The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 2000-04-20AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE APRIL 20,2000 8:00 A. M. Preparation date: 4/13/00 *Revision date: 4/19/00 1. The Reserve Subdivision, Phase 2, Proposed Utility Easement Request for an easement on Town owned Open Space 2. Annual Guardrail Project Request to proceed with budgeted item 3. Annual Bridge Maintenance Project Request to proceed with budgeted item Reports: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Hwy. 36/7 Project update 3. *Private vs. Public Bridge Report TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum April 18, 2000 TO: Public Works Commi~e FROM: Bill Linnane OIL, SUBJECT: The Reserve Subdivision - Owner request for a utility easement on Town- owned Tract B, The Reserve Subdivision Background: The owner of The Reserve Subdivision is requesting a 10-foot wide utility easement along the south and east boundary of Tract B, Town-owned outlot of The Reserve. The easement would lessen the impact to the private owners of the Ranch Meadows Subdivision to the south and would allow an electric line to be "looped" along the east line. Please refer to the attached location sketch and letter from Bill Van Horn for a more detailed description of the request Town Attorney Greg White has reviewed the request and does not foresee any legal problems with the granting of an easement Budget/Cost N/A Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request since it would lessen the impact to private and public property. BL/lb 1-1 TSN 3 1 1 1/7,1 7 /) 2 1 1 1 1.1 j t\, 7 /\~? / 1\4 7 / , ; ; 1 / 1,1 14.1-â€¢ i I NORM- LANE \ A \ 19 78#cr w. i ~/-2~45---702â‚¬Dâ‚¬m ' 5- 1-ro 1 7-844 1.-1- P.ofo e en / tv 3 +fe TeÂ«. Â¢14/11 8 - 9.ric-,0111 J w 9 PHASE, 11.. \___~ ~ Z / STANLEY 5 - \\ ~~ \~" ci// Jj HEIGHTS ' P,Vb ~ 3 / 6 DEE / UN -h \ 7 .?A-- *Â· /\ PHASE I Crl r--bl -Atopos â€¢29 2 A- 1 0.1,â€¢10,4, I L.0 , Ano.3 SOUTH ~ LANE i\_ L=At#10|O~RANCH - LONE fAL (boT 44 PINE ~1#LEELU d ' fb 4 / MEADOW 6 #wed. / SU50!VISION ACRES 6â€¢wor 1 /446 \ \ ~(gb 11 --\\24\4 4 1-1.126 1 STANLEY \V/ -//11 1 HEIGHTS P r 1 ADD B -4/\\ / r# \3.1 f GRAND ESTATES \7Â«CL. /0 4 LAKE ~ / AYERS ~~ VIEW \ ' ACRES -1 TRACTS Â»0 /\b- - SUB. CANAIY 19 20 0l I GOLF y),UNT 1 COURSE-~ -- STANL UEADOWS LAKE ESTES - 1-% 105*29'30 VICINITY MAP NO SCALE ila eYUE SeaD --- 1-2 R72W Lt'lti 4 44>- /663.49..,Â»Â«,03Â»3~A, LAND SURVEYS 2=1. --&11;Jilge- - + , ..4- SUBDIVISIONS - -- DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IMPROVEMENT PLATS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ~ VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING SANITARY ENGINEERING MUNICIPALENGINEERING 'fi' r \,1 J'~ WILLIAM G. VAN HORN - COLO. PE & PLS 9485 April 14,2000 Mr. Bill Linnane Director o f Public Works Town o f Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Bill, Pursuant to recent conversations, I am requesting on the behalf o f Gary and Sharon Nordic, that the Town grant a ten (10) foot wide utility easement along the east boundary and south boundary of the open space now owned by the Town in the easterly portion of The Reserve, 2nd Filing. Sewer service for The Reserve was originally designed with two connections going through Ranch Meadows Subdivision to minimize the length of line. These areas of Ranch Meadows are now built out and significant site improvements will be disrupted by the sewer construction. The proposed change will result in more length of main but will eliminate digging up the Town street and the installation of an additional man-hole. The change has been approved by UTSD. A need has also arisen for an electrical easement along a portion o f the east line o f the subdivision to provide for a looping of the system. The enclosed description is for a general utility easement along the entire east and south boundaries of the open space. In hindsight, we probably should have made this provision when the plat was developed. Sincerely, n ' / -U) 0-0 1~ 1~ -3)1 U/41)**A- U (04: William G. Van Horn 1043 Fish Creek Road Â· RO. Box 456 â€¢ Estes Park, Colorado 80517 â€¢ 970-586-9388 â€¢ Fax 970-586-8101 1-3 Exhibit A General Utility Easement Interior to the Final Plat of The Reserve, Second Filing A general utility easement, 10 feet in width and interior to the final plat of The Reserve, Second Filing, along the East line and a portion of the South line of said final plat, located in Section 19, Township 5 North, Range 72 West of the 6th P.M. and being more particularly described as follows: a 10 foot wide easement with its East line coinciding with a line commencing from the Northeast corner of said final plat also being the North 1/16th corner of Section 20 and said Section 19; thence along the East line of said final plat to the East 1/4 corner of said Section 19, S 01Â°35'33" W a distance of 1320.77'; thence continuing along the East line of said final plat to the Southeast corner of said final plat, S 01Â°08'00" W a distance of 268.32'; and a 10 foot wide easement with its South line coinciding with a line commencing from the Southeast corner of said final plat; thence along the South line of said final plat to the intersection of the Southeast line of Lot 32 of said final plat, N 89Â°11'06" W a distance of 477.65'. 