Ambulance - Approval Requested 2. Donation of Old Hazardous Material Truck to American Red Cross - Approval Requested Reports 1. 2nd Quarter Incident Reports 2. Open Burning Ban "NOTE: The Board of Trustees (or Public Safety Committee) reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared." Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Public Safety Committee and Chairman : ette From: Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Poll*C; J Date: July 22,2003 Re: Faith Base and Community Partnership Background In June of 2003 Larimer County Health and Human Services held a Faith Based and Community Government Initiative Summit in Ft. Collins. The purpose of the summit was to explore the possibility of sharing resources and develop partnerships between the faith community and local government. An outcome of that summit is the Estes Park Faith Based and Community Partnership. Since the initial summit an Estes Park committee has formed and met. Current members include; Father Rex Rorex Crossroads Ministries, Father Paul Garrett St. Bartholomew's Church, Rev. Dan Mengler Lutheran Church, Pat Washburn St. Bartholomew's, Dr. Richard Guest Larimer County Health and Human Services and Lowell Richardson Town of Estes Park. These initial meetings revealed a need to coordinate efforts in providing services for those people and families in crisis. A majority of the time people and families in crisis come to the police for assistance, i.e. for gas money, lodging or food. These services are provided by Estes Faith members but not the police department. The committee requested use of the police to augment current services and to use the Town's website to provide public information on where these services can be accessed for those people in need. Budget Impact None Recommendations Staff recommends the following: 1. Allow the police department to provide after hours services distributing Salvation Army vouchers for food, gas or lodging. 2. Allow the police department staff to develop a shared data base for those receiving services so the system cannot be abused. 3. Create an information page to be placed on the Town website listing services available by the Faith Based and Community Partners. 1 % 4 July 10, 2003 Mr. Lowell Richardson Chief of Police Town of Estes Park, Colorado Dear Chief Richardson FBACP (Faith Base and Community Partnership), an Estes Park committee organized out of the Larimer County Faith Based and Community Initiatives Summit, has been in conversation to determine if there are ways in which the faith community of Estes Park and agencies of the Town of Estes Park can more fully cooperate and coordinate in the provision of services to the needy of the community and those transients and visitors who look to the town and the faith community for help in difficult circumstances after hours when assistance from Crossroads is not available. Out of this conversation we offer the following proposal and request: 1. The authorization of the Police Department to provide Salvation Army or other vouchers to people seeking food, fuel or lodging assistance in crisis situations. 2. The authorization of the Police Department to contact local faith groups and human service groups such as Crossroads Ministry to provide additional resources as may be appropriate. 3. To develop a contact file, accessible through dispatch, of those receiving assistance that can be referred to by faith groups and other human service groups to minimize duplication of service especially after hours and in emergency situations. (Information in this file to consist of Name, Address, Phone Number, Services Received, Date and Service Provider.) 4. That a listing of service resources be included in the town website. FBACP believes that the elements of this proposal will streamline many aspects of the various efforts of the town and the faith community to provide appropriate levels of assistance to those who find themselves in crisis or emergency situations and will enhance the level of communication and cooperation that already exists between the town (especially the Police Dept.) and the faith community. Thank you for your attention. Very sincerely yours, . f) (4 m '\-t (}44 ~ J .6/1''C~~7 The Rev. M. Paul Garrett For: FBACP . POLICE DEPARTMENT Memo To: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Commander Gregg Filsinger Date: 07/18/03 Re: Amendment to Municipal Ordinance Background: The Town currently has a Municipal Ordinance, # 9.28.030 that prohibits the sale of drug paraphernalia. The wording in the ordinance is more restrictive (from the perspective of the prosecution) than the wording contained in the state statute prohibiting the sale of drug paraphernalia. Town Attorney Greg White has reviewed the proposed ordinance. Budget There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: Staff requests that the attached ordinance be favorably recommended for adoption. 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9.28 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, THE SAME RELATING TO DRUG PARAPHERNALIA WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to amend Chapter 9.28 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That Section 9.28.030 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park is amended to read as follows: Chapter 9.28.030 Sale unlawful. It is unlawful for any person to sell, deliver, possess with intent to sell or deliver, or manufacture with intent to sell or deliver equipment, products, or materials knowing, or under circumstances where one reasonably should know, that such equipment, products, or materials could be used as drug paraphernalia. Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2003, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of ,2003. Town Clerk Police Department ~ To: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Commander Gregg Filsinger Date: 07/17/03 Re: Amendment to Municipal Ordinance Background: The current Municipal Ordinance 9.18.010 Definitions defines skateboards as being 1, "a device propelled by human power. .... Motorized skateboards are now available and there are some that are locally owned. The current ordinance does not include a motorized skateboard in the definition and therefore it would appear that the current restrictions do not apply to the motorized skateboards. In addition to these, there are other wheeled devices that are becoming popular, i.e. the Segway transportation device. Our current Municipal Ordinances do not address these types of devices. Budget There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: Staff requests that the attached ordinances be favorably recommended for adoption. 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9.18 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK WITH REGARDS TO SKATEBOARDS, ROLLERBLADES, AND BICYCLES WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to amend certain sections of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. Section 9.18.010 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park is amended to read as follows: 9.18.010 Definitions. (d) Skateboard means a device propelled by human or motorized power upon which any person may ride, which is composed of one or more wheels, none of which exceeds four inches in diameter and upon which is mounted a flat board or surface designed to carry one or more persons. Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at the meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2003, and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado on the day of ,2003. Town Clerk Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Chairman Steven Gillette and Public Safety Committee Board Members From: Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Police Cc: Town Administrator Richard Wdmer Date: 7/17/2003 Re: Repeal Concealed Weapons Ordinance Backaround The 2003 Colorado Senate Session passed Senate Bill 24 in an attempt to standardize issuance of concealed weapons permits by law enforcement officials. This bill has rescinded munidpal police chiefs authority to issue concealed weapons to the public. The new law passed authorjzes only County Sheriffs to issue concealed weapons permits effective May 2003. BudgeUCost None Recommendation Staff recommends repealing the Town of Estes Park Carrying Concealed Weapon Ordinance Section 9.08.070 in its entirety. 1 . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 9.08.070 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, THE SAME RELATING TO CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITS WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado has determined that pursuant to recent legislation it is in the best interest of the Town to delete, in its entirety, Section 9.08.070 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That Section 9.08.070 of the Municipal Code is hereby repealed. Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2003, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 2003. Town Clerk Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Richard Widmer, Town Administrator From Lowell Richardson, Chief of Police CC: Greg White, Town Attorney Date: June 12, 2003 Re: 2003 Senate Bills 24 and 25; House Bill 1224 Please find attached a report prepared regarding recent law enacted at the State level concerning Carrying Concealed Weapons; Municipal Authority to Regulate Carrying Concealed Weapons; and Official Identifications. These new laws do affect procedural practices of the police department and will be adopted within the new policies currently under development. However, portions of these bills affect municipal advities as well. All town licensing procedures now require applicants to produce secure and verifiable identification before the issuance of a license can take place and local government no longer can control people carrying concealed weapons within our munidpal facilities. There are few exceptions to this rule which are addressed in-depth within this repolt. I am recommending these bills to be reviewed by Town Attorney White for legal interpretation and comment. Then I am recommending these bills are presented to the Public Safety Committee as a report at our July meeting. If you have any questions regarding these bills or the report please feel free to contact me at your convenience. 1 Executive Summary Proiected Impacts of Senate Bills 03-24.03-25 and House Bill 03-1224 On the Town of Estes Park & the Estes Park Police Degartment This document was prepared for Chief of Police Lowell Richardson regarding three new pieces of legislation that are likely to impact the Town of Estes Park and the Estes Park Police Department It can be anticipated that we may see an increase of concealed weapons in the Town limits. We can also predict officers may encounter more concealed weapons during official contacts with citizens. Additionally we may see some citizens wearing concealed weapons in places that we have not traditionally seen them and that some citizens will be alarmed should they incidentally see a concealed weapon. The municipal governments ability to regulate concealed weapons and the transportation of weapons within their jurisdictions have been effectively eliminated. Ali public buildings with the exception of schools and federal installations cannot ban concealed weapons. Premises that are licensed to dispense alcoholic beverages are now open to persons with concealed weapons. Owners of private buildings can implement rules banning weapons, however no state law mandates this. We must also prepare to make some changes within the Town government Specifically I suggest that the Town be prepared to implement the following changes: • Training o Police • Trained in new legislation requirements • Officers to temporarily disarm CCW (Carry Concealed Weapons) permit holders during official contacts • Vehicles in school parking lots may now legally contain a secured weapon m CCW holders are not allowed in school buildings or in specifically prohibited federal buildings • All other public buildings are accessible by CCW holders with weapons. m CCW holders are required to have permit and a photo ID with them anytime they are carrying a concealed weapon m CCW holders may be issued summons for class 1 petty offense for infraction of above requirement • Any citizen is allowed to conceal a weapon anywhere in their vehicle for protection • Officers must record any information from non-secure and non- verifiable identification documents • Persons without secure and verifiable documents may be fingerprinted and fingerprints are to be kept for 3 years o Any Town employee that accepts identification for licenses and/or permits • Business Licenses • Building Permits • Liquor License • Special Event Permits • Pet Licenses • New legislation requirements regarding secure and verifiable identification documents This document was prepared by CommanderMike van Deutekom/EPPD "Projected Impacts of Senate Bills 03-24/03-25 and House Bill 03-1224 on the Town of Estes Park & the Estes Park Police Department" Senate Bill 03-24 Effective Date: May 18, 2003 This bill attempts to standardize the issuance of concealed handgun permits by county Sheriffs. Historically the Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) stated that either a County Sheriff or the local Police Chief could issue a concealed weapons permit. The ability for local Police Chiefs to issue concealed weapons permits has effectively been eliminated. Though this new law authorizes a Sheriff to consult with the Police Chief of a municipality on citizens living within the Chiefs jurisdiction, it is not mandatory. There are some criteria that must be met by a permit applicant before a Sheriff may issue a permit including: • Applicant must be a legal Colorado resident • Must be minimum of21 years of age • Is not ineligible to possess a firearm pursuant to CRS 18-12-108 • No convictions of perjury • Does not chronically and habitually abuse alcohol 0 3 years of sobriety exception with a signed affidavit from a licensed alcohol counselor • Is not an unlawful abuser of or addicted to controlled substances • Is not subject to a restraining order at the time of application • Demonstrates competence with a handgun o Has a handgun training certificate from a certified instructor There are a few other exceptions dealing with retired law enforcement officers or officers from outside the state of Colorado. Handguns are also now authorized on school property, but only in the parking lot of a school. If a person exits the vehicle to enter the school, the weapon must be locked inside of a compartment within the vehicle, and the vehicle is required to be locked. A concealed handgun permit owner is not authorized however, to take a weapon into any of the school buildings. Permittees are also banned from carry a concealed weapon into any public facility that utilizes security personnel and electronic weapons screening equipment. This indicates that the Town ofEstes Park will need to review this portion of this law, as it appears that concealed weapons are allowable in the Town building unless we employ full-time security personnel and use screening equipment. This may further impact the Town, as there is no legal recourse to prevent employees from bringing a concealed handgun into the workplace. Currently neither the Town ordinances nor the Town policy manual restrict a concealed handgun. As an example, should the Town attempt to adopt a rule 1 under 