The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works Committee 2003-07-17V ICK/6 4 AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE July 17, 2003 8:00 A. M. Preparation date: 7/11/03 *Revision date: ACTION ITEMS: 1. Riverside Drive Project End-of-project quantity/cost change order approval request 2. Annual Town Street Improvement Project Request to award overlay project bid 3. Knoll Trail Approval of construction of a trail "test section" 4. Fish Creek Trail Request approval of a change order. REPORTS: Refer to the Reports Summary Memo at the beginning of the Reports Section of the Packet. The Summary follows the same order as the Agenda. 1. Highway Signalization Project 2. East Elkhorn/MacGregor Avenue Crosswalk/Flag Project 3. Gateway Sign 4. Current pedestrian trail construction projects 5. Award of a CDOT ISTEA grant for Fall River Trail Phase II and Fish Creek Trail Phase II 6. Misc. projects Note: The Public Works Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum July 14, 2003 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane (.UL SUBJECT: Riverside Drive Project Quantity Close-out/Report Only No action at this time Background: The blizzard, traffic control, and existing underground utilities resulted in higher quantities for this project than originally estimated. The final quantities and associated costs are currently being negotiated between G.L. Hoff and Van Horn Engineering, the project manager. A fill material quantity issue between Van Horn (Town) and G.L. Hoff has resulted in an ongoing disagreement Hoff is requesting payment for quantities they have not appropriately documented. The fill material discrepancy of $19,000 by Hoff and the other quantity adjustment totals $34,500. As stated, we contest $19,000 of this. Staff optimistically hoped to have this resolved by now. We will present at a future committee meeting. Cost/Budget Approved cost $410,400 Additional cost to approve: Max. 34,500 (1/3 each L&P, Water, existing Street budget) Min. 15,500 (1/3 each L&P, Water, existing Street budget) Total project max. cost $444,500 Total project min. cost $425,000 Note: No cost increase to the General Fund or Community Reinvestment Action: Staff will present at a future meeting after resolution of the quantity issue. BL/mjs 1-1 Public Works Engineering Memo TO: Public Works Committee From: Greg Sievers 6~- CC: Bill Linnane Date: July 16, 2003 Re: Street Overlay Program Background: Refer to attached list and map. We bid out the asphalt overlay quantities for the STIP program and bids were received on June 13, 2003. Coulson is the low bidder and the results are as follows: Aggregate Industries, Greeley $221,430.00 Connell Resources, Fort Collins $252,000.00 Co-ulson Ekcavating, Loveland : .$196,780.00 - U 1 Â£ 2% LaFarge West, Inc. , Boulder $257,795.15 CosUBudget: Budget is $197,000. This is the remaining budget after the chip seal project was adjusted, slurry seal deleted and the Riverside Drive project costs were deducted. Cost: $196,780.00 Action: Staff recommends approval to contract with Coulson Excavating for $196,780.00 for the overlay portion of this program. â€¢ Page 1 2-1 25%00020000 000 00 0 0 0 U. CN O 0 0 .. 00 O 0 Ct O O LO 0 1 A U-3 0 CD CD C- 4. Rt g LU IU) 1.- CD CD CD CD C\1 r xi"*91-91-00(\11 gr NCNINN-WN 1 LO X O CD CO E * 8 MR 5 Z CO LO N CO '0 1 - C) C) CD C) . O% (\1 - (9 2 E (9 O-i N A (0 CD LO CD CD UD; CD h N 42 N -2 @ (\1 ro 6 1- >4 A> #v. A CD -CS E - *a I O fo 0- el- 2 - 14 r 4 & 35 .- 31 .-. r 3 9 7 0 I- O O â€¢ 0 00 91- O N A 5 0 2 2 2 0 - (1) 9 1 *Lu. -1 wo=.2~=~A~ ge=' Â£ -1 m U.1 Z 3 g .c> E 2,2 2 4 ke#M 2222Â£ 22 2 Ell cot e O j N 10 r 04 (9 If)CON CO e r- 1- r- r- 0217 L 0 68'6626Z â‚¬0Eâ‚¬L slvlo CDS 2150.00 180.00 Peak View CDS 1408.00 120.00 Stanley Circle CDS 1850 4522.22 380.00 Black Canyon CDS 1051 2802.67 235.00 0006 00008 VE @101!0 UGABM eu!d euol enueAV UeAekl O L 00.0Â£ 0003Â£ BL pue 00 OEL 00002 GL uojDu!xel Z Xe 45 H 009 00'061 299*te ZE 01.00 LZ elle-1 8!u!63!A Manford 1140 3040.00 260.00 4 Monida Court Scott Ave CDS 704.00 3rd street 4th street 770.00 â‚¬â‚¬.â‚¬â‚¬2 sa 0 .}SE' load 0 OOL 00 oon N SOO .163 loedsoid unoo eleeis #L n F ' Ma*ina '2310-, Â· 8 2053.00 Z AMH eA!.10 MooispooM Z L FROM. TQ Â¥1* WIDTH 01 0006 K 0000*1 *E â‚¬Z SOO 4;oq aSUILLIXÂ¥ Spnoo puelp 9 L 00917 8Â£88 93 sejeisEI pue.lo Juoid eyel .,9 elqel peeds â‚¬ W 1 - E o~ Ill * 3: 0122,0 4-1 C R 3,35 A d 4--*J i h 1 j'' l 0 -,RA -41 2 *lrft "hj v=*444 /,1 --~34-1Â¢fy \- 4 /1 148Â¥ 14-3 Â¤ - 1 -' L__2_3*,Â£ 1, 1 r itai.Ad -p , â‚¬ 0~-fi'~ \N -- 1 -3 94 141 Affe*nd 0~- #01*52Â¢/ 9 3/ E#% 4 4# Ai Â¥,r an J (*144-*~ F ~ 7:04.99 8 ~ d =1 tia XOd,(91* 5\1. W :Â¥2Ulu/,1 ~4 7 crÂ· Du:Â·rÂ» 0, f.gth ./1 ./ 70*~li Â¥%*r '4*â‚¬ -- L__ *:tf 2.1 / 148 ft U 1% 1 1 C 4 -v 3 16. 1 -1 FA /4-3 \ ~ 4 61@\Â« 1% 1 h '13 /1 1 N j 0/1.-Aff = 7/ 44 1 4% j , 43 04 -.ft.'#@t kivertrn a m i 0 loefoid -slee.Il Overlay 2003 7** \- E-f--4 2-=14- 2797- 9-- 2 - -,1 -f-4-%-1 r, -4-hi_ - 1 i~_ tf - -1-fr# . 1 -1 Li~EJ.,Lt 4~-~~-'1 - - -1 4--1 1 - **e 41 - + 2 ~ 7-4--- 734 11.-1- 1.1446.15 iIAE- -412*540000& C - 1 2 1 - 1--- 111 ;" L' -rl, lil _ mil~~-, 1 - i-*lti ll- 1- 'b 1 -1 - r- :0-~' IIAL-A I# t,J -4939-9/-1-1- - I bIL A 2 .4 ~ 4 4=t 1- 1 1 - -1 1-1 =f 1 5 = 113 1.ki- -*g L I iÂ·-4 + 4 * 4 L T r' *1 r Â£ <5499- + 1 -3 4Â£-0 1.k- =' '- - *.I 19 1--'4 - 4---- -.-4/t' 8 1 - f - . 2 - dr - Al '11#62- Ai 1,T. 1 _ ; L , Al - Alvw"* -151.9.i Â·,1~~Aa -' 2%~ Â· ' il,=:~il. 444: 7-1.9-1-1 "7 1- ./ 41#Ki Ufl 4144, 1~242~~~5 /*Pf 1 1- r-35 '.#-' b.