HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Public Safety 1999-02-044 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE February 4, 1999 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Judge Brown - Court Report 2.- Vehicle Purchase FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. ISO Calculation Method 2. Ice Dangers Warning 3. -Puel<- REPORTS 1. Correspondence Summary 2. NIBRS Statistics * The committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate business not available at the time the agenda was prepared.
TOWN OF ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum ... February 2,1999 . To: Greg Filsingdr / Randy Repola / Public Safety Committee . From: Dave Mahany »04£0/ Subject: 1999 Vehicle Replacement (G-78A and G-106B) - Background: These vehicles have been in the police patrol fleet since 1994 (G-78A) and 1996 (G-1068).The vehicles usage will be within the vehicle replacement parameters of 80,000 to 90,000 miles by mid-year 1999. (approx order time for a police car is 5-6 months). Budget / Costs: Rains Motor Company 1st vehicle -1999 Crown Victoria $22,059.00 -$ 6.800.00 Less Trade-in (1996 Crown Victoria G-106B) $15,559.00 Bid Price 211~ vehicle -1999 Crown Victoria $22,059.00 -$ 5.000.00 Less Trade-in (1994 Chevrolet Caprice G-78A) $17,059.00 Bid Price Burts Arapahoe Ford lIne. Ist vehicle -1999 Crown Victoria $20,526.50 -$ 3.800.00 Less Trade-in (1996 Crown Victoria G-106B) $16,726.50 Bid Price 20~ vehicle -1999 Crown Victoria $20,526.50 -$ 1.500.00 Less Trade-in (1994 Chevrolet Caprice G-78A) $19,026.50 Bid Price Longmont Ford 1999 Crown Victoria $21,704.80 -$ 0 NO TRADE-IN ACCEPTED $21,704.80 Bid Price Each / Vehicle The 1999 Police Department budget includes $56,400.00 for vehicles/equipment. Recommendation: The Police Department / Fleet Department recommends approval of the bids from Rains Motor Company and requests approval to purchase Two new Ford Crown Victoria Police Vehicles from Rains Motor Co. for a total price of $32,618.00.
TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 14, 1999 TO: Randy Repola/Gregg Filsinger/Public Safety Committee FROM: Dave Mahany- SUBJECT: Police Vehicle Analysis Background: Police Fleet Size (current): 1 humane officer vehicle 2 unmarked vehicles (one Taurus, one Ford Crown Victoria) 6 marked vehicles (three Ford Crown Victorias, one Chevrolet Caprice, two Jeep Cherokee 4x4s) Total Annual Miles (6 marked vehicles): 1996 - 123,660 miles 1997 - 111,427 miles ~ Average: 120,000 miles per year 1998 - est 123,816 miles ----~~ New Vehicle Prices For 1999 Sedans - $19,848.00 (basic state bid) - less any trade-in. 4x4s - $24'500.00 (11~ state bid) - less any trade-in. Police Vehicle life Expectancy: Existing Data Sedans (4) < 40,000 = 17¢/mi. 40,000 - 70,000 = 20¢/mi. 70,000 - 90,000 = 36¢/mi. 90,000+ = 41¢/mi. 4WD (2) <40,000 = 26¢/mi. 40,000 - 60,000 = 29¢/mi. 60,000+ = 41¢/mi. Existinz Replacement Policv Sedans: Replace 90,000 - 100,000 4WD: Replace 90,000 - 100,000
1 NOTE: 95,000 mi. life expectancy used for the following calculations. Fleet size (marked vehicles): Three vehicles: 120,000 +3= 40,000 miles per vehicle, per year. life expectancy 95,000 + 40,000 = 2375 years per vehicle. Costs = (1) sedan - $8,357 per vehicle, per year @ $19,848 EA. (2) Jeep 4x4s - $10,315 per vehicle, per year @ $24,500 EA. Approximate cost per year - $28,987, excluding maintenance & fuel. Four vehicles: 120,000 +4= 30,000 miles per vehicle, per year. Iife expectancy (95,000 + 30,000) = 3.1667 years per vehicle. Costs = (2) sedans - $6,268 per vehicle, per year @ $19,848 EA. (2) Jeep 4x4s - $7,737 per vehicle, per year @ $24,500 EA. Approximate cost per year - $28,010, excluding maintenance & fuel. Five vehicles (A): 120,000 +5= 24,000 miles per vehicle, per year. Life expectancy (95,000 + 24,000) = 3.9583 years per vehicle. Costs = (3) sedans - $5,014 per vehicle, per year @ $19,848 EX (2) Jeep 4x4s - $6,189 per vehicle, per year @ $24,500 EA. Approximate cost per year - $27,420, excluding maintenance and fuel. Five vehicles (B): All Jeep 4x4s - 120,000 +5= 24,000 miles per vehicle, per year. Life expectancy (95,000 + 24,000) = 3.9583 years per vehicle. Costs: (5) Jeep 4x4s - $6,189 per vehicle per year @ $24,500 EA. Approximate cost per year = $30,945 excluding maintenance & fuel. 1 Current Fleet Six vehicles: 120,000 +6= 20,000 miles per vehicle, per year. life expectancy (95,000 + 20,000) = 4.75 years per vehicle. Costs = (4) sedans - $4,178 per vehicle, per year @ $19,848 EA. (2) Jeep 4x4s - $5,157 per vehicle, per year @ $24,500 EA. Approximate cost per year - $27,026, excluding maintenance & fuel. I NOTE: 80,000 to 85,000 miles life expectancy is used for the following calculations. Fleet Size (marked vehicles): Three vehicles: 120,000 +3= 40,000 miles per vehicle, per year. Life expectancy (80,000 + 40,000) = 2.0 years per vehicle. Costs = (1) sedan - $9,924 per vehicle, per year @ $19,848. (2) Jeep 4x4s - $12,250 per vehicle, per year @ $24,500. Approximate costs per year = $34,424, excluding maintenance and fuel. Four vehicles: 120,000 +4= 30,00 miles per vehicle, per year. Life expectancy (80,000 + 30,000) = 2.667 years per vehicle. Costs: (2) sedans - $7,442 per vehicle, per year @ $19,848. (2) Jeep 4x4s - $9,186 per vehicle, per year @ $24,500.
