Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Public Works 2008-05-22AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE 8 a.m. Thursday, May 22,2008 preparation date: May 14, 2008 PUBLIC COMMENT 1. League of Women Voters Recycling Report ACTION ITEMS: 1. Drainage Master Plan a. Recommendation to hire consulting engineer 2. Fall River Trail Phase 4 a. Request to solicit bid for construction REPORTS: 1. Downtown Transportation Study Note: The Public Works Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Cynthia Deats From: EP Administration [ir3045@estes.org] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 4:24 PM To: Cynthia Deats Subject: Job Done Notice(Send) ***************************** *** Job Done Notice(Send) *** ***************************** JOB NO. 0335 ST. TIME 05/19 16:20 PGS. 1 SEND DOCUMENT NAME TX/RX INCOMPLETE ----- TRANSACTION OK 5869561 KEPL 5869532 Trail Gazette 5861691 Channel 8 6353677 Reporter Herald 5771590 EP News ERROR ----- 1 . I. INTRODUCTION The League of Women Voters ofthe United States began studying solid waste disposal in 1971-72 by looking at what was the situation in local communities and then turned their attention to national policies on reuse, reclamation and recycling. "By April 1973, members had reached agreement that solid waste should be regarded as a resource and that although the major responsibility should be at the state and local levels, the federal government should play a greater role in managing solid waste. Diminishing landfill capacity and a growing awareness of the pollution hazards of incineration brought a flurry ofactivity on interstate commerce in waste and renewed enthusiasm for recycling in the late 1980s. Leagues continue to support national and state recycling efforts, waste reduction measures and household hazardous waste collection programs." (From Impact on Issues 2006-2008, League ofWomen Voters ofthe United States) The League of Women Voters ofEstes Park began studying the local situation of recycling in 1991. The LWV learned that in 1976 Claudia Irwin, the high school music teacher, wanted to raise money for the high school choir and asked a friend, Jean Weaver, to work with her on a project to collect newspaper for recycling. They collected newspapers each month, which went from 4 tons in November, the first month, to 9 tons by June. This was the beginning ofrecycling in Estes Park. Estes Park is the second longest continuously operating recycling program in Colorado, second only to Eco-cycle ofBoulder. Jean Weaver has won awards as recognition ofher leadership in recycling from RMNP,-Recycle America, and Eco-cycle. We are very proud to have her as a member ofthe present recycling committee! Jean has had many adventures in her years ofiecycling, but that is information for another time and place. In January 2002, the EPHS National Honor Society partnered with Safeway and began collecting cardboard, which Safeway baled and took to a distribution point in Denver. This quickly became a program overwhelmed with cardboard! In 2002 the town of Estes Park agreed to a pilot project to recycle cardboard. From the minutes of August 15, 2002,...."the Town Board established the implementation ofa cardboard recycling program as one of its goals."