Â·p~* 4, b I * 17* - 0-0 -L 7_ '-1 B 4 / 4 - 2 U -14- +T 'ZE--11- 2 1 - 1 -- 11 - I IL E., r Â£14 &4 1 N ti- % -Fli 1-4 14= 7 i, 2 - 41#Â· 0 Â· , 1 0 - -IL. I . - 1 1% i. ' 'i '1,+Bill.,1 11/Wif 51:87-113.544 11- 1: 6 2 1 Â·= 09*9 D - 2 4 2- - Al-Â¥ t- _ -AN 1 1 iultÂ«' ,-2-5, 11-1 1 -1-1 - 1 -**464= -1 4.- -9 -1-'-1 4 - 381 + 9-4- 1-- Flu.731 -7,1 Â£111 4 3 ,r 15=-,qffr - 4-'46442*#~ 1=4 1 24, - 3 + 1%1 i 11 - thil),1 n.3 1_1, -YAA;23d/kWA/// Estes Park - Highway 34 - Bike Trail Improvement Location Map - 2003 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, April 17, 2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 17th day of April, 1,4 2003. .1 .4 l Committee: Chairman Barker, Trustees Doylen and Habecker Attending: Chairman Barker and Trustee Habecker Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Public Works Director Linnane, Construction/Facilities Mgr. Sievers, and Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Absent Trustee Doylen Chairman Barker called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. HYDROPLANT TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS - REQUEST APPROVAL. The Hydro Plant Trail has been designed and $30,000 co-payment funds were budgeted for a possible Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO) Matching Grant. Access easements are major issues with trails and grant applications. Therefore, staff has begun easement negotiations with H.W. Stewart (a.k.a. Rocky Mountain Gateway Center) to meet the GOCO application filing deadline in June. The Stewarts have agreed to grant an access easement for the western portion of the trail in return for the Town granting an easement for the livery property and the eastern portion of the trail. There is a possibility that a portion of the 1,200-ft. trail could be rough cut and road-based with budgeted trail funds. This is dependent on the GOCO grant and/or road-base unit prices to be solicited from the current trail contractor for the Fall River Trail and the Fish Creek Trail. Concluding all discussion, the Committee recommends granting an access easement to H.W. Stewart (Rocky Mountain Gateway Center) as outlined above. Staff will return to the Committee for approval of the trail construction at the conclusion of the potential road-base trail construction. 2003 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - REQUEST APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH BIDDING PROCESS. Construction/Facilities Mgr. Sievers explained the work that will occur through the year to provide surface improvements to the asphalt infrastructure, such as slurry seal, chip seal, and overlay. These 3 material applications are described as: 1. Slurry Seal: (Type 2, latex based w/ 1/4" rock) Surface treatment of streets with high oxidation caused by ultraviolet radiation. Rejuvenates and water proofs the surface, adds some skid resistance, and extends the life of newer asphalt. 2. Chip Seal: (polymer modified 3/8" rock & surface sealed) Course surface treatment for streets that require high skid resistance, are steep, UV protection, waterproofing and crack filling. Extends the life of all asphalt. 3. Overlay: A structural asphalt repaving that reestablishes the integrity of the road that was lost due to water damage, excessive axle loads, poor sub-grade or construction. This repaving is usually 1.5" (minimum) depending on the level-of-wear criteria. Other areas discussed include speed tables, Paver Condition Index (PCI), parking lot maintenance/improvements, cold patching concerns, and school safety improvements. The 2003 Budget contains $300,000 for the annual Street Improvement Program. 2-5A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS , Public Works Committee - April 17, 2003 - Page 2 The Committee recommends staff be authorized to proceed with the projects as outlined below returning to the Committee for further action regarding the overlay # portion. 1. Slurry Seal: solicit prices and proceed with the work in June, $30,000 2, Chip Seal: solicit prices and proceed with the work in July, $100,000 3. Overlay bid in May, return for approval in June. Work in September-October, $150,000 4. Striping: purchase and install in May & September, $20,000 HWY. 34 GATEWAY SIGN - REQUEST TO PROCEED. At the March 20th meeting, the Committee directed staff to proceed with design and cost estimates for the proposed project west of Dry Gulch Rd. on North Lake Ave. Cornerstone Engineering submitted a sub-contractor.generated cost estimate of $36,000 for the sign, plus an additional $8,000 for water service and an irrigation tap. Staff will meet with CDOT on April 21st to finalize the sign placement within the right-of-way. The 2003 Budget includes $30,000 for the Hwy. 34 Gateway Sign. Following CDOT approval, the Committee recommends proceeding with the project with Cornerstone Engineering acting as the General Contractor at a cost of $36,000, plus an additional $8,000 for water service and an irrigation tap, with the $14,000 deficit funded from the Community Reinvestment Fund. REPORTS 2003 Blizzard - Public Works Dept. Expenses. Director Linnane reported that an estimated cost for the 2003 Blizzard was approximately $100,000. These costs include vehicle depreciation, fuel, salaries, and contractor fees. The majority of expenses was in-house, and Director Linnane noted that a small portion of the costs are reimbursable through FEMA. Riverside Dr. Project. Construction/Facilities Mgr. Sievers explained that the completion date has been delayed until June 2nd due to project complexities and weather. Discussion followed regarding project status, curb/gutter/sidewalk and conduit installation. Director