The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 2001-10-18/ t, AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE OCTOBER 18, 2001 8:00 A. M. Preparation date: 10/12/01 *Revision date: 10/15/01 1.AspenLBirch/Columbine Avenues On-street Parking Citizen request to ban on-street parking 2. Larimer County Landfill 2002 Proposed Fee Schedule Presentation by Stephen Gillette, Lan County Assistant Dir. of Natural Resources *3.Police Dispatch Office Remodel Project Request Approval to award bid *4.Police Dept. Squad Room Addition Project Request to proceed with final design and the design/build process Reports: 1.Misc. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: October 16, 2001 TO: Public Works Comwittee FROM: Bill Linnane ll-/ B- SUBJECT: Citizen request to ban on-street parking on Aspen, Birch, and Columbine Avenues ("Hill Streets"). Background: The Mayor received the attached letter dated August 28, 2001 from Patrick Cipolla, 632 Aspen Avenue, requesting that the steep portions of Aspen, Birch, and Columbine Avenues be posted as "No Parking." The letter cited a safety concern for children walking along the streets. The letter also mentioned particular on-street parking adjacent to 403 and 520 Aspen Avenue. The Mayor asked that I report to him on this request I researched the request and responded with my attached memo. The response memo recommended against banning on-street parking because: 1) It will increase traffic speeds. 2) It will relocate on-street parking to surrounding neighborhoods. 3) Excessive on-street parking was and is not a daily problem. (Background - Continued on Page 2) Cost/Budget N/A Action: Staff recommends continuing to allow on-street parking on the "hill *Yeets." Staff will respond to individual problems associated with on-street parking on a case -by-case basis. 1-1 Background - Continued#om Page 1 The Mayor relayed my memo to Mr. Cipolla who responded with the attached additional letter to Mayor Baudek, dated September 24, 2001. He cited that his original letter of request was actually a result of suggestions to him by EMT drivers. Therefore, he has asked that the request be revisited. Similar to the no parking request on MacGregor Avenue, the adjacent property owners have been notified of this Public Works Committee agenda item via door hangers. As a result of Mr. Cipolla's second letter, Greg Sievers contacted a sampling of the EMT drivers and a few of the contacts living on these hill streets. One driver that lives on Aspen Avenue mentioned that the old tenants of 520 Aspen Avenue routinely parked on the street It was also brought to our attention that a truck has been parked in front of 405 Aspen Avenue for at least six months. The Public Works Department informed the Police Department of the vehicle; the truck was "red-tagged" this past Monday, and as of this date is off of the street I still stand behind my original memo and recommend continuing to allow on- street parking. I recommend that the Public Works Department work with the residents as well as the EMT drivers and respond to individual situations such as those mentioned above. BL/lb Attachments 1-2 lt[))~- Â·~ ~--- .-- TO: Mayor Baudek Sep. 24, 206~ ~ SEP 2 4 2001 11 1 i t... t 'll ii r 1 SUBJ: On-street Parking on Aspen Ave Reference your Inter-Office Memo dated Sept. 11 from Bill Linnane. First of all, I think this issue needs to be re-visited. I originally submitted this request at the suggestion of certain EMT drivers. I knew what the result would be since it was me suggesting this. According to the EMT, one female driver has called in this problem to the police on at least 3 different occasions this summer. It is hard for them to manuever and understandably so. I also showed interested individuals the response letter from Mr. Linnane. Secondly, speed is not the issue (otherwise we wouldn't have 4 or 5 lanes highways here) - but safety is. Thirdly, at the time I said 520 Aspen, there were at least 5 vehicles there everyday. Since then, the lower apartment (the house is rented out at the bottom part) has been vacated. As for 403 Aspen, my error. It should have read 405 where at least 2 large vehicles are parked everyday. Lastly, if Bill Linnane thinks speed is the problem, ask him to talk to the EMT people! Sincerely, - Patrick F. Cipolli 1-3 1 . TOWN OF ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: September 11, 2001 TO: Mayor John Baudek FROM: Bill Linnane (/ ~-~ Public Works Director SUBJECT: On-street parking on Aspen, Birch and Columbine This memo is in response to the letter from Patrick â‚¬ipolla you received requesting that there be no parking on the steep grades of Aspen, Birch and Columbine Avenues. Mr. Cipolla's opinion is that the cars parking on the steep grade cause a dangerous situation when children are walking on the road. He also stated that between four and seven vehicles are periodically parked on each of the steep grades of 403 Aspen and 520 Aspen. Greg Sievers and I drove the area at least three times after receiving a copy of the letter. At no time did we witness a large number of