Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Public Works Committee 2003-01-16
VI CK / E AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS CO1MMITTEE JANUARY 16, 2003 8:00 A. M. Preparation date: 1/10/03 *Revision date ACTION ITEMS: 1. Habitat for Humanity/Habitat Subd., Lot 2 Tap Fee Tap fee waiver request 2. Boulder Colony Subdivision Tap Fee Transfer Request Request by owner to transfer from Lot 18A to 18B 3. Water Rights Fee Study Presentation by Black and Watch and request to approve recommendations 4. Water Dept Financial Plan and Rate Study Scope of Services Request approval of Black and Veatch Scope of Services 5. Prospect Mountain Water Co./Venner Ranch Area Water Lease Owner request to lease 4 acre-feet 6. Fish Creek Pedestrian Trail - Brodie Ave to Creekside Ct. Request approval of design and construction management Scope of Services 7. Fall River Trail - Perfonnance Park, west to first Hwy Bridge Request approval of design and construction management Scope of Services 8. Federal Storm Water Discharge Permit Regulations Report Scope of Services Request approval of Scope of Services 9. Water Dept 2002 Water Looping Project Change Order Request approval to sign Change Order 10. CDOT Urban Area Boundary (IJAB) Map Request approval of the official Boundary Map to assist with future CDOT funds REPORTS: 1. Fall River Trail - Phase I construction 2. Riverside Drive Project construction 3. Bond Park Mid-Block Pedestrian Crosswalk Test Project Note: The Public Works Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 9,2003 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane A(//0-4 SUBJECT: Tap fee waiver request for Lot 2, Habitat Subdivision Background: Lee Kundtz, president of Habitat for Humanity ofiEstes Valley, has submitted the attached letter of request to waive the water tap fee for construction of the next Habitat house in the Habitat Subdivision. The General Fund has transferred funds to the Water Fund to cover tap fees for similar Habitat projects in the past The most recent transfer was for Lots 3 and 4 of the same Habitat Subdivision. Habitat agrees to reimburse the current $4,110 tap fee if the home is sold on the open market in the next 10 years. Since no item was budgeted in the General Fund in the 2003/2004 budget the Water Fund could waive the fee. This would result in lost revenue, not a cost Cost/Budget Not in the General Fund budget Action Staff recommends approval to waive the tap fee. The result would be a non-recognized revenue to the Water Fund. BL/lb 1-1 |~~ Habitat for Humanity of Estes Va//ey Building houses in partnership with God's people in need RO. Box 2745 • Estes Park, Colorado 80517 • (970) 586-8301 December 24,2002 Mr. Bill Linnane Public Works Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Bill: Habitat for Humanity ofEstes Valley requests a water tap from The Town ofEstes Park for lot 2 in the Habitat subdivision for the house that will be under construction in January 2003 at 663 Halbach Lane. In November 2001 The Town provided 2 water taps for the houses on lots 4 and 3 in the Habitat Subdivision now designated as 653 and 661 Halbach Lane. Attached are two diagrams ofthe property showing the previously developed lots and the new development on lot 2. As with previous water tap grants by the Town, Habitat ofEstes Valtley agrees that ifthis house at 663 Halbach Lane is sold within ten years other than to Habitat for resale as affordable housing where the new homeowners earn 50% or less of the area median income or the new homeowners qualify under the affordable criteria as set forth in The Town Development Code, Habitat will reimburse the Town for the amount of the donated tap. The donated water tap has been a most important contribution by the Town which enables Habitat to construct affordable housing so that the homeowners housing costs do not exceed 30% oftheir income. I would appreciate having this request placed on the Public Works Committee agenda in January which I believe is scheduled on the 16th. Thank you. 377 ly O«10-- Lee R. Kundtz, President TAr (~ Printed on Recycled Paper 1-2 1 ...: 1 I~ lor \\\ 4 I J \\\\ i 3 1 413 Nf/£.cA 66/ \\ \ 1 Hwikk.. . e . i dt '2 4 0 3 1-,nd„cA L.•~ ELEC BOX-¤ "t . ... SECTION UNES MEASURED INFORMATION 0.00 PLATTED / OCEDED INFORWATM FOUND MOIUIDITAION AS NOTEO SEr ,-PLASTIC CAP »PC ON A F REBAR, IS 19485 FOUND AUOUOT CORNER AS NOTED 2-0 + 1 SCALE: 1-- 20 0 20 40 60 1 4 190, 1-3 OO f 4...21 £au: trrh,Yli°rm :'2; 27 42 09"~'9 r.97,fi-A 6./31//1 .1£gzdQZ:d 1 1 fOUN 31/4- 0 *99 CAP Addition | j 1 -CAtoUATED SOUTH i *59'05'* 2011.50' --H h-* 1 =0.'Il -'A.-:»·4,0." , 450'~-0* 12&29' 1 ' ' ; ' .p. IN#NWI *A«'4~ A >12;3919 Nr.gr - -- r>,-Moo'u·in, 1309.94' 900·45'041./r j 'L r---------- -4 , -4-1-----ln------ 4 5-3 /,91 4,·0,·A '·1-~,~_-,r_1-.21>~~~~~4(AMOVW*. - ~ 48' ¥00£ MIVATi rowl[ 3 1/4. . .ASS CAP i 1 \\ \ \ LMU k_,CCESS AND 'AlE,119,/ 1 -EASEMENT AS DESCM«D 4 1 \ 15/ 1 \ 1.-0 3 1 1~A E~S~U~~~~~Y 6 1 . \ -2,2 0 I -*WW2AA=CT ~ AS DISCROED 4 No¥ #5 5 0% 1 66 / 00 'i0ij 1 \-\ Lat_ad jek LgLa Bonnie Brge 5 1 \ R- I Rell.."'ll 4 ' 71' 22.80. 1. 1 JIW WIda *W4 j , P 3 L----------Iq ' 5890'45-* 101.72 0 1 1 4 -----------7 1 6 4 3 4.- , 3,""4 .1 /4ne . 1 8 Lgil 7F **' ..TUA., 1 , 1 »No 1. P.K-, 4&1 1: 1 , M I li I 1 32 1 Lgui HenniLE=€ 589'50'45'* 8(60 19. 80' <f"<imfi,/m//m/,im„/f,/m/·'//0.·,7/im,i,m<..t•w.#Y /1 ddition .*'at:g 5/ 01®%1 4001 -7 r #E 1 r- SE' com.11 r©uq r p.,/ j M i i 18 1 2=lign._91 1/ 1 Liging 1.gL.22 Banie Bme 0.00) h€ASURED 1~CRIATI0N Addition : 0-81„14 6 1 0.00 PUTTIp / OCEDED I,f¢-ADON m 1 . 6":4:N#**t 11 1 0 1 82%5*1 222:till-Al i g | 0 '0.0 AL- C*'NER Lai* 1 2 b 25 45 WIED Eazmid= ¥% 10 . 4. A B ..... 0 .4.3 Additign R-2 -•-r•-41 fol. r ..c-t 90950'45~W 79.7 ....0 1. -C-%\~ P«//////////////////////////%1//-,f ////f//,////////#1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 £Miti,11 1 1 1 1 1 1 t Str ~ PLASne C,P -PC- 1 I 1 1 L I 1 1 13 1 111 11 1 1,QU ..1'41/6. 1 1 1 1 1 SC#LE: 1' = 10' 0 1 0 20 40 N '-==mn21,..,.24 KU® 1. Mill 0(57'tr., 12*.03') .Qugat ..1 L£*&*4&43~%T ~ 3' .CE PUBLIC UTUTY Existino M¥An G 94 Villa- Suy 86QI UNDEMOROIJND UTLITY EASEMENT AS *SCRIDED IN NOTE 'S connects to Community Drive I 1-4 »Ne»N•**Ne#**N*****4ee*N*N**NN**N«*»Nek HurM. K-wow#*HHI Haim»»N>»~ ,.,Ill-r,0&.,Ill,Ii;,-,.-,&'i'*'Nel TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 9,2003 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: BillLinnane <1~0- SUBJECT: Boulder Colony Subdivision, Lot 18A and 18B Tap Fee Transfer Request Background: The owner of Lots 18A and 18B, Boulder Colony Subdivision, recently demolished a dwelling unit on Lot 18A. The lot has a water tap and the owner is still paying all water fees to keep the tap current The owner would like to sell Lot 18A and intends to keep ownership of Lot 18B. He is requesting that the Lot 18A tap be transferred to Lot 18B. Staff foresees no problem with the transfer, since only one owner is involved and the lots are adjacent as a result of a lot split Cost/Budget N/A Action Staff recommends approval of the tap transfer. BL/lb 2-1 . 1 11 1 6 \\ 4 ' 3-4 . 1 '1 ' ' ./- -....#J i _= 1 '3 --- - kl S '1,~<"~ fr./L--IL--8>1, 11' 1 ---4.71 / ..771 i W2:N · ILL ~82 *I 4 2-, 1 1·-4'21-\ , rcur,. ¥:91· - \ C.£6- .1, I -1/ J e \1 I-1 - 1 , i.",NALSL 4 1- -nk •000,/40 L.L...6-'T~~-1'17-7f--1 ' L- 4-5-1 r·*UQP lf..«6. L.-5=2 . I 't·i· Ii*Un . WIL-AL' B »2 1"L-& . BEAVER POINT - - ' "' -h-4 0"i' 7.- '\ 1 1 3,4 .00' 4 - 1--r-1 1¥,k• v,Q,7 w -1 ..1.-\U=-, \.. , -- 2 ..1. »*21 - - --:-It,FFEli-Jit@--lf'#*T 31-1"1' T¥~ Iii ~· ' .AVER ./. £ 1 , r 11• I baa Jg . .1.1.%02'.1, . POINT '"di.t.47 . I ' AT. . -' ilit 0-1 •/7'k'/•1. 1. . I ... '" 1 ..izzl~· ' .91 5 , . .. 0. . . .r -exE*k:27 2 , -- u i %9 -7 3735 D i ' Il ' Ir---L 1 1 •• »v ...'.... , .CONO .. 4 ... . ..1. 1 AD.T.. 2. SU. RVILLA 1 POIT , „. ./ O v.... . „ "1/ / 1 . 1 0 . ..... . 87,0 NA L -1 % 6. 41 ... .J . - * . I . '. . ,0 1, ·4'_1 PW". 0 . 1 , .. ' -r-r- -r-,-r- . 1 :11 LL# -: 1 1'~ .. • / li~LI'l, ·. 1 ·F: +4 -' I· kid . I\'-1 . -1. .1, '1.1,1. 1 c. 1 ' 1 li „ t• I. •• el, L*'-7 | | '1"'Ini.El.i, 4.1,1, i .117 'f.El~ > * 1 1· Mi 'I jil A-ii.:. ..„ . 3- . 1.-c) . 1 I . i-i t.· \7 1 7 11 tol i. . ri : 1 1 1 - " 7'.' '11"1.... 1 . -,1,13-1-. 1 :. ·, , : i i i i , 1 1~;,wIN+91244462:*- " 3 - t V0 4 1 - ' ..... .... ..:O 12 // 1 1 1 1.,1 -1 't-1 J« i . L I 1-' L./11 1 . 0,1. M 1·.a . t---€1 - 4 -4 i 1 CHAILE-1 #EIGNIS\VE-;4 JPH '1; :1 L Lt---l.:~rtu-:a-- - i •13· 1 -11 • 1 1 r-4 - 60=-*af -" 1 I .€'11:f"l i.:. n ,.1.,, : r.. - . Lk--M q , 1-1-4 13 J, 1. ..1 t. 6 1 I=............./ 1 4- --1 i : I .- ·11 1 ....U.£,A 1 ,/se - . 1 0,17 j . ......1 4 1.r ---- -- 7---- - r 1 1 1 r' ' ,-1 1.1 1'*i .. 1 1 1.a IL ) / f)}-4*L ... 1 LL Zlj-Ep-1 -1.,1"12 1 L-· ter' 00 1 0. 1 1 1, 11 +U 'h¥..7 ., ·~~£.. l • ".• a#44 1(6(J"111*410<-Vi'/ , , 1 " 14.4 A L.au ~ i.-•T- 1% A,i'98 1 ..,-,L=Iva 35% 1 ..1.,P ». 4 1 L' Nker-In• :- · 1 19 -1 ~ - 1 ~11.(13'Er.3 :.2.7,2-3,;11 71 94 5 '49 7, 1. 0 ..·A. > Vglill/, 4-ARE- --163.-14,2 4% . .v i :'-0 --41&.Ill , 2..1,~91,/1. 1 1 -42 , 1,Mi -*1(P:12 1*.Djfi# Ff:d·.· ~ ~3 7#4 ...t - 1) M 1 ,.i~·*y~~~:AR; *,9 94 -5, ',·It*y,4 ·:.-43.3:*Re#*1.914-214\ UNI ./ Hi--~t /£4 /9 -.- - p \\ L./.~~ r----- ; .'r, #ttf.31 t.- r ..4·101·1:4~9..?fl/,f » ..ef +.-1. - -711-.91... . . ...--ae€.- - b _44 -1.