1-4 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum April 18, 2000 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Greg Sievers AM CC: Bill Linnane SUBJECT: Guardrail Installation Background: The PWI) has been doing minor guardrail installation throughout Town for the past four years. The areas we address have been either by citizen request or by Street Department review and traffic analysis. In an effort to be attentive to the safety concerns of citizens, motorists and pedestrians, we have addressed the most critical or obvious areas first. These usually include steep drop-offs, ravines, switchbacks and obstacles. Ideal Fence Company of Erie, Colorado, is one of the few guardrail specialists located along the Front Range. For the past four years they have been working with Engineering staff closely and have produced a high-quality product. They have offered the following prices: 1. Fall River Estates, various locations. 932 linear feet plus end treatments $17,563 2. Upper Columbine and other miscellaneous locations. 7,437 Total: $25,000 Budget/Cost: Budget: $25,000 Cost: $25,000 Recommendation: Staff requests to purchase the installation of guardrails for a total of $25,000 from Ideal Fence Company. BL/lb 2-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum April 18, 2000 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Greg Sievers (~~- lj CC: Bill Linnane SUBJECT: Annual Bridge Maintenance Project Background: The annual bridge maintenance line item in the budget is for the benefit of the Town's public bridges. This year guardrail and handrail improvements are scheduled for the bridges at Old Ranger Drive and East Riverside Drive across the Big Thompson River. Maintenance to various bridge abutments is also scheduled. Inspections during May will determine the exact locations. Ideal Fence Company, Erie, Colorado, has been the general contractor for the Town's previous guardrail and handrail projects and its work has been very good. It is one of the few companies along the Front Range that has shown interest in the Town's relatively small guardrail projects. Ideal Fence Company has submitted prices for the project Budget/Cost Budget $30,000 Cost Old Ranger Drive Bridge $12,150 (Ideal Fence Co.) East Riverside Drive Bridge 7,421 (Ideal Fence Co.) Misc. Abutments & Maintenance 10,000 (Contractor to be determined) Total: $29,571 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ideal Fence Company's price of $19,571 and $10,000 for abutment work, with the abutment contractor to be determined. Total recommended expenditure is $29,571. BL/lb 3-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT MARCH, 2000 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE - .. 0.00 0.00 12 UTILITY LOCATION 76.00 72.00 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION Â· O.00 0.00 16 TAP REQUEST 2.00 4.00 17 WATER QUALITY 2.00 2.00 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS 0.00 0.00 22 FROZEN LINES > 0.00 0.00 23/24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN/SERVICE 1.00 16.50 30 METER REPAIR Â· 75.00 ~ . 79.00 32 FINAL INSPECTION 1.00 1.00 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED . 4,00 5.00 50 STREET REPAIR 1.00 1.00 51 SNOW REMOVAL / 0.00 0.00 52 STREET SWEEPING 0.00 0.00 53 SIGN REQUESTS*AND REPAIR * 0.00 .: . 0.00 54 STORM DRAINAGE 0.00 0.00 60 OTHER 11.00 .... ~ f 18.00 TOTALS: MARCH, 2000 - 173.00 198.50 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 173.00 96.00 158.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 198.50 207.50 207.00 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) +80.21%/-4.38% -2.04%/-17.98% +9.49%/-4.10% 4-1 . GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney At Law April 19, 2000 BILL LINNANE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TOWN OF ESTES PARK. PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Fall River Bridges Dear Bill: You have requested that I give you a legal opinion concerning the eight bridges located on Fall River that were constructed after the 1982 Lawn Lake flood. These eight bridges are listed as follows: Fall River Village Four Seasons Colonial Deer Crest Pine Haven James Mcintyre Ponderosa Kanemoto In reaching this legal opinion, I have reviewed the following documents: 1. The Town's file with regard to the application for the $400K HUD Imminent Threat development grant. 2. Grants of Easement from the Property owners to the Town to allow construction of the bridges. 3. Letter dated September 8, 1993, to the Colorado Department of Transportation from Greg Sievers. It is my opinion that the bridges are private bridges and not property of the Town of Estes Park. In arriving at this opinion I have considered the following factors: 1423 West 29th St. (970) 667-5310 Loveland, CO 80538 Fax (970) 667-2527 1. Prior to July 15, 1982, all the bridges were private bridges providing access to private properties. The private property owners have not dedicated the bridges to public use nor granted any public access to or over the private bridges. 