Linnane noted that an aesthetic finish will be placed on the 045.dr retaining wall to match the existing wall at Confluence Park. ' *25# . r I Trails. â€¢ Fish Creek Trail - construction will begin next week. The trail will be repositioned in the right-of-way near the Community Church to accommodate a restricted'area along the eastern edge of their property. â€¢ Fall River Trail Phase Il - construction will begin April 21St. â€¢ Knoll Trail - the preliminary location of the trail has been staked by the trail designer and Community Dev. Dir. Joseph. Staff and the trail committee will inspect the proposed trail this week. Completion of the trail design is antioipated by June 1 St and will bÂ¥ bresented to the Committee for approval prior to construction. Traffic Signal Timing - Staff and CDOT continue discussions regarding traffic signals located at Highways 34/36 and 7. The primary goal is to adjust the pedestrian sequences, signals, and loop detectors to improve the traffic flow. There being no further business, Chairman Barker adjourned the meeting at 8:58 a.m. Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC, Deputy Town Clerk 2-5B TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum July 15, 2003 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane ~ Pt SUBJECT: Knoll Trail Design/Construction Background: The Knoll Trailis being designed to be constructed in a manner that protects the land and vegetation in a manner similar to that employed by RMNP for its trail construction. Since this type of trail construction is new to the Town, staff is proposing to construct a test section of trail so that accurate cost estimates and construction procedures can be determined. The attached cost letter by Cornerstone Engineering describes the proposed test project in detail. The test section will remain after construction is complete and the cost will be $10,000. Cost/Budget Cost $ 10,000 Remaining construction budget $149,000 Action: Staff requests approval to construct a $10,000 test section of trail. BL/mjs Attachment 3-1 91 -l- g-Â£ 1.f-: 6 1 1969Â£.7/O,~flll L 1Â¥%5**15~Sawil 1 .r J-â€¢ rUG.Al/TRAGdUl"Mt 14 .*4 0Â· r'11 Il //MMJ/#*d/%. . A '-4- PAg 46 - , 1 rl 6'*â€ž7*'B6* -- 2 rilb .. :4/ f .6 .p- Â·Â· : .......'' 1 r. ' -i~. 1 -,-,90 -,42'.~ Â»44~6t~, . r U~'Â·,~~~~ : ' Â·21.-4 -/ .2 >6 :.t# * 134- / 3 L 11&9<1/Al ... . $**1 e i'....= v. ...dr, Fi 14 .Â¥.1. 'I ...4 ~ Â·: *1,4.'.~ . 3 < 1:. 1.4,&~ lie 1.-11 L 4 ../'* I ~ 1 -1:1~~.A Â£941-.St . I i : Â·-t i'&'4#.3Â· I. 31:~4.6 1 A ./*976.-_'i=,-1 . 1 6 1469,, ....... ..i- ---le- . t . = - 11 1.1 f '. -....., 4- .1- hz :ZKM 'E .....1.- 22.... 1 0- * 1 WI''f.: 431*,h93:41.... ...:2,#lru .>Â«11* 1 21 J.ti'*~~-~~ *~ Sh, Rbi...f i i :, 2-41 > ~ V /~ 6.1 9 R-1. Wbalrot .. 21951,1.'i. 4 -.* .....4% . . I 5 . D.3,4 -* a,;. ree:/ .,37 1,0,-54.ev.- 31-4"41.. ..< 0,~~~' ~ 04 4 tr 4 7Â· 'Q 'Â·4 k 3.. . "~ ~' , ,Â·~- -if. 0:%11, 1,11 t#11 4.-~ t X - 4. 1 3*1 .} 9,..1 k< 1 , . .. 1.4..9 2.:5.7 . 4* "6--' . dr- lkE r 0 ~11 99'Â«.6 -78 ...,~ o Â·-:.,2 Â· * Â·Â· fix U..2 r 4.17 ' <Sgpi'Wf. *9~47. 1 1. 44; '11*(~~'Â·3~2~39<~~A 11 ..A /. :. ''. ~ :f I '41 . .44,4\ ) t.0- ...1.- .14 / 0 LI Â· . fi':. -'~ i*4<.- ... . h.:2 I .9. d }=jlÂ¢~ tt"<1# fiha !I i ter.... f..... j~.a- .**Â¥1' .:1 litff?"'~~b-4/ M"f. J. 11 ./. , PT. .1- 00 - 4 1%.p te.*i .. 4-1 k- . : .--- ./- .lek .t.CV Â¢991 . '#44. 1.1 . . - - - .1.1 . - A, 9 4 1.417 *+ -"51 k:~ - .4. 2, 9 I . I.-I >-I -:A: ... ;3 *24.',41 1 '' t~ I - .. V i.~ E. ..rl ap ..6 e*kt- 9. 41 . Â· -1.-0 --I-'..16 A_-* -1,07 #.94 YL,.,... 1% *d.' -' t~2.31.f~. Â· 44-~ . ..4 . <*434.-3 !.:2202*(Â·?i I -Â·iÂ¥Â· '*R?4, Â·Â·., ~.*, . L -.cr -r- v 4 11 --' --rr. %.A % % :.2 6 r ..... 1, 1-Â· --- -ic;~-- 2- C ./ E -mÂ¥' . 1 . J r' -4/34*9 /4/:/ -42't ... 1 .... - 1 0 2,466*4"12272413 1:'CL~~3. _ I -1 6 r K ./-6,25 - 4 Â· .AP~.~.ts ~Pe//P*=96. Wi~ <LU - I ': '415 - " S:4 . 1 * 1 f CORNERSTONE Estes Park, CO 80517 437 South St. Vrain (970)586-2458 Fax (970) 586-2459 ENGINEER EYING, INC. E-mail: ces@charter.net June 20,2003 Mr. Bob Joseph Director of Community Development Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Knoll Trail Dear Bob: Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. (CES) would like to thank you for the opportunity to submit the following Scope of Services. The Scope of Services is for construction of limited portions of the Knoll Trail. The purpose for the construction of limited portions of the trail is to more accurately determine the construction cost and construction procedure for the trail. Currently, the trail is broken into three sections consisting o f an upper trail, lower trail and a connector trail. Upper Trail The upper trail would begin at a proposed parking area near the existing gate access off Highway 34 Bypass. This section oftrail would extend up the north sloping side ofthe Knoll to the existing ruins. The trail would be approximately 900 linear feet in length with three view areas adding approximately 300 more linear feet of trail. The ground cover is primary native bunch grass in decomposed granite soil. The area is sparsely forested with ponderosa pine and current bushes. Construction of the upper trail would consist of removal of approximately 3" oftop soil at a three foot width and filling with a red anthracite Class 6 aggregate base course. Where the trail runs perpendicular to the contours, the removed soil and vegetation would be moved off site. Where the trail follows the contours or crosses at an angle, the trail will require back cut on the up slope side and/or fill on the down slope side. The excavated