The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1996-02-22AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 22, 1996 8:00 A.M. 1. Water Dept. Utility Truck Request approval to purchase from low bidder 2. Fuel Tanks Removal Project Request approval of RMC scope of services for design & C.M. Reports: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Report 3. Hwy. 7, Hwy. 34, Elkhorn Overlay Projects Update 4. Water Dept. capital improvement projects & cash flow analysis 5. Revised Street Cut Standards Project update 6. March Public Works Committee To: BILL LINNANE/BOB GOEHRING FROM: GARY SHANAFELT SUBJ: WATER DEPARTMENT TRUCK BIDS DATE: 6 FEBRUARY 1996 SPECIFICATIONS WERE WRITTEN AND REQUESTS FOR BIDS WERE MADE TO SEVEN DEALERS FOR A 3/4 TON. FOUR WHEEL DRIVE TRUCK WITH UTILITY BODY AND CRANE. THE RESPONSE FOR THIS PIECE OF EQUIPMENT ARE AS FOUND BELOW. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME. TRANSWEST TRUCKS INC. ONE GMC TRUCK Ac PER OUR SPECIFICATIONS $24,497.00 WITH TRADE-IN RAINS MOTOR COMPANY ONE FORD TRUCK AS PER OUR SPECIFICATIONS $26,163.00 WITH TRADE-IN ONE DODGE TRUCK AS PER nUR SPECIFICATIONS S27,636.20 WITH TRADE-IN * IF LOCAL VENDOR CONSIDERATION OF $500.00 IS GIVEN TO RAINS MOTOR COMPANY ON THE FORD TRUCK BID THE PRICE WOULD THEN BE $25.663.00. I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE BID FROM TRANSWEST TRUCKS BE ACCEPTED. 1-1 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. gmc 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 February 20, 1996 (303) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 FAX (303) 825-8912 Bill Linnane Public Works Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Underground Fuel Storage Tank Removal Dear Bill: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) appreciates the opportunity to submit the following scope of services for engineering and testing services related to the removal of underground fuel storage tanks at the Town of Estes Park shop facility. Our August, 1995 report entitled "Town of Estes Park Fueling System Feasibility Study" detailed a number of alternatives for the Town fueling system. The preferred alternative selected by the Town was abandonment of the existing fueling system and utilization of the Larimer County and Park R-3 District fueling systems. As part of the abandonment the existing fuel system is to be removed and a closure report prepared. In particular our services would include 1) preparation of a bid package for obtaining competitive prices for removal of the underground fuel storage tanks, 2) observation and documentation of the removal, transportation and disposal of the tanks and piping 3) analytical testing of soil and if applicable groundwater and 4) site characterization report. For purposes of this scope of services there is assumed to be no contamination of material outside of the tanks and appurtenant piping. Scope of Services Task 1: Preparation of Bid Package. Prepare contract documents for a competitive bid process. The contract documents will detail the limits of asphalt removal, tank and appurtenant piping removal, compaction requirements for imported soil and asphalt patching requirements. During the bid process RMC will be available to answer all questions. Task 2: Construction Observation Observe and document proper removal, transportation and disposal of tanks and appurtenant piping. Collect composite soil samples from the four walls and floor of the excavation and two composite samples from excavated spoil material. In the event ground water is encountered in the excavation, an additional sample will be taken of the water. Perform