2. There is no requirement in the grant application, grant acceptance, nor any correspondence which indicates it was a requirement for the grant that the bridges following construction be public. Although there were some statements made in 1983 concerning this matter, it does not appear to be a requirement of the federal grant. The following quote in The Trail Gazette article dated November 24, 1982 states as follows: "Kistner ( Bob Kistner, FEMA Disaster Recovery Manager) explained that the Town may have to own the bridges if HUD money is used to replace them. If that were the case, the Town would then lease the bridges back to the current owners. "But I'm not sure of that yet-I'm still trying to get a legal opinion on it," Kistner sid Monday afternoon." 3. Following the construction of the bridges, the property owners did not execute any documents conveying the bridges and any access rights to the bridges to the Town of Estes Park. 4. The letter of September 8, 1993, from Mr. Sievers to the Colorado Department of Transportation confirms ownership of the Town of Estes Park. That letter was written without consultation with me with regard to the legal question of bridge ownership. I believe this misstatement with regard to ownership of the bridges in the September 8,1993 letter relates back to certain statements made in the grant application which stated that the Town would institute a special improvement district in order to finance the construction of the bridges. Such a special improvement district would require public ownership of the bridges. However, a special improvement district was never instituted by the Town, as there was no necessity for recoupment of Town funds through that funding mechanism. 5. The bridges do not provide any public benefit to the Town or its citizens. Accesses to the bridges are private. Therefore, there is no reason the Town would wish to assert ownership in the bridges if the public cannot use them. 6. The Grants of Easement appear to be for the purpose of allowing the Town access to the site in order to construct the bridges. Those Grants of Easements do not convey to the Town ownership of the bridges once construction is completed. In fact, some of the Grants of Easement contain the following language: "together with the right of access along the route of Old Fall River Road, for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Such access right is limited to that right of access, if any, which existed on July 15, 1982." Based upon my review of the above referenced documents and reasons stated in this letter, it is my opinion that the bridges are privately owned. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to give me a call. r~ry truly~yours, 1 fo U.34- ~ Giegory A. White /1 Cc: Rich Widmer 1 --1- 1.442-PH.."151Â£R?%1%89:.6*~10' C [--i -t~ ~tr~ ~ Â»l 1 ; 4 : I./1; 1 11 3 1 4 - 'J! L - k.i:22Â·' : ju--r-*f 77214 F~---- - m .B ! ~ i f#/ 93 4 :0- r: If I N \ U . . 1 1. 112 .1 1 111 ~ ~ *At**4 i K 44 1:11~ :t 1 D -M..1 f.z, -'I /1 - 7 - â€¢ rl -1 ,>irrn 8--/9/7***:dt ......'. 491 ri A. 1, 'lliff,=.ai 14\ 1- .2- 1 1 ~uÂ·~iÂ·u~ 4 _*16-I2,6~~3~i 1 1 1 E-\ 1 Â· US+Al 1 1 1"\ 1 - i w 11 i :1 Â£*.I=afÂ»-2.1 UL , Ill LL'l E--fi,lif~:.Jit'/.il/ LL LIC-9~Â·771-[TTTE P~jItjbkI--L 6,7 inÂ· .Â·L-- J f ..0 11 - .24â‚¬*U L-----.-- 17-.-1-7!.Ni'Ibil'iÂ©-4>134~\ .// 0./ i .1- 3,6.2{-'~I cp-;rt:-AP.g'>1,9.43, j.cr 1.d 1 N rf.:-Â»9,3.94fel~ 44:! -'(iI---. 0,4,Â·=u/-4/Â¥i~-Â·-ipi*~tf_tlft, - . Rt&.11/jAyfpi:A~f9Yi,dies,iA'~l:~E~D~.*: i 03?FQPIV-44%'i-?FO~*41!*mardeÂ· . 47 hy pw L- . '. -1Â»fÂ®11% f-~-44 gip-6 i 14 ~, I I UU : 3 ,:i '42*814*r:Ma*.,4.---L-11-41, i ELK . 1 0 111.L .,./.:.,-< 9,=egN 9 1, rie-Â¥4Â·:Â· >iN < A m*iÂ¥ 1 1 1 \46#91--ht i ~71~ UJ - O :E t : a r , -' w-/6 Unt . . 1 ''' FTS# ' (7 1 f : - i i ta o i-Ltar.1 1 .4 1 I . to i Z 1 1 . .- -'. -fTA-; 1 ~ - t. - ~-~~ 2 ~U54:,|~ - L__~ # -11. *! AE 1 \3*91 : 1 aL - e . Â·:: :Â·N â€¢1Â©. c. 'r 1 ..0. & & 1 :1 L f : 11. - ~ h F u. ~/ 6 ' '9'.Â·42 '.t: : . ~ & 1%.~ I Â· , . 142 -1.*Ff- Z1% -1 92,/ iiI - L - - ---_ 4- -6.1-Ful\, 3,14!14>Se> I i.1-:..6 4 5 1:1:..2 97:9...2:Ul 2( 1 j .. 1ft& SN~#Eim ..i, f. - ./1- \ 2, 1, 0 41*&*f; I~I{*~~.7-Â·Â· .Â·;,Â·t4~~~~ ~.~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ O il LdillÂ· -L 1 & 1 1 1,1 ' Â· - . ... .. .. |'. ./. :I ' ' - I-,.I, ./ 9-8 044 4 . ..:t 7-2 f -h 6 ... ..1 L (,0 1 h =/7 - 4 ' I lit :,1 2 : : n :,f:Â°21 Lt $*glinpLEC ill 2Â·'FA '.41 j' ! 6 r-451 ilÂ»1.1--1-11 11.&-VA-4 1- ' ' ' i .... , -.I I . 4 J.1 \ \FT : a . i > W . . . 1.1. .I/%11 - - 1 g zE**if'. 11 / -1 1 1 --1 7 K. t"f.:-1.\.tÂ»-1 j I Ill 1 1 . pâ€¢r-19-Wi*.il ~ &2\ / . | P----~ ->7-Ilil~34-Th. /" 1 1 4 â€¢ 1 2: 1 , .-- 1 1 9 - u -n-_ Â·- ./ 1 1 , : ' . . , 'i - 1 :4 2 1 i >9 1 ./70; 4/ > 1 r*04-. . 