Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Public Safety 1994-12-15
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE December 15, 1994 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Todd Jirsa Accountability 2. P.A.C.K. Program Roger Shippy 3. Vicious Dog Ordinance FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. Nothing this month REPORTS 1. Monthly * The committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate business not available at the time the agenda was prepared. prepared for Public Safety Committee Meeting 12/15/94 POSSIBLE PROJECTS FOR PaCK IN COOPERATION WITH PUBLIC SAFETY assist in newsletters to community $ 100.00/issue computer link between EP Police Department and Northern Colorado Task Force approx. $ 300.00 Mark Scharenbroich, speaker at MS and HS Feb. 9 $ 1800.00 Polaroid camera and film for one year approx. $ 200.00 Youth open forum once per quarter -0- Neighborhood watch, business watch, -0- recreation equipment (pool table, ping-pong, etc) portable sound system for MS and HS dances, club house fall speaker at MS and HS volunteer staff at a youth center, drop-in 11/30/94 14:45 'O' SCHARAL,6131<Uluti .tw V V -6 Il.z....1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|1!~ 0(74IE S#k~~A~©> «f*p ~ - $ LA * I ...t . 1 When Mark Scharenbroich speaks to an assembly of high school students, the most remarkable thing happens. They listen. And in listening they take in a serious message, delivered with laughter straight to their hearts, minds and imaginations. "I have received phone calls from many parents," reports an educator from a high . .9 .·.·'1~•. ' school where Mark recently spoke. "They have repeatedly asked me what [Mark] told the students to make them come home so excited about school and themselves." I * When il comes to com]B112igating wi_th young__2£gule and educators, Mark SctiFEEWEEh has a spark of genius. He engages us with hilarious and poignant in- sights into the common experiences that unite us, and the individual uniqueness that sets each of us apart. He challenges us to accept one another unconditionally, and to achieve a life rich in self-acceptance and - 0 accomplishment. His audience leaves energized with hope and inspired to action. /'REDENTIALS Mark has connected with students and educators in over a thousand high schools • Minnesota native Graduated with -in all fifty states, every Canadian pro- honors from St. Clcud State University vince, in schools from above the Arctic with a degree in Mais Communications. Circle to below the Panama Canal. The Outstanding Young E lumni Award. educational courses he has written, and the award-winning films he has directed, are • Star of the most Oidely used motiva- used by educators throughout the world. tional film for high sclool students, "The ~~~ Greatest Days of Year Life...(so far)" produced by Jostens Seen by over six million students wo•dwide since 198 1. elle m Received Silver Screen Award from the US :AA LJ Industrial Film Festual. Golden Apple . 942.. award from the Natiot al Educational Film .v4- Festival. • Author of "One of i Kind" course used to teach self-esteem ir over 1,000 schools nationwide. First place winner Family Life Film Award by the National Council on Family Relations. • Author of "Pathwa ·s to Performance" FATHM course used to enhnce performance 44 --- within teams, organiz .tions and talented FERfO ~' ~ and gifted programs in high schools. . Award winner at tile International Film and Television Festival of New York. • Consistently rated a the top keynote speaker by educational convention evalua- tions. • Member of the 1 Iational Speakers Association. 24'4 *w *HEPRESENTATIONS 1 ..1, .6. .. JAU.·. t· f /442&12.40··.t)~t.ti:.; L C -/ f ' --'-:, 6. 1 ..1/ -. -a. "GREATEST DAYL OF YOUR LIFE... ..- / (so far)" - Assembly presentatic n. The presentation s resses the importance of parLICIPMLIUM alld persollal glowill lIU1 - "THE UNCOMMON EDUCATOR" ing the high school years. Self-esteem is Inservice/staff presentation. cnhanccd through Ehc realization that The presentation reaffirms the impact st,irienti are nne of s kinrl vprqi,q nne in 2 educators havc on the livo of thcir crowd. Thc presenLition clearly affirms students. When educators are committed participation and pride...pride in one's to their profession and excited about their self. pride in one's p :rformance and pride migsion, they turn Gommon situations into in one's school. uncommon ones. Educators leave the presentation feeling good about their pro- fession and their value in the lives of others. . 1 . '. 4. D I C 4 I r .: 254.4445 4. -4 v ·,0 t.. "CHOOSE TO LD D" Leadership clinic for student leaders. fe*02 students how to hav a long term positive "THE TWO GREATEST GIFTS" A leadership trai, ing session teaching 2 plans; foundations d school pride; prac- The presentation winds it's way from impact on their schels using measurable Graduation presentation. tical involvement tecl niques; ownership by kindergarten to high school graduation dividing the recognit-on pie. The presenta- mixing a warm humor with a message en- tion combines ideas with inspiration to couraging the graduates to value family- form an outline for Muccess. value self. A high emotional appeal for all .00. ages. "PATUWAVA TO 1 Fl}FORMANCE" Goal based presentat on. , --'- WAYS TOJ The path to improud performance must ILI~ ]RMANCE / belief, discipline and ittitude. The seminar be walked along th steps of direction, aFFAL- 4- (111(]ine•: fon!,; far en iancing Fllch Rter, rn .....r.:r,..W.." move forward to the next level of perfor- 9.4.. mance. 00 ••• 0*00 0-0--0-00 0-0- O-0.-O-0-0 *•~IXIXIXIXXXXX1121211=rxIXIYrirrr!rrr~~~rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrFnrnnn1-, Zoo [3] HOT ONFINHMYHOS 0 CZ:CT DA/0£/TI 11/30/94 14: 49 12 SCHARENBROICH [0 002 ....................................................................................... 0-1 2 3.1 EWS€LIPPINGS¢ft~" 1 -1 '#1 ~~0·~-* ~~- ¢ 0~12*iN 1-·2 9 ~ :,I ~--22.... 'Mr.'1·;~I ;©, ~8 1; M,,5,133 7 -:A.j,24::4·6~-~92:4- Y . _j·,:·.' , ..2.- · - ·a., -p ·· .:1.·..... i . . r.: ./ - M "'1-ne auditorium Swolls Willl lauslitgl "Students at Ill .infield IIigh Echool got and applause...this guy knows what he's more than the t}ree R's on Jan. 20 .... talking about." They learned a lit le more about life, self- MINNEAPOLIS MAGAZINE, MN acceptance and perticipation." THE ENT ERPRISE, PLAINFIELD, IL "Scharenbroich was the solo attraction at the event. Clown, showman, master motivator, for one hour he held students "Reaction to I is presentation was as spellbound...he probed and prodded positive as his , harismatic personality. their private lives with the skill of a After the lights ; ere turned off and the neurosurgeon." laughter dies dov n, his message of high self-esteem rang s•ong in the halls of Hill- ADDISON TRAIL NEWS, CHICAGO, IL Murray." HORIZON, HIL -MURRAY HIGH SCHOOL "Thrn,igh A imirlile hlend of comedy ST WA; 11. Mhl and insight of which he is a master, Scharenbroich has helped students cope with who they are and how to accept themselves." THE JOURNAL, CAMP VERDE, AZ "Like a strange hybrid of comedian Robin Williams and love doctor, Leo Buscalia, Seharenbroich led an audience of student leaders through a rapid-fire stream of anecdotes." 1 THE COLORADAN, FT. SMITH, CO "Without a doubt, Mark accomplished what he set out to do. He wants students to . get the message that it is not a bad thing to ~. ~. t believe in oneself. Humor, subtlety and the , , truth, all these qualities are what Mark Scharenbroich projected." H. WISE WOOD GRAPEVINE ALBERTA, CANADA "Mark Schartnbroich eloquently ex- pressed the feelings of many students and parents, taking hi, audience through an at- tic of memories c f childhood and parent- hood." YUC,IPA NEWS, YUCAIPA, CA "Mark Schare:broich is a rarity. It's a tough task for el iers to relate to students these days, much less arouse their interest and enthusiasm or school. But Scharen- --£-,a,a......,1- broich did all thet." . WATERLOO CHRONICLE ~ ~ . ONTARIO, CANADA lill-V-.