vehicles parked on the street Also, an acquaintance of mine lives at the top of Aspen and has informed me that occasionally on-street parking can be a nuisance, but it is only occasionally. He states that when there is an abundance of on-street parking, cars do tend to slow down. Neither 403 Aspen nor 520 Aspen had more than two cars parked adjacent to them. The cars in front of 403 & 520 Aspen were parked off-street. It is interesting because 403 Aspen, a house under construction at the southwest corner of Stanley Avenue and Aspen Avenue, is on a moderate slope of approximately 6% to 8%, similar to many othef town streets. In the past the Town has banned on-street parking in front of multi-family apartment complexes and for situations such as when the parking interferes with. a pedestrian trail/route or when safety is improved by the ban. 1-4 9. 4 , I cannot recommend banning on-street parking for the following reasons: 1) My opinion is that vehicle speeding is the number one safety concern for children walking on any roadway. Banning on-street parking will not decrease vehicle speeds, but may actually result in the increase of vehicle speeds. Proven design standards indicate that narrow roadway travel widths reduce vehicle speeds. I've attached a page out of the "Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan" by the Oregon Department of Transportation defending my opinion that banning on- street parking may actually increase traffic speed. 2) The slopes of Aspen, Birch and Columbine Avenues are from 12% to 15 % at their steepest Driftwood, which was not mentioned in the letter, has a slope of +20% at the steepest If we ban on-street parking on these streets, we will be relocating parking to the other adjacent streets and neighborhoods. I don't recommend that. 3) Excessive on-street parking was not evident when the Public Works Dgpartment inspected the area on three occasions. There were only a few cars parked on the steep sections of the hill streets. I must add that in mf opinion, on-street parking may not improve snowplowing safety and may not improve the visibility of children, but it will reduce traffic speeds. Excessive traffic speeds are the number one danger to pedestrians. (EC: Rich Widmer BL/mjs 1-5 . 160 ' II.9. TRAFFIC CALMING A. REDUCING The hump is designed with a reversing curve at TRAFFIC SPEEDS each end, and a level area in the middle long enough to accommodate most wheelbases. Reducing traffic speeds can be accomplished .1-:4â‚¬Â·- through physical constraints on the roadway or -- fit..,Ii:}14 by creating an "illusion of less space." ------2-i~.C, 3 Motorists typically drive at a speed they ~0-hu --- 43. perceive as safe; this is usually related to the road design, especially available width. -03*- 242'3 A.1. PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS ,/9.12.139,- -- a t A.1.a. Narrow Streets or Travel Lanes Narrow cross-sections can effectively reduce speeds, as most drivers adjust their speed to the available lane width. Narrow streets also reduce construction and maintenance costs. Figure 154: Speed hump A.1.b. Speed Humps (not speed bumps) A.1.c. Chokers (curb extensions) If well-designed, speed humps allow a vehicle to proceed over the hump at the intended speed Chokers constrier the street width and reduce with minimal discomfort, but driving over'the the pedestrian crossing distance (see Figure t:. ... hump at higher speeds will rock the vehicle. 71, page 108). ~\1 3 2: 1.6.1 i 7 intÂ·'.--=~4 Â· Â· 64 7 -, &1 N ~ --8 U tkit _iftl:i t' i fâ‚¬ bera ,/21 1,}â‚¬3 1 mt,8194- s 7.4.4, 3 3 4Â·:4; t . .: - .-74,Â· 3 4 <; ~0 1 i ' I., ..:. Â·~ Â· bit X I . Â· - ' . 1. .. 1 r-1~'-4 4*'J. . 1 , .- 9 00.117Â» .. a 1 - . 1 4 -f~Zit;<,4 72 . . . .V. . , t.. Â·Â· 'Â·' - ' ~ j~*:-, li 5%25:#,f~~(pilt~ 4:2 ' 1. ..... * .Â· 4-<i 24~95*3~ , 13 -1,7.1.2 1:1.l fiE,~~69..1.-Ji.I.;: .- '- 2 14' {!.1 02 4- N . t.-. -Â·.EQ.yi.7 r. - 1 27:. --:':.224~ ~.id.~ 5&j~/~* 1'14-LiJ :, 9 -1..i. .t;~.~Â·2~40 3.1 7.. p..5.;.-13-1i,%2~EFâ‚¬Â· ir; .4Â·.~M g')44 4/~6* :...P "Â·71,Â·' 39-y... '.4 -i 7.4 . 3.- 6,< ~412#74-5Â·4-1~4,=24'21(-- r; ,-4-E-: evt)1Â« ...itilt-Zf<#plwajht~ rwef,7-2,Â£41*"912513t is.1~.df:W-- i.. --Â·suus- 3;L.21.2 2.77-,317---IN/*/P#Q+-*4884**0.1 .it*.3-~T.t'-3~i~~t~ ~~~~~r.Â·'~~~~Â·If eÂ·tl ~Â· ~ /34'th- 31-maw<-< Â· a. t: â‚¬*~ NL,2Â·-,3 ~449<1(*TF~47- Ti-28~#A-41*9Â£~~~~~ f>.2 <7710*f#37/C.. 1 , .,1 , 1 ,- Â· : .N'qâ‚¬lytmÂ·12,*dk-yoyÂ¥ 4 -I.e-Fy* 3,1Fjifitisi,i#Y&48,~GÂ·:>-Â·-r... .:. c. , 1-0:79.?321.3 '1 I. Street space rededicated to pedestrians (Holland) 1995 OREGON n 1 E t) 1Â·: ST!:tAX 11{.AN 1-6 ;2::7:5 19.1 4.* ~7 8&8$.1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK I f ri,b Fr Â»42*6~Â«4*Â«4 #U-â‚¬ C. .,S~fsÂ£, .4 9 114 236\3Ft 6Â·-1~Â·WA K 6,â€¢ ;.. 7' 044%1, 6.HK~52~.~.2-**bu Ak..'.41*..t, ,;4Â©tiÂ· :*ril#..,Â»Â»/-.Â« =?472. -- r vE*2 +Ut IJ -~Â·298,41~~~4~~1~4 ,.4 -- 19 2 ...6,7/,.244 42.0 h *~t'0419Â»* e.*41.re,7 ~- '44:17~ -A zi~.4>%...:\ 1,. 77611.-LE:,20 /0013f~134&1~ John Baudek E-p-Â«'Pt _,--+.'AeÂ»*r r Mayor 6,4.1\ Â£#4*4.'