The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Safety 1986-01-16. I g . January 16, 1986 2:00 p.m. .. G 6 1 .4. I 1â‚¬.~ , 2~ /4 -t. 1 . .:Â·.1 PUBLIC SAFETY,v " C, . AGENDA~ 1 .1 4 0 1. Odd Lyngholm - Alarm Systems Â· 0 , 2. Parking enforcement . .1 '1 . 3. Radar 4. Police Vehicle - bids 4, ., 5. Copy Machine - bids . 1 1 <1 6. Sponsor explorer scout (law enforcement): . ; 4 . 0. 1 Reports: 1. DUI's . 1 2. Disaster : 4.9..J T, - . . '. 3 i' 1 r ... I /0 I . - -. '. ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT ~- ALARMS RESPONDED TO BY THE ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 1985 ALARM BOARD 121 WELLSFARGO 31 MOUNTAIN SECURITY O :/' ' GUARDIAN SECURITY 6 ELECTRO ALARM 7 - MOSLER 4 ./ D.; t 7 EXECULAR ALARM 1 MOUNTAIN SHIELDS 0 AUDIBLE 9 UNKNOWN INFORMANT 7 WESTERN SECURITY 1 TOTAL 187 ~ . . *39 of these alarms were due to employeeerror Out of the 187 alarms, they were all false 1 Our Officers average approximately 10 minutes per call This has resulted in approximately 31 hours which = $311.00 in Dollars & Cents. Â·Â·rÂ· Â·-Â·r.... L . V...., 3 f ' Chapter -9 :102.7 ALARM SYSTEMS--ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT Sections: 9.102.010 Alarm deviceiterminating,at town facilities. 9.102.020 Permit required. :St:t;:, i.-. 9.102.030 Permit application.and investigation. 9.102.035 Transfer of.permit..20., 9.102.040 Permit fee. 1Â· ,-,P..6Â·.--- Â·r:Â·-~ :~..~ i,Â· -- 1 . I'. ./. 9.102.050 Revocation o flpermitl-Hearing. 9.102.060 Administration:and, regulation. 9.102.070 Audible fire and burglar alarms not to be similar to siren.*04..,. 16, ..' 9.102.080 Instruction as to/operation of system. 9.102.090 False alarm charges: and penalties. ) 9.102.100 Notice of namet,.of .lserviceman and occupant. 9.102.110 Responsibility:Â·,fortalarm service. 9.102.120 Service requirements 02',, 9.102.130 Compliance required ,and.,;time period. 9.102.140 NoncomplianceÂ·deemed unlawful and a public 9.102.150 V i O1 at ion . t,,.1-W,9., ; :.-rÂ· t Â·4Â· i v.'la '.1... - ', 9.102.010 Alarm devicetterminating at town facilities. , It is unlawful for any person,Wincluding an owner of a build- ing located within the town 4Â®6.kengage in,the installation, servicing, maintaining, repairing>*treplacing or moving of any ' fire or burglar alarm device :,<whichiltransmits alarms directly ~ or indirectly to a main emergency tterminal, except as set forth in this chapter. Such.ialarm idevice using a telephone installation or installations.was.ja,ymeans of transmitting alarms shall make use only of telephone!(numbers designated for that purpose by the chief of police ,and/or- fire chief. (Ord. 37-75 Â§1(part), 1975). . . . . 1--' 1 , , ,-1,% ,~ . . 9.102.020 Permit required;1"f:ANd,-0-person shall allow the installation, servicing, maintaining,t repairing, replacing, moving or removing of any fire Nor.,burglar alarm device unless a valid permit therefor, ..granted :,and subsisting in compliance with this chapter, exists; and.no,person shall engage in, manage, conduct or carry on a business involving any such activity unless a valid permiti.therefor, granted and subsist- ing in compliance with this chapter, exists. (Ord. 37-75 Â§1 (part), 1975). 9.102.030 Permit application and investigation. Applica- tions for permits to engage in;any or all of the activities set forth in Section 9.102.020/shall be made -in the form to be determined by the town administrator. Upon the filing of , 96-2,F,Â·, (Estes Park 3/84) d.1 F .- -1 , . 2 application for a permit inacompliance with this chapter, the chie f of police and fire.chief:.shallemake such investiga- tions as they deem necessary to-:satisfyitthe'requirements set , forth in this chapter, and shalltreport Csuch findings to the town administrator. If the townhadmini*trator finds that the issuance of a permit to allowithel'-Jinstalling, servicing, main- taining, repairing, replacing,i,mov~ing.,for .removing of any fire or burglar alarm device will not",be,detrimental or injurious to the public wel fare, he shall:;.Â·issue ythe permit. In making z such finding, the town administrator>shall consider whether or not the applicant and the proposedkalarm device can comply with the provisions of this chapter.%4â‚¬It must be determined by the town administrator that.allpapplicants for permits to engage in, manage, conduct or carij,on':a business of install- ing, servicing, maintaining, repairinglreplacing, moving or removing fire or burglar alarm devices fare of good character and of good business repute; have'/notibeen'convicted of theft, embezzlement, or any felony.or..,misdemeanor'involving robbery, burglary, dishonesty, fraud, orttheibuying'or receiving of ~ stolen property, andÂ· do not employfbersons,who, have been similarly convicted; or, if theritappli'cant is a corporation, that its officers, directors fand.,priricipal.stockholders meet like requirements. To assist-the>,chiefkof:/police and fire chief in their investigation offpersonstapplying for a permit to engage in, manage, conduct-For,carry,on Â·a business as described above, the applicant.fand.his:dmployees shall furnish~ ~ the chie f of police or fire; chief,the,following information and records: 1. Name and description:Â·oflapplicant and all employees; 2. Address, legal and :,local,Â·,(i f.j.any), and telephone number; Â·Â·Â·,f,Â·&â€¢i-, t ' 3. Fingerprints and photog'ralphNof ythe" applicant, to be taken by the chief of police' or.:a\Â·member..of the police depart- ment of the town, at the discretiontotthe chief of police; 4.. A sworn statement as 2Â·toixwhether. or not the applicant or the applicant's employees have been :convicted of a crime, felony or misdemeanor, the naturd'of the offense and the . punishment assessed therefor; i. 1.:.