HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Public Safety 1985-03-13AGENDA PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE March 13, 1985 1. Alarm System - Report from Acting Police Chief Elste, 2, "Dog at Large" Ordinance - waste, 3. Two Patrol Vehicles. 4 Request permission to purchase two typewriters 5. Rockwell Street - traffic review,
t> 4* TOWN OF ~k¢j ES PARK 1 . )*.ti 26.1 -·ft.'EfF-- - -* UP#t:... 2 : AR.h ¢1:%93 Se* / 474 -raL - d.si*234 = 2.7 .,33~f,·iii ---3~ --€260«.\ i: US€/t~<~,~·'j·: :~ ' - : '.../*4/1--·G3t·. 1 ' _ - . 1:24.-1 - -'--- I-.Mt9CL---/ -,-4-*0-721 4 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Elste FROM: Gary Shanafelt L_ t'»--" DATE: March 13, 1985 Ghent Ford will not offer pickup and delivery for warranty work on these vehicles, nor will they allow warranty work to be performed by Town mechanics. Rains Estes Park Ford will provide pickup and delivery service and will authorize Town mechanics to do warranty work. They will also purchase, outright, vehicles G.98A,1981 Chrysler Le Baron, 105,000 miles, and G.90 A, 1979 Plymouth Volare with 95,000 miles, for a total price of $1,200.00. GS:ca P O Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586-5331
WO al U ,-1 Ul gil )-1 a \4 «1 71€ f 10 - I m ;-1 cA 1 36 E 0) 05 ! k.1,< 1 AID ! IDDER VEIIICLE BASE PRI€E TRADE IN NET PRICE GHENT 85 LTD 4Dr. $10 474.57 ($10,474.57 DAVE TAYLOR .3&6, $10,946.62 $300.00 $10,646.62 $10,530.07 $10,530.07 UNT {~ AFELT 3/12/83 OLICE DEPARTMENT _Vehicles Sedan Police Package 11
q »4*j Prices indicated are for two machines Olympia Electronic Compact 2 $ 958 .pratt's *U- Ad-Mad.t- A (interface built in) -6433 9 aA» or Teal Electronic Model 270 .1:190 Weatherly Office /Products 1 9 /4 - UUAw IBM Electric Personal~Typewriter 1190 IBM --Denver Sales Office /7 1 45494 Note: Computer interface is available on the Teal for additional cost Olympia Electrocic Compact 2 1020 Lewan & Associates-Bew-1-der - <2666«.7
Estes Area Merchants Association P. O. Box 3487. Estes Park, Colorado 80517 March 13, 1985 Public Safety Committee Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 Gentlemen: I write this letter to express the interest and concern of the Estes Area Merchants Association in regard to the man- agement of automobile and pedestrian traffic at the intersec- tion of Rockwell Street and East Riverside Drive, particular- ly directed toward the pedestrian exchange between the Miners Assay Exchange Building and the municipal parking lot. Our concern lies primarily with the projected increased flow of automobile traffic on Rockwell Street and East Riverside Drive brought about by the second phase of urban renewal. We feel that this increase may have the potential to physically limit the pedestrian access to the Miners Assay Exchange Building and the businesses therein under current pedestrian control design. We hope that a solution to this problem can be achieved to the satisfaction of all concerned. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. - Sincerely, --SEK LL--,tbr*LL-4 - Scott Webermeier President Estes Area Merchants Association
7.12.040 Dogs Running at Large Prohibited A. It is unlawful for the owner (including the custodian or prossessor) of any dog to permit it to leave the premises of its owner, unless it is under the effective control of its owner. Effective control is deemed to be: 1. Confinement within a vehicle, fencing, or other adequate enclosure, where the dog has no access to passers-by; or 2. Attachment to a leash not over six feet in length and held by a person of sufficient size and strength to restrain the dog. A dog is not under effective control when: 1. The dog inflicts damage or injury to the person or property of someone other than its owner; 2. The dog is female and apparently in heat, and is not confined in an enclosure capable of preventing the entry of other dogs; 3. A dog is tethered such that it blocks public pedestrian thoroughfares or such that it has access to passers-by; 4. A dog is tethered away from the premises of its owner for more than 20 minutes; or . 5. A dog is tethered away from the premises of its owner by a leash greater than six feet in length. B. A dog shall not be deemed to be running at large, or not under its owner's control when it is upon the residential or vacant real property of its owner, or on the residential or vacant real property of others with the permission of all owners or tenants thereof.