compaction testing on the imported soil to assure compliance with contract documents and preclude any future settlement of the fill. 2-1 CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING gmc Task 3: Analytical Testing Soil samples would be analyzed for total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH); Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene (BTEX), and EP-TOX lead depending upon the type of tank removed. The analytical laboratory we would utilize for this project is as follows: Analytical Technology, Inc. 225 Commerce Drive Fort Collins, CO 80524 490-1511 A matrix of tests that will be run for the specific conditions is shown below: TESTING PARAMETERS SAMPLE GASOLINE STORAGE DIESEL STORAGE Walls and Bottoms (soil) TPH-G/BTEX TPH-D Spoil Material (soil) TPH-G/BTEX,LEAD TPH-D Water Sample TPH-G/BTEX TPH-D Task 4: Site Characterization Report Prepare a site characterization report (closure report) that details the regional hydrogeology, potential receptors,(wells, basement sumps) within a 1/2 mile radius, the tank removal process, certification of tank destruction, site geology and interpretation of test data. 2-2 9mc The engineering costs for the project are as follows: Description Hrs./Test Rate Total Project Manager 8.0 $75 $ 600 Project Engineer 16.0 $50 $ 800 Engineering Technician 16.0 $35 $ 560 Survey Crew 4.0 $90 $ 360 Cadd Operator 16.0 $50 $ 800 Clerical 24.0 $20 $ 480 Proctor Test 2.0 $200 $ 400 Compaction Test 16.0 $25 $ 400 Soil Analysis (Assumed 12 tests) $2460 Water Analysis (Assumed 1 test) $ 150 Explosimeter $ 20 Organic Vapor Meter 2 day $75 $ 150 TOTAL $7180 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ROCKY M~(~ITA#I CONSULTANTS, INC. Kerrl- M. Prochaska, P.E. Associate Principal KMP/mas 2-3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT JANUARY 1996 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION Â· 1 137.00 84.75 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 16 TAP REQUEST 3.00 5.00 17 WATER QUALITY f. 60:rÂ·Â·.Â· *~ ~~~ ~ : Â¥;00.3 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS 22 FROZEN LINES 4.00 5.50 24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN * 3.00 . 29.00 30 METER REPAIR 4.00 2.50 32 FINAL INSPECTION 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED 50 STREET REPAIR 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 54 STORM DRAINAGE 60 OTHER TOTALS FORJANUARY 1996 152.00 128.75 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS ~~ ~ 152.00 587.00 61.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 128.75 421.50 99.50 .: %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) -74.11%/-69.45% 7 +149.18%/+29.40%. +150.82%/+29.40% Rl-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK JANUARY 1996 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for December 14, through January 13: Dec. 14 to 31 Water Treated: *Fall River 0 Glacier Creek 20,383,000 Marys 0 Jan. 1 to 13 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 13,953,000 Marys 85,000 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 34,421,000 Gal. 2)Accountable Water Adjustments: 3,314,568 Billing(Indudes billed bleaders) 21,206,616 *Backwash O Total Water accounted for: 24,521,184 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 71% 4.) 