Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Public Works 1996-01-25
r, t AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 25, 1996 8:00 A.M. 1. Fire Station and Bureau of Reclamation Gateway Plan Request approval to adopt 2. Street Dept. Crack Seal System Request to purchase budgeted item 3. Spruce Drive Bridge Request approval to proceed with construction 4. 1996 Water Line Projects Request approval of RMC scope of services for 1) Hwy. 34 Utility Study 2.) Hwy. 34 Water Line Design & CM 3.) Looping Design & CM 5. Holding Green House Request to solicit prices 6. River Walk Retaining Wall Request to solicit prices Reports: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Report 3. Hwy. 7, Hwy. 34, Elkhorn Overlay Projects Update 4. Lake Trail Punch List 5. 1996 Public Works Dept. Activity Plan 6. Downtown Mail Delivery . 1 --- 1 RECEIVED JAN 18 1995 V ¥ 1~...... ADMIN. DEPT. ESTES VALLEY RECREATION and PARK DISTRICT Post Office Box 1379 • Estes Park, Colorado 80517 690 Big Thompson Avenue • {970} 586-8191 • FAX 586-8193 January 17, 1996 Gary Klaphake, Town Administrator Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Gary: I have reviewed the Gateway Plan for improvements along Highway 36. The plan appears to include all the items identified during our discussions of locating the fire station in Cherokee Draw. My only comment is how the trail will be addressed in front of the power plant. The terrain and parking lot will make it difficult in making a smooth transition along this area. The trail between the fire station and the power plant looks good, and we might want to target this area for heavy landscaping. Great Outdoors Colorado initially identified six projects in the State to pursue as part of the Legacy Program. Other projects submitted to GOCO are still viable but need further study. The Poudre River/Big Thompson River Project submitted to GOCO included this project as part of the Legacy Grant Program. Unfortunately, this project was not one of the initial six chosen by GOCO, but the project has merit and needs further definition. Our committee is meeting with Will Shaffroth, Executive Director of GOCO, on Friday, January 19, 1996, and after this meeting I can give you an updated status of the project. If you need additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Stanley C. Gengler Executive Director 1-1 45¥,j Highway 36 Gateway Plan Town of Estes Park ... ...t·...:,1...,6.»i.I<,44,5.--Ul=?/4. .... I . ; - 77.:7*Z.f:.f=£0*:20r:¢ "t,·74.u.. z . 0% 4.29306 #fc:'..~A~2<414./4·~~. -9« - 0 - .. . .':-Ii.r.:f.....~t:747.34.Y):Ii!0 41/·1.<241€ *.: -'.'*4 .~~~~~1~~6&~£~~ 5</1-5/li,AL€4~ -4 43 €\ \ ·' -Q©9.· 4-bild<IMA.852, ..:I.-427 V-,Ue:/., ...1- .~.....a...4,-'·:- '%T~ - I ./ 1% I . . ..... . I . , .. .-,1.... 0.4 =. .:.... . It. Ill 11 1 1 11 ..1,1 1 f.,li.t¢ffliedjb.h Fourth of July Fireworks Display - Lake Estes In cooperation with: Bureau of Reclamation Estes Valley Recreation and Park District December 1995 1-2 MUL?.14 SJUIL'f @ 00-2 Purpose: The~;§„Afghway 36 Gateway Plan purpose is to plan, describe and coordinate public improvements along Highway 36 starting at the open space area east of the Bureau Power Plant going west to the intersection of~U.<. Highway 34 and Highway 36. East of the Bureau of Reclamation Power Plant - Cherokee Draw Area This area is designated as the future site for the Estes Park Fire Station. The Fire Station site shall be conveyed by the United States to the Town in the form of an easement. The landscaping for the Fire Station site will not be contained iii the easement. It is our intent to create a transition to the Fire Station by a combination of large trees and shrubs. We will transition from the dry landscape to a green setting next to the Fire Station. Trees and shrubs shall be irrigated in the dry areas to assure growth. Access to the Fire Station shall be through the existing curb cut to the Bureau Power Plant. The future bike path shall proceed west along the lake shore and then transition south and west toward Highway 36. Parking at the Fire Station site shall be designated for firemen. Overflow parking shall be in the Bureau lot. . Task Year Fire Station Town 1996 Landscaping Town 1996 Bike Path Town/EVRPD To be determined Power Plant Area This area will facilitate the connection of the bike path from the Fire Station area to the existing Lake Estes path. The bike path will utilize part of the parking lot. Separation and striping will be provided. A pedestrian walk shall be constructed to Highway 36 and connect to the Highway 7 Bike/Pedestrian system. The Bureau parking shall be used for Bureau parking, overflow Fire Station parking and park-and-ride parking. The Town shall sealcoat the parking lot as necessary. Landscape maintenance of the Bureau front yard shall be the responsibility of the Town. This includes but not limited to cutting grass, watering, replanting of trees and shrubs as necessary. 1-3 1: 1 1 Task Year ~ Bureau Landscape Maintenance Town Starting 1996 Hike/Bike Path Town/EVRPD To be determined ' Parking Lot Sealcoating Town 1998 t Pedestrian Sidewalk Town To be determined 5 Y Palmer Propertv and Parking Area This area includes a triangle piece of property purchased by the Town from G. Palmer as open space and the parking area south of the Chamber. A scenic pull-out will be constructed along with landscaping such as trees and shrubs to assure growth. f An elk crossing area will be designated. The crossing follows the historic elk usage path. g To facilitate the crossing, the existing parking lot road will be moved to the west. Task Year b Purchase Palmer Property Town 1995 Scenic Pull-Out and Landscaping Town To be determined 1 - New Parking Lot Entrance Town To be determined 1 1-4 1 1 Ur 1-1-0 1 14, " 4 f.·'1 . a /2.2-I x i . 464 /-' '~" 71. - - f 1 '. /,7 //I.LA :4 A Gle. ft . OU ..- 'U - 1 1- I .b - ./f f i 6- 1 1111 2 2' ./' U 3 li 1 . i .1.94 1.. 0 , ! - L 0 - 2 - ' e .- z / - f, 2 l.1 1 . . I 1- ...4 1 / 1 i . 1 0 4 1 1. .: / 41 i Will //e ../ 40'f, F r J1, ,.CD 2 0 1 -''f L 1. .11/ ....+ , r , I i ' 1. ., / .4 , 1 , I ' 2 - / 1 X . / 11 1-1. ' 12 1 1 1 9 4 Z -9 0 1 \1 ,/ 1 1 4 -· /~64- 4 4 , 1, 4 4 ' / : 1 : 11114 1 - ittr /.4 k . I --' riL 1 1- 04 *1 / fi -1 1.- t r- Gb · i \\ f V 0 1 I --- ' , A 1 if T/ /\71 r ' -8 bl 1- . . ~ "(4 1 1 1. I \ % -- 1, ' 1\1 < 1 --52- / A -41 - 1\ , Al#' 1 l.1.-V ' 1 0 - J y- 01 / 4 .4 -Yi, r //-* f / 'ri ' 72.-- --. -- / 1 ./ 4, -.r. - 9 0 1/ L- - 9 2.- 7 . 1 02 1, - -- - ,n~,A¥ A,WwiT--- =hi? . .-, , / * - Y,. , t )19) 1 , - 1/ , 4 1, 1 / /X ; r ..40.0/ - , b Il h 1\\ ,. I #32 i \ 9, . 1 44 1/// 1 8 / 3. rf , - ... . -t: el '\ I 0 ! 2 .1 - C 'J \ 471 :41 l\\C«A 'Z' - i I /,1 1 1.d=== O Elj~: fe - ./111:4312 - / d. 0. 1 -4: 1 I ,- 2*131 -,-- ( 8, (197>4 / - \ 31 E--0 , 1-t-''Wf)#1->Ill'<, Ill;,* 00--1,* 1« 4~77--.-*i \\ Quo l\\ k'02 1- , ,-7,< b V 1 m 't / -t / 41 04110 -1- 7 --1- 2 / .C\\.\/AA\\ 1,& 4 * 4/Kal#,1 1 , -%... 11(4 14%'C,(1.7 :· 1 UNT't:# LA Pk-k f. 4 74*-M')8461- 0 1 ·9.r*/<4 ?-~ ° 0 ~ r 0'.0.,>00.- *fiki- · F C.-Ly,/In\(s 8 1_ - _ »41 / Nx; 'i 1-641814 a )4') \Am~ 13*4 ' 17 IAA _90 1 li '4 : i %331), //i~k i; M '11 7/4~~~~~ 32/ 5 \ -2 #00 -4 1 -4:6 t#1 #v.- 11~ 2 , (\ 1 »* 4 '',466,444 £ f §11..~,i~»4~In\12%|f /4254- , hi 1 )KN= .- -,- 49~ 1-5 - = - \"ll~:4431(19,~~- , 42·1*?J?.Sp#~:ip . \U , ... 