The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1998-12-17AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE DECEMBER 17, 1998 3:30 P.M. preparation date: 12/11/98 *revision date: ~2:Harmony Foundation Water Line Contract Request approval 2. CDOT Hwy. 34/36 Project Design & C.M. Scope of Services Request approval of RMC Scope Of Services U 0-4-~ LbA.j ~ 1FaLL.1 *J Reports: 1. Customer Service Response ful 67 119\. 9/ TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum December 15, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane-~= ~ SUBJECT: Harmony Foundation Water line Contract Backzround: The Harmony Foundation constructed, at its own cost an 8" water line as indicated on the attached map. Harmony has prepared the attached water line reimbursement agreement and is requesting that the Town collect additional fees from the parcels shown on the map. These fees would be collected at the time of tap issuance and would be reimbursed to Harmony. The agreement is similar to other water line reimbursement agreements: 1) 15-year enforcement 2) 33% additional fee payable to the Harmony Foundation Budget/Cost Not applicable Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Harmony Foundation agreement BL/lb Attachments 1-1 ESTES PARK, COLORADO WATERLINE EXTENSION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19_, by and between the TOWN OF ESTES PARK ("Town"), operating and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado, and HARMONY FOUNDATION, INC. ("Developer") for the HARMONY FOUNDATION WATER UTILITY EXTENSION ("Project") and designed by ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS. INC. ("Engineer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of the following described property: (See Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.) and it is proposed that said property be served by water distribution facilities constructed pursuant to this Agreement; and WHEREAS. Developer has caused to be constructed and has paid for the installation of a water main extension built to Town standards at a cost of $123.612.74, extending to said Property: and WHEREAS. the Town is not required to enlarge or extend its facilities beyond those currently existing and all such enlargements or extensions are undertaken at the discretion of the Town in the interest of the public health. safety, and welfare. THEREFORE. it is mutually understood and agreed as follows: 1. Developer has had constructed the Project known as the Harmonv Foundation Water Main Extension. Said extension was designed by Rockv Mountain Consultants. Inc. and has been constructed in accordance with the most current edition of the Town's Water Utilitv Policies and Standards ("Design Standards"). The Project has been inspected and tested by the Town. 2. Developer has delivered to the Town a written warranty in accordance with the requirements of the Design Standards. 3. Transfer ofFacilities. Ownership and maintenance responsibility for the facilities will traiisfer from the Developer to the Town immediately upon delivery to the Town of a good and sufficient bill of sale for the facilities. The conveyance must state that the facilities so conveyed are free and clear of any claims or liens whatever. The Developer shall also deliver any required easements and said easements must be properly recorded with the Larimer County recorder prior to submission to the Public Works Director. -1- 1-2 4. Operation and Maintenance ofFacilities. After the facilities have been transferred and subject to the provisions ofthe warranty, the Town will have full responsibility for operation and maintenance of the facilities and the actual costs incurred in connection therewith. The Town agrees to allow connections to the facilities in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of Town of Estes.Park. 5. Indemnification. The Developer hereby agrees to hold harmless the Town, its successors and assigns, against any and allliability, loss, or damage the Town may suffer as a result ofclaims or judgements against it under the mechanics' lien lays ofthe State of Colorado, or on account ofdefective materials and workmanship used to install the facilities. Said indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, court costs, damages, repair costs, and reasonable attorney's fees. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. The Developer and Town acknowledge and agree that this Agreement may be enforced in law or in equity by a decree of specific performance, damages, or such other legal and equitable relief as may be available to either party. i. Survival of Obligations. The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to survive the transfer of the facilities and shall be binding upon the successors. transferees, and assigns of the parties. 8. Assignments. The Developer shall not assign its rights or delegate its duties under this Agreement without prior written consent by the Town. 9. Reimbursement for Costs. I f. at any time withinfifteenyears from the effective date of the Agreement, any party other than Developer or Developer's successors-iii- interest taps into. extends, or otherwise makes use of the facilities (including developers making use of the facilities in connection with future subdivisions). the Town shall collect from each such party. as its Dro ram share of the cost-of the installation, in addition to the fees to be collected and retained by the Town, an amount equal to approximately one-third of the Town's applicable connection charges. as the same are adjusted from time to time (See Exhibit B). The Town shall pay over to Developer any such amounts so collected within the fifteen year period as the same are received. The Town shall not be liable to Developer for such additional fees if it should inadvertently fail to collect the same when approving a water tap application, so long as the Town is acting in good faith and seasonably cooperates with the Developer to collect such fees. -2- 1-3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have caused their names and seals to be affixed the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER: - Name: Harmonv Foundation Inc. By: Title: STATE OF COLORADO } } S.S. COUNTY OF LARIMER } The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of A.D. 1998. by Witness my hand and Seal. My commission expires: Notary Public TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor: Robert L. Dekker Attest: Town Clerk -3- 1-4 9-I I .C, 2 0 Z -1 D tn \ /\\ O B g Z 00 0 m. CO L 11 0 gi 1 /*/l l i \ 21 /.\ < 1. 4 CO / i li 1 1 'f.--4 / % 4 21 /1./ i ..a am 1/ 1 X j 8. \NV\ :. = a .. 1. ' irilki :.Â· Ii/ Â·.. 43Â»*Â· 4~4.*-43, <. 7 *t~ .4..94>.~- Â« r #.~.;f-Â«f~f . tÂ» 2-\>449 1 MIl - -1 1 O LU 1&21Â· 2, 'i/ 449.4444 UJ . 82% I , .' . -1 1 ==d ~ X..7: 111 7 .82.:\1948Â©4tÂ»1Â»142*~8'â‚¬~930*14* Ege 4 < --.,61 iFFAAR#~~.:~i~~~.~..36Â»2<Â« &*6 1 k..21* :1 3 ~99Â»Â«Â»4414Â« u,Z' \ 1 1- k ..1 53* ' Â· f Fat; 4444<4~ â€¢=au \ 00-7 I 2 \\:..: \Â« \\ =FIE mi@<N 9 -W / r ./. 2 Â·S.77 .17%*44163FtÂ»*49<~>\U)*Â« 1%~#R~~ L :1-ma: 1 3 49Â«34 ..Â·' Â·~ Â«423.,~214 :Al 56 Ji T#Em / '151*42#Â«If. 44 â€¢N:ism ,/, ':1.44.Â«00.32.~f~4Â§3~Â·4~ E Elim:E /f *Ap-26\Â»3 43-4-;1 214 8/Med: 4194:44â‚¬ / 05=tw 5 5.29: 419<454**0 E -* A ZgEÂ¤1 fÂ»Â« 0 9 f N. 0 / 38@23 =0 0 ~ 1~ ifit-&Â»*f*.1 f -\ O tealÂ» 1 \4 0 04#SkÂ«Â»4 ' s 744\ 0= li 1 i 30- I 1 i *64\ m /6.-/ SM \\ 6 5 2 4% 11 v-- y #12 8 2'm Â£ 80 / L FA 1 , 1 J 4 > ill IS08 00Â¥80100 '>IMVd St,2-985(016}:XV:I EEZe-978([0 35= 1111 ANTICIPATED FUTURE WATER LINE CONNECTIONS EASEMENTAGREEMENT -IAHMONY NUA I ION WA I tH U I ILI I Y 1NBIN33UDV ANOINHVH NollÂ¥CNnO=I ANOMHVH 1,913a 639O01131YHO 31Nll HalVAA 03!10Â¥Ul.N mmoulacv 01 loarens XTENSION OJE .1 2 6 ., .- 45-4 .12....4.0:1 F .,1.:4Â·i j,:' dil.> 31.,ill' \Â·i 111 \ 'M " .1 . 11, i,I 1 1 1 -Tul EX--r 1 1 0 -1-1., f JA .it. . 1. A)11 ... /4/ i.... % 4,01~A-~A)*i:.:1 1111\. 01 111 1 - 1 a. LA {/, )1 . I . Â· 1 j,r / Â·1~ '?. ll V -L, 11 Â»72-/Â· li Â«Â»42 01--4---- t-- W 4/ ~" b a.w- 1/-,4.4 \ 2 , 111) 2 1 C. 1 f . -I 1 - 2 .. 