The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Safety 2003-01-22t.. .t" TOWN OF ESTES PARK Â£ , *t - PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA January 22,2003 4:00 P.M. *Revision Date: January 21,2003 2: 15 p.m. POLICE DEPARTMENT Action 1. Contract for Services - Estes Valley Victim Advocates - Approval Requested 2. Proposed Amendment to the Model Traffic Code (Jake Brakes) - Approval Requested 3. L.E.T.A. M.O.U.'s - Approval Requested *4. E.P.P.D. Contract with Animal Medical Center - Approval Requested Reports 1. N.I.B.R.S. 2002 Reports - Please See Attachments 2. Riverwalk Plaza Statistics - Chief Richardson 3. Estes Valley Victim Advocates Annual Report - E.V.V.A. Director Mary Mesropian & Board President Frank Shavlik *4. Dispatch Commendation (postponed until the next Public Safety Meeting) *5. Mark Swallow Master Police Officer Promotion - Chief Richardson FIRE DEPARTMENT Action 1. None Reports 1. Year End Summary Report 2. Larimer County Fire Council Sub-Committee - Fire Education 3. Integrated Emergency Management Course 4. Fire Academy 5. E.P.V.F.D. new N.F.P.A. Compliant Uniforms "NOTE: The Board of Trustees (or Public Safety Committee) reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared." '. A f.. T 'I . CONTRACT FOR SERVICES TOWN OF ESTES PARK THIS CONTRACT, dated this day of , 2003, is by and between the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, STATE OF COLORADO, 170 MacGregor Ave., Estes Park, CO, a body politic and corporate (the "Town'), and ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES, INC. ("Contractor".) RECITALS WHEREAS, the Town plans to continue a project entitled, "ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES, INC.," and WHEREAS, the Town desires to retain the services of the Contractor to assist it in studies relative thereto and the planning and designing thereof as set forth in this agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, and for other good and valuable considerations, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Town and the Contractor agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: the "Contract Documents" shall consist of the following: a. This Contract; b. The Scope of Services, attached hereto as Exhibit "A." All of which are incorporated by reference as though set forth in full herein, whether or not attached hereto, and shall form an integral part of this contract. If there is any conflict between this Contract and the other Contract Documents, this Contract shall control. 2. THE WORK: The Contractor shall furnish the labor, equipment, materials and supervision necessary for or incident to the complete and timely performance of everything described or reasonably implied from the Contract Documents (the "Work") except as provided for herein. 3. INSPECTION: The Town reserves the right to monitor and evaluate the progress and performance of the Contractor to ensure that the terms of this agreement are being satisfactorily met in accordance with the Town and other applicable monitoring and evaluation criteria and standards. Contractor shall cooperate with Town relating to such monitoring and evaluation. 4. PAYMENT: Upon satisfactory completion of the Work; and provided that Contractor is not in default of the Contract, the Tojvn shall pay the Contractor the firm fixed price of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS . 6 - I . AND 00/00 ($5,000) in quarterly fund distribution on or about January 2003, April 2003, July 2003 r '1, 1 ' <Â· #Ad October 2003, in equal increment payments of $1,250. 5. TERMINATION: The Town reserves the right to terminate this Contract in whole or in part, with or without cause upon thirty (30) days written notice to the Contractor. In the event of termination, the Contractor shall incur no additional expenses and shall perform no further services for the Town under this Contract as of the date of -receipt of the notice of termination unless otherwise specified by the Town. The Town shall pay the Contractor for all services satisfactorily performed prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for other services required by the Town to be completed prior to termination and satisfactorily performed. In the event of termination for cause, the Contractor shall be liable for any and all damages, including without limitations, the cost of procuring similar supplies or services and all other costs and expenses incurred by the Town because of such failure. 6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS, PAYMENT OF TAXES AND UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE: In performing the Work, the Contractor acts as an independent contractor and is not acting as an agent, servant or employee of the Town. The Contractor is solely responsible for necessary and adequate worker's compensation insurance and shall be responsible for withholding and paving ali federal and state taxes. The Contractor and its employees are not entitled to unemployment insurance benefits unless unemployment compensation coverage is provided bv the Contractor or an entity other than the Town. The Contractor understands and agrees that it is an independent contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As such, the Contractor is not entitled to emplovment or insurance benefits through the Town. Also, the Contractor understands and agrees that it is solely responsible for ali Federal and State income tax, FICA taxes and unemployment insurance taxes. The Contractor also understands and agrees that it is responsible for workers' compensation coverage and taxes for itself and anv employee. 7. INDEMNIFICATION: The Contractor hereby agrees to and does indemnify, defend, save and hold the Town harmless from any and all liability, loss, costs, charges, penalties, obligations, expenses, attorney's fees, litigation, judgments, damages, claims and demands of any kind whatsoever in connection with, arising out of or by any reason of any violation of the contract or of any law, ordinance or regulation by the Contractor, his agents, employees, servants, subcontractors, business invitees; or by reason of any injury or damage however occurring to any person or persons whomever (including the Contractor, his agents, employees, servants, subcontractors, or business invitees) or to property of any kind whatsoever and to whomever belonging (including the Contractor, his agents, employees, servants, subcontractors or business invitees)- or from any cause or causes whatsoever arising out of the performance of services hereunder. . . 8. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS: f ''1 1 I: Â· 1 a. The Contractor and its subcontractors shall purchase and maintain such insurance in a company or companies licensed to do business in the State of Colorado as will protect them from claims which may arise out of or result from operations under the Contract whether such operations be by themselves or by any Subcontractor or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. The insurance required by this Contract is set forth below: b. Comprehensive General Liabilitv: The Contractor shall procure and keep in force during the duration of this contract a policy of Comprehensive General Liability insurance-insuring the Contractor and naming the Town as an additional insured against any liability for personal injury, bodily injury, or death arising out of the performance of services hereunder and against liability for property damage with a combined single limit of at least $1,000,000. The limits of said insurance shall not be a limit to the liability of the Contractor hereunder. c. Comprehensive Automobile Liability: The Contractor shall procure and keep in force during the duration of this contract a policy of Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance, insuring the Contractor and naming the Town as an additional insured against any liability for personal injury, bodily injury, or death arising from the use of motor vehicles and shall cover operations on or off the site of all vehicles controlled by the Contractor, whether they are owned, non-owned, or hired, with a combined single limit of at least $1,000,000. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, be a limit to the liability of Contractor hereunder. d. Other Insurance: The Contractor shall procure and keep in force during the term of this Contract, Worker's Compensation and such other insurance as may be required by any applicable law, ordinance or governmental regulation. If the Contractor is not required to carry Worker's Compensation, the Artist may sign a waiver to this effect. e. Terms of Insurance: Insurance required shall be with companies qualified to do business in the State of Colorado with a general policy holder's financial rating of not less than that of "A" as set forth in the most current edition of "Best's Insurance Reports", and may provide for deductible amounts as the Contractor may deem to be reasonable for completion of the Work, but in no case greater than $20,000. The Contractor shall not do nor permit to be done anything which shall invalidate the insurance policies referred to in this section, and the Contractor shalI immediately advise the Town in writing if a reduction in coverage or other modification of the insurance coverage occurs. Insurance policies shall be for the mutual and joint benefit and protection of the Contractor and the Town. Such policies shall be written as primary policies not contributing to and not in excess of coverage which the Town must carry. f. Proof of Insurance: Prior to the commencement of the Work, the Contractor shall furnish to the Town certificates of insurance policies evidencing the required coverage. Such certificates shall provide that cancellation of the policies in such insurance shall not be effective until thirty (30) days after written notice to the Town. The Contractor shall identify whether the type of coverage is "occurrence" or "claims made". If the type of coverage is "claims made" which at renewal, Contractor changes to "occurrence", Contractor shall carry a six-month tail. The Contractor agrees to insert the substance of these insurance requirements in all subcontracts. Furthermore, the Town will hold the Contractor responsible in the event the subcontractor fails to have adequate insurance. .. . , g. The Town reserves the right to approve variations in the above requirements upon request of the Cbnthctdr, in the Town's sole discretion. 9. AMENDMENT: a. This Contract contains the entire agreement of the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and, except as provided; this Contract may not be modified or amended except by written agreement of the parties. b. The Town reserves the right to omit any of the tasks identified in the Scope of Services upon written notice to the Contractor. 