Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Public Works 1995-10-26AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE OCTOBER 26, 1995 8:00 A.M. 1. Stanley Views Subdivision Owner request to dedicate Findley Ct. to the Town 2. Drainage Easement Vacation Request Lot 2 Spruce Lake Addition 3. November PWC Meeting Request to Reschedule Reports: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Report 3. Hwy. 7, Hwy. 34, Elkhorn Overlay Projects Update 4. Recognition of P.W. Dept. 4th Place finish at the Snow & Ice "Roadeo" 5. Fuel Tank Site Study Update 6. Glacier Water Tank Project Update Note: The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary. ; 1 1 1 1 40 1 1 1 1 +4 N.T'· 1 : ,-.1 1 1 .. BLACK 14 " ~,.0 11 11 1, 0 f - ----1 10 - Ifill . CANYO .' " I. Ze " I - 1---1---1--UL --+ -: - _; j_L~-7 Fi.roweiv cr. 1 .9 21 24 4. 1 \-4 11 I 'fHOLO01 1 . K MOUNT .,r W N HILL / .t .. 1 1,1 ·h 1 ·1: 1..1 , 1, : 0 ..1. .1,1. VCRS ADDITION I --'•44 32 31 ·Loc,r·/.1 1 - 35 1 " .. S../L.y ,- /- tt~%%1 2 2.1 J STAN kY -C '| ' \ ' '-·~ '~ 0 0 STORER -7 LONE PINEIAC.-ES- \ • 16-=-7.STINLE¥ 1 HEIGMAS-,3/ RANCH STANLEY 1--1 / •'• ... 1. 1, .t T.0-304 1,0 * M~S~C. 0 6-4-'.'llk ; [/C PLACE NOCK / . ADDITION 8 , ..7 1 -winNI__..._1,:~1,~ " 1,1/ -35-1- , ' DIST'ICT , ..fl " 0,: 31~ ..~u,-, ~,~ : " 0 - 5117' /6.2 ...... SU.D. , 2 , 10 10 5 -0- ESTA ES c...... I. ... 4 -*, -'*72 I . :/\ 7<e' i , e 1 07.- „ I . HILLS .... 0, 1 ....0. - .,1.. B. '. 944~41~~~~~ \" TLARE HIE : r.·A ~s " • . 1 6 ':S,-7,-0 & 1 .Mi.•, b ,· 'my ' AVE. 5 r .... 'L- 1. ... ..... , 19 : 0 : . 0 , e „ . '.1. I . 34. "Ccul 1 4 - ¥4'.. 1 - 1 $-.f¥~ , 1. L t . 2 " CANAIY SUB. ..9 m2'14'~-d ~~~ '~ 1, .•Oill SU~I STAILEV ,2 ,9 ,..1 ... I. .0 , . S. .4 1 2 I vILLAGE /53.00 ,- 4 \. _••11-·0£- -111 2,• 1 - 19 20 . 1 .sue. 1 1 SUS 750:. - 2SMZ 29 ST.IN- 95-~~~ ~0 ' .... 1 ,... 42011.2 1 V. 1$3,0 5 9.0 1 4. ., ·-- - LAME C..... -. ESTES ' 44 .Ulr~ s ME ~Ows , .00 '' .0, ' ,..er --Fi 3 A .1 0 - DO. »19 SAINT .•P•ft ..4,4 - •01 < 12. •· .. s 4 - ' 44 I -Ilk -- ---.- 1 22~ 1 0 10 .. P ' , :m; " .0 31/ ESTES , %6-.-4. 4 .U..S NORTH ·' 1. '< - 3 .S e, t. 93,4, ¥RAIN 00 - I vt . , =tz, 4 . ... I . .0 .Uslul .--#27/,-- '• · , •whE '•Res•Eti is..%--- -- ... ' •'.- ./. Al % I 1 '01 '. --/ STANLEY , 0 - /1 ./ .... , .0-t- %»:49 . , PA R• \ --2===U===- _ t *•0,0*f'. 12*A f ~&4/ZIN:.1,~4*gwu#m~ .,.¢b/\ Mosp,¥/t ADP. 1 I r-,V-1-7FWall,le" 17 ,i, STANLEY ) l ~ PARK ADD. 1 LJ *- . /. I Nzrhz, ·'67 »AL' ~ *4»KEKE«» VALLE / 3 ..419.··='.7#0.1 ' '° i_- -rritlrlril,1-...r,0,·2- 0 ....122'Ii.. i.4, I „ m E 4/ · -_:74<21: -223&*Mej*fig.- ...· 1 1 1-2 - <:-~«·:·A vEN~NER.*©_~~... ~38,TE.-s" ·\:9·f«.9 .0.~ E.LA ----- 1 Wy - 1 \91•· .... 4,1. 1,[:1'27"-"c- ' 11'147*1'1_11'1'14 -Ll-&414,E ~1 . Ill:. 11 1 IS ':;ff' 1 •All J) ) E:I , .