12 MONTH AVE. PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 75% R2-1 JANUARY, 1996 ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 96,000 2.) Bleeders TOTAL BLEEDERS NOT BILLED (Gal.) 1,283,568 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 15-Dec Olympian Ln. leak 20,000 b. 27-Dec Machins cotttages 30,000 c. 1-Jan opened hydrant 75,000 d. 12/14-1/13 Fish Hatchery 1,364,000 e. 12/14-1/13 Riverside Dr. loss 446,000 f. g. h. 1. j. k. L TOTAL LEAKS, MISC. (Gal.) 1,935,000 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) 3,314,568 R2-2 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS JANUARY, 1996 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL O MARYS i ~-' ..' TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS (GAL) CFS L (GAL) 1 0 1,165,000 1,165,000 1.81 0 0.00 '. ~-' f :' ~: 1,165,000 2 0 1,121,000 1,121,000 1.75 2 0 0.00 P : 1,121,000 3 0 1,134,000 1,134,000 1.77 0 0.00 1-Â» ,-f : 1,134,000 4 0 1,098,000 1,098,000 1.71 4 0 0.00 ~ - - 1,098,000 5 0 1,113,000 1,113,000 1.73 4 0 0.00 1 .1,113,000 6 0 1,114,000 1,114,000 1.73Â·1 0 0.00 i 1,114,000 7 0 1,106,000 1,106,000 1.72 M 0 0.00 i /' 1,106,000 8 0 701,000 701,000 1.09 G 0 0.00 1 701,000 9 0 1,025,000 1,025,000 1.60 4 0 0.00 1 i..- d 1,025,000 10 0 1,090,000 1,090,000 1.70 3 0 0.00 '- 9 1,090,000 11 0 1,088,000 1,088,000 1.69 6 85,000 0.13 1,173,000 12 0 1,034,000 1,034,000 1.61 4 0 0.00 1,034,000 13 0 1,164,000 1,164,000 1.81 r d 0 0.00 1,164,000 14 0 1,098,000 1,098,000 1.71 0 0.00 ] 2: 1,098,000 15 0 1,051,000 1,051,000 1.64 ; i 0 0.00 1,051,000 16 0 1,041,000 1,041,000 1.62 i j 73,000 0.11 ~ - V.- 4 1,114,000 17 0 0 - 0.00 ffi 1,156,000 1.80 '' .Â·0 1,156,000 18 0 0 - 0.00 2 1,171,000 1.82 1,171,000 19 0 0 - 0.00 1 1,186,000 1.85 n 11 1,186,000 1 - 20 0 0 - 0.00 4 1,226,000 1.91 -~" 4.11 1,226,000 21 0 0 - 0.00 N 1,213,000 1.89 i., ..., 1,213,000 22 0 0 - 0.00 4 1,257,000 1.96 1,257,000 23 0 0 - 0Â·00 7 1,251,000 1.95 -1.hÂ·'Â·Â·Â·: 1,251,000 24 0 0 - 0.00 LÂ· 1,253,000 1.95 4 1- 1,253,000 25 0 0 - 0.00 4 1,268,000 1.97 f n '. 1,268,000 26 0 0 - 0.00 7- 1,166,000 1.82 i , 1,166,000 27 0 0 - 0.00 1% 1,246,000 1.94 t..'~~'1 - 1,246,000 28 0 0 - 0.00 6' 1,279,000 1.99 ! 0 1,279,000 29 0 0 - 0.00 3: 1,277,000 1.99 1,277,000 30 0 0 - 0.00 4 1,239,000 1.93 ~ ., F 1,239,000 31 0 0 - 0.00 3 1,270,000 1.98 I Â· .-- 2 1,270,000 TOT. 0 17,143,000 17,143,000 0.86 d 18,616,000 0.93 1 .Â©. 35,759,000 84 AF 0.00 52.61 52.61 4 57.13 r 'Â· 109.75 CFS 0.00 0.86 0.86 N 0.93 1.78 BULK(-) WA N/A N/A C : N/A -3,314,568 L L . & GAL 0 17,143,000 17,143,000 0 18,616,000 9 ~ 32,444,432 ~ AF 0 52.61 52.61 8 57.13 : . &â€¢ *3 99.58 1st-13 0 13,953,000 85,000 14 -31 0 3,190,000 18,531,000 R2-3 2 0 z E & 9 t- < 2 1%9 .m -1 -- *T-. 966t 5-IMMN,iAFF*,Â·Ir 4{Ul[,{~1~[4-:42:711-~ ~Iffi~~fmt.fPh-h-Â·89rri?EtÂ·r*:~fl - ==â‚¬13LL.=2:=::E~ ~Um+--9Â·E~*4-~ ,66 L 1 , 1 -- Â£4~J~j~L-,:~~'23-,H f~=f Ziptiffi:2~.t Z66 L - 1 1 EL ~ n-m-1-Irl,limprmx,J:)051*,9797:mr , .:sm~ dilimifii,IT'~.Â·Â·Â·'.r-Â·7-i:- i~~~-~. ~Il I-1~~-1. --~I~~ ~'~ ~''~ '~ â€¢m##mÂ».:eft.1-421't--5â€žÂ»Â»-1-11!~~L 1---1-=- 1 066 k Â·Â· 1 23%1-0 --=5,=.~933Â»-~ 696 K Â» 2 -It'/14*27'Wit/t/'.1.1.1'1 4 44;..2 ,:UN' N ..t ....0.'F:,]4.-,m......1.t' 1 1 .: : ~ilinzi'tr.':il'ifi):1ii: '.Â·:!iiI i':ilii,Ii':i:;:il:Ii'i'::IliI~~I:Hi'!: Â·T.~ -~ L96 L Â£86 L - -- - 1961. 0 R2-4 Change from previous year ~ Change 15,000,000 -# revious -3.0% JANUARY & YTD GALLONS BILLED hIVBA 25,000,000 j 20,000,000 -# - 000'000'ox ,- 000'000'9 CD 0 2 E .8 & co P > O 00= 0 1 -Ill A- ~ 966 X 966 L -E U; 82 -- 11 Â£66 L ""Ill,811,Il,NIEE,11â€ž8*4**BAt AN'.1 1. 1,Â·niÂ·1! rc '4.-,44--, C_ ~ 1 r i' 11 ~ E66 L .. P"lil!!I. il.".I!~ !liM~Em~i.i[-!Ellil..2!, ... .I'::il.i!.~ ..............49&/ Mr#Tr/97?9 11 - i I -~1~-4771--- 1, 9.. .1.. 4 .. . --~7- 066 K - Jgrl 'IrÂ·L,1â€¢4,i- 6961. 1 1 E- + m,y,N.'~7-7-'1~1"Â·rrrMf?'.1,.7Â·7"-'.''/*.'-b Mi, -'' 1 r~Â·r77:Â· ... .*7;--r' Iii -T-1- - ;7r - ~ *96 L milimil=J 1 1.2=,4 -ir-Â·F,--- 1212---=u-.