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: Governing Law and Venue: This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado and venue shall be in the County of Larimer, State of Colorado. Assignabilitv: This Contract is voidable by the Town if assigned by the Contractor without the prior written consent of the Town. Survival Clause: The indemnification provision of this Contract shall survive the completion of the Work and the termination of this Contract. Compliance with the Laws: The Contractor shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, including but not limited to federal, state and local laws, regulations, rules or ordinances that effect those employed or engaged by it the materials or equipment used for the conduct of the Work, and shall procure any and all necessary approvals, licenses and permits, all at its own expense. Severability: If any provision in this Contract shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not invalidate any other part or provision hereof. Renewal: This contract is subject to renewal annually upon review and agreement of the Contractor and the Town. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract. TOWN OF ESTES PARK BY: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES, INC. ATTEST: BY: / ,---7 ~ Â· I . EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Term of Service: The term of this agreement shall be from January 01, 2003, through December 31, 2003, unless earlier termination pursuant to the Contract. This Contract shall be renewed and/or modified as necessary before the beginning of a new grant term and prior to the termination date of the Contract. 2. Remuneration for Services: The Town shall pay Contractor the amount of $5,000 for immediate victim assistance as set forth in paragraph three ("Services Provided") herein. Providing services to victims of crime ($4,000) and crisis intervention ($1,000) in non-criminal incidents. The Town's obligation to Contractor shallnot exceed a total of $5,000 for the entire term of this Contract. The Town shall also provide "in kind" contributions such as temporary use of a telephone and/ or office while in the service of victims at the Police Department. The Town will also continue to provide pagers for the advocates not to exceed the total cost of $35 per month. 3. Services Provided: Contractor shall provide Representatives to respond by phone or in person for immediate crisis intervention and counseling. Contractor shall provide twenty-four (24) hour phone referral services and/or other assistance to victims of all crimes to which victim's rights attach according to the laws of the State of Colorado. This is a broadening of the services provided by Contractor beyond the basic services of counseling and referral for sexual assault and domestic violence victims for whom Contractor receives no specific remuneration from the Town other than "in kind" contributions. 4. INDEMNIFICATION: By accepting referrals from the Town to Estes Valley Victim Advocates, Inc., Contractor hereby agrees to fully comply with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Contractor agrees to be fully responsible and liable for making counseling and support programs available for use by disabled participants. Contractor agrees to and does indemnify and hold the Town and its agents and employees harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, injuries, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees relating to or arising out of Contractor's failure to comply with the ADA. 5. POLICE RECORDS RELEASES: By accepting copies of official and confidential Police Reports, Contractor agrees to not release these reports, or any information contained therein, to anyone except its own agents/representatives who are acting in the capacity of providing the aforementioned services to the Town. - I . Cpntractor assumes full responsibility for any and all breaches of confidentiality or security of ' itecords; and agrees to and does indemnify the Town for any and all liability, loss, damage, costs, expenses and attorney's fees resulting from said breach by Contractor, its agents, servants, and eniployees. 6. BI-ANNUAL AND ANNUAL REPORTS: Contractor shall provide the Town with bi-annual reports on the type and total number of crimes responded to through the Project. These statistics shall include whether the victim was initially contacted at the time the crime occurred, noting if response was either in person, at the scene, or by phone at the scene. If initial victim contact transpires at a later time, the statistics shall indicate whether the victim was contacted in person, by phone, or by mail. Contractor shall provide the Town with bi-annual reports and adequate documentation referencing any paid positions within their organization maintained in whole or in part by grant monies obtained by the Town. Depending upon the term and conditions of the grant, Contractor shall also provide the Town with the total final statistics that, in turn will be submitted to the grantor for any required reporting period. L Z,~45-0-Â·,4'49 .XY+ 4'Â·1'E 1 11 1 '.1 Wâ€¢14 Dj *4 ill'Al,IA, I4314**39 . Memo To: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Commander Gregg Filsingej>~~ Date: January 22,2003 Re: Proposed Amendment to the Model Traffic Code Background: The Town has attempted to deal with issues concerning the noise resulting from the use of "jake brakes" in residential areas. The enforcement tool available at the time was a decibel meter, thus requiring that the offending noise be measured at the time of the violation. The State Legislature has recognized the enforcement difficulties and in the year 2000 did create and pass Colorado House Bill 00-1142. This Bill specifies that commercial vehicles equipped with an engine compression braking device ("jake brakes") will have a muffler and that there can be no device in place to "cutoff' or "bypass" this muffler. The Bill was adopted into Colorado law just recently. The intent of this action is to permit law enforcement officials to perform physical inspections on a truck that is legally stopped for a noise violation without meeting a specific decibel level requirement. The penalty under the state statute is five hundred dollars, the maximum fine that can be levied by our Municipal Court is three hundred dollars. Budget There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: Staff recommends approval of adopting the attached Ordinance amending section 225 of the Model Traffic Code. 1 . ORDINANCE NO. , 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 225 OF THE MODEL TRAFFIC CODE WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined it is necessary to amend the Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities, 1995 Edition by the addition of a Subsection 3 to Section 225 of the Model Traffic Code requiring all commercial vehicles that are equipped with engine compression brake devices (jake- brakes) to have mufflers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: Section 10.04.030 of the Municipal Code is amended by the addition of the following language: Section 225 of the Model Traffic Code is hereby amended by the addition of subsection (3) to read as follows: "(3) Any commercial vehicle as defined in Section 42-4-235 (1) (a), C.R.S., subject to registration and operated on a highway, that is equipped with an engine compression brake device is required to have a muffler." Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk Frey, Kor-1, Haggerty & Mickaels, P.C. Attorneys at Law John P. Frey 318.Canyon Avenue, Suite 200 P.O. Box 2283 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-2283 Telephone (970) 493-8622 Fax (970) 493-1218 E-mail jfrey@fkhmlaw.com December 13, 2002 Ms. Mary Moore Mr. Thomas E. Raabe Ms. Cherie Bartram Fort Collins Police Services Loveland Police Department Estes Park Police Department P. O. Box 580 810 East 10th Street, Suite 100 P. O. Box 1287 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Loveland, CO 80537 Estes Park, CO 80517 Ms. Diane Jaso Donn Hopkins Larimer County Sheriff's Office CSU Police Department 2501 Midpoint Drive Green Hall, 750 Meridian Avenue Fort Collins, CO 8052 Fort Collins, CO 80523 Dear Mary, Tom, Cherie, Diane, and Donn: On December 4, 2002, the LETA Board approved two Memorandums of Understanding relating to non-capital expenditures for E9-1-1 services and the implementation and funding of PSAP Emergency Medical Dispatch Services. Copies of those MOUs are enclosed. In order to complete the process of adopting these MOUs, they need to be approved by the Larimer County Administrator, Colorado State University, and the city or town managers for Fort Collins, Loveland, and Estes Park. Each MOU may be signed in counterparts pursuant to its terms. Please review the MOUs and if they are acceptable to your agency, please obtain the necessary signature and return them to us. Once we have obtained all of the necessary signatures we will provide you with a copy of each MOU with all of the signature pages evidencing approval by all of the agencies. Please let us know if you have any questions. J A A ery/4Wy 1 -s, 11 11. ~ P. trey, ~torney for ~ lat\mer Emergency Telephone Authority jk enclosures 1712 0 h MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU") concerning funding for noncapital expenditures relating to the provision of E9-1-1 services is made and entered into this hAL. day ofil-t-Â·Â·1â‚¬-_ , 2002, by and between the LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY, hereinafter referred to as "LETA," and the CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO; the CITY OF LOVELAND, COLORADO; the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO; LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO; and COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, hereinafter collectively referred to as "the PSAPs. " 1. LETA was established on or about November 19, 1990, through an Intergovernmental Agreement between LETA and Larimer County and municipalities, fire districts, and health districts within Larimer, County. The formation of LETA was authorized by Â§ 29-11-101, et seq., Colorado Revised Statutes. 2. Since its inception, LETA has provided funding consistent with its Mission Statement to the five public service answering points (PSAPs) in Larimer County. Such funding has included the purchase of capital items and noncapital expenditures. 3. Historically, the PSAPs have submitted requests for funding of noncapital expenditures for inclusion within LETA's annual budget. These funding requests have varied from PSAP to PSAP and have consumed an extraordinary amount of administrative time on behalf of LETA and the PSAPs in determining the appropriate level of PSAP funding. 4. LETA's Board of Directors recently approved an amended funding mechanism that will result in increased efficiencies in the funding process. 5. Commencing with the budget year 2003 and continuing each year thereafter until modified by the LETA Board, LETA shall fund the PSAPs located in Larimer County in accordance with the cost reimbursement formula hereinafter set forth. The levels of funding hereinafter established shall be subject to annual review by the LETA Board. Expense Reimbursement Formula for Noncapital Expenditures General expense reimbursement per PSAP dispatcher, including the PSAP supervisor and/or manager: â€¢ Training: $400 per dispatcher ' Page 1 of 4 , â€¢ Headsets/handsets/cords/repairs/jacks: $300 per dispatcher â€¢ Service awards: $50 per dispatcher Specific cost reimbursement allocated per PSAP: â€¢ ANI/ALI Printer: $800 â€¢ NENA Conference: $1500 â€¢ NENA Membership: $75 Cost reimbursement expenses based upon call volume: Reimbursement for equipment and supplies shall be based upon call volume in accordance with the following schedule: â€¢ For PSAPs with less than 10,000 E9-1-1 calls per year: $1500 â€¢ For PSAPs with between 10,001 and 30,000 E9-1-1 calls per year: $3,000 â€¢ For PSAPs with 30,001 or more E9-1-1 calls per year: $5,000 6. It is understood and agreed that in accordance with its Mission Statement, LETA shall continue to fund all expenses in connection with the operation of the LETA Board of Directors, all networking charges and hotlines, and all charges for maintenance contracts on LETA capital equipment. 