-~F sue. i,~, 2.3.-f:'.F E-~tes;31 -2 T 91: 4.:1-2 1, i.am---•Fr- /•• 1-1 1, 0.-tr .. . . 1" "1"1 '. 1"1,;Qkdz#'.1 , „ ' 4'OUNTAIN . ~ |1~2.71 | A 1 1 . . . .. F./9541.1 -i-F'.E-~ ' COMMUNI ~ ADD. < ' 1 , :.%. 4· 1",fl :-ltiO7 , ' RME··34% i...f : m ~ ' 4-f - 23130 I 30 29 3613/ . 1 3, ~32 1 , 1 Y i W.littilit_-i.L,ZIX,Lf •: .' 170:.1 Goi, cOURSE ~ 1 k ' l y* U47 " -1-10 -~4'k '' O 1 i 43 : 5---i--.x€aa L_AL : 6 I kif: e . _--___ 0 1 -_.-1~L-11 , ...1 -4 f=71.4 1,17 "11· it--~i r - --,1---- 1 1 /'• Te#'•1 "' '1 '5 3. - il•I,1,1,6,=J 1 11.Ji i . /»05'ECT •74 1 " " 9 1 .0 . . , 0., 70.,4.. ...." Bel. • 1 'M iGHTS- . I „ R,;L ....L 0 1.f g ,. „ • "IsT '0 400 , b~'h~-1, . , 1 1/1 1 11.1 ''.... : • " · 0 · -i;ti;t~1 1.CAL... 1 . r--1 · 1 1-1 ./ . 1--- . , ..< / 1 4.-4-21'y I I , . 1 Fs- 0, 0. , F E-r=ip.1*91 - Ill , 1· ·I-I· 1.1 , ou,~0 -,f,1--i-- 1„1„1„1 PIOSPECT ~ . 7.-i- All....03 , - epura PLANNED PROGRESS ~ BOARD OF January 25, 1995 COMMISSIONERS J. DONALD PAULEY CHAIRMAN EDWARD B. POHL VICE-CHAIRMAN Mr. W.B. Findley, Sr. CARL HENDERSON TREASURER 224 W. 4th Street - MILT ERICSON Keene, Texas 76059 GARY F. KLAPHAKE ACHARD S. PUTNEY GERALD SWANK Dear Mr. Findley: STAFF ,RTHUR L .ANDERSON The Technical Review Committee wishes to respond to the EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR submittal of Van Horn Engineering and Surveying for Parcel 3, Stanley Views Development. 1. We have not received the complete package submittal as required by the Stanley Historic District Master Plan (p. 5). 2. The final site plan at a scale of ll'=20' indicating final roadway, site improvements, setbacks, and easements has not been received. The site plan is intended to show significant site features (trees, etc.), layout, and horizontal relationship. 3. A certified grading plan showing areas of cut, fill and areas of no disturbance has not been submitted. Areas of particular interest are those in excess of 3:1 slope and their proposed treatment. 4. The final drainage plan with all calculations shall be submitted. 5. The final grading for the detention pond shall be submitted. 6. A landscape plan for the entire Lot 3 is required showing areas to be landscaped, improved, and restored. 7. The plant material proposed for outlot A is undersized and inadequate in quantity. It does not provide sufficient or adequate screening of the detention pond. 8. specifications and planting details illustrating tree, shrub and native grass amendments and soil mix are required. Seed mix, agricultural soil type, germination rate and related typical landscape specifications shall be submitted in the final landscape plan. A restoration plan for disturbed areas caused by construction is required. ESTES PARK URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY -- 1,1 - enura , , I PLANNED