The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1998-08-20f AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMnTEE AUGUST 20, 1998 fit 3:30 P.M. i 012>, . preparation date: 8/14/98 4 3, *revision date: 8/18/98 1. September PWC Meeting Request approval to cancel 4 ~I1 2. Bike Path Petition Petition request to improve bike riding conditions on Elkhorn Avenue 3. Lake Trail - Wapiti Meadows Phase Request approval of low bid 4. Tap Abandonment/rransfer 1240 Devils Gulch Road request to transfer to Habitat for Humanity 5. 1998 Street Improvement Project - Asphalt Overlay Portion Request approval of low bid *6. Glacier Water Plant Rehab Phase 2 Request approval of negotiated price with Benson Construction ~ ~ *7. U.S. West Easement Request 9Â»Â»72Â£00 Request approval ofU.S. West easement Reports: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Water Line Looping Project of * Hwy. 34/36 Project Presentation by RMC 4. Street Cut Standards Revision Update 3 .85 Water Department 10-year Improvements and Priorities Update/Fire Department Improvement Update 5 ,-65 Dog Waste Bag Stations 7. NBU Cluster Box 1, 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee t IL FROM: Bill Linnane , â‚¬,02~ SUBJECT: Request to cancel the September P.W.C. meeting Background Staff and some of the committee members will be attending an APWA Conference the day of the next committee meeting. Budget/Cost 4 tt Ilt Not applicable Recommendation Due to the lack of agenda items projected for the September meeting and the APWA Conference, staff recommends canceling the September P.W.C. meeting. BL/rv 1-1 t /' 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane_~kj SUBJECT: Petition request to improve bike riding conditions on Elkhorn Avenue Background Brian McCutchen submitted a petition with approximately 50 signatures that requests that the Town provide "a safe and legal place for bicyclists to ride their bikes - a bike path - through the downtown area." Mr. McCutchen will present the request Budzet/Cost There is no budget item for an additional bike path through downtown in the 1998 Budget Cost is unknown. 0 Recommendation Mr. McCutchen will present his request Staff and the committee can then make a decision based on the request which is unclear at this point BL/rv 2-1 E JUL -1 0 1998 M 1/ T This is a petition to the Town Council concerning the issue of unsafe/illegal bicycle riding through the downtown area. Bicyclists are faced with the issue ADMIN. DEPT. of either putting their lives in danger by riding on Elkhorn Avenue or getting a ticket for riding on the sidewalk because they do not want to get hit by a car. The solution to both problems is to have a safe and legal place for bicyclists to ride their bikes - a bike path - through the downtown area. That would solve both problems-at the same time and that is what all of us who signed the petition would like to see. 1.IDan,â‚¬1 70&609 26 2.SLP ALd#W 27~~~~~9 0 29 - A 5.M/t\Qlp<ka All' ATf QU=aU=I/ 6. ~dkÂ·~rAâ„¢~V%.- .4641 4â‚¬Â·eptO'~ 31. -;f W- y. 7. ~A,~4 0 31. #10/ri Mi#Lu 33. / U \\U\VU- 9 Â· L ha<doc 97-Lit- 34 . ~Â£11\~~2 JQ~ ' n r A 10. - 35. , ~t~~Zzz:7 e {IA:18,1,-- 36.- 12. 22*IZQI- xo---~ U,rÂ·-~r 37.,41''6974- U 0 13. \<4.Aw-uukl,b b Gn/vu~ 3% . X:Le f)4 30-7 97 - - =.- 7.-52 tl/kil A.c 1 25~ 39.GlfIhi~ %.94<571 A 1 5. Uhap.\99% EAn\:.4 n I 40.~ -7-1*- 16. 4#WY,A ARLA<;L .. 41:~ < .- 7&024 43.1~ dj ~UL ~,",-L.1 ,11 j 19. 0 06~/..1 63'6- 6<-- 20. QAA-)01 1148 ATI.0 45.~ 21. Â£04/ 42- 7474F 46.~ 22. *4 4, 4 i 04<- 664 47. Uell &0.9 5 23. ~330 ~kgru,% 48. CAA _~c~-' ~ ;c /1 1 24. d,n h /vA Ana, r A 49. /1 vu U 1 1 47 1 ~ 1 A ..0,44 25. - .50 71ff <' 543 0.,i~ - 31- 04 0-- COck 920~~Â·Â« ~#hun 2-2 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane~6~ SUBJECT: Lake Trail - Wapiti Meadows Phase Request approval of low bid Background This phase of the trail has been awarded a $95,000 grant from CDOT. Guidelines of the grant require that the Town and EVRPD fund at least 20% of the project What that means is that the project cost must be at least $118,750 (.8 x $118,750 = $95,000) for the Town to realize the full benefit of the $95,000 grant Bids were received on August 14& and G.L Hoff Company was the low bidder at $91,754.10 (refer to the attached bid tabulation). Staff has contacted CDOT and requested 0 that the design, construction management and concrete testing costs of approximately 16,000 be included in the total cost If this cost is allowed, change orders and additional quantities may drive the total cost up to the $118,750 amount mentioned above and possibly greater. Budget/Cost CDOT portion $ 95,000 max Town portion $ 19,150 max EVRPD portion $ 19,150 max $133,300 Recommendation 9 Since G.L. Hoff has a good reputation with the Town, staff recommends accepting their low ~ 1- bid of $91,754.10. Staff also requests to spend the entire $133,000 budget if CDOT approves additional 0 K quantities. BL/rv 3-1 21\\ 1 Â£20 a /,9,4-D,~ Igi~~111 '0.1 ...Â»\ d ,#wr..au,r\. LAND SURVE'FS- --~21'- 9=3'~ -~*'-1. 4 - . .L . C 1 -7 - = SUBDIVISIONS - DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IMPROVEMENT PLATS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING A VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING SANITARY ENGINEERING MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING WILLIAM G. VAN HORN - COLO. PE & PLS 9485 ,7l4 August 17, 1998 Mr. Bill Linnane, Director Public Works Department Town ofEstes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Bid Analysis and Recommendations Lake Estes Bike and Pedestrian Trail (Phase V) Dear Bill, 0 We have reviewed the Bids received on August 14, 1998 for the above referenced project. Bids were received from five contractors. I have examined the tabulations for individual bid items and the summations on all bids for accuracy. All bids were found to be in order. The results ofthe checked bid tabulations are attached and summarized here. CONTRACTOR BID G. L. Hoff Company $91,754.10 M.S. I. $91,895.75 Cornerstone Concrete $98,793.75 Dumar Contractors $100,166.50 L & L Concrete $127,711.58 3-2 1043 Fish Creek Road â€¢ RO. Box 456 â€¢ Estes Park, Colorado 80517 â€¢ 970-586-9388 â€¢ Fax 970-586-8101 The Engineer's Estimate for Construction costs was $112,047 (without contingency). We thus believe the bids received were reasonable. G. L. Hoff has preformed satisfactorily on the Trail under a previous contract as well as doing other projects for the Town. We thus recommend the Town award a contract to G.L. Hoff. In considering the total cost and complexity ofthe project it would be appropriate to add a contingency of $8000 to the base bid. Ifwe can answer questions for You or the Trustees, please call. Respectfully submitted, VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, iNC. 0 -48, 0 .9-0-{,U~L , V. , 1 1 /John A Spooner, P.E. attachments 3 3-3 m. 0 m 0 00 0 J -1 -1 -1 Ul -1 -1 !5!5~1LULLU.U.