The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1999-01-21K AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 21, 1999 3:30 P.M. preparation date: 1/15/99 *revision date: 1. Town's Vehicle Replacement Policy Request approval Reports: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Upper Front Range Region Transportation 20 Yr. Plan to the year 2020 3. Accountable Water Report update 4. Update of 1999 proposed water line replacement projects/ water line replacement projects priority list , TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 8, 1999 TO: Bill Unnane/Public Works Commitbee EROM: Dave Mahan- SUBJECT: Vehicle Replacement Policy Recommendation Background: The Town has approximately 300 pieces of equipment currently being maintained. During the budget process every year, the Fleet Department recommends replacement of various pieces of equipment The current replacement policy is unwritten, but has been and currently is consistent Due to the large fleet size, staff has taken this policy and put it into a written form. The written vehicle replacement policy guidelines are attached for your review. Budget Not applicable. Recommendation: Staff recommends acceptance of the written vehicle replacement policy. It should be noted that this policy is only a guide. Certain circumstance such as high maintenance on a particular vehicle or a change of use on a vehicle may require replacement outside of these guidelines. DM/lb 1-1 GENERAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT POLICY GUIDELINES Summary Type 1 - Light Use 80,000-90,000 miles Pickups 14, M, 94 ton or 10 years Light use 4x4s Type 2 - Heavy Use 60,000 miles Â· Pickups 1,2, 94 ton Â· or 8-10 years Snowplows Type 3 - Heavy Use 60,000 miles Jeep Wranglers or 6 years (meter readers) Tvpe 4 - Medium Use 80,000-90,000 miles Pickup V ton . or 7-8 years Type 5 - Heavy Use 50,000-60,000 miles 1-ton or 5-6 years (duty trucks & dumps) Tvpe 6 -Extra Heavy Use Monitor costs 1-H Dump or life 15 years (snowplow/dump) Type 7 - Heavy Use 80,000-90,000 miles Police cars or 4-4 M years Type 8 - Light Use 100,000-120,000 miles Cars ~ . :or 7Â·years Type 9 - Heavy Use 50,000-60,000 miles 1-ton or 10 years (snowplows) Tvbe 10- HeaVv UieR(hour meter)Â· 2,500-3,000 hours 1-ton . : or: 14 years (special use - blasting truck) Type 11 - Heavy Use (hour meter) 6,000 hours Tractors or 12-15 years (loader/backhoe/grader/tractors) Type 12 - Heavy Use (hour meter) Monitor costs Street sweepers 6,000 hours or 10 years Type 13 - Heavy Use (hour meter) 8,500-9,000 hours Truck/Aerial or 12 years (L&P buckets) Type 14 - Medium Use (hour meter) 650-700 hours Walker mowers. :: of 7-10 years (seasonal use) Type 15 - Medium Use (hour meter) 800-1,000 hours E-Z Go's or 10 years (seasonal use) NOTE: Certain circumstances such as high maintenance on a particular vehicle, or change of use of a vehicle may require replacement outside of these guidelines. 1-2 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 i.Â·>1> Â· 4 0 2-2 .2 0,0 8 NER ERE 2 3 19 1 E 5 --- 0 Â®N qi I Â® - 064= E Eg 7/ R 2*~-%49 49269&21 EZBEE&5 2 *â€ž00000 .O -fiel e o . -20 0 ~lli~ ~ i :I ~ (0 2 16<Â«Ez 4 0:216Â©un 0 eCOZZZ ZI@*840 10=Â®66 *34 0 g . L 0) .J Q. 03 - d E :01':2 3} =2 2 2 2 32 2 = Im M wv aN E ui 1* J e R k k k & R -8 -0- EE=g ... 216 ~ 10Â· 3. 3- 2 8*E %8Â§-E.f. 11 1* 5 - ID G) 4 4 01 N < 2 1,5 -2 d M LL E-O > ' 6-- 22 Â®aja) = 22 -a -2 0) th':3 S EE t ~5 -EIg~ * ~ E -Eg 2 ~ .13 ~ ~ - - O- 00 0 r (D Â£10.a 2 @82*& Â§2@b 4,0 m A 13-11-9 0 0 4 g '12 E 01 CK * C) Lu . m to I = 00 - *:r i X g LU -0 . . 1-1 1**i 3 c 1 0 2 2 2 1 2 19 43 33 0 :* 2 2 6- g lE 2 2 & C .5 E (D E 0) 0) 0) Ui Â® .n (D >4 * * BEE 13 , $ 25 % 2 2 2 8 E E E Z .5 * as E 2 9 E 1 E. 8-Â·S 0,4 g 1 -0 1 2 1 a. : a o 0 0 : o 2 8 # &2 8 ~f * S Â® M 0 16 Â© 2 -2 8 -e : -u z z z z -6 9 53 - 1, o @ O- g g 2 2 & J I 05 i LO 0 - LD Â® -= tr) 0-*; io Â® a, 75 01 9- 10 : ig< E m K g w lu â‚¬v a) c (DO>(1)(1)(1)(D + 0168 8 k %52/1 g F F E E ~5 * -@ * 3-Â¤@19 -9. qj EgoE li; u R & R & R R Z: M 8 8 1 -2 Â§ t? * S % 2 8 ..5 1% 14 U =e- * 1* 1& Â· Z -0, 0. Cl -8- 9 ~Ei- CO 0 0 h * 0) 00 00 CO "01010191-4 f 24 E R & 25*w :Ililli (D (D (D (D (1) - a) v - (1) 0 3 0 -92 2*.cco !61 M:* 5 2. t 1% Sa .1# 1M /M im * 2 m in 0 --0 692 Egui - Â·Â· 1.-IL L L. L (D (D .6 j 8 2--E .1Â§ ElE ~ 80--2 22 o l* 2% % 2 2 & R & a a o Â· o -5,Â© -E 21 0)1* 0, - E <D E :E - 8. 19. -e -e -e Z ZÂ· 0 0 10 (D ID rl- liD 8 8 a. 0 9- 16 8 r CV M =- Â·1- E 05 1 U.1 (D Q . 0, 0) 0, (D CD 00 48:2- 2 Bo E gu . C D * co E .E* .E * * 2 Egui-@vER= EM ui g - 1- 6 6- 6 R & & 1 R k Z, 2 d 2 1 8 b .2 E a O -* A o 8. 19- 9 -8 -U ye - A co E 8 cÂ» E u, k m (DE 71=2 2 tohcolor Â£ f 16 0 a R & 2 a E N M M ~ le N < EW Â£2 1i1111t 5 *- â‚¬n .92 -92 -2 -0 -E' 2 2.16 0 - 0. 43 -9 12 -2 E 65 E .E E -E .E 'E .2 eE 2 2 *:E m *2 i i i % -2 R k E- R ~ S % E -23 E ~ 01 5 g E g ao Â® 0 * E D 9-0 E '5" 8% F r E ; igae=#32Â§%5387 9 fg<L 2 01 CE Z W W M CR.B : J ----- al 4) > - 0 -q, 00- CD Â® O 0 -- 00 1-3 jeek slsoo ie eoueueju! g L :Aouepedxe set!111 000'0 'selill] 000 0 ajewils31 sieek sieek O L Wi~ete ~~S sieek 8 01 2 'SJeaX 9 OLe;!1 8 ANALYSIS - REPLACEMENT POLICY GUIDELINES le Nell, 08 ~S~ TOWN OF ESTES PARK Use Hea Snowplows 20,000-40,000 $1.25 per mile 17Â¢ per 40,000-60,000 $1.36 per mile 20Â¢ per:mile 0-20,000 Â¢ per mile 7 60,000-80,000 27Â¢ No data 80,000-90,000 39Â¢ per . No data 90,000- No data No data puell]LUO08&1 le $0 is SOO 6up NUOLU 9'~iwq~*~dudeÂ¥ e SJe8X &P duty trucks. ommend sieeX Miles O - 11 11 It 11 " 11 . LD E 0 . U) esl Euit O- 1 k C Â£ 6- ~ A-Z 00 J 3. Oc O.- C U L O U *Dip o CE Â£= =E E â‚¬ 5 -~ C OE 22 CÂ» 6 (1)1* ui lim .5 @E 09 me *5 On ms am ma 9- S t3- * 0 =E-@ 2 0- 20 20 20 2,8 2,8 2.82 22 &8Â§ Sg I..000008:08 e.Ca: 0 000000 0 >0 a.- Â® O al e r LO (0 00 â€ž- k r- E " 0 11 t.i== $ E L k Q Q . Bglive= #*t J ZO O EE =â‚¬ 2 -C:E lf) - C W J j #05 E E @3 Â§~ gR g!~ g A & E .5 2 9 Â¢9 4- r LO LO 0 2 &e8 Egg .-'I -'- Or- -r- A .-I (0 2 o e - 93 - e = e M e -0 0000000 E=& 8-31 i 00 000 zzz < R 01 (9 4- 1111!11 E 10 8-2 - 00 16 - . . 0,2-19 -C - L L . C Â· (D â‚¬ 2 0.- Â® O,2 -C E (0 J 5. 0 -0 9 3 9 0 49 9 - 10 A UD O> BA > &2 2 0 49 . â‚¬A O â‚¬4 m E R: g 11 222 d- Z Fi 11 C E J<- 0- 2 O 0- :**i D O :R Z & 2.4 â‚¬18 O -C 0, m i 13 0 fi L (0 O. 1** 3 ~ . c 90 9- r 91- > 10 - .r s -2 -M IN Ive 0 m CO- C) *14 15 9 A M E.S Â·2 N 2 03 06 6! Ze e e 69 41 80% 01 64 01 0 Â·ee z co- 2 k. L (1) C C a> E . 16 m E- 2 64 3 2 1 9 f W E% 'DE cÂ» u, 8 E f *22% m ma 4,4.1 f N * 2 2 S 16. N (O 8[Xyg 64 0 0 -6-9 2 . 