The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1995-09-28y - AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 28, 1995 8:00 A.M. 1. EVRPD Golf Course Agreement Review of agreement 2. EPSD and Town Land Exchange Request approval to exchange property 3. Riverside Water Main Emergency Repair Request approval of low bid 4. Glacier Creek Water Tank Project Review Draft of YMCA agreement 5. Noxious Weed Mitigation EVIA request for Town fiscal support in 1996 budget 6. Larimer County/School Dist. Building Addition Request for a tap fee waiver 7. Mail Cluster Box Project Stanley Hills Asc. box location appeal Reports: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Report 3. Hwy. 7, Hwy. 34, Elkhorn Overlay Projects Update 4. Mail Cluster Box Project Update 5. Fuel Tank Site Study Update Note: The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum September 25, 1995 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane (7,0/~- SUBJECT: EPSD and Town Land Swap Please refer to Sheet 1 of 2 for the existing boundaries. The Estes Park Sanitation district Treatment Plant is located on Lot 1, which is owned by the Town. The Town's substation and Parks Shop are located on Lot 2, which is owned by EPSD. For liability and ownership purposes EPSD and Town staff is requesting a land exchange. The Town will give a portion of existing Lot 1, to EPSD. This portion is equal to 2.4 acres of the Total 4.1 Acres of Lot 1. The Town will receive all of Lot 2, 1.6 Acres, from EPSD. Please refer to Sheet 2 of 2 for the proposed lot boundaries. The Sanitation district will then own all of Lots lA and 1C. The Town will own all of Lots lB and 2. Although the Town is giving 0.8 Acres more than receiving, the Town is giving non-highway frontage property and receiving highway frontage property, which is more valuable. Staff requests approval to perform the land swap and proceed with the replat process. 2-1 2 -9 06 , 4 WL . m .L J z i , r.1 R --2=- C m O 63 X 1 -LLL T:EL / 2 '~lij i) 1 1 *C % 4 1\0 -, SE 34\/231- 2.1,5 *s~~~1-- Ei l- '0 . t ,r ' M Â· 1 $4 t*/.2+ \ 064 JO X J to /2 â‚¬ 4 W 2 - .2 Vi n 8-. â‚¬/ 6 -.1 1-39 a y \%. 1 0 0 9 m \- w 0 - reT u.l c o /lÂ»/ A . N C, 9. 0>- . 4 W8/ I. 00 1 Z la / 0-2 0 1 0 N \PX agw i W V ..4. i .9 \ 0 0, f i 6 N \ Ew u. 1 01 N 1 \>Io / A- Â» 2 896 - $ O,><c etÂ«<3XA 0 -0 1 9\ . 4 227// 4 j \ \A r Q Â¢ min 9,011 o rc M r 69 h 2- Al %1, Â· w g WHO . O 4 u. \ ~ ~5/4 1-I~O- ~Â« S + NG /1' FA9i#, 0 0% ) 2%40% C] D 7%~4*k 4 Â»f .. w 01 N \ v 4.6 ~ 01 b 90 W 1- Z uÂ· u, t n' 5 J E-oa ~2 \AB -1 0 00 .1 V 9 nu / -aÂ» 00 : k) c /7 6 E \ 42 I i - Â· ,\ \9 1 1%94 019 \\ 4 13 - . *CA // C C L Dy 4 -2 11 ~ 22 Chs, allY / 0 k C 0 76% O 2 V . \\ \\\\\ . il zi 9% i /~2 - V' ' Wil 0- w 0... EC r-\ q 9%6 0 ' t:2/ ~ -3 ~' awj . @~ 021 1 9 /,O C Nzy d \ 1, \ -. (f C Wt e . 9 tâ‚¬~ \ 094\ . , 4. / 0 48 5'91 38Â£6 / 0 311,918>h 40 2 ) -1-4. 2211 .Â«2~VÂ«9 Q 171\ . -1 0. I. 1/ I Q: .-gr 7,..===4.U_:09 '2.50.76' :l -#~*-, 01 Â«\\ f 1 10 9 k Â·C O e/ -. It 1 10 i 555 109.85 O He 19'e r.. > . \ l . to- ... ; . 14 Â£ i Â·ur ,Â© . *-ki" 0'~'' *- tz>9~ . \\\ 1.4 0 , 24 ar-x x ./ p.:95' Â°606 1 Mic: Z 1, - 1 ~:~4 U) 6 1 54. 0 0 \1 11/ 8 14. 0 \ m rk 34 &-0 . jaq?No 12â€¢ . - 1~ , -AÂ»-\Alf- Fr loâ€¢\\8' /\ 50*15'-ar-331 211.y| 1 4~ \~ SO~~~~~~~.2 Y 9-- :4/ \ -0 1-1 \\ o \\ 00 4- n 1 \\ A \\ *I-I 4 W d E S UP-- -6-) zk 209 Â»- .1 -7/ a.vr\11\4 4 4.4 01 10\24 WZ U,- O ->/ Ar \\7~k \\ \\ An\\ 1 .- Mr, t.n 91â€¢ cr . 'th 1 \ It,RaILS Wii; 3 COUNTY, COLORAD). sSSH cy.AE F:'PE A.P. 65. + 97.8--7500 74999~ // .I VJ 06 .<~ no / 1 W L q â‚¬! N L,/11 / -1816 1 h #-4-t 0 H W I 0 2 C \R T // 102 5 -B *, < 0- n; 1 X I . Â£15 X ,\ 0-ID 10 4 w , t,. 1 1\.39 .1 >, es. 1,0 LD 7 % fut-5 , 0- .- r 1- *- 1 ~ f\ .' ~ fa. 4/ 1.4.< -2.2, rs f 44 Â· in â‚¬ 1 - b ; KK/.' 6 2. 1:r U D 2 ge =*e 3.- :12 . CO Â·Â· 22- lo r d 4 . / -ACE r . W a. 3 45>/ /51.: -\ t../C Â¢wg gt O T--'-b-3- ,.4 . : -0 \\ 1 0 9 W 9 2 3 0 9. ..4 1 : H m V) ID V U 0- - 143 0-4 3 33 <n 0 0 V... te 16. 0 0 - 06 + U ii, 2, ~X /1 . 9 15 8 N ti-4 . i ./ , 9 e,m 4(0 ,/24 iÂ¥ g ~72 n, 0 0 h .\90/ <fif~.\= 0 0 4477. ~ â‚¬6 ;.~6 4 fAS-4 \4 1% * 4 ic 0 O, 4 ) 0 r W 0 1314# 5 2,0 I " E ./. /9*4 0000 j Azi , %58\812\\\1 - 7 L v 83 ~~ - _ '1 â‚¬ 1 Ha ~ 10 4 a ~9 \I T + ##p 9 r: /th \Sk \ S \Avi c. 6 % i li li k l. / \ e . W 15- O 3.21Â£6 1 - 03:[.1MLEPh &302000'E,/ . 1/1 \ ..11Â·u , 5 7 1 4 o as 5 t Ji> 1 i 49.6-N---i:-Â·~p~w/2,~0.76' ./..fÂ« ;iL) ct )/f ft' 929.- O 4 d 6.-3,; -~ L \ 272 - i// i C 0*- *-1 -1.4 01. DJ I , pe 9 rÂ·.. 6.. a Â°04 *I..., -.,LyÂ¢ i I. osha 2 i Â£4. L 0 -0 4 4 -\ x \ n , / 40 N /ty x8 4 ~ 1//~ 1 .\\ * .\\\ 0 -- \6 0\ 0 \ ~~-=----~ ~ ' ~1~222/x s5*:Aile 2ll.15)| 1 81 1 - 4~-S O ~~0- \ji il't R \ I'll % + 6 44 q tu Â· d W 2 Â§3 :96 32=2657 4/74\ 4 \ \3 NK-./ / 93 33= 2 9/ >011 4 %4\ Ma Fli:-f 1 \\ Fl n 1 ' - 'Â· 8,7 GROUND 1N31'JS\'3 T COUNTY, COLORAD 62~#~i #-- -7500 RECE,vtu /7--PA r- 4 SEP 2 5 1995 ESTES VALLEY ADMIN. DEPT 1[E'"7-7-71 IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. Box 597 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 (303) 586-9519 DATE: September 20, 1995 TO: Larimer County Commissioners Town of Estes Park Rocky Mountain National Park U.S. Forest Service, Estes-Poudre Dist. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Colorado Division of Wildlife Colorado Department of Transportation Park School District R-3 EVRPD SUBJECT: Support for Noxious Weed Mitigation in the Estes Valley On September 8, 1995, a conference was held in Denver on noxious weed mitigation. It was attended by regional, state and federal persons involved in public lands management. Governor Roy Romer stated that we must fight this invasion of weeds with the same level of effort put into .K forest fire. He further stated he would direct Colorado agencies to identify a region to become a laboratory and an incubator of ideas that would involve a strong coordinated attack on weeds. All of the federal agency representatives concurred that the problem is serious and must be addressed. We cannot plan, organize, legislate, or even research these weeds out of existence. While on- going research can improve our efficiency in dealing with the weeds, the problem is immediate, the basic methodologies established for elimination of the weeds. While the Estes Valley would certainly make an appropriate "laboratory" for the governor's program, given its proximity to Rocky Mountain National Park and the park' s on-going weed mitigation effort as a part of its overall native biota protection program, we have other more immediate and imperative concerns. The Park is fighting an incursion of Leafy Spurge and Spotted Knapweed. This effort must continue, or the Elk Study results will have a hollow ring to them, due to the rapid spread of these weeds and their high rate of displacement of forageable native plants. The Estes Valley is also presently under heavy attack by Diffuse Knapweed, one of the four state-listed undesirable (noxious) weeds. Leafy Spurge and Spotted Knapweed are also on this list. Many land agencies are involved in this issue in the Estes Valley. Without the dedicated effort and financial support of an on-the-ground program by all agencies, the war is lost. 5-1 We request substantive fiscal support for the Estes Valley weed mitigation program on lands managed by your organization in your 1996 budget. We believe this request is certainly in line with the need for ecosystem protection expressed by the participants at the "Gateways" conference. It you have any questions relating to this matter, please call Ed McKinney at 586- 3398. Thank you for your most thoughtful consideration of this request. Sincerely, 741*0006/ 862*L_ MargareÂ¢tlark, President -,7 NKA C\.f - Â£5Â£9 /74 n Ed McKinney, Weed Miyfgation . 