The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works Committee 2002-05-16AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2002 8:00 A. M. Preparation date: 5/16/02 *Revision date: 5/14/02 1.Petition for an Emergency Road Connection @ Pawnee Meadows Subd. Presentation of Citizen petition 2.Riverside Dr./Sundance Center Condo Project Parking Private Developer request for tenant use of the Connuence Park Parking Lot 3. EP Sanitation Easement Request *WITHDRAWN Request for a private easement on Town owned Children's Parking Lot 4. Fall River Trail Project and Neighborhood Meetings Report Request to Proceed with Design and CM of first phase 5.Glacier Water Plant Request to purchase filter media material 6.Parks dept SCADA Project Request to proceed with installation of the third phase 7.Board Room Project Request approval of change orders 8.Street Improvement Project - 2002 Request approval to proceed with a portion and bid the overlay portion Reports: 1.Prospect Ave/Stanley Circle Dr. Road Connection Project 2. Misc. " Note: The Public Works Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. t TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: May 10, 2002 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane 64~ SUBJECT: Petition for a Town-financed Emergency Road Connection at Pawnee Drive and Cherokee Drive Background: The attached letter and petition request the Town to construct an emergency, non-paved access connection between Cherokee Drive and Pawnee Drive, as shown on the attached maps. The dashed lines in the sketch indicate a dirt road and the heavy lines indicate an asphalt road. The petition and letter ask for emergency access only which would be accomplished by the construction of the creek crossing with culverts and fill material; the remainder of the dirt road in the R.O.W. is accessible by large emergency vehicles. All of the subdivisions west of the proposed connection point have two access roads in Public R.O.W. which is in accordance with good engineering standards, as well as Town policy for new subdivisions. This third requested access point would only improve an acceptable access condition. (Background - Continued on page 2) Cosl/Budget Cost: Non-paved, double RCP/fill emergency road connection $40,000 Budget $0 Action: Staff recommends denial of the Town-financed road connection request 1-1 , i Background - Continued from page 1 I understand that the Fire Department supports the request since more access roads to subdivisions always improve emergency access. Even though the emergency access situation would improve with another road connection, the Public Works Department hesitates to recommend a connection financed by public funds, since emergency access is already acceptable and in accordance with Town standards. The use of public funds to build an expensive roadway creek crossing that Town policy has established to be the responsibility of the private development (in this case Pawnee Meadows Subdivision), will set precedence for future development BL/lb Attachments 1-2 i r B I L 0% 1 1 2, 99.4 4 / .r. â€¢~r,a Â· LAâ€¢Iâ€¢a â€¢u.n,- . A D. .1 - .. .. 2 ./.'~>â€¢141>0'.~ir trmWn. r. ./ iL y 1.C %54#piv r-714:L-Â·---*--- &. f/ 1 #~Â·ic ..~ ev- C â€¢ Â·w--* Wil/*MY., ..0 Â· - 151 /" *T-Rp~~ 1 I x 0 . ~Ur--2 12 -'- ~ at'%.1.. - 6-* Â· . 1Lt..,4.1 ....1 ./ +4: 442Â» L . 4 1.44441 -_ f,A, 1 A.1.4. 1 / 741 9- 4,1 -kh -5."d .m 4.. w 4 9 1 , -1--=- .* l.,M: ..7147*. - . - r. Art 1 - I. CW , 1 44 i, Â· .. *Y . I. . .6 L 2 W: 1. #'120-8-10 .1.,0, '. 1 ..: 7 t * 47.2. ' .54 $/D , 96 6 372.4 : C /4-4,1 2 -21=IL Al. - 1 -4 1,4 -,â€ž...2 â„¢- Am;Y .2,4 .. 2. 7 4% k R . .-â€¢ 40./9 . te,+7- v .0* 11 1 : a ..Â£-- . 1 y .-L R .1 '-1 A ./ 62 Atz<fjpi.j).EYE~* -~49gtÂ·eÂ·rtÂ». 24 - 1,62..1~1 ~%1 .. \.44~. jip#Â·-tÂ·*fiffk*f, +9,4.1'.... # ./....7'K / L 4. r. IT.- 1 +3.kÂ»Â·idip.bâ€žyÂ·46 ~: f..%96Â¥13~~'*i*~*~ . *~ ~m-Â¥f ~ - j \ 6 1.27 Fâ€¢'3 1 -- / i s Â· 'uâ€¢= >41 1 ' Â·- . A - 4 14 flir-,1 0 - . I -Â· c ' /<k- \ aliat*/*51 i _-1 ~ , P . i.pâ€¢ I . . . <.1 I , --, ./ I I . I . I . ~ I 1.- . Â£ 7--Â·:Â· iiÂ» . - - - I -- 9 - - f --4.:vi*â‚¬4-..r, 3% 4.4 -<Â· Â° . -U' - .t --e.X~ r 1 4 ....ile . 4(, 1 18= , 12*.Â¥34/ r : r i Â·~ , i"Â»b - 1.Â·t /7,/ M $ # # 4. ./ A*.&*-1 *hly*AN 6 - S ..1 . 2 1 J.. 1 -,t ...4 1 -4 - .4 4 2 Lt 7&,i. * 1 - - lif 43 F 1, , I Â£14.. ./ ..129 -0 4--*71 . -'~lEÂ·2*9 .Air.4 '; '7 1 t . & *Ii#ZE i#Al . W ' I ~ E-.AMEte. - fâ€¢ 44 -*92 t. j #Airl â€¢ ~t lee. . I'l--%.. -* 4. 047 .6.Â» / * 21. 1 4 4 4- /11. - 0 -94 4-> . 1-3 May 10, 2002 To: Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Public Works Committee Subject: Request for opening ofPawnee Dr. between Hwy 7 and Cherokee Dr. The accompanying petition requests the full opening of Pawnee Dr. by October 31, 2002. While this is physically possible, we realize there are both logistical and economic constraints: first, the developer is under no time line for completion of the project, and second, the town historically does not pay to build roads for developers. These are two large impediments to seeing the road completed soon. While construction and incidental traffic is a nuisance to residents of Prospect Estates, there is a much larger issue: that ofpublic safety, in terms ofadequate emergency vehicle access. Within the dotted area on the accompanying map, there are 126 single-family dwelling lots. As ofthis date, there are 80 homes in the defined area. The rate ofbuild-out continues to accelerate. The only two access points to this area at present are through Prospect Estates offofPeak View, or through Arapaho Meadows offofHwy 7 near Marys Lake Rd. Fire Chief Scott Dorman concurs that access on Pawnee Dr. to the core ofthe referenced area would enhance emergency response capabilities for fire, police and medical emergencies. We would like to see Pawnee Dr. fully opened to traffic this October. Again, we understand some ofthe impediments to the likelihood ofthis happening. I'm sure there are considerations ofwhich we are unaware. We request the town give this situation its best look in all its aspects, but PLEASE- at least provide the area with emergency access relief by constructing a rudimentary connection which would permit expeditious access to the core area by emergency vehicles. Thanking you in hopes of favorable consideration, Ed McKinney for the petitioners 1-4 j ..t . . ,-1/1 *00 - 4 --4 l 1 9% 1 - 2 2 Al/\ . /. N 1 - /4 4 . O 0. / 5,9 Â»1 n lilli g i i Eli S. 91 1 1,"1 \ 1/Â· 1 I 636 \89. 2 - i. I Wh Al / %\ . 5 / 0 .1. 1/4 a . 12 Â· 0-0 1 1. :X E.â€¢ - 2 H ' 4 i-' > .0. El.. 0 1 I I 11 ill'i il i 1 Ma,0 0 .. 26 , 952 ' wgia .1 42 .:04.11 I W 4 834 1 1 ~91 . WE! 2 8134. 5 / .1 -4. , 1 Â¥ f :wiew leâ€¢. ./. U Â® !1141 6 1 1 0 :X /' 3/Â§/3 ~ i A : 10, iii ,/15... tâ‚¬%\ i Hu 151?1 1 1 1 , .\*.. .. 1 -+ ' . 35 â€¢ A 1 I fiji *iff j i I / 3 ' 444 2 <A, Pe , 1 ile 1;41: 12, #: 1 , s!"569104 i i R y'/ g.' : :46 ~~~, e /8 1 1:M; 1/11/1 1111/ : # 6 &: M .* ):b ./:9;v'/pfl> i , i I.ill mill /1111 1 , - 1 M. d/,/ 4-t 1 7 :iH.filiti. il!!1 1 ' . I. :L I. 11 44}HiE+killi ! ! 45901 .. J i, 11}11"11/1/1/1/1 1 2 2 ' /4 V .14 A ' 1 i i 1 1 i; 1 3 11:21 :i 4** jili 14'5â€¢ v'*JU; 11 Â£ UTÂ«4> h 41 J 1* 1 2 2, tilt, el f z.Â· 22 $ 2. ; }$ 511!' 0 bla ~ 1 ,!11 :14: 1 4 j .i; 4 i:Ell A %2 T-iD I illi! M Et * :1 id l . ilitill J lii 1 1 1 22 & S 1111 1 fll:1 . I. i. D i oSI -21 46*2 1 6.1 . 1 6. 1. m 0111 ; ii. li ilit 1 9 , LI 1 : 16 -IN / -/9 -- 1 -r. iii! &:G: BRIR ett I *51 7 &-11* -00 / 018 il / 3-7 M Al 4 N-- 4 1/110-,-1 , %0 1 1 .8 1 I44/h 1 + _U â‚¬8 / ; mal li ; 2:9 j f 1 f ....... \ 7 m juill 1 *2 2 - ./.al I 1 1 M I ' ..64& 1 9 , 11 61 ' ' //, N,&*1 1 1 1 ' ,-le JO - ,/ y. A Â§3 1 h 'al m 14/-/&0/Jk , 21 M: 1 )aR *--- 1- t}---- id! 1 4 ,=3* -- -] R 22?/ lV (n .ic,g. iEv F- - --*A-:di,-11121=2~ --~ 1-6 L~gog dVIN ALINDIA 1 l9Â£Z : TIVOR JIHdÂ¥219 EOWNERS 4.684 Â¥ swoilagns U./.0 s Mocr 3,1 33'MY' 133/ohid TYAOMdrrÂ¥ a ZIYOIKIES:) S.I ISAMI 30 i :133)4S 000Z 'ONI 'Sh]3NION3 * Sh!011410 S lerd Â£$3 @ ~00'13 .... I -â€¢4 ... 61- , DEDICATION 'IYAN~dy Plic,UL Flaa ,UBDIÂ¥010â€¢ 21Â¥31111'633 S,liollk IR]*30Â¥3 ADDm)11 1 CCOND,Â»,CE Â¥Ant DED S WIDE SIG EASE)40Â£ 800,< 1364. PA/â‚¬ 732. 7.S' *10Â£ iâ€¢DJAC/4 TO 1/'ADOÂ¥ SUB.I... DRIVE ~ ACRES / UBUC R.O.W.) ....5........3 221.679 SF H3Nh)00 1183dOhld 1SJM HLXON 01 ]U ' t 43 Lr , 1 1 wi Â£ 1 r &7- -ji i----5-7--7-1 3 /i I. :3 2 .,3 : it. N r~ *..4-0- 4-1-1 1~ 5 I - *6--y.3. i :i |~ .it-~-: 8, 11 11 1 I Â¥ 11 il li| 1 -IZ--- F L 4 lit l: h M. E ' boili i i li jil iii 11&1 3.l :1 8 Â§15 wÂ· I,F 8 g hex.,i"rd . t 18 . '4 I 7 11 ,#54z* :- W 8 / i } 41 .0 \ 11!!111 i'Â·1 i 1 1! i.1 % 13 1 # ~ j~~ 4 1 4 li ~ = / R N I .' 1 11 1/ Â·d j lihit- g 11 0 W i W 1 t:t ____-1 11 4/ /1~41? < '*EBEEEFIEssa=_= ~11, 1 .J-anci.J,WO . .,4. , r----__ 1 --' 1 j -â€¢â€¢e .- 1 f 1 ,! 9 i 14 3, ---1.- Â·2 &: im ~ -- \ ----* f i - -r- 1 4/2~ 8114 h.' 9% 1 1 e iii !44 14 L--lil ~ % 2,4 ,/ .,-; 1 I 82* I 51 imi 1% 1 Cit 111 E 1 1~: / 1 toi 16 16 . -613~- :Abs/i/4947 . 2 M 0 Â§__ : lili O 9 M) :ZiN . - w- . # 4 40/14,_.--,/ 2%29 + -#441 ll, d 0 0 2-Ne ]11,1 m 60 2% Â§11 b . 7 i. i 1---------- I L ' 4 1 8 2 12 41 ------ , a ,-Am-j-aERS-, 0 3 1 2 Â£4 61% 9 .f E %2 - : 1% W #W - & 12 :Diw 011Â· 5 4 . .i &4-8 m '41 6 02 28* 2 RE \/ 01 1 2.1 4 .. ililili i u'z g 4 1\ I 0 00 â€¢B IfK 1431 . b w R wmt~ iii I 8 Â®f J f 1 3 -- ! i ii i lil 9\ 6% 1 11 1 1 , :11 A' â€¢25 - N i 1 9 !1! 10 31 a- p 4 \41 3 I & -0 - 14 \\ 1, \\\ *d-,w-w-- .0 f t. 3414Â»Â»PR v\ ililihid@:1.8., Wh#),hkA'h 2*.Imillmi, m ed"kwuRM 1 . fic, AN"N"*W' Em=*HUBMEN, 3 ilii \.4 f.:=388:8:8Â£222 l ,-WWK : \\~' h %:, M: 9 1 K 4 ~' /..\ 11 H 1 02=511* P %\ i i; 1. 8. 01; EN *23.330' 15; F ji \\\ t MÂ®lik: lk... \2 ..... 1 / .0,102 Â»-91 - .lf=.60-1 7*, 1-7 STEELE SUBDIVI OISIAICanS VENNER RANCH ESTATES LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF 154 RnW, TH CTION 2, AND THE FINAL PLAT FOR C ECOND FIUNG 31'OI :1430 NW 1/4 OF SECTION 1 LOW&, 1 VICINITY WAP March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening of Pawnee Drive between HWY 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents of the town of Estes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address STe ve s V cE u D Mt L ~44411+D 1(,35 fablfeCT esTA-Tel DR, ./. MAâ‚¬pie. Neuma.,u 9-6, â€ž4Â»v /635 P,205Â·PE e â‚¬ 5,-Al-%?sbe 'Di~KA H M 16(463 14 Ad,5 108 Aes=y-- 2~.*44-De- . I CRB.64 & rn (fill ld.2 9 1~~~~ 1 42.4- Pa*t U Â· -Dr. AL/6 . 2:*ogÂ«Aini /6,6 --6 ihospo ,~ AS, - hi ' 2Â«240*af/Â« oftubteek, CA 8206- 41.In Af/fu~-ac z*, Lg 3 0 %*ra- 6*-bc f FlaL E- (L- 133 94=4#*EA ZT 1 U 1 61 0 1 0*da-T- ar Dr \ cr. ---8. W.h-u'uÂ« 4-09 41173.2- U-1 4077 3,3-et (96 *ji6-4Â£Â£Â£Â£- L/' 1-8 March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening of Pawnee Drive between HWY 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents of the town of Estes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address lt-a~.aÂ·Â£.Djb ~ h-) A,,u w 4 6 49 d opeur 4/E Tb 7Y\O+WA~, 1(o~*â€ž- /ops--- FL+. /64. 914.1 j I-34Â©k.*â€¢U 1 612 PArh41#* AGNO D//4 . 1 WO-dLn, <cL,LAÂ· 164-1 Prospec* Es+a-le.s bÂ« A),AL) c)3.ODed /640 Prog peer El+Jes br. 0444441 K - 4a-lfÂ».0 /440 9 veil>u_A- E-q-K bv. /7 02/7 A/frkâ‚¬UL(1~ 'Ar .<~Â·Â£94~j )695 File>p* cr p971 UR, .... 1495 6 05 peel Est. 33r. cv/LE,1,0 ,(r. jaaiyze,4/ Wy . I fl Do, frr>ipec= 4127. 6Â·q... L Â»9141 E-7 0-D f}Lospjpc-t â‚¬4. Ck_ >Â«q 1 g/1- (701 (Rosoic, Esr<f,> . j 1-1 '. 1 T/1 reD 1-10 1 Prbs/re/- â‚¬44.'5 )1- 1-9 March, 2002 Board ofTrustees, Town ofEstes Park Subject: Opening ofPawnee Drive between Hwy 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents ofthe town ofEstes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow ofthe above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address ' 76. MC Ki,4441-ev / 6%5- P,yoÂ»Â« E 444/ Dn< f f f -- A. rvÂ·Â·Â·,ClL,1 / /685 P.,My-a t.0141- Ck . \ 3v.&42.- e , aue.3/ 384 24.-pj- 444 et 0 3 Y Y frhpil Â£Â·161.0-~ Cj , V , (i-. ft 1 3/f 951<Â£) \ 61 6 f-u f *-&-* 6.2-Â£a<Â£*; AA..u'*00 VUIL,-2 fite-e_-< / 09 o <3/''~1~'~~lcltiL 0,0-34, 6 AL<M (] 1.46*00 /Â¥50 8..l~* -f~#CLÂ»iÂ»,-- Au i . - 1 pu U U 4 h v rviki A Aketq. -Utetat - 1644 Prospeck Estates brun ':A~~~ k>ut fo 9'~~son-ji_~m~-uD l 4, IS- 95Â·Qi&<Lf51(I#99 1/711-4 '49 1.3 /.i 1 ~ /0 YY krâ€ž-4 ijiLuounu-j 1650 Fll,~-#11,4/6 & ' bx.. . r ' Â»Rly, t..1Â¢~f/~~~- 9.*~52fk-,rc.206_.c _~a_, 1 703> OUU. It c:f~_i - hA , 1 - / / 762,3 /91&/2-j- 6-3-44-4.-,,ar - - EW~352- ./ 1-10 March, 2002 Board o f Trustees, Town o f Estes Park Subject: Opening ofPawnee Drive between Hwy 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents ofthe town ofEstes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address -F t. 1 63 Â£ 1477*4*r 8.Gm- De C J*-j Wazil 861/2 t>-r#-, AP. 3'ed- -1 4 N 0 N fl li~ A 7-6/7 /4 1 1 1 -(0 3 1 ff? 0 9 Â¢ .e 84 6ii Ad ~1) h 405-4- Wi,Â·dÂ· 0-- :pG.. /708 Fsped- Estâ€¢des bvic/6 Eskalâ€¢Ic, CO 856/7 V,7 E-)09 FAOS ?gcr ES-rATEJ OR-. e f.yos, ' llc) 4- R#Wei gkfARM N - f.rk'~ * r j- :._4,'~'~ /h ' 9 744 6Â» 93 ld,U,Â«L,tÂ» CO / 4>'1-9 <7Â£4 pe-el-- AJ .146 Â· 1 1 14 1-1 I D %*ct- 86/ c br c All-,49 Mul -11 41_Juk 1 00 1-op,66Â£(~Uu Il. 0 .1 j 1-11 Ql!222ZE March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening of Pawnee Drive between HWY 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents of the town of Estes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address 'r i,-4,~u.Liet,vÂ·t /24,06;'td 161 6 olit>r)'10,1 0 N o.Â« Rmotâ‚¬U J iâ€¢ 7,64 gato ,Â».1 5*; 64 7'0~,041---Â·74*.44- 2.fi-,1 -50/0 -n *A 'r, fc . 9 ) 4 c /1,1 '380 3 /46t 1 76 S G 1,0 /01 8// D/4 - bl=\ - 02 A /4 I. 7~1AA * L }0/Â¥,Lut / ,Â·264 16,(I-yu +>-1.... * 03- DAPn k lu I Emrn 45-4 50/0,4 ,-9 rat' 1&06, *40Â«71/ 25Â£1 50 1 6 17-7 0 n Dr, (-144. 259 Jeco. 0,1_Dg . - -t[ttbi j ~~01 doN j 29? SALA Roll 06 50(.