0 -6,6 22 co Z - I -2 m I Â® 0 oug RM eC E 2 N E G & C 22 -3% I t: Elt o 82 gid m m 00 1 5 & 16 16 6 K E o g g cÂ·4- ~~ '' - O 0 uS E (05- 0 2 i r 00 Z iN 0 : 0 0 (D 8 0 f o 0 0 In F O- 1-4 ou rs:= hours = hours = hours = available hours = sjeek O1. :Aouepedxe :ejil pejeul! is3 sisoo Su!]01!UOUI 0;Hee~je~~El 'SJee* 4 L eiqelieAe el +000'9 data available 0 081 eJ 01 0 9 eidei 009'E~ lueoeide] 'Jeek Jed wnoll hours = 92/hr. 14/96 92$ (AA) elqel!8Ae Sin~15Â°'6 o; puel.Ull]0083:1 :eill Pejew! 193 pou =+009'9 e LUOO e jeak 009-004 85eueAv eidai at 6,000 High cost due to dirty A 36esn lueluu03!Aue tai use Hours 0-1,000 1,000-2,500 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT DECEMBER, 1998 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 1.00 ~ ~~ " ~ 1.00 12 UTILITY LOCATION 78.00 102.50 15 SERVICE UNE INSPECTION 16 TAP REQUEST 4.00 10.00 17 WATER QUALITY 1.00 - 1.50 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS 1.00 1.00 22 FROZEN LINES 23/24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN/SERVICE 3.00 19.25 30 METER REPAIR 10.00 18.00 32 FINAL INSPECTION 5.00 6.50 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED 2.00 6.00 50 STREET REPAIR 3.00 6.00 51 SNOW REMOVAL 1.00 0.50 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 SGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 1_00 2.00 54 STORM DRAINAGE 1.00 1.00 60 OTHER 6.00 - 4.00 TOTALS: DECEMBER, 1998 117.00 179-25 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 117.00 181.00 75.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 179.25 261.75 155.75 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) -30.77%/-32.80% +7.10%/-1.87% +56.00%/+15.09 R-1-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 19, 1999 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane <d~- SUBJECT: Update on Upper Front Range 20-year Transportation Plan Backsuound: In accordance with CDOT requirements for future transportation projects funding, all regions (15) within Colorado must submit a regional transportation plan for the years 2000 through 2020. Bob Felsburg, of Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig Inc., is under contract with Larimer County, Weld County and Fort Morgan County (Upper Front Range Region) to prepare this plan. All municipalities in this region have been requested to submit projects for CDOT funding by January 22. After much staff discussion and input from this past April's Transportation Forum and from the general public, the Town is submitting the following projects: 1. Highway 36 improvements west of downtown from Crags Drive to Marys Lake Road: o the addition of two 6' shoulders o construction of an 8' detached sidewalk the entire length o improvements to the Crags Drive intersection and Marys Lake Road intersection â€¢ center turn lane in the heavy commercial area 2. Western/Downtown Bypass between Hwy. 34 and Hwy. 36: I new roadway e exact location undetermined 3. Valley-wide/Rocky Mountain National Park mass transit system feasibility study: â€¢ This study would research the possibility of various transit systems between the Estes Valley and RMNP, and within the Park The final report will prioritize all submitted projects from the different agencies. Obviously R-2-1 the higher the priority rating, the better the chance of funding. The Town's submittals are in rough-draft form and emphasize the necessity of our projects based on safety, congestion relief and benefit to the Town and the State's economy. Hopefully, our projects will be highly prioritized. Cost/Budget N/A Recommendation: This is a report only. BL/lb R-2-2 . t .. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 19, 1999 TO: Public Works Commitbee FROM: Bill I.innanet<_ ,/tt.-- SUBJECT Black &~a~~Accountable Water Study Background: The January 1998 PWC (see attached minutes) approved the scope of services of the above study by Black & Veatch. In April of 1998 they recommended that the Town wait until the end of the year for the report so that the meter change-out program data in 1998 could be used inthereport The rough draft is complete. The final draft will be presented at the February PWC meeting It should be noted that the Town's accountable water has improved from a January 1997 12- month running total of 72% to a December 1998 12-month average of 84%, an increase of 12%. A large contributor to this improvement is that during that time, several major leaks were discovered and fixed. Budget N/A Recommendation: This is an update only. BL/lb 8-3-1 . I ./.0/0.....1-1/.ING Co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - January 22, 1998 - Page 2 WATER DEPT. ACCOUNTABILITY STUDY - REQUEST APPROVAL OF SCOPE OF SERVICES - BLACK & VEACH. The 1998 Budget includes funding of $13,000 for a water accountability study. The Committee reviewed the Scope of Services submitted by Black and Veatch to perform an overall water accountability study, and submit recommendations. An estimated fee of $11,900 will complete the proposed scope of services based on 140 hours of effort. The Committee recommends approval of the Scope of Services, which includes a presentation by John Gallagher/Black and Veatch, in the amount of $11,900. WATER DEPT. AUTOMATIC METER READING (AMR) PROJECT - REQUEST APPROVAL TO PROCEED. The Town Board recently approved the AMR Project for the Light and Power Dept. Included in the QI Team's recommendation was the replacement of water meters. Staff requested authorization to implement the new ERT module units, increasing the meter cost of tap fees, depending on meter size (eg: 3/4" meter = $125.00 additional). The Committee recommends approval of staff's request, including the pass-on fee increase for new development. HIGHWAY 34/36 INTERSECTION FEASIBILITY STUDY - REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT PRICE QUOTES. As required in the 1998 Budget, Director Linnane requested ~ authorization to solicit price quotes for said study. CDOT has 1. budgeted $1 Million dollars for 1998/1999 to improve the Hwy. 34/36 intersection, including the bridge. CDOT's procedure has changed, and they now make a monetary contribution. Municipalities will have local management of the entire project. In terms of CDOT priority, this project is one of the highest priorities in the Upper Front Range Region State Transportation Plan. Staff would begin soliciting prices to compile a feasibility study; due to the apparent duration of this process (approximately one year for preliminary design), staff intends to obtain a preliminary recommendation for the 1999 Budget. In this project, there would be a trail underpass below the existing bridge. Director Linnane stressed that the $1 Million dollars from CDOT is not a project cost estimate, but a contribution to the project. Actual construction costs would most likely exceed the $1 Million dollars from CDOT, and excess costs would need to be funded by the Town. The Committee recommends approval of the request to solicit bids. MANFORD AVE. SIDEWALK/PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT TRAFFIC STUDY - AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. Felsburg Holt & Ullevig presented their traffic study report to the Town Board in November, 1997. Following the presentation, Mayor Dekker referred the study to the Committee for review of the recommendations. The primary recommendations were the (1) construction of a new sidewalk along the north side of Manford Ave. between S. St. Vrain Ave. and east Community Dr.; (2) not to realign the west and east leg of Community Dr. with an "S" curve; (3) providing a 3-way stop situation at the Manford Ave. and West j Community leg intersection with a new crosswalk to provide pedestrian access from the north side of Manford Ave. to the south side; (4) additional signage and crosswalks; and (5) on- site School sidewalks. R-3-2 .CÂ·~4 I . .. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum January 13, 1999 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bob Goehring and Bill Linnane Lt/7(-, SUBJECT: Update of 1999 proposed water line projects/water line replacement projects priority list Background: This memo is an update of the proposed 1999 water line projects and the replacement project priority list The following water line projects are scheduled for 1999: 1. Fall River 12" - Phase 4 2. Big Horn 12" - Phase 4 3. Chiquita 6" 4. Hwy. 7/Prospect Mountain water line The proposed water line projects are labeled in the attached priority list Completion of these projects will decrease the existing priority #1 projects from 9 to 6 projects. Priority #2 projects will be reduced from 10 to 9 after completion of the 1999 projects. Budget Not applicable. Recommendation: It should be noted that occasionally projects will be added to the lists and supersede projects currently on the list BL/lb R-4-1 Water Line Replacement Priorities v Water Department - Town of Estes Park Priority #1: Extremely High Maintenance Unes LF 4/- Amount 1999 Beaver Point to Ramshom Village 1,900 $135,000 ..-t Big Hom 8" 1,400 95,000 Big Thompson 10" 3,300 230,000 1999 Chapin/Chiquita 2" 500 35,000 -t Chiquita 2" 800 52,000 1999 * Fall River Corridor Abandonment 4,000 305,000 MacGregor Ave. E./Wonderview 2,700 190,000 MacGregor Ave. W.monderview 3,900 270,000 Stanley Circle 2" 500 35,000 Subtotal $1,347,000 Priority #2: Extremely Low Pressure Domestic Use and <500 GPM Fire Protection Country Club 2" 1,200 $85,000 Devils Gulch East - Phase I 4,300 300,000 Devils Gulch West - Phase 11 2,100 150,000 Evergreen 4" 1,400 100,000 Fall River Tank #2 (Master Plan) 4,300 300,000 1999 * Hwy 7 to Prospect Mountain Pump House 2,900 205,000 North Lane to Devils Gulch 1,200 80,000 Panorama Cirde 3,100 216,000 Southern Interconnect 900 60,000 Twin Drive 2' 600 40,000 Subtotal $1,536,000 Priority #3: <500 GPM Fire Protection List Feet Amount Axminster Lane 2,000 $120,000 Belleview Heights 2,000 120,000 Broadview/Lower Broadview 54,000 325,000 Brook Drive 1,200 70,000 Cedar Lane 1,500 90,000 Charles Heights Water Main 2,000 110,000 Cremorrah Drive 800 50,000 Davis Hill 3,000 180,000 Eagle Cliff 2,500 150,000 East Lane/North Lane 3,000 180,000 Fort Morgan Colony 1,000 60,000 Hill Road 2" 1,500 90,000 Hill Streets 5,000 300,000 Hondius Heights 5,500 335,000 Juniper Lane 1,000 60,000 Lone Pine Acres 3,500 210,000 Narcissus Circle 1,000 60,000 Old Mocassin Drive 1,000 60,000 Old Ranger Road 900 55,000 Park View Lane 500 30,000 Pinewood Lane 1,500 90,000 Spruce Drive 500 30,000 Sunny Acres 1,000 60,000 Tranquil Lane 500 30,000 Upper Broadview 1,800 105,000 Webb Cottages 500 30,000 Willow Lane 1,900 60,000 Subtotal $3,060,000 TOTAL $5,943,000 Jan-21-99 01:31P Rocky Mountain Consultant P.01 AOCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. â€¢mc 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park CO 80517 (970) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 Fax (970) 586-2459 january 21 2, 1999 Town of Estes Park ATTN: Bi{1 Unnane P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: 1998 Town of Estes Park Water Looping Pro,eds - Big Horn Drive\Chicuita Lane Interconnection Change Order Summary / RMIC Job No. 9-0233.084.00 Dear Bili: The purpose of this letter is to explain the latest changes made to tte crigina contract with Ktchen & Company for the 1 998 Big Horn Drve\Chic uha Lane Interconrection Project. The modificalions made to the orginal contract have been the result of 'r<reased asphalt quantities due to water line realignment along Big Horn Drive, and the discovery oftwo additicral sen/,ce connes.orÂ·s dunng construction. 1 hs letter is the first notice received by your office concerning the extra work associated with the added service connections. Funds in :he amount of $11140 were aspreved bythe Pubbc Works Commhtee in October of last year forlhe additional a5prait patching. Below is a summary of ali of the crange order additions and deductions te the original contract, along with an est mated final cop,tract arnount. Originat Contract Amount: $138,834.00 Engineer Overestimate Decuction: $5.700.00 Adiusted Con.ract Arrcunt: $133,134.CO Summary of Contract Acditions: Asphait Patching EstÂ·mate: $ 1,578.00 Service Connections: $10,650.00 Tclal: $ 12,228.00 Final Estimated Contract Amount: $145,362.00 Total Change Order $6,528.00 Total Change Order Pending Approval $5,388.00 Rocky Mounlain Consultants, Inc. apoiog-zes for ary inconvenience :hat this ate notice may cause. CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING Jan-21-99 01:32P Rocky Mountain Consultant P.02 9mc if there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our oftice. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. A , 7 ' 1 1, Thomas J. Scobe!1, E.1. Engineer TJS/ts Jan-21-99 02:2OP Rocky Mountain Consultant P.01 1 n 1' Ni.:~~ ~ 4 1 ' post-i~ Fax Note 7671 Date \/ Z.1Acl :42 ) %331g, 11 1-2.1.'.-M< h--7ZeScrMe l) . Co./Dept. Co ri 1 4-04 --1 3 +~ 132~{T:. PX..!,\ Phone 0 Phone 9-A,-2453- 1 Faxâ€¢ , A . I . ' t t..'.. f Â· r 1 1,14 -4 1 LI.-1 / - *ROF<k -- Â· -hz i Li ..'~~ -- 11 ' 3.: j \16.-1 1 1 , Â·t Â· - F. E-1. 3 C --.- i ' ' 1 \ I , LU .. / 1/6 115 1 1 1 4/ I -I / 1 19 442. 4 19 , I. 14 (6â€¢4, NAq f'* Irr-- , , . I / 6000 r / ' / , 1' 6-00 P --' - ' 7,19.0'* .-' ,-SO.Â·, M * rF:7.3.e Â·Â·Â·f: *1 , ~'~ i 1.QUITÂ« 9 , 1 1 1--- rr-~L--1 \ 1 ' I. 1 . I. \ 1/8 \ 00 - 4 , 1 , li I *1 67 . O,/' 4 2.96 1 / & 7 i 117 j L ,- \ 1 Â¥ E --3 r-n La : ,- 129 /\ ! I 1 - I , 4 ; 9 0 . r Jt 1/ -\ 1 i It : / 1.4 / , 1\ 12.Lk F Y' .1.1 '60 Y / I -4 , Y * >44 Fi ire:,PY*41* he - I ~ 10 , VOIC.01 :,14 4 â€¢ t t * , 44/ Al x j i i , 119 A \25 t V / ' .. / 4 0 430 / r--- 44 / 4. jf f \' 1' fi 20 . ?27 1 40 140 fbi / \C' pv,61 1 \ 1 07 , / i /: I- I / 1\i A . / M I . â€žÂ·t-17 1 / /7 ',d (,2 ,2-2 ... .. .f 4 AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 18, 1999 3:30 P.M. Preparation date: 2/12/99 *Revision date: 2/12/1999 1. Confluence Park/Riverside Dr. Retaining Wall Request approval of design and const. mgmt. Scope of Services 2. Western Bypass Feasibility Study Request approval of Scope of Services 3. Prospect Mountain water tank Prospect Mountain Water Co. request for a tank deed transfer 4. 