5-2 Page 12 The Trail-Gazette, Friday, Sept. 22, 1995 ~ Agencies to combine forces t in all-out assault on weeds 1 1.. - t ' Spread of knapweed poses threat to native grasses * By BRIAN ANDERSON there is a need for an integrated ple pulling enough weeds to fill : . The enemy, in the form of dif- tion right now for Estes Park," are required to do community : approach. about 45 large trash bags, said he The war on weeds is on. Â«I consider it a serious situa- would like to see individuals who fuse knapweed, has begun an in- Conner said. "They are very service put on weed patrol. vasion of Estes Park. aggressive, and they will displace The EVIA is in the process of The Estes Valley Improvement native grasses." sending out letters to at least i Association is trying to assemble Diffuse knapweed is a biennial eight government agencies re- allied forces to combat the inva- that reproduces and spreads sole- questing substantive fiscal sup- sion. ly from seed. port in each agency's budget for Along those lines, the EVIA The noxious weed first started the Estes Valley weed mitigation hosted a noxious weed abatement showing up in Estes Park about program. strategy meeting Sept. 14. five years ago, making its way up 'There are many land agencies ' Representatives of several gov- from Boulder, through Pinewood involved in this issue in the Estes ernment dgencies and some Springs and eventually to the Valley. Without the dedicated ef- homeowners associations at- Highway 36 entryway to Estes fort and financial support of an tended. Park. on-the-ground program by all Perhaps the biggest develop- Cars were the primary culprit agencies, the war is lost," the let- ment to come out of the meeting in spreading seeds of the aggres- ter states. was the proposed creation of a sive weed. committee to address the prob- Now diffuse knapweed has be- CSU working on weed study lern. come a concern in a variety of ar- Conner said RMNP is in the L Jeff Conner, a natural re- eas across the valley, but primar- process of having a study done by i sources specialist for Rocky ily along roadways. Colorado State University that Mountain National Park, said he will rank the noxious weeds in would like to see an Estes Valley Spraying, pulling combat weeds terms of most damaging. exotic plant management plan. Spraying herbicides is Derhaps Once he obtains results of the Â«What I would like to propose the most effective way of combat- study,-..Conner said he would get is forming a task force to develop ing the problem, and it was word out to other possible task an integrated approach to the stressed at Thursday's meeting force membe'rs and they could noxious plants we have a concern that most pesticides now used are come up with an exotic plant about," Conner told attendees at non-toxic to humans and wildlife. management plan. last week's meeting. Jim Broadwell of CDOT said Rick O'Dell of the EVRPD said Although their are currently the Department of Transporta- one component of the plan could no formal plans for such a task tion had trucks ipraying for dif- be an activity similar to the an- force, Conner's proposal received fuse knapweed along Highway 36 nual river cleanup. a warm reception among the local last week, and they will spray He would like to see in event 1 government representatives. again in the spring. scheduled next year to deal specif-Â· 1 The Town of Estes Park, ~ The BOR has contracted for ically with the weed problem. Larimer County, Colorado Divi- herbicide sprayingÂ·in the area, as Larimer County Weed Agent sion of Wildlife, Bureau of Recla- does RMNP. . Lloyd Berry commended the at- mation, Colorado Department of The EVIA no longer provides tendees of Thursday's meeting for I Transportation, Estes Valley herbicides or sprayers to local their efforts and concern of what Recreation and Park District, residents, but EVIA's Ed McKin- he terms a serious problem if not Park School District and RMNP ney stressed the association is addressed. were all represented at the meet- more than happy to provide all Â«In 10 years you']l have knap- ing. the necessary information to any- weed and dirt," he said. one interested in combating nox- "You up here are doing a whole Problem knows no boundaries ious weeds on property they are lot more than most of the rest of Conner said 12 percent of the responsible for. ' the county, or the state for that known plants in RMNP are nox- Homeowner associations that matter," Berry said. . ious, with diffuse knapweed have a weed problem were en- It is merely the start of a,war being the one they are most con- couraged to hire a contractor to that is not expected to end. cerned about. come in and spray for them. "It's something we're going to But it is a problem that knows McKinney, who was out on have to live with from here on . no boundaries, which is why Saturday with two groups ofpeo- in," McKinney said. --1. . r .-':,iW.v.,'Â£~ -4 + ~ .'.....