2 1 4.: -:- ft]L 1 C w U -2- l =9- lai--=--liÂ«A / 3 i --- -1 ,Â«54<,41':1.)-39*1Â¥M LI LL U. 1 466 1 -Wl,T .... '. '11 0 5.... I i .1 .. d I u . . LLY' â€¢ DI 1 . 1. 4 1 LL i lil CL Ld Fill 1 \ M; / 9 ' : '--1-1.Â»*1... - dir 1 72 1~ 1 EL-.- . 78 ,uaÂ·I_ 1 '=19 \\: tâ€¢: ..L ./ LL ' ~~ ,*t'--164,-*-,7-3 -+ 1 -- 1 - 1 il 1 1 i : 'tj 1 11 -1- f a. 1 :I F.: m Z U il 1 U.- M 2 z W I f*34 d W W W -- -2Air. 4 11 , 9 2 Al~e*%3*#-00*~ .."lili .... TOWN OF E PARK -SOV&10 3 SECTIONS /9,20.29,30,31.32, 5 N, R 72W. OF THE GTH â€¢OU.0, Toiâ€¢, â€¢â€¢1â€¢ â€¢1 WI,IW. 3,2$~ 2 -m SITUATE LAR1MER UNTY SECTIONS 15,22,23,24,25.26,35,36, OF T g-1 EP-DAVIDDR-FALL SECTIONS 1,2,11,12, SECTIONS 6,7, LNEMOT-FALL | EP-DEERCRT-FALL| ~ .-- EP-4SEASON- L Vz! -39NVM -d3 ~ EP-FALLRCT-F L 11V3-N3 EP-FHAC'HRD-FALL | Form Approved OMB No. 2506-0060 .. NUMBER 3. STATI a. WUMBER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2. APPUÂ· APPUCA- N/A CANT'S nON 1. TYPE ~ PREAPPLICANON APPLI b. DATE IDENT1- b. DATE 1'â€¢or â„¢01â€¢th dav OF bar -enth day nER ASSIGNED 19 ACTION Lil APPL]CAnON CATION 19 (Marif "- ~ NOTIFICATION OF INTENT (Opt) L.0.0 Â£ REPORT OF FEDE]UL ACTION Ina.k 4. LEGAL APPLICANT/RECIPIENT 5. FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO. 69-0840030 i. 4plkant Narne : Town of Estes Park b. Or:â€¢nlutton Unit :Department of Public Works 6. o. NUMBER D MIÂ·klilgl c. Strâ€žt/P.O. BaK : P. 0. Box 1200 PROÂ· GRAM b. TITLE d. CIty : Estes Park 1. County : Larimer (Pre- CDBG - SCP 1. Slaw :Colorado g. ZIP Cod.: 80517 Â¥ LA-Ttl M ~ 6 1,1'th.ni-NE) :(303) 586-5331 h. Contld P,noa (Nâ€¢- Robert L. Kistner Catalog) & 1 7. TITLE AND DESCRIPTION OF'APPLICANTS PROJECT a. r/PE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT. A-Stâ€¢te H-Community Action Aeocy 8-Intâ€¢ntâ€¢10 :- HI;h.f Educallonit Initltwtlon ~| "Bridge Replacement Project" 0- Substalâ€¢ 3-Indlin Tilbo (Imminent threat") DI,tilct K-01 hâ€¢r (sp,cuy): D-CO u o ty Single Purpose F-School District E-CIty G-Spâ€¢<11 1 Purpow D).trIct K./.r apprepr<â€¢U k"- ~ 9. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE A-Basic Grant . D-Injuranci g B-Supplimintal Grint E-Other Ent. .p,ro- r--1-Al C-toin pliat, 1,â‚¬Ur(,1 I [M ] ~ 10. ARIA OF PROJECT IMPACT (Namu of ati.i, oeve.Uu, 11. [STIMATED NUM 12. TYPE OF APPLICATION Sultiâ€¢, Al.) BER OF PERSONS A-N-t C-Revttlon [-Augmintatt,4 BENEFITING B-Renewal D-Continuation Townt of Estes Park 700 EMCir â€¢,propriatâ€¢ ~ 13. PROPOSED FUNDING 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: 15. TYPE OF CHANGE (For llc oÂ¥ 1 Ul A-Incrâ€¢,se Dollen F-Ott;.r (Sp,ef/v) 1 I i. FED[RAL r 400,000 .00 .. APPLI CANT b. PROJECT~~- B.-Diceâ€¢,1 Dollar: C-Increas, Duration b. APPL ICANT 81,000 .00 4 4 O-0 *cre.,0 Dufallon E-Cincâ€¢Ilition c. STATE ~0 16. PROJECT START 17. PROJECT pe Revers Q. Lock * 1,500 .00 DAT]E90 7171 day DURATIO,t' Ent,r Ipprl. 1 d Mon,A. yriati .1. (.) 111 Si de 39,000 .00 18. ESTIMATED DATE TO 1'.ar ..o.Ch dav 19. EXISTING FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER i. OTHER BE SUBMITTED TO f. TOTAL $ 521,500 .00 FEDERAL AGENCY W 19 82/10/28 N/A 20. FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST (Ncy.â€¢. City. Stalâ€¢, ZIP cod.) 21. REMARKS ADDED 21. i. To thi best of my knowledge ind b,Ilif, dik In this pr#:pllutton/ippllcallon ori THE trui ind conoct, thi documint bu t-n APPLICANT dul, authorited by thi goirning body of CERTIFIES thi applitantÂ·â€¢nd the applicant â€¢111 comply THAT W with thi ittach.d auuranc# If thi elld- ani 11 approv.d. 23. .. TYPED NAME AND TillÂ£ b. SIGNATURE c. DATE SIGNED CERTIFYING }'-r MAIA dav REPRE- Harry B. Tregent . 1982/10/27 SENTATIVE Mavor 24. AGENCY NAMâ‚¬ 25. APPLICAÂ· 1'.. moMU day TION RECEIVED 19 26. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT 27. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE - 20. FEDERAL APPLICATION IDENTIFICATION 29. ADDRESS 30. FEDERAL GRANT IDEN TIFICATION ~ 31. ACTION TAKEN 32. FUNDING Yoar month day 14. Year .to. tA day STARTING O 1. AWARDED .. FEDERAL S .00 33. ACTION DATE > 19 DATE- 19 O b. RUICTED b. APPLICANT .00 35. CONTACT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMAÂ· 36. Yiar month dav TtON (Nami an,C tâ€¢le,dion, number) ENDING ~ c. RETURNED FOR t. STATE .00 DATE 19 AMENDMENT d. LOCAL .00 37. REMARKS ADDED [] d. DEFERRED e. OTHER .00 Â¤ .. WITHDUWN 1. TOTAL $ .00 El Yes ONO Prâ€¢â€¢cribâ€¢d by GSA. Fod,ral Monoomant Cirrâ€¢lar 4-1 SECTIOM 116FED[RAL ACnOM ~ SE.CnOM lt--CtinFICATION 1 ~SECT10N IY-REMARKS (Pleaâ€¢e referma tho proper item number /rom Sâ€¢ction, I, II or III, g apphcabid 13 b. $81,000 Estimate - Town of Estes Park will institute an Improvement District under 31-25-501 et. seq., 1973 Colorado Revised Statutes as a vehicle for financing and constructing replacement bridges. Replacement structures would thus be publicly owned and operated, and would qualify for Federal Funding in the event of a future disaster. The Improvment District to be formed by the Town would have the ability to issue special assessment bonds to finance the project. The bonds would then be repaid by property owners as special assess- ments over a period of ten (10) years. 