-.--El A-!0144+fifÂ·4;4;4:4!Â·4,Â·:44*34*- 1. I z961, i- g 0 R2-5 NVf M Change f evious year JANUARY & YTD REVENUE hIVBA 90,000.00 -~ 80,000.00 -~ 70,000.00 -i 60,000.00 -* 50,000.00 /- 00.000'0* 00 000'08 - 00.000'02 r /- ooÂ·oooÂ·ox REVENUE 4 4/16( TOWN OF ESTES PARK \ -ro if - 49- -7,719 <t{.M,M- M -~4377*. *f; jit,4Â¥tk_ -.---- ~-1=.13274,-0211~ n *-.--, I .32,24:-f ;;;~Â·~ 'alf#TE Fi~~i/Â·.fâ‚¬'.U.-1~4' . 41%, ....441% il '41/.&*JiL/JE -.477. - -Â» 0>22-- e.,~-f 42~,7~~~~~~~1 - /5> 4*9 - -. 41...3,1.Ts.~/,1-,2*"..r/44*.b-* '*LA, i,~ a -CA , f. February 20, 1996 Mr. Dave Forsyth, Staff Design Branch Colorado Department of Transportation 4201 East Arkansas Avenue Denver, CO 80222 Subject: Highway 7 Project - Trees Dear Dave: I have enclosed a copy of a letter to the editor in the February 16, 1996 issue of the Trail Gazette. Two issues are brought up: (1) the removal of the Hwy. 7 bike path and (2) the removal of the trees (20*) in front of the Eagles View (Sta 47+00 east side) and Eagles Landing (Sta 50+00 east side). I assured those concerned that the Highway 7 bike path will not be removed but, in fact, improved. The Town is requesting that the trees in front of the condos be saved since about ten of the 20 are in a one-foot to two-foot fill section. The Town is requesting that tree wells be placed around the trunk so that the fill material does not eventually kill the trees. Thanks again for your consideration and help. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK Public Works Department baÂ£ el vwy-*L Bill Linnane, Director BL:ck Enclosure copy: Gary Klaphake R3-1 (303) 586-5331 â€¢ RO. BOX 1200 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (303) 586-0249 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT â€¢ FAX (303) 586-6909 OTHER Is Highway -7 path-in peril?---- should Ut ty in findi To the Editor, given a chance to express opposi- problemsÂ· Everyoi I have heard that the plans for tion. the widening of Highway 7 call for These plans are unacceptable, tourist-ori the elimination of the bike-pedes- especially elimination of thabike- largely on uninsured trian path and removal of the pedestrian path. During, trees in front of the Eagle's View What are people supposed to YMCA of t and Eagle's Landing apartments, dot walk their dogs or ride their and that the roadway will be bikes on the road shoulder? of this prol seasonal wi within a few feet from the patios What is most needed on High- ment that ii on those buildings. . way 7 is left-turn lanes, not four ic happens 1 This should not be! lanes of race track. ered by thei Is this true? If so, I think it is Unfortun important that everyone should Spencer H. Wyant be made aware of this plan and Estes Park other worke with us yea small child from the sa' R3-2 2/16/96 WATER DEPARTMENT 1995/1996 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS Cash Flow Summarv The Black and Veatch Water Rate Study, which included the Town's capital improvement plan (sheet 4/5) estimated a balance of $1,395,600 at the end of 1996. (See sheet 3/5) The Town has kept current with the Water Rate Study and the capital improvement plan and is estimating a 1996 ending balance of $2,315,187. (See sheet 3/5) The water rate study and author recommended that the balance never drop below $1.3M (See sheet 2/5 for a copy of the Public Works Committee meeting minutes.) The following is a summary of the projected and actual revenues and cash balances. Per Black & Veatch Actual and Water Rate Study Estimate 1993 Revenues $989,100. $1,069,188. * 1994 Beginning Balance 2,359,900. 3,086,289. 1994 Revenues 1,048,000. 1,182,557. 