-' -'. Â©33 Uâ€¢EMID PUILIWING CO. RECORD OF PRQCEEDINGS Public Works Committee October 27, 1994 Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Doylen and Miller Attending All Also Attending: Trustee Dekker, Public Works Director Linnane, Town Attorney White, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: None Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. -4- > WEED CONTROL EVIA is encouraging the Town to take two actions regarding weed control: 1. Amend the Town code to require all commercial stables within the Town limits use only certified feed. 2. Designate a portion of the Town's seasonal beautification budget to weed control on both Town property and private property. Director Linnane acknowledged that requiring commercial stables within town limits to use only certified feed would cause an economic disadvantage to the one stable location affected because the state and county do not enforce similar requirements for stables outside town limits. In addition, enforcement of this requirement would be difficult. Linnane stressed that the town does have a weed control program for town property, including mowing of street right-of-ways and spraying and cutting weeds upon request. Each special request receives a follow up to determine action needed. Administrator Klaphake explained that the limited parks budget would require a level of service exchange from other areas if weed control is increased. And, expanding the weed control program would increase use of pesticides and that would bring into action other activists against such use. The Committee recommends the Town: (1) continue the present weed program and offer assistance to EVIA in furthering public awareness; and (2) not require the stable located within Town limits to use certified feed until such time that the county requires the same, but Town staff will advise the stable owners of the option of utilizing this feed for weed control purposes. REPORTS The Committee reviewed the Customer Service Response for September . and the Monthly Water Reports for August and September. Director Linnane announced that future reports will include department operations updates and that future field trips will be scheduled. The November Public Works Committee meeting has been canceled due to the Thanksgiving Holiday. Director Linnane recognized the work of the Parks Department employees who exceeded expectations under a reduced work force and the increased maintenance of aging parks. Director Linnane commended the Bureau of Reclamation, Rocky Mountain Consultants, EVRPD, Larimer County, EPURA, the Corps of Engineers, CDOT, GOCO, and Bob Joseph for their efforts in laying 5-4 1,1 1 9- LO- 099 ' J/* '3 + * 4 7 15 0 ' 4 5 -gâ‚¬ g 0*~~ 11111-* %-1 -2 ~ r 1 1 if* 9.1 H 1 Â·28 5&2.ES'Sss:F u *ft.0.- 05822 h 2.62. 1 .0 1% & 01 0 %= 33 7= I .8 .M c. g -8 2 0 =a -m 2 M= ZE = 2 >- . - .s i o.ou.b >0 0 -3 %.2 92.- 2 fi.Â§ S.iffi ,.fL 5 1 1% 0,3 1% a =..0.8 4.Z:::.3 6 0 - 2Â·5 d -0 -0 #5â‚¬.2.5 5 o g zi U Â·- .E =: u.-Â·g u---v-d = Â¢94Â°94 u 2 221 0 5-9 846 9 0 0 - â€¢ O > 609%-02-0 .â‚¬ 3 Â·R.& g.% 5 8.â‚¬*fâ‚¬3 8 2 ~ E.3 .2 -6.9 a a A A U A ..04 3 0 g= .0 .14 U U b O 6 g 2 p Â·2 m 8 ~ a >, 292% a % R 0 44 4 8 -3 6.2, ,2 E 3 O = == 0 4.3 2 . C E 44 5 0 En -0 B C = .ag Et *..E enrs = ist o M.54 2 -E -0 w . O 3 2 0, 2 -23 4 8 4 -0 4. 22 9 -0 9- W CO 64.- M'g 8 M .2=iMâ‚¬ 4 32 2 .0 3-M E E k 2 24 3 - E 4 = 0 0 0 S .52 E 0= >, 0%,5 = 2 0 -0 Z ro - 0 0 -O ra ~ 2 M.22 *~ ~ ~ 0=01 E ~-9 1 2 2 2 -2. 4 â‚¬ -_g e g IN = 2 -= == = 0 9 R C N.3 00 3 3 < - . - 2 %*&3531 3 1 -1--:Z EÂ·-22* U 8 1 M --2.0 05 2 2 = 2-2 M. -61- 0 -9 U -*-h -2 COC C .4 -6 - Wi â‚¬9 ca %.8 91 O 2 111 2 2 1 E 0.2- = 0272 7.2,g 8 9 .9 U 1% 1% 1 -31% - 03 % 53-4-2-G 2.- cono E m E f 0 2 2.0 0- C = 9 %42 2 ..... 4 4 in. 0 41.-Mgo 3 N E 2 = 9 E.7 NE.2 h .r, .n M M .' - . â€¢4 M 32 u] r.)13 2 -3 M en rn M rn .. -= 8 NgÂ·NFM 8 H - 2 74 h 5 0:0 0 0 b C = -0 -0 0 M. E 2 - 4 M rs Ki N O.= 8 E O 9-5 Â· 600 - 10 51.2 2 .9.2 =.2 2==EWÂ° A FEM E E N 5 -0.8 2 Zbgt . 2 E .*ir= Nt SK 022 2 EM O. .a 08 50 IM 76 J, 2 2 8 9 0 O -2 0 0 1 1- g.= 60 0 CO Rge.=:3g~ i~3 1 -9 0%-00 M .0.- 8 0->-- O 4- 8 -4 .- 0 - >, X 1.0.= 23 U 9* 2,@ M .OU 012 rof; EN SEE er 86 2 1% 2 1-ovdE * 02=.R .12 E l= M.2 013 -0 - 5 6.0 0- t= Oâ‚¬ 92 0 E.2 2 3 - MaficÂ°+ 8-2 31 1=V=Â»â‚¬ 9 0= M =a q = 9 -= i- 2 --0-0 ~Si S.5 11:3 0= 0 0820 39 -23 0 rn E t':11 e Ik . 3 9 8 22 b 1 0 â‚¬= -~ -E -2 M-EN B~-3 % a 0-*Â¤ 2 -E g 2 -9 J* -Â°IM -8 E~ Y 9 2.2 / 0 2 .7 0 3 0 3.0= O 2 -8 8 30 4 . 52 E 2.2 9 .8 N to B J E-: %34; K W. -= - t, 3 5 M g :32 1 EN *m E g N g 14~~~~0. atM g e *2-3 6 g Â§18 -1 - U 49.9 00 00 O 22 - u.9 â‚¬2-0 3 E Â·3 & 4 .=.0 0.2 - 9.0 4. ~ v 4. 8 0 . 5 0 0 -1 0 ca '3 E 2 4 j z u 0:15 1,z Z z 24*/MASN- oeM-0,023 E ar= d r E 0 2 2 5 00.5 .1 6 d Â· -- 1-=CO O .0 u O 4- A 4 $0 U C U .C C A . 0 2 ~ 2 4 4 2.2 9 * c .0 57 3 2 es '~ ~ ~ Â·~ 'B ~ ~~ ~ ~ g;6 2 0.92 'E h =,2 03'E E 2 H~Ej ~f 4 .E E . Â·2 â‚¬ 9 0 0 0 * 9.N w U w 0 â‚¬ 8 >. c,1 4. 0 5 - 34 2 2 8 Â¤ 2 8.- ==08%422 1 C 0.0 _OA0 .3--0= E " -~ &- 2 13 >. .: ~ .3 lE ~ Â·9 4 â‚¬-2 *-M a. ~ M. ~* ~ ~ Â¤~g EM-~Z e U=OBEE# y. r,â‚¬ 341 N 2 9.6 9 .- C -0 3 S .5 2.2 1 k k N 2 - 0 0 u 4 00 0 g .2 0.9 *0 x 2592=~41 O 2 - Jl .2Wg c 06026*= M '3 2..: .312 g E .: 2 -0 32 2 9 g 26. o E g,= D, .5 0 -0 8 H Â·. 2 0.0 8 5 2.-g 2 >,2 .E *li 8 k w "7=ME 8 r = HO k .Â§5 7 3 0 G R u 4 8 U o ' twaosso E 3 2:6 6 - b , CU = 1-0--"GEr = = aug .2,E & R N'~ N ~ -rli :% 29 2 sâ‚¬N g tn 9 R -0 0 6 X U ~0 8- o cs o 2 5.2 aa M UlE@Eg Vl M &%224 Elld~ 5-5 qu!!BA ~Y~00 gue 1U0UI0 11!00101 0Ag-Xluokil -UOSeol 1!COBUOUO00 pue fO!102.Id It[A, pul! SU[flutuup KIIDWO , ptle UO '100JJO U U!8.120.Id DP olu S! pue 011!1 9!41 1 9 0[0!Ue 01 uo!1!Ppe u! W 010!1113 slouo!SS!UIUIOO ,(lunoO JO PJ U INES JO suo!9!AOJd 0 1 'JOJ Uounl!19 qns H lou 90 uo!suedxo ue 01 01OA OnSS! 041 uo fru!1()A S.IOU,nop~et PFUS JO 35-4-1 1 4.~ Agriculture 1, 1 unacsirable Plant Management 35-4-114 Penalties. Except for sect 107 and 35-4-11 for the m ment or con trol of weeds, noxious w cd u! 104104 0 urdlu00 4 Ape 0411841 ou09 041 JOlu U S / 41 JO JW Aq pokloss!p 4/â€¢ Spoqloul 0 41 1 1UOUIDUCUBILI -000.Id lelituls section added, L.,90, P. 1557, Â§ 3, Undesirable Plant Management 35-5.5-108. o con ction. 35-5.5-109. plant manage- 35-5.5-111. wcrs of county 35-5.5-112. 0! tuouooo pon ARTICLE 5.5 in article 5.5 ofthis title. U 41 SOJE[oop declaration - rule anagc undesirable 35-5,5-1 10. plant manage- authority. ssions - This article shall ' I '6â€¢5 I *d '06 1 'PoPP JO 01 1 - UO!)11.rupop 0.1 . puct BId *Iqui sopun oveu polomo tuo 132& tuojuor,buu:oplfufwcol mmiss~crs. . 2 Â·: '1 KIn-Â£,OA?701.10 '99,Â§11'LOI .d' .OM~pUU X!9-Klx person wh cle commit S! uo!1Sonb qons uot~A\ POAI Ss!P OSIB ke oner o county c 100 os 'siou !SS 70!11~!P 041 OA 9. atâ‚¬.6 6= B 51 ~ 7 6 2* 2 24 6- 2- c L 2 V.E- >. 3222 >. 5 2 2 5 23 0 8-2 5:3 71; e &40 4 g =2 -2 Â·=&2 NEÂ·:% 5 ?3:1iÂ· - 44 9 - O. 7 4 2 2 9 M Z-20 93 1411 E dia; 8% 34 ~ = tx E . . u... 1= 3 &2Vb % 5 2 q ..% '3 2 6~s 7 3 ke * B 2 a>% = 0 1 U -Co 1 = 2 * &% E.2 .O 1 0 r.3 0 0 = 32 2 24 2 : 8 0 %'.= 0. &'11.0=11 ve=88=- 4-0 0 CO P. .* . 51 002 C i'? C el = 3-3 2 3 - 8 O== i g:2 --3 -=42 -2-2 -2 -0 -2 -2 = 2= e --g m. E .2- i 1-'... 0 EE~28 5 â‚¬22 g Â·r'AS .~ 2 ke.-eciÂ°%-6.E=q, 0 - O 4 024 R. E $ M â‚¬ 2 u Â·g ti 'c :2 2 3 & 9 2 = 4. 13 = U .0 0 -C, = 0 9 - s E-2 =d 3-3 = 2-2 =5 28- Dq-2-2, 12 22 2-~-m --~% *2.E 3.-9-~ g*-NJEÂ©=i- -Râ‚¬ 81-2-*=2= =.0 O e â€¢- E- 9 u, 6Â· -Â· 2 93Â·*14 -45Â·Mi E* 211 3 -~3-128*#0--*wag,5-9-5 3-2 33/3-5-2 F 44.0 SCCOOO e 1 4 8 &3 :- = O 8 E - &6.2 >.Ef â‚¬ z :3 2 .2 E 0.3 &15 B ge-2 & 2.M * 2.2 .3â‚¬ 2 0 4 3 0 0 = 02 9 0 2,32 d @E EE -' 2'g %'a s,g 2 9-3-:. EM'&-2 2.M = ..'