7. The provisions of this MOU shall not apply to the funding of capital items, the procedure for which shall continue to be governed by existing LETA policy. 8. As a condition of the continued receipt of funds from LETA, the PSAPs shall comply with all reasonable directives of the LETA Board relating to the management of E9-1-1 calls to insure the uniformity of emergency telephone service in Larimer County. Such directives may include the obligation of the PSAPs to prepare and file certain reports with LETA concerning E9-1-1 calls. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the elimination or reduction of funding from LETA as provided for in this MOU. Page 2 of 4 I . I 9. This MOU may be signed in counterparts. APPROVED the day and year first above written. LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY By c15-g-r,Â·.0.0- Yta-ob-â‚¬, Thomas E. Raabe, Chairman . LETA Board of Directors CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO By City Manager [Print Name] CITY OF LOVELAND, COLORADO By City Manager [Print Name] TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By City Manager [Print Name] Page 3 of 4 ... LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO By County Administrator [Print Name] COLORADO STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE by and through COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY By [Print Name and Title] Page 4 of 4 .. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU") concerning the implementation of the Medical Priority Dispatch System ("MPDS") protocols and the funding of PSAP Emergency Medical Dispatch Services ("EMDS") by LETA, is made and entered into this 44 , day of 93.in,cÂ»1.-e- , 2002, by and between'the LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY, hereinafter referred to as "LETA," and the CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO; the CITY OF LOVELAND, COLORADO; the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO; LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO; and COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, hereinafter collectively referred to as " the PSAPs. " 1. LETA was established on or about November 19, 1990, through an Intergovernmental Agreement between LETA and Larimer County and municipalities, fire districts, and health districts within Larimer County. The formation of LETA was authorized by Â§ 29-11-101, et seq., Colorado Revised Statutes. 2. LETA has historically provided funds to the PSAPs generally for services related to emergency medical dispatch and specifically for training and the implementation of the MPDS. Such funding has included the purchase of software, dispatcher training, and funds for quality improvement evaluation of dispatchers. 3. LETA has determined that the most effective way to contribute to the continued advancement and improvement of the delivery of EMDS in Larimer County is to remove the direct involvement of the LETA Board in the internal affairs and operations of the PSAPs and to allow the PSAPs to assume those responsibilities subject to the conditions set forth in this MOU. 4. The effective administration of EMDS and the implementation of the MPDS in Larimer County requires each PSAP to adopt identical protocols establishing the appropriate methodology for answering emergency medical calls and interacting with E9-1-1 callers. Attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as "Exhibit A" is a set of protocols concerning the MPDS. Within thirty (30) days of the execution of this MOU and by the terms of this MOU, each PSAP agrees that it shall adopt and take such steps as may be necessary to implement the attached protocols. 5. By the terms of this MOU, it is understood and agreed that LETA's historic methodology of funding EMDS for the PSAPs shall be altered, and that by such alteration, the PSAPs shall be afforded a more direct and responsible role in administering EMDS. Page 1 of 5 I . 6. Commencing with the budget year 2003 and continuing each year thereafter until modified by the LETA Board, LETA shall fund the PSAPs in Larimer County in accordance with the cost reimbursement formula hereinafter set forth. The levels of funding hereinafter established shall be subject to annual review by the LETA Board. Expense Reimbursement Per Budgeted Dispatcher General expense reimbursement per budgeted dispatcher, including the PSAP supervisor and/or manager: â€¢ Certifications: Sll5 â€¢ Service awards: S25 â€¢ Continuing education: $360 â€¢ Card set maintenance: $20 â€¢ Support services: $60 â€¢ Physician Advisor: $106 â€¢ TOTAL: $686 per dispatcher Specific cost reimbursement allocated per PSAP: â€¢ Navigator Program: $1500 â€¢ Navigator per hospital for Physician Advisor: $1500 â€¢ Continuing education series: $150 â€¢ Quality Assurance (QA) certification and re-certification: S550 â€¢ Aqua and ProQA maintenance: $1,725 â€¢ Meeting obligations including QA @ 1.5 hours, MDRC @ 1.5 hours, Steering @ 1.5 hours (4.5 hours times 12 months @ $54/hour): $1,620 Page 2 of 5 ... â€¢ PUGS and Miranda Cards: $100 â€¢ TOTAL: $5,645 without hospital or $7,145 with hospital Cost reimbursement expenses based upon Quality Assurance (QA) volume: QA cost reimbursement shall be paid in accordance with the following schedule: â€¢ For calls totaling 20 or less: $300/month $3,600/year â€¢ For calls totaling 40 or less: $600/month $7,200/year â€¢ For calls totaling 60 or less: $900/month $10,800/year â€¢ For calls totaling 80 or less: $1,200/month $14,400/year â€¢ For calls totaling 100 or less: $1,500/month $18,000/year 7. It is understood and agreed that in accordance with its Mission Statement, LETA shall continue to fund all charges for ProQA software and interfaces, Aqua software and interfaces, and Card set expansion. 8. As a condition of the receipt of funds from LETA, the PSAPs shall adopt the attached protocols and requirements as set forth above and shall thereafter comply with all of the directives contained therein together with such other reasonable directives with regard thereto, including the filing of periodic reports with LETA. Any failure to comply by the PSAPs may result in the elimination or reduction of funding by LETA for the Emergency Medical Dispatch System generally and the MPDS specifically. Page 3 of 5 .. 9. This MOU may be signed in counterparts. APPROVED the day and year first above written. LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY -3 A By<:Sbho--rÂ·.a>a; 2 4.-_3~0*-C - Thomas E. Raabe, Chairman LETA Board of Directors , CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO By City Manager [Print Name] CITY OF LOVELAND, COLORADO By City Manager [Print Name] TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By City Manager [Print Name] Page 4 of 5 .. LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO By County Administrator [Print Name] COLORADO STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE by and through COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY By [Print Name and Title] Page 5 of 5 . , EXHIBIT A * ' ~ MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH POLICY 'NUMBER: 1 DATE: SUBJECT: Medical Priority Dispatch Implementation Policy PURPOSE: To provide all Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMD's) with the necessary tools and skills relating to the safe and effective provision of Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) services. POLICY: Call receipt and dispatch for medical assistance shall be provided in a standardized manner following approved Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) protocols for caller interrogation, determination of appropriate response configurations and codes, and provision of Post Dispatch Instructions (PDI's) and Pre-Arrival Instructions (PAI's). PROCEDURE: I. MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH SYSTEM (MPDS) PROTOCOLS A. A flip chart card system, containing protocols for Emergency Medical Dispatching (EMD), shall be provided for each call-taking and dispatch position. B. This protocol system will provide standardized Key Questions (KQ), Post Dispatch Instructions (PDI's), Pre-Arrival Instructions (PAI's) and response based codes. C. The protocol file shall be kept on the console at all times. D. The American Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS) protocols have been approved by the Larimer County Steering Committee, LETA and a Medical Director for Emergency Medical Dispatching. E. The AMPDS protocols shall be followed on all incoming calls for medical assistance. n. RESPONSE CONFIGURATIONS AND CODES A. The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) interrogation protocols will be used to select and enter the currently used situation codes in the appropriate field of the CAD system along with determinant code. B. Dispatch configurations and codes will be established and altered by the Dispatch center and its Fire/EMS agencies. - ~ MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH POLICY NUMBER: 2 DATE: SUBJECT: Medical Priority Dispatch Case Entry Compliance Policy Statement PURPOSE: To ensure proper case entry procedure and to effect an increase in protocol compliance. To provide all Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMD' s) with a standardized methodology for initiating the Emergency Rule when appropriate and necessary. POLICY: Each Emergency Medical Dispatcher answering a request for EMS shall ask for and attempt to obtain all case entry level information after location and call back number have been obtained and verified on every case. PROCEDURE: I. The case entry questions shall be asked by the EMD, in order and phrased as shown below, to obtain the following information: 1. What's the problem, tell me exactly what happened. (The Chief Complaint) 2. How old is s/he? (Approximate if necessary) 3. Is s/he conscious? 