material would be used for shouldering the trail in these areas. Also, those areas will create more o f a scar along the trail's edge. 3-3 , . Mr. Bob Joseph Scope of Services for Knoll Trail June 20,2003 Page 2 Staging for the upper section would be at the proposed parking area. Stockpiling road base and multiple trips in and out with a bobcat for construction will have significant impact to the ground cover. The parking area would need to be delineated to contain any disturbance. Lower Trail The lower trail would begin along the north side of the municipal parking area at the green stones. The trail would require a bridge to cross Black Canyon Creek. The trail would follow around the toe of slope on the east side ofBlack Canyon Creek to the cabin for approximately 600 to 700 linear feet in length. An interpretive shelter is shown on the preliminary sketch plan north o f the Black Canyon Creek crossing. The location of the shelter appears to infringe on a wetland area and placement may require closer evaluation. The ground cover is primarily vegetated with brome grass and some rush in a dark, silty, sandy top soil. Willow are dispersed through the area with ponderosa pine trees above the toe o f slope. Construction ofthe lower trail would be primarily along a side slope requiring it to be cut into the side hill with built up embankment on the downhill side. The top soil taken offthe trail surface would be used to shoulder the trail after placement of the tread material. The lower trail will show more disturbance after construction than the upper trail. The rich soil in the area should produce a rapid revegetation. The bridge will have to be placed prior to other work along this section to allow access across the creek. The proposed bridge would be steel girders set on a concrete abutment. The steel girders would allow small vehicles across the bridge maintaining a shallow girder depth. The bridge would be decked with pressure treated lumber and kick plates along the side. Split logs would be bolted to the outside of the steel girders for a cosmetic finish. Placement of a bridge will also require an Army Corp of Engineers 404 permit and a Town of Estes Park Flood Plain Development Permit. Connector Trail The connector trail would connect the upper trail at the proposed parking area to the lower tril at the cabin. Construction would be a combination of the upper and lower sections. CES understands the connector trail to be part o f a later phase of construction: Proposed Services All work is to be contained to the trail alignment to minimize any disturbance beyond the actual trail. An initial work crew would consist of two laborers, a supervisor, and a project manager. Either the project manager or supervisor would be on site full time until competent work practices were developed. The estimated construction cost for the bridge is $22,400 and would involve more equipment and labor. 3-4 1 Mr. Bob Joseph Scope of Services for Knoll Trail June 20,2003 Page 3 For the actual trail construction, CES recommends constructing a test section at fixed unit rates not to exceed a total of $10,000. The test section could be either on the upper trail, lower trail, or both. After completion of the test section, the Town o f Estes Park and CES could more closely evaluate practical construction methods and develop a full trail construction budget. The fixed unit rates for the trail construction would be as follows: Item - Cost Proj ect Manager $60.00/Hour Laborer $20.00/Hour Supervisor $45.00/Hour Bobcat $200.00/Day Road Base $31.00/Ton General Conditions 8% Margin 10 % Other material and equipment would be billed at cost plus margin and general conditions. Please contact me if you have questions or need further information. I look forward to hearing from you regarding this Scope of Services. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. 7*J 3-Ldl Michael S. Todd, P.E. Principal < 3-5 i ... 1,5. f L TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum July 15, 2003 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane <~ SUBJECT: Fish Creek Trail - Change Order Request Background: The Cornerstone Engineering design of the two Fish Creek crossings shown on the attached map resulted in an increase to the 100-year floodway. An Army Corps permit and a Flood Plain permit were obtained by Cornerstone Engineering. By mistake, FEMA was not contacted and has since been contacted. Staff has directed Cornerstone to reduce the proposed water levelin accordance with the standards we regulate. Two 36" x 58"-diameter culverts, similar to the single culvert recently installed, will be added at both crossings. The construction cost to the Town per G.L. Hoff's unit bid price is $9,400 total for both. A second 36"x 54"-diameter culvert similar to the single culvert recently installed will be added at both crossings. The construction cost per G.L. Hoffs unit bid price is $9,400 total for both. Staff requested Cornerstone to share in the cost of adding a culvert at each location. Cornerstone has offered to pay for the $1,100 duplication of costs resulting from removal of material already placed. Cornerstone also offered to pay for the hydraulic modeling analyses and FEMA coordination. Cost/Budget Cost of Change Order #2: $9,400 net after Cornerstone adjustment Original construction budget $312,800 Original contract (-256,369) Church easement (-9,100) Change Order #1, June 2003: (-6,550) Remaining budget $40,781 Action: Staff requests approval of Change Order #2 for $9,400. BL/lb 4-1 1 -1--- 1-Lrr- -.~~ LAME .-- ES-rES 1 tl 574 4 + 1 '4 + L -1 4 . 