- .- 0 * 'O k. 9 0 6 $ .2 2 -- 9 &*32 02 a.52 a .2 %23 d, g E & 49 & 3 ri g & 9 8 U M .S g , R Â·M - c. 00.8 % c L O SE >. 3.5 6 C' N 3.2 9 .. 8 .. 2 u=-e Â·0 o.Â¤ 9 3 AN j ," 2 #i 3 & X E 5 iEE U.E.0 -Â¤ = o O -Â£) m R . A J 2 = O 4 = C.C= $ o c.g=-0 2 - cw E 3 2 1% g v- 9.g= R >' a L. - -2: M B rg fl C .2 >Â· = k M E 0 0.2.1 6 E. u M j >. .32 222 f 3135 3%.84*52 0 Â·0~&;iÂ·~N 32@ CE.9,3- cio U Â¢3 -0 - ='au-3-2 0 c 0 2,2 d >,0 0 12 g 9. 2 9 a f p -2 * E 4 E â‚¬ r E 3. u:~ s -a Â·g e = E e.i N u Cra .C 08 --5.40<006.Ra .=6.Eougo.250 - A.U CO= U 0 - 534 11 14/2 4 0 1 4 31 -2 : M 8 0 2 0.2 - c c Â·IE .9 - M Wn OU 0.0 coÂ·E Â£ 5 0, 2 a *.h â‚¬ 75 & M .2 4 2 73 -5 cr= 0 O 0 5 0% 45 -* 3 0 b g.c MOVO-,2.Ge.32: t ca.sz e, - #37Â·~fÂ·~.iÂ·~333 6% f:g:fg~Rigi~j-3â‚¬9 #Mul#3 - C - ur= u...0.8 13.2.2%.8 GE .13 .1= .% 11 C F H.f: 2 8 8 % 8% g,Â·5 :2 3.2 4 N R Â°u "89. 0 A d m -=00,0 C.0 9 1=2 9 2 h.2 9 44 32 m .8 = 2 Â§ ~Â·~ 9 2'0 E g .u, u = - 0. C M.- 0 0 0.9.9 8 2 + 9 0 0 .0 4 0 h M J co $ Ill SREN C E C Â° 0*=a-g-~ <E ~* A g g &~ oJ a:-~ F.9 .2.3 2 94 w U ro: : o. I -00 4 -,*vous= A e 2 2.- .5. C 50. 0 . a. 8 ,6 E F N LU t.â€¢ b 2 EeliN 6.Â·26.4 -AP - ra - t. E -8 *62.- E {342**1=liE.je.~6 8 *:4 9% cz m =6-1 g -3-4 L =f, --g %-1 1 M F a Z # E - Â° f Â° g'.5&.6'* 4- 5~ Â·3 C, C: 2 1~ 2 -ar#.1&34: 2 u ~ C co ca 00 0 0 0,=3 0 2 2 &2 0 A .2 'Ei U; 5 2.ttl~. ' 2-013 0= - 2 N E Â·8 2 - u u - C 0 2 Ch.8.2. - -R = r' rs - 0 -- - F f F % i Â£ 6 .2 Â· -01-2 0.= g 2 W Â£ 0. 0 45 .1 .0 2 = E --a =b â€ž 2 8 6.32 .1 4 2 2 9 - .0 e Â°.-1 13 1 ?= -O 2 13 22 0 = 9 0 00 3 2 Â° ;0 -ati- ' 1% a *2.4 25.8 R C - 3.5 * US Â·- h E k 2= 2 6 Sg g " o m.-I= CO U Â·2 E v .8 5 2 â‚¬ 2 8 .Â° 0.8 . ~ -2 E Z s -5 M *~,w.~4 2 .m 3 *2-g -3 .5 2- E--M E .. C- 60 C - hlefl otc :6 g 2 2 -3 3 2 f bm 5-* -2 a Me.-fi:&19 0 fil~ ef-* M 2 S-2 â€ž- (44* 2 k %20 C.Ew 0 00 60 60 v M 16 -a- >.~- 32 04 2 .2 E = 2.2 0 8 N .9 NE 'Â° 3 -R E e 6. C 2 o== o cwe 02 3-Â·5 3 2 ko 92 ~S 2.8 22 06 â‚¬ o Z f .2 ~' f@ 3 ~,i~ ~ i Â¢ 8,~21 w-2 9 m .-,0 -=.4 3 -a O 04.2 EX.- Q >Â· o -2 .2 Â·u,â‚¬ i = c P :E 4# f 2 SEE .@g.goofFEEâ‚¬Â°MET#la @e=8 .agalr.@2 Â·1 e - i. aguis 9.52,Â§ ODÂ·ia ~ E >; b.g 8 0 8- v > E Â§ i .8 3 /1 . 2-3-0 -0205 -8 Â° li f i :4 25>r -2 2=00 - TE '3./ 1 1 2Â°13:12 - E E '3 8 -2 3 25 1% 2 e > Â·- i 9 u N 2. 0 gâ‚¬Â§ C -- 3-%(tra = == 5 u= #2. -3 2 -3 .4 E 2 S O. - - O -8 0 o.a -- rc E ru 3 2 E. 25 1 . 32 8 mo O -8 -9 C. = i -2 2 NDE Â§22 t a=o.,2 0.. Eu~ 71 2 2 8 t E o o ~2S~~ 0 u ' f . 132 f...:.. E N .. .1 :t u 60 0 0. a- - E .2 6EF & E-. 4:~ 2 i Â· E,Â·3 #~ â‚¬ a.2% â‚¬ E Ns=e ->.<-- 2 2. .EN 0.- 1- c: U . 0 C . rs ac .- C= .- --- 0-CO % ENE1%&Mti Ele p 900'g come= .2 VI C= E . 1- A $ ta H = 4 / . E 4- - 0 Â¤â‚¬ 2 % 59 5 Ng -38@:333â‚¬ a.5 0 8 E .2 '3 8 = Â·= 4 E .. = CO U -5.822 --EN E 2 0 8 &22 rl C FIC 2 .6 9 b Â¢ k >.C a C= =2 -- C 2 2..0 .Dg e .s: b Z_ 200:6 6- O %Â·ove o . .02 i. 2 E Â° 2 3 0 c e ... rs .8 - /= . .9 O -,- O .- C - r. - 0 -, CO u H.2 g = - 0.00,92- OCMEAG=A - 00 1 - - 2 2 22.5 0 GE E 16 03 56 2 ~ 99 >Â· 0 0 .' 0 2 4 -.- 0 .2 3 5 ,Â·2,3 8: E K.2 9 3.& E .9 5.9.9 9 9:3 nE 0 0 N & 5 2 th + 0, ro d >â€¢ O v A =E.==4 - 0 08,3 0.9 e u > U o E:0.5 .L Â·=.3 % .ci .9 23.~~E Â§2:@EÂ·Zip z.~Z 8 %' E .1,1 V, 0 7~.2;<295292&: gÂ·E@EP&Pt.:Bogoo.=: Eg: go'ss: e: : : 2: s= SEE & 6 E021 22.-.Â°i_ ~...E.~*.*.BNE8 81*mi;*i812 Â§5#2~ 4 u 0 m BM w - 0 8 0 4 4 00 0000.O >'- 40 0 6 0 C=-0 0 6 02 4 26 4- 0.3 E. 00.X m 0 . . W.- 0 0. $ - -C ... =.3 Ett O.E C- >" C U WO O 0 t'Mjort-01/23-2- wâ€¢aco o UNAE: 13â‚¬25:=COO_= .... EU .- - U C .6 64 0 W =.2 0 03 5.0 Or M = 14 6- 0 -O C A 22 007-3 Â®6 w 0 9 9 e r.Â· 000 h c, r, 0 g a gE o= C 6 0 042#0-Ff-â‚¬453-4-23=5~3=Â§841683 â‚¬ . 6 0 - 0. 0, i L. 0 rn -~ ~31 vi M , 40 0 -, - '-'v- e 5-6 0 - 35-5.5-103 Undesirable Plant Management 35-5.5-105 gove advise on matters or federal, or local gov or agency herc luentlnd 10 041 01 lueId e suuouI â€žlueld mission" n ndividual, partners sed for Ct[S Spot{10 01, st: 1,1~~1~~11 10 JO 10!J 80 OMOC 0 I luoUIOSe a noxio de 40ns J J 0.1 i 1 , '1,1111,1.1 X[[elu 0111 01 lunoo 40eojo rU luotuoutltleul lue means a pl ow ng, occupy controll OCCSS noo 04 CUOSEUCCU IUOq U S SJOUO!99!LUIUOO Klunoo 'Solueu is found. means those meth cment prac- undesirab plcmentation 'o managemen JO X no 1 OUIOSCU 011UOO '(9j I 0 ed!0!un luOUIOSEUctu sdon DituOUOO ,! m SopeAU X 04 man gemen cans the use 05 0 Xue agcnc ns ca age cans th 019 lue[d idnmp live measures, 'SLU 019'(SOX) 7 , 2 .1 u S 2, E#~~f11 423 9 0 0 bo 1 -,4 2 6 2 .. >4 M t- 0 0 v, >, ....1 0.8.0 CE $ 0 0 4 0 .- = C ed O & 1% N :, I.. *-, 3:g Â°:O-0.2 2-354 S .s.Â¤ 0 -% f 1.s N:% .E â‚¬ 5 E AS .&13 22233 5 2 cr 00 5 0 5 3 0 4 3 3 2 Â· N 16 8 k raÂ· '3 -Cl g . . X.E i 2 5 -a *204 Z 53.- 44 > M ... 6 E.2 ' -0 es O 10.6 i h cr ~ g ~ r .2 I .Â§ ,; 3! ,1 e. -2.36..9.C 8 -0 1 >,-, 44 0 0 =1 0 SM ;03* 2.2 -2 22 i =* M : -M ~s N = - UCE L. 1- &- C t: O E= O, 3 2 2 2 .9 0.-0 -Â·. g l~ 8 c 3-Â·S ~ Â· >' 5 Â·3 Z 2.3 02 U Â» V *2 2 C - rio a 91 -= 2 2 27 L *2 =11 1 3 2 5 11 *-11 Eqg 3 O- ovREE ..9 0 2,5 E do uy' Â·- 2 1 4 9 1 -Â· N 'C -' Cd Â° E C: -3 0 0 8 . 5 0 m - 0-2 - 2 -, 08 0 .0 % 32 % 53 . 2 V., 0 - 0.0 0.,c: u; D ~-5 E 2Â·38=>21-=> C 9 2 RES >.1 2 - 2900 .5~E *5&13~01Â§ Ni_@&1981 2* MEN Ngg de.~ - O 2 0 81 U >5'0 a W E 9 -1 el - u * Cot H C.0 0 0 = â‚¬ 2% a OE U C r. &M 8 2.11 o a :* .O 0 %9*-NJCM'MME -3-0 2345 4Â·~ EC~ 33â‚¬2983 24 9 Â§'g Z N.* J @ E Â£..Eo 282= - 0.- .0 - 4 C >'.0 3 3 3 5 2 RE-3 3 12 9.Z' E.% %2 9 2 -C U - 2 2.9 m 4 -2 6 1 54â‚¬ E-* A .C 7.* M EÂ·g 9 -0 -G -e ..0 2 ' - c ' 'S S Â° ta .0 ... a .O.52 Â¢ .g F z .S 9.2< L. ta d C 012 O.9 -O 0 =- 12 0 .9 2.0 V 2 - 3 4 o. d Q g: 83 4.= - 9 > O 3;23 E .c 02/2 2 Â· -O Â° 5 6 2 - C D- o -. '6 2 2 8 M g E 3 021 &33 2 00 d ag*k g.g fli ERÂ¥ 5 0. .g.9 0 0 1. C 0. d L. 23%-23~ M 92% 82UN @1233 Oda. 00-E O 2- Â° 4.5 Â·Â·. & 8 0> O 0 0 50 - ~ O - E.#t- CC -6 22 - E 13 - - A *.- = d -8 -O ~ u Z N.E 4 = a- as e.2 Â·2 2 - 88 R 99 0 1{ c . ... 00 - g~~i; g EET4-6-9 %<-0~~*1*3432-3 2 08-83~ 0-= uo.-,-2 r K ~ 3 % 9 f:.2 I-193 -~ & 2 :3.Â·g #PLE - 2 -9 -8 o - g ki,E &22 u a 0 0 ~ li E 2 14 2% 1 ta & 00 -0 -43 C 7 - . >:c 9 13 58 Â·67 '2 2- 4 20 Ocd O.2.% 3.2 5 g 04.9 5 8 2 2 1 -8 .E .3 2 3 -M :2 .g C: 71 ~ ~ . 66 ME@ 3 8 2â‚¬ 5 4 3 N.E i- muE-:z>.0 2*=Â·E =- .d E .2 i. 21 8 â‚¬ -O=BE'-or~, 2 8 = E 32.M E < - . 2 - ,-.8 .3 2 .3 -% r. 0 E j /2 41 & 9 -= DE Q c Â·0 8 ri o - * C h' C Z. 6 8 'g .3 2 8,g g E dl u rs --0 59 0 2, g: ~, ~ 5 ,~ ~ ~ ul 3 00=~ C!,309 f 2%8 :.%2 8 2,2 E = a,af-Mad 21 2 hk a : '= SE 8 c. --- Â¢. ger A 1 .4 .8.8:/ 1 .3 3.M # 8.6 -3 .Mâ‚¬ 3 g M .8 33* 2- & 0 - o ONÂ· . -t- 4 9 9 >. 4 m f.% 2 0 0.2.7 = 0 3 02 .. 1- O.- -0 0 E ro= UE .1 a 1 -8 0-M = .9 4 E = TA Et 0- 21 9 Â·2 %â‚¬1 2-o .