13 d. $1,500~Budgeted Contribution - Town of Estes Park to cover cost of audit. Estes Park will administer the "Bridge Replacement Project" utilizing Mr. 6 Robert L. Kjstner, Disaster Recovery.Manager. No costs:.fbri:.administration will be charged to this project. 13 e. $39,000 - Larimer County agreed to transfer the remaining. balance from its 1981 HUD Community Development Block Grant to this project. Public Hearing Larimer County September 27, 1982: PUDLIC WARINO . , f OR COWWUâ€¢In DIVILOPWINT 'IOCKGRA/1 1.. h....0.u,...thip.... ....' 1 rvtÂ« '-rv-â€¢1 1. i-,M-Â¢'1 01 'Wll I Ceâ€¢am",11 Ofâ€¢i'"ment 8,"1 6,â€¢At, 10' 1- 0â€¢â€¢..,â€¢40 .â€¢d of i,â€¢ 4,1 13 tÂ»,001 1 iâ€¢ tilâ€¢â€¢ - r,n ././1/6 h Ihe her.d .4 14 â€¢-621, 01 13â€¢.Cru. ..6.60,0 optic-, â€¢84 1,0-1-4.0 {cill 00. i 'rld'-0 0"" M....,...,rÂ·ofÂ·,r, JIO roo ., .* 1 . . 2 Aci.-iâ€¢i, 10 6. ina,â‚¬1,Â·id le' â€¢riÂ·'/,1,04 1 4., 1:eÂ·,pu C.co-â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢,wrÂ·Ir [4Â·,â€¢1Â·4Â·"4. ["r<' I 0,â€¢ 61 DAlt Sit"f",tâ€¢â‚¬. 17.1~2 6 7.00/ M Cimmâ€¢,iâ€¢ovi, H...â€¢aÂ© Aoe. X]0Â¥/f 510â€¢â€¢ SI,â€¢,1 fer: Ell,â€¢fl. C.O 1 JOT- f "iâ€¢beck., ' 1,â€¢,Re; Couâ€¢4 14â‚¬v'Â·'IC A.,Anâ€¢14 . Â· ~i tri-,FI, A.dpiâ€¢'YR.pole,Â·.1.1.4 * 9 /1. mti' 11 1,62 - On October- 6,Â·1982, Ms. Rusty Van-Horn, USDHUD, gave verbal approval to ' -1<z*LarimerÂ·?08-0~Â·ty.:,Â·t.o:,-tb.anst.eM~Â·.Â·fundi,ng.toÂ·,:Estes,-,Â·.Bark.Â· On Octobe.r. 11,.1 982 Larimer County. signed contract with Rocky'Mounâ‚¬Ain Consultarits to Assess, Design, Inspect and Perform the Testing of "Bridge Replacement Project." Breakdown of costs are: (1) $ 7,000 Assessment Phase (2) $17,400 Engineering Design (3) $11,000Â·Inspection of Construction (4) $ 4,000 1Laboratory testing of material used in constructic Total contract $38,400.00 - STANDARD FORM 424 PAGE 2 (10-75) 2,Â·.- 1 ' ,Â·-1Â·,i-i: AC (,(4 Oil/,DO I- f:1 1~,d i~ t.Â·: i -4... t GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency whereof is acknowledged, GUY N. CARTER, DONNA M. CARTER, EVAN C. CARTER AND NANCY L. CARTER, hereinafter referred to as "Grantors", do hereby grant unto the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, a muncipal corporation, its successors and assigns, hereinafter referred to as "Town", an easement for construction and installation of a bridge, as more fully described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, with the right to construct, maintain, inspect, operate, protect, repair, replace and remove such bridge, and for the use of such bridge for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Grantors warrant that they arc the owners in fee simple of said easement and are authorized to grant this easement. Grantors further grant unto the Town the right of access to said easement and the right of ingress and egress on and over the within easement for any and all purposes necessary and incident hereunder. Grantors reserve the righÂ·t to use and enjoy such easement so 10]19 as such use and enjoyment does not interfere with the rights herein granted to said Town. Grantors specifically agree not to build, create, or construct any obstructions or structures over or within said easement, nor permit the same to be dione by others without the written consent of Town. The rights herein granted may be assigned in whole or part by the Town, and the terms, conditions, provisions of this easement grant shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this 02 .... -- D t. 4 1 '.Â· i il-- Aj 4 agreement this / ~ 'day of //.47 i c , 1983. f , // 44 ((ci 31- (10,31 1 /GUY N. CATEn ' ' ' lJ 7*32-, Lii 0 i-j~~1 * 9 d..1}001-, DONNA M. CARTE* EVAN C. CARTER / ri V~ i l ..1,1 -Of A- \ . 6 --< c .(04 il- .P_A .. NANCY L. CA*ER 1, Grantors" TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO * I By iÂ·/6,71.i') rifi : ./9-<91'' i 7 ATTEST: <..0.11/79 ~--- - ~A~.Â£7â‚¬- 0 S TA TE OF #/44UAL ) SS. COUNTY OF (12-r,i.4,~/ ~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ..44_day of 9<1,422 _~ 1983, by GUY N. CARTER, DONNA M. CARTER, WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: i-/:2-36- Â«),ck.LA) c:~ffl., JiAL. Notar YAGAW,~9:ORD NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF MO. STATE OF COLORADO ) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1-12-85 CAM9EN COUNTY ) SS. COUNTY OF LARIMER ) Address .0'-The foregoing<,instrument was acknowledged before me this 6 tx day of ...09Â° f I. f , J983, by 4/4 d â‚¬ Â· e'AL/.r A ,/ and p A WO ,/ t.. 4,4 KNAL WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 0-.