...The trial period is October-December, 2002". However, by November 30,2002, less the four months scheduled for the trial, the project was discontinued. The town's reasons being that the revenues were not great enough and that there was a contamination problem. ' . Since that time, other attempts have been made to establish a more comprehensive recycling program, especially for cardboard and many other paper products. Currently, what can be recycled for free in Estes Park is limited and what is available for recycling cardboard is expensive and inconvenient for businesses in particular. The need for a better system ofrecycling in Estes Park has been evident for some time. The place where the free recycling is located has become too crowded, doesn't accept all that can be recycled, does not have co-mingled recycling, has limited hours, and access is dangerous to those who want to recycle. Having trash being dumped in the same small area is not conducive to a good recycling program. In March of 2007 the League of Women Voters formed a"recycling committee" to research what was available in the area. The following steps in the research were taken: • Toured recycling centers in the county and other towns • Talked with the local schools about recycling in the school buildings . Sponsored a "hard to recycle" drop-off, with the materials then taken to a state of the art recycling center on the Front Range • Toured the Eco-Cycle site and CHARM site with a group from LWV and Sustainable Mountain Living ' The committee talked with Steve Gillette, supervisor ofthe Larimer County landfill ' The committee talked to representatives of Waste Management . The committee talked with 3 companies that offer recycling services in the Estes Park * Surveys were done with both businesses and private citizens to determine recycling habits. Results were published in the community newspapers and presented to the Town Board - e The survey showed that 85% ofresidents who responded do recycle, but the diversion rate to the Larimer County landfill is less that 5% 0 The survey showed that businesses would be very interested in recycling, but don't have the manpower. The greatest need for businesses is to recycle cardboard e Investigated the cost ofcompactors and balers • Several committee members talked with County Commissioner Glenn Gibson about our recycling needs. Larimer County has the oversight ofthe Transfer Station and its operation e Did a presentation to the town ofEstes Park public works department . Sponsored a recycling booth at the first annual Estes Park Earth Fest, with 400 attendees ' Sponsored a community forum bringing together businesses, town trustees, waste hauler representatives, LWV members, and public school representatives. This resulted in a sense ofcommunity resolve fromthe sharing of ideas and resources • Found that many businesses work hard at recycling • Recycling forum report was posted on our website as well as in the local newspapers • Used a town trustee forum to asks questions about positions of candidates on support for funding better recycling facilities • Worked with Safeway to accept plastic bags for recycling and to sponsor an Earth Day event • Formed a cardboard sub-committee to investigate possible sites for and funding for equipment to recycle cardboard • Wrote articles for the newspapers about recycling, encouraging people to find more ways to recycle Because Estes Park is an awesome, classy community it is important that we have an awesome, classy system of recycling. The town, as a tourist town, has many possible recycling materials that are now going to the county landfill....wasted....can't be used again! It is our desire to reach a system ofrecycling to get beyond the currently reported 5% recycling rate to a rate ofat least 50% as an initial goal and working toward a 99% recycling goal. Of course, there are some things that cannot be recycled, but