The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1998-05-21I . .' .. i 4. 7.k :3 4, . 4, t:.: 3 AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MAY 21, 1998 3:30 P.M. preparation date: 5/15/98 *revision date: 5-20-92 * 1. June PWC Mectilig R~vesfto cancel >15 2. Hwy. 34/36 Intersection Project Consultant Choice Request approval of interview team choice 3. Private request to landscape Public Properly - I f Citizen requests to landscape 1) Outlot C Carriage Hills 7th 2) Mathew Cr. ROW 4. NCWCD Boundary Inclusion Project . Request approval of inclusion fee and to proceed with project Â¥ 5. Water Dept. 1998 Water Main Looping Project Request approval to bid project and present bids at the July 14m Town Board 6. Glacier Creek Water Plant Intake Modifications Project - Phase 2 Request approval negotiate price 7. Water Dept. Pickup Truck Purchase Request to award bid to Raines Ford 9 8. Lake Trail / Wapiti Meadows Project Request to present 1) Grant contract @ 6/9 T. Bd. 2) Bid contract @ 7/14 T. Bd. Reports: 1. Customer Service Response 2. ROW Permit Standards Update 4 . -2 j, .. %1 1 . 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum May 15, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane (~O,t~- SUBJECT: Request to cancel June Public W Committee meeting Background Many Town Board members will out of town due to the CML Conference Budget/Cost Not applicable Recommendatio Staff recomm~s canceling the June meeting. Staff will schedule necessary action items for the June/9& Town Board meeting since the June 23rd Town Board meeting has been canceled. BL/rv 1-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum May 15, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane /$- SUBJECT: Proposed Hwy. 34/36 Intersection Project; Engineering Consultant Choice Background The CDOT State Transportation Plan (STI?) project Hwy. 34/36 Intersection/Bridge is scheduled to start construction in 1999. CDOT has budgeted $1.1M for the project The ., t'' following are the approximate action dates: 3 August 1, 1998 Preliminary engineering complete Aug.-Nov.,1998 Town Budget process January, 1999 Final design to begin :~~; June, 1999 Final design submitted to CDOT for review . P , September, 1999 Construction bid contract awarded rl .... Sept 1999 - Jun. 2000 Construction ; On May 141 an interview team consisting of PWC (John Baudek, Lori Jeffries, Jeff Barker), CDOT representative (Larry Haase), Gary I<laphake and Bill Linnane interviewed two local engineering firm teams (Van Horn Engineering and Rocky Mountain Consultants), : interested in performing the preliminary and final engineering work associated with the project These interviews would be the only interviews associated with the consultant 1 choice process. Both candidates were interviewed for approximately 45 minutes each. Discussion between the interview team followed. It was determined to make a final decision as to the selected engineering firm at the May 21st PWC meeting. The selected firm would immediately begin preliminary engineering so that design alternatives and cost estimates would be complete by the Town's August 1998 Budget process. This is critical since it is possible that the Town Board may elect to supplement the CDOT budget with Town funds. Budget/Cost As explained above. Recommendation Staff recommends that the most qualified firm be chosen at the May 21St PWC meeting AND PIESEN T THE CHOSEN M=Amly PRE=M. S SAG. SCo PE BL/rv OF SEAV.rcES AT W THâ‚¬ Wauc 9 7-0 8. 0,74 . 2 -1 %. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum May 15, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane ~(/~-- SUBJECT: Citizens requests to landscape public property at 1) Outlot C, Carriage Hills, 7lh Filing, 1970 Baldpate Court 2) Mountain Fairways, R.O.W. adjacent to Matthew Circle Background : The Public Works Department policy concerning the above subject when a citizen wants to landscape public property is to route all requests through the Public Works Committee. . 1) The owner of 1970 Baldpate Court (see map) is requesting to personally plant trees and shrubs on Outlot C behind her lot 2) Mountain Fairways Association is also requesting to plant trees and shrubs adjacent to the bike path and Matthew Circle (see map). Budget/Cost No cost to the Town Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requests contingent upon both owners accepting all maintenance. The Mountain Fairways landscape cannot impede vehicle and pedestrian site distance. BL/rv Attachment 3-1 1 4 4/30/98 Mr. Bill Linnane, PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Linnane: My neighbor (Mr.Brian Myer) and I would like to plant some bushes and trees in the open space behind our houses as a buffer to an industrial eyesore. We would not put them over any utilities or sewers but would place them between the sewer line and the fence behind 1970 Baldpate Ct. and 1960 Baldpate Ct., I will also have Dan Speedlin supervise and help us select the proper plantings. We will not move in any fill but will plant things in the already established area. I would like to do the planting as soon as possible because I am planning on selling my house and I had promised (2 Hears ago) to help the Meyers with the expense of the plantings. Sincerely Maurine Bergland Sayler 1970 Baldpate Ct., PO Box 2127, Estes Park, CO 80517 3-1- 24"Ult-51,74Â«5 N. 1 - r,. . 24 4.: 5 9- 494 *% .7,>%=994 5 g 32% 1 1 l>K . (to; f, D y 42, liÂ· 0 - \\ 41 11 1111 42 4 L 4-ML ~~ ity k 34 4 f / 7174 . . \ I. v Qq,tr,â€ževy ;Zqjf 2 Â¢ 4 4 252 f' Oil. 5,4__f 0 X ..... \C'(/r,>OP'>P,cr 4 1 & ..1 4 - 0. \ ....j'~A 6- .ffi *41Â¢> ...5.853(k,â€¢' 71% TA#P -4Â«63 4 9 < 5- 2,Â·ootoit g p -' 1~ hc.'* 3 dp 4/ *â‚¬'%3.41, 2\1 1,,541,ttgh Rave,-re #- 1-7600 UA*D SCAPE \ 181" /adle.-1 3 4-444 2 -- A ta 1 894;ttyÂ· + 1 0 "9Â· F I =100 ~- --725.62 ee- , 018, ,- 11 - i y==\ 1. =-21254 1 * VIe 00' 9 0,9 C , Â«=> *430:GÂ»Â»Â« ,1 0~ i,MISJUg,4--:00 64 -~â‚¬ / te Â·*hÂ·4 0 9 â€¢00 -. , ' D.1,0/ Â·'4004 , 12.11 I SE COP). SEE ' i 4.'20.449.00 u, ' 2212.ACâ€¢,2 9 & 15>KI' ft'llk| . * 4 01~0 ~, i 3/*~4 1~sedit -cf 46., ,@'0~ 9 , ~~~~~4-:478.12,01-7 rb 1 1 \OP G.L.D. fift - /9 -,2260.0 1 4 .20. 0Â©~. AA CAPPE.C, P~~.: 1. 4, of>*Â© "c:342~Q# 7 ACJ,tlÂ·<=Wk' 55~ 1 1 -:- - Arrol-1 Ek[ ~-4, 1 40:99- 2 / , R 'FAofEÂ«YÂ·Â·~~ -:fÂ·'-::7 .#Â· 3// '9#0~//~~*04537 /2. 4 â‚¬2001,9 166-1 M. .MAGE- -141 '-; 33 11 -= 91 00:1<// 4 345,~4 5 6/0 3 i li .1 t, a e <b 4 ./ ez>51 ls, + - 0..' 49. / +3/ ~b' 0. e . Â·2. 4 : 1 l//320. e e /2 4/ 002-1:,r (Â»,0/ \ 4-...01 143- Cb. , ./. 1 '.41: I , -. -â‚¬..2 a. ....I -1 C *I/*Ft# Nâ€¢e ) // / 205- 24 -1 0 4 21 - ,/:Â·.Â· '4' ~~3 , -7 :Re>- 0. 57' d' j4,%.6:1.-/ / // 16, .79/ 7/ 4 .% 749 &/ . y. 4% I 4/0 1 6 + 1412 4 .h f.t. / 01, 01 ...: oi k 4, 1 , _,~Â·tr,p,W . .--L O - r .-b<,5 312_ 3't ' *A 90 < 4- .r ... CA-'W_ 5 o / -~>919; 45 4 3'9-zee. ***72 I = -*lf,bf,fi, - > .ih i. S>~2joyf .' ~ -gpsRAA< 31. 4Â£9 ~,9' .Â· t.:1:24. , ':-1.4 -- I - 4.,7.4,5~~zE..).. 4 447 Â¢ L ':1:11 - I ..r -2 4*02'4\ 16 r --3Â¥-â‚¬*'- 26 v UU'c 4 ..3 - 1 0,104, S. rnÂ·-.bl.07*15644,2 . 1 *434= .:- r /40' 1 -11&2.11 .. / 1 1% haM $ .*11-- .1 ti V 4-,49, t? 9- 1 te ge ve 'ORP ,+ :9 Â©*1 4 + 3 V- Ell.*ZA 9.71 V 1 8 I /1 4. 4 ''A . . 114&*21?- 1 1 - 05Â°44'31' - er-I 8,- 543.00' /1.k , L -54.41' 7+ c I U23'33'04'E 54.390 i < 43:. 1 4 es'20'14'|e. C541 ..4Â£94 aol ria U. .90 5 ,4,9 4 tistl .4/ e - ./%1939 .:I 3-3 ...4-2 Y 4* Un:4' .. ESTES PARK MOUNTAIN FAIRWAYS, INC. 1460 MATTH EW CIRCLE ESTES PARK, COLORADO. 80517 PHONE 586-4909 May 13.1998 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PLANNING DEPARTMENT 170 MacGREGOR AVE. ESTES PARK,CO.,80517 ATTN: MR. BILL LINANE Dear Mr. Linane, Our Association wishes to landscape Town property. The area we want to landscape is between Brodie Avenue and the golf course(north to south), and west to east is between the asphalt sidewalk and our rail fence(between Matthew Circle and the golf course). Between Brodie Avenue and Matthew Circle the area is from Community Drive to our rail fencÂ®west to : east). We Understand that it is necessary for our Association to receive the Town's permission to landscape the area mentioned above before proceeding with a detailed plan. We agree that no landscaping will be accomplished until the Town has approved the landscape plan which will : be submitted to the Town at a later date. Sincerely Yours, ~L-031- 0 Â£24-uÂ» Lewis Wallace/ President of Estes Park Mountain Fairways / James O. Smith Secretary of Estes Park Mountain Fairways 3-4 1 X 7578.0 29*k , 5100 --- ?-\ B ROD IE ' UN lili 1, 1 1 11 11 1 1 1434 1436 1422 t43a /440 FAI AY Â· Pe 2 1447 }445 1457 145 1 1455 1449 1453 , 1 1 1 1 It 1.41 1 11/1 1 1 1.1 , C/RCLE 1 \ ) lilli \ I * l452 1450 ~ t456 - t 45* 3 SUBD/V/SIO ---r. \ '#.Iu'\ ( < X 7626.â‚¬ 394 GREEN â€ž , .. ,1 2.14 (1 0---7 It . , N / 144 t 1 I GREEN i L 1 0 11 ~ - -- COMMUNITY TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum May 15, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane l~,6~5 SUBJECY: Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) Background The Town receives water for domestic use treatment from N.C.W.C.D., the managing agency. A requirement associated with usage of this water is that all parcel users be within the boundaries of the N.C.W.D. In 1968, the Estes Park town limits were included in the NCWCD boundary, but parcels outside of the 1968 Town boundary were excluded from this process. As the town limits expanded, some of the developers of the annexed parcels did not go through the NCWCD inclusion process. As a result of this, approximately 200+ parcels, as of this date, need to be added into the NCWCD boundary. In compliance with federal laws concerning the inclusion process, back mil levy taxes associated with these parcels must accompany the inclusion application. Rather than punish back individual parcel owners, since it was no fault of their own, it is fair that the Town pay this inclusion fee. Town Attorney Greg White will present a more detailed description and background of the NCWCD inclusion requirement and application process at this May 21* P.W.C. meeting. Budget/Cost Approximately $68,000-$80,000. Exact cost to be calculated by Town staff approved by NCWCD and be presented at a future Town Board meeting. Recommendation Staff, including the Town Attorney, recommends that the Town proceed with the inclusion process and pay all associated fees. BL/rv 4-1 05/19/1998 11:11 3/U-ob/-ZOIC Ul VIU 4-,111 1 L 1 , Dear Property Owner: Your property was annexed to the Town of ENG Park prior to 1998. At the time of annexation your property was inadvertently not, included