4. Iss/he breathing? It is recognized that a minority of callers may refuse or be unable to provide the answers to case entry questions. EMD's shall not be held accountable for this provided they have made a reasonable attempt to ask these questions initially. With regard to first party callers (i.e., when the caller is the patient), the EMD may omit questions three and four. II. Initiating the Emergency Rule A. PSAP's will establish a policy outlining the criteria under which the emergency rule may be invoked. I. . MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH POLICY NUMBER: 3 DATE: SUBJECT: Medical Priority Dispatch Quality Improvement Process PURPOSE: To provide all dispatch personnel with the necessary understanding and skills as they relate to the efficient and effective provision of quality assurance for the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS). Such quality assurance processes shall be sufficient to meet the requirements of the National Academy of Emergency Medical Dispatch (NAEMD). POLICY: The quality improvement process shall follow a standardized procedure as detailed below and as required by the NAEMD and Larimer County quality assurance standards approved by the steering committee. PROCEDURE: I. Quality Improvement Case Review A. A 3% (or 100 calls, whichever is the greater) minimum sampling of all EMS calls shall be randomly selected and reviewed monthly by the Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) Quality Improvement Unit (QIU) to assure compliance to MPDS protocol at acceptable levels as defined within NAEMD and Larimer County QIU standards. B. An approximately equal number of calls shall be reviewed for each individual call taker. C. The level of compliance required outlined in the compliance policy will be followed. II. Case Review Feedback Process A. Completed Case Evaluation Templates (CET's) generated by the (Advanced Quality Assurance (AQUA) database will be forwarded to the EMD and his or her supervisor. B. The supervisor will review each CET Report. C. As circumstances dictate, the Supervisor should develop an action plan for the EMD. Action plans involving remedial action will adhere to the PSAP's internal policies and procedures. III. QI-U Database/Individual EMD Compliance Reports A. Compliance data for individual EMD's, if available, shall be generated from the AQUA database and forwarded to Supervisors on a quarterly basis. B. As circumstances dictate, the Supervisor should develop an action plan for the EMD. Action plans involving remedial action will adhere to the PSAP's internal policies and procedures. IV. QIU Database Compliance Reports A. Compliance data, if available, will be generated from the AQUA database and posted in dispatch at monthly intervals. B. Each PSAP will have a policy outlining the action plans needed for non-compliance. C. Regular compliance reports will be submitted to LETA via LETA's administrative assistant. ~ Â· MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH POLICY NUMBER: 4 DATE: SUBJECT: Medical Priority Dispatch Continuing Dispatch Education Process. PURPOSE: To provide all dispatch personnel with the necessary understanding and skills for the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS). These Continuing Dispatch Education (CDE) processes shall be sufficient'to meet the requirements ofthe National Academy of Emergency Medical Dispatch (NAEMD) for accreditation as a Dispatch Center of Excellence. POLICY: The CDE process shall follow a standardized procedure as detailed below and as required by the NAEMD. PROCEDURE: I. CDE Program Management . i A. The Medical Dispatch Review Committee (MDRC) and the Quality Improvement Unit (QRD shall be responsible for defining the topics that the CDE program will address. B. Appropriate CDE topics may be identified in a number of ways: 1. As a result of the MDRC's recommendations (based on QIU' s findings). 2. Via Supervisor's action plans or requests for further action by the QIU. 3. Via requests from Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMI)'s). C. The PSAP's shall be responsible for arranging educational opportunities, as necessary, to address the needs identified above. D. The PSAP's shall be responsible for maintaining appropriate CDE program Records. II. Meeting NAEMD Re-Certification Requirements A. The PSAP's shall be responsible for ensuring that all EMD's are given adequate opportunity to meet NAEMD re-certification requirements. B. EMD's are ultimately responsible for ensuring that they attend sufficient educational opportunities to meet NAEMD re-certification requirements. They must alert their supervisor of any likely problems in this area. ' III..Types of CDE' s A. The following are acceptable formats and their associated maximum hours for CDE: , 1. National EMD Journal CDE, article review and quiz are included ih each issue. Max: 8 credit hours (4 per year) 2. Workshops and Seminars related to EMS, preferably to the required skills of an EMD; i.e., airway management, review of essential skills, scenarios, medical-legal issues, computer-aided dispatch, stress reduction, refresher courses, etc. Max: 16 credit hours (8 per year) 3. Multimedia educational products, which illustrate and review proper emergency care and EMD procedures. Titles are restricted to those that are EMS, preferably EMD related, and should be written on the application. Max: 16 credit hours (8 per year) 4. Oualitv Assurance case review, planning, and analysis of issues or findings identified by dispatch Q.A., theoretically or in practice. Max: 16 credit hours (8 per year) 5. Local Planning and Management, including general organization for disaster, mass casualty, and HAZMAT. Max: 8 credit hours (4 per year) 6. Teaching the general public, any topic within the scope of basic EMD/EMS relations. Synopsis of subjects taught should be included with application. Max: 4 credit hours (2 per year) 7. Protocol Review of the MPDS, especially College of Fellows updates or new versions. Max: 4 credit hours (2 per year) 8. Miscellaneous, Max: 4 credit hours G per year) B. The minimum CDE requirement is 24 hours every 2 years of completed CDE per EMD, at least sixteen hours of which shall be instructional in nature. C. In addition to the CDE hours, types, and topics discussed above, each EMD must maintain current CPR certification. D. The bulk of the subject matter accepted as fulfilling NAEMD requirements will be directly related to Emergency Medical Dispatch and the use of the MPDS. However, other EMS related material will be considered for its educational relevance. ~ ~ MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH POLICY NUMBER: 5 DATE: SUBJECT: Medical Priority Dispatch Press Information Policy PURPOSE: To provide staff with a procedure that will ensure cases potentially providing opportunities for positive publicity are identified in a timely manner to the Public Information Officer (PIO). POLICY: Dispatch staff will alert the PSAP administration of Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) cases of potential interest to the press. PROCEDURE: I. Each PSAP shall maintain a press information policy A. Policy shall outline the procedure for notification and dissemination of EMD case information Â· MEDICAL PRIORITY- DISPATCH POLICY , POLICY NUMBER: 6 DATE: SUBJECT: Medical Priority Dispatch Certification and Re-certification Policy PURPOSE: To provide requirements to Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMD's) for Certification and Re-certification with the National Academy of Emergency Medical Dispatch (NAEMD). POLICY: Communications Specialists will receive initial certificationas an Emergency Medical Dispatcher (EMI)), and are required to maintain this qualification through recertification. PROCEDURE: I. Emergency Medical Dispatcher Certification A. All personnel using the MPDS protocol will obtain EMD certification with the NAEMD. All new personnel shall, within six months of hiring, obtain EMD certification. B. Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority (LETA) will provide funding for the necessary training and continuing education to facilitate certification and re-certification through the administrative assistant. II. Re-certification A. All personnel using the MPDS protocols are required to maintain current EMD certification as mandated by NAEMD. This currently requires completion of a minimum of 24 hours Continuing Dispatch Education (CDE' s) per two year period, achieving a passing mark in an open book EMD examination at two-year intervals, and maintaining current CPR certification. B. Details of CDE requirements are contained in a separate CDE specific policy. . MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH POLICY NUMBER: 7 DATE: .. SUBJECT: Language Translation Policy PURPOSE: To provide all Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMD's) with the necessary understanding of the requirements for use of the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) when the caller utilizes a language other than North American English POLICY: Call receipt and dispatch for medical assistance shall be provided in a standardized manner following approved MPDS protocol scripts regardless of the language used by the caller. EMD's must therefore make a reasonable attempt to ensure translation of the EMD scripts to the non-English speaking caller requesting emergency medical assistance. PROCEDURE: 1. EMD's with the appropriate language skills may translate the protocols into any other language 'on the fly.' Any translation made must result in an exact reproduction ofthe precise meaning, tense and phrasing of the American English language version of the MPDS. If no EMD with the necessary language skills is available, the EMD should conference the call with an appropriate translator, such as Language Line or an immediately available resource fluent in the caller's language. The EMD process should be initiated through the translator with the following information obtained, at a minimum: a. Obtain and verify incident location (CE #1). b. Obtain and verify call back number (CE #2). c. Obtain an appropriate description ofthe chief compliant (CE #3). The EMD should make a reasonable attempt to provide a complete interrogation according to the MPDS protocol and provision of post dispatch and pre-arrival instructions through the translator; although, it is understood that this may not be feasible due to call volume and situations within the Center. ~ MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH POLICY NUMBER: 8 DATE: SUBJECT: Medical Priority Dispatch Request for Clarification Review Policy PURPOSE: To provide all Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMD's) with the opportunity to enhance their skills by reviewing the questions (and the associated answers) raised by their peers regarding the use of this system. POLICY: Each PSAP will maintain a MPDS binder containing requests for clarification and their associated answers. PROCEDURE: I. MPDS Binder A. A binder will be provided in the dispatch center which allows EMD's to raise questions regarding the use ofthe MPDS. B. This binder will be regularly reviewed by the QA person for each dispatch center for new questions to which he or she will promptly provide a written response, a copy of which will be placed in the binder. C. At least once per quarter, the PSAP's QA will distribute an updated copy ofthe log to the other PSAP's in the County EMD Program. I .