1995 Beginning Balance 2,305,500. 3,613,185. 1995 Revenues 1,144,800. 1,183,000. 1996 Beginning Balance 1,532,500. 2,773,372. 1996 Revenues 1,273,400. 1,243,000. 1996 Ending Balance 1,395,600. 2,315,187. Difference $919,587. to the good The reasons for the positive discrepancy are the following: 1. 1993-1996 Revenues $4,455,300 (B&V) $4,677,745 (actual) = $222,445 2. *1994 Beginning B&V underestimated due to unknowns = $726,389 R4-1 1 H./roll pul./wiNG co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ---- -/Public Works Committee ... 69. November 19, 1993 J Committee: Chairman Habecker, Trustees Doylen and Gillette Attending All Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Widmer, Trustee Dekker, Public Works Director Linnane, Water Superintendent Goehring, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: None Chairman Habecker called the meeting to order at 10:10 A.M. WATER RATE STUDY Public Works Director Linnane explained that three Financial Plans have been prepared by Black & Veatch since 1989. These plans have anticipated the end of the approximate $700,000/year MDC revenue source in 1993. At the conclusion of each Financial Plan, the public was notified of a possible rate increase starting in 1994. John Gallagher, of Black & Veatch, presented the preliminary study which includes the projection of water sales revenue, the cost of service, and the design of cost rates. Water rate increases are needed because of necessary capital improvements to upgrade the transmission and distribution system. The 1993 reserves stand at / $2.3 million and the goal is to maintain a reserve of $1.3 million reserve by 1999, after 6 years of capital improvements. These reserves are needed to cover capital emergencies that may result ~ ~ healthy reserve. from catastrophic occurrences. The $1.3 million is a financially -- Four water classifications were designated (residential, commercial, pump flow, and bulk) and the following rate structure was recommended for approval: Minimum Charge Structure: Charge customers the cost of billing the customer, repairing and maintaining the meter, maintaining smaller mains, and the minimum cost of 2,500 gallons of water, plus a charge for the actual water used. The total increase over the six- year period would be $75/residential (5,000 gallon average) per year and $360/commercial per year (25,000 gallon average). Following are the projected percentage increases over the next six years: 1994 5% 1997 9% 1995 7% 1998 5% 1996 9% 1999 5% The Committee recommended an ordinance be prepared by the Town Attorney using the Minimum Charge Structure and presented to the Board of Trustees at their January 11, 1994 meeting. BIKE PATH EXTENSION Director Linnane reported that $138,000 was budgeted for capital improvements during 1993 with $8,700 remaining in this fund. It was suggested this money be used to continue the bike path from Matthew Circle to the corner of Community Drive and Graves Avenue. The encumbrance of these funds would not affect the budget. The Committee recommended the $8,700 remaining in the capital improvements budget be encumbered in 1993 to order to complete this project in 1994. R4-2 94-. 61<50) ,â‚¬ 1~boll.5- Clf6921._,- TABLE 2-1Â·-. '' CASH FLOW ANALYSIS - 4 1 (\ad Mi C-~Â·40Lid ~A~-â€¢VJÂ·U~ +L.ul- '47 $:1- (42, /ekb, "=<Â£ p* 9*t.. -30A 9(2-9 1.,4 C.,A.04+ Ca-4.4 Budget I;1.cled 1994 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Â· 1999 $ ~~~/.. * I 3, /~) 1)-113,3-73 BEGINNING BALANCE 2,359,900 < 2,359,900 jZ, 2Â«500 ,/1.p2;S00 1,395,600 1,306,300 1,217,300 SOURCES OF FUNDS Water Sal. Rivenue Rovâ€¢nuâ€¢ from Existing Ratis 989,100 ) 998,100 1,9.19.600 1.039.