.4. ...., MA -/94/4 4>bâ‚¬. Â¥3 rn"Â·' 0 ' /4 r August 30,2001 \ Mr. Patrick Cipolla 632 Aspen Ave. Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Patrick: I have received your letter regarding a potential parking problem on Aspen, Birch, and Columbine Avenues with the st@ep grades and numerous children present. I will fonvard your letter to Mr. Bill Linnane, the Public Works Department Director. I would think that this issue has come up before. I would also think that the majority of residents on these streets would be opposed to any parking restrictions, especially if they have numerous vehicles. I will have Mr. Linnane review the situation and forward a report to me. If some action might be warranted, the issue can be put on the Public Works Committee agenda for their recommendations. I will keep you informed of the status of what is occurring. Thank you for taking the time to bring a potential safety situation to my attention. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK 2.L Bdu'la- John Baudek Mayor JB/rv CC: Bill Linnane Rich Widmer http://www.estefnet.com (970) 586-5331 Â· RO. BOX 1200 Â· 170 1 IUE Â· ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Â· FAX (970) 586-2016 1-7 1 -7 IR-,1 /â€ž lim 1] 43/ LE r - 1 Di '26 14â‚¬2= TO: Mayor Baudek Aug.18,vi- 1 - - * E PA 5 AUG 2 9 2001 ~ SUBJ: No Street Parking 1.1 U I L Dear Mr. Mayor: .. i' j i . r...,4 'A '. . - / The steep grades going up Akpen Ave, Birch, Columbine, making driving an adventure sometime~-*hy? Becausedaily, people are parking vehicles in the street. Particularly in front of,403.Knd'~20)>ispen Ave. Both are single residences and have, at various times, between-44ehiclest403) and 7 vehicles (520 Aspen ave). 12 - /4.~ crt'.7.,th During the school year, this can become very dangerous because it not only creates 1 car passing at a time, but sometimes kids are walking down the streets as well. This summer has been particularly bad because ofthe amount ofvehicles on the street. I am requesting that there be no street parking on these very steep grades. Could you please look into this f Thank you for your assistance. Â§incerely, 1\.4/ f /c no PWÂ« ,l. 40? #,C.l/ Patrick Cipolla 632 Aspen ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 586-6298 1-8 IfILI Â¥ TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: October 15, 2001 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane 0 SUBJECT: Larimer County Landfill and Transfer Station 2002 Proposed Fee Schedule Presentation by Stephen Gillette Background: Larimer County is proposing a change to their 2002 Landfill and Transfer Station fees. The proposed fee schedule is attached for your review. Stephen Gillette, Larimer County Assistant Director of Natural Resources, will present the proposed fee changes. Cosl/Budget N/A Action: N/A BL/mjs Attachments 2-1 PROPOSED 2002 FEE SCHEDULE LARIMER COUNTY LANDFILL $$ '01 PROPOSED PER STATE TOTAL NCR WASTE TYPE COUNTY '02 FEE - SURCHARGE - FEE -- FEE - $ 4.00 / $4.05 Minimum load $3.57 $3.94 Ea 6Â¢ or 11Â¢ 10.3% perload $5.30 Car Load $4.78 $5.24 Ea 6Â¢ 9.6% per load $12.45 Small Pickup Load $11.22 $12.34 Ea 11Â¢ 9.9% per load $17.40 Large Pickup Load $15.72 $17.29 Ea 11Â¢ 9.98% perload Loose Waste $ 4.90 / $ 4.95 On trailers and other $4.80 $4.84 cy 6Â¢ or 11Â¢ .8% per cubic yd trucks) $ 5.01 Commercial Loose $4.80 $4.84 cy 17Â¢ .8% per cubic yd $ 5.55 Compacted $5.10 $5.38 cy 17Â¢ 5.49% per cubic yd $ 4.75 Animal carcasses $4.00 $4.75 50 lbs. 18.7% per 50 lbs. $20.00 Appliances w/freon $19.80 $20.00 Ea 1% each $30.00 Car Bodies $27.50 $30.00 Ea 9% each Whole Tires >>>>Auto and light truck (up to 16.5" rim diameter) 1-9 2001 $3.10 ea 2002 $3.25 ea 4.83% 10+ 2001 $8.00 cy 2002 $9.50 cy 18.75% >>>>Truck and light industrial (17" to 24" rim diameter) 1-9 2001 $4.25 ea 2002 $4.50 ea 5.88% 10+ 2001 $11.30 cy 2002 $13.00 â‚¬y 15% >>>>Heavy equipment (larger than 24" rim diameter) 1-9 2001 $11.30 each 2002 $13.00 ea 15% Chopped or Shredded Tires - will be charged as loose waste *Private vehicles such as vans, sport utility vehicles, etc. maybe charges as carloads, small or large pickup trucks, depending on the size and type ofthe vehicle. * Unsecured loads subject to double fee 2-2 PROPOSED 2002 FEE SCHEDULE ESTES PARK TRANSFER STATIONS ' 01 COUNTY PROPOSED STATE - TOTAL WASTE TW'E PER INCR FEE '02 FEE - SURCHARGE FEE - - $ 6.15 / $6.20 5.4% Minimum load $5.78 $6.09 Ea 6Â¢ or 11Â¢ perload $10.20 / 10.25 / 10.31 10.2% Loose Waste $9.20 $10.14 Cy 6Â¢ or 11Â¢ or 17Â¢ per cubic yd Commercial $11.31 9.75% $10.15 $11.14 Cy 17Â¢ Compacted per cubic yd Rock Rubble, $22.45 9.75% $20.30 $22.28 Cy 17Â¢ Etc. per cubic yd Whole Tires >>>>Auto and light truck (up to 16.5" rim diamqter) 2001 $3.60 ea 2002 $3.94 ea 9.4% Chopped or Shredded Tires - will be charged as loose waste *Private vehicles such as vans, sport utility vehicles, etc. maybe charges as carloads, small or large pickup trucks, depending on the size and type of the vehicle. Colorado State Surcharge (landfill and transfer stations) Surcharge car 6Â¢ per car regardless of waste type Surcharge truck 11Â¢ per truck regardless ofwaste type Surcharge commercial 