PROGRESS Mr. Brooks Findley -2- January 25, 1995 9. The proposed timber walls are not acceptable. The use of rock is preferred. Based on the landscape plan for outlot A, the location of retaining walls (horizontal) or proposed elevation (vertical) of the top of the walls is unclear. The proposed treatment of a timber retaining wall immediately adjacent to the roadway is both engineeringly unsafe and visually obtrusive. Applicant should consider utilizing large stones as a retaining wall which is placed at irregular off- sets from the edge of the proposed roadway to create a more natural roadway edge which reduces side slope erosion, sluffing, the need for timber wall drainage (weep hole and lateral drains), bracing, and long-term maintenance cost. 10. The extent of the proposed cross slope planting trench is unspecified and needs more horizonal and vertical control (Final Grading Plan). 11. The proposed entry sign is not appropriate for a quality development such as Stanley Views. It is the distinct understanding of the Te :nical Committee that Mr. Bud Findley verbally described tl =ca stone entry sign would be used. This verbal indication was made at the Preliminary Technical Review meeting of June 7, 1994 at the Town of Estes Park Municipal Building. Regardless, stone is eminently favored over a wooden log slab. 12. A detailed entryway plan shall be submitted indicating the horizonal and vertical control of the proposed entry monument, planting, lighting, and material specifications. Applicant is referred to the Entrance Monument Sign plan for the Stanley Historic District as a guideline for layout, required detail and specifications. (Attached) Until demonstrated otherwise, (Plan and Section) the proposed sign shall be .located according to the typical setback requirements. 13. Further design and specification will have to be demonstrated before approval can be given on the location, design, finish, and setting (Planting, Lighting, etc.) for the proposed mailboxes. 14. Once a Final Landscape Plan has been approved an irrigation plan shall be submitted clearly noting point of connection (tap), mainline, lateral, head locations and type of controller system. . eR'IVL.. ss Mr. Brooks Findley -3- January 25, 1995 15. The proposed 4" x 4" open space delineation markers are totally undersized and do not represent a "marker" or vertical landmark of any kind. In summary, please present your technical review package in the format stated in the Master Plan and that you agreed to. The signage landscape, grading, submittals are inadequate and do not meet the standards of this type of quality project. The final site plan has not been submitted. We will meet again when you have submitted a complete package as required by the Stanley Historic District Master Plan. Your attention