Â£: MEUU r>/2 ~ 90 03 e~ (Quill'*,neit ULQ-Ing~K) Ihh Â¥L. 0-1-4 1-12 March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening of Pawnee Drive between HWY 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents of the town of Estes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address , 2 , ./ill'[Lul.,cu Y\+0â€¢LÂ·a C<.*4..,AX-Â· ..4 -5-0 ficilow 4, I)/7. 5 stes -SAK Â· 7 4 0 501.kl c 44 (JA, 56 l.4 pol A- ' /Mitti~'fit*j? + 4---02Â£ .>4 e 2- 5/ 3-140,â€¢10,J 232. 22:ra- 4}g,~s 1 0, Al. D ,%51 43.*rÂ·Â»02 0-9 ha. â‚¬AaQ' 2% ~1~*AA,AÂ· ~44*41 an.w Set--g_, 1â€žLc.,aa,Â£104- 14Â«- 4 0(-Clt 27 g 16 ju Knon Olure, EU-8 (16 k- 1Q . 1. w |<.0 i- ~- 3-71_ . iLL,_ 614: ?kf72-L I 1\ 1// i 41 ) ~Â«'~ 41 92.AU j 211 3; 4-~vicÂ« 1,â‚¬_; 6912 il-cd-,/ /)A 2 77 22-41$- LA.' ELDU ,/Wlâ‚¬, It/+9-.1 /Â»Ui-'* - 4ax 27 9 64*1Â·u 1 7 11 A. '.,) / P / r./ >Of'.22/3.1/' 77' 3/Â·r <.,d,r..i-.-~ic. /63 3 j3-4Â£-1-JÂ« 2: 1 Ell<.lo :*.10 -. CÂ» 4 j '16<. 4. 'f Â¢ i h 1 1 40' I.... ~ *..... 2 1.Â· - : 3 -LÂ·Â·Â·t., ' 4....... C.. 1 LÂ»./I 1-13 March, 2002 Board ofTrustees, Town ofEstes Park Subject: Opening ofPawnee Drive between Hwy 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents ofthe town ofEstes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address A 1690 bjusnect F5444,5 \.flve 9 -U 46*Lop /(29 o f\-c j De-cl-- EalÂ·zies D ri ve- 414%44(O )06 80~9-(t flflahk) />uu.3 ' -#A 'q C J 1 f,l â€ž 0 i *Wl Q'k:~4 /69* Pros pect Estakes Dr-~ye u.Â«,n LÂ» 1 69Â£1 prospel 664\<s Drue dl j Â¥1 * p HEAk) 30 Ki flA 4- fros ppol 644~~Aes D r i VE 12$26 l~k\~ Crv\ABLed--- 4 iz- 54-eehe_ 0 4- 955/7 1-14 March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening of Pawnee Drive between HWY 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents of the town of Estes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address t.-73Â¢i#A 0 <-La- C.<.- 11 3 9 0 lo --- .,D *P' 9 1 bri/. 49-_./544-J 7, 6 7 1 6 /Â©Â») e = D - 1-15 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: May 8,2002 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane ~~-0~' SUBJECT: Riverside Drive/Sundance Center Condo Parking Request Background: The new owner of the Sundance Center has converted part of the Center's space into 12 condominium dwelling units. Since adequate parking space is not available onsite, he is requesting use of the Confluence Park parking lot as permanent parking for the 12 condos. Please refer to the attached letter of request. The attached sketch shows the location of the Confluence lot as well as the Post Office lot and Children's Park parking lot The sketch indicates the current time limits in the lots. It should be noted that the Town currently has a team researching the downtown parking situation and how to increase the efficiency of that parking, therefore the status of all parking lot time limits may be subject to change in the future. Cost/Budget Cost No monetary cost Action: Staff refers this request to the Committee for appropriate action. BL/lb Attachments 2-1 4/ / //- 47 4062*-- LOT///// 'f / 1 5 225 1,rh i/<3 0 ) 0/11 /0 p 2 5 1- hC -~ 4,- -123 'QEA '/7 12/ les /29 13:sj Y- /4, /43 /45 /49 /53 /57 /65 4,7 ~h\\, Fo f. ./ 5 -- 5 r \ i ~ EL CEEMrO-0 ~ EAST ELKHORN~ 1520 AVENUE 60.,-rel. ,~ . L . 2 108 '10 42 '20 122 124 '28 '32 /44 '4~ 152\\\/Se /60 /6.q '72 'pe leo le, . . 2496/ Â« r&Â»% WDRFW; PALk/ 0. f4 A Â· f ele 5 SCOCk - t--~ 1 -re~,120PAR-4 - s iF 7 1- ,L N o 4 2/1 1 1 - 0 ~ f~ .1.1,T, 2,0ft â€¢ ' S 'LK - RIVER PARK ~ Ll 6, 44 Â¢06|~.1 \ .1-J 1 0 .... \ I | 12.0 Jal 3 4 Ce 7523 9 40 4+ 0 44<. '20 / ' 1 . >/ 7 . 'e/ \ 93 2 \ / 04, -:' .~~ , 7526,5 4 3'Ng# / / /20 7 1/9/ 2 * '41 'r- . \ \<3 + 0 4 20/ /60 > / r 22, - '70 1 1 2 Â¥.leo / X 7527.0 232 - 4/4-/- \ 2 4 , \\ 0 4 ' ~7 232 0-4 /236 7 -4- / /238 Nk>24 / D D / -944 y 1- -. April 24,2002 Town of Estes P O Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Attn: Bill Linnane Public Works Regarding: Public Parking at the Dark Horse Lot Dear Bill, Estes Park's Master Plan indicates a desire for downtown accommodations, therefore, at the May 16th Public Works Committee Meeting, we respectfully request consideration of lifting the 3 hour maximum parking limit at the Dark Horse Lot. We are in the process of a use change for the "Sundance Center" to become Lofts of Estes, which will be overnight accommodations, open by Memorial Day 2002. If allowing us permits for our customers is a better solution for you, twelve would be ample. We look forward to discussing this further with you or if we can answer any questions, please feel free to contact Lofts of Estes at 586-3393 or on my cell phone which is 1-623-680-8886. Respectfully, â€ž: Â£ A I -'-*.1..-..--- Spencer-imith 2-3 .. Memorandum May 7,2002 TO: Bill Linnane From: Wil Smith Re: EPURA Position on Desirable Land Uses within Central Business District, Note of Challenges Relative to Parking. Let me follow up briefly on our conversation concerning EPURA's position on desirable land uses within the central business district and the relationships of said uses. As you know, the central business district is the primary component of the Urban Renewal Area. The major charge of EPURA is to make physical improvements that serve the community and enhance the economy. Stated another way, a primary EPURA goal is to achieve the healthiest and most viable central business district possible. If one compares the central business districts of a variety of cities and towns around the country, it will be concluded that the most vibrant are those which accommodate a complementary mix of uses and activities including: retail shopping, employment (in addition to retail, usually offices), accommodations, restaurants, services and residential. It can be concluded that a complementary mix of compatible uses, which support each other and result in continuous daytime and evening activities, make for maximum health and success. Achieving such a mix is consistent with EPURA's overall goal of economic enhancement. At the same time, it is possible that the various desirable uses can have competing needs. One of these competing needs can be available parking. The Town of Estes Park made the conscious decision years ago to forego private parking requirements within the CD zoning district, in lieu of the Town providing public parking. This has been a generally workable arrangement; however, residents generally insist on parking in reasonable proximity to their dwelling unit where they don't have to compete with commercial customers for a parking space. And, retailers need adequate parking to ensure that all potential customers can get out oftheir cars and into the stores. Hence, we have a dilemma. What is the answer? There is no easy answer; however, the best answer will recognize these divergent needs and seek to achieve the best possible balance to serve them. 2-4 ITEM #3 EP SANITAT[ON EASEMENT REQUEST 1~THDRAWN TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: May 8,2002 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane ~.00~- SUBJECT: Fall River Trail Background: Staff, with support from CDOT and Cornerstone Engineering, presented the Fall River Trail Concept Plan at a community meeting February 21st. Cornerstone Engineering presented the preliminary location plans. A question and answer session followed this initial project description. Generally the audience supported the project. However, a handful of those in attendance had design questions that could not be readily answered at that stage. Therefore, Staff requested Cornerstone Engineering to contact four property owners along the proposed trail location and specifically address their individual design concerns. Cornerstone met with the individual property owners the week of April 84 The concerns of the individuals have been addressed and future design of the trail will attempt to accommodate such. (See Background - Continued on page 2) Cost/Budget Design/CM Scope of Services Cost Proposal: $28,046 Budget: $295,000 for design, construction management and construction. Action: Staff recommends proceeding with Phase I Design and Construction Management for a cost of $28,046 from Cornerstone Engineering. 4-1 Background - Continued#om page 1 Cornerstone Engineering will present the results of the individual neighbor discussions at this PWC meeting. Cost of the entire project from Performance Park to the Rocky Mountain National Park boundary, is estimated to be approximately $2 million. Due to the cost of the project it must be a phased project with the number of phases estimated at 5 to 10, depending upon future funding. Currently, the 2002 Community Reinvestment Fund has $295,000 budgeted for design and construction of the first phase, which begins near Performance Park This phase could begin this fall. Since Cornerstone has performed all of the preliminary work to date, they were asked to provide a Design and Construction Management Scope of Services. BL/lb 4-2 CORNE?STONE Estes Park, CO 80517 437 South St. Vrain (970) 586-2458 ' Fax (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & ,,0(2.~ SURVEYING, INC. E-mail: ces@charter.net May 7,2002 Mr. Bill Linnane Director of Public Works Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Fall River Corridor Pedestrian Trail Study, Part II Dear Bill: Following a public information meeting for the Fall River Pedestrian Trail on February 21,2002, a field survey was performed of the state highway right-of-way from 1520 Fall River Road to 1820 Fall River Road. The purpose ofthe survey was to determine existing state highway right- of-way and actual alignment of the trail through this section of highway. Survey information was compiled with state highway right-of-way maps and it was determined that approximately 30 feet of state highway right-of-way exists from the south drive lane to the southern edge ofthe right-of-way. Based on the survey information and the right-of-way data adequate state highway right-of-way exists for construction of a pedestrian trail system. The attached exhibits were prepared for four property owners and subsequent on site meetings were scheduled to discuss trail alignment. The meetings took place on April 10,11 and 12, 2002. At all meetings Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. (CES) discussed with the property owners/managers a proposed minimum cross section of a two foot curb and gutter starting at the existing white line ofU.S. Highway 34, an attached ten foot walk and a minimum clear zone to fences, signs, etc. of three feet. A brief synopsis of each meeting is as follows: â€¢ Castle Mountain Lodge, 1520 Fall River Road-CES met with the owners of Castle Mountain Lodge on April 12,2002 and discussed the trail. A copy of the exhibit was left with the owners. The owners were shown the limits of the project and were very receptive to the proposed trail. â€¢ Inn on Fall River, 1660 Fall River Road-On April 10,2002, CES met with property managers who were shown an exhibit of the proposed cross section and alignment adjacent to the property. Discussion of construction of the trail and relocation of a fence which currently sits in highway right-of-way took place. The managers were very receptive to the project. 4-3 â€¢ Black Hawk Lodge, 1750 Fall River Road-CES met with the property owner on April 10,2002 and discussed the exhibit and proposed cross section and alignment of the trail adjacent to the property. CES indicated the edge of the walkway would be placed two feet off the drive lane and, because of the clear zone requirements, would require relocating a fence. The owner's primary concern was encroachment of the trail on his property. An additional concern of the owner was public safety due to the trail being close to the highway. The back of the trail would be twelve feet off of the drive line and eighteen feet off of the property line. The owner expressed concern about snow build up along his fence. CES met with the owner a second time on April 10,2002 to further discuss the owner's questions. â€¢ Ponderosa Lodge, 1820 Fall River Road-The property owner met with CES on April 11,2002, and was shown a proposed cross section and alignment of the trail adjacent to the property. The property is separated from the highway by the river. The owner was shown the physical limitations and required tree removal for the proposed trail placement in that area. A concern of the owner was that the trees removed for trail construction be replaced by the Town of Estes Park to establish a buffer between the trail and the owner's property. State highway minimum specifications establish a distance from the drive lane to the back of curb o f two feet six inches for a sidewalk. Optimum construction o f the trail allowing the greatest separation from the road based on state highway right-of-way would increase user safety. CES recommends, for actual and perceived safety, trail alignment be a minimum of six feet off of the edge of the drive lane except as indicated at the above mentioned properties. If you have questions or need further information regarding this phase of the Fall River Corridor Pedestrian Trail Study please contact me. Sincerely, A j A Corneistohd lindheering & Surveying, Inc. Al V lili â€¢' v A U \~ ~Cerry Prochaska, P.E. Principal Attachments 4-4 m \ \ 9 N -Liu :-00 \O W \ 4.- E & 00 -4 E 0 < \ VJ 05 0 f Jar 4 1 .1 ) 4 0 0- 09 - l==U 22 ~E 2 :d 8: 1- 4 7 // C=.2 . 0 .W O O La 4. r- e CD n \ CD -1 1-2 Z ti 0 1 6 0\ \ 4 â€ž \ 4 1 d 00 4 - 7 4 AVAA- 30-1HDIN AMH ~ \ 0 -O. 3 \ -9 - 2 \ . 3 f I J i -7- < .1-\\- 9 *,3 - LK Â¥ r Z b tk k- -- f - H i L = 6 0 & - O- A - 11 - \\- 11 ji 9 - N ,_La 11 4-5 ~'Ni'N 2~78 3019 L llÂ¥@1 -IVI~S303cl )2 AVMHOIH ~;go.9 3 8301AOHS 103S 1Â¥Oldkl If 07 IE Â»z- 2-r- LU -1 < CO 1. 0 164 < 1 3 1 4 1<//6/ 1-, U \ 1 i A / 1/0 i , 4- CD /0/ 4/ tk=Zi .1 - AVM-30-1HDIEI AMH -/ ~ #5 0 & 1 1 1~ h J 4-ff - -1 y CM . 