1999 Water Main Replacement Project Design and Const. Mgmt Request approval of Scope of Services 5. Town shops gates replacement Request approval to replace gates 6. Muni. Building telephone system Y2K upgrade Request to proceed with upgrade Reports: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Accountable Water Report update 3. Augmentation Plan update 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum February 10, 1999 TO: Public Works Commitbee FROM: Bill Linnane & 3 b SUBJECT: Confluence Park Retaining Wall Design and Construction Management Scope of Services Background: The Public Works Department budgeted to build a retaining wall to stabilize the road and river embankment adjacent and south of the Riverside Drive bridge. The new wall will improve safety and prevent further erosion of the river bank and road subgrade. Van Horn Engineering submitted the attached scope in a phased approach. Phase I includes a cost estimate and Phase I[ includes bidding construction to receive actual costs. If either phase determines that the $50,000 budget is inadequate, the project can be reassessed and postponed if necessary. Budget/Cost Budget Design, Construction Management Construction - $50,000 Cost Design, Construction Management - $10,590 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Van Horn Engineering's Scope of Services of $10,590. BL/lb 1-1 / f ~+4 000 2/2 ~ 167 165 210,~ 137 5 ,53 157 < BLOCK 2 4 080 1.4 7 149 BO 10 145 172 , / 20 143 176 141 160 7 135 156 . 129 152 25 1 5 121 144 117 132 110 \ 0 10 , 124 K 120 12~ B 112 - 523 120 O 15 - - x 100 \ ... 2 Â· ... r C \1 *1 1 1 1 00 16 1: 3 32 \ %38. 34 / f.' f 134 132 141 , 35 142 1 46 42 STREET | . 150 7526. ROCKWELL /1847 . A- RIVE SID . 1 19.1 l8/ 160 1.3 / F 160 --- 3 ,64 170 170 '9' 201 . t 200 5 221 ~~ 220 1 121 2 212 / 222 215 ' 1 6 0 1 232 .- 232 240 x 7527.2 IVY STREET *1523.0 7 225 555.0 242 232 246 8 231 - 41 231 232 I , ' 233 Mâ€¢rbÂ¢-)Orne gRn$gg 0 -1 e ON er# O 00 $000 -Que-N r- 10 04 u 00 -1- $1 H. M. U 44 64 64 64 95 64 44 64 64 64 64 1,1 U U U Z 0 2 - N Ul 0 00 QUZZ ><Â£4 N Model-â‚¬N ~ 00 â‚¬9-12rn MeN g g 0-1 W U --2- EN ---Men -- r- A Ul a 0 -le E Â·r; CLI u U 2 4 2 i i 1 5 ,~ M 31:31% 0 1 3 Â£ 3. t â‚¬&&@Re 0 1.97 e < O =3 8 8i >. z *REN #2 0-.#dtf 0 < E- 3Â£6Â£31 E am-42:* m o ul im UNM4~~ 4 N e; 4 4 0 AN A 05 0 2090=u 831 0 0 , g B @4 W W 41 0 1-3 CIPAL SENIOR COMPUTER GENERAL TOTAL 065'01$ ~ 103[Olid TV1O1 DRIVE/CONFLUENCE PARK INING WALL DESIGN VAN HORN ENG RING & SURVEYING OF ITEM NCINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER FIELD CREW AIDED DESIGN OFFICE ITEMIZE[ 16 9I ZE 81 9I 1043 FISH CREEK ROAD CO 80517 PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES PHASE I - PRELIMINARY DESIGN/COSTS )NIGGIE[/SLI]NHHONDISE] IVNIA - 2 3SVHd Alternatives .LNHWHDVNV]N NOILOIRLLSNOO 'E 3SV}id (skup 00 uouon.nsu 11,1999 . Irina Desi TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum February 10, 1999 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane LL SUBJECT: Western Bypass Feasibility Study Background: The Town budgeted for a Western Bypass Feasibility Study. The Town has also requested that construction of the bypass be included in CDOT's North Front Range Transportation Plan (NFRTP). The request to CDOT includes the fact that the Town would be performing a feasibility study. The study would result in alternative locations for the bypass, including estimated costs. Not only will this study be important for the NFRTP, but also will be very important for future Town planning if the project is not funded. Van Horn Engineering submitted the attached Scope of Services. Budget/Cost Budget $20,000 Cost $19,940 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Van Horn Engineering's Scope of Services of $19,940. BL/lb 2-1 45 ADDIVICN 01 1 1 I 1 ' I i L r- 10_ tual - ---1 ROCKÂ¥ , MOUNTAIN ]NATIONAL PARK ' 1 i \1 V ( t --1.-i'.4 t.ou.,.â€ž. 4/ / 1/ -a , r'Eably-9-MY--H+9- 1 1 ; \ ~ 1-I,-IMA:,44/,61. . / 9 . . 49:-' ' 11 1 1 .A . 1 1 /,,"/Fr>91 ' 2.add 1 .- lili : i 1 0 1 2>0' 1 1 - r'.i F.-~1 . .00 4 1 1 / i ... â€¢ I. -.--124*: e. - Â·824*Ck ' \ 7- , I. '*- 1 1 1 Â· 3 RIVE* , I .. 1 IVE #â€¢ | 1 11 1 0 ... 1 - ./1 . .... , 11 1 hr-1 911_21"kiEX .:, 1 1 . ----- -0.-f> R. .- ....0. ... .4 Vil,d\ ...:c-\\ lcKL,/ , 1 1' 1 ... 7 t: r- ' . 00':10â€ž 1 - ..... I , I r 7 :- 3 94Â».1 , . 1 9, 1 lili 1 1 1 | Ir - 1 ' 0 , 0 .... l. . ... 1 1 ... \"73jt-lfr3fir1isiz .~ifila *' . ~I/0/&' .. 4' ~ ELâ€¢MOR ' , , .,1 k S Â»-UIL.Â· k / 1 1 1 "~ 15&,4 - 't , t 1 J m. I f.â€¢ 1 1 1 .-' 1 , i r._-/' ..~ ' -Il/ WONDEâ€¢VIEâ€¢ iii i ..1., ' 1. 23 :â€¢I â€¢A,L Lf'..1,11.1 1 .keNm#W'WAE + 5 1 27 26 i , 26 MS â€¢â€¢ i. lili 'i . 1 . - I, . PUP.0 68 - .. . 4 :14.2.. 1 0,~ ...:.. D. i , '4 , *.... I . I . D. JE ....'.1 : i UNIV I RES ; 19?444 ELIMORN .0 1 :... .. 1, -- i i Â·- J z J . .,ir: 1 .-:.- 2 1 ST#T s â€¢â€¢ -1- .4, ." ..1, . *$ EL'MORN 2 - '' .1 ... .. . ...0 17 ADDITION 6. 1 . , u-6.~4Â¤â€¢AL-- - 1 a , 1 . 1.-L './6/1 ..... . ., .. I . ' 1 ... 1 - .. 60 9"ON ...' 1 . ... 1. - : U NNA 11 ....... 1. . . 3% ' I " 1.2.J L. .- 4, 1 - Â¥,1. ~. - 1. 1 . . - b... 20 , : 1 " 7 ; â€¢ey.-e -- ...tÂ¥ R .' 1, ".. . I . .0 - , 7 7. . ...6; Â¥11% 1 11 . 1 , CR Gs --' I . ..1 -- 0 #- .â€¢' CAAGS ..50 .. I '.., ED.. S.0 -i . 1 I . 2 . . 4 - , ...0 â€¢ BEA v f N . 1 ~.0,0 . .. . ' . aDD ' - . . Ty . .7 . U I. Eli . . I. .C, - ./,1. . 2., , , Â· â€¢ P.R. , s .. ../1 / .... 2 1 - 1 '-r jUl ~. - " 3 --- M 4 . ' I '. . I . 0 5 0 , ELM NOAD S..1~./1 , .' POINT , E " Al : <IFT- - i iftiÂ·-2 7 1~r ' Â·Â·. . Â·' '2 I ., - ,Â· Â·Â· 2- ADD . .Â· d.\12 ..2 41-r--7 Eli. . .,Yâ€¢, 4 â€ž,6. " i p,Â·,S -/2,1 '. L_ 0' . CS .TES. ' E.. 'Fl i â€¢ . , .9 ,, 0â€ž ,;2.â€¢I 'â€¢i YANIA wpi --etn> '... . â€ž - IL-L_.-1--1--5[ h-11 \ 2, 2 Â·, " 1,1., 1.. 11* 1,0 1 .0 \ 3 33 1 1 4 1 26 -25 L--4 1 0, .co- , .. 7- 33 36 1 1 #'.0,/ .., 1.,7 ' . 1-1 47, 0 -7 , 1 - -7- . 'h , ITIO. 1,1, ~ sUâ€¢â€¢ Câ€¢Vi LLA 1 ,--=-Â·~r=r=JAj, r --1 0, lilli. 1 - 1 164Z..2.L#~962>2<~ .3 J t 1 1 1 Â·,fc. /. i . 2 \ hr/7.1 1 .1 1 Â· Â·\ Â·cÂ· 1-I- 40LE' - 1 = : * ..L 1 it 2-*4. 1 1 \ f 1... , , 1 1 1,1 5 ... I. Râ€¢â€¢â€¢,Eâ€¢ . , - . 1 # , I i .0 ,"1.-,~De--U ' 7. I . ... ...0 1.1.1 "b " " " 1 su6 11. -1 â€¢10,|â€¢ i I .1 ., .1.1 ..... . " C., '. ' 11 -'., " n Sui. \ . D . I 1-" '. t 0' ' ' ' " 1 1 --V";*t * ' so. s ./4 â€ž $ . 97 '. I . lili A. - â€¢,Illâ€¢ 1* i.. 1 -mm,1 11 .. . â€ž .. - - 1.1 -; 0 1 .. . I. _LL 1 1 '7491 .. . . 