we can do a much better job of protecting the environment than we are presently doing. The League of Women Voters Recycling Committee has developed a proposal to create and operate a new recycling center in Estes Park. The proposal includes: • Political Partnership • Physical Requirements • Financial Requirements • Operations • Education II. POLITICAL PARTNERSHIP The League of.Women Voters Recycling Committee is recommending that a political partnership should be formed to effectively create and operate the new recycling center. The partnership should consist of the town of Estes Park, Larimer County, the landowner, and the designated operator. The League ofWomen Voters Recycling Committee can assist in coordinating this effort. The League could also act as a liaison between the partnership and the community. The partnership should develop a legal agreement with all parties involved so that a formal public document is created similar to an intergovernmental agreement. The partnership could apply for grants to establish the recycling center. Funding needs will be determined by the parties. It may be necessary to create a minimal recycling fee to establish and operate the recycling center. The town or the county would need to collect any fee. The locations that the recycling committee looked at for a recycle center include: • The Light and Power yard on the east side of Elm Road • The Larimer County CDOT property on the west side of Elm Road • The Upper Thompson Sanitation District property on the east side of Mall Road • The Bureau of Reclamation property, also on the east side of Mall Road. All ofthese properties appear to be acceptable for a recycle center. III. PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS A possible configuration for the Recycling Center 1 is shown in the following sketch A three sided building, 50 ft. long, 40 ft. wide, and 20 ft. high would house three roll-off containers: It is expected that single stream recycling will be available. All materials would be gathered in two containers, except for corrugated cardboard. This will make it much more convenient for the public to recycle. Cardboard would be placed in a compactor. Based on a footprint of 100 ft. by 140 ft., there would be nine parking places, and room for the roll off container to be trucked for disposal. A concrete pad would be located in the building for supporting the three containers. Asphalt would be used for parking in an area approximately 100 ft by 120 ft. Three phase power will be required to operate the compactor which will be in the 10 - 20 horsepower range. (It is hoped that wind generated power from our local electric provider will be used.) A fence may or may not be required, depending on the site selected. IV. FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS ESTIMATED START UP COSTS Building erected with footers $40,000 - $50,000 Town of Estes electrical service $ 12,000 Electrician $ 10,000 Fence (if required) with keypad $ 10,000 Pad in building and a paved 100 ft. by 20 ft. parking $ 32,000 Level the land (site specific) $ 5,000 Insurance TBD Surveillance camera TBD ONGOING COSTS Snow plowing Utilities Custodial expenses (It is assumed that maintenance of the compactor or baler would be done by the operator) V. OPERATIONS The facility should be open for as many hours as possible, Monday through Saturday., with the possibility of a keypad for businesses to bring their materials to the site after hours. Thefe could be at least one evening when it would be open. Exact hours will depend on the location ofthe recycling site. Access