<00 LU Z 3 1 - 3-4 BID SCHEDULE G. L. HOFF COMPANY 202 Remove/dispose 12 LF Curb 1 $165.00 $165.00 203 Excavate/replace dam cobble stome CY 28 $20.00 $560.00 203 Trail Subgrade Preparation 3035 $1.10 $3,338.50 203 Final Dress Erail (both sides) 3035 $1.00 $3,035.00 506 Riprap 80 $40.70 $3,256.00 601 18" Retaining wall 116 $15.10 $1,751.60 608 Bikeway (5" x 10') 1805 $22.10 $39,890.50 099Â£0'Mt OL'9â‚¬$ 9/1. (eope peue)10!111 ., te X .9) AeMe)1!8 909 00'*Â£2'6Kt 09 LE$ gLÂ£ (peoJOJU!@J ',0 K x â€žg) ABMe)1!8 909 00029'6$ 09.Â£2Â¢ 00* (peoJOJU!@J ',0 B X 0,9) ABMe)1!8 909 00.OOmt 00-002$ L ia)pos pue Ille1108 - 'os!IAI Z1.9 001 L 1'9$ 00 LLI.'9$ L uollez!1!qon 929 0009 A 00'09 L$ 1 iro Joi!d 002 01.'*92' L6$ WIEI HO10Â¥bll[NOO 1Â¥1O1 LAKE ESTES BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN TRAIL, PHASE V DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED UNIT TOWN OF ESTES PARK COLORADO NUMBER OFITEM QUANTITY 0 CO . Ui 0 CO O 9 1 Z O 3 O 0 0 1.L LL LLILLL< J -IJOuj--1-1_11,1.1 LU Z 0 >LL U. 3-5 202 Remove/dispose 12 LF Curb 1 $100.00 $100.00 203 Excavate/replace dam cobble stone CY 28 $12.25 $343.00 203 Trail Subgrade Preparation 3035 $1.50 $4,552.50 203 Final Dress Trail (both sides) 3035 $0.75 $2,276.25 80 $45.00 $3,600.00 601 18" Retaining wall 116 $24.00 $2,784.00 00*OLL'6â‚¬$ 00.ZEÂ¢ 9091. (,0 L x .g) ABMe)1!8 909 00089'ES 007Â£$ 9LK (85pe peue>lo!41 ', LK X â€ž9) ABAAe)I!8 909 00~09*'LE$ 00.0â‚¬$ SLL (peoJoiu!0J ',0 L X â€ž9) ABMe>1!8 909 00.003'LLÂ¢ 00 91$ (peoJoil!!al ',0 k x â€ž9) ABMe)1!8 809 00'09$ 00.09$ 18)pos pue pJell08 - 09!vu Z :9 00.000'2$ 00000'2:$ 91 l.lo!1ezillqon 919 00.09 Lt 00*09 LE L 91 lrO Jolid 002 92/968'Let flle BO10Â¥bl.iNOO 1V101 LAKE ESTES BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN TRAIL, PHASE V DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED UNIT BID SCHEDULE TOWN OF ESTES PARK C NUMBER OFITEM 506 Riprap I k 0 m 0 Z % C 06 'li u. >- 11 11 1.L U. 1.1- <00 -1 =00.-jj==113== UJ t LL 0 3-6 BID SCHEDULE CORNERSTONE 202 Remove/dispose 12 LF Curb 1 $200.00 $200.00 203 Excavate/replace dam cobble stone 28 $35.00 $980.00 203 Trail Subgrade Preparation 3035 $5.00 $15,175.00 203 Final Dress Trail (both sides) 3035 $2.25 $6,828.75 506 RipraP 80 $60.00 $4,800.00 601 18" Retaining wall 116 $10.00 $1,160.00 608 Bikeway (5" x 10') 1805 $21.00 $37,905.00 00.OZE'Â£Â¢ 0011$ 9% L (eope peueyo!111 1, t:X â€ž9) ABAAe>1!8 809 009Â£8'LIÂ¢ 0092$ SLL (peojolu!0J '00 K X .9) ABMe>1!8 809 00002'6Â¢ 00Â£2$ 004 (peOJOJU!eJ ',0 L X ,,9) AeMe>1!8 809 00.005$ 00009$ L le>pos pue PJell08 - .OS!141 Z L9 00.000' tÂ¢ 00.000'%$ 1 uollezil! 01,~1 919 00/09Wt 00.091$ L lrO Jolld 004 GLEBL'86$ :dIW NO10Â¥bl.l.NOO 1V.I.O.1. LAKE ESTES BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN TRAIL, PHASE V ILINE DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED UNIT TOWN OF ESTES PARK COLORADO DIWMBER â€¢ 1 0 00 Z 1 0 111>LL.U.U.U.U.< ..J-Joe--1--1-JJUJ 0 3-7 BID SCHEDULE DUMAR CONTRACTORS LAKE ESTES BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN TRAIL, PHASE V LINE DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT BID 202 Remove/dispose 12 LF Curb $160.00 $160.00 203 Excavate/replace dam cobble stone CY 28 $48.50 $1,358.00 203 Trail Subgrade Preparation 3035 $2.15 $6,525.25 203 Final Dress Trail (both sides) 3035 $2.15 $6,525.25 506 RipraP 80 $60.50 $4,840.00 601 18" Retaining wall 116 $20.00 $2,320.00 608 Bikeway (5" x 10') 1805 $22.50 $40,612.50 005*61$ 00.Â£*$ 91.L (eope peue)10!41 'â€¢ L L X â€ž9) ABMeM!8 909 090Â£2:'erÂ¢ OLZEÂ¢ 91'L (Pe<Joiu!@J ',0 L Xi,9) ABMe)1!13 909 0000*'6$ 09-E/$ 004 (peojoiu!0J ',0 L X #,9) ABMeM!8 909 00.00 Wt 00.00 Wt L leNOOS pue piell08 - '09!IN Z1,9 00.0007$ 00'000'4$ L 91 uollez!HqOIN 919 00-09 Ut 00'09:$ L 91 lrO ;OI!d 00Z 0999:'00:$ ~CIEI BO10Â¥hliNOO 1V1O1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK COLORADO NUMBER OFITEM QUANTITY 0 co 0 9 m Z O < -1 0 8 0. 11 LL >- 1.LU-LL< -1 .1.100.IJ--1-JW UJ 1- LL 0 LL LL 0 LU Z 3-8 BID SCHEDULE L & L CONCRETE 202 Remove/dispose 12 LF Curb 1 $100.00 $100.00 203 Excavate/replace dam cobble stone CY 28 $200.00 $5,600.00 203 Trail Subgrade Preparation 3035 $5.00 $15,175,00 203 Final Dress Trail (both sides) 3035 $2.00 $6,070.00 506 Riprap 80 $50.00 $4,000.00 601 18" Retaining wall 116 $7.00 $812.00 608 Bikeway (5" x 10') 1805 $25.00 $45,125.00 00089'Â£$ 00-ZES GLL (0Â£'pe Peue)10!41 1, LK X â€ž9) ABMe)118 909 00'OLL'LEÂ¢ 008Â£$ 9 U (PeojoluleJ 'i01, X â€ž9) ABMe)1!8 909 00.000'*Lit 005Â£$ 004 Cpeolow!@J ',0 L X â€ž9) Ae/V~eN!8 809 00.001$ 00-0023 L 10)pos pue mellog - -09!V\1 Zk9 89'629'9$ 99'619'9$ L 91 Uollez! liqoVy 919 00*09%$ 00'09:$ L 91 lrO lolid 004 89'KLL'LEKÂ¢ :ClIEI 23010Â¥81NOO 1Â¥101 LAKE ESTES BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN TRAIL, PHASE V DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED UNIT B1D TOWN OF ESTES PARK C NUMBER TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane ~~ SUBJECT: Water tap transfer request by owner of 1240 Devils Gulch Road Background Mr. & Mrs. Gibbs, 1240 Devils Gulch Road, are requesting to transfer an unused water tap of their property to Habitat for Humanity, as explained in the attached letter. They would transfer the tap and all rights associated with the tap to the non-profit group. After transfer, the tap would be used for a tentative Habitat project on W. Riverside or some other property. Town policy does not allow tap transfers from one property to another unless special circumstances warrant the transfer. For background information, within the past 5 years the Town has funded the payment of 2 water taps for Habitat for Humanity valued at approximately $4,000 per tap. Budget/Cost Budget Not applicable Cost $4,000 asset transfer from the Gibbs' and possiblv a $4,000 savings to the Town in the future. Recommendation Since 1) the water tap transfer benefits Habitat for Humanity, a non-profit agency, and 2) the transfer may possibly save the Town a future $4,000 cost staff is recommending approval of the tap transfer. BL/rv 4-1 C I:I I: THI 6-5 ~~2 ~ i= =---1 1 1 1 13jlltilk~ti_-- -1 R73W OF THE 6TH RM. 1 1 111Â»/ ,/-- i tifF --r (f \\ , R 72W OF THE 6TH RM. -34 HILL CREST /, / C 45' 1 1 \ , I *- 1 / 10 1 - 6 ACRES (5 96.1 -) 212 1 6434 i 1 9-=Â©3IE EED-tEEr- t'.1 4 1 _ --_.