1. . I 1 1\ -IliEF..., ...1 ., I. I. 1 1 3 -7~t.N,5 0 54/ a, 11 il 'i\\ a. 1 -1 1\â€ž " ' L.lk_1<531 PROS, -- --4 1 1 . El .1. CIâ€¢â€¢M MEIGMTS 1 \ ./- 91 1 1,1 ., - .. -1.61â€ž1 L--' W .Id.1."1 1 1-1.1 â€¢ I I 1 //--I -1 - 1 1 - ' ' Â· -I ' ' .., 1 1-I- . -., - 1 1 .....LI. . 1 6. 1 % 1 t,.Nt..MAL:, -j... 1 \.A YA . 1 '0 1.\It//2 1. ' ----- 11 1 11 . ' ; , - -7,~,-pw~Â·r..1-1 2-2 1â€ž1â€ž1-1.,\ \4/1.-> .\,/. , H v 1* I 1 I 0.%01.- - /1 1 ,-:91#AR-1 ,#11~-=065*D\;u,ilrka~ t41â‚¬2..&6-1,21<"liawk:"altiTWI - */ / 9rl J gr L.~ I - -~ LAND SURVEYC~ -==Ill-- -- r 15.b SUBDIVISIONS - -2- 3"/EL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IMPROVEMENT PLATS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING j,~ VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND-SURVEYING SANITARY ENGINEERING MUNICIPALENGINEERING WILLIAM G. VAN HORN - COLO. PE & PLS 9485 041 1% February 12, 1999 Mr. Bill Linnane, Director Public Works Department Town of Estes Park Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Scope of Services, Western Bypass Feasibility Study Dear Mr. Linnane: At your request, we have prepared the following Cost proposal for feasibility studies for the above referenced project. This proposal follows the Scope of Work outlined in your letter of January 25,1999. We have visited the site and roughed out severalpossible routes. We have prepared a detailed Scope of Work as shown on the attached Cost Proposal. As part of a ongoing project for EPURA, we will be taking aerial photography for the area immediately east of the location of this project. For a relatively low cost, the aerial photography firm (Aero-Metric) has agreed to extend their flight path and provide oblique color low level photos of the study area for this project. The resulting product will be four approximately 30x36" color photos of the area. We propose to superimpose our recommended routes on this photography. We believe that this photography will be extremely valuable in presenting alternate route information for various meetings with property owners and the Town.. If you wish to discuss this proposal further please call. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the Town. Sincerely yours, VAN HO ENGINEERING'ANIVSURVE'~pIG, INC. 4Lt J --p William G. Van Horn, P.E., P.L.S. Enclosures 1043 Fish Creek Road â€¢ RO. Box 456 â€¢ Estes Park, Colorado 80517 â€¢ 970-586-9388 â€¢ Fax 970-586-8101 2-3 2 R ERSRRRZ RS E r 01 =G rl - 5512 535 64 te 69 â‚¬/3 4/3 I N N N 1 lu > RE W R M E U U 5 6 M-92 2 ~0 00 wdÂ©Woo = 9 1025 m 53 M - M-TE OOM-rn 11-1",-1 - r - N - C N 91- > 8445 DZ 0 N 00 N - - - re' r-, N-- UN e W 70 - e z 00 = W 2 . 0- 0 = UD -* 2 -O E - 0 UO O 2 i R 4 .M = -1 0 8 0 -- tu F Z K 02 M <t W - - 3 -Â§ t #~ a : E 1@ i * g i N M f N Z R: & 0111 2 wOKE MUE<guo.Emol ,62& 570Â£24 2 83 E Z g NEE &128 5 7 1 :E A FE 23 . , A. 0,<1 8= 1 I < M 2-4 SENIOR 2-PERSON COMPUTER GENERAL EXPENSE TOTAL ize Contours/computerize $500 $1,915 $600 ROUIET-TCATION $1,200 CDOT (access issues) $270 00Â£,1 $ (SOA!113L1.101~E +) Sg 091$ GLY$ gEE$ SSU!AULIp ggg$ 06*$ SOES <Ets ooz$ OF IT EER ENGINE ER ENGINEER FIELD CREW AID ED DESIGN OFFICE ITEMIZE 001 1$ 15 051$ sfiuiljoIN Poolpoq48!OU OAil F PROPOSAL FO PLANNING/ENGINEERING SER ASS FEASIBILITY S AN HORN NGIN EERING & SURVEYING EK ROAD AR CO 80517 metry/constraints (Town StIs) try/constraints (CDOT Stds) FEBRU 12,1999 SM3NA\O AlkIE]dOkld a312)3:1:tV 12)ViNOD oveu! NOI1V SDNI133IN dROND C A pmod umol 103rObld 1V101 TOWN of ESTES PARK InteD-Office Memorandum February 10, 1999 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane ULAV SUBJECT: Town of Estes Park Abandoned Prospect Mountain Water Tank Background: In 1998, the Town completed the water line connection between the Arapahoe Estates water main and the Prospect Estates water main. This allowed water customers along Prospect Mountain to be serviced by the Marys Lake Plant tank rather than the old Prospect Mountain water tank The Prospect Mountain tank now serves no purpose to the Town. Mrs. John Heron, owner of Prospect Mountain Water Company (Venner Ranch, Koral Heights), is requesting that the Town deed the tank to Prospect Mountain Water Company. This would reduce Town liability associated with the abandoned tank and also benefit water users of Venner Ranch and Koral Heights. Mrs. Heron has agreed to disconnect and plug the Town's inlet water line to the tank Cost/Budget N/A Recommendation: Since both the Town and Prospect Mountain Water Company will benefit by the tank deed exchange, Staff recommends approval. BL/lb 3-1 i.Â·-, I~T,At' 1.* -.- e'*mp 4 +~29 - I'/ j 7. + 4 4 2 48: Z . Â· 1/Â· I Y -~ J . -3 1 2 9 5-, 1-1 1%31~9 0 i .j ..' 13 i -2 e -ce.Â· ..2- 1- i -'33- r p .1. --Cli\ .-- ./.M -- - .-' -41 l 11; 11 2 :12/.13Â·21 Ei/2./i . i 'l-* E 5 1 3Â£#im: i.96: a ' 4 3-4 . -: *. ..2/= '/t i. r 1 .*.-- :4 - . :4.3. 47 I - 0~ Efs ~-A. F A : ii.fi:t::ii 1,0{0* 4 fl AT L j 1 i fit _ 2. 5] Ifiliq/4 2 1..:z.91; lifffii 11 . 5,23/ 18 I r r.-1 i KE : Lk . =I Â°2:i/ . - r Esl n r. i ... I .-. 4113- ' W 1:,4 'i- i; Si!:6*j iliilit ..1 , id A .AP ;f 1,0.i %.: ...3 33 1111562~ 78!r .1 4.23 4.43 44* 2 ig . .... - I 141 2711 Et 7./r -, Â· .. i. 24 46...,221: HEd Â¢ 9Â£ 3 mfi . i :e ;f Â·2Â· iii Z 11 4,9!:1!!i 1%11!h t *!ii 1 +0131*; f.411- t.,-3-,1~.,- S: :- 20 .. f ' 1--- ---- 1~,mit; ti ~~01 : 39 jj;:~12: - ; OM i g =2 *6 22':I . 4Â¢1"; %~ Bi F f r - n 4-Wi S:li - 4!ji!*} t:ihi i,.~ill;tj i ji 3 1 31* F Â· 40<FqjÂ°<1 2% 4 ia . ~ti! 5 em-& w ash# 2 ...O .. # . -i J.... 5 .1 & 1 3 --L g= I 8 3 5.1 k. 4 4 24 1 41 6, 4 j Â©1 Nh :."":Â·.Â·râ€¢*-â€¢.P 'Â¥93?10'lls<MI W Â·.r .1Â¢Â· . ...F / i? :'42,3.22 2 2%5 I I Ele 42 : .1.: 01*41* i 1 01:181:*M : 2 r t r . hÂ¥ bE I 1 11 / a 1 :gk:kwkÂ¥?>blf. = 10**Pt~Â£*Z:ZÂ£Â© BU 4 B 23 ; 1 ff Â® t ~ i iii@ i 1 7 4,1 , :4:. , iftit, 4 ziilit \ E Z-- - 0 8 ....4.1 1 ---LW~ aik 1.-1 1~t- a~~ ~,UJ-: 2.Â·.;-y_=4~~~ . 4-- -2--, dd *V-'Â·p.7:', ro~.-4 . - 1-'-,t"Or t.Â»15 4 7,2 --- 0 :--2 - b. i! 4 2: 431 -G Al,S i:; ii ~te... 92:1 --i tryt~: -, .3 ., 4 \ 4 - 1 :! &5 3: ' 3:31 i: jii:Wi ' -4 n H . 4) 492 3 53::9 fi \ Dâ€¢ TS , . .1 581 *_ - -5.; I m x = 56 1 :21:3 4 al . *P/".. f, i - 6. 2 i - twei 1 ifiti m I e.-- .2-7 'jit; â‚¬!. 'Ri ki S . ~ Â· ~| OV. 1 2 S + S w: I gl~E t W .2.- 1 .' 6.2 b . u ~ -- a .11 ,142Â·Â£01 .a ZE ,10.' I " 2,21 I .19 2./A 1 1 4 : : 4 f , 4. / 1 ' 1 . - ji'i ~ il i' 1 I # ..> c . + ,/ i t. 0 , . r .... ,% i : (1 5 8 -2 C. w 0 - .. 93 3-2 . ' 1 Pâ€¢'twâ€¢1â€¢t - ..t # .. 'WA, â€¢â€¢A ...'. I-.' 1-%*-64 '// . . PROSPECT MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION, A BUD.. FIRST FILING e.lu I ~1 1â€¢ 1~5{ HEWN S th~ ugÂ· '4,â€¢.. .I~ $ _21.,I..,~;w_. -4."J,E ,PORTION F ~ TRACT A. PROSP ESTATES ADDITION */ 1% 2.-- 4, .