~):Â·I~f,: --'Â·.; jjâ‚¬..:'Â·:. ., , 5. A description of the,activities-proposed to be under- taken by the applicant if the application is granted, and a description of all equipment to be 'used by the applicant in undertaking those activities ; -, f-t~.1 7.. r~ l.,-1. I. 6. A statement setting forth. thecexperience, if any, of the applicant with respect to; ~the activities proposed to be undertaken; and 7. Such other information' as may'lbe reasonably required by the town administrator to carrtout the purposes of this chapter. I I â€¢ ' i 3- 96-31ALÂ·UN 4 (Estes Park 4/15/76) 2 , . ... . 1. .., .: ./ 1,- ' If the town administrator>findsithat the issuance of a permit to engage in, manage, t conduct;for carry on a business of installing, servicing, maintaining/' repairing, replacing, moving or removing fire or burglar.:alarm devices will not be detrimental or injurious to thetpublic. welfare, he shall issue the permit. (Ord. 10-76 Â§2 (part)1:1976 : , Ord. 37-75 Â§1(part), , 1975). 9.102.035 Transfer of permit:.:-LA.Â°. The permittee shall 'not transfer any permit issued under,,the terms of this chapter nor transfer the business or realÂ·/property or an interest in the real property on which the..alarm system is placed to any Â·' other person or entity withoutifiling a .request for transfer of permit in the form to be determined by the town administra- tor, B. The form shall contain'tinformation sufficient to allow the town administrator: toiÂ·'determine whether or not the, proposed transferee is qualifiedg under the provisions of this chapter. Failure to obtainlapproval of the transfer of the permit from the townÂ·administrator prior to trans- ferring of the business or realfproperty .upon which the alarm system is located is aviolation.of the provisions of this chapter and subjects the permit,toÂ·,revocation under the terms and conditions of section 9.102'050. f.(Ord. 1-84 Â§2, 1984). 9.102.040 Permit fee. ': Th&re.shall be no fee for a permit , to allow the installing, servicing,,maintaining, repairing, replacing, moving or removing .of,tany..fire or burglar alarm ' device. The fee for a permit@tolengage .in, manage, conduct or carry on a business of installing,Pservicing, maintaining, repairing, replacing, moving .or.,removing fire or burglar alarm devices shall be ten dollarsyfor.:reach :year or portion of the year the permit is in effect.UAThes.annual fee for such a permit granted in a previous year sha~il,(beÂ·idue .and payable on or before January 31st of each ,succeeding ;year in which the per- mit is to be effective. UponÂ·)such/,:payment, the permit shall , be renewed if there have been'inorÂ·violations of the provisions of this chapter with respect,to.:the .permit. (Ord. 10-76 Â§2 (part), 1976: Ord. 37-75 Â§1(part),21975). 9.102.050 Revocation of'Dermit--Hearing. A permit granted pursuant to this chapter may be.revoked by the town administra- tor for violation of any provision .iof..this chapter and of rules and regulations in implementation..thereof. The revocation shall be effective on the fifteenth :day .after a notice of such revocation is placed in the United States mail, with adequate postage thereon, addressed to ,the permittee at the address shown on the permit being revoked,, ..unless the permittee has filed with the town clerk within said fifteen days a written appeal of the revocation addressed,to :the board of trustees. - 9614''L .-V'; (Estes Park 3/84) The board of trustees shall consider , the. appeal at the next , regular meeting of the board of'trustees.following the filing of such appeal as herein provided.til,fÂ·iIf-, the revocation is approved, such revocation shall be reffective on the date the board of trustees approves the ,revocation. (Ord. 10-76 Â§2 (part), 1976: Ord. 37-75 Â§1(part),31975). 9.102.060 AdministratioN andÂ·regulation. The provi- sions of this chapter shall be administered and enforced by the chief of police and fire chief. EVThey are authorized to make inspections of the fire ort burglar Â·alarm device and of the premises whereon the device lis .Â·located, provided such inspections are consistent with -the provisions of this code regulating inspections. The chief/of police and fire chief shall have the power to make andienforce such rules and reg- ulations as may in their discretionibe:necessary to implement the provisions of this chapter inuaddit:Lon to such rules and regulations as may be provided.