to the containers will be by platforms. Single stream recycling will simplify this. Materials for recycling should be brought to the site by Estes Valley residents. For businesses, two options could be considered: • Businesses could drop off cardboard and other materials for no charge • Cardboard could be hauled by a commercial hauler from the various locations around town for a fee The materials from schools (Park R-3, Eagle Rock) could be picked up for a fee and brought to the recycle drop-off center. (The schools are presently paying Waste Management to haul both their trash and their recyclables.) The environmental club from the high school could be involved in collecting materials to be recycled. • Regular pick-ups ofthe roll-offs should be scheduled with the precise times varying with the seasons. The roll-offs will then go to a recycle center in the Front Range. • Volunteers could monitor the site for cleanliness and other concerns., but it may be necessary to hire a custodial service. • The new roll-offs for the recycle center should be provided by Larimer County or the independent operator. (The roll-offs that are presently at the Transfer Station are the property ofLarimer County, it is reported.) ' Snow plowing will depend on the location ofthe site and under whose control the site is, whether that be town, county or private ownership. • Traffic flow will depend on the new location and signs should be posted. • Physical safety ofpeople bringing recycle materials would require that there be proper placement of stairs and railings. • Surveillance cameras should be used to monitor the recycle area. ./ VI. EDUCATION Educating various sectors ofthe Estes Valley community about recycling issues is vital for the success ofthe recycling drop-offcenter. Signs at the recycling drop-off center should be explicit for the efficient operation ofthe center. The League of Women Voters Recycling Committee wants the Estes Park recycling center to be modeled after the Lyons drop-offcenter, which has excellent signage (see attached photos). The signs should be in both English and Spanish To keep the public infonned, the recycling committee should write articles for the local newspapers designed to educate people about the specific materials that can and can not be recycled at the drop-off center. In addition, the recycling committee will continue to write informational articles about various recycling issues, eg. plastics, CFLs, cardboard, paperboard and any other hard to recycle items. The information about recycling should also be distributed to Home Owners' Associations, Newcomers, Women's Club, the Senior Center, the Historical Museum, Sustainable Mountain Living and League o f Women Voters. A newsletter about the drop-offcenter should also be available throughout Estes Park. Information about recycling should also be distributed through real estate agencies that do rentals and be available to motels and hotels. Phone books, (e.g. Names & Numbers and DEX) should have information about the Estes Park drop-offcenter. Information should also be included in Estes Park Vacationland and the location ofthe drop-offcenter should be included on local maps. Public service announcements should be made on Channel 8 (Estes Park's local TV station), at Reel Mountain Theater and the Park Theater, and on the local radio stations (KEPL 1470 and KREV 104 PM). Once the recycling drop-off center is ready for operation, the League of Women Voters Recycling Committee will give public presentations to the trustees of the town of Estes Park, the Larimer Coounty Commissioners, to service clubs (Rotary, Quota Club, Kiwanis, Optimists etc.) and at the Park-RE and Eagle Rock schools. Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering 111 Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Memo 970-577-3586, gsievers@estes.org TO: Public Works Committee From: Scott Zum Director Date: May 22,2008 Re: 2008 EP Drainage Master Plan, RFP Background: The PW dept. responds to stormwater complaints area-wide on a regular basis, especially in the summer thunderstorm season. In 1985 PW received a Drainage Master Plan for the North-East quadrant of Prospect Mountain and that report lead to the construction of several major underground stormwater collection projects. The majority of complaints in recent years are generated in the South-east quadrant of town which is generally 'built out' with residential subdivisions (Study Area A). The terminus of this surface flow is Fish Creek. The report will also address drainage issues near Elm Road that terminate in the Big Thompson River (Study Area B). With this RFP it is staffs hope to develop a plan to address drainage and project needs, reduce and mitigate localized flooding, and improve water quality. Staff produced the 13-page Request for Proposal, and mailed it to eleven professional consultants with extensive backgrounds in drainage master-planning, the results are shown below: Name Address Cost Ranking / Comments RG Consulting Engineers Denver $39,780 79.5 / very thorough - very qualified HDR Engineering Fort Collins $50,000 76.2 / good overall& qualified Nolte Engineering Fort Collins $49,999 73.8 / good overall& qualified Budget / Cost: the 2008 budget contains $50,000 for this engineering project. (see page 175 of the Budget Book, #204-5400-544-35-35) Recommendation: Upon close review of all submittals using the evaluation criteria referenced in the RPF, staff recommends the acceptance of the proposal by RG Consulting Engineers, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $50,000. m [19 Town of Estes Park ESTES -u ®PARK Public Works Engineering COLORADO Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, qsievers@estes.org Memo TO: Public Works Committee From: Greg Sievers Date: May 22,2008 Re: Fall River Trail Phase 4 - Request to bid Background: This phase of the Fall River Trail Corridor plan is the next piece of the EP Trail Master Plan (attached) planned for construction. It will begin on West Elkhom Avenue (hwy 34 business) proceeding west approximately 4,000', ending near the Castle Mountain Lodge covered-bridge. Preliminary & final designs have been completed and nearing final review; approval by PW staff & CDOT will follow later this month. A public comment meeting was held on April 24, 2008, in Town Hall. Staff & the design consulting engineer (VHE) anticipate bid packages will be available to go out by late June. Budget: $150,000 of the Larimer County Open Space Fund was rolled over from the 2007 budget and added to the 2008 budget of $200,000 for a total project budget of $350,000. See page 217 of the Budget Book (acct. #220-4600-462-35-60) Recommendation: Staff is requesting to go out to bid in late June or early July. Bid results will be brought back to PWC on August 14, 2008 for review and approval. List of Exhibits: 1) Trail System Master Plan 2) Fall River Trail Phase 4 - Pedestrian and Bicycle Trail • Page 1 EXHIBIT 1 TO GLEN : HAVEN TOWN OF ESTES PARK ~ TRAIL SYSTEM MAP ESTES PARK TRAIL 0| ,< -dbl SYSTEM COSTS / /fl 1 inch equals 4,000 feet ,, / 4' f LAKE ESTES TRAIL, FALL RIVER TRAIL, FISH CREEK TRAIL d ( FEBRUARY 2004 < TOWN EVRPD CDOT GOCO LARIMER BOR TOTAL -4 3 4,050,000 120,000 1,250,000 200,000 150,000 70,000 5,840,0000 * BOR donated land for Lake Estes Trail use. -1 \ 4 - / / /1142 4 7 1D . ..1 0 LOP / \1 n MACGREGOR A)& , - 1- -|~~r-ft- AVE , (-0 TRAIL £ TO LOVELAND 6.i 34 FALL , RIVER RD TO RMNP LAKE ESTES TRA <. MORAINE AVE ~ TO RMNP TORMNP -4-441«3 p 1-3/9 - 4.61 11-64»0»-3 I C le --3 2..1 -*LL-6-~ e q. BRODIE TO 00- 1- AVE BOULDER g ir - r-ir- $'r-rl-··-4'* f/-/-m-).