- E.2 2 0 Â· c.8 0 5.0 4 g z w 0 02 0 - r:; .8 e E E u, 2!~ 0~ ;~ ~ 14 0.= 00 2 cu hs O 5.2 5 g $45% 624 ... *CÂ¢E cEDÂ° No=du, 0.- 23.2,2 *M u 23Â·~(1 #* ,4 2226 Fâ‚¬ w 1 32 0%&0 + 0 06- . C 8 8.g,3 & 0.0 0 .SEGOo 2Ndiouo [1 -2.- E >. -5 N a E N A - Â·% *g E N .O 0 6- 4 ~.~u.*Jg~ 2, i 3 0% 2 8 2' 6.- 3 0 0 -Â· 0 2 72 3321 C -3 L. >=2 6- -J CL- c . 53 Â¢ = O 6 0 5- 0 â‚¬ Z Â·c .= R ts .3 g. 8 .5 â‚¬ .. = 04 -1 -M .2 51 0 gj ii-1-~~%:g S i ~ 6~ *-~ IM' Â§ E gl; g S N Z 0 f 3 2% 24 1 IN- 31& 1 23%_5 3 4 6 = 3-2 Â·s -3 O d >, g 01 M â‚¬ =.0 6. 10 -L.*Sog 0 = U- g * 2 E 4 Â·-.9 2 -92 .3 . u .91: e ::; 3 52 Cd % 2 0 0 i g.g 1. M a.~.2 3' 12 2.2 &239*CO ~ Beo- = c o r, 602 2 2 = 9 0. 9 2 Rci.M M b 2 3 '33 -8 . NE 2 0 es 6 >â€¢ PrJ 02 1-=0.d=k OVA - :,roo 9 . 2 2 0 2 a U J M .9,42 -3 9.0.0 =Â¤ 6 0.= 6 3 <N.=M 99 B.G 6 -2 >, 0 c o c . -.,3 4 - 2 2---- 0 + a o d-6 P 0--26- rd -3 k 3 a* 51 Ngâ€ž 24 3~J A,5 2 8- 2 3'% 3 9 ~3 2 =Â·e MEN k. E= E *C 'c O 60 - E t..ME O 32 02 M , '4 2 2.51-0 8 62.8 .2 .; %:62% 4.2 6 4.,E . Â·E 11 6 j 24-01- eo O Â¢ ra.0 0 rico.~ g 85 5% 4 1122Â¤131112 5%2e=10012&32MBO 64 - 4 &1= 0 0.=.2 a.6 2 Z 5,3 E 33 " o E - 8 0 4 2 .. .1 S Q. P W.52 =v ot~ Â¢ 2 W = C O = 3.4 0 - --Â·~ O 0- k ./ 0 6 43.0 213 5 =- 16 4 16 N es 5 43 5~ a E.0 0 2 ..5 % : M 8* b g 0 01% 32,8 52 N o U, evi .~ = *222 g .5, g O.g s. 322.2 06= O 2 5 0 2:2 01 &:3 2 2.2 4 &~ 4 5 -2.0 EE E 1 0 *hÂ·M -:=E C -1 e .24 0 60 0 2 0 40 91 o.Â¤21,-4,auo-su=-â€ž -oâ‚¬-&5s.Â¤Â¤u 7.g - 022 -3 O 92 *Pa=ugge 0 0 8=AEE## 2= Â° = a o b s â€¢â€¢ q I i- Â¤,: .. B k Â·8 '~ E- A ., E ~s~ 3 '= Cho â€¢2 ~ ~i} ~3 EZE~j KitiÂ·*z W 2.2 m M = co o :p - c w -i'?u-Cd cz :51 9 %97 8 M *Â§ %36:4 4 51â‚¬~; Ets g %10 16:51 RE 23% 0 1 .2 - - t-- =0 OO 9 -3 3 - -9- 2 -2 -2 -2-2 7 0 1 -0- C - C- O b -0 00 8 - .0 W.- - I 0 - A- 0 st=* EM E== 0.2 <o 0- O.0 0.Â·Ss- A d 9 0. 3'.Z; O'.DC Crn 5-7 A bers of the commi ion shall bc residents of thc unincorporat d owers a as the case may cooperate with annual and sccre- ion shall ta c the mbers of 40!4 slued oiqu 1 u&!SOp OJE SO,03 rccomm ena for und : joildnEI OllIe U 0 UO!09 041 Xq uaoul OSIE '03.Inds ue Fulqns SJOUMOp C pO irec y o wed su spooK pue nuclei 01 O 9 Â§ 'zgn 'd '06 -I 'PORPe oP! 01!lun :0)1!10 uu 99!1Un OO jO So!poq gUJUJO 'I AInf OADOOJJO 'I Â§ 'al:I 'd '06 -IÂ·'POPPE 010!UP o.1!lua :aoinog :01 u 9!41 JO suo!9!A 41 opun posruu oq SUIUJ0AO2 Pol 041 uo I Sl 11100 LIOS!Ape JUOUIOSCUVUI 0Iquilsopun 041 11341 90.!el e spuy Kqolo JOJ 1UOUIO.1!nbol 0111 09!1139 01 pow o p oq 11249 s of the comm ) ' muld orqUJ!sopun Polu 5Â£ Â· SOOUU ns Jo uopdope 041~'slueld OrqUJISol u 0-IU[OOp pUB Op,JeOD JO IUUI00 1132 10 'Â·S"kI' unsind 2UJUJOAO2 0 I) .50!11!p - uoiluu!.IOJ - suo!59!Uitt!00 LIOS,APV *LOI-Â§'5-55Â£ 8*Apjard of cou may cooperate with other coun- crgover Idc 1 0.]WOO 11!0!11]0 OUIU!0001 -condde lions JO 11 041 SU lou 01 'SJOUMOpuer JO UOISS!tuttIOO Ioil! luloaae AUU: Uouuo p. 1551, Â§ 1, effective July 1. uu gulod(Ie Hutis Xlged!0 pue Aunoo Voco Jo Apoq selI Ali edi 1 30 uu pold o m elodooo 0!luouOO0 041 01 leOJ41 luosoJd e ie u oPIuu 9141 Kq posodiur ueld luou!02euern lucid gU 9 -- -2 8 2-.2 C .2 51.2 5.8 2 g 2-:,8 5-5 â‚¬ - - 6 E % 9 E '3 342 & 6 8 Abl!.2 s = F = E ZE 8 9 6 43 E C *3 -2% 4 12 CE 2 8 -- .a g .3 2 J 0.% C 6. 8*= O= 3.0 0. 2.8 8 - u E Fe =02 z U 4% ad p gN *RJ b e 2 11&1 :â‚¬ 2 1,9 16 2 %08 R&O 1 @gE k:E E.2 9 .. b. b= 5 6 R -6 :4 6 2.2 g 0 2 3 5 0 1 2 -K al j i 62 a.0 ~ 1 12 ho <4 cO e WÂ©3.3 2=- ... 1 -Â° tie o - A 89 825â‚¬â‚¬Â§ g~E=WNME KENE *Zte NES .g E li > t ts/=2>,9 6 E R:% 3 8 m 0 9 1 E' 5 li a E N 11 :Â§ 6'la M 66 * s 5313%_~ ~%â‚¬222 WEZâ‚¬ 2* RE *4 A a o 20' 2 22 9 =. 0 =0 CO--CO6O 14:3 881, 1 0 - 3 = d =-2 5 w 8 KJâ‚¬~ 9'3.Eâ‚¬ c .3 .- 2 9 . O -O tak . C.E E o. O E %2& 0 -0 - C O.5 2 E- C.M 0â‚¬ ocu CE CA ~32%qw~ TE M ai=A.~~.f ~ ~ &- asE u k h.2 K O %2 w >E .2 â‚¬2 2 0 = 1-= 16 1% :: 3 & 0 8 - - V 223=&0 71 &- /2 .la 75 4* M 4J 'm u gia 0== 4 6-6.0 2 o CO- gla , 6'3 2-Â¤ b '0 0 C 2 ra Â· -C 8 02.at Li .0 -5 + c >. 01 5.Â§- 2.M.R 8 'g B a - Â¢ 6. 9 N !1 E g 2 A .9 %68 ba 2 22.0 0 0 9.64 Cop 0 p co O % FW Â° 4~E 00 Â¤. 2 . 3 -5 2 6* 9 4.-0 ,0 '1 -E.C) 8 62.0,2,ME :3 2-Ginc S 3-gui 5-5. E-=3 1 23-3 â‚¬ 3-2 A M Â·0 2 o o. 6 = 0 2 0 0 -0 ..c _ a 1 -g ) ul M ro = 52 Â· 6 0 -3 000 9.233% 1 gE RUE = =10 - 0 . 0 â‚¬--- S.- -2 .E .2 -4-.- A R O-2 0 43 0 K - a 10-0 ME>~ O.-. - 524 ?N 9 -,0 o =_ 2 01%@ s M o Ist 20-8=99 -- ora_ 0 35;2 22 M E 8 8 0 8 Â° 9 1 ro - C .. N COEE; 0 -= 2 's = E g = - .O k = >'.0 - 'Â¤ M 0 42 13 mÂ· a N * 64 4* - 0-E=Â·c - - - o 8,!g N .2 6 g N. >. 8 v.E.& 0-3 .00 0 82Â·59 * c E ~ C &*-OESE& 8 %222 2 *S W 825 Â°Â·RÂ° 0 -F: 0. O= fE Ez gm-gass MEN *m.&-g *-ig -2 Em 21*2 -9-% 2 EB E---2 2-* 4-EE- E-=- 3-m -3 C O - 0 Â¢-1 g-Of,EXE A- 9 1-13,0 5 0 0 -0 = _ _ 0 - .0 -0 -= r c M S N 52 4 -, u' 0 - 0 - a- 0 0 ~ = 2 M ~g.2 EZ} P g ~ ~z~ 22 28Â·5 42,8 % w t:ZE:M c. i~. o= ra ZE.E 2 82 1& 44 â‚¬ 2 0 0 R 5.E c ..2 -Uor,Cw SeÂ»~a Z M~~~a fog=a=u ng 2*92=~ eu~ =a a *32 0.600 6 000 A- c 0.2 0 0 = ;* w - * d F & R -sig~- ~Â·EEÂ·M â€¢3.2 2 0 6 1% 9 5 4-* *s o c 2 22 & 3 52 2 -i_ 8 SESIE .2 Â·c.2 MEâ‚¬ 22.- a k o.E:=.= - ro _ Â§ e.-g 2 u.9= 2 o Z e B ~ 9 :2Â·Ii ~ â‚¬ EM == 2.2 0 02 c ='22 )'8Â·- (72,4 6 :2 0 2%'8.5-9 ~2 roo C .0 =00 g>.= C = 14a~es:~:92â‚¬~%%922%EN*9 ~~@Eif~63@qER;24% Eetiu 0. 0. 0 0 c. .=.0 0 =-0.- - .0 ==2-2 r. 0 '0 - 0-0 0= ...0 - =C -= = = 2 2 -9 Zil~ 221 BEN Â°2 8 E * 3Â·2:3 8 B.N#%-3,9.2@2 M ' = e Z "22â‚¬~ 5~- I - I..- 0 -10 r, p k >.3 24. .- Â· 3 . Â·M:M .= H -3; 52 6 0 8 2.ae g t- i I & 3 - 9 X AME 22 20 9 0-4 O O >0 = taw &000 Â·â‚¬ Â·E. 00 -% p e o j Â· E Â· â€ž s 9 -~ g B i -3 8.2 â‚¬ â‚¬ C v o -Â° 2~~ 3 4 ~ c ro 6â€¢ 4 -Â· E -or:Â·- t a Â£ =: 4. 2 -Â°*â‚¬= >c:E :E E.#.3 .w 2 $2.2 rs-= O -00 . 1 0 0 Q 0 6. 0 01 E : 00*M .4 4.Â§.2 E *C -6- 4 C 9 - W ' O 444 . 5.0 Nor; - rs - w- u E A U.52 b Â· g & 2.5 8 1Â£ ~ 55 ~ =1**g .E Â·M g t.@ % 3 -* 9 4 0 48â‚¬N.-*00=Ng 600 alifi .= CS 0 6-0 = . 6 2 - &2 BE MIE'Â¤â‚¬3 AdÂ· > ~-9 9 02-0 0 MOO >C 8 0.& 00 6.6. N .4. 5 Â·5.- o,li >, = k â‚¬ 2 -Ers 'r = 0 = W O 4. .= = -Â£3 : =2'.3 2 = S E k o jE ..9 / 0 2%0 -0 04 5 â‚¬ 35 2 . E 6- U, T.-3 kk E O.0 2 OM CO 00 - : g p 3- or#45= Na oF .2 0.0.k 0 -O =.0 0 =03 9 9 2 8 h-- -0.0 0 0 0 9= . â‚¬2 0 = h -2 Â§.00 -9. g M e * -a -2 0=WO -0 2 0 0 â‚¬.- 3,4%08 1 -3 0 0 0 0 . l; 2 2 :% 8 243~Set Â£ 9- Rg i C.0 > 513 32 .Mggil M Châ€¢ 8 & O 3 M %62&6. 8 e g.3 3,4 2 h=U = O = ts 0 9 M o â‚¬ U'.5. a g K. 9 89 2 1 - 0 N t.- w M O- 9 - rav OUU 02' co Â¤ >. O = P =-O O 8 -2 Â£ i 3% 31310 22 2 -O 2 W D B.Â§1 .s % f Cr 2.8 & 5 - 5 & E % -- '- N 73 0 F-2 -5 C i 23 M 41 E-@ 59 1-2 0 9 uer 51111&2- .2 â‚¬ E .2 v E .6 0. 0 0.-.0 .= a.- 0 C Â¢'.Â¢ -0 X WON 14 1- U ra *=O Â£ coo :s,4 S 8 2 3 ~- .E.2, m,k 64.- *299 * . 