Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Public Works 2001-01-18I '' AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2001 8 a.nt. Preparation date: 1/12/01 *Revision date: 1/12/01 1. Stanley Ave./Hwy 7 Intersection Reconstruction Project Request approval of design scope and approval to solicit construction cost 2. Stanley Ave. Trail Request approval of design scope and approval to solicit construction cost 3. Municipal Building Budgeted Projects Request approval to proceed with: A) Elevator rehab project B) A/C design build C) 2002 remodel design firm solicitation - D) Rm. 203 Kitchen remodel - Design build * 4. Causeway Underpass/Trail Project CDOT Grant Agreement Request approval of Intergovernmental Agreement. 5. Water Dept. 2000 Loop Project Request approval to expand scope with a change order. 6. Water Dept. 2001 Loop Project Request approval of design scope of services Reports: 1. Misc. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 16, 2001 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane 41 SUBJECT: Stanley Avenue/Highway 7 Intersection Project kkgraiind: The Town budgeted for the Stanley Avenue/Highway 7 reconstruction Project Van Horn Engineering (VHE) performed all of the R.O.W. work associated with the Plat revision and prepared a preliminary design of the proposed new intersection design. Staff requested and received a $12,845 proposal from VHE to prepare the Construction Plan and manage the construction. Staff has established a June 15, 2001 construction completion deadline and would like to proceed with cost solicitation after the design is complete and present the cost at a future PWC meeting. Phirl<yet/Cnct- 0 1 Design/C.M. $15,000 Construction $125,000 Cost Design C.M. $12,845 Construction To be determined later Recammendation: Staff recommends approval of VHE scope of $12,845. Staff also recommends approval·to solicit construction costs. BL/Ib 1-1 ,=.'., .11#Ni 4 - , 4 /1-~ ' , I >fi,~~,~4* .- % , LAND SURVEYS-7 4 '-1 72299». . 7--I-7=1--12 4,£:7-··gea. 7--7' :,--s£ +4.1,-1-Af... SUBDIVISIONS '.71„ --9- & ;40 . DEVELOPMENT PLANNING -2 n r IMPROVEMENT PLATS .01· J 1 9-0- STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ·' VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING SANITARY ENGINEERING , 6 - WILLIAM G. VAN HORN - COLO. PE & PLS 9485- MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING January 15,2001 - Bill Linnane Dirdctor of Public Works Town of Estes Park 170 Mac Gfegor Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 RE. Stanley Ave/Hwy 7 intersection Design Cost Dear Bill, In response to your letter to me dated January 8,2001, I am providing the attached design cost spreadsheet regarding the reconstruction of the Stanley Avenlie and Highway #7. Thank you for asking Van Horn Engineering to stay connected and involved in this local project. In providing this cost, some assumptions had to be made and are listed below: 1. Plans, Specifications, and Bid Documents will not need to meet CDOT standards. The only involvement by CDOT will be review and approval of an Access Permit. 2. Three lane configuration will be approved by CDOT. 3. Length of project will not exceed 250 feet. 41 · Grades will be approved so to not require existing utilities to be lowered. 5. Stanley Avenue can be closed during the reconstruction process. 6.. Geotechnical testing will be provided (paid for separately) by the Town 7,2 The design includes an Engineer's Estimate. 8. As-Builts are included. - We feel that these assumptions are reasonable. If, for reasons beyond our control, the above assumptions can not be met we will bill the task at our normal billing rates. Thank you again for asking us to provide this cost. We 16ok forward to working with you on this challenging and interesting project. If there are any 4uestions do not hekitate to phone ine. 1... Sincerely, 7 2 . ....1 F.. 'f.... 4 0 / f' 2 ...,.William G. VAn Hdtn: .-- -' b.:, r Colorado PE and PLS #9485 - .. 