within the boundaries of the Northern Â· Colorado Water Conservancy Distdct ("Di,â‚¬11Ct") and the Municipal Subdistrict, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District ('*bdistrict"). The Rules and Regulations of the District and Subdistrict, require that all propgdes receiving Distiict and/or Subdisuict water bc within the boundaries of the Disuict and/or the Subdistrict. A large portion of thc Town of Estes Park's watcr supply, which you are a customer or a potential customer, includes water allocated to the Town by the District and/or the Subdistrict. The Town is in the process of induding all properties located within the Town of Estes Park which currently are not included into the Disuict and the Subdistrict. On the day of , at 7:30 P.M., a hearing will be held in the Board Room of the Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue for the purpose of considering an Ordinance which will consent to the inclusion of your property and other like properties within the boundaries of the District and the Subdistrict. You may be present at said time or may make any written comment by tfansmitting rhe same to the Town Clerk, Post Office Box 1200, Estes Patk, Colorado 80517. The Town of Estes Park will pay all fees associated with the inclusion of your property within the District and the Subdistoct. Since your property was not included within the District at the ome of annexation into the Town, you or thc previous owner of your property have not. been required to pay the one mitilevy back to 1938. Those back taxcs will be paid by the Town and not you as property owner. Please bc advised that following the inclusion of your property within the District, youx propeity will be subject to the mill 1cvy of the District beginning January 1, 1999. Said millievy is currently onc mill. If you have any questions conccrning this matter, please contact _ at the Town or attend the hearing on Very truly yours, 4-1 05/19/1998 11:11 9/8-bbi-2324 uirc-u WI )1 & L , 1 ....Li .. .. ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE CONSENTING TO THE INCLUSION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK INTO THE NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT - WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park is an allottce of the Northern Colorado Water Consenrancy District; and WHEREAS, certain properties located within the Town of Estes Park have inadvertently not been included within the boundaries of the Notthern Colorado Water Conservancy District. WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Town of Estes Park to consent to the inclusion of said pioperties within the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District pugguant to the provisions of Section 37-45-136(3.6) C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to use the provisions of Section 37-45-136(3.6) C.R.S., to include those properties within the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District which properties were not included at the time of annexation of the property to the Town of Estes Park; and WHEREAS, a notice was sent by mail to all property owners owning property to be included within the Northern Colorado Warer Conservancy notifying said property owners of the terms and conditions of this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, said written notice provides that any property owner could appear before the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park and express any concerns prior to the adoption of this Ordinance by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustecs, prior to the adoption of this Ordinance has allowed all interested panics to express their concerns regarding this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO. Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 37-45-136(3.6) C.R.S., the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park hereby consent to the inclusion of the properties set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hcreto and incorporated herein by reference within the boundaries of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. Section 2. The Board of Trustees hereby authorized the Town of Estes Park to file the necessary documents for inclusion of the lands as set forth on Exhibit "A" and pay all fees necessary to accomplish the inclusion of the lands within the Northern Colondo Water Conservancy District. 4-3 05/19/1998 11:11 970-667-2527 GREb WHflt rHOLL. LI 4 Section 3. The adoption of chis Ordinance shall take effect and bc enforced thirty (30) days after iu adoption and publication. PASSED AMD ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO THIS DAY OF ,1998. TOWN OF ESTES PARK BY: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 1998, and published in a newspaper of geneical circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado on the day of ,1998. Town Cletk 2 1\-#t -1 7 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum May 15, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane (~(/'~~ SUBJECT: Request to Bid 1998 Water Department Loop Project and present bids at July 14th Town Board meeting. Background The 1) Big Horn Water Main; 2) Northern Interconnect/Stanley Heights Water Main; 3) Big Thompson Tank/Village Green Lane Water Main projects are budgeted for 1998. Design is almost complete. Staff is requesting to bid the project Bne-te-the-cancellation-0Â£1:he_June -Publiâ‚¬WorksÂ·â‚¬ommittee-mee~g-mtd-the*~me-2&G - 1 .. staff is requesting to present the bids at the July 14th Town Board meeting. 71Â·#3= 3 wz J- SAV E. A n O 6, 1-H I= A) Co AJ ETA.u tr-LON CLO M (n E-Al C.â‚¬. M C/v -r, Budget/Cost $405,000 Recoinmendation Staff recommends approval to bid the project with the bids being presented at the July 14lh Town Board meeting. BL/rv 5-1 6:.7,/.:1*Elifirl'EN:gii;FI TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum May 15, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane (j/- SUBJECT: Glacier Water Plant Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project Request to solicit price from Benson Construction Background Prior to 1996, Benson Construction competitively bid two water treatment rehabilitation projects at the Glacier Water Plant Both times Benson was the only bidder. Treatment Plant contractors for small projects are difficult to find. In 1996, the Public Works Committee approved staff to negotiate a fair price with Benson for the Glacier Plant Intake Phase I Project Rocky Mountain Consultants Engineering and staff did negotiate a fair price and Benson provided an excellent project This year's budget contains $105,000 to complete Phase 2 of the Glacier Plant Intake facilities. These facilities include: a new above ground instrumentation building, and various chemical addition equipment. Staff is again requesting to negotiate a price with Benson to construct the project. If approved, staff would present the cost at the July Public Works Committee meeting for approval. Budget $105,000 Recommendation Staff is recommending approval to negotiate a price with Benson Construction for the construction of Phase 2 of the Glacier Plant Intake modifications. BL/rv 4-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum May 15, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane (~/t~ SUBJECT: Water Department pick-up truck purchase Background , The Water Department has budgeted for a new pick-up truck in 1998. Bids were solicited in February and received on March 3rd with Dellenbach Chevrolet being the low bidder ($18;196) and Rains Ford being the second low bidder ($18,939.50) see attached bid summary. Bids were presented at the April Public Works Committee meeting and the April 28th Town Board with Dellenbach chosen as the supplier. Staff contacted Dellenbach after the April 28th Town Board and were informed that Dellenbach could not supply a dark blue truck at their bid price since they qualified their bid with the clause "to be good for only 30 days." Their explanation was that Chevy's special production ordered 1998 pick-up trucks cut-off date of March 14th had expired. It is still unclear why Dellenbach qualified their bid with a 30 day stipulation when the order cut-off date was prior to the 30 day bid expiration date. Subsequently, Rains Ford was contacted and they could still supply a 1998 pick-up truck at their bid price, since Ford's special production cut-off date will not expire until after June 1st. Budget/Cost Budget $20,000 Cost $18,939.50 Recommendation Award bid to Rains Ford for $18,939.50. BL/rv Attachnient 7-1 , 1 " t',2 :t'qÂ·Â·>. FLEET MEMO TO: BILL LINNANE %1Â¥2 H. FROM: DAVE MAHANY '1 ''' SUBJECT: PICKUP TRUCK BID RESULTS DATE: 10 MARCH 1998 PLEASE FIND BELOW BID RESULTS FOR ONE 4X4, M TON PICKUP TRUCK AS PER OUR SPECIFICATIONS INCLUDING A TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE. .p IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE LET ME KNOW. DELLENBACH CHEVROLET CHEVROLET PICKUP $21,196.00 -$3.000.00 LESS TRADE-IN $18,196.00 BID PRICE PRESTIGE CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH DODGE PICKUP $21,678.00 -$2.000.00 LESS TRADE-IN $19,678.00 BID PRICE ' RAINS MOTOR COMPANY DODGE PICKUP $23,454.00 -2,300,00 LESS TRADE-IN $21,154.00 BID PRICE FORD PICKUP $21,239.50 -$2,300.00 LESS TRADE-IN $18,939.50 BID PRICE *WITH THE 2% LOCAL VENDOR CONSIDERATION RAINS MOTOR COMPANY WOULD NOT BE THE LOW BIDDER - ON THE FORD PICKUP ' $18,939.00 LESS 2% = $378.79, $18,939.00 LESS $378.79 = $18,560.71 * THERE WERE 7 NO-BIDS * THE TRADE-IN VEHICLE IS A 1986 FORD F150 4X4 PICKUP WITH 77,000 MILES * $20,000.00 WAS BUDGETED FOR THIS PURCHASE IN 1998 -1-1 ' 4 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum May 15, 1998 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane C.Â£/8. SUBJECT: Lake Trail through Wapiti Meadows; CDOT Grant and Construction Background This portion of the Trail was awarded a CDOT Grant of $95,000 (with a minimum of a 20% Town/EVRPD match). Certain CDOT deadlines (see attached memo from the engineering firm) are critical so that construction can begin by August 10, 1998 and be completed prior to winter. Since-*te-fttne-#WG-meeting has been canceled,:fRe grant contract between CDOT and the Town needs to be presented at the June 9th Town Board meeting. Following this the project must be bid and the construction bid contract needs to be approved at the July 14th Town Board meeting. Budget/Cost CDOT: $95,000 Town: $19,150 EVRPD: $19,150 Recommendation Staff recommends approval to present the grant contract at the June 9lh Town Board meeting and the construction bid contract at the July 14lh Town Board meeting. BL/rv 21-1 '0:uÂ·- Â·-Â·Â·- -Â·.,Â·.