to this matter would be appreciated. Very truly yours, ESI54 PAR /«feturITY Executive Director Enc. CC: Bill Van Horn Bud Findley MEMORANDUM DATE: October 25, 1995 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Greg Sievers RE: Stanley Views Subdivision CC: Bill Linnane An informal final inspection was conducted by Town Staff on October 25, 1995 at the referenced project. The Owner or Engineer has not officially requested a walkthrough, but due to the circumstances staff felt it was appropriate. Staff recommends the follow items be addressed thoroughly prior to any consideration of ownership transfer. 1. Curbing to be backfilled and feathered into native slopes. 2. Provide and execute landscape plan, after Town review and acceptance. Include hydroseeding. 3. Neighborhood mailbox cluster unit to be installed. 4. Install street lights as planned. 5. Install asphallt curb behind water valve to prevent erosion. 6. Clean out / fiush all Storm Drain facilities. 7. Sweep streets, remove all rock debris. 8. Remove straw bails from detention pond. 9. Provide Storm Water Maintenance Agreement for homeowners association. To include Catch Basins, Manholes, Pond and inleVoutlets. 10. Remove and realign approximately 200 linear feet of curb and roadway at the ingress/egress to allow traffic flow more similar to minimum standards. 11. Provide Town and all associated utility companies with As-Built mylars. 12. Verify installation of all lot & property corners. f KI . .AY< / Ii/ ; 1 'TU" 421' /, „ 1,-w'. „ .. K. la-·>4 0,4<1< g i i 'ALL , RivER , . 111. .. -,f..&.1,-35424'''m-' ' 11.r.- -x=Jf«'*2 / ADDITION 1 .1 ~ ..4 t~ ....0 W 1.,1- -' 0 TV/13*FEPAP·A..a~ i #*=**y· i,-~.· r '„| . 2.732.41,*alcu -- -t-5 2.-:,ti"' \All»XE , 3.8 '1 1 1-2:. ~ : 4-1 4 r" Y¢.. » \b ......--- Y , , r·--'--' M' "7-rr-- · •0'NOE•VIEW i 12, ;•I·,1'.Ul,£'.·4]I· i -,TD*5.trijtw:::40&*-F*-[-,1" 1 1,1 1 1 ·· 1 " i ,• / ~ 2•14 K ,• LE_t "1~ „ ~ '11-4; EN:1%4.-,1 1.kE ' '0 , i -'h~~$:lmE].4:,···· '6·<~ ' ' . RIVE' 6 -1 1,-/ 11.,W„ . xy ELIHORN „ ~p I r\AUNNY ACRES ~ ; -. 19901... : .. th,-A bc-L..:el:,7-591· . 9 4 YTEi '4 „ ILIHORN G . T... 1 ... " ..el ADDITION .. ,-Vfl' 1 . 1 1 ..h . . 1/ i ' 1~- es•LLEE ..... . ., .S * A.T; ,/ I 1 1 60*ROWT .1 LoT 2.- 1 SpO•J€.E *AKA ,... 2:22 'S + r '.,--': L RIVEI --5. ~ A DD ' 1-,04, c r-* .i.....L , • 1, i A 3 -*ct SU~. -TERRA/2~ 1 :,1 2,121 1, .' " ': 1- '=,;u.• 1 f =r/23 1 ,€53 ' : 12 10 2 - \ , 1...... ... , 1 1 , , ..0 5 1, . '' :, I. 1, . 2 %, 6. 1 - -1 1*' 1 ...'. 0 1, 4 . 1 , . .0 11 . .1 " . 1 . r. 1 . 1 - _,-24' | 3, CRAGS . 1 Li- . H A!00. , 11 -Ir .D,•. -SUBD ,-: '.. - --,4.11 ' ...0 , '2 15 I .1 5 0 2 ' ' . : 1 1 4 I. b. . S , 4 C ¢ f_r:q- ~ ijv 1 1 ~13- ', , .~~ - ... . I . \ ./1. - '.1 I I t - 0 10 1 . • PARK I .0.. ..0,1 1..~4 1 , ",r 1-0.,VE. . 