* -'ll '17 - i 11/30/94 14 .00 = SCHARENB]401 CH .003 "Of the scores of speakers and presenters which our program has had in its six year history, there is none that com- pres with Mark Scharenbroich. In addi- tion to 'knowing kids', he takes the time to learn important facts of our program to which he can allude. Our staff appreciates his creativity, his brilliance, and his profes- sionalism." 1.11. - Dean Ted Torkow, Co-Director _ - Missouri Scholars Academy ditl,D 14/ "Mark Scharenbroich has no peers in IliflllElTjlfr9llllll the youth enrichment field. His research, "The atmosphcm: on our campus was so 111/lill his content and delivery are laser accurate positive after the a sembly, I thought that I ~ and even more illuminating. His presenta- had gone to heaven!" tions should be required viewing for stu- dent, educators and families." -Carole <chmidt. Associate Principal Catalina h gh School, Tucson. Arizona -Denis Wailley, Ph. D., outhor "The Psychology Of Winning" "It was absoluely the finest assembly "Seeds of Greatness" that we have had a Southside in the fifteen "On behalf of 825 New York City high years that I have been here. The impact ~ school students and advisors, let me hearti- upon our students will last for a long time and many of thei - lives will be changed 4 Il ly thank you for your exhilarating permanently as a result of your sharing "Choose to Lead" Seminar. It is inspiring with them." to listen to your messages of choosing life -Wayne Haver, Principal .., 2.1 " I I over existence and being inner-directed. Southside High School, Ft. Smith, Arkansas -John Humins, Director of Student Affairs New York City Board of Educonon "If there has be· n anything I have done v right in 25 years o ' teaching, it was to get "As I looked around as you were speak- Mark Scharenbroth to come to Marcus ing, I saw thousands of Utah young people High School. He :acl an impact on these doing something they rarely do today- kids that will not 1 e forgotten." listening to an adult. You have a -Nancey Joi .s, Sfudent Council Sponsor - remarkable gift to communicate with Marcus H :h School, Lewisville, Texas young people..." -Governor Norman Bangerter "The responses )f students, faculty and Stule of Utah parents have been unanimous in their ap- proval. The enthlimastic reception at both "You were truly great, Mark! 1 have a{- schools is a testa-nent to your positive tended numerous assemblies during the message and your ;kill as a speaker." ,#.,44.-.j,IBi 4. last fourteen years, yours by far is the best. Sensitive, warm, caring, enthusiastic and -Shirley Makibb 1, Chief, Education Division ineaningful all describe you and your pro- Depar(ment -I.f Defense Schools, Punumo t.- 3. gi,i".*£2463 gram." "Everyone had been on an emotional -Nancy Jandrls. Activairs Direcior North High School, Downers Grove, Illinois high before, durin; and after you talked to us. It was like another successful Steven "Mark combines the performance skills Speilberg movie. Someone who could IQ& of a seasoned actor, the insights of a make you laugh a id cry all at once. The ~ ._~ counseling psychiatrist, the humor of a Bill only difference wa that your speech told a ~ Cosby, the motivation of a Zig Ziglar and truth we could fin i in all of us." ~ the inspiration of a Vince Lombardi. Mark -Loreta Kashuba. S. C. President is the best high school assembly speaker 1 Canadian Na.-onal Leadership Conference have ever witnessed." -John Young. Principal Baraboo. Wisconsin 11/JU/UV 14.01 -U- blitAKENNUKUilll liZ]004 / I #. ...............................................................0 REVIOUS ENGAGEMENTS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STUDENT COUNCILS Keynote Chicago, IL and Buffalo, NY. #1 rated speaker at each conference. NATIONAL FEDERATION OF STATE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE SECONDARY SCHOOL PRINCIPALS ASSOCIATION S Concurrent session. Keynote naticial convention, CANADIAN NATIONAL JOURNALISM EDUCATION STUDENT GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATIOF Keynote five years. Keynote natinal conventions. BUSINESS PROFESSIONALS DEPARTMEN-OF DEFENSE OF AMERICA SCHOOLS Keynote Iialional conventions. Panama and lermany. KEYNOTE 25 f TATE STUDENT COUNCII, CONVENTIONS UTAH GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE FOR DRUG-14 EE YOUTH Keynote two ·ears. MISSOUR1 SC IOLARS ACADEMY Keynote six y :ars. 4. NATIONAL FEDERATION OF PARENTS FOT DRUG-FREE YOUTH Keynote natic nal convention. FUTURE HOA EMAKERS OF AMERICA Keynote natic nal convention and ten state con,-entions. For scheduling information contact: ~ SCHARENBEDICH & ASSOCIATES TEXAS WAR ON DRUGS 5702 Seven O ks Court Keynote state conventions. Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone: (612)9 9-9080 MINNESOTA AND MISSOURI BUSINESS VENTURE Fax: (612)939 0093 Keynote seven years. 1.. ////BEA )<'ll //Illi:'1(1'll £ C- <al- - -i ..4- - -1.11~ BEN FRUMESS PIONEER GIFT SHOP k / ¥71>·1 U P. O. Box 1422 ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 December 2, 1994 Mr. Steve-Gillette RECEIVED Public Safety Committee Municipal Building DEC 6 1994 P. O. Box 1200 Estes park, Colo. 80517 ADMIN. DEPT. On Monday, Augus-€129€h of this year, I walked to Bob Andrews' house, 278 Virginia Drive, to give his infant daughter a present. As I am 74 lydarslord and lega°ily:-·bltari, I did not notice that the yard was fenced on only three sides but not the fourth side. I called out to Rhonda, his wife, and suddenly his twomdogs '.. h-I -V- --I.W * Vifdrously-a¢tackeliTirm. They did not have containing leashes. Bear, the black dog, bit me several times, and one of the bites was so deep on the inside of my wrist that at this late date I still suffer nerve damage. The doctors at the hospital told me it would take from one to two years to heal. I have made no less than tent visitsatbrithe dgergfi. I have unsightly stitches on the left side of my wrist where the wound had to be sewed all around. (It was like an open flap of skin and flesh.) I have suffered from fi'a?Shbackst;.Ctrauma and ndevousness whenever I hear dogs bark. In addition I have suffered a eliessi 918/.incbme, as I must close the store when I go to the doctor and cannot wrap packages. The dog, Bear, still barks at me viciously when I walk to work. I spoke to Chief Dave Racine, and he told me that Bob Andrews had been arraigned and charged just $120.00 for the dog's keep at the kennel when it was being examined, but no fine was assessed against him. The dog even tried to break out of the kennel. Thi#Zdog.I.Tft'Ta·Ly-dung-boy._at' -the same-tim€r F ~fasrbitten--the hospital has his name. I also have the nam€§'Udf-Ztli#b:.youngster?s wlid--*itnessed the attack Bob Andrews did not put up a fourth side to his fence until the police told him to and after the deed was done. 41 3 11 Page No. 2 ..gri....