1.I - ,--41.3-#I'la till, 414&' -*<-.Iiel- STANLEY , 002 -2 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum January 16, 1996 TO: Bill Linnane, Public Works Director FROM: Roy Johnson R.I SUBJECT: Crack Seal System Staff researched several different makes and models through magazines and brochures. We think that the Bearcat Kracker Crack Seal System would best suit our needs. On January 12, 1996, MacDonald Equipment gave Fleet and Street a demonstration on this particular machine, and everybody gave it rave reviews. The Bearcat Kracker Crack Seal system exclusively offers the following: 1. Dual heating coils 2. Pourable crack seal within one hour 3. Lowest loading heights available: 44 inches 4. Non-splash back doors 5. Diesel ignitor with no open flames 6. Total service of machine within two hours 7. Ability to continue to heat while in transport 8. Flush free system (no solvent) 9. Application hose is stored in a heated cabinet. The Street Department's reasons for picking this crack seal system are as follows: 1. Diesel ignition instead of propane is much safer. 2. No open flame which eliminates fire or explosion. 3. 250-gallon tank capacity means more productivity. 4. Application wand and pump system eliminates heavy lifting. 5. Material costs are going to be cut from $.50/lb. to $.24/lb, which means thousands of dollars saved each year. 6. Due to the opportunity of crack sealing year round, we can extend the life of each street. 7. Non-splash back door. 8. Flush free system by reversing the pump system. Our 1996 budget includes $26,000 for purchase of a crack seal system. We have received a price quote for this system of $25,790 from MacDonald Equipment, which is $210 under what was budgeted. This system will help us extend our pavement life and will be a major asset to our department. Thanks for your consideration. RJ:ck 2-1 1./ 111/ X, 11• 4 i I'lt-ILL/Ul *-ILL; CUdU 1 1- 1 IL--1 1 1 1 2 1 U JUL, U -'L J 1 1'_'. -1 J I U L'U Macdonald Equipment Company 7333 Highway 85 P.O. Box 5011 A ED if MACDONALD 11 ~ eQUIPMENT j | Commerce City, CO 80022 - - I •-Lt¥ '.'It Phone: (303) 287-7401 FAX: 003) 287-7404 'lly•1•VO•' January 15,1996 Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO Attn: Roy Johnson Fax #: 1-970-586-6909 We are pleased m quote as follows: (1) One Beareat Model BK-2500 250 gallon crack filter with all standard equipment. SELLING PRICE $25,790.00 Units quoted front stock are quoted subject to prior sale. Prices subject to adjustment to comply with manufacturers prices in e#eet al date oj shipment and quotation automatically expires thirty (30) days from its date. Prices quoted do not include any state or local taxes and such taxes (if any) shall be paid by the purchaser in addition to the quoted price, unless shown separately above. Delivery quoted is an estimate only and is based on the date of {his quotation and ts further subject to any delay encountered in receiving a jirm order and to other factors beyond our control. Warranty is limited to thcd on new machines as provided by the manufacturers, copies Of which ure available on request. It is understood that there are no verbal agreements or wkierstandings which in any manner conflict with the written re,·ms (21- this quotation. F.O.B.: Commerce City, CO Estimated shipping (completion) date (s): 4-6 weeks ARO Terms: Net 30 MACDONALD EQUIPMENT COMPANY: Submitted by: Bryan Baldwin - Sales Rep. Approved by: , /6 €L--1,/cif- 1 JU Owens, Vice-President 2-2 -21494%i#64%24*2&#CID,~. I..,-4446.->;··.~(,5.€4,~I:.u.- :. ~;,t.12·:- 1·i· f ~- .·.·-·>·.-4 »h~; 3 rj. , J.6-jyit~k.i·,1-1.Pit;4[gJ£~. 7,4. • ,•3 u £ f. FE,gN ·'6»:Yf.:6%11„&,LfiJFK=Li.-:'1.1.*.f kn--- E.z.,- :1.--:I,6.:.' ;: I·€· -:. ,.-'A,fis-€ .. 1. :4 4-:. 3441%%»LF€21ft.."fiEN/jf-t }j--~~:a~-6 ~NIA„4-0 -- ' - rt-i-: --LE '-·:-· ~,2::j.f-33:---24.f.?94,1¢:1 -3<-,4:(5:'5··43¥*44*4i<~~-im#p*~241,~~~ .'r'll.E~m i -*IM £19%4;'v 7~t'tri.<-.,-.f)*42)?fitciof.4.4-t...: t,4,7.. 7,1,7. 72 . .,~ ~ High=Production Crack=Sealing Machines 1 1 7~ ¥ 411 ; 49 t 14\ 1. .4 \ 573-h.*7314. .. r »- 1 ,- 'ALF£81:,14..Zl.W u . 11_ <~>» I 1 m. lit f ·' --ALL 11 , F-- ~©MM: Bearcat DIESEL . . 1 '. .- ijt 4°* .401 ; <./, J.., irlF, £ 23.-* p:1 - 49/3/. -- ft....pjil Lt - 1,-1,71 02 , . I.. ... t ' .:32/L.4-* -0 €£4 1 *· '43-«.2 V*22:1.---/ 1 0 3 -ALL k I £- Ijil ..rr#t ; DIESEL -,03earcatt A '-7 L~_mmil-J ''€2- J-~ /~1~/~. ~;;pul P¥/ ' .- C - '. "2= -„'.9..t€G.~- "tte:ki#•4~4'£4142*#:41'.83<·15*'~ 4..1.~6*58,&0„ «10'T/4.-1, 7..3- T ..>- M * 9- ***=~*»4;~9339*oppir Ehgineertd ?for\Maximo mib,i#433*W33 2 '-- · '--'-r·r't-':.G'i P..S'4·.·: -t#.0-,4,4: - -oductiont on Every Jobo,93%1 2'33 BearCat Mf g. 2-3 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 18, 1996 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: Greg Sievers RE: SPRUCE DRIVE BRIDGE CC: Bill Linnane The 1995 budget included $55,000 for the rehabilitation of the Spruce Drive Bridge over the Fall River. This project is an 80% - 20% split with the Colorado Department of Transportation. Design and planning took place throughout 1995. After all bids exceeded the budget, the project was modified and rebid. The new cost of the project, including rebidding, redesign, plans and specifications and all the extra engineering and construction is $77,485.00. The Town will be reimbursed approximately $62,000. The addditional cost to the Town will be approx. $4,500, which can be absorbed by the Street Deptartment line items. The Public Works Department is requesting approval to proceed with this project. 3-1 U £29'acrj TOWN OF ESTES PARK J€Ullf &),A,/ , 4* -ait 1. 1 lk.le V<Oul V tri det 1~r EL<'-»1.-:·· .~ 4 4.- 4 -4/Z: //0.. January 17, 1996 Mr. Mike Frederick Colorado Department of Transportation 1420 Second Street P.O. Box 850 Greeley, CO 80632 Subject: Estes Park Highway 34 Widening: CY 06-0034-14; SA 92303 I)ear Mike: I've enclosed a copy of the Highway 34 Utility Study in accordance with the Town and Colorado Department of Transportation agreement referenced above. Our Consulting Engineer, Rocky Mountain Consultants, is currently preparing a scope of services for Design & Construction of the utility study recommendation of alternative number three. I will send you the proposed scope prior to January 23rd and we can discuss costs and scheduling. i Thank you very much for your help and coordination concerning the cost sharing. I'll talk to you soon. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK ®-9- 0< 1/.Vvt.O/4.<4 Bill Linnane Director of Public Works cc: Dave Forsyth w/attachment BL/lp 4-1 (303) 586-5331 • RO. BOX 1200 • ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (303) 586-0249 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • FAX (303) 586-6909 OTHER PROJECT NO. (PE) CY 06-0034-14 SA 92303 (UTIL) " " It (CONSTR) " LOCATION SH 36 Eavt and West in Estes Park STANDARD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AGREEMENT UTILITY/DITCH CO./RAILROAD AGREEMENT THIS. AGREEMENT, made this day of. , 1996, is by and between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereinafter referred to as "the State," and the Town of Fqtpq Park , located at 170 McGregor, Estes Park, CO 80517 , hereinafter referred to as "the Owner." WHEREAS: 1. Authority exists in the Law and Funds have been budgeted, appropriated, and otherwise made available, and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Fund Number 400, Appropriation Code 010, Contract Encumbrance Number _ 92301. 2. Required approval, clearance, and coordination has been accomplished from and with appropriate persons and agencies. 3. The State considers it necessary to make certain improvements on the State Highway System which are generally described and located as follows: Widening, crub and gutter, drainage and asphalt paving County Larimer Highway Number 34 Located from Station 5+00 to Station 55 +38.5 4-2 . ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS. INC. 9mc January 19, 1996 437 South St. Vrain Estes Pork. CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 FAX (303) 825-8912 Bill Linnane, P.E. Public Works Director Town of Estes Park P.O. BOX 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Highway 34 Corridor Water Utilities Study Dear Bill: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) is submitting the following proposal for work related to the Highway 34 Corridor Water Utility Study. The emphasis of the Study is to evaluate the effects of the Highway 34 reconstruction on the paralleling 8" water main. HIGHWAY 34 CORRIDOR WATER UTILITY STUDY For the Highway· 34 Corridor Water Utility Study RMC will evaluate the effects of the highway widening on the existing water main. A number of separate areas are to be reviewed. These areas will include the following: 1. Evaluate the replacement or relocation of a 3/4" service line from the 8" main adjacent to the Estes Park Waste Water Treatment Plant across Highway 34 to the Silver Spur Stables and Phillips 66 gas station. The water service will be evaluated in its current location as opposed to relocating it to the 6" main in Stanley Village. 2. Evaluate the replacement or abandonment of·the 6" water main across Highway 34 at Steamer Drive. A hydraulic evaluation will be done to ensure the effectiveness of having the Stanley Village/Stanley Heights water mains Iooped into the 8" water main along Highway 34. 3. Evaluate the replacement of the 8" water main across Highway 34 at Summit Drive and Hillside Lane with either 8" or 12" ductile iron pipe. 4. Evaluate the·lowering of the new 12" water main up Summit Drive from Highway 34. Approximately 350 feet of 12" water main will require lowering due to the Highway 34 widening. 5. Evaluate the replacement or relocation of the 4" water main crossing Highway 34 approximately 700 feet west of Hillside Drive. 6. Evaluate the replacement, relocation or lowering of approximately 4000 feet of 8" water main along Highway 34 from Hillside Lane east to Lone Pine Drive. This will also include a hydraulic evaluation to determine whether the existing 8" main should be increased to 12" as outlined in the Water Utility Master Plan. CIVIL AND ENVI 4-5 IEERING • PLANNING gmc The methodology used for the Highway 34 Corridor Water Utility Study will include the following: 1. Survey the water main and services for vertical and horizontal alignment relative to Highway 34. 2. Review Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) coordinate system for the Highway 34 project. 3. Compile the existing water main and services information into the CDOT plans. 4. Evaluate the existing water main and services location and crossings. 5. Evaluate the future hydraulic demands of the 8" water main along Highway 34. 6. Prepare a report containing RMC's findings and recommendations. The Highway 34 Corridor Water Utility Study wil] be completed by January 12, 1996. A scope of services from RMC for the required Water main work along Highway 34 will be submitted with the study report. Please see attached pages for the cost associated with the aforementioned project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ROCKY MODWTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 440 Kerr& M. Prochaska, P.E. Associate Principal KMP/mah 4-6 gmc HIGHWAY 34 CORRIDOR WATER UTILITY STUDY Cost of Engineering Services Data Collection RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 16.0 $ 1,280 Project Engineer $50 36.0 $ 1,800 2 Person Survey Crew $75 8.0 $ 600 Survey Technician $35 8.0 $ 280 Drafting ~ $30 32.0 $ 960 TOTAL DATA COLLECTION ..... $ 4,920 Data Analysis and Report Preparation RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 8.0 $ 640 Project Engineer $50 . 16.0 $ 800 Clerical . $20 20.0 $ 400 TOTAL ANALYSIS AND REPORT PREPARATION $1,840 TOTAL UTILITY STUDY .... $6,760 4-7 1 -1 1 / rr=k ' · -12._ !.;121=22:5%§9 ' 1 -b,C / % r-<15N »i [- / 1 2-' d*Zk:C,-77 CO. eg#22//[~ d 31 4 ~ -{ 13*-fi~-91·Q % ·**AiA ~ 11 I----1 . ; 1 11 .10-11756 Z ify / . - 3 /7 Liz_ . -' 1 11 1 A--+ I-117=El -:-14 0 /4.4 i k, 6 A- ~ 1 1 4/,/9 2. '; 202% :1 , Ll? . 14 . 11 5 1 k j 4 111»lp A '47 2 ,--1 h99.y '4>J.:\ ; lili ./7./.J . . 1 . 1 1+1 1 - /4fz- 30-„.7 1 '6'0\L /:HAN . 1 1 1-29)3\OV . ) f. ///41 : :: 1% 1 5...: .:a-*. Jb . «.-· L_--_i_, # ft- m·: **t **~·: 31 -1.1.1 I . il#f //: 1 ®A ..... - . 99- ~ 41 2- , 214.7 : . . 1 .4 - y .... - 1-Llf. £3* . 0 - N .. . . ... - 9 1 bill . 4 - .... el / w 4 u .\=. . ' ti ~ 249» I I 1.¥1 JZ.. - · lf~- 1\ . \3.-M~ 61 i (f 4 r. -/ .. W. 1- - » Ll : 6 #:73*3 1 .1 1 1: l.31: 54*(44,255 2 • .h« 9,4 7::::%: 1 / e 13 52134< ... 3, % 0 . -%6 If . 10.3. - // '6 &23 - 1 -- . Elf«*Vvy j H , : k 4 F V /. lek.- u. : 11 ~: :2 7.0 . A ,0'f · 7 U. 1 0-Ii .2 \t -r:- 4 Z Pa . . ViA : #8 . :"44*9 l 7 1--<'' 116/ 4.· 1 + ~...lt' i '92 . M·--% :\·:\. 42 *· il.1-PUr 1 14. / J . 1 2 1..= 16 r .1 irt bar 4 ..r 1 . 3 ' 27 ..1 \26< . 6.11 E,n\=1*:A/\:14:131.Z E-~ I - twh,V ', i~ ~ .......-1 1 //4€2<56%,IR~Z: t:51--r'/' W. - .1 -ah.,euvs< .1 3 : F 19*H,yh:34 4 / 1 n . 1. d. 3 . .3/ .N\. -ly N''\,0 A J » 3 1 +S - 10 hzbulte - 1. 9.446 7,/:\ -- --~ n .. ,2 I E........ . 1- : k~ : 4.. C. A-£ 2 - R '©1 Al,1.11 /· M / · A 4 0 .. . L. G. . . - . '. PJ ../- Al :\ .G , 26•r .. . ..Im . S:: 0- -I 6 + : . / == 1, . t 03. : '- -. 3.fpt -4 = 1 ' 0 - I OIl. 14 i-_ 4---t. ~ 39-G 5 - N 1 2\ 1 . 0 h. 4-8 69•1 53153 STORER .ii•,i 1 MI AN L E Y 1. BLACK '4 1, r NIO 0 . . /rA•LE, m " fl}LISNOO gmc ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 January 24, 1996 FAX (303) 825-8912 Bill Linnane, P.E. Public Works Director Town of Estes Park P.O. BOX 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Highway 34 Water Utilities Interconnect Dear Bill: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) is submitting the following proposal for work related to the Highway 34 Water Utility Interconnect. The emphasis of the Interconnect is to relocate a section of 8" water main out of the Highway 34 Corridor. For the Highway 34 Water Utilities Interconnect, RMC will provide field survey, preliminary and find design, easement preparation as required and construction related engineering services for the project. The sections to be relocated are as follows: STEAMER DRIVE This section includes the replacement and lowering of approximately 400 feet of 6" water main with new 6" ductile iron pipe. The 6" main will be replaced from the interconnection with the 8" main on the south side of Highway 34, north across Highway 34 and up Steamer Drive. SUMMIT DRIVE This section includes the lowering of approximately 230 feet of 12" water main. The 12" main will be relocated from the interconnection with 8" main on the south side of Highway 34, north across Highway 34, and up Summit Drive. GRAND ESTATES DRIVE EXTENSION This section includes the abandonment of the 8" steel main from Summit Drive to the eastern intersection of the Grand Estates Drive and Highway 34 with approximately 4,000 feet of 12" ductile iron pipe to be installed through Lake View Tracts and Grand Estates. The 12" line will tie into the existing 8" main at the intersection of Highway 34 and Hillside Lane. The 12" line will then follow the existing 4" and 6" water line south down Hillside Lane for 350 feet, then east along Pine Lane for 1,000 feet, then north up Grand Estates Drive for 200 feet, then easterly crossing private property for approximately 2,400 feet to the eastern leg of Grand Estates Drive and interconnect with the existing 8" main. The existing 4" and 6" water line along