Â·,38 Wal) 1; Uj fM VAN 1101(N ENOINELK ING MAX No. I9'/U5Ub81U1 P. 2 VAN HORN ENGINEERING PROJECT MEMO May 13, 1998 TO: Bob Sadeghlan (CDOT), Bill Linnane (TOEP) From: John A. SpoonerÂ£:Â¢~~ Â· i RE: Schedule for Phase ~, Lake Estes Trail ~ ; On May 6, Bob, Bill, John, Bill, and Amy met to discuss the following Bchedule for the Lake Estes Pedestrian and Bike Trail, Phase V. â€¢ 1. Plans and specifications to Bob at CDOT by May 13 . â€¢ 2. Project Contract from CDOT by June 5 â€¢ 3. Project Contract to Estes Park Town Board June 9 â€¢ 4. Advertise Phase V project in 2 major publications June 10,12,17,19 . m 5. Plans available to bidders June 10 m 6. Bid opening July 1 â€¢ 7. Construction Contract to Estes Park Town Board July 14 â€¢ 8. CDOT construction contract review July 15- August 5 â€¢ 9. Notice to proceed August 10 â€¢ 10. Construction (45 working days) : August 11 - October 13 If the above schedule is different than interpreted, please contact Van Horn Engineering cc: Stan Geingler, Estes Valley Recreation and Park DiGtrict Will Tully,Â·Bureau of Reclamation pv-cdol. wpd 3-1 e A I . TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT APRIL, 1998 CODE TYPE OF CALL ~ NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION 96.00 104.00 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTtON X 16 TAP REQUEST 2.00 4.00 17 WATER QUALITY 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS 2.00 2.00 22 FROZEN LINES 24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN/SERVICE 2.00 23.50 30 METER REPAIR 61.00 83.25 32 FINAL INSPECTION 4.00 4.00 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED 6.00 61.50 50 STREET REPAIR 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 1.00 1.00 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR ~ .:.s . 54 STORM DRAINAGE 1.00 0.25 60 OTHER :. ~~ 2 9.00 34.75 TOTALS: APRIL, 1998 184.00 318.25 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 184.00 86.00 150.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 318.25 227.25 184.25 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) 113.95%/+40.04% -62.93%/-53.97% +22.66%/+72.72% L 1 -__ 1FT PROPOSED UTILITY FEES DATE_MAY_2.1_1998 r . FOR DIbut-138#OMONLY The following information is a combination of fee structures which are already in place-at many, governmental agencies along the front range of Colorado. The following fees have been revised from the first draft, based on comments and suggestions from regular applicants. UTILITY PERMIT FEES Base Fee: Permit Applicants Will Be Assessed A $50.00 Fee-For Refiewland Processing OfThe Permit And Associated Documents. This Will Apply To Each Permit Submitted. Service Installations: Service Installations Which[Do Not Disturb Asphalt; Concrete, Or Treated Gravel Surfaces, And Do Not Exceed A Distance O f-Ten (10) Unear:Feet Within The Right-of-Way, Mil Not Be Assesse*In Addition to the Base Fee. This Would Apply To Sen'ice Installations On The Same Side Of The Roadway, Or For A Single Road Bore To Provide Individual Utility Service. Overhead Power, Telephone, Or Cable Television Installations Will Not Be Assessed In Addition To The Base Fee (A Permit Will Be Required For All Overhead Installations). Linear Installations: Installations Parallel,To The Roadway And Within The Right-of-Way Will Be Assdsed At A Rate of S. 10 Per Linear Foot Plus The Base Fee. This Rate Will Apply To Underground Installations Only. Street Cuts: *{Flat Fee Of $200.00 Will Be-Assess*ed For-CuttinifA*halfOr Chip/Seal Roadway Surfaces. If The Asphalt To Be Cut [s.Less Than Twelve (12) Months Old,iAÂ·Fee Of$5.00 Per Square,Foo.t Will Be Charged In Place OfThe Flat Fee (IfThe $5.00 Per Square Foot Fee Is Less Than $200.00, The $200.00 Fee Will Apply). A Flat Fee Of $ 100.00 Will Be Assessed For Cutting Treated Gravel Roadway Surfaces. This Fee Applies To Roadways That Have Been Treated With Calcium Chloride, Magnesium Chloride, Or Lignin Sui fonate Within The Previous Twelve (12) Month Period. A Flat Fee Of $50.00 Will Be Assessed For Cutting Gravel, or Native Material, Roadways. Note: These Fees In No Way Release The Applicant From Restoring Roadways To Original Or Better Condition. The Street Cut Fees Are In Addition To The Base Fee and Linear Footage Fees. All Fees Are Cumulative. Fees Will Not Be Charged For Utility Relocations Due To Capital Improvement Projects. Ellialli ,TOWN of ESTES PARK PERMIT # RIGHT-OF-WAY WORK PERMIT EXPIRES 30 DAYS PROM ISSUE P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 ISSUE DATE: 970-586-5331 FAX 970-586-6909 GENERAL INFORMATION MINUMUM 3 WORKING DAYS REQUIRED FOR ENGINERING APPROVAL owner's name contractor address ,. > address citytstate/zip city/stateizip phone / FAX phone t FAX license # emergency phone # PROJECT INFORMATION work location. type of work trencher bonng open cut ADDRESS NEW REPAIR DEPTH WIDTH LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION 0. , 24 purpose WATER SEWER GAS ELECTRIC PHONE OTHER nearest intersection START DATE END DATE UENGTH OF PROJECT SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS asphalt roadway gravel roadway concrete driveway _long X wide SF long X wide SF long X wide SF culvert length ATFACH COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING TO THIS DOCUMENT yes no TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 0 0 TIME OF DAY OPERATION LANDSCAPING PLAN 0 0 ENGINEERS NAME DOWNTOWN PROVISIONS 0 0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL date INSURANCE PROVIDED 0 0 BOND# BONDING AGENT AGENT address phone TRAFFIC CONTROL COMPANY phone CONCRETE ~ OR BACKFILL * AND COMPACHON Â·METHODS FOR LINEAR RUNS SHALLBE TESTED BY: ENGINEER -, - -: 2 -- - 4 - 1 4. 1- : ;4: ~~~. PHONE- ~ : -Â·.Â·*-~ I i *- , FAX TEST BESULTS SHALL BE: FAXED TO THIS AGENCY : IMMEDIATELY *(WITHIN :24 HOURS) FOLLOWING LABORATORY WORK.: PERMIT COST =TOTAL S PAID ves no SPECIAL CONDITIONS BY : DATE Having carefully read the requirements-of the Construction Specifications i (permitee) hembyaerce ic the Er-3 3-1 2 3-3 +0+ descril=1:within: NAME ~ APPROVED & IS SUFD BY DATE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-922-1987 final inspection date - Â©lruu T c/<-1998 FOR DISCUSSION ONLY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT APPLICATION AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES FOR THE LOCAL ENTITIES OF: LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO CITY OF LOVELAND, COLORADO TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO TOWN OF BERTHOUD, COLORADO May 1998 I c - 1 Â· 71 MA~ Table of Contents 1. GENERAL A. - Purpose 1 B. Introduction 1 C. Entities Included Under These Guidelines D. Definitions and Abbreviations 1 E. Specifid'Conditions. 3 1. Traffic Control Plang 3 2. Traffic Flow During Peak Hours 3. End ofDay Lane Condition q 4. Inspection Requedq 3 5. Minimum Concrete Removals/Replacements 6. Road Clogureg 3 F. Permit Fre< 9 G. Insurance Requirementq 4 1. Commercial General Liability 4 2. Automobile Liability 4 3. Terms ofInsurance 4 H. Bond Requirements and Warranty Perind i I. Licensing Requirementq 2. PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS 5 A. Obtain Blank Permit Form 9 B. Submission of Plang 5 C. Submission of Traffic Control Plane 5 D. Payment of Fee 5 E. Review of Submittals F. Approval of Submittals G. Issuance of Permit 6 H. Other Permits 6 3. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 6 A. General Conditinne 4 1. Protection of Existing Improvements 2. Temporary Surfaces Rerplired 7 3. Pavement Patcheq 7 4. Work to be Done in Expedient Manner 7 5. Removal and Replacement of Unsatisfactory Work 7 B. Excavation 7 C. Al,gting 8 9 D. Equipment E. Dewatering 9 F. Removak 9 1. Streets, Paverl 2. Streets, Gravel 9 3. Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk 10 G. Bgrkfill - 10 1. Flowable-Fill 10 2. Conventional Backfill (Other Than Flowable Fill) Â°*10 11 3. Compaction Testing Requirementq * :- 4. Embankment and Sloppc Â· '1 Â· 111 - 11 ..:.,: H. ' Re<stora~inn 1._ Bore Holes - Vertical and Horizontal .- ' 953 i . . .0 1. M ./ i ; I I Â» . + 4 . 2. Subgrade 3. Asphalt Slirfaring 12 4. Concrete Surfacing and Patching 12 5. Joint Filling 13 4. DEVELOPING A"QUALITY" APPROACH TO STREET REPAIRS - - 13 A. General 13 B. Appearance 13 C. Rideability 16 D. Pavement Management 17 E. Future Maintenanre 19 5. TESTING 91 A. Descriptinn 7 1 B. Testing Frequencies 7 1 6. INSPECTION 91 Appendix A Local Entity Contact Person A-1 Appendix B Sample Permit B-1 COÂ» 4. t. 11 -4 1. GENERAL .E A..Purpose The purposes of these Guidelines are to: â€¢ instruct contractors on how to prepare and submit plans and other documentation for Right-of-Way Permits, â€¢ describe processes, policies and requirements, and â€¢ define roles and responsibilities of all parties. B. Introduction All contractors and public utility agencies must obtain a Right-of-Way Permit for any work performed within the public rights-of-way of the Larimer County entities listed below. The storage of materials and equipment within the public rights-of-way also requires a Permit. To preserve the original investment of the street and roadway systems within Larimer County, minimize the disruption and maximize the safety to the traveling public caused by construction, and reduce future maintenance problems, it is the policy of the Local Entities within Larimer County to require the installation of new utilities across existing streets be done by boring or tunneling. Open cutting of existing streets for the installation of new utilities will be permitted only when it can be proven it is not possible to use boring or tunneling techniques. Applicants for Right-of-Way Permits must plan for adequate time for review and approval by the affected Local Entity and any other involved agencies. Generally, the greater the scope of work, the longer the permit review and approval process will take. NOTE: EACH LOCAL ENTITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VARY FROM THESE STANDARDS BASED UPON CONDITIONS SPECIFIC TO THE LOCATION WHERE THE WORK WILL OCCUR. THE "SPECIAL CONDITIONS" SECTION OF THE PERMIT WILL OUTLINE ANY VARIATIONS FROM THE COUNTY-WIDE SPECIFICATIONS. C. Entities Included Under These Guidelines The following Local Entities are covered by these Guidelines: â€¢ Larimer County Colorado (all unincorporated areas), â€¢ City of Fort Collins, Colorado, â€¢ City of Loveland, Colorado, â€¢ Town of Berthoud, Colorado, â€¢ Town of Estes Park, Colorado, D. Definitions and Abbreviations Wherever the following words, phrases, or abbreviations appear in these standards, they shall have the following