28 SE U r. o .5 1 C 4 0 22&3=8 Â·5 -M -2 M * 0 2 -*2 -3 -5-2 2-a -~ -2 =r O 9 u R -'K -O 9 29 co , > eocr o 0- Z B %'1 e E E = 8 -0 8 5 -6.E 9 .0 0 6 0 6. 1 E--2 9 - 9 -4 A= 0 01=-03 =1m 029â‚¬â‚¬ 2.4 9 22 E .D U 0 C ta rÂ° M X E 4 0 0 ro - M to 3 4 0 60 2- O 0 &0600 2 99 C 0 - 2 O Q M b= AR 'g U ~= 92=2 w - 0* m 2 03 .2 & ~ - 0 95 2,2 .o 2'g : CO OZ %â‚¬E ,% 3 2 6 P â€¢. 2 .. = c * u p U= 9.6 all R E 8 2-ZE -S. M :g I* s : -E' G, = < -9 -=-3 11, .--0 -als b Q B.X.0 = & 00 9:6 -8 2 Â° N e a.g - O - C I '9 E- =.52 8 i ,4 - 2 C - ases:39=MON g-=89 35 g 0 'S EAÂ·=: .0 r. . mig:se:gae.a~vilg@.5-~ggy g.:g i.rÂ·SEEN@E'#*~~~v~~u<~~ 44 ..2 8 -2.-3 2 v' . 6.5 2.2 2 .9 â‚¬ â‚¬ 9 0 0 / k C k c: 5 .c u, 0* * Â·- ca ok= c MA=OW S C .0 0, 0.-0.-_-.- e ro O. t =-O- = 600 -O 3 5-8 64- Agriculture 196 197 Undesirable Plant Management 35-5.5-109 - apwccds, also known by ,thc scientific namesÂ· of Â·Centaurea diffusa, rcas receipt of notification, which at. nagemen control of undesirab r ccu t shal decisio rc~ens, and Centaurea maculosa. or occupant shall either: entire c 0, p. 1553,Â§ 1, cffecti the local governing scienti -PAOP UBId luotuoveue JO Slucid oiqI!1!90 141 Iolluoo I Auoo 01 luednooo w or area and has rea on to ction and ther Inc ental costs in cc loued e ~t==4== 83uq~nq~1~)10,~~~11 logro 219% i{IdlIturuoSCUUU! i its delegate e panc a d niann go~ve 1 Uto pt!13 'Sluove 'soleblop 31! tifinoiqi 'Apoq SU JUOUIOSCUUU! 1 soinse 0 0 20 u 'spuei 'sos!tuold Xue uodn .10 48!1 041 OATHI JO AA .Iollu 0 El HnO JO '1 UOUIO r k oq su!U.IOAO& Ieo Unit 10 Xlun00 1 9UJUJOAO 'SlUOU!01!nbol leoo~ 101[10 Aue pue lUOUIOSe UI lu oued uo ! JO Sp0410Ut Iolluoo IquI!EAU 1 Oq eld OIqU.!!so opun J s ~ ;4 4 ip' s~El~puuendnj0 oouoso missioners or governing b munici- Â· . vu puo dsu! 041 01 Ssoooe Soluo onal boundaries aftc infestations, when at 1 tprls 1 ssoooe Auop Heqs luedn000 Jo J undesirable plants, fo y 21:i'tr'~1 u 0!qui!so 01(Il X110 uednooo 041 1841 :pole!0!A U dinsop FJOUOS U any pre Iloq 01 osneo OIquu uodn rcu st nces ha c . ~ ~.-7..:fi --2-Â·04 --Â·u,uu.,;ez=:.24;219344-5&::~-99,--2~-cf-- 7-2-5-- -- -i---iur-seÂ«--=.-= :.---Â» : i.- Â·fÂ·Â·Â· . . ...7 :;. ..... ; .?:-MeÂ£iex.. E.C.-'.t.Ter:=-1.4 ..: -... 0 6- t- 0 Q ta OC-' >uc C ' A & 2 -2 8Â£500> 0 65= O 8 s r &-5 Â¢2& 22 -2 2-â‚¬â‚¬ a -9 - =, 8 = & 4.C.3.21 22 0 C .. -2 -0 8 u ..2.2 :1 8 . . M 1 0% 2%.2 82 0.0 4 5 - . I , 2 3-3 -6 - p "rf S C u N. 8 Z 2 9.-1 3 1 1Â·1 * t i .c, -:~2,.>,.2 t ge=.4 8%8â‚¬2 0 , 2 Â·EE g RIc e 2 M .2 12 - - 1 2 * 0 - 3 2-2 -3 k c e -2 9 ksÂ°OC 0,=CONâ‚¬=0 00.6*groo=10 0 - 0.- 0 . 4 0 - M 3 - -O a -O *. .- .O- 005 0- 11 â‚¬ 13 b % 2 .1 2 0.0 0 -0 3 E i 0 u Fc: 4 -4 . 73.9 4 0 4 el u 'M 8=1 J w Â·m Mia# g E ig A â€¢. 6 # .0 7gE g 62 ~ 6 3 1 2 A--M 7 -* 2 13 H -8 . a .5 0.0 = m E.2, -2 2 8 g 6.-w UO bo E u 2 0 '02 -2 8 0 0 >.22. g ell 00 60 3 5 1 2 -2 -Â·N E C.2 E-5 2 0 0 4 2 4 0 9 ./.I-*- 4 0 Â· . 22 =5 8 0 F.2 o rs 6. -0 0 76 _.* 25 gbe .-1 -0 0 M M Z.M..3 -3,22 4 - R.En~ 1, -= P R -0 0 Â¢1 1. ... '2% 228fEE 0 0 ta~Â·C- -5 0 E ;3 ~ : =-Â· -0 11 ~ fw 9& 7 IUM-- NEE:=-6-2 u ; 5 6 -9 16 W i- + 'S , - 0 2 0 - A U.1 --50 0 >,Cw LU 8 = 8.8 0 R 4 0.- EW 3 %: 52 2 Lr. 0 -C ME 1% O le=YE 8 t. 9)â‚¬=86-,0 -0 - LOC,*E=0 En v g... :51.5 c p .9 A * 9 6.- 7 13 M ,2 .S .3 M n %.2 N i Ul 0 Le. .M 2 9 - ~ 0~ 4 1~ ~ ra.~ C *222 =-G - 0 0.- -5 =ts- /0.6 - .E .5 47 2,= 8 a.7 69'0 1 = 12 E B 8 -9 32 17 6.E -0 2 -â‚¬ -cf E & C ru '.3 = .2.W>, a 4-9 8 5 2 4 .F E.Â·o 0-ous * C & C C 0 .J M 3%~~00% E~~ 1 & o 2 2 2.2 .9 E888@42 A 5 o .25_EN ... 0 8 3 60-2 >, S ~71.5 -s :% a % 8 5 Â§ 2 - WNg: ./ E 51 0 0"g he - == 0 -0 O 1-= Â°â‚¬.E U M Â¢ E 2 3 %-5 â‚¬ Z 4 0 C= m -2-2 M M.-2 2 1 -M IN 3% M .... 2 2 I - > 0.2 . SE - 0â‚¬ Ar, ,Â¤ 8.v E â‚¬ C E & o= 10 li - >. 0 u, - Z E- A ---0 -8 Â°Â·2.413 ~ 0 4 9.- 601- A * EEK HFNE= 2.8.0 8 8 E B.% .2 -t: 2 2 â‚¬ 3 >' 9 aÂ° 8 *rs- 3 % &3 o = 8 Z 49.2.g !3 1912 912 3276 0 2/73 o i D k .. E- 2 13 ke-20 9. C 0 .-0 9 E.,'= o c - 8 0, m * E Â£ 0.0 0.12 0= C L. 50!2 E .ed. o goet:3 ca- o L 2012â‚¬10 c ....= 01 0 (= , M 02 0 86 W OÂ·o :-0 -3.0 8 id~gat '3 8 -- &-c = 1, 62 -0 # 3 -52 - - Z 012=-C= 60 6 0. 00 -06=- 3,3.BÂ· A ?2 2 % M-~ 2:e â‚¬ La > 3 3 = O 0 Â£ 2 L CS= C i.9 8 i g N .0 a g .% G . ?3-2 0 2 cÂ·.Â¤ c ..r f.3 00Â¤ Â·* 3.2 Â·g , ,= :s . 2-2 -M -a %:3 e 0*-Â¤ g.0 ~-* ..2 t~ -2.8 ; 92# 3-5=% 2-3-9 E-:-p.*ue *0 : a g t.~ SO 3 . 0 a.g . - 8 A 1 1 1-3 11 -2 11 -5 0 4-% 4 -2 53 -2 Af -2-2 -2 -o = 21 6--2 23* *2 z-3 2 -ReÂ·E 3 12 00 - .0--- 0 - rs 0 0 0.-0 8.-0--0= 6 0 M =2 2 8 73 8. A E 4 2 27 E.ze - 0 4 0 W 0.0 -0 0 0.5 _.0 0 2-02.2 8.o -E:# o E o 52-0= O C M 0.- 0 O M -20 w -4.... 4.9 = .-9.2 t3 2 .0 = EgierlE %5> U -O rul E C 14.0 W C g % O 2â‚¬.Â¤ ro .4 - 31 z. t" 2 8.3 2 0 Â° S S rs 8 3 2 a â‚¬ *4 1 f #% 6 92 6 8 # 5 4 & 4 v' 1 -T-1 -C O O g i,S ~ â‚¬ 82-3 22 6 E c - E -2 . .8 N g " 1:2Â·2 3 82%42 2.0 .11 a,3 Z Z O-0'05== 00 5. c..ta"M -82= c - 02 23 O I C.Le Â° 2 .1 3 6 1- ....M c W 8 3.S Â·6~~~ 0 =-0 50.3 0 - . 0 g*.g g g= 9 -2 '4 p 12='U*g~ 3. M 6. C: 6- 2.E .O 0Â·g z.2 0 .., 2,j c:= a Â¤, a 4 0 C MO 0 0 -0 - - a . 0 â€¢ -- 0 00 C OW /O C .- 9.-EREsgÂ·Zi cont:.-<000 2 31%3 -7 8 .2 M Ul = = p lkÂ· E wi o ~-2, 0 2.E .2 Jâ‚¬ 2 -8 g â€ž%2. . ,--Â·R,g 5 :61- â‚¬ 0.*2 2 % 2â‚¬ u X S *b; 0 A., ~G 2 0 .A= u V 8 >.5.0 = H L el N'u 0 -fi . O ..O- 4 0 - 0. 0 M C .2 + ,~ g g 4 12 6 '0 -0.21 r S 0 5 -0 4 0 2 O L. C 00 IN- = cs- 00- 0 & 0- 0 . * c 0- 02 =racc= - O '0 - C f 0 e - -. 4 0 0 5- - -* ... O 02 0 > 0- C ..= c. 4 4 1== S C - -- , 0 M .- 4 A Zi u.5.2 8 u- 1 Â° E Â° 04= 0 0 - - 2 9 05 -0 2 rs ... 0 p W u D o rs_ oc O 7 d '- O 23 0= c 0 -= 3 -O -8 â‚¬3 52 -2 O E t. a - E 2-* 2 -2 -5 23 2,-a-E = 9-M-*& -a i =~ E-m RJUN C-2-S-=-D: SÂ»2 -DIa -5 :% i &.. 6 1- g e Ul &...# NES Ne.EC 2 0-6 65:g ~5Â·Â§3 g.â‚¬ %3 8 * *Â·B rlouo Â· rl ~ ~.6~~ ~ ig H %Â·T S *-'22 = = 8 0 N~ %03 & 2 = 3 0.0Â·8 3 R.E 5 8 & 5-9 1 Cati verning y , ina su anner ise, ma OJojoq Jo U ouo 2 041 1 Apnis gong J suo sniouoo o nuef Jojoq 0 'pur:I Irlopoj uo o:)uu! U.1 0 Alo!AO oyeg, or ody shall have ~~~-111. Cooperationn~t~ federal and state agencies cics for the integrated management of undesirable plants Source: Entire article added, L. 90, p. 1557,Â§ 1, effective Jul y~mag ncurr to enter into cooperative agreements with 1 KinfoillooJJO '1 Â§ 'l.55 I 'd '06 7'POPPI! 010!Ut! 91.lua :ounos 009 'sts,d JO 1031uo, pue ou!,ue.tenb 041 2u!.11}33UOO suo!5!AOJd luifildi.lo~c~KEJO~Gi Jo loAOI 041 oupulloiop -018 WES L 40!Ue s 41!AL lUOUIUJOAOS JJÂ·Â·J.-'-11U ..V 17' .4- - ndowner cs of all counties unicipalities in th trols or c rights-of-way - control f und rviscs stat each local governing bo y and assure that all public roads, ubli day eascments appurtenant ther 1 ilunoo osolll AOA.InS lie Hounoo Xouo cont te board, department, or agen Alnf *Alloolp 'I Â§ '1.55 I 'd '06 ..1 'poppe 010!lle 01!lu :Joino U SpUU[ 40 s uodn oluo 9 GI'DIJAIV sp 21 04 ou!1uuiuno luuId puu lgOd which arc n iclc added, L. 90, p. 1557, Â§ '5861 '91 kupq OA!103110 '91 Â§ '5[I I 'd,98 .7 'PoieodotI peclive territorial jurisdictions. e ch suc entit , arc in compliance with this a artmc of, thlr LUk andtany anc AOLUOJ posed lo inks a n thcrewith sance the local govern n d havin (Poleodou) . 