9.02.050, Unlawful Conduct on Public Property, this would be considered unlawful by this new legislation. The only exception again appears to be the security personnel and electronic weapons screening exception mentioned above. Local liquor board or local ordinances that may restrict the possession of a concealed handgun in a liquor-licensed establishment also appear to be unenforceable. It is interesting to note that this new law deals strictly with public places and buildings. Private property and buildings may adopt any rule they see fit to regulate their property. For instance, if a bar owner places a sign at all of the entrances restricted concealed weapons, the permittee would be obligated to follow the rules or they could be legally barred from the premise. They can even request police assistance in this matter should a person refuse to comply or leave the premise. According to the Colorado Municipal League, there is the possibility that municipal judges "...may be able to ban concealed handguns under the separation of branches doctrine". This is not clear in the statute, and the Judge and Town Attorney should be contacted for an opinion in this matter. Another area that could be problematic for the Town ofEstes Park is ordinance 9.08.020 (4) that states, 'Not being a peace officer, displays a deadly weapon in a public place in a manner calculated to alarm a member of the public". If a citizen is alarmed because they see a concealed handgun and the permittee has not engaged in any specific threatening behavior, it is unlikely that police officers would be able to make an arrest. A person who is merely offended or alarmed because they are in a public area is not probable cause to make an arrest. Though it is true that this has always been the case in this type of scenario, it is likely that we could see an increase with these types ofcalls for service. Of special interest to the police department officers may arrest a person for carrying a concealed weapon i f they are not in possession o f their permit and a photo ID. They can be charged with a class 1 petty offense. Should an offender produce the permit and ID to the court at or prior to trial, the court shall dismiss the charge. Officers also have the ability to temporarily disarm any permit holder (18-12-214) (1) (b). Once the contact is terminated the officer is obliged to immediately return the weapon, assuming that the person had the required documents to legally carry a concealed handgun and is not arrested for any other criminal matter and is free to leave. Additionally officers may still arrest any person found to be under the influence of an intoxicating liquor or controlled substance and in possession of a handgun under 18-12- 106, Prohibited Use of Weapons. 2 Senate Bill 03-25 Effective date: March 18, 2003 This Senate bill restricts municipalities from adopting and enforcing any gun laws that are more restrictive than the state standard. Local governments may not restrict or regulate the sale, possession or transportation of handguns within their jurisdictions as long as state law permits the action. As an example, a handgun may now be possessed in a vehicle and may be kept in any area of the vehicle without any restrictions involving concealing the weapon. The state felt that this was an issue for the citizens of Colorado as different municipalities had adopted different standards from each other and the state, and that this placed the citizen in a precarious situation as it is unreasonable for the average person to know each local government's restrictions. Additionally local government is prohibited from creating or maintaining a database with information regarding who has purchased, exchanged, repairs or sells firearms. Information regarding the serial numbers ofweapons sold, exchanged, repaired or sold is also prohibited from being maintained in a database. Local governments may however "... enact an ordinance, regulation or other law that prohibits the open carrying of a firearm in a building or specific area within the local government's jurisdiction." In other words, the local government can restrict someone from openly carrying a weapon into it's building, however it mav not restrict a concealed weapons permit holder ftom entering the building (unless there are security personnel and the use ofelectronic weapons detection equipment. SB 03-24). House Bi1103-1224 Effective date: May 22,2003 This house bill deals with the subject of official identification, Specifically this bill prohibits municipalities from accepting identification cards that are not "secure and verifiable". A "secure and verifiable" document means a document "issued by a state or federal jurisdiction or recognized by the United States government and that is verifiable by federal or state law enforcement..." 3 Background information provided by the Colorado Municipal League indicates that the "matricula consular" card issued by the Mexican government is an example of a form of identification that is not a valid form of identification. This will affect the Town of Estes Park municipal operations as CRS 24-72.1-103, Identity documents-verifiable specifically states: (1) A public entity that provides services shall not accept, rely upon, or utilize an identification document to provide services unless it is a secure and verifiable document. (2) A public entity that is issuing an identification card, license, permit or official document shall not authorize acceptance of an identification document, nor shall a public official acting in an official capacity accept an identification document before issuing such documents, unless such identification document is a secure and verifiable document. The Town will need to develop and distribute guidelines on what identifications may be accepted when persons apply for a business license, a building permit, etc. Once the information from an applicant is taken, it is required to be retained for 3 years. Again, a policy outlining the storage of these applications for 3 years will need to be created. Police officers have some specific guidelines and duties as follows: o This article does not apply to a person reporting a crime o A pubic entity or official from accepting a crime report o While conducting a criminal investigation - o A peace officer in the performance ofthe officer's duties Additionally (1) "A peace officer in the performance of the officer's duties, utilizes identification that is not secure and verifiable shall not forfeit governmental immunity pursuant to this section if such officer: a. Gather all information from such identification; and b. If feasible, according to any applicable law enforcement agency guidelines, gathers fingerprint information from such person and stores such fingerprints for at least one year as a criminal record. The department should adopt a new practice of ensuring that officers gather all identification information from any non-secure/non-verifiable source and upon a physical arrest and transportation to the station, that the person be fingerprinted. We will also need to adopt a new practice of keeping all of the fingerprint cards gathered for this purpose to be stored in records for one year. 4 Police Department Policy Recommendations: I recommend the following: Records/CACP Standard 210.1-210.6 210.1 (A) 1 (c) i. Pursuant to CRS 27-72.1-101 Secure and Verifiable Identity Documents, all officers should attempt to gather identification from secure and verifiable documents, which is defined as: "...a document issued by a state or federal jurisdiction or recognized by the United States government and that is verifiable by federal or state law enforcement, intelligence, or homeland security agencies." ii. Should an officer discover that