meanings: AS-CONSTRUCTED DRAWINGS - A set of construction drawings that has been red-penciled or otherwise marked to record all changes which have occurred during the construction. CDOT - Colorado Department of Transportation. - 2 CODE - shall mean the latest official adopted ordinances, policids codes and/or regulations of Larimer County; the Cities Fort Collins and Loveland, and the Towns of Berthoud and Estes Park, Co16rado. I I = I. '-' . ir - 1 6-/ f - . .t~ ,~ CONTRACTOR - shall mean a person, partnership or corporation duly bonded, licensed and insured to perform work within public rights-of-way in the Local Entity. DAYS - intended as calendar days and not normal working days unless stipulated as working days. ~ _ DRIVEWAY, RURAL - that portion of gravel or hard surfaced roadway from the street, roadway or alley to the private property line to gain access to the private property. DRIVEWAY, URBAN - that portion of portland cement concrete or asphalt extending from the street gutter lip to the property line for the full width of access from the public right-of-way to the private property. ENGINEER - shall mean the Larimer County Engineer, and the City Engineers for the Cities of Fort Collins, Loveland, and the Towns of Berthoud and Estes Park, Colorado, or their authorized representatives acting on behalf of the entity. ENGINEERING PLANS - Drawings, plans, profiles, cross sections and other required details for the construction of public or private improvements within the public rights-of-way or public easements, conforming with the Local Entities' applicable improvement standards. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION - the objective grouping of roads, streets and highways into integrated systems, each ranked by their relative importance to the general welfare, the motorists and land use. IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS - A set of regulations established by each Local Entity setting forth the details, specifications, instructions, and procedures to be followed in the planning, design, installation and construction of public or private improvements within the public rights-of-way or public easements. INSPECTOR - shall mean an authorized representative of the Engineer assigned to make inspections for contract performances, standards and contract compliance. LOCAL ENTITY - shall mean unincorporated Larimer County, the Cities of Fort Collins, and Loveland, and the Towns of Berthoud and Estes Park, Colorado. MAY - a permissive condition. No requirement for design or application is intended. MUTCD- Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Federal Highway Administration). ... OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Administration. RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.)- Any strip of area of land, including surface, overhead, or underground, granted by deed, easement, dedication, prescription or lease, for construction and maintenance according to designated use, such as for streets and highways, drainage ditches, irrigation canals, etc. RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT - An official document issued by one of the Local Entities authorizing the performance of a specified activity or work within public rights-of-way and public easements by a person, contractor, company, firm, corporation, or public utility. SHALL - a mandatory condition. Where certain requirements in the design or application are described with the Ashallg stipulation, it is mandatory that these requirements be met. SHOULD - an advisory condition. Where the word Ashoulda is used, it is considered to be advisable usage, recommended but not mandatory. Deviations may be allowed when reasons are given which show intent of the standard is met. STREET - a general term denoting a public way for purposes of vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle travel ways, including the entire area within the right-of-way (includes alleyways). Any constructed facility within the right-of-way. ~ ~.~ ~~TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR (TCS) - A well trained and knowledgeable individual assigned the responsibility for traffic control devices at worksites. The TCS must be ATSSA (American Traffic Safety ' Services Association) or CCA (Colorado Contractor's Association) certified. - 2 4 Qi ., t i :' TRAFFIC ENGINEER - shall mean the Traffic Engineer or person responsible for monitoring traffic in the Local Entity. UNCC - Utility Notification Center of Colorado (commonly referred to as "One Call"). Statewide - clearinghouse for coordinating and scheduling utility locates. Most utilities, both public and private, -- utilize this service. Toll-free phone number for UNCC is 1-800-922-1987. E. Specific Conditions 1. Traffic Control Plans A Traffic Control Plan (TCP) shall be submitted prior to or submitted with the permit application for all proposed work in/on arterial and collector streets for approval by the Traffic Engineer. Work in/on residential streets typically do not need a separate TCP but all signs, barricades and other necessary traffic control devices shall be placed in accordance with the MUTCD, Part VI. All the work described above shall be performed by a TCS. 2. Traffic Flow During Peak Hours No interference with traffic flow on arterial or collector streets shall be permitted during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. or from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. unless authorized in writing by the Traffic Engineer. 3. End of Day Lane Conditions ASPHALT STREET - When work is stopped for the day, all lanes of an arterial or collector street shall be opened to traffic unless approved by the Engineer. A traffic lane shall be considered satisfactorily open only if it is paved with hot or cold mix asphalt paving, except when the local jurisdiction allows an alternate temporary surface at its discretion. CONCRETE STREET - When work is stopped for the day, all lanes of an arterial or collector street shall be opened for traffic. A traffic lane shall be considered satisfactorily open only if it is surfaced with a temporary asphalt surface. In the event the street surface has been replaced in the same day as the excavation was made, the repaired areas should be properly barricaded to protect the concrete during the curing stage. 4. Inspection Requests It shall be the responsibility of the person performing the work authorized by the permit to notify the Engineer or his authorized representatives that such work is ready for inspection. The Engineer requires that every request for inspection be received at least twenty-four (24) hours before such inspection is desired. Such requests may be in writing or by telephoning or faxing the Engineer. 5. Minimum Concrete Removals/Replacements Removal and replacement shall be to existing joints. 6. Road Closures Road closures will only be allowed at the approval of the Engineer. F. Permit Fees A complete fee schedule for each Local Entity can be found in Appendix A. The Local Entities' permit - fees are*established under appropriate enabling res61utions and/or ordinaiices ahd are subject to change pdriodidally. . . 3 i An additional fee may be charged for any excavation work that may affect the accuracy of the Local Entities' Survey Monumentation System. G. Insurance Requirements The Permit Applicant is required to submit certificates of insurance for Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability as described below: 1. Commercial General Liability The Contractor shall procure and keep in force during the duration of all work covered under this Permit a policy of Commercial General Liability insurance insuring the Contractor and naming the Local Entity as an additional insured against any liability arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy, or construction of the work and all areas appurtenant thereto with a combined single limit of at least $1,000,000. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, be a limit to the liability of the Contractor hereunder. 2. Automobile Liability The Contractor shall procure and keep in force during the duration of all work covered under this Permit a policy of Automobile Liability insurance insuring the Contractor and naming the Local Entity as an additional insured against any liability for personal injury, bodily injury, or death arising from the use of motor vehicles and shall cover operations on or off the site of all motor vehicles controlled by the Contractor whether they are owned, non-owned, or hired with a combined single limit of at least $1,000,000. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of the Contractor hereunder. I. 3. Terms of Insurance Insurance required shall be with companies qualified to do business in the State of Colorado with a general policyholder's financial rating of not less than "A" as set forth in the most current edition of "Best's Insurance Reports" and may provide for deductible amounts as the Contractor may deem to be reasonable for the project, but in no event greater than $1,000. No such policies shall be cancelable or subject to reduction in coverage limits or other modification except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Local Entity. However, where cancellation of coverage is due to nonpayment of premium a ten (10) day written notice to the Local Entity is required. The Contractor shall not do nor permit to be done anything, which shall invalidate the insurance policies referred to in this section. Policies described in Sections 1 and 2 above shall be for the mutual and joint benefit and protection of the Contractor and the Local Entity. Such policies shall contain a provision that the Local Entity, although named as an additional insured, shall nevertheless be entitled to recovery under said policies for any loss occasioned to it, its servants, agents, citizens, and employees by reason of negligence of the Contractor. Such policies shall be written as primary policies not contributing to and not in excess of coverage which the Local Entity may carry. Such policies shall be for the mutual and joint benefit and protection of the Contractor and the Local Entity. All policies shall contain a provision that the Local Entity, although named as an insured, shall nevertheless be entitled to recovery under said policies for any loss occasioned to it, its servants, agents, citizens, and employees by reason of negligence of the Contractor. All policies shall be written as primary policies not contributing with and not in excess of coverage which the Local Entity may carry. The type of coverage shall be "occurrence". Contractor shall furnish certificates evidencing required insurance coverage to the Local Entity. Such certificates shall be in a form acceptable to the Local Entity. -. 