<elsewhere .in this code. Such , rules and regulations shall be.i effective on the fifteenth day after a notice of such rules and?regulations is placed in the United States mail, with adequate.Â·postage thereon, addressed to all holders of valid permits ifissued in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, unless.:. atpermittee has filed with the town clerk a written objectiongtoisuch rules and regula- tions addressed to the board Â·of'trustees. The board of trustees shall consider the objections fat..a hearing to be held at the next regular meeting of the board. ofitrustees following the filing of such objections as ~ herein provided. Such rules and regulations approved by the board *'of ,trustees shall be effec- tive on the date of their approval<:.1.Cord. 10-76 Â§2 (part), 1976: Ord. 37-75 Â§1 (part) , Â·1975),-.'..D:,p,-,el.:. , ....... 9.102.070 Audible fire'and;burglar alarms not to be similar to siren. It is unlawful ,to .install a fire or burglar alarm device which, upon activationÂ·hemits a sound similar to sirens in use on emergency vehicles Â·.or for civil defense pur- poses. (Ord. 37-75 Â§1(part),,11975).lv.:,t , 9.102.080 Instruction'as,Vto-Â·operation of system. It shall be the responsibility of..the holder of a permit to instruct and reinstruct his,subscriber.and the occupant of. the premises wherein the fire,orjburglar alarm device is installed in the proper use and. operation of the device, whether silent or audible, including all necessary instruction in turning off the alarm andÂ· .in.avoiding false alarms. (Ord. 37-75 Â§1(part), 1975). 9.102.090 False alarm charges and penalties. A. The permittee of the premises wherein ia fire or burglar alarm device is installed is subject'.totthe, following charges and penalties for all false alarms.Â·from the device which exceed three in any calendar year: i -- -Â«.:.s -4,,.. ' 96-5,044,Â· 'Estes Park 3/84) 1 1. Fourth false alarmiff,twenty-five dollars; 2. Fifth false alarm,.,Â·fifty dollars; 3. Sixth false alarm; ione .hundred dollars; 4. Seventh false alarmtione .hundred fifty dollars ; 5. Eighth false alarmi.:two..hundred dollars; 6. Ninth false alarm,-two hundred fifty dollars; 7. Tenth false alarm,r; three hundred dollars; 8. Eleventh false alarm, discontinuance of the use of the alarm device for the balance of .the calendar year upon order of the town administrator. Â· :/The town administrator shall issue the order only after.review of all of the false alarm reports by the public safety committee and recommenda- tion by the committee of discontinuance of the use of the alarm device. B. All false alarm charges: shall be paid to the town within twenty days from the dateof, Â·billing by the town. The town shall notify the permittee>of each false alarm by , a written notice thereof addressed to the permittee at the address shown on the permit applicable to the premises. The permittee shall have fifteen days,from the date the notice is placed in the United States mail,Lwith adequate postage thereon, within which to file Â·with :the town clerk a written request addressed to the board,ofutrustees requesting that it determine that the permitteetis :not ',responsible for such false alarm and that the alarm <should inot be considered a false alarm under the provisions:.of.Lthis section. The Â· board of trustees shall consider)(,the.,:request at the next regular meeting of the boardcofktrustees, following the filing of the request. If the board: ofbtrustees determines that the permittee is not responsibleD,for:'Â·,the false alarm, the alarm shall not be considered anfalse: alarm under the provisions of this section. (Ord. 1-84 Â§1,-~19.84:; Ord. 10-76 Â§2 (part), 1976: Ord. 37-Â·75 Â§1 (part) , ..19.75)...2.'.:f,':.cÂ·i:.0,i.., ' 9.102.100 Notice of name/of serviceman and occupant. Every person maintaining an ,audible. or silent fire or burglar alam device shall furnish -to - the -police and fire department the name and telephone numberzof .the person to be notified to render service to the system during any hour of the day or night when such alarm sounds,..unless such device also trans- mits notification to said person,upon its activation, together with the names and telephone humbers of the occupant of the premises and at least one alternate person. (Ord. 10-76 Â§2(part), 1976: Ord. 37-75.Â§1(part), 1975). ..'. .1 9.102.110 Responsibility for alarm service. The person or persons named in the required posted notice, or the person or persons notified by the device,. shall, upon proper notifica- tion, proceed immediately to. the location of th& activated alarm and render all necessary service; provided that the occupant of the premises may,-- by agreement with the permittee, . 96-6 ref' (Estes Park 3/84) - l assume the permittee's obligation to,respond. (Ord. 37-75 Â§1(part), 1975). 9.102.120 Service requirements.' -4 No person shall ihstall, permit installation, maintain, or .cause to be maintained any fire or burglar alarm device for which. periodic service or .~~~~ maintenance is not provided. (Ord<-~37,-75 Â§1(part) , 1975) . 