1 4 1, /2/3/0 , 1,0 0 \1 '117' .JIL.(· L,JU U >,2- , 3 . ' 1 BEAVER ~~ #no~931·' ' " ~~ ' 1 I . ' ' I. poll. -,&96./AZ n A 4-1-.4-... •u,6..2-1- *--1-~'-bU~ W.14'l,• 3- A :1:V#.. 1 ~.\ MI V ' p u ,• 1 ~SW 1 ~ 2. 1 11 It 1 =311 1 1 1 1 lvAT>4.1 7 . · 6, - • ENTR I / ; u .1 1 1'- 0 1 K--1 1 1 >Arig-t'e"i • 'I' ' PNES HIG•t .: I 1111 il 11,1 1//4, N.-w ,. . . 11 , " i•,31 1 8 ' . . 4~ 1,0,1 U ESTATES .. . I. 1 . .1 - . . .00 't' , , - · i -T--T---7 26 25- " ~ -,2, 261 I I , \ . 1, . . M , * xY,2· LJ 0 al /117 , 34-135- 0 ' ' ' 35.36 1 1 1 6 *8' , 1 ) SECO -1. - ' , 0 L-' 7\ ., t..:.:·.·· C , DE-ER M A TioN li 5.-- E.V.LA ~~N~~e~--~ 2 1 , 4:47:--h- Ld„Ul ' POINT 1 . 0 1 ..1 k X3.. / -* 1 - 4. 1 1, 4 .A \7 JY ·· /.2\)F-fe DIU , 1 1 .M j v m=:t:r-_" m 1 0. / \ 1,-' . ID. [·\ · ir#~r/j/; :i U 1 Lfitu.. -1 \ \ 2 ---Ii- , ···/1121 " 1.'_dl, , 0 ' L__L_ 1. . , .1 .1 t. .. SPANIER . 1 1 1 ••/7 ..,. -3 Xlly /;· , sue , 1 0 ®fl ·• 1' 1.- 0 1 -- -1-«CLE,- . rf• . 1 . I .. I I DA"T 1 1 ...1 .D. SUB. 44 , '·-1. L-J- 1,0 11" .0 4, .,1., --„A,DE„ 1 1 .... . .1 1, 1 • . .1 . 1 " BRO.0.,r. \ . 1-z *' 2,6.,I..\ .11' . ' .-' · ·· r»jaIRXUDi=jur-~-:121+1~2 3 2 -0 . 0 7131:1; till- 1 F GSON S W . „ D. .. SO , 4 . 4.-- . --„,1 1 1 :rti.i \ ' . 13 L,AIC:fil ~ 1.1,-1.1 L. f.\ . 111 1 1/ Sue. " t„ ,5 1 .' , t f.,21 . . I , CHARa o „hA Z r----- al h i . 9.01 0 0 2-3 \ 1-1 L--1 1 ... „ „ 1 -1.1 PRO 1.#,0 . 10 . FIRST A D 1 +1+ 1 - -33.- ' 1 . . I. . 1 e 1 --- 1 .:.:I . .. 1 0 1, - -- 1 TRACT 1 --11,· .. 1 ; ... 0 1\ 1.Nk >:>3 0 1 10 . A h»»4;;7 F 1 :..T-1122/,XVic·c€ 20 1-1 1 lili-1 - mm~...4~-*A,·' ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ '~ 1. " E--1/ •• 17 Hy/ \ . 4 1. a 2 - 1 ilbu . :; 1 10.1 ~ 1 h 3•133 1 33136 .. 2-1 9 1 1 F '312 --b>,-011*149\ 1 1 1 L..4-4 /Al-, ffi *ADIC ( 2 - ./.' I:,0/0.1/4 Wl,0.34 . f 0 1 4 - ..~c L .8 . , 1 I . , , ., 66 83\177'..ip~ W<: t 00 4 . 17,,,.... 100 Ce .2 0 ' ' . .. 1 09 4,1.. 4/ .. -4 . ' (/. 1,1 ~1•. € Z. • '1' 1 , .OlA . * ./ -.1 0, 13 - la - 11,4% . .... · 3 44;*4 -iw 'P23<t f 1-1 - - 1.- I . . I 4 · WO 4 F , 4 U, .1. -W.- m 3 4 .,. 35£! 1 0 . 1, f . . ,t: Al ·) 0- ~ ' 5 M .. -] 4 0 I . , 2 . 4' , 100 .<W , . 23"*..J#I. 4 /' /1.8 14 Wi,3 a = .· al .z. 41 , t , . 1 , 1 10 . I . 1. 21 . , . 0 01 • . .1 j.: 73,\1 ., ,0 .1 I Z 1 i / 04 . \ .. .4 1 ti El.~-- _-1--1,1595'E :' ,1 1 . 1 r. '' N ! 1 . ~- , \ -2~ - -11-6-:-7-,so., ' -1-3/53;57- -/--dii/9-'---- -IZ f 1 4/. . /1,09 12/ / // 1 : 47, /. 1 . kil.t.2,< / I ' 1 ' 4430 ' I 3, sorm,2,1 . . / - / rellf <. //..0~ # I -- I l '4 .' +I k € 169 :/ Z 41 . '......2.0 1 2-2 \4· · w ~|. ~|·»*«fr.; ··.:.:6- .,.ij.~.,t:~~0:*...~Aubti#*<+~#**~.-~~.~A.~**~a*#*,41**#.