11 - 41 I 1, I.' 9 - /1 1 - IN . 7 -, 1/ +%-. 1-- i -- , .1 4 -1 + '1 + 4 . / 1 1 +41.2,1 - 1 I '-L~ ~ ~4 9 ; 4 - :51 ' C'-pic/~i -1 _ ~ i.' i. L - -1- L 4 1 1. 4 It . 4 - 1 1- | 4 --: 42.- 1 -1111 4 1 1 -1 1 11 + 4 - 1 1 1 n ! 1 r 1 1 It F,leetâ€¢,E- AVE - s 11 Mf.i! 1 .. 1 .h~. 1 \--7(2 -----0--' i. t. N~ . I f . 7 L . -1- 1 .4 k.ja r- 1 F MN \ 6% 8 6 8 -f- ' 1 - L 4% ''11 1 1 ..2 11,16 11 2 1 1 6~'t /944 :,;. I ..1 ~ 4 hÂ®4 1 I lie . *&431#i-*i-" -1-:-'tr; _fg 'f 'f- * r,9-6,- 1.-Â¥1Â» 6,= 1 'wir:+54 â€¢rcle,0#A 4 A. , â€¢,-<1'hilit. 01' *' 14 --=2 0 -2 111 4 - i. r Â£ i-Â·A:~'*'Â¥i i | r-rd*-1 |4 /42.61>11%*.1-1 t 21"41 -1 4,44 1 1 1- 1 , r , Â», 0, 4 4 9 '4# " T...: 11 . 17 1 1 1-Lt,7k.,fl,04 - 3.*.i,445.' --4-~4 -- i > >44;-2-,411 . 4. 0 3 +1 ..~~4 - â€ž.t.- t.'+ 4 4,1. :nt,tÂ·F:t,JÂ·Â·Â·.tâ‚¬1 /1 / 1.-11=*-1,-. A 142, i L, 1- -'-- =' 41,i 4 '' :Ir'L #'2 I.-''I* 3 4- 14 1, r ,~fi I.4 9 I ny ' ' - 4 2/ *4' p -7,4ll 3 ..: 1.11:-1 L.1 1 _ *ff< 1 r 4 1 f.11, +1 1 1 42- 001 .4 . 1 4. --- ' '1711-93:4-~*. 1,0.+ :-4 1 111 1 .6 1 -1 4 1 1 -1 X in-1 \ :,tt'*t,-* . ~ 35>h Â·& 1 -,A. '4.1 4 . 12-4*, ..'..NOÂ· ft: 11&1 1 ....1. 41-* -t '614~-1'.~ ~1.41 :r* I + p Â·~EtÂ·~t@teÂ·Â·>, 5/44-f~? 5>4:.9.49 1,.,46 14. nr' ..3 4 4....; 14,1.Â¢01 1-31 j j I I I ..iL I , 4 g.a 0,:.. *44 :* illÂ· , .. I. 4 ,..<-1.9.44:90'4 - ek:*% 01.1 â€ž. ~ r.v~i.e.. Sift:.... f. ;. . .43 0 ..,0. Â· /' . .aff *10 .. 4 ' r 5~ I ' 4* 1 1-2 Â·2*V Â· 44.4, h :60: r. -u M k:/11, ' ft>~.'* '~ : â€¢ 44" ' ' . ,>Â¢4 . 1 1 .2 '91 - . ..1223 . 5 3 6. 4 1 ..1. k ...44* Ur . b t*;4-: . , L .. ~61' .L-412- I i,.~ -'"ti.%, .01 'Â£%~;,1 Ec',I.~r/ ,4 - ~. 1031&.7- . 41... ~. ; 71.,.Fâ€¢<14 â€¢ ., e. + * 2,?*. t t .4 V (11 1 4 4. 1: 1 4 -Ii *2141'~; ~ ~ 'Â·le. 4-2 Ill 1 2,5 2;Ii" /7-m I. ./ Public Works Director's ...A Report Summary I , Date: July 17, 2003 To: The Public Works Committee S'ES PAtt From: Bill Linnane PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1) Highway Signalization Project CDOT has completed the signalization computer model and report and has implemented the recommended results. The intent is to optimize the Town's four main traffic signals: 1) Hwy. 7 and Hwy. 36; 2) Hwy. 34 and Hwy. 36; 3) Elkhom Avenue and Riverside Drive; and 4) Elkhom Avenue and Moraine Avenue. CDOT has supplied the Town with a print- out of the timing and they will be presented in summary. 2) Elkhom Pedestrian Crossing Flag Project The project is resulting in a safer crossing of Elkhorn, as well as a loss of flags. A cheaper source at $2.50 per flag has been located. 3) Gateway Sign On behalf of the Town, Dan Speedlin and Sue Doylen have received verbal approval to construct water and electrical service lines across the 10-ft. private strip. The project has been staked for construction. Construction is anticipated to begin next week. 4) Current Trail Construction Projects A. Fall River Trail - Phase II The project including the pedestrian bridge, is substantially complete. B. Fish Creek Trail - Phase I The trail is scheduled to be complete in the end of August. The creek crossings have been an issue, but will be resolved. C. Knoll Trail A test section is scheduled to be started this month. Design is requiring the project to be bid in August or September. 1 4 V 5) CDOT Grants for Fall River Trail Phase II and Fish Creek Trail Phase II CDOT has awarded the Town $341,000 of Enhancement Fund Grants for the two projects that have been budgeted for 2004. 6) Miscellaneous Project Reports Staff will report on miscellaneous projects and will attempt to answer questions that the Committee may have. BL/lb 2 luebutly, July 10, LUUS 0114 MIVI Charles H Weber (9/0) 350-2284 p. 01 STATE OF COLORADO tter*f'%3722.. Company: CDOT Date/Time: 7-15-03/4:56pm From: Cobie Garbiso Pages:* / 69 Title: Traffic Signal Supervisor Fax To #: 970-586-6909 Address: 10601 W. US34 Business Rte. Attn: Laurie Button Greeley, CO. 80634 Office 970-350-2137 Fax #: 970-350-2284 Subject: Estes Park Signal Timings Here are the summer timings as you requested. Thank you. 4*91 /3 Q *OKS!04000566932Â° 0000000000Â©00000 dodoood 800009002@204520 E 0000000000000000 0000000 3 -2 0000000000000.0.00 a 0000000 0000000000000000 odoodoo N ZON'~0200 222 2 732 0 Mt .*0000,00023}22=200 52 . a. A.1-82 U.10Â¥-CVÂ¢94Â·U, CO Â»00Â®<m OO LLILL. C 2 2! co co 92 3 PR * a g R E 0-c + I I E-2 11 Â®a,Â« 101 Â£ 2 51*m 5 5,-M 02a ir-140, 3 2 Co co 10 W W to %O M M N 11 M O -Ne 4 10 0 hooa)<mOOLLILL n (U C s e 18&_ * 2/dE- m~ <mooa> 5 35@ 15 41 6% fi 1332#445 + i N F E *C,go a>- 0 >0-05>0-0-_10(0(000OOLL!(0 AD'd 997.7-09â‚¬ (0/61 JeqeAA H Selleign INrl kn:Q ROOZ 'CL ilnr 'Xepsen I FUNCTION KEY 12345678 KY Ph 3 Ph 4 Ph 5 Ph 7 Ph 8 , ,, 2000016 - SH L SCI tiuilll!1 S snoaue Mul Tls 6 8 0 8 8 8 8 3 ~ 8 61 83 Lb 2 m elt 6 4 06 06 4 066 6 4 60 644,0 0000000Â¤WWLLILLILLILLLU- 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 (9 0 h Q C) 0 9- eN M 4 11-) to N 000) O r N r- r â€¢- CNI CN N N N N N N N N (9 (9 cr) 0 0- rES~o ogm*Â®8&*09<wk@mgm H 0640602,4600.Â»686460 0 0000 CO coc,C>al M<<< <m mm co gif,1 *â€¢O*0000000000000 1-el 0000000000000000 Neâ€¢) 0000000000000 r- CN (9 V 10 0 r.00 0Â·,0 -- N e 91- t.0 0 Rn.d 179/Z-092 (0/6) JeqeAA H sewello IAIrl DO q ROOZ '41 Xlnr 'Xepsen 1 -32 EVENT 1234567 HOUR MIN FUNC EVENT 1234567 HOUR MIN FUNC CODE A + Code 1234567 1234567 1234567 21 Nu~ 5 419 6 gor,cosÂ°Â°2522552Â° ROCCOU)003=32@%220 *Â°StsÂ°SÂ°Â°0000032Â° LD ~ 000010 0000000000 04004-0 2Â°he-Â°2Â°Â°0006TSSÂ© 20000.0002%22%220 g}Â°NtsÂ°90Â°29022920 9-no000100000000000 0400*3.-0 32 -C a. 2 288 > W 0- N co * 10 CD h.000)<mOOLUU. %0% FR r bz M R 0/t MO = 23% ts=N 0% +F E CT-W Â£ m 8280/ *0--ILS-w 22 ~xmal@sEE.80.GE-21-8 $5*ma#,hoaa<>Ne - 22 E.