94/ i Â» / 214[ I 1 437 0 11 - 21 - - . L / 1 / 55 0 LIU Z / 1 J diz j I 4-6 ay~~'~A*(77303Ngld9 ~ AlS H AO L l~~ '00 '>IMVd SS]Li~~ 1036 1Â¥Oldi 10ft Â« PONDEROSA LODG 1)96-6 1,90 0 NVI81S303d M301nOHS ONA08 1IVhll 1Â¥~6303d )2 AV~HOIH A I 1 Sm Ne / JS c) 90 ... = 4J- L 1 C\1 1 j 1* l 1 0/ 4/ b d ill1\ 1 / \Z- -1 /1 /Â» / /O 1 1/ /1/ I. / 1 /2/ / / )-2 1 / 1 / A-<A l f-.(-0 99 i 17 -- 0 v",a â€¢4- 1 -...-Z<./. ON- O- 1 4-7 OVO~W~~3~ 3900-1 >IMVH >10Â¥18 ,Ot=â€ž L 31Â¥06 \\ N .0 0 1 1 4 . -- 1% 1 - a 3 I ?i p~ 8 4\ 1 1 11 23 05 Os 11 E-Â· A s. 1 -Â·Â«14 52 N M V 0 4 C==> ~ 0 i i 56 4 \ 43 \... 1 300 <1\ -N K7 \ \ ri E . CD \ + 1 4, . ei 32 i\ 1 \ \\ 2.---17 7 0\ .>- \ 1 71 -5 1 1-__ %) Il 1 f 1 Â«F *-O LU <C 0 4-8 3 1 -1-~ 099 L BA -15 HinOS 613AM -11Â¥3 NO NNI ~ CORNE?STONE 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 (970) 586-2458 1/0. Fax (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & ~0(1 SURVEYING, INC. E-mail: ces@charter.net V May 9,2002 Mr. Bill Linnane Director of Public Works Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Scope of Services Fall River Pedestrian Trail, Phase I Dear Bill: Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. (CES) is pleased to provide the following Scope of Services for design and construction observation of Phase I of the Fall River Pedestrian Trail. Project Overview Fall River Pedestrian Trail would be a trail system extension linking the downtown river walk area, west along Fall River Road ending at Rocky Mountain National Park Gateway Visitor Center. The trail would be a10 foot wide concrete path. The length of the trail constructed in Phase I would be based on the Town of Estes Park budget for Phase I. Phase I would extend to the area of 1150 West Elkhorn, providing approximately 5,000 feet of trail. Design The design ofPhase I of the Fall River Pedestrian Trail would include the following services: â€¢ Survey the area surrounding the proposed trail alignment. â€¢ Preparation of base maps showing horizontal and vertical constraints with topographical contours at two foot intervals. â€¢ Trail design with plan and profile sheets, alignment and grading requirements. â€¢ Highway right-of-way permits. â€¢ Preparation of construction documents. â€¢ Manage construction bidding. Construction Observation Construction observation of Phase I of the Fall River Pedestrian Trail would include construction observation during the construction phase of the trail to insure the contractor complies with the intent of the plans and specifications. 4-9 Mr. Bill Linnane Scope of Services Fall River Pedestrian Trail, Phase I May 9,2002 Page 2 Cost The cost for design ofPhase I of the Fall River Pedestrian Trail is $19,606. The cost for construction observation is $8,440. Total engineering costs would be $28,046. A breakdown of design and construction observation costs is attached. Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. is pleased to have the opportunity to provide this scope of work to the Town o f Estes Park. If you have questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. w13 >1111 Michael S. Todd, P.E. Principal 4-10 Fall River Pedestrian Trail Phase I Design Personnel Hours Rate/Hr Total Cost Principal 18 $90.00 $ 1,620 Project Engineer 75 $60.00 $ 4,500 Project Manager 23 $70.00 $ 1,610 Engineering Technician 90 $50.00 $ 4,500 AutoCadd Technician 133 $50.00 $ 6,650 Clerical 22 $33.00 $ 726 Total Design $19,606 Construction Observation Personnel Hours Rate/Hr Total Cost Principal 3 $90.00 $ 270 Project Engineer 37 $60.00 $ 2,200 Project Manager 12 $70.00 $ 840 Engineering Technician 72 $50.00 $ 3,600 AutoCadd Technician 24 $50.00 $ 1,200 Clerical 10 $33.00 $ 330 Total Construction Observation $ 8,440 Total Engineering Cost $28,046 4-11 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE May 9,2002 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bob Goehring and Bill Linnane Uj SUBJECT: Purchase filter media for the Glacier filter building remodel Background: We budgeted $220,000 this year to remodel the Glacier filter building. The remodel will make the facility meet upcoming regulations. Included in this remodel was filter media replacement The filters were last replaced in 1991. We recently discovered that it will take from 6 to 9 months to receive the media from the time it is ordered. While we are still in the design stage for the other improvements, it will be necessary to order the media as soon as possible. The Glacier remodel needs to be completed by April 1, 2003. Cost/Budget Budget for Glacier filter building remodels: $220,000 Cornerstone Engineering has contacted the following venders for quotes. Delivery is anticipated in 20 weeks. â€¢ Misco $35,901.90 â€¢ Fairmont $31,189.91 â€¢ WAACO $25,486.00 Action: Staff recommends that we order the filter media now form WAACO for $25,468.00 and store it at the Water Shop. BG/BL/lb 5-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: May 8,2002 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Tim Rische41 U.yL SUBJECT: Phase 3 SCADA Irrigation System Background: The SCADA system allows one person to program, operate, and monitor the Town's irrigation systems from one computer centrally located at the Park Shop. Phase 3 is budgeted for this year and is shown on the attached map. All equipment is supplied by L.L. Johnson and will be installed in-house by Wes Reichardt The tentative schedule for installation begins June 17, 2002 and is to be completed by July 12, 2002. Cost/Budget: Cost $24,309.66 Budget: $25,000 (Conservation Trust Fund 211-5900-459-31-61) Action: Staff recommends approval and requests permission to proceed with the project TR/lb 6-1 -t To ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK To ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK â€¢ r-Â· ~ Vtâ€¢ US HWY 36 Â·RMNP Hoidquirt.r. A Vlittor Cintâ€¢, 1 ~ 9 ~ 1 8 VIâ€¢ US HWY 34 -Fill RIÂ¥â€¢r Entranco 1 22 .wt,mi,0 VIâ€¢win, . Â·Motil Ar, â€¢Tr*11 Rldgi Road / Â· Â¥,tld'. VI. wt,â€¢, L~~-Â·--CE:57 Â·old F.11 Rlver Roâ€¢d 4*9 .Trill RIdge Roid DO .YMCA of th, Rockl.. J.n Â·Motif Ar,i . - 4-4 'f e.. /42 *PAUCE ~Nul J 0,9 â‚¬ \, 4%2 <*J- /0 -/ \ 1 S..4 g c %â‚¬ 0\ 1 00,8 - 0/ th~-2~ \US \ 36 .AM'INO f Off 2/@Â« 0 0 77 2 0 - . 0 47900 =,%0 fÂ® Â¥0 .4 -PA*a Morain. 4f - '7=-21* POST 0,-1 p j ),4 9 24< b ~â‚¬*~0 - I wdin : N U 0101.47 427 -Mike/ - h- Ft,â€¢~IC PARâ€¢,HO 4094\ 0223 = / )0 je ~- fÂ« .....44.-: r-= 9 01 -""A. f~-4.14 7~ 4%Â» .OND.AA. 0 10 fills Ht-. 891 1.-TuinY"11 Â»+-.A L.~__,1 PUBLIC PARKING 4 Jn -yÂ©13-1 , 629..1 l_____,1 MUNICIPAL PARKS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1 Â° L_ru---~ 4 01 *OP.,Allâ„¢VAA--I. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ..1 1 Â® - 4 PUBLIC RESTROOMS 11 v W :3 - -O- PICNIC AREA w L - ~ PURLIC PHONE ~ " it d 1 4- - t :4 t, 34 9,P.-444*4 Icl 1,0..7.1 // J~ ffÂ»t=--- , ..../... 1 ....... 34 4\ 1 US 38 1 | Â·' US 4 Bouidir ~ : -, to voland and Ft.Collins 1 A- 4 .i-1 61 TOM IMfO~CEN~~M ,~WME 1~YES D.- r:-1 Ate 1 q- .A 6-2 91< C C KNO TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: May 8,2002 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane C IJ r--- SUBJECT: Board Room/Heath Construction Change Order Request Background: Staff requests approval of the following change orders: 1) Twenty-eight additional Staff and committee member name signs. The original scope was for 23 aluminum name signs. The actual count which accommodates Board of Adjustments, EPURA, Planning Commission and other committees is 51. 2) Two additional Staff table microphones. The originalidea was for those sitting at the three-member Staff table to share one microphone. The Staff table should have three microphones to avoid awkward space-sharing. 3) ADA retrofit the existing restrooms adjacent to the Board Room. Mirrors, water supply and trap covers were added to both restrooms per Building Department requirements. Cost/Budget: Cost 1) Additional signs $1,612 2) Additional microphones 878 3) ADA retrofit of restrooms 903 Total: $3,393 The Community Reinvestment Contingency Fund for the Board Room can accommodate the additional cost. Action: Staff recommends approval of the change orders. BL/lb 7-1 HEATH R C. HEATH CONSTRUCTION CO. ,~ADDITIONAL WORK P 0. DRAWER H â€¢ 141 RACQUETTE DR. Â»,--- AU~HORIZATION FORT COLLINS, CO 80522 (970) 221-4195 FAX (970) 221-2907 --*--I -â€¢ â€¢ r â€¢--â€¢â€¢â€¢--- -I -$* CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT WO- 015 DATE: 24-Apr-02 PROJECT NO.: 02313 PROJECT: Estes Park Municipal Building OWNER: Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO Estes Park, CO DESCRIPTION ' Provide two additional microphones at staff table per Town's request COST SUMMARY EQUIPMENT: SUBTOTALS TOTALS OWNED EQUIPMENT................................ ........................ ....................... ,.. ,.,...... $ 0 RENTED EQUIPMENT........................... ................ $ 0 $ PERMANENT MATERIAL (INCLUDING TAXES, FREIGHT, ETC.) NONE ..................., NONE ...... ......... $ 0 NONE ....................NONE ....,. ,... $ 0 NONE .................... NONE 0 $ 0 SMALL TOOLS and SUPPLIES: MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AND FASTENERS .................................................. ...... $ 0 $ 0 LABOR: HOURS RATE LABORER. 0.0 HOURS @ $12.00 $ 0 CRAFTSMAN. 0.0 HOURS @ ... $17.00 $ 0 FOREMAN .... .. ....... 0.0 HOURS @ .. $22.00 $ 0 SUPERINTENDENT .. 2.0 HOURS @ ... $32.00 $ 64 PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR 0.0 HOURS @ ..,,.. $15.00 $ 0 PROJECT COORDINATOR. 0.0 HOURS@ $25.00 $ 0 PROJECT MANAGER........ 10 HOURS @ $40.00 $ 40 SUBTOTAL LABOR,,.....,.,..... ........,,...........,.....,.,..,,, ,... ......... ..... $ 104 INSUARANCE & TAXES: 40% ..,........... ... .......... $ 42 $ 146 SUBCONTRACT: Comp View NONE 660 $ 660 NONE ............ NONE .... $ 0 NONE .... NONE $ 0 NONE . NONE . $ 0 $ 660 OTHER: PERMITS, FEES & TAXES . $ 0 BOND ADJUSTMENT. ..,. ,...... $ 15 BUILDERS RISK INSURANCE. $ 0 GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE. ... $ 7 GENERAL CONDITIONS (SEE ATTACHED) . 3 0 $ 22 SUBTOTAL (ITEMS ABOVF) $ 828 OVERHEAD & MARGIN ............ RATE: 6.0% $ 50 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES $ 0 TOTAL WORK AUTHORIZATION $ 878 ACCt#:PEIjIND APPROVED: / \ 1 ,11 /14 6340Â·Â·-- 1 ) 35/9 k C-)#4 4,Â« 4)12.4,1 / 1â€¢ R.0 HEATH CONSTRUCTION CO. DATE Town of Estes Park , U DATE ftpÂ· 7-2 v vi i,V' 4 11.V 1 A VI ! rnA INU, a ( Uld 1 C UU / " K 03/04 R.C. HEATH CONSTRUCTION CO. ADDITIONAL WORK HEATH (9701221-4193 FAX (970)221-1907 . 1.0, DRAWER H â€¢ 14; RACQUSL-!E DR. NORT COLLINS, CD 80322 AUTHORIZATION CONSTRUCHON MANAGEMENT WO- 013 DATE; 11.Apr-02 PROJECT NO.' 02313 1.ROJECT. Bstea Park Muni,iial Building OWNER; Town u f Estes Pitrk Estes Park. CO Eites Park, Â¢0 4 #4/ ' DESCRIPTION 1- e l *. c. c,-- Jj trA- h Provide appmximately 28 additional signs from ABC Signworks for valrioul commitwes in addition to the Town Board i 7, 0.,6 0 13< 41.twt,*' . COST SUMMARY EQUIPMENT: SUB'rOTALS TOTALS OWNED EQUIPMEN'r ....1.1...............1.1....,11. 0 RENTED EQUIPMENT. ....1.1.'............ ..,1...... ....,1,1,11, .........4.....1,1.,1. 0 $ 0 PERMANENT MATERIA L (INCY.,13Â»ING 1 AXES, FREIGHV, F.TO ABC Signworks 28 ea 41.43 8 t,160 NONE .....4..'...'... NONE _~ .~__~ .. $ 0 NONE .........,i.â€ž NONE ............. ....,...â€ž. $ 0 $ 1,160 SMALL TOOLS anti SUPPLIES: MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AND FASTBNERS.i......... ....,...,,.,... $ 0 SO LABOR; HOURS R.4.!.E 0.0 110URS (24 $12,00 $ CRAFTSMAN ...,.,...,.........., 0.0 HOURS (&! 0,L,.,, $ 17.00 $ 0 FOREMAN 0,0 HOURS @ 322.00 $ SUPERINTENDENT....,...... ... 1,0 LIOURS @ ...i,.. $32.00 $ 32 PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR . 00 HOURS@ ,....... $ 1500 $ 0 PROJECT COORDINATOR... 0.0 HOURS@ .. 325.00 $ 0 PROJECT MANAGER. ...1...'.1 4.0 HOURS $40,00 $ 160 SUBIOTAL LABOR 1,11'..1'... ........11'.... ....1,1.....1â€ž'. .......11'....'... I ]92 INSUARANCE & TAXES: 40% 5 77 $ 269 SUBCONTRACT; NONE .,1,1..... ..... NONR OS 0 NONE ..........1,4,0.'., NONE Â·~~"-~ Â·"Â°'" i <~ NONE 11,1..,1....... . NONE NONE ..............."I'. NONE ...1, 1 0 $ 0 OTHER: PERMITS, FEES & TAXES....................... .1,%.....1.,1..... BOND ADJUSTMENT. $ 25 BUILDERS RISK INSURANCE............. ........11.1.9"t'...... ...,1,1..... 0 GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE ...........i,,iâ€žâ€ž,- J GENERAL CONDi-1-IONS (SEE AT ACHED) . 1.1,1,1,11....1 O $ 36 1,465 | OVERHEAD& MARGIN ......â€žâ€ž'. RA'1' E; 10.09/0 ....... 147 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES $ 0 TOTAL WORK AUTHORIZATION _ 1,61/ Ac.Xy'ff~D APPROVED: C *WÂ»- C>ATE R.C. 11EATH CONS'I RUCTION CO DATE Town of R.te, Purk 7-3 Public Works Engineering Memo To: Public Works Committee From: Greg Sievers CC: Bill Linnane l// Date: May 16, 2002 Re: 2002 Street Improvement Program Background: This annual program is broken down into 6 categories of work that takes place throughout the year to provide surface improvements to our asphalt infrastructure and are based on levels of distress. 1) Patching small damaged areas and crack filling are the two most basic maintenance repairs items that should always precede resurfacing. 2) Chip Seal and Slurry Seals are surface improvements that are applied to streets in generally fair to good condition to extend their service life. 3) Overlaying is repaving existing roads who's condition has deteriorated to a point that the previous application are insufficient. 4) Rebuilding is an approach for streets with surface conditions beyond the scope where any of the previous approaches are financially feasible or when we can partner with other entities to replace the section in a more cost efficient manner. 5) Striping is pavement marking replacement for any street that is faded beyond safe visible levels. 