a person does not possess secure and verifiable identification documents, the officer is still obligated to take a crime report and/or conduct a criminal investigation for this person. iii. The officer shall gather all information from a non-secure/non-verifiable document for reporting purposes. If a person is arrested and produces non-secure/non-verifiable documents, that person will be fingerprinted and the records personnel will keep those fingerprints on file for at least one year. iv. All officers should be aware that any person "Uttering a forged document to peace officer shall create a presumption that the person intended to defraud such peace officer." CRS 18-5-102 (c). Forgery v. Should any citizen contact the department for a dog license, secure and - verifiable documents may only be accepted for the issuance of that pet license. If secure and verifiable documents are not available, no pet license may be issued without exception. No policy changes are recommended for the new concealed handgun laws. We, as an agency should incorporate new training in the CCW laws. Training should consist of classroom review of the new laws and we can include an officer safety component in regards to temporarily disarming CCW permit holders. This report was prepared by Commander Mike van Deutekom 06/10/03 5 Police Department Memo To: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Commander Gregg Filsinger Date: 7/17/2003 Re: Amendment to Municipal Code Background: A review of Municipal Code 7.12.080 revealed an incorrect reference to Title 17. The Code has been reviewed for further modification to provide uniformity with the Development Code, EVDC §13.3. The modification will permit a person to have up to three adult dogs before obtaining a Kennel License. Budget There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: Staff requests that the attached ordinance be favorably recommended for adoption. 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 7.12.080 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to amend certain sections of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That Section 7.12.080 Kennel restrictions shall be amended to read: It is unlawful for any person to keep or maintain a kennel for the keeping of dogs within the Town limits, except where kennels are permitted in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.3.129 of the Estes Valley Development Code. Section 2. That Section 7.12.080 Kennel restrictions shall be further amended to read: As used herein, kennel shall mean a commercial or noncommercial use with indoor and/or outdoor facilities for the keeping, breeding, boarding, or training of four (4) or more adult dogs, over the age of (3) months shall be kept. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF 2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk Larimer County Land Use Code livestock where the average number of livestock exceeds 10 animals per acre of feed yard and where less than 50% of the roughage type feed is raised on the same farm premises. 1. A non-conforming feed yard may include a Farmstead as described in Subsection 4.3.10 (Accessory Uses). 2. Feed yards established after the effective date of this Code require approval through the Special Review Process. Accessory dwellings must be included on the Site Plan submitted with the Special Review application. G. Boarding Stable. A facility for the care and feeding of more than 4 horses for a fee. H. Veterinary Clinic/Hospital. A facility for the diagnosis, treat- ment and hospitalization of animals. 1. Livestock Auction. A permanent facility where livestock are offered for sale to people who bid on animals. J. Kennel. A facility where 4 or more animals of the canine or feline family over 4 months old are kept, maintained, sheltered orboarded. 1. A single-family dwelling occupied by the owner or operator of the kennel is allowed as an accessory building to the kennel. K. Fur Farm. A facility where fur bearing animals are kept, raised and/or bred. 1. A single-family dwelling occupied by the owner or operator of the fur farm is allowed as an accessory building. L. Agricultural Labor Housing. A facility for the dormitory style housing of agricultural workers on a seasonal basis. M. Greenhouse. A facility where plants are raised inside a permanent structure constructed of rigid materials for sale or transplanting. 1. A single-family dwelling occupied by the owner or operator of the greenhouse is allowed as an accessory building. N. Packing Facility. A facility where locally-raised farm products are to be prepared for shipping, excluding meat packing and canning operations. 4.3.2 Residential Uses A Single-Family Dwelling. A structure designed, arranged or intended to be occupied by one living unit, containing a primary heat source and living facilities for sleeping, cooking, eating and sanitation. B. Duplex Dwelling. A structure designed, arranged or intended to be occupied by 2 separate occupants or living units, contain- ing a primary heat source and living facilities for sleeping, cooking, eating and sanitation. C. Multiple-Family Dwelling. A structure designed, arranged or intended to be occupied by 3 or more separate occupants or November 22, 1999 4-71 Message Page 1 of 3 Vickie O'Connor From: Alison Chilcott Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 9:34 AM To: Bonnie Wright CC: Vickie O'Connor; Greg White; Bob Joseph Subject: FW: Kennel Definition Bonnie, Here's a revised definition. Please include this in the packets rather than the one I emailed earlier today. Thanks. 119. Kennel shall mean a commercial or noncommercial use with indoor and/or outdoor facilities for the keeping, breeding, boarding or training of four (4) or more domesticated adult canine animals. i.e. four or more dogs over the age of three months. Alison -----Original Message----- From: Alison Chilcott Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:43 AM To: Bonnie Wright Cc: Bob Joseph; Vickie O'Connor Subject: RE: Kennel Definition Bonnie, Bob suggested taking the following definition to the Public Safety Committee and letting the committee decide whether to eliminate cats from the definition. 129. Kennel shall mean a commercial or noncommercial use with indoor and/or outdoor facilities for the keeping, breeding, boarding or training of four (4) or more domesticated adult canine or feline animals of the same genus, i.e. four dogs or cats over the age of three months. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Alison -----Original Message----- From: Alison Chilcott Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 3:51 PM To: Bonnie Wright Subject: FW: Kennel Definition Bonnie, Hi. I've proposed making some changes to the EVDC kennel definition based on comments from Jackie, Vickie, and Greg F. I emailed the changes to them and a few other people earlier today and am waiting for a response. When on Monday do I need to let you know what to change the definition to? 7/21/2003 , Message Page 2 of 3 Have a great weekend! Alison -----Original Message----- From: Vickie O'Connor Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:59 PM To: Alison Chilcott Subject: RE: Kennel Definition Okay: Public Safety is Thursday, July 24th at 7:30 a.m. and Bonnie will start packets Monday morning. Vickie O' Connor, Town Clerk (970) 577- 3702 (970) 586-2816 fax voconnor@estes.org www.estesnet.com -----Original Message----- From: Alison Chilcott Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:58 PM To: Vickie O'Connor Cc: Bob Joseph Subject: RE: Kennel Definition 1'11 forward this to Bob and talk to him about it. -----Original Message----- From: Vickie O'Connor Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:35 PM To: Alison Chilcott Subject: RE: Kennel Definition Alison, Greg White reviewed this Ordinance for Public Safety, and it reads: 7.12.080 Kennel restrictions shall be amended to read: It is unlawful for any person to keep or maintain a kennel for the keeping of dogs within the Town limits, except where kennel are permitted in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.3.129 of the Estes Valley Development Code. 7.12.080 Kennel restrictions shall be further amended to read: As used herein, kennel shall mean a commercial or noncommercial use with indoor and/or outdoor facilities for the keeping, breeding, boarding, or training of four (4) or more adult dogs, over the age of (3) months shall be kept. 7/21/2003 , Message Page 3 of 3 As I've mentioned, we don't license cats, and the Muni. Code addresses livestock, hogs, sheep, goats, cattle & horses, fowl and rabbits. The only reference to cats deals with waste removal. Mary' s intent is to increase the number of dogs allowed from 2 to 3; if we've issued a horse permit and the person owns 3 dogs, wouldn't the horse count in the mix by referencing "animals"? Vickie Vickie O' Connor, Town Clerk (970) 577- 3702 (970) 586-2816 fax voconnor@estes.org www.estesnet.com -----Original Message----- From: Alison Chilcott Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:47 AM To: Vickie O'Connor; Bob Joseph; Dave Shirk; Jackie Williamson; Gregg Filsinger; Mary Thacker Subject: Kennel Definition Below is a revised kennel definition based on comments from Jackie, Vickie, and Greg F. Please let me know if you have any comments or concerns. 129. Kennel shall mean a commercial or noncommercial use with indoor and/or outdoor facilities for the keeping, breeding, boarding or training of four (4) or more domesticated adult canine or feline animals of the same genus. i.e. four dogs or cats over the age of three months. Bob, Does this need to go back to Planning Commission for review? Or is this a minor enough change that additional Planning Commission review is not needed? Alison 7/21/2003 Message Page 1 of 3 Vickie O'Connor From: Alison Chilcott Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:43 AM To: Bonnie Wright CC: Bob Joseph; Vickie O'Connor Subject: RE: Kennel Definition Bonnie, Bob suggested taking the following definition to the Public Safety Committee and letting the committee decide whether to eliminate cats from the definition. 119. Kennel shall mean a commercial or noncommercial use with indoor and/or outdoor facilities for the keeping. breeding. boarding or training of four (4) or more domesticated adult canine or feline animals of the same genus. i.e. four dogs or cats over the age of three months. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Alison -----Original Message----- From: Alison Chilcott Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 3:51 PM To: Bonnie Wright Subject: FW: Kennel Definition Bonnie, Hi. I've proposed making some changes to the EVDC kennel definition based on comments from Jackie, Vickie, and Greg F. I emailed the changes to them and a few other people earlier today and am waiting for a response. When on Monday do I need to let you know what to change the definition to? Have a great weekend! Alison -----Original Message----- From: Vickie O'Connor Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:59 PM To: Alison Chilcott Subject: RE: Kennel Definition Okay: Public Safety is Thursday, July 24th at 7:30 a.m. and Bonnie will start packets Monday morning. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk (970) 577-3702 (970) 586-2816 fax 7/21/2003 Message Page 2 of 3 voconnor@estes.org www.estesnet.com -----Original Message----- From: Alison Chilcott Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:58 PM To: Vickie O'Connor Cc: Bob Joseph Subject: RE: Kennel Definition 1'11 forward this to Bob and talk to him about it. -----Original Message----- From: Vickie O'Connor Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:35 PM To: Alison Chilcott Subject: RE: Kennel Definition Alison, Greg White reviewed this Ordinance for Public Safety, and it reads: 7.12.080 Kennel restrictions shall be amended to read: It is unlawful for any person to keep or maintain a kennel for the keeping of dogs within the Town limits, except where kennel are permitted in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.3.129 of the Estes Valley Development Code. 7.12.080 Kennel restrictions shall be further amended to read: As used herein, kennel shall mean a commercial or noncommercial use with indoor and/or outdoor facilities for the keeping, breeding, boarding, or training of four (4) or more adult dogs, over the age of (3) months shall be kept. As I've mentioned, we don't license cats, and the Muni. Code addresses livestock, hogs, sheep, goats, cattle & horses, fowl and rabbits. The only reference to cats deals with waste removal. Mary's intent is to increase the number of dogs allowed from 2 to 3; if we've issued a horse permit and the person owns 3 dogs, wouldn't the horse count in the mix by referencing "animals"? Vickie Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk (970) 577- 3702 (970) 586-2816 fax voconnor@estes.org 7/21/2003 Message Page 3 of 3 www.estesnet.com -----Original Message----- From: Alison Chilcott Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:47 AM To: Vickie O'Connor; Bob Joseph; Dave Shirk; Jackie Williamson; Gregg Filsinger; Mary Thacker Subject: Kennel Definition Below is a revised kennel definition based on comments from Jackie, Vickie, and Greg F. Please let me know if you have any comments or concerns. 129. Kennel shall mean a commercial or noncommercial use with indoor and/or outdoor facilities for the keeping, breeding, boarding or training of four (41 or more domesticated adult canine or feline animals of the same genus. i.e. four dogs or cats over the age of three months. Bob, Does this need to go back to Planning Commission for review? Or is this a minor enough change that additional Planning Commission review is not needed? Alison 7/21/2003 Memo To: Chairman Stephen Gillette a~ Public Safety Committee Board Members From: Lowell C. Richardson,0*~ Date: 07/22/03 U Re: LETA Surcharges Background: The Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority set the monthly access facility charge (9-1-1 fee) for telephone exchange and wireless communication at $.45 a month per phone for January 2004. A prepared resolution by the LETA Board is presented for adoption by the Town Trustees at the next available board meeting. These fund all 9-1-1 expenses required to operate the communication's center, computers, software and training of dispatchers. Budget There are no budget implications for this request. Action: Since this is not an increase or decrease, it is recommended to approve the presented service fee of $.45 a month. 