= r, S N .4 0 -N,9.- M ON 00><mO OLLI U. 3 JL 00*8% ait5 '431,5m~liÂ£00= 2 Â¥ iE â‚¬ â‚¬ 4 1 â‚¬ 1 # 5 1 -E 2 .% 6, le 0 >a.af>a-a..10<0000804120 Do d 9972-092 (0/6) JecleAA H saweun IAIr-1 170:q RODE '91, *Inr 'Xepsen I FUNCTION KEY 12345678 FU Ph 2 Ph 3 Ph4 aph Ph 6 Ph 7 Ph 8 2000005 - US 34 @ S 36 Table 1 - Tim ns Page uone dep@A 11 )IleM ' dee snoeuelinuti a depaA 141 34/8 & re N M LL m A m 1-1- cr, Txm LI_ c.) 1-- ai u_ 9O0900O0UjujUI HI LL LL U_ Ur 0 4 06 0 6 4 6 6 6 4 06 0 2,4 06 0 00000000 LULLIWLUU.U.LL LL 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 - 42 - 2= 2= 21Â¥3 4 â‚¬- ze t= = â„¢ 58 28 Z= 40* v WEAE#gs;%%2*M!42*mt 01- 89I*M*d*g***Q2i*2 %31 0*10 ROO 000 00 000 000 5 LL 0000000000000000 Z A;2mOOOOOOOOOOOOO S In IN - N M . Lo co r- 00 0 9 u 5! 2 rt 10 0 V- r- r- Go.d 4977.-09Â£ (0/63) JeqeAA H sallello MIA 90:9 200/. 'cit Alnr 'Aepsen I EVENT 1234567 HOUR EVENT 1234567 HOUR MIN FUNC CODE 34 @ US 36 4-4 Events 1-32 A + Code 1234567 1234567 E. EL-14*4ok,1 Ped.egrne. 49.2 0000000000.00000 0000000 0000000000000000 0000000 0000000000000000 doodood 0000000000000000 0600000 OÂ°59Â°9Â°000020320 00000000Â¤00000/00 odoodod *3000000000000000 CO dodd 0-3 NO 0000000000000000 0000000 d ~0-Me,4-tocor#-000)<COUOUJU- ME B C g 1= Â£1 91 ZES (0 i o - + 93 m d *F Â¢21 3 - a.* E 5 8 <~3% 8 25 2 55 m M~WBM=k/25',CE.1-ZE Â£ 2=* m a i 2 K O 2 S 4 $ e Z D ID r- %0 .. {41 â‚¬4 N .4 O -N,9 4Â· 4,01- 00 M Â«m OQWLL C 9Â£1 803 - 5 0'm:26<~0 55223*2Â£%2&# gf ~g -ZE-O-0= & p m 2 g m 42% 22#22 3:30505 060 01110 Old DRZZ-09Â£ (0/6) JecleAA H seijello IAIc-1 Do ci Â£007 'ca Ainr 'Xepsan 1 KEY 12345678 FUNCTION Ph 1 Ph 2 Ph 3 Ph 4 Ph 5 Ph 6 Ph 7 Ph 8 2000099 -US 4@P nal ~%21,age o 7/15/2003 Duilll!.L des snoeueil depaA a depaA e . EEL*.,4Â©LA Pul,izern/Ald 9/<A) Ai W (9 A m 1-1- c.7 A m U- (9 N m LL- râ€¢) 1~ m LL X *282 7 533 Wi #1&*29 ~.223 0000 OOCOW LULU LLILL LL ILLL 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 CP gr 99 EN a. LU h 00 C~ 0 - GI C'-3 1 ul CD N 00 C) O â€¢- N 9 7- r NN N NCN Al GINNN (9 co a u.1 a ,~- m LL M N m LL CO N m LL m N ID LL 000000000)Â®O,CD<<<<mmoo~ 06406064Â©606446664060 ococooOOOO30,0,0,<<<<mrocorn o QI' 0.â€¢OR0000000000000 N 1= 1 5 LL 0000000000000000 g %&2N 0000000000000 0 m g g g EBE r M c, 9 40 Â© r- 0 0, 2 := 2 53 - - r # Lf> CO LLÂ·d 997.7-092 (016) JeqeAA H seljello IAIrl to:9 2007 '91, kinrÂ·'Xepsen 1 EVENT 12 EVENT 1234567 HOUR MIN FUNC COD A + Code - 34 1 k.t Jâ€¢re t p L 0000000000000000 ooddodo f 0000000000000000 0000000 2 W@00Â°09Â°Â°300Â§2000 Â£ UD moo0O Ur)0000000000 00000-0 m if Â£ 4 00 1.-9Â°looogoogo.000 0000(940 f 100000100000000000 0400 c#No Â£ â„¢:900Â°Â°2Â°Â°g~Â§2@2 2 0 firm ,_20000100000000000 driooe-0 Â£ U.1 Or-N M *U,CONOOCD<mOOWLL r.9 -0 9 - r 3 021 1E 35 2 %ag 3 t & a) EiS~ma&c $02-=:*-5=70(. I W E Â£ 2 2 2 2Â£ s 22 X 82 &< 33 3 3 W W It'j .. co -Co M M r, m 0 - N e 7 10 0 5- 00 a) <QO OW LI. 2 = Ec 29= â‚¬ 2 E & E * 0'r3-6,9 *2~'BCD<)00 0 E anac> *82& 9 2.220-2 (1) 9~ 39 -g %Â·9 'CZED'&55viat&@Clot +0 0 04,4,0 0% 6@5>>>>x OLL>O-M>0.0-JO CO MOOCOLLI (25 9 Ld DRZZ-09Â£ (O/6) 3@Cle/\A H sawello MIc] to:Q Â£007 '91, A]nf' 'Aepsen 1 4,@ ~ile KEY 12345678 123456 uolienPV PP 95 EZI des snoeuellnw 34 l Â¢-109*,*e M h rn LI- 79 h rn U- ce Â»m 1.1- ce Â»BU. OOUomOOQWWWLLILLLI-LLIL 64 060 6 4 60 8 4 06 06 4 6 0 000 000000 LU WWW LL LL IL LL 00000000*RÂ©0000$%11 0000000000000000 O 0000 000Â»00 0 00000 - g > â‚¬~82 t=:359@ARI12% R m A g g B + tona .0037 5,3 = 4, ION' E2*g*V4$%?42%@4W& 3Â» 0640600.0000#0500.000 o co 0000 000, e No>< < <<m com m Â§'2 r AMI ..082*00000000000 0000000000000000 her-â€ž000000000000 9-N-Al ..9# mmafrl ==== - N Â¢9 4- In CO h 00 0, 2 U 2 9 y w te 7.n d t,Q77-ACC (01/2) JaaeAA U Sallein IAL-1 bA C Crlrll 'Cl Xlnr 'XÂ¥2O9An I EVENT 1234567 HOUR MIN FUNC EVENT 1234567 HOUR MIN FUNC ODE Riverside â€¢06:z- LDSPEZI SE Â£9SVEZI 695Â¥EtI 1234567 A + Code 1/uor,#AL- . 0000NÂ¥-0000000000000 dc;OOONd E 0000000090000000 0000000 'Â°*Â°Â°Â°09Â°Â°2922522Â° L.)0 000000000000000 0000000 co 2*001~=05?0022222%20 tr) 0000Lt)0000000000 6 4000â€¢,Nd 2-200009002@ggzAgo CL 0000000000000000 Z 6060006 Â£1. ga 2~ ~0,-MEâ€¢,91Â·10(01*.0003<mOOWLL 0R 12Rl E F s 4 a O *r- %8 2 oiwi 8 â„¢31 15-5 EYS %93%33iz *Z x M*-E x 20:<2,0 ===.2.2-a Â£283*2~1 codVilia:0:9 = 00 - 0 0 0 .1 . n M N 01 O -N(99Â·to Or- 00 0< CDO 0 WL 2 8 z 010:F & 23-55 33&3&1':22.~ 2 0: A ~ .8 EZZ= re Fli Â·1 -5 111-3.2 +D= Na>cia,Nua,-> ou.>re:>O.0.-,ou,coooOOWGi Â£.L'd tezz-OGR (O/ 61 jeqeM H seliello IAIc-1 #0 9 POOZ 'GL Xinr 'Xepsen i 00003 - US 34 Q Moraine lp-- and Funct13Eldge-0 1~TI0N KEY 12345678 Ph 3 Ph ctuation 8189,g EE 9 EE deD snoeuell '3 4 J BiD rA , .0..-- 8084>8882im[DmI:~2[2214 6 4 06 0 6 4 6 8 8 4 05 0 6 4 06 o O 00 00000 WLLIWUJU- 11-LL LL Â°Â°Â°Â°000Â°Am00000% 0000000000000000 00000000Â»00000000 - k m r 22 Ail A & N %&* 2 8 :8 21 *16 2 a. ele an - U.1 e Am LL m N COLL Â¢9 tim LI- Cr) h LL r- oaococococic,0,03<<<<mm m 06406064060646064 8 0000000000]a, a,w<<<<Bm m m 40@AnÂ©0000000000 0000000000000000 r- â‚¬9 --0000Â©0000000 r- C\1 Â·r- N HZZ === UN/99-43(.Dhooc) 0 - N er, .1. Lo cO *Ld DRZZ-09Â£ (0/6) JecleAA H seljewn IAIrl tr):4 ROOZ '91, Alnr 'iepsen 1 EVENT 1234567 HOUR MIN FUNC EVENT 1234567 HOUR MIN FUNC CODE 2000003 - *025?1 ven -32 L95DEZI L95DECI 099/EZI' 88-88 A +Code 4 1 1234567 1234567 ENâ€¢+A,Oce,19All- QÂ«lect IJ.