9.102.130 Compliance requiredÂ·and time period. All fire or burglar alarm devices installed.on or prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter shall be brought into conformity with the requirements of this chapter within a period not to exceed one hundred eighty days from the effec- tive date of the ordinance codified herein. Any person owning, managing, canducting, carrying on.the business of, or permit- ting the installing, servicing, maintaining, repairing, replac= ing, moving or removing of fire Â·for:burglar alarm devices; or, any person, including an owner, laboring at the trade o f and engaging directly in the business.of,.Â·installing, servicing, maintaining, repairing, replacing>:moving or removing fire or burglar alarm devices, on the effective date of the ordi- nance codified in this chapter, . shall.Ibe permitted a period , not to. exceed thirty days from fsuchidate to make application as required under the provisions .offithis chapter. Upon appli- cation to the town administratoriandja. showing of hardship by., any person required to comply. withothis section, the town administrator may permit an extension, .for a reasonable period of time, within which toÂ·comply with the provisions of this section. (Ord. 37-75.Â§1(part); 1975). 9.102.140 Non'compliance deemed unlawful and a public nuisance. Any and all fire or burglar alarm devices which do not comply with the provisions .of.:this chapter are unlaw- ful and a public nuisance, and shall;<'be abated as such. (Ord. 37-75 Â§1(part), 1975). 9.102.150 Violation. It-,is':-Unlawful for any person to violate or fail to comply with.:any provisionÂ· of this chapter. (Ord. 37-75 Â§1(part),-- 1975.)Â·. - r r ' 1, , (Estes Park 3/84) .. 3 3 - VA .Â·14 -4..1 i u v v 14 01- C.3 1 tb 1-' / 1 i 4.11. i * 4.9 -11 Police Department 22 , 't U. 11" h>vie .B . li W =2249....., i j Robert W. Ault Chief of Police /5Â©;. CCO&Â©Pit'i,Apt,4 ,*%Â»%?4?3*~{ti~kf ~.â€ž Â·6) 41 442 NI .p)&$4 146*jÂ©.31330 ... -Â¢22441 1, g --4Â£+44/~4~.9 -h \1 \Â·8Â·Â·329,~ C 5 5..&Â£.~Af Strt ' " w/Â· Â¥' i: .t,94ufJ'hg' i 24 ' 171,-~21 1 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 " December 12, 1985 Estes Park City Attorney Greg White Post Office Box 701 Loveland, Colorado 80539 Dear Mr. White: Please find enclosed a draft copy of a new procedure regarding parking tickets that we would like to implement. Would you please review this draft and let me know if you forsee any problems with the model traffic codes 22-12, 22-13 or 22-14 if we choose , to enforce them? Your assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated. I will look forward,to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Robert W. Ault Chief of Police ~ Â· ~Â· ~Â·Â· RWA/jh ENC: P O. Box 1287 Â·Tele'llione (303) 586-4466 ti lut 94 , 1 1 DRAFT COPY Special Order Procedure Parking Violations The yellow copy of all parking violations issued will be submitted to Records j for program entry and recording. This file will be queried monthly to produce ~ a list of parking tickets issued. The list will be cross-checked with the I weekly cash reports and paid violations crossed off. Unpaid violations within the designated boundaries will be sent written warnings : addressed to the registered vehicle owners, giving them 20 days to pay the fine: 2 Following the 20-day period, unpaid violations will be entered into the CCIC vehicle file with a 6-month expiration date. These entries will be keyed as ~ "local interest only" - no extradition will apply. Upon contact with the vehicle, the Officer will advise the owner of the unpaid violation, and the owner would be requested to come to the Police Department. Upon payment, he would receive a copy of the parking ticket and a cash receipt. If requested, a court date may be given using the form designated for this purpose in lieu of the cash payment. If the individual refuses to come in and pay the fine, the Officer will issue a summons and complaint citing 22-13 of the Model Traffic Code (Failure to Comply with Notice on Parked Vehicle) and released on his own recognizance. Monies collected for parking fines will be included on the Weekly Cash Report Summary and forwarded to the Town Finance Office. Â·.i:.,.tâ€ž Fee Schedule , 43(:,ff,f-~ :' ~ Violation Fee tÂ«;70 Â·- *Late Fee Overtime $-1-00 After 72 hrs. 4.00 .:,1 4 :31 K: After 20 days 8.00 , .... ..... ..,1 No Parking Zone 5.00 704.3 , 10.00 Blocking Fire Hydrant 5.00 .7~42 K 10.00 Blocking Driveway 5.00 10.00 Disobey Angle Parking 5.00 Â« ~Â· 10.00 Double Parked 5.00 10.00 Parked Headed Wrong Way 5.00 A 10.00 Crosswalk 5.00 10.00 Sidewalk 5.00 . 10.00 5 Loading Zone 10.00 10.00 Other ' . 1 10.00 f *Except for Overtime parking violations, the standard fee will apply if paid within the first 30 days after issue or if paid within 20 days following receipt of the i reminder letter. Unpaid violations after the 20-day period will be assessed an additional $10 late fee. This procedure will apply to all areas within the city limits and the immediate l surrounding areas: Hwy 36 to and including Pinewood Springs i Hwy 34 to and including Drake and the Glen Haven area i Hwy 7 to Meeker Park County areas between the City Limits and Rocky Mtn. Nat'l Park , t , JAMES M. LITTLEJOHN I ' '.