17Â¢ per cubic yard *Unsecured loads subject to double fee 2-3 . PROPOSED 2002 FEE SCHEDULE BERTHOUD/WELLINGTON/RED FEATHER TRANSFER STATIONS = O, i PROPOSED PER STATE TOTAL WASTE TYPE COUNTY *03 FEE ~ SURCHAROB elm IN~R j FEE = Minimum load $4.33 $4.74 6Â¢ or 11Â¢ $ 4.80 / $4.85 per load 9.4% $7.20 per 6% Car Load $6.73 $7.14 6Â¢ load $13.15 per 9.4% Small Pickup Load $11.92 $13.04 11Â¢ load $19.70 per 18.9% Large Pickup Load $16.47 $19.59 11Â¢ load Loose Waste 10.5% (in trailers and other $5.92 $6.54 cy 6Â¢ or 11Â¢ $ 6.60 / $ 6.65 per cyd trucks) Whole Tires >>>>Auto and light truck (up to 16.5" rim diameter) 1-9 2001 $3.10 ea 2002 $3.40 5% 10+ must be taken to the Landfill >>>>Truck and light industrial (17" to 24" rim diameter) 1-9 2001 $4.25 ea 2002 $4.65 9.4% 10+ must be taken to the Landfill >>Â»Heavy equipment (larger than 24" rim diameter) Any Amount must be taken to the Landfill Chopped or Shredded Tires - will be charged as loose waste *Private vehicles such as vans, sport utility vehicles, etc. maybe charges as carloads, small or large pickup trucks, depending on the size and type of the vehicle. *Unsecured loads subject to double fee 2-4 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: October 15, 2001 TO: Public Works Committee 1 k FROM: Bill Linnane IX_ /t- SUBJECT: Police Department Dispatch Office Remodel and Alarm System Project - Request to Award Low Bid Background: The Town budgeted to remodel the Dispatch Office this year. The attached existing and proposed floor plans will give you a general idea of the project scope. (Continued on Page 2.) Cosl/Budget Cost Westover Construction Dispatch Office Remodel $78,468 Contingencies @ 10% 7,840 Alarm system (not to exceed) 10,000 Total: $96,308 Budget $80,000 The Police Department budgeted line items for vehicle equipment and radio equipment that could easily be adjusted to accommodate the $16,308 excess. Action: Staff requests approval to award the bid to Westover Construction and fund the estimated $16,308 excess from the vehicle and radio equipment budget line items. 3-1 Background: (Continued from Page 1) The project consists of: 1. Converting the two men's and women's restrooms into one public women's restroom and one private Dispatch unisex restroom. 2. Adding a kitchenette sink and counter to the general space. 3. Adding an equipment room with an air-conditioning unit for equipment. 4. Relocating the existing conference room. 5. Miscellaneous demolition, drywall, HVAC, cabinet, carpet electrical, and other work. The staff also budgeted to hardware a Dispatch alarm system from the reception desks in the Administration, Public Works, Finance, and Police Department offices. Staff solicited bids and received two bids on October 2nd. The bids did not include the alarm system. This scope will be unknown until the demo work is complete and the low bidder's electrician can have a better idea of the required work. The bids received are attached and the results are as follows. Both bidders have good references. Westover Construction $78,468 Ray Duggan Builders & Design $79,579 The low bidder is Westover Construction. BL/lb Attachments 3-2 O ' - ' N.0 2 1 -' U 't> \6/1 U- 1.L50' 2 \ 1 <121 A piti ~ ~ = 3 13 L -:091 8 0 .... b=zi ..4 ME o En IL] 2 <.~ 3- -t-, *7 1 = . 11 211[ C r... Â»-7777- ~7777- ... 0 1 t- ... -2 . 1 Â· 3 - /: 32 P O F; 2 7 1 9 Z COZ -- E -.C 1% 3 - Cd 141 a. al CO. 0 1 0 0. 0 GS-' '1 4 2- 0.0 1 1/ . ' 1, ... 9 1 \/ L - . 1- A X &6 ...... 1 1. 7 > - 8- a t~ 3 -- 1 * g ~%- f . & 141 4 ~ 91 2 . 1 â‚¬ A v/ . f 3. -- 1 1 1 081 4 Wki 2-6-li Z L JA f. ///6, .-. A /77'71 E~EL Â· 6 -- - 1- u Eilâ‚¬ 112 , 9 0 LL_ 3102& 1 '. 6)W04 R -0504 J . 3 93- -. Â»1 : I . .-I 3t , , - 45 093 >-~ *N\133 < 7 2. I .//1 ~. 01 -- 3-1LL lenCEÂ¥Â¥v i - \1\ 0 4 g n. ~ ~ ___._ -,rn-,LE,~*~ Lil (Fi 14-8- fl ~ 11 0 144=*1/1 7- 1 M <722Â¢ .Â« tjiL 8 1 . A /_ w 11- ' *041{ 0 --0 6. 3 ?/ 1 1,33I I &" 1 1 - .W I, I. 11 1 ' '1 1. 4 Rt ~ h 31â‚¬ 3-Et)ChÂ« ~ C 1 . . 1 1 Â©Nt-)Â¢kO ' ~ -* 07 1 TOM --1,#44 , _ ... -Rt 11-1 1 I : 4/': 0 91-1*2074%144 . . - 13 7 6 1 1 --- , Â· 3 Fi f ~~p~~22 13 .' --- 11 . U U~ Cc,L ~ i ae M..21 Es Mt y 36 le 31 m lil Ujf -- 11 6 A - 3-3 dd And=7T1-â‚¬-1 974 ' 1 rd 1 . 1 0 0 -11 3 k 1 9 I. Ip-/-4.WI-* D 0 '0 0 |__1 ' LJ â€¢ 0 'h -8 - 32 7-1 1 \\ . 1 1 7 AF O -- '' S f ..~ ---- hi 22 n -- l, 1 - 4 , 4â‚¬ E I r s 09,4 8 6 t'-E: ~ 1 1 \l 22 ./ U E Mt - 3 - - Ir. 4 6 . : 1.- f .t-â€ž2 .1 Â· 0 - .--i 9/>4 1 61 0 1- T , C> . \ 1Â£ 1 0 Fat \. ft lu 31; 0 7 042 30 9 dA~ 2 0 3-4 (556584 .0-126 .01-.15 .old 2-30 -Â»crle I , BID PROPOSAL TO: TOWN OF ESTES PARK OCTOBER 2, 2001 170 MacGregor Avenue P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park,,CO 80517 FROM: Westover Construction, Inc.