- I . MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH . POLICY NUMBER: 9 DATE: SUBJECT: Medical Priority Dispatch Answering and Handling of 911 Calls PURPOSE: To provide all Emergency Medical bispatchers (EMD's) with a standardized methodology of the data gathering and interrogation process during the receipt of 911 calls. Professional EMD's are expected to do their best to accurately gather all appropriate information and to give Post Dispatch Instructions CPI)I's) and Pre- Arrival Instructions (PAI's) when possible, appropriate and necessary. POLICY: EMD's shall answer 911 calls for emergency medical assistance using a standardized format. This may be clarified and enhanced when necessary but may not be unjustifiably altered or abandoned. If an EMD applies all relevant techniques but the caller still refuses to cooperate, the EMD will not be considered to be at fault. EMD's will follow the National Academy Emergency Medical Dispatch (NAEMD) case review scoring standards and Larimer County scoring standards for each call that requires the EMD protocol. PROCEDURE: I. Initial Receipt of a 911 Call A. All 911 calls will be answered according to each PSAP's policy. II. Confirmation of Location A. It is the EMD's responsibility to make sure that the address of the emergency is obtained and verified. III. Confirmation of Call Back Number A. It is the EMD's responsibility to obtain and verify the phone number that the caller is calling from. IV. Obtaining the Nature of the Emergency A. It is the responsibility of the EMD to obtain the nature of the Emergency. V. Interrogation A. EMD' s will interrogate callers using the EMD protocol. - 0 VIL Relay of Information to Responding units A. The following items shall be regarded as the minimum information to be passed along to :-0 ., Â· .responding personnel. 1. Location 2. Safety concerns 3. MPDS determinant code 4. Chief Complaint 5. Age of patient 6. Status of consciousness 7. Status of breathing B. Should additional information become available after responders have been mobilized but prior to their arrival on scene, this should also be relayed to responding units. VI[I. Dispatch Life Support Instructions (DLS) A. DLS includes Post-Dispatch Instructions (PDI's) and Pre-Arrival Instructions (PAI's) and in some cases both are used. B. PDI's will be provided to the caller whenever possible and appropriate. C. PAI's will be provided to the caller whenever possible and appropriate. I . I V MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH POLICY NUMBER: 10 DATE: SUBJECT: Medical Priority Dispatch Obvious Death Policy PURPOSE: To provide Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMD's) with a protocol to follow with regard to confirming obvious death or in the event a "Living Will" or "Do Not Resuscitate" order is identified. POLICY: The following defines the meaning of the tenn "obvious death" for dispatch purposes and provides a protocol to be followed by dispatch staff. It also defines the actions to be taken in the event that the caller identifies the patient has signed a "Living Will" or is subject to a "Do Not Resuscitate" order (DNR). PROCEDURE: I. Obvious Death Definition A. For dispatch purposes 'obvious death' is defined as meaning that a patient's condition can be identified, as the sole result of information being provided by a 911 caller and without doubt of fear of error, as being incompatible with life. This information would in turn indicate that it would be inappropriate for an EMD to offer pre-arrival instructions. B. The medical director shall establish the conditions that may be considered by the dispatcher to constitute obvious death. Authorization and definitions will be approved and signed by the medical director on the cardiac/respiratory arrest card (protocol 9). III. Living Wills and Do Not Resuscitate Orders (DNR) A. If the caller identifies that the patient has signed a Living Will or is subject to a DNR order, the EMD will follow the protocol as indicated by the medical director. IV. Refusal by Caller to act on Pre-Arrival Instructions A. It is not the EMD's responsibility to attempt to force callers to participate in actions against that individual's will. . ~ MEDICAL PRIORITY DISPATCH POLICY'NUMBER: 11 DATE: SUBJECT: Medical Priority Dispatch Compliance Policy PURPOSE: In order to achieve and retain accreditation from the National Academy for Emergency Medical Dispatch (NAEMD), all dispatchers shall maintain the average compliance scores as required by that organization. POLICY: It is the policy of each PSAP to comply with the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) protocols. , PROCEDURE: I. Compliance It is necessary for each individual Emergency Medical Dispatcher (EMD) to meet the following average MPDS compliance scores, which are as follows: Case Entry 95% Chief Complaint 95% Key Questions 90% Pre-Arrival Instructions 95% Post-Dispatch Instructions 90% Final Coding 90% Overall score recommendation = 90% Realizing that achievement of these compliance rates is not immediately feasible for newly qualified EMD's, the above compliance scores will not be required for the first six months of becoming certified. This policy does not exclude the need for discipline when considering individual cases of gross negligence and/or gross improper behavior, or cases of persistent failure to apply standards for the MPDS protocols; nor does it exclude any other existing disciplinary process. II. Discipline Vs. Quality Assurance A. The Quality Improvement Unit (QIU) shall handle all quality improvement reviews. The QIU is to provide education and feedback to individual call takers without threat of disciplinary action. B. When compliance becomes a discipline versus quality improvement problem, QIU will notify the EMD's supervisor. C. PSAP administration shall be responsible for all disciplinary actions and remedial training. ' AGREEMENT THIS -AGREEMENT, made and entered into this o?J' day of z.*11../U.A.4- , 1997, by and between the TOWN OF ESTES PARK ~OLORA*, a Colorado Municipal Corporatien, hereinafter referred to as ("the Town "), as party of the first part, and the ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER OF ESTES PARK, LTD, hereinafter referred to as C "Dill" ), as party of the second part. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Dill provides kennel, veterinarian, and other services; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to contract with Dill to kennel and treat dogs impounded by the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and the covenants hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows: 1. Dill shall kennel all dogs impounded by the Town. The kennel shall be available at all times during the term of this agreement for the impounding of dogs. 2. Dill shall keep all dogs confined in order to prevent their escape therefrom. Dill shall not release any dogs until receipt of approval for release from the Town. 3. The place of impoundment shall be a closed shelter with a dog run and shall be properly heated, ventilated and kept in a sanitary condition. All dogs confined therein shall be furnished with adequate food and water. 4. Dill shall dispose of impounded dogs upon the direction of the Town at Dill's cost. In the event that Dill' s cost of disposal substantially increases during the term of this agreement, the Town and Dill agree to renegotiate the dollar amount of payment in Paragraph 6 to reflect Dill's increased cost of disposal. 5. Dill shall, upon prior approval of the Town, furnish treatment and care by a duly licensed veterinarian for all sick and injured dogs placed in the kennel. In the event of a medical emergency which requires immediate treatment, Dill shall provide the necessary treatment without prior Town approval. All expenses for treatment and care shall be collected from the owners of the dogs receiving the same at the time of their release from impoundment. Town shall have no obligation to Dill in the event any owner of a do* receiving care does not pay for said care. 6. The Town shall pay to Dill the sum of Six Hundred Dollars ($600.00) per month for the services furnished as herein provided. This fee. shall cover one hundred fifty (150) impourids for the calendar year. In the event there are more than one hundred fifty .. (150) impounds, Town shall pay Dill Ten Dollars ($10.00) per day fot each impound with a five (5) day maximum for each impound . Town shall pay Dill Twelve and 50/100 Dollars ($12.50) for. each euthanasia. Beginning with the fifth (5th) year of this agreement, Dill shall have the right to increase the fee for services by written notice to Town thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of said increase for a sum not to exceed fifteen percent (15%). Town and Dill understand and agree that they will renegotiate this - Paragraph 6 with regard to the number of animals to be covered by the monthly fee after four (4) years have elapsed under the terms of this agreement. 7. Dill will indemnify and hold the Town harmless from all demands, claims, causes of action or judgments arising from or growing out of any act or neglect of Dill, his contractors, agents or employees in connection with the operations of the above place of impoundment or the performance of this agreement by Dill; and from all expenses that may be incurred in investigating or resisting the same, including all reasonable attorney fees, expert fees and costs incurred. Dill shall fully inform all persons using or being upon said place of impoundment, or dealing therewith of the nonliability of the Town, by posting an adequate number of notices to that effect in, about, or on said premises. At his own expense, Dill shall cirry insurance for the benefit of, and to protect himself and the Town from all claims, demands, causes of action or judgments; and from all expenses that may be incurred in investigating or resisting the same. Said insurance shall be in the amount of at least $150,000.00 per claim and $600,000.00 per occurrence, with Town designated as an additional insured on the policy. Town and Dill agree that Town is relying on and does not waive or intend to waive by this agreement any of the rights, immunities and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity at, 24-10-101 et seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, otherwise available to the Town, its officers, agents or employees. 8. To the extent lawfully allowed, the Town shall indemnify and hold Dill harmless from all demands, claims, causes of action or judgments arising out of Town's negligent impoundment of dogs or direction to Dill to dispose of the same. 9. The term of this agreement shall be for one (1) year from the 1st day of January, 1997 and from year to year thereafter until terminated by either the Town or Dill hereto as hereinafter provided. 10. This agreement may be terminated by either the Town or Dill, upon thirty (30) days written notice to either party in the event either party fails to comply with the terms and provisions hereof. This agreement may also be terminated by either party giving the other party ninety (90) days written notice before the . 1 .. 1 end *of any annual term hereof. All notices given hereunder, if mailed by certified mail to the Town of Estes Park, P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, Colorado 80517 and to Animal Medical Center of Estes Park, LTD at 1260 Manford Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado.80517 shall be sufficient notice under the terms of this agreement. 11. All covenants and agreements herein contained shall be binding upon the' heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors and,assigns of the respective parties hereto. 