- 24~.4*,<44593*kit 1 • N77°57'80"i -9-SINS V ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 2, SPRUCE LAKE ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO WHEREAS, the owner of Lot 2, Spruce Lake Addition to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, has requested that a portion of the utility and drainage easement located on said property be vacated; and WHEREAS, all current and potential users of said utility and drainage easement have provided the Town of Estes Park with written statements indicating that they agree and approve of the partial vacation of the utility and drainage easement on said property; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to vacate a portion of the utility and drainage easement located on said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, hereby vacates a portion of the following utility and drainage easement: A vacation of a portion of an easement for drainage and utilities on Lot 2, Spruce Lake Addition to the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, located in the NE i of Section 35, T5N, R73W of the 6th P.M., more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the .southeast corner of Lot 2, with all bearings relative to the south line of said Lot 2 bearing S89°19'43"W 305.60 feet; thence S89°19'43"W 21.75 feet along the south line of Lot 2, thence N23°46'59"W 131.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: thence N66°13'01"E 7.00 feet, thence S23°46'59"E 15.00 feet, thence S66°13'01"W 7.00 feet, thence N23°46'59"W 15.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 2-3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT SEPTEMBER 1995 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION 76.00 155.00 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 16 TAP REQUEST 4.00 9.00 17 WATER QUALITY 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS 4.00 5.50 22 FROZEN LINES 24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN 9.00 33.50 30 METER REPAIR 3.00 2.00 32 FINAL INSPECTION 7.00 7.50 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED 1.00 1.00 50 STREET REPAIR 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 54 STORM DRAINAGE 1.00 4.00 60 OTHER 5.00 5.75 TOTALS FOR SEPTEMBER 1995 110.00 223.25 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 110.00 136.00 93.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 223.25 273.25 155.00 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) -19.12%/-18.3% -9.93%/-34.94% +18.28%/+44.03Ok Rl-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK SEPTEMBER 1995 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for August 14,1995 through September 13,1995: Aug. 14 to 31 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 21,955,000 Marys 16,145,000 Sept. 1 to 13 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 17,657,000 Marys 7,455,000 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 63,212,000 Gal. 2)Accountable Water Adjustments: 3,462,514 Billing(Includes billed bleaders) 44,604,763 *Backwash 0 Total Water accounted for: 48,067,277 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 76% 4.) 