1 Frey, Korb, Haggerty & Mickaels, P.C. Attorneys at Law John P. Frey 318 Canyon Avenue, Suite 200 P.O. Box 2283 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-2283 Telephone (970) 493-8622 Fax (970) 493-1218 E-mail jfrey@fkhmlaw.com July 10, 2003 '10~I JUL 1 8 2003 ||~ ~| Ms. Vickie O'Connor, CMC Town Clerk Town of Estes Park P. O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Vickie: Re: Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority (LETA) Enclosed is a copy of a Resolution of Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority concerning action taken by the LETA Board on July 2,2003, approving a telephone exchange access facility charge and a wireless communications access charge effective January 1, 2004, each at the rate of $.45 per month. We have taken the liberty of preparing the enclosed Resolution for adoption by the Town's Board o f Trustees. Please review the Resolution and if you find it acceptable please place it before the Board of Trustees for adoption and provide us with a copy of the adopted resolution no later than August 25,2003. Should you have any questions concerning the Resolution or any other matters involving the Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority, you should feel free to contact our office or one of the Town's representatives on the LETA Board: Tim Gaines or Lowell Richardson. Very trul~Yours, ~,,~0~,~AGGERTY & MICHAELS, P.C. 0ohn ¥ Frey Attortey for(jlarimer Emergency Telephone Authority jk enclosures cc Ms. Debbie Tellez, LETA Administrative Assistant RESOLUTION OF LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY BEING A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TELEPHONE EXCHANGE ACCESS FACILITY CHARGE AND A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS ACCESS CHARGE FOR THE LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2004. WHEREAS, the Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority (LETA) was created pursuant to Section 29-11-101, et seq., C.R.S., by an Intergovernmental Agreement Concerning the Implementation of an E-911 Emergency Telephone Service dated November 14, 1990, between certain governmental entities located in Larimer County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid statutory authority, Larimer County, Colorado, and the incorporated municipalities which are signatories to the aforesaid Intergovernmental Agreement are empowered to annually establish a telephone access facility charge and a wireless communications access charge for the Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority; and WHEREAS, by the terms of this Resolution, the Board of Directors of Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority desires to recommend to the County of Larimer and the participating municipalities that the telephone exchange access facility charge and the wireless communications access charge remain unchanged for the calendar year 2004; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS: 1. That. it is recommended that effective January 1, 2004, the County of Larimer and the participating municipalities reestablish the telephone exchange access facility charge and the wireless communications access charge at forty-five cents ($.45) per month per exchange access facility or pet wireless communications access. 2. That copies of this Resolution be transmitted to the County of Larimer and the participating municipalities with the request that the charges set forth herein be promptly adopted. 3. That upon the establishment or reestablishment of charges by the County of Larimer and the participating municipalities, the Administrative Assistant for the Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority, or her designee, shall forthwith notify all telephone service suppliers affected thereby of the establishment or reestablishment of these charges effective January 1,2004. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted the el day of Juli , 2003. LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY BY *43/L Randy Lesher Chairman of the Board of Directors A~~EST: t<. A- LUVU' - Ron Uthmann, Secretary 2 RESOLUTION NO. BEING A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A TELEPHONE EXCHANGE ACCESS FACILITY CHARGE AND A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS ACCESS CHARGE FOR THE LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2004. WHEREAS, the Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority was created pursuant to § 29-11-101, et seq., C.R.S., by an Intergovernmental Agreement Concerning the Implementation of an "E911" Emergency Telephone Service, dated November 14, 1990, between certain governmental entities located in Larimer County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid statutory authority and by resolution of the Town of Estes Park on May 8, 1990, and Ordinance No. 4-98 properly adopted by the Board ofTrustees on February 10, 1998, the Board of Trustees is authorized to raise, lower, or reestablish a telephone exchange access facility charge and a wireless communications access charge to be assessed telephone (wireline and wireless) service users in the Town of Estes Park; and WHEREAS, the Board ofTrustees deems that reestablishing the telephone exchange access facility charge at the rate of forty-five cents ($.45) per month and the wireless communications access charge at the rate of forty-five cents ($.45) per month is necessary and appropriate to adequately fund emergency telephone services in the Town of Estes Park; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: 1. Commencing on January 1,2004, the telephone exchange access facility charge and the wireless communications access charge shall each be reestablished at forty-five cents ($.45) per month per exchange access facility or per wireless cornmunications access. 2. Telephone service suppliers providing telephone service in the Town of Estes Park are authorized to collect the telephone exchange access facility charge in accordance with § 29-11-101, et seq., C.R.S. 3. Wireless telephone service suppliers providing wireless telephone service in the Town of Estes Park are authorized to collect the wireless communications access charge in accordance with § 29-11-100.5, et seq., C.R.S. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted this day of , 2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk c>yyzey@2302900000 322 32 0 22 0 #2 0 03 0 888:Ag°22°5:°° 88°°°&888 C) 01 ~ CONDOONO-00 - - OOON•-CD 10 - •r- W N 9 M Q ;; r- ~ M O LO •¢ p --00 -CD - D LD M ON- 000006100-0-00 0000000000 C) N 9· (9 W (9 - 000(0 9 1- - •- O 0 - (D •- u 10 - (9 0,1 - 5 2 2 3 0 0 3% 2 0 0 8 0 2 2 69 3* 25 2% 31 3< 1< 1% 3~ ec.COCCCOO-OCCO CM {9 00(9 gage - O - a -U#L "fr . ·-- r.· 0 0 i£ 0 ·7 04 0 0 ,- 0 0 =· -· C C (·f; C 9* Cl C J> - 1 0 (D * C GO K (0 00 in •- , r el .·- 0 -¢ 0 9 tO' C 2 - A •- COCOOCCCOOCCO 0000000000 O,- U O £ 03 2 00 CO (9 CO LD - -*reD-C·70700 7 - 32 0 3€ 0 0 ze Be ze y 0 3€ 0 0 5 0 0 0 32 0 32 2 22 32 22 g888RRIOOAO;g882000°A8888 Ng-(DN•-0009·09(Nnt)(9000010©01.r)cr)(9 9- 539AO'(9~!rYS N a> SC'(NNN---M°°10'90' 8 000000000000000000000000 0 gV A (NCD 9 r " EN C) 9(N )(NeN -r-- ~00 Lf) CDCD & 2 W 111 J U) 1¥61»t 29 221 8 95%0% g »9 5 WS -1 25>tut y |21-2 miz ihi20=~<5& E *8 o g zizoz~nom le B%&2%*BREW E ig %§ 0 21 t-- /-12@%@,223@ENE "§& RE -lulu)Q- iL 21000 1-0 Out 00 40=25=U}HU.U.< 2 4 O u. . 0 0 . %00 SNOLLV-10!A NOd¥BM Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rat 2003 2002 2001 2nd Qrtr NIB S Cri me Summary-Grp A pril - June 2003,2002,2001 OJOM 9.841 'eJOBJ@41 'LOOZ pue 0002 Joilslxe JOU P.!P Uolies!#!ssels s!41 - SAULT ASSAULT OFFENSES RUG/NARCOT C OFFENSE 10IA lNEWdl rLESETPCAERT~/~SMWi E Col 51¥101 aN¥80 MPLE ASSA vodai 01 wequ,nu ou 2nd Quarter NIBRS Crime Summary Group B April-June 2003, 2002, 2001 OFFENSE CHARGED 2003 2002 2001 90A - BAD CHECKS 0 1 0 908 - CURFEW/LOITERINGNAGRANCY VIOLS 0 0 0 90C - DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1 4 0 90D - DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 9 13 10 90E-DRUNKENNESS 1 1 3 90F - FAMILY OFFENSES, NONVIOLENT 0 0 0 90G - LIQUOR LAW VIOLATIONS 11 15 27 90H - PEEPING TOM 0 0 0 901 - RUNAWAY 2 6 2 90J - TRESPASS OF REAL PROPERTY 0 3 0 90Z - ALL OTHER OFFENSES 8 9 10 2003 TOTAL ARRESTEES: 32 TOTAL ADULTS: 20 TOTAL JUVENILES: 12 TOTAL JUVENILES HANDLED: 6 TOTAL JUVENILES REFERRED: 6 - STOLEN RECOVERED PROPERTY REPORT APR - JUNE 2003 PROPERTY CODE BURNED CNTRFT DAMAGE[ ECOVERE SEIZED STOLEN ALCOHOL 45 45 AUTOS 5380 15000 75000 BICYCLES 50 450 450 CLOTHES 180 CONSUMABLEGOODS 97 DRUG EQUIPMENT I 12 HOUSEHOLD GOODS 7686 JEWELRY 1260 MERCHANDISE 175 325 MONEY 20 4187 NEGOTBLINSTMNTS 200 OFFICE EQUIPMENT OTHER VEHICLES PURSES 30 110 RADIOS/TVs 20 RECORDINGS 5339 6485 STRUCTURE/SINGLE 200 STRUC/OTH DWELLG 200 STRUC PUBLIC I 4550 STRUC/COMMERCIAL STRUC/OTHER 210 TOOLS I 2070 TRUCKS VEHICLE PARTS 100 5 5 OTHER GRAND TOTAL 200 13342 20995 27 108257 4 -,4 Estes Park Police Department Memo To: Chief Richardson From: Commander van Deutekom Date. 7/23/2003 Re: CSO Update Please find below the information that I have recorded reference the CSO program as of today, July 23, 2003. Telephone Complaints: Date 2 Downtown Merchants Memorial Day Weekend 1 Local Resident Memorial Day Weekend 2 Local Residents June 2 Local Residents July (to date) Total: 7 telephone complaints Letter to the Editor Complaints: 1 Local Resident 1Group Complaint Julv 4,2003 Trail Gazette Total: 2 Letters to the Editor Complaint Letters Received: 1 Local Resident July 5,2003 1 Downtown Employees x10 July 8,2003 Total: 2 Complaint Letters • Page 1 61.'