12. Dill shall not assign his interest..in this agreement without the prior written consent of khe Town. 13. Dill understands and agrees that he is an independent contractor under the terms and conditions of this agreement. As such, Dill is not entitled to unemployment or insurance benefits through the Town. Also, Dill understands and agrees that he is solely responsible for all Federal and State income tax, FICA taxes and unemolovment insurance taxes. Dill also understands and agrees that he is responsible for worker's compensation coverage and taxes for himself and anv employee. TOWN OYAESTES PARK, COLORADO 641â‚¬ 44Â«- C 4.7. ATTEST: Ukc~Â·xy 64. ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER OF ESTES PARK, LTD. 1$1321 Z IZ~Zi 11 '0!012' 1 ; ~ 10' 10!3R'2~ 212~ 0;2210!go' ~ 2:, 0.0 '' J '1 101 '2 00 23 + C)OLD.CO i ! ' 1 r. 1 O 0 0000 0 -0-1-N-ZO' -O 16]--'b-----A,~0 0 to â€¢4- 0- ONM 0 000000 'i:1 1 .:11111! 11 1 le'wr il lili 14 01 !0 ):- 0;0'- O| 001(9 ~10 0 ,O 0~ !co 1 100 {9 1 . 'co N 0'- 0 01 01 ; 0' 0 0 0,0'0 0 O 0 00000 O 0000 10 01 0 01000.-000-r O 000000 0 0, (Nix- 0 0 r 01 00 03 LD O 0 .0 00 OCDâ€¢--0000OrOCON O 000000 1 1 1 1 11111, lili i .1 01 01!4 301111 4-101 lit- 111 22 ag 2 32' 2 32 32'32 0 32'32 0 4 82 0 co C-)O-0Â»000 0 r- 1.1-) M .- 1111, lilli 1 11 11 lili 11:1 0 ' .01 .-00 0 1.-1 01 h .-mo' 0~ 10 ,)1 1â„¢'01.- CDÂ·*Or-,00 0! ' 0 (9 N O - O O 1!1 O 0 - O 0 0 - O O. O N CO O 00 N n N O CD -1- (N 01 9-010(NGO 1 "' ~01 -/-1 O 0: ,O,0 000 ol O 0 0*0*- O -07 30 -,O 0-6-0-0 0-0.0 0 6 0 O 0 0 0,0 0Â· i ili Iii 11 Ill 1,11'i:;.ii'ili: ' i i lilill'lli 0 01 10 cor-14Â·~r-~ 0~ ~0 Gl! IOO'0,00!N:(91(N (0'e')14Â· CV~ ~ ~WI ,lN~OCV.00 ' 1 1,1,il:~ii'1 !1 1 ' i i I i : : i I ~ Â· 1 1 ! Ii_ -1-g i ' , . 1 i 111 1 1~i o~ .1 ~ 32 2/izE~ '32 32 0 0 0 0' (111 ir- O r ' I :9TS' ' R N :OIl 1 (D CNI 67 5& lit 11 C 1 li 1 |lil''imill'!111:,11.1 '1 jill 1 111;1 1 11 i '111 11 01 01 1 10,01-1-1 |O 'CILD~A~O~ ~0| O (4 |0)~010~19 câ€¢> 10,0,0 Mt.- r- olo - 00Â· 0 0 "- r 1 O u O 03 0. 0 0 0)' 'CO O (9 LD 9 0 10 (\1 1 C).N rul Al r O "0 0 . O 0 0 00,0 0 0000 O.- 6 0000000000000Â· 000000 11' 1 11.-111 I!ilili 11111 01 10 (910 (9 1.0 4 0'ul'N 4- COC\11â€¢-'10' LN'--40 r- O 0 to oIl-1.-1 0 i,01(0 0,101 10~ 101 1.1 lilli'll'i''i LL| ~4 51 1 R M H 1 !011. ,= 'KiLLUII R ME'z - L> LL 1 'ZI<!-11 5 j 1 i .F-IZ I ~ 'D' cl- i~ ~ ~~ 18.01 0 1.- U '' I.Jill 2 Eoill ' Ilml< O 110 16. loi=lz ~ 1 1 1 I~la~ =19 ]8 2 - E 2,~1 ~M<,~,1 - M=!.9| 12:0: 1 1,3, CE U) BILL LILI,126519 ' Ei El !3 li!9 Â» Â· C 1%!<!F â‚¬ 1:I it:QwZ Paciooi> 'Uplul Â®'51 ; *|5 ZE&i ENE Zim E, d,% 31'@: g Q 1' 1& GE bit: 9 3~CK 2 ~~~0~152' = . O,0 DO 11111111 111111 1 lili 11'111 1 11'lililli I 11Â·:IiÂ·1' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i-1 :(01 1 r -1 er- lili!1 I i,il||iii' !i 1 1 1 1 1 11 /, , |1||111 11113111' 1 i ..JU -1 Z ul ; rp'X M m O 0 UJ O m (ne Z A 0 0 :Â¤'m g *Â·*.m mel~F2152E~ ~.W~m m~ LL LL CO LL Q *<0~ EE@ 30-GIEUILL=<2<08 E=0 262 05 .. . Reported ' Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate 2002 2001 2000 SEX OFF ENSE 100% 100% Â· %9Z %00 L ~ %00 L 1%oot 310NI %09 Â°/coot ; Ilv C)9h!3d INI 3rd Qrtr NIBRS Crime Summary-Grp A July - September 2002,2001,2000 80% 67% %09 12139hIO=1 313IH3A MO 83% 42% ONI 11 8 OFFENSE HOMICIDE KIDNAPPING/ABDUCTION /1 1Â£:glgE 11 Int'11 1 11 1 h h.00 11 1 0 0 .- CO LO 010 0 0 Oioolo 1 0 0 1 1 1#'co 0 0 o O O CIO 01 0 1 1 f ' 0 0 0 0 00 O 0 0 '0 0' 0 0 0 O 0 1 :y.I ,4- CO (0 10 010 i 0 1 '.1 1-1 1 01 01 101 0 lilli 1 1 111 111 1 1; IiI I i!Â· It !1 i 1 f 32 y f 288 i -re 11 1 inâ€¢, iii lilli --:11!111'11 O 0 1â€ž1 @â€ž4,- h io O O 0 :01 10 01 -1 i 1 1 ! 1 1-1 1 + 18 1 11 O- O 3,Â» N :0 0'0 0 '0 '0 '0 bg 0 0 1-2 0 ;000 000 0 010 ;01 0 1 111 I lili O 0 J -1 Al 10 010 0 101 lot 01 1.- i 1 1 1 11. Iii 11 1 0 0 4-1 .0 9- â„¢1 1010io 0 1 1111!111 O 0 01 i <0 9 01 000 0 0 0 0 12 al Ii,1 Ii, 1 li 0 0 1 DO 1000 '000 0 0000 0 01 01 ~ 1.0 N' 1(01. el POO O :O 0 01 - 11 1 i Z 9:- U)' Egi ~d 1 1 ~J: 1- P' 1 15 litil!1 5 1 Milo UJ Z I Ill 1 11 i 0 1 0 H ' o a; 0 :11 i, 0-i , a., . V . I uri6Ijnde Abtua |Clearance Rate 'Rep Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate 2002 , 2001 2000 LOL LOK- 91V1O1 ONVhl9 WEAPON VIO LATIONS 100% - 100% 3rd Qrtr NIBRS Crime Summary-Grp A July - Septemb 2002,2001,20 RUG/EQUIPMENT VIOL 100%' DESTRUCTIO AN 18% DRUG/NARCOTIC OFFENSE 100% RUG/NARCOTIC 100% EMBEZZLEMENT ! BSCENE SEX OFFENSES STOLEN PROPERTY GAMBLING OFFENSE ROSTITUTION OFFENSES STATUTORY BRIBERY ~ " I . 3rd Quarter NIBRS Crime Summary Group B July - September 2002,2001,2000 OFFENSE CHARGED 2002 2001 2000 90A-BADCHECKS 0 0 1 90B - CURFEW/LOITERING/VAGRANCY VIOLS 0 0 0 90C - DISORDERLY CONDUCT 7 10 13 90D - DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 13 12, 10 90E - DRUNKENNESS 3 0' 0 90F - FAMILY OFFENSES, NONVIOLENT 0 0 1 90G -LIQUOR LAW VIOLATIONS 25 I 12' 11 90H - PEEPING TOM 0 0 0 901 - RUNAWAY 9 0 0 90J - TRESPASS OF REAL PROPERTY 0 4 2 90Z - ALL OTHER OFFENSES 20 27 12 TOTAL ARRESTEES: 77 TOTAL ADULTS: 51 TOTAL JUVENILES: 26 TOTAL JUVENILES HANDLED: 9 TOTAL JUVENILES REFERRED: 17 NIBRS STOLEN RECOVERED PROPERTY 3RD QUARTER JULY - SEPTEMBER 2002 PROPERTY CODE BURNED COUNTERFT DAMAGED RECOVERED SEIZED STOLEN ALCOHOL 15 349 AUTOS 1455 2500 2500 BICYCLES 50 700 1500 CLOTHES 426 COMP EQUIP 162 CONSUMABLE GOODS 54 310 DRUG EQUIP 190 MERCHANDISE 220 MONEY 313 31801 NEGOTBL INSTMNTS 168 OTHER VEHICLES 500 PuRSES 25 225 RECORDINGS 522 STRUCTURE/SINGLE 300 STRUC/OTH DWELLG 300 STRUC/COMMERCIAL 3401 STRUC/OTHER 100 TOOLS 725 VEHICLE PARTS 140 112 Other 2178 60 5858 GRAND TOTAL 481 7924 3339 205 45210 I l & 111 ~i 115 5 gi l 1 1#21 10' 0 0'32'82'01 BRi , 1 0, ./.-01 0 -0 1 14Â» 0 Â»010 0 01,1 - c,)00 1 0 1 1.- Intl 1 1.01 1 :101 111 30: 1(9: 19 lili 1 1 1 11- ...1 1 111111 1:lilli jil: 1 i 0 0.011.- 0 CD] 0 r CO O 0 91 0 0 91Â· O 0~ O, N -O,-000 ' 11 1 lili lili i lili i o fo r o lo 10 .lio . 01 N O 1 VI o IN i , l O 01 1Â» O, 1,- 00 , O' r- 1 ~ O ,0 Cor- "00.- 1 1 1 1,1,1 1! iMI :1!Iii 1 :i 1 lilli 111':Ii; 1 li t r O 01 :010 00 Ol 01 lololo;01 '01 Oi :Oi :O,0 010'0100 0,01 0 0 0'010 0 00: O 0 9Â·-O 0 Or- O O 0.1 - 0 O 0 h. g O N h a> r 00 O tr~ O 09 (Or-1-00.- CO lilli: I ~,!i, 1 ''ll 11:iii g $ 0 0Â° 0 32 9 :34 8... R 9 2 00 â€¢ r- O 0; 01(\1 0'0 0' O UD .- 1 0 .0 10 3: 'NO'- 01,~!O r- O r-: 09, O, - OrOOO ' 'lliili:'!' lil'III-1 11 111'11111111/lili i' 1 lilli 11 1''ilii lili Itt. ~ol I W r- IqÂ·,ol loi 10 )WI|itiloi-- '~ 9 0 a o'oot el IO; Bl!-i- 010Â·0) 0. 0 .- - .0 0 0 01'0000 01 01 O, 0 0 0.0 0 0 00,0 0 0 000000 Itj 0 01.09 %01,00 -~ '01 *LOIâ€¢- *~01 01 '01 . lf, 64 01â€¢-,Lf)'0 0 (9,0 aol 'C')~ .O (\1 -- O'0 0 0 1 1 1,1 1 1 Illi|I ]11|11|11|ilili'illil[il~i'iti 1 :51 :g.,41 4, 1 1 ':i 11!1 O CO 1 CO N 0; 0 ,â€¢1Â·t010 0 1 ,Or A M M 01 0' 0 0 4) 0;0 M )60 0 010 o â€ž 0 0 0 0 0.0 11 1 0 1 ; 94Â· :O 0 o i~.1 10 1 ~ co al w) 1 0 1 0 0 0, :O 1-1 M co ; o i e,V j N 1 %0 ~ ,01; M 1 r - 0 0 1 0 ~ 1-1 11!lili:, 1; 1 Irlill'~111 O 00 010 0 01 0 00 0 '01 0 O 000'0 00000 O 0 000000 1 11! / 1; I i 1 $ !1111 I 02 0 '1Â· 0 00 rt 0 00 (9~10 0| 01 0 -4 0, 0 r- M OoiC) /3 N N~ 0 Â·N, CN,f- r- 0Â·0:0 1 Ill 1 1 1 111 i 111 1 i 1 ~ 1 1 li 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 M 1 1 .~ 1 1 1 i 1 111 5 O D 3 > z 18 < 1 0 CD E UJ' 5 E @,0 5 EEG , 0 0 1- z Q 0- Dz' 1 .ul|oiD.Z. E 5Â·G'e $10% ZIej d z. ~~ ~ - g 2 01 g 0 0 1 -0 cr- LO @15 21%,2 1 Itt Â®10191 1 1 1 1 , ;Zigi<iz:o :*23 u.1 'rl ;P, L.U < z: >.i t: a.lizil-'9 010 1> wi lut; *;, M 0 0 w 4 122 6121&.u.,015!' ift <>i . I 0:010:J 0 9! 121 1 -| g !-1 i .LU,M ''A'[1 121:2,0 01 , f g tta [E'* .i ' U. ie:gir E ~CE '-'1 , 101 1 m i ' 0.:,_ m r 1 1 .-1 1.- 1 f Ex Zmg ME Â·E ille' 1 1 M F. af' 2 010'I I'Qf H.0 j ~91 0,0'0210'u.110 0,< -1! Â»-1 3 4 4 E-& W 81 ?L U. U) U. ~ ,~ <,cnÂ· ; % MI 2 5 0-:0-,0 H U. U. 5 <' @i 8 E L. O Â£ 24* .. , ... Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared.Clearance Rate Reported' Unfounded Actual Cleared 'Clearance Rate Â·Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate FORCIBLE 100% 67% Â· 100% 100% 100% 100% GRAVA 100% 100% IMPLE 100% 52 %00 50% 4th Qrtr NIBRS Crime Summary-Grp A ober - December 002,2001,2000 26% , HOVWd %09 KIDNAPPING/ABDUCTION 31aNI DOMY 133H1 3 9NtallnS anVEJ:! E]bil 2002 ' ' ' 2001 ' 2000 OFFENSE HOMICIDE ORTION INTIM T -2 0 gl g'glg '' 5''il 0 Â·O:0,0 : 11 1 1 I : -1-1- 1 1 Elli 1 11 Ii'Ii! i' ,;lill 0 0 r-Lile\ 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 1-LON 000 0 0 0 0 +0 0- O 9,0 ; 20 Â«Cd '01010~ L L Eom o >=4 1 I i 1 ' !1:Â·11:~ 1,1 0 0 1.- 10:N 000 0 0 0 0 0 1!1 -1â€ž, 1]111 11 '1 O 0 - NON 0000 0 0 0 0 1 13~ ~15 ' iQ| | - .!(NI .0:010' ioi 01 01 .01 101 ' i -81"1!ill!111:1111;,il:i ! 1 0 0 O 'O 0 0 O 0 0' O 0 0 00 0 0 CO h to )1 10 do O 1 0 01 0 .0: O! 111 1-Ilili 11 1 E-1321 1%13,101 1 111 1 101 igIGigi 1 111 0 0 CO, 9- Cgi Chi 0 0 0 0 0 :0 0 0 0 0 ,-,CD' ;ill-!11!111!11 0 0 0 0'0,0 0Â·0'0 .O 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 79 0.09 CNI 000 0 0 OJO 1 .i :El U.11 9; 9' u ' 1 liLi ll!111 mi-1 o 1 U- :0 IS , 111~111 111!, 2 1, i j Ilil 11i 1 1 i 0 C CO CO Â¢D 0 1 111 11! I M Mi@ co !* i 010& W I> 11 1 ' i i 'F @1%18 :E 15 i: 10 1 1 1 1 11313 1% ts'% 18 5 - bl 1 1 i ~1 1 1 1.- g!21@ is =13 1= 12 @ 1@ 1 1 I gao WEU) 2 5 g ./'ll Re orted Unfounded 49tua Cleared Clearance Ra e -kporled Unfounded Actu Unfounded Actual 'Cleared Clearspce Rate 2002 2001 2000 DES RUC ON/VANDAL 20 3 95 91V1010NVUS 100% 4th Qrtr NIBRS Crime Summary-Grp A October - December 2002,2001,2000 EMBEZZLEMENT OBSCEN STOLEN PROPERTY OFFENSE WEAPON VIOLATIONS TUTION OFFENSES . 4th Quarter NIBRS Crime Summary Group B October - December 2002,2001,2000 OFFENSE CHARGED 2002 2001 2000 90A-BADCHECKS 0 0 0 908 - CURFEW/LOITERINGNAGRANCY VIOLS 0 0 0 90C - DISORDERLY CONDUCT 3 1 7 90D - DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE gl 10 7 90E - DRUNKENNESS 1 0 0 90F - FAMILY OFFENSES, NONVIOLENT 0 0 0 90G - LIQUOR LAW VIOLATIONS I 8 12 56 90H - PEEPING TOM 1 0 0 0 90I -RUNAWAY 1 0 1 0 90J - TRESPASS OF REAL PROPERTY 01 2i 0 90Z - ALL OTHER OFFENSES 13 8 5 TOTAL ARRESTEES: 34 TOTAL ADULTS: 26 TOTAL JUVENILES: 8 1 TOTAL JUVENILES HANDLED: 1 TOTAL JUVENILES REFERRED: 7 . r. 1 NIBRS STOLEN RECOVERED PROPERTY 4th QUARTER OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2002 PROPERTY CODE BURNED COUNTERFT DAMAGED RECOVERED SEIZED STOLEN ALCOHOL 358 22 AUTOS 3014 BICYCLES CLOTHES 17 2367 COMP EQUIP 2500 CONSUMABLE GOODS 22 10 DRUGS 404 DRUG EQUIP 11 FIREARMS 2495 1115 JEWELRY 180 MERCHANDISE MONEY 18627 7040 NEGOTBLINSTMNTS 790 800 OTHER VEHICLES 500 PURSES 410 RADIOS/TVS 150 RECORDINGS 1075 STRUCTURE/SINGLE STRUC/OTH DWELLG 300 STRUC/COMMERCIAL 728 STRUC/OTHER TOOLS 10 410 VEHICLE PARTS 270 35 Other 10 555 3 8397 GRAND TOTAL 800 4877 24522 11 22415 . 6 . 32 32 : i# , 032 32'' '3210'0 32.32 32'32 0 32 0 '32 8:g .g : 53 0;O O,2 ZONGON 9 , 1. imig CD'CD.CD iii:lilli lili 1-11 111 I]lt1t1 lilli ,! 111 1 I lilli 1 I i 01 '01 1.1. 0:oiâ€ž 10 CO O 00 0 0 O 1.- 11Â·Â·10 0!101.-to (D.O;toÂ· 110Â· 1 IN CD N 01 â€ž -1 1 1 '11111 1 111' 11! il lIlli '11111,1, III lilli !11 0Â· -01 >- 0 0 .CV!01 1~ 'U 123 :0; 0 1 IC) 1 *3&3 :cl 'CO ini~ 'â€ž 2 :S *: :m ;"~ ~~ * O 0 '01'NOO O O "!O - O 0 0 - 10 010 O.MOO O,N. r O-0,0 It'i Â· /1 1 ,1:it li 0 0 , t.r)~CD 0 0 OIl to' 1.-1.-1001 10 1,0 Â¢9 '(D /O,0 .- IC) CD 'COL IN 1 1 Â· 'to CD ./ 1 1 N i.1 leD-IN. 1 1. 