'sOI-9-5Â£ 01 IOI-9-5Â£ u 041 02!lot{Ing UJOAOS 00UU OWES 041 ic lan rol of unddsirable plants - charges: (1) 0110!ps!.Inf c: Entire ar cle added, L. 90, p. 1554, Â§ 1, effective July 1. -OKIS!129 suo!1!puoopue StUJ01 polloll department,or acl 1sulul]U 02.1 01 JO01041 osuodxo Clu LOUOS '1 Xinf OA!10OJJO 'I Â§ '959 I 'd '06 '7 'POPPe ?10!Ue 0.1 lua :30.Inog 101 uo 01 poll!tuqn contro Jo HE 01 lion Intl p00 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Dick Anderson AIA, Director A Commitmem Tv Previen 498-7310 FAX 498-7986 Post Office Box 1190 Fon Collins, Colorado 80522Â·1190 LARIMER COUNTY COLORADO Buildings and Grounds Gerald Sigward 498Â·7312 Custodial Services Josh Zander TO: Bill Unnanne, Town of Estes Park 498-7315 FROM: Dick Anderson, Larimer County Facilities Manager 04* DATE: September 26,1995 RE: Water Tap Fee / 1605 Brodie Avenue Park School District & Larimer County Administration Building Joint Project LeArner County and Park School District have entered into an intergovernmental agreement to construct a bus maintenance building. All costs were established and we neglected to consider a water tap fee required by the Town of Estes Park. The service line length is approximately 500 feet and the building has 24 fixture units. We request a waiver of a one inch (17 tap for a cost of $4815.00. If a V tap waived is not feasible, we would consider a 3/4' tap. The tap fee was not considered in the project and budget is tight so we ask that the tap fee be paid through the General Fund. Paying the tap fee through the Estes Park General Fund will be In the spiMt of Intergovernmental Agreements such as the Lake Estes Bike Path. Rlease support the item for approval. Thank you. DA/sis BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS John Clarke Janet Duvall Jim Disney District I DisIric! Il District Ill TOTAL P.02 6-1 . TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT AUGUST, 1995 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION 93.00 175.25 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 2.00 2.00 16 TAP REQUEST 1:.00 1.00 17 WATER QUALITY 1.00 2.50 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS. 2.00 1.50 22 FROZEN LINES 24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN 4.00 23.50 30 METER REPAIR 10.00 20.50 32 FINAL INSPECTION 5.00 4.50 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED 2.00Â· 3.00 50 STREET REPAIR 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 1.00 1.00 253 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 3.00 4.00 54 STORM DRAINAGE 60 OTHER 12.00 34.50 TOTALS FOR AUGUST, 1995 136.00 273.25 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 136.00 151.00 126.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 273.25 420.00 196.50 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) -9.93%/-34.94% -13.71%/+36.59% +7.94%/+39.06% Rl-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK AUGUST 1995 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for July 14, 1995 through August 13,1995: July 14 to 31 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 23,178,000 Marys 18,634,000 August 1 to 13 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 18,801,000 Marys 14,448,000 ~ ~ Total Water Treated in Billing Period 75,061,000 Gal. 2)Accountable Water Adjustments: 3,060,800 Billing(Includes billed bleaders) 50,326,147 *Backwash 0 Total Water accounted for: 53,386,947 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 71% 4.) 12 MONTH AVE. PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 75% R2-1 .. AUGUST, 1995 ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 135,000 2.) Bleeders TOTAL BLEEDERS NOT BILLED (Gal.) 766,800 3.Â·) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 21-Aug Leak on Chapin 430,000 b. 15-Aug Leak on Virginia 50,000 c. 28-Aug TM o'flow & Riverside leak 315,000 d. 7/14-8/13 Fish Hatchery 1,364,000 e. f. g. h. 1. j. k. 1. TOTAL LEAKS, MISC. (Gal.) 2,159,000 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) 3,060,800 R2-2 TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS/LEAKS) 1994 1994 1995 1995 MONTH YTD MONTH YTD % % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 26,254,900 26,254,900 29,773,400 29,773,400 13% 13% FEBRUARY 23,570,900 49,825,800 26,673,800 56,447,200 13% 13% MARCH 25,802,800 75,628,600 29,439,200 85,886,400 14% 14% APRIL 25,339,400 100,968,000 28,508,550 114,394,950 13% 13% MAY 41,750,328 142,718,328 33,845,000 148,239,950 -19% 4% JUNE 63,441,300 206,159,628 45,954,716 194,194,666 -28% -6% JULY 76,468,746 282,628,374 67,042,100 261,236,766 -12% -8% AUGUST 58,651,900 341,280,274 68,288,200 329,524,966 16% -3% SEPTEMBER 46,454,520 387,734,794 OCTOBER 33,144,140 420,878,934 NOVEMBER 27,853,010 448,731,944 DECEMBER 29,341,400 478,073,344 TOTAL 478,073,344 AC - FT 1,467 R2-3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS AUGUST, 1995 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL MARYS : f J TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS (GAL) CFS : (GAL) 1 0 1,655,000 1,655,000 2.58 781,000 1.22 : 2,436,000 2 0 1,665,000 1,665,000 2.59 962,000 1.50 2:.. i 2,627,000 3 0 1,516,000 1,516,000 2.36 1,162,000 1.81 t- =- - 1 2,678,000 4 0 1,386,000 1,386,000 2.16 1,174,000 1.83 0 2,560,000 5 0 1,254,000 1,254,000 1.95 1,140,000 1.77 : - 2,394,000 6 0 1,406,000 1,406,000 2.19 1,162,000 1.81 2,568,000 7 0 1,419,000 1,419,000 2.21 1,008,000 1.57 iii* : 2,427,000 8 0 1,422,000 1,422,000 2.21 1,147,000 1.79 : 2,569,000 9 0 1,455,000 1,455,000 2.27 1,121,000 1.75 .:=- 2,576,000 10 0 1,438,000 1,438,000 2.24 1,285,000 2.00 2 2,723,000 11 0 1,402,000 1,402,000 2.18 1,214,000 1.89 2,616,000 12 0 1,490,000 1,490,000 2.32 1,212,000 1.89 1 2,702,000 13 0 1,293,000 1,293,000 2.01 1,080,000 1.68 i i 2,373,000 14 0 1,376,000 1,376,000 2.14 1,052,000 1.64 i 2,428,000 15 0 1,298,000 1,298,000 2.02 1,097,000 1.71 - 2,395,000 16 0 1,303,000 1,303,000 2.03 1,032,000 1.61 2,335,000 17 0 1,362,000 1,362,000 2.12 952,000 1.48 6 2,314,000 108 0 1,358,000 1,358,000 2.11 1,099,000 1.71 . 2,457,000 19 0 1,379,000 1,379,000 2.15 1,086,000 1.69 2,465,000 20 0 1,368,000 1,368,000 2.13 1,114,000 1.73 . 2.482,000 21 0 1,309,000 1,309,000 2.04 1,100,000 1.71 2,409,000 22 0 1,061,000 1,061,000 1.65 855,000 1.33 i 1,916,000 23 0 952,000 952,000 1.48 853,000 1.33 i 1,805,000 24 0 968,000 968,000 1.51 784,000 1.22 2 1,752,000 25 0 985,000 985,000 1.53 756,000 1.18 I 1,741,000 26 0 1,100,000 1,100,000 1.71 818,000 1.27 : . 