1043 Fish Creek.Rpad . • RO. Box 456 · _Estes Park, Colorado 80517« 970-586-9388 6 Fax 970-586-8101 1-2 .....1 :-,1-1.i.. C' - . Stanley Avenue and Highway 7 intersection Costs - Jan 15, 2001 Intersection Design on one 24" x 36" plan Field-crew '~ ~ including utilities, drainage, future Reduce Notes Stanley Ave. and Hwy. 7 sidewalks Engineer Staff Engineer Drafting Gen office Total $4,210.00 Coordinate with CDOT and utility companies Staff Engineer Gen office Total $630.00 Access Permits by CDOT Engineer Staff Engineer Drafting Gen office Total $790.00 Local Construction Company Bidding Engineer (includes specs, plans, bid docs) Staff Engineer Gen office Total $810.00 Construction Management Field-Engineer (incluoes As-Builts) Field-crew (includes pay requests) Engineer Total $6,405.00 Total. ................. $12,845.00 4 1-3 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 16, 2001 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane (,L,/~'u SUBJECT: Stanley Avenue Trail Barkgroiinriz The Town budgeted for a concrete pedestrian trail along Stanley Avenue, from Prospect Avenue to Highway 7 adjacent to KRKI. Approximately half is budgeted for 2001 and half is budgeted for 2002. Estes Park Surveyors (EPS) has designed a substantial drainage project and along this same stretch of R.O.W. Staff requested and received a $14,600 Design/C.M. Scope of Services for the trail project Staff requests approval to solicit construction prices after design is complete. Riirigpt/Cnvt- Budget Design/CM./Construction Phase 1 - 2001 $60,000 Phase 2 - 2002 $50,000 Cost Phase 1, 2 - Design/ C.M. $14,600 Phase 1 - Construction N/A Rerommenrlation Staff recommends approval of EPS Scope of Services of $14,600. Staff also recommends approval to solicit Phase 1 construction costs. BL/lb 2-1 ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Post Office Box 3047 Telephone 970-586-5175 Estes Park, CO 80517 Receive FAX at 970-586-5816 January 16, 2001 W.O. 3226 Re: Pedestrian Path along Stanley Ave. from US 36 to Prospect Avenue Scope of Services for Engineering Design and Construction Management STANDARD HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE Classification Hourly Rate $ General Staff Drafting ....................................................................50 Engineer-design ....................................................................60 Engineer-project ....................................................................70 Engineer - principal Surveyor-project ....................................................................70 Survey crew ....................................................................80 Direct Costs (sub-consultant fees, prints, reproduction, etc.) ....... Cost + 5% COST SUMMARY PHASEI PHASE 11 TOTAL $ DESIGN 8,000 4,000 12,000 CONSTRUCTION/ 1,400 1,200 2,600 MANAGEMENT TOTAL 9,400 5,200 14,600 If both phase I and phase 11 are to be designed this year and phase I construction is to be complete this year, the total cost is $13,400 in the first budget year. 2-2 . Public Works Engineering e . 1 4/ Memo To: Public Works Committee Fronw Greg Sievers CC: Bill Unnane Date: January 17,2001 Re: Munidpal Building Projects Background: Several improvement project are slated for the Municipal Building to improve occupant comfort, safety, effidency and expansion. The building is 27 years old and in some areas may be considered functionally obsolete. A) The elevabor is due for a complete overhaul and modemizauon to meet current safety and ADA standards. B) Air flow in the building is insufficient to maintain a comfortable working environment in the summer and proceeding b hire a Mechanical Engineering company to evaluabe the possibilities of adding air conditioning is desired. C) Relocate the Board Room to the Police Garage; hire an architect ibr design this year (Construction in 2002). D) Public Meeting Room 202-203 can be made more effident by dividing it further to make a third room ilat contains a remodded and modernized kjbchen. This improvement will allow better control of access and use. In addition it will provide