1 |01 i;4 18~ 1 1(VI,0 iâ„¢ ...p; .1â€ž1 1.1 1.1 :.1.1 1'11 Ii1!1 -0 + + J ~04=J * J-0 0- : 0- .5Â§Â§Â§ f M 5% MEME Ef 5 g RG : 0- 0- 0 '2 8 G iii Fili!.551 lilli ' , III O | 0' ir-~ |r-Er-~N,CO r OLW O *1 ~~01 1 1 1 1Â¢9 00!1 1 1 1 ! i 1 1 ! 11:'1111 1 11 2 1 G 0 h 1 0 0109 :0 (\1 CD r- LO O 0 01 r'.-Â·0 M CO CO.CO O co :co Â· 9 U Â© 1091â„¢111 ; 1 le (0 -- M m r N M 2 -8 11 1 I 10 0 -2 0 0 1. "10 0,0 0 1â€ž o â€ž-,0, 0 0 0 colo'0 010110 1-00 0 O 00 1 1:1:1,1 2 1 I .0 1 1 Illi Illili 11 lilil 0% i I Il, ~~ '' 111 'll,Ii,1,11 1 1 !1 0 100 10 0.0 M 101 '(91Â©'N'10 10 1 0 iN ; 'XI T- '0 (9 0 V)'(' O 00 col 1 1 to. 2 d f | 1,CO N : 1 1 :/9 (D Â· i r- (9 4- r N 09, lilli:r-1 m L O 0. 6/0- 2 J 32 : 32 1 32 4 32 f *02 -0 f 323232 gg crÂ· A * ko- r o *u.1 6, 8 tz:c r- ZQ ~~~ .- 09 O (Der-O - 0 000-0 le 1:- r 111 11'1111'111 111!lill!.0 imitilli 0 ' 0 1 t.0,0 0'0'10 :0 ' IM COIN 01 '0 0 1- O 0 !01'0 0 O IN O I- 0: D IC') r-IN iO .CO 7 Chi 1 1 '(19 -- 1 r M !:1 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 Al--WOO -0 h (9 r r 00 00 M LO CD CO h â€¢-' 9 01 CD 00 Cor) 1 . O,1 01 r r " N r 1 .r- Â·r- 0 010'0~0 0 0 ~0~0 010'r'T-'10.0! ~p! |0~0,0 0 0 0,0,0 0' Â» O 0.0' 'O. O 0 i 1,1 111~111 :!1:1-1 :/illili i.lili .'iii 0 O LO O 0.0'LO :O IN 4- r- CNI'" 1.- r-,0 00 ;C') 9-,91- CO CO 09 LO.CD CO : r.- ' r- V , 01 4 CD .0 CO - CNI Al 01 9- 01 - .cio Â·LLI L 0, 1 mo 1.-'B, Â§11 .It-; cio 1%Â£11,1 1 01 ll.1 :0'~0 : 1 Ii'gis 121 1 1 1 ; â€ž i*1%Â· 12:~ 91% 2 Im 1 8%5 ; ' 19'.O 4Â·z'W E5%0295 %,5 d 1 ED 0 E 0 * LL , ~5 0 A,W - W (0 0 ' Z ~ Z 1- 111 of 32123<LU R & 5 & 5 E 9 5 0 > w m ek 1 !lilli 1 1 1 1 1, 11111111,11 11 1 1 1 CO 0= O 0 2 1 1 -1 > LL CO Co/!al & 5!@ 1.3 %1 g C z E u.j zi 3 0 6 QÂ·+ > a- IE M * a;* m *Im * E E:m 2 0 0 OOHOLLJOOK-1 0&2 Z 0, -1 LU M .0 a. m a ~ P o ~ ~ u- L.L I (/) ~U- ~~ l22 <C 83 ~ ~ * ~*6 ~% ~% 2 2,35.25 ,Ef E % 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2002 2000 Reported'Unfounded.Actual Cleared'Clearance al Cleared 'Clearance Rate Reported Unfounded 'Actual Cleared Clearance Rate ummary - ro PA rk Police Lt--, 01 anVhld %6L Ablaph!03/ON.Ill332331NnOO KIDNAPPING/ABDUCTION 31(1NIAAS/N313kid 3S1V=I OFFENSE HOMICIDE H3A B3H10 . . 0, . 2 y ;y 0 . 2.0 'CO !2 ig ili: T JiJ 1 10 21 11'rilit''lli~i , 4 e-6-6 -ib -- 1 0 'co '00(9'to: 10 ;01 0, 10: lo 1%1 6 1 ! ri vi i ~ ~ +1 1 - -i - - - - 1 - r.-CDOr- -0 0000 09 9 1<1 , 1 00 66-6 vor O 010 0 ;O '01 0 0, 10 2 r MJE, , -, !c,~~1 '0 ~N g ! ~g ~RI '53 iÂ° i iÂ° i p:, , Ic:, Ic, ! 1 m g Â£ 0.04 F~Â§ Â§ ii I:~11 1 ,1 :jill 11 10 1 0 00 1-010 1.- Ilo'(91) 1 10' 501 10' '0! !(91 1 , 104 IMIM,01 1!11 '11.1 CD 0 3 m o 0 0 - N__-G, ~ - ~~6 ~cl N 0 0' 0 0-- ~-- m O O (9 CNI 02 02 - @ 9 tu OlD i<i : 111 :il,~ 0 0 -0 0 - 10 E O 10 000 0 0 10 101 0 ;112 : C 1 1 1 1 i / 1 1 / ~ ~ N cg- 0 0.0 1~ m S' IEIM'N' O 10 0; 10 M gg ,El ir 02 32 3. ' 132 32. 5}8 (1) 1% . 112 111111' 0 1 1 IlÂ·111!/!1 Ilill,11'll 1 1 r-,- 00 0 r co 0 0 0 0 09 CN 73"00 0 g .O 00 lo (9 0 0 0 0 03 h N .- r- N 1<1 11 O-ocroo~ 7 FiÂ©i '0 0100 0 0 0 B i !91 11 ilii 1,11 Ille]1111 lilli Ic. 1 11 m r O 0.0--- ir - 2 1%:9 2 0 .0 10 10 M~ 18 It (9 2- al) ~CIC 1 ' : '111 11 1 Â· co Â· , u, ! 1 i 52 Zi .-' Z 9 0 31 mi 1:1 u, ~ J' u.11-1 0~ 5i I l- E 5 9 : 1 <1 ; 10'Clul: 2-1 112 0 ! 1 MO Zi O 'Z U. 0#20 12 EbE abz 1%U-D a 00&!@ 21 E N:% 2 2 E ~ co 0 ':1 Z 2 500 0 ht U.1 J 91 Ul oz*% E - I IE, ~ iM* 3' 3, ~ , *: ~& -100% Â· $00% 97% 96Â°0 100% %00 1 _ %00L _ SNOMMOIA NOdV3 dual Cleared Clearanpe_Rat Rep earance R teIR Estes Park Police Depa Year End umma 01,20~ LEN PROPE TY if ~ _22-3 03 -- ~ 3 BRIBERY i98 . Â£Â£Â£ - S1V101 aN + 1--- . Estes Park Police Department Year End NIBRS Crime Summary Group B for 2002, 2001, 2000 OFFENSE CHARGED 2002 2001 2000 90A-BAD CHECKS 1 I 0 1 90B - CURFEW/LOITERING/VAGRANCY VIOLS 01 0 0 90C - DISORDERLY CONDUCT 17 11 24 90D - DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 521 40 33 90E - DRUNKENNESS 61 5 0 90F - FAMILY OFFENSES, NONVIOLENT 1 0 2 90G - LIQUOR LAW VIOLATIONS 60 59 79 90H - PEEPING TOM 0 Ot 1 90I - RUNAWAY 23 4 1 90J - TRESPASS OF REAL PROPERTY 3 6 4 90Z - ALL OTHER OFFENSES 57 49 24 TOTAL ARRESTEES: 220 ' TOTAL ADULTS: 146 TOTAL JUVENILES: 74 i i TOTAL JUVENILES HANDLED: 24 TOTAL JUVENILES REFERRED: 50 . f.. . NIBRS STOLEN RECOVERED PROPERTY END OF YEAR REPORT JANUARY - DECEMBER 2002 PROPERTY CODE BURNED COUNTERFT DAMAGED RECOVERED SEIZED STOLEN ALCOHOL 373 15 431 AUTOS 8426 28537 24537 BICYCLES 50 700 2020 CLOTHES 117 4161 COMP EQUIP 2700 3662 CONSUMABLEGOODS 84 428 DRUGS 404 DRUG EQUIP 403 FIREARMS 2495 100 82800 HOUSEHOLD GOODS 35 5 50 1710 JEWELRY 8 188 MERCHANDISE 169 2310 MONEY 603 18627 63526 NEGOTBLINSTMNTS 17476 800 OFFICE EQUIP 200 OTHER VEHICLES 500 ' 500 PURSES 35 645 RADIOS/TVS 100 392 RECORDINGS 100 224 2437 STRUCTURE/SINGLE 870 STRUC/OTH DWELLG 700 STRUC/COMMERCIAL 6836 3000 STRUC/PUBLIC 400 STRUC/STORAGE 200 STRUC/OTHER 100 600 600 TOOLS 10 50 5016 VEHICLE PARTS 1505 150 Other 10 5164 1233 19429 GRAND TOTAL 35 18089 24666 56502 518 219146 . .: :%-,15- em Â£ 17 in: . Â· 2 1 11, 1- 1 2 031111.1 C 2 2 le. 0 lo 10> j S DOSSE a#weAnt g lEn 940040 pu!LUND-UON Riverside Plaza 2000-2002 Activity Comparison LE ezeld ep.!SJGA.!B a~ gAL U/MOJU/MOO O ~ 1 11 1 "")! Â· "1"' "!I $ -1 1 ..... lili:: I . 0-0 0 0 , 0 0 49 1 : - .-I - 1 F- 4 4. -1 -I \1 '1. -J--11- 7- ZE,7 ~44_223/' ezeld ai)!SlaA!kl El UMOJUMOCI @ Riverside laza Activity Comparison 24% %9Z . I. . .. Â¥ 1 10 Z LU 0 1-Or-â€ž0000000001â„¢ 0 0 O.-0001-0 0 Ul r N 9- 4- 00 00 - c\1 2 - (NI nil ~ :3 .- e 01009-100 a W -1 1- O 0 1- 1- Z 0 r- 0 1- 00 0 61 e o â„¢ 0110 co 0 51 2 000....Ce 0 ,- .O 0 01 Z N N' R 0 0 -1 0 r O r - 0 r 0 0 - 0 0100 .0 O M %010000â„¢0 Ul > 2 Mzk 0 8 Z 7-0 692& 1-W aM MÂ»Ed 8*2 5 d 5 2|u.1 ~521Â£* M 61 0 4 COW O >' Z OIbdOED. 9.Iyogo W J D )1-00,0:12 201 z J< ul 2 % 52*<2 0-OLL10-30-0 |dEJEM 0 4= ~ ~J,_ILLI:f-OZOft/)Eg-J 20 f 5=4m5WM8 r.,252OERiZJILILLIOO.< M ZE g 2552(LaNd 2 Â£ 0 05 (0 i- 335 IOLLI 0 1- 52 R O.3Zm<)CO aze<DCO-#1110-30 X <<<mmOLLHEOO.(00)- 111 Z < << m In O IL N3MV1 lhIOd3hl NON-CRIMINAL RIVERWALK PLAZA DOWNTOWN R~ENCY AONEDÂ¥ hi '. t 4. . r THOO"OO"- ~ r . r Â¢\10 01 - Al N 0.â€ž0000000 r -1 00"91- 0 0 -r Cv - 21 A r-Â·r- N - en 9- C)10) 0-MOO<0.-000 r- -1 -1 1.- 0 1- Z N " 1- O CO r- 1-- r- 0 g~ ~ O 0 0 - r. r el .0 00.-n'0010-*00 gl .- 01 Z N' R 0 0 "0001-00.-CDC r r N O 010 CO~ H %00000â€ž0â„¢00 el 2 p . LU 1- > 1- 02 0 Fzk NE g ,-08 amB Z O LU Z F - 1- - 4 69 M tza LU m:E@ oafz 368 O 0 Illf as 05 oowm *Eg ul >a=w 2-I-yogEta-00 geÂ»= dE @EE Wz 0- < of (9 ,-d=go, O 40<*09 e ILLIZR:Se* of'-00- Of O z -1-1-'flla < 55 Me<02 14 05.0-ZILU:bELL-1 4 ZI*2200,-4 :63Â£*BOZNLB- 58&0WEE&#0 M ER,50*imb> ~ 5*G cr E '-v=J 3,9 229 6 O 0-0 0 1-1- ul O<OOINI--1-7 Z<<<mmOOLL LL- 1--LUO_JOLO X 0/Maip<DIOD 0<DE.OOZ NaMÂ¥11Â¥Odabl 1VNIWIHO CHECK L VIOLATIO IAI318Ohld 31IN3 , .... b-000â€ž00- =1 0 000â€žr"-â€ž04~ 0 .. r-0 - 2 1,0 Lo co ~ : 0 0 0- - N NO '0~ 4 .i h O r- i O LO Xf (O 01 0 0 0 00 â€ž00 0-1 11 0, 000010.-O*1 N O 0 0 -ON NO lei r .-1 to â€ž- -t 1- 0 Ei 00 %2 =bz wam~ :ggl 9m PA 220 ,_:ZIU Bolita 0 m U.1 I O LU m C 504 z. tb n~0-1-LUD. DOLO 252<EDIIO 3jOO o. 001-1.- OOII20-1-1- ERSONS CHECK ESTRIAN CONTACT ALCOHOL VIOLATION ~C~AONCE EXTRA CHECKS IN3180kld 31*3Anr CRI INAL & RUN S~Vl 1 . I . . d f I . ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES Annual Report Agency Name Date Estes Valley Victim Advocates, Inc. January 2003 Address P.O. Box 1287, 851 Dry Gulch Road City State Zip Phone Estes Park CO 80517 577-9781 Executive Director Mary Mesropian Brief Program Description: Estes Valley Victim Advocates, Inc. provides advocacy to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, staking, other crimes and trauma. Victim Advocates are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. An advocate can support victims through the immediate crisis, medical exams, law enforcement interviews and the court process. Advocates provide information on victim's rights, the cycle of violence, victim's compensation, and the legal process as well as make referrals to safehousing. The director coordinates the advocate program by recruiting, training, supervising, scheduling and evaluating victim advocates. A counselor is available to provide short-term (3-6 months) individual counseling and support groups to assist victims in recovering from the trauma of the incident. Objectives: Law enforcement, Estes Park Medical Center or other referral sources page victim advocates and advocates then provide services at the most appropriate safe location. After the services are provided to the victim, the victim advocate submits a written report. If an arrest has been made, a report is sent to the District Attorney's Office to use in considering bail conditions. A Court Advocate will attend court with the victim if requested. There are three areas ofadvocate assessment: Safety, Options and Stability. These questions are on every advocate case sheet and advocates must answer these questions on every call: Is victim(s) physically safe? (Not in immediate danger.) Victim knows options and rights and knows what to do next? Is the situation stabilized? This includes emotional stability as well as their ability to take care of their own and their children's immediate needs. All victims are offered individual counseling and support groups. Assessments are completed by program participants in the form of victim assessment needs questionnaires. We collaborate with Crossroads Safehouse, Alternatives to Violence and Larimer Center for Mental Health Sexual Assault Victim Advocates to keep our measurement tools appropriate and current. 1 4 6 . , : Innovqtive Actions: The director sits on the Board of Directors of the Estes Valley Restorative Justice Partnership and supports developing a program that integrates victim inclusion, rights and supportive services in the restorative justice process. She also sits on the Board of Directors of Estes Valley Multicultural Connections forging a partnership that assists domestic violence victims that speak only Spanish, is on the Child Protection Team for Estes Park and is the Chair ofthe Estes Valley Community Services Coalition. We have given free office space to Larimer County ChildSafe one day a week so that chile! victims of sexual assault can receive specialized counseling in Estes Park. A teen women 10-week support group has been established to look at issues around date rape and dating violence has been established and is now beginning its 2nd session. Future Objectives: We will continue our 24 hour/7 days per week victim advocacy services with the objective of continuing to have highly trained volunteer advocates delivering quality care, information and referrals to victims. Education to the community and in our schools on the issues of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and date rape are our top priority. 