-1.. . - ! I '-6 ' ' 24,19 .1,4 ; I ; 'ESTATES . 51 1 1 11 . 1 1 1 , 4/ r-112 Â· :â€ž 9 -- 1 1 8 IE 11 -A A-6 A+J Do ., 1 . 1 1 1 . " . 1 4 . 1 ./ 1 1 1 1 4 1 - - ------ - - -TT--r -- --- -- -- 1---1 --1 1.1 lili- 1 , Â« 1.. 4. lic 0 ' 1 I -1 --- - I I. ..1 1.1 m f â€¢â€¢ t 1. __1 1 7 BLACK 'â€¢ " -- ---- ~ *- .0 ~ d \/t--+- : : I -I'.' i e. 1 1 J 1 12 5 1 1- --1-------- ". . 11 48 ------ --, 4. ll--L D ,-. I L CANYO " - â€¢ 1 H - ,/ 0 â€¢c ..__- -4 ./ " Z 11 - / 0777>Â«F.1 .MEIGHTS .. " x '7 z_~* >â€¢~~Â·-â€¢~Â·-r-r-~-7 ..Im.-. I " -1 7/ t HE /.2/44.11,\.1,1,01,1/9/--1 -:LI-, -,1,4' HILL -2 li *' Il Â¥CMS ADDITION ,# " 0 - I -- 1 1 ---ir-7--/Fl ' 1 1 's - 1 - -,0 11 - 1 . /*.1, 1 ,7 - 1 " ildj~,12#'30â€¢-6..1 I' Â· ...... 10 1, 1. 13 ' sT,r,YO '1' j \ 7-ITT-71 0 L 1-41-# VIE.5 4 ~-2.-77.2-j ~ta--itmE=li. -0/ LONE PINE ACRES f | g 2 9.. .3 I â€¢ 1 , .1.1. e '......,0. ' STANLEY ' ' 'i :1133 Â· Â·Â· ,;- - ~ :.'~"r' ,Â· filâ‚¬~DA~-12-43 El~U~r--1\94,4#- , ., 6 I. i E ST 1, .1 0, ibl 0 4 1 , / --7..... Pt?Â« , R I,sTOIRIC 1 .00..O. ROCK / ; DISTRICT : .* r' C~..~0'-~d'*6%4(AK-2Â«0Â·~ */..4-< â€¢ ACM S - SUID M=7 1. N... . 1 flk.. ' .... 1 0 .. ... T m.l ~. * . Al .A'28-W 4 44.Za /: : 4,0, HILLS Wy,p--3-, . 0 b/'\096.ria 92,4,~~frs-----â€¢0 -â€¢Â·"L,~~;,4,0~1~1, . \2, i . P : 4 9740â€¢. ==hSÂ·-),~~~~1 1 ~r-0 ' -<eÂ·Â·073 "3-,Al , AVEÂ· 4 ., / I .c- i \ Â·,uÂ·Â·4$mwi " CANAIY SUB. S 5...Lfy. , r I. m. , I . i â€¢ I â€¢40Ll~ SU~D STANLEY 12* /9/\\/4;11\ Â· - =--- 1--1.90 7 vILLâ€¢GE 5 40*|| 4 .. , i t . , -r ..C. 1 / /22' ./.7 N>kx *0 .,;0 ' 1~-11,1.(-mb#*. ''.1,4,1-392[ ESTES , 20--<O.- I . 4 1 1 1 ADD r' 9 5 m. W. 1 ," f-o sr,â€žLE, .Â£1~8~;;27~ â‚¬'~~~Ze==-~ /z#.w_~ ~ 1 Ur ---.LIJ.6.'-li.-5-.. )%.\ 1 . . 5/tly 212'"' -te,/â€¢ALL, -- 11+ C' I ./ ...i - -,D:ae:j?%0==n ..... 7/72 \ 3 ' V-41Â· 13 "91 ' LAN f tsrcs . * . I.' .1. \ '. â€ž.5~=.'.'. F - '... P , .-.<7.1= I . .......'....,1.. .. I . , filve . . -32, " ** Â· --- SAINT ..S '. 36 I. 41' ALJ-1872mbRN ..E -Â« 101 -- \ . " 1 0 .Â·.AÂ· '..--:c: Â·' '\ \13*VAAUÂ£7 1F'tr:-4, 1.... ... . - 2- '' , 1,UNLE 4 3â€¢Etr , &...EU. r , L L- . E-====> " --- 1 -.-ILT.. ~*E~:,~IJI~ ----- Â«~j~9â‚¬79'tÂ»~i ~Â«~~tÂ»U-U~~- - - {~U*-77Â» *,VEâ€¢SIDE , ~ ~ ~ t. PA R. , [ 4 -4 . --7-4-. 1 . , .U" . '02-,INOUSâ€¢... .. .. ~~~~~~::~~~::til,N5>'*~v~~; - . .. 1 \\ C'.. .00. . 1 1 = 1 .21. ;:A flu - t *i> I : â€¢LIS -ALâ€ž '. I 1 â€ž/0 / \ ... .a HOSPITAL ADD. 1: STANLEY 31 -RU P... C s.. 1 0 , 'r,: / 5. De .f: 0- r : . S.D. ,- â€ž )*llp* -& 1 Â· b' 31* r.1 l-INJI<* 44 ; ...l, , ,~' Nrn=~== MIGM 0- . 5C 40'Ol 5 CIAGS *4.~.rzz_~-,:~i. IN 1 , .1.... r':.rliME,-2&933-r]4~Â· Â·Â·. :.iÂ·AN;ORD .='2% 8 Al.DO. 11 .00 i -r-Lit-L~ â€¢ â€¢" ~Z~3:,t:.~ 0. ----- 5'-; 2â€ž7,31 >4",>IN '\ 1 I ,LA KF, -flf- -22Â£:293Â·St l.1-g V--5.-Jao-E .-ENE-; 1 1 1 .,3'..i,Jl~~~~~~~~~~~~*-a \N-râ€¢Â°ne 'l-kl]Lnt' ' co..0.â€ž' ACDIT,6. # I 1 ..0. 1 1 1 ...... 1 ~Lâ€¢ S LL_-/ 12111-113. -jj L -rt-1 1.172:fiffiEr .-7- .- F.....Â¥ -0 1 J 1.% | " "%4" ... 0 '.4---4 -â€¢ " 0 1 --0 11 0 .:.2,9(Ki+at-16: -- 3, 12 1 1 - .J 25130 â€žâ€ž 30,29 r--1 36 I3, - --J------1------~-r-~1 , 10 IDLE 1 1 GOL/ COUISE -----1--1 4-2 I IT...4 1. - 11 .i , 1 1, 1 1 '1 0 - 1 / l~G,C. 0 971L EJ' 0 / '1 0 0 su.O. 1 July 30, 1998 Mr. Bill Linnane Public Works Director Town of Estes Park Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Linnane, My wife and I are planning to donate a conservation easement to the Estes Valley Land Trust on the vacant lot we own in the Stanly Heights Sub-division. This lot is adjacent to Devil's Gulch Road and is described as follows (Deed Bk 1829 Pg 0220): A portion of Lots 12 and 13, STANLEY HEIGHTS, Exhibit "A", a Subdivision in the West th of Section 19, Township 5 North, Range 72 West of the 6th P.M., described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said lot 13 which is monumented by an iron pipe in concrete; thence S 01Â° 35" West along the East line of said Lot 13 a distance of 359.03 feet; thence North 880 25" West a distance of 362.39 feet to a point which is 40 feet East of the West line of said Lot 12; thence North 010 34' 36" East parallel to the West line of said Lot 12 a distance of 330.66 feet; thence North 770 32' 33" East along the North line of said Lot 12 a distance of 166.21 feet to the North corner common to said Lots 12 and 13 which is an iron pin in concrete, thence along the Northerly lines of said Lot 13 North 77'32'33" East a distance of 23.25 feet; thence South 82'47'27" East a distance of 179.49 feet to the true point of beginning. 0 On this property we have a water tap (Utilities Dept. Acct # 3609-3138) which we wish to Afbandon. With Town approval, we would like to donate this tap to the Habitat for Humanity obthe Estes Valley for the new home they are planning on West Riverside Drive. Sincerely, Â»7:gÂ»Er George & Dorothy Gibbs 1240 Devil's Gulch Rd. Estes Park, CO 80517 Tel.: 970/586-4092 cc: Rita Mayhew, Estes Valley Habitat for Humanity 4-3 ED N 77'38'E Zv. .. - , j -3 V-----Ser ACTUAL 877032,33"E 20.1.44._~~cru4LE&2641/279<,756.49. , 1 7 9 60' 4, 0 1404 .YO>e. 4/ + -_..0 $71Â°32'33 . 3'll.23~-"F 1 66.21 4. 1 1,A 1, CÂ« e 4 % * A/4, .'21 0 92 â‚¬ O ts,4% 9 444. 44 0. 3 4.4. roe '1*9 'Littp h eg els. 6 %,91 .6. t N 11, .Cl Of 3 0 1/ 2.507 ACRES - ~' 0 A 6 -3 O 0 . fe- 0 S 0,4 7 0 4 9/0 . r .41 0 N 880 25' W 362.40' U, C r).1. i: lcd 2 SCALE 10 D 0.493 ACRES N 1- 6 U n q N88025'W 362.39' 100 75 50 25 0 100 L . ser r | i (. Brier. IRON p horrd.irÂ· 0,1,â€¢(Â· i rh- 11,Â·â€¢, r I,...7 Â· 1.n,Â·r.,1. 7",1 '1 ivi,Irâ€¢,1 1.01 9 12 .0 n ! ..1 1 451 1 1,4< r,1.14 77,1 ,Ii,q,-r irÂ·! i 0. â€¢<.li '1 <41, Ver. FA.L. -17. CLCL... 1, \ /1- I . Â£ 'd 7% 0 r O 40' El E. %2 I - -0 13-9 . 1 FOUND IRON PIPE IN CONCR N.b / st COR,LOT 13 0- PLATTED N 89 955'W 252.75' ~~PLATTEDN89aq,4'~149.82 1 ACTUAL N 89'58'35"W 252.65' A IACTUALN 89007 33 WI49.79 el NORTH LANE 0 0 05 1 Et-i ~ 4 PI. 1 : gr f s:- 12 r 1 3, I.V,Â·r-!Tr ..,.1. , erâ€¢n- rt''H T'l'~ .r 4 I ri,r- .......... 