Approximate costs per year - $33,257, excluding maintenance and fuel. Five vehicles (A): 120,000 +5= 24,000 miles per vehicle, per year. Life expectancy (80,000 + 24,000) = 3.3333 years per vehicle. Costs = (3) sedans - $5,454 per vehicle, per year @ $19,848 EX. (2) Jeep 4x4s - $7,350 per vehicle, per year @ $24,500 EA. Approximate cost per year = $32,562, excluding maintenance and fuel Five vehicles (B): All Jeep 4x4s - 120,000 +5= 24,000 miles per vehicle, per year. Life expectancy (80,000 + 24,000) = 3.3333 years per vehicle. Costs = (5) Jeep 4x4s - $7,350 per vehicle, per year @ $24,500 EA. Approximate costs per year = $36,750, excluding maintenance and fuel. 1 Current Eleet Six vehicles: 120,000 +6= 20,000 miles per vehicle, per year. Life expectancy (80,000 + 20,000) = four years per vehicle. Costs: (4) sedans - $4,962 per vehicle, per year @ $19,848. (2) Jeep 4x4s - $6,125 per vehicle, per year @ $24,500. Approximate costs per year = $32,098, excluding maintenance and fuel. Vehicles out-of-service history for maintenance, breakdown, factory recalls or otherwise in past 12 months (for marked patrol vehicles): 27 times a vehicle was out-of-service two days or more 18 times two or more vehicles were out-of-service at the same time 5 times three vehicles were out-of-service at the same time 1 time four vehicles were out-of-service at the same time 1 time 5 vehicles were out-of-service at the same time Budget Not applicable. Recommendation: No recommendation. This is a report only. This report shows that the yearly cost of the fleet does not change a significant amount between three and six marked patrol cars. Fleet size should be determined by need. Comparisons: Aspen: 10 total vehicles (nine Saabs) 1 humane officer vehicle 2 unmarked vehicles 7 marked vehicles = 1 per 785 residents (The population of Aspen is 5,500 year-round residents and approximately 25,000 in the winter.) Aspen vehicle replacement policy: Humane officer pickup - maximum use four years
Marked/unmarked vehicles - maximum two years - less than 30,000 miles Breckenridge - 10 total vehicles (a114x4s Land Rovers) 2 unmarked vehicles 8 marked vehicles = one per 625 residents (The population of Breckenridge is 5,000 year-round residents, and approximately 30,000 in the winter.) Breckeruidge police vehicle replacement policy: Marked/unmarked vehicles - replacement @ three years Estes Park - nine total vehicles (currently) 1 humane officer vehicle 2 unmarked vehicles 6 marked vehicles = one per 916 residents (The population of Estes Park is 5,200 year-round residents, and increases to 10,000 full-time summer residents with approximately 20,000 to 25,000 people in the summer.) DM/lb
MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor Dekker and Board of Trustees From: Fire Chief Scott Dorman Date: February 1, 1999 Subject: Standardization of estimated fire flow and hydrant screening procedure Background: Before 1996 estimated fire flows and fire hydrant locations were determined by the Water Department with little input from the Fire Department. During our last Insurance Services Office (ISO) inspection in October of 1997, it was discussed that this is an area in which the Fire Department should have more input and review. At that time the fire department was given two methods for calculating fire flow requirements from ISO. These methods are as follows : 04 ISO method: F= 18C(A)(*+(EHO) Where: F= required fire flow in gallons per minute (GPM) C= coefficient related to the type of construction A= total floor area (including all stories) E= percentage to be added for exposures 0= reduction for occupancy type 'F" may have an additional reduction of 50% if building has Automatic Sprintders. Poudre Valley Fire Protection District Method(PVA): Use PFA table 1 with adjustments Although PVA's method is much simpler we have found that it is too broad for use within our water system and area. We have also encountered some confusion with having two methods.
The hydrant distribution credit is set by ISO and is used for either method. Hydrant distribution per ISO is as follows: Hydrant location from buildings credit for hydrant in GPM over 1000' 0 GPM 601' - 1000' 250 GPM 301' - 600' 670 GPM less than 300' 1000 GPM Hydrant distribution must be equal to or greater than estimated fire flow. BudgeUcost: No cost or budget implications Recommendation: To ensure consistency in calculations of fire flow requirements and hydrant locations I recommend Town Board approval of the use of the ISO method for such calculations.
ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW AND FIRE HYDRANT SCREEN]NG PROCEDURE PURPOSE: The purpose of this procedure is to screen new building plans for the estimated fire flow and fire hydrant locations required for manual fire suppression operations. This procedure is tailored to existing PFA fire suppression capabilities and is promulgated under section 10.301 of the Uniform Fire Code as adopted by the City of Ft. Collins and the Poudre Valley Fire Protection District. I. Minimum Required Fire Flow All buildings except UBC Classification R-3. The estimated minimum required fire flow is determined by the ground floor square footage as detailed in Table 1. The basic fire flow from Table 1 can be adjusted with adjustments 1-4 to determine adjusted estimated re- quired fire flow. TABLE 1 Square Footage on First Floor Basic Fire Flow Less than 2,500 1000 Gallons Per Minute 2,501 - 5,000 1500 " " " 5,001 - 10,000 2000 " " " 10,001 - 15,000 2500 " " " 15,001 - 20,000 3000 " It 11 -- 20,001 - 25,000 3500 " " " 25,001 - 30,000 4000 " " " 30,001 - 35,000 4500 " " " Over 35,000 5000 " " " ADJUSTMENTS: 1. An additional 500 gallons per minute should be added to basic fire flow for each additional story above grade. The total adjustment should not exceed 1500 gallons per minute. 2. The basic fire flow plus height adjustment may be reduced by 25% if the building is of fire resistive or protected non-combustible construction. 3. The basic fire flow plus height adjustment may be reduced by 50% if the building is fully protected by an approved fire sprinkler system. 4. Total adjustments due to construction type and sprinkler protection may not exceed 50%.
., ~ APPENDIX A -GUIDE FOR DETERMINATION OF REQUIRED FIRE FLOW This guide has been prepared for the use of the municipal survey and grading personnel of surance Services Office and other fire insurance rating organizations. It is being made available municipal officials, consulting engineers, and other interested parties as an aid in estimating e flow requirements. It should be recognized that this publication is a "guide" in the true sense the word, and requires a certain amount of knowledge and experience in fire protection gineering for its effective application. INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE 160 Water Street 4 A New York, New York 10038 December 1974 INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE ' Guide For Determination of Required Fire Flow t 1 An estimate of the fire flow required for a given fire area may be determined by the 1 formula: I . F = 18 C (A)0.5 'here . = the required fire flow in gpm . _ C = coefficient related to the type of construction C = 1.5 for wood frame construction e = 1.0 for ordinary construction = 0.9 for heavy timber type buildings · 1: = 0.8 for noncombustible construction - a B = 0.6 for fire-resistive construction 1. r. Note: For types of construction and/or materials that do not fall within the categories given, use a coefficient reflecting the difference. Coefficients shall not be greater than 1.5 nor less than 0.6 and may be determined by interpolation. Such interpolation shall be between consecutive types of construction as listed above. i Definitions of types of construction are included in Appendix C. li A = The total floor area (including all stories, but excluding basements) in the building being considered. For fire-resistive buildings consider the 6 largest successive floor areas if the vertical openings are unprotected; if the vertical openings are properly protected, consider only the 3 largest successive floor areas. The fire flow as determined by the above shall not exceed: 8,000 gpm for wood frame construction I1 "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974. Insurance Services Office." 97
8,000 gpm for ordinary and heavy timber construction 6,000 gpm for noncombustible construction 6,000 gpm for fire-resistive construction . - except that for a normal 1-story building of any type of construction the fire flow shall not exceed 6,000 gpm. The fire flow shall not be less than 500 gpm. For 1 -family and small 2-family dwellings not exceeding 2 stories in height see note 10. 2. The value obtained in No. 1 above may be reduced by up to 25% for occupancies having a low fire hazard or may be increased by up to 25% for occupancies having a high fire hazard. As a guide for determining low or high hazard occupancies see the lists in Appendix C. The fire flow shall not be less than 500 gpm. 3. The value obtained in No. 2 above may be reduced by up to 50% for complete automatic sprinkler protection. Where buildings are either fire-resisitive or noncombustible construction, and have a low fire hazard, the reduction may be up to 75%. The percentage reduction made for an automatic sprinkler system will depend upon the extent to which the system is judged to reduce the possibility of fires spreading within and beyond the fire area. Normally this reduction will not be the maximum allowed without proper system supervision including water flow and valves. 4. To the value obtained in No. 2 above a percentage should be added for structures exposed within 150 feet by the fire area under consideration. This percentage shall depend upon the height, area, and construction of the building(s) being exposed, the separation, openings in the exposed building(s), the length o f exposure, the provision o f automatic sprinklers and/or outside sprinklers in the building(s) exposed, the occupancy. of the exposed building(s), and the effect o f hillside location on the possible spread o f fire, The percentage for any one side generally should not exceed the following limits for the separations shown: Separation .Percentage 0 - 10 feet 25% 11 - 30 20 j 31 - 60 15 f 61 - 100 10 f 101 - 1505/ The total percentage shall be the sum of the percentages for- all sides, but shall not exceed 75%. "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office."