' . -2- C. Nothing herein shall restrict the ordinary uses of seeing eye dogs. Animal Wastes 0.00.000 Removal Required. The owner or any person having control or purporting to have control over any dog shall be responsible for the removal of any feces deposited by his dog(s) on public walks, recreation areas or private property forthwith.
AGENDA PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE 3:30 P.M. 1. Odd Lyngholm - Regarding alarms. 2. V.C.R. Purchase. 3. Dog Ordinance - Proposed. 4. Reports: a. Seasonal Officers b. Training 5. Fire Chief Jack Rumley: a. Fire House Monitor b. Video Camera
-1 o G ZW 640 a G 7 OLLI 0 H %Â¥ K - 4 ERCIAL 8%14"'as ;'suns IN10HDNA-I 000 STATE OF THE ART
I .1 .- =. FEF . 42 116 2 5 /5 1 2 3 : C 6 , 4- 4- CD{o- a, - o a'.c al, - 0 E c E-% c E &-2 jiE -os.fic 222 -0,89 -I O al, „_ E 9 ---0 0- 2.0 - € i. 2 E ·4 -& 2 § : -§ -8 ii § E EE ~d ~~~~~ 22*§ 04%2 .pig·Z vE > 2 68 0 *E 20·-E>- >4- Ef IN.@gz irof&:~ - L 2 25 82€22 0% i Mi-E i ~2 i~53f 1% Aggico 5 1 iM *-2- im·EE E & 1 2 2 20 . C ocs £ 0 V I. 0 6- L O C 2- 0 ·· .1 CD 4- O L 5 % a> .43 - ...C N 0 0 ( - O 4-' .at, o CD C m .22 CD* m 4 . 3 6- W ro t; > co L c = -0 v . /f .0 a. - D a> 0 -13.12 - ai W m 0.52 -3 e (O 0 8 Z c=12- a, e. .0 2 -Cm D o N I e .c ·52 = - 16 -6 a, b .0 &3 EC *2-8 25 * 52 2 2 0 0/ r e M E c pc 3·E ° 87 € 03_& 1 E ~ i € R 3 §-2 ~ # g 2 ·al c & 2.2 §@120- 2 T 2 m P Z E ki O w -4- -O > .C .0; v § 16 E I & E & S .2 0 I E -52 16 .- E 8 92 * 1& b 1- D 16 lf_Z CO ·+- C J a, N - 0 €*@ Ec t%i - 0-£ 0 N C 3 :3 2 ~-522~ 2 3 g 5 16 8 g > 0 6 2 w J E u, D o a,a,C O %-O Cgo#al 821% 851/ E o m b »3 101 2 0 2 8 S.2 c 0% 0 a) al J " 4- @ 1% li & Ji .%7 5 2·33 NE Zs-i- .-E=- C (0 0.92 >(00 T .!2 -C 5 20 290 %<vE 0>%2 3 03 >%34 - 0 % L-0- 2.1 -5{0 0 E & 1258 .U) al) 3--Et S m QZZ .e -2= 9 5= CO . c k . - 4-100 = a, ro 3 2 2 U, b .9- %2 4 -- ·i E 3 -f ~ fi v i i % £ 5,12~% Em=Eal,ro SE&%*- C al, N·- e c 6.c Z E 6 ·- 2 ER 2 2 4 ·58€ a *·3 €8028Eb 0 a> Co wo 2 - == 2 - Sum UJ UJ aI 01--8 . O U) 4, L W 1-@t; ZU.14 *-1 All sensors, includi detector; low temperature detec seismic "bugs which detect win s, and security under ca !eluoo e 'gui!1 ctor, and Jadoid 841 Al seo@u 4! 'P 1003 1 ailo 041 auolld@ial Alele!.P@Ullu! lauuos.le as 'p Boa s! uuele ue |ua4/\A 0 lou Sao JO '30Uepise lou s! t;0!P 041 il r| rueiss~1 1.SIA Al peUJUI! le u S-'ad i33bl=1 1,3M lod a~1 loeluoo Al@leip odsai pau!Ul.lalapel puodsei WAA lauuosiled Al!170s' 4 ' ~!]OU S! aA:lelaj Al!.112 unloA sn do 2181 10 are connected with ately transmits 11 n er dollar an be e lueO4!u6! s 410 u e 'AJesseoau s ze o a clgar tte p An el 6-4403 to no
January 22, 1985 TO: Dale Hill, Town Administrator Greg White, Town Attorney ~~ROM: Lt. Elste, Acting Chief of Police , SUBJECT: Town/City Ordinances regarding Animal Waste Removal. CITY OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS 100.020.040. Animal littering prohibited. Any person owning, harboring, or having charge of any animal shall forthwith pick up, remove and dispose of in a sanitary fashion any and all animal litter attributable to such animal. In addition to any penalty therefor, the failure to pick up, remove and dispose of all animal litter is hereby declared to be a nuisance and shall be subject to abatement as provided in section 100.010.050 (Code 1971, § 3-34) CITY OF FORT COLLINS