#2,5.Ad.#WaftÂ·{3- ~ ~1,1. ATTORNEY AT LAW - P. O. BOX 1831 j,y-~Â·244*24 , ' 4 ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 . .';948* :4':2 (303 ) 586-46 53 ,..4; .;,4% t...1 ift-,L,1~,~..~ ~:,.,:, December 9, 1985:.AttliÂ· 5--21,., ,-Â·â€¢ -9 4*4,1.- - Chief Robert Ault 1, ...%'*10.1...{jil,..1*,iii.fli Estes Park Police Department P. 0. Box 1200 47Al:Cibd*CM-~' : '-Â· Estes Park, CO 80517 , 11 9...t.'.:r 21:.?].9{22;9.:.4.t,.hil....1 :. 1. ~.i: . Interdepartmental memo concerning Town.of Estes Park parking tickets. # '.63~Zikiâ‚¬Â·%:iff i. - 0 - Dear Chief Ault: *i-*4Â·Na 4. Â·,- 2-4 07 6-' ' It has come to my attention that there ista.periodic accumulation of unpaid parking tickets. I am occasionally, asked for the Municipal Courtls view of them. This memo, then, .ispa commentary on the Court' s perspective of the matter. It should be noted at the outset, however, that the Court has no jurisdiction: over any matter until : the original comulaint is filed with the .,CourtÂ·44 Â· i ' 40; ~: .4-44 k'*itÂ·~ 4 I tend to regard parking tickets to be petialty.'~assessment notices, 1 rather than summons and complaints, and they.are described that way ift in Â§22-12 of the M.T.C. Attaching a parking 'ticket to the vehicle is not the kind of service of process required by the state or federal I supreme courts to meet standards of noticepand due Drocess. To overcome that problem, we have two solutions: First, Â§22-13 of the M.T.C. can allow for personal service of a summons and comnlaint citing Failure to Comply with Notice of Parked Vehicle, following the 20 day written reminder. Second, the person who comes to the police department window to contest a parking ticket must fill in the form I previously suggested in order to do so. By filling in the form, the person accepts the jurisdiction of the court. After either the summons and complaint, or ~'the other form, is filed with the court, the court has jurisdiction and can issue a bench warrant for any fai_lure to appear, etc. But such bench warrants are only good within Colorado..3 R t..Â· P I am well aware that both the M.T.C. and the state statutes seek to treat a parking ticket on a windshield as being just as good as a summons and complaint served personally. But I have no faith that Â§22-14 of the M.T.C. which can make the owner of a vehicle criminally liable for the acts of the vehicle's driver, Â·would be held to be valid. Therefore, the Town would be assuming undue risks should it elect 4'Â·.i~.h:'2'; t..1 6&:1 .' : 'te,4.':.i:*446.: . 44:.:r ~:'HAA, ~ I ..1 ...4/. I ' '~I.'/' I. I I I /** 9.-* -*+.&. -Â·fi )6*40#.**j*.01Â· giBT' 0.1**:-Â·.-.,W.41TAIi ,:Â·.w~~J~Jrkt:92...>?R'fi;34~ 1.:,Â·-Â· Â·1'; ~. Â· %8Â·~iÂ·Â·Â·1-Â·;(43:442{':AÂ·:9?f~.tÂ·:Â·"~ Â·~ Â· ; Chief Robert Ault '' December 9, 1985 -"' .1 Â· ~ ~"N't" ~~1 1, .,,4 ,â€¢Â·,Â·â€¢:rÂ·.Â·> ..Â·Â·- Â· ~ Â·c Page 2. ;i?~ti.(44%4742$Â·t }lâ€ž' .;* .~Â· t-Â· f.:;'99'iyj.:Â·2*.Â·. 0~2Y- t;.4.Â·,Â· Â·. to detain or arrest anyone for failure to pay a parking ticket alone, without the other steps having been taken )first in order to solidlv confer jurisdiction on the court. Having Â·a bearing here too, are the recent decisions in which people have.been awarded damages for being held because they couldn't post bond, when the violation they were charged with rarely if ever bore a jail sentence even though one may have been authorized. ..F,1 ... Estes Park's unpaid narking tickets fall <f into< three categories: Out-of-staters, Coloradoans from outside â‚¬the Estes Park area, and locals. .: 0 L - -Â·240,1:0-'..t4 Out-of-staters may or may not respond t-oKaÂ·~ reminder letter. I'm sure they know as well as we do that we :aren't going to extradite them. I imagine a cost-benefit ratio might be done to see if the effort of obtaining a vehicle owner's name, and,.address is suonorted by the dollars these letters bring in. : bA,-4~Â· -kÂ·. 0'44*ff>-JiÂ® Coloradoans from outside the Estes Park)Â·area may be more inclined to respond to a reminder letter, narticularlyrif serious sounding con- sequences are mentioned. Here, the cost-benefit ratio might also be compared with the value of being sedn to fvigorously nursue such violations. Will the Department of Revenue Â·put a,stop order on license plate or driver's license renewalsÂ·for reported unnaid parking tickets? If so, that would, be very/effective leverage. Locals, of course, can fairly easilyÂ·.be,inersonally served with a summons and complaint, citing Â§22-13-?of~.the M.T.C. It would annear that the court would usually be involved only with the last category. ...f. 11.K Should a Coloradoan from out of the areaihave been served with such a summons and complaint, or have filled out the form at the window, the court would have jurisdiction, but this circumstance seems rare. Obviously, most of what I've said here comes under your jurisdiction, not mine, and it is not my purpose to step on anyone's toes, only to comment on parking tickets from the court's point of view. Parking tickets keep things moving, and I'd guessÂ· that if 80% of them got paid voluntarily, then you're probably doing a great job and making money for the Town as well. If you did absolutely nothing about unpaid parking tickets involving non-locals, I would not be offended, although I'd feel better if a reminder letter was written at least to the Coloradoans. Locals, however, need to comnly with the rules as much as the visitor and vigorous law enforcement would seem to be in order. 