--02Â£ -,/~6 Notary/Public 0.9 70 (AÂ·\Â·166.,quÂ· Mitue... + 4 Addres7/ A -2-\ r J N t 6 + 6 2 214 2 112 7 Easement Description JAMES McINTYRE To the Town of Estes Park from Guy N., Donna M., Evan C. and Nancy L. Carter. Easement and right-of= hy for the installation of a bridge located in a portion of Lot 5, Lot 9, and that land lying West of Lot 5 and East of the centerline of Fall River, James Mcintyre Subdivision Addition to the Town of Estes Park being situated in the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, '1'ownship 5 North, Range 73 West of the Gth P.M., Town of Estes Park, County of Larimer, State of Colorado. Said easement is described as commencing at the Northwest corner of that portion of said Lot 9 which lies South of U.S. Highway 34, with all bearings relative to the South line of Section 22, considered as bearing N87039 '10"W, Thence Southwesterly along the centerline of Fall River and the West line of said Lot 9 to a point and TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, which bears S22019'38" W a distance of 126.59 feet from said Northwest corner of Lot 9: Thence along the centerline of Fall River to a point which bears S25'34' W, 40.0 feet from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence S64026' E, 32.00 feet; Thence N25Q34' E, 40.00 feet; Thence N64026' W, 32.00 feet back to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Together with a right of access along the route of Old Fall River Road, for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Such access right is limited to that right of access, if any, which existed on July 15, 1982. EXHIBIT "A" 4 9 9/9 1 Ullj ..1 1, -Â·1 nit Ii- -LJ B 2 7 1 3 P I 1 1 1 5 I // COUNTY OF LARIMER STATE OF COLORADO GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and suffigiency whereof is acknowledged, KMC CORP. OF LONGMONT, hereina f ter referred to as "Grantors", do hereby grant unto the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, a muncipal corporation, its successors ancl assigns, hereinafter referred to as "Town" , an easeinent for construction and installation of a bridge, as more fully described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, with the right to construct, maintain, inspect, operate, protect, repair, replace and remove such bridge, and for the use of such bridge for vehicular and pedestrian , traffic. Grantors warrant that they arc the owners in fee simple ' of said easement and are authorized to grant this easement. Grantors further grant unto the Town the right of access to said easement and the right of ingress and egress on and over the within easement for any and all purposes necessary and incident hereunder. Grantors reserve the right to use and enjoy such easement so long as such use and enjoyment docs not interfere with the rights herein granted to said Town. Grantors specifically agree not to build, create, or construct any obstructions or ' structures over or within said easement, nor permit the same to be done by others without the written consent of Town. The rights hercin granted may be assigned in whole or part by the Town, and the terms, conditions, provisions of this easement grant shall extend to and be binding upon the , heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of ! the parties hereto. , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this -/ 1 0.] CD:, r:-t â€¢11, - agreement this ~~~5Â¥ day of 462UAR-U . 1983. KMC CORP. OF LONGMONT Attest: < Ky,~ ~_ ~~~N ' g.' ~3~Â«-4.- 464Â· "Grantor" TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COL,OIU\DO C- 97 . ATTEST: A STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF ,~LA,t<~Â·00~ ~ The foreg ing instrument was acknow] edged before me this F 4 day of <:~--#ALLA.La- , 1983, by 21/LÂ« Â·d), 6-u,/4 and d of KMC (0Â©RP. OF LONFMONT. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ~ -r-kj 3 , 19 y E- ,U l J 14/W Le 0 ' 0Â»K.J Notary Public p.0.1111: 4-34. talÂ©O ad. (4 35â‚¬-1-1 Address STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF LARIMER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , day of , 1983, by and WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public Address R 2 2 13 Pi l ot Eatement Dc.,cription JAMES Mc INTYRE To Town of [sles Park front KtiC Corp. of Longmont Easement and right-of-way for the installation of a bridge located in o portion of Tract 80, Fall River Addition to the Town of Estcs Park, being situated in thc Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter or Section 22, Tpwnship 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6lh P.M., Town of Esres Park, County of Larimer, State of Colorado. Said easement is ... Tract 80 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, with all bearings described as commencing at the Northeast corner of said relative lo the South line of said Section 22 considered as bearing 587'35'11"E: Thencc along the boundary between said Tract 80 and Lot 8, Jamcs Mcintyre Subdivifion, N63'46'W, 32.01 fccl; Thencc 525'34'w, 42.90 fccl; Thence 564'26'[. 32.00 fcct to tlic ccnlorlinc of .. Fall River and tile boundary between 5oid Trocl 80 and Lol 5, James Mcintyre SubdivisionÂ· Thcncc alonfi the ccnlcrlinc of Fall River N25~34'[, 42.53 feel back to the 11(U[ POINT OF BEGINNING. Together with a right of access for vehicular and pedestrian traffic to the described easement across Tract 80 along the route of Old Fall River Road. 1-0 r U 44&.. ; \ -Â·-*...2.8 ACE ? 