~ 1 TRAIL- HW'(7 W 1 \1-6 2 *Arc>' - \ 14 g EL BIG 1 -/ ~-- THOMPSON L RIVER «40.,1 1 1 -1--/rL 1- 4// 7 COUNTRY CLUB DR SPUR 66 ~ , 11 twaD < 327'1~6 $ f 13.- / h...r'. AVE SCOTT /14 V-6¢\- 1 . CARRIAGE - 1 )hy W ,- HILLS " 1 \\J<X A-*' YMCA~ , ~1 ~ (t72/-« \ 1 , 1/ 6, /R 0/9» el 0 RAIL TIE TO OMER ROU» Legend CENTENNIAL m EXISTING 13 MILES HILLS . 6 FUTURE 13 MiLES En TOWN LIMITS 26 TOTAL MILES TO ALLENSPARK EXHIBIT 2 '67 € *rN--99**... jy,= ~ Re~~11'*ii,~ ,-'~dip - c €7 4 t, -. i~~'4*,~ yu - 00 WMA~ TA..39- *fy>** 4»41: 0 ....-b ,, 1 ,1 2.l©39.*3 1 D . 11 91. 0 . : -1 - --1 .''I ...1-, h ' ~ , t 7 a, N : if. + 5 - . 9 4.'/L_. 1 2= -9357 /2. \ . ., 1... ] 4 ' '. 1 . € 4 . 2 , i , 0 U) = 0 1,2 %* .1 - €"1 - d h. , 1 , 17£ ·7. I )4 £'£·311€„ . Z 00 -1 * t. f- 2 t.. · t .4. 00 4 22 - 1:4 i= g al- . 7 ./.-: W.fll **:. m . r tk gm< , f 2,1~~€M *~ 4. 5 L *.Di,f < 7~ 7 CE .0 0- 92 i r' . 9 r. I W. k .v--'- 1# 1- 6 m (*ti 4% 11 , ~---- U) 2 LU U ... *f€ - I~.hilij~ .t 8 , ~~1 -~11 - .t , 4 . 4: Z al- i42& .r A 3* «, 4'f :. 0 00 A ...2 & f *4 ~. r' 7 14 6 ., 1 U) LU · 4 . h • - I# . -7 9 A... t W * & 4 .4 i te# ' I I ..1 , 26 - - ' f I K,1 - - F-k .€, 1 ·. . · . -, ' , 1·'·7.0 i':1 , 4141,/. li €4. -1" · - f. 4304. r. I , ./ : .¥.,~ , 4, 7 -{'9 '11, 7 ..1 . . I ...: I .11 t. €'a¢*R 'i * ~ 30€ .·,1 . $ I. 1 ·. 1 WY#t% *t I 4 * r y. , .1 2 . ,¥5 4-4 '' ., + ./ 4 Lul 1 gr . . . .7..' 1 . 2: . U.0 '1*6?44 3 'fy.,- · , >-1-. .4.:~0 f.2-·.4:53-vA~f #=*" - ,· R.«13- ,t, '8944* rt M -7 ~ · 4*D ':t . :7 ..AJ.iC;<4 4'441#uARL. L . ' * ..< ;· .44¢ 4174 t., 3,0'h I #3 4 '.f· .1-44 7*47. -,11'.1;1.4 t ' i k 0 "vb#· ' 7 £ -, .4 1. . ...t.*1,3-J ' 4- 74'f. 49 134'fl>31 :Aq delll BOUe#JeJ C]Md 'S.leAe'S BeJE) 4. . tt, t, 94,1., V=i( 1N3I/\I3NllV 00 0390dOhld 00¥80100 JO NMO1 pedestrian and bicycle tr FALL RIVER TRAI Igu TOWN of ESTES PARK ESTES PARK Public Works Department COLORADO INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: May 22,2007 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Scott Zurn P.E. Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Transportation Alternatives Study Background: The Colorado Dept. of Transportation and the Public Works Dept. are in the final stages of the downtown transportation study currently being completed by PBS&J, a transportation engineering firm. The results are significant by indicating downtown congestion can be improved substantially within the existing R.O.W. boundaries. These results are computer modeled (see attachments A, B, C, D and E) and incorporate the latest Upper Front Range 2035 population and traffic projections. This study suggests improvements in the downtown area, such as additional traffic signals and a reconfiguration of the traffic flow on the 100 block, resulting in solid improvement to congestion. The resulting improvements would be jointly cost-shared by the Town of Estes Park and the Colorado Dept. of Transportation. List of Exhibits A. Moraine Avenue with travel paths B. Elkhorn & Riverside channelizing island C. Traffic signal at Rockwell & Riverside D. Moraine Ave between Elkhorn & Rockwell E. Moraine Avenue between Elkhorn and Rockwell (interim design) - NUW $ L : P ~ HORN AVE. C US 34 M ELA ' - -Z- GE CAR -J 0 4 r '' 1 16 3 ·3 .r . /.1-1 X 1 . 