-I â€¢ 1-Â· 3. I . TOWN OF ESTES PA COLORADO CURVE 28Ii - 03 hilm Nj u twoo\N P P N 010\ E I ./1.3. -- 30 1 It - b : . .A '! l: t y: I .E,-'1- --/ 1- - ' 1 '.T - , # , -1:5:'-4, Z -4/15>... f L i 1. 1 1" r 1. x , - - , .1.- . : 14- 1....4 . 1 . 1 4- . - .46 \\3 3 ..Ill ; ' .% '11 1 . 1 .1 1 . 1. h,1 4 . 1, L. - - 11 -s ,). 1,1 ~..1 .'.1,>/'' 1, , /- I. 1 -4 1 , i r 1 . r ... 1 4 . .1 1 0 . f-#. 1.1 -- I ./. 1 2 V .W .- 4254% 11 2 - _- 74<i / ~, - 1 It 1 . 2 ' . . .1. 4- . t. , 4 U 1- 1 1 4.1 1 L 1 4 4. 01:1. 1.-19; ' ,/, - f 4% p - I km " R~Ld....2 + 5. i. I.1. il 1.~. # I- I. *' I I , '1- 11 1 l' 1 d. J ./1 -1 i. .. . 4 '4. It .12: . / 7-1-7 - 7 r 10 1 1 . -/. --- -' t - a:..i... a uinerrb7=-='.2-urx - 1 1.1. /11 \ i. I .,C: 6- ---- ' . N.=21*dE'El 7 91 ..11 . 7.. t>.4 4 4,- 1 -*,27 r /1 -1 I. -.. 4 1 1 - 4 .. C.--L--- ti , - :' f I . - 11 .1 . 1 ...7, 1 . r. 2 . rk E.i~ . 'TE -r I . /1, I ' i i ' J .'- -'.'-I..-..--- 1 ! 411 . ,Â· I-' Z Gl 0=1 , . ..- 1.,4,> 1- 4.1.1 - 1; 1 3 W' 4 5 1 ' i L ' ,â€¢ / 00 1 O,1 ' i r. 7 O zi ..r'Y f.--Al D F 3 & 1| O 1 4.97 .Â· .DJ i I ' 1 { 9 h , .â‚¬ I .. 1 1 . ' -2-1, 4 iU Ez -- Z 61 1= 2 99 m a:-7 I. 22 - -1 -1 ret. 0 ext 1. 41 , ov 1%100 r 11 Â· 1 col- /3 1 1 InoJ z D jz .'â€¢ 0, 0*1 1 - 10 4% 1- - 1 M c - \ Z ff 2 REÂ¥ 1.\ 1 ...2'-Ib W L l. f . 0 1. ./I. . 1 5 r ' - F J ~ -1 h~ ,- ---:1.-- ;j 1 . 9,2 1 1 j . ,0/ 73 3 L .... U O 11 4 "e. ! , 4/ ' f' . i 'li '. . 9 .4 W 3/ / 1 i- 1 ...1 Â·f - i $ D ./ 1 i / Z . . :1 Z 3 1 . /</ '. --4- a 1 ... 3-3 1 , I CIO ; // \ - CL~A~W~LL ~ HWL'I~69~ i.-7 1Nqld~34 d i - \~ (.LIN-NO~H73;11:1 ~PECT MTN~ WATER CO. 3,~,-/4~.~Â«0~4x i'>35:,4, 90'45-53>*g>. 7//F/'/phy 41 \ ge -51? 3=-=.0 37Â£1*- LAND SURVE'FS- -- 212' - 9> j~IlL - 6.7Â·07 SUBDIVISIONS - --- DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IMPROVEMENT PLATS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AIIIMAVAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING SANITARY ENGINEERING MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING WILLIAM G. VAN HORN - COLO. PE & PLS 9485 1 117 , February 9,1999 Mr. Bill Linnane Public Works Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Prospect Estates Water Tank Dear Bill, Pursuant-to-our telephone-corwersationpl-arn-writingthis-letteron-the-behalf of the Prospect Mountain Water Company, requesting the transfer of the Town water ta n k that was installed to serve Prospect Estates and is no longer being used. Prospect Mountain Water Company could put this tank to good use and would substantially better the service level of the residents of Koral Heights. As per our conversations, I would propose that the tank and its associated easements be transferred to Prospect Mountain Water Company via quitclaim deed. In return, Prospect Mountain Water Company will execute an indemnification protecting the town from any further liability. If it would be appropriate, we will-prepare an Indemnification Agreement for the Town's review. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, ju 4. 9 0~ 4- 1- Ch / William G. Van Horn cc: John Heron 1043 Fish Creek Road Â· RO. Box 456 â€¢ Estes Park, Colorado 80517 â€¢ 970-586-9388 â€¢ Fax 970-586-8101 3-4 . TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter~Office Memorandum February 10, 1999 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Iuinnane tf~U~ SUBJECT: 1999 Water Main Replacement Project - Design and Construction Management Scope of Services Background: The Town has budgeted to replace the following water lines in 1999. Please refer to the attached location maps. 1. Fall River 12" - Phase 4 2. Big Horn 12" - Phase 4 (Al Fresco Subdivision) 3. Chiquita 6" - (Al Fresco Subdivision) 4. Highway 7/Prospect Mountain water line RMC has submitted the attached Scope of Services for easement preparation, design and construction management for $71,955. Cost/Budget Scope Budget â€¢ Design and Construction Management $71,955 $100,000 â€¢ Construction $580,000 NOTE: The Design/CM. Scope represents 125% of the construction budget which is within acceptable engineering standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of RMCs scope of $71,955. BL/lb 4-1 $ ' ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. gmc 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 (970) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 January 1 91 1999 Fax (970) 586-2459 Town of Estes Park ATTN: Bill Linnane P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: 1999 Town of Estes Park Water Looping Projects Dear Bill: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) is pleased to submit the following proposal for work related to the Town of Estes Park I 999 Water Looping Projects. The main emphasis of the looping projects will be to replace existing deteriorated water mains. For the 1999 Water Looping Projects, RMC will provide field surveys, prelimina17 and final design, easement preparation as required, and construction related engineering services for the following projects described below, Figures illustrating the location of each project are attached. Al Fresco Place Water Lines: This project will consist ofthe replacement ofthree water main sections with new ductile iron water line, The three line replacement are explained below. Biz Horn Water Line - Replacement of approximately 880 feet of 8" steel water main with new 12" ductile iron water line, The new line will connect to the water main constructed as part of the 1997 Water Looping Projects and proceed southeast along the alignment of the existing 8" line to a 12" cross placed as part of the 1998 Water Looping Projects south of Chapin Lane, Easements will be required in order to avoid the unnecessary removal of trees. All work will remain outside of the asphalt with the exception of the crossing of Chapin Lane for the southern connection. BiR Horn/Chapin Lane Interconnect - Replacement of approximately 930 feet of 2" water main with 8" ductile iron water line. The new line wi[I begin from the proposed 12" Big Horn Water Line and continue east to Chapin Lane. From Chapin Lane the line will proceed north and connect to a section of 6" water line located just south of the Chapin Lane/Mummy Lane intersection. The new 8" line will replace all ofthe 2" line along Chapin Lane running north from the Chapin Lane/Chiquita Lane intersection. Easement will be required for the water line between Big Hom Drive and Chapin Lane. Work will remain outside the asphalt with the exception of the pipe placed along Chapin Lane. Chiquita Lane/MacGrezor Avenue Interconnect - Replacement of approximately 390 feet of 2" water main with 6" ductile iron water line, The new line will begin from the existing 6" water line along Chiquita Lane and continue east across the Chiquita Subdivisionto connecttothe existing 6" water line along FlacGregor Avenue. Easement will be required to cross the Chiquita Subdivision. The water line replacement will involve a connection inside the asphalt on Chiquita Lane, and a County road crossing (Larimer County Road 43 / MacGregor Avenue). 