an effident way to serve food for funcbons. Budget: The 2001 budget contains four line items to address these improvements. A) Elevator upgrade: $ 45,000 B) Air Conditioning design & build: $145,000 (plus $25,000 for Police wing.) C) Remodel Design $ 35,000 D) Room 203 Kitchen $ 35,000 Recommendations: A) Staff request to hire Montgomery Kone (only authorized service company) to perform the necessary upgrades to the elevator at a negotiated cost of $38,959 and hold the remaining $6,041 as a contingency. Total expenditure: $45,000 B) Request to solicit RFP's from Mechanical Engineering firms that can provide A/C design plus CM including construction and installation completion at the combined budgeted value of $170,000 C) Request to hire an architect to develop design options and drawings for the renood at a cost of $35,000. D) Request to interview 2 local contractors and proceed to hire one and construct the remodel of the kitchen at the budgeted amount of $35,000. 3-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 16, 2001 TO: Public Works Com*ttee -f FROM: Bill Linnau SUBJECT: Causeway Underpass/Trail Project Grant Contract Background: The Town received two CDOT grants for the project. The 2001 grant is for $157,000 with a $250,000 Town match, and the 2002 grant is for $167,000 with a $50,000 Town match. Similar to the other CDOT Lake Trail Grants, CDOT requires a contract with the Town that is adopted by a Town Resolution. Staff also prepared the attached resolution for your review. The contract and resolution have been reviewed and approved by Town Attorney Greg White. Budget/Cost: N/A Rprommenriatinn· Staff recommends approval of the Resolution and approval of the CDOT Grant Contract BL/lb Attachment 4-1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park has previously budgeted and appropriated in its 2001 Budget, sufficient funds for the Town's required financial participation in the Causeway Underpass/Fish Creek Trail, Phase I Project; and WHEREAS, in order for the Project to commence, it is necessary for the Town to enter into a Contract with the Colorado Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to approve and authorize said Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: 1. The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park hereby approves and authorizes a 25% match of the federal funding, the additional Town overmatch of $211,000, and the execution of the Transportation Enhancement Contract by and between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Colorado Department of Transportation in the Town of Estes Park for the Causeway Underpass/Fish Creek Trail, Phase I Project. 2. The appropriate officials of the Town of Estes Park are hereby authorized to execute the Contract as the sbme has been presented to the Town. INTRODUCED, READ, AND PASSED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK on this day of ,2001. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: , Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk 4-2 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 17, 2001 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane li/6- SUBJECT: Water Department 2000 Loop Project - Expanded Scope of Wonderview 12" Project Background: The Town budgeted to replace the Wonderview 12" water main from Virginia Avenue to MacGregor Avenue in 2001. Kitchen and Company is currently completing the 2000 Wonderview 12" from James Street to Virginia Avenue. Kitchen will honor the 2000 unit prices of the James Street Project to construct the 2001 Project from Virginia to MacGregor. Total estimated cost would be $58,388. Cost/Budget: 2001 Budget $50,000 Cost: $58,388 Although the cost is $8,388 more than the budgeted amount the unit prices are 2000 prices and are favorable. The over-budget amount can be funded from the 2001 Engineering Services under-budget. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the expanded scope. BL/lb 5-1 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9mc 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 (970 586-2458 January 11, 2001 Metro (303) 825-8233 Fax (970) 586-2459 Bill Linnane, Public Works Director Town of Estes Park- P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO. 80517 RE: 2000/2001 Town of Estes Park Water Looping Projects Dear Mr. Linnane: In our effort to contain costs for the Town of Estes Park's Water Distribution projects, it is in our best interest to consider the continuation of the 2000 Estes Park Water Loop project known as James St to MacGregor. Please consider the following: The contractor is in the service connect phase of the 2000 stage of the project. His equipment is still on the job, therefore, the mobilization cost can be eliminated. Since a portion of the project was re-routed recently, the valves have been placed at the intersection of Virginia Ln and Wonderview, leaving approximately 100 feet of pipeline unfilled. Therefore, the next stage of the replacement can begin immediately without the additional cost of an interconnect. · This additional 700 feet of pipeline replacement, from Virginia Ln to MacGregor, was designed initially, therefore, eliminating the cost of engineering design. The cost of the Wonderview project, Virginia Ln to MacGregor, using the 2000 projected prices, would sum to $58,388.00. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. sincerel¥<57 1 #/ R~'MOp~All<i~CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 1 /1 ill i .i:\1 A,t'A 91 1 VLf Jt~d~&*>9>illiams E.T. CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • PLANNING 5-2 ~JAMES ST. / MACGREGOR AVE. INTERCONNECTION 2000 1)Et /CH. . 0 \L r- -7. · I /g_.--1 ~>L..7,7~%:. 1 VT J CA N¥Oy .1 · < I L. U •10"r •af• 1 1/ .....'ll HILL " U.LEEJA.27-1~ / h / d 1 /1./.f."S .Dol.,O. 1'* NO-&2II¥*=3 1 ..1.... I N ·9.04/7 .' / [Ffs j „ ~„ A 1 ....,1.GS! I 1 i 1 0944.-: / - 2 STAN'LrY i 1 , 1%=~H ··: >=. \ell..'- , .,STO•,c -4 ~ DISTRICT 'u'C \\U ~OCK - , f - M'J*Fil ~ .c•£ so , ,· r\ 1 1 · L' " 22" l. =/A- ,.· *:i' P. ... \.4 7 , 43 ) / 1 1 . --1 - =7\·,•\> ./ . - 4 >.1-,dili:-.- " 1'"A..A # ·,· :f,··01 z AVE. £- 2 .,0.. ... 1 , 5'..... ..0'.1 26123 i• ,• 3, 1 i,, 1 " 9 ] i · i :1· '* I ' I i 3 Wl\ . A :it'e *B. . 1 4, 4 .A .1 .i , Til:&.- ' ' ~~ f L 1 6.I,• 1 1 d E JM , R CL.•0#4 C '63,6 \Wy · '.X-4 rn-,( > : •DDIT,04 1220*~Ea*UkE**939% -1 k 9 2 : 0Des,4,329 tA 20.0 1 r 1) r.564/ , =Imc I [ 513 0 12>/ .4//5,9 2 1 I .41 WONDERVIEW AVE 4-IHIII«19 -1 - /N .- \\ 0 -1710 - . F . - PROPOSED WONDERVIEW r.32. - j- ' gmc 12¤ WATER LINE =032) EXHIBIT B f 5-4 - \Eo.#lul~" TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 17, 2001 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane l.»p~ SUBJECT: 2001 Water Main Replacement Project - Design and Construction Management (C.M.) Scope of Services Background: The Town has budgeted for the following construction projects and design/C.M. services in 2001. Please refer to the attached location maps. 1. Fall River/Sommerset 12" 2. Wonderview 12"; Virginia to MacGregor (C.M. only) 3. Beaver Point 8" 4. Stanley Circle 6" 5. Devils Gulch 12" 6. Marys Lake Raw Water Pump 7. Annual Fire Hydrant Project RMC has submitted the attached Scope of Services for easement preparation, design and construction management for $113,930. Cost/Budget: Scope Budget · Design and Construction Management $113,930 $145,000 · Construction ---------- $985,000 NOTE: The Design/C.M. Scope represents 12% of the construction budget, which is within acceptable engineering standards. Recommendation: Staffrecommends approval ofRMC's scope of $113,930. BLAb 6-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Works ~ommittee FROM: Bill Linnane <A/(~ 4 SIJBJECI': Water Department 10 year improvements and priorities update/ Fire Department Improvements update Background (This item is a report for committee information) In 1997, a home in Charles Heights Subdivision burned down. When the Fire Department first arrived at the scene, the house was unsavable. Although the water system in the general vicinity was adequate to supply domestic