the alignment will be abandoned after completion. CIVIL AND E 4-9 SINEERING • PLANNING 9mc LOTS 1 AND 2 LAKE VIEW TRACTS This section includes the replacement of the 4" water main servicing lots 1 and 2 of Lake View Tracts form the existing 8" main in the Highway 34 corridor. The new service main will either be provided from the north off the existing 4" line located in Otis Lane or from the south off the new 12" line to be installed. Design of the projects would be completed to go to bid by February 5, 1996 with construction to begin in March, 1996. Easements for approximately 19 lots will have to be secured prior to any construction. The cost for review of existing easements and obtainment for required new easement has been broken down in the accompanying Cost of Engineering Services. Based on the "Town of Estes Park Highway 34 Corridor Water Utility Study" the towns portion of the design and construction was estimated to be 57.5 % of the total cost with CDOT estimated portion of 42.5 %. Please see attached pages for the cost associated with the aforementioned projects. Colorado Department of Transportation R.O.W. permits will be obtained for all projects where applicable. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ROC~Y MO'*7<IN CONSULTANTS, INC. /12 \1 / A 1 Apl KIV Kerry M. Prochaska, P.E. Associate Principal ' KMP/mas 4-10 HIGHWAY 34 WATER UTILITY INTERCONNECT Cost of Engineering Services Preliminary and Final Design RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 44.0 $ 3,520 Design Engineer $50 185.0 $ 9,250 2 Person Survey Crew $75 60.0 $ 4,500 Drafting $30 380.0 $11,400 Clerical $20 88.0 $ 1.760 ; TOTAL DESIGN ...$30,430 51., 4 Construction Inspection RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 26.0 $ 2,080 Construction Inspector $46 · 130.0 $ 5,980 Drafting $30 32.0 $ 960 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION.. ' $ 9,020 4-11 Easements (Estimated 19 Required) RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 8.0 $ 640 Registered Land Surveyor $50 16.0 $ 800 Survey Technician $35 48.0 $ 1,680 Drafting $30 40.0 $ 1,200 Clerical $20 40.0 $ 800 Title Company Research Fees $ 700 TOTAL EASEMENT $ 5,820 TOTAL PROJECT %45,270 Portion to the Town of Estes Park $26,030 Portion to CDOT $19,240 4-12 8. 1 1 76 1 i.-1.F--44-9 2-:161/3297:/1 i 7 a . - 1* 7 W lf' 1 - 1 J . I M - l., I W 1.7 / / ..../ D- 1 ~ 2-• -2 -t}-1 -\/ / / % t. M . --1 - 0 .2, - • Ar .. . .EM 7 --~r-. M . ~ -.f,v- 1 - 1- JO . . ... . . tlt-:i 79 . FOO, Wik 4 - 1 - 01 01 -1 R : :1 . 4 3. 2 - ... Z b IN o ZE j : Z. 1 - 5 1 I I. - 0 .4. . 6. 0 W:.1 7 k, i E :.- f 09 -Cl i, W t - .! i .--71 --t Ft i -i 22 · Q &: -e i•t--- 1, 2 3 /121.74- ./ -2. ir »l ..1. E.1 2 . O U) t . :R. f - . 0 :9 - P.. . I I f.. E- 9/1 1 1 ' 7 0.- . . €f . U 40> . . 0 k 0 - . . .2 :2::21 - 92 *0 -~" kt:0·*7~Z hah I ' - 6-7 -... ..... hly\ 7 1 0 6 9 . N - I . 1.. (r /.. ]I¥1 '... ., -- - -1 ? f. ~1-24~,~ ~ ~ : All 1 • 1\ M. - ... 0 */ Z /N,f:*~¢ ... : .1 ,%222>6430 .t: u . 2. i V : . 9 /. L\-/ 1 ite, , 9 t.. 0. , '' LI--ii:% EV. o . k u '1 110= -6,e, , 15 - - 1: · 32 9 Dll A = = L-32.I-Val = h :4: , # ... 40. A; 1.,1 0 , , , - li J " 1 3.42 =t=z 6 ' .4 ri & :J& 1 : -1 . J l -1 - 10 24 J ' 1 •2- 7 . 0.-'..*1 k .....4- , r.r. - i B . - 1 lit y . 4041 I .- . 6- 0 -1 711 1 V ~ 0 . % - J . 0.- 0 :2 · . . Z W U·/- .. -- O,.0. lu J •' I.,'2/< 4.•3 1 -n . r .' 5 9 2.- . ' k . U r I I. .' .,1. .' :Et:3 5 : %%23 9 :0,4.0 2 J : . . .1. . . n Et 1 2 8= - , .- I - 6.- I. - L+ .- -01 2 - ... r. 'EN .- S W.\ ZZ." , . = 4 / . .- U 4- -1& r : 1-1 i 1- f il; . , . X , . - -2 : 4 0 1. .. U. .. . I. . 4 % 0- . . 6 . = 4- 7 - - 9 . I +0 - -„. --- I 0 - . 9 - N --1 J.1 5 ... 4- - - .... 6 -a - . 6 . I ; i .. .-7 ..:2 I 2~ ii 4. 4 .: E ' 01. 1 8,1 ./ i A 0/ 10 l/.1 . . - 13 -- k - cs*629<14#.4 - ' 1-Z:&.HY-: . - , 1 /~ < - Fi~--~' 1,-1<- ~-,/&./0 i ~ ·~0 ,/1 . 95,-' :: ~1€ 1 \.. , :i.. m./ d - 0 \ 1 - 'r v . , V 1 - ... f.. i 1 -glk 4 .0 - /t: "'r?: fr:EviOL. ~--6~lir L~~-1 -2--/./-* 1/4. " FRvAr-yij~ •I -u C.UL-W 2 'L.,._¤0 * ~!719I+N{ :10: tilfirhbi-91 ; 4-13 A--c.·.m T? MA-5,41*„ - 97271*TZ£ft, I . nWATER UTILITIES INTERCONNECT STORER ' ADDITION HIGHWAY 34 94 rs. 01•]S 4% 1. All,1 02 1 3D 40 4, 2 Et .1 21: STAN~~~ST~RIC Wins 110NN YERS ADDITION 34 I QUITA ug JAOK ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS,INC. 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 January 24, 1996 Metro (303) 825-8233 FAX (303) 825-8912 Bill Linnane, P.E. Public Works Director Town of Estes Park P.O. BOX 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Town of Estes Park 1996 Water Looping Projects Dear Bill: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) is submitting the following proposal for work related to the Town of Estes Park 1996 Water Looping projects. The emphasis of the looping projects is to replace existing deteriorated water mains. For the 1996 Looping Project, RMC will provide field survey, preliminary and find design, easement preparation as required and construction related engineering services for the following projects: Valley Road This project includes the replacement of approximately 2450 feet of 12" water main with new 12" ductile iron pipe. The 12" line will be replaced along West Elkhorn Ave. from the PRV vault east to Valley Road, northeast up Valley Road to Highway 34 and east to the water main crossing of Highway 34. Included with this project will be traffic control plans and permitting required for work in a State Highway Right-of-Way. Per preliminary review of Larimer County Assessor Maps, no dedicated right-of-way was granted for Valley Road through Fall River Addition. Existing right-of-way and easement information for the water line alignment will be obtained prior to construction. East Riverside Drive This project includes the replacement of 117 feet of water main with 6" to 12" ductile iron pipe on east Riverside Drive at Moccasin Street. Design of this project was completed in 1995, hence RMC's services at this time will only include the construction related engineering services commencing with the bidding. Due to the high density of underground utilities in the area this project will involve close construction observation. Hill Side Lane This project includes the replacement of approximately 300 feet of 4" water main along Hillside Lane between Pine Lane and Vista Lane with 6" ductile iron pipe. Design of the projects would be completed to go to bid by February 5, 1996 with construction to begin in March, 1996. CIVIL AND ENVIF 4-14 ERING - PLANNING gmc Please see attached pages for the cost associated with the aforementioned projects. Colorado Department of Transportation R.O.W. permits will be obtained for all projects where applicable. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ROCKY MbuNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. \ lill .1/ i/1\ 17 1 : 1 /*FUL, Kerry M. Prochaska, P.E. Associate Principal KMP/mas 3 t 4-15 VALLEY ROAD Cost of Engineering Services Preliminary and Final Design RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 18.0 $ 1,440 Design Engineer $50 76.0 $ 3,800 2 Person Survey Crew $75 26.0 $ 1,950 Drafting $30 155.0 $ 4,650 Clerical $20 27.0 $ 540 TOTAL DESIGN, $12,380 Construction Inspection RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 10.0 $ 800 Construction Inspector $46 55.0 $ 2,530 Drafting $30 13.0 $ 390 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION ' C 3,720 4-16 Easements RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 3.0 $ 240 Registered Land Surveyor $50 8.0 $ 400 Survey Technician . $35 8.0 $ 280 Drafting $30 4.0 $ 120 Title Company Research Fees $ 350 TOTAL EASEMENTS $ 1,390 TOTAL PROJECT... $17,490 4-17 EAST RIVERSIDE DRIVE Cost of Engineering Services Construction Inspection Including Project Bidding RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 5.0 $ 400 Construction Inspector $46 18.0 $ 828 Drafting $30 8.0 $ 240 Clerical $20 3.0 $ 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION $ 1,528 HILLSIDE LANE Cost of Engineering Services Preliminary and Final Design RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 ' 5.0 $ 400 Design Engineer $50 10.0 $ 500 2 Person Survey Crew $75 4.0 $ 300 Drafting $30 16.0 $ 480 Clerical ~ $20 4.0 $ 80 TOTAL DESIGN. $ 1,760 4-18 A ' 04 . Construction Inspection RATE/HR. HRS. TOTAL Project Manager $80 2.0 $ 160 Construction Inspector $46 10.0 $ 460 Drafting $30 4.0 $ 120 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION ..... $ 740 TOTAL PROJECT $ 2,500 TOWN OF ESTES PARK 1996 WATER LOOPING PROJECTS Cost of Engineering Services Project Cost Valley Road $17,490 East Riverside Drive $ 1,528 Hillside Lane $ 2,500 TOTAL PROJECT COST (Not to Exceed) $21,518 4-19 11- 'I: I : ?I.E./ip:-4/L-:9,>/ A 1 i. 1 k A ~ i " '~ \\ %3/\ 0'1\ ty *30-ji · K A. \46 l l.~ : ltd*39%] ©nz.-t.12 0 . 4 --- * 1-*N-ZA:_3«\ 0-024241 1' i 94**r,/ .Aud..4=.ZiREE]tri 699*ET '*es- . 1 1/ / : 11 M: »*M 7~ 3, . L 8:r. ..4140%0#3*fll 1A. - ' -m·MY:r *tt , . X _ 4 . . ., 0 -241/Thdir#4:, . , I I /4 O :. C - 00 -, 11, .2. -'- . -¥d barzo:glacrr-~••co 1%(2/ 2 .-ze. : . X\1.3 f, 4 2. 4 : -1 -'i-1 71+ 3-T: •r.·1.a c 4.64 . - unmltih.*1* 3 '· : *TE:.ti"t.. S ; V - *.4:* :. 4 E 0- :1 ;~: :f _ta #n-#Aryf:. . .M-+4 P ... 2 ~~2 v .: : J.,6.,, E 31 • 0.. 0 -HrH:Irrr r.rr . 4. ..;L-:T~:,RE,-rf,1 · I. I - kai I . . . 25 • t. 2 -t. 1 --\X S /0 ... '' . -1 t . ...,4 AX° k A. . W 0 .. * . 9 4 3 3: .1 . 1% 6 1, C. ' . ): . ' 0% ' 1 1 6* m I C . - I /- . = - w w~ -- I / . 2.. eg: 3 ..4- 4 4 1 %:% x, 2/: 'i :12 : , . I I 0 . a - d 9 : 4 . 8 , n - .1 . Pi & . .1; . 3 •~_-1 1 - . M / . . 1. m S)__. :-1-r- , N --0 t" 1 . 0. e I 3 :4 : .: SLA 9.1 1184 . D- - -TATLAVI 0. 1 - , \t - /8. /1: r -* . \. gox \% d . . 73..)*f<P ' ij:S~ i;~.~~ 13~.=1~.,E* C : C.. . k=221 r 9.-4 , 62-ji k.,im : Fle<Y M 9 1531 i .- 0 141 -EEE[** k" &ufx,1'9 L '1., U wa / 3% 1-6 -A.,3/E. 6 1 MA .'.3/,1./.- 0 W - . vrk. ·3,7 . h - 9 l < -~ --/1 33 IN lili 11•fl¥~27••T,ryi»Zih 't -.C - 4 . O/ 4.'04•.0.'%'I•o, i IAE ' 3 - . . T~ i *«~3141] ~ A D/;5 :I:I:' 2 ',,01 , ,.C.~ 'FL-la X.: 273·m• - 6 1:} L:.:7/:.: rn-,-r\* t /6 & 1, i: -:cqi Ul.2-NE * I.\ 2; 41 2 NE 35 -~i* r. %-5,·1#%0 : N.:Abflf-FJZJIX\&\1'22 k>: 1< . .0 1 5 111 \ ·&=58/:ell-®86- \ -4 h. · : 43-rn ¥- .. K r .<r R :2 71;-W I ~ .MO~ 01-· 9-01*t@*7&,JXW«}- -A.440< h im .1266 -14-1-1-YA\2B.1.D -ib--*-1 341 1 · 1' · - · j s ¥*,1>ra e 9 - - /1 -Ill . . . :; f/1 · 1 9 4 : ™21=I .: : 2. : 41· I · 3-7-i '*<8*: il-LI #r . 2:3 En----7 .1.X/Af 1: l. :. 3: -1 - 41 10... '- . 11 .1 1 , AIN \ ; 4 . E 5 .6.1 .. . 4 .U .... =: . 1 4 2 1 11 - I . N . I . 3 0 1 . „- ./ W. .0 2 -/ 9 - 2 %:1 . 9 -I . a , .:::: .An C 4.4 1/ 4 \\ .:... . ht-9.-12 2 R • G .„- 4 Z #18 -i Jili~'4.:.i·· ' 1 ···l L: J'-1,4~~24'7 4 , . 2,2 31.4 . 33 4 fl ... !,11 A fA ~ „.,44 q :.: . ~ ~ ~-3-1-- 7 · 1%. 1 ~ I . t. . 0 i. :.·){fli~!t].;Gij:ii'· & 4 ---1 il..:. 4 - . ..„- 7=;--1-/1 . 1% '.0, I 0. N¥.: ~ f ~, f..9 j .. f-- -- 1 -0 -- 4 = 0 -- 6 - ./.-7 1.1. ... .- 4. in:0. r L): 3271 >/ 67. . 1, 4-20 -i---7. / / B. L adtz~.---7 -4 1996 WAT SCOU.1, . .Al .A L•,0, ILLAG , 1·Cins r....1.- v f60. Ilt•to• 7«71*Clul S'.,1.,NOLO., 1.---~1., , 'COV 1/lldsoM STAILry n. 1 DISTRICT ....... STEAMER NNOLL SU.0. ./..11 YERS ADDITION 34 F $„O '11.Z' CRkGS U. .0.001 - , At BO . 1/1 JANES . NOW THEREFORE, THE OWNER AND STATE AGREE: 1. The Owner shall perform or have performed the Work in accordance with all terms and conditions of this agreement. 2. If the Work provides for engineering review by the Owner, and such review fails to establish specifically that the State's proposed improvements will adversely affect Owner's facilities, then the proposed improvement will be deemed approved by the Owner. If the Owner's review does establish specifically that the proposed improvements will adversely affect Owner's facil:ities, then the State may revise its proposed improvements. 3. The State will reimburse the Owner as provided below for the Work after the Work is completed to the State's satisfaction and the State has received proper billing. 4. The Owner will bill the State for the direct and indirect costs incurred in performance of the Work and accumulated under a work order accounting procedure prescribed by a federal or state regulatory body. The Owner's cost estimate, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, is $ 6,760.00 , which shall constitute the State's maximum obligation under this Agreement for eligible Work costs actually incurred by the Owner, unless this Agreement is modified in writing by the parties before performance of Work which results in additional costs. 5. The amount the State pays the Owner under this agreement will be full compensation for all costs incurred by the Owner while performing the Work. 6. After this agreement is executed by the parties and is approved by the State Controller, the State will give the Owner written authorization to proceed with the Work. The Owner shall complete the Work within 60 days after receiving this written authorization. 7. The Owner shall obtain State approval prior to the award of any contract etween the owner and another party for the performance of the Work. The Owner agrees to adhere to all applicable state ;and federal statutes and regulations pertaining to the performance of the Work. 8. In the performance of the Work, the owner and its contractor(s) shall: a. Record the Work costs in accordance with Part 645 of Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations and any other applicable regulations or procedures. b. Provide the State with all information and reports required by state or federal statute or regulation., c. Retain all Work related records, including contract records between Owner and any contractors, for three years after the final payment. d. Permit the State or FHWA to access all Work records as necessary to determine compliance with this agreement. Records access will be permitted at any reasonable time during the performance of the Work and up to three years after receipt of final payment. 9. This agreement will terminate on the date the State makes final payment to the Owner, with the exception of the continuing records retention requirements in clauses 9(c) and 9(d). -3- 4-4 4. The proposed highway improvements will require the future relocation, adjustment, or installation of facilities that belong to the Owner. The proposed highway improvements currently require the performance of Engineering Design, Estimating and/or Review Work by the Owner, which is generally described as follows: SH 34 Water Corridor Study and Recommendations (hereinafter referred to as "the WORK"). 5. Any relocation, adjustments, or installations ("modification") of Owners' facilities required by the proposed highway improvements are subject to Owner's review and approval. 6. The Work is necessary to enable the parties to accurately describe the scope and cost of the modifications to Owner's facilities necessitated by the proposed highway improvements, and/or to ensure that such modifications are reviewed and approved by the Owner. 7. The State desires the Owner to complete the Work as soon as possible. 8.- This agreement is limited to performance of the Work as described above. 