2 IlÂ·-c 1 1 4 j,/Â·*-~1 i/ILY. -/I, Al.'' I v,44- 11 41' 'g' i ,' . 4.'.c:~Â· f. 20 60/ 1 L LL 1 - J 4 . i Â¢ J Aill . -2 k f , 4% f %" F , 5 71 1 / 1 .4.,1 1 1. Â¢ / 1 '7 ..1 .IJ.,! MU,< 21#c, ' 1 6. ff . l '</ 4 , I . 2 4 .., - t'11.""l. 11 i' 1 59,5,1 \1/10,2- c. ..1 fi,0 L '11 -0 4 9 5 -~4 2Â£ Wt>m r *#64/9.Â·k28&-11: j-'7 ) Â· 17 ~;~; It#91* Â· 1' * ..f j % i#&74Â¢~~ : i..- ,Â¥.Â·2 ) fPE (/) A /il 'liip jÂ·'M ~~%- ': r. ,;!j//kr-, Â·,~AFE 11">11'JI'l~W ./ 1 1 Ill ' . C, A Â» 1 -44. . . 9. 1.- 1- â€¢ . D * w I. I 1.11 '11' '' Il '<AP.. .t 0 1 " "' j //1 #99./ / ><1 Z,-I 00<W-D 'M,0 -2 .Z .WOOLLOI >JUI -WJOI-Or-U_ U.--12â€¢- 9 tj/Am, 44+ UJUJOC U,HI -ZO . 1 Â»*â‚¬>, . 3-6 /2.- -,4 1.~9 Â·. 1 .-/0.-- U, zo,- -DII-1</I- u. . 111.01 . 40 0 W W O 1\ Z H H E J I- Z M 0 -4 lili, 2|"1 C â€¢ D LUWWZ =0000<1 O h.10 4:~f-94 A . :-i- -*, ~ __ J HZ I Ld D M 0' I m Z H , J Â«1 Â· 1-WOW>- U.1- W Z O 1.Las/7 LL w D 4 00 /1 U. I - t -Z:%404.4 1-293121#<4,215' - - 1Â£1 +.- ...1 1 I. f 11 0 224- too#-O Â·2 ' / .DIOU,WH O4WZ a. 1 . -Of -OWI 00--1,1-03 \' '' 1 U) 9- I O.10â€¢U u.<-ZO,- Â·Â· ' 196 4 /f, 10/ ''.5tri-/*#JA,Q~), \Â»Â·â€¢B ./wo - u z low 4 9* IM*alit<179&4 10&4 c , 11 Â» c2 # 1, â€¢ N - -OF- LAI .." - 41---WO: W O 0Â» (NIHI--Z OW< bINCX i /# 1#' \1 f''Al, m M w 00->WO W *zmaton- IV-OCZa.JA f~2 1 ,n 1- ar .lowoo , , w F. liu aC UJuUi.14 Z O as OW ZI-DOI V I-ZO --Â· 4 ~- Z _Jld o K â€¢- W UJ<IW a. w-JUJ CL =O 90Â»?jitfQA.trt< 2 1,<4~i~~ff#21Â» O U.>2.0-Z U. 4 .low-WO F- fl.f lkÂ¢ vA~/ ~4Â·I>'9({f~j~Ft[EFiiK{ C lf# G B le 9 2&9&36:jigetatim 4 wa- OUD Â·Z -HO-J IWL.u J Z- Â·WWO-01 H. a U W _-1 a: I 210- u, U 0 -1 Z Â·Â· W - U. 2 7- U. O vi fu (4 4 - ,- 0 F I a O U Z Â· .1 n: LU Â»LU t.0 M 4,0 0 3:ck-UWI>-(DZUJUJU.1 4 1 7//1\19<ff// 71"404181(4:1 :111'llifi'; \ c /* 4, . J. 1 H 1-0 '-'-'1 ZOLL-I*0~~I Z .MZ U 0,- Â£ Ma: 2 - 0 -Â· 2 9&2 4 w -0 44 3 -Xs<70 a: a Â·40 4 D O u. Z W,0 0 a: u 1 O-0 . O Â» â€¢-towm Â» ~-ZIOWZ'-(/)# 0 4 0=-I Wâ€¢~-ZU.BOOL ZWW 0 - 0-H JIFIOI<\104-* W 1,1 j Z <lk- 00# 2 OIl 2 >. 1 o ZLL- U.- . Z a a: WWOUOO<WÂ·Â·Â»â€¢--- 429 1-6 IW -Z UF-Knw W k-1-Hu-Ol-OZWâ‚¬IWJ . 0, X LO U. J I - WWW L,- 4 O LA 19 W F.-WO-le=ILL W I 0 9 I <1 to N -to.- . Ln,1 wl- a. â€¢DenÂ»WI)- O Z Â·-UU) 0Â·â€¢ M> O Â· 4,1, 2 H (n Â· 8 Zon-4>-20 Â·. Ma.-DWO Z --ELL W JOZV-r.DJODZ E MEL#,84*2"â„¢w... E Z TIUWMIZ W SU]wor)Â»}---4-IÂ·-HZH-a:CI- U if afz. culoot/>DcÂ£wz<1. O X OLLI<1OO4W<{OQIWWLAW W ve#-JozwmWV,-1-Ummal 1 00 96 W 1298.6 2 â€¢ U. Za: I O WO 1- . EW =Mtâ€¢Iwur~WI4 9-Il---AO UZJ\ W,n Â· â€¢ N H (Jac M ZW Z-4 -03Â» -Cy -2Wj&'uniEW'JLL.1-5,62 c ~ z Â·wa.2 WOW Z # < U.ZÂ»OO- - w &WE*~~E*EWEWÂ§~Â§ W U- 00Â»1Â£0 g E .WWLZEI-z JU-Â¢9-<1 N 00 00' E 1,9.35 - &# Â£ OWOLU O-002 42C 7 - Â·-HÂ»W-IM 4 - l>~ ~ $ *(-Ovz 8 Â¥ 128 I - U-HQB-~WM.-5 . - -W-WO'OOW09-ha- n D 0. . I D W Z Id-Nut- W -114 W,-40 2-W Z W U. Z )- 1 X 4 Â» W HOOLL r - .ZLeccskEE?u >-0.. I rwoÂ»-Â· 4WZW Z .0 u. a) co 4 1- AU)LLONW>Wâ€¢00. / i - 3,9 J U J Cory 0 Z U. i- 00 0 U.1 0 LL N â‚¬1 WZI U O 0:0â€¢-WZ,nooN IWÂ·-1 OIW Â° . A >-Â» I JZ Cla- 4 zaw 9-IJ $- D Â·1 2 /- 4 1 - gr #-1-ZO â€¢41-0:I v <1 Â» /1 2, & /3 8 4 OUJUJ-W Â· - 02 La H Â· - u.1 1 H DI .13 UÂ¥1'wiz'!wg=:Eg!305 tu . e * ~ ~ ~ M~ ~~O~~Wdiav~~~~~~<0~~~; J W H 9- 4 41 * COOC â€¢B-OZH--OLL.001 -A . I Â· O to WO<â€¢-â€¢-Z . D ~E , IOUUâ€¢ 02'N 3â€¢ Â· 72 U. 0. ~~ a=WIX.JOUJ\.-ZWW 00- - & a oww.... I- .O M Â·Â· 4 a. E 62 -8 2.LE:g..Z'-.Ci:Nwa9582 O WJ WOWZO-LI.ZLUZ*--_IW 6. ad 1 1 62 / E =2 ew=-3:re=ZE=*82* \ 1 1.10Â·60 .soÂ·oir 3 .21'Â·00 N . 15% 5 == 1-IIa-O 040 COU. OLL W 4 - A - -JWL,lu) 9 Â·I-OWO Lk a: IOIN WM- In ZO .02) 3.00.00 N V w 28 12@U!2Â°'-now'#0Zati'2.0 .9 1.11 3 .01.00 N O al LUD â€¢U.N Â· ---04,00, Â¥81'21:Â°wmeÂ°' S -rl 1 wk: aso .~~Ezb,SUW9:::3w WINOO-â‚¬100}4-U-OI04 3 iEE ml-9--UJ<U ZU--Oal-Ua 163~ 3- 'Hl OO7klO1O3 11NA ~R IWE;ST:TZ.Z:CEL 11. Rmc EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF COSTS HARMONY FOUNDATION WATER UTILITY EXTENSION Costs are based on the actual billings from Kearney & Son's Excavating and Pump Service, Inc. and Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. Description Quantity Unit Price Total Amount 1. Mobilization 1 (1.s.) $895.00 $895.00 2. 