~0 1,060,500 1.081,400 1,102,200 Rwâ€¢nuâ€¢ from Indicatâ€¢d Increases Pâ€¢icâ€¢nt Months Incrias, Eff*cuv. 1994 5.00% 12 49,900 51 eDo 52,000 53,000 54,100 55,100 7 1995 7.00% 12 74,800 76.400 78,000 79,500 81,000 1996 9.00% 12 105,200 107.200 109.300 111,500 1997 9.00% 12 116,900 119,200 121.500 1998 5.00% 12 72,200 73,500 1, 3.4/ 000 1990 5.00% 12 2 77.300 Total Water Sales Rovenue 989,100 1,048,000 1,144,800 \14113,400 ' 1,415,600 1.515,700 1,622.100 trag:Eh /-,17&,a Fire Protection - Gen Fund ~~4,-< 94.400 ~ 94,4 C-,1.:.VV .6, L..9Â£%&) 100,100 102,000 103,900 Tap F.es -4*ff'lA- - 11,510,00 . Plant Development . 125,000 125,000 -425,000 ' 125.000 125,000 125,000 125,000 Water Rights 150,000 150.000 49,000]4900â€¢ 15<000 150.000 150,000 150,000 Total Tap F... 275.000 275,000 /275,000- h /'276:000-1 275,000 275,000 275,000 J<_- 35#359 v*i':zy--/ Interest Income 90,000 93,300 /7/72) <58,664 ' 54,000 50.500 47,700 <150/0.a 92&292 Miscollanâ€¢ous Revenue 13,80 44,0,. 13.800 Bulk Water Surcha,ge 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 Bulk Water Dispenser . 7,100 7,100 .74100 73'00 461 000 7,100 7.100 7,100 Matirial Sales 5,000 5,000 Â§00 -1, 004 5.000 3 0.. 5,000 5,000 5,000 Motor Sales 10,000 10,000 10.000 1000 10,000 IS,004 10,000 10,000 10.000 Mise/Other 2,000 2.000 2,000 2.000 2,000 6%0'9,Â°' j.4.ieN j,zoo 3,200 3,200 Nonoperating 3.200 3.200 Total Miscellanious Revenue 41,100 41,100 u( 41ailoh -333-13) 41,100 41,100 41,100 Total Sources of Funds 1,489,600 1.551,800 ~1,#34.000---1 Â©7~6100 -J 1,885,800 1,984,300 2,089,800 USES OF FUNDS Operation & Maintenance (02,1-1 P Source of Supply 98.100 98,100.41-,4'4 98,200 t I3, 59 o 98,30010'0906 98,400 98,500 98,600 Water Treatment 273,200 273,200- 4284,100 040,769295,500253,445307,400 319,500 332,200 Distribution 253.200 253.200 11151â€ž 263,300 295,635 273,900310,890284,800 296.100 307,900 Customer Accounts 97,300 97.300 4't,* 101,200 91, 965 105,200 101,73â€¢109,300 113,700 118,200 Administrative & Gineral (2#Clha.ALE~ 4 298,000 298.000 111 ,-3109205,8, 451 3-22.%19 406,4,0335,300 348,800 362,700 Total Operation & Maintenance . 44* 1,019,800 1,019,800 02;â€¢:100 hl-,O~:400---,1,1 35,200 1,176,600 1,219,600 /'&6/.23;L~lizede~ -0 Debt Service .5,4,31?4 7,0,00- Existing 316,100 317,300 32,zoo 319:00 317,000 319,200 320,700 Proposed O - - 5- O 0 0 Total Debt Sâ€¢rvicâ€¢ 316,100 317.300 921.,2003,1 39(31.97100 ) 317,000 319,200 320,700 Routine Capital Improvements 124,100 124,100; ~60:000 ) 62,400 1 64,900 67,500< 70,200 (:.11.,.4. ,/r;isr=A ~:i-cie, 4 Maior Capital Improvements 145,000 145,006, U229/ UMBO 458,000 510,000 529,000 Total Uses of Funds 1,605,000 1,606,200 < 2.10000\ / 1,306:200 71,975,100 2,073,300 2.139,500 41,9,9,211 1,39/,9/0 Annual Surplus ([)*ficit) (115,400) (54.400) g32<0001 1,;goor (89.300) (89,000) (49,700) 039,%13) (458,/85) ENDING BALANCE 2,244.500 2,305.500 1 ~4500 1,~95:500 1.306,300 1,217,300 1,167,600 11 774372- 2-,31.5,/87 0 *4 DIg R4-3 r,1.1 0000000 el 800000@0 El 0 0-00000-0 00 4 in eN060Â¢5 4 Wt:1233320 0, ev. C, 00 0 g 4, @@ 2 96 N - 14 14 col g g' 0 0 E t. g 44 CO 1. g. - 1 - 't 1 1 000 C\1 tol 2/ 4, 000 UJ 00.0 OON p ... O t.0 0 M LO â€ž 1.0, J 01 it g. 11 .0, JEw <4 +V-1 1 &4Hnk . f -1.4)4)4)@0) 1 7% EEZ 1 - c kcccCI -117-#2Es Â¤'ca:~fNEEIÂ£ r < 22 LLZ ZZ 1 2 01 -=(94-10(ONO 0 R4-4 4(1 , 1- -~ 6--- 000'Â£10'E 000'ois 000'994 5 %*. 