1 Â·Â·. "47<'IA ,/.9, rÂ· . '. . , ~1,~~irr- Â· ' ~Â· i,4 ~'~ . .. ,....2.Â·-4:';*tÂ»Â·1 -. + '4('/:,i-,ev,%~112~â‚¬â‚¬4.'72 :~. Chief Robert Ault l. '' ~:,~f{.if-:r.,5..if.Â·9(Â·~ffâ‚¬4*9. 9*;414'*Wif<~;~ Â· December 9, 1985 Page 3... *440Â»Â·-* 01 43 2 1 - But again, all these things fall within your range of discretionary law enforcement parameters. The court's only interest, in the practical sense, arises after a case is filed. ~Â¢cerely, f -UÂ»/ i fr-1--- //-0- -142Â»4 3/4 //74//L JamA, M. Litttel 0-rin 1 2 Munidipal Judge JML:jmc 1 314 222201 2-* 1013: 1111Â¥?~r :Â· . FA:-:~f ...'/1 292Â·4:/9. 7 Â· Â· 17.!)1#8 2;:f'4*.- A, 19.4..4.4.Â·.... r/:01 Â·. I I.':' fri ESTES PARK POLICE nfl-1.- c-- 641 Ir Office of the -C> ..- GENERAL i Â»- 1,6 /- / \4 %BASJNU .0 Date Issued Date Effective ~<~4 .. No. Reference Radar Subject Operational Procedures To All Personnel POLICY The Estes Park Police Department will use both stationary and moving radar in its vehicles to aid officers in speed enforcement. Radar devices may be used by any officer who has successfully completed radar certification and/or instructors course, and has demonstrated proficiency in the proper operation of the device for which he is certified. To assure a high level of profi- ciency, each officer will be periodically recertified to demonstrate prac- tical ability in proper radar operation techniques and the estimation of speed. PROCEDURE ~ I. Radar set up and calibration check A. Prior to commencing radar operation, each officer will ensure that all radar sets are properly set up according to the manu- facturer's instructions and Larimer County Court procedures. B. The calibration of all radar devices shall be checked with two tuning forks of different speeds. Moving radar will be checked with both tuning forks in both the stationary and moving modes. All tuning forks will be kept in the storage pouch when not in use. C. Tuning forks are not to be struct against any hard objects, ie: .â€žcliâ‚¬>oard, side of table, desk, etc. They may be struck against semi-hard objects, ie: the heel of a boot. D. An additional calibration check shall be performed by comparing radar speed displays with the patrol car speedometer while the vehicle is in motion. E. Periodic calibration checks shall conform to the following mini- mums: 1. If a sustained operation is conducted, a full calibration check with two tuning forks and speedometer verification shall be performed once each hour. 2. If an operation is less than one hour duration, a complete calibration check shall be performed at the beginning and end of the operation. -1- L - . . 3. Calibration checks will be made in accordance with Larimer County and Estes Park Municipal Court guidelines. F. It will be the officer's responsibility to make certain a radar device is working properly and to report any malfunction, damage, or operational difficulty. Upon determination that repairs are necessary, the device will not be used. II. Radar Operation A. All moving radar antennas shall be aimed straight ahead in order to eliminate any error relating to Patrol car speed. B. If a radar device is equipped with an audio circuit, this func- tion will be in operation at all times. Operators may adjust the audio volume to a comfortable listening level, but the audio will be loud enough to clearly detect all incoming signals or interference. If the device has no audio, the operator must ensure that all known or obvious sources of interference are avoided to reduce the probability of a faulty reading. III. Radar and tuning fork recertification A. It is the responsibility of the Lt. to ensure that radar sets and tuning forks are within certification. Recertification shall be done at least (30) days prior to expiration of certification. B. Tuning forks shall be certified accurate once every twelve (12) months. Any tuning fork which becomes damaged or fails to pro- duce the proper reading will be returned to the Lt. for replace- ment. Should a tuning fork become lost, replacement will be handled only through the Lt. or the Chief of Police. IV. Radar operator recertification A. The Lt. will ensure that every radar operator is recertified at least once every two years. Evidence of current recertification will be provided to each radar operator in the form of a wallet card designed for that purpose. The specific types of radar the hold- er is qualified to operate will be listed on the card. The