~48ft¥%*26·9;' tp~i~ , ~22*6.wgful..9.7 Fiei#·9 t. L ' ~ ' I. 0 ,-----2 -- ....405 ¥1 .M·'·)4 4 • 2 i /*.. / 2/2, · ·91 ...Ze-·,·.6 ..,rte• h•Li:.1-4~.. *< ' T. 1 -1.224!5 » 3%18 »410 4'71 1 1 *8,1·:RN·bp, -· r ..4 1 .· , - ' - 1 ------ - - ---- ---- An Ul-13 . .7.•4:L¥ *. 6.4, ,·,UBL -- 7~ ~ 1,PA : : 1,3/32'-031/B+ w. * I.~../.' ./R ... y:71 7:,latia; , 4.:53 1 1 ' 1 94. - <-- 0 .*· i.re<2 7 1 .- -- - m.#,4.-4 A I ' Al " 1, i ./,1 - t. 4 Fride ~~ J *. h >216 * A n. r :,11,21. 4- r kp . 1 MARS LAKE ' .# 1 e - 141:$16- t.4. *,7, f A. edt .1 :.1/ 1 . :i 34.4 .9 , .,1 -1 1. 1. ..:1 1.4.213*z:-:.----- 1.1 . \ r#.'+€• . ' ..~ 43,1,2 i L. ' f'.4 . 2, 5 , 3. 6 -2,4. *1. lit.-*fitle / >411-(11£443.' v-... 3'42*t.hg ----lK-- * 71; .A :€1 14- · 4. 1.-- ,¥ry'Ld 2-2 ~Sp ,·~ ~ Et · 34 9'' 3* '·~' ' r *112 M.~. /\ 11 1 1 2.'' /,-/It.'7.1.re'-,55rn'·.~*.i/.*i,LT+474 1~.:*fl,r· '·1~·dl~ ~0ss:*2:5:=:.; / ¥&441 ~ i IFOUND . -- ' | 1/2' REBAR , 2% FOUND .... 1.44 FEET SOUTH OF LINE; S8T55'58*E 39.96' FROW (N90'00'00"E)· ,' 10 PIPE ~ NW LOT CORNER - SPIKE N90'00'00"E 4 1( b ¥ '7>' 6. U 30' ACCESS & \~ 301.78 g - 125.44 TO ESMT CENTERLIN \ / NFILITf EASEMENT , EXISnNG / ~ ~ / //4 .01_07618A O 1 / al 0.528 ACRES - O / 14 „ , 0/ ///2.t. Ous / 1 9% UTILITY 22,993 SF ,-40 N / /+2% ;'. EASEMENT l 1 i I <P>. QC~ (TYPICAL) , 1 IND , » REBAR 1 4# ix1sn*Ap $ / Cy 1/ SPRING HOUSE~.---- / 0- / CABIN / - 46>. L .' Nt,/2 , // /0// ----- / 19., ----/ , , ---- ---- 9/ // N76*50'00"E 171.48' · h~·// ----7, ' UTILITY EAS~MEr ' 10-------- *F UNE - . 171 0 --- 1 / 1' FROM . 1 her> ./4 18B '6> -->< // e ©// 7 81 8 ER 1,42 I,/ LOT 1 8 ~_I 22'L''· g'' /A>-34/ OVERHEAD z 1 : . 6>09 Stal 0.344 ACRES 1 , --AL UTIUTY UNE A . .,9&00.3-,•04 , S45'01'277V 15,004 SF 0 ' ' - 3 , 1 - LORIGINA 5.,4, w 2- . I 72. --0- C / --L LOU//t FOUND 1 ' PIPE W/NAIL f~ 4, W --4------j=be b ,7 2 bLEM] LOT 1 8 01 9 2 D = 02'25'43" R = 1176.00' / w ~ s#£9 1~~ 0.345 ACRES tb ; 8 .-- L = 49.84' C = S51'27'13"b 28 0 42 ,• " 15,014 SF -0 1 to FOUND 49.84' ~ ~~ ~ 40' ACCESS & 0 589;59'41'E 1.010 1-1 /9" PIPF RFARINT . 01 UTILITY EASEMENT FROM TRUE CORNER Z -7 SET 1/2" DIA. REBAR WfTH PLASTIC CAP NO 9 7.42' TO EASEMENT CENTERUNEI 15760 ! FOUND , · ' ~/'~8.15' 3/40 PIPE 0 ~ . ~ · . 9 FOUND 112~f__-~ 1/2. REBAR S89'59'41"E 260.98 --- ---1--- . 0.54 FEET NORTH OF UNE (EAST 260) . kuPHOLE·< N88'52'42'E 27.60' FROU ' SW LOT CORNER (LOT 20) .. .. U -- EAST EAST 0 '. 1314.42' Jz 1389.78' .65 - FOUND eld -73 RASS 3/G P\PE 44# PIPE - BEARING :/0 S8759'0871 4.60' 2 DE FROM TRUE CORNER FOUND 3~ DIA. BRASS CAP/ IN CONCRETE / **3331 =\A th\\ ~ EARING BASIS- SOUTH LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF 17+54.9 ECTION 34, T5N, R73W OF THE 6TH P.M., AS HOWN ON THE GREELEY-BOULDER COLONY \4>. UBDIVISION PLAT OF RECORD ' ~ \20. 0 yn ...740 4 ./ / /1£24,9.- /9»k /1 R~. ,) 3 2, 0 1 2. &-2 11J 20(lit¢-d 41-D »Ual.251 -) 6.-9< - 6,·t 9 f LA ft/0-\ S Ki , L6 0.1 LEGEND 2-3 cc,nrd · m6 1 1 9 Tne-~ i C>Unkic kin , 070 10(2 0 1 2.-1 n=- n -71 OARD 11 • '.22.1 0 1 1 £ U.3 0 - TOWN OF EGrES PARK, 0-Tiliri BILLiNG DEPARTMENT F.C. De= 1220, 17: MACGREGOR AVENUE =61-50 D.tole en 2,1417 C)-W PHONE: 970-586-5331 OR 1-800-748·1717 - CY 6991 . 4 .11 .JE~ -am*: -a,054 Imzmt¢E-AohEESLi.111=211 1 4%/ 3,1-.=£2742:)88'/Mill'lf'IN&/T#<I"V hV j240/ illenwAI 00 \A/ - - ,:6 -~- I ./ .'.... /no 12/55-2328 1U1-40 \ LL/ 1// UL Total Current Charges 24.82 Balance Forward .00 OA 92 9 A'Vt.-a-L £11#LUUAL U .1.-iLL( --.-- 1! 1 !1 1 1 ..1.1'll....1.1.H...1/.1.11....lili.1.....111 ... T.7-1- T T T , tuf 'ro Cr.7-A TGOATJ - - 00000275500000232800000002482 :Ae€A . Mn. . ARB r. ,-rn JU.L.7 Il-Er,1.LAJAJOL, VI FORT COY,T,TNS CO 80526-2646 CITACM AND RETURN ABOVE STUB MTM PAYMENT MADETO:TOWN OF E<TES PARK RETAIN BOTTOM PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS. - =-2 .3270 - :4*57,-..'Ah Al-2 ....'.M.'1 : r. . .. F~pe/MAIJ•J•lalaRN•2407 HIGHWAY 66 ~®.:;.--E:.*m¢e#N¥;N~Mnen:€·.=:4+'.'C.':vt*.,*FS# ;*'1.i:92§]mehbGb*rEbu,'·.-:~iy:f-8088 DAFFL~·11 Last Bill Amount 24.82 2755-2328 91-23 42/17/02 ~1/06/03 I Pgyments 24.52 - na 1 ' AUJUD 1-411=2462> ... a DraTRT:'1,7+TAT. An ! ineta Worward .00 . -----I.---- --- Last payment amount/date: 24.82 12/06/02 I ·· 0*3351-J.~Ul-2622£640· n-- Cha:tjsut SUrredlt *6916*21 . .·-<1931#-122-.2./iL... 062.-7· 6 TT== =.4 B 3"*WRal.3#0'?&00-2-Cla'/06/02: 29 9128*47-04 1..000 HGALi '339500. (2;339500'' ~ 77-70 t. . - .· LUU.2,1.Ul~/6.-LWAA . , %-L-Lul .4 U= ·. . -V,pu- ,n.4.47 <"Wn-#':'NAN'l~ty TW¥*ry[TINI 24.82 · . 1 -Ttital -CH-r¥-ent- rh:4 y·rimA . ' 24.82 -- Bilanc@Foruard --3' -- . 0 .00 / Total -Amount Due - - 24.82 - I.' I ' -704.42'-A/ ' r'„W - . A» -1 - · ~..~ - · --' LA' - - n.. 0/ , I 1 1 - a '11 - I I . MANKYOU FOR YOUR PROMPTPA~!ENE" UTEUTY BALUNG DEPARTMENT OFFICE HOURS: MONDAY THROUGH FR!DAY B AM - 5 PM AFTNA >401 ]AR EMERGENCY NUMBER· 470.686=69544 2-4 - till: il, 1~ 4NGE ...EALTY LTD. /lillilllliZillii EST. 1969 The Oldest Real Estate Company In Estes Park Mr. Bill Linnane January 10, 2003 Town of Estes Park Public Works Department Dear Bill, As for our conversation please find enclosed a copy of Mr. William Swanson's utility bill that he has been paying on Highway 66 for many years. This particular bill has been a water tap that has been connected to an old cabin that has just recently been disassembled and only a slab remains. Mr. Swanson would like to move the water tap from lot 181 Boulder/Greely Subdivision to 188. He plans on building his own home on 188 not 18A. Please find enclosed a plat of this particular property located on Highway 66. If there are any other questions that you may have concerning Mr. Swanson's water tap, please let me know. You5/ruly, /7 1 ,/AnnRacint ~ GRI, CRS Broker/Owner 300 East Elkhorn Avenue RO. Box 1604 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 (970) 586-2345 Fax (970) 586-5293 2-5 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 9,2003 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill I.innane SUBJECT: Water Rights Fee Study Background: As explained in the attached study, the Town recently purchased $2.2 million of CBT Water Rights. The price paid per unit ranged from $10,000 to $12,000 and the current market value of a unit is $12,500. The water rights portion of the tap fee structure has not been changed in more than 15 years, when the CBT unit market value was approximately $2,000. The Town's recent water rights purchase and current CBT market value indicates that it is time to review the Town tap fee structure and change it if necessary. Upon direction received during the July 2002 Public Works Committee meeting, Black and Veatch was asked to submit a Scope of Services for a Water Right Fee Study. In September 2002 the PWC approved the submitted Scope of Services. A draft report is attached and the cost analysis is based upon: 1) The cpenuparket value of $12,500 per CBT unit 2) Estes alle'Average monthly water usage of 5,000 gallons 3) A 50% CBT unit allotment (Background: Continued on Page 2) Cost/Budget N/A Action Staff recommends approval of the Black and Veatch water rights fee recommendation as outlined in its study. As suggested in the report staff recommends approval to annually review and revise the fee if necessary. 3-1 (Background: Continuedfrom Page 1) Black and Veatch recommends adjusting the water rights portion of the tap fee from $2,000 to $5,400 for a single-family residence. This will result in increasing the current total tap fee from $3,840 to $7,240 per single-family residence. The following table illustrates all of the different customer class connection charges. System Water Rights Total Connection Customer Class Development Fee Fee Charge Charge Basis ($) Single-family 1,840 5,400 7,240 Dwelling unit Multi-family 1,288 3,780 5,068 Dwelling unit Accommodation 1,104 3,240 4,344 Dwelling unit Non-accommodation 92 270 362 Plumbing fixture unit The study recommends the above tap fee structure be reviewed periodically as the water rights market value changes. BL/lb 3-2 DRAFT REPORT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY WATER RIGHTS FEE Prepared for ESTES PARK, COLORADO January 13, 2003 ....2 2 building a world of difference- 1BLACK & VEATCH 3-3 Water Rights Fee A. Introduction The Town of Estes Park (Town) is experiencing its most severe drought. To counter this situation, the Town purchased $2.2 million of Colorado Big Thompson (CBT) water rights during 2002 at prices ranging from $10,000 to $12,000 per unit. As recent as 1996, CBT units were selling for $2,000 per unit. This study recommends that the Town adjust its water rights fee to better represent the current price of CBT units. B. Existing Fee Formula The existing single-family water rights fee was implemented in August 2000 and is based on the following equation: Water Rights Fee =UxAx [(CBT x2) + WG] where: U =Annual waterusage forsinglefamily tapinacre-feet A =Percent oftotal waterneededforaugmentation CBT = CBT price ($) per unit WG = Windy Gap price ($) per unit Water rights fees for non-single-family customers, such as commercial and multi- family, are prorated according to their annual water requirements relative to single-family requirements. C. Proposed Fee Formula The equation below is proposed to develop the water rights fee. It is recommended that each ofthese parameters be reviewed on a regular basis. Water Rights Fee =U/ (1-L) x1/ 50% x CBT where: U =Annual waterusage forsinglefamily tapin acre-feet L = Percentage loss of water in the distribution system. 