9. Any relocation, adjustment or installation of Owner facilities which is required as a result of the State improvements will be performed pursuant to a separate agreement to be executed at a later date, and is not a part of the work to be performed under this agreement. 10. The State has authority to enter this agreement under section 43-1-110 and 43-1-225, C.R.S., as amended. -2- 4-3 1- . Ji 1,wuvcluclauu' 3SnOHN3389 SnX]N ---=--- Jl .L-1 1/luwu INVI.Lul ICUOINVU A un 2 0 W 9 40 0/f -\ . 4.0 .- 94 \ - .r-- 4 20 " I " 4 / 14/f. 1 111% -r, f Nt 4 9 - 4/4 £3 4014 1 + ./.Uy i - *040< - ./7 - . 1 ' 124, 0 ,?/ \ 0 ..7/ZO v 944. p 4 illl- r /42.-- \\ 1 r==- A - 5-1 * Sll¥13CI NOI103hl3 1VNOildO SNIFW&13 9 1N3~Idln03 FE©~ or,poli SHEET TUIAL PROJ. Na. NO. SHEETS coun~0O CY 08-0034-44 4 RIGIrr OF WAY Nwra DEL 1~ POE, TE16. S.H. 36 East in Estes Park P€19. TE19 M S.E. 1/4 Sec. 24 / ~ Otis L. Opol L Whiteside 621 Big Thompson Ave. - Este. Porit CO 80517 NQIE; design data Is ~~ PT· SW 1/4 SW 1/4 SEC. 19 In English units and is for 164 .-. information only 165 T.----, ~ Warne K. Schrader 6 L~ t r ----L-1 / ~2' 561 t L -2 57 -1.-f , 0 0 Estcs 80517 /9:) ,r---* 0 Fr. SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC 24 /6 14 PT. ~ 1/4 NE 1/4 SEC. 20« TE JU32 r * * 14 4.- - 0 11------4 7 6/4 -2 31 -&04- 4< - i TE · 2' SE ,2/I 1/ - G 1 1 ' 6&*4 -- / 02 r¥- . 1-1 - IT- 1 11 -- . --I-- ---- o 12. 1r S. 0- . 19 4 tr N.5910'2CE. . .2, M- p uP .0 1r -- 2• - A -~-ZIE-U@ --V----v I *--ill - ---I- li--I rs-ZE- - - -- -1 ---- - m . - - - EREiiEXo.w. -1-Il --I~ * 4P '16 \ - * 1 TO PRNIET / ~ . .---lill-& -p-0- 0 ~ 440/ . 334 42.\ E.t„ Pork Soritation District 1 1 5 1 NE' 610 Big Thoml,on M.~7 11 4.7 W. E- Parl< col 805174/tt 15.47 ~ lot 2, portion 61 lot 4, ,. 4,/ Ston'ey 64•odo•, Addlion btfUQ 012 0. 5 0 U96.SU~69.06' -. A- 1 4 9 e Existing Ea:ement to Ill L ,- United States Bureau of . 4 Redomotion Existing 23' N~Bk. 907 Pg. 89 Utility E-mint 6 le / l 7-890rn 58.69' 5,&=11&51=n 2. 336 Exiating Eomement to -1/ / r United States Bureau Ble 1895. Pg. 569 / of Reclamation S.W. 1/4 Sec. 19 £ Ble 1041 Pg. 542 ~ ~ _ The Town of Estes Pork 338 ~ 4%9 i p,z0~ ~ ~~ bles Put co 80517 88 690 Big Thomp,on A- / Lot 2. Stanley Meodo., Addilion 1 1 Nt'35'37'E. y - s.8 t'17'32'E 116978 (44.94') 431~ 5.689m l€ 8.66 h 4/ UEk,/ 37 /5*h /92\ u-s- Bureau of Redomotion T. 5 N., R. 72 W. '019748/ 841 N. St Vroin A¥•. 436«/ / .1'29'59'V. Est= Pork. CO B0517 4351x #4 - 12.9128 <42369 N.W. 1/4 Sec. 30 t'i;2\ /i*\ lot i po,tion of lot 4, -¥ 7pn \28/ 45' Stanley thodow, Addition N.8549'35W. £ -. ,434 432_ 6.09Jm (19.99') 376X 49*0 r - 4 vitiA 7-*x*re-*1-1 04 1 .1111111 1 18'46* TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT DECEMBER 1995 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION 556.00 274.00 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 16 TAP REQUEST 4.00 8.00 17 WATER QUALITY ~ 1.00 1.00 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS 1.00 1.00 22 FROZEN LINES 24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN 10.00 119.00 30 METER REPAIR 3.00 2.50 32 FINAL INSPECTION 5.00 5.00 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED 1.00 1.00 50 STREET REPAIR 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 1.00 2.00 54 STORM DRAINAGE 60 OTHER 5.00 8.00 TOTALS FOR DECEMBER 1995 587.00 421.50 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 587.00 220.00 88.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 421.50 341.00 127.50 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) +166.82%/+23.61% +15.18%/-6.70% +567.05%/+230.59% Rl-1 . NOVEMBER, 1995 ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 126,000 2.) Bleeders TOTAL BLEEDERS NOT BILLED (Gal.) 1,220,840 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 16-Oct Leak on Virginia 30,000 b. 12-Oct Leak on Chapin 30,000 c. 18-Oct TM o'flow & Riverside leak 60,000 d. 26-Oct Marigold/Riverside leaks 80,000 e. 27-Oct 3rd/4th st. leaks 30,000 f. 10/14-10/31 Fish Hatchery 1,364,000 g. 10/14-10/31 Riverside Dr. loss i 130,645 h. 1. j. k. 1. TOTAL LEAKS, MISC. (Gal.) 1,724,645 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) 3,071,485 R2-1 . TOWN OF ESTES PARK NOVEMBER 1995 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for October 14,1995 through November 13,1995: Oct. 14 to 31 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 21,582,000 Marys 0 Nov. 1 to 13 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 14,796,000 Marys 0 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 36,378,000 Gal. 2)Accountable Water Adjustments: 3,071,485 Billing(Includes billed bleaders) 20,508,283 *Backwash 0 Total Water accounted for: 23,579,768 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 65% 4.) 12 MONTH AVE. PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 76% R2-2 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS NOVEMBER, 1995 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL MARYS TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS: (GAL) CFS (GAL) 1 0 1,106,000 1,106,000 1.72 -:i 0 0.00 1,106,000 2 0 967,000 967,000 1.51 0 0.00 : 967,000 3 0 997,000 997,000 1.55 : 0 0.00 997,000 4 0 1,157,000 1,157,000 1.80 0 0.00 1,157,000 5 0 1,225,000 1,225,000 1.91 0 0.00 1,225,000 6 0 1,018,000 1,018,000 1.58 : 0 0.00 1,018,000 7 0 1,748,000 1,748,000 2.72 0 0.00 :·· 1,748,000 8 0 963,000 963,000 1.50 0 0.00 ::-i.: 963,000 9 0 1,097,000 1,097,000 1.71 0 0.00 1,097,000 10 0 1,095,000 1,095,000 1.70 0 0.00 4... . 1,095,000 11 0 1,044,000 1,044,000 1.63 * 0 0.00 ::: 1,044,000 12 0 1,170,000 1,170,000 1.82 0 0.00 1.4.3 1,170,000 13 0 1,209,000 1,209,000 1.88 0 0.00 : :F 1,209,000 14 0 1,161,000 1,161,000 1.81 0 0.00 ·>F« 1,161,000 15 0 1,098,000 1,098,000 1.71 0 0.00 1,098,000 16 0 1,167,000 1,167,000 1.82 0 0.00 .. 1,167,000 17 0 1,099,000 1,099,000 1.71 0 0.00 ~~; :·:.· 1,099,000 18 0 1,209,000 1,209,000 1.88 0 0.00 . 1,209,000 19 0 1,207,000 1,207,000 1.88 0 0.00 1,207,000 20 0 1,217,000 1,217,000 1.89 1,217,000 21 0 1,074,000 1,074,000 1.67 0 0.00 ¤ 1,074,000 22 0 1,141,000 1,141,000 1.78 0 0.00 1,141,000 23 0 886,000 886,000 1.38 0 0.00 886,000 24 0 1,206,000 1,206,000 1.88 0 0.00 1,206,000 25 0 1,253,000 1,253,000 1.95 0 0.00 1,253,000 26 0 1,360,000 1,360,000 2.12 - 0 0.00 1,360,000 27 0 1,164,000 1,164,000 1.81 0 0.00 1,164,000 28 0 1,121,000 1,121,000 1.75 0 0.00 . 1,121,000 29 0 1,077,000 1,077,000 1.68 0 0.00 : 1,077,000 30 0 983,000 983,000 1.53 0 0.00 · 983,000 31 00- 0.00 0 0.00 0 TOT. 0 34,219,000 34,219,000 1.71 0 0.00 34,219,000 105.02 AF 0.00 105.02 105.02 0.00 CFS 0.00 1.71 1.71 0.00 1.71 BL/LK(-) N/A N/A N/A N/A -3,071,485 GAL 0 34,219,000 34.219.000 : 0 4.f _31.147.515~ AF 0 105.02 105.02 . 0.00 - 95.59 1st-13 0 14,796,000 0 14 - 31 0 19,423,000 0 R2-3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS/LEAKS) 1994 1994 1995 1995 MONTH YTD ~ MONTH YTD ~i ~ % % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 26,254,900 26,254,900 29,773,400 29,773,400 13% 13% FEBRUARY 23,570,900 49,825,800 26,673,800 56,447,200 13% 13% MARCH 25,802,800 75,628,600 29,439,200 85,886,400 14% 14% APRIL 25,339,400 100,968,000 28,508,550 114,394.950 13% 13% MAY 41,750,328 142,718,328 33,845,000 148,239,950 -19% 4% JUNE 63,441,300 206,159,628 45,954,716 194,194,666 -28% -6% JULY 76,468,746 282,628,374 67,042,100 261,236,766 -12% -8% AUGUST 58,651,900 341,280,274 68,288,200 329,524,966 16% -3% SEPTEMBER 46,454,520 387,734,794 47,652,486 377,177,452 F 3% -3% OCTOBER 33,144,140 420,878,934 34,487,192 411,664,644 4% -2% NOVEMBER 27,853,010 448,731,944 31,147,515 442,812,159 12% -196 DECEMBER 29,341,400 478,073,344 TOTAL 478,073,344 AC - FT 1,467 R2-4 32 0 dEEP@ 0 1 0 a a. A • Bs -1 - , - 2%, j.