1/2 99 :r-Trnv 10. fv. Pl,V ., ,% ..:1 r ... , .rÂ¥....., -1........ B n T A.' 1.~n . . : 1, 1.. 1 : 4-4 c her t. 2 n f 3 Â·s br / 59.26' ~ N 010 3~6"E 271.40' PLATTED NOI Â¤35'E 766.14' ACTUAL NOI 0 34'36"E 772.73' PU8LIC ROAD 8 BRiDLE PATH EASEMENT ,z9'962 A#,990;09 0311Vld TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane_EL.Â·OU SUBJECT: 1998 Asphalt Overlay Street Improvement Project Request approval of the low bid Background The chip seal and striping portion of the 1998 Street Improvement Project are complete. Staff solicited bids for the overlay and Fall River Lane road construction portion of the project and bids were received on Friday, August 146. Western Mobile was the low bidder at $122,003.75. Please refer to the attached bid summary. Budget/Cost Funds from the Walkway/Bikeway and Street Maintenance Capital accounts can more than adequately fund the bid price of $122,003.75. Recommendation Staffrecommends approval of Western Mobile's low bid of $122,003.75. BL/rv ,2 6.~ bu, ,/1 '- 40,0.0 rb - .4.7/UN,7 gy. 4.4.6 5-1 4 r.ki S. 14~~ c i: & 0 1 Â® V) u, 8 r- 1 ' : i - i B C . - J a. e 4 Cr- - E N @ 1--74- H 4 5 /\A~ ..0 + -. 9 0 - r r. C .A # SO Jj 9 1 X j O r '0 rl ~ ~ KSÂ·- NAJ U * .2, c,(<Com W - 2,no' N W * M'-Ne N po= E~ - N x m on- - W 1 4 W.FE 38 - cm 44 91 V '8 2 0-= 4 - - e - 9- 94 J i -00.4- 44 n. 9- N -, 4 C / C D D 0 8%0 002 2 CROOQQ .0 g.1 4% 2119 4928 41 2 & 9111 0 -ne N r 12 - u 2,4 -5 A 0 Ul - OW - 42&8&8 no o whow-8Â§420 3# -- O e - -1 -45 9 0 ~ ~19 LoÂ©N>~~ C D 0 M - W \ 3 r O 4 O t- N N C) 7 1 . 00 00 - .t' rr â‚¬ 0 0 a .0 C - 0 - a. C , D , 70:>trtdil~ H " M 111 Wui J A - F '4 *000 A m 0 V, b J v :88â€¢ Wr o 1--BE- 3 - t- N *N # 9= 0 0 q-0 t,r~,0 a -- r - 7 0 f - 2Â» 9 -2 le W a r r ~4 9 A u e L .0 n g = *~Â° 1 2 1 2 1 2. 1 â‚¬.1 C ig 0 IC ' a i -i 2 1 3, 1 01 -c o ~Â° 9 U, 9 3,%2 2 39 Â§81.As 18 81&61 guu O QE 6 t= S a ( N W E E a) O 0, O --Nc')4â€¢LOCONOOC).- =-CUM. 10 0 NOOC).- 5-2 Unit Price Extension U Extension uo!suet)(3 1Â¥101 -- 92/4 19101 Oggg 1Â¥101 BID TABULATION TOOLS U TOTAL TOTAL 0/1 3/3 Â»Â©219 Project: 5 â‚¬ il f Tv, AÂ©0 0b 11 1.0 CO O O LO O O LO helo xI-NCDOCNI XI- r or) r (90(DO 010 0 0 100(0 00 N (\1(DO C\1 0 (D C\1 4- N Lr) tO US W (Vf r-- 4- 4- LD 1 9- 0 Xi- (\1 C\1 (\1 r- C\1 (N (\1 CNI CN 000001.01010 (\10 0 001.0 (\1(9 - (\18 *C) tO CD m O r- r- r- (1) > 250 9 *g ~ c .0 D 241 0 8 > @ 23 E_e coc m -1 LU CO LU LU J LU <ICELLLULLI -2- 0t â‚¬ Â¢ 2 en 4 Â¥ 2 4 0 0&-3 > CD 05 a) E: co EC) 2- 0 o % 8 &3 -' 2 2 r -1 fE .7 -93 u) Co 22 -0 - M .2 0 ~ e 2 R g :% 2 -M E r <00OLLCDJO r r- 01 CO 4- LO (D N '00 0 * 5-3 STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH WIDTH YARDS TONS t,LGI. 490,8 L Slvlol SQUARE 1998 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RESURFACING SCHEDULE "A" Avenue Horn Drive River Court green Lane eA!Ja 868!JJeo Acacia Drive valon Old Man Mountian -Jeopnq 341 U!41!AA AelS 01 AJEA AE Ul egguenck- 7eeLIS Jed kel.leAO lieu 3.1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Worl~ Committee/Town Board FROM: Bill LinnanÂ£661 SUBJECT: Glacier Water Plant Rehab Phase 2 Request approval of negotiated price from Benson Construction Background On May 15, 1998 the P.W.C. recommended approval to allow staff to negotiate a price with Benson Construction to rehab the Glacier Plant Intake facilities. Please refer to the attached May 15th memo and P.W.C. minutes. Staff and R.MC. have negotiated a fair price of $88,131 with Benson as explained in the attached R.M.C. letter. 3 Budget/Cost Budget $ 105,000 Cost $ 88,131 Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the $88,131 price submitted by Benson Construction with the remainder of the budget to be used for possible change orders. BL/rv Attachments aw. *24.Â£4Â£ 'Z,Â¢4.Â£ 4~ 42Â£4 dd~+ z */<,O,0. 6-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Work~ Committee FROM: Bill LinnaneUL?L SUBJECT: US. West easement request Background On January 21, 1993, the P.W.C. recommended approval to grant U.S. West a U.S. West utility easement adjacent to Carriage Drive and Hwy. 7. Please refer to the attached map and commitbee minutes. U.S. West led the committee to believe that 1 pedestal would be added to the 2 that existed at that time. The committee recommended granting an easement based on this information and also requested that U.S. West keep the disturbance area to a minimum. Once the easement was granted, U.S. West proceeded to add numerous pedestals to the area and did not inform Town staff of the additional pedestal installations (none of which were in the granted easement boundary). In May 1997, the Town Parks Department planted drought resistant shrubbery around the facilities perimeter. Approximately three months later, U.S. West or a U.S. West agent destroyed the vegetation. During the past year, Town staff has sent numerous letters to U.S. West and have called U.S. West numerous times, (all of which have been unanswered) to correct the following problems: 1) Remove all abandoned telephone pedestals 2) Construct a cedar fence around the original easement agreement location 3) Plant drought resistant shrubbery around the fence 4) Vacate the old easement by warranty deed to the Town 5) Prepare a new easement and legal description to be recorded after the Town verifies accuracy Currently, U.S. West has scheduled numerous projects in the Estes area. Town staff is not issuing any R.O.W. permits until the above 5 items are either completed, in the process of being completed, or under construction. Budget/Cost No cost to the Town. Recommendation Grant US. West an easement and issue R.O.W. permits after all 5 major items of concern are completed, in the process of being completed, or under construction. Also, US. West shall prepare all easement documents for recording. BL/rv 7-1 . T i ./.0/0/0......1//CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS .jlm.Â£04 ~-L U 0- iDA . _wo~ttee d.- .-- .