- BEN FRUMES S - PIONEER GIFT SHOP P. O. Box 1422 ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 I spoke to Mary, the Humane officer, and she said that apparently the dog is an attack dog and does not like people. I told her that Andrews has an infant child who will soon be a toddler and in danger of attack by the dog, because as a mother and grandmother I am worried about his putting the dog ahead of the safety of the baby as well as the safety of outsiders such. as myself. She said, "Well, perhaps he will get along better with the baby." I told her she has no guaranty of that, especially since the dog was there before the baby and is not bonded with it. As you know, the town ordinance, 7.12.090, of which I am enclosing a copy, states (A) "It is unlawful for any person to keep, possess or permit to be at large, any vicious dog within the town. A vicious dog shall be deemed a public nuisance, and shall thereafter be taken up and destroyed. (B) For the purposes of subsection A of this section, any dog which attacks human beings or animals, whether domestic or wild, upon public or private property, whether by causing physical injury or by approaching its victim in a vicious or terrorizing manner or attitude of attack, shall be deemed a vicious dog....." I think it is obvious that Bob Andrews' dog, Bear, comes within more than one of the ordinance defi- nitions of a vicious dog. It has attacked more than one human being both by causing physical injury and by approaching its victim in a vicious manner, and,g?I, f*questatihati:*UTY'd€}92£kam.termato-fitheuordinan-ES- Bob A-ffell¢-6'wil£28*GRBearIEbendestroyed . Very truly ygurs, cbcs i .0--g« 2'1*0 Doris R kkrumess 251 Virginia Drive P. 0. Box 1422 Estes Park, Colo. 80517 Phone: Store 586-4561 Home 586-3148 P. S. The names of the witnesses are Melissa< Maley and Mike Wilcox, both at 265-B Virginia Drive, Estes Park ..4,-1 - 9 U l •[ .- Il lul 11' UL--1.1. „... 1 -• Jul '' I WW77....... -Il.-I J...... ..1./ 2 I ./ ..1 MEMORANDUM TO: Public Safety Committee FROM: Gregory A. White DATE: December 14, 1994 RE: Letter dated December 2, 1994 I have reviewed the letter dated December 2, 1994 fram Dorts R. Frumess to Mr. Steve Gillette with regard to a dog located at the Andrews residence at 278 Virginia Drive. Also, I have reviewed copies of the Municipal Court docket sheet and applicable Town ordinances. Based upon the above documents, I have the following opinion regarding options available to the Town. 1. On August 30. 1994, a Municipal Court violation was issued-to Robert Mark Andrews for a violation of Section 7.12.090 of the Municipal Code. This ticket was issued as a result of an incident on August 29, 1994. On September 21, 1994, this matter was heard in Municipal Court with Mr. Andrews paying the cost of confinement of the dog plus $15.00 in Court costs. There was no finding at this time in Municipal Court that the dog was a "vicious dog" and being declared a public nuisance. Since thia matter has already been heard in Municipal Court, there is no further opportunity to prosecute a violation of Section 7.12.090 of the Municipal Code with regard to declaring the dog a "vicious dog" based upon the incident of August 29, 1994. In the event there is any further incident or indication that the dog is a "vicious dog" under the terms of Section 7-12-090 of the Municipal Code, the Police Department on its own investigation or following a citizen's complaint can issue a ticket if there are sufficient facts to support the issuance of said ticket. At that time, the Municipal Court could review the question of whether the dog is a "vicious dog" and make appropriate findings. Since the dog appears to be confined and not a hazard to the public at large, the Town and the Police Department do not have the authority to destroy the dog without allowing the owner an opportunity to conteot the finding of the dog as a "vicious dog". V.. .. I --- - . . WW--'VWV VWW ./VW V-W- . --7 I Page 2 2. If the Town is concerned about the immediate welfare of any resident of the premises where the dog is currently confined, it is my suggestion that the Town staff contact the Department of Social Services of Larimer County and ask them to investigate whether or not the keeping of the dog on the premises constituteD a hazardous condition for the occupants of the premises. If you have any other questions, please feel free to call. r . '' 7.12.080--7.12.090 , fierce, dangerous or vicious dog shall be released unless provisions suitable to the chief of police have been made for the dog by its owner or custodian to protect the public against said propensities, and that no female- dog in heat shall-be released unless the owner or custodian has facili- ties for the caring and confining of such dog satisfactory to the chief of police. No dog shall be released from the pound until the production of satisfactory proof of owner- ship thereof, the payment of a pound service _fee Pf four dollars together with, four dollars per day for each day of impoundment and any expenses incurred by the town for veter- inary care and treatment, and submission of proof that the dog has been properly licensed and inoculated against rabies as required by this chapter. Upon the expiration of five days after notice of impoundment as provided in Section 7.12.060, if the dog has not been claimed, such dog may be released to any person upon payment of a pound service fee of four dollars and submission of evidence that the dog is properly licensed and inoculated. Any dog unclaimed after the expiration of the five days shall be disposed of in ac- cordance with the directions of the chief of police. (Ord. 13-78 §1, 1978: Ord. 36-75 §1(part), 1975: Ord. 18-73 §1 (part), 1973: Ord. 7-73 §1(part), 1973: prior code §18- .8-2). 7.12.080 Kennel restrictions. It is unlawful for any person to keep or maintain a kennel for the keeping of dogs within the town limits, except where kennels are permitted in accordance with the provisions of Title 17. As used here- in, "kennel" means any house,. building, premises or land where more than two dogs over the age of three months shall be kept. (Ord. 24-71 §1, 1971: prior code §18.9). 17:12~709'02IY.Vidi°dill.IldbiE¥FaMibited. #AD It is unlawful for any person to keep, possess, or permit to be at large, any vicious dog within the town. A vicious dog shall be deemed a public nuisance, and shall thereafter be taken up and destroyed, whether such dog is licensed, registered, or otherwise. Any vicious dog found at large, which cannot be safely taken up and impounded, may be slain by any police officer of the town, or by any other person duly authorized by the chief of police for this purpose. 13'Bo For the purposes of subsection A of this section, any dog which atticks human beings or animals, whether do- mestic or wild, upon public or private property, whether by causing physical injury or by approaching its victim in a vicious or terrorizing manner or attitude of attack, shall be deemed a vicious dog, except when in defense of persons who would themselves be permitted to use a similar degree of force as that used by the dog. 72 (Estes Park 2/91) - ....a 7.12.100--7.12.110 C. A dog kept or possessed for protection or security purposes, which by its nature or training would otherwise come under the foregoing provision, shall not be deemed a vicious dog so long as it is securely confined in an en- closure which keeps it-physically segregated from persons other than its owner, custodian or possessor. (Ord. 21-77 §2, 1977: Ord. 18-73 §1(part), 1973). 67 :12 71003.:-Difty.tegardiTY¢, bi-€ii..=frdin ari'imi£11&. A. Any person having knowledge that an animal has bitten a human shall immediately report the incident to the police department. B. Bites from rodents, rabbits, birds and reptiles are excluded from the reporting requirements of this section. C. Any veterinarian who clinically diagnoses rabies or any person who suspects rabies in a dog, cat or other animal shall immediately report the incident to the police depart- ment stating exactly where such animal may be found. D. A dog or cat which has bitten a person shall be im- pounded for a period of ten days for rabies observation or may be taken for observation to a hospital or a veterinarian for said ten-day period. Such confinement shall be at the expense of the owner or custodian. The owner or custodian of any dog or other animal that has been reported to have inflic- ted the bite on any person shall, on demand, produce said animal for impoundment as prescribed in this section. E. It is unlawful for any person to remove from any place of confinement any animal which has been confined as authorized, without the consent of the police department. F. If a known or suspected rabid animal bites or at- tacks a domestic animal, such incident shall also be reported as required in this section. (Ord. 1490 §9, 1990: Ord. 11- 80 §5, 1980). 