water, it was inadequate for fire protection. It should be noted that with or without fire protection water, this house could not have been saved. In May 1997, the Charles Heights Association (CHA) requested that the P.W.C. approve Town funded improvements to the water system in Charles Heights so that adequate fire protection could be provided. At that time, staff explained the Town's system of prioritizing water line projects: ; Priority #1: Extremely high maintenance lines Priority #2: Extremely low pressure domestic use and <500 GPM fire protection ]Priority #3: <500 GPM fire protection lines Since the Charles Heights water lin& request was a priority #3 project the committee had the following recommendation: "The committee recommends that CHA either wait for their project to be constructed according to the long-term plan schedule or privately fund Gie project" Within the past couple of months, the Town has received numerous letters from lot owners in Charles Heights requesting water line improvements similar to last yeads 1997 request Staff prepared a position paper that explains the Town's water line replacement priorities method and highlights the improvements to the Town's water system and Fire Department in the past 10 years. Fire Chief Dorman and I will present the attached report , Budget/Cost Not applicable. Recommendation This isa report only. Staff recommends continuing with the eidsting priority system and ..2 also continue with the annual capital improvements projects. BL/rv . 6-2 1 1 . 9- I. Future bnprovements - '-: i'•. 11 The existing $9.6M capital improvements have reduced the Water Department cash c -3 3?:-1 P./f fund to the point where a $1.6M catastrophic fund can be maintained. In addition, 9~, 7-:3'{· 0 approximately $400,000/yr. can be spent on facilities and pipeline maintenance ~ 1 ~ - . 0.' 2 14 , ~ without operating with a negative.cash flow. Iii The Town of Estes Park and a majority of the water industry uses the following J.* system to prioritize annual pipeline projects: 11 r '1 Priority #1: Extremely high maintenance lines ,; . i Priority #2: Extremely low pressure domestic use and <500 GPM fire protection lines Priority #3: <500 GPM fire protection lines Category 1 has been established as the #1 priority so that water line breaks that cause extremely long water service delays can be eliminated. These · high maintenance lines also result in inadequate fire protection and extreme damage to . 1 private and public land. Category 2 has been set as the next priority so that lines that are not immediately in ~.·, -·· :,9 danger of breaking, but experience low pressure and inadequate domestic and fire protection service, can be eliminated. Category 3 contains only fire protection problems, therefore, it has been established as a third priority. All 3 categories are very important but projects must be prioritized in such a method as that described. · i The following is the current annual improvement lists with associated projected costs, categorized as previously explained. I Priority #1: Extremely High Maintenance Lines LF +A Amount I .1 '. 7· Beaver Point to Ramshom Village 1,900 $135,000 · Big Horn 8" 1,400 95,000 . ·, Big Thompson 10" 3,300 230,000 Chapin/Chiquita 2" 500 35,000 0 2 . ..- ! Chiquita 2" 800 52,000 5 Fall River Corridor 4,000 305,000 MacGregor Ave. E./Wonderview <100 1-~ 2,700 190,000·· 2~ MacGregor Ave. W./Wonderview 3,900 270,000 ; · 4 ~ Stanley Circle 2" 500 35,000 Subtotal $1,347,000 Priority #2: Extremely Low Pressure Domestic Use and <500 GPM Fire Protection 1 1,200 $85,000 1 - 5 -- b (Devi~s~ulch bst - Phase l, U 4,300 , 1.300,000 Devils Gulch West - Phase Ill 2,100 150,000 Evergreen 4" 1,400 ..100,000 Fall River Tank #2 (Master Plan) 4,300 ' 300,000 Hwy. 7 to Prospect Mountain Pump House 2,900 205,000. North Lane to Devils Gulch 1,200 80,000:- Panorama Circle 3,100 216,000 Southern Interconnect 900 60,000' ~' -~ -'.r: Twin Drive 2" 600 <'' 42 40,0001'1, di'.1 2 Subfota/ $1,536,0009'-· -- --:.1.: i . 111 -41 ... 