. I . Parking Ticket Complaints: 2 Letters 4 Written comments on parking ticket envelope Parking Tickets Issued/Voided 344 Tickets issued through July 20,2003 49 Tickets VOIDED = 14% of tickets voided YTD Approximately $2950.00 worth of tickets written YTD YTD Bike Warnings: 157 YTD Rollerblade/Skateboard Warnings 58 YTD MVA's 9 YTD Cold Reports 14 YTD Citizen Assists 158 YTD Merchant Visits 812 • Page 2 MEMORANDUM To: Public Safety Committee Fronn: Fire Chief Scott Dorman _Ab I)ate: July 18, 2003 Subject: Dive Boat Donation Background: The Fire Department has been using a 14ft Zodiac dive boat with trailer for swift water and still water rescues and recoveries. The Larimer County Dive Rescue Team donated this boat and trailer to the EPVFD. This equipment has served the dive team well for many years, although the boat does have some leaks. Recently, the EPVFD received a newer 16 ft Zodiac dive boat with trailer and 40 HP Yamaha outboard motor from Platte River Power Authority. With the acquisition of this newer equipment we have no need for the current equipment, which is taking up needed space at the fire station. Additionally, this equipment has a history of being donated from agency to agency. Thompson Valley Ambulance Service currently needs a dive boat and is interested in this equipment. This is one ofthe agencies that the EPVFD's dive team is likely to work with on mutual aid calls. Budget: No budget impact Recommendation: Keeping with tradition the Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department recommends donating the 14 ft Zodiac dive boat with trailer and the 15 HP Mariner outboard motor to the Thompson Valley Ambulance Service. MEMORANDUM To: Public Safety Committee From: Fire Chief Scott Dorman -+YA Date: July 18, 2003 Subject: Haz Mat truck Donation Background: The Fire Department has been using a 1980 Ford LN 7000 for it's Hazardous Materials response vehicle. The Kodak Corporation donated this vehicle to the Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department. Although this truck was our emergency response vehicle for hazardous materials incidents, working out of this vehicle has proven to be very difficult. Our new rescue truck is now in service thus moving our old Rescue truck into the role of our hazardous materials response vehicle. The old rescue truck is more conducive to this task and should give many years of service. The American Red Cross has been proving services to the residents of Estes Park and Larimer County for many years. In order to provide these services they must have a storage area for shelter supplies, i.e. sleeping cots, bedding. They have been storing these supplies at the Lake Estes Power Plant, but due to homeland security issues they must find a new location to store their supplies. Budget: No budget impact Recommendation: Keeping with tradition the Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department recommends donating the 1980 Ford LN 7000 to the American Red Cross. They would be able to use this as a mobile storage facility for faster response to our area as well as other areas in Larimer County. I I ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2003-SECOND QUARTER INCIDENT RUN REPORTS Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) , Alarm Date Between {04/01/2003} And {06/30/2003} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 1 Fire 100 Fire, Other 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 111 Building fire 2 2.12% $275,000 78.19 % 113 Cooking fire, confined to container 2 2.12% $0 0.00 % 116 Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 131 Passenger vehicle fire 1 1.06% $0 0.00 0 1401 Unattended Campfire , 2 2.12% $0 0.00 % 141 Forest, woods or wildland fire 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 154 Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle 1 1.06% $200 0.05 % 11 11.70% $275,200 78.24 % 3 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 300 Rescue, emergency medical (EMS) call, Other 2 2.12% $0 0-00 % 311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 18 19.14% $0 0.00 % 321 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with 1 1.06% 40 0.00 % 322 Vehicle accident with injuries 8 8.51% $49,500 14.07 9 342 Search for person in water 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 355 Confined space rescue 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 371 Electrocution or potential electrocution 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 32 34.04% $49,500 14..07 % 4 Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 2 2.12% $0 0.00 % 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 4 4.25% $0 0.00 % 413 Oil or other combustible liquid spill 2 2.12% $0 0.00 % 421 Chemical hazard (no spill or leak) 1 1.06% 40 0.00 % 440 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, Other 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 443 Light ballast breakdown 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 463 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 6 6.38% $27,000 7.67 % 17 18.08% $27,000 7.67 % 5 Service Call 510 Person in distress, Other 2 2.12% $0 0.00 9 520 Water problem, Other 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 4 4.25% $0 0.00 % 6 Good Intent Call 07/17/2003 13:54 Page 1 Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Incident Type Report (Summary) Alarm Date Between {04/01/2003} And {06/30/2003} Pct of Total Pct of Incident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses 6 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, Other 3 3.19% $0 0.00 % 611 Dispatched & canceled en route 6 6.38% $0 0.00 % 650 Steam, Other gas mistaken for smoke, Other 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 2 2.12% $0 0.00 % 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 653 Barbecue, tar kettle 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 6531 Campfire 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 15 15.95% $0 0.00 % 7 False Alarm & False Call 700 False alarm or false call, Other 3 3.19% $0 0.00 % 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire - 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 744 Detector activation, no fire - 2 2.12% $0 0.00 % 745 Alarm system sounded, no fire - 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 8 8.51% $0 0.00 % 8 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 812 Flood assessment 2 2.12% $0 0.00 % 814 Lightning strike (no fire) 1 1.06% $0 0.00 % 3 3.19% $0 0.00 % 9 Special incident type 900 Special type of incident, Other 4 4.25% $0 0.00 % 4 4.25% $0 0.00 % Total Incident Count: 94 Total Est Loss: $351,700 07/17/2003 13:54 Page 2 L i _- * r--th·- 1-*t 1-:';L 6 €€- -:. - -h>34~ 2,-Lf-L 9- F yll J- 2 '11 /9- P 4. I !13 T 1 1.71- i -In-9.-tri J. -- 1117 N --E 11- i¢ 1?1 -- 1 -.-1-4*9 4 -0*1 -9-41 7 -1*1 111-3 I . 