Â»,014 4â‚¬Jâ‚¬Mt lâ€¢"FOR.MAn 04 INTRODUCTION On June 9, 1998, President Clinton signed the Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century (TEA- 21) into law. Federal transportation policy, as reflected in the strategic goals of the US. Department of Transportation (USDOT), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and its Environmental Policy Statement, continues to stress mobility, protection of the human and natural environment, community preservation, and sustainability. The achievement of these goals and objectives is a high ---2 priority for the USDOT. TEA-21 continues these efforts through the further expansion and funding of the Transportation Enhancement Program activities initiated under the Intermodal Surface Tr~929#atidn Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). - FHWA guidelines under TEA-21 include: â€¢ Only the twelve activities listed (see Appendix A) are eligible for funding. ~00Â» Applicants forfunding must provide atleast 20% of the total project costs in matching funds 1 â€¢ Enhancement is defined as "going beyond the normal, routine, or customary elements of ,, 5 transportation projects. Enhancements do not include typical maintenance activities or activities provided to mitigate project impacts in compliance with requirements of state or federal laws. 1 â€¢ All funded enhancement projects must be related to the surface transportation system, though not necessarily to a currently planned or proposed project. ~ â€¢ The use of federal funds requires compliance with federal regulations governing environmental protection, contracting for services, acquisition of property, etc. Tomeet the intent ofISTEA, TEA-21 and the FHWA guidance, FHWA published A Guide to Transportation Enhancements. CDOT developed this supplemental guidance to provide you with specific information as it relates to CDOT's Transportation Enhancement Program. This supplemental, Transportation Enhancement Guidelines - Colorado Supnlement, supercedes all previous editions or publications specific to Colorado's Transportation Enhancement Program. While no two state Transportation Enhancement programs are exactly alike, each state program has several characteristics with which you will want to be familiar. We address these characteristics as they apply to Colorado in the following chapters: 1) Eligibility; 2) Selection Process; 3) Project Implementation; and 4) Innovative Financing. CDOT is prepared to assist all applicants in understandingthe federal requirements of the Transportation Enhancement program. CDOT is divided into six engineering regions throughout the state. Each Region is headed by a Regional Transportation Director, and has its own Transportation Enhancement Program Manager. Figure _ shows the CDOT Region in which you are located and Appendix E identifies the CDOT Transportation Enhancement Program Manager in your Region. Each Region has specific guidelines that meet the unique needs and situations for that Region. Therefore, communicating with your Transportation Enhancement Program Manager is crucial prior to developing your application. CHAPTER 1 - ELIGIBILITY Project applications are only accepted from federal, tribal, state, county or municipal governmental agencies. The applicant restriction was adopted because of project development and financial administration requirements associated with this federally funded program. CDOT recognizes that many private, non-profit, and civic organizations have a strong interest in, and support for, using ........./1 1, 1 ' 431 ....... UPPER FRONT RANGE LARIMER TRANSPORTATION PLANNING REGION WELD P.O. BOX 758, GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 1,2.45....e MORGAN UPPER FRONT RANGE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Regional Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, June 24 at 1:00 - 4:00pm Weld County Training Center, Greeler, Colorado Corner of 11th Avenue & "H" Street (Note: North llt Ave. bridge isstill closed.) AGENDA 1) INTRODUCTIONS 2) APPROVAL OF RPC MEETING MINUTES FROM APRIL 29,2003 23126 -~, 3) SUPPLEMENTAL ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS (26'PER-5 -ro AA+ALHED TLA,6.1 +341,000 TRAIL 4 RAM-r To GE,1136 0 Â£*654-91144 '1004 -1, +4* L 4) PROJECT DESCRIPTION M#-1-4 - F.rtil 1 -in.)+eâ€¢ a. Scope A --t-+ A L *eb~) b. Schedule 5) REVIEW OF THE 2020 PLAN a. Mission Statement b. Goals 6) EXISTING CONDITIONS 7) CHANGES IN REGIONAL PLANNING PROCESS a. Corridor Visioning b. Multi-Modal Prioritization c. Modal TAC's 8) PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT - FIRST ROUND ATTACHMENTS: 1. RPC Meeting Minutes 2. Executive Committee Meeting Minutes 3, UFR TPC Bylaws 4. Supplemental Enhancement Project Letter 5. Copy of Acronyms M:\WPFILES\FRANK\UFR\6-24-2093agenda.doc LARIMER COUNTY WELD COUNTY MORGAN COUNTY COMMISSIONER GLENN GIBSON COMMISSIONER M. J. GEILE COMMISSIONER MIKE HARMS MARK PETERSON, P.E.,ENGINEERING FRANK B. HEMPEN, JR., P.E, ENGINEERING JOE BALTAZAR, ENGINEERING (970)498-7003 (970)356-4000, EXT 3750 (970)542-3500 FELSBLJRG HOLT & ULLEVIG engineeying pal;hs m transpination solutionj June 17, 2003 MEETING MINUTES UPPER FRONT RANGE 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FHU Reference No. 03-087 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Meeting Date: June 5,2003 at 1:00 PM -4-- ~WEE-county Public Works Building 1111 H Street Greeley, Colorado The following information was discussed at the meeting. 