7.12.110 Dog waste removal. The owner, custodian or possessor of any dog shall be responsible for removal of any feces deposited by said dog on public sidewalks, rights-of- way, streets, parks or recreation areas. Said person shall immediately remove and sanitarily dispose of the feces. Also, the owner, custodian or possessor shall be responsible for the removal of any feces deposited by his dog on any private property not owned, controlled or possessed by said person. Said person shall immediatley remove and sanitarily dispose of the feces. (Ord. 4-85 §2, 1985). 72-1 (Estes Park 2/91) - r 7.12.050--7.12.070 2. Attachment to a leash not over six feet in length and held by a person of sufficient size and strength to restrain the dog. B. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection A of this section, a dog shall be deemed to be not under effective control of a person as follows: 1. Every female dog in pre-estrus, estrus, or post- estrus (in heat or in season) shall be confined in a building or secure enclosure in such a manner that the female dog cannot come in to contact with a male dog except for planned breeding; or 2. The dog inflicts damage or injury to the person or property of someone other than its owner, custodian or possessor; or 3. A dog is tethered on the premises of its owner, custodian or possessor such that it has access to a passerby on a public street, sidewalk or right-of-way. C. Nothing herein shall restrict the ordinary uses of seeing-eye dogs. (Ord. 14-90 §7, 1990: Ord. 4-85 §1, 1985). 7. 12. 050 Impbundment--Whdn. When any animal control officer or police officer finds a dog within the town, off the premises of its owner, possessor or custodian, and in violation of Section 7.12.040 of this code, said dog shall be impounded by such officer. (Ord. 36-75 §1(part), 1975: prior code §18.8). EJ.2>2Cva0II:Impouriddiaff@NE€ite:~-procedulha. Upon the im- poundment of a dog, the police department shall notify the owner or custodian of the dog that the dog has been impounded and will be released upon proof that the dog is properly li- censed, upon payment of a pound service fee of ten dollars, together with twenty dollars for the first day of impoundment and ten dollars for each day thereafter for board and keep, and any expenses incurred for veterinary care and treatment; arid that, if the dog is not released within five days from the day of said notice, it will be disposed of at the direc- tion of the chief of police. The notice shall be delivered to such owner or custodian, or if such owner or custodian is not available, by posting said notice on the premises from which the dog was impounded. A copy of said notice shall also be posted in the lobby of the police department section of the municipal building. (Ord. 1490 §8, 1990: Ord. 3-80 §1, 1980: Ord. 21-78 §1, 1978: Ord. 36-75 §1(part), 1975: Ord. 7-73 §1(part), 1973: prior code §18.8-1). £717224,07<0,2.,tImpoundmentrmGeneralnprocedure·. All dogs impounded shall be kept for a period of five days unless sooner redeemed by their owners or custodians; provided, no 71-1 (Estes Park 2/91) ' I. September 24, 1994 Mr. Robert M. Andrews P. 0. Box 2002 Estes Park, Colo. 80517 bear Mr. Andrews: Re: Claim No. Y5 26095 Relative to the bite I suffered from your dog on August 29, 1994, you have not even extended me the courtesy of a simple apology, and in spite of the dog's vicious nature, it is back in your yard ready to bite again. The dog is a vicious animal which attacked and bit not only me but a young boy at the same time. In'addition, someone witnessed your wife running to her car with the dog in hot pursuit, barking ferociously, and she had to throw him a bone to keep him away until she reached the car.- This, of course, was not on the same day as my bite. The town ordinanceprovides, Section 7.12.090: "A. It is unlawful for any person to keep, possess, or -permit to be at large, any vicious dog within the town. "B. For the purposes of subsection A of this section, any dog which attacks human beings or animals, whether domestic or wild, upon public or private property, whether by causing physical injury or by approaching its victim in.a vicious or ter- rorizing manner or attitude of attack, shall be deemed a vicious dog." I have been and still am undergoing a considerable amount of pain and suffering and stiffness, and the doctor said the stiffness will probably continue for some time. Believe me, at this time my wrist and arm are still far from being healed. In addition, at night I suffer flashbacks of that dog rushing up and biting me, which keeps me awake. My husband and I are trying to close our business, and my presence is required at the store at all times. Due to this dog bite I have found it necessary to make several visits to the hospital and doctors, and since I am seventy-four and legally blind I cannot drive, and-my husband has had to drive me on all those visits, which meant we had to close the store ducing each visit, resulting in a considerable loss of income. Also, when I am at the store, I cannot lift merchandise -i 11-170 a 4. .... A A., 7.4 07 , f~ a m AAE UNIFORM SUMMONS & COMPLAINT OA PENALTY ASSESSMENT , 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO County 04 Lanmer TOWN OF ESTES PARK VS CASE NO. 94 -07 - Il %3 No . 12137 1 (Middle) Date 01 18#rlh 640/Day/Yi Ag Violation:Mo'Day/Yf Defendant (last Nan€ eARFQ-r A KI 'Ct<Pt.U) b (nao,\5 09 /4*I ~9 94 O TraMIC ~Penal 31:2919+ . 2,0 Code Co. No. Approx Time 01 Violation 1 0*endant s Admes*DF-1 V i e(„ 1 W I A AR . [6re ··4431~ , <??~, 10541 06 1903 Drivers License Number and Type (1 - State- Sex Rac4 Ht.; Wl Mal f [Mu Home Telephone Direction Of Travel 1 K -14%86 co m w 56 10 fie..1 6%6 -ania NSEW Employer Name Empfoyer Address Occupation Business Teleplione ~ Trall€ Acc,dent Inwnes Irvol>ed O Yes ¥po O Yes *No 1 Veh,cle Luense Number and Type State vet,cle Year Make Type or Body Style Approximate Location ol Violation. State of Colorado. Larimer County, in the 1 0 TOWN OF ESTES PARK Vefucle Color ~Bonom) VIN 25-7 ¥/26 1 lut A De. Registered Owner YOU ARE SUMMONED AND ORDERED TO APPEAR (Nane and Address) TO ANSWER CHARGES AS STATED BELOW IN: O Same as above Of .-. LARIMERMm o =--m..- a c*,..cd ISTEs PARK\ 170 MacGregor Avenue on S E i)7 9 ) i ~UNICIPAL COMT Estes Park. CO 19 94:_ AT -1: 00 AM/64 CHARGE- SE2!Z' MIC INE POINTS COM CODE Nat ~ In,090 S VIC,1006 Aal, \PROHihltyJO tim - 1 l= 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CHARGE SECTION MTC FINE POINTS COM.CODE 10 No. 2 CRS EPMC l 0 I r 1-1 1.,4. 