6) Traffic Calming Devices: construct a Speed Table on Summit Drive. Budget: The 2002 budget contains $300,000 for the annual Street Improvement Program. Action: Staff requests to proceed with the following expenditures and schedules: 1. Patching: Solicit prices, award and complete by July. ($10,000) (charged to street maint.) 2. Chip & Slurrv Seal: purchase from A-1 & I.P.P. at 2000 prices. Complete in June. $80,000 3. Overlay pavinq: bid in May, PWC in June, construct in September-October. $162,000 4A. Rebuild: a portion of Big Horn Drive in partnership with EPSD & Water Dept. $8,000 4B. Rebuild: this special project to rebuild a portion of East Riverside Drive is in partnership with a capital river-wall project and a water department project. Construction will be in the fall. $40,000 replace curb & gutter and sidewalk, $10,000 (street maintenance funding) Design scope ($10,687.50) from Van Horn is to be paid by the ( water department funding) 5. Striping: Purchase from United Rentals (1997 prices) install in May & October $10,000 6. Traffic Calmer: construct asphalt Speed-Table on Summit Drive. $5,000 TOTAL Public Works Capital Funds $305,000 See attachments for proposed work locations. Locations and quantities may change to stay with the budget and avoid utility company construction conflicts. 8-1 }=sur O 0 ~?00 0Â°2Â°k 0 0 #Ii -bt' CO 4?26 fÂ·Â·r,Â· e A- 13@g. 014*Z !2 LO OOo,-010 h 0 0 U 0 0 4~20 35 5 # A 7-, _ cv T- flly.:t m!'18 %40 28 88092 e h W 91- C rn O 1- - N 1- mfiS 3*FE Efa y. 91Â°#o"N 1% 4- ul vu CN CO C\1 C\1 N LO 10 drir%5'*3: Im 94?,â€¢ El 00 ~2 OLO B. ia ?44!*WERER**E CD 33*Ul - *4-te LOC)CDC\IOODCD tlitÂ¢t~. CD LO CD O 0 tO O 8 eag V:,b. 1 6-'40â€¢D 1- 11 -7:'919 FIll.1 4 5 J 9 O.-6 0 0 b 4"40 0 2' 3 c O O N O -2 E lo N M fy;tt r-IN 4.E w 4 4 44 ' 4 Â·iÂ· 6 4 XE5 990.2 -6 22 -8 i JM di 90= li#*0111 0.2 itÂ« 5 8 feR r- 03. c.~ 3, a> > 0 .2 7 0 vi -3 1497/4~ :*4 ,%:4.44: CD U) m II k- u) I 0 - 2 4 94=,1 - .W'. . g :9 %94% &2 a. 0. 1} m. =1 Z â‚¬ 2 16 4, m UG':3Â£' 4- %8 9. .= 6 In - Rels ~ ~ Â£3 9 /0 16 *43IiÂ· 9 C .35 1 2 0 0 a. m N..al.1 0 b ~ O 30 25 =0 *i321: 9 z.z or ty = C) 11 394115~ I p a: E T '5 *48 4 m Lum=zo.u) : PI 14;'11*749 *A*>fil~; 7- C\I CO * Lf) CD h CO C) * U S~ 9358 ~ {he422-4 0Zt'17 9ZZZ 086'6 L L 062d 3002/* L/9 SleAe{S Dea Aq peledeld ive (4") 1,870 2002 Street Imp 0, e ment Program Town of Estes Park Schedule A-- gree curve aoe,q-In 19.9 u'pu!.15 eA!a leS)pn A Aeul 4!weno =thz: 921) 241 14Â· 1 54 24 Â°i RE 11* i Fl Y fÂ·%-90:ir Nat t>4 Kied* 140* *26 teÂ·â‚¬ 41 *t.'Â§4. =Ch: 5.,Frl 4 itht'â€¢I %4 0,209 h 5 0 M t-- h r. '21 - 6:ji '.-4 1.54 't. 9 !60 r /4 5 00 E= tti,rj. 2 Countney Lane Davis - end 80 880 x 21 2,050 3 Devon Drive Peak View Dr. - Peak view 1875 x 24 5,000 4 Darcy Drive Devon - CDS 800 x 24 2,200 5 High Pine North Ridge to End 1030 x 24 2,750 6 Raven Circle Lake Front - Lake Front 8 3380 x 24 9,000 033'93 UV.LOI 1 Community Drive Manford - Brodie 1000 x 38 i79 /0 46+I 8% f "t 1,61 *f#:f Â¥ *â‚¬. O 0 0 oo +927 12.=Â·2 A 2 - 00 - 1 L :lu iâ‚¬ R 2 + 44* O 41 c,i o m -0 00 2 41 - A , J In 4 = U M - i 4=4 k % ..91' b ~Â·Rf Â·t #PM'z h 00 un 01 0 en rn e - 00 00 0 01 0 h 00 h h h h 00 h ht>co 00 E 44 U co e # k 34â€¢U Erificv v .6 -- .4 4 U 2#t:V ca CO UE ff *6{ en E ca g a gu E &%50 i-:com U U Z W. 4 4 e ~ R = u 2 3 0(0 6 -3 2 u 94* E p hyl Uuu 42 %>%,Ph 0 1%Â¢2 # 2 5 9 ass 8,2 m&2 U A A 320 3%0 E MEN ~2*~ 0 0 2<< 5 &,Am - -0 AD .% 2 k 1,9 = 3 78 === E = 4 og A 749 44ij 12 1 2 ;z..Pt EE&% 445* i i /1% Til A E WA igâ‚¬ U O - U M t o ..... 09 E a E rd -0 ce 0 a #R M 5 Or- #*1:$70 2002 Chip Seal Project - Proposed Street List Quantities Drive 2700 3 Freeland Court 1375 4 Pioneer Lane 2800 5 Prospector Lane 2600 OSLL Oleqs 000L tz x OLE unoo Uoluqs 8 0093 OPWII!.H pURJD outrI guld 6 000Â£ lied ozu!@H OI 9ZLL ) AA@!A 48!H I I 0968 sao 01 HEAL M Unoo uny olok) EI 001'ZE 1Â¥101 Town of Estes Park 300 x 24 dES-SS 111181 PalDO) 33Â»Jins aq 11mfs spails 11Â¥ out Jau,Klod aq mt xi mu 1 09 L L ZE X EEP ALI 0018 unoo 100.Ig â‚¬I lilli t. 1 ?)jjji -1 +P. 1 1[LL-Un-~131'.E 1 i / 1 1 ; 11'Â· I " I " " I'Â· E~--Â»-4- 1 51Â«I ,Â· 1 i Â·r INTLE - 43'.:41- I , ." - 'i' ' " .. 4. 1 1 1 'cl r-7 i . r - U.0 1 . .. 1 NATIONAL PARK , 1.,L-:2326:0~ 1.3-1-4 ,. -.. " I i ...., â€ž,w , . i''lli' r; ik----- I \ 1. 1.... ' H,LL 'r ., I hâ‚¬(41;' 1.1,Â·r--9 '1.. ...,rio. '. . 0 1.1, 1. t.1. 1, 4 7 0 ,-F:71Â« 1 ' / -- 1. 11 Â·Â· 1 " - -4.-J- . .,SEAVE â€ž ...I-t=N-z_/ ..1,4),4-' #*32' " -'.--w UtÂ· 3 ......... sT."LEy .. - MIA 14 ': I *4 Â«bleu:-c -17.1.-- - - Wk ...CM S .'terI- 1' i . ti' , . ,<A.10]-71 . 1â€¢â€¢ * 9 /4 -/2 / . I - 03*4<~79.07--1.,..4 . 77151 - ...Â·'. 1 ; :.: . 4, , . .2 , -,4....I â€¢ le- - ..... HI " -- . 4 ls;42 - 1.2+ I . . 1 0 . 46 ': 0 - , ...â€ž,1 1 . .â€ž .. . .....â€ž. er.,5,4 1,11.'...â€ž.--- .--- , . . ". U. .,O 1 ". " CAN.Â¥ Sue ...". 1 I. . 0. 31. 4. â€ž - 3 ELâ€¢NOR' S -I ./ I .. .'- A- *m ./. 1 6- 5 -1 .. . 400 ,..., -U--1) I-- ". ..Dir,0. . 1. Â» - - ..... 7472' './. .... 3 .... \- CAA,740: 4&10 ... 4. .. 4 v , fru , s.,tr --- --L-3 ..... go= : I' .... ' . , '- MAN.00/ *-- 9 -/. ' BEAVER POINT ,. /O , /7 - '. .1 2 ... 0, AD: = e.244 1 I . . 4 , .. - D .. ADD --Â·: . ,Â·Â·Â· n , Â· , . 4- L.J., . : =... 1 ...1 1.V- --------: "77 . r': 4 211,~...i I i= 24=1131 E. I - ..14 ./.(Fla 'j?NÂ« 1. . 5. , - .2.-12.\.tur.r ..-: . - :i: :r-; |râ€¢ i '1r~AT--- , ....1- ----1-1 2- , l GOLF 1 - . 0 ... â€ž I. 1 1 1 2.25 '11,11~:, -:.-.f -t--4 '.2 % 30 29 .... 4.COND ' . /2 , , AODITION " -Â¥Ill* i 1 --Elf-Ti# i)283:iJ ,.~ii lin~- * r.,1, .04' COURSE I . 2 ' 4. 'mir-1 i ..... . ... . 0 Â· ....0 â‚¬-121-41-1 . 1 *4[I 1--1_ 0 3 . 1 . 1 .J 01 /J IA,ak+-1 ' ' 1 242(*.-Vi--1 : . 01 . . ..L . '6â€žrs--- ./ -,-0 1 1 1. . 711. " .... 'I . 1 1. 1,1,Â»93-' 1,1 3 - 1 11 : .... ; 1 11 1 1 -4 . PROSPECY ; j , .... f I.\"Ly â€žâ€žâ€ž -4.. r " 7....4,/--- 1 ." ESTATES , . I /Â£_L: 1, COUâ€¢,â€¢i j Clu, .:12"' 4 .1 B\,1-P=4C-rT..1-/Â·./L. ,, 1 4 .,4,4{ >4- I abÂ«4*14@1 - LEI d+)., 4'ENN~ ' -# ... .â€ž. s 1 .$,ATES . 2 Y:2--16*i â€žâ€ž ". - 2.' '. . , I '1," "' .'. .8 3 17 /'2 ' . 1. " a Z>.4. . 1,1,1 1 1., â€ž â€ž, â€ž m. .* ...3 V 1 " . I .... , . :,Â·Â·i / -â€¢Â·4:t , rÂ· Â· " '5/ " "' 4 1 4 tk ~ . -- . 7 -- ~ ; ~ ~0< 1 $ 4 1. .- 3.1.%2. " ' 1 1 - 35 36 ~17[=11--_6,13.1 'bg~ 621* 147LZEÂ·4 _ .426.LL:106/111Â·2-LiEr >-- ;f-~~~~~ :;C STREET 11 TOWN OF ESTES PARK 2002 Street Improvement Program ASPHALT OVERLAY PROPOSAL LIST 8-5 TOWN CM ESTPHS PARK -- V e * y 1 2002 S.T.I.P. S lurry & Chip Seal Proposal 1.~~ HIL' C...Yl L UN v----- ~ :ti ---r-L-VL~.1 ~ - ~ : 1.1, D i 4144 ~-- -Ff-T-1--FltjAE-1 Lr~J q -1.- I ii n i ~ ~ 1 " ".I " 40 - i--Â·-- - 1/jic.*HIEÂ«>~~2-1-*9Â£ .A 1/-,gi, 4 --103~12;48- 32-=--99-9--6--1 Wgix L-x 8,Â£i uffâ‚¬EEkE-='==--Â·.:77=I ;--p-Â·7-FLgLLT:71&81|- fEA) i.k_Sol_.mt -4 1 .....Â¥~ 061.0/1"613,9.Â·.0,4, Â·ilrilÂ· I.trwol,4166'_ --.iZEr--_-3--thft[ AdZ):r'ir:*<T*WIN//444/ 1 1 . . U ..â€ž '.Â· --:/-21<044.3 0/ I.--- r.e, 0 . 1.1 2. .. - . Â· Â·.i.-I â€žr. S <1 - 1 :--- -- 1, . 1.-Il. - ly-ly ',â€ž. . I -1 m.. 1, .0 ' 1 . -./4.3 fi Â·â€¢,-Aâ€ž.,4*4., 9 ,:1 Â¥,4., - W~ " ~ I- 18 , 4%4Â·.E/:Â·.....â€žpf.EJ:&- 1 /(52) â€ž 6 4 4-4-.r. ~.1:~ ~ - ~~6Â¤3MÂ«/.c.-~*"~~~ ~~~~~Â· - . "4.82 , . il Â· --y . 'D-:71- . 21.. 11 724- 3 1-3 1 i ..1 ., ... - ..... I ' Â·Â·" .1-- 11#81~ ".1=2,1â‚¬12;45 , Â·: F ';2:t,. e .... . I MW&#AMERIMMA%' ... a /1-,~ f'I~1 ~ 1114'.':id ...31: t~ '0Â·-i.&1 5% -1/â€¢ Il ........ -- . 1 U .- Iiti~-flls- 5 9,5.,.:-.2- . 222= i 1 1 i " .. 1 . i Â· 1 Â·J ./ YjgM--2~ , 1 , 0 . ..: :,+9:.5617- ..2 I 0,2- .1. N . 4 . *:. -rj-*.~ -L . : 2 i ' ..1.1.01/.1 ; ;11 :t*r:i.lt: W. : +~ â€ž 1 0 i___ 1 "' -~:,Â·''~.~.~~1~0IÂ·JAI...IÂ·I I 211 11. . 1.-7.-kd.il 'U. C.... .f'... . I .-I : .1 I. 10 " " ' 1. .. " 1 . . .. 11 . ...... V ...1, , ..> ntll]["1Rr-NE,1 JULL#lit .â€ž. 2/EMO E., , fw 9, iâ€¢Â·2Â·m'/Â·Â·U''ET-'C 2. STREETI * 1- 1- 1 /944% : . ==Il-- Aâ„¢p,ho R{,ad.........Â·- , ,''r:,3 . , - . . 4 . Â·...:,....'. . . '7" ~L rj>-7, - - ..... Al,Jo~ Dâ€¢â€¢â€¢ -Â·'- - -:-.-,-'4~wi----- 40. INK -i.1/IL- - 1%7 ..75 1,1 ./dp//Cown .....--..... .bn, D.â€¢--Â·Â·-â€ž - ~ .....#. - JR 1/' 'A ..... . , iâ€¢ I " i C.... :t'll-'.:;EZZE " J. ' - -UTE- ~irch Ave....-.-.. i. ....../.- Blu,Sp.=Court--- m,/bc. D- - 11 . 1 Brodi~A,cau,- 1-i,4.._ ~ . Estes Park Medical Center lemo To: Little Prospect Addition residents and the public in general From: Andrew Wills, CEO Date: April 10, 2002 Re: Prospect Avenue extension The Estes Park Medical Center, (EPMC), has been experiencing traffic problems for years a-ssociated with two forms of non-medical related traffic. 1. Commuter traffic 2. Delivery traffic. Commuter traffic. When the Moccasin Bypass was built, traffic in increasing numbers began to utilize EPMC's campus as a surface roadway to quickly access the bypass from Stanley Circle Drive, and conversely, to return from it. As a result, EPMC experiences increased safety hazards for its patients as pedestrians, increased potential for automobile accidents, and additional maintenance costs associated with upkeep of asphalt in the parking lots. The extension of Prospect Avenue will alleviate this problem by providing commuter traffic a safer, easier, and faster route between Moccasin Bypass and Stanley Circle Drive. Delivery traffic. Currently, EPMC receives deliveries at the lower entrance to the Medical Center adjacent to the conference rooms. This entrance serves multiple purposes that are inconsistent with one another: deliveries and non-medical public foot traffic. Additionally, the delivery vehicles must coexist with patients that attempt to park near the Physical Therapy entrance. In the future, EPMC plans to relocate the delivery entrance to the facility at the North end of our campus, on the lower level of the building. This project is part of an overall facility renovation. When complete, this delivery entrance would be serviced by the new roadway extension of Prospect Avenue. The result would be a separation of delivery traffic from patient traffic, (car and pedestrian). Again, major safety issues would be addressed when this project is complete. 1 R-lB ~EPMC ESTES PARK MEDICAL CENTER 555 PROSPECT AVENUE â€¢ P.O. BOX 2740 â€¢ ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 PHONE 970/586-9513 â€¢ FAX 970/586-9514 E-mail: awills@epmedcenter.com ANDREW WILLS ChiefExecutive Officer May 8,2002 Public Works Committee c/o Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Members of the Public Works Committee: Estes Park Medical Center, (EPMC), has been working with the Town of Estes Park to extend Prospect Ave. along the Northeast boundary of our campus, connecting to the north drive entrance to our property. Doing so would be a benefit to EPMC strategically and from a liability perspective. As you may be aware, on April 10, 2002, we held a public meeting in EPMC's conference rooms to discuss the roadway extension. EPMC provided information in a memo at that meeting, outlining the need for the road extension, (see attached). Several concerns were raised by those in attendance. Possibly the most significant concern was hospital traffic, (largely employee), that utilizes Stanley Circle Drive to reach EPMC. This is a safety issue for area residents. Instead of reaching consensus on extending the roadway, the discussion shifted to a request from those attending for EPMC to close its north entrance. It is my understanding that this will be an agenda item at the Public Works Committee meeting on May 16, 2002. I would like to address the committee at that time. There may be a compromise approach, that may be beneficial to the Town, the neighbors of EPMC, and to EPMC itself. Thank you for your consideration of this project. Sincerely, 1 I ~+~Vue.A~' uuC lf.,O Andrew Wills Member of American Hospital Association â€¢ Member of Colorado Hospital Association â€¢ Member of Voluntary Hospitals ofAmerica, Inc. Member of Colorado Association and Service for the Aging â€¢ Member of American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging R-lA I , Traffic Study Stanley Circle Drive/ Estes Park Medical Center Tuesday, May 14,2002 Time Hospital Through Stanley Circle 0530-0600 2 0 1 0600-0630 1 1 0 0630-0700 1 1 5 0700-0730 2 2 3 0730-0800 3 1 7 0800-0830 7 1 4 0830-0900 1 0 1 0900-0930 4 1 2 0930-1000 3 2 2 1000-1030 5 0 4 1030-1100 6 4 1 1100-1130 5 0 1 1130-1200 7 1 1 1200-1230 6 0 1 1230-1300 2 0 2 1300-1330 5 3 5 1330-1400 8 2 5 1400-1430 4 0 7 1430-1500 3 0 4 1500-1530 5 3 4 1530-1600 4 2 3 1600-1630 5 0 5 1630-1700 7 1 13 1700-1730 9 10 5 1730-1800 3 1 1 1800-1830 2 0 3 1830-1900 3 1 4 Total vehicles 113 37 94 Hospital: employees or visitors, to or from EPMC/PPLC via Stanley Circle Drive Through: any vehicle that uses EPMC lot to go either direction between Moccasin Bypass and Stanley Circle Drive Stanley Circle: vehicles that use Stanley Circle Dr, either direction, and do not use EPMC lot UlÂ«//E , AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JUNE 20,2002 8:00 A.M. Preparation date: 6/14/02 *Revision date: 1. Hospital/Prospect Ave. Road Connection Project Neighborhood meeting to determine future action. 2. Petition for a Road Connection @ Pawnee Meadows Subdivision (continued from last month). 