(hereinafter called "Bidder") organized and existing under the laws ofthe State of Colorado, doing business as a Corporation. Gentlemen: Having carefully examined the Plans and Specifications, as well as the premises and conditions affecting the Work, the Bidder, in compliance with your Advertisement for Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all labor and materials and to perform all Work required by and in strict accordance with the Contract Documents, for the construction of the Town ofEstes Park Project entitled: Police Communications Office Remodel 2001, within the time set forth therein, and at the prices stated on the included Bid Schedule as totaled herein. By submission of this Bid Proposal, each Bidder certifies, and in the case ofa joint venture, each party thereto certifies as to his own organization, that this Bid Proposal has been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement, as to any matter relating to this Bid Proposal, with any other Bidder or with any competitor. Bidder acknowledges receipt of Addendum Number 1. Bidder states that his Major Material Suppliers are: Material They Will Supply: Estes Park Lumber Lumber, fasteners, misc. building materials Major Subcontractors are: Work They Will Perform: Abbey Carpet Floor coverings Rightway Electric Co. Inc. . Electrical work Estes Park Plumbers Plumbing Advantage Mechanical Air Conditioning & Retrofit 3-5 Bidder hereby agrees to commence Work under this Contract on or before a date to be specified in the Notice to Proceed and to fully complete the Project within 58 calendar days thereafter, and complete the work by the date stated on the Notice To Proceed. Bidder further agrees to pay liquidated damages, the sum of $ 250 for each consecutive calendar day thereafter. BID AMOUNT: $ 71(, Â¢45,00 Addendum's, Change Order's, other: $ TOTAL: $ -7 1 44 7. 46 Respectfully submitted: Oc.75 624 A , 2001 signature /flill 8.-f 6/ . 1, ' L_ A (An Title MA13 i Â£UU(- company: LUitover C onif-.-Chc_ Address (cq< 0*444ock 9 05 Ful Phone: 3- 06 577 Â¥ 1 (Comorate Seajj Â· Â· ' f - Attest: ' BID PROPOSAL 2 pages 3-6 Work Items: Units: Price: Demolish concrete-tile block walls 360 SF 800.00 Demolish plumbing fixtures 9 EA 340.00 Demolish metal stud & rock walls 100 SF 340.00 Demolish interior window 1 LS 100.00 Demolish doorway 1 LA 240.00 Remove existing doors & fill in 3EA 260.00 Remove existing plumbing fixtures 9 LS 135.00 Connect new sinks to existing waste lines LS 400.00 Supply & Install new doors 1 EA 275.00 Construct walls (full height) 54 LF 1070.00 Relocate & install existing door 1 RA 175.00 Repair drop ceiling (grid & tiles) 1100 SF 2465.00 S & I swivel can-light fixtures & dimmers controls 25 EA 1975.00 Supply & Install electric heater 1 EA 400.00 Relocate Hand-Dryers, mirrors, trash cans, etc. 1 LS 600.00 S & I Kitchenette (60" - counter & 6 cabinets) 1 LS 1860.00 -- - Relocate counter w/ 2 sinks 1 LS 300.00 Install existing plumbing fixtures 3 EA 450.00 S & I floor closet flange and modify waste pipes 1 LS 600.00 Supply & Install plumbing fixtures (ss sink& new toilet) 1 EA 1400.00 S & I Air conditioning unit (owner option) 1 LS 4855.00 - Relocate ducts and grills NC 440.00 Supply & Install carpet & carpet cove 85 SY 3211.00 Install floor leveling compound 55 SF 175.00 Install & finish quarry tile floor w/ cove base tile 88 SF 657.00 S & I wall covering fabric 310 SF 556.00 Supply & Install push-button lock set (owner option) 1 LS 600.00 Supply & Install Corbin lever style hardware w/ locks and keying 1 EA 300.00 Incidentals (mobilization, O& P, Construction Management, fees, etc. LS 12400.00 Other: Tenting, Trash removal, Dust Mitigation, Cleanup, General Labor 11400.00 Other: Plumbing, Electric, Mechanical, Carpentry Labor, Misc Materials, Painting, drywall, Cabinets, Countertops, acoustic ceiling, other misc. details not included above 29689.00 Total 78468.00 No asbestos mitigation provided No phone work included, but it could be added as an owner option Dispatch Bath to use the existing sinks, new ADA toilet set on existing drain (per Larry Pettyjohn), and new grab bars on south and east walls 3-7 BID PROPOSAL TO: TOWN OF ESTES PARK DATE: 9% 170 MacGregor Avenue P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 FROM: 1<Ag -3>466AN-134!U:>ALS ~13Â£5 JAN LUL (liereinafter called "Bidder") organized and existing under the laws of tht-State of' 6>1-Â£)Â£2Â·ADO , doing business as (a Corporation), (a Partnership), (an Individual). LLC Gentlemen: Having carefully examined the Plans and Specifications, as well as the premises and conditions affecting the Work, the Bidder, in compliance with your Advertisement for Bids, hereby proposes to furnish alllabor and materials and to perform all Work required by and in strict accordance with the Contract Documents, for the construction of the Town of Estes Park Project entitled: Police Communications Office Reniodel 2001 , within the time set forth therein, and at the prices stated on the included Bid Schedule as totaled herein. By submission of this Bid Proposal, each Bidder certifies, and iIi the case of a joint venture, each party thereto certifies as to his own organization, that this Bid Pioposal has been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement, as to any matter re]ating to this Bid Proposal, with any other Bidder or with any competitor. Bidder acknowledges receipt of Addendum Number j , , Bidder states that his Major Material Suppliers are: Material They Will Supply: lisTES 7,9Â£ LUMBE-f~ 7Aek- .6,/1FFLy} Major Subcontractors are: Work They Will Perform: E,S'26 7Aa,L-7Â£.u M6O25 CA21.