1. Welcome and Introductions Frank Hempen welcomed the members of the Executive Committee to the first meeting for the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan. Introductions were made, and the following people were in attendance: 1. Mike Geile Weld County Commissioner 2. Glenn Gibson Larimer County Commissioner 3. Mike Harms Morgan County Commissioner 4. Stan Elmquist CDOT Region 4 5. Frank Hempen Weld County 6. Myron Hora CDOT Region 4 7. Bob Lohne CDOT Division of Aeronautics 8. Jeff Manual CDOT Region 4 9. Sheble McConnellogue CDOT Region 4 10. Suzette Thieman NFRT&AQPC 11. Bob Felsburg Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 12. Jennv Halcomb Felsbura Holt & Ullevia m.4,%,41Â·tk /1 Ek ArÂ¥G.'*.2' '2Â¢ June 17, 2003 ' Executive Committee Meeting Minutes of June 5,2003 Upper Front Range 2030 Regional Transportation Plan Page 2 241-25 ---* 2. Enhancement Projects 1.0,4/66 At the request of Frank Hempen, Jr., UFR Administrative Secretary, the Excecutive Committee added "UFR Supplemental Enhancement Projects" as Item No. 1 to its Agenda. The Committee reviewed a list of Enhancement Project proposals submitted by member municipalities for funding consideration from an additional $371,000 being made available to the UFRTPR. Four projects were submitted and all were approved by-the Committee (see attached list). Gibson moved to approve the projects, recommend final approval to the UFRTPC, and to authorize the Chairman to advise CDOT of those actions. Harms seconded. Motion carried. 3. Project Scope and Schedule FHU Project Manager, Jenny Halcomb, summarized the tasks included in the scope of work and reviewed the proposed schedule for the project. It was suggested that an additional Regional Planning Commission (RPC) meeting should be held prior to the second round of open houses. This meeting will be added to the schedule and will be held in late October. 4. Review of the 2020 Plan The Mission Statement, Themes and Goals from the 2020 Regional Transportation Plan were presented and the Executive Committee provided comments regarding potential changes to the Mission Statement and Goals. The Mission Statement and Goals from the 2020 plan will be presented at the RPC meeting on June 24*, and the modifications recommended by the Executive Committee will be provided, as follows: Mission Statement â€¢ The word "balanced" should be deleted from the Mission Statement; it could be misinterpreted to mean equal funding for various modes. â€¢ "Maintenance of the existing system" should be included in the Mission Statement. â€¢ The phrase "meets the transportation needs of all segments of the population in the Upper Front Range" should be modified to include "all travelers in the Upper Front Range" or "all segments of the population in the Upper Front Range and surrounding areas." Goals . Tho -i-r,-I "holorÂ·,~0,4" In /2-11 4+1 oh.â€ž,1,4 kn rialatarl June 17,2003 , ' Executive Committee Meeting Minutes of June 5,2003 Upper Front Range 2030 Regional Transportation Plan Page 5 UFR - Year 2003 Enhancement Project Proposals Federal Allotment Â·$371,000.00 PROJECT NAME AGENCY SPONSOR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FEDERAL $ LOCAL $ MATCH 4, Fish Cr. Rd Estes Park Bike/Pei Path $150,000. $200,000, Phase n 6000' length (Construction) -17 Fall River Estes Park Bike/Ped. Path $150,000.Â· $250,000, Phase m 3600'length (Construdion) Pull-out Area Ft. Morgan Historic Preservation $ 20,000. $ 5,000. Kiosk Site Transportation Aesthetics (Design Only) For Rainbow Arch Bridge & Pawnee Pioneer Trail}lead Streetscape Ault Transportation - Landscaping, - $ 8,000. $ 2,000. (Haven't Rec'd Yet) Aesthetics, Benches, Trash ' Receptacles Federal Money Unspent - $41,000.00 Total $330,000, A-Dvt-rloâ€¢14*4*, ocÂ» Au,A Absh Tb Ed-TE% A-7 -ntâ‚¬ (4'1-9 1, Or o.:rp *LE# / 08 4( WAT <4. - M:\WPFILES\FRANK\UFR\EC Meeting Minutes.060503.doc ESTES To=rAL. : ts â€¢+t, 000 UPPER FRONT RANGE LARIMER Â· TR-ANSPORTATION PLANNING -REGION t WELD P.O. BOX 758, GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 1Â·p:l e . . -I. ./ : MORGAN L \ ~ June 6,2003 Mr. Jeff Manual Enhancement Coordinator CDOT 1420 2nd Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Approval of Projects for 2003 Supplemental System Enhancement Funds Dear Mr. Manual: h June 5, 2003: the Upper Front Range Planning Council Executive Committee met and reviewed System -ilhancement Projects subniitted by member entities. These proj ects were vying for an additional $371,000 made available to the UFRTPR by CDOT. Four projects were submitted. (See the attached summary sheet.) The Executive Committee approved these pre ects and voted to recommend final approval to the UFRTPC, If you have questions concerning this issue, please contact Frank B. Hempen, Jr., P.E., UFR Administrative Secretary. Sincere~r 27 -. 14, Mike Geile UFRTPC Chairman. Enclosure M:\WPFILES\FRANK\UFR\CDOT03xtraenhance.doc LARIMER COUNTY WELD COUNTY MORGAN COUNTY COMMISSIONER GLENN GIBSON COMMISSIONER M. J. GEILE COMMISSIONER MIKE HARMS MARK PETERSON, P.E., ENGINEERING FRANK B. HEMPEN, JR, P.E., ENGINEERING JOE BALTAZAR, ENGINEERING (970)498-7003 (970)356-4000, EXT 3750 (970)542-3500 7\ , .. y 8 ,0 -1 I 2 1, i> 25: c Er 0 0 43. -1 r < 0 8 (\1 0 - 01- 04 0 0 -7 0 0 0 0O -l < N f = 2 n cO 8 0 2 CO CO S -9 2 0 1-- C -5 & 1- 2 2 00 - a) 2 O J = co < Ida~ Sc<g c C a) 41 li g 2 R E 2 a] 0 2 & c U.1 0_ ~Â£ aa g :LIM : ~a~~-# it = 0 0 2 0 0 ,Â£ O m CO I It LL 06 #>r Ity (D m * 0 C O < 2 0 m 0 3- 0 9 00 Â·- CD == O L -C -C L_(00 co cd -92 - C C (1) E -ah CD 9 9% '83 -5 0 45 p & GE 2 009'ILE D g <17 vm, o ,-1 V 000' L#$ - luedsun XeuoIN lejepe:1 PROJECT AGENCY ELIGIBILITY FEDERAL $ +7 ~a~l~:~'er Estes Park Bike/Ped. Path E"EL, 150,000 250,000 tt 744 1 00000' L*$ luedsun ed. Path -*Trc ~on 6,-u LWO . 9+71 70 ' Se 'Pon/,1 NAME SPONSOR , Fish Cr. Rd Estes Park --6 150,000 2 ,000 Ft. Morgan 20,000 5,000 NGA P.oeh' (Construction) (Construction) Phase 11 rl