0 1-, -,- p l' el ~ I 1 / EXHIBIT ..."Ar -11 ~/ i 4/ , 1 Abri,7 , ' 1 3// 1 ; 7 1 1 *11Utl- 9 u Ek,7 Â£~A the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this , -7. 1 0! OD 6-Â· %2) E D :. 1 ~ ~ t~i~7' TOWN OF ESTES PARK -2'.thly , 7. >/1 1,2 20 ME('9 f Prn.75 -3 x *a#,241>* '* Â«f;~~ :- ---4Â¢j*~271*:- I p#is VUil,Â£4A104Â£491:: ?I.>.,- *.4* >Â·3 ' 04,3' 1,4*Jj,\\.11,0 ..,~ .,.Â·~ -:~~ ..a I 3 j 1,*444-:c=ug521:i*,- â‚¬41>44 4 0 3%31.91â‚¬114 3 7.re,4 -15944'0*>44.45&5,2;'"' . September 8, 1993 Mr. Walt Mystrowski COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Staff Bridge, Room 320 4201 East Arkansas Denver, CO 80222 Dear Walt: I have recently taken responsibility of the bridge inventory files for our Public Works Department. Along with designing a preventative maintenance program, I have contracted the services of Rocky Mountain Consultants to assist me in preparing our application for the DOT/Federal Bridge Funds and in planning future repair and reconstruction. I have discovered that the eight local private bridges have been excluded. Following the ftood of July 15, 1982, state eniergency money was acquired for the construction of these bridges. One requirement of that funding was for the Town of Estes Park to assume ownership and maintenance of those bridges. Due to the low volume of use on these bridges, they have remained in good condition. However, that determination is really the responsibility of a professional engineer. I have been in contact with Randy Haynes at Alpha Engineering Group, Inc. I understand that they may add these bridges to our report next year. This letter is to confirm the ownership and maintenance of the following bridges by the Town of Estes Park. All bridges are on the Fall River. Listed in order from east to west: 1. Fall River Village 2. Four Seasons 3. Colonial 4. Deer Crest 5. Pine Haven 6. James Mcintyre 7. Ponderosa 8. Kanemoto (303)586-5.3.31 â€¢ P.O, IJOX12(10 â€¢ 1.51 1.51'ARK, CO 80517 â€¢ rAX(303)5116-2/116ADMINISIRATIC)N â€¢ IAX (.10.1)5236-690'JOIHER 2. -3 2 W .92 6, 4 & 5 J .1 &9 5.3 & 32 ,9 -8 -6 & . 1 1 g.: gl 2 = 6 9 g -2 2 E 2 -2 2 E 1 E~ - 5Â¤ .ga .E -2 * ar Â£ m 0 F s :1. c, 1 f . -0 .6 Â§':5 ~ 2 -5 1 4 .-4-/. : , at> I . 6,3 51 7 boF.- 1 ..81 31 Â¤ o E .9 hoj c Â®2 5:1 - M 5 9 -0 6 0 004 0 I 8.3 -0 -: 2 g g ZE 8 3 8 8 ///1 .1 .2 6, = * 8 f , -CE .* 7 49 W â‚¬ 3 * 70 3 9 7 & 73 boa .2 0 Â¤3 O -5.-2 -2 0- E-= â‚¬ a -2 ==a =2 2 1 - 2 -5 q * -3 f -S y.2 *3 52 9 1 â€¢3 0 Â£ i -2 -0 â€¢ --g N 50-- M,-0 Q 2 72 , g W m 3 -5 2 2-=a :* 1 -0 -5 9 -li -8 -1 -0 z.g~reÂ·g-= .3 &=' C 8-gÂ» ~- NE ~ 6. 2.gÂ·S & C h.[39 . SE '604 0.3 2,4 0 2&-u,~'S.' O 5Â® 0~:1 . E 0 & 9 8 U . 7' I * e w -rj k 2.. g * c:o, s i .. 0 = a, Â¤.52_ ..- 64 - - 4 5 .1,3 3, 8 Â£ 0.~i 1 0 -22:703-0 +G :-2 e LE= g 3-2 4 2-N ----S -Z=IN t1Â¤2â‚¬ 72-2 Kil~ 1 5 4 *>. 4 > 2 ES ~: + X < E 5 4 3 = 5 0 B E &4 5 -2 c 2 m 20â‚¬ Z E 4 4 .5 8 bo 2 d w 93~.~ 5% 2 2 - C . I /22 2. Z a m E Jt â‚¬ E =-1 --5 -E * 4 A a) a) I z ; -0 -C - b 60 6 0 3%) E .2 2 i 2 0 Â£ . @am Z 0)0 130 2= =4)= - 3:DE- 04; Ag i R -2 1 -2 m =2 G -2 :5 - 3 -M~ 1 3 0 Q 92 4 4, 1 t.3;3 14 i.i digÂ·1*if: ~ - 3 W 6 Ul-C .U-2 -M c 5 7 0 3 a> 2 -0 1 A :333 g bo 0 - 0 0 2 60 .2 4 g .8 3 0 5.6 60 . 10 Â·5386*â€¢'S-~ t= S.C Â¤ 6. 2 *,..En Co > Ed * 7 1 4 4 * '0 'C N - ce B g 92 6 U C= d N.3 v gta}*380)=.00,Â¤ .4.2& E==CO /98.88.0.2 Et lifd Â§0 ges -L- k t.0 5.5 3 1 i 0 + 0 0 Q al> 02 El== - -9 :Rf Â£31 2-I 1 4% 5% e:Â£*# 24-4-3 1 1 -2 HZ IC a-U @ -i-: 6 a) 4- ... :Buo goc> 04i-,a}PE 6. 0 28.3.12 -2 0, + .= 6. t 0 w .0 2 - r .5 Â·YE Z RE E.*0 Â¤g * =:9. W Â¥ 829 0 9! E NE -E ' 31% i @@- 9-3 2 7 2 .m 33 Er Me W EN<,2 E.% E- .E %.5 %13/Wiu);:21 2 3 -i â‚¬ 5 8 :2 2 R .li w E -6 ks 3 JO = o *2 P 1 4=: .., Be N 0 = UU 0 5 .2 1 99 i 8 .4 0 râ€¢ w 6- 4 31 g - 0 - - =1- - .9.4 ugM 2 8 Â» b Wesg E 22 R .* 26 's 2 8 .S z . r'- c 41) .1- At 9' 6 S a) 6, 3 -M al 1 03405 21:57 $ ..5 a #C -M .9 2~ R M % 0 0 = a> 8 g g Ei8 8#18 9 72842 ~~ ~ -3 2.0 J Q> 02.-02 5 01 1 * 1 -a=JEWP#Sm'wa/6 E -z 2 8 g t&4*2C a) C C mic 29 a, -g Ps MAS=45 - 8.g 9 0= u at}- Ag 3 9 1 '2 -2 E e # u u : - c a; m 2 # 2 0,- A 0- O % .c 8Evg*Abi* E = ht).M Q - 31<5 1 A E c ed 2 2% â‚¬ 5 E â‚¬ 8 -D u.O a> 6-04)6- 4 50 @ , 2,& q ...1 58 423 0â‚¬ -92 * da, M-0390 :g 6. 0 2 = 2 2.Z S=- := a> 60 0, - v E . E .-1 o 2 W v 1 .E 1* Mils 0 m 1 fil O .70 2.8 ~ Z: :3 .% E &03 6. F. - 8.2 w = 44 a -2 43-3. 96922 IM=*3:263, 3*fle 1 A -Â° I :Â·2 -t~ Â·Â·M 22 -Z â‚¬ 2.B Z 11 A. AE - E-1 71 B tÂ· a, 1 -E W -Â· O 4 a x E 33&*E 6349@2& 0 â‚¬ 4 4, # 0 0 08 8, CS â€¢ / Â·M a,.C Â¤ Â·284Â® -0 0 29 gg .0 01 > .1 =2 ~2@5*=02Â°IdigjE ~o 1 .2 0 4- = 0.-O CD O â‚¬0 2 f E-a .1 2 - 4 -O w - Â§ ESâ‚¬ B v 2.2.0 6 ~ Mâ‚¬ 60 N 0, F .8 & 3 2 6 6, es r. m .9.