- 6,~ ----7 L-----danuary-21, 1993 ~ 6 - 039 6 Committee: Chairman Habecker, Trustees Bar Gillette Attending: Chairman Habecker, Trustee Gillet Also Attending: Mayor ProTem nix, Town Administrator Klaphake, Public Works Director Linnane, Water Superintendent Goehring, Fleet Manager Shanafelt, Clerk O'Connor U Absent: Trustee Barker Chairman Habccker called tile meeting to order at 10:02 A.M. ~ ~/ US WEST - REOUEST EASEMENT ON TOWN PROPERTY. ~ uS West is in the process of upgrading the telephone facilities in , ~ the Carriage Hills Area and is requesting an easement east of the bike path on Carriage Drive (north side of Carriage Drive, 392' east of Highway 7.) The Committee reviewed the location of the 15'x15' parcel which is currently open space. Ed Heinz/US West presented photographs of ~ electric cabinet which is 5%' high and will be installed on a concrete pad. Staff expressed concern with potential obstruction of future._improvements which may be made to C. y. the site due to 23 cabinet, 4Â£j~Nexisting cabinets near the site will not be relocated. Discussion included the possibility of *'E'.-Â·. ,tu..i ' + fencing and comments that the site was dedicated as open space, not a "park" (intent was to retain a negligible appearance). The <6Â·t.Â·rÂ·Â· Committee recommends approval of the easement as presented contingent upon installation being accomplished with minimal -destruction to the site. 39"'ll ESTES VALLEY RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT (EVRPD) - REOUEST APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT BUILDING ON TOWN PROPERTY. EVRPD Executive Director Stan Gengler reported that pursuant to the Operating Agreement, the District is requesting approval to construct a 60x70 sq. ft. maintenance facility at the 18-hole golf course. Pursuant to the sensitivity to the west and south sides of 4 the building, the exterior walls of the metal building will be upgraded to match the existing clubhouse. Placement of the new facility will preclude parking in the area, thus an open area north . of the existing "overflow" parking area will be utilized; however, thls new area will not be improved at this time. Director Gengler confirmed that the maintenance building will not be placed off Fish Creek Road which was the site earlier discussed. The existing shop building will be removed Â· during the next winter season. The Committee recommends approval of the request as submitted. ' CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA/PLANTATION BUILDING - REQUEST APPROVAL. The Contractor, Aldrich Builders, has requested use of six (6) parking spaces in the Dark liorse Parking Lot to be used as the construction staging area for the remodeling of the Plantation Building. The Committee recommends approval of the request contingent upon complete restoration of the site one week prior to Memorial Day Weekend. USE OF PARKING LOT FOR SPECIAL EVENT - APPROVAL. 0 ; Romance of the Rockies has requested use of 15 parking spaces at Parking Lot /2 (Estes Kuntry Kitchen Lot) during the Valentine's Day Special Event February 13 and 14. The Committee recommends approval of the request. , #*lkâ€¢ 7-2 N#TrÂ·. : 0 . i I 'd ,Â£m' DESCRIPTION r Act of land in Uie North 1/2, Section 1, Township 4 North, Range 73 West of the Gth 11 Â·,M., Larimer County, Colorado, said tract is described as follows: ~ Kan the Westerly corner of Outlot ' D', Carriage 11ills Seventh Filing, Larimer County, I - ;/Colorado; 'I thence S 57'06'15" E 287.68 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said ~ 4â€ž point being on the Southwesterly line of said Outlet 'D'; 171 4 thence N 32'53'45" E 15.00 feet; thence S 57'06'15" E 15.00 feet; <~ thence S 32'53'45" W 15.00 feet to the said Soulliwesterly line of Outlot 'D'; ,/4 4 . 1 1 thence N 57'06'15" W 15.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said ' Â· tract contains 225 square feet, more or less. Tlie basis of bearings for lizis easeinent description is the said Southwesterly line of Outlot ' D' as platt:ed, said line bears ~ S 57'06'15" E. 1. 0/ I do hereby certify that this easement description is true and do/ ,>x correct to the best of my knowledge and inforination furnished. 0 . /1 Uh//9 0,> 42 - -=74* ill ~,lin J. liall 00 PLS #15278 41 8 4 ; 4, 0. 1 \220 e 0402 , 020/2100 ..0 -4 17* f '1 Ii,2212 I , i: \â‚¬4,0 123, OÂ» v 'A Â·Â· 6. S 1.. C>1 ;[ . i I 4,~00, 'i~#tp N., M ,Â·Â· O -i \ Â·tÂ· Â» e *1 1 , 1 i- f Â¢ I 47 A, .,4* tee e. 1 1 . Sy, */3, 4/ 094. e'A.06 V~..imit.44(94:~12.7, . 6 44# ,- g V 0 J:4,0 L A 393 136Â· i 2 + h' aâ€¢ . , O, FNO I !4"AWM.CAP LS 10385 0 E., 4 , AAL , . H Prolesslon~ OCNTEL~~A~A EASE>#57]7- 11 8 873 N. Cleveland : Loveland, CO 80537 VA (Aâ‚¬>. (303) 663-1177 HAIFILENO. 92-500- 2-11 . :i U NAME OF SUBDIVISION .1 . v CARRIAGE HILLS 71 h FILING ~) U.S. WEST , COMMUNICATIONS, INC. N 1/2 SECTION | TOWNSHIP 4N RANGE 73 W SCALE: f 6 4 0' 61 h PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO ekh 7-3 bno. CS - 9GZ M EjQS EXCH. RAW. NO. _ .DATE' 12-14-90 . 1 ... .....ne.c--. EXHIBIT "A" DA 00,â€¢bâ‚¬Arr s , LOT 7 8.18-96 LOT LOT 6 5 09 4- 44 y 40 'f 4, 229 y f y~gofose Â®, 0 3 * y ee (:tf. 47 29MT. RECO'VIP,JOED 4, 10 NW 1/2 SEC. 1 TRUE ce <432- Â· T S 4 N., R 73 W., POIN.T OF 6th P.M. BEGINNING LINE I DIRECTION 1 DISTANCE Ll S4171'04"E 37.13' 1.â€¢CA.r,0.1 XXX S5712'34"E 132.80' , 0, PRopole, U $62'04'49"E 93.55' ~OUTLOT D , -ACE. Lt S42'24'33"E 20.33' L5 S27'31'35"E 30.11' //' CURREM-r USW /,A VAL,wr'ES = 1,~E I AIR CDON 1 DISTANCE CARRIAGE /1A N3!l'50'29"E 15,00' / L2A WIDÂ¥* 4,8/ \Ni L / LJA S3214'47"W 15.00' ~ S5104'35"E 15.00' -13> 52 DE.1-2/2/4 IWED 1 L2A ~ L#A 1 N57'dp'00"W 15.00' foll'w'%6 FIELD 60. Â°444 ,/68 { FicA-T, 04 OF LINES 4~~ LOA* Aft 4%<s' L4A LIAN'~69 Dit (2/6 62*yrt G *10â‚¬, Li,Â·le 0 V ~ PROPOSE D STAFF #SM7; A.ANDON 6'WE -ID ENCOMPASS ALL CAOLE S, pgpvÂ».1 1 E-~4 6138,2,17 446,â€¢Jet-S 2 Feâ€¢'CE . CARRIAGE HILLS 7 - 0 2nd FILING 7-4 ..6.....INOTES 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane_LL/P~ SUBJECT: Highway 34/36 Project presentation by R.M.C. Background (This item is for presentation only and not an action item at this time) On June 98, the Town Board approved the scope of services by R.M.C. to prepare a preliminary plan and report for the proposed 1999/2000 CDOT Hwy. 34/36 project The scope included the study and cost estimates of various scenarios such as additional travel lanes between Hwy. 7 and the 34/36 intersection, widening and/or replacing the 34/36 bridge, 2 types of pedestrian underpasses and miscellaneous changes to the 34/36 intersection geometry. Staff has received and reviewed the report, which recommends the following general changes to the existing roadway: 1) widening the bridge; 2) adding additional travel lanes between 34/36 and Hwy. 7; 3) changes to the intersection geometry; and 4) a separate underpass box culvert If the Town desires, the following phases could