50% = Expected average yield of CBT water units. CBT = CBT price ($) per unit Estes Park, Colorado Water Rights Fee January 2003 - 133133.1100 3-4 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only D. Sample Calculation An example using values that are representative of current conditions illustrates how this formula can be used to calculate water rights fee. The following values are used: • Annual water use per single-family residential equivalent (U) is 0.184 acre- feet (5,000 gallons per month; 60,000 gallons per year). • Average losses in the water distribution system (L) are assumed to be 15 percent. • The CBT price is $12,500 per unit. Based on the above values, the water rights calculation is as follows: Sample Water Rights Fee = .184/(1-.15) x 1/0.50 x $12,500 - $5,400 E. Water Connection Charges The Town's water connection charges consist of system development fees and water rights fees. The tabulation below shows the total connection charge assuming a water rights fee of $5,400. System Total Development Water Rights Connection Customer Class Fee Fee Charge Charge Basis ($) Single Family 1,840 5,400 7,240 Dwelling Unit Multi-family 1,288 3,780 5,068 Dwelling Unit Accommodation 1,104 3,240 4,344 Dwelling Unit Non-accommod 92 270 362 Plumbing Commercial Fixture Unit F. Northern Front Range Water Rights Policies The chart in Appendix A compares Northern Front Range utilities' raw water rights policies and is provided by the City of Loveland. This chart is for comparison only. The proposed fee developed above is cost based. Estes Park, Colorado Water Rights Fee January 2003 -133133.1100 3-5 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only 1 1,1 - 2 :0 2 +C- at:#R 0, SH 2 5 . A 0 1 M= 3 E 5 5 f#: 12 / 5/ tf f , 2 2 56: E a /3* 2 8 2 VE 3* g /bt :5 2 2£ 1, U . 51 . E-:I *tg 3·gi/8 ile: 4 U 5 3,222/19*4 5: 3,122/ In, 2 8.Z .- U + *:2=1&26=as; G: U I*; 2.2 :.p fl i N:*RM-1119 *. ifi 1* E f f Z· E - ems U 8 --085-,ue=, Eta JAK i &*:-661,4:f f 11% 63242 git Zul 2 p -1 d 26 A U 91 2 0 foR =_c ma : anOOOO 2 , 9/7 15: 63#1 C C. 5 --M:Vipj ~ =12301#18&30.:& 12 622 03 U 2. gMs 0/ I *effisp. 822 PM - ./.- . 2.k..=22 5 *€#ms:,f ligs ~ 5555$ 51/4 1, 1,4 1-8 2-* i . . il/192228 2 Bibb-b- 18 8 : /. 52:•t £832: : .ENE Zi.... Z f#<1 14;M/j 0346; 2 1 5.§65-Arie C -R 052,1 ilitif m E # A &·5/ 8-£Ejo- . 12/511 8 0 R 4,12%41, a 6~.9 EL:§8 1%1, 1 i!if/ $Ga/81 u 0 6 a.r. u.noz- 0 i. :a--6,€uu=.1 - 2-20jp e.=Gal - 24 /5 * 0- 1 gn 25.1 H *3 i 6 YSE 1 5 2 #02 =6 €104,8 1 8 1- 3 2:8 t ifili b 8/ e li & 052 i Na *-i: 1. 7/: 25 ~li R 01 4/2 1% F:MY :*2 . :flis-5 al *16: #27 1 1:•fi :1 12/Ii a 4 8:b,00/* M %3152 5 li :-29 'f /1 ii #62 1 '81* Rifi 1 1 f 1/1/11/3 a 0, a 3. 0 0 ..8 6 .07.*.*24 ¥ 5*ifilit ifili i 0 35&,82:63 ES dii*:41:41' 3 30., 10 ./ Z 32.9 0 I 4. 8 - 43 g ! 13 i : 51/1. i 5#3,12. = d:. I .2,2 gl ii 0 f: m fei 1 i 4048 5 14,ilk: a H c i. 5@.211 * 191 2 M ¥ E 1 -* =El-: 2- * 2221*A~.212= 8 g *52!fi!=6 2 22€2 Z 0. g I I £ e :ft,kil N /: 11*Efielk E lk:* ¢aa. If 11 11: 11 1 1/1 2: 168 2 2.-00 - f~ 2 -it»•Bf:? R 81 ?fir#Ul,9 1 ?:11 i & M . 0*&11 Ii: B: 6 553.13 1/5 51 124: /33 1: 1 2 dE 1/15;,1/1 1/1/1 1 dil U 411 - .0 i - . f•.82%/0 ./ E . #ligil?301 0:.23 0 glu ## *=g 22 : 5 3: R ·%# E ..10=-- . 2 1 Z. 8 2 11 218 8:0• •, Ke 3 W...•:.qi#ZE.#9 0¥/1 -=w/11,12 82- 1•13 0 ZEd E d 63 #BE iff; 1,12 : 38 kil 85.6, 0- 0, 9 i Hi i 8/Els@@30 7 214-4-5.546& .. 605.-SE .6021 = 30%21 6% il i fii,14 1 /112 3 O.05 1 & Elly#: , 44 12 a. 022£Jig 21 #9881 9.iliffi* 4*1"ilfi# 4 - tifil 3 1 1 8- 1-5 0 Ey· 21 19§ f#*5 0 2 2 FRE# twgia/t:* m 1 20 1,124!211 ==*52#F!*W 21 8.n 8 G 5@9 6 ~ ~ ~~C~*21 IIFJ .:AgiSER-539 2%. 9§*v- 5 Ze ,R.11.*c:, 9 *M .1; 56 82 , i i.. 20=~1 i #i -5 6 285 -0 15 * 52 . 0 2= li Iii E .115 8, 1 -10: 2 3- f 1, M 1-0-~13§21 flil 0.111 /Iii 11#111 i 12 1 i 8648! 2 11 i -*.0 is-1 1 9222@9301,1, 3,15 iliffi i im 1 f il ask¢*1 1 1*0 .#.....53*51% med• 25& Ria '1 11 ~ i~. =8. ...0 ' .P-2 M -r...00.... 8++I ...2@: $ 4 ; sEE 21 L= w ' e · 2 - %-0 SE ..2£ 1 lilli ; led les •Wa lig e. Ed:#Elle i=RE ORT E*Z ;IM ZO i '~ * ri Larry Howard (970) 962-3703 i.422&0%'&,Js,O - 7¥.-cok ELAND LIT'I THOMPS N u ,.22,'32 e·family. Tio ize CET unlls foq'4 ·hell·u!-Useo hed 10 JeIUM 0,ow Joi.Uen t=nul jol,Jois 3 041 »190!t,epluhollie blt ®41 181(0<6 slown 04' polad 1411,101,1-ZI. RUU UNI 05-ul· 1 c JOI se!(ddns iusig!]Ing ic] 91.leld MoU *110 Ill.1 'lue,Jed ~5 1noqe ,(q 'sil,ewellnbel 10!0~eu1tuoo pue lemanpul et,11 se 118# 99 901091 Slt# P J~I ~J~~~ 00 '8061 Ul .01 Jo Int •@41 Vloque 9 litn: 43 '41 OA~S Polflau PU!Ila<) 00:I Il/• '9 L Bleutotto 94 11 ·,totoe#~Al Blipe ei m Northern Colorado Citi ' Raw Water Requi rements and edit Comparisons Doffs Bleht (970) 9504810) ) 686.7476 *All MUI ation Subject to Change Table 2 ·{ig» 10 11·ou i Jod suou•5 000 00 #) i ge·gge Lq OBINP pue ·sood 1·1·0 6 44el,Unlu 'Dowel 4,Idni 041) 26'1 *4 Rellunw '( 0080') 4!ullu! Joi %8 t#,01003 'll"0008 Imide o mlei 'su!1100110:1 lit 06,0*ns 041 ole'noleo (luouncan Joi ~ o,AM SI~01314 1|¥ 101 IUUe 10 01.LI, @111 4 x• A-jo-stlIG, glunoo put 'el=~s 'pZ-1*ni snual eevene sso.0 -In g! minimum. LOVELAND eSI,Janr nEIn·N UIREMENT 3/4' TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 9,2003 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Iinnane ~f01~ SUBJECT: Water Department 2003 Financial Plan and Rate Study Scope of Services Background: Upon a request by staff, Black and Veatch submitted the attached Scope of Services to perform a Financial Plan and Water Rate Study. As explained in the Scope of Services, Black and Veatch prepared a Water Rate Study for the Town in 2001 and a copy of the executive summary is included in this packet. Several non- anticipated and significant changes have occurred since that report was adopted by the Town. First, the fire protection transfer from the General Fund to the Water Fund of $132,000 (about 5% of annual revenue) has ceased. Secondly, reserves in the Water Rights Reserve Fund have been reduced by $2.2 million as the result of water rights acquisitions during 2002. Finally, the Town is considering initiating a transfer from the Water Fund to the General Fund, similar to the current Light and Power Department transfer. These changes will significantly affect the financial plan forecast shown in the 2001 Water Rate Study Report. The requested Scope of Services will amend the 2001 report. Cost/Budget Budget: $25,000 Cost: $25,000 Action Staff recommends approval of the Scope of Services for a cost of $25,000. BL/lb 4-1 BLACK & VEATC H 11900 East Cornell Avenue Black & Veatch Corporation Suite 300 Aurora, Colorado 80014 USA Tel: (303) 671-4200 Fax: (303 671-4285 January 7,2003 Mr. Bill Linnane Director of Public Works Town ofEstes Park P. O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Linnane: Black & Veatch (Consultant) is pleased to submit this proposal to perform[ a water rate study for the Town of Estes Park, Colorado (Owner). Our proposal includes a scope of services and estimated fee. BACKGROUND Black & Veatch performed a comprehensive water rate study for the Town in 2001. Several changes have occurred since that time that were not anticipated in the study. The fire protection transfer from the General Fund to the Water Fund of $132,000 (about 5% of annual revenue) has ceased. Reserves in the Water Rights Reserve Fund have been reduced by $2.2 million as the result ofwater rights acquisitions during 2002. These changes will significantly affect the financial plan forecast shown in the 2001 water rate study report. As a result the Town staff has requested the following scope of services. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant proposes to perform the tasks below. In preparing our work plan, we have assumed Owner representatives will be available for interviews, data collection, progress meetings, will provide policy direction, and timely review comments on interim reports. the imagine build company™ 4-2 Page 2 Mr. Bill Linnane January 7,2003 TASK 100 - PROJECT ORIENTAT[ON/DATA COLLECTION Task 101 - Orientation Meeting Meet with Owner representatives at beginning of study to assure mutual understanding of study objectives, establish communication lines, discuss Owner policies affecting study and receive available financial, operating, and statistical data. Task 102 - Usage Analysis Assist Owner representatives in preparation of usage analysis of water accounts. The analysis summarizes accounts and volumes by customer class, meter size, and usage ranges for a recent 12-month period. TASK 200 - FINANCIAL PLAN Consultant will review and update its December 2001 report as necessary using the following tasks: Task 201 - Cash Flows Develop up to four cash flow scenarios for the study period 2003 through 2008. Proposed rate adjustments will be established in a sequential manner to meet operating requirements. Task 202 - Financial Plan Meeting Meet with Owner representatives to discuss preliminary financial- plan lindings. Alternative financial plan scenarios will be developed at the meeting, as necessary, and the financial plan will be finalized. TASK 300 - COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Consultant will determine cost of providing service to customer classes using base-extra capacity method endorsed by