3. MacGregor Mountain Lodge Proposed Water Tank Site Request approval to lease the Lodge 1 acre foot of Windy Gap as compensation for future tank site. Reports: 1. Misc. Note: The Public Works Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. , 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: June 18, 2002 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane I C '(./ SUBJECT: Prospect Avenue/Stanley Circle Drive Roadway Construction Project Background: Last year the Estes Park Medical Center (EPMQ requested that the Town budget funds for a roadway connection in existing R.O.W. between Prospect Avenue and Stanley Circle Drive as shown on the attached sketch. Subsequently, the Town budgeted $70,000 for the project in 2002. An interesting note is that the hospital made the Â§ame request at the June 1983 Public Works Committee meeting. The August 1983 Public Works Committee recommended that the roadway could be built if the hospital paid for it. At the October 1983 Public Works Committee meeting, the hospital decided not to finance the project. The EPMC and Public Works Department Staff held a neighborhood meeting on April 10th to present the project to interested parties. Approximately 70 people attended the meeting and most were not in favor of the project. Some of the issues discussed were: â€¢ the dangerous short-cut traffic through the hospital parking lot that currently connects Narcissus Drive and Stanley Circle Drive; â€¢ the lack of a second public roadway connection to the Stanley Circle Drive neighborhood. New subdivisions attempt to have two roadway connections and try to plan for such; and â€¢ increased pedestrian danger as a result of the additional traffic the new road would generate through the neighborhood. 1-1 Hospital Staff stated their concern with the public using their parking lot as a thoroughfare between Moccasin and Stanley Circle Drive. A new road connection would help alleviate this problem and the danger associated with it People speaking against the public road connection suggested that the northern connection to the parking lot be either: 1) removed; 2) designated by a sign indicating emergency vehicles only; or 3) gated for authorized vehicles only. Town Staff explained that planning for new subdivisions usually allows for two roadway connections if possible. This policy stems from good engineering design of roadway networks. Staff explained that this 1971-platted neighborhood and its roadway system did not provide a two-road connection. Policy has changed since this area was subdivided. Hospital Administrator, Andrew Wills, spoke to the Committee at last month's May meeting and suggested that the road connection be made and that the existing parking lot driveway connect to the R.O.W. be removed. His opinion is that emergency vehicles could still access the hospital at the new roadway and removal of the dangerous parking lot connection would reduce existing traffic conflict point. All of the issues discussed to date are very important and there are safety "trade-offs" with construction of an additional roadway connection. In particular, the additional emergency access to the neighborhood will improve safety, but on the other hand may increase the traffic through the neighborhood. Cost/Budget: Budget $70,000 Action: Action to be decided after input from all of the parties involved. BL/mjs Attachments 1-2 ' r r 7 -,9-1 # M -4 4& .4-7% R Â¥' - 1* -- 1 -9 ,-11' 1 -1 - , ye 6 T A 7 - 1 41 - 1 1 f 01 1 r r'A- U J . i 1 1 - , - -1 ' 141 -41 , 1131 44 43 + r 1 - F .9 - _ ~~IÂ·-Â¢.34| 2 h; .ie, ./ f /;- 41 L 1 , 9 1 4rf- 4 94 1- -:1' 1 -M 0/<' 4 4 4 . 1- =1 - -1 1 - 1 6 1 -- 1 1 | IL *,t 1 -*r ~ T~, F It 11 1 I 1 -li-~ , 11 1- 1 =51, +41 - , ~~ ; - -ft '12 1- 4 - ./-0 1- /1- - 6 - 1 *1 ~ 41Â¢*+ 1, 1. ,/4, T -- 4:63 f. 1,1 1 9 /1 4 '1 + 1 B 1 : 1* -0 41 -- 1,1 ' %.P -1, . . . . 11 1- ~ ,,t--- ,I'<f~*r * --2 : - -':4. , ~f%~%9 , 'Izp -*i - 1!"* '1.,,94:,-~ 1+* $ 1 - 14'' %11 11 45, - 1 , ', 4460 4 0 JATP L ' _-lh, 44 + i 0 1~Z-2L 116 1- 1 1- It .- h. 1 1 -0/ 41 -559 . I 4 r ... . *, -e k =* 41 * -Fil 1 -2 2, 1- 4 11-3 1 + - r 4 rÂ© . $14+ .e i :1*Ki~Â¥4 4 'i,â€¢ !, 1*yfe - r - 1 '*bir, :diÂ» 2 3016'if-# '* 1--8 +Arick-P--1 k -1 1 -R,t .24. -, 1 - 1 - 1 L -34-- 64* re 4 . 1 , -1 1 4 6 44 +1 il 1.4-4. 4 b-0 . 90%1- 'i 3.1 -74- ,- - i-ir (p J /' : Â·Â·. I 0 19 4 1 1 r-~1. 1-9 . - 20 1 -1 /1./9 9 4 - f.25; 1 9.4 11-1 - -1 0 , '4- La t.-t 4 J - 4 + - 2- 1- - _J- 4 1- . 494'.. - -55 C-Â¥ r ,44 -- 1 40 - -_1 f=-? 1 -1 G 4 * 2 166 ~~â‚¬)*9 ' r** 77.~Aift/-_~2 ~0 - -- 0 !1 - = 7' Mel -/ - 1~ -4 ~ ~ * - 1 - i.- =. 1 t. 1 L 0 - - /41 1 IT- f I 1 1. Â¥r - rIT .,_ 1 + L - - - r r, 4 -Vil~ ~ 1 '31 - I , __ Â£/4 - -2 r 1 J R .VVT- - '-r"i ,:f-*4Â£' â€¢6~ i*Mt *- _ C __~ M 1.- JU -Â· -r -4.-tis# i Ls: it - , -5 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 --+ k. 91% *-1 L . 4. ~72,Â»,/â€¢/*72#euÂ£Â£uztln.Â£20LF - 'I, Prospect Avdnue L = *4 , 7 -- 4 D ----6 - 049&46tu â€¢tw HOAD 2 ij 4 -1= ~ 4,4 #447 . Â»Ir- ~4 -e- & - 1 1 , I â€ž-1 f. r -' , 2 th 13- - 1 1 - 3- 1= L I 1 .d=* - - = 2 2 2- -1 , -1 4 -6-it ... t, 11 1 1. g..r - Flâ€žI. 12 , 1 1 I.:. 1 - 1 -L-- -7- '1~-; t'Â¢.e, rh i... j i.i ,-L - r t 1 1 - F-* 1 I I +-/- 1 1 â‚¬ C- 1 - -r 47<91 1-1. - %1 - -11 .1-1. - - ; 1% #-11 tkâ‚¬*41,4-11tp Â¢--' 1**44 1 - 1 -' 41 / 3 1 , 'High'Streat ,--- 1 -â€¢ , 4 .-Le-- - 10â€¢ 11 -_ 2,=I~ 1- r --4 ..D Jae' - Â¥ - - #Al -1, â€¢4 r 4 -# ~ Â«* ~- -* - - 4, ~-~-----r- r rt.,pâ€¢4Â» 1 4 511 1 4 1 14 1,1 1 4- 4==61 1 - 1 41 , - -~34 t. 4 ; r,i ' t.f - 6 10 .4 - *4.- ~ 7 .r - 1 -4- -1 4 - -T+-1. 1 7 1- 1-~ ) w rl .,. 43*54 .1,6 1-Li, 1 4,4,42 1--Â», .---L@ir 4*ff .. ., 41 7 4 -7 - t.*tt- â€¢ r LE - $ r*Z, 1 .4/-1 1 - 1.- -11, {-3-i I 1 1 W 1 - 0 + I -4 ZIW. 1 - . A g l -- 1 ZIL -1/1 . I IiI * -41 r, i Â¢ - I-larÂ·Â·=21 --- 51- 9- Lili 1 4 - r - - 'Hoce Â·=.5 f N, 3 1 - 1-- 7/4 I - 4,4-1- A-0, 41 - - 2 + .1 + / _ Ill <1#~IL *fl - D-p- L -2'2> r 7- 1 1_ -1-Â· ,#/*.1 1 / ... eÂ·Â·I-Â¢ li filli 1 *-1%, 413 IN~ 4 99. 1 7 4 2, 11 ' 7 -4-1 - 41-4- 1 - '. 4 2 4-* . -68%.1 -r! 4 ,-. . 1 -1 -4 't' .1't T S I 1 lilli- 3-/- ... 1 - 1111 1$2 _ T+1 61--1 1 fi -14 , 1-11 : T I , , - -1 +11 .r f 1 - It 3- 1 1 =1.41 _, 1 1*4 1 1 -1. 1 0.4 49 .. T i - .11 1 0 + - 1,Â·- - 0 4-1 1 - 0,91, .tal, 1 -3. - - 6 1 -- 1 t - .9..1 _ , , 1/ -1 44* 1- 1 1 -- 4 lt- - 1 1- r.. - 1 1 1 - i ' f.--6 +*-r-* 1 -, 9~71/(# 4 4<,~ Â¥11 ' 1 . - - 4- 1 - 1 1 -1 1 <& A- i t - 1 ' - I. - 1 1- 1 - 1 44 -4 .1 i -a=,9 ,-1 4, 8 -7 1 1 1 . i 11- 4,41 -11 6 . F'-54 4 4 * 4 -1 1 -0.1-* 1, i - 4~Fal- I -/~ / IA I -'i' - 1 1-3 1- Im> 11. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS / Public Works Committee - May 16, 2002 - Page 3 1! The Community Reinvestment Contingency Fund for the Board Room can accommodate the additional cost. The Committee recommends approval of the change order requests as presented. 2002 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - REQUEST APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH BIDDING THE OVERLAY PORTION AND PROCEED WITH CHIP SEAL, ETC. Director Linnane explained the work that will occur throughout the year to provide surface improvements to the asphalt infrastructure, such as patching, chip seal & slurry seals, overlaying, rebuilding, striping, and traffic calming devices. The 2002 Budget contains $300,000 for the annual Street Improvement Program. The Committee recommends staff be authorized to bid the project as outlined below returning to the Committee for further action. 1. Patching: solicit prices, award and complete by July, $10,000 2. Chip & Slurrv Seat purchase from A-1 & I.P.P. at 2000 prices and complete in June, $80,000 3, Over/aV paving: bid in May, PWC in June, construct in September-October, $162,000 4a. Rebuild. a portion of Big Horn Dr. in partnership with EPSD & Water Dept., $8,000 4b. Rebuild: a portion of East Riverside Dr. is in partnership with a capital river-wall project and a water department project, construct in the fall, $40,000 Replace curb & gutter and sidewalk, $10,000 (Street maintenance funding) Design scope ($10,687.50) from Van Horn is to be paid by the (Water Department funding) 5. Striping: purchase from United Rentals (1997 prices), install in May and October, $10,000 6, Traffic Ca/mer: construct asphalt Speed-Table on Summit Dr., $5,000 TOTAL $305,000 Locations and quantities may change to remain within the budget and avoid utility company constructions conflicts. REPORTS. Prospect Ave./Stanley Circle Dr. Road Connection Pro~ect. Andrew Wills/Estes - Park Medical Center briefed the Committee on the April lot public meeting regarding the Hospital's requested roadway extension and discussed concerns raised by citizens in attendance. Audience comments were heard from: Mark Igel/168 Stanley Circle; Brenda Reins/165 Stanley Circle; Byron Hall/161 Stanley Circle. Items discussed include: drainage, traffic patterns and studies, access points, notification of public meetings, safety hazards, and signage. Chairman Barker noted that additional public meetings would be beneficial prior to final consideration of the Hospital's request for this road extension and requested that this item be placed on the June 20th meeting to provide a forum for additional citizen input. There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 10:14 a.m. Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC, Deputy Town Clerk 1-4 ESTES PARK MEDICAL CENTER 555 PROSPECT AVENUE â€¢ P.O. BOX 2740 â€¢ ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 PHONE 970/586-9513 â€¢ FAX 970/586-9514 E-mail: awills@epmedcenter.com ANDREW WILLS ChiefExecutive Officer May 8,2002 Public Works Committee do Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Members of the Public Works Committee: Estes Park Medical Center, (EPMC), has been working with the Town of Estes Park to extend Prospect Ave. along the Northeast boundary of our campus, connecting to the north drive entrance to our property. Doing 50 would be a benefit to EPMC strategically and from a liability perspective. As you may be aware, on April 10,: 2002, we held a public meeting in EPMC's conference rooms to discuss the roadwdy extension/EPMC Provided information in a merno at that meeting, blitlining the need for the road extensioh, (see attached). Several concerns were raised by those in attendance. Possibly the most sionificant concern _ .was:hospital traffic, (largely employee), that utilizes Stanley Circle-Drive to reach EPMC. This is a:Â§afety issue for area:residents. Instead of reaching consensus on extending the roadway, the discussion shifted to a request from those attending for EPMC to close its north entrance. It is my understanding that this will be an agenda item at the Public Works Committee meeting on May 16, 2002. I would like to address the committee at that time. There may be a compromise approach, that may be beneficial to the Town, the neighbors of EPMC, and to EPMC itself. Thank you for your consideration of this project. Sincerely, 0Â»Ls- l/jÂ»o Andrew Wills Member of American Hospital Association â€¢ Member ofColorado Hospital Association â€¢ Member of Voluntary Hospitals ofAmerica, Inc. Member of Colorado Association and Service for the Aging â€¢ Member ofAmerican Association of Homes and Services for the Aging 1-5 Estes Park Medical Center lemo To: Little Prospect Addition residents and the public in general From: Andrew Wills, CEO Date: April 10, 2002 Re: Prospect Avenue extension The Estes Park Medical Center, (EPMC), has been experiencing traffic problems for years associated with two forms of non-medical related traffic. 1. Commuter traffic 2. Delivery traffic. Commuter traffic. When the Moccasin Bypass was built, traffic in increasing numbers began to utilize EPMC's campus as a surface roadway to quickly access the bypass from Stanley Circle Drive, and conversely, to return from it. As a result, EPMC experiences increased safety hazards for its patients as pedestrians, increased potential for automobile accidents, and additional maintenance costs associated with upkeep of asphalt in the parking lots. The extension of Prospect Avenue will alleviate this problem by providing commuter traffic a safer, easier, and faster route between Moccasin Bypass and Stanley Circle Drive. Delivery traffic. Currently, EPMC receives deliveries at the lower entrance to the Medical Center adjacent to the conference rooms. This entrance serves multiple purposes that are inconsistent with one another: deliveries and non-medical public foot traffic. Additionally, the delivery vehicles must coexist with patients that attempt to park near the Physical Therapy entrance. In the future, EPMC plans to relocate the delivery entrance to the facility at the North end of our campus, on the lower level of the building. This project is part of an overall facility renovation. When complete, this delivery entrance would be serviced by the new roadway extension of Prospect Avenue. The result would be a separation of delivery traffic from patient traffic, (car and pedestrian). Again, major safety issues would be addressed when this project is complete. 1 1-6 Traffic Study Stanley Circle Drive/ Estes Park Medical Center Tuesday, May 14, 2002 Time Hospital Through Stanley Circle 0530-0600 2 0 1 0600-0630 1 1 0 0630-0700 1 1 5 0700-0730 2 2 3 0730-0800 3 1 7 0800-0830 7 1 4 0830-0900 1 0 1 0900-0930 4 1 2 0930-1000 3 2 2 1000-1030 5 0 4 1030-1100 6 4 1 1100-1130 5 0 1 1130-1200 7 1 1 1200-1230 6 0 1 1230-1300 2 0 2 1300-1330 5 3 5 1330-1400 8 2 5 1400-1430 4 0 7 1430-1500 3 0 4 1500-1530 5 3 4 1530-1600 4 2 3 1600-1630 5 0 5 1630-1700 7 1 13 1700-1730 9 10 5 1730-1800 3 1 1 1800-1830 2 0 3 1830-1900 3 1 4 Total vehicles 113 37 94 Hospital: employees or visitors, to or from EPMC/PPLC via Stanley Circle Drive Through: any vehicle that uses EPMC lot to go either direction between Moccasin Bypass and Stanley Circle Drive Stanley Circle: vehicles that use Stanley Circle Dr, either direction, and do not use EPMC lot 1-7 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: May 10, 2002 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bil.1 Linnane ~~'~6 SUBJECT: Petition for a Town-financed Emergency Road Connection at Pawnee Drive and Cherokee Drive Background: The attached letter and petition request the Town to construct an emergency, non-paved access connection between Cherokee Drive and Pawnee Drive, as shown on the attached maps. The dashed lines in the sketch indicate a dirt road and the heavy lines indicate an asphalt road. The petition and letter ask for emergency access only which would be accomplished by the construction of the creek crossing with culverts and fill material; the remainder of the dirt road in the R.O.W. is accessible by large emergency vehicles. All of the subdivisions west of the proposed connection point have two access roads in Public R.O.W. which is in accordance with good engineering standards, as well as Town policy for new subdivisions. This third requested access point would only improve an acceptable access condition. (Background - Continued on page 2) Cost/Budget Cost Non-paved, double RCP/fill emergency road connection $40,000 6)0 /2#Ad b-) Budget: $0 Action: Staff recommends denial of the Town-financed road connection request. 