be accommodated: 3 Phase I Construction would include the addition of an intersection pedestrian underpass, widening of the bridge and adding additional travellanes. Phase I[ This portion would include reconstruction of the intersection to include a standard right turn lane in lieu of the eastbound inadequate yield lane. A Hwy. 34 southbound left turn lane would be added and other various changes to the intersection would be completed. Budget/Cost Budget CDOT has included a $1.1M budget in the fiscal year 1999/2000. The Town has yet to determine a budget for 1999 and future years. Cost Estimate: Phase I CDOT Cost = $ 1,111,000 Town Cost = 336,000 Total Cost = 1,446,000 Phase I[ CDOT Cost = 0 Town Cost = 310,000 Total Cost = 310,000 Recommendation The committee and the Town Board can use this report and presentation to make decisions during the upcoming budget process. Staff agrees with the general concepts of the report and is of the opinion that Phase I is a higher priority than Phase IL BL/rv R3-1 I I . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In June, 1998 the Town of Estes Park retained Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) to prepare a preliminary design evaluation of the U.S. Highway 36 corridor from U.S. Highway 34 to Colorado State Highway 7. The Colorado Department of Transportation in various forms set aside $1,110,000 for construction improvements along the corridor. The purpose of the study is to consolidate existing information and develop additional analysis to evaluate the following: - intersection operation - Elk viewing and Chamber facility parking - Pedestrian underpass of U.S. 36 - Big Thompson River Bridge The study further develops alternatives for proposed improvement along the corridor with construction and engineering costs and recommendations for phasing and development of the alternative improvements. The conclusions of our study are as follows: Big Thomson River Bridge - Widen the existing bridge 24' to 64' utilizing the existing abutments at an estimated cost of $377,000 Bicycle/Pedestrian Underpass - Install a 12' wide, 8' high concrete box culvert to be utilized as a pedestrian trail at an estimated cost of $240,000. U. S. Highway 36 - Widen the existing roadway to include 5 lanes, two eastbound, two westbound and a center turn lane. Total estimated cost for the improvement is $618,000. Elk Viewing/ Chamber Facility Access - Construct and access for the Elk Viewing/Chamber Facility parking areas. The access would facilitate left hand ingress and egress at an estimated cost of $159,000. Stanley Avenue Intersection - Improve the Stanley Avenue Intersection at an estimated cost of $29,000. U. S. 34/36 Intersection - Re-construct the intersection to allow for extension of dual left turn lanes for northbound U.S.361 a new right hand turn for southbound 36 and dual left hand turn lanes onto U.S. 36. Total cost is estimated at $260,000 for the intersection improvements. Total cost of the study improvements are $1,683,000. I. 1 7 r . I. For budgetary purposes the project could be phased into two projects. The initial phase would include all portions of the project except improvements to the U.S.34/U.S. 36 intersection. Based on this phasing the project cost would be $1,423,000. A breakdown of project funds for Phase I is shown in the following table: PHASEI Item Description CDOT Federal Town Funding Total Funding Funding Enhancement Funding 1 U.S. Highway 36 $1,000,000 $0 $183,000 $1,183,000 Improvements including Bridge 2 Bicycle/Pedestrian $0 $110,000 $130,000 $240,000 Underpass TOTAL $1,000,000 $110,000 $313,000 $1,423,000 Phase Il would include completion of the U.S. 34/U.S. 36 intersection at a cost of $310,000 which includes additional costs for implementation of the project in two phases. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Works Fommittee FROM: Bill Linnane UJ SUBJECT: Water Department 10 year improvements and priorities update/ Fire Department Improvements update Background (rhis item is a report for committee information) In 1997, a home in Charles Heights Subdivision burned down. When the Fire Department first arrived at the scene, the house was unsavable. Although the water system in the general vicinity was adequate to supply domestic water, it was inadequate for fire protection. It should be noted that with or without fire protection water, this house could not have been saved. In May 1997, the Charles Heights Association (CHA) requested that the P.W.C. approve Town funded improvements to the water system in Charles Heights so that adequate fire protection could be provided. At that time, staff explained the Town's system of prioritizing water line projects: Priority #1: Extremely high maintenance lines Priority #2: Extremely low pressure domestic use and <500 GPM fire protection Priority #3: <500 GPM fire protection lines Since the Charles Heights water line request was a priority #3 project the committee had the following recommendation: "The committee recommends that CHA either wait for their project to be constructed according to the long-term plan schedule or privately fund the project" Within the past couple of months, the Town has received numerous letters from lot owners in Charles Heights requesting waler line improvements similar to last yeats 1997 request Staff prepared a position paper that explains the Town's water line replacement priorities method and highlights the improvements to the Town's water system and Fire Department in the past 10 years. Fire Chief Dorman and I will present the attached report Budget/Cost Not applicable. Recommendation This is a report only. Staff recommends continuing with the existing priority system and aIso continue with the annual capitalimprovements projects. BL/rv R5-1 WATER SERVICE QUALITY AND FIRE PROTECTION IN THE ESTES VALLEY Within the last decade, the water system and fire protection in the Estes Valley has drastically improved. This brief will summarize the many changes, improvements, and future direction of the Water Department and the Fire Department as it relates to water service quality and fire protection. A discussion of the annual Water Department maintenance program and how project priorities are established will also be presented. I. Water Department Background In 1985, the water system consisted of 75 miles of pipe, much of which was old, undersized, and in poor condition. The system had 0.7 MG of water storage to be used for domestic and fire protection use. Three water plants treated the water and were old and in need of rehabilitation or replacement The system also had approximately 245 fire hydrants, of which approximately 30% had a capacity of less than 500 GPM (white capped). Therefore, the Town had a Water Master Plan prepared and the plan recommended the following capital improveinent program categories. A partial list of individual projects is included in the following section. 