4 H. Bond Requirements and Warranty Period All Permit Applicants must have on file with the Local Entity prior to issuance of any permit a performance bond executed by a reliable surety company in the sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), which bond shall be conditioned upon compliance with all provisions of the permit for = excavations in the public rights of way and the ordinances of the Local Entity. .r 1 The warranty period shall be in effect for two years past the completion and acceptance of the work. In case the area fails where the work was done and the Permittee refuses to fix the problem, the bond will be used to cover all costs incurred by the Local Entity to correct the problem. 1. Licensing Requirements All applicable licenses for the specific types of work to be performed under a permit shall be obtained from the Local Entity prior to the issuance of a permit and commencement of any construction. 2. PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS A. Obtain Blank Permit Form Blank permit forms can be obtained from each respective Local Entity as shown in Appendix A. Fill out the form completely and accurately. Be sure to sign and date the form. Turn in the completed form, together with all required submittals and all copies, to the appropriate Local Entity a minimum of forty (40) work hours (not including Saturdays and Sundays) prior to the proposed start of work. B. Submission of Plans Drawings or plans that clearly indicate the proposed work must be attached to the permit application. These drawings must be to a working scale and must show position and location of work, streeVroad names/numbers, widths of streets, property lines, topographic and man-made features, existing drainage patterns, etc. Plans shall show the relative position of proposed work to existing utilities and existing improvements and shall be drawn to a scale of one (1) inch = fifty (50) feet or larger and shall include a north reference. C. Submission of Traffic Control Plans Traffic Control Plans shall show in detail the proposed work area location and the traffic control devices being proposed. Such plan shall be on paper at least 8 1/2 inches by 11 inches and may be faxed, mailed or brought to the office of the Local Entity a minimum of forty (40) work hours prior to issuance the Permit. Traffic Control Plans may require more detail than normal at the discretion of the Traffic Engineer due to unique or unusual conditions. Traffic control shall also include construction traffic routing requirements. D. Payment of Fee Acceptable methods of payment and payees have been established by each Local Entity. The Local Entity Contact Person, as identified in Appendix A, will provide Applicants with the appropriate permit fee and method of payment. u . --7 - t. Review of Submittals 6 .M .. 1 U- Â¢ . 1 - . The completed submittals will be reviewed by the affected Local Entity. If additional information is ndeded: the Applicant will be contacted. The Local Entity will check to make curtain that the Applicant has provided the required bond. license and insurance certificates. V .. I Â· 5 . . 142. 7 */ 3 ... - */ A.. 2 k 11 , F. Approval of Submittals Once the permit form and all required submittals have been reviewed and found to be complete, the Permit may be approved by the Local Entity. .' 1 G. Issuance of Permit The approved Permit is issued to the Applicant. Any modifications to the approved permit including any schedule or scope changes must be submitted in writing to the Local Entity for their review and approval. The Applicant is solely responsible for all work for a period of two (2) years following the project completion. H. Other Permits Permit Applicants are responsible for obtaining separate permits or permission as may be required. Examples may be when work is proposed within state highway, railroad or irrigation company right-of- ways, or private property. 3. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS A. General Conditions The following general conditions apply to all work done within the public rights-of-way such Â£ utility line installation or repairs performed by any contractor or utility department, public or private. 1. Protection of Existing Improvements a. The Contractor shall at all times take proper precautions and be responsible for the 1- protection of existing street and alley surfaces, driveway culverts, street intersection culverts or aprons, irrigation systems, mail boxes, driveway approaches, curb, gutter and sidewalks and all other identifiable installations that may be encountered during construction. b. The Contractor shall at all times take proper precautions for the protection of existing utilities, the presence of which are known or can be determined by field locations of the utility companies. The Contractor shall contact the UNCC (One Call) at 1-800-922-1987 for utility locates a minimum of two (2) working days prior to his proposed start of work. c. Existing improvements to adjacent property such as landscaping, fencing, utility services, driveway surfaces, etc., that are not to be removed shall be protected from injury or damage resulting from the Contractofs operations. d. The Contractor shall at all times take proper precautions for the protection of property pins/corners and survey control monuments encountered during construction. Any damaged or disturbed survey markers shall be replaced by a registered land sun/eyor at the Contractofs expense. e. The repair of any damaged improvements as described above shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. f. The Contractor shall make adequate provisions to assure that traffic and adjacent property owners experience a minimum of inconvenience 6 2. Temporary Surfaces Required When the final surface is not immediately installed, it shall be necessary to place a temporary asphalt surface on any street cut opening. The temporary surface installation and maintenance shall be the responsibility of the Permittee until the permanent surface is completed and accepted. It shall be either a hot mix or cold mix paving material. Temporary surfaces shall be compacted, rolled smooth and sealed to prevent degradation of the repair and existing structures during the temporary period. Permanent patching shall occur within two (2) weeks except as outlined by the Local Entity in the Permit. 3. Pavement Patches All permanent pavement patches and repairs shall be made with "in kind" materials. For example, concrete patches in concrete surfaces, full depth asphalt patches with full depth asphalt, concrete pavement with asphalt overlay patches will be expected in permanent Aoverlaid- concrete streets, etc. In no case is there to be an asphalt patch in concrete streets or concrete patch in asphalt streets. Any repair not meeting these requirements will be removed and replaced by the Contractor at his expense. Refer to Section 4 for details. 4. Work to be Done in Expedient Manner All work shall be done in an expedient manner. Repairs shall be made as rapidly as is consistent with high quality workmanship and materials. Use of fast setting concrete and similar techniques are encouraged whenever possible without sacrificing the quality of repair. Completion of the work including replacement of pavement and cleanup shall normally be accomplished within two (2) weeks after the repair work or activity involving the cut is done. Extension of time for completion shall be with the written approval of the Engineer. If the repairs are not completed in the allotted time, the Local Entity has the right to repair the street at the . Contractor's expense. 5. Removal and Replacement of Unsatisfactory Work Removal and replacement of unsatisfactory work shall be completed within fifteen (15) days of written notification of the deficiency unless deemed an emergency requiring immediate action. In the event the replacement work has not been completed, the Local Entity will take action upon the Contractor's bond to cover all related costs. B. Excavation 1. Excavation shall consist of removal of all material necessary for the construction of the roadway section to the subgrade elevation, line, and grade shown on the plans or as specified in the contract documents. Unacceptable material defined as any earthen material containing vegetable or organic silt, topsoil, frozen material, trees, stumps, certain man-made deposits, or industrial waste, sludge or landfill, or other undesirable materials will be categorized as Aunclassified excavation- and removed from the site and disposed of in accordance with applicable Local Entity, State and Federal requirements. All tree stumps and roots shall be removed to a minimum of two (2) feet below subgrade. Unclassified excavation includes any and all earthen materials encountered, including rocks and boulders measuring less than one- half cubic yard in volume, during construction. 2. Any work on trees, including roots, must be reviewed by a licensed arborist. Final work shall be approved by the Local entity. 3. Excavation shall be performed in a careful and orderly manner with due consideration given to protection of adjoining property, the public and workmen. Any damage to streets, parking lots, utilities, irrigation systems, plants, trees, building or structures or private property, or the bench , ~ marks and construction staking due to the negligence of the Contractor, shall be repaired and restored to its original conditions by the Contractor at his expense. Those areas that are to be , saved will be clearly fenced off by the Contractor per the ownefs instructions and it will be the 7 Contractor's responsibility to ensure that these areas are not damaged during the construction process. Following completion of construction, should any of these trees, shrubs or irrigation facilities, etc. require replacement, it shall be done at the Contractor's expense. 4. All materials determined acceptable by the Engineer acquired from roadway excavations may be used for embankment fill and backfill as needed. The entire area in the vicinity of the construction where excavation and filling has been performed shall be raked clean of all trash, wood forms, and debris, after completion of the work with no additional cost to the Owner. Material removed in excavation and not acceptable or not required for embankment fill of backfill shall be disposed of by the Contractor. It shall not be wasted on private property without written permission of the property owner. Waste banks shall be left with reasonable smooth and regular surfaces. 