6-3 -1 - li~. Priority #3: <500 GPM Fire Protection Feet Amount List Axminster Lane 2,000 $120,000 Belleview Heights .. 2,000 120,000 Broadview/Lower Broadview 54,000 325,000 Brook Drive 1:200 70,000 Cedar Lane 1,500 90,000 Charles Heights Water Main 2,000 110,000 Cremorrah Drive 800 50,000 Davis Hill 3,000 180,000. Eagle Cliff 2,500 150,000 East Lane/North Lane 3,000 180,000 Fort Morgan Colony 1,000 60,000 Hill Road 2" 1,500 90,000 Hill Streets 5,000 300,000 Hondius Heights 5,500 335,000 Juniper Lane 1,000 60,000 Lone Pine Acres 3,500 210,000 Narcissus Circle 1,000 60,000 Old Mocassin Drive 1,000 60,000 Old Ranger Road 900 55,000 Park View Lane 500 30,000 Pinewood Lane 1,500 90,000 Spruce Drive 500 30,000 Sunny Acres 1,000 60,000 Tranquil Lane 500 30,000 Upper Broadview 1,800 105,000 Webb Cottages 500 30,000 Willow Lane 1,900 60,000 Subtotal $3,060,000 TOTAL $5,943,000 By comparing the estimated project costs with the available funds of $400,000 +/- per year, it is obvious that the funds available are short of the project costs. 0 . 6-4 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS. INC. gmc 437 South St. Vrain January 12, 2001 Estes Park, CO 80517 (970) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 Fax (970) 586-2459 Bill Linnane, Public Works Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO. 80517 RE: 2001 Town of Estes Park Water Looping Projects Dear Mr. Linnane: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) is pleased to submit the following proposal for work related to the Town of Estes Park 2001 Water Looping Projects. The main emphasis of the looping projects will be to replace existing deteriorated water mains. For the 2001 Water Looping Projects, RMC will provide field surveys, preliminary and final design, easement preparation as required, and construction related engineering services for the following projects described below, unless otherwise noted. Figures illustrating the location of each project are attached. A. Summerset Ct. 12" Water Line (Exhibit A) Homestead Ln. to Sleepv Hollow Ct. - Replacement of approximately 580 feet of 12" steel pipe with 12" ductile iron pipe along Summerset Ct. from Homestead Ln. to Sleepy Hollow Ct. All work will be done within the ROW and will not involve asphalt cuts except for driveway and street crossings. B. Wonderview Ave. 12" Water Line (Exhibit B) 0Aui Virginia Lane to MacGregor Ave. - Construction inspection for the replacement of approximately 750 feet of 12" steel pipe with 12" ductile iron pipe along Wonderview Ave. from approximately 100 feet east of Virginia Ln. to the west side of MacGregor Ave. All work will be done within the highway ROW and will not involve asphalt cuts except for driveway crossings. C. Beaver Point 8" and 6" Water Line (three parts) (Exhibit C) 1. Blue Arrow RV Park - Installation of approximately 330 feet of 8" ductile iron pipe from the rear of 1675 Hwy 66 (Rock Inn Restaurant) to the meter pit at 1665 Hwy 66 (Blue Arrow RV Park) Upon installation of,said pipe line, approximately 1100 feet of existing 2" steel pipe will be abandoned. Easements to accommodate the water line will be essential to cross the Blue Arrow RV Park property. The water line installation involves no asphalt cuts. 1 Mary's Lake and Lower Broadview - Installation of approximately 280 feet of 6" ductile iron pipe along the west side of Mary's Lake Rd. from Lower Broadview to 280 feet south, connecting to the 4" steel for increased flow. The water line installation involves no asphalt cuts. CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • PLANNING f 6-5 gmc 111. Beaver Point to Ram's Horn Village Resort - Replacement of approximately 1750 feet of 4" cast iron pipe with 8" ductile iron pipe from the northwest corner of the intersection of Hwy 66 and Mary's Lake Rd. to the northwest corner of the intersection of Hwy 66 and Park Entrance Rd. The replacement will involve 3 asphalt cuts totaling approximately 150 feet, which includes the eastbound and westbound lanes of Park Entrance Rd. and the eastbound Park Entrance Rd. to