000227 -K*3 000'5#4 (e) S.1.903 03.Lyl:IN] 1V.101 nual Water L Projects 145,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 1, 000'064 000.044 000'06Â£ 000'2Â£6 000'94 1 MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 5Â« 6/0 140,000 140,000 the Green Zone luao,ed Jnol io eleJ uo!1ellu! lenuue uo paseg (e) 94 COST L Memorandum DATE: January 31,1996 TO: Bill Linnane FROM: Bob Goehring RE: Northern Interconnection CC: The purpose and alignment of the northern interconnection is to outline the northern border of the low zone or red zone, and increase pressure to the middle or green zone north of town and supply water to the red zone near summit drive. the creation of the different pressure zones was of high importance in the water master plane due to the high pressures experienced within the system. These lines are currently being replaced on an as need basis with these zones in mind. the full creation of these zones probably wont be realized for another 10 to 15 years. It is designed to follow the old 12 steel from the fall river prv to the bore on the 34 bypass cross the highway and proceed to bighorn. At big horn turn north and follow big horn until it intersect with the 8" steel line and follow it to evergreen lane. East on evergreen following the 4" steel line across devils gulch go through blackcanyon to the point Jim Slone replaced the 4" steel with 6" d.i.p.. This portion is needed to replace all of the old lines it parallels. the 12" . 8" and 4" have all started leaking and require immediate attention ( within the next 5 years ). The line would then continue through Black Canyon Hills to Stanley heights to the corner of south and 9*di'Gne. The line would then jump to the north west corner of Stanley heights and continue out to devils gulch. This portion will also have to be replaced in the near future to help with pressure problems & fire protection along devils gulch. R4-5 1 1 46 4162,44:'tviL'.1 . -L./ TOWN OF ESTES PARK 11% 1 t.. 14 luu*1434 .Fy \ 6.kii.4 â€¢â€¢ 4'2 7*; .-*.*09/'39-5>3~Â»- ----212:9{*3- /7 yÂ»./.-IN -4~-.44,4~ ' ''1'~~-"- 2- 1-All..\ ~AA ~.l:#464: 3,0 Fwt- f 4-14. 'Al:,4--UA---4.u AN--~- .- --r,- . ~1 -31305' ,?4 Â·I Â·2~ ?' ~1~~~i/Â·$4.44-Fi~~' - >-Â«-, E ~% 1 1 -4/22.. 37 '~.; 1*:4,4362Â· 233-,63:Yaa/%1.- _.&438: 1)7<EZZ,#Mt/F- . /-//...#- Fa=5*429 vt .%44. t ., *j il ~elf~<~~1'< ,~ ' -' , .4 Town of Timnath Monday, February 12,1996 Jerry Whittaker, Mayor P.O. Box 37 Timnath, CO 80547 Dear Mr Whittaker: Recently, four Governmental agencies of the Larimer County area have formed a task group to write and design a City/County wide right-of-way work permit for the management of all work within the local road rights-of-way. Our goal is to produce a single regulating document which will specify the quality of work throughout Larimer County and it's Cities and Towns. Our hope is to provide the taxpayer with better quality roads following utility work, and to simplify and generalize the standards which contractors in our region must adhere to. We just had our first meeting on February 1, 1996. Those involved are Mike Bryant, Larimer County; George Miller, City of Loveland, Dave Stringer, City of Fort Collins and myself. We would like to solicit your support and invite your representative. If you wish to attend the next meeting, it will be at the City of Fort Collins Engineering Offices, 281 North College on March 1 @ 9:00am. We will be addressing cost of permits, life- cycle-costing of asphalt and the inclusion of permit revenue within local budgets. Thank you for your anticipated participation. Town of Estes Park Public Works,Department Greg Sievers Construction Manager CC: Bryant, Stringer, Miller R5-1 (Â·303) 586-5331 â€¢ RO. BOX 1200 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (303) 586-0249 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT â€¢ FAX (303) 586-6909 OTHER