the American Water Works Association. This method equitably distributes costs to each customer class according to their water service requirements. The cost analysis includes the following tasks. Task 301 - Test Year Cost of Service Select a test year representative of near-term utility operations. Total expenditures (cost of service) to be met from rates will be determined for the test year from the financial plan. Task 302 - Allocation to Cost Centers 4-3 Page 3 Mr. Bill Linnane January 7,2003 Segregate test year expenditures into cost centers that represent distinct system operational areas that support cost of service rate design. Typical water utility cost centers include: • Source of supply. • Treatment. • Distribution. • Customer billing. • Administration and general. Task 303 - Allocation to Cost Components Allocate test year expenditures to functional cost components representing cost causative agents related to customer service requirements. Typical cost components include: • Base water use. • Maximum day water demand. • Maximum hour water demand. • Customer. • Fire protection costs. Task 304 - Customer Classes Classes include residential, commercial pump flow, and bulk water. Task 305 - Class Units of Service Estimate class service characteristics associated with each of the functional cost elements recognizing customer classifications, usage analysis, applicable data available in Owner's records, Consultant's judgment, and experience with other utility operations. Task 306 - Allocation to Customer Classes Distribute allocated costs ofservice to customer classes based on service requirements ofeach class. Task 307 - Determination of Revenue Adequacy Prepare comparison of class revenues under existing water rates with allocated class costs of service to determine level ofcost recovery by class. 4-4 Page 4 Mr. Bill Linnane January 7,2003 TASK 400 - RATE, DESIGN Consultant will design water rates for the test year using the following tasks. Task 401 - Existing Rates Analyze Owner's current water rate structure. Task 402 - Proposed Rates Design proposed water rates considering the following parameters: • Owner's policies. • Recovery ofwater sales revenues forecast in financial plan. • Cost of service findings. • Defensibility. • Ease of administration. • Drought management pricing. Task 403 - Sales Revenue Adequacy Calculate revenue from proposed rates to ensure adequate recovery of cost of service. Task 404 - Typical Bills Comparison Prepare comparison oftypical monthly bills under existing and proposed rates. Task 405 - Rates Meeting Meet with Owner representatives to discuss preliminary findings of cost of service and rate design analysis. Alternative rates will be developed, as necessary, and proposed rates will be finalized. TASK 500 - DELNERABLES Task 501 - Draft Report Provide up to two editions of draft report summarizing study assumptions, procedures, findings, and recommendations. 4-5 Page 5 Mr. Bill Linnane January 7,2003 Task 502 - Final Report Upon receipt of Owner's comments on draft report, finalize study report and provide sufficient number of copies to Owner. Task 503 - Study Findings Presentation Attend two meetings with Owner representatives to present study findings. ESTIMATED FEE We will perform the above scope of work for a lump sum of $25,000. This fee will be billed in monthly increments commensurate with the amount of work completed. The final invoice will be sent following completion ofthe study. SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES The fee estimate does not include services that are supplemental to the basic services proposed in Tasks 100 through 500. Supplemental services include attendance at additional meetings, preparation of entire usage analysis, developing more than four cash flow scenarios, providing more than two editions ofthe draft report, and other additional services. 4-6 Page 6 Mr. Bill Linnane January 7,2003 We greatly appreciate this opportunity to submit this proposal. Please call me if you have any questions. Ifthis proposal is acceptable to you, please return one executed original agreement. Very truly yours, John A. Gallagher Vice President JAG:alh ACCEPTED BY TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO Name Title Date 4-7 Chapter 1 Executive Summary A. Introduction The Town of Estes Park, Colorado (Town) provides water service to approximately 4,100-customers. The Town's water operations are financially self-sufficient with funding | for capital and operating requirements derived primarily from water rates. In order to continue to provide reliable water service, the Town has undertaken a capital program to upgrade the distribution system. Recognizing the importance of financially planning for these capital improvements, the Town authorized Black & Watch to perform a comprehensive rate study. The study's assumptions, procedures, findings, and recommendations are summarized in this report. The water rate study includes the following elements: . Projection of water sales revenue needed to meet revenue requirements for the six-year period, 2001 through 2006. . Analysis of cost of providing water service to customer classes. . Design of cost of service rates. B. Findings and Recommendations Annual water sales revenue under existing rates is insufficient to meet annual revenue requirements throughout the study period. Equal annual rate adjustments of 2.9 percent are proposed for 2002 through 2006 to assist in funding the capital improvement plan. Proposed rates have been developed for 2006 and are shown in Table 1-1. These rates are designed to equitably recover the cost of serving each customer class. Rates proposed for 2002 gradually transition into 2006 rates to minimize the impact of rate i increases on the various classes. Table 1-2 shows typical monthly bills for urban residential and commercial customers. The average monthly consumption of residential customers is 6,000 gallons. The average monthly residential bill will increase about $1.13 annually through 2006 under proposed rates. Estes Park, Colorado Water Rate Study December 2001 - 65456.100 4-8 2003 WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL RELATED PROJECTS YTD COSTS VERSUS BUDGET 1.)Water System/Capital (503-7000-580-35-54) Budaet CosUPO Comments Budgeted Proiects Marys Lake Pump Project 180,000 C.0 Fall River Tank 500,000 C.O. Meadow Lane Water Line 50,000 C.O. Non-budaeted Proiects 2002 Loop C.O. 0 6,192 1/16/03 pwc Sub-total 730,000 6,192 2.)Enqineerinq (503-6500-560-22-02) Budqeted Proiects Fin. Plan/Rate>Study 25,000 25,000 1/16/03 pwc C.O. Plant Expansion Master Plan 20,000 C.O. Fall River TanldLine D/CM 116,500 C.O. Marys Lake Pump D/C.M.(2002) 25,000 0 C.O. Non-budgeted Proiects Storm Water Discharge Report 0 11,990 1/16/03 pwc C.O. Sub-total 186,500 36,990 Total 916,500 43,182 4-9 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 9,2003 TO: Public Works Committee EROM: Bill Linnane ~LL SUBJECT: Prospect Mountain Water Company (PMWCD Request to Lease Water Background: John Heron, President of the Prospect Mountain Water Company (PMWC), has submitted the attached letter of request to lease 4 A.F. of Town-owned CBT. As explained at the November Public Works Committee meeting, the Town is projecting a surplus of 498 A.F. of water for next year. (See attached water rights projections table.) Of this 498 A.F. surplus, 135 A.F. is to be leased to the Estes Valley Recreation and Park District and Park R-3 School District. Attorney White is drafting a lease agreement between the Town and EVRPD/School District. The same format could be used to lease 4 A.F. to PMWC. PMWC has agreed to a lease price equal to the current lease market value of $350/A.F. Cost/Budget N/A Action Staff recommends approval to lease 4 A.F. of CBT water to PMWC at a price of $350/A.F. BL/lb 5-1 PROSPECT MOUNTAIN WATER COMPANY January 8, 2003 MR. BILL LINNANE DIRECTOR TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RE: Water Rights Lease For 2003 Dear Mr. Linnane: This letter is a follow-up to our discussion yesterday regarding the Northern Colorado Water District's 30 percent quota on the units allotted by the district. In 2002 PMWC used 20.8 AC-FT of our 40 AC-FT of C-BT Project water rights. With the 30% allotment and our carryover from 2002, PMWC may still require the lease of an additional 4 AC-FT in 2003. Mr. Dennis Miller of the District (800-845-3794), recently stated to PMWC, that the average market for 1AC-FT leases was $350/AC-FT. PMWC is requesting that the town consider leasing 4AC-FT to the company for 2003. If you have any questions please contact me at 227-4157. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, John A. Heron President PMWC 5-2 2003 WATER USE PROJECTIONS Depletion Estimated Estimated Estimated factor Depleted USA WG CBT Marys Glacier Glacier Glacier (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF) 2002 Nov - 0 102 0.06 6 0 6 0 Dec 68 39 0.06 2 68 2 0 2003 Jan 102 Q 0.06 0 102 0 0 Feb 94 0 0.06 0' 94 0 0 March 0 107 0.06 6 0 6 0 April 0 111 0.07 8 0 8 0 May 0 159 0.12 19 0 19 0 June 79 146 0.17 25 79 25 0 July 42 229 0.13 30 42 30 ' 0 Aug 7 222 0.11 24 7 24 0 Sept 0 175 0.1 18 0 18 0 Oct 0 121 0.08 10 0 10 0 TOTAL 392 1411 148 392 148 0 2003 WATER RIGHTS 2003 2003 2003 projected projected projected Water acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet Rights available used unused USA 500 500 392 108 WG 300 200 * 148 52 CBT Units 1207 228 - 0 228 CBT carryover 110 0 110 TOTAL 1038 540 498 For Reference only: * Ordered only 200 acre-feet out of available 300 acre-feet ** Calculated based on 30% quota minus Windy Gap collateral water (1207 *.3) - (200 - 66 Nov. to June prepay carry over water) = 228 5-3 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 9,2003 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane (,4'LC SUBJECT: Fish Creek Trail - Phase I, Design/Construction Management Scope of Services Background: The Town budgeted $350,000 for the Design, Construction Management, and construction of the Fish Creek Trail from Brodie Avenue to Country Club Drive/Creekside Court, a trail length of 4,700 feet. The project will require easement prepa~ation, an Army Corps of Engineers permit, one or two creek crossings, and structural improvement of the concrete path subgrade. The construction cost estimate is $310,000. Cornerstone Engineering submitted the attached Scope of Services and cost of $37,200, which is 12 % of the construction cost estimate. Cost/Budget Budget $350,000 for Design/Construction Management/Construction Cost: $ 37,200 for Design/Construction Management Action Staff requests and recommends approval of the Cornerstone Scope of Services and Scope cost of $37,200. BL/lb 6-1 SU•0. anr\.2 '* .0 1-Li.7 1-25Ux,.11*¢ / j ' HILLS . ,• I 1.0- ES A ES 7- **,- Nuy -• 44•ur- >·y·u 1, j t€A,ca ./ , 3- 5 • .. . I. I . ... # i .<.2./ 1• / ,#J -. .S„K .. . - Xwy':41 -4---, m"Ey C -- 4 ./ . 1. .1 '44 .,A "20 1 . C..... %37 -77-..... U I D n »--0 /#/64 -*- - - ~. : - 1 {int o ' · 1.- = - . . 41 . ... -7-02- . 11 ./ -4 e I . ... I. I'...... .. ' :4 ..24\ ; LAI, ESTES 7472' \ r ' ·· 90 h . : •t·•th-% 1 1 F r;y--1=**E3~+3,~0 - 41 ./ 11 - 1 i -X #:9(Ae-•32*55411.2, 1 .•I• Cr. Uls M*. 34 .. 4 .£0- 2~.4 •00 41. 3 .-1 125*tameBZZ r"-' 1 " . .r. i - . 1 7 1: 6 - Lok/138624*k t <'·.,.Zk:C: .· ~' ~· 4.. . =..... /7 v. 4-3 4IiiI....6 wi,arl'\. 90$>AVI, i MOS//AL ADD. =121„1. r <**-742. *C 1 H i 1 3 --1 - ST•NLE¥ ... 10Hlt- ·1:-.=4':sl,2 I l , ADO , 9. CAL \\ .-r., 7 ·:'- 0-' 0 *Mal*11* ... 1 J. I . .DO ... , 1 ......... 6 i . " J .Al/ORD 1 1 € N'.. -// ----1 . 21 '42,39 1 - I , * VEN~NER 0 9- • . ./.I .- 1-21-1 *_1111 .UCE Il' trls:Il:~6,, -34 " SUB. , i. : : .; ; • '•*'I•1••28•·' . •• , ... .:ONEi@Eli ' 5/ I *2/ : I . 7. I I .. ...E ' sT"· 4 ' ..... .r. A-I. 1,40, .. ,. -1•00, Id L-kl] 1.1-[ I . I . | I .. I I I I I- - - I . - , i~ OUN~4#N , i f=*, 50..1.11. fiI- 7..3. .1- ....0. F . 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - I 1 1 . -1 •1• , -- 231,0 i . I '~;ZW =I ' 1 ' 09.• Z .--1029 i :. 1 t-N 1.- 0,1.2 -C. -{f-i<~21 -- . -. 3/1,2 It .$ . . , 1 ~ ou cou•~ 1 --- --1 -4 Z 6 , Ir- - T--- 11 . 1 rl, a. - 0 U 1 ti . N . . D 41-- il I " u - . 7.,",4,2,".,z, d . lA ./IS- .. ·· d 1. /-- 1 " " 1 14.7 3 0 1 U : ; 11 . 1 . " . , 1 - . Ah:. : 1 1 .1 1 -1.1.1 -000...,D 0 . 1 I. 1. 773* ... . 3 , 11 1 1 • ' .. 6--1--' 1 7/. 0 . 1 r--r I--+F__-_'K'___, 11 0, . 0 .. . : ..4 , -I'll- 1 ./. 1 .. ' dulic : r..« .r. ,I: ... ., - '' ... <4,6......F---2¥-9- -4 1 -Imat-fi , . C:.' ., 1 CLU. .11#... -, Au••••,0.-*1'EIGHT,Ah, ,-·A 4 ....... 0 2 • - $U. . 1 '.<'11 '*i~f-. ,:. I ./~-./- 1 'Vor A ..El; S . '. I . ..lilli. / 1 4 i /' r --n 1 --t--1/-- 1 1 /6 1, S S w' . S " 1. I . .1. . , ' I. /1.1.*.1. I . b h ....,4, , I. D S. k ... 4 7 -"' S E S P .4 . --1./-04 V S 0 0 '0¢ PEA. .. . ... -I - .00. L -, C 1 , , s ;i ''1 .'I- r.- ' S .CACM ..6 -- ''---J S - , 31 :PLE . M 1 saur. ..., 7 1 11 - / /, /3.-. i ~ j -4% .-i -1 S *C*i , 0. 4 . ; ·t S 2 J. 3/ 1 , S 11 sua -- 3, 32 STREET INDEX S .r¥ 0 U. 41 .. . S E . m •# A.KbDI.G. 07-8 S -X 1 .- lzEU:'i·.'33"*4# . 2, 2 .. . I 'a Adamentrinct Rd ..........,......,....,.,., Ht-JI S Arapaho Road .............. HS,15 DedloWay................................, 69 S y..¢, 4 -1 . I Aspen Drive .._„,·" ·- ··.„~„. 17,17 DavidD:lic,.....................................,.,, Al S ./,p//Al#32, 1 - D•vi, Strect ...................................... DS S AspenctiffCourt. . Deer Mountain Dfive ............... ........... Bl S . D ./,&435 s „ AT Axolimic,Lanc . 0 - . FAGI Devo.Dtive ....... . *.......... 067 S 0*,nor A, / 2- 7 • 85-6 Decrpatheourt.............................. 88,CS S Audubon Chcle.- Audubon Street. . Avalon Drive ..... .G8 Devils Gulch Road - ... „. AS-9,86-7 S f » Driftwood Avenue . .........,...,... 27 S . C I //4,7,<9~ I , " 1 , M. - I ' . ' v ' - , i Dly Gulch Road . ..... ... A9-10,89,0 S Ba#Lanc............................................E7 Driftwood Lane . - HB S Bellevue Drive ...... ..,.,................. D9- 10 Duntavon Lane ....... 16-7 S 0 FISH , CREEK Big Horn Drive .............................. C545 Dunraven Street .........- D7 S 4 '.. U . 1 . I. m • Big Thompson Ave . ,,_.,.. (7-9,06 S , V " Birch Avenue .,,.........,. ,...........,.... 27 245 aiff Lane ..,......,,.,...,,........,...,,,,.,. 17 S . S Black Canyon Drive ....., ..... .. 836.C]6 Eagle aUTRoad ....................... Fl-2,02 - -111 LEk·/ Blue Sprucs Court .......................... Bl E.gledif[Circle Dfive ...,...,,...,,.,,..,..i..,,, J) 1 3. - - . / f , ,... 1 •,X/Vf 12-332-3 T /1>34*,4 1.A . M 241©difID!*ve ..,, ...,„_.,_ 6-2 Blucbell Dfive ............ E] East Court ...........,............,......-...D7 K . I Boyd Lanc ....... ....... D5 But Lane .,,..,.,.,.,...,........,.....„_....Bl,(7 T -3 East Ri¥cnide Drive ....................-...,,.. 06 T CORNE?STONE Estes Park, CO 80517 437 South St. Vrain (970) 586-2458 Fax (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & dK.GA 24, SURVEYING, INC. E-mail: ces@charter.net January 3,2003 Mr. Bill Linnane Director o f Public Works Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Scope of Services Fish Creek Pedestrian Trail, Brodie Avenue to Creekside Court Dear Bill: Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. (CES) is pleased to provide the following Scope of Services for design and construction observation of the Fish Creek Pedestrian Trail, Brodie Avenue to Creekside Court. Project Overview Fish Creek Pedestrian Trail would be an extension of the Stanley Park Trail south along Fish Creek. The trail would be a 10 foot wide concrete path. The trail would extend from the south end of the Stanley Park Trail at Brodie Avenue, south to Creekside Court, providing approximately 4,700 feet of trail. Design The design of The Fish Creek Pedestrian Trail would include the following services: • Survey the area surrounding the proposed trail alignment. • Preparation of base maps showing horizontal and vertical constraints with topographical contours at two foot intervals. • Trail design with plan and profile sheets, alignment and grading requirements. • Pedestrian bridge design with geotechnical investigation. • 404 Permit for work in the stream area. • Town of Estes Park Flood Plain Development permit. • Preparation ofnecessary easements. · Preparation of construction documents. • Manage construction bidding. 6-3 January 3,2003 Mr. Bill Linnane Scope of Services Fish Creek Pedestrian Trail, Brodie Avenue to Creekside Court Page 2 Construction Observation Construction observation of the Fish Creek Pedestrian Trail would include construction observation during the construction phase of the trail to insure the contractor complies with the intent of the plans and specifications. Cost The cost for design ofthe Fish Creek Pedestrian Trail is $24,816. The cost for construction observation is $12,394. Total engineering costs would be $37,210. A breakdown of design and construction observation costs is attached. Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. is pleased to have the opportunity to provide this scope ofwork to the Town of Estes Park. If you have questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 70 1 U* Michael S. Todd, P.E. Principal 6-4 Fish Creek Pedestrian Brodie Avenue to Creekside Court Design Personnel Hours Rate/Iir Total Cost Principal 20 $ 90.00 $ 1,800.00 Project Engineer 80 $ 60.00 $ 4,800.00 Project Manager 28 $ 70.00 $ 1,960.00 Engineering Technician 120 $ 50.00 $ 6,000.00 AutoCad Technician 184 $ 50.00 $ 9,200.00 Clerical 32 $ 33.00 $ 1.056.00 Total Design $24,816.00 Construction Observation Personnel Hours Rate/}ir Total Cost Principal 4 $ 90,00 $ 360.00 Project Engineer 48 $ 60.00 $ 2,880.00 Project Manager 18 $ 70.00 $ 1,260.00 Engineering Technician 110 $ 50.00 $ 5,500.00 AutoCad Technician 36 $ 50.00 $ 1,800.00 Clerical 18 $ 33.00 $ 594.00 Total Construction Observation $12,394.00 Total Engineering Cost $ 37,210.00 6-5 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 9,2003 TO: Public Works Committee EROM: Bill I.innane ~€/~~~0,~ SUBJECT: Fall River Trail - Performance Park West to Highway Bridge Design and Construction Management Scope of Services Background: Please refer to the attached map of the project. The Town budgeted $150,000 for construction of this 1,300-foot section of trail. It will connect Performance Park with the section of trail currently under construction west of the bridge. • Issues with the Willows Condos property have been resolved and the trail will parallel the highway along this section and cross the river at the existing highway bridge with a new pedestrian bridge. • Staff just recently received a draft easement for the section of proposed trail through the trailer park property. The final easement will be signed in the next week or two. • The Conservation Land Trust is currently negotiating an easement for Lot 24, between the highway and the river adjacent to the Willows Condos. Hopefully, the trail can cross this property, thereby keeping separation between the trail and the highway. Cornerstone Engineering submitted the attached Design and Construction Management Scope of Services with an associated cost of $16,234. Mountain Constructors (Phase I contractor), as well as local concrete contractors will be solicited for a construction price. Work is scheduled to begin in February. CosVBudget Budget: $150,000 for Design/Construction Management/Construction Note: the Willows Condos group is sharing in the cost Cost $16,234 for Design/Construction Management Action Staff requests and recommends approval of the Cornerstone Scope of Services at a cost of $16,234. BL/lb 7-1 1 1.