1 . 5. The value obtained in No. 2 above is reduced by the percentage (if any) determined in No. 3 above and increased by the percentage (if any) determined in No. 4 above. The fire flow shall not exceed 12,000 gpm nor be less than 500 gpm. Note 1: The guide is not expected to necessarily provide an adequate value for lumber yards, petroleum storage, refineries, grain elevators, and large chemical plants but may indicate a minimum value for these hazards. Note 2: Judgment must be used for business, industrial, and other occupancies not specifically mentioned. Note 3: Consideration should be given to the configuration o f the building(s) being considered and to the fire department accessibility. - Note 4: Wood frame structures separated by less than 10 feet shall be considered as one fire area. . I Note 5: Party Walls - Normally an unpierced party (common) wall m* warrant up to a 10% exposure charge. Note 6: High one-story buildings - When a building is stated as 1 = 2, or more stories, the number of stories to be used in the formula depends upon the use being made o f the building. For example, consider 1 = 3-story building. If the building is being used for high-piled stock, or for rack storage, the building would probably be considered as 3 stories and, in addition, an - increased percentage for occupancy may be warranted. However, if the building is being used for steel fabrication and the extra height is provided only to facilitate movement of owects by a crane, the building would probably be considered as a 1-story building and a decreased percentage for occupancy may be warranted. Note 7: If a building is exposed within 150 feet, normally some percentage increase for exposure will be made. Note 8: Where wood shingle roofs could contribute to spreading fires, add 500 gpm. Note 9: Any noncombustible building is considered to warrant an 0.8 coefficient. Note 10: Dwellings - For groupings of 1-family and small 2-family dwellings not tl exceeding 2 stodes in height, the following short method may be used. (For other residential buildings, the regular method should be used.) Exposure distances Suggested required fire flow Over 100' 500 gpm 31 - 100' 750 - 1000 11 - 30' 1000 - 1500 10' or less 1500 - 2000* *If the buildings are continuous, use a minimum of 2500 gpm. Also consider Note 8. ..t *10 "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission.Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office." *i. 5: -1 · ·i ...6.~ · •W-**i*7
1.. . 4 - Outline of Procedure j' A. Determine the type of construction. B. Determine the ground floor area. C. Determine the height in Stories. D. Using tables in Appendix B, determine the required fire flow to the nearest 250 gpm. E. Determine the increase or decrease for occupancy and apply to the value obtained in D above. Do not round off the answer. F. Determine the decrease, if any, for automatic sprinkler protection. Do not round off the value. G. Determine the total increase for exposures. Do not round off the value. H. To the answer obtained in E, subtract the value obtained in F and add the value obtained in G. Round off the final answer to the nearest 250 gpm if less than 2500 gpm and to the : nearest 500 gpm if greater than 2500 gpm. Use of Tables (Steps A, B, C, D) The tables use the GROUND AREA of the building and the height o f the building in stories. r . Using the table corresponding to the type of construction, look under the number of stories and locate the ground area of the building(s) being considered between two ground areas given in the table. The corresponding fire flow is found in the left column. Examples a. Given: A 3-story building of ordinary construction of 7300 square feet (ground area). Using the table C = 1.0, in the 3-story column, 7300 square feet falls between 7100 and 8500 square feet and the corresponding fire flow is 2750 gpm. b. Given: A 3-story building of ordinary construction of 7300 square feet (ground area) communicating to a 5-story building of ordinary construction of 9700 square feet (ground area) for a total ground area of 17,000 square feet. Determine the total floor area which equals 3 (7300) + 5 (9700) = 70,400 square feet. Using the table C = 1.0, under the one story column for 70,400 sq. ft. the corresponding fire flow is 4750 gpm. c. Given: A 3-story wood frame building of 7300 square feet (ground area) communicating with a 5-story building of ordinary construction of 9700 square feet (ground area) for a total ground area of 17,000 square feet. Determine the total floor area for each type of construction and for the fire area which is 3 (7300) = 21,900 square feet of wood frame construction, 5 (9700) = 48,500 square feet of ordinary construction, and a total area of 70,400 square feet with 31% being of wood frame construction and 69% being o f ordinary construction. Under the one-story column in the wood frame construction table (C => 1.5), an area of 70,400 square feet has a corresponding fire flow of 7250 gpm. Similarly, under the one-story °'Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission.Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office." l 1An 8/63&1.281ll=*?E'paw,L"il/GuE%.9 6 .: t¥
ril column in the ordinary construction table (C = 1.0), an area of 70,400 square feet has a corresponding fire flow of 4750 gpm. In this case, the fire flow will be 31% (7250) + 69% (4750) = 2250 +,3280 = 5530 gpm, or to the nearest 250 gpm, = 5500 gpm. d. Given: A 2-story building consisting of 10,000 square feet (ground area) of wood frame construction, 15,000 square feet (ground area) of 6rdinary construction, 20,000 square feet (ground area) of noncombustible construction, and 25,000 square feet (ground area) of fire-resistive construction. The total floor area is 140,000 square feet. The maximum fire flow for wood frame construction is at 85,100 square feet (see table). Note: "When the total area exceeds the upper limit for the poorest type of construction, limit the floor area o f the best type(s) of construction so that the total area considered does not exceed the upper limit for the poorest type of construction." Consider 2x 10,000 = 20,000 square feet of wood frame construction, plus 2 x 15,000 = 30,000 square feet of ordinary construction plus 2 x 20,000 = 40,000 square feet (limited to 35,100 square feet) of noncombustible construction. The fire flow will-·be 24% x 8000 (wood frame) + 35% x 6750* (ordinary) + 41% x 5500* (noncombustible) = 1920 + 2362 + 2255 = 6537 gpm, or to the nearest 250 gpm, = 6500 gpm. *based upon 140,000 square feet. = . e. Given: A 2-story building of ordinary construction of 105,000 square feet (ground area) communicates with a 1 -story building of noncombustible construction of 80,000 square feet (ground area). Normally the required fire flow would be determined by proportioning as in "c" above. This would result in a required fire flow of 7460 gpm, £ 0 or 7500 gpm. However, it is to be noted that the total area of the 2-story building alone results in a fire flow of 8,000 gpm and, of course, the logical answer would be 8,000 gpm. Any time the total area results in the use of an upper limit for fire flow, the possibility of a portion of the fire area justifying the upper limit must -be investigated. ... f. Given: A normal 1-story building of ordinary construction of 210,000 square feet (ground area). The table gives a required fire flow of 8,000 gpm; hokever, since this is a normal 1-story building, the maximum fire flow is 6,000 gpm. g. Given: A normal 1-story building of ordinary construction of 80,000 square feet communicates with a normal 1-story building of noncombustible construction of 85,000 square feet. Normally the required fire flow would be determined by proportioning as in "c" above. This would result in a required fire flow of 6480 gpm, or 6500 gpm However, since these are normal l-story buildings the maximum fire flow is 6,000 gpm. f El.3 "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office." 101 0 . 11 4-....