1) New Construction or Replacement of Trunk Lines 2) Miscellaneous Water Line Repair 3) Water Plant Construction and Rehabilitation 4) Water Tank Storage The cost estimate for a 5 year plan was approximately $4.5M (which was extremely underestimated). Since the Water Department could not support the funding in that short of a time span, outside consultants restructured the water use rates and water tap fees so that the Capital Improvement Program could be accommodated and an annual maintenance program could be implemented. As a result of this new financial restructuring, the Town was able to implement the Water Master Plan and Maintenance Program. The following section summarizes the Master Plan capital improvements completed between 1988 and the present R5-2 6 3 " . Existing Master Plan Improvements Individual Categories and Costs 1) Proiect Category: New Construction or Replacement of Trunk Lines Misc. Proiects: Northern Interconnect Phase I, n 5,200' Western Interconnect Phase I, Il I[I 11,000' Southern Interconnect 1,000' Marys Lake Road Line 8,100' Highway 7 Line 11,000' Highway 34 Line 6,000' Elkhorn Avenue Line 2,000' Fall River Road Phase I, I[ 11,0009 Big Horn Drive Phase L n 2,009 Big Thompson Tank Line MOO' Moccasin Bypass Line 4,100' Eastern Interconnect 3,009 High Street Interconnect 1,600' Length: 13 Miles 68,500' Cost $3.7M 2) Project Category: Misc. Water Line Repair Misc. Proiects: 1988-1998 Annual Loop Repair Projects . Length: 3 Miles Cost $1.5M 3) Project Category: Water Plant Construction and Rehabilitation Misc. Proiects: Marys Lake Water Plant Construction Glacier Creek Plant Rehabilitation Phase I, II, III, IV Additional Water Treatment Capacity: 2 MGD Cost $2.5M (Marys Lake Tank included in the following category) 4) Proiect Category: Water Tank Storage Misc. Projects: Crystal Tank 0.5 MG Marys Lake Tank 1.1 MG Glacier Creek Tank 1.0 MG Additional Storage: 2.6 MG Cost $1.9M Total Costs Total Cost of Categories 1-4:. $9.6M R5-3 Future Improvements The existing $9.6M capital improvements have reduced the Water Department cash fund to the point where a $1.6M catastrophic fund can be maintained. In addition, approximately $400,000/yr. can be spent on facilities and pipeline maintenance without operating with a negative cash flow. The Town of Estes Park and a majority of the water industry uses the following system to prioritize annual pipeline projects: Priority #1: Extremely high maintenance lines Priority #2: Extremely low pressure domestic use and <500 GPM fire protection lines Priority #3: <500 GPM fire protection lines Category 1 has been established as the #1 priority so that water line breaks that cause extremely long water service delays can be eliminated. These high maintenance lines also result in inadequate fire protection and extreme damage to private and public land. Category 2 has been set as the next priority so that lines that are not immediately in danger of breaking, but experience low pressure and inadequate domestic and fire protection service, can be eliminated. Category 3 contains only fire protection problems, therefore, it has been established as a third priority. All 3 categories are very important but projects must be prioritized in such a method as that described. 3 The following is the current annual improvement lists with associated projected costs, categorized as previously explained. Prioritv #1: Extremely High Maintenance Lines LF +/- Amount Beaver Point to Ramshorn Village 1,900 $135,000 Big Horn 8" 1,400 95,000 Big Thompson 10" 3,300 230,000 Chapin/Chiquita 2" 500 35,000 Chiquita 2" 800 52,000 Fall River Corridor Abandonment 4,000 305,000 MacGregor Ave. E./Wonderview 2,700 190,000 MacGregor Ave. W./Wonderview 3,900 270,000 Stanley Circle 2" 500 35,000 Subtotal $1,347,000 Priority #2: Extremely Low Pressure Domestic Use and <500 GPM Fire Protection Country Club 2" 1,200 $85,000 Devils Gulch East - Phase I 4,300 300,000 Devils Gulch West - Phase 11 2,100 150,000 Evergreen 4" 1,400 100,000 Fall River Tank #2 (Master Plan) 4,300 300,000 Hwy. 7 to Prospect Mountain Pump House 2,900 205,000 North Lane to Devils Gulch 1,200 80,000 Panorama Circle 3,100 216,000 Southern Interconnect . 900 60,000 Twin Drive 2" 600 40,000 Subtotal $1,536,000 n5-4 6.11 1 Prioritv #3: <500 GPM Fire Protection Feet Amount List Axminster Lane 2,000 $120,000 Belleview Heights 2,000 120,000 Broadview/Lower Broadview 54,000 325,000 Brook Drive 1,200 70,000 Cedar Lane 1,500 90,000 Charles Heights Water Main 2,000 110,000 Cremorrah Drive 800 50,000 Davis Hill 3,000 180,000 Eagle Cliff 2,500 150,000 East Lane/North Lane 3,000 180,000 Fort Morgan Colony 1,000 60,000 Hill Road 2" 1,500 90,000 Hill Streets 5,000 300,000 Hondius Heights 5,500 335,000 Juniper Lane 1,000 60,000 Lone Pine Acres 3,500 210,000 Narcissus Circle 1,000 60,000 Old Mocassin Drive 1,000 60,000 Old Ranger Road 900 55,000 Park View Lane 500 30,000 Pinewood Lane 1,500 90,000 Spruce Drive 500 30,000 Sunny Acres 1,000 60,000 Tranquil Lane 500 30,000 Upper Broadview 1,800 105,000 3 Webb Cottages 500 30,000 Willow Lane 1:900 60,000 Subtotal $3,060,000 TOTAL $5,943,000 By comparing the estimated project costs with the available funds of $400,000 +/- per year, it is obvious that the funds available are short of the project costs. R5-5 .. Water Department Summaty The positive changes that have occurred since 1988 are a result of new development and the completed Master Plan projects. These changes are as follows: 1) A vastlyjmproved domestic water supply system â€¢ /~3% inAease in total trunk line pipe: 75 mi. vs. 100 mi. 0 30*ii@rease in reliable water treatment capacity: 4 MGD vs. 6 MGD. â€¢ (50% reduction in major water line breaks 2) A vastly improved fire protection system â€¢ 400% increase in water storage: 0.7 MG vs. 3.3 MG â€¢ 250% increase in adequate fire hydrants: 170 vs. 410 3) An increase of accountable