2-1 Background - Continued ftom page 1 I understand that the Fire Department supports the request since more access roads to subdivisions always improve emergency access. Even though the emergency access situation would improve with another road connection, the Public Works Department hesitates to recommend a connection financed by public funds, since emergency access is already acceptable and in accordance with Town standards. The use of public funds to build an expensive roadway creek crossing that Town policy has established to be the responsibility of the private development (in this case Pawnee Meadows Subdivision), will set precedence for future development BL/lb Attachments 2-2 4 .1 . . 5 -~5 7~2 9 j,pit'r "~ . 9 '.4"' d 6.: ..4 , ~'9~22' IÂ·4"6#f~ 44. 7 ':44'4.22Â¥491392....1 . 7..Â£,- p.;1 1- '14.7,12'fic-f'4Â·i 53 ~ ' .; .1 1 5 P~ 1/ 1 t 2/:tit~ 14.1,>.,1 I , :././ . Â·. f tf: 1 1. I . it' 1.*#.Â· '4/- r....~t ... : /-* I 1 '4 1 .10. ... : . ! 1..,-'C ..:... 1Â£,1 .11 /3....i :7,1.0.~.P :-, 4 V. Â·Â·Â·~ ~ 31Â·''lifti Â·0Â· ... 3.*INZ<. 0 :~.-;f . .W:2 :1 194Â·24A :*Â·9- 54Â·9 ..,S.Jij;ljfk ..f g,4%'. 2., ..~,111 :4 ,../0.=4 4 : .i ~ A g ~94.~p 4144-<" * u 'B1' f:-t . .:/ . ... .2 + .Â¥ 4544?.%> Â·Â·Â·2 - 941 *; . . 4'. i .... b: .Pi 9Â·Â·Â·4 -446'4 " i. 1. . Â·.*-' .7 - t . 4%4 94, - . ~-: ' 00', w. -04:4< 1... /%1*3.'~Ly 16..1 /11,4. I ~r$*~~30{46Â¥~9.4 v - t~~*/3~~:fifi - Â· Â· 4 pÂ· *i.â€¢~4Â·. 4&62~~1*'rft ' 4, 9. '~'~ t.. - 9 4.teÂ»-4 .4 9.- 132Â·- . ' 1.. tri' U., 6.:- .- , '4Â·'-1, I:/' I. + .... 6,0 I â€¢- I. I I <5 41':544fdhi A.:IN.a , - . ... " f.. 11 :,7 ...% , ...:14*#:*11Â· . 4 " 2... e.'.%61* .**': 1 1- 7 - e .. . ... : 44 Al *NE' 4.â€¢ .1 . f ..16'F~tÂ·j:. flitlffitee: -'~Â·i~~,.+1 4,â€ž ~,4 1".. -4.41.trl:Â·:;Â·2>f--- Ai'.1. . . fy'I:.193,%.... ,~ .. .~,.- 7,0. . . -v~ .. % 5.7 94. ...tr, CAVI Â· Â·3, 'twhi':'2 j :- 5'.".0' ,< * " * 11ri.# .. -Â·2 '~0.2 .,- ~.232* ~ â‚¬ 1<7-=<*.1=44 i.V . f. 4. :. .':15<,4 1,1 1 9 + si: tr 7/$ >*ii ~ ..* t# t.Â·, Â· ~. . 4.7 .2*e<*17 *I.0 ->-=I ~ :':- ~--t~-Twi-:in-â‚¬-r- Â·--r J I--,cf*~2 -t-7-22Â«-331?1~3;tft -- . . rr. ..... 0.4 .NJ S.7.6,"-:'.42>1~.'=. â€ž . .Ap .. ; ,~ ~; f.:t ~19.- : 0 4 ~ t.le -i: . a . ~- ' .1 .>57' Â· r 4.Â·,..'* Fbr:.2j'P ~~ V f .... - 11:fl:444.t.'. flit.iÂ·./. .,rÂ· 1, . F.Â· ~~" ~~ ~,Â·,Â· 1Â»4.-~-:...itet'Â·.t .3Â·:Â·4491:>-4 4~Â·. : 5/84*63%/Ebr/Fil *16' : ';' : .G . 3% ~ '/44 .-CY.*41.Â·369 .... 16Â·.Â·Â·Â·.Â·=.Â·r eli ./ :- 1 -*444%/em*.6#kers# 126 . , 1 .1 .#t .je . ffilth-- 2 -...,s bil : 1.1 ,.44 4.4...f.:%:...9.: .01'..,tti~.-r-J *Â·.4- 504*397$3014%-,-~;t fifi.t. . 9.1 1 r ' A~')FagÂ·f,<Rit*t?; -33Â·.~~; F :. 1 '- Â·Â· .plail: O.:7Â·.-:p~ . Â· .r :$3*, 24Â»..03,1 .4 4. , 40Â¥*ifi ia 5- 3: , : 31<riâ‚¬tly?iÂ·.4, .of:~ 4: i ; - Â·. " : Â·) - 7'Â·,1.?to~iÂ· ' ~ ' * 4 ,4(:1,- . *.,~ ~:w*:.z:. c'..i #.1*..:.:- -. Â£05 4 t/F/'.. 34Â¢40.i'.3 44-3.iiI.* 744 I .*'.4 1 /105Â·* . . :. 34 $ hÂ· .. f . 3*fi..:ff<t:fs} y ~ .. ~t..t . ..4..>40.:. Â» 2* .:... ~ :r /. u,3 *. 1 4 1 1 42 -. Â»,3 f..4 ,;AN 1 5, - , ' 'Â· t. , 2' .Â· Â·Â· . d, '0 1 l. 4*fl. I . 4Â· 9 ' .3.t. 2% , 4.Â· ~1:" . * '. :T./. .AJâ‚¬1~,<*:Â·1!27 t .. Â· , 44-9 .... I :464.-' I ~~~ -:.4 v k : I. 2-3 .. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, May 16, 2002 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 16th day of May 2002. Committee: Chairman Barker, Trustees Doylen and Gillette Attending: Chairman Barker and Trustee Doylen Also Attending: Â· Town Administrator Widmer, Public Works Director Linnane, Facilities Manager Sievers, Fire Chief Dorman, Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Absent Trustee Gillette Chairman Barker called the meeting to order at 8:04 a.m. PRESENTATION OF PETITION FOR AN EMERGENCY ROAD CONNECTION AT ~megEE- PAWNEE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - ED McKINNEY. Ed McKinney presented a letter and petition requesting construction of a non-paved emergency access connection between Cherokee Dr. and Pawnee Dr. The letter was made a part of the record by reference thereto. Director Linnane reported that all of the subdivisions west of the proposed connection point have two access roads in public right-of-way, which is in accordance with engineering standards and Town policy for new subdivisions. This third requested access point would improve an already acceptable access condition, therefore, staff does not recommend a connection financed by public funds. The use of public funds to build a roadway creek crossing that Town policy has established to be the responsibility of the private development (in this case Pawnee Meadows Subdivision), will set precedence for future development. The developer will automatically be required to make the connection upon development of the subdivision. Chief Dorman confirmed that the Fire Dept. requires that roads be 14' wide and constructed of all surface and all weather materials. He indicated that private matching funds are available through the Forrest Service to aid in road construction. Other areas discussed include: historical and emergency access, wetland crossing, ISO ratings, and Special Improvements Districts. Due to the absence of Trustee Gillette, the Committee continued this item to the 4- June 20th meeting prior to issuing a recommendation. RIVERSIDE DRIVE/SUNDANCE CENTER CONDOMINIUM PROJECT - PARKING REQUEST. Director Linnane explained that the Sundance Center has converted a portion of its building into 12 condominium dwelling units. Since adequate parking space is not available onsite, the owner is requesting use of the Confluence Park parking lot as permanent parking for the 12 condos. It should be noted that the Town currently has a ' team researching the downtown-parking situation and the status of all parking lot time limits may be subject to change in the future. Spencer Smith/Sundance Center spoke in support of this request and explained their projected tax revenues and proposed changes to the property. Following all discussion, the Committee denied the request to allow Sundance Center use of the Confluence Park parking lot as permanent parking for the 12 condos. Chairman Barker noted that parking is a major component of the 2-4 May 10, 2002 fo: Board ofTrustees, Town of Estes Park Public Works Committee Subject: Request for opening ofPawnee Dr. between Hwy 7 and Cherokee Dr. The accompanying petition requests the full opening ofPawnee Dr. by October 31, 2002. While this is physically possible, we realize there are both logistical and economic constraints: first, the developer is under no time line for completion ofthe project, and second, the town historically does not pay to build roads for developers. These are two large impediments to seeing the road completed soon. While construction and incidental traffic is a nuisance to residents ofProspect Estates, there is a much larger issue: that ofpublic safety, in terms of adequate emergency vehicle access. Within the dotted area on the accompanying map, there are 126 single-family dwelling lots. As ofthis date, there are 80 homes in the defined area. The rate ofbuild-out continues to accelerate. The only two access points to this area at present are through Prospect Estates offofPeak View, or through Arapaho Meadows offofHwy 7 near Marys Lake Rd. Fire Chief Scott Dorman concurs that access on Pawnee Dr. to the core of the referenced area would enhance emergency iesponse capabilities for fire, police and medical emergencies. We would like to see Pawnee Dr. fully opened to traffic this October. Again, we understand some ofthe impediments to the likelihood ofthis happening. I'm sure there are considerations ofwhich we are unaware. We request the town give this situation its best look in all its aspects, but PLEASE- at least provide the area with emergency access relief by constructing a rudimentary connection which would permit expeditious access to the core area by emergency vehicles. Thanking you in hopes of favorable consideration, 264 M c U.. f & /4//Myt-'29 Ed McKinney for the petitioners 2-5 1- / IL-_13 ...76 * 9 r - t. 1 \ f , 1 ;24 L 6 \U / E 2 08 9 dew T 0 5/. ./6.. d , i E . Al,/76-~ 4 :- j. - m NE: 1 40 1 10 :ZE /... 0 0. ...Aim#ir,4#4 2~2..... Mill ul.-: i *1 1 8:Â§ . 1 1 :16 . dift 8 5 21.41 1. .20 1 1 li r (4 ABQ' ii , 2 02* 4. / 232 -4 i ... 0 . d iii] i 11 , 9 , f Q OK ' 028/ I ' f. , ... le' it 1 5:13 mi , b f N.. d E/</0 4 41: 1 lili liÂ¥ i :um:= 'Nx '::f. :... C.ii" ...: I .. 1*'14 1 f Iii g h \ 4 51:230 4 10 N<Z b <P . 16 -I... 4-45*. ii HU D]f! i 1 1:2 .-. 4/5.7 E- S . , %2: . Ent ; k. I H tfil ite# 1 1 i!! 1 , 3.4 4.915.4~ 8/ 4 /47 <4@t 52 -:11 !249,02# A.1 : 1 4/ /1-1 Â»\\ //49#10 ~i il ji.â€¢ ilill! liall li 62 1! :~!i fl~i!! t!~!! ! iiI g 47 e / / ..4 1Lfititimm i :11 4 .f .t 22*49:.8 1 1.1 1! .id.inindims : Ill + a/' 4Â¥Â§91 H illii!1111!111111 i .7. i i 1 . 191 / 1 , 1111 1 1 1 2 4 34/ 1 4*Â¢ 448 X 5 ;21 ~i i ; W N e:w: : q ~1 0 P~I i ; 1 1. 'll m : i Â· .111 /immi~ L ~-9 21-_ - 5 *'0# 1 4 = 21 J i- 4 1 ..All 1 , 111 1 ! i 14: 1 &[1 1 8-5 1 14] 1 , tilit . , 21 1 f -0 1 -3,- 4- - 6.1 h :11 i 1 i u, 1 0 iii! i ! e i.,11 1 mi . mi 1 1 1% 1 L 411 i 6.2 i r---- --- ..: U M. 06 112 2%9 R It / t:1 \ die \:1:1 // 1 \ / 011 -1 2 2292 *5, , , I taze 0 0 Â» 03,1, Â»01 ~ IIi-14 -44 - 11 Â£251:1 L 4* 4- 4 I.#1./1:~~~0 1 1 ammail 11 031 D # 1 1,10,0,- 1Â¤Ng.2 1 031:CS= I.- I | ZE*%88 1 8 lilli 1 1 zf~2 1 4 135 1 ...4 i 1-- t,:1. Z - :440 00 i \4 , 11': ,, *i<*,-T *:-ibb 111 81 1 0 i 1 1 1 1 . 1-2 1 9 0 1 4- -Se.j e, 1 J 4] 1 Z N\. W LU 3 1 1 4/ ' 1\ -25- h i )11 b D 11! Z Ui Â§,t Â· thF Ibli i A Iwj/ - -'Lust --- ---- -1 1. 2-7 DNnU U o swoons MOOV3/ 33NMÂ¥/ 13310&,d Â£~gog 00 .bld Sl.LS3 ILE X08 -0'd / CM(10,1 dÂ¥'Al 1111410 A gui-989 (0Â£6) Ent,1 110 05 NI N] Shia.U,WnS WiQLO Â£ X06 8 Â·ON 133rold I :10 1 :133HS 000Z Â·ONI 'SH]3NIM 09 SM 0A1,Wr XyÂ¥d SalS] @ DEDICATION 7,0.toitddly s.rouuwn s.z 'IVAOEddY 2.1 DI UN)83 SNIZNIONE PliCIrVI. PINâ„¢ SUBDI'lâ„¢ON ACRES-L IR'/30/3 ADD~)11 IM,096 MIA')01 SURDIVBION ST,OS 00{dÂ¥20 ACRES 221.679 SF kl3NBOO 11@3dohld 1SaMHLMON 01 31 r ~4 NA i ' Wi - -Iftent IiI 0 5 Â§ 4, 4 f *31 : 8 *, W 1 4 ~.1122Â£'Motl B m 01 1 G j - *,do,91.-wl'-5 *#3 ~4; 11 ; ' 5 61 4 il "1 11 tr=.=1==i i ~ 1. 114 71 1 8 ~i . . 1 4 0 '84 5 /r-,6:6:7-MA-; /1/Wl M '13 Di LW 9 , tiÂ· 3 2 iiI !! 1- Â·i 5 -il}zer'R:'3(t~ ,/lii; i ,/.~4 0 Jit' i * i!! 1:j : i * Â·itij lin Â· I b 1 Mi i im i_ i id aill .unor,-.24'_r.._, 1~ lb----F b.. ~ LLEE= 3bt , / 4/1 75 j. 3 6 11 5 li i . P.FNED-fPE , .7 -'.5 S - 1 r------___ 11 #91 g WK-)Lif. *-**Â·Â·Lit Â·it,/ I 1/ 1 -â€¢.e 14 L-4.-tur 1 1 12 5 x r ,3 94: ; L -li- -- ----' ,; 2 6/ i : 0\ 4 1 0 = c 11* 11: Z 4 - - --t 457\+ I Na :5 ' - \ 1 6 411; , 81!i 6 5 144: .fl:p <~ z:1 1 1 i. R F; L-I_ f 8 1 91\' / 1 1 0 1 Z /! 0 /6 01&! 01*1 6 $] r Â·, A-N ' L--- teÂ¢W: f..., 8 . w 1, 1 Iii re: 1, P ~it!% , - 11.- '' .4,4- .4 4 6. 91 L 62 E f: f ,-~i *t-t.--21'\11-14 4 9 1 1 1 WJ : 9 01= ./ it:/ 3 11 ili Â§ 2\ \. $ 6% 94~1 E tele 1 - il-Il-.- ' , F WI, A i--Â·â€¢Crt'--3.R!.EVE...., 13 : B C!.1. I . ul < 5 - o=FiEM 3---- 3 1% 01[di ! ~ Â£ 2 i Â£ 6 tz w , 4 3/' tlk' 1 2#8% 01 Billi 91:=3 1 1 81 I 0 : U: 3 4118 3 11 i.1 gil 25 ulze: il. 1 Â°: i _%% il O q O ___ :2% 11 111 1- 9192 1 , Z. .. jig*ti'Z\\ 2 - 0 /.-h 11 H I n i i i 1 1 9 O - i i i i i ik i 0 419$ r /1 .1 li !1.. mili 6 8 1 i Iii! 1 i' 1 i P a *m 4 0 - 4 \\\ ~ Â·4 111 2 1 IiiÂ· 1 E 'E' 2 W\, b~ iii ill likiii \\\ 5 ~A., 2 .R 511 *JU#In#/PR#4 ./. iâ€¢ i k*FVHARb 11 i \,1 ,~ ~i*eq~~ -- ,~ ~ 4"14.9," .... 3 -,00..10.~' 5 'Hfunpar . 4 8 4 il:5 1 1111}1111}11111 1 4 923 \\L h' 11,6 ' g '.fi il'* d. bh 1OOO358Da;03538 - 4 j Imi# 1 22!:41 1{ 1% 2 1 1.-' 1 1-* Ill+0/. 3\ 84 \\\ \\\ 1 40 194 14 /130/ ~tR + M \ ii 4 PTy#W C $ 006Â·001 -4\ 3 Y Â·...' 2-8 STEELE BDIVISION 100 0 NOISIAK]enS S/AO<]Â¥]M 331033 LOCATED IN THE SW 1 SECTION 2, AND THE FINAL PLAT FOR CHERO UBDIVISIO 31*011%1830 53315 1 30 087 V0Idle30 S.B]3NION] NMOL NW 1/4 OF SECTION 977,24 1 March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening of Pawnee Drive between HWY 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents of the town of Estes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address STe ve S 1+ 6 uhAI+ L 1639 <ClosfECT eaTA-TES DR, '/ V /)16*9Â£97-c )96â‚¬Lm A-,/Â£.; ~~-~]~â€ž~Jf, '*,6/ /635- /3>/2 05Â»PEâ‚¬7 8-STA'Tes be LyÂ·f 4kl44,14 R.(-6 ~f->el.Si~- 2*+I~~~De.. ~ /Rold 3 *9cd,0Â£ '94,1 1465,1/k E.9 7 165= fbospod >st - hi. ~ < 1 <<2<1 '1'1 h' A Â»Â»*Quff- (24.2 4 634- -133 A--o,FAm-Â£@- 27- 1 Flt V -29 14Â« 1 62 0 ~fr ge>kx- EST- Dr \ fr. AÂ»els. Â«-- +09 '*273-a- U-~, 4 07 31.4- C 1--f 77 14Â«'Â· Â©12.iLIX9--7)- L /Â·' -*ul,-4 1 1 0/ 5 A-P.4--c$,;~o< 9/4~bÂ°3-Â» / 6//V- . 2-9 March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening of Pawnee Drive between HWY 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents of the town of Estes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address luaAD_Â£00/b - 51 W u_-j .[ 6 49 0 Â©pea- 4/E 7)1 /Lps- 9* -- t.,Â£t- L+./34- ./.4&,flle.P j di' 1 #1! 