-SoN EterfUL AnvANThaL MEZ+(AN l<CAL- CA APEy 1-62â‚¬Arbs BID PROPOSAL 2 pages 3-8 Bidder hereby agrees to commence Work under this Contract on or before a date to be specified in the Notice to Proceed and to fully complete the Project within 58 calendar daYs thereafter, and complete the work by the date stated on the Notice To Proceed. Bidder further agrees to pay liquidated damages, the sum of $ 250 for each consecutive calendar day thereafter. BID AMOUNT: $ 79,579- Addendum's, Change Order's, other: $ TOTAL: $ 73,579*- Respectfully submitted: ID< 2. , 2001 Signature 3 %,-- Title D UJNFL . Company: PAY -h,66,Â·.2 3uju::#25 ~3Â£5}DA Address 48 514 -00(3 , 7. 0.-BOX 21 6 Al-LENS-F#.0.Â£.. 6. 90510-021 6 Phone: 376- 584-112.6 970 - 6-73 -7533 0-1 1 (Corporate Seal) Attest: BID PROPOSAL - ' 2 pages 575- 793% 3-9 0 0 c - 0 Â£ 0 3 3 s 3 ~ co .>.4-~ a) L 00 C 8 0 5 2.0 .0 9% 19 8 11 = C U 8 2-3 5 % 5 2- 2 3 2 4 d 8 8 8 aL â‚¬3.08 ~ ~ LU,AÂ·E ki ki ~.5 2 U 9 .6 11 @f g g IM 7~ & m 1 % 2 0-<U_Q_ 005(00 RemzER mÂ£â‚¬â‚¬2~59 0000 00000 00000 000000 UD 00 C 01 0- O = 1.0 h (\1 03 4- LO 00 X-or)ONOO r- 01 (9 4- LO O r 0-r- O.1 r(NNWGI CO 00 00 00 CO (0 XI- 1- EtÂ· 4- 4- t.r) Lf) 3 0 0 O Â·-r-r-r- t-- r = 7 = M = 7 7 r- r- e r r- err-rr 1- X- M .4 03 C U) (1) == 1.1.- O r 8 0 06 m 0 C C 0 1-L O CO- 0 {1 0 3 E E 5 0 6 - 0 0 0 2 EL k- 0- DispatchOffice emodel Date 10/02/2001 RayDugganBuilders & Design Bid Amount Draw.Â«mi AmountRemaining OI-Â£ 1400 1400 1150 *CLE 09L 096 JOLIell'I t,822 L NOISIAICI 2103 91Â¥101 091.9 uompillaa OZOZ gency JOAAO ite phone ater Ha ling Jo!Jalx3 MJOAA 51!9 2 uois'A!O Town of Estes ark O O O 0 O, 0 U) 5 60 0 0 E a. m (U L 1 11-2 -5 1 g m m .5 5 0 a in (D (D 2 3 -O m O 92 X W il di*DDED cm.c N 0-MY! = hy-223 1 >6)0 u) E (c D-~3582,6 2- 43 8 2 -2 11 2- S a 4) ru D C - & 2 9- 2 ~ 1 Â® 9-.2 16 % 2 -2 3 2 6 353Â§%%%2% 5 OLLIEO~_1013Â«LU~(1)00_001 g 6- LL O_ O (O 5 0- F O ~ 00000000Â¢90000000 > 0000010000 > 2 000 r 10 0 tO O LO 00 0 r r N CO Xt- Lf) r CO X L- ,- (N (9 V. 1.0 tOO LD 0 - T T N N CO 91- 4- 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 N CO U O 00 09 09 co (9 09 4- 1 0 0 C 24)Z CNNCNCNCNINCNICNINCNCNICNDINNCNI af c or)0909(909(9Â¢90000 05 0 4- 9- 9- 0 0 ro O 02 LL U- 0 CO 0 4. C J C 3- - 9 < 0 0 .0 2> O> 25 5- Â£3 II- 5150 Sil~/~'0 1 Site Clearing ma.louoolse 81.JOUO =19*EER 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 00 00 00 LOLO A r- 00 Gl a) 338% SEEstE C E @ 2# 3 â‚¬ 3 8 JG.ficM ti Ig9iaa -5 EcubE 3 -Di O 3 m E-*-8 3~22980@ rt QU{20* in MM E*.9; -NI-H EOO 2 11 4 2 p g) -Di z 92342% 1M la AE Ji 0 4 13 1 m 05 9 0 emaIHZ Q 2 22~ZA'98*REm 00 > 000000 > 4 OOOOLOONLD0O 0 0 u-) O X 0 N O O N * Lo x C O"(Ner)09Â»0)0)0)0 0 u DN ,- 01 LO Lf) O to [-1 9 Di LO LO Lf-) LO tO LD Of 2- O(05(0(00(DOLDID<DO m 05 00 LL U. LO 0 CO 00 C ...1 C .0 < E 1- .G 1- 12 0 > O > 1- 25- a ZI-Â£ 006 sdowejunoo 00*â‚¬1 9 NOISIAID MO=1 91V1O1 4slu!:1 0 L 4300 Ex-stone/moss rk 4350 Ex-stone/Special 00 In-stone/moss rk stone/Special tIDeck onePaving Fasteners uo!10010Jda.Inls{Olll/Uo!1einsul Z uo!9!A!O . I O 0 O 0 Ce, 1 CO O 0 C O S .3 - 0 4.. ~-h ko elf ~1~083 0 to -0 2 -2 cÂ» 2 2 a> 0 .c Â¤)Â¤,E k;=.C cÂ£ 9 ErsÂ·%99 030- 2025889 3 -2 **32 -6- 2 ST v= PLE ME -= 0 0 13 .b= 2 0 J J 3<22Â§32238 R *E ce 000010010000000 06 0 0 a) 1- L.O =rNIN LO (DOOLO O r N N 00 00 00 00 00 4- LO CD 0 0) E 29~ AN A NNI- h h h N NA N h O 00 00 00 0 0 00 C .0 0 25 8Z2Z IiBAAÂ«10926 120 FoundationWaterp Foundationlnsulatn Wall/rooflnsulation AsphaltShgIMatrl hgLabor Vapor Barrier pels SMOpl.1!AA 0199 L.Unuil.UnlvS/\AOpU!AA 0Â£99 Ule;SASJU043]019 0999 8710 FinishHardware LS FOR DIVISION 7 8 NOISIAICI NO=1 91V101 'ZE 2732 leAO ol,t'8 OM SAAOpu!AA O1.98 Su!ze16/ssels 01,99 saNS!u!=16 uois!Aia O 0 O O 0 0 M O 53 a {1 - 2 0 0- e ~ U.1 6% 8 18 cÂ» m .52 0 2 2 .6 8 &3 9 1 al EA 41 9 2 315 0 0 0 r .2 16 39& Z 4) LI-RELLml-1-2 E 00000000 f 000 9 1- LO LO N O T 01 CO 00 0 t.O 0 â€ž r- CO LD 00 00 CO 00 .9- (D a) a) O 00000000 2 000) U 82 2 GO LU O C C 2 .2 0 0 - > 5 6 9510 Acoustic/suspelg 4840 DI-E arpeting 4895 TOTALS FOR DIVIS N 9 16176 tinguisher 0601 se!1!UeA/SlaU!qeo 9941' L 0602 L L NOISIAICI WOM 91Â¥101 cessones oe/\/d!nb3 P!sek:10101.1. Encl/shrDrs saoue!1 ddVP!seh' 094 L X 9300 Tile Work 550 WoodFlooring 9650 Resili ntF ireplaces 00!AjeSPOO=1004 1. L dinbE] MueE; 080 L L ooa6uipeol 091, L 1. 3100 U!)1'eM 01+Id. Fo!UeLpatAI GL uo!9!A!a OISIAID NO=I 91Â¥101 O 0 0 O 0 O 5 2 4 - 31 1 S E - m m A g -92 3 229gggE 31*3rf 22 EC E (D X A 3 4, 0, I I 9,oBBEE 9-E- P 16 0 9 2 16 16 & E LO 4 - X - E A lt@REWMELE 82 i >bo (D COLE<(DRI<I282 Q _ m RE 52 25*B CO m OOOOOOOOLr)00 - 000000000 U-) CNI O V LO O 1- LO If) O h OCNLOO,_CNNOOD r 00 Xi- 4- 4- 1.0 10 10 0 h 00 i - r r Y t.O LO LO A 00 00 LO LO LE) LO LO LD 10 LD LO LO LO U O CD<0(0(0(0(00(0(0 r-x-r-r--r-Â·-r--r-r LU 2 0 CO J C AS @ 0 2 Â» 0 6u!uleujek:Ijunolliv 1821~2.31721 lunou.1Â¥P!