. APPENDIX B - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW TABLES INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE FIRE FLOW vs. GROUND AREA Wood Frame Construction F = 18£(A)0·5 (Ground area in square feet) F =gpm; C = 1.5 A = area in sq. ft. gpm 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stories 500 - 500 300 200 100 100 100 750 1,100 600 400 300 200 200 1000 1,700 900 600 400 300 300 1250 2,600 1,300 900 700 500 400 1500 3,600 1,800 1,200 900 700 600 1750 4,80'0 2,400 1,600 1,200 1,000 800 2000 6,200 3,100 2,100 1,600 1,200 1,000 2250 y V,t-* 7,700 3,900 2,600 1,900 1,500 1,300 4.2.- 2500 9,400 4,700 3,100 2,400 1,900 1,600 2?50 11,300 5,700 3,800 2,800 2,300 1,900 3000 - 13,400 6,700 4,500 3,400 2,700 2,200 3250 15,600 7,800 5,200 3,900 3,100 2,600 3500 18,000 9,000 6,000 4,500 3,600 3,000 3750 20,600 10,300 / 6,900 5,200 4,100 3,400 4000 - 23,300 11,700 . 7,800 .5,800, .4,700 . 3,900 4250 1 i.=b, "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission.Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office."
I - i 1 2 3 4 5 9 , Stories 4250 26,300 13,200 8,800 " 6-,600 5,300 - 4,400 4500 29,300 14,700 9,800 7,300 5,900 4,900 1 4750 32,600 16,300 10,900 8,200 6,500 5,400 5000 / . 36,000 18,000 12,000 9,000 7,200 6,000 5250 39,600 19,800 13,200 9,900 7,900 6,600 5500 43,400 21,700 14,500_ 10,900 8,700 7,200 5750 47,400 23,700 15,800 11,900 9,500 7,900 J 6000 51,500 25,800 17,200 12,900 10,300 8,600 6250 55,700 27,900 18,600 13,900 11,100 9,300 6500- 60,200 30,100 203 00 15,100 12,000 10,000 6750 64,800 32,400 21,600 16,200 13,000 10,800 7000 ,- -& 69,600 34,800 23,200 17,400 13,900 11,600 7250 74,600 37,300 24,900 18,700 14,900 12,400 7500 79,800 39,900 26,600 20,000 16,000 13,300 7750 85,100 42,600. 28,400 21,300 17,000 14,200 8000 J "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office." 103
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE FIRE FLOW vs. GROUND AREA F = I BC(A)0.5 Ordinary Construction F = gpm; C = 1.0 (Ground area in square feet) A = area in sq. ft. gpnn 12345. 6 Stories 500 1,200 600 400 300 200 200 750 2,400 1,200 800 600 500 400 1000 3,900 2,000 1,300 1,000 800 700 1250 5,800 2,900 1,900 1,500 1,200 1,000 1500 / 8,200 4,100 2,700 2,100 1,600 1,400 1750 10,900 5,500 3,600 2,700 2,200 1,800 2000 13,900 7,000 4,600 3,500 2,800 2,300 2250 17,400 8,700 5,800 4,400 3,500 2,900 2500 21,300 10,700 7,100 5,300 4,300 3,600 2750 25,500 12,800 8,500 6,400 5,100 4,300 3000 30,100 15,100 10,000 7,500 6,000 5,000 3250 35,200 17,600 11,700 8,800 7,000 5,900 3500 10,600 20,300 13,500 10,200 8,100 6,800 3750 46,400 23,200 15,500 11,600 9,300 7,700 4000 52,500 26,300 17,500 13,100 10,500 8,800 4250 ,59,100 29,600, 19,700 14,800 11,800 9,900 4500 "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office." ....