1/ CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING ./ 4-2 gmc Boulder Brook / Fall River Interconnection: . This project includes the replacement of approximately 1790 feet of 12" spiral welded steel water main with new 12" dudile iron water line. The new water main will follow the alignment of the existing line, remaining inside the former Fall River Road Right-Of-Way. The alignment of the 12" water line will remain outside of the asphalt. Prospect Mountain / Colo. Hwy 7 Interconnection: This project includes the replacement of approximately 2200 feet of 4"- water main with 8" ductile iron water line. The new water main will connect the exst,r,g Prospect Mountain Pump Station to the recently constructed 12" Colorado Highway 7 water line. Al gnment ofthe new line will follow the southern boundaries of the Peak View and Majestic Pines Subdivisions. Easement to accommodate the water line alignment will be required. A Colorado Department of Transportation R.O.W. permit will be obtained if necessary Design of the projects will be completed to go to bid on May 3*, 1999, with construction to begin in June, I 999. Please see the attached for the Cost of Engineering Services associated with the aforementioned projects. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC, Thomas J. Scobell, E.I. Engineer Reviey41 By, DAR ke%-0.Frochasta,P.E. Associate Principal TJS/tjs enclosed 4-3 gmc AL FRESCO PLACE WATER LINES COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Preliminary and Final DesiÂ£n Personnel Rate/1-1 r. Hrs. Total Project Manager $80 28.0 $2,240 Design Engineer $55 115.0 $6,325 2 Person Survey Crew $65 30.0 $1,950 Drafting (AutoCad) $5C 95.0 $4,750 Clerical $20 30.0 $ 600 Subtotal Preliminary & Final Design $ 15,865 Easement Preparation Personnel Rate/Hr. Hrs. Total Project Manager $80 20.0 $I,600 Professional Land Suneyor $60 60.0 $3,600 Clerical $20 15.0 $ 300 Subtotal Easement Preparation $5,500 Construction Inspection Personnel Rate/Hr. Hrs. Total Project IManager $80 12.0 $ 960 Construction Inspector $45 125.0 $5,625 Drafting (AutoCad) $50 13.0 $ 650 Clerical $20 15.0 $ 300 Subtotal Construction Inspection $7,535 TOTAL AL FRESCO PLACE WATER LINES $28,900 4-4 gmc BOULDER BROOK / FALL RIVER INTERCONNECTION COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Preliminary and Final Desitn Personnel Rate/Hr. Hrs. Total Project IManager $80 24.0 $1,920 Design Engineer $55 90.0 $4,950 2 Person Survey Crew $65 24.0 $1,560 Drafting (AutoCad) $50 78.0 $3,900 Clerical S20 25.0 $ 500 Subtotal Preliminary & Final Design $12,830 Construction Inspection Personnel Rate/1-1 r. Hrs. Total Project Manager S80 8.0 $ 640 Construction Inspector S45 95.0 $4,275 Drafting (AutoCad) S50 10.0 $ 500 Clerical 320 10.0 $ 200 Subtotal Construction Inspection $5,615 TOTAL BOULDER BROOK / FALL RIVER $ 18,445 INTERCONNECTION 4-5 gmc PROSPECT MOUNTAIN / COLO. HWY 7 INTERCONNECTION COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Preliminary and Final Desiezn Personnel Rate/Hr. Hrs. Total Project Manager $80 26.0 $2,080 Design Engineer $55 95.0 $5,225 2 Person Survey Crew $65 26.0 $1,690 Drafting (AutoCad) $50 82.0 $4,100 Clerical $20 25.0 $ 500 Subtotal Preliminary & Final Design $13,595 Easement Preparation Personnel Rate/Hr. Hrs. Total Project Manager $80 15.0 $ 1,200 Professional Land Surveyor $60 45.0 $2,700 Clerical $20 15.0 $ 300 Subtotal Easement Preparation $4,200 Construction Inspection Personnel Rate/Hr. Hrs. Total Project IManager $80 10.0 $ 800 Construction Inspector $45 115.0 $5, I 75 Drafting (AutoCad) $50 12.0 $ 600 Clerical $20 12.0 $ 240 Subtotal Construction Inspection $6,815 TOTAL PROSPECT MOUNTAIN / COLO. HVA' 7 $24,610 INTERCONNECTION 4-6 gmc TOWN OF ESTES PARK 1999 WATER LOOPING PROJECTS Cost of EnRineering Services Summary Proiect Cost AL FRESCO PLACE WATER LINES $28,900 BOULDER BROOK / FALL RIVER INTERCONNECTION $ 18,445 PROSPECT MOUNTAIN / COLO. H\AA' 7 $24,610 INTERCONNECTION TOTAL PROJ ECT COST $71,955 Total engineeringcost (not includingeasement preparation) is $62,255, which is 12.0% of estimated construction cost. 4-7 AL FRESCO PLACE WATER LINES 1 1 1 8t 1/ i f - - - -- 3 ft 1 , 2-0 e,AN,Tr LN i 20 / 1- --- /~23 5 1 - 1 ~0* i - 1 / ST. aâ€¢â€¢THOLOâ€¢E-'S Â¢ MOUNT VIEW J , a Â°*123~ 44.-- f MEyERS ADDITION 1341, 6-1 ROWER '2.,A--â€¢â€¢Ef"dcAâ‚¬.i i ,- 1-4 , A 00. i Lt ! i ' 4 1 3 12;:'. 1 I ! / tjjt ~IUMâ€¢,~T LN-J~: :341 h I 1 \ 3 ual-- - 04 '10 ' 1 1 0 1 14 ~>Â·*WY --l /33 1 .\ .-- 1 4 \ ~>~'1/3-Â·-i~ ~Ai;viNGSTON ''~ jo. ~ 0 3 3 , )~~L AKE / 1 U 1, //3 -5~7Â»7 2 '03 A L K FiES C R PLACE \ i 4 ROCK /1 ' \\ \ 4 R /3, 1 5 r.1 VL E y . A _ tM-~ 14& \\ â€¢OUGM U.\1 3 - 1 '02 '11 /, 41;77â‚¬2-7:~ 4.3Â« 4 A Vâ‚¬-/*:Â§- !01 11 ~L.) 7'17=â‚¬\ 43 ~2 i 40 ' 3, 1.tf\\"Pt,;30'.4,0 .113, h.-3--11 \\19 ~ - - --- - ~1 - - -=4"\11Â° 'j P'~ 12 7 12,4, ilig Buâ€¢o[ s s '. 1 \1 - â€¢Aue \ - --2-211322\J.I ,14\ 11*-21Â·1 -7--â€ž__~ WONDERVIEW --I 'â€¢'3 dll flKIFI~14,1,1,i.;,iÂ·:iN ... i Â·Â· 1\ \\ .1 . :.; 7.-,7 \\41 h - 13 1 35 7 . gmc 4-8 LDER BROOK / FALL HIVill INTERCONNECTION 96 A ~ 95\ ~ - 1 9. 193\,1 / ~ CASWELL ~\ TOWN PROP aURBACH ~ - 1 \ 1 ADO. IMENNINGS -ANK ... ,-S'' ' SUB. 2 1 1 U- -- a --/.0-5 Vi -- 17 2 ~ 89b / HOWES AD , â€ž 4 1 \. f\ 71 \ 11 0-2// i - 96 -- SU 0- d / 6 I \ ,// 2 \ , i - - 890 as 1-4 1, K 41\81 4 1 1 :- 1 / '.4--4-Ii--1.- . T ~ol' 6 9â‚¬PLA1 OF Na, 70~~g" i I V /â‚¬,rr f,\ -44-1~~ 1 - ;'1 a 0 \ JAIC='INIFYIE . 13 1 1 k 21 - 90~N:LA MES- MciNTY RE 1 1. 7-Â·.'sue. / 4. , 22 23 27 26 4-9 PROSPECT MOUNTAIN / COLO. HWY 7 INTERCONNECTION ,u / 61 - 4/ 61 1 \ "-2 1:, 7;-ilat OUTIOT WA.EN' f 113%EL 1-;1\71 1 , r-' .i.O TANA E .\ "--LN-14Â° Ll--1.4 vii*r -1 4 'OUNTA,w i ,-1 9 , 1, 0,r i ': ' C 9 ki,;k>15(%29 '_-- 0 14Â£ c \ 5 1\15/ \3 t--1 N. 2 1 ! 4 , 1-3--PRF#L (3 /5 1 N p , 7 ~, TE % 0 4 4 s //'\ / 1 -\\ 4 \.\ b.-2 * 0... 0.. v. A IN A D 81 , SOUTH 1â€¢ ITION ~ -.-4-.~ ' I 9 , 1, :'- */4 V)-li; j 'li,-_ vlf. D.--7- .1 r Cs I 110.*â‚¬ 1 3 DANNELS 0. ADD /,UCE:2~ i 7 /3 14 13 1 R y /\ F -f"/1 4,2.;02/ ~ i ,;>2<t'59 6 1 2 1 3 14 \1 gK*41- .5.- 1-~ 2 , 77 fs pr..07# wi . i' 0 6 1 ,A 1 " '... ,-40' 1 -â‚¬77-1-- -1 4- 6.27 liz /7 -Â·-*r~ I \ STEELE -_r' 723.L~--1-2 " i i '2 , PE,40-1----~ I "-li:.,i/// -IM- MASONIC < SUB~-4 1 1 - \\.4 / 1 1, 1 2 1 .\ / 17, , / ACACIA ACRE 11 , ,~41/ - 1---tlrlr - -7*-- ---J~~i r ~1 L 1 1 Sue p---01.-~ ~ A :Acia OP 0 716~3 DIWEE 1 2 O...EL; HSOUTI SAINT vâ€¢Atâ€¢~ADD. /:Â·/'Ask/ A 0/6 Suil 1 g Aob , 2 1! 1. ts f , t 2/ 2 ' -I- 'V 1 /\19,â‚¬47/2./ 14,37 1 /Â£....F ~,0,.r.. 2.12.~ 'pE.LE "NE.OOC. i ".>2\<12*4207/449192.923 72 ac.~s 1 .Eru' /90 / )\p--Â¥1, 7, .."439> 13\1 22- 3-24\ / Acto D-fÂ©/ 3 -2964+3â‚¬73Â·10-1 berÂ«+A,9 19272 ' 78 l ' / -24 5/,4- <1Â©0 f.y ~p 79, \ Ut = .41 *,67 . /1,6 94%, 2 j <FY hf -- / GO,/ /6/ 5 _2/ 6.-t *tal y f/45*;~ga 31\ - *RN - fi, gmc 4-10 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM FEB. 10,1999 TO: BILL LINNANE / RICHARD MATZKE FROM: TOM OLDHAM, DARYL McCOWN, ROY JOHNSON, DAVE MAHANY SUBJECT: GATES AT PUBLIC WORKS SHOPS / LIGHT AND POWER SHOP BACKGROUND: Presently we are using manual gates at the Public Works and Light & Power shops. These gates are being locked during non-work hours for yard security. When access to the shop area is required for duty personal, snow-plow personal and employees coming and leaving work, the opening and closing of the gates is becoming unsafe and not user friendly. You must park your vehicle on Elm Road while unlocking and locking gates, due to the traffic, the slope of the road and shop access area it makes a hazard for the person using the gate, especially during icy conditions. The gate research team would like-to-recommend replacement of-the two main gates with automatic gates and remote openers. COSTS: ~ ARMADILLO: Material and Labor - $5,090.00 EACH Quotes were asked for from three different fencing contractors. CHAMPION FENCE & CONSTRUCTION: Refers Auto Gates to Armadillo re- LOVELAND FENCE LTD: NO RESPONSE RECOMMENDATION: We would like to recommend replacing the lower (1 & P) and middle (P.W.) gates with automatic gates with remote control and combination touch pad @ a cost of $5,090.00 each, for a total cost of $10,180.00. The Light and Power Department personal will run the power lines to the gates and we will need an electrician to wire in the openers. 5-1 Public Works Engineering Memo TO: Public Works Committee / Bill Linnane From: Greg Sievers CC: Y2K Compliance Team; Repola Date: February 16, 1999 Re: Upgrade Phone System for Y2K Background 1. Executone phone system was purchased in 1993 for $61,748.28 and it needs to be upgraded for Year 2000 compatibility. 2. Executone has submitted an estimated scope of services to upgrade to Y2K at a price of $10,654.28 3. This phone system services all 12 Departments and 92 employees. 4. Staff has investigated other options for Y2K upgrades, all of which are cost prohibitive. All other options require a telephone system replacement. 5. A free phone switch was offered from PRPA but would require a new Voice Mail System and new telephones. Lucent Technologies estimated $70,000. Budget/Cost Budget: $15,000 Executone estimate: $10,654.28 Recommendation Staff requests to proceed with the Y2K upgrade as proposed from Executone/Claricom. Holding the remaining $4345.72 as a contingency should any unforeseen difficulties arise. Work to be completed by June. â€¢ Pmne 1 6-1 JAA-UJ ivvw - I . ' Ye.,511- 2#UD t.*par:dde DDS 100 - EME 'YOVGN OF E:STE:3 PARK 1-40 tinces qut>led ate baseri on EXECUTONO Federal Supply Service Information Technology Sohedule. ccintlact number GSÂ·Â·35F- 10700, expires Seplember 2000. Any order resultlng from this quotation must be placed v,a w Deliva,y Omer against the GSA Schedule Contract. Pel the conituct, the Dollvery Order must be soued to EXIE.(;:31 ONE Inlotirtalion Systeins, Government Systeme Division. 10455 White Granite Drive, Oakton, VA.,22124 (703) 359Â·4000, fax (703) 359-0339. . 12-Aug.98 S;of:k ~ Integrated Digltnl System Unit Eqtipment Unit InstaU Nuwbe, Deâ€¢criptin,; Qty Price Amourit limlall Amount 21380Â·.6 Advanced C.PU, w/additional RAM 1 1249.93 $1,249.93 3.24 -228-UPG los Pot t Upgrade 1 N/C 111524 1.lograde to 30 houre 1 240.55 $240.55 21840Â· 1 Elpandd VCM 1 721.66 $721 66 403034 VX3 Mini Tower 1 1800.00 * 31,800.00 30 38-00003 VGA Menodwome Monitot 1 150.00 - $150.00 30-30Â·00166 DIAL.OGM Voice Board, i per 4 ports 2 775.00' $1,550.00 141033 VM Soltwaro Releabe 3 0 to 4.0 1 129.00 ' $129.00) 10/\3822,1 VM Soltware Rele3se 4.0 to 5.0 1 294.79 ' $294.79 ~ loTE.94 10A4020-1 VM Softwate Release 5.0 to 6.0 1 327.34 * $327.34 i VXOÂ· SWUPG-7 './MI Sofrware Releate 6.0 to 7.0 1 327.81 * $327.81, INS-!0001 AC.Pll A EVCM Upoinde 1.abor 13 121.20 $1,575.60 IN51-0001 Labor to upgrade to \00 10 121.20 SZ.181.60 00002 1 r;p Charge -1 106.00 * $106.00 S.==.C..==IZ ==.=:3.=.....1 EQUiPMENT , INSIALLATION TOTAL 36,897.08 $3,757.20 CONâ„¢ACT TOTAL $10,664.28 VWAy, anty and r.urvice. Al, oqulpment is Installed with a 12 month warranly pt oviding full service and replacement or 'nited compo"ents. ' Ouuhld ap. Open Market v.:W 6-2 t, ' * TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT JANUARY, 1999 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 2.00 5.00 12 UTILITY LOCATION 46.00 58.00 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 16 TAP REQUEST 4.00 10.00 17 WATER QUAUTY 0: ~ i "X flisolo:~ 3.50 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS 0.00 0.00 22 FROZEN LINES ~~***~ t. - " 23/24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN/SERVICE 3.00 5.75 30 METER REPAIR 57.00 * ~60.00 32 FINAL INSPECTION 5.00 6.00 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED "~* 1.00 5.00 50 STREET REPAIR 0.00 0.00 51 SNOW REMOVAL 11.DO ~ .1.25 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 0,00 0100 54 STORM DRAINAGE 1.00 1.00 60 fÂ©Ftâ‚¬*ERÂ»20337>-ff- Â« 1.00 ..14 ' 0.25 TOTALS: JANUARY, 1999 132.00 155.75 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 132.00 117.00 93.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 155.75 179.25 171.25 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) +12.82%/-13.11% -35.36%/-31.52% +41.94%/-9.05 4 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney At Law February 17,1999 BILL LIÂ»JANE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Dear Bill: On February 10,1999, I attended a status conference on the augmentation plan held by Ray Liesman, the Water COUrt Magistrate. In that heating it was determined that only the State of Colorado has not responded to the Town's proposal as more fully outlined in the 1998 Temporary Substitution Plan. In order for things to move forward as quickly as possible, the attorney for the state requested that I go ahead and draft a proposed decree and she would work ~ from her end with the state. I will begin drafnng that decree in the next few weeks. A further status conference is set for April 13,1999 at 1:30 p.m. to discuss where matters stand. As part of the Town's water policy, which includes the augmentation plan, I am beginning to pursue purchase of $50,000 worth of raw water, cirher CBT or Windy Gap. If you have any questions pleas~ do not hesitate to give me a call. ~ lery t* yours, 1 \/ 149-74 egory A. White cc: Mark McLean Rich Widmer l1 GAW/bf 1423 West 29th St (970) 667-5310 Impeland, CO 80538 Fax (970) 667-2527