1 SUMMONS: O TRAFFIC INFRACTION O OFFENSE PENAUY ASSESSMENT. O TRAFFIC INFRACTION O OFFENSE 7~t~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ '~~' 1 0 EQ WITHOUT ADMWTING GUILI I HEREBY PROMISE TO UPON PAYMENT OF THIS PENALTY ASSESSMENT WITHIN 20 DAYS. 1 ACKNOWLEDGE GUILT OF ALL CHARGES 1- 22 APPEAR AT THE TIME AND PLACE INDICATED ABOVE. CONTAINED HEREON AND UNDERSTAND THAT THE POINTS INDICATED ABOVE WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST 6 - MY DRIVER'S LICENSE. - DEFENDANT DEFENDANT ' ' ~'-t' NOTICE See instrucdons On Reverse Sida NOT/CE: See Mstruct/ons On Revene Sida | total Fine $ O Mailed 1 WITHOUT ADMITTING GUILT. I HEREBY PROMISE TO APPEAR AT THE O MANDATORY COURT APPEARANCE | i f $2. TIME AND PLACE 1'95~TED AB*~ 1 193 1 E8 DEFENDANT b< // t,~r / C./£~ CITIZEN COMPLAINT NOT/CE: See #fst,Dcdd/il-044**ersi S/de. THE UNDERSIGNED HAS PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE DEFENDANT COMMITTED THE OFFENSE(S) AGAINST THE PEACE AND DIGNITY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 5rATE OF 1 COLORADO AND AFFIRMS THAT A COPY OF THIS SUMMONS & COMPLAINT OR PENALTY ASSESSMENT WAS DULY SERVED UPON THEMEFENDA'ti I DATED -30-DAY OF·~Al-, 19(34 OFFICER~'21911#70EX~ ._NOS)46 OFFIER LAST RAW .+I-VTLY - 1 CU ENT-READ BOTH SIDE i 1 -L-/ j-\l 5-_2 --- Colorado Department of Health Public Health Veterinary Section ANIMAL BITE REPORT 5TE; of Bite 1 County %\29 ~014 Lne-trn E.2 Person Bitten \ Age Phor,e 3-9 Q.E m I At-1 14 ic.K F (250 d 1 5 5 86 - 040 1 Address. City· County - State 5 495 1-14)q ?ho :ISTE.5 -~£,k LO Q \rn Ek CO .. Lpgation of Bite 'lace,ra..h th 92*JarY. CE,Sa_8,·-4 45 Address Where Bitten 44. I C 0IT-· VOQE Atm RGa VIe(mlk)IA (32.- Treated Bv Address Phone ..2222.49<--Pr-(*Ail&*eFAvLSq&-73;7 Vaccinated? )my°n P)Mat_GO Lap , :6004-r" 17/0 /4 4 9 3 -73t-7 Owner Date of Birth P®ne/ 913 4 1 1 State 6-te- 0-7 g_3 Address City AS] 112(,tkila F<Fre<, (Mak LAQA vng:-2 CA Date Peceiyed 1*peived By i.;f?*fylla 4 L_XLMU rn A E E.)1 fP-Udic Date j Fsry<, O%2 k EN ice OF gr. Place of Confinement 875rn @ae\< Ak \ ivnaL CLIJR , Disposition: Date t . ~-~ Unable to locate ~i34(~paser! e q.10 %194 FHV 8 (Rev. 9-72-500) VIKI RABIES CONFINEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES In Accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25, Article 4 Definition of Confinement: Inside a secure building where no contact with animals or persons out side the family can occur for a 10-day period. Dog must not be let out to relieve itself with out being on a leash and handled by a person capable of restraint. Dates of Confinement : 01 - .~ 941 to qi E l~~ AND UNTIL RELEASED BY AN ANIMAL CONTROL OFF~(~ERJ , , Description of Animal: 6ladc L,,1-k) L,ul/ Wn'\ Rabies Certificate Number and Year: Date of Expiratior<)00)02 9 g-- Neterinarian Abv:utf 11/le,£ c.a.0,2 6~26,- I have read the above requirements and understand that any violation of these requirements may result in the impoundment of the animal described above; furthermore, I understand that I will be responsible for any fees required for the duration of the rabies quarantine/confinement period. A. 'W 10\ flAN 4 Reck-c-d (b,A- a-6.12_ Owner's Signature Address where animal is confined ina«j ch.ach, C 10961 Officer's Signature Date Signed IRE, . . ...-I ..--- ...-- Colorado Department of Health Public Health Veler,nary Section ANIMAL BITE REPORT 6it. of Bite County 75 ~39.94 LAQ..1 mER PU.Jon Bit ten Age Phone 4 172 1 5 FeunniI 95 14 596 - 4501 Address City County~ State A 51 9 1(260 i klth A (2 0 F?gra (luk I Lae Irn EA CO - Localion of Bite jacU»fri' alie VJ 'b-ia-'0..re,b Address Where Bitten LF Fr F n (1£ A(Un 2142 VIRGIK-}~14 012 - Ireated Bv Address IPhone F. P.rns 551- Fjos ped & Ele g A¢k-516 - 3317 ~scription of mal 4 Vaccinated? iw 1\ L Lab Fuu« de.« 69029# 93- 43 17 1. t. Phone Date of birth \340 Aw ©QEU) 5 09 /&Gl 59 396- A-1 <63 Address City Count'y State 0291 V'(2(311~1\A F STES (19-k 1-821 nnen C.0. Date Received Received By <31891 CiA 6Cd-lu rn AKE-2. ~ 2~U.0 -22.,C Referrled toi Date 1 Esi-Fs ChQU 94lry_ DE.p-E. Way 1 94_ Place of Cont'i~ement Date Qbnlined E-sr-ES Wle\< Ak]\41(11 EL_I lok_ 1199194- Disposition: Date Fl Unable to locate |U-R¢leased 09 0%99 FHV 8 (Rev. 9-72-500) 7XX RABIES CONFINEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES In Accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25, Article 4 Definition of Confinement.: Inside a secure building where no contact with animals or persons out side the family can occur for a. 10-day period. Dog must not be let out to relieve itself with out being on a leash and handled by a person capable of restraint. Dates of Confinement: 14Acil(44- to 9~<Ell V AND UNTIL RELEASED BY AN ANIMAL CONTROL OFEI®ER. Description of Ani'mal: 13 llc La8 nt,24 1 N rn 't BeA r l' Rabies Certificate Number and Year: Date of Expiration 0701 93- Veterinarian A-*\ i *«9 VIA<kic£0(22*- l.d if** . , I have read the above requirements and understand that arf¥ violation of these requirements may result in the impoundment of the animal described above; furthermore, I understand that I will be responsible for any fees required for the duration of the rabies quarantine/confinement period. 9 AORd Mek-cap *Alig £34 il/k= Owner's Signature Address where animal is confined »Arna Ch A ~8~32~44, Officer's Signature Date Signed - IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT IN AND FOR THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK i · TOWN OF ESTES PARK, ) Plaintiff, DOCKET NO. } 10873 VS. t ROBERr MARK ANDREWS ). HON. GARY R. BROWN ) MUNICIPAL JUDGE Defendant(s). ) STATE OF COLORADO) SS. Summons No: 12137 COUNTY OF LARIMER) Date: Aug. 29, 1994 Judge's Appearance Date Charge(s) Action Taken Initials Sept. 21, 1994 VICIOUS DOG PROHIBITED Upe I -,_Li-»U ,·U. - -~it o n fl \ tl('y•uu,·,~: _n. A h'' 91,599- (2,4 * 86£4. ./l A D 6 A p -# - %-- I g 91 S 230~ OmNLOL,)~g;£ m Er W r. ff U.1 0, In ~Z m m 0 10 r. m h - .- O N CO " m " 1, m mc, 5 = Ri gr,NNM•-~!2!31 6 flo '0 91. 91. c.1 1 - m O u' N mato ....wN U.) cho NT-NU MLAr- N N m 10 00 in W W In N O ~ 00 'O N 00 N 1.0 00. ,- p „ U.b 1~ tri a 2 O m = ' 2 0 C E 8 € SE _ m 2 'A .2 -- b t U ¢0 2 W.2 -C *32 3 m th LE V Z56 522*53 4 6 5 0 1 Incident Type First Quarter Third Quarter Year to Date 1994 1994 08P L LZZL Estes Park Summary Report Problems er Incidents sasuago Pal.lodall 06ewea *Uadokl VAIN Ambulance VA Hit & Run Arrests Warrants leu!Ul!0 kinful v SUOUJLUns sBu!UJeAA Traffic BEN FRUMESS PIONEER GIFT SHOP P. O. Box 1422 ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 December 2, 1994 Mr. Steve Gillette RECEIVED Public Safety Committee Municipal Building DEC 6 1994 P. 0. Box 1200 Estes park, Colo. 80517 ADMIN. DEPT. CC 1 4,0 /1/4, On Monday, August 29th of this year, I walked to Bob Andrews' house, 278 Virginia Drive, to give his infant daughter a present. As I am 74 years old and legally blihd, I did not notice that the yard was fenced on only three sides but not the fourth side. I called out to Rhonda, -his wife, and suddenly his two dogs viciously a®tacked me. They did not have containing leashes. Bear, the black dog, bit me several times, and one of the bites was so deep on the inside of my wrist that at this late date I still suffer nerve damage. The doctors at the hospital told me it would take from one to two years to heal. I have made no less than ten visits to the doctors. I have unsightly stitches on the left side of my wrist where the wound had to be sewed all around. (It was like an open flap of skin and flesh.) I have suffered from flashbacks, trauma and nervousness whenever I hear dogs bark. In addition I have suffered a loss of income, as I must close the store when I go to the doctor and cannot wrap packages. The dog, Bear, still barks at me viciously when I walk to work. I spoke to Chief Dave Racine, and he told me that Bob Andrews had been arraigned and charged just $120.00 for the dog's keep at the kennel when it was being examined, but no fine was assessed against him. The dog even tried to break out of the kennel. The dog bit a young boy at the same time I was bitten--the hospital has his name. I also have the names of two youngsters who witnessed the attack Bob Andrews did not put up a fourth side to his fence until the police told