5. The construction of any repair activity within the street or alley rights-of-way shall be accomplished by open cut, jacking, boring, tunneling or a combination of these methods as approved by the permit. The Engineer shall approve anv change from the approved permit. 6. Trenches shall be excavated along the lines and grades established and in no case shall be more than two hundred (200) feet in length, or be trenched or backfilled in non-continuous sections unless approved by the Engineer. Failure by the Contractor to comply with these requirements may result in an order to stop the excavation in progress until compliance has been achieved. 7. All excavated material shall be stockpiled in a manner that does not endanger the work or workers and that does not obstruct sidewalks, streets and driveways. No stockpiled materials shall be allowed on the asphalt surface or adjacent walkways. The work shall be done in a manner that will minimize interference with traffic and/or drainage of the street. ThÂ¢Contractor at the end of each day shall barricade all excavations and ditch lines, remove excess material from travel ways, and thoroughly clean all street, alleys and sidewalks affected by the excavation. If it becomes necessary to accomplish this, all streets, alleys (if asphalt or concrete) and sidewalks shall be swept or washed as required by the Engineer. 8. Materials encountered during excavation such as rubbish, organic, or frozen material, and any other material that is not satisfactory for use as backfill in the opinion of the Engineer, shall be removed from the site and disposed of daily by the Contractor at his expense. Stones, concrete or asphalt chunks larger than six (6) inches or frozen material shall be@onsidered unsatisfactory backfill and removed by the Contractor. 9. All excavation, shoring and trenching, and the like shall comply with OSHA's "Construction Industry Standards" as well as all applicable Federal and State regulations. 10. No tracked vehicles shall be allowed on asphalt or concrete unless approved by the Engineer. 11. Crossings under sidewalks or curbs may be made by tunneling only when approved by the Engineer. If the Contractor elects to remove a portion of the sidewalk or curb, the applicable Local Entity standards shall be followed. 12. Grading shall be done as necessary to prevent surface water from entering the excavation; any other water accumulation therein shall be promptly removed. Surface drainage, driveways, fire hydrants, manholes, water valves, etc. of adjoining areas shall be unobstructed. 13. When soft or unstable material or rock is encountered in the trench subgrade that will not uniformly support the pipe, such material shall be excavated to additional depths directed by the Engineer and backfilled with Type B material, as described in Subsection G, Part 2. C. Blasting 1. The Contractofs blasting procedures shall conform to Federal, State, and local ordinances. The Contractor shall acquire all required permits prior to the start of blasting. 8 2. Blasting for excavation will be permitted only after securing the approval of the Engineer. The Engineer will fix the hours of blasting. The Contractor shall use the utmost care to protect life and property. All explosives shall be safely and securely stored in compliance with local laws and ordinances, and all storage places shall be clearly marker "Dangerous Explosives". No explosives shall be left unprotected where they could endanger life or property 3. When blasting in trenches, the Contractor shall cover the area to be shot with earth backfill .- or approved blasting mats. Prior to blasting, the Contractor shall station flaggers and provide - signals of danger in suitable places to warn people and stop vehicles. The Contractor shall be responsible for all damage to property and injury to persons resulting from blasting or accidental explosions that may occur in connection with the use of explosives. D. Equipment 1. The use of trench digging equipment will be permitted in places where its operation will not cause damage to existing structures or features, in which case hand methods shall be employed. 2. No tracked vehicles shall be permitted on streets unless approved by the Engineer. When tracked vehicles are allowed, existing facilities will be restored to original condition at the Contractor's expense. 3. Construction equipment and material delivery routing will be made a condition of the Permit. E. Dewatering Where ground water is encountered in the excavation, it shall be removed to avoid interfering with the work. It is the Contractor's responsibility to comply with all Federal, State and local permitting requirements prior to beginning any dewatering operations. F. Removals 1. Streets, Paved Bituminous pavement shall be saw cut to clean, straight lines and should be perpendicular or parallel to the flow of traffic. (See Section 4(B)(2)(a)) In existing pavement, all excavations within 36" of the edge of the asphalt shall require removal and replacement from the edge of asphalt to the excavation edge. Concrete pavement, cross pans, driveways, streets and alleys shall be removed to neatly sawed edges cut to full depth. 2. Streets, Gravel When trenches are excavated in streets or alleys which have only a gravel surface, the Contractor shall replace such surfacing on a satisfactory compacted backfill with gravel - conforming to CDOT Class 5 or Class 6 aggregate base course. Gravel replacement shall be one (1) inch greater in depth to that which originally existed, but not less than four (4) inches. The surface shall conform to the original street grade. Where the completed surface settles, additional gravel base shall be placed and compacted by the Contractor immediately after being notified by the Local Entity, to restore the roadbed surface to finished grade. Some streets may have been treated with a special surface treatment to control dust and/or bind the a4gregates together. In these cases the Contractor is responsible for installing the .~r~|~~ ' -.... gravel surface in the same manner as what was existing. Such surface treatments shall be of the same -chemical composition as what existed prior to the excavation work. The Engineer ,' shall note on the permit the surface treatment that will be required. . . - .9 I I . 3. Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Concrete shall be removed to neatly sawed edges to full depth for sidewalks and curb and gutter and shall be saw cut in straight lines either parallel to the curb or perpendicular to the alignment of the sidewalk or curb. Any removal shall be done to the nearest joint. Replaced sections may require doweling connections if required by the Engineer. - G. Backfill 1. Flowable-Fill FLOWABLE-FILL WILL BE REQUIRED AS UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL FOR ALL TRENCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. Refer to Section 5 for compaction requirements. This requirement applies to all pavement and gravel locations. Flowable-fill vibration may be required. The recommended mix for flowable-fill is shown below. Concrete backfill will not be allowed within the public right-of-way. Flash-fill may be used if approved by the Engineer. Refer to CDOT specification 206.02. INGREDIENTS POUNDS/CUBIC YARD Cement 42 (0.47 sack) Water 235 (39 gallons or as needed) Coarse Aggregate (Size No. 57) 1700 Sand (ASTM C-33) 1845 The maximum desired 28-day strength is 60 psi. The above combination of material, or an equivaleht, may be used to obtain the desired Aflowable-fiIla c Flowable-fill or flash-fill shall be prohibited as a temporary or permanent street surface. Trenches shall initially be backfilled to the level of the original surface. After the flowable-fill has cured, the top surface of the flowable-fill shall be removed and the temporary or permanent surface shall be placed. Bridging and cutback requirements as described in these standards may still be required jf the street failures indicate a clear need. Repair of failed trenches will be the responsibility of the party requiring the trench. Another acceptable use of flowable-fill backfill (with proper vibrating) is in situations where there is over break on concrete streets. 2. Conventional Backfill (Other Than Flowable Fill) When "non flowable-fill" backfill material has been pre-approved by the Engineer, backfill in existing or proposed streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and alleys is divided into three (3) categories: initial, intermediate and final lifts as defined below: a. The INITIAL LIFT, designated as Class B and generally comprised of a washed, clean gravel material, consists of the section from the bottom of the excavation to a point six to twelve (6 - 12) inches above the top of the installation. Placement and compaction of the initial layer shall be as specified by the utility to protect their installation. b. The INTERMEDIATE LIFT, generally comprised of native material, consists of the section above the initial layer to a point within six (6) inches of the ground level or the bottom of the pavement section whichever is greater. Excavated material may be used in the intermediate layer provided that it is deemed suitable by the Engineer. 10 c. The FINAL LIFT includes both road base and asphalt surfacing. Road base material shall be CDOT Class 5 or 6 aggregate base course or as specified by the Engineer. Maximum dry density of all soil types used will be determined in accordance with AASHTO T 99 or AASHTO T 180. These densities will be determined prior to placement of backfill. When a hydro-hammer or drop hammer compaction machine is used for compaction of fill in trenches, the maximum layer shall be 30 inches. 3. Compaction Testing Requirements See Section 5, page 21. 4. Embankment and Slopes a. The Engineer shall approve all fill material. b. All cut slopes shall conform to OSHA standards. H. Restoration 1. Bore Holes - Vertical and Horizontal For openings less than or equal to 6" in diameter, bore holes shall be filled with patching material (cold mix is not acceptable) to prevent entry of moisture. Patching material used shall be in all cases compatible with the existing surface. Subgrade shall be replaced with flowable fill to provide necessary support to the surface. The sealing of bore holes is the responsibility of the Contractor or persons making the bore. For openings greater than 6" in diameter, the limits of repair shall be identified in the permit. The completed job shall be flush with the surrounding pavement and have no indentations, pockets, or recesses that maytrap and hold water. 