12 MONTH AVE. PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 75% R2-1 SEPTEMBER, 1995 ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 134,640 2.) Bleeders TOTAL BLEEDERS NOT BILLED (Gal.) 773,874 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 15-Aug Leak on Virginia 50,000 b. 21-Aug Leak on Chapin 430,000 c. 28-Aug TM o'flow & Riverside leak 315,000 d. 7-Sep Marigold/Riverside leaks 195,000 e. 9-Sep 3rd/4th st. leaks 200,000 f. 9/14-8/13 Fish Hatchery 1,364,000 g. h. 1. j. k. 1. TOTAL LEAKS, MISC. (Gal.) 2,554,000 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) 3,462,514 R2-2 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS SEPTEMBER, 1995 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL MARYS .: TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS (GAL) CFS:Ii ~~~ (GAL) 1 0 1,625,000 1,625,000 2.53 574,000 0.89 :.i. 2,199,000 2 0 1,599,000 1,599,000 2.49 606,000 0.94 i: 2,205,000 3 0 1,549,000 1,549,000 2.41 832,000 1.30 2,381,000 4 0 1,336,000 1,336,000 2.08 682,000 1.06 P-- · 2,018,000 5 0 1,528,000 1,528,000 2.38 569,000 0.89 : . 2,097,000 6 0 1,280,000 1,280,000 1.99 620,000 0.97 W 1,900,000 7 0 1,268,000 1,268,000 1.97 528,000 0.82 i : 1,796,000 8 0 1,153,000 1,153,000 1.80 555,000 0.86 F 1 : 1,708,000 9 0 1,321,000 1,321,000 2.06 418,000 0.65 E.:- ~: 1,739,000 10 0 1,314,000 1,314,000 2.05 584,000 0.91 1,898,000 11 0 1,279,000 1,279,000 1.99 457,000 0.71 : -~ 1,736,000 12 0 1,160,000 1,160,000 1.81 469,000 0.73 5 - 1,629,000 13 0 1,245,000 1,245,000 1.94 561,000 0.87 1,806,000 14 0 1,381,000 1,381,000 2.15 388,000 0.60 2 -- 1,769,000 15 0 1,578,000 1,578,000 2.46 0 0.00: 1,578,000 16 0 1,703,000 1,703,000 2.65 0 0.00 F- 1,703.000 17 0 1,826,000 1,826,000 2.84 0 0.00 : -: 1,826,000 18 0 1,845,000 1,845,000 2.87 0 0.00 EED: - 1,845,000 19 0 1,693,000 1,693,000 2.64 0 0.00: . 1,693,000 20 0 1,511,000 1,511,000 2.35 0 0.00 1 ; 1,511,000 21 0 1,339,000 1,339,000 2.08 0 0.00 3 1,339,000 22 0 1,408,000 1,408,000 2.19 0 0.00 2.- ---. 1,408.000 23 0 1,677,000 1,677,000 2.61 0 0.00 5 : 1,677,000 24 0 1,627,000 1,627,000 2.53 0 0.00 i 3.-1 1,627,000 25 0 1,354,000 1,354,000 2.11 0 0.00 I --I =' 1,354.000 26 0 1,338,000 1,338,000 2.08 0 0.00 it= 1.- - 1,338,000 27 0 1,345,000 1,345,000 2.09 0 0.00 FDD. 1,345,000 28 0 1,356,000 1,356,000 2.11 0 0.00 **7 4 1.356,000 29 0 1,326,000 1,326,000 2.06 0 0.00 - 1,326,000 30 0 1,308,000 1,308,000 2.04 0 0.00 1,308,000 31 00- 0.00 0 0.00 % 1 . 