him to and after the deed was done. Page No. 2 BEN FR U MESS PIONEER GIFT SHOP P. 0. Box 1422 ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 I spoke to Mary, the Humane officer, and she said that apparently the dog is an attack dog and does not like people. I told her that Andrews has an infant child who will soon be a toddler and in danger of attack by the dog, because as a mother and grandmother I am worried about his putting the dog ahead of the safety of the baby as well as the safety of outsiders such as myself. She said, "Well, perhaps he will get along better with the baby." I told her she has no guaranty of that, especially since the dog was there before the baby and is not bonded with it. As you know, the town ordinance, 7.12.090, of which I am enclosing a copy, states (A) "It is unlawful for any person to keep, possess or permit to be at large, any vicious dog within the town. A vicious dog shall be deemed a public nuisance, and shall thereafter be taken up and destroyed. (B) For the purposes of subsection A of this section, any dog which attacks human beings or animals, whether domestic or wild, upon public or private property, whether by causing physical injury or by approaching its victim in a vicious or terrorizing manner or attitude of attack, shall be deemed a vicious dog....." I think it is obvious that Bob Andrews' dog, Bear, comes within more than one of the ordinance defi- nitions of a vicious dog. It has attacked more than one human being both by causing physical injury and by approaching its victim in a vicious manner, and I request that under the terms of the ordinance Bob Andrews' dog, Bear, be destroyed. Very truly ypys, Doris Rk/Frumess 251 Virginia Drive P. 0. Box 1422 Estes Park, Colo. 80517 Phone: Store 586-4561 Home 586-3148 P. S. The names of the witnesses are MelissasMaley and Mike Wilcox, both at 265-B Virginia Drive, Estes Park 7.12.050--7.12.070 2. Attachment to a leash not over six feet in length and held by a person of sufficient size and strength to restrain the dog. B. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection A of this section, a dog shall be deemed to be not under effective control of a person as follows: 1. Every female dog in pre-estrus, estrus, or post- estrus (in heat or in season) shall be confined in a building or secure enclosure in such a manner that the female dog cannot come in to contact with a male dog except for planned breeding; or 2. The dog inflicts damage or injury to the person or property of someone other than its owner, custodian or possessor; or 3. A dog is tethered on the premises of its owner, custodian or possessor such that it has access to a passerby on a public street, sidewalk or right-of-way. C. Nothing herein shall restrict the ordinary uses of seeing-eye dogs. (Ord. 14-90 §7, 1990: Ord. 4-85 §1, 1985). 7.12.050 Impoundment--When. When any animal control officer or police officer finds a dog within the town, off the premises of its owner, possessor or custodian, and in violation of Section 7.12.040 of this code, said dog shall be impounded by such officer. (Ord. 36-75 §1(part), 1975: prior code §18.8). ' 7.12.060 Impoundment--Notice procedure. Upon the im- poundment of a dog, the police department shKil notify the owner or custodian of the dog that the dog has been impounded and will be released upon proof that the_ dog is properly li- censed, upon payment of a pound service fee of ten dollars, together with twenty dollars for the first day of impoundment and ten dollars for each day thereafter for board and keep, and any expenses incurred for veterinary care and treatment; and that, if the dog is not released within five days from the day of said notice, it will be disposed of at the direc- tion of the chief of police. The notice shall be delivered to such owner or custodian, or if such owner or custodian is not available, by posting said notice on the premises from which the dog was impounded. A copy of said notice shall also be posted in the lobby of the police department section of the municipal building. (Ord. 1490 §8, 1990: Ord. 3-80 §1, 1980: Ord. 21-78 §1, 1978: Ord. 36-75 §1(part), 1975: Ord. 7-73 §1(part), 1973: prior code §18.8-1). 7.12.070 Impoundment--General procedure¢ All dogs impounded shall be kept for a period of five days unless sooner redeemed by their owners or custodians; provided, no 71-1 (Estes Park 2/91) 7.12.080--7.12.090 fierce, dangerous or vicious dog shall be released unless provisions suitable to the chief of police have been made for the dog by its owner or custodian to protect the public against said propensities, and that no female dog in heat shall-be released unless the·owner or custodian has facili- ties for the caring and confining of such dog satisfactory to the chief of police. No dog shall be released from the pound until the production of satisfactory proof of owner- ship thereo f, the payment o f a pound service _fee .p f four dollars together with, four dollars per day for each day of impoundment and any expenses incurred by the town for veter- inary care and treatment, and submission of proof that the dog has been properly licensed and inoculated against rabies as required by this chapter. Upon the expiration of five days after notice of impoundment as provided in Section 7.12.060, if the dog has not been claimed, such dog may be released to any person upon payment of a pound service fee of four dollars and submission of evidence that the dog is properly licensed and inoculated. Any dog unclaimed after the expiration of the five days shall be disposed of in ac- cordance with the directions of the chief of police. (Ord. 13-78 §1, 1978: Ord. 36-75 §1(part), 1975: Ord. 18-73 §1 (part), 1973: Ord. 7-73 §1(part), 1973: prior code §18- .8-2). 7.12.080 Kennel restrictions. It is unlawful for any person to keep or maintain a kennel for the keeping of dogs within the town limits, except where kennels are permitted in accordance with the provisions of Title 17. As used here- in, "kennel" means any house, building, premises or land where more than two dogs over the age of three months shall be kept. (Ord. 24-71 §1, 1971: prior code .§18.9) . F7.12.090 Vicious dogs prohibited. rA./ It is unlawful for any person to keep, possess, or permit to be at large, any vicious dog within the town. A vicious dog shall be deemed a public nuisance, and shall thereafter be taken up and destroyed, whether such dog is licensed, registered, or otherwise. Any vicious dog found at large, which cannot be safely taken up and impounded, may be slain by any police officer of the town, or by any other person duly authorized by the chief of police for this purpose. B.