gpm 1 2 3 4 5. 6 Stories 4500 66,000 - 33,000 22,000 16,500 13,200 11,000 4750 73,300 - 36,700 24,400 18,300 14,700 12,200 . 5000 - 81,100 -40,600 27,000 20,300 16,200 f3,500 5250 89,200 -44,600 29,700 22,300 17,800 14,900 5500 97,700 -48,900 32,600 24,400 19,500 16,300 5750 106,500 - 53,300 35,500 26,600 21,300 17,800 6000 115,800 -57,900 38,600 28,900 23,200 19,300 6250 125,500 - 62,800 41,800 31,400 25,100 20,900 6500 135,500 - 67,800 45,200 33,900 27,100 22,600 6750 145,800 -72,900 48,600 36,500 29,200 24,300 7000 156,700 -78,400 52,200 39,200 31,300 26,100 7250 167,900 - 84,000 56,000 42,000 33,600 28,000 7500 179,400 - 89,700 59,800 44,900 35,900 29,900 7750 191,400 -95,700 63,800 47,900 38,300 31,900 8000 j . "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974. Insurance Services Office."
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE FIRE FLOW vs. GROUND AREA F = 18£(A)0·5 Noncombustible Construction F= gpm ; C= 0.8 (Ground area in square feet) A = area in sq. ft. ---%.. gpm 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stories 500 1,900 - 1,000 600 500 400 300 750 3,700 - 1,900 1,200 900 700 600 1000 6,100 - 3,100 2,000 1,500 1,200 1,000 1250 9,100 4,600 3,000 2,300 1,800 1,500 1500 12,700 6,400 4,200 3,200 2,500 2,100 1750 17,000 - 8,500 5,700 4,100 3,400 2,800 2000 21,800 - 10,900 7,300 5,500 4,400 3,600 2250 27,200 - 13,600 9,100 6,800 5,400 4,500 2500 33,200 - 16,600 11,100 8,300 6,600 5,500 2750 39,700 - 19,900 13,200 9,900 7,900 6,600 3000 47,100 - 23,600 15,700 11,800 9,400 7,900 - 3250 54,900 - 27,500 18,300 13,700 11,000 9,200 3500 63,400 31,700 21,100 15,900 12,700 10,600 . 3750 72,400 36,200 24,100 18,100 14,500 12,100 4000 82,100 -41,200 27,400 20,500 16,400 13,700 4250 92,400 - 46,200 30,800 23,100 18,500 15,400 4500 103,100 51,600 34,400 25,800 20,600 17,200 4750 114,600 57,300 38;200 28,700 22,900 19,100 5000 126,700 63,400 42,200 31,700 25,300 21,100 5250 139,400 - 69,700 46,500 34,900 27,900 23,200 5500 152,600 76,300 50,900 38,200 30,500 25,400 5750 166,500 - 83,300 55,500 41,600 33,300 27,800 6000 "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office." 106
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE FIRE FLOW vs. GROUND AREA F = 18CCA)0·5 Fire-Resistive Construction F = gpm; C = 0.6 (Ground area in square feet) A = area in iq. ft. gpnn 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stories 500 3,300 - 1,700 - 1,100 800 700 600 750 6,600 - 3,300 - 2,200 1,700 1,300 1,100 1000 10,900 - 5,500 - 3,600 2,700 2,200 1,800 1250 16,200 8,100 5,400 4,100 3,200 2,700 6, A. 1500 22,700 11,400 7,600 5,700 4,500 3,800 1750 30,200 - 15,100 10,100 7,600 6,000 5,000 2000 38,700 - 19,400 - 12,900 9,700 7,700 6,500 e I 2250 48,300 - 24,200 - 16,100 12,100 9,700 8,100 -2500 59,000 - 29,500 19,700 14,800 11,800 9,800 2750 - 70,900 35,500 - 23,600 17,700 14,200 11,800 3000 83,700 - 41,900 - 27,900 20,900 16,800 13,900 3250 97,700 - 48,900 32,600 24,400 19,500 16,300 3500 112,700 - 56,400 - 37,600 28,200 22,500 18,800 3750 128,700 - 64,400 - 42,900 32,290 25,700 21,500 4000 145,900 - 73,000 - 48,600 36,500 29,200 24,300 4250 164,200 - 82,100 - 54,700 41,100 32,800 27,400 4500 183,400 - 91,700 - 61,100 45,900 36,700 30,600 4750 203,700 - 101,900 - 67,900 50,900 10,700 34,000 5000 225,200 - 112,600 - 75,100 56,300 45,000 37,600 5250 247,700 - 123,900 - 82,600 61,900 49,500 41,300 5500 271,200 - 135,600 - 90,400 67,800 54,200 45,200 5750 295,900 148,000 - 981600 74,000 59,200 49,300 J 6000 "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office." 107
APPENDIX C - DETERMINING FIRE FLOW FOR TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION For the specific purpose of using the Guide, the following definitions may be used: Fire-Resistive Construction - Any structure that is considered fire-resistive by any of the four model building codes. Noncombustible Construction - Any structure having all structural members, including walls, columns, piers, beams, girders, trusses, floors, and roofs of noncombustible matexial and not qualifying as fire-resistive construction. Ordinary Construction L Any structure having exterior walls of masonry or other noncombustible material in which the other structural members, including but not limited to