0 1 lia ~f· . , f 6 ' r 20-_ At + 11 1 © 9 ¥ 2 -* 0. ..... 4.... r LANE~. .. n 1%.~ ..4.1 • .... 7 '.'-I V 1 1 4 24-415/p '1 11. '%9 i. /,!UJ M fil 4 r I -« I .9,4,4 0/i <It /4, f 729 1 %--2 1.-- %9'9,~ I 1 /1./ .A .. - 'A 2.2...... 4 4.li 4. 0/ . 1 -- I ... f 4.1 p--RV 9 93 4/ I_- 3*. 1 ... > ,1 .* t. 1 L.LJ ' ia z i I ' 1 O . IN 294 1 *2 0 -4 SCALE 20 40 . /4 B-50 Alilll/l f* 4 1;45 Yl A ' i IN FEET ) Moraine Ave.- Between Elkhom Ave. & Rockwell St. . i ~ 43%81. EXHIBIT A 3 $ . ..... D A., e ;* 0//1/ 1.11 . E. 1 1/ ..lwr#/ 'i,"m#' 1 1-r 1 1 1 I..4.-m,- 1 · ' ING.3/"Il'- ' I 1 I. 1=. .0 1 I ..11!7 "rt Villillillilliller: 1. 49 -ry,1 11 3A, C US 94 #+ T,D BE ~ p -> 1911 , r €y h :41.11. ~ .V.&' 4 09 .-- ./.4 .00 FLKHORN 21- lamr , prk·I'~ .EXIST'194 .CROSSWALK· dOVFF · 1111 ~ 1, I 1 1 . ....:f 41'.aft&@Ii ..'... ,- 72 -1,-1. 1 5 : 1 · JAPER' 1,33'M...r ... 'C ~Af $ 0.-4 : ..1 m ' j ;4 " 46 1 . - I. ' , - t ./3..6 .- :' I. I / \ 1 -J> 1 ~,f,6, *~,4 t 1/1 .6...W 0 . -p -. 0 ..t. 2..pippill/ 1 g*. ./ 9 ¢ 4 -1 i 'pff .. 9 7 d. a Fll A=. 1~ . ht P Pre - ..I-,-:~.....# I - 1@k: . - 2- ~i 4 ( $\ -*Im y~.. £: , 7. ¥ - k «0 * F,7 4,1 ?0 , i 4 t. 3 4 ~ Elkhorn Ave. (US 34) & Riverside Dr. Channelizing Island 1 *- I 1 -414 I ? EXHIBIT B It en- e -------- --------------- y - lif ------ 4.B .:th' * M~~ . Lr . 1 u.......2-I. Willim/&*b/A..ill'.U . ~I.&&£:*ilillill-4........Bl , 3.,ri.1 1 17 · k. r J ft- A. .il-~I Re I allmlW0Mast A~Al from 1)'m.i na Ave: ·41' -il ?P //1/a-#, 54 - €4 ..2 ./*F 1 2 4?34 il . ,4 .'a 3:7 4 -J 1 1/ e P ~C SCALE i 0 10 f N Ct- 64 IN FEET ) i- '11. I .-lil.'& ./~ AN 1?MI- Q. 99.. ,/ Traffic Signal at intersection of Rockwell St. & Riverside Dr. ft/Illilli EXHIBIT C ' - 1....'/T.'. . - 4 4 i .1 111 :2. . 4 -t 1 ~#PV M' J. .. 3 * iAL 141 .4'FA!.:- 1 11111,1 1 i 4, f, If Nk Z 1 ~ ..2 ' 11 r h lit + it . 44 4. \ 4 % 2 a. 1 » *. I. 41 4 . A© ..,r 1 45 . i .....'-2.7 0 14 5 ....4 4*L .-4 4 f js . I RK + I ' - 4" - E /1 - --1 "&21 - , .1. 4.* ./1/Il. 41*31 /li ..i .5,7.- LANES'. ----4/7 1.. : - .7 + 4 -4 0 / 4.4 - 1 ' A 281'. --9./ 1 :. - 029 * 1 ....1 34 1 9% ,;rk, 4 h. *r I 4- *i- 1 94 1* 351/&* . 6* 1, , 4 4- C 1 2,02'/1/.-i =Il-'I'-=& .. >- 1 4* - _ r. 40 00 te - 1 1 1.> : *Lt. LU •3 f,I; - . .V 1 1-1- ** SCALE 330<'i~~ ~ 9.15/ 4,1 £ ,0 20 40 120 - pl 3 L , =28-* 1 I:.'4- ~~6_ JINFEPT] .r 1 Moraine Ave.- Between Elkhorn Ave. & Rockwell St ~ , - i lit. »§1- 1 EXHIBIT D -r, ™G, -·Ne - -- -- --1-- -- - ---- ---2,--1-- -- -. 7.1 =10.P.111™11-1 ~gldE'llili ~ ELKHORN AVE. CUS 34) + ..1.111 I b ~1 ..»9 A 1 . r .*,24~ - f. r. i 1 -4 L 1. 1 Al * . 9 2. 1 . -=OUS : f " 4, r .4 *Ul = , LANES*. .al......... 1 *1 5 l.&11.Mil.... 1 -Ilib 91 7. 1 i 1, €~ 4 1 .r , , f 7, 1 30' Most.Ar 4:":#641*/4 9., V -17 el d , 41: i s.i dd *42 € \ I e 11:1/Ily-YI \\ . I 1 . ... - . - /4 r ....0 "V·.$ 491 k ef ROCKWELL 5 1 4 312 'f. _ . , i .1-*4 ' -Aill LU J 1 ; > " 4 „ 4 2, M.1* 6 1 t L.L.1 - 1-*,1 /4, 1 tb 0 CE SCALE me i I #.*4»:,Ii,*/'*4$...... *R . 20 10 20 40 - 4~EET3 MO.(. Moraine Ave.- Between Elkhorn Ave. & Rockwell St. 3 ' Interim Design *~- 1 44,6 EXHIBIT E ~~~~ 6 ~ r ..11 ir~WI , 2 1.1,18W 3 J- I -- -- -- ·· -_ 2 -66 - Town Clerk's Office Memo To: Honorable Mayor Pinkham Board of Trustees Town Administrator Halburnt Media From: Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk Date: June 18, 2008 Subject: Meeting Cancellation - Public Works The Public Works Committee meeting scheduled for Thursday, June 26,2008 has been cancelled.