27..TV.'- - - .- ~6125- i~hetÂ»* Ed@kÂ© 111? f 1 C g I . 1 10-7 Prospeck 64=43 bÂ« /646 Pros peer- Es+Jes br. Â£ C./ 4~244441 1- ~-A<Â£9,A-A / 640 ? v e,~spu_A- E-q-1- bv. 015 47 72 797 -p21#KEL&4..4 /.6*ZÂ«Â»/ ) 6.99 joile>17* cr p971 UR. /1 / j , 1 475 -N os pect Est. 3*. . 7.7 ve> (FLASPE C. 7- 419 7. A.0 - Lâ€ž.210441" (2-Litag \700 -iÂ» sppa <61. Ik_ I y (70( P / fe-osoicÂ¥- Esr<=1- f> ~1Â». (3>Â«f#23 1 70 1 2(DS/tt/-- ~60~5 )1--Â· 2-10 March, 2002 Board ofTrustees, Town ofEstes Park Subject: Opening ofPawnee Drive between Hwy 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents ofthe town ofEstes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow ofthe above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address P ve . fl c Kls-7: / 6 85- P're,<f- Elo~,th:Ac,) LD n,- -t.&<Mp~71-Â· c / 6 55 P jÂ»6-gy-49t t. t- Ck. ~h'UL C ~ g~-31 3 34 PA,~fj E+Gt4 C.t, 4 3 7 9 f rbu-c-1 9- 4.- 1 A Â·4. Â£--71 0-1 15 1 U, . 'I 0 F+-j-Lvi, A-,~: . 147 0 471-4.-4 -20- R,â‚¬ A- 4--244.,c<LL..34/U -0- /3:- 16*fl/, 20Â£-VGJ V f 4 -4-4=1 2-22 --k-AÂ·~-+ 4~Lt L/''U=L.~â‚¬-j - / 49 0 61.Â»U.44121'. A n (f~ 4.644 ~-~ 1 ..0(4491, .'93-0 4.4 -Â«,41~0~*~ -*Â·44 r - 432 7 6/ 0 1 4,/ A \J 5Ok~j AA// -2 . -kkeekâ‚¬/1 - I(r.44 ProspcolÂ· EhtÂ«1 0% Dr,vcÂ° I, I- 349 Inuj\,O L 14-152)11-4,lff*43 lo 1 5 9, 03-Â¢96*5-imje s- J?j>j'(, fw y.7./[39 1 c.* i / 43 0 014444-7~ 4-4 , UÂ«-) * _27 ' 170-35 0,~U , _it k i Â·- IL. v.2-2 .. 1-70. \Â»5/ - -Cce-44 -~7 3 /J- -V- '10-- i U./ 2%#--- 264501 , 70 3 frÂ».s &le AÂ· 22-s-(43-e~ .lbr . 2-11 March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening ofPawnee Drive between Hwy 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents ofthe town ofEstes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow ofthe above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Narne Street Address /2 1 9 1 (23 L 1* 4Â£94â„¢*r- 4Gm- D e 2 +- { J AtÂ£J U.GUI, Â£--17>Uti /776*14,. Ce - tkas -)=--r 1\jiONA lij 47-9/0 /63/ i/> Repeff fo/Ad D,h . 425-2:K pv 1-70"6 lomspe--/ 4/." Z), 49'GAE) GuuÂ« /708 Rtsped Est,jles bhut Eskâ‚¬R.1,1 CO 865/7 Lik Â·c274Â» 1 1-Joq Fru)19607[ 6-rATES OR.. E ,;.y(A - l-*04- Re:QÂ»-- 9*Pr:50% -OR .J, / ,6 i.uÂ·. Ef- / 1, CO C<; .~. 23g~f'/ 4%57 Â«0Â·2., / 6:6;/- 9 /tif,.29 4.yy~9:%23*ZE, ZI?2Â¢' U ,/L W-34-_ frf/bocc,L" 4% , 618 4,231 pe-ef 4 -331:u . # j 1 111 1--9 1 D ~fa{44 Osf . fj~ i /r' \ i l \fi) /4-Â«3. Jr~-. 6( - , 7 to A<xyÂ» (5-- g;307 44_. / him-i k 74 td_.Uk-, 11,90*o~aÂ£Â©1 duu Il I 0. 41 2-12 March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening of Pawnee Drive between HWY 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents of the town of Estes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address an ti tricue tvt. t~c.Â©ALL 161 9 0 Larnon O A-Â£ of_ O r-.3 :Â·:/; n j 49 1-4,02;2-* 11 1, p 9 21/Â£--1 4 r*/ 2,1 0 )neL,Â· 264 ELe./., 24 ;c,-e 9' 4 1 *ti}41-2-YA ./7--0..--*~~--f. 153> -So ) tD,cy, r. en .~. 14/7~.AU )Â·442Â« 1 7 6 1 0 10 Â»f 80/ D/4 ,-2(f 4 &6*u, <biÂ·t >Â»Â«Li.,/4Â»ttj 6,-V 1 Zkg-77 k A gulej 45-4 50/Om r>, t-24. Â»49.V 25Â£1 50 l 0 17-7 0 in {Dr OLUJ.} 1 .- , 25, 39(23:4 0.1, DA 1Â£Lkkrut fioi j 29? SAGA rn/31.1 of Â·- '(3.4.5-.IL,/... /OLD,Mut,U 1:262- 711 . L~(477(1, A 37 -4 <4â€¢ râ€ž l=Q,I,Vt&%9-4J-2- U 2-13 March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening of Pawnee Drive between HWY 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents of the town of Estes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic fiow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address 7, 10 3.2 * .1 1- C ~Nullit.11427 ~,Â·L-0 AA;IQ . .. t-, 0 ._-3 0 i oÂ·Â»t a, D N . 2 32â‚¬.5 - /21 F K 1 . - A 9 <-1 6.1 d 46,er,* ik, ~:i-,4, /9,0_ 7 1,-22 44 YA.42 2-5/ -0,1.0,40/U Â£)20 'AC -rES , A A 01 f) ' 4)041,1,442 .~ '1'\Â©Fbea. -,1.2 it/ ,%61 11)Â»),1 3-0 A DA . 'â‚¬21 421-0- LJ/' 1 - (A . 14/vA A i' 2-1, r 5,4-U-' AÂ«44&.4- ;442 11-Ott-+ 2-1 â‚¬ 26 /D yrkrn ~14Â»â‚¬, EW-44 IL JL 0, . 261-J-*2.,30 01-71.- c~z JU.u-,u C\,4/ A~ 4 jj j 2 11 _4 66Â«Â· 1.2 C 1166Â»0.Y Â»4 7 *(,dhk J f '-r-- A d & ; 10 4 ...U Ul J 1 0 I.d5,&Â£69:al.iY, 1 6 ---7 904'U 2/7 24 v. . -e--Cr ~'1, 619.,7 42~ . At-JigAt- i 6/.Â·21.1-_ *Lu.~~â€ž_ A . gi---- ~9 9 # D-nA.-,0-*,#.u (0~ k. 44,16uo PQLA 7 .- /) 41 ..â‚¬ /6.33 601<-Vi.a-7 61,Â· t.do ./ 2,. 84, 2,4 h h â€ž C 7 2-14 March, 2002 Board ofTrustees, Town ofEstes Park Subject: Opening ofPawnee Drive between Hwy 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents ofthe town ofEstes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address 06â„¢70 ncl'Aft 1690 Pro#,04 File-45 Nive / 09 0 Yer a ~)Â«-ci- Eated-es D M ve- 444. -10 j~of ~Mfict <201-atiÂ© /juve /694 Prospect Est-cutes Drite LwÂ» [U 1 69Â£1 ?rospec\- 64Â£65 Drke HUnter Hwoor] 944& por_4 464 D r i Ve t~4- t~16 er-v\Ae Le\0 41â‚¬- 54-eehe_ 04- 955/7 2-15 March, 2002 Board of Trustees, Town of Estes Park Subject: Opening of Pawnee Drive between HWY 7 and Cherokee Drive We, the undersigned residents of the town of Estes Park, hereby request that you direct the town administration to take any and all such steps as may be required to assure completion of construction and full opening to traffic flow of the above mentioned street, prior to October 31, 2002. Name Street Address Â»c:v,U2 0Â«-Â«- L..4 V..... Al 3 & OU i-- b v,- I 118 ) / .17/ A Ai j /Bf#/1 7,4 / %,1- ./ /(ft'*41 â‚¬ A 7 irt +4Â», O A P. -v,v 2-16 MEMO TO: Public Works Committee/Board of Trustees FROM: Gregory A. White DATE: June 14,2002 RE: Water Rights - MacGregor Mountain Lodge BACKGROUND: Accompanying this memo is a proposed lease of water rights between the Town and the Warren and Ruth Clinton Charitable Remainder Unitrust ('lessee"). The Lessee owns MacGregor Mountain Lodge (the "Pfopeity'0. Piesently, the Property's primary water supply is a domestic well which has a very junior priority date. Lessee is currently pursuing an augmentation plan in order to continue the current use of the well. The Lessee has requested that the Town lease one acte-foot of the Town's Windy Gap watcr to be used in Lessee's augmentation plan. In consideration of the lease of the Windy Gap water, Lessce agrees to provide the Town the following benefits: 1. Pay the sum of $200 per year foi the lease of the water. 2. Upon extension of the Town's watei system, to purchase a tap for the property 3. If the Town's future improvement to its water system requires constriction of a storage tank on Lessee's property, Lessee will give an easement to the Town for such storage tank at tio cost (The Town's Water Master Plan indicates that the Fall River High Zone Tank may be located on or near Lessee's propeityo I reviewed dic proposed lease and subject to modifications set forth below in the recommendations, I believe the lease is acceptable. It should be noted that Windy Gap.water is ideal for augmentation plans as it can be totally consumed without any requitement of return flows. The Town's Bureau water and CBT water are not available for augmentation plans as the return flows from use of this water are the property of the Noithern Colorado Water Conseivancy Distinct. BUDGET: There are no negative budget implications. The $200 per year payment will more than defray the annual cost of pumping and delivefing thc one acre-foot ofWindy Gap water. (Approximately $50.00 per acre-foot per year.) The granting ofthe easement for the storage tank and distribution lines will provide the Town with a tank site at no cost. Cost of obtaining a tank site and easement is at least $20,000. 3-1 ACTION: Staff recommends approval of the lease subject to the following modifications: 1. Paragfaph 2.2 of the Lease be amended to provide the Lessee shall physically connect to the Town's water system when the system is available; and 2. The grant of easement for a storage tank include the grant of all necessary access easements and easements for distribution facilities from and to thc storage tank. 3-2 DRAFT - June 10, 2002 LEASE OF WATER RIGHTS THIS LEASE OF WATER RIGHTS ('leaseD is made and entered into as of the .day of , 2002, by and between the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Colorado ("Town"), and THE WARREN AND RUTH CLINTON CHARITABLE REMAINDER UNITRUST ("Lessee'V. RECITALS A. The Town is the owner ofthree (3) units of Windy Gap Project water ('#Windy Gap Water' 3, as such units are defined in the Allotment Contract between the Municipal Subdistrict of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District ("Municipal Subdistrict") and the Town. The Town utilizes its Windy Gap Water as part o f an augmentation and exchange plan decreed in Case No. 97CW126, Water Division No. 1. The Town also owns units of Colorado-Big Thompson Project water ("CBT Water"), which it can use to firm the yield of its Windy Gap Water pursuanI to the collateralization policies and regulations ofthe Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District ("Northern District") and the Municipal Subdistrict. B. Lessee owns real and personal property located at 2815 Fall River Road ("Lessee's property"), between the Town and Rocky Mountin National Park, within the boundaries ofthe Northern District and within the boundaries of the Municipal Subdistrict. Wood Mountain Management, LLC operates a lodging business on Lessee's property, known as the McGregor Mountain Lodge. McGregor Mountain Lodge provides year round guest accommodations with a maximum capacity of approximately 80 persons. C. Presently, Lessee derives its primary water supply for the McGregor Mountain Lodge from the Schubert Well No. 1-45635, decreed in Case No. W-5831, Water Division 1, for commercial use with apriorit:y date of May 1, 1971. In addition, three springs on Lessee's property serve as a source for limited irrigation and as an emergency potable water supply. Due to the Schubert Well's relativelyjunior priority, Lessee has been involved with efforts to have thc Town's water supply system extended to supply Lessee's property. Because of its elevation however, Lessee's property currently cannot bc served by the Town's gravity flow system. Until the Town's system can be extended to Lessee's property, the Water Commissioner for Water District 4 has informed Lessee that an augmentation plan must be in place for the current use of the Schubert Well. Accordingly, Lessee desires to lease augmentation water from the Town. D. The Town is willing to lease a portion of its Windy Gap Water to Lessee, in accordance with the tel:mS and conditions ofthis Lease. 3-3 AGREEMENT For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Lease. Subject to the limitations, terms, and conditions stated herein, the Town hereby leases and agrees to pfovide Lessee a maximum of one (1) acre-foot ofthe Town's Windy Gap Water each calendar year during the term ofthis Lease, or, in the Town's discretion, from such other water rights owned by or otherwise available to the Town which may be lawfully used to supply water to Lessee under the terms and conditions of this Lease, and in accordance with any applicable regulations of the Municipal Subdistrict and Northern. The water shall be delivered by the Town at locations suitable for replacement of depletioils by Lessee consistent with the manner and points of delivery set forth in the Town's augmentation and exchange plan in Case No. 97CW126. 2. Initial Term. Potential Extension of Town Supvlv System. and Option to Extend. 2.1. The tenn ofthis Lease shall be for five (5) years beginning on , 2002 and shall terminate on , 2007 ("Initial Terra"), unless terminated sooner pursuant to the provisions ofthis Lease. 2.2. During tile Initial Terra, the Town will evaluate the possibility of extending its water supply system up the Fall River corridor to Lessee's property, however, it is explicitly recognized that this Lease in no way obligates the Town to make such an extension. If the Town determines to extend its water supply system to Lessee's property, then Lessee shall purchase a tap to be supplied from the Town's water supply system and consent to annexation into the Town limits. If extension ofthe Town's water supply system requires the construction of a storage tank on Lessee's property, the Town shall make all reasonable efforts to assure that the location, use and maintenance of such tank does not interfere with the quiet enjoyment ofLessee's lodge guests, and Lessee shall grant an easement to the Town for such storage tank at no cost. 2.3. Ifthe Town chooses not to extend its water system or has not yet made its determination, as of _ , 2007, Lessee may extend the term of this Lease for an additional fifteen (15) years to , 2022 ("Extension"), upon the same terms and conditions by giving written notice to the Town ofits intent to exercise this option to extend. 3. Rent. Lessee agrees to pay the Town Two Hundred and no/100 dollars ($200.00) pcl; year in advance for any water supplied during that year under this Lease up to the one (1) acre foot maximum; this payment shall be nonrefundable and not contingent upon Lessee's actual usage of the water during that year. Payment for delivery ofwater by the Town for the first year of this Lease shall be made upon execution ofthis Lease. Subsequent payments to the Town shall be made by Lessee on December 1 st of each year for the following calendar year. If the Lodge fails to make any payment when due, such delinquent payment shall incur interest at the rate of 1.5% compounded monthly until paid. After the first year, and upon written notice and supporting 3-4 documentation given by the Town to Lessee, the lease price of $200.00 may be adjusted yearly by the Town at the time of payment to reflect the percentage increase or decrease in water rates charged by the Town to residential customers living outside the city limits. 