-1 C 05 a. Ul 1- Z LU 0 00 O 2 1- C 04= 0 ~~ 6- E tr 1.U M 0 0 04, O CO O,4 + JZ H 40 0 JO O *0 -1 9 / % / a 7- D / -19* I 0 07 i % & 1% Ve'l I 7-2 30NVIAINO:lhlad - ~IddOHS >Iblvel lsaM 133=109~= HONI L 431 CORNEASTONE Estes Park, CO 80517 437 South St. Vrain (970) 586-2458 Fax (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & ,#f¢1 :J SURVEYING, INC. E-mail: ces@charter.net January 3,2003 Mr. Bill Linnane Director ofPublic Works Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Scope of Services Fall River Pedestrian Trail, Phase II Performance Park to 500 block of West Elkhorn Avenue Dear Bill: Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. (CES) is pleased to provide the following Scope of Services for design and construction observation ofPhase II ofthe Fall River Pedestrian Trail from Performance Park to the 500 block of West Elkhom Avenue (Trappers Motor Inn). Project Overview Fall River Pedestrian Trail would be a trail system extension, linking the downtown river walk area, west along Fall River Road ending at Rocky Mountain National Park Gateway Visitor Center. The trail would be a 10 foot wide concrete path. The length ofthe trail constructed in Phase II would connect Performance Park with the east end of Phase I at the 500 block of West Elkhorn Avenue. Phase II would also include a pedestrian bridge across Fall River. The length of Phase II would be approximately 1,300 feet of trail. Design The design of Phase II ofthe Fall River Pedestrian Trail would include the following services: • Pedestrian Bridge Design with geotechnical investigation. • Survey the area surrounding the proposed trail alignment. • Preparation ofbase maps showing horizontal and vertical constraints with topographical contours at two foot intervals. • Trail design with plan and profile sheets, alignment and grading requirements. • Highway right-of-way permits. 7-3 January 3,2003 Scope of Services Fall River Pedestrian Trail, Phase II Page 2 • 404 permitting for work in the river. • Town of Estes Flood Plain Development permit. • Preparation of construction documents. • Manage construction bidding. • Negotiation with Qwest Communication for relocation of Fiber Optics. Construction Observation Construction observation of Phase II of the Fall River Pedestrian Trail would include construction observation during the construction phase of the trail to insure the contractor complies with the intent of the plans and specifications. Cost The cost for design of Phase II of the Fall River Pedestrian Trail is $10,816. The cost for construction observation is $5,418. Total engineering costs would be $16,234. A breakdown of design and construction observation costs is attached. Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. is pleased to have the opportunity to provide this scope of work to the Town of Estes Park. If you have questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. Michael S. Todd, P.E. Principal 7-4 Fall River Pedestrian Phase II Design Personnel Hours Rate/Hr Total Cost Principal 10 $ 90.00 $ 900.00 Project Engineer 41 $ 60.00 $ 2,460.00 Project Manager 13 $ 70.00 $ 910.00 Engineering Technician 50 $ 50.00 $ 2,500.00 AutoCad Technician 73 $ 50.00 $ 3,650.00 Clerical 12 $ 33.00 $ 396.00 Total Design $ 10,816.00 Construction Observation Personnel Hours Rate/Hr Total Cost Principal 2 $ 90.00 $ 180.00 Project Engineer 23 $ 60.00 $ 1,380.00 Project Manager 8 $ 70.00 $ 560.00 Engineering Technician 46 $ 50.00 $ 2,300.00 AutoCad Technician 16 $ 50.00 $ 800.00 Clerical 6 $ 33.00 $ 198.00 Total Construction Observation $ 5,418.00 Total Engineering Cost $ 16,234.00 7-5 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 9,2003 TO: Public Works Committee EROM: Bill Linnane (£- SUBJECT: Federal Storm Water Discharge Regulations Report Scope of Services Background: The federal Clean Water Act, Phase II, is requiring municipalities with populations under 100,000, to submit an application for a Storm Water Discharge Permit by March 2003. This permit would regulate private and public construction projects, as well as public drainage facilities such as curb, gutter, and ditches in the Town limits. Cornerstone Engineering submitted a Scope of Services to research the extensive requirements and prepare a permit for the March deadline. The attached Scope also includes preparation of a report detailing what is required of the Town and a schedule of completion. Basically, the new regulations will help reduce the containment levels of the storm water discharge into our streams and lakes. It is anticipated that more erosion control and water quality ponds will be integrated into development construction projects in order to reduce contarninants. Cost/Budget Cost $11,990 Budget Water Department budget - $0 (new regulation letter was received by the Town in October 2002). The attached spread sheet will be used for all Water Department projects to keep a running total of capital-associated expenses versus budget. All projects such as these will be included in the Black and Veatch Financial Plan updates. Action Staff requests and recommends approval of the Cornerstone Scope of Services cost of $11,990 to be charged to the Water Fund. BL/lb 8-1 2003 WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL RELATED PROJECTS YTD COSTS VERSUS BUDGET 1.)Water Svstem/Capital (503-7000-580-35-54) Budget Cost/PO Comments Budqeted Proiects Marys Lake Pump Project 180,000 C.0 Fall River Tank 500,000 C.O. Meadow Lane Water Line 50,000 C.O. Non-budqeted Proiects 2002 Loop C.O. 0 6,192 1/16/03 pwc Sub-total 730,000 6,192 2.)Engineering (503-6500-560-22-02) Budqeted Proiects Fin. Plan/Rate Study 25,000 25,000 1/16/03 pwc C.O. Plant Expansion Master Plan 20,000 C.O. Fall River Tank/Line D/CM 116,500 C.O. Marys Lake Pump D/C.M.(2002) 25,000 0 C.O. Non-budqeted Proiects Storm Water Discharge Report 0 11,990 1/16/03 pwc C.O. Sub-total 186,500 36,990 Total 916,500 43,182 8-2 CORNE?STONE Estes Park, CO 80517 437 South St. Vrain (970) 586-2458 Fax (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & /<GA J SURVEYING, INC. E-mail: ces@charter.net January 6,2003 Mr. Bill Linnane Director of Public Works Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Scope of Services for General Permit Application Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Dear Bill: Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. (CES) is pleased to provide the following Scope of Services for the preparation of the General Permit Application for "Storm Water Discharge Associated with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)" PROJECT OVERVIEW The federal Clean Water Act requires that stormwater discharges from certain types of facilities be authorized under stormwater discharge permits. (See 40 CFR 122.26.) The goal of the stormwater permits program is to reduce the amount ofpollutants entering streams, lakes and rivers as a result of runoff from residential, commercial and industrial areas. The original 1990 regulation (Phase I) covered municipal (i.e., publicly-owned) storm sewer systems for municipalities over 100,000 populations. The regulation was expanded in 1999 to include smaller municipalities as well. This expansion of the program is referred to as Phase II. In Colorado, stormwater discharge permits are issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division (the "Division"). Such permits are part ofthe Colorado Discharge Pennit System, or CDPS, under regulation 61. The Phase II municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) will be covered under a general permit for stonnwater discharges from MS4s. As per the Division's regulation, the main*requirement of this general permit will be for the MS4 operator to develop and implement six stormwater management programs, or minimum measures. These measures are: 8-3 Mr. Bill Linnane Scope of Services for General Permit Application Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems January 6,2003 Page 2 1) Public education and outreach 2) Public participation/involvement 3) Illicit discharge detection and elimination 4) Construction site stoimwater runoff control 5) Post-construction stormwater management 6) Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations The regulation states that the MS4 operator must "develop, implement, and enforce a stormwater management program designed to reduce the discharge of pollutants from the MS4 to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP), to