westbound Hwy 66 exit ramp. The replacement consists of approximately 600 feet of asphalt cuts involving parking lots and driveways. Costs for this project assumes minor difficulties obtaining easement from the National Park Service. D. Stanley Circle 6" Water Line (two parts) (Exhibit D) Stanley Circle Interconnect 1. Extension of a 6" ductile iron pipe line, approximately 300 feet, to serve a fire hydrant on Highland Ln. 11. Replacement of approximately 2250 feet of 2" steel pipe with 6" ductile iron pipe from approximately 300 feet south of Highland Ln., counter-clockwise around Stanley Circle to approximately 300 feet north of Park View Ln. The replacement will involve several asphalt cuts on Stanley Circle and several grants of easement. E. Devil's Gulch 12" Water Line (Exhibit E) Devil's Gulch Interconnect - Replacement of approximately 1000 feet of 3" steel pipe with 12" ductile iron pipe along Devil's Gulch Rd. from approximately 675 feet east of Black Canyon Dr. to the Gem Lake Trail head. The water line replacement involves no asphalt crossings. F. Mary's Lake Pump (Exhibit F) Marv's Lake Raw Water Pump - Preliminary design and analysis including coordination with Bureau of Reclamation for the installation of a 2 MGD variable speed, trash protected pump for the purpose of transporting raw water from the Mary's Lake Reservoir to the Mary's Lake Water Treatment Plant at times when the Bureau of Reclamation is not flowing water through the Ram's Horn Tunnel. The pump should be auto-controlled (4 to 20 milliamps) to auto-adjust from l MGD to 2 MGD. This will be a multi phased project with the preliminary design and analysis being phase one. Design options, at present, include: I. an interior mounted pump installation with pipeline attached to the existing penstock for minimum esthetic disturbance 11. an exterior rail mounted pump installation with pipeline attached to the existing penstock for minimum esthetic disturbance 6-6 gmc G. Fire Department (new hydrants) RMC will provide engineering services at no cost for placement, negotiations and installation of the fire hydrants for the Estes Park Fire Department. All ROW permits will be obtained, as necessary, from the appropriate agencies. Design of Wonderview and Beaver Point projects will be complete and will go to bid on March 27, 2001, with construction to begin on April 16, 2001. Construction will be complete by May 28, 2001. Design of the remainder of the projects will be complete and will go to bid on August 7, 2001, with construction to begin on September 11, 2001. Please see the attachments for the Cost of Engineering Services and specific locations associated with the aforementioned projects. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincer*, / R00* *l*FAil*dbNSULTANTS, INC. -AU--1 -1 l»« A. wi ,,0/ lams E.T. Re i ed b'01 WIll AeAl®ochaska, P.E. Ass6ciate Principal ADW/adw Enclosure 6-7 2001 ESTES PARK WATER LOOPING PROJECT SUMMERSET CT 12" WATER LINE (EXHIBIT A) COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Preliminary and Final Design Personnel , Rate/Hr Hrs Total Project Manager $85.00 20.0 $1,700.00 Design Engineer $55.00 80.0 $4,400.00 2 Person Survey Crew $65.00 24.0 $1,560.00 Drafting (Auto-Cad) $50.00 60.0 $3,000.00 Clerical - $20.00 16.0 $320.00 Subtotal Preliminary and Final Design $10,980.00 Construction Inspection Personnel Project Manager $85.00 12.0 $1,020.00 Construction Inspector $50.00 80.0 $4,000.00 Drafting (Auto-Cad) $50.00 16.0 $800.00 Clerical $20.00 8.0 $160.00 Subtotal Construction Inspection $5,980.00 TOTAL SUMMERSET CT 12" WATER LINE $16,960.00 Percent of Estimated Construction Cost 13.0% 6-8 :q 2001 ESTES PARK WATER LOOPING PROJECT WONDERVIEW AVE 12" WATER LINE (EXHIBIT B) COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Construction Inspection Personnel Project Manager $85.00 16.0 ' $1,360.00 Construction Inspector $50.00 36.0 $1,800.00 Drafting (Auto-Cad) $50.00 16.0 $800.00 Clerical $20.00 12.0 $240.00 Subtotal Construction Inspection $4,200.00 TOTAL WONDERVIEW AVE 12" WATER LINE $4,200.00 Percent of Estimated Construction Cost 8.4% 0-- ..1.