~ For the purposes of subsection A of this section, any dog which attacks human beings or animals, whether do- mestic or wild, upon public or private property, whether by causing physical injury or by approaching its victim in a vicious or terrorizing manner or attitude of attack, shall be deemed a vicious dog, except when in defense of persons who would themselves be permitted to use a similar degree of force as that used by the dog. 72 (Estes Park 2/91) 7.12.100--7.12.110 <fC..1 A dog kept or possessed for protection or security purposes, which by its nature or training would otherwise come under the foregoing provision, shall not be deemed a vicious dog so long as it is securely confined in an en- closure which keeps it physically segregated from persons other than its owner, custodian or possessor. (Ord. 21-77 §2, 1977: Ord. 18-73 §1(part), 1973). l 7.12.100 Duty regarding bitds from animals. A. Any person having knowledge that an animal has bitten a human shall immediately report the incident to the police department. B. Bites from rodents, rabbits, birds and reptiles are excluded from the reporting requirements of this section. C. Any veterinarian who clinically diagnoses rabies or any person who suspects rabies in a dog, cat or other animal shall immediately report the incident to the police depart- ment stating exactly where such animal may be found. D. A dog or cat which has bitten a person shall be im- pounded for a period of ten days for rabies observation or may be taken for observation to a hospital or a veterinarian for said ten-day period. Such confinement shall be at the expense of the owner or custodian. The owner or custodian of any dog or other animal that has been reported to have inflic- ted the bite on any person shall, on demand, produce said animal for impoundment as prescribed in this section. E. It is unlawful for any person to remove from any place of confinement any animal which has been confined as authorized, without the consent of the police department. F. If a known or suspected rabid animal bites or at- tacks a domestic animal, such incident shall also be reported as required in this section. (Ord. 1490 §9, 1990: Ord. 11- 80 §5, 1980). - 7.12.110 Dog waste removal. The owner, custodian or possessor of any dog shall be responsible for removal of any feces deposited by said dog on public sidewalks, rights-of- way, streets, parks or recreation areas. Said person shall immediately remove and sanitarily dispose of the feces. Also, the owner, custodian or possessor shall be responsible for the removal of any feces deposited by his dog on any private property not owned, controlled or possessed by said person. Said person shall immediatley remove and sanitarily dispose of the feces. (Ord. 4-85 §2, 1985). 72-1 (Estes Park 2/91) September 24, 1994 Mr. Robert M. Andrews P. 0. Box 2002 Estes Park, Colo. 80517 Dear Mr. Andrews: Re: Claim No. Y5 26095 Relative to the bite I suffered from your dog on August 29, 1994, you have not even extended me the courtesy of a simple apology, and in spite of the dog's vicious nature, it is back in your yard ready to bite again. The dog is a vicious animal which attacked and bit not only me but a young boy at the same time. In addition, someone witnessed your wife running to her car with the dog in hot pursuit, barking ferociously, and she had to throw him a bone to keep him away until she reached the car.0 This, of course, was not on the same day as my bite. The town ordinanceprovides, Section 7.12.090: "A. It is unlawful for any person to keep, possess, or -permit to be at large, any vicious dog within the town. "B. For the purposes of subsection A of this section, any dog which attacks human beings or animals, whether domestic or wild, upon public or private property, whether by causing physical injury or by approaching its victim in a vicious or ter- rorizing manner or attitude of attack, shall be deemed a vicious dog." I have been and still am undergoing a considerable amount of pain and suffering and stiffness, and the doctor said the stiffness will probably continue for some time. Believe me, at this time my wrist and arm are still far from being healed. In addition, at night I suffer flashbacks of that dog rushing up and biting me, which keeps me awake. My husband and I are trying to close our business, and my presence is required at the store at all times. Due to this dog bite I have found it necessary to make several visits to the hospital and doctors, and since I am seventy-four and legally blind I cannot drive, and my husband has had to drive me on all those visits, which meant we had to close the store during each visit, resulting in a considerable loss of income. Also, when I am at the store, I cannot lift merchandise 94:~ 17 3 J COPY -1-jumane UNIFORM SUMMONS & COMPLAINT OR PENALTY ASSESSMENT , THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO CASE No 94 -O-1 - 1-1133 No 12137 Count·y 01 l.arimer, TOWN OF ESTES PARK VS Defend~toMP#U.) % eAKe=,- &11:612 03/4*1 39 44 0 Traffic ~Penal 312=113+ 1 Date 018,(th: Mo/Day/Yr Violatioo:Mo/Day/Yr (- Defendant's AdGesse-) · State 1 . Zip Code Co Na Approx 'time 01 Violation e.ylvie(„IWIA OR. Firolt·*ZE, co 4051 1 06 1903 Dnver's License Number and lype f ) Nome Telephone Direction Of Travel K 12 93%6 86 & 02 8'6 Ra Al| Mulae -ar-IN NSEW Employer Name Empfoyer Address Occupation Bumness TelepRone ~ Trallic Accident Injuries Irvolyed O Yes ~No O Yes *No Vehicle L,cense Number and Type ~ State Vehicle Year Make Type or Body Style Approximate Location ol Violation. State of Colorado. Larimer County, in the TOWN OF ESTES PARK Veh,cle Color frop/Bottom) VIN %-1 ¥/ 26 1 N I A De Registered Owner YOU ARE SUMMONED AND ORDERED TO APPEAR (Nene and Address) TO ANSWER CHARGES AS STATED BELOW IN: O Same as abme of f ial••m,COUNIYO Bous6~-A--rel~~PRK) 170 Maceregor Avenue On S EPT * 1 19 81_ AT -1: 06 AM/€4 f wtrum.WUREe=nwod.si.4. F. B.,4(6 %NIGPAL ®0m Estes Park, CO CHARGE SE2!21 POINTS COM CODE i No 1 ~ 6> viC,touS flal., VROH,h) tvO |€~m - I= 1 | CHARGE SECTION MTC FINE POINTS COM CODE 1 No. 2 CRS EPMC 1 1 1 1 U ' : fMP >SUMMONS: O TRAFFIC INFRACTION O OFFENSE . PENALTY ASSESSMENif '0 +RAFFIC INF~ACTION d.ik14Nsel,°fihhig ·4>~f"it *,3'ft}PI'l~¢0 · 1 0 h Q WITHOUT ADMITTING GUILT, 1 HEREBY PROMISE TO UPON PAYMENT OF THIS PENALTY ASSESSMENT WITHIN 20 DAYS, 1 ACKNOWLEDGE GUILT OF ALL CHARGES 1 7 k, APPEAR AT THE TIME AND PLACE INDICATED ABOVE. CONTAINED HEREON AND UNDERSTAND THAT THE POINTS, INDICATED ABOVE.WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST §8·' MY DRIVERS LICENSE., --__ DEFENDANT DEFENDANT · · ' 4 11- h · NOTICE: See instructions On Reverse Sida NOT/CE: See /nstruct/ona On Amerse Side. - ., 4., · Total Fine $' 4 '· '•- - · ·< O Mailed I 4 WITHOUT ADMITTING GUILT. 1 HEREBY PROMISI TO APPEAR AT THE O MANDATORY COURT APPEARANCE 1 4 Q TIME AND PLACE IN-95€ED ABO/y /'14 1 52 1 ~8 DEFENDANT € /7 i3? Al /\J -- CITIZEN COMPLAINT m NOTICE: See Illstr0ct167TB+~2*erG Side. | THE UNDERSIGNED HAS PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE DEFENDANT COMMITTED THE OFFENSE(S) AGAINST THE PEACE AND DIGNITY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF 1 COLORADO AND AFFIRMS THAT A COPY OF THIS SUMMONS & COMPLAINT OA PENALTY ASSESSMENT WAS DULY SERVED UPON THE REFENDA'F•, i DATED 30 - DAY OF-AAb · 19 (34 OFFICERS,Hurnalr-GO NOSO4€ __OFFICER LAST NAMF JhC-VrrrCLyL---- 1 1 L k ) SNEP,IERD MI * NAJ 4- 1(.44 /®te 11 , 0 A LEGAL DOCUM EAD BOTH SIDES IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT IN AND FOR THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK 5 . TOWN OF ESTES PARK, Plaintiff, DOCKET NO. vs. 10873 ROBERr MARK ANDREWS ) ) HON. GARY R. BROWN ) MUNICIPAL JUDGE Defendant(s). ) STATE OF COLORADO) ss. Summons No: 12137 COUNTY OF LARIMER) Date : Aug. 29, 1994 Judge's Appearance Date Charge(s) Action Taken Initials Sept. 21, 1994 VICIOUS DOG PROHIBITED fit- re K .q -2 .21 1 (L, 2#UN, b-J 11., - 4 W. -19-0-7 -17 625 Colorado Department of Health Public Health Veler,naty Section ANIMAL BITE REPORT 5;To-of-Bite 1 County 93\29 1014 1._R eirn Ee Person Bitten I Age Phone unc e E rn ial-1 14 t©KE ecod 15 5%6 - 040<6 Address City· County State 5 4-96 Mut/36 EST E .5 Evk LOQ,rn d ..n... Lp,ation of Bite itace,rtul-Uns '3JKJ <54,0,L LIDS·u.+1,·w ¤5 Address Where Bitten \K NoMT-· -FOrlf- /1<YA AM VIQ(-,ik-'IA l)2- Treated By Address Phone ED. nar. _ 4-ssfikasecd-- A,s~ Ate.Glf¢ L 5 96--EiC,__ Vaccindted? 4~i~ion MEL» #Ap - 4604<4 - '02/4 '3 93 -73 %*7 Date of Birth m /56 1 1 6.46- 0-7 6 Address Courfty State City R51 VIR.(,IkiIA F~sre.