4. Use of Leased Water. Lessee shall use the water supplied by the Town pursuant to a court-approved plan for augmentation or exchange, or pursuant to a State Engineer-approved temporary substitute supply plan, to replace out-of-priority water depletions occurring in connection with pumping of the Schubert Well No. 1-45635 and the three springs located on Lessee's property, for domestic and irrigation uses associated with Lessee's property. 5. Deliveries of Water. The Town will make deliveries of the Windy Gap Water as directed by Lessee upon reasonably advanced notice. The specific timing and amounts ofthese delivaies will be determined by the State Engineer pursuant to the tenns ofa plan for augmentation or exchange approved by the water court or temporary substitute SUpply plan approved by the State Engineer. Lessee will endeavor to obtain a water Court decree which does not require releases at such times or in such quantities as are burdensome to the Town. 6. Augmentation Plan. Lessee shall have the right to seek and obtain water court approval of a plan for augmentation or exchange, or a State Engineer-approved temporary substitute supply plan, using the Town's Windy Gap Water as a source of augmentation or replacement water. All such proceedings shall be conducted by water rights counsel and engineering consultants selected by Lessee, at Lessee's sole cost and expense. No application, stipulation, or consent decree shall be filed, signed, or adopted by Lessee without prior review by and consent of the Town; provided, however, that in no event shall the Town withhold such consent by reason of any requirement that is specifically.addressed in this Agreement. The Town shall not file a statement of opposition to Lessee's water court application, and the Town shall fully cooperate with Lessee in connection with the application by providing such information and assistance as is reasonably requested by Lessee, its water rights counsel, or its engineering consultants. Lessee shall structure any application for approval ofplan for augmentation or exchange to require the least number and the largest quantities of deliveries ofwater as is acceptable to the water court and the State Engineer. No change of the Town's water rights shall be applied for or reviewed in such proceedings. Lessee shall be solely responsible for operating and maintaining the existing totalizing flow meter or such other devices as may be required by the water court or State Engineer to operate the augmentation plan. Lessee shall also be solely responsible for preparing, maintaining, and compiling accounting forms or other reports required by the State Engineer in connection with the augmentation plan, to the extent not otherwise required from the Town. Lessee shall promptly provide the Town with copies of any reports (including accounting forms) to or correspondence with the State Engineer relating to the augmentation plan. 7. Approvals. Lessee will be responsible for obtaining all necessary authorizations, approvals, water court decrees, and permits from any and all private entities, and local, state, and federal agencies, as may be required to effectuate this Lease. Lessee shall provide copies of any such authorizations, approvals, and pennits to the Town upon its request. 3-5 8. Untreated Water. The water delivered to Lessee under this Lease is untreated or non-potable water of whatever quality is now or in the future available from the sources specified herein. Delivery ofnon-potable water under this Lease will be on an "as is" basis only, and the Town does not warrant the quality of the water. The Town does not warrant the suitability ofthe Windy Gap Water for any particular purpose, and Lessee hereby acknowledges that it has made its own evaluation of the Town' s water and its appropriateness for use by exchange at Lessee's property. Lessee shall not make any claim against the Town arising tom the quality of water delivered, and the'Town shall have no water treatment responsibility for non-potable water made available under this Lease other than such responsibility it would have otherwise apart from the Lease. 9. Firming of Windv Gap Water. To reduce variability associated with the yield of Windy Gap Water and to enable the year-round delivery ofwater pursuant to this Lease, the Town shall utilize its CBT Water to firm up or collateralize its Windy Gap Water in accordance with the policies and regulations of the Northern District and the Municipal Subdistrict. 10. Costs and Chargel. The Town shall be responsible for payment of the annual debt service and the United States Bureau ofReclamation fixed charge allocated to the Town's Windy Gap Water and all carriage and pumping charges'allocated and accrued to the Windy Gap Water which the Town pays to the Municipal Subdistrict during the term of this Lease. The Town shall also be responsible for any firming or collateralizing expenses which it incurs as a result of its firming the yield of its Windy Gap Water due, without limitation, to storage of water or borrowing CBT Water. 11. Curtailment. The Town represents that, under reasonable and foreseeable circumstances, it should have adequate water to deliver to Lessee under this Lease. Lessee recognizes that the water provided hereunder is presently surplus to the Town's needs, but that the Town's water supply is dependent upon natural water resources that are variable in quantity of supply from year to year, and which can be affected by causes beyond The Town's control. Except as provided in Paragraph 9 above, the Town shall not be liable for filure to adequately anticipate avilability of the Town's water supply or foran actual failure ofTown's water supply. In times of such shortage or failure, the Town may refuse to supply water or curtail the amount of water provided pursuant to this Lease in order to meet the Town's reasonable municipal needs for water, provided that the Town shall in such event refund to Lessee a pro rata share of the Town's annual rental payment for that year. The Town shall make a reasonable attempt to notify Lessee in advance of any interruptions of delivery. 12. Transfer and Assignment. As of the date of this Lease, Lessee's property is being offered for sale and it is anticipated that there will be a transfer of this Lease in the near future. Lessee may assign its rights and interests under this Lease to any person or entity, provided that the assignee assumes all obligations of Lessee under this Lease and takes the rights and interests subject to the provisions of this Lease, and provided the Lessee provides written notice of such assignment to the Town; however, this Lease may not be assigned for use at locations other than Lessee's property without the prior written consent ofthe Town. This Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Lessee and the Town and their respective successors and assigns. 3-6 13. Default: Remedies. A default shall be deemed to have occurred if either party breaches its obligations hereunder and fails to cure such breach within 30 days ofwritten notice from the non-breaching party specifying the breach. Waiver or failure to give notice of a particular default or defaults shall not be construed as condoning or acquiescing to any continuing or subsequent default. In addition to other legal remedies available to it for a default, including specific performance and damages, the.non-breaching party shall also have the Iight to cancel the Lease by giving written notice of cancellation after the event of default as defined herein. 14. Entire Agreement. This Lease constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all other prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations, and understandings of the parties regarding the subject matter of this Lease. No supplement, modification, or amendment ofthis Lease shall be binding unless executed in writing by the parties. No representations or wamnties whatever are made by any party to this Lease except as specifically set forth in this Lease or in an instrument delivered pursuant to this Lease. 15. Full Authority. The undersigned represent that they have full authority to enter this Agreement on behalf of the respective Parties. The Parties have taken all actions required and secured the necessary approvals to enter this Agreement. 16. Enforcement. This Lease shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of Color-ado, and it shall be deemed perfonnable iii Larimer County, Colorado. This Lease may be enforced in an action for specific performance, injunctive relief, or damages in the District Court, Larimer County, Colorado. 17. Paragraph Headings. The headings ofthe paragraphs ofthis Lease are inserted solely for the convcniÂ¢nce of reference and are not a part of and are not intended to govern, limit, or aid in the construction of any term or provision herein. 18. Payments and Notices. Any payments and notices required or permitted to be given under this Lease shall be in writing and shall be delivered by United States certified mail, postage prepaid, or by hand delivery, directed to the following addresses: LESSEE: The Warren and Ruth Clinton Charitable Remainder Unitrust 2815 Fall River Road Estes Park, CO 80517 Copy to: Petros & White, LLC 730 17* Street, Suite 820 Denver, CO 80202-3518 Attn: Raymond L. Petros, Jr., Esq. THE TOWN: The Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 3-7 Attn: Town Administrator Copy to: Gregory A. White, Esq. 1423 West 29th Street Loveland, CO 80538 Any such notice shall be deemed to be effective on the earlier ofthe date of its actual receipt or the third day after the same is deposited with the United States Postal Service. Either party, by notice given as provided above, may change the address to which future notices are to be sent. Executed to be effective as ofthe date set forth above. LESSEE: THE WARREN AND RUTH CLINTON CHARITABLE REMAINDER UNITRUST By: American Trust Corporation, a New Hampshire Corporation, Trustee; Paul H. Collins, President OF ) ) SS. ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of , 2002, by Paul H. Collins, President, American Trust Corporation, as Trustee for the Warren and Ruth Clinton Charitable Remainder Unitrust. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires Notary Public 3-8 1 . TOWN OF ESTES PARK, ATTEST: STATE OF COLORADO, By: Town Clerk Title: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS- ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF _ ) The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of , 2002, by as of the Town ofEstes Park. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires Notary Public 3-9 K 4- -2 â‚¬1Â£47*9"vt i vattj 214/L.. Â·Â·r- 1 3 6.-0149.. 1 41 1,11-dis- Â£ 1 1 m %14 â‚¬1 1 1 LL-1 AO 04 4 . -14 Vt)#5%-#- ~i 1 - *4. , aâ€¢,KN f e 1 CO 1.A r j W.4 9 '' 1,1 4 ff $ 924 u /j to .M I il L l) 1 l: 1 . 1 V. "0- i 7- 1 19 m JA K 1 -I 91.,/1 An t '2"1 fri , f 1 3 Ull F 6,Ii .- ~: ' 1 f /1- d ED - 41 , r 1 .42 1 ~ 14-_3 f 0 1-6/4 1 :r , :' t. 1 . i r 1 I It. 1 L 9 â‚¬ 1 1 9:,-3 . 4 1 *7 4 1 0 2 1 . 1 /4* r.4 .11 }41 1/ / r. , r r ' ,#1.-# 1 7 - Â¢} t A 1 41-11 -<lu,0 1 U/' 2 Z 7 2 .1 - F ~ft</4. ...0 52 - 4- , 7 LU- r jt Â¥ I 0 1- fnk. 3 2,Â·Â¢ / 1{/ V 12>~lifj 0 36 f trrl ( (Ch - *22223/ 25r $ t < i -%"% 5 0.< fe..reg . r 4 0 ./1 7.- 1 E .<,22 ,,C F .' ~ <47 I 5 1 A 90-3 I 2, /â‚¬ j i.uf + , V-,1;:44Â· i h. 4 vf 7.-4-1 /4,42/9 1/-1 1 c)40' 2 1 21/1,4 t. â€¢ . rÂ¥ UN f I '441 â€¢ I ' re f . 4 I f , 03/ , 4> i. (3 20.344 u '..49 1 9 V4 -/'-/9 f 4 AP ..r + - it r h. ; ' Â·Â·.. f '40Â«* : - ~. \ *~-tt3-' Lj - tr#4-i ft~ Lu 3 â‚¬ 7 Â· 44 *Iri Â»rÂ». , lf..64> - 1 1 / ,p i Â«> 1 J. . 3 Â·, - /' C ' q f Z jÂ·f ~ :tOi 1 Q....F i yi,-,1 <3 *44 19Â» 16: r H < 5 2-Â·X Lu~* . 11 4, ) f r Canyon C -rt'Â»ty'v,. Mountain Lo 04â‚¬1 , 5, 0.014<74-%.rf.,9.1,1.-,. JOI-IN M. WAZLITT 325 parkview Lane Cftee ~arti CO 80517 Public Works Dept. Town of Estes Park June 18, 2002 Re: New street proposed by EPMC Friends: It is inevitable that any change proposed in streets and traffic will evokeobjections from some property owners who feel their property may be adversely effected. This phenomenon has become known as the NIMBY (Not in my back yard) response, and the feelings of those most personally effected must be given consideration. It is also fact that those who might benefit from a public improvement, but are not so directly impacted, are much less vocal, and usually take a passive interest in the decision making process. As a 14 year property owner and resident at 325 Parkview Lane, I have long had aconcern about the single street access to Stanley Circle and Parkview Lane. This one access, for, by my count, at least 88 homes, is the intersection at Stanley Avenue. The only other roadway available for entrance or egress is through the EPMC parking lot, private property which may be blocked for use either in an emergency or for the convenience of residents getting to the Medical Center or points beyond. Having only one entrance and exit for such a large residential area in mountainous terrain is not good planning, either for public safety, orconvenience. In event of acatastrophe such as a forest fi re, earthquake, or other need to get help or to evacuate, a roadblock at Stanley Circle and Stanley Avenue could be very serious, possibly resulting in loss of lives and property. I t seems apparent that this large residential area in the geographic center of Estes Park needs and should have at least two entrance and exit options. Both should be public streets, open for use 24 hours each day. With no desire to work hardships on anyone, I urge the use of the town's long standing access street right-of-way on the north side of the EPMC property for a new street that would meet the needs of EPMC, and enhance meeting the needs of the entire area from both a safety and a convenience standpoint. Respectfully, 1 \ John M. Hazlitt