----- . 6-9 2001 ESTES PARK WATER LOOPING PROJECT , BEAVER POINT 8" AND 6" WATER LINE (EXHIBIT C) COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Preliminarv and Final Design Personnel Rate/Hr Hrs Total Project Manager $85.00 42.0 - $3,570.00 Design Engineer $55.00 136.0 $7,480.00 2 Person Survey Crew $65.00 36.0 $2,340.00 Drafting (Auto-Cad) $50.00 96.0 $4,800.00 Clerical $20.00 36.0 $720.00 Subtotal Preliminary and Final Design $18,910.00 Construction Inspection Personnel Project Manager $85.00 26.0 $2,210.00 Construction Inspector $50.00 128.0 $6,400.00 Drafting (Auto-Cad) $50.00 24.0 $1,200.00 Clerical $20.00 24.0 $480.00 Subtotal Construction Inspection $10,290.00 TOTAL BEAVER POINT 8" AND 6" WATER LINE $29,200.00 Percent of Estimated Construction Cost 13.0% 6-10 2001 ESTES PARK WATER LOOPING PROJECT . STANLEY CIRCLE 6" WATER LINE (EXHIBIT D) COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Preliminary and Final Design Personnel Rate/Hr Hrs Total Project Manager $85.00 72.0 ' 66,120.00 Design Engineer $55.00 160.0 $8,800.00 2 Person Survey Crew $65.00 64.0 $4,160.00 Drafting (Auto-Cad) $50.00 48.0 $2,400.00 Clerical - $20.00 36.0 $720.00 Subtotal Preliminary and Final Design $22,200.00 Construction Inspection Personnel Project Manager $85.00 24.0 $2,040.00 Construction Inspector $50.00 160.0 $8,000.00 Drafting (Auto-Cad) $50.00 24.0 $1,200.00 Clerical $20.00 24.0 $480.00 Subtotal Construction Inspection $11,720.00 TOTAL STANLEY 6" CIRCLE WATER LINE $33,920.00 Percent of Estimated Construction Cost 13.0% 6-11 2001 ESTES PARK WATER LOOPING PROJECT DEVIL'S GULCH 12" WATER LINE (EXHIBIT E) COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Preliminary and Final Design Personnel Rate/Hr Hrs Total Project Manager $85.00 20.0 - $1,700.00 Design Engineer $55.00 60.0 $3,300.00 2 Person Survey Crew $65.00 20.0 $1,300.00 Drafting (Auto-Cad) $50.00 60.0 $3,000.00 Clerical -"~ $20.00 16.0 $320.00 Subtotal Preliminary and Final Design $9,620.00 Construction Inspection Personnel Project Manager $85.00 12.0 $1,020.00 Construction Inspector $50.00 80.0 $4,000.00 Drafting (Auto-Cad) $50.00 16.0 $800.00 Clerical $20.00 8.0 $160.00 Subtotal Construction Inspection $5,980.00 TOTAL DEVIL'S GULCH 12" WATER LINE $15,600.00 Percent of Estimated Construction Cost 13.0% 6-12 2001 ESTES PARK WATER LOOPING PROJECT MARY'S LAKE PUMP (EXHIBIT F) COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Preliminary Design and Analvsis (Coordination with Bureau of Reclamation) Personnel Rate/Hr Hrs Total Project Manager $85.00 42.0 - $3,570.00 Design Engineer $55.00 80.0 $4,400.00 2 Person Survey Crew $65.00 40.0 $2,600.00 Drafting (Auto-Cad) $50.00 60.0 $3,000.00 Clerical $20.00 24.0 $480.00 Subtotal Preliminary Design and Analysis $14,050.00 TOTAL MARY'S LAKE PUMP $14,050.00 6-13 2001 ESTES PARK WATER LOOPING PROJECT TOTAL COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES EXHIBIT PROJECT COST A. SUMMERSET CT 12" WATER LINE $16,960.00 B. WONDERVIEW AVE 12"WATERLINE $4,200.00 C. BEAVER PT 8" AND 6" WATER LINE $29,200.00 D. STANLEY CIRCLE WATER LINE $33,920.00 E. DEVIL'S GULCH WATER LINE $15,600.00 F. MARY'S LAKE PUMP $14,050.00 G. FIRE DEPARTMENT HYDRANTS NO CHARGE TOTAL ENGINEERING COSTS $113,930.00 6-14 N - f SLEEP 41 12" WATER LINE __ -__ 1,0,w .~RIA p. 1119 gEN di EXHIBIT A 6-15 ,\4~57 . @1 1% 1,4. MER E CT OVOW kl 3Alhl 11V3 N WONDERVIEW AVE © H I l~-lfi« -IT<* /N --1- ~ \\ 0 0131»10 - 12" WATER LINE iff'/5= 1 2212 0. El W --- ---- vid'"43/ EXHIBIT B 6-16 .-=9/ »44% ENT RANCE BLUE ARROW RD RV PARK % 10 e rn--4 7 i 2 H 01 1- 8" AND 6" WATER UNE___ 1 JUBIA .ugi~ 10 mil M[ IM EXHIBIT C 6-17 17 99 , I N 1 / re * 11 e 0 + 41 A /PO<r - j HL N LN 4- 1 1 - m==STANLEYCLr~ 6" WATER LINE . (2.7,7 ) EXHIBIT D 6-18 . \292>/ .25. =98 -1 rt« --» L~ 3 4 / 1 0 -1 I - U ap, LAKE RD l - WATER \ \ - TREATMENT\./V PLANT / 40'- MARY'S LAKE i N PROPOSED MARVS LAKE Ignal,r,~ PUMP 76<ju 018£7" pall '#Al' al i EXHIBIT F 6-20 192-21