columns, floors, roofs, beams, girders, and joists, are wholly. or partly of wood or other combustible material. Heavy timber type buildings are required to satisfy a number of specific provisions (see any of the four model building codes). Wood Frame Construction - Any structure in which the structural members are wholly or partly of wood or other combustible material and the construction does not qualify as ordinary construction. OCCUPANCY Low Hazard Occupancies: Apartments Asylums Churches Clubs Colleges and Universities Dormitories Dwellings Hospitals Hotels Institutions Libraries, except Large Stack Room Areas Museums Nursing, Convalescent and Care Homes J Office Buildings Prisons Public Buildings Rooming Houses Schools Tenements "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office." 108
i High Hazard Occupancies: Aircraft Hangers Cereal, Feed, Flour and Grist Mills Chemical Works - High Hazard Cotton Picker and Opening Operations Explosives and Pyrotechnics Manufacturing ' High-Piled Combustible Storage in excess of 21 feet high Linoleum and Oilcloth Manufacturing Linseed Oil Mills Match Manufacturing Oil Refineries A I. Paint Shops Pyroxylin Plastic Manufacturing and Processing Shade Cloth Manufacturing Solvent Extracting Varnish and Paint Works Wood Working with Flammable Finishing Other occupancies involving processing, mixing, storage and dispensing flammable and/or combustible liquids. Experience has shown that the following credits should normally be applied for the occupancies listed: aL Dwellings*, apartments and dormitories -25% Hospitals -20% Elementary schools -20% Junior and Senior high schools -15% Open parking garages -25% *When applying the standard method. For other occupancies, good judgment should be used, and the percentage increase or decrease will not necessarily be the same for all buildings that are in the same general category - for example "Colleges and Universities": this could range from a 25% decrease for buildings used - only as dormitories to an increase for a chemical laboratory. Even when considering high schools, the decrease should be less if they have extensive shops. It is expected that in commercial buildings no percentage increase or decrease for occupancy will be applied in most of the fire flow determinations. In general, percentage increase or decrease . will not be at the limits of 125%. EXPOSURES When determining exposures it is necessary to understand that the exposure percentage increase for a fire in a building (x) exposing another building (y) does not necessarily equal the U "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office." 105
percentage increase when the fire is in building (y) exposing building (x). The Guide gives the maximum possible percentage for exposure at specified distances. However, these maximum percentages should not be used for all exposures at those distances. In each case the percentage applied should reflect the actual conditions but should not exceed the percentage listed. The maximum percentage for the separations listed generally should be used if the exposed building meets all of the following conditions: a. Same type or a poorer type of construction than the fire building. b. Same or greater height than the fire building. c. Contains unprotected exposed openings. d. UnspIinklered. "Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office with its permission. Copyright 1974, Insurance Services Office." Copy the sample Fire Flow Estimate form on the facing page to record and use the actual figures and conditions found locally. Following the blank sample are several filled-in samples for comparison.
•. CORRESPONDENCE SUMMARY January 1999 Received a letter from Allnutt Funeral Service thanking the Police Department for ..."outstanding funeral escort service"..... "many compliments are directed to the officers for their respect, reverence and efficiency from Our families and their friends and loved ones." C 0 • I.-/