4 00 -- 1.-' - yel 1- /.t. af!=1 0 sluappul SIAI3 9 enosah! 1 (eJ!=1 ON) suompuoo snoplezeH O neo asie:19 uueiv esle:10 ,}ses!0 lenieN ¥ J041eaAA JaAes I ZE O Service Call 1]Prh In arIA *rl clip, in larli i intl . u, I uw lieD Jualul Poog m ed*i juappu! 18!oeds ¤ 11 4RIT,21·4441 1 11.,IL.,1.1,~4 -Jit 1 t., Ut@&'iu- .'.$./ 1 .«37*24.1 1 ./.9.. 1 ~44.1.1 Z 1 ·;2';'12/ k,ii¢ i . r. ~:*f~;j 'D.' / 6 . 1499 ' ,»40 F Urc 4111 >'4421.1 3 Al' 1 -¥¥Vr'141~!S; 1 - .-L- 11' 1~,1,811&; 1 -1. 1 F##*kkek.%:t? t: 1 0 i.e. wl•r..r-a/22'U./.0 :462·1·¢:6..·?r'0*libm 0 NO CO O 4- NO •Ir- •r- sleo JoiaquunN O Within City Limits I Outside City Limits ~;~ul 9 :27# C'32 luej~~~ooS IIeO 0,1Nes snol)jiteH 19 2003 SECOND QUARTER - within / outside city limits 20 Disaster 18 16 siwo Jo adAl Cal!=10% Sluappul 14 ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2003-YEAR TO DATE INCIDENT RUN REPORTS (01/ 01/ 2003) - (06 /30/ 2003) 0 , 11 4,11.4510 [2* F.~%43% 219%#- rEFETbt>%301 . ., 1. .1 -1 3, :44* l cg 11·:.40"A I--BR=--i---2:..6-I'.3./ 4- h. . IO- 14*.:lt;3.4.;·>i>t'lf)):1}':~20..ist*6~f.~r.ZORek«u..tiqi·u·~ ~ ·t.. . 1 . '......t ..2 ·'~~~~ 'tn·~':01-Ef;.: 016 1 '96«44 0 00 Fir'24.'ti'!'. 9.·~ ..i·'·2 ' Q. tibc:hy.,:-7-'' , 8 :E I 5Lb.4:1.:4.6~1'*LRiir¢i@-:fii?-tic ;3).:~ 1·:ttit ~*~Ifff* 5 ui 1 f:.': f:~: p f:.:;M*i g g LO O to o sleo Jo JequlnN Within City Limits i Outside City Limits lepads J.Aes ed*; lueppu! 9 JellweAA :LAYSS:rep Jual:ipo O 1180 00!Ales snoilleze 2003 YEAR TO DATE - within /outside city limits 1:~a~er lieo Jo ed*l Sluappul il„ 4 1 -TI l·I £ ,' - 5 ~; 93 -9324 -'- 9-t¢/ -ir:?r?Fick - - i#* ! 3,203-23-39.6 V*,14.-&4-. . 2 - -11-riJ'I -1, P--I#Kifi I - E r=1 - 11 1 PIA 0 4- 1 11 1 1 Cl , 0 - ~~·F 1. 1 ''r I 1 6 1 1-1 -: 111 Ill - L r 0'.212'In 2003 YEAR TO DATE- number of calls by type of call O Fire I Rescue & EMS Incidents 38 61 O Hazardous Conditions (No Fire) O Service Call 1180 lualll' POOD. 1190 esle:119 ulleiv asle:1 ¤ Je}SeS!O lenleN 9 J041eOM JaAes m adhi juappu! lepeds o ,*f.>P·.1 17 I . LEGAL NOTICE BAN ON OPEN BURNING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF ESTES PARK Revised: July 22,2003 In response to the very high fire danger in the area and the continuing drought conditions, and pursuant to Municipal Code Section 8.04.075, Fire Chief Dorman is hereby issuing a ban on open burning within the city limits of Estes Park dated July 21, 2003. This ban shall apply to all open fires, including the following: 1. Building, maintaining, attending or using fire for slash burning, campfires, recreational fires or educational fires. 2. Use of all fireworks including approved fireworks (i.e. sparklers, fountains). 3. Smoking on public property, except within an enclosed vehicle or building, or an area at least three feet in diameter that is barren or cleared of all flammable material. 4. Welding or operating acetylene or other torch with an open flame on outdoor property unless the area is clear of all flammable materials. Exceptions shall include: campfires or charcoal fires in approved developed campsites or picnic grounds with permanently constructed stationary masonry or metal fireplaces or grills specifically designed for the purpose of combustion, LPG or natural gas fired portable grills, other petroleum-fueled stoves, lanterns or heating devices, flares used by Public Safety agencies to warn the public of danger, training fires used by Public Safety agencies, or persons with a permit for such actions. This ban shall be effective from 12:00 Noon, July 21, 2003 until otherwise lifted or changed by the Fire Chief or his designee. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Legal Notice: Publish Friday, July 25,2003 MEMORANDUM To: Vickie O'Conner, Town Clerk CC: Rich Widmer, Town Administrator; Lowell Richardson, Chief of Police From: Fire Chief Scott Dorman Date: July 21,2003 Subject: Open Burning Ban In response to the very high fire danger in our area and the continuing drought conditions, per Municipal Code Section 8.04.075, I hereby issue a ban on open burning within the city limits of Estes Park. This ban shall apply to all open fires including the following: 1. Building, maintaining, attending or using fire for slash burning, campfire, recreational fires or educational fires. 2. Use of all fireworks including approved fireworks (i.e. sparklers, fountains). 3. Smoking on public property, except within an enclosed vehicle or building or an area at least three feet in diameter that is barren or cleared of all flammable material. 4. Welding or operating acetylene or other torch with an open flame on outdoor property unless the area is clear of all flammable materials. Exceptions shall include: campfires in approved developed campsites or picnic grounds with permanently constructed stationary masonry or metal fireplaces specifically designed for the purpose of combustion , LPG or natural gas fired grills, other petroleum-fueled stoves, lanterns or heating devices, flares used by Public Safety agencies to warn the public of danger, training fires used by Public Safety agencies or persons with a permit for such actions. This ban shall be effective from 12:00 Noon, July 21, 2003 until otherwise lifted or changed by the Fire Chief or his designee. 07/21/2 10 19:37 FAX 9705770923 ESTES PARK FIRE DEPT 0001 Courcy-wide Ban on Open Fires and Fireworks Page l of l *. . Countywide Ban on Open Fires and Fireworks The Board of Larimer County Commissioners have imposed a counlywide ban on open fires and fireworks through September 1, 2003. Open fires include any open burning, including camp and cooking fires; welding, or operamlg a torch with an open :1:rre. Oren fircs do not include: 1. Fires in camp sloves or grills, fueled by bottled gas or pressurized liquid, and specifically designed for cooking or heating purposes. 2. Fires in permanently constructed stationary masomy or metal fireplaces specifically designed for the purpose of combustion. 3. Fires in large commercially operated wood and/or charcoal fired grills designed for cooking. The resolution means IT IS OKAY to have contained fires in the permanent grates in campgrounds such as those at lork ooth Reservoir and Carter Lake and to cook or heat with bottled gas or pressurized liquid fuel in containers meant Tor tt ruipose. irc.(,k-ng orimide a vehicle or building is also restricted. Open fires also include the burning of Mgation ditches except for those complerely surrounded by irrigated farmIands where such burning is necessary for crop survival and specific written approval has been granted in advance by the Sheriff of Larimer County. The resolution authorizes the Larimer Count f Sheriffto exempt any open fire approved by the Sheriff after a prior complete inspection Firlip orks mean any article, device, or substance prepared for the primary purpose of producing a visual or auditory sensadon by combustion, explosion, or detonation. Fireworks do not include: Toy caps; highway flares and other emergency signal devices; educational rockets; and fireworks used for research. An> p:rson who knowingly violates the open fire and fireworks ban commits a class 2 petty offense and upon conviction vilb: fned not more than one thousand dollars for each separate offense. There is a graduated fine schedule that can be astesr:d and includes $100 dollars for the first offense:$250 dollars for the second offense within sixty days ofthe first offense; $500 dollars for each additional offense within sixty days ofthe first offense. In addition persons convicted of a violation ofthis Ordinance are subject to a surcharge often dollars. Comr lete Countv Policv 22927. Oak-Sm=P Fort Collins. CO 8052 I • 970-498-7000 Il © 1995-2003. L.arimer County b.ttpy/,pmrw.larimer.org/hot/fireban.htm 7/21/2003