ARTICLE IX Animal Wastes § 35-42. Removal required. The owner or any person having control or purportinq to have control over any animal shall be responsible for the removal of any feces deposited by his animal(s) on public walks, recreation areas or private property. FORT LUPTON SECTION 25 (Chapter 11-2-25) REMOVAL OF EXCREMENT. It shall be unlawful for the owner of any dog or other animal, except an ordinary domesticated house cat, not to immediately remove excrement deposited by such animal upon a common thoroughfare, street, sidewalk, play area, park or upon any other public property (except unlandscaped city owned property in its native state) or upon private property when permission of the owner or tenant of said property has not been obtained, and the same is hereby declared to be a public nuisance and a violation of this chapter. Animal excrement shall not be placed in storm sewers or street gutters but shall be disposed of in a sanitary manner. a. Cleanliness of premises required: It is unlawful for any person to maintain or permit the maintenance of any stable, stall, shed, compartment or any yard or appurtenance thereof in which any animals or fowl shall be kept or any other place in the city in which manure or liquid discharges of animals shall collect and accumulate if such stable, stall, shed, compartment or other yard or appurtenance thereof is not kept in a clean and wholesome condition in a manner which will prevent offensive odor, attraction of insects or rodents or creation of other unsanitary conditions that are hazardous to the health of the public.
-2- CITY OF BOULDER 6-1-14 Removal of Animal Excrement Required. (a) No person owning or keeping any animal shall fail to prevent such animal from defecating upon any property other than the premises of the owner or keeper. (b) It is a specific defense to a charge of violating this section that the defecation occurred on private property with express permission of the owner or all tenants thereof. (c) It is a specific defense to a charge of violating this section that the owner or keeper immediately removed or cleaned up such deposit and disposed thereof by depositing it in a toilet or a receptacle ordinarily used for garbage and covered by a lid or in an otherwise lawful and sanitary manner. (d) Every person convicted of a violation of this section shall pay at least a minimum fine, none of which can be suspended, according to the following schedule: first conviction, ten dollars; second conviction, twenty dollars, third and each subsequent conviction, thirty-five dollars. In applying this schedule: (1) The date when the actual violation occurred will control regardless of the date of conviction; and (2) The record of the violator for two years prior to the date of the current violation will be considered. CITY OF LOVELAND 6.04.100 Animal waste removal. It is unlawful to fail to remove and dispose of any animal feces deposited by an animal upon public or private property. Any person owning or having charge, care custody or control of any animal shall remove and sanitarily dispose of the animal waste. The complete animal ordinances are on file for the above towns at the Police Department. Ordinances on file that do not have specific animal waste removal sections are the towns of Vail, Steamboat Springs, Lyons, and Longmont.