8" Ductile Iron Water Line 2373 (1.f.) $41.95 399,547.35 3.6" Gate Valve 1 (e.a.) $643.90 $643.90 4. Fire Hydrants 2 (e.a.) $2998.50 $5997.00 5. PVC Encasement 60 (1.f.) $7.00 $420.00 6. 12" Water Main Abandonment 1 (e.a.) $940.00 $940.00 7. 12" Water Main Reconnect 1 (e.a.) $1,100.00 31.100.00 8. Traffic Control 1 (e.a.) 82029.49 $2029.49 9. Landscaping 1 (e.a.) $840.00 $840.00 10. Engineering Services Sll.200 TOTAL COST $123,612.74 PROPOSED FEE With consideration ofthe number ofresidences/businesses whichmay connectto the facilities, and based upon the assumption that 10 % of the total use of the water line extension will be by the Harmony Foundation, Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) estimates that approximately 89 single family taps are possible within 15 years from the effective date of the Agreement. RMC proposes an additional fee of 31250 (which is approximately 33% of the Town's single family tap fee) for the properties indicated on the attached figure. The total collected would not exceed $111.250. For a tap fee larger than 3/4", the additional fee collected shall be 33% of the existing tap fee at the time of application. 1-7 TOWN of ESTES PARK InterÂ·-Office Memorandum December 15, 1998 TO: Public Works Conpittee FROM: Bill Linnane (,1/~ SUBJECT: Hwy. 34/36 Project Design & Construction Management Background: The Hwy. 34/36 project is tentatively scheduled to begin construction October 1, 1999. This schedule requires the following deadlines: â€¢ Plans and specifications reviewed by CDOT: April 1999 through June 1999 â€¢ Plans and specifications approved by CDOT: July 1, 1999 â€¢ Bid advertising date: July 15, 1999 â€¢ Bids due: September 1, 1999 RMC has submitted the attached scope of services for design and construction management The proposed scope cost of $179,953 is within the budget amount as shown in the August 20, 1998 PWC meeting minutes. Budget/Cost Budget $186,000 Scope/cost $179,953 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the attached RMC scope of services. BL/lb Attachments 2-1 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. gmc 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 December 10,1998 (970) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 Fax (970) 586-2459 Bill Linnane Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Scope of Services for Engineering Services forthe U.S. Highway 36 Widening from U.S. Highway 34 to Colorado State Highway 7. Dear Mr. Linnane: This letter outlines the Scope of Services and Cost of Engineering Services associated with the design and construction observation services for the U.S. Highway 36 widening. PROJECT OVERVIEW The U.S. Highway road widening is a transportation improvement project within the Town of Estes Park. The proposed improvements will be jointly funded by Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), Federal Enhancement Funding and the Town of Estes Park. The project corridor is from the U.S. Highway 34/36 intersection east along U.S. Highway 36 to the U.S. Highway 36 and State Highway 7 intersection. Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RIVIC) in conjunction with Plains Engineering and Felsburg, Holt, and Ullevig performed a preliminary design evaluation for the stated section of road. The information and recommendations from the evaluation were compiled in a report Ut\ed "Preliminary Design Evaluation of U.S. Highway 36 from U.S. Highway 34 to Colorado State Highway 7." The major component of the design, based on recommendations for Phase I from the preliminary design evaluation, are as follows: Bridge Widening of the existing U.S. Highway 36 bridge across the Big Thompson River, with either rolled steel or steel plate girders. The bridge is to be widened two lanes (24') to provide for five lanes of traffic. Bridge railing are to be upgraded to Type 4 with treatment on the outside and toe surface to reflect the aesthetic treatment which Estes Park has been CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING 2-2 gmc using on their urban bridge rails. Other bridge design features will be per the "Addendum to the Structure Selection Report for U.S. 36 Over the Biq Thompson River Structure No. C-14-A". â€¢ Bicycle/ Pedestrian Underpass An 8 foot high by 12 foot wide concrete box underpass, located behind the west bridge abutment. The underpass would be approximately 145 feet long and include electric lights and a storm water drainage system. The underpass would provide access from downtown Estes Park and the river walk area to the chamber facility and Lake Estes trail system. U.S. 36 Highway A widening of the existing roadway from the U.S. 34/U.S. 36 intersection east to the CS 7 intersection. The roadway would be widened from the existing three lanes to five lanes. The five lanes would consist of two east bound lanes, two west bound lanes and a center turn lane. Two east bound lanes will be extended up to CS 7. Also a center left turn lane for inbound and outbound left turn movements associated with the elk viewing/chamber facility parking area and Stanley Avenue. A right turn deceleration lane for access into the elk viewing/chamber facility parking area will be incorporated. U.S. 34/U.S. 36 INTERSECTION ' Extend the length of dual left turn lanes along the northbound U.S. 36 approach access the bridge. Also, construct a new right turn lane along the north bound U.S. 36 approach. SCOPE OF WORK A. Preliminary Design Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) will prepare a preliminary design for the work outlined above. The preliminary design will include grading plan, storm water management plans, project survey control plan, construction traffic control plan, cross-sections and structural plans with the necessary details. All design information shall be presented in a format (written and computer) to CDOT per their current standards for the FIR (Field Inspection RA>iew). Besides the FIR plans 2-3 gmc other design information to be included are hydraulic information, wetland information and construction phasing. B. Final Design RMC will revise the preliminary plans per the comments of the Town of Estes Park and CDOT from the FIR plan review. RMC will submit the revised plans, specifications and estimate(PS & E) for the Final Office Review (FOR). RMC will also submit the PS & E to a peer engineering consulting firm for additional quality assurance review. The PS & E will be revised per the Town and CDOT comments. The PS & E will then be submitted for final clearance. C. Construction Bidding Upon final clearance and construction authorization, RMC will advertise the approved bid package for construction. Also RMC will manage pre-bid questions, job walk, addendums and bid opening. D. Construction Related Engineering Services A. RMC will provide construction related engineering services including review shop drawings, attending all progress meetings, review of progress payments from the contractor, prepare and review all change orders and other change associated engineering tasks. B. Upon completion of the projects, record drawings prepared with the original inked mylars being submitted to the Town and CDOT along with 3.5" computer disk containing the CADD record files for the project. C. RMC will coordinate acceptance testing and documentation during construction acceptance testing and documentation will follow the CDOT Field Materials Manual and/or project specifications. Laboratory cost for acceptance testing is not included in RMC's Scope of Services. D. RMC will provide a full time field representative to observe construction in order to assure compliance with the intent of the drawings and specifications. The field representative is supported by periodic site reviews by the project manager. 2-4 gmc PROJECT TEAM The project team will include Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc., as the prime consultants with Diana Horner of Plains Engineering Inc., responsible for the structural design of the bridge. COSTS The cost for the services outlined above are listed in Table 1. The total cost for the design bidding and construction related Engineering Services is $179,953.00. RMC and the project design team is pleased to have the opportunity to provide this scope of work, and we look forward to the project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, ROCIÂ©' 1*~TAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. ;1/ r# NI LA- /Kerty M. Prochaska, P.E. Associate Principal KMP/mas 2-5 gmc ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. U.S. Highway 36 Improvements 1999 SCHEDULE OF RATES Employee Category Hourly Rate Principal $100-$120 Engineering: Project Manager $70-$115 Project Engineer, Project Geologist S55 - S95 Engineer, Geologist $48-$70 Engineer Technician 635- $55 Construction Engineer $55-$70 Construction Field Representative $45-$55 Planning: Senior Planner $55- 675 Planner $40-$55 Senior Landscape Architect $60- $80 Landscape Architect S45 - S60 Surveying: Licensed Surveyor S55 - S85 Surveyor S40 - 355 Survey Technician 340 - S55 Survey Crews: Two Person S95 Three Person 6120 Support: Computer Technician, CAD Operator $40-$60 CAD Drafter S30 - 350 Clerical $20-$45 Direct Reimbursables Travel, communications, printing, deliveries, outside services and sub-consultant services shall be reimbursed at cost plus 10%. Mileage shall be reimbursed at the rate of SO.35 per mile. 2-6 , gmc TABLE 1 HIGHWAY 36 WIDENING COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PRELIMINARY DESIGN PERSONNEL HRS. RATE/HR. TOTAL COST Principal 32 110 $3,520.00 Project Manager 75 80 $6,000.00 Project Engineer 156 60 $9,360.00 Geotechnical Engineer 24 55 $1,320.00 Hydraulics Engineer 40 55 $2,200.00 Engineering Technician 135 45 $6,075.00 Landscape Architect 40 50 $2,000.00 Surveyor 24 55 $1,320.00 Survey Crew 24 120 $2,880.00 CADD Operator 180 50 $9,000.00 Clerical 80 20 $1.600.00 Structural Consultant $28,656.00 TOTAL PRELIMINARY DESIGN $73,931.00 FINAL DESIGN PERSONNEL HRS. RATE/HR. TOTAL COST Principal 8 110 $880.00 Project Manager 24 80 $1,920.00 Project Engineer 50 60 $3,000.00 Geotechnical Engineer 8 55 $440.00 Hydraulics Engineer 16 55 $880.00 Engineering Technician 60 45 32,700.00 Landscape Architect 16 50 $800.00 Surveyor 8 55 $440.00 CADD Operator 80 50 $4,000.00 Clerical 40 20 $800.00 Structural Consultant $12,282.00 Peer Review of Plans $3,520.00 TOTAL FINAL DESIGN $31,662.00 2-7 gmc PROJECT BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED ENGINEERING SERVICES PERSONNEL HRS. RATE/HR. . TOTAL COST Principal 40 110 $4,400.00 Project Manager 80 80 $6,400.00 Project Engineer 136 60 $8,160.00 Construction Engineer 300 55 $16,500.00 Construction Field Representative 600 50 $30,000.00 Engineering Technician 40 45 $1,800.00 Survey Crew 20 120 $2,400.00 CADD Operator 70 50 33,500.00 Clerical 60 20 $1,200.00 TOTAL BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION $74,360.00 SUMMARY OF COST PRELIMINARY DESIGN $73,931.00 FINAL DESIGN $31.662.00 PROJECT BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION RELATED $74.360.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES TOTAL PROJECT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES $179,953.00 2-8 .....0/0/Ul./.1.0 CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ,......~ Public Works Cornmittee - August 20, 1998 - Page 3 1 - â€¢ Remove all abandoned telephone pedestals. â€¢ Construct a cedar fence around the original easement agreement location. â€¢ Plant drought-resistant shrubbery around the fence. â€¢ Vacate the old easement by warranty deed to the Town. â€¢ Prepare a new easement and legal description to be recorded after the Town verifies accuracy. U.S. West has scheduled numerous projects in the Estes area, and Town staff is not issuing any right-of-way permits until such time as the five items listed above are either completed, in the process of being completed, or under construction. Jesse Trujillo, Field Engineer/U.S. West, responded to staff's concerns: crack-sealing (an additional Town request not mentioned above) was being started today (8/20/98) and will continue until this portion of the project is completed; the abandoned cabinets will be removed. The fence can be constructed within two weeks. The Committee expressed their regret with the lack of response offered by U.S. West, particularly with regard to the five items identified above, and also U.S. West's failure to complete projects as presented relative to easements granted by the Town. The Committee recommends the Town grant U.S. West an easement and issue right-of-permits only after the cedar fence and landscaping are in place, and U.S. West prepare all necessary easement and vacation documents for recording. REPORTS. The Customer Service Response Report for July, 1998 will be attached to the minutes. Water Line Looping Project. At the June meeting, the Committee recommended approval to award the Big Thompson/Village Green water line project to BT Construction. BT Construction stated they would complete the asphalt work by November, 1998. The projected commencement date is one month behind schedule, however, it is still possible to complete the section of pipe underneath the asphalt roadway by November lat Kerry Prochaska/RMC, confirmed that BT Construction is committed to complete all asphalt work by the deadline date, and staff has directed BT to begin the project by August 31't. If work has not started by 9/15, staff will delay the project until 1999. ~-- Highway 34/36 Project. On June 98, the Town Board approved the scope of services by RMC to prepare a preliminary plan and report for the proposed 1999/2000 CDOT Hwy. 34/36 Project. The scope includes the study and cost estimates of various scenarios such as additional travel lanes between Hwy. 7 and the Hwy. 34/36 intersection, widening and/or replacing the Hwy. 34/36 bridge, two types of pedestrian underpasses, and miscellaneous changes to the Hwy. 34/36 intersection geometry. Preliminary Phase I construction includes the addition of an intersection pedestrian underpass, widening of the bridge, and adding additional travel l lanes. Preliminary Phase II includes reconstruction of the intersection to include a standard right turn lane in lieu of the eastbound inadequate yield lane. A Hwy. 34 southbound left turn 2-9 IMADFORD PUBLIIHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS --\ Public Works Committee - August 20, 1998 - Page 4 lane would be added and other various changes to the intersection a would be completed. 1 -4( CDOT has budgeted $1.1 Million for this project in 1999/2000. The Town has yet to determine a budget for 1999 and beyond. Cost estimates for Phase I are: CDOT/$1,111,000, Town/$336,000 for a total cost of $1,446,0009Â¢- Phase II cost estimates are: CDOT/$0, Town/$310,000, for a total cost of $310,000. . t'A'6.Dej RMC will give a formal presentation to the Town Board at their 1 86,000 -ED{L meeting scheduled August 25th; however, action is not required at DES + C.,4, this time. RMC prepared and reviewed an Executive Summary. RMC confirmed that Phase I can stand on its own merit, and they are recommending design begin January 1, 1999, bid advertising Summer of 1999, and construction in Fall of 1999, with completion by Memorial Day, 2000. Discussion followed on highway widening ~ relative to any similarities to the reconstruction of Hwy. 7; the project does not include any water line improvements; EPSD, U.S. West & Light and Power will be affected by the construction, and staff urged RMC to coordinate all utility agencies in a timely manner pursuant to a seven month notification process; and drainage. Acting Town Administrator Widmer commented on the budget which, if the project is approved, will include not only the Town's funding portion but CDOT's grant as well. Commenting on a delay for Phase II, Mr. Prochaska confirmed that costs could escalate _ 5%/yr.1. The Committee expressed their appreciation to Mr. Prochaska for his report. Street Cut Standards Revision Update. The Committee reviewed a proposed schedule for adoption of the Street Cut Standards for Estes Park, Loveland, Ft. Collins, and Larimer County. Public meetings in Estes Park are planned October 15% and staff anticipates final draft adoption for Estes Park in February, 1999. Water Dept. 10-year Improvements and Priorities Update, and Fire Dept. Improvements - Update. In 1997, a home in Charles Heights Subdivision burned down. When the Fire Department first arrived at the scene, the house was unsavable. Although the water system in the general vicinity was adequate to supply domestic water, it was inadequate for fire protection. It should be noted that with or without fire protection water, this house could not have been saved. In May 1997, the Charles Heights Association (CHA) requested that the Public Works Committee approve Town-funded improvements to the water system in Charles Heights so that adequate fire protection could be provided. At that time, staff explained the Town's system of prioritizing water line projects: Priority #1: Extremely high maintenance lines. Priority #2: Extremely low pressure domestic use and less than 500 GPM fire protection. Priority #3: Less than 500 GPM fire protection lines. Since the Charles Heights water line request was a priority #3 project, the Committee recommended: "The Committee recommends that 2-10 '.i - L....2 i-:Â· BREAK DOWN OF PROJECT FUNDS FOR PHASING ALTERNATIVE ' PHASEI Federal CDOT Enhancement Town Total ,+3,-.N Item Description Funding Funding Funding Funding 1 U.S. Highway 36 improvements $1,000,000 $0 $182,917 $1,182,917 1Â·?.Â·iti Including Bridge ; 2 2.2 t./,t 2 Bicycle/Pedestrian Underpass $0 $110,000 $129,484 $239,484 TOTAL $1,000,000 $110,000 $312,401 $1,422,401 4 1 d oweas 41 ge do . 1..1 fe A- De>./ c. wi . 1.. PHASE 11 (.f, 40... Federal CDOT Enhancement Town Total Item Description Funding Funding Funding Funding 3 U.S. 34/U.S. 36 Intersection $0 $0 $310,000 $310,000 if TOTAL PHASE I & 11 $1,000,000 $110,000 $622,401 $1,732,401 1. . 1 2-11 Â· . TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum December 17, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill I.innane ~-~~-0' SUBJECT: Village Green/Lexington Lane Water Line Final Change Order Background: The Public Works Department just received the final quantities and costs for the Village Green/Lexington Lane Water Line Project from B.T. Construction and Cornell Resources. The fittings and asphalt quantities exceeded the original estimate by $11,740. This final change represents 4.2% of the original contract. Budget/Cost Original construction sum: $279,080 Final construction sum: 290,823 Recommendation: The Water Department fund can adequately accommodate the extra $11,740 cost Staff requests approval of this final change order. BL/lb TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT NOVEMBER, 1998 _ CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION 115.00 135.75 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 16 TAP REQUEST 5.00 10.00 .1 17 WATER QUALITY ~ r 3.00 7.25 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS 1.00 1.00 22 FROZEN LINES 23/24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN/SERVICE 1.00 22.00 30 METER REPAIR 40.00 40.50 32 FINAL INSPECTION 3.00 5.00 40 COt4STRUCTtON RELATED 100 4.00 50 STREET REPAIR 3.00 6.00 51 SNOWREMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 *i:GiN REQUESTS-Â·AN*''REPAFR ': 3 T. 2~â€ž.Â·~. -Â·, ~~~<:,~uliÂ®47Â«41 ... :113.00:1 54 STORM DRAINAGE 1.00 1.00 TOTALS: NOVEMBER, 1998 -181,00* 'I:~,Â·Â· ---2 *Â«7/*-261.75 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 181.00 169.00 103.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 261.75 266.75 244.00 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) +7.10%/-1.87% -11.98%/-.19% +75.73%/+7.27