water from 74% to 82% 4) A 95% reduction in water quality complaints The good condition of the system must be maintained and improved. The optimal way to accomplish this is to continue with the priority system as established and i' 6632 away" at the lists. As stated previously, funds are very limited and the lists may take years to complete. If groups in the lower priority categories wish to have their projects constructed sooner than the Town has them scheduled, it is rec6mmended that they establish a special improvement district or group. R5-6 II. Fire Department Background Prior to 1980, the Town of Estes Park had an ISO rating of 8 for within city limits and a rating of 10 outside the city limits. In 1980, the Fire Department had 32 members and responded to approximately 100 calls per year. At that time the Department did not respond to medical, dive or HazMat calls or MVA's except for fuel flushes and all extrications were performed by the ambulance service. The majority of all calls in 1980 were fire related. In 1980, the town's ISO rating was upgraded to a 7 within city limits and remained at 10 outside city limits. ISO ratings were upgraded again in 1987 to a 6 within city limits, based primarily on improvements in the town water system, Fire Department training and the acquisition of Engine 1 (purchased in 1983). In 1997, ISO was requested to review the ratings again. At this time, the town water system had been further improved; the Fire Department had established response boundaries, improved training and training records and had acquired a 75-ft aerial Ladder truck. The Fire Department was relocated to a state of the art facility in 1996. As a result of this review, the rating remained a 6 within city limits and improved to a 6/9 rating outside citv limits. The Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department currently has 32 members who respond to approximately 300 calls per year. These calls include hazardous materials incidents, dive rescues, including swift water rescue, search and rescue calls, medical calls, extrications, Motor Vehicle Accidents, wildland and structure fires. In addition, the firefighters spend an average of 57 hours per man annually in training for all of these types of calls. Currently, our fleet of apparatus includes: - Engine 1, 750 gallon tank, pumping capacity of 1250 gpm (gallons per minute) - Engine 2, 500 gallon tank, pumping capacity of 1000 gpm - Ladder 6,300 gallon tank, pumping capacity of 1500 gpm, equipped with 75 ft aerial ladder - Engine 5,250 gallon tank, pumping capacity of 150 gpm - Tender/Tanker 4, 1200 gallon tank, pumping capacity < 150 gpm - Engine 7,250 gallon tank, pumping capacity of 150 gpm - Squad 3 - equipped with HazMat supplies - Squad 8 - equipped with all rescue supplies including extrication equipment lighting and cascade system for filling air packs. - Dive Rescue Truck - carries all equipment for ice rescue, ice diving, open water diving and swift water rescue and has a Zodiac rescue boat with trailer. - Command Vehicle (Jeep) R5-7 . 4, The Town of Estes Park has continued to demonstrate its commitment to quality fire protection through the acquisition of needed equipment A maiority of the equipment listed above has been purchased since 1983 at a cost in excess of $500,000. Short Term Goals O vears) The Fire Department is currently engaged in its bi-annual fund drive, which will help with the purchase of an Engine/Tanker. This piece of apparatus will provide better fire protection to locations outside of the hydrant system and areas the have inadequate water supply from the hydrant system. This piece of apparatus will meet current ISO minimum specifications of 2000-gallon capacity with a 750-gpm pump. This apparatus would be additionally equipped with 2 drop tanks and additional hose, nozzles and fittings. The Fire Department is presently working with the Colorado State Forest Service lease program is to obtain a wildland firefighting truck. Training goals include confined space rescue per NFPA requirements and enhancing structural firefighter training. Recruitment goals include increasing membership to 40 volunteers. A joint project with the Estes Park Police Dept to develop a thorough emergency operations plan is in progress. Long term goals (3 to 10 years) 3 After immediate needs of equipment and manpower are met the continued growth of the Estes Valley will undoubtedly lead to consideration of single engine stations located strategically in order to keep growth within the 5-mile radius of a fire station. Within 10 years it is realistic to expect an improvement in ISO rating within city limits to a 4. Long term goals with regard to manpower include a roster of 50 members and the possibility of manning the fire station. Fire Department Summary The Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department has witnessed a 300% increase in call volume since 1980 and at the same time span improved the urban ISO rating from 8 to 6 and the rural ISO rating from 10 to 6/9. The Department has also responded to this increased demand by expanding services to include highly specialized areas such as HazMat Emergency Medical Services and Dive Rescue. The primary goal is, and has always been, the protection of life and property within the Estes Valley. Training towards this goal has been vastly improved and equipment upgraded as resources allow. A contingent of 32 dedicated volunteers devotes their time and talents towards this goal. 25-8 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 18, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Unnane~&4_j SUBJECT: Dog waste bag station update Background (This item is a report only and not an action item) There is a current dog waste problem at some of the Town's public parks and walkways. The Public Works Department has recently purchased 1,000 dog waste bags and 2 distribution stations to help alleviate the problem. These stations will be located at high problem areas and effectiveness will be monitored to determine if other stations should be added. According to the Parks Department personnel, the problem areas, listed in priority, are: Municipal Lot/Creek Side area Childrens/LaCasa Park Tregent Park Baldwin on Rive]walk The Lake Trailis a problem area, but falls under the maintenance of EVRPD Budget/Cost Cost $500 Recommendation This memo is for information only. BL/rv R6-1