recert- ification worksheet will remain in the officer's training files to be available for use in court. B. A master file of all radar-qualified officers will be maintained by the Lt. and will be updated accordingly. Notice of all changes in operator status such as certification, renewal, or the addition of different radar devices will be sent via memorandum to the Lt. V. The traffic radar will only be used in the below listed situations: A. During traffic periods where speeding presents a special danger in school zones and residential areas. B. In areas where complaints have been received and at the directions of the shift commander. -2- ' 1 C. During supervised safety checks. D. D.U.I. enforcement VI. Basis for issuing summons' as follows: A. Summons' into court will not be issued where the violator is found to be driving 10 MPH or less, over the posted speed limit except in the following situations: 1. The violator is suspected to be under the influence of alcohol or drugs. 2. The violator's driving priviledge is found to be suspended, revoked or denied in Colorado. 3. Where special hazards exist in regards to road conditions, or other circumstances, at the direction of the shift commander. It is to be clearly understood that at all times when radartis in use, either stationary or mobil, the patrol vehicle must be clearly visible to the motor- ing public unless otherwise directed by the Chief of Police. Respectfully submitted, Robert W. Ault Chief of Police RWA/jh . MEMO TO: CHIEF AULT ~7~ A ~ ~/<4 FROM: GAIL CLARK & JO HUTTER 1 U ./ U - / DATE: JANUARY 14, 1986 RE: PURCHASE OF A COPIER FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT The bids are all in (see attached) and the bottom line is this: Cannon $4547.60 Minolta 5783.95 Richo 5985.00 Due to the fact that Cannon has the lowest bid, and we are also happy with that particular machine, we would like to hereby request that we have permission to purchase the Cannon. Cannon's prices, however, are scheduled to go up 10% after the 17th of January. Therefore, we would like to know at your earliest convenience. R:U 9. ' ~ 23,41 nk,WWWLA. ASSOCIATED BUSINESS PRODUCTS Rf.Y .1 Corporate Office: 5285 Fox Street ' -0 ~- t L' SEY 19'85 Â©~0-Â§1' Authorized Denver, Colorado 80216 ' Â·..4 7 i Dealer 41: { ... .,i .ESÂ»? AR\& 13033 295-0757 ..','. : -0.T eÂ· *~ Z13ic>22lt - Ouotation Period Expires~J-- 3 / 1 /92 4 ~~ : Â· ,Â·~*0;hone 1\Io:~~~ 9 - q f (0--5 liustomer * Rate' , /2 Â·Â· Branch # SIs # - Sis Namy i ' PO. # Order Controi * lim r, 2- 1. 4 0 14 il - ~ cri (12.-4 06-4_ C /'0-41-x-- *r-jACÂ·Ol 11 1 L) 1 1%121 gpO_ n d;ttl.~ 1 00â‚¬0-D (i.ti 04- U 63 1 (414Â» 4 /473 - 2470 - \ Ct-3/1 ple.6 . .Ft /O 3 3.76 I - 1.-70.- 50 '20Â« -i .2-IL<_,1_ 4.-2 s- F<44' --- 7. -3 u Ah- \ 6 / ob.?.-~~ J CA-k.,1- U.(-/ V U L. 'A . I 1 If, (1'-3 1. L.11- ~ C~,~2r'~ laGÂ· . 0112- GA , r.,2JLd/9 I 42.- COMMENTS: S.N Meter: SUB TOTAL .f<5 +7.6,0 TAX 00,0-0-0 Gf-L~~. c.1 / 1- /Â·Â»023.-4 01 54 .,. DELIVERY 60. *- 01,1.0- Pifll-.14 Ci'bu- fULLL TOTAL /9 C <'CUÂ§TOMER SIGNATURE -,-0 ; DATE ABP DELIVERY DATE 9/1 1 I iâ‚¬-1 AB~-SALES REP. 1 # DATE CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE DATE BRANCH MANAGER DATE UCC SIGNED BY CUST. DATE ~ NATIONAL ~~ CANON TAX CODE //1 03 03 TAX EXEMPT ~ Aspen Office ~CZDFI. Collins Office ~ Glenwood Springs Office U Casper Office El Colorado Springs Office 520 East Cooper 1819 E. Multerry (303) 945-0139 Â·, 933 Foster Road 805 Garden of. the Gods Road Unit C-7, Office #19 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 . Casper, Wyoming 82601 Suites G and H Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 223-2010 (307) 234-8017 Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907 (303) 925-6373 (303) 593-7984 SLS, AD-2 12/84 OFFICE r--r-r---- -,4 -. f:.6, .1-,=;cli~dECVT:,7~lil.'3,9Â·)Â·,~~' --*- 1Â·3'.Â·.,r. - ...4574(Â·1-''RGÂ· 9 1-2.1 i., , : ctif~Ul'~--D 41Â·6&1 :L '4&%261~Â·1111-.1114:2676â€¢2514:.wwk:6~~, w..Â£&,-j .....; CO@ {Efn-ATA77fq-n>FriP *>*Dff[7RI HEIAJierR~-N~iFft* *ft 1:'fli?i.6~Â·~f~EFÂ¢j<-c:~~.. ; - Company 0 59-CS ~47.f' ~T' f /,ficf J)~ /)Â£7,-/6,1'106,-(~ Purchaser's Warne~ 5 ~ric yo lict Dert 0 / Address -17 0 Ar G i'~â‚¬ cce; 0 4 u 3. H- Address 2 0 602 10 2 7 J c\W E 599 fur k =! City Eâ‚¬* s Pa. r k State lip f-09-/ 7 St;It A CO L 7,rjOS (1 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL M i N, 1 1-q E P- 490 2- C Phe-4 copier- , 1 65 a 35-4 4 po u 4 6- 11 - (Ao le per~-f Â·ce j 3-7 3,co F- L I - (Seon Feeoter 3 -149.co Â·. .--9- I 0 1 ~ 50,--1Â·'Fe h TRADEÂ·IN MAKE LI188 TRAIDe /Â¥<bpt/Â¢L SUB-TOTAL 35-3765 ACCESSORIES DESCRIPTION .: '..2:Â·L QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL CABINET 15-0-1_ opnsole 699: 95-- 1-999 COUNTER CASSETTES SERVICECOVERAGE PRICE TOTAL ,..'â‚¬'fll#.~~fir,:. 1 .f QUANTITY ALLCOPIERS SOLDOR LEASED ARE COVEREDBY [I]TO BE BILLEDWITH COPIER OUR STANDARD 90 DAY SERVICE WARRANTY, AFTERWHICHTIMEANANNUALSERVICE El TO BE BILLED AT TIME OF AGREEMENTISAVAILABLE. WARRANTY EXPIRATION SUPPLIES SIZE DESCRIPTION , >.