<, Cha k LAQ Arne-V CA Date YeceiYed ~fet ved By Re;~4 c -XLM< 1 rn A ¥2 E.011 Date , Fsr·y<,CU k. EN Ke .DE gr- <61&9194- Place of Confinement Date tont ih,ed E<Sr-Wn @Ge\< AL\,vnaL CLI UK , 1>lag ~C14- rispo.ition: n Unable to locate |*Glaced 0 01-10 494 Date 1, PHV 8 (Rev. 9-72-500) A- RABIES CONFINEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES In Accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25, Article 4 Definition of Confinement: Inside a secure building where no contact with animals or persons out side the family can occur for.a 10-day period. Dog must not be let out to relieve itself with out being on a leash and handled by a person capable of restraint. Dates of Confinement: (3<K~~0~ 9 4 to 9/ E t+1 AND UNTIL RELEASED BY AN ANIMAL CONTROL OFF E „ Description of Ani'mal: d lei l.-b ,« W rn " 8.4 Rabies Certificate Number and Year: Date of Expiratio<)0)02 95~ veterinarian„4-LO;U,r D r\Adaa-0 (26,- I have read the above requirements and understand that any violation of these requirements may result in the impoundment of the animal described above; furthermore, I understand that I will be responsible for any fees required for the duration of the rabies quarantine/confinement period. Spx,na< Redicd 6.3*- 4-6'Avt_ Owner's Signature Address where animal is confined «Flag 03666,/ 09 1 09 4 Officer's Signature Date Signed 44-0 7- 1-7% 3 Colorado Departrnent of Health . Public Health Veler,nary Section ANIMAL BITE REPORT ST; of Bite County -1 71 ~89.9 4 | AQ.ImER Pe,Non Bit ten Age Phone C >*2 1 h F e Urnp-st> -14 596 - 4561 Address City County. State 26 1 412(,iklihAR . EST-49 PRek. LaetrniEA CO· Location of Bite ~GcuroeFI' c,u vJ •sict-0.- re--6 Address Where Bitten L.FFE Po Q.E .Aern @44 412(lik).IA 012 - Treated By Address IPhone _F. P.rns 5552 pos pe,-4 Ae·t £* s A,k»G - 0317 Description of mal 4 Vaccinated? N m AL.9- 11\.24 LA\21 n,2+ de#« el 02.9 A 91 43 17 .t Phone Date of Birth 11-10 Ah)DQF-un 09/a€l 59 94 - A-1 <63 Addryss Count'y State City a€01 V 1 (2(3 I Al *A FsrEA (lm-k 1.-ae' n'172 CO- Date Received <31 891 q 4 REGLnn AKE*2- / bc -2€1 1 ReferAec! toi ...Esivs ChQk 03\V,F DEpr. all 94_ Place of Con~+~ement Date ¢bnflned F--sr-ES \Phok Ak.11¥nchi CLW k ji c_ »9194- risposition: 09 0% 99 Date n Unable to locate ILP¢*1-eaged FHV 8 (Rev. 9-72-500) '-PRX. RABIES CONFINEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES In Accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25, Article 4 Definition of Confinement: Inside a secure building where no contact with animals or persons out side the family can occur for a 10-day period. Dog must not be let out to relieve itself with out being on a leash and handled by a person capable of restraint. Dates of Confinement: 141A, 194- to 9~ 9 lict AND UNTIL RELEASED BY AN ANIMAL CONTROL OFFI¢ER. Description of An i'mal: 6115 LAB nvit ' N rn " Fled r " Rabies Certificate Number and Year: Date of Expiration 070,1 93-- Veterinarian Ay\i *69 VIAmUci-OGg*r LU i 044. . I have read the above requirements and understand that arf¥ violation of these requirements may result in the impoundment of the animal described above; furthermore, I understand that I will be responsible for any fees required for the duration of the rabies quarantine/confinement period. Ad •Ad #AA;ic AP Ce C/5, Es€JUG Fjok¥~,ao Owner's Signature Address where animal is confined 14 -31 94 Officer's Signature Date Signed IRAOFOMOPU~LISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee December 15, 1994 Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Dekker and Marshall Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Police Chief Racine, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT. Citizen Input. Todd Jirsa read a quote that, in summary, commented -- on the dis-trust in government and the government's obligation to ~~ assure fundamental fairness. Mr. Jirsa has had discussions with various agencies concerning accountability--through accountability, a better government is achieved. Specifically relating to law enforcement agencies, Mr. Jirsa found 317 such agencies are accredited. Police Departments must meet 436 standards for policies and procedures and they are held accountable--Estes Park is not accredited. Reasoning for such accreditation include: improved Police Dept./community relations, improved police morale, helps limit liability and decrease the number of lawsuits, and provides better trained, more informed officers. Mr. Jirsa suggested the formation of a "Professional Standards Committee" to oversee the entire Town government. In reviewing recent newspaper articles, Mr. Jirsa found 31 different complaints in 25 different areas; however, in Mr. Jirsals opinion, most people don't issue complaints due to: fear of nothing being done to resolve the problem, and they find themselves up against an unsensitive bureaucracy. The citizenry must be assured they will be heard. professional Standards Committees can fail which is due to lack of local government or Police Department support, and/or the Committee is not given the proper tools to do the job (lack of authority). In summary, Mr. Jirsa requested a Professional Standards Committee be appointed with the following responsibilities/authority: 1. Oversee all Town employees. 2. Conduct their own independent investigations. 3. Have subpoena powers. 4. Have power to take disciplinary action. Chief Racine responded that he was an active participant in the formation of the Professional Standards of Colorado through the Colorado Chiefs Association; the Estes Park Police Department has been accredited for approximately one year; and that due to costs of approximately $15,000 plus one full-time officer and the Town's size, Estes Park cannot financially afford national accreditation. Mr. Jirsa was invited to review the Colorado Standards. Administrator Klaphake commented that formation of such a committee may have honorable concepts; however, he cautioned that in some instances, a "bigger bureaucracy" is at times created. Administrator Klaphake conceded that the Town and its employees may have a public perception problem and he welcomed ideas on how such a perception could be eliminated. Trustee Dekker commented that the Board recently approved TQM training for employees with a focus on needs Of the community/customers. Trustee Dekker urged citizens to approach the public Safety Committee Meeting, December 15, 1994 - Page 2 ' Board of Trustees to discuss matters of interest. Staff added that the two components of the TQM training are: problem-solving and teamwork building. Trustee Marshall stated that the Board conducts monthly breakfast meetings to provide a platform for citizen discussion--these meetings are not well attended. Chairman Gillette agreed that should a Professional Standards Committee be formulated, it should oversee the entire Town workforce, not only the Police Department. Additionally, Chairman Gillette cautioned against inappropriate Standards Committee action relative to employee rights/liability. In summary, the Committee stated the Professional Standards Committee is a valuable concept, beneficial to all political entities, and recommends Administrator Klaphake contact CML to obtain additional information on the Standards Committee, particularly relative to liability issues. Staff will report their findings in early January. January 4, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Administrator Klaphake FROM: Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk SUBJECT: Accountability Committee Research Telecon 1/3/95 with Steve Smithers/Technical Services Coordinator with CML. 1. Municipalities don' t use Accountability Committees in the same manner as do schools. 2. Municipalities could use for a short-term specific function, i.e. Broomfield - Budget; Westminster - Vision 2000. 3. Unaware of any member using such a committee for their municipalities on a general basis. 11'obc 1- "ru-4_ ktal