32 32 32 0 32 32 32 32 0 30 32 2848 0 A - 830 ¤n O 0 -000.- O 9-Mo 0 0 m unool-mooor 0 O 000000 O e (D O 0 e O 0 0 r O U) r .O 0 61 000(91-1-0-1- r r 000000 0 01 r- m CN O 0 -000 - O 0000 0 0 O 000000000 0 0 000000 000 O 0 61000™ O 10 - 1 0 - O N O 0 0 - I- p O I- 1- 000000 0 N (9 01 $22 gg 32 0510 28 32 235'00 BR 22 g gg ; e 22 20200 0 & 76 8;20 0 g O 0 --000 0 0 0 M 000™M-000 - 0 000000 0 - r 0 0 Mrorr 0 - M 10 - - 0 61 00 0 61 * 04 40 0* M M --0000 0 r €4 . 0 O 00000 0 0000 000 000000000 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 (9.- Orr O - €9 0 - - 0 61 -00-*61400. M M ..0000 O - N .- 32 32 g m 4%.ggaR . 0 7 Z f h h 61 a A 8 900 0 O 0 ....000 0 000)0 0 0 N 000¢90.-0061 0 O 000000 0 0 10 0 0 -O,000 O MONO O 0 0 6) O 0 . . P M N 10 19 000000 - 0 r- r 0 0 00000 O 0000 0 0 O 000000000 00 000000 000 0 0 NNOOo o MONO O 0 0 0 0 0 . * 9- M N to - M 000000 -4 0 n r r .- .- i *,-3 04 0 5,3 m - §389*45:% 3 D- 2403 l2t eg 22z° 11100 EQF:2 ZEENE , 8%1 *LL.9 8 9=40 k 5<U,O S m 2EEMaw=* 0 - *02%e 1-- m 21(lil le - Z 9 8 1@232 m '222 3 i j 020'b 3822 M 8 o Mooido § 1§3% Eig 201=2292 0 8 2,•02*= / 2 /11-LL/u- 0-0,11-U-2< 2 011'MMU-LU Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared dlearance Rate Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared Clearance Rate 100% 100% %0 %O DNI I d¥31Nn %09 Alkladabld NarlmS °/oVE 93 92 49, 92 91 %02 9Z WSI-IVONVA/NOUOnklisaa 1998 1997 1996 4th Quarter NIBRS Crime Summary October · December 1998 PING/ABDUCTION ONIallng SAUL OFFENSE ATION LARCENY/T 1NaWE-IZZaSWE
0 09€4 00 0 0 0 ON LD(901 00 0 0 0 ON 0000000000 WAN 00 0 0 0 0 04 it 9.-St·S 0 888 00 00000 2 6; 0 4 #~00 0 0 0 0 0 E E 000 00 0 0 000 40.- 00 0 0 000 0 32 $ 888 p- 00 0 0 0 0 04 00000001 0000000000 1=.U) 00 0OOON i 2 m Unfounded Actual Cleared Reported Vnfounded Actual Reported Unfounded Actual Cleared #VALUE! 100% 100% WEAPON VIOLATIONS 100% 100% 1996 4th Quarter NIBRS Crime S October · December 1998 0% DRUG/NARCOTIC OFPENSE ~RU~~RU~~T~~~~OOL SEX OFFENSES INCEST PORNOGRAPHY/OBSCENE GAMBLING OFPENSE PROSTITUTION OFFENSES
NIBRS 1998 YEAR END CRIME SUMMARY Reported Unfounded Adual Cleared Clearance Rate OFFENSE HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 KIDNAPPING/ABDUCTING 1 0 1 0 0% SEX OFFENSE/FORCIBLE 10 2 8 7 88% FORCIBLE RAPE 3 0 3 3 100% FORCIBLE SODOMY 3 1 2 1 50% SEXUALASSAULT 1 0 1 1 100% FORCIBLE FONDLING 3 1 2 2 100% ROBBERY 3 0 3 1 33% ASSAULT OFFENSES 45 0 45 34 76% AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 4 0 4 3 75% SIMPLE ASSAULT 37 0 37 31 84% INTIMIDATION 4 0 4 0 0% ARSON 0 0 0 0 EXTORTION 0 0 0 0 BURGLARY 45 0 45 13 29% LARCENY/THEFT 138 0 138 24 17% POCKET-PICKING 2 0 2 0 0% PURSE-SNATCHING 4 0 4 0 0% SHOPLIFTING 21 0 21 13 62% THEFT FROM BUILDING 54 0 54 6 11% FROM COIN-OP MACH 2 0 2 1 50% FROM MOTOR VEH 27 0 27 1 4% MOTOR VEH PARTS 9 0 9 1 11% ALL OTHER LARCENY 19 0 19 2 11% MOTOR VEH THEFT 3 0 3 0 0% COUNTERFEITING 8 0 8 1 13% FRAUD 3 0 3 1 33% FALSE PRETEN/SWINDLE 0 0 0 0 CREDIT CARD/ATM 0 0 0 0 IMPERSONATION 3 0 3 1 33% WELFARE FRAUD 0 0 0 0 WIRE FRAUD 0 0 0 0 EMBEZZLEMENT 1 0 1 0 0% STOLENPROPERTY 0 0 0 0
NIBRS 1998 YEAR END CRIME SUMMARY DESTRUCTION/VANDALISM 102 0 102 14 14% DRUG/NARCOTIC OFFFENSE 49 0 49 48 98% DRUG/NARCOTIC VIOL 27 0 27 27 100% DRUG/EQUIPMENT VIOL 22 0 22 21 95% SEXOFFENSES 0 0 0 0 INCEST 0 0 0 0 PORNOGRAPHY/OBSCENE 0 0 0 0 GAMBLING OFFENSE 0 0 0 0 PROSTITUTION OFFENSES 0 0 0 0 BRIBERY 0 0 0 0 WEAPON VIOLATIONS 7 0 7 6 86%
4th Quarter NIBRS Crime Summary- Group B October - December 1998 OFFENSE CHARGED 1998 1997 1996 90A - BAD CHECKS 0 1 1 90B - CURFEW/LOITERING/VAGRANCY VIOLS 0 0 0 90C - DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2 8 0 90D - DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 17 11 15 90E - DRUNKENNESS 0 0 0 90F - FAMILY OFFENSES, NONVIOLENT 0 0 0 90G - LIQUOR LAW VIOLATIONS 2 7 21 9014 - PEEPING TOM 0 0 0 . 901- RUNAWAY 0 0 0 90J - TRESPASS OF REAL PROPERTY 2 0 - 1 90Z - ALL Oâ„¢ER OFFENSES 3 35 30
NIBRS 1998 YEAR END CRIME SUMMARY - GROUP B OFFENSE CHARGED 90A - BAD CHECKS 1 90B - CURFEW/LOITERING/VAGRANCY VIOLS. 0 90C - DISORDERLY CONDUCT 15 90D - DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 54 90E - DRUNKENNESS 0 90F - FAMILY OFFENSES, NONVIOLENT 1 90G - LIQUOR LAW VIOLATIONS 26 90H - PEEPING TOM 0 901 - RUNAWAY O 90J - TRESPASS OF REAL PROPERTY 4 90Z - ALL OTHER OFFENSES 30
MUNICIPAL COURT CASES AND INCOME: 1996 1997 1998 Court Cases 428 414 483 Income $17,935.00 $22,274.00 $24,703.00 Parking fines 251 388 365 Parking receipts 2,380.00 3,730.00 3,630.00