2. Subgrade The subgrade for the pavement structure shall be graded to conform to the cross sections and profile required by the construction plans. Prior to the placement of aggregate base course or sub-course, the subgrade should be properly prepared. The subgrade should be scarified to a minimum depth of six (6) inches, moisture adjusted as necessary, and recompacted to not less than the following: a. For cohesive soils, 90% maximum Modified Proctor dry density at K2% of optimum moisture content, or 95% maximum Standard Proctor dry density at K2% of optimum moisture content. b. For non-cohesive soils, 92% maximum Modified Proctor dry density at K2% of optimum moisture content, or 97% maximum Standard Proctor dry density at K2% of optimum moisture content. c. For expansive soils, 88% maximum Modified Proctor dry density at 3% or greater above optimum moisture content, or 93% maximum Standard Proctor dry density at 1 % or greater above optimum moisture content. For highly expansive soils (swell potential 2% under 200 psf surcharge pressure), paving will not be permitted without a subgrade treatment approved by the Engineer. y . . Prior to approval to place the base or dub-base course, all utility main and service trenches shall Â·' be compacted to'not less;than the' above referenced densities required for the given soil ' classification. This density requirement also appli6s to all utility trenches within the public rights- of-way from<a -point four (4) feet beyond the 6dge of asphalt and descending at 1:1 outward. ... u ' r 9 1 '1, r 1.: 9 t.2 44 6 . --+V I . I. L 4., N.-=f-':41'th ...J, R 3. Asphalt Surfacing Any damage, even superficial, to the existing asphalt surface in the viciriity of the work shall be repaired at the expense of the Contractor, including but not limited to gouges, scrapes, outrigger marks, backhoe bucket marks, etc. A slurry seal type covering will be considered the minimum repair. Patching may be required, at the discretion of the Local Entity. The depth of asphalt patches in asphalt streets shall typically be the depth of the existing asphalt surface plus two (2) inches or as specified by the Engineer. The asphalt patch area for street excavations that fall within the wheel path of the vehicular travel lane shall be increased in size to the center of the lane or adjacent lane. In no circumstance will the edge of a patch area be allowed to fall within the wheel path. All street cuts shall be patched as per the guidelines of Section 4 (pages 13-20). In streets that are less then five (5) years old the Local Entity reserves the right to deny any street excavation or require repairs that are over and above these specifications. EXCEPTIONS - There may be situations where the patching standards are considered inappropriate. For example, rebuilding half of a road today when we know the road is due for reconstruction at a different profile in 2-3 years. In these cases, the Permit Holder can provide a more modest patch adequate to accommodate traffic for the 2-3 year period. In addition, the Permit Holder may be required to make a financial contribution to the street maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction program to support the more permanent improvements that are anticipated. This determination shall be made by the Engineer. - 4Â¥:06 DISPUTE RESOLUTION - Mutual acceptance of these guidelines is expected to evolve over time with experience in the field. Disagreements over requirements and cost sharing are inevitable. In cases where agreement cannot be reached, the dispute shall not deter the Contractor from compliance to the specific Permit or guidelines provided by this document unless approved by the Engineer. 4. Concrete Surfacing and Patching The concrete pavement shall be replaced with 4,000 psi concrete to match the finish and thickness of the existing pavement, but not less than eight (8) inches thick. All concrete construction shall be protected from vehicular traffic, including contractor vehicles, until the concrete has achieved eighty (80) percent of its ultimate strength. Concrete shall be coated and sealed with a uniform application of membrane curing compound applied in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. The use of quick curing concrete (3000 psi strength within 48 hours) shall be used on all arterial and collector streets when repair areas are less than 500 square feet or when temperatures are below 40Â° F. Quick curing concrete repairs may be opened to traffic within two (2) days or when the concrete has achieved eighty (80) percent of its ultimate strength. Where existing cracks or damage are adjacent to the area being repaired the repair area shall include the cracked or damaged concrete. Pavement repairs shall include all areas of damage, including leak test holes, pot holes, equipment and/or material scaring otthe exiting surface. When repairing concrete, removal perimeter shall be sawcut and replacement concrete shall be doweled into the old concrete as directed by the Engineer. 12 5. Joint Filling 4 a. Asphalt Following placement of the asphalt surface, the joints where the new asphalt abuts the old shall be sealed with a fog or painted coat of bitumen cement. b. Concrete Joints shall be thoroughly cleaned of all foreign material then filled with a hot-poured elastic type joint filler conforming to M 173, ASTM D1190-80 or ASTM D1751-83, D1752-84, D3405-78, D3406-78, D3407-78 or silicone sealants or others as approved by the Engineer. Joint material shall be filled to within 1/2 inch of the surface. Excess material shall be scraped off to provide a smooth riding surface. - 4. DEVELOPING A "QUALITY" APPROACH TO STREET REPAIRS A. General Every street and street repair situation is unique. Design criteria and construction standards cannot address every situation but, in order to maintain some form of consistency, these standards have been developed. In most cases, they provide the minimum acceptable standards for construction or repair. Consequently, when strictly applied, they will provide the minimum acceptable product. Therefore, this criteria has been developed to maintain the same integrity of the street pavement and subsurface condition prior to its being cut for utility installations. To achieve the goal of "Quality" or "Excellence" in street repairs, then these criteria shall be viewed as guidelines when used in conjunction with good planning and judgement. This will restore the street to an acceptable condition with minimal patching failures. In most cases, it will be necessary to exceed the minimum standards to achieve a quality repair. Issues that shall be considered in a quality approach to street repairs are as follows (these criteria must all be balanced against the long-term maintenance needs of the utility): B. Appearance Does the final appearance of the street suggest the repairs were planned, or that they happened by accident? 1. Consciously or not, the driving public "rates" the appearance of the street system - including street repairs - every day. Street repairs which are satisfactory from a functional point of view may produce a negative reaction from the public if they give the appearance of being poorly planned or executed. 2. The public's perception of street repairs is based primarily on shape, size, and orientation - the geometry of a patch. Here are some guidelines for the geometry of a quality patch: I , 69 ...1, p. , ~ %. 4 9 - -:4 .2 I I ..':'./'< , . . .3 ..1. T. 4 ' . I , 4. -4- ..'91 2.9 1 9 V . ': 4 0 .... . . ,. I *- . 13 .. - 1- Â» I , ..' 4 1 . .. a. Existing pavements should be removed to clean, straight lines PARALLEL and PERPEND/CULAR to the flow of traffic. Do not construct patches with angled sides and irregular shapes. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 044.-1-7 -00000 + 0 b. Avoid patches within existing patches. If this cannot be avoided, make the boundaries of the - patches coincide. , NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE .. Exis~h .. Exis~ch hew patch +-- New Patch+-.. 14 . '. c. Do not 'leave" strips of pavement less than one-half lane in width from the edge of the new patch to the edge of an existing patch or the lip of the gutter. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE + Less than 8' ~ + I, 743- 00 11 1.:70- 0 0/J./- - 64 4 New-# ~ 44 patch-0000 4-bl Patch -0 + nâ€ž,A Less than 8'~ 00 0 + % ~41 0 0 0 0. + Existin Existin ~ Patch - 0- Patch . d. In concrete pavements, remove sections to existing joints in the case of concrete in good repair. In damaged concrete, the limits of removal should be determined in the field by a representative of the Engineer. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Joints /X Joints .. 444.. 1.3% ,/ A- -'- 4.DY , bil 0 - 0 , 8 1 '4 --0- . *7Â· 6. r 4. , - 15 , -- y*A e. Asphalt and concrete pavements should be removed by saw cutting or grinding. Avoid breaking away the edges of the existing pavement or damaging the remaining pavement with heavy construction equipment. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 4 Aqu- efar'i*~ <4':..AÂ¥44,149 aoe... 2%1; N I . f. In the case of a series of patches or patches for service lines off a main trench, repair the pavement over the patches by grinding and overlay when the spacing between the patches is less than 75 feet (in cases where the existing pavement is in poor condition and may require overlay within the next few years, this requirement may be modified or waived by the"Engineer). 'L NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 0 4 I. 9.-L -000 r",4 .3~47Â·. :,te/E. 99*3494k,Â· 49/ -**~,Ny. + 2Â»41 01'44* Ae M~L r 4 / 1 p# 4 A- #al'. + -*Â£44>1 -t#* '032, 0 0 -4(451/2/Sl td FeÂ·.Â« a d i#'ll Less than 75' - AW *4.' .7 eF 6 021:$: *1'th: r -9 24, Al ..4*VEÂ«Ke mÂ¢ 4.Jlga-4â€¢.Â· U C. Rideability Are the transitions on and off of the repair smooth? Does the patch itself offer a smooth ride? Are the joints located outside of the normal wheel path? 1. COMPLETED STREET REPAIRS SHOULD HAVE RIDEABILITY AT LEAST AS GOOD AS, IF NOT BETTER THAN, THE PAVEMENT PRIOR TO THE REPAIRS. A driver may be able to see a street repair, but in the case of a quality repair, he/she should not be able to 'feel" it in driving normally down the street. 16 2. Do not place overlays with feathered edges on streets of any classification. Overlays should be placed by first removing the existing pavement to the desired depth by grinding, and then placing the pavement flush with the adjacent surfaces. NOT ACCEPTABLE ~t ACCEPTABLE i-dp -/0.