2 t I ESTES VALLEY VICTIM ADVOCATES, INC. INCIDENT REPORT OVERVIEW JANUARY - DECEMBER 2002 INCIDENT FIRST CONT. PHONE TOTAL CONTACT CONTACT CONTACT CONTACTS Domestic Abuse 59 v.men 17 141 217women ~ 38 children 38 children Sexual Assault 14 2 12 28 Assault 6 1 2 9 Stalking 2 0 2 4 Other Crime 8 1 4 13 Other Trauma 30 2 12 44 Counseling 66 218 107 391 TOTAL 223 241 280 744 TOTAL CONTACTS: 744 TOTAL ADVOCATE HOURS: 851.25 I . ~ Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department PO Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 (970) 577-0900, fax 970 577-0923 January 1,2003 Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Town Board Trustees: Our annual election of Officers was held at our December 3,2002 business meeting. The results of that election are as follows: â€¢ First Assistant Chief- Daryl McCown â€¢ Second Assistant Chief- Robert Hirning â€¢ Secretary- Will Birchfield â€¢ Treasurer- Doug Deats We respectfully request your approval of these Officers we have chosen to lead us in 2003. Sincerely, ic ' Scott Dorman, Chief Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department a I . 2002 TRAINING REPORT January 10, 2003 Town Board of Trustees Estes Park, Colorado Training hours for 36 full time volunteers during 2002 totaled 2,491 hours, resulting in an average of 69 hours per volunteer. Training in 2002 included the following: Fire behavior Fire streams Fire extinguishers Fire hose Incident command system Water supply Personal protective equipment Salvage and overhaul Vehicle fires Vehicle extrication Ventilation CPR Dive rescue Ice rescue EMT Hazardous material- operations level First Responder Rescue Hose testing and inspections Arson investigation Ladders and aerial operations Wildland fire red card Defensive driving Ropes & knots ISO practical testing Live fire scenarios Pumper/engineer Inspections & Prevention Interior fire attack Forcible entry Confined space Chemical/Biological response Building construction Communications Respectfully submitted, Scott Dorman, Chief Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department 4 I . h to NO-Alf)0091-91*LOLOLD CDto M.. 10 0)â€ž00*K A 00 N 0 91- 00 M 91 V N CO er) O LO LO CO N to 00 0 4- 01 O e CO r LO B-2 CO C) COlO M CO LO ..wooc!=44 0 U) (N Â¢9 0 E 2 co ir 16 0, 0 2 < =Â®11? U 2210 9 2 2261 0 > (D 2002 EPVFD RUN REPORT TOTALS Outside Dollars Lost Dollars Saved Average 37 1,112.50 11.51 898.9 00000'LOE'Z $ 00096'ZEâ‚¬'10 $ 99-Z Z9Z 9'99Z. 809 siejoi Type of Fire Call Count Man Hours C ts City Limits (est.) (est.) response time 000'L90'Z 090'48' L 9' KE L 9843 enionns Motor Vehicle Accidents 90 1,267 32 799,000 29 341 21,200 009'02 9.,9/ 000'092 008'Â£ 9.49 luewdinb3 6unee,1 pue Suplooo EMT Assists 153 475 96 44 381.5 18 28 268.5 14 Smoke Reports 41 69 1 Assist Other Agency 28 9.913. uo'WBASeAul 00 popo LEI 9.Â£9 SeJ!3 4sejl 9 Jelsdulncl 9'EL senosehl COOZ/ZE/L 4 W . ..0/toÂ©Ins=(0â‚¬000â€¢OB.NO 0 NO.10 10 N . M to 10 A M M Â®E 52 00 22 #228 15 42 -h*(0100(40 M E DJ % 8 44 Ri 00 NNOCOON-Â®CO(001 0 M CO - p M m 3 2 2 li 2 8 5 e of Fire Call Count Man Hours its Dollars Lost (est.) Dollars Saved (est. ) ~~posnse Resp Time 122 251 43 533 Motor Vehicle Accidents 106 1186 60 $ 518,200.00 $ - 520 48 36 440 False Alarms 34 168.5 21 158 145.5 17 $ 400.00 183 Haz-Mal 242 11 $ 5,000.00 170 Smoke Reports (unfounded) 59 17 205 Assist Other Agency 122.5 12 217 1 96 L 99 uo!}eO! 19@Aul JOPO LL 00000'29Â£'2 $ 0009â‚¬'611. EZZ Se]!=1 al np lu 19 99 00'009 9992 Weel eA!0 00 000'OE $ 00.00128Â£ 9-*6 SeJ!=1 eP!4@A 00.000' L 99 senoseH 00'000'09* $ 00.ook $ * g'99 al!=1 beulll!40 00009 $ 1. 9.99 lueludinba BuneeH/Buplooo 998Z 00'000'899'Z $ 0009&'Â£69 $ 8*Z VE 861Â£ M. sle;01 2001 Run Report Totals SeJ!=I 4SeJ1 '9 Jawdwna runttle01 4.. 6-gz rs 5 5 2! c,1- r r Sce- 9- 9- 9-- -S! . 00 - :2â€ž 2 (C)- S! . M ~ JO ~ St R' 2 31 r Ali 2 3124 f..4. 4 N N (9 00 Nâ„¢(NCNIX(\INNâ„¢Nâ„¢ A 00 (N ENC') N 22! (NIC! CVgg~ zoog~ CN ir; 4 m Imm i 32 1 7~ P 6 - 16 TB E 16 16 0. â„¢ 0' " 04 r.-r-"2""r-"r--""roli--r-(\12'-(9=222"CO CO rE 3 3 1 1 J E E EEE I-. --W C\1 - (9 N N tl 2% 9 v ~2 v .63- .Â¤ 47 2 F u, u, & 2 0 2 u, E Z' $' S 2 0 -9 2 CD (1) c (1) 0, w v P 3 1 .9 0 (0 .592-gEEÂ® -v-vucccE22(1) ECOE:CN -2 IE 4 2 c 0 ~ .0 -5 3 :2 8 .E @f :Ef .f f ~ f f :, ; 2 1 ; D = Lf'i o o *E r J -4.i R cJ3 216*2~' c c W LO . p M 0 0 0 V 4. 222 LL LE U. 2 t U. 222 222222222 2-@c ~LLILLILLINIZ zi JJJ JJJJJJJJJ JJJ J 30Â¤101=m Ji.g ?be 2 2~,~~~~ 2111111111Â®~f~ 21 21~~~lflâ‚¬4 7-tx : 00 0 01% 000000000=000 M :'4% ii ~~s*~:Â® acannoDaaE Coia ~RE gi401h.&= â€¢-8222222222Â®222=*2 2 2 2 a) m =Â£ E be O 0 L.9 .3. E E M *= 2 (D (D (1) t (1) (13 a) (D (13 0 0) (D (D _ (13 0) (D -' - (D 9 :*0-00% 2.5 -M -M W.E.M.M.1Â£2(-M-M-MM-%-M 00000:03-5.23Â·51213127{1i C C ie-2 @10 @52 22222 22E EE EEÂ®EEEME EFEEFFE*E ; J CD 0 CD = 0 0 0 00 0 0 w w 0 0 0 w E w u) 0 0 0 0 CD 64 CD CD 00 4= w L= \\\ ,\lili '' . I .. .. 01 01 nt W N 01 01 01 N 01 01 N N N N N IN IN C\1 01 W C\1 01 01 01 M N N 01 01 (N N W Â£(N 0099909099 990 099900009009 90 9 9999 9 3. 9 6 06 0 M M o â€¢- J r r- Co r- : B oo M r $ A A 16 0 e. A co r- A â€¢r 10 YI N M M ~ 1.0 0=01(9 09 1.0 (0 5 1~00 00 00000) WOOO =61(991Â·91-4-4-LOCDCD 01--t-t-r~-.2 C) 9- â€¢- r- r â€¢- â€¢- r- = r- r r â€¢- r Y â€¢- C\1 N (NOIC\1 CNI N N N N N (44 N N N (\1 01 (~1 W - Report no. . 1. uation found Approximate size Cause, No. of Engines responded Number of personnel Man~Hou 9.Et'Z L LGE 909. nN lejol Â·(acres) r 1 Â·-0 : . ...4,<"41,1 ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT DLAND FIRE REPORT power line nfounded JeAU00 leo JeAUOO leo aircraft-crash unfounded ejnpq, 146!I 4t. . lo il lo cv cci LO LO UDA LOv LO LO ~. Ir)-Ee g W 1 .. '~ o o 'Â°NA Ze 'Â° 'o 'e u) U, 3% r- 1.- C.4 r- (ON . 0000 R' 10(9 0 000008 2Kt. '174 ..40 3'. -N .* M M N M 2 53 3 0, .-r-r-r-r- CVA Â°*CD N â„¢EON-*3.-0.-r-r- .1-,- 1 0 4 â€ž. r r . r . M Â»1 A k :g (0 '25 - 4, m 0" " r r- r CY) cO r 2 .-,- r r r- r- CV Y M M r- r CV CV CV r 2Â¢9._r_ r- r-Â¤00~~~ J J E E I-. CN 9.- 8 -0 3 0 (D O O la an Gn 1a Er :/ 1M 1a 1 Ji 1M 89.Ev CE vE m co c Ec M QU /: :: /, .0 42 mi * 1, JL Mi .~ il RE O c 225 %3 3 2 2 8 2 E .2 â‚¬ S L- t .0'.CÂ» 0 - 0 0 4 .2 5 -c 'E 01 3 9.Â¥ (D C C CO- .C =, ~ %-C=ec za to to to tOlD M N N (,114:9 n N N. 0 0 00 06 d 0 91Â· f-22 <Effvv v.Â¤vvv v CC OCCCc C C .Z 4 jiLLI= 3001 6- 11107 J J 12222222 '&2 8022 2 02 0 2 0 c~~~ccc CcccCC C CO C - 0312(1113321 0. 11 *52) .52) -6 -2 1& 1& ic= 8 -tk 1& tk .2 -e t= e = dE R 2=== 18= 16 *ttEE=t~ &&221ERR&&RERM~f g. .35 1% .0 2. .D; Daa.aa X U) .-tal, 03 92bâ‚¬224)02:-84,Â®Â®Â®Â®6Â®22= 2 2 2 430 a,a,a, a) Â¥.2 4Â®~ 16 (13 (D I N~S 0 0 0 Â® Â® t: (D tz * to trta)- a) a) a, a) a) a) r 66-0-002 0 0 0 6- O 6- 6- 6- 6- - O 4-51*00000%00000,00,00*OU,U,CD O 0 0 M M X 0 2 M M M M .1Â£ 0 2 0 0 . 0 0-X M M M M M M M U) 1.-Â·E22EEEEIP=EEEEEIYEEFeELFIYEFEI~~~~~~EEEIP 0 ~C ~ U) 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 im U) O) 0] Â¤) U) O 0 U) U) u) U) U) U) U) O Z 1 4 ' 4 ..... I . 4 .b /..#I 2221/j I11 1- 3 CNI CNI N N CNI N ON N CN CNI N N N W N (N N N (4 CNIN (\1 CN N (N N CV (N (N CN (N (NI N M ,2 9999999999990999900000000009099999 h 0 0 e r- cv v w - co i. c.1 B . co w . ci 6 4- cli c,4 4 A elt e d, c., 6 :o co * 4,4- â‚¬ h h 10 00 - r r r- C) r- â€ž M (9 91Â· 4- 4- 4Â· 4- tO 10 10 ID LO LO (0 0 1% 10 C) C) O -- r- (D 447~5 (Ple le :I Ju J odi] 1 ESTES PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2002 WILDLAND FIRE REPORT Report no. tuation found Approximate size Cause No. of Engines responded Number of personnel Man Ho (acres) ." unfounded clouds cookout heavt'~0) mney UL XeULU!40 punoJun eull Je/V\Od pepuno,un . punojun odei e o punoJun puncgun punoJun puno,un puno,un ke re ,Â£ :simo Jo Jeqlun 4 1 . .. I . to if) 49 KO to 10 10 CV Ficv .22' 0000 W. AN 001Â® M N Y y: 4 y t. 64< 000000 8%#,0 g Â¥ CL :b UJ U- 05 5 >' c W % 1 112% J 0 a. 2 â‚¬ J â‚¬0 R - M R. 0 0 Â¥ 2 i-'/ 1@ 19 W to O 10 10 E 5 (NI N W (NICNI 0 0 ..0 27 g.8.1 CC , 88. ...... 5 5 -0 tk 12 R 2 O 0 0 i O 0 000 E E eme Â£' 0-0- 0- & lo â€¢- c.1 3 --- 2 .2 - 818881,2 000- 4-1606 <6 e A1~00O)7 0110 CO CO CO .- M Report no. J . Situation found No. of Engines responded ~ Number of pe rsonnel Man Hours ke report-unfound *.310%,4**,.,~*,A1't 6-4 *15 Number of calls: 7 . 4510.5 96 -*.. , - .~,t..;* .i,-. - 84:u,zeÂ»,: cÂ·., 04.2193#4 ESTES PARK VOLUN IRE DEPARTMENT smoke repo unfounded no.of calls no.of calls 3 controlled burn 3: no.of calls Number of Cal : . 10:33 AM Estes Park Fire Department 01/17/03 Balance Sheet Cash Basis As of December 31, 2002 Dec 31, 02 ASSETS Current Assets Checking/Savings First National Bank Checking 4,424.05 First National Bank Money Ma... 180,893.98 Total Checking/Savings 185,318.03 Total Current Assets 185,318.03 Other Assets Petty Cash 100.00 Total Other Assets 100.00 TOTAL ASSETS 185,418.03 LIABILITIES & EQUITY Equity Opening Bal Equity 105,362.52 Retained Earnings -412.35 Net Income 80,467.86 Total Equity 185,418.03 TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 185,418.03 Page 1 Â·10:34 AM Estes Park Fire Department 01/17/03 Profit & Loss YTD Comparison Cash Basis December 30 - 31, 2002 Dec 30 - 31, 02 Jan - Dec 02 Income Chaplain's Relief Fund 0.00 12,066.32 Convention 2002 Golf Tournament Income 0.00 3,043.00 Convention 2002 - Other 0.00 4,736.36 Total Convention 2002 0.00 7,779.36 Crafts Fair 0.00 29,751.00 Donations 10,515.00 116,316.08 El Pomar Foundation Grant 0.00 19,500.00 Fire Fighting Grant NPS 0.00 9,000.00 Interest Income 188.46 1,430.64 MDA Boot 0.00 11,097.03 Other Income 57.50 5,844.36 Total Income 10,760.96 212,784.79 Expense Awards 0.00 5,060.76 Bank Charges 0.00 4.95 Communications 0.00 11,228.65 Dive Team 0.00 7,590.83 Dry Hydrant Expense 0.00 3,544.78 Dues/Memberships 0.00 2,253.36 EMS Expense 0.00 4,203.11 Equipment 2,711.94 24,606.95 Fire District 0.00 24.50 Fire Prevention Materials 0.00 1,257.39 Firehouse Maintenance 0.00 2,918.53 Fundraising Expenses 0.00 983.66 Hazardous Materials 0.00 938.81 Incentives Volunteer/F Fighters 47.67 12,568.10 Insurance Policies 0.00 7,501.00 Labor Day Craft Fair Expense 0.00 1,864.83 MDA Contribution Expense 0.00 11,135.03 Miscellanious Expenses 0.00 61.57 New Members 0.00 560.18 New Truck Expense 0.00 220.80 Office Supplies 17.33 621.03 Operating Supplies 0.00 3,259.81 Other Expenses 0.00 6,639.35 Pagers 0.00 287.78 Software 0.00 3,190.00 Â·10:34 AM Estes Park Fire Department 01/17/03 Profit & Loss YTD Comparison Cash Basis December 30 - 31, 2002 Dec 30 - 31, 02 Jan - Dec 02 State Convention Expense Entertainment 0.00 600.00 Golf Tournament 0.00 2,928.50 Memorial 0.00 41.09 Open House 0.00 500.00 Other Expenses 0.00 2,119.37 Raffle Items 0.00 2,945.00 State Convention Expense - Ot... 0.00 479.74 Total State Convention Expense 0.00 9,613.70 Tax Preparation/Audit 0.00 245.00 Telephone 0.00 2,682.18 Training 0.00 - 6,895.07 Truck Maintenance 0.00 297.80 Upstairs Remodel 0.00 57.42 Total Expense 2,776.94 132,316.93 Net Income 7,984.02 80,467.86 . V - 4,4 . Income and Expense by Month 1!Incorne January through December 2002 liExpense $ in 1,000's 70~ 60 1 50+ Ul'GI 40 irt. e..Â¥1 1~ *.7-Â· 30 tf , $**4 *11.#t bale. %034?2 ~Ef .% 1 RSIÂ·. 2.R.. --- i. 20+ 5. 8" la ES. E** =A<' - 1,4 -3- EÂ¢*14 "/2.' pasci I *C=- 10 -I-/ f zillillill)lillilit- 1.- ..4 m lill' 02 1"/ a Â»-1,1 1% '... --- Jan02 Mar02 May02 Ju102 Sep02 Nov02 Feb02 Apr02 Jun02 Aug02 C)ct02 Dec02 Expense Summary 2Equipment %18.60 January through December 2002 IIncentives Volunteer/F Fighters 9.50 Communications 8.49 IMDA Contribution Expense 8.42 IState Convention Expense 7.27 ElI)ive Team 5.74 Insurance Policies 5.67 ETraining 5.21 1Other Expenses 5.02 lAwards 3.82 - IOther 22.28 - .Â· I'# I Total $132,316.93 70'bam.Mac#*fy:n .tet .. .E 1 r, . By Account