â‚¬1 GI-Â£ 15120 PlumbingSystem 7424 6105 13529 System 21450 09* LE 9L NOISIAIO &03 91Â¥101 6L96L slejolloefoid 1Nf-0-1 Jue!pek:loploal3 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: October 16, 2001 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane LU t- SUBJECr: Police Department Squad Room Addition Project - Request to Proceed Background: A portion of the Town Board Room Remodel Project includes expanding the existing Police Staff room and adding a new Police Squad room. The attached proposed floor plan identifies this smaller project in better detail. During the discussion of the Board Room Remodel Project at the October 9th Town Board meeting (notes attached), the Town Board directed Staff to return to the Board with the architecfs fee for the Police Department portion of the Project Heath Construction and Thorpe submitted the attached Cost Estimates. They are: Architectural Preliminary/Final Design $ 4,850 Contractor General Conditions $ 4,990 Construction Overhead/Profit (6%) $ 2,792 Direct Construction Costs $34,786 Contingencies $ 3,182 Total Estimated Cost $50,600 Cost/Budget Cost Architecfs Fee $ 4,850 Contractor/Construction Cost $45,850 Total $50,600 Action: Staff requests to proceed with the project Architectural Design for $4,850. Staff also requests to proceed with the Police Department Squad Room project for a Preliminary Guaranteed Maximum price of $50,600 as summarized above. BL/mjs Attachments 4-1 E-P o fl Â·Â· m /1 a 17 000 8 D { - K-5 - 7 9 - 1 U Y V~ 11 -- - - r r...,r..., . .1 ~ ri â€¢r *......'- I...--'....'- 4 J ~jaL~* . C C CD I.-' - r-iN rr U L~ 4..1 L...LU *134. t.- 1%\ 30 Â© - O .x -92 0 Â·. .-=- - CE \ \ 112191da 2-LU LU OL_' ~ I LIZL--- 0 1 u j.....RE<190 1... - Â·. V Vi V ' h' 4 V V V V Nt I - LJ J O 1 *1 JC 1 -I~ J ... YOYY& CY ,PY- v.... Leif J./5 1Jt J Er--L -6-1 1. 4 -o .r- v-vv,r * L.K__11-JILA-11 1 fwifir UNP (Illilt L-J cy a c]CODOD.Emmm 61 fl- 1 -01 4 S 821 0 :rnnn-arin 2 nnar-rn 0 -~ r- CL U L_J L-J co n ILL-~J 09 23 c a. 1 N 0 0 C 4 .2 U 4- u__-0 0 -Ky Mr < ...L 0 t 24: 62 .1 0 In - In to Â·Â·0 - -0 01 m B 9 4 -0 41 - M(N- A <in m tA 9 62 0 4 - 2 0 11 ZI . . 1 0 11 0- fy f LU - 1 CD M .c -3 095 3 0 -O -8 I 0 D 8 cs- - â€¢v u U A 51>* =3 3 - 0 0 X 2 2 23 a_ Z A 1 2324. luOUIDNEUEIN uotionliSUOD '41EDH 3 Slool!401V 'KId SolupossÂ¥ dION.L I OOZ 'z 10 S Existing u-EId JOoId- 20 s.f. Bldg. Remodel s"DAA Bu!15!XE' U!Dll.133 01 sl'DAA MaN ~ 9~88~0 Board of Trustees - October 9, 2001 - Page 3 4. REZONING & FINAL PLAT FOR THE HABITAT SUBDIVISION, A PORTION OF LOT 33, BONNIE BRAE SUBDIVISION, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ESTES VALLEY/APPLICANT. Mayor Baudek opened the public hearing. Community Development Dir. Joseph presented the Staff Report, noting that the Town Board previously approved the Final Plat, however, the need for a rezoning hearing was overlooked, thus this item must be revisited. The rezoning request is from R-2 to R-1 to create four 6-7,000 sq. ft. single-family lots restricted for attainable housing. The required deed restriction assures the availability of the units for sale or rent to persons meeting the income guidelines for no less than 20 years. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Bill Van Horn, Habitat Representative, stated that considerable discussion was held at the Planning Commission, however, the land use "stands on its own merit." Town Attorney White read Ordinance #13-01 zoning the property R-1 Single-Family Residential Zoning. The Ordinance includes an emergency clause. There was no additional testimony, thus Mayor Baudek closed the public hearing, and it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Gillette) Ordinance #13-01 be approved and the Final Plat be reaffirmed, and it passed unanimously. 5. LIQUOR SHOW CAUSE HEARING - (1) APPROVAL OF STIPULATION AGREEMENT & (2) FINDINGS AND ORDER OF SUSPENSION FOR DEER RIDGE, INC., dba NATIONAL PARK VILLAGE SOUTH (COUNTRY SUPER MARKET). Police Chief Richardson reported that following a meeting with the Licensee, staff prepared and executed a Stipulation Agreement. Inthe Agreement, staff is recommending a standard 21-day suspension of the 3.2% Retail Beer License, with the actual time served of 7 days from 12:01 a.m. Thursday, October 1101 through 11:59 p.m. Wednesday, October 17111. The remaining 14 days will be held in abeyance for one year from the date of the "Findings and Order of Suspension." It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Doylen) the following be approved: (1) Stipulation Agreement, and (2) the Findings and Order of Suspension, and it passed unanimously. u'S 6. BOARD ROOM REMODELING PROJECT - AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH DESIGN. As noted at the September 11 th Town Board meeting, this item Ia) was returned for consideration. Town Administrator Widmer advised that Chief Richardson, Judge Brown and he met and, with minor floor changes, an official Court space has been provided in the Police Dept. Randy DeMario/Heath Const. presented the final preliminary cost estimate of $766,310. Trustee Doylen questioned whether the benefit from Heath mobilizing with the Library Project remains