*/***##M#**9**4*. ===ii) Overlay ,=*w#*=<44#**1 Grind & Overlay 3. Surface tolerances for street repairs should meet the standard for new construction. That is, the finished surface of the street repair, when tested with a ten (10) foot straightedge parallel to the centerline or perpendicular across joints, will show variations measured from the testing face of the straightedge to the surface of the street repair which do not exceed one-quarter (1/4) inch. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 10' Straightedge 10' Straightedge -=tlf-TD,41*4~ Greater than 1/4" Less than 1/4" D. Pavement Management Is the repair consistent with the long-term pavement management strategy for the particular street? 1. STREET REPAIRS SHOULD LEAVE A PAVEMENT IN A CONDITION AT LEAST AS GOOD AS, IF NOT BETTER THAN, THE CONDITION PRIOR TO THE REPAIRS. 2. In most cases, and particularly in the cases of extensive excavation and repairs, it is desirable to survey the existirig pavement condition with a representative of the Local Entity prior to the work. After completion of the work, survey the pavement condition again to verify that the pavement ~ , condition has been maintained or improved. .. 3 -a: . In the case of minor repairs, these pavement surveys can be made by visual obserVation. ... . - A 1 . f. ..1,2 jÂ» .---. 2 , , Â»t 17 t . I â€¢ 4 1 I .- * J 7 I . . b. However, in the case of major projects that involve excessive haul of materials or unusually heavy construction equipment or activity, non-destructive testing of the pavement condition before and after construction is required. 3. Consideration of pavement management issues may also identify opportunities for joint efforts between the utilities and the Local Entity. For example, suppose the repair of a utility line requires an overlay on half of a street, and that the condition of the remaining half of the street might also warrant an overlay. Wp may decide at that point to overlay the entire street, with Local Entity's street authority and the utility splitting the cost of the overlay. In such a case, the utility may be able to save the cost of grinding half the street. The Local Entity's street authority will allocate a reasonable percentage of their annual overlay program to accommodate their share of these situations. This includes minor (2-3 block) maintenance projects and larger capital improvement projects (major water line extension). Coordination for these types of cooperative repairs should occur as far in advance of actual construction as possible. 4. Transverse patches on arterial and collector streets shall be overlaid across the entire street width for a distance of two (2) feet minimum on all sides of the trench. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE - 'RE/Â£7/x Â· 0 0 #9:<9:*:47/Lrim't- ' 0>k--- M Ng/ --4 - 4 8409% 6.9/21/05Â£/#4WN'.1 ' 1&.A 51 ME.b-+0- 0 8&41 f 7.~Ii@Irl'UIC.Obs, UNI Ah 1/1 1 ~â„¢624,9 - ~ -- fo~fls,A- /.97 1 + 12\41 . ---,ag&3159**Al - - //94 -Ii:el. dli,t.i -460/-1 5. Do not allow the edges of patches to fall in existing wheel paths. The edges of patches parallel to the direction of traffic shall be limited to the boundaries of lanes or to the centerline of travel lanes. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE /*=Sh- *2447 -- 4&2 392 ed/ 00 + FILS<1 7 1 . 7~04~y + 18 1 1Â¥h... ' 0 6. Patches should have a smooth longitudinal grade consistent with the existing roadway. Patches should also have a cross slope or cross section consistent with the design of the existing roadway. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE . 0 Cross Slope eâ‚¬= Cross Slope 'SE@aa 41%~.426-~- Patch Patch E. Future Maintenance Will the repair pose any future maintenance problems or make future maintenance more difficult? 1. Excavations and street repairs, even well constructed street repairs, shorten a pavement's life. Several types of street distress, settlement, alligator cracking, and potholes, often show up around patches. Quality street repairs should attempt to reduce the occurrence of these types of distress. 2. Avoid weakening or destroying the existing pavement around an excavation with heavy construction equipment, stockpiling or delivery of materials, etc. When damage does occur, remove the damaged pavement, extending the limits of the street repair, before replacing the pavement. Remember, no stockpiling of backfill or road building materials is permitted on the pavement. 3. When the proposed excavation falls within two feet of a section of failed pavement, the failed area shall be removed to sound pavement and patched. Scarring, gouging, or other damaged pavement adjacent to a patch shall be removed and the pavement repaired. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Less than 2' ~ 96:21-,Il'.. -I.........I- + 0 + +4(398,6 DamageaÂ·â€¢.~ 0 0 0 Â£43/-.t=>.1. ~ Pavement fisfi@.:4:,~ 4.~, ~ 74%0~97, Â·:/ 2.4 .r- . ~NIC . .5: . , â€ž4.1- ,7 - Patcl~+92.. 2/ - . -U ... -% . ,.. . I .: 1 . . 19 6, .. .. .. I . . . . 12 , , '...4 4. In the case of older pavement where the likelihood of cracking and potholes next to the patch is greater, it may be necessary to extend the 'shoulders" of the pavement beyond the two-foot minimum, and reinforce this area with a geotextile. T cutting is required for all repairs. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Min 2' Min 2' -C } ~94*'7. irri MvrMr':a'I Geotextile May b* required O 0 5. For patches in asphalt, a tack coat shall be applied to all edges of the existing asphalt before placing the new pavement 6. After placing the new asphalt, all seams (loints) between the new and existing pavements shall be sealed with an asphalt tack coat or rubberized crack seal material. 7. Avoid frequent changes in width of patches. For future maintenance, this simplifies removal of adjacent pavement failures. NOT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE A>J42.- V ~~ 24 1 *4 2*: 44. 740=Jr e =.aq-~~.~UE3rkÂ»---- ,4;'â€¢t#-E"k 'Ad,rk-0- n w#1% .4*:5% 2~.Â·IT 3, '91, Rk*$444''tregal 69*41#â‚¬ yteeti-... ....N.~?.,â‚¬5443Â¢410 0 0 20 . . 5. TESTING A. Description The contractor is required to provide material testing for each phase of the work and at no cost to the Local Entity. The Independent Geotechnical Testing Firm chosen to perform this work for the Contractor must be qualified an61 identified on the Permit application. B. Testing Frequencies The number of density tests required may be increased if directed by the Engineer. The costs of any testing, as required, shall be borne by the Contractor. Proctors shall be determined prior to backfilling. Independent lab results shall be faxed to the Local entity as soon as possible. The horizontal frequencies of density tests are as follows: 1. Utility Mains - One test per 100 linear feet per lift. 2. Service Lines - One test per each service per per lift. 3. Manholes and valve boxes per each lift. Following are the minimum number of tests required for each construction activity. These tests must be submitted to the Engineer on a daily basis as acquired and shall be hand delivered or faxed to the Local Entity. 1. Native or imported backfill - One (1) test for every two (2) vertical feet and every one hundred (100) feet horizontally, or some fraction thereof with at least one (1) test per each lift. 2. Flowable-fill- Testing may be required at the discretion of the Engineer. 3. Concrete pavement, curbs, gutters and sidewalks - Testing to be conducted for every 100 cubic yards or portion thereof, with a minimum of one. The types of testing required shall be as prescribed by each Local Entity 4. Asphalt Pavement - Asphalt content - One test per 500 tons or fraction thereof of mix produced, minimum of one test per job. Gradation - Aggregate: one test per 500 tons or fraction thereof of mix produced, minimum of one test per job. In-place density - One test per 500 tons or fraction thereof of mix placed, minimum of one test per job. 5. Aggregate base course materials -One test per 400 lane feet. No less than two (2) tests per excavation. 6. INSPECTION All construction work within the public rights-of-way shall be subject to inspection by the Engineer and certain types of work may have continuous inspection. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to provide safe access for the inspector to perform the required inspections. - It dhall be the responsibility of the person performing the work authorized by the Permit.to notify the Engineer or his authorized representatives that such work is ready for inspection. The Engineer requires that every request for inspection is to be received at least twenty-four (24) hours before such inspection is desired. Such requests may be in writing or by telephoning or faxir,0 the Engineer. 21 - I. 9: .. - 1 . The Engineer may make or require other inspections of any work as deemed necessary to ascertain compliance with the provisions of these Guidelines or the Local Entity's Street Design and Construction Standards, or Municipal Code. Any work performed without the required inspections shall be subject to removal and replacement at the Contractor's expense, regardless of the quality of the work. Where large scale projects exceed the ability of the Local Entity to provide inspection, the contractor or utility company will incur the cost of a private inspection firm. This inspection firm will be mutually agreed upon by the Permit applicant and the Local Entity prior to issuance of the Permit. 22 " e 4' 5 1 ,; '7/ 'R lo & Boot 3 9 312:12 2 ENTITY NAME AND/OR TITLE ADDRESS PHONE NUMBERS Access and Utilities Coordinator 218 W Mountain Ave., P.O. Box 1190 ~~e~(907)0~949-87~09 City of Fort Collins Todd Juergens City of Fort Collins Engineering. Dept. Voice: (970) 221-6605 Lead Construction Inspector P.O. Box 580 Fax: (970) 221-6378 â€ž City of Loveland George Miller City of Loveland Traffic Section Voice: (970) 962-2516 Associate Traffic Engineer W. 5th St. Fax: (970) 962-2907 01.ZE-2Â£9 (026) :130!OA pnoll]Jag JO U 29 'SeABIN u40f pnoques Jo UAA01 Â£492-ZES (016) xed 6211, x08 'Od 'eAV 40~eAA juepuejuuedns leaRS LEâ‚¬9-999 (026) :80!OA >wed sels3 Jo u SleAe!9 6819 wed sals3 JO UMO.L 6069-999 (0Â£6) .xe:1 oozl. X08 'Od 'eAV i06880evy 02 1, 386euevy se!1!1!oed 0!Iqnd pue uonorulsuoo L X LE-09Â£ (026) :80!OA uoneuodsual.L Jo Idea opeJOIOO Ie6uehl A.lueH uoge]Jodsueu Jo Idea opeJoloo 6ZLE-09Â£ C0L6) :xed 19 pul OZMÂ· Joleu!p.IOOC) Se!1!I!]n uo!1089 90!1!IRA LOCAL ENTITY CONTACT PERSON Larimer County Mike Bryant Larimer County Engineering Dept. Fort Collins, CO 80522-1190 Fort Collins, CO 80522 land, CO 80537 Â£10908 OO 'pflo 11.909 00 'Wed selsEI LÂ£908 03 'XeleaJO APPENDIX A