- 4, M Â® v z 3 * i -s g i -E 0 0.9 -8 -0 0, C) . C W 2 0= .0- 0.3 8 4 60 3 4 S 0) W -- bo 2 71 1 8 E ..9 3 f Â¤,C) i d. 4 < g 0 1 2-0 Â§0 c o g .1 01 2 8 n = 8 1 m 92 -0 -3 -7 ;s k 2 MC Â£ r 05 8 . AN - 2 E .9 c U@Aa Estes Park, Colorado day, November DAN CAMPBELL additional funds. Bob Ki replace what.we lost in t e flood, nOt aB elqnop appears unlikely, especially The for completion of the convenient way to ak A-Iesqo a ac single 18 Bridge District Unl ikely eason, IngaP0; 41!M [Be tri lualliaoeidai p lue~~;~ -- eAOS r disaster are bridge, lane Fall River Flood Repairs to avoid the need for a ingle lane othe nine bridges is ginally That is considere the number has to allow ner exp pasn 4 Inda i 82 1:!7Â°-;auu~smq 366.U I A had been alerted 99-13/,B UO 8.1 83 "pq~qi :a 41 01 8-louITU DUIOG Twice Weekly 6 1 Bale JaAIN laA03 LARIMER COUNTY TOWN OF ESTES PARK STRUCIURE NUMBER EP-JMSMCIN-FALL INSPECTED 10/03/96 URGENTLY NEEDED REPAIRS: 1. Install delineators or other safety marking de,~ices on both approaches. S * 2. Repair bond on insulation of sewer pipe between girders A and B near abutment 1.$ * Total Estimated Cost For Urgently Needed Repairs PROGRAMMED REPAIRS: 1. Patch both low approaches to reduce impact on the bridge. S * 2. Clean sand/gravel from edge of both curbs. S * 3. Apply clear seal coat to hue concrete wearing Eurface. $ 500.00 4. Paint or apply wood pregn'ative to timber rails and posts to prevent rot. $ * 5. Seal expansion joints at both abutments using a flexible rubberized joint seal ant. $ * 6. Rearrange and replace damaged riprap at Northwest and Nortbeast oorners of tbe bridge. S : 7. Seal crack in grouted keray al ceoterline of bridge. S * 8. Dump or place 5 C.Y. of fill and/or riprap behind Southwest, Southeast, and Northeast wingwall ends, (15 C.Y. tota]). S 600.00 Total Estimated Cast of Programmed Repairs ..........................S 1,100.00 ADDITIONAL REPAIRS TO IMPROVE SAFETY: 1. Install bridge rails to meet curreot AASHTO standards. S 5,300.00 2. Install approach rails to meet curÂ·rent AASHTO standards, (Interrupted barrier design required at Northwest and Northeast corners for restricted width bridge). $ 14,200.00 Total Estimated Cost of Safety Repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . ... . .. S 19,500.00 Total Estimated Cost of Bridge Repairs .............S 21,100.00 These items art eslimiled to be less tbu 5500.00 .. Com of ropairs arc includcd within st fety rtpain lo subsund,rd nils. - Repair costs do Dot include mobi]E,tion and arc c.stirnatcd ]995 costs. - Noted repairs art to upgrade Lo original condition, maintain present condition aDd/or provide minimum safety futurts. These repairs may Dot be all inclusive. Approximate Sufficiency Rating: 79.7 HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES ; Infrartructure, Inc. Alpha Engineering Group 1! It 1.111 lili. lilli::.:1111111 ,. -- . 2 *-:I':,:-9/Â»xY-FL<Qu.M'Wium/"8~835793/-, - - 8'Â·IPAR)<Il>Rk- 2 -t. f.-~22' f>ijit~* ~3 ~~,d '25". ': , ~.'...n -..-'. M..- MEÂ·Â·Â· .. AREA / . r 44 -. .... 4.1...iÂ·Gf ' I 27SHOULDER '. t .-Â·.-Â·-r= 99MEep.-01429*ji*2.20â‚¬E* 2 #e-- - . - - r . 404 r 'I. 1 " Â·~,- ~~7 ,~ 1.. 'P~~Al..la t.Â¥91:77.0-,J-41.4, -4-1 -- -4-'.IuFK:2*d~Ii.2-Â·2 - - v - '. 14.7/ 2.1.0 ..2 t..3' .1:.1-":3 590 4462#.g:W~~"~bl - i,iÂ· - :Â· . 24Â· ht-C'k,Â·. 0221**32'*16#815MMVe. 7<*'~. ... - ... -' .--:. - t.:-?-8<Nt:-47(<7%,02Â¥/â‚¬9*.V'Al . '<G - -1 ~ <:- -=,...-; ~>~:- ..Â»-Liti iÂ·-~ ,(it4,:Ap#*Ai<*pe:*.*.si.u-~Lpf.4.-- ~ *. ~ ~ TRASH RECEPTACLE I . PROPOSED. PARKING{ ARIEK>%.4-N ~tÂ·'~-1.*29'*st.14"lk,er**HAL=57.3.1 . '..4. a .1.1 - 1 1%.E:'12.-) * 10' x :8' AREA FOR (COU.FlT.DECREE:- 95(V291~)-Af-t't':-:~(Qi)~ff- ~Â·- - 6 . fj.~:~~I.Â»07, 2 ..fi~(iCI t~7';*139~~5 ...'Â·Â·'.''w/.1,/2.6%44:â€¢ â€¢Â·-7.. v -- . LU UNAGE - - CUSS 2 69-SUBGRAbE'?Qj~i.~%~2' -/7 Â· L 11 O .TAIL>-- , :Â· Â·i.- . Â·.~ .i.~~ ict.-Â©~S'Â¢%9 r: r'.. 4 , CL > PONDEROE . 'Â· . . .~ ' 4 -elzYvER#i-?bÂ·951Â·t ~ -fer 97 - 0 . .. .. I.J. ROADWAY SECTION~~ALLADS;44;,32:17(:i< ,Â§~ 2 0. . - COURT DED -J , 12:rket 4-7 ,... HOLLOW COURT - -NOT TO SCALE,.3....r:lf--Â·~J:fÂ·Â·. ... '- 1 3 (4 -L.:py I - I - CE -. 7 4-1 ':t Â· - SEWER MH STA 1 +00 FORMER-- PROPERTY LINE :r .-49.- . BEGIN SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION - LAND VACATED PER-~ A..Â·7 2... ..- .,12 4.3.'EX....MH E- 134 LINE - - / COURT DECREE 950/291 : Â·. 4.'-- " . ... . RIM. ELEV. =. 7749.00' ' 5.09 - INV. IN = 7740.83' 1-2 . 'Â·. - 02.3 P.~-..INV..bUT = 7740.43' - L3 LOT 8 L5 L6 04 .r --'< 17. I - 1 PROJECT BENCHMARK L7 --- LB PONDEROSA- 7749.04' L9 LODGES - 4 *04Â» 00 L10 . . Â· I <1Â· BLACKHAWK LODGES '0 ,.0.-6... â€¢ . cav le - 4<4 74:0Â¢1,Â» Â·Â·.-Â·Â·c C.Â· 1. SEWER i-Â· >r' . . tÂ»...... 'DU<*6:..... - .0 :.. N-69'41'16' W / I - 2414 2 2.45 WIDE - . -1 . 268.00% I --. CJ-4 1 < / - I ., < 1~2,4..f SesÂ»SEMENT Whlifft/\ Â·- ill .i -m , k /4-'%f -2Â»'63Â·Â·Â·2 :. \ - - --C2-=--1 .>. :1.=.44<"tig~Gr.~32 -7 Â© . ..1 32 - I./4.11. 17614AVASL"-. 2 -\ TRAILS WEST COTTAGES . RAP. Dcn = 18- . ~ ~ , ~t ~:7.Â·XY-0342â‚¬:27 -1.r:/ ND.WEST BANKS F-- .. .. 'htJ'*.11.tÂ«7 R WITH RIP RAP. --aÂ«: I.- I..~ 0-3 f~~~1 j : -... ~..yâ‚¬:@**EfA,Lli RIVER )ISCHARGE POINT ~ .=. 4 'Â· . Â¥,5?1 ,:0~14/A>61.:,11.,,. .., w . .: