The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1998-10-154,4, AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK - PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE OCTOBER 15, 1998 3:30 P.M. preparation date: 10/8/98 *revision date: 10/14/98 1. Proposed ROW Construction Standards Public input session and request to proceed to final draft phase 2. Water Dept. Water line Projects Change Orders Request approval to sign change orders for: a.)Big Horn Phase I b.)Big Horn Phase II c.)Big Thompson d.)Devils Gulch 3. Fleet Dept. Software Request to purchase 4. Executive Session * (oug 4 ue fiens (l* FI Attorney Client Discussion dens e k 'luv 0 6 6- Reports: /U utt b ,aver L.C. 1. Customer Service Response i 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum - - -October 8,1998- - - -- -1~ TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane ~L#~ SUBJECT: Review of the R.O.W. Construction Standards Draft BACKGROUND For the past two years, Fort Collins, Loveland,-Larimer Couity and Est@Â§ Park (rask-Tan) have been in the process of adopting one universal street cut standard for Larimer County. A draft is included in the packet and also has been sent to interested parties (utility companies, contractors, etc.) in all of the municipalities mentioned above. All interested parties have been invited to the October 158 P.W.C. meeting so that the P.W.C., staff and the Task Team can receive input concerning the R.O.W. Construction Standards Draft BUDGET/COST Not applicable RECOMMENDATION The Committee, Task Team and the public should discuss all concerns. Recommendations from staff and the Task Team should be presented to the Committee. Staff and the team should make appropriate changes and present the Final Draft to the Town Board for adoption. / 0~g- 7 p i Va4 1 BlePet,a,mes (61 r , 7 1-1 Mission Statement The ROW task team and Construction Guidelines shall: Develop one set of County wide construction standards and guidelines to assist contractors in producing high quality repairs to the existing streets and rights of way. Also to assist contractors in providing their clients with bids based on consistant perameters. The guidelines shall detail the best overall methodology for producing long lasting, low maintenance, repairs to subsurface and surface areas in existing streets. These guidelines are not job specific but incorporate the best overall engineering and construction practices available. These guideline we hope will satisfy the general public, that as stewards of the roadway infrastructure, we (PWD) are maintaining their investments, and not incurring future expenditure at their expense from private utility improvements. Public Works Enginee,ing i Summary and Right of Way Permitting Plan Interagency Task Team for Construction Guidelines 1. Permits shall be acquired 48 hours prior to any work within the R.O.W. 2. Traffic control plans to be submitted prior to any work wRh the R.O.W. 3. Boring shall be attempted before an open cut is permitted. 4. Flowable fill required full depth in all trenches for utility service connedions, repairs and minor main replacements. 5. When flowable fill is waived by the Town, compaction testing by an authorized engineer shall produce written reports. 6. Asphalt shall be saw cut full depth (no jack hammers or wheel cutters). 7. Asphalt patching shall be 4" minimum or match existing depth. 8. New streets less than 5 years old may be denied permits_fQ[_excavation. 9. Asphalt patching layout shall match examples,On pages 14-21:~~0 10. Cold mix shall be placed on all cuts when asplialrworK-i*~t scheduled within 2 weeks. 11. Professional paving contractors with proper credentials & experience shall beu 12. Basic fee's shall be $50 for permit and $200 to cut across a street. See pade B-2 for A details. 13. The warranty period for all work shall be two years. This shall be enforced. - â€¢ Proposed adoption and activation November, 1998 Il /94)9 8 -T-#. .2 1 1-2 1.fet U %-1.-*V ~ *~*) TOWN OF ESTES PARK 41 3 9*9 te â€¢ac 7 ff*XEZMAJVY:*rekLTAP -...0-.74Â£9,96%9Â·K .~*# ./lbu>WU . Aer y....3--4459*4*:&% N / -- . ~N:,1~p.r-t< -:,IC--65 2049411 -~41 . , 72Â» - 1 i l / 1 - -Â« r--1 9/4/ 6 l'>'{ RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT APPLICATION AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES FOR THE LOCAL ENTITIES OF: LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO CITY OF LOVELAND, COLORADO TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO TOWN OF BERTHOUD, COLORADO DRAFT May 1998 DA- MAY 21 1998 FOR DISCUSSION ONLY (970) 586-33.31 Â· PO. BOX 1200 â€¢ 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (970) 586-28,1 4 . 1 \C/*30 .1 4< 42*v TOWN OF ESTES PARK .*..t _91 li --1:~22*92 g 'dcs=90*,ee. -,=â€¢d=fit=*4~ 1 mi, + 17/ rw:770/9-fec>. - --- - A).C!4.Lj . .1,= Â»1 .0 1,4 + a#*05 1 , May 26, 1998 p':Estds Park-(Sntractors. Engineers & Developers: Enclosed is a booklet of proposed construction standards and fee schedule for work within the rights-of-Way in the Town of Estes Park These specifications have been under design for two years and represent the best methodology and interest of all jurisdictions in Larimer County, i.e.: City of Fort Collins, City of Loveland, Larimer County, and the Towns of Berthoud and Estes Park. Our attempt is to make all utility improvements, service connects and work within ~ the roadways and rights-of-way consistent throughout the county and provide our community with a safe, smooth and cost effective road repair. We have attempted to create guidelines which will direct the contractors to provide our community with road repairs that will stand the test of time and not become a burden to the taxpayers following the completion of private work. Many of these procedures are already in effect. They should also help contractors to bid more consistently by removing the variability's in construction methods. At this point the guidelines are in draft form and may be revised. Your participation in this process is encouraged and welcomed. Please take the time to review these guidelines, then send your written comments to me by June 10, 1998. Following public comment it is our intent to host an open meeting to review possible changes on these specifications. They will then be modified and submitted to the Town Board for adoption, hopefully by late July. Town ofEstes Park Public Works Department Greg Sfevers Construction Manager (970) 586-5331 Â· RO. BOX 1200 Â· 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Â· FAX (970) 586-6909 I. . Table of Contents 1. GENERAL 1 A. Pillpnge 1 B. Introductinn 1 C. Entities Included Under These Guidelinp< 1 D. Definitions and Abbreviations 1 E. Specific Conditinng 1. Traffic Control Plan < 3 2. Traffic Flow During Peak Hourg 3 3. End ofDay Lane Conditiong 4. Inspection Requeete 5. Minimum Concrete Removals/Replacemenâ„¢ 3 6. Road Closurpq 3 F. Permit Fe,4 3 G. Insurance Requirementâ‚¬ Â· 3 1. Commercial General Liability 3 2. Automobile Liability 4 3. Terms of In~rnnre 4 4. Indemnification.. 4 H. Bond Requirements and Warranty Period 5 I. Licensing Requirempnk 2. PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS 5 A. Obtain Blank Permit Form 5 B. Submission of Plan< 5 C. Submission of Traffic Control Plang D. Payment of Fee 5 E. Review of Submittals, 5 F. Approval of Submittals ' 6 G. Issuance of Permit 6 H. Other Permits 6 3. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 6 A. General Conditiong 6 1. Protection of Existing Improvemenâ„¢ 6 2. Temporary Surfaces Requirp,1 6 3. Pavement Patch pq 7 4. Work to be Done in Expedient Manner 7 5. Removal and Replacement ofUnsatisfactory Work 7 B. Excavation 7 C. Blafting 8 D. Equipment 9 E. Dewatering 9 F. Removalq 9 1. Streets, Pave,1 9 2. Streets, Gravel 9 3. Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk 9 1 G. Fl,rkfill I . 1. Flowable-Fill 9 2. Conventional Backfill (Other Than Flowable Fill) 10 3. Compaction Testing Requirementq 10 4. Embankment and glnpec 10 H. Restoration 11 1. Bore Holes - Vertical and Horizontal 2. Subgrade 11 3. Asphalt Surfaring 11 4. Concrete Surfacing and Pptrhing 12 5. Joint Filling 12 4. DEVELOPING A "QUALITY" APPROACH TO STREET REPAIRS 13 A. Gpnpral 13 B. Appearance 13 C. Rideability 16 D. Pavement Management 17 E. Future Maintenan r. 19 5. TESTING 21 A. Descriptinn ?1 B. Testing Frequencies ?1 6. INSPECTION 99 Appendix A Local Entity Contact Person A-1 Appendix B Sample Permit B-1 !1 1. GENERAL A. Purpose The purposes of these Guidelines are to: â€¢ instruct contractors on how to prepare and submit plans and other documentation for Right-of-Way Permits, â€¢ describe processes, policies and requirements, and â€¢ define roles and responsibilities of all parties. B. Introduction All contractors and public utility agencies must obtain a Right-of-Way Permit for any work performed within the public rights-of-way of the Larimer County entities listed below. The storage of materials and equipment within the public rights-of-way also requires a Permit. To preserve the original investment of the street and roadway systems within Larimer County, minimize the disruption and maximize the safety to the traveling public caused by construction, and reduce future maintenance problems, it is the policy of the Local Entities within Larimer County to require the installation of new utilities across existing streets be done by boring or tunneling. Open cutting of existing streets for the installation of new utilities will be permitted only when it can be proven it is not possible to use boring or tunneling techniques. Applicants for Right-of-Way Permits must plan for adequate time for review and approval by the affected Local Entity and any other involved agencies. Generally, the greater the scope of work, the longer the permit review and approval process will take. NOTE: EACH LOCAL ENTITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VARY FROM THESE STANDARDS BASED UPON CONDITIONS SPECIFIC TO THE LOCATION WHERE THE WORK WILL OCCUR. THE "SPECIAL CONDITIONS" SECTION OF THE PERMIT WILL OUTLINE ANY VARIATIONS FROM THE COUNTY-WIDE SPECIFICATIONS. C. Entities Included Under These Guidelines The following Local Entities are covered by these Guidelines: â€¢ Larimer County Colorado (all unincorporated areas), â€¢ City of Fort Collins, Colorado, â€¢ City of Loveland, Colorado, â€¢ Town of Berthoud, Colorado, â€¢ Town of Estes Park, Colorado, D. Definitions and Abbreviations Wherever the following words, phrases, or abbreviations appear in these standards, they shall have the following meanings: AS-CONSTRUCTED DRAWINGS - A set of construction drawings that has been red-penciled or otherwise marked to record all changes which have occurred during the construction. CDOT - Colorado Department of Transportation. CODE - shall mean the latest official adopted ordinances, policies codes and/or regulations of Larimer County, the Cities Fort Collins and Loveland, and the Towns of Berthoud and Estes Park, Colorado. - CONTRACTOR - shall mean a person, partnership or corporation duly bonded, licensed and insured to perform work within public rights-of-way in the Local Entity. DAYS - intended as calendar days and not normal working days unless stipulated as working days. 1 DRIVEWAY, RURAL - that portion of gravel or hard surfaced roadway from the street, roadway or alley . to the private property line to gain access to the private property. ' DRIVEWAY, URBAN - that portion of portland cement concrete or asphalt extending from the street gutter lip to the property line for the full width of access from the public right-of-way to the private property. ENGINEER - shall mean the Larimer County Engineer, and the City Engineers for the Cities of Fort Collins, Loveland, and the Towns of Berthoud and Estes Park, Colorado, or their authorized representatives acting on behalf of the entity. ENGINEERING PLANS - Drawings, plans, profiles, cross sections and other required details for the construction of public or private improvements within the public rights-of-way or public easements, conforming with the Local Entities' applicable improvement standards. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION - the objective grouping of roads, streets and highways into integrated systems, each ranked by their relative importance to the general welfare, the motorists and land use. IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS - A set of regulations established by each Local Entity setting forth the details, specifications, instructions, and procedures to be followed in the planning, design, installation and construction of public or private improvements within the public rights-of-way or public easements. INSPECTOR - shall mean an authorized representative of the Engineer assigned to make inspections for contract performances, standards and contract compliance. LOCAL ENTITY - shall mean unincorporated Larimer County, the Cities of Fort Collins, and Loveland, and the Towns of Berthoud and Estes Park, Colorado. MAY - a permissive condition. No requirement for design or application is intended. MUTCD- Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Federal Highway Administration). OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Administration. RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.)- Any strip of area of land, including surface, overhead, or underground, granted by deed, easement, dedication, prescription or lease, for construction and maintenance according to designated use, such as for streets and highways, drainage ditches, irrigation canals, etc. RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT - An official document issued by one of the Local Entities authorizing the performance of a specified activity or work within public rights-of-way and public easements by a person, contractor, company, firm, corporation, or public utility. SHALL - a mandatory condition. Where certain requirements in the design or application are described with the shall stipulation, it is mandatory that these requirements be met. SHOULD - an advisory condition. Where the word should is used, it is considered to be advisable usage, recommended but not mandatory. Deviations may be allowed when reasons are given which show intent of the standard is met. STREET - a general term denoting a public way for purposes of vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle travel ways, including the entire area within the right-of-way (includes alleyways). Any constructed facility within the right-of-way. TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR (TCS) - A well trained and knowledgeable individual assigned the responsibility for traffic control devices at worksites. The TCS must be ATSSA (American Traffic Safety Services Association) or CCA (Colorado Contractor's Association) certified. TRAFFIC ENGINEER - shall mean the Traffic Engineer or person responsible for monitoring traffic in the Local Entity. UNCC - Utility Notification Center of Colorado (commonly referred to as "One Call"). Statewide clearinghouse for coordinating and scheduling utility locates. Most utilities, both public and private, - utilize this service. Toll-free phone number for UNCC is 1-800-922-1987. 2 4 E. Specific Conditions .. 1. Traffic Control Plans 41,Â·l. A Traffic Control Plan (TCP) shall be submitted prior to or submitted with the permit application for all proposed work in/on adecial-3414-&0116GteR streets for approval by the Traffic Engineer. JALed#Ante,wesidentiol otrccto typically do not nccd a ccporatc TCP bute'-signs, barricades and other necessary traffic control devices shall be placed in accordance with the MUTCD, Part VI. All the work described above shall be performed by a TCS. 2. Traffic Flow During Peak Hours No interference with traffic flow on arterial or collector streets shall be permitted during the hours of 7:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. or from 4:45 p.m. to 5:15 p.m. unless authorized in writing by the Traffic Engineer. 3. End of Day Lane Conditions ASPHALT STREET - When work is stopped for the day, all lanes of an arterial or collector street shall be opened to traffic unless approved by the Engineer. A traffic lane shall be considered satisfactorily open only if it is paved with hot or cold mix asphalt paving, except when the local jurisdiction allows an alternate temporary surface at its discretion. CONCRETE STREET - When work is stopped for the day, all lanes of an arterial or collector street shall be opened for traffic. A traffic lane shall be considered satisfactorily open only if it is surfaced with a temporary asphalt surface. In the event the street surface has been replaced in the same day as the excavation was made, the repaired areas should be properly barricaded to protect the concrete during the curing stage. 4. Inspection Requests It shall be the responsibility of the person performing the work authorized by the permit to notify the Engineer or his authorized representatives that such work is ready for inspection. The Engineer requires that every request for inspection be received at least twenty-four (24) hours before such inspection is desired. Such requests may be in writing or by telephoning or faxing the Engineer. 5. Minimum Concrete Removals/Replacements Removal and replacement shall be to existing joints. 6. Road Closures Road closures will only be allowed at the approval of the Engineer. F. Permit Fees A complete fee schedule for each Local Entity can be found in Appendix A. The Local Entities' permit fees are established under appropriate enabling resolutions and/or ordinances and are subject to change periodically. An additional fee may be charged for any excavation work that may affect the accuracy of the Local Entities' Survey Monumentation System. G. Insurance Requirements The Permit Applicant is required to submit certificates of insurance for Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability as described below: 1. Commercial General Liability The Contractor shall procure and keep in force during the duration of all work covered under this Permit a policy of Commercial General Liability insurance insuring the Contractor and 3 4 naming the Local Entity as an additional insured against any liability arising out of the , ownership, use, occupancy, or construction of the work and all areas appurtenant thereto with a ' combined single limit of at least $1,000,000. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, be a limit to the liability of the Contractor hereunder. 2. Automobile Liability The Contractor shall procure and keep in force during the duration of all work covered under this Permit a policy of Automobile Liability insurance insuring the Contractor and naming the Local Entity as an additional insured against any liability for personal injury, bodily injury, or Â· death arising from the use of motor vehicles and shall cover operations on or off the site of all motor vehicles controlled by the Contractor whether they are owned, non-owned, or hired with a combined single limit of at least $1,000,000. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of the Contractor hereunder. 3. Terms of Insurance Insurance required shall be with companies qualified to do business in the State of Colorado with a general policyholdefs financial rating of not less than "A" as set forth in the most current edition of "Best's Insurance Reports" and may provide for deductible amounts as the Contractor may deem to be reasonable for the project, but in no event greater than $1,000. No such policies shall be cancelable or subject to reduction in coverage limits or other modification except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Local Entity. However, where cancellation of coverage is due to nonpayment of premium a ten (10) day written notice to the Local Entity is required. The Contractor shall not do nor permit to be done anything, which shall invalidate the insurance policies referred to in this section. Policies described in Sections 1 and 2 above shall be for the mutual and joint benefit and protection of the Contractor and the Local Entity. Such policies shall contain a provision that the Local Entity, although named as an additional insured, shall nevertheless be entitled to recovery under said policies for any loss occasioned to it, its servants, agents, citizens, and employees by reason of negligence of the Contractor. Such policies shall be written as primary policies not contributing to and not in excess of coverage which the Local Entity may carry. Such policies shall be for the mutual and joint benefit and protection of the Contractor and the Local Entity. All policies shall contain a provision that the Local Entity, although named as an insured, shall nevertheless be entitled to recovery under said policies for any loss occasioned to it, its servants, agents, citizens, and employees by reason of negligencd of the Contractor. All policies shall be written as primary policies not contributing with and not in excess of coverage which the Local Entity may carry. The type of coverage shall be "occurrence". Contractor shall furnish certificates evidencing required insurance coverage to the Local Entity. Such certificates shall be in a form acceptable to the Local Entity. 4. Indemnification The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Owner, its officers, employees, insurers, and self-insurance pool, from and against all liability, claims and demands, on account of injury, loss, or damage, including without limitation, claims arising from bodily injury, personal injury, sickness, disease, death, property loss or damage, or any other loss of any kind whatsoever, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with the Contract. If such injury, loss, or damage is caused in whole or in part by the act, omission, error, professional error, mistake, negligence, or other fault of the Contractor, or any officer, employee, representative, or agent of the contractor or of any subcontractor of the Contractor, or which arise out of any women's compensation claim of any employee of the Contractor or any employee of any subcontractor of the Contractor. The Contractor agrees to investigate, handle, respond to, and to provide defense for and defend against, any such liability, claims or demands at the sole expense of the Contractor. The Contractor also agrees to bear all other costs and expenses related thereto, including court costs, expert fees and attorney fees, whether or not any such liability, claims, or demands alleged are groundless, false or fraudulent. 4 H. Bond Requirements and Warranty Period All Permit Applicants must have on file with the Local Entity prior to issuance of any permit a / performance bond executed by a reliable surety company in the sum of ten thousand dollars / ($10,000.00), which bond shall be conditioned upon compliance with all provisions of the permit for ~ excavations in the public rights of way and the ordinances of the Local Entity. The warranty period shall be in effect for two years past the completion and acceptance of the < work. In case the area fails where the work was done and the Permittee refuses to fix the \ problem, the bond will be used to cover all costs incurred by the Local Entity to correct the 1 problem. 1. Licensing Requirements All applicants shall acquire a Town of Estes Park business license prior to the issuance of a permit and commencement of any construction. They are available from the Town Clerks office and currently cost $200. 2. PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS A. Obtain Blank Permit Form Blank permit forms can be obtained from each respective Local Entity as shown in Appendix A. Fill out the form completely and accurately. Be sure to sign and date the form. Turn in the completed form, together with all required submittals and all copies, to the appropriate Local Entity a minimum of forty (40) work hours (not including Saturdays and Sundays) prior to the proposed start of work. -004,-1--'AM,#â‚¬, FOF %14â‚¬*.Eâ€¢kyl Woal< *rn-6 , 7,203+7 Sha,46 42 5.29*Â·44 6. 14. IAU...â€¢~ %-*6.uy- co'At..1 kkA* 9,49 And MAKâ€¢J ' ent,th,#4-f'. B. Submission of Plans Drawings or plans that clearly indicate the proposed work must be attached to the permit application. These drawings must be to a working scale and must show position and location of work, street/road names/numbers, widths of streets, property lines, topograohic and man-made features, existing drainage patterns, etc. Plans shall show the relative positierr6Fproposeto existing utilities and existing improvements and shall be drawn to ~scale efrof,e (1) inch = fifty (50) tyet-eNefger and shall include a north reference. , 4 6,1 t: 41*CE 6 C. Submission of Traffic Control Plans Traffic Control Plans shall show in detail the proposed work area location and the traffic control devices being proposed. Such plan shall be on paper at least 8 1/2 inches by 11 inches and may be faxed, mailed or brought to the office of the Local Entity a minimum of forty (40) work hours prior to issuance the Permit. Traffic Control Plans may require more detail than normal at the discretion of the Traffic Engineer due to unique or unusual conditions. Traffic control shall also include construction traffic routing requirements. The traffic control company hired by the contractor shall be identified on the application along with a contact person and phone number. D. Payment of Fee Acceptable methods of payment and payees have been established by each Local Entity. The Local Entity Contact Person, as identified in Appendix A, will provide Applicants with the appropriate permit fee and method of payment. E. Review of Submittals The completed submittals will be reviewed by the affected Local Entity. If additional information is needed, the Applicant will be contacted. The Local Entity will check to make certain that the Applicant has provided the required bond. license and insurance certificates. 5 F. Approval of Submittals Once the permit form and all required submittals have been reviewed and found to be complete, the . Permit may be approved by the Local Entity. G. Issuance of Permit The approved Permit is issued to the Applicant. Any modifications to the approved permit including any schedule or scope changes must be submitted in writing to the Local Entity for their review and approval. The Applicant is solely responsible for all work for a period of two (2) years following the project completion. H. Other Permits Permit Applicants are responsible for obtaining separate permits or permission as may be required. Examples may be when work is proposed within state highway, railroad or irrigation company right-of- ways, or private property. 3. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS A. General Conditions The following general conditions apply to all work done within the public rights-of-way such as utility line installation or repairs performed by any contractor or utility department, public or private. 1. Protection of Existing Improvements a. The Contractor shall at all times take proper precautions and be responsible for the protection of existing street and alley surfaces, driveway culverts, street intersection culverts or aprons, irrigation systems, mail boxes, driveway approaches, curb, gutter and sidewalks and all other identifiable installations that may be encountered during construction. b. The Contractor shall at all times take proper precautions for the protection of existing utilities, the presence of which are known or can be determinedi by field locations of the utility companies. The Contractor shall contact the UNCC (One Call) at 1-800-922-1987 for utility locates a minimum of two (2) working days prior to his proposed start of work. c. Existing improvements to adjacent property such as landscaping, fencing, utility services, driveway surfaces, etc., that are not to be removed shall be protected from injury or damage resulting from the Contractor's operations. d. The Contractor shall at all times take proper precautions for the protection of property pins/corners and survey control monuments encountered during construction. Any damaged or disturbed survey markers shall be replaced by a registered land surveyor at the Contractor's expense. e. The repair of any damaged improvements as described above shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. f. The Contractor shall make adequate provisions to assure that traffic and adjacent property owners experience a minimum of inconvenience 2. Temporary Surfaces Required - When the final surface is not immediately installed, it shall be necessary to place a temporary asphalt surface on any street cut opening. The temporary surface installation and maintenance shall be the responsibility of the Permittee until the permanent surface is completed and accepted. It shall be either a hot mix or cold mix paving material. Temporary surfaces shall be compacted, rolled smooth and sealed to prevent degradation of the repair and existing 6 structures during the temporary period. Permanent patching shall occur within two (2) weeks except as outlined by the Local Entity in the Permit. 3. Pavement Patches All permanent pavement patches and repairs shall be made with "in kind" materials. For example, concrete patches in concrete surfaces, full depth asphalt patches with full depth asphalt, concrete pavement with asphalt overlay patches will be expected in permanent overlaid concrete streets, etc. In no case is there to be an asphalt patch in concrete streets or concrete patch in asphalt streets. Any repair not meeting these requirements will be removed and replaced by the Contractor at his expense. Refer to Section 4 for details. 4. Work to be Done in Expedient Manner All work shall be done in an expedient manner. Repairs shall be made as rapidly as is consistent with high quality workmanship and materials. Use of fast setting concrete and similar techniques are encouraged whenever possible without sacrificing the quality of repair. Completion of the work including replacement of pavement and cleanup shall normally be accomplished within two (2) weeks after the repair work or activity involving the cut is done. Extension of time for completion shall be with the written approval of the Engineer. If the repairs are not completed in the allotted time, the Local Entity has the right to repair the street at the Contractor's expense. 5. Removal and Replacement of Unsatisfactory Work Removal and replacement of unsatisfactory work shall be completed within fifteen (15) days of written notification of the deficiency unless deemed an emergency requiring immediate action. In the event the replacement work has not been completed, the Local Entity will take action upon the Contractor's bond to cover all related costs. B. Excavation 1. Excavation shall consist of removal of all material necessary for the construction of the roadway section to the subgrade elevation, line, and grade shown on the plans or as specified in the contract documents. Unacceptable material defined as any earthen material containing vegetable or organic silt, topsoil, frozen material, trees, stumps, certain man-made deposits, or industrial waste, sludge or landfill, or other undesirable materials will be categorized as Aunclassified excavation and removed from the site and disposed of in accordance with applicable Local Entity, State and Federal requirements. All tree stumps and roots shall be removed to a minimum of two (2) feet below subgrade. Unclassified excavation includes any and all earthen materials encountered, including rocks and boulders measuring less than one- half cubic yard in volume, during construction. Â·Â·Â·,:c,~'2. Any work on trees, including roots, must be reviewed by a.lieensed=Durlst. Final work shall /'4 be approved by the Local entity. 890*5 40,-4 3. Excavation shall be performed in a careful and orderly manner with due consideration given to protection of adjoining property, the public and workmen. Any damage to streets, parking lots, utilities, irrigation systems, plants, trees, building or structures or private property, or the bench marks and construction staking due to the negligence of the Contractor, shall be repaired and restored to its original conditions by the Contractor at his expense. Those areas that are to be saved will be clearly fenced off by the Contractor per the owner's instructions and it will be the Contractor's responsibility to ensure that these areas are not damaged during the construction process. Following completion of construction, should any of these trees, shrubs or irrigation facilities, etc. require replacement, it shall be done at the Contractor's expense. 4. All materials determined acceptable by the Engineer acquired from roadway excavations may be used for embankment fill and backfill as needed. The entire area in the vicinity of the construction where excavation and filling has been performed shall be raked clean of all trash, wood forms, and debris, after completion of the work with no additional cost to the Owner. Material removed in excavation and not acceptable or not required for embankment fill of backfill shall be disposed of by the Contractor. It shall not be wasted on private property without 7 written permission of the property owner. Waste banks shall be left with reasonable smooth and regular surfaces. 5. The construction of any repair activity within the street or alley rights-of-way shall be accomplished by open cut, jacking, boring, tunneling or a combination of these methods as approved by the permit. The Engineer shall approve anv change from the approved permit. 6. Trenches shall be excavated along the lines and grades established and in no case shall be\ i more than two hundred (200) feet in length, or be trenched or backfilled in non-continuous \ Lce sections unless approved by the Engineer. Failure by the Contractor to comply with these / #V requirements may result in an order to stop the excavation in progress until compliance hasi been achieved. 7. All excavated material shall be stockpiled in a manner that does not endanger the work or workers and that does not obstruct sidewalks, streets and driveways.<No stockpiled materials shall be allowed on the asphalt surfac,g.adjacent_walkway.LIhe work shall be done-ina ~ manner that will minimize interference with traffic and/or drainage of the street. The Contractor at the end of each day shall barricade all excavations and ditch lines, remove excess_material from travel ways, and thoroughly clean all street, alleys and sideWalks affected by the acavatlon. 1Tifbecomes necessary to accomplish this, all streets, alleys (if asphalt or concrete) and sidewalks shall be swept or washed as required by the Engineer. 8. Materials encountered during excavation such as rubbish, organic, or frozen material, and any other material that is not satisfactory for use as backfill in the opinion of the Engineer, shall be removed from the site and disposed of daily by the Contractor at his expense. Stones, concrete or asphalt chunks larger than six (6) inches or frozen material shall be considered unsatisfactory backfill and removed by the Contractor. 9. All excavation, shoring and trenching, and the like shall comply with OSHA's "Construction Industry Standards" as well as all applicable Federal and State regulations. 10. No tracked vehicles shall be allowed on asphalt or concrete unless approved by the Engineer. 11. Crossings under sidewalks or curbs may be made by tunneling only when approved by the Engineer. If the Contractor elects to remove a portion of the sidewalk or curb, the applicable Local Entity standards shall be followed. 12. Grading shall be done as necessary to prevent surface water from entering the excavation; any other water accumulation therein shall be promptly removed. Surface drainage, driveways, â€ž fire hydrants, manholes, water valves, etc. of adjoining areas shall be unobstructed. \ . 2 13. When soft or unstable material or rock is encountered in the trench subgrade that will not 40' uniformly support the pipe, such material shall be excavated to additional depths directed by the Engineer and backfilled with Type B material, as described in Subsection G, Part 2. C. Blasting 1. The Contractor's blasting procedures shall conform to Federal, State, and local ordinances. The Contractor shall acquire all required permits prior to the start of blasting. 2. Blasting for excavation will be permitted only after securing the approval of the Engineer. The Engineer will fix the hours of blasting. The Contractor shall use the utmost care to protect life and property. All explosives shall be safely and securely stored in compliance with local laws and ordinances, and all storage places shall be clearly marker "Dangerous Explosives". No explosives shall be left unprotected where they could endanger life or property 3. When blasting in trenches, the Contractor shall cover the area to be shot with earth backfill or approved blasting mats. Prior to blasting, the Contractor shall station flaggers and provide signals of danger in suitable places to warn people and stop vehicles. The Contractor shall be responsible for all damage to property and injury to persons resulting from blasting or accidental explosions that may occur in connection with the use of explosives. 8 4 . D. Equipment 1. The use of trench digging equipment will be permitted in places where its operation will not cause damage to existing structures or features, in which case hand methods shall be employed. 2. No tracked vehicles shall be permitted on streets unless approved by the Engineer. When tracked vehicles are allowed, existing facilities will be restored to original condition at the Contractor's expense. 3. Construction equipment and material delivery routing will be made a condition of the Permit. E. Dewatering Where ground water is encountered in the excavation, it shall be removed to avoid interfering with the work. It is the Contractor's responsibility to comply with all Federal, State and local permitting requirements prior to beginning any dewatering operations. F. Removals 1. Streets, Paved Bituminous pavement shall be saw cut to clean, straight lines and should be perpendicular or parallel to the flow of traffic. (See Section 4(B)(2)(a)) In existing pavement, all excavations within 36" of the edge of the asphalt shall require removal and replacement from the edge of asphalt to the excavation edge. Concrete pavement, cross pans, driveways, streets and alleys shall be removed to neatly sawed edges cut to full depth. 2. Streets, Gravel When trenches are excavated in streets or alleys which have only a gravel surface, the Contractor shall replace such surfacing on a satisfactory compacted backfill with gravel conforming to CDOT Class 5 or Class 6 aggregate base course. Gravel replacement shall be one (1) inch greater in depth to that which originally existed, but not less than four (4) inches. The surface shall conform to the original street grade. Where the completed surface settles, additional gravel base shall be placed and compacted by the Contractor immediately after being notified by the Local Entity, to restore the roadbed surface to finished grade. Some streets may have been treated with a special surface treatment to control dust and/or bind the aggregates together. In these cases the Contractor is responsible for installing the gravel surface in the same manner as what was existing. Such surface treatments shall be of the same chemical composition as what existed prior to the excavation work. The Engineer shall note on the permit the surface treatment that will be required. 3. Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Concrete shall be removed to neatly sawed edges to full depth for sidewalks and curb and gutter and shall be saw cut in straight lines either parallel to the curb or perpendicular to the alignment of the sidewalk or curb. Any removal shall be done to the nearest joint. Replaced sections may require doweling connections if required by the Engineer. G. Backfill 1. Flowable-Fill FLOWABLE-FILL WILL BE REQUIRED AS UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL FOR ALL TRENCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. Refer to Section 5 for compaction requirements. This requirement applies to all pavement and gravel locations. Flowable-fill vibration may be required. 9 The recommended mix for flowable-fill is shown below. Concrete backfill will not be allowed within the public right-of-way. Flash-fill may be used if approved by the Engineer. Refer to CDOT specification 206.02. INGREDIENTS POUNDS/CUBIC YARD Cement 42 (0.47 sack) Water 235 (39 gallons or as needed) Coarse Aggregate (Size No. 57) 1700 Sand (ASTM C-33) 1845 The maximum desired 28-day strength is 60 psi. The above combination of material, or an equivalent, may be used to obtain the desired flowable-fill. Flowable-fill or flash-fill shall be prohibited as a temporary or permanent street surface. Trenches shall initially be backfilled to the level of the original surface. After the flowable-fill has cured, the top surface of the flowable-fill shall be removed and the temporary or permanent surface shall be placed. Bridging and cutback requirements as described in these standards mav still be required if the street failures indicate a clear need. Repair of failed trenches will be the responsibility of the party requiring the trench. Another acceptable use of flowable-fill backfill (with proper vibrating) is in situations where there is over break on concrete streets. 2. Conventional Backfill (Other Than Flowable Fill) When "non flowable-fill" backfill material has been pre-approved by the Engineer, backfill in existing or proposed streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and alleys is divided into three (3) categories: initial, intermediate and final lifts as defined below: a. The INITIAL LIFT, designated as Class B and generally comprised of a washed, clean gravel material, consists of the section from the bottom of the excavation to a point six to twelve (6 - 12) inches above the top of the installation. Placement and compaction of the initial layer shall be as specified by the utility to protect their installation. b. The INTERMEDIATE LIFT, generally comprised of native material, consists of the section above the initial layer to a point within six (6) inches of the ground level or the bottom of the pavement section whichever is greater. Excavated material may be used in the intermediate layer provided that it is deemed suitable by the Engineer. c. The FINAL LIFT includes both road base and asphalt surfacing. Road base material shall be CDOT Class 5 or 6 aggregate base course or as specified by the Engineer. Maximum dry density of all soil types used will be determined in accordance with AASHTO T 99 or AASHTO T 180. These densities will be determined prior to placement of backfill. When a hydro-hammer or drop hammer compaction machine is used for compaction of fill in trenches, the maximum layer shall be 30 inches. 3. Compaction Testing Requirements See Section 5, page 21. 4. Embankment and Slopes a. The Engineer shall approve all fill material. b. All cut slopes shall conform to OSHA standards. 10 H. Restoration 1. Bore Holes - Vertical and Horizontal For openings less than or equal to 6" in diameter, bore holes shall be filled with patching material (cold mix is not acceptable) to prevent entry of moisture. Patching material used shall be in all cases compatible with the existing surface. Subgrade shall be replaced with flowable fill to provide necessary support to the surface. The sealing of bore holes is the responsibility of the Contractor or persons making the bore. For openings greater than 6" in diameter, the limits of repair shall be identified in the permit. The completed job shall be flush with the surrounding pavement and have no indentations, pockets, or recesses that may trap and hold water. 2. Subgrade The subgrade for the pavement structure shall be graded to conform to the cross sections and profile required by the construction plans. Prior to the placement of aggregate base course or sub-course, the subgrade should be properly prepared. The subgrade should be scarified to a minimum depth of six (6) inches, moisture adjusted as necessary, and recompacted to not less than the following: a. For cohesive soils, 90% maximum Modified Proctor dry density at K2% of optimum moisture content, or 95% maximum Standard Proctor dry density at K2% of optimum moisture content. b. For non-cohesive soils, 92% maximum Modified Proctor dry density at K2% of optimum moisture content, or 97% maximum Standard Proctor dry density at K2% of optimum moisture content. c. For expansive soils, 88% maximum Modified Proctor dry density at 3% or greater above optimum moisture content, or 93% maximum Standard Proctor dry density at 1 % or greater above optimum moisture content. For highly expansive soils (swell potential 2% under 200 psf surcharge pressure), paving will not be permitted without a subgrade treatment approved by the Engineer. Prior to approval to place the base or sub-base course, all utility main and service trenches shall be compacted to not less than the above referenced densities required for the given soil classification. This density requirement also applies to all utility trenches within the public rights- of-way from a point four (4) feet beyond the edge of asphalt and descending at 1:1 outward. 3. Asphalt Surfacing Any damage, even superficial, to the existing asphalt surface in the vicinity of the work shall be repaired at the expense of the Contractor, including but not limited to gouges, scrapes, outrigger marks, backhoe bucket marks, etc. A slurry seal type covering will be considered the minimum repair. Patching may be required, at the discretion of the Local Entity. The depth of asphalt patches in asphalt streets shall typically be the depth of the existing asphalt surface plus two (2) inches or as specified by the Engineer. The asphalt patch area for street excavations that fall within the wheel path of the vehicular travel lane shall be increased in size to the center of the lane or adjacent lane. In no circumstance will the edge of a patch area be allowed to fall within the wheel path. All street cuts shall be patched as per the guidelines of Section 4 (pages 13-20). 11 In streets that are less then five (5) years old the Local Entity reserves the right to deny any street excavation or require repairs that are over and above these specifications. EXCEPTIONS - There may be situations where the patching standards are considered inappropriate. For example, rebuilding half of a road today when we know the road is due for reconstruction at a different profile in 2-3 years. In these cases, the Permit Holder can provide, r,fre moslest patch adequate to accommodate traffic for the 2-3 year pef itionAhe Permit Holder may be (C# required to make a finanâ‚¬41#ontribution to #le stredh[Mintenance, rehabilitation or No.t: reconstruction program to>(support the more perrodhent improvements that are ep anticipated. This deter~prhttn shall be made by~ EnOineer.~ DISPUTE RESOLUTION - Mutual acceptance of these guidelines is expected to evolve over time with experience in the field. Disagreements over requirements and cost sharing are inevitable. In cases where agreement cannot be reached, the dispute shall not deter the Contractor from compliance to the specific Permit or guidelines provided by this document unless approved by the Engineer. 4. Concrete Surfacing and Patching The concrete pavement shall be replaced with 4,000 psi concrete to match the finish and thickness of the existing pavement, but not less than eight (8) inches thick. All concrete construction shall be protected from vehicular traffic, including contractor vehicles, until the concrete has achieved eighty (80) percent of its ultimate strength. Concrete shall be coated and sealed with a uniform application of membrane curing compound applied in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. The use of quick curing concrete (3000 psi strength within 48 hours) shall be used on all arterial and collector streets when repair areas are less than 500 square feet or when temperatures are below 40Â° F. Quick curing concrete repairs may be opened to traffic within two (2) days or when the concrete has achieved eighty (80) percent of its ultimate strength. Where existing cracks or damage are adjacent to the area being repaired the repair area shall include the cracked or damaged concrete. Pavement repairs shall include all areas of damage, including leak test holes, pot holes, equipment and/or material scaring of the exiting surface. When repairing concrete, removal perimeter shall be sawcut and replacement concrete shall be doweled into the old concrete as directed by the Engineer. 5. Joint Filling a. Asphalt Following placement of the asphalt surface, the joints where the new asphalt abuts the old shall be sealed with a fog or painted coat of bitumen cement. b. Concrete Joints shall be thoroughly cleaned of all foreign material then filled with a hot-poured elastic type joint filler conforming to M 173, ASTM Dl 190-80 or ASTM D1751-83, D1752-84, D3405-78, D3406-78, D3407-78 or silicone sealants or others as approved by the Engineer. Joint material shall be filled to within 1/2 inch of the surface. Excess material shall be scraped off to provide a smooth riding surface. 12 iI* IfiI#I*fir 4. DEVELOPING A "QUALITY" APPROACH TO STREET REPAIRS A. General Every street and street repair situation is unique. Design criteria and construction standards cannot address every situation but, in order to maintain some form of consistency, these standards have been developed. In most cases, they provide the minimum acceptable standards for construction or repair. Consequently, when strictly applied, they will provide the minimum acceptable product. Therefore, this criteria has been developed to maintain the same integrity of the street pavement and subsurface condition prior to its being cut for utility installations. To achieve the goal of "Quality" or "Excellence" in street repairs, then these criteria shall be viewed as guidelines when used in conjunction with good planning and judgement. This will restore the street to an acceptable condition with minimal patching failures. In most cases, it will be necessary to exceed the minimum standards to achieve a quality repair. Issues that shall be considered in a quality approach to street repairs are as follows (these criteria must all be balanced against the long-term maintenance needs of the utility): B. Appearance Does the final appearance of the street suggest the repairs were planned, or that they happened by accident? 1. Consciously or not, the driving public "rates" the appearance of the street system -- including street repairs -- every day. Street repairs which are satisfactory from a functional point of view may produce a negative reaction from the public if they give the appearance of being poorly planned or executed. 2. The public's perception of street repairs is based primarily on shape, size, and orientation -- the geometry of a patch. Here are some guidelines for the geometry of a quality patch: 13 a. Existing pavements should be removed to clean, straight lines PARALLEL and PERPEND/CULAR to the flow of traffic. Do not construct patches with angled sides and irregular shapes. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE f~ . ttst ..42#el 044~/ NX -9~-0 b. Avoid patches within existing patches. If this cannot be avoided, make the boundaries of the patches coincide. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE . Exisii*!Hktl' . ExistifitH4!th .. + 0 -4214- N....Â¢41 0 00000:* New Patch +.- ~ew Patch *.. 14 . c. Do not "leave" strips of pavement less than one-half lane in width from the edge of the new patch to the edge of an existing patch or the lip of the gutter. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 0 0 0 Less than~0- 0 00 67 - - /92*- New-'0 . et New 44< Patch.~ (*. Patch In-\Â« V.*:000 Less than,0,0 + *+ 0 0 49, 00 - Existin Existin ~ Patch + +000- Patch - 0 . d. In concrete pavements, remove sections to existing joints in the case of concrete in good repair. In damaged concrete, the limits of removal should be determined in the field by a representative of the Engineer. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE /X Joints ~*~oints 0 ty.. M fe':~,1<i: Â·e, 1 - itar- 41Â«309Â»- ' lot;729]t 0 1*h - /*969/ 0 0 . -001404*4#419 15 AP' e. Asphalt and concrete pavements should be removed by saw cutting or grinding. Avoid breaking away the edges of the existing pavement or damaging the remaining pavement with heavy construction equipment. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 0\\ - 00 /,2 0 44*#*ew*43/<-- /671474 .1~F.z:.-4~< *9 f. In the case of a series of patches or patches for service lines off a main trench, repair the pavement over the patches by grinding and overlay when the spacing between the patches is less than 75 feet (in cases where the existing pavement is in poor condition and may require overlay within the next few years, this requirement may be modified or waived by the Engineer). NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Kit] --141 + + - W/*44~/ 44 -74- Nt /4.1 27 + 44Â«3-747*097*2-- l. m -7 0./. 7,.Â¥i Â«. 74'b 4%*:~,4 â‚¬Z -94%2 49/ /0* - + 44:*1*/(.. ;kAi+'.0*77**b. -- dE* 4*â€¢24<46Â¢.Mi,~'4 'P ' Less than 75' ~ C. Rideability Are the transitions on and off of the repair smooth? Does the patch itself offer a smooth ride? Are the joints located outside of the normal wheel path? 1. COMPLETED STREET REPAIRS SHOULD HAVE RIDEABILITY AT LEAST AS GOOD AS, IF NOT BETTER THAN, THE PAVEMENT PRIOR TO THE REPAIRS. A driver may be able to see a street repair, but in the case of a quality repair, he/she should not be able to "feel" it in driving normally down the street. 16 2. Do not place overlays with feathered edges on streets of any classification. Overlays should be . placed by first removing the existing pavement to the desired depth by grinding, and then placing the pavement flush with the adjacent surfaces. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE --dp Overlay Imr.....=ami Grind & Overlay 3. Surface tolerances for street repairs should meet the standard for new construction. That is, the finished surface of the street repair, when tested with a ten (10) foot straightedge parallel to the centerline or perpendicular across joints, will show variations measured from the testing face of the straightedge to the surface of the street repair which do not exceed one-quarter (1/4) inch. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 10' Straightedge 10' Straightedge 0,0. t.,5.. .4.4 4 - Greater than 1/4" Less tnan 1/4" D. Pavement Management Is the repair consistent with the long-term pavement management strategy for the particular street? 1. STREET REPAIRS SHOULD LEAVE A PAVEMENT IN A CONDITION AT LEAST AS GOOD AS, IF NOT BETTER THAN, THE CONDITION PRIOR TO THE REPAIRS. 2. In most cases, and particularly in the cases of extensive excavation and repairs, it is desirable to survey the existing pavement condition with a representative of the Local Entity prior to the work. After completion of the work, survey the pavement condition again to verify that the pavement condition has been maintained or improved. a. In the case of minor repairs, these pavement surveys can be made by visual observation. b. However, in the case of major projects that involve excessive haul of materials or unusually heavy construction equipment or activity, non-destructive testing of the pavement condition before and after construction is required. 17 3. Consideration of pavement management issues may also identify opportunities for joint efforts between the utilities and the Local Entity. For example, suppose the repair of a utility line requires an overlay on half of a street, and that the condition of the remaining half of the street might also warrant an overlay. We may decide at that point to overlay the entire street, with Local Entity's street authority and the utility splitting the cost of the overlay. In such a case, the utility may be able to save the cost of grinding half the street. The Local Entity's street authority will allocate a reasonable percentage of their annual overlay program to accommodate their share of these situations. This includes minor (2-3 block) maintenance projects and larger capital improvement projects (major water line extension). Coordination for these types of cooperative repairs should occur as far in advance of actual construction as possible. 4. Transverse patches on arterial and collector streets shall be overlaid across the entire street width for a distance of two (2) feet minimum on all sides of the trench. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE le.07 -000 -0- 8*i':*7+1Â»>k 1 4 /*41': ..94*, 94'blw:~ 2Â£40- 0.4:4.i~-~ 1%:Â»Mir r?00 1 16 6/ 1*4,8*&41*Wth#24-il ' =Jgt a-%4*3*?*/.e> %~Â·.*i . // 1 Y. PX Vi *~i,4.Ag,64*,R.) â€¢ -- - /60Â¥y -* + 0.- -9., + 9255*219.5,% + 1 /4.bak./7 0 . - #991 9-#-4-4~/IL $ 6,4,0/ 1 5. Do not allow the edges of patches to fall in existing wheel paths. The edges of patches parallel to the direction of traffic shall be limited to the boundaries of lanes or to the centerline of travel lanes. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 20/ 4 /<lk>**7~-~~<s*7 41.3,;12,7 + Al*9'1~47 -'< 0 0 -qu 18 6. Patches should have a smooth longitudinal grade consistent with the existing roadway. Patches should also have a cross slope or cross section consistent with the design of the existing roadway. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Cross Slope 2~ Cross Slope Patch Patch --1:11 E. Future Maintenance Will the repair pose any future maintenance problems or make future maintenance more difficult? 1. Excavations and street repairs, even well constructed street repairs, shorten a pavement's life. Several types of street distress, settlement, alligator cracking, and potholes, often show up around patches. Quality street repairs should attempt to reduce the occurrence of these types of distress. 2. Avoid weakening or destroying the existing pavement around an excavation with heavy construction equipment, stockpiling or delivery of materials, etc. When damage does occur, remove the damaged pavement, extending the limits of the street repair, before replacing the pavement. Remember, no stockpiling of backfill or road building materials is permitted on the pavement. 3. When the proposed excavation falls within-bunfeatof a section of failed pavement, the failed area shall be removed to sound pavement and patched. Scarring, gouging, or other damaged pavement adjacent to a patch shall be removed and the pavement repaired. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Less than Z' ~ - lk.25# 0 - - rvAL Darr~~222~ #V#.#4_ -=0~>. Pavement 'Al:yid# -~- -179*.4. 2%fÂ® 0 - ~ Patch -44;~,&17 + ~C"'7 - - 19 4. In the case of older pavement where the likelihood of cracking and potholes next to the patch is greater, it may be necessary to extend the 'shoulders" of the pavement beyond the two-foot minimum, and reinforce this area with a geotextile. "T" cutting is required for all repairs. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Min 2' Min 2' â‚¬ } C , Geotextile may be required 0 10~ 5. For patches in asphalt, a tack coat shall be applied to all edges of the existing asphalt before placing the new pavement. 6. After placing the new asphalt, all seams (joints) between the new and existing pavements shall be sealed with an asphalt tack coat or rubberized crack seal material. 7. Avoid frequent changes in width of patches. For future maintenance, this simplifies removal of adjacent pavement failures. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE /,%*t..9 Vt . 0 0*.1.~2/1, +*&225*,d~~.)&~~ 129- 2*Â»43Â» /$6410, "' fi?%4*4.,t~~414fF#l 63*9 A.,50,3-*6 *Câ€¢.â‚¬5 -AND,109 - ~~30~fj-Â·fiÂ¢3*24~ /4*7 UY, 4/*diX i . 0 â„¢44*/ 20 . 4 . 5. TESTING A. Description The contractor is required to provide material testing for each phase of the work and at no cost to the Local Entity. The Independent Geotechnical Testing Firm chosen to perform this work for the Contractor must be qualified and identified on the Permit application. B. Testing Frequencies The number of density tests required may be increased if directed by the Engineer. The costs of any testing, as required, shall be borne by the Contractor. Proctors shall be determined prior to backfilling. Independent lab results shall be faxed to the Local entity as soon as possible. The horizontal frequencies of density tests are as follows: 1. Utility Mains - One test per 100 linear feet per lift. 2. Service Lines - One test per each service per per lift. 3. Manholes and valve boxes per each lift. Following are the minimum number of tests required for each construction activity. These tests must be submitted to the Engineer on a daily basis as acquired and shall be hand delivered or faxed to the Local Entity. 1. Native or imported backfill - One (1) test for every two (2) vertical feet and every one hundred (100) feet horizontally, or some fraction thereof with at least one (1) test per each lift. ~ Flowable-fill - Testing may be required at the discretion of the Engineer. 3. Concrete pavement, curbs, gutters and sidewalks - Testing to be conducted for every 100 cubic yards or portion thereof, with a minimum of one. The types of testing required shall be as prescribed by each Local Entity 4. Asphalt Pavement - Asphalt content - One test per 500 tons or fraction thereof of mix produced, minimum of one test per job. Gradation - Aggregate: one test per 500 tons or fraction thereof of mix produced, minimum of one test per job. In-place density - One test per 500 tons or fraction thereof of mix placed, minimum of one test per job. 5. Aggregate base course materials -One test per 400 lane feet. No less than two (2) tests per excavation. 21 . 6. INSPECTION All construction work within the public rights-of-way shall be subject to inspection by the Engineer and certain types of work may have continuous inspection. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to provide safe access for the inspector to perform the required inspections. It shall be the responsibility of the person performing the work authorized by the Permit to notify the Engineer or his authorized representatives that such work is ready for inspection. The Engineer requires that every request for inspection is to be received at least twenty-four (24) hours before such inspection is desired. Such requests may be in writing or by telephoning or faxing the Engineer. The Engineer may make or require other inspections of any work as deemed necessary to ascertain compliance with the provisions of these Guidelines or the Local Entity's Street Design and Construction Standards, or Municipal Code. Any work performed without the required inspections shall be subject to removal and replacement at the Contractofs expense, regardless of the quality of the work. Where large scale projects exceed the ability of the Local Entity to provide inspection, the contractor or utility company will incur the cost of a private inspection firm. This inspection firm will be mutually agreed upon by the Permit applicant and the Local Entity prior to issuance of the Permit. 22 ENTITY NAME AND/OR TITLE ADDRESS PHONE NUMBERS Larimer County Mike Bryant Larimer County Engineering Dept. Voice: (970) 498-5709 Access and Utilities Coordinator 218 W Mountain Ave., P.O. Box 1190 Fax: (970) 498-7986 City of Fort Collins Todd Juergens City of Fort Collins Engineering. Dept. Voice: (970) 221-6605 Lead Construction Inspector P.O. Box 580 Fax: (970) 221-6378 City of Loveland George Miller City of Loveland Traffic Section Voice: (970) 962-2516 Associate Traffic Engineer 105 W. 5~~ St. Fax: (970) 962-2907 0 LZE-Zâ‚¬9(026) :90!OA Pnoques Jo umol 79 'Saiew u40r pnol#Jag JO UAAol Â£491-1Â£9(016) :xed 61110 xog Â·OÂ·d 'eAV 4018AA 911 ]uepuejuped!19 laails LEâ‚¬9-989 (026) :80!OA Mied sels3 JO UAA01 SJOAFS 6aJ9 )lied se193 JO UMol 6069-999 (0Z6) :xed oozl, x08 -O*d 'eAV Â·'069Jgoevy ozl, JaSeueIN se!1!Hoed 0!Iqnd pue uo!]onJlsuoo 2Â£40-ZZE :1180 Z I.909 OO ')Ned sals3 L L LE-09Â£ (026) :80!OA uoneuodsue]1 Jo Idea opeloloo ieSuehl X.luaH uoneuodsuell JO Idea opeJoloo 62 LE.-09Â£ (026) :xe:i 19 pul OEM. Joleuip]003 se!1!I!1n l.10!pas se!1!I!]n Fort Collins, CO 80522-1190 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Loveland, CO 80537 Berthoud, CO 80513 LOCAL ENTITY CONTACT PERSON APPENDIX A Greeley, CO 80531 TOWN of ESTES PARK PERMIT # RIGHT-OF-WAY WORK PERMIT EXPIRES 30 DAYS FROM ISSUE â€ž P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 ISSUE DATE: â€¢ / 970-586-5331 FAX 970-586-6909 GENERAL INFORMATION MINUMUM 3 WORKING DAYS REQUIRED FOR ENGINERING APPROVAL owner's name contractor ~:: :: :~ ~: address +Â·:~: : - address city/state/zip .............. city/statelzip phonei FAX license # phone./ FAX ~~ :~ . emergency phone # PROJECT INFORMATION work location, type of wom trencher boring open cut ADDRESS NEW REPAIR DEPTH ~ WIDTH LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION : purpose WATER SEWER GAS ELECTRIC PHONE OTHER nearest intersechon STARIDATE END DATE y LENGTH OF PROJECT SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS asphalt roadway gravel roadway concrete driveway long X wide SF long X wide SF long X wide SF culvert length ATTACH COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING TO THIS DOCUMENT zes no TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 0 0 TIME OF DAY OPERATION LANDSCAPING PLAN El 0 ENGINEERS NAME DOWNTOWN PROVISIONS D U DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL date INSURANCE PROVIDED El E BOND # * BONDING AGENT . phone AGENT address . . TRAFFIC CONTROL COMPANY :. ~* phone CONCRETE OR: BACKFILL AND COMPACTION METHODS FOR LINEAR RUNS SHALL BE TESTED BY: ENGINEER PHONE FAX TEST RESULTS SHALL BE FAXED TO THIS AGENCY IMMEDIATELY (WITHIN 24 HOURS) FOLLOWING LABORATORY WORK. PERMIT COST = TOTAL $ PAID ves no SPECIAL CONDITIONS BY : DATE Having carefully read the requirements of the Construction Specifications I (permitee) hereby ag:.0 17 :!ts tr:--3 6-1 -9- -9- described uitlzin Â·Â· NAME_._. DATE APPROVED R- ISST TFn Rv DATE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-922-1987 final inspection date B-1 4 , '., PROPOSED UTILITY FEES . t The following information is a combination of fee structures which are already in place at many governmental agencies along the front range of Colorado. The following fees have been revised from the first draft, based on comments and suggestions from regular applicants. UTILITY PERMIT FEES Base Fee: Permit Applicants Will Be Assessed A $50.00 Fee For Review and Processing Of The Permit And Associated Documents. This Will Apply To Each Permit Submitted. Service Installations: Service Installations Which!Do Not Disturb'Asphalt; Concrete, Or Treated Gravel Surfaces, And Do Not Exceed A Distance Of Ten ( 10) L inear Feet Within The Right-of-Way, Will Not Be AssesseÂ¢In Addition to the Base Fee. This Would Apply To Sen'ice Installations On The Same Side Of The Roadway, Or For A Single Road Bore To Provide Individual Utility Service. Overhead Power, Telephone, Or Cable Television Installations Will Not Be Assessed In Addition To The Base Fee (A Permit Will Be Required For All Overhead Installations). Linear Installations: Installations Parallel To The Roadway And Within The Right-of-Way Will Be Assdsed At A Rate of S. 10 Per Linear Foot Plus The Base Fee. This Rate Will Apply To Underground Installations Only. Street Cuts: :A Flat Fee Of $200.00"Will Be Assessed For Cutting*sphalt Or Chip/Seal Roadway Surfaces. If The Asphalt To Be Cut Is.Less:Than Twelve (12) Months Old, A Fee Of $5.00 Per Square Foot Will Be Charged In Place Of The Flat Fee (IfThe $5.00 Per Square Foot Fee Is Less Than 3200.00, The $200.00 Fee Will Apply). A Flat Fee Of $100.00 Will Be Assessed For Cutting Treated Gravel Roadway Surfaces. This Fee Applies To Roadways That Have Been Treated With Calcium Chloride, Magnesium Chloride, Or Lignin Sul fonate Within The Previous Twelve (12) Month Period. A Flat Fee Of$50.00 Will Be Assessed For Cutting Gravel, or Native Material, Roadways. Note: These Fees In No Way Release The Applicant From Restoring Roadways To Original Or Better Condition. The Street Cut Fees Are In Addition To The Base Fee and Linear Footage Fees. All Fees Are Cumulative. Fees Will Not Be Charged For Utility Relocations Due To Capital Improvement Projects. B-2 . TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum October 12, 1998 TO: P.W.C FROM: Bill Iinnane l/4 //d--- SUBJECT: Water Department water line projects change orders BACKGROUND: Big Horn Phase 1 - Quantity adjustments and additional asphalt resulted in a change order of $3,595.50 to Kitchen & Company. Payment of this change order will close out the project Big Horn Phase 2 Actual asphalt quantity exceeds the engineer's estimate resulting in a $1,140 change order to Kitchen & Company. Big Thompson Unknown underground water line locations required changes to four water main connections. The change order is for $5,220 to B.T. Construction. Devils Gulch In order to avoid additional crossings of the gas line, two extra bends were required. The change order is for $728 to I<itchen & Company. COST: Total change order cost is $10,683.50. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of all change orders. BL/lb 2-1 I , . . ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS. INC. gmc 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park CO 80517 (970) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 Fax (970) 586-2459 August 25*, 1998 Town of Estes Park ATTN: Bill Linnane P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: 1997 Big Hom Drive Water Looping Projed - Final Application for Payment RMCJob No. 9-0223.079.00 Dear Bill: Please find enclosed the final application for payment submitted by Kitchen & Company for the 1997 Big Hom Drive Water Looping Project. Included with this application for payment is a change order in the amount of $3,595.50 reflecting all quantity adjustments for the project. As you recall, Kitchen & Company agreed to submit one final change order once the asphalt paving was completed to avoid extra paperwork (Letter dated February 134,1998). The net change to the contract prior to the road work was $8.00. The overrun in the asphalt quantity was the result of paving the entire:width of Big Horn Drive from the north end of the project to the Mummy Lane intersection with 4 inches of asphalt. Compensation for the additional asphalt removal and road preparation is included in Item I I of the change order. The grand total forthis item was $3000.00, with $ 1500.00 to be paid for by the Estes Park Sanitation District. All other changes to the contract are explained in the justification section of the change order. Roclq Mountain Consultants, Inc. approves of the final payment of $21 ,469.35. If there are any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. -[-9~Â© 9- f,dW Thomas J. Scobell Engineer T-IS/tis r.ceser 1 ~ 2-2a CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING SECTION 00950 CHANGE ORDER TO THE AGREEMENT Colorado 001 State Order Number Larimer Auoust 18m, 1998 County Date Owner: Town of Estes Park Description of Work: 1997 Bia Horn Drive Water Looping Proiect Contractor: Kitchen & Company You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes to the Contract Documents Description of Changes DECREASE TO INCREASE TO Supplemental Plans & Specs Attached Contract Amount Contract Amount 1. 12" Class 52 D.I.P. (-4 I.f.) $ 340.00 $ C 2. 3/4" Service Tap & Service (+2 e.a.) $ $ 700.00 3. 3/4" "K" Copper Service (-10 I.f.) $ 450.00 $ 4. Pothole Sewer Service (-1 e.a.) $ 200.00 $ 5. SDR35 PVC Encasement (-251.f.) $ 1,000.00 $ 6. Asphalt Patch & Overlay (+45 ton) $ $ 2,227.50 7. Asphalt Curb (-201.f.) $ 140.00 $ 8. Fill Dirt (24 c.y.) $ $ 240.00 9. 3/4" Washed Rock (32 c.y.) $ $ 608.00 10. 4" Drain Pipe Installation (225 I.f.) $ $ 450.00 11. Asphalt Removal, Road Preparation, & $ $ 1.500.00 Shoulder Work For New Paving TOTALS $ 2,130.00 $ 5,725.50 NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT $ $ 3,595.50 11/93 Section 00950 - Page 1 of 2 2-2b I I ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9mc 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park. CO 80517 (970) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 Fcx (970) 586-2459 October 5th, 1998 Town of Estes Park ATTN: Bill Linnane P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: 1998 Town of Estes Park Water Looping Projects - Cost Estimate for Additional Work Big Thompson Tank Water Line & Big Horn Drive/Chiquita Lane Interconnection RIMCJob No. 9-0223.084.00 Dear Bill: The purpose of this letter is to infcrm ycu about a few additional work items that have become necessary in the construction of the Big Thompson Tank and Big Horn Drive/Chiquita Lane Water Line Projects. Listed below is a summary ofthese additional wer< items, with brief explanations and cost estimates for each, These costs are only estimates based upon the bid schedules, reported man hours, and equipment rental rates. The final cost for each of the additional work items will be negotiated between Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMIC) and the contractors once the projects are near completion. Big Thompson Tank Water Line: 1. STA 1 +00 - Connection to Existing 12" Water Line Originally, an 8" wet tap with an 8" gaze valve was scheduled for the connection at the Colo. Hwy. 7/LexingTon Lane intersection (See Figure I). Hcnever, excavation in the area revealed that there was not enough room to install a wet tap between the existing 90Â° tends (i f'). Relocaticn of the wet tap was ruled out given the close prcximity of a sewer line to the north and electrical and telephone lines to the south. After further investigation, RMC and the Town Water Department decided to elimiraze the wet tap and begin laying pipe from the 8" gate valve, which was placed approximately 20 feet west oftne exisdng 90' bends. The extra cost of this connecion is associated with the time spent by Ed Pierce who was scheduied to inrall the wet tap. The additional cost ofthe work is estimated at $420.00. 2. STA 3 +06 - Connection to ExistrE 4" Water Line During the installation of this ccr,necocn. the existing-4" gate valve was discovered in the middle of Lexington Lane rather than adjacent tothe 10"water main (See Figure 2). Instead of completing the connection inside the asphalt, RMC and the Town Water Department decided :c install additicnal 6" water line to completely cross Lexington Lane and connect into the existing 40 water line on the -crch side ofthe rcad. The extension ofthe 6" water line involved the crossing of a sewer main, telephone line, gas line, :cwer line. and an EMes Valley Recreation District 12"irrigation line. The additional cost of the work is estimated at $ 1.650.00. 3. STA 17+ 19 - Connection to Existir:2 2" Water Line As with the connection at STA 3-06. RFIC and the Town Water Department decided to extend the 6" water line completely across the roadway zo compEete the connecion outside ofthe asphalt (See Figure 3). The extra 6" ductiie iron water line at this connection was supplied by the Town. The additional cost of the work is estimated at $ 1,300.00. 2-3a CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING gmc .. 4. STA 19+88 - Connection to Existine 8"Water Line At this connection, two unexpected obsmcies were uncovered by the excavation. The first was a 2" water line coming from a 6" x 4" tee that exited into a nearby sewer line. After further investigation, the 2" line was abandoned and the tee was plugged to allow room for the proposed water line. The additional cost of the work is estimated at $965.00. Further north, the 12" Estes Valley irrigation line was located where the proposed 90Â° bend was scheduled for connection to the existing 8" line (See Figure 4). The location of the 12" irrigation line disagreed with what was shown on the construction plans provided to RMC by the Estes Valley Recreation District. Consequently, the 8" gate valve and 90Â° bend were moved back 3 feet to make the connection. The additional cost of the work is estimated at $885.00. Big Horn Drive/Chiquita Lane Interconnection: 1. Realignment abne Bie Horn Drive The construction of a new sewer line by the Estes Park Sanitation District this summer along the east side of Big Hornl Drive forced the proposed 12" water line to remain along the west side of the road for a greater distance than originally anticipated. Due to the minimal amount of right-of-way and presence of a gas line and water services on the west side of Big Horn Drive. the 12" water line was realigned to follow the inside edge of asphalt for approximately 190 feet. Written notification ofthe 1998 Town of Estes Park Water Looping Projects was given to #le Estes Park Sanitation District and other utility agencies in March of this year. The additional cost of the work is estimated at $1.140.00. TOTAL COST ESTIIMATE: $6,360.00 The asphalt work for the Big Thompson Tank Water Line Project was e!iminated from the contract with BT Construction due to their high bid unit price of S 130.00/ton , RMIC rescheduled the asphalt work with Conne!1 Resources at a unit price of $92.56/ton, saving 537,50/ton. The asphalt patching for the Big Thompson Tank Water Line Project is scheduled fer October 12~ I 998. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. - ...1 Thomas J. Scobell, E.I. Engineer Reueked,%1, ~ ~ /V j) Q A i i V 10 U ~ Kerr/ MI. Prochaska, P.E. Associate Principal TJSAis enclosed 2-3b I. 1 TEXISTING 10" STEEL LINE r-EXISTI NG 12" 90 ~T O BE ABANDONED / BEND & THRUST BLOCK u EXISTI NG 1 2 - - 10- / ~ E DUCE R -12" WATER LINE r-, r r-> - unuch 1 [[1__ _m~_1__i ~~ 1 . w c., c n=H..- -- "1 111 Oil ...' LU 11 0-PROPOSED 12- 7 C A I.2 i '12'. 1 1 ..t n Â· 1 - L. â€¢ ,2 L'K \ PROPOSED-1 1 THRUST BLOCK AT - -- U COMPLETION or R (-; 1 - , .1 7 9.2 1 VE i : PRO.JECT -i -1 Â·Â·-IL_-- 0 1 A L.LI -EXISTING 12 1 DOODOCED= \ 01.1 T P VAl \/ F 1 1: 41 - 1,1-- 1 8.. D I r . 1. 1 \/i ..1./ , 1 1 1 t 1 M-1 ti '4 ' 'M 1 i 71' J , 1 1 11 1 1 1 ~i Â«/1<~' ~ ~~ ~~~< ~~ /711 - O 1 21 1+00 ;1- BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 1/ / (03 ~- E X 1 S T N G INSTALL 12 TAP P I NG / ' Une = ' DE '2 v[,2 2 N.I T i EC\ ASSEMBLY LLv L. 8 - WET -4 -, , Â·- f 1 11:- '1 -'\,11.1 THRUST BLOCK = EX I ST I NG ~ 2 - 90Â° BEND & THRUST rt, Â·n Â» 1/ DLULA C' f 3- N - FIGURE 1 9 gmc BIG THOMPSON TANK WATER LINE ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS INC. STA 1+00 - CONNECTION DETAIL (970,1 586-2458 '.ETRO: (303) 825-8233 FAX:(970) 58612459 437 SOUTH ST.'.'RAIN, ESTES Pam<, CO 805,7 2-3c 90 03 Ex I STING 4 - -. ,-DRESSER COUPL I iNG / WATER LINE / 90Â° BEN[) / f- PROPOSED - / / 6 THRUST BLOCK / 4- LINE TO BE -. /- PROPOSED 6 BLEND REMOVED ~'~, 1~ - PLAN (3 E \ 22=/ ===P \ 2 4 El EXIST I NG 10 " x 4.' x I (0 - 4,1 E2~.' I. \\ -,ROPOSED 6 x 2 :< 13 TEE 4 gAJE-- \01 TEE & THRUST ELOOK VALVE & i HRUL i r. 1 ~\ ~\ SE DLULA : 4/771 ' b i t-L L ! NE -EX!311 Ne io lilli 1 111-- --- --AL - - Ij| 111 1 --, i,v, uSED o DE}ADO ,Â·EATE \/L! \/E n DOD,3Â¢Cn Q \/ 4 x â‚¬ TEE & THRUST 6-OCK 4.1 IT \-PROPOSED 8"DIP IN] - FIGURE 2 Frk \ . :Â£111'V -___ BIG THOMPSON TANK WATER LINE ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS INC 4-Tra =94_-7.1=2 *6:Â·-con. 1-BVI CO=_P"' STA 3+06 - CONNECTION DETAIL FAy:'9701 586-2459 237 SCUTH ST.Â·,PAIN. ESTES PA RK, u v ....... i , r. CO 2 -- 2-3d il~,1. lip .. 0 I D-ADnerr. 0 - 1 n Vi VOC Lj O x x O TEE & THRUST BLOCK -PROPOSED P ROPOSED 8- 900 BEND -~ n\ I T U D 1 1 C T El ACK 1 1,1~\J Â·.1 1 wL - -A '4 ) 2 1,< 1 5 7114(3 2 1 WATER L I 'NE- ~-11 (21 L--PREPOSED 8 11 1 /4Â° TO BE ABANDONED V v BEND & THRUST BLOCK \ 2- WATER LINE TO- " -~ 'x -PROPOSED 6 GATE V.ALVE DE DEMOVED \ L - -2~-7- \ FLANGE 9/ 2" THREADED '- PROPOSED 6 BLIND COUPL I Nci --------- / PLUG ///// - p D ADOC AD / A Lor, ER I I I. r -D- 1\VI v--1 - LINE 6/, loli i.lil z - WATER 1 1 Ng N - FIGURE 3 44 gmc 1420% BIG THOMPSON TANK WATER LINE ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS INC STA 17+19 - CONNECTION DETAIL (970) 526-2,58 METRO : t#W.) --- ---- "Al' Me-47... FAX(970) 586-2459 40/ Â·=LÂ·Vin / i ,.1-GN, .2.i:n, -4.-:K, Lu CLEÂ·, 2-3e r-vICTI NG 8- WATER LINE '-CAIJII . , DRu.3 scrt culJF'L ING-7 1 0/ r-PROPOSED 8 90' BEND / & THRUST BLOCK EXIST ING 8- LINE-,, IN ' r-PROPOSED 8- 90Â° BEND n 1- DC Mn\/ C h 1 1 T ir), r ALI !V V L L/ 1/ A===/ ...+I.1 o innuST BLOCK ,\ v:<-0 -%-GIIU L \2'- h\Â·:+Â·'Â·,* LJ L.J - .-PROPOSED 8 GATR r \ 112:90 EXISTING 8-1, 49 1,-4. ./. VALVE 0& It VALVI \ UZZ. 1 1 1 ~EXESTI NG 10 DI f, r V / LINE 7 1 1 1 4 0 - 11 -4 1 j ETISTING 2 LINE AND GATE 41 8"DIP VALVE TO BE Â£3/4- SERVICES -0 3 ABANDONED , SLEEVED TO THE CUR STOPS OF THE FOLLOWING , 925 INENCED EXISTING n 1 1054 LEXINGTON I ANE ./ x8xi Itt 2 1058 LEXINGTON LANT N - FIGURE 4 BIG THOMPSON TANK WATER LINE ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS (970) 586-2452 :.â‚¬TRO: (303) 325-2232 STA 19+88 - CONNECTION DETAIL FAXâ‚¬970) 586-2459 437 SOUTH ST.VRAN, ESTES PARK, CO ECE 2-3f LI_] r.0 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS. INC. -11 115 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 (970) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 Fax (970) 586-2459 September 80', 1998 Town of Estes Park ATTN: Bill Linnane P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: 1998 Town of Estes Park Water Loopirig Projects - Devils Gulch Interconnection Application For Payment - RMIC Job No. 9-0223.084.00 Dear Bill: Please find enclosed the Application and Certificate for Payment submitted by Kitchen & Company for the Devils Gulch Water Line Interconnection / 1998 Town of Estes Park Water Looping Projects. Included with this application for payment is a change order in the amount of $728.00 for two additional 221/2Â° bends. These extra bends were needed in order to accommodate for a change in the alignment of the proposed 12' line (See Figure 1). Originally, the 12" water line was designed to minimize the loss of trees within the 40' wide Right-Of-Way. However, after meeting at the site with George Gibbs, owner of Lot 12 of Stanley Heights, Roclq Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) discovered that Mr. Gibbs preferred that the water line be placed further west of his property despite the fact that additional trees would need to be removed. RMC decided that this modification would be beneficial since the proposed realignment would eliminate any crossings with the existing 4" water line and gas line. The enclosed Application and Certificate For Payment has been reviewed to confirm the accuracy of calculations. RMC approves of the partial payment of $79,615.00.Â° If there are any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, ROCIOr MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. -"-1,4.,RÂ« Thomas J. Scobell Engineer TJSAjs enclosed CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING 2-4a Â©42..I ' ' SECTION 00950 CHANGE ORDER TO THE AGREEMENT Col orocIA / State Order Number I nrinnpr 9- 25-99 County Date Owner: Town of Estes Park Description of Work: 1998 Town of Estes Park Water Looping Proiects contractor: 14 Â· E. MAJ,en dbo K,+chen -1- Company You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes to the Contract Documents Description of Changes DECREASE TO INCREASE TO Supolemental Plans & Specs Attached Contract Amount Contract Amount â‚¬ E - ALI GNMENT 2- 22'60 OUNES $ $ 7282. $ TOTALS $ $ NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT $ $ 726? CE- JUSTIFICATION: ef,Â·,6 ,1â‚¬Cc/Câ€¢/ to r=- 04>01 0/â€¢ +O- 1770'.9 Fer â‚¬e,0 "4â€¢ cr' rctf<$1.0 The amount of the Agreement will be (decreased)((increased1by the sum of ($ U 8 82 11 $ 5<,0, huhaked +Wcht-V eifht Dollars. The Contract Amount including this and previous charige orddfs will be: ($ 7 95 6157- 00 $3'f ve-,79 nine +40,-,ra,1,/ 32>< ~h Uv~ r r ,~ flf} pen - Dollars. The Contracf Time provided for completion will be (increased) (decreased)~GREfian-ge~ days. Ke-comrnande& I 42*y AAoukaffi ("o'*50\Â¥421-5 3*c ~flt'Â· c Evi9,'v4'F C Dat: 9/9 /991 . 1/93 Section 00950 - Page 1 of 2 2-4b Â«f;Ii:.*EN,MI>s-<*.ii- 1 : . LI+Z Vlb ..#., 1 % ~ rÂ« E 0,-8 6 -2 I . 0 0 UL - ........... U. 41 14 '1 2 / U: 1, 1, i E . : 11 1/ . / = lo'It . i iii m m .7 ..- i g & i ..1 i - t: : .- -1 ! 0 : 443 3 2 : 4 1 <. : i x 'W WQ i ; SE =- I , . .0 .-. a i -t : : JO 6 02 E 0B WH 0 1 = li 88 1 1% UJ ms g : 1. 1 El!-Sig // L N Kâ€ž.0 1 1 bÂ· 1 i 4 4 1. - : -17 3 - L ..1 : O 1 -r' J 6 * --1, .1-J 9 1 k-J Q) E --- 1 f. r 1 31 . 11 h 8. '0.,0 ..1 11 1 900 0-- 0 ------7--- -/ 1 38 1 O. 53 5 % Z .4 1 6 i :g 1 1 92: 1:/ W / irâ€¢ 4 Â¥14 g- 1 . ) ----7 1-L -00 C j 0- dg - 6---~ 4- 0 0 O : AW 5. In W Do ZE d 05 Z -1 - ' - -8 all - .-W EWE . ....t...............................................................................: - â‚¬40 ' / -.: ~E . 2 : 94 r ./. / UJ 0...........................7....... ./ , 1 , - : wÂ· U V.L. : 9= : , O. : 86 : i h 2 , â€¢ W r, - - - - E)â€¢STIO EDGE of ABAT -- EDGE GRAIL ROA-Y ASTIC *A B MIE VALYâ‚¬ i 2 3/VAQ z I SlHDI 3H A31NV1S El 101 ),473,4,1\A +7 01'ZL SELL SSAL 9 (IME) 81~~ . TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum October Z 1998 TO: Bill Unnane/Public Works Committee FROM: Dave Mahart~~~~~_~ SUBJECT: Fleet Maintenance Computer Software Package Amended Fleet Maintenance 1998 Budget Background: The current Fleet computer system was installed in 1990. The system has been very dependable and useful in Fleet management The current system is not year 2000 compatible and needs replacement before the year 2000. It has been determined that preventive maintenance projection problems will start affecting the current system in mid , 1999. We have researched various systems to replace this system and found the H.LE. Fleet Management System (software addition to the Town's current accounting system) will provide equipment tracking and information needed to manage the Town's fleet The Town's Computer Team and Fleet Maintenance would like to purchase the H.T.E. Software package in 1998 to get ahead of the year 2000 rush. Training, maintenance and project management would be included in the 1999 budget Budget/Costs: $ 22,000 - software package 10,000 - data conversion - fuel interface with Larimer County $ 32,000 - Total for 1998 Recommendation: Since the H.T.E. System has worked well for the Town, and the Finance Department assures that the funds are available, staff would like to request approval to amend the 1998 Fleet budget for $32,000 and request approval to purchase the Fleet Management Software in 1998. - DM/rv 3-1 '4. t .. TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT SEPTEMBER, 1998 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION 127.00 135.00 15 SERVICE UNE INSPECTION 1.00 225 16 TAP REQUEST 3.00 6.00 17 WATER QUALITY 3.00 8.25 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS 1.00 1.00 22 FROZEN UNES 23/24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN/SERVICE 3.00 35.50 30 METER REPAIR 41.00 4480 32 FINAL INSPECTION 5.00 9.00 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED 2.00 4.00 50 STREET REPAIR 1.00 2.00 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 *19# RÂ®j)*$Â¥5 AND REPAIR 200 225 54 STORM DRAINAGE 1.00 18.00 60 :OTHER 2.00 * 2.00 3.% TOTALS: SEPTEMBER, 1998 i 192,00 ~".257.25 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH TOTAL CALLS 192.00 183.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 267.25 315.50 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) +4.92%/-15.30% +.55%/-6.52% Â¢ r.. TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS SEPTEMBER, 1998 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL MARYS 1 TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS} 1 (GAL) CFS i (GAL) 1 0 1,433,000 1,433,000 2.23 425,000 0.66 F 1 1,858.000 2 0 1,843,000 1,843,000 2.87 i : 0 0.00 . i 1.843,000 3 0 1,704,000 1,704,000 2.65 0 0.00 , 1,704,000 4 0 2,076,000 2,076,000 3.23 i M 0 0.00 2,076,000 5 0 2,114,000 2,114,000 3.29 2 1 0 0.00 2,114,000 6 0 2,324,000 2,324,000 3.62 1 ? 0 0.00 2,324,000 7 0 2,365,000 2,365,000 3.68 ~ 0 0.00 2,365,000 8 0 1,905,000 1,905,000 2.97 1 0 0.00 1,905,000 9 0 2,035,000 2,035,000 3.17 1 0 0.00 l 2,035,000 10 0 1,681,000 1,681,000 2.62 i 0 0.00 1,681,000 11 0 2,037,000 2,037,000 3.17 0 0.00 2,037,000 12 0 1,792,000 1,792,000 2.79 0 0.00 1,792,000 13 0 1,793,000 1,793,000 2.79 0 0.00 1,793,000 14 0 1,770,000 1,770,000 2.76 1 0 0.00 :, : 1,770.000 15 0 1,717,000 1,717,000 2.67 0 0.00 : 4 1,717,000 16 0 1,733,000 1,733,000 2.70 0 0.00 f 1,733,000 17 0 1,928,000 1,928,000 3.00 0 0.00 i ~ ' fid 1,928,000 18 0 1,835,000 1,835,000 2.86 0 0.00 . 1,835,000 5 I 19 0 1,972,000 1,972,000 3.07 : 0 0.00 E i 1,972,000 20 0 1,880,000 1,880,000 2.93 0 0.00 1 1.880.000 21 0 1,828,000 1,828,000 2.85 0 0.00 : 1,828,000 22 0 1,768,000 1,768,000 2.75 0 0.00 1,768,000 23 0 1,601,000 1,601,000 2.49 0 0.00 1,601,000 24 0 1,795,000 1,795,000 2.79 j 0 0.00 1 1,795,000 25 0 1,820,000 1,820,000 2.83 1 0 0.00 1,820,000 26 0 1,919,000 1,919,000 2.99 0 0.00: 1,919,000 27 0 1,861,000 1,861,000 2.90 i 0 0.00 1,861,000 28 0 1,745,000 1,745,000 2.72 j 0 0.00 1,745,000 29 0 1,666,000 1,666,000 2.59 0 0.00 1,666,000 30 0 1,404,000 1,404,000 2.19 0 0.00 1,404,000 31 0 0 - 0.00: 0 0.00 i ...% 0 TOT. 0 55,344,000 55.344.000 2.76 i 1 425.000 0.02 . 55,769.000 > AF 0.00 169.86 169.86 1.30 171.16 CFS 0.00 2.76 2.76 0.02 2.78 Â§ BL/LK(-) N/A N/A N/A N/A -5.515.351 GAL 0 55,344,000 55.344.000 425,000 1 50.253.649~ AF 0 169.86 169.86 1.30 154.23 1st-13 0 25,102,000 425,000 14 - 31 0 30,242,000 0