protect water quality, and to satisfy the appropriate water quality requirements of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act" (CCR 61.8(11)(a)(i)). In short, the permittee must develop programs that meet the requirements of the six minimum measures and protect state waters from pollution, contamination, and/or degradation. The municipal permit covers discharges from municipal separate storm sewer systems, or MS4s. An MS4 is defined as conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains). The primary basis for the MS4s application is for the municipality to develop a storm water management plan specific to the municipality. The storm water management plan is defined through measurable goals for each of the six measures. Measurable goals are milestones in the development and implementations of the six minimum measures. Implementation of the six minimum measures is to be completed by March 9,2008. The goals are to reflect a relative steady level ofprogress throughout the permit term. The deadline for submittal of the application for Phase II municipalities is March 10,2003. MS4s PERMIT APPLICATION CES's services would include the following: 1) Complete preparation of the MS4s Permit Application including, but not limited to: • Ident@ing information (entity name, contact information, address, etc.) as specified on the application from provided by the Division. • 17:eperson(s) responsible for implementing or coordinating the permittee's stormwater management program. • A general description of the program elements that the permittee or another entity will implement for each o f the stormwater minimum control nieasures. 8-4 Mr. Bill Linnane Scope of Services for General Permit Application Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems January 6,2003 Page 3 • The measurable goals for each of the minimum control measure components, including, as appropriate, a frequency of the action. • Other information the Division may reasonable require. The application will provide an overall analysis of the program elements with descriptions clear enough for the Division to determine the Town's general strategy for complying with each ofthe six minimum measures. A copy of the complete application requirements is attached. 2) Report to the Town ofEstes Park summarizing the permit application with milestone dates and recommendation for implementation of the stormwater management plan. 3) CES will provide an estimate of the annual cost for management and implementation of the stormwater mangement plan. Also included will be cost for review and management for individual construction projects for the Town of Estes Park. 4) CES will review the Town's existing stormwater guidelines including construction area stormwater and provide a report as to the Town's current standings on the six minimum measures. The total cost for the MS4s permit application is $11,990. A breakdown of the cost is attached. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need more information, or have questions. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. NUJ *711 .th/V- Michael S. Todd, P.E. Principal 8-5 MS4s PERMIT APPLICATION PREPARATION Personnel Hours Rate/Hour Total Cost Principal 20 $90.00 $ 1,800 Project Manager 50 $70.00 $ 3,500 Project Engineer 50 $60.00 $ 3,000 Engineering Technician 30 $50.00 $ 1,500 AutoCad Technician 24 $50.00 $ 1,200 Clerical 30 $33.00 $ 990 Total $11,990 8-6 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 9,2003 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane v u~ SUBJECT: Water Department 2002 Water Looping Project Change Order Background: Item 1: Staff requests that a fire hydrant be added to the Ma€Gregor Avenue Line Replacement Project. The location is 50 feet north of the Sweet Basilico Restaurant, within MacGregor Avenue R.O.W. The closest hydrant at this northwest corner is at the WestStar Bank driveway. The cost is $3,467. Item 2: 4- An old steel irrigation culvert that crosses-MaeGregor Avenue between WestStar Bank and the pond at the west end of the Lower Stanley Village Shopping Center, was not located on the construction plans since there was no record of it. It was damaged during the water line construction. The repair cost is $2,724.58. Cosl/Budget Cost $6,191.58 Budget $ 0.00 Refer to the attached Water Fund YTD Capital Cost Spread Sheet. Action Staff requests and recommends approval of the change order. BL/lb 9-1 2003 WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL RELATED PROJECTS YTD COSTS VERSUS BUDGET - 1.)Water Svstem/Capital (503-7000-580-35-54) Budget CosUPO Comments Budaeted Proiects Marys Lake Pump Project 180,000 C.0 Fall River Tank 500,000 C.O. Meadow Lane Water Line 50,000 C.O. Non-budgeted Proiects 2002 Loop C.O. 0 6,192 1/16/03 pwc Sub-total 730,000 6,192 2.)Enaineering (503-6500-560-22-02) Budqeted Proiects Fin. Plan/Rate,Study 25,000 25,000 1/16/03 pwc C.O. ' Plant Expansion Master Plan 20,000 C.O. Fall River Tank/Line D/CM 116,500 C.O. Marys Lake Pump D/C.M.(2002) 25,000 0 C.O. Non-budgeted Proiects Storm Water Discharge Report 0 11,990 1/16/03 pwc C.O. Sub-total 186,500 36,990 Total 916,500 43,182 9-2 CORNE?STONE Estes Park, CO 80517 437 South St. Vrain (970) 586-2458 Fax (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & ~5&~ SURVEYING, INC. E-mail: ces@charter.net 47 January 2,2003 Bill Linnane Director of Public Works Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 ' Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: 2002 Town ofEstes Park Water Looping Project Wonderview Avenue (Bid Schedule B) Dear Bill: Please find attached, request for Change Order No. 1 for the 2002 Town of Estes Park Water Looping Projects, Wonderview Avenue (Bid Schedule B). Item 1) Install an additional fire hydrant. A fire hydrant did not exist at the northwest corner of the Highway 36/34 intersection (Egg and I, Sweet Basilico). In order to increase fire protection for this area without having to cross the highway, an additional fire hydrant was installed at the Town's recommendation. The fire hydrant had to be cut into the 12 inch water main. The amount requested by E-Z Excavating for the additional work is $ 3,467.00. Item 2) Repair the steel culvert at approximate STA 21+40. A 24 inch steel culvert exists, which feeds water from Black Canyon Creek near West Star Bank to Stanley Village, then to the pond at the Hobby Horse Motel. There are no records of the culvert's location. The culvert was broken during construction due to no locates being provided. No ownership of the culvert could be determined, but multiple entities maintain water rights from it. The break on the culvert cost the contractor approximately 2 extra days of work due to the flooding of the water line trench. Due to the age and material type of the culvert, three attempts at patching the culvert were required before it was adequately sealed. E-Z Excavating has requested additional funding for the repair of the culvert. The amount requested for the additional work is $ 2,724.58. 9-3 January 2,2003 Bill Linnane Change Order No. 1 Page 2 Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. has reviewed a breakdown of the material and labor for each item and recommends accepting Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $ 6,191.58 for additional work done. Ifyou have further questions or need more information, do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. M27 17-52/, Michael S. Todd, P.E. Principal 9-4 SECTION 00950 CHANGE ORDER TO THE AGREEMENT Colorado No. 1 State Order Number Larimer December 27,2002 County Date Owner: TOWN OF ESTES PARK Description of Work: 2002 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER LOOPING PROJECTS, Wonderview Avenue (Bid Schedule B). Contractor E-Z Excavatina, Inc. You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes to the Contract Documents Description of Changes DECREASE TO INCREASE TO Supplemental Plans & Specs Attached Contract Amount Contract Amount 1) Install additional fire hydrant $ $ 3,467.00 2) Repair steel culvert at approximate STA 21+40 $ $ 2,724.58 TOTALS $ $ 6,191.58 NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT $ $ 6,191.58 JUSTIFICATION: Please see attached letter. The amount of the Agreement will be(increased) by the sum of ($ 6,191.58), $Six thousand one hundred ninety one dollars and 58/100 Dollars. The Contract Amount including this and previous change orders will be: ($190,201.58), $One hundred ninety thousand two hundred one dollars and 58/100 Dollars. The Contract Time provided for completion will be (unchanged) X days. 11/93 Section 00950 - Page 1 of 2 9-5 December 27,2002 2002 Town of Estes Park Water Looping Projects, Wonderview Avenue (Bid Schedule B) Contract Change Order # 1 Page Two This document will become a supplement to the Agreement and all provisions will apply hereto: Requested: E-Z EXCAVATING, INC. CONTRACTOR _. Bvj«-42 -/1 Title Aes/omi-T Date / Z '-30 102- Recommended: CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC. OWNER'S ENGINEUW >*1»92:2» BV Title 72. 'Le=7- 42 Date 1 2.