*d 966 J ~ --5'ii.--'---1-~.--142-.-9 1-;Clic-- -221., .. £1=13%6~rke. €* - ., *- £66 L I 0. ,~921827?tt~ 1...· ' ..6 -Jjrthj ~~, j- it· ..i-~ ·I L ~= - 7 4- ..0 42 686 L .: 9,&[g~ *661. ·- - -· - M.....: u?r ,- · . *~· U·490 166 L 42 166 K 4~; 066 K , · t.. 423_986L 9*: 2.96 L .....-~W~26/.-4.- 1 .:. 11412 986 K , ul - t,OA I 7+ '- I /522 ...... .*, -< 4* €86 K %1&6 196 k 0 R2-5 8 -/ 1- 000'000'09 L sno! Change from previous year hIVBA NOVEMBER & YTD GALLONS BILLED 350,000,000 300,000,000 -1 - 250,000,000 -/ 200,000,000 -/ GALLONS /- 000'000'oot 1- 000'000'09 0 UD >0 ~ FEE@ 2 2 3 1 2% ON- O & mm 1.."+D (11 f.--1--2- - -~~r=-fiX!301£¥e~ - ' . - . . I./:.-r/,4,<IA.*4;m=w=r•~--0---1./483'Fer,a*.212£6-4.61142* '~ r,- 1 ~.'··-·95£* £66 L 13 ' -r ' * : 4 = 0 - f " . # 2 ,~£ 266 L - . . 41&1 886 k twil#/48<./APHARM'Rm=8***4* - 48£- 686 K 1 4,2 L96 J . -l_ -- ~ - Ae: W?&4 9961. - D W .. .... · ' V:~73»,·©cir·JateK*gMR*,·la·2~*,r·m'~447:71,€b, <, - ' - 41 986 K -.--- 3 4* *86 L '544~ . ; 4'*f~ ~-~ - ,- i ~ 196 K g 0 R2-6 NOVEMBER & YTD REVENUE mprevious year 1,200,000.00 « 800,000.00 -2 - 4 hIVBA 1,000,000.00 -1 . REVENUE 600,000.00 -/ 2 j- 00-000'0017 1- 00 000'ooz DECEMBER, 1995 ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 82,000 2.) Bleeders TOTAL BLEEDERS NOT BILLED (Gal.) 1,613,130 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 28-Nov hwy 66 leak 5,000 b. 30-Nov macgregor w.m. 10,000 c. 1-Dec flush canyon cr. 30,000 d. 5-Dec e. riverside leaks 20,000 e. 9-Dec p. knoll dr. leaks 60,000 f. 15-Dec olympian In. leak 20,000 g. 11/14-12/13 Fish Hatchery . 1,364,000 h. 11/14-11/31 Riverside Dr. loss 99,000 1. j. k. 1. TOTAL LEAKS, MISC. (Gal.) 1,608,000 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) 3,303,130 R2-7 TOWN OF ESTES PARK DECEMBER 1995 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for November 14,1995 through December 13,1995: Nov. 14 to 31 Water Treated: * Fall River O Glacier Creek 14,664,000 Marys 0 Dec. 1 to 13 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 14,664,000 Marys 0 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 29,328,000 Gal. 2)Accountable Water Adjustments: 3,303,130 Billing(Includes billed bleaders) 20,539,026 *Backwash 0 Total Water accounted for: 23,842,156 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 81% 4.) 12 MONTH AVE. PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 76% R2-8 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS DECEMBER, 1995 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL MARYS TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS (GAL) CFS (GAL) 1 0 1,179,000 1,179,000 1.84 0 0.00 1,179,000 2 0 1,105,000 1,105,000 1.72 0 0.00 1,105,000 3 0 1,171,000 1,171,000 1.82 : 0 0.00 1,171,000 4 0 1,111,000 1,111,000 1.73 0 0.00 1,111,000 5 0 1,172,000 1,172,000 1.82 0 0.00 1,172,000 6 0 1,066,000 1,066,000 1.66 0 0.00 1,066,000 7 0 1,061,000 1,061,000 1.65 0 0.00 1,061,000 8 0 1,072,000 1,072,000 1.67 0 0.00 1,072,000 9 0 1,143,000 1,143,000 1.78 0 0.00 1,143,000 10 0 1,172,000 1,172,000 1.82 0 0.00 1,172,000 11 0 1,123,000 1,123,000 1.75 : 0 0.00 ::. 1,123,000 12 0 1,083,000 1,083,000 1.69 0 0.00 1,083,000 13 0 1,206,000 1,206,000 1.88 0 0.00 2 -: 1,206,000 14 0 1,020,000 1,020,000 1.59 0 0.00 ¢ 1,020,000 15 0 1,034,000 1,034,000 1.61 i 0 0.00 : 1,034,000 16 0 1,053,000 1,053,000 1.64 0 0.00 : 1,053,000 17 0 1,058,000 1,058,000 1.65 0 0.00 1,058,000 18 0 1,067,000 1,067,000 1.66 0 0.00 . 1,067,000 19 0 1,138,000 1,138,000 1.77 2 0 0.00 1,138,000 20 0 1,050,000 1,050,000 1.63 0 0.00 1,050,000 21 0 1,036,000 1,036,000 1.61 0 0.00 1,036,000 22 0 1,109,000 1,109,000 1.73 0 0.00 1,109,000 23 0 1,144,000 1,144,000 1.78 0 0.00 1,144,000 24 0 1,217,000 1,217,000 1.89 0 0.00 1,217,000 25 0 1,146,000 1,146,000 1.78 0 0.00 : 1,146,000 26 0 1,150,000 1,150,000 1.79 0 0.00 1,150,000 27 0 1,217,000 1,217,000 1.89 0 0.00 1,217,000 28 0 1,248,000 1,248,000 1.94 0 0.00 1,248,000 29 0 1,243,000 1,243,000 1.94 i 0 0.00 1,243,000 30 0 1,214,000 1,214,000 1.89 0 0.00 1,214,000 31 0 1,239,000 1,239,000 1.93 : 0 0.00 1,239,000 TOT. 0 35,047,000 35,047,000 1.75 0 0.00 35,047,000 AF 0.00 107.56 107.56 0.00 107.56 CFS 0.00 1.75 1.75 0.00 1.75 BL/LK(-) N/A N/A NIA i NIA -3,303,130 GAL 0 35.047,000 35,047,000 : 0 - 31.743,870~ AF 0 107.56 107.56 0.00 : r 97.42 1 st-13 0 14,664,000 0 14 - 31 0 20,383,000 0 R2-9 TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS/LEAKS) 1994 1994 1995 1995 MONTH YTD ~ ~ MONTH YTD OF % % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ; i CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) : (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 26,254,900 26,254,900 29,773,400 29,773,400 13% 13% FEBRUARY 23,570,900 49,825,800 26,673,800 56,447,200 13% 13% MARCH 25,802,800 75,628,600 29,439,200 85,886,400 14% 14% APRIL 25,339,400 100,968,000 28,508,550 114,394,950 13% 13% MAY 41,750,328 142,718,328 33,845,000 148,239,950 -19% 4% JUNE 63,441,300 206,159,628 45,954,716 194,194,666 -28% -6% JULY 76,468,746 282,628,374 67,042,100 261,236,766 -12% -8% AUGUST 58,651,900 341,280,274 68,288,200 329,524,966 16% -3% SEPTEMBER 46,454,520 387,734,794 47,652,486 377,177,452 3% -3% OCTOBER 33,144,140 420,878,934 34,487,192 411,664,644 4% -2% NOVEMBER 27,853,010 448,731,944 31,147,515 442,812,159 i 12% -196 DECEMBER 29,341,400 478,073,344 31,743,870 474,556,029 8% -1 % TOTAL 478,073,344 474,556,029 -196 AC - FT 1,467 1,456 R2-10 Ag 00 = m E 2 h E tz r= O 1 0 rot a> 00 f)J'.37--~- . . t...1 -,2. :. i< 4 9,L S:<4 '11,~~ 966 L Ill.-i#- . -•.71-I./.4./.I'/W'iF-WI/Mt/EMM . I V.Z. t.0 - 1-6 %1&9 '661. ~ :I-'~~v:fi,~~~ 1 - .. 1 Flke. 166 I. 1 I ~- ,-I.JE,j;:·~'.pi:limmi:,Immilimme:Filminfili~/2%6//pjgfiWitHIMMIMMiMi ~ 41& 066 K . I. c. 1. 42 6861. .- f '\ ··4&& 986 J o yvg L86 L - -I-.- ' :3':·:t.i.· ~.4--'- 42 986K i. 4 :·:-5 :3·.... u I .~- 4£ 9861. i.·---' I (--2-~L- f - 0-- -.» -7~ ..e r.... 1 ' 9&1 2961. 0 R2-11 Change from previou~ ious DECEMBER & YTD GALLONS BILLED 400,000,000 -, i ...-f :'- ,* 2193* 350,000,000 -/ GALLONS 200,000,000 -3.:. 9- 000'000'09 L 300,000,000 -1 . 250,000,000 -/ t- 000'000'001. 1- 000'000'09 U) E=0-co 8% 00 2 > O - 2 - 89 a. LO E . 1-3 -7 ·. - 1.' 9·™· .fe *66L 42 O --I--Ill-=-I--Irm-WI-.-I'll'-m-2----£----Lit.g-*-Il-*)... 1.. i - :2~:.:.- qg£ £66 L 0 'A I:- 'i ~,1 -4.-*./~./iWE#el"42#Fm,XM - --1 1 L=- 1 '*2; :66 L wk,- 066 L -, --JP,-'f i ,*~ 6961. ~ NE& 996 L - 0 --C O·.40 . W.. L86 I. .· t-0.41 ~~" ,4 ' 98.'- 986L i -- -- . t· '*.10,4 . 41 996 L - 92 €96 K 7/1 1 - ~„mei440** I~ r Z86: I - R2-12 ] 11 previous year DECEMBER & YTD REVENUE &- 00 000'00* hIVEA 4 41 k i 11 1,200,000.00 -O. REVENUE 600,000.00 -/ 800,000.00 -2, .to ' 1... , /- 00.000'003 1,000,000.00 -2 ,, 4 4%7 TOWN OF ESTES PARK *i¥-K,AMN*Li*6£#9 miN' 1,4 f.2 . .--/4 Ij-Iirie~.0.2**1*343*> . -~42 fifitili·~4193.kie-:: A ~ I. . b -2-t- 4. i.'" ...«ft>&. '.T 9 62 42.3-94*Lf*EZYE33 44*4 - . - -,, -~.u···i„.ev =fri~* /-5-- e«/1.-'/ --2-=Li-- .-,-„. ., - 1, 4 41.. #7»< 734 1 / January 18, 1996 Mr. Dave Forsyth, Staff Design Branch Colorado Department of Transportation 4201 East Arkansas Avenue Denver, CO 80222 Subject: Highway 34 Project in Estes Park - Storer Ranch Right-of-Way Dear Dave: Mike Morgan and I have been discussing the right-of-way issues concerning the Highway 34 Storer Ranch area. As you may be aware, Storer Ranch additional R.O.W. may need to be condemned. Mike and I are very concerned about the delay to the project, as I'm sure you are. In order to avoid a delay and avoid condemnation, can the Storer R.O.W. purchase funds of $35,000* be used to construct a retaining wall? Also, since we told the citizen group that we would construct as much as possible of the rough grading and curb work on the south side prior to May 25th, can we bid the project without having 100 % of the north right-of-way? Any help in this matter would be appreciated. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK Public Works Department 0:ze- eflu~ Bill Linnane, Director BL:ck copy: Gary Klaphake, Town Administrator R3-1 (303) 586-5331 • RO. BOX 1200 • ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (303) 586-0249 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • FAX (303) 586-6909 OTHER Friday, January 12, 1996 Lake Estes Bike Trail Inspection for final aceptance ITEM STATION PHOTO DESCRIPTION 1. 3+00 1 N. edge oftrail/ 2"x5" 2. patio Plug 2 holes, near mens room 3. 7+80 2 18" comer crack, south of bridge 4. 15+50 S. edge of trail, hairline 18' x 24", BOR 5. 15+75 N. edge of trail, 18" x 36", BOR 6. 18+15 3 S. edge, 2 ea., 12" x 24" @ BOR culvert 7. 28+30 N. edge 6" 8. 31+00 S. edge hairline, 12' 9. 31+20 N. edge, 48" (silicone crack) 10. 46+50 Plug holes 11. 48+40 4 S. edge 24" x 36" ~ pick up cable waste 12. 50+34 S. edge hairline 13. 51+00 5 Rip Rap settlement into lake 14. 54+24 N. edge 24" , caulked crack 15. 56+00 S. edge 16" 16. 56+40 6,7 cracks around SSMH R4-1 ...........1,1.....11: '11'11...........lili - 1.....................11. :1:III!':·· ·11111111111 .......1 . 1.1.1....11 111111111 .11.11 ····· ···lili'I·.1 .........1 1 1 1 1. ·. 1. A 1.7 1 : lilli 11.1.11111111 ...11....11.1 111111111111 - -- ...1....1 111 ...1 .....lili. I - 111.11...... ..........1 11111...11 ....111 I i CIZ 23 111 R5-r page 1 of 5 1996 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROJECT ACTIVITY LIST DEPT PROJECT BUDGET MGR SCHEDULE MTCE. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec fascia 35,000 GS 2nd floor remodel 80,000 GS Police Dept. roof 33,000 GS 99 000'EL 16!1 #saOOB Vav 99 000'9 1001 Woollsal eU!EJOIN 99 000'9L 'osilu YaY SS 099'9 WOOJ41Eq/eoeutni *10401DH 49!:I $9 000, lu!ed - xeldrip Xennvy Hl/SS 000'91 L WOOJ]Se] Spun019 Oepol >18/99 000' L uo!SUal)(a eu04d ulnesn IN Uoilels el!:I 18 -- dems puel UAA01/asd3 99 Jell130 eolleleJUOO Municipal Bldg. remodel design $12,000 G Municipal Bldg. construction: elevator UPS 2,000 GS 99 dew e,08 UMol . 1 111111.9.1 1 11111,1111 I 11111.11.1.1 lilli lili 1 R5-2 page 2 of 5 1996 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROJECT ACTIVITY LIST Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DEPT PROJECT BUDGET MGR SCHEDULE 99/18 000'0 L u5!Sep IEAOWel >IUE] land Street sweeper $89,300 RJ/GS -- Street G95 conveyer 6,500 RJ/GS -- Street G69 replacement - Blazer 25,000 RJ/GS -- Street G73 replacement - loader 43,100 KZ/RH -- Street G81 sander reverse 2,500 RJ/GS -- Street crack sealant machine 26,000 RJ/GS -- Water utility truck 28,000 BG FLEET 99/18 000'94 UO!lonilsUOO IBAOWe] )IUm lan:I - .. - 11111,1 :11 1/ R5-3 page 3 of 5 1996 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROJECT ACTIVITY LIST DEPT PROJECT BUDGET MGR SCHEDULE Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Seal Confluence Park ponds $8,000 DS Sa 000'98 Buldeospuel JeqLUB40 Redwood benches/containers 8,600 DS Planter curbing downtown 1,200 DS/GS Rock retaining wall along river 20,000 DS Sa 000'9 uo!1BleBeA I!ell e)le-1 dVSV 18 0 19!I 4ound I! 11 eyel PARKS Steam Clean Walks 2 times 10,000 DS Stanley Hotel tap 0 DS Green house 25,000 DS ·· .... .... Ill.'111111' lilli 1.11.1...1.1 ············...11.:1;:1: .1 1 .11111111111 11111.111. 1 ... TIll 1.1.ILCJ... lilli lilli.....11 :..-i:..1 lillillili., .......C:1 -Illili,111 lili - 'p 0 11/.11111.1 ..... .... 1 ....1:11::.1 M...1. .1..1 11.1.1111111 .... CO J _1 0 (0 3 mmee m m 11§§ 2 0 44 4 D~-/1 9/1 000'81 '1SUOO JaMeS Ullols 'eAv UeABB Subdivision construction inspection -- BUGS Pros. Mtn./1 st St. storm sewer design 12,000 GS 99 000'002 ABIJaAO ]88]19 99 000'93 Jelin619 qinO 'UAAO;UAAOp eAv UJ04)113 99 000'99 (spun; 966 0 '19uoo e6P!J8 eonids u5!sep ~193 eouBJ]u3 MJEd 18 -- .lsuoo .193 eouallu3 MJEd Pros. Mtn./1 st St. storm sewer const. 120,000 GS Hwy. 34 construction Hwy. 7 citizen meetings Landfill monitoring Elkhorn gas monitoring Raven Ave. storm sewer design : 99 000'02 sexoq 18191110 VV/-18 000'00 L i eseqd loi Bul>lied led!0!unw E-C AD21!> 1../I/.!!1 ...1./.ll[ /1111.11111 11'111111,1...1111111111 .'~~~ ,,,,,,,,,~,~ irr ' ~..~;~r,11 1.111111111- I.I./1· lili lilill lili:11111,1 111111111111 1111.11.1. R5-5 page 5 of 5 1996 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROJECT ACTIVITY LIST · DEPT PROJECT BUDGET MGR SCHEDULE Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec GIS Dept. startup $0 BG Glacier Creek tank const. 750,000 BG Glacier Creek Plant rehab design 15,000 BG 98 000'06 - 1suoo luelueoeldel ed!d te 'XMH Glacier Creek Plant rehab const. 75,000 BG Looping project design 50,000 BG Hwy. 34 pipe replacement design 14,000 BG 98 000'09 u6!sep u!Elll JeleAA JaA!El Iled 98 000' L 1!npll00 Jalnduloo MJOAA]eu S,dolls (6u!JB49 1900 loGo) WATER 98 000'092 'lsUOO U!BUI JelEM JaA!B lied 18 -- uoisniou! AJepl]1108 DOMON 18 000'0 L *pnls 146noia Looping project construction 250,000 BG . i- DELIVERY PROGRAMS DENVER DISTRICT 2,1 UNITED STATES A POSTALSERVICE January 12, 1996 Mr. Bill Linnane Director, Public Works Department Town of Estes Park PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK CO 80517-1200 Dear Mr. Linnane, I apologize for the delay in responding to your question regarding post office rates in the Estes Park Post Office. I was of the understanding after our phone conversation, that I had answered your question. Postal rates are controlled by the Postal Rate Commission. The Postal Rate Commission is a five-member independent agency appointed by the President of the United States, which was created by chapter 36, subchapter I of the Postal Reorganization Act of August 12,1970. 1 The box rent rates in the Estes Park Post Office can not be changed from the rest of the post offices except by the decision of the Postal Rate Commission. In my opinion, It is not likely that this would happen, but as I said, it would be a decision the Postal Rate Commission would make. Rates are set across the United States as a whole. Sincerely, C.y» Elaine Nelson Customer Service Analyst, SR 7500 E 53RD PL STE 2213 DENVER, CO 80266-9334 303-853-6668 R6-1 Jan-22-96 12:32P F . DEUVERY PROGRAMS DENVER DISTRICT /7 LAW,ED 572375 VA POSMLSEIMCE January 23, 1996 ATTN: Bill Linnane Director, Public Works Department Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 ESTES PARK CO 80517-1200 Dear Mr. Linnanel, I am faxing the information you requested. As always, please call me if the information is not clear or you have further questions. Present box rent rates for Estes Park: Box Size 1 2 3 4 5 Annual Rate $8.00 $13.00 $24.00 $35.00 .$55.00 Box rent rates with delivery to the downtown area: Box Size 1 2 3 4 5 Annual Rate $40.00 $58.00 $104.00 $172.00 $288.00 7500 E 53RD PL STE 2213 DENVER, CO 80265-9334 303-853-6688 R6-2 -€21 Jan-22-96 12:332 P.02 . I . -2- The request for a rate change goes through the Board of Governors. The address for the Board is: Office of the Board of Governors 475 L'Enfant Plz SW STE 10300 Washington, D.C. 20260-1000 1 have a phone call into this office to ask the particulars of placing a rate request. 1 have not heard back yet, so I will send this information and hopefully I will have the rest of the information for you by tomorrow. Sincerely, ,€*97\_ Elaine Nelson Customer Service Analyst, SR R6-3