0 TOT. 0 43,272,000 43,272.000 2.16 | 7,843,000 0.39 1 -:2 51.115,000 AF 0.00 132.81 132.81 24.07 156.88 CFS 0.00 2.16 2.16 0.39 ·· - - 2.55 BL/LK(-) N/A N/A N/A N/A -3,462,514 GAL 0 43,272,000 43,272,000 7,843,000 ~47.652,486~ AF 0 132.81 132.81 24.07 146.25 1st-13 0 17,657,000 7,455,000 14 - 31 0 25,615,000 388,000 R2-3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS/LEAKS) 1994 1994 1995 1995 MONTH YTD i MONTH YTD % % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 26,254,900 26,254,900 : 29,773,400 29,773,400 13% 13% FEBRUARY 23,570,900 49,825,800 -i 26,673,800 56,447,200 13% 13% MARCH 25,802,800 75,628,600 1 29,439,200 85,886,400 14% 14% APRIL 25,339,400 100,968,000 28,508,550 114,394,950 13% 13% MAY 41,750,328 142.718,328 § 33,845,000 148,239,950 -19% 4% JUNE 63,441,300 206,159,628 ii 45,954,716 194,194,666 -28% -6% JULY 76,468,746 282,628,374 67,042,100 261,236,766 -12% -8% AUGUST 58,651,900 341,280,274 68,288,200 329,524,966 16% -3% SEPTEMBER 46,454,520 387,734,794 47,652,486 377,177,452 3% -3% OCTOBER 33,144,140 420,878,934 NOVEMBER 27,853,010 448,731,944 i. DECEMBER 29,341,400 478,073,344 : TOTAL 478,073,344 AC - FT 1,467 R2-4 2* 2 0 Ne E g €fig h a ~ ..., ··......: ~*2€72*» 966 L 0 7¥e.. 10 0 1 i t.»4*·*:'1 *66 L 1 CD l. 1 . , t'Kj$~4*6:U~ £66k .-Ii Of,~' 'r.*.~.-7 --T ~WGA#*9-£:.:yx-=·49--,Gam-ill**54#Itta ¥3%%3¥21- 61*•90•94£224* 166K . 1 1. N 96.ve'.1. . { Df.-2-=.3 2 .17- -,··..8Ii940¥R~@**2:*y:3*f?il.*tt.**ti*234-3.-2155,1*6&1%63#'gsgo L /4.4·49 -,A, .... .-4 z . L661 066 L 1- m,4*§t~2-#,em;*aM,**m-*Am®019"2'FlmeT i---= -'2-»rf. ·~ -i-:--= 43"0*E«f~2-04€5·3«6«-9*·t--:633»%*3*~ 696L 1 ! · 1.· 1 U ...4<=M,- 996 L . 1. i:t .-r- .--Ill-r '- i -Ii t.~.T- t~...... 42:'.-'.ium:71*:t:~56:-42/:6)E.#1-€<*,9»24»22255~-0¥1· ~- F ~N N..610*43 Z86X .... * 1&4%/1/7233'4%*SME*Ter-68#W/#37443'45/.inimi 1 -*Al:*02: 9961. 933*4**ef ·2*_*.t..4-e,-62.-52€:i*-24~~.:Pt*W.*:*R*743 L 4 13.:4%2~. 1 , .,L< 1 - #111:€94< 296 L 996K cr..'*Wei €96 L - 1 ~ .1 bfu"innimiage"il/mue,Wmir'.m"*p/**/pe"P//"j 1 1 ''~ '4*24- 286 k d 1 1 1 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8- 8- 0 0 0 % 8 0 2 „- Z 0 -1 -1 CD R2-5 Jeak d39 m hIV3A SEPTEMBER & YTD GALLONS BILLED 250,000,000 -1 32 5 0- 0 h 3 2 -2 1 W % 2\ 0 k am a/4*6249>:'2 966 K - 32 '5280, €66L 1 ...Cj#-1u~ 266k . *959*09- K66L 1 .: B -1.1.~J '19&*FWA#$2*#4*51421#Rfu.T-*1~~19*1464 ··IN *i€*V~· 066L 1~11*fat'4342**»73**23 4 - 686 L 1/ 1 1 f.9. .- .3 -' -'E*143*Zipl#D. ~·O/W/22/*44- ~E343424954.*«" 996k 1 1 . . I W ff:--621:.·· fi-/- 5 -·<t--i > .7.-9@2*:«17/19.5/Ad#41/**40*-2**~6*Mb t. U--32:ei L96 J 41 '86 L :il V . ta r. . . - - - \xI -37 ..18:A:42=.e.=323>.:14.2:1104*:%690. R....1.=g==mm=mI., 2 4- -1-·:··441 996K i- 1 - i:.1.4 43*. €9610 1 i. : ·.1:~:Coff 196k lilli 1 000000000 000000000 doog 0000 0 0 0 0000 CL CL CL - 0 000.0 0000 0600 0000 0000 O CO A o M N r R2-6 Change from previous year hl V3 A SEPTEMBER & YTD REVENUE 1,000,000.00 -4 i. .- 00.0 REVENUE 500 000