in place, and Mr. DeMario confirmed that the Town is realizing a savings of approximately $25,000. Mayor Baudek was assured that the $766,310 cost was firm, pending any change orders initiated by the Town. Should the final GMP be significantly increased, the Town would have the ability to amend the project. Trustee Habecker stated that the cost figures do not appear out of line. Roger Thorn stated that the $766,310 figure is only for the Board Room remodel, and that he is seeking a decision on the additional Police Dept. minor remodel. Judge Brown commented on the staff meeting that addresses his security, and records stofage concerns. Trustee Doylen added that the existing room does not meet audio-visual needs of the physical audience and television audience, and there is poor ventilation, and sound. George Hockman questioned the future use of the existing Board Room and Administrator Widmer responded that the room could be used as a training/meeting room and perhaps future office space. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Jeffrey-Clark) the Town proceed with the Town Board Remodeling Project for a Preliminary Guaranteed Maximum Price of $766,310, with the architect's fee for the Squad Room design to be obtained and submitted to the Town Board for further consideration, and it passed unanimously. 7. STANLEY PARK QUIET TITLE - UPDATE. Town Attorney White stated that all Larimer County civil filings are being reviewed and categorized into basic, 4-3 OCT-12-2001 FRI 04:56 PM FAX NO, P. 01/02 [HEATH FOICT COLLINS. CO 80532 (60524) R.C. HEATH CONSTRUCTION CO, PO DRAWER IlÂ·Ill RACQUETTE Int (970)221-4195 FAX (970))21.2907 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT October 12, 2001 Mr. Richard Widmer Town of Estes Park , 170 MacGregor Avenue, PO Box 1200 Estes Park, Coloradt 80517 RE: Estes Park Police Department Remodel Dear Richard, Per your request and a[ the request of the Town Board of Estes Park, the design/build team of Heath Construction/Thorp Associates has generated our fees for the remodcl of the Police Department portion of the municipal building. Our fees arc based on the current scope of the project as generated by Heath Construction/Thorp Associates and the project preliminary drawings. Based on the design and construction of the police department remodel work running concurrently with the BoardRoom Remodel Project, the following fees arc being proposed: TOTAL Preliminary & Final Design Services including Architectural, Structural & Electrical Design Services - $4,850. plus Reimbursables (Per Thorp Associates) General Contractor General Conditions: $4,990. Construction Fees: 6.5% Based on the preliminary estimate dated August 61 the preliminary budget for the project would then be: Direct Costs: $34,786, General Conditions: $4,990. Contingency: $3,182, Construction Fee: 6.5% ($2,792.) Design Fees: $4,850, TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET: $50,600. The Team of Heath Construction/Thorp Associates appreciates the opportunity to work the Town of Estes Park on this project. If approved, this project would be included as an addendum to our Municipal BonrdRoom Design/Build Contract. Please cal! with any questions regarding these fees. Re42ctfully, 4-0\ 4Â¢61Â»40 Randy DeMdrio President Attachment. Thorp Associates Fee Proposal dated October 12,2001 Cc: Thorp Associates, PC / Roger Thorp via FAX 586-4 145 www. I IEATHCONSTRUCTION,coM 4-4 OCT-12-2001 FRI 04:56 PM FAX NO, P, 02/02 OCT. 12.2001 2:33PM 19?05864145 NO. 265 P. 1 -TO:R C HEATH TAI Thorp Associates, P.C. Architects and Planners October 12,2001 Mr. Randy DeMario, President R.C. Hcath Conslruction Co. P.O. Box Drawer H Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Re: Estes Park Municipal Building Remodel Dear Randy: As you will recall at last Tuesday'& Estes Park Town Board Meet:ing, the Board approved the Preliminary Guaranteed Maximum price on tile above referenced project and asked that Thorp Associates set forth a fee amount to complete design and cons,niction drawings for the remodel of the police deparlment. It is our understanding that we need to get this information 10 Mr. Richard Widmer no later than Monday morning, October 15, 2001, so it can be included in the consent agenda at the nextTown Board meeting. Upon review of the workwehave already accomplisbed on the police department remodel, as well as the remaining consumeâ‚¬on document work including skuctural and electrical design ge:vices, we are proposing an additional fee of $4,850.00, plus reimbursable expenses, to include the police department redesign with the originally contracted municipal board room design. Please get this information to Mr. Widmer and we will develop an amended contract with Heath Construction for submittal as soon as possible. If you have any questiong, feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, RoÂ»G M. tkpip, President, 4IANCARB TH&EMPOCIATES, p,CkBhitects and Planners 131 Stanley Ave. #100 â€¢ PO Box 129 â€¢ Estes Park CO 80517â€¢970,586.9528â€¢303-534-1378 (Melro)â€¢Fax:970.586.4145â€¢thorpassoccorn 4-5