%4?ii....,2'*6.6 ': QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL Mine 1 1Â« Storter kkl- 9 /0 Paper : { 6,1 96- Bil ( (62 30 Pa-vs- - K- TERMS: The AOE equipment and/or supplies indicated above are purchased under AOE stan- dard terms which are: net payment due within 10 days of purchase date. Unless shipping instruc- ' tions are specified, we will useour judgement as to mode of transportation. Ati accounts due and 2.. ~ 5 -~-~ 9Â£5-- payable per terms shown above, Interestat therate of 11/2% per month (18% PER YEAR) will- |lk-f, r?.Â·ie bRIFP[FRI==i, ~ 1 U' O â€¢ be charged on all past due accounts. In case of litigation all attorneys fees will be borne by n (r/*0243-u .f, customer. 41 THIS ISA BINDING ORDER, notsubject to cancellation. No trials accepted. This ordercannot be , 19: '+,2.~.1.=AFFilEI?!imip 939Â·27*:sial*&218,Â£019&*d changed except in writing byan AOE officer. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE ~~ PRINTED SIGNATURE NAM ~~ TITL.OX ~ 4 - 44 - 8-6 DATF J P.O. NO. AOESALESMAN 90 P.N Trid \ Period w lorder - SHIP TO ~*77 , 2- 3:ZZIE3'ze,=,~ Â·T . . ..i n -- a.- .--rsÂ·. : Â·,;Wr~CU.&;4.;t,2/136/m//mmod/Eu,zle,2:2gE=r=:19,1=16#26,4-.-: -- ~- 2'Â·-.:t**=F+Lal25.22/ 111~11111 /11 ~1:1'll!111111111111~1111111111~1111,111:1 , r 1 11 111;1111 Ill~i ..:L '. *~0 N.$3kill/Lim, I,|" BUSINESS PRODUCTS COMI'ANY . I *'er'c * I ''. 9... lilli 111111 1 11 1/1111'jill'111111111/lili",blil ... '1"~"i"f'l 41'I*'4 - Â·'.. tt-Â· ,Â«c'.'. To: ESTES PARK POLICE DEPT. 113A Cameron Drive Ft Collins, CO 80525 493Â·2679 Â· Loveland 667-4311 1. Date: December 31, 1985 -H ' 2" Prices quoted hereon are firm for 30 days from above date. 9-:... -.70...4F r -- --,-v- Quantity Description Unit Price Total lea. Ricoh Model FT4085 Plain Paper Copier 3225.00 (includes 3 paper cassettes) lea. Automatic/Semi-Automatic Document Feeder 461.00 i lea. Turnover Device 115.00 lea. 10-Bin Sorter 692.00 lea. Cabinet 153.00 NET INVESTMENT $4646.00 lea. Ricoh Model FT5050 Plain Paper Copier .-Â·-tÂ· : Â· 1 3923.00 (includes 3 500 sheet paper cassettes and cabinet) . lea. 15-Bin Sorter Â· , 1000.00 lea. Automatic Document Feeder 1000.00 lea. Start-up Supply Kit , ' 62.00 NET INVESTMENT $5985.00 Recommended Verified Preventive Maintenance Agreement: $480.00 annually or 60,000 copies, whichever occurs first. Excess copy charge is $.008/copy. - provides you with preventive maintenance asiwell as emergency calls - includes all parts and labor not classified as supply items Anticipated Delivery After Receipt For your convenience this quotation becomes an order when authorized within firm quotation period. of C~prÂ·-- O--Ouoteincludes tran,sportation -1 Quotation Accepted 0 E[G Tran~rtqtigK (Oubte [pes Not I'nqfgde Applicpblp Tafes),P By. AUTHORIZED AGENT RYÂ· f, 4-x''f/-4,/ b 1/2 IL,-,%*61-1 ACITHORIZED AGENT Title: ' Rick Miller Purchase Order No.: Copier Division Supervisor Frontier Business Products DateÂ· 'Li.1111}21( i ov\./IN OF ESTES PAK, 149% a\ Police Department h ./.,1., I. 14 - Â·4 ..2Tf.11 -Â·.9-4 Robert W. Ault ~ 70 1... 3Â» Chiel 01 Police : Â· 34 -a 4 Fl jÂ·~,~- ~~~ 3 '12.8â‚¬4 13/Â·vr.,11.ft; Â»=ty# 4,9 --,SIVÂ·i.-C ? 4. t: ''f /11Â·Â¥~i. 74.â‚¬0 i 'P Â¢70Â«9 4*.Â£2/*w,78,4 44 1, , - Â·Â· .- 29 8- 6 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 y : .. ' ,Â·:-~.. ,..2 -. .z:,3.-Ff:i.-;A) . January 4,1986 1 Â·,r < .v,Â·.gf;Z-gr To Lt Elste- Ref: DUI arrests for 1985; There have been a total of 195 DUI arrest,for the year of 1985, The brake down is as follows. Breath 117 Blood 54 Refusal 24 Total 195 Of this total 86 were for per se . Â·'Â·. 2,-Â·"Â·~-p~6211-19.~~ Breath 49 blood 37 Break down by Department is - ~ r 1 EPPD Breath 94 blood 50 refusal 24-t 490.f :k:-1 LCSO breath 21 blood 3 refusal 0 P.- Â·.Â·-Â·.., CSP breath 1 blood 1 refusal 0 .,., . Â·1: 1 RMNP breath 1 EPPD Officer Totals ~ Filsinger Breath 44 Blood 23 Refusal 7 Cazan Breath 13 Blood 6 Refusal 3 Ballew Breath 11 Blood 5 Refusal 9 Dougherty Breath 7 Blood 5 Refusal 0 Emerine Breath 10 Blood 7 Refusal ,5<.' ............4. . Heifner Breath 6 Blood 1 refusal 0 J..1 1 J........i...... . 1' O.110:, I)87 Telephone (303) 586-4466 .REMBER /94Â£ Â¥ FLA 19 2, fÂ» u i L/91/ N OF ESTES .PARA ** 09 3 Police Department c_Â£30= 'atÂ¥.,4./ 4 P -WARdley 9 ..44 .1./.Ame. Robert W. Ault â‚¬65/5 *10 Chict of Ponce 0.3...7%Le -A/* 1-T fâ‚¬j~#1242UT: /%>'-0~ 6 9,4 , -12 ..2 A ,- ict.<IZZL.,9,4~,4 -D.413. 9 4 Â».1. 4- /-3Â»* 1-114Â£%21.f -/-1 119 -1 ..,.: - I / 0 1. 1;MivT/'t-,;7 1& 1 -JN -Â« Â·Â·Â· ,- "'Ii: 'r'*.1....';20Â·Â·Â·' Estes Park, Colorado 80517 C./..hutte-- .1 . -b-1 1:fÂ¢i:~ffil?117 .:>. EPPD Officer Totals I 24-'-2 * 1' â€¢ '. ' 1 --'ri ' *6/,4 6 1 Greenman Breath 1 Blood 2 Colin Breath 1 ., Repola Blood 1 - -*7- "' 7. 0-2:.Â· U,%.39.'-- Connolly Breath 1 : Al '1 -. :-6- .Â»56- i-kf: 2. We also recieved 100 reddi reports for :the year -of these we contacted 21 and made arrests on 7. ..I- ' 'Â·'-Â· I':Â·...'...,r '--- ... 1 111.l :Â· .'.111. *4.5.- :Â·'- ' ~--2 r'A~k:%;#'ttii;~pt,..I , Gerry J. Dougherty 1- . I' l). li)< I 287 Telephone (303) 586-4466 6 -