- ~ vII oz- Accepted: TOWN OF ESTES PARK OWNER BV Title Date Section 00950 - Page 2 of 2 11/93 9-6 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 9,2003 TO: Public Works Committee EROM: Bill Linnane SUBJECT: Adoption of the Revised Urban Area Boundary Map Background: Following each census, CDOT requires that municipalities revise, if necessary, their Urban Area Boundary (UAB) map. After revision, a resolution adjusting the UAB is requested by CDOT. These boundary maps are used to assist with funding for CDOT programs and projects. The map displayed at this PWC meeting is the revised UAB map for the Estes Valley and shows the urban limits of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. Staff is recommending adoption of this as the official UAB map. Cost/Budget N/A Action Staff requests and recommends approval of the UAB map and recommends a resolution adopting this map be read at the next Town Board meeting. BL/lb 10-1 4, 20 f w TOWN OF ESTES PARK 'r,6#~k#*pry*C &~ *~.~~*~4*292~-,£5~*1N~IM:li-~~ y~ .~tle'.~/.?11 .k«... ~QUA 51 oi/*\1 ...:4«. October 4,2002 «* 2\9'4:76-, { f '161 Paul Tessar Colorado Department of Transportation - DTD 4201 East Arkansas Avenue, Empire Park B-606 Denver, CO 80222 RE: Defining and Approving Urban Area Boundaries based on 2000 Census Dear Mr. Tessar: The Estes Park Community Development Department and Public Works Department have reviewed the enclosed map. A copy of the Town's official zoning map in enclosed showing the designated planning area for the Estes Valley. This entire area should be included in the Urban Area Boundary. All areas shown in green on the CDOT map and the areas noted by staff on this map are currently developed to urban densities. A map of the Windcliff subdivision roads is also included. This subdivision is not shown on the CDOT map. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me (577-3720) at your convenience. Sincerely, Alison Chilcott, AICP Planner II 10-2 :esnet.com (970) 586-5331 • RO. BOX 1200 • 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE • ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (970) 586-0249 /f . . . STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~ bal 4201 East Arkansas Avenue, DTD Denver, Colorado 80222 DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATKN 003) 757-9266 September 13,2002 TO: Local Government Officials Metropolitan-Planning Organizations Regional Planning Commissions and STAC Members ACTION REQUIRED: Defining and Approving Urban Area Boundaries (UABs) based on 2000 Census Following each decennial census, the boundaries defining urban locations must be established through a process involving the municipal local elected officials, the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), and CDOT. Approval of the urban area boundaries involve the municipal local elected officials, the Transportation Commission, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The boundaries are required for determining which miles of roadway fall within urban and rural areas. This is directly related to the functional classification of roadways and eligibility for federal aid funding for a number of federal programs - e.g., National Highway System (NHS), Surface Transportation Program (STD, etc. In the large metropolitan areas of the state, these boundaries also affect planning responsibilities by the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and federal metropolitan planning (PL) and STP-Metro funding. In order to achieve timely submittal of the proposed urban boundaries for approval, I am requesting your staff (e.g., manager, public works director, etc.) to review the enclosed map of your municipality and provide proposed boundary changes back to my staff by November 1, 2002. This will allow CDOT approximately 90 days to incorporate the proposed changes, provide you with the revised map for your municipality's approval [signature by your municipality's principal elected official] and submittal to the Transportation Commission for approval in February 2003. After Commission approval, these maps will be forwarded to FHWA and FTA for approval in March 2003. Enclosed is a map of your municipality that compares the previously designated 1990 Urbanized Area Boundaries (IJAB) with those identified by the Census Bureau based on the 2000 Census. The Census designation is based upon having a density greater than 1,000 population/sq. mile and a total population greater than 5,000. The map depictions are described below: 10-3 September 13, 2002 Page 2 • Pink (Deleted2000) - areas considered urban in 1990 but not in 2000; • Gray (InBoth) - areas considered urban in both 1990 and 2000; and, • Green (New2000) - areas added in 2000 based on density greater than 1,000/sq.mile and a total population greater than 5,000. All gray and green areas are automatically included in the FHWA/FTA 2000 UAB. The pink - (Deleted2000) areas are not automatically included in the FHWA/FTA 2000 UAB but the municipality can propose including it, particularly since it was defined as urban in 1990. If your municipality has a designated planning area or adopted growth boundary, the area within the boundaries of the designated planning area or adopted growth boundary can be included in your proposed UAB. Any other areas to be added to the UAB beyond those areas mentioned above, will need to be justified and documented by the municipality as to why they qualify as "urban." For MI'Os: If you are in the process of changing your metropolitan planning area (MPA) boundary and would like to incorporate the approval of your proposed MPA boundary in this process, please provide CDOT with the proposed MPA boundary information along with the UAB boundary information. However, it is not required that the MPA update must occur at the same time as the UAB. According to the information provided by FHWA, "MPOs' metropolitan planning area boundaries should be updated no later than the next scheduled plan update after 10/01/02, or within 3 years, which ever occurs first." What we need you to do by 11/1/02: Please carefully review the shaded areas on the maps, If you are in general agreement with CDOT's proposed 2000 UAB (the gray, green, and pink areas), simply sketch any desired modihcations right on the map. If your designated planning areas or adopted growth boundary includes more area than shaded,9.ease sketch the new boundary on the map, as well as any suggested modifications. A copy of your designated planning areas or adopted growth boundaries will suffice as documentation to support these additions. If local governments or regional planning organizations have Geographic Information System (GIS) capabilities, CDOT can provide you with a copy of the enclosed map in GIS format so you can make your proposed changes in this [preferred] format. Please contact Paul Tessar for GIS technical assistance questions at 303.757.9805. If there are other areas you would like to include in the UAB, FHWA will require additional justification. CDOT is willing to consider your requests and work with you through the State and FHWA procedures to seek approval, but you will be responsible for developing the justification materials. Return map and supporting documentation to: Paul Tessar Colorado Department of Transportation - DTD 4201 E. Arkansas Avenue, Empire Park B-606 Denver, CO 80222 10-4 September 13, 2002 Page 3 If you have any further questions regarding updating the UAB for your jurisdiction, please contact Paul Tessar (GIS) at 303.757.9805 or George Ventura (Planning) at 303.757.9495. Sincerely, A 4 0 :40kt»42* Mt t%\ ,/ :- Jennifer ~nch, Director / / Division hf Transportation Development i 1 / Map Enclosure U./ CC: CDOT Regional Transportation Directors CDOT Region Planners 10-5 1 1 1 .4-4-1,----1- ; TAMMA'* ',0'~'?~··:~ I.lip.>., . 1. 1 ; -- 1 , ) 1 r 27 4* STANLEY , 4. * .- BLAC .0 47 4 . 4. t. 1, S 1,0 I. 1 1 -- 4. 14 40 , * CANYO 17 -/. -1.4 Zc M „ w 4 . 1 1 f, SO . - 0. i R .. I - - - I - -,f - *,HEIGHTS 7,1, 24 Jt* 2. .. 4D . 1,0. HILL .e 2. 1 4/ ': 1, I YERS ADDITION 1 1 0. )4 1 ./ S. D. 40 4, 3, .. 3. - 11 1, STANLEY * j '0 ¥,2.* A .... s ·i'/ U.1 se , 3.45 Y 2, --4 1 #A)*\ 2, :0 1 STANLEY " HEIGHTS -•57 \ 21 \ . L.¥*0*10' STANLEY . I 3 8 . 1* 1 HISTCRIC . 17 u ADDITION \8 ROER / -- -- £ f DISTRICT ', ,4 C 6-7/ 1 . i • •c" s - SUID. t-/1 . 1 r /3 A .7 • ,/11-11_1 4 Ht LS 1 3 -* 0 /·· ' -9, 08 7 „< , . 3. * LA*E Vt, RT-•A rs- 5 1„ t A 6 . " Z AVE- a. . .4 A 1 ¥,L /6 90 . 3 STANLEY' r . 10¥61 0 4 R* •40LL SUID TANLEY *2.49 Ail~U" 0 2"'ct r /0 I I. - 3 ,$ 2 1 : VILLAGE : Sus. VIT ' 11~ 1 4..... €-22>- C* STANLEY •E 0•5 .. i I . 4 SAiNT , r re...ALL, 5 ICE . 4.4,4 44 . #By u - 4.47 3 7 40 .A 46 t 07 4 I .1 ..0 ... 1 ~0/1/ I " " 1 '///0/ , 8 -* 0' .Ect...1 2. · .* 30 /- - 2, - IC ' ' 4 4 :14¢Zk-32'2742'~3-" I , 4,9 - : . 4. W. .... 15' i '4 l/Trrr- " 1 *, r,1 E P. SPEtr ~ , 4 . \ V.A.••/11 /-1-<14-744- . - 9, , '.-2..-- ,\ ... 1 . , RIVERSIDE , . -TN. ADD. 1.-3 I Z 1 ,#r·»-- S.'m I1 71Sul.- . U; li,Ard I ./14,4 1 i \ 00.- 1 '60 , i. i'.,..i'KJ• ,/. . .Trv, Ak-2- - ... , 4 , I - \ "A " .iM,~4<,29 , -ir- 'S. 1 . , 7 .2/42 ligilllJ6lli:liallibill-imilli~ - *Ce . . . C'Fr? 2 3 -- *. /1. . /1 -\ , 0 + . 1/I. \0 kly UL-1 *V ' #mme I.,I· A.O 4#* *K. i,A 1 1, HOSPITAL ADD. 142 1 0.7% a . 11&. WPJAL I 1," . - 1-1 LD. litja 9\ M , m SAD C A00 ~ I //3-1, #i ' hijaipmlakji.Al;Me!'<94/ *3 ' • m p RAM *~4~1<,=,T 1. l : i : I 2,1 i .... h =10 22¥--ariiililll Fi'fl f - 4 n --I ./I.IT..ik M . 1.41: 1 14 4 ...140» tah# Ili' ¢*R" , 04 1 6.1 L Fl 8 RIGHT WHEN - A.'11,4*It 1 11 CROSSING FOR ADDED VISIBIUTY CARRY ' 9*%4 *A. ~ ORANGE FLAG IIIIIIIIIIE#le'% - ACR05S '1111.You , 40 9 . R3-2