1,918,000 27 0 1,183,000 1,183,000 1.84 844,000 1.31 i 2,027,000 28 0 1,161,000 1,161,000 1.81 827,000 1.29 : 1,988,000 29 0 1,004,000 1,004,000 1.56 805,000 1.25 1 Zi 1,809,000 30 0 1,432,000 1,432,000 2.23 504,000 0.78 : 1,936,000 31 0 1,356,000 1,356,000 2.11 567,000 0.88 . 1,923,000 TOT. 0 40,756,000 40,756,000 2.03 30.593.000 1.54 P-- -- i 71.349.000 AF 0.00 125.08 125.08 93.89 218.98 CFS 0.00 2.03 2.03 1.53 3.56 BULK(-) N/A N/A N/A N/A -3.060,800 GAL 0 40,756,000 40,756,000 30,593,000 Â®h 1 68.288.200~ AF 0 125.08 125.08 93.89 %4*:4 209.58 1st-13 0 18,801,000 14,448,000 14 - 31 0 21,955,000 16,145,000 R2-4 1 ; 1 1, 60,0/ / 'i 1 1 1 9.Ovi * \*-20,0 SHA Open Space ~Â·-5HA Ff ~ p ce ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ and Steamer Drive Right-of-Way (ROW) \ SHW \ Open STANLEY HILLS ASSOCIATION (SHA) OPEN SPACE at East Entrance to Stanley Village 2 - September 1, 1995 17// Scale: , 25.01.-j i- -7 Black-Topped Area 15/5,-poÂ«02-yÂ«h 8-1/0 V ' ./ , SHA Open Space Space 1 / /// 4 - JAN 1 1/4/ 1 \11) / //9 / 1 Â·li/:i iÂ· i / ; b, 9, , 1 #\ 7 ,a ./Â«4~ffÂ« ~ 1\ All l - 44*4/ 1 i illi'Ilili ./1/> r SHA Open Space e,n ker, / //\, : 7 // ///9// 3/'.4\ 0 1/ijt-ili\; ~//,/4 WL ; N W I , 1 ll/-uÂ· 2-1 --6 1 1 1 2 1-4- b 4 4 ///f://,ti *,-0/ -ifff,- /1/4/ Zr-371 li /4 A, ' ' ' Emto&0 , ' / 111 rn A - - -- Â·; / -9544 3%1> ~HA open space ~/ l.li'/ -- 4 //1/1~ _- U.&44&/ E VE,R /4 9 /4 aid * 4 ' 3Â«i l i VA rÂ·i, 1 11 11<tl . 1 4%Â« 1 \. . I . \\\ \ \'b V-/ - - . 1. 0-1 -4- i ZIJ \\ .L-'->li' 1 1 - 1 0 SHA 'OpeK<24 ace -VC===---~SHA Open Space I . 4 1 0 \Â«-20Â·a SHA Open Space ~ . -5}AA f fA \ -SiCK / L/j ~ Open ~ Space . I . + and Steamer Drive Right-of-Way (ROW) STANLEY HILLS ASSOCIATION (SHA) OPEN SPACE at East Entrance to Stanley Village September 1, 1995 ,-=zÂ·s.o, 4 Scale: ; / i fj* Black-Topped Rillili Area 1% 1 . , J..7 7//i, '17 y , ./1// j>* lillill SHA open Space ~ SpacE al/li/jil/,11 1 SHA \/ 1 / / / l / j / i /~ #0. Open North ~ -J n 1. $ 1 11' illilillic" "0 Li"H ki /4 f //71 / I h\.1 lili /1,1.Ill.Pli /i:lill SHA Open Space rr:Â¥-1 Ap,+ *9 %*7Â·v , j j /r j / , i , , / All / / h (i l ti i i l i l i Lij 'dj -u -tl I OSHON#J ! i Prr . 1.4- lo -7.-ll I i i //61/ 1Â»=tLe- 111 Lt'OJ itt ..IL, 1 1 1 b I \3// i. /ll> Aft -- /1 / . Tihi \25, &SHA Open Space . . 1 1 Â«:SS ..Elv- 4 r,K, 1 Ifi ft-*f, ff - --'i/~r//YÂ» - 0, -' 1-= <t\Lr SHA Opeff<hace ~t~~~E---4SHA Open Space ~ . / 60,O.*~ ROY'f I. 'J lili Tâ‚¬ KMâ‚¬ 9/_64 \/ r~1. i 1 . 1 . J; ,.... \11- . m. - f . 1. . 3 â‚¬ th,1%3* ,O.02.7 - 214+ 1' 2.53-E 2 ':. --.fit~.1 Ti;*itbbY.23 I-:.,- .& ..7 46.5 Q p- . .. NO tÂ£7.r Â¥ 14/Â£> I .- 1 , 10 4.. De2:'lk.. 1...5---- 4.< M . .4 ..4.. M t .**r-1* ' ':&.2 :~~/~~~~/~~ * 44' ':i.-; n F - ' Cfc'~,'.. * 1 4. S . /1. 1, <:.4#29*2--Â·- - . - I. -0-8-v&-4442~18.~ t.tÂ·-4,163:12.â‚¬-2~AK~~;Â· ~,Â·4--;G; f ,@00â€¢6' Â·Â· - .--1 -r " .,7 . - -,24 g 6.'J if:Â¢*2 2 I . -13. Z 1 %*3<11. 2*61 9.. y, .49Â£ ' -=t. . -4. /%8478 91-A,4 LEV WI LLS '=iw. 27 3'31*0~=>*-}9~3;:4-' '.~.~ ; As.5.(c-. 1&59,11, 74.t,4. - 1.2-44 16- 4 1..r I 47" C Â·Â·- -:el;-' 0~~-Â·'~742 f F 4%;;*11:,g -3- 92 /4: 1~\fbe l._ec.*n,ed RNA.~/&/LL 'in. ... .*I:*dE4--'Egrl.'-,rf.-4 4 2- 2- ~ te- I.' 6 i,*Tti ~-4;3cp.7.---2 F :,:77891%9i:-9 -11 ..2.2.,4 , b*9Eof. 6 . -- 4 A.K. 49â‚¬.. . f lt.2*9\ ..i r < 1 ..,15//1/ . 1 21 $. . , Â£ ~ 4 r- Â· 6 1 *"Â· . A rf*74 -.Â·.4 1 I .. Â· 4 . '*, tÂ¥Rtc 4*i.*--Â·< 7 :- :.iÂ·~ c Â·~21:13' ej.1 4 i %'. 1 7 1.4.6-2 I I 234;,6Aa. . -42 1.51=34>~fo â‚¬ ?. . . - ' Iâ‚¬ _.49 ~:4. 2 4 ' 4 -07Â¥L J I -f-- .1 t' i 4 ... 't 87- t~7~*8.1.9--&.4: Ttir~31/y .:.1/51. Â· Â£=S-GEâ€¢ 4 . <7/"1 -4 W. T I. .2 4 ./ 4%: -,5 - -pll:'Mal . ' 4-Â·*.14*- Â· .r. . lt; '2 r I <- *4 4 'f . J. .....- . ... L. I . 21 , i A.t ( . 47. ' . 94, L â‚¬ / -- /4. F 5?,09..i~- -7. '-c. f. .~.- N.' yrÂ¥.. '..:i,i -2 - , 11Â¥9 / .1 P ..1,1 / . m, 41 P 1 &6 , , 5 Â· Â· -L 4 . . 44-1 h . .. 1 I ..'-I 2.'t< , G.: 0.-,49!All:CE#2*4# -f. P Â·. - \ 4 #syWA #14:/P, 1 2. 7.4-ff.... /00 -- AV 1% 81 -*4-'/~2 - j- I -/ A - 1 ..:i,-1,313.f~ ., 2 -'Â·A - v / V:Oi- A - 47?2,~il//.Aai'filimmi"Zimi'*fll#i#r:'14: *, *5.w,*.~*2.1///m.*~m=U#Ir ~..~*,-~,vaf/07 414{44- :1*. 4.~01 7. 6 Â·~ -- ,.-~1~31if~ i-,; it~ ,$<diFWL#LAAN/5/ps,%1 Y. - 4 '*. ip; I Â· Â· ..JFÂ·-c...Â¥.i..% .,Â·'..~Y.b...31: i.4.i .1 Ij*yt--.,2. ft> ..t.4./.:-,-- :'1: uvi.21:59 :51-:...'3-. dwi/34 46'4< =t 4 4 4 ...E....94: YA A r 0. -140 - -4 '*tÂ¥ e. ., . . .:tlf '4 }f: ,.1%,j.~.9:73 -h ./. - -rÂ¥/.1Â·tix/A Â·t'~ : 11%1~11#71<4*3,2-~ ~-40.-2-,8 - .:.' - *-al 5/ 4/4 2/ing/4: i f.4//P 2 - 442' 7-1 -- 7 45 : ..:..24. v - . . 9-1.:411 .,Â». 302 ?. 7:?P ki f, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION U.S. HIGHWAY 34 WIDENING PROJECT CITIZEN INPUT MEETING SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 6:30 P.M. - 8:00 P.M. 170 MacGregor Avenue, Room 203 Purpose of Meeting: To gather input and suggestions on construction management guidelines for the CDOT, Highway 34 Widening Project. The following input was received: Highway 34 East: 1. Noconstruction from 6:00p.m., Fridays to 8:00 a.m., Mondays, and no construction between 8:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. on weekdays. 2. If safe and efficient construction practices allow, paving will occur starting at the west end of the project and working east. 3. All measures will be used to minimize tree cutting. Trees on rented and leased land will be protected against any damage*by contractor fencing. 4. CDOT will include business representatives in pre-construction and construction meetings and will fax construction updates to those who request it. Meetings will be held weekly. A bulletin board with schedules and project information will be posted at Town Hall. 5. Whiteside Stables will be given continuous scheduling information at least 5 days prior to construction of Steamer Drive and construction of any facilities adjacent to the stables. 6. On Highway 34, the construction period is anticipated to begin by April 15 with intent to finish rough grade and curb work on the south side prior to May 25th. The project is estimated to be complete in 80 working days. This schedule is weather dependent. 7. One lane of traffic, with minimal delays, may be experienced prior to May 25th. Two lanes of traffic will be maintained from May 25th through the end of the project. 8. Access to all businesses will be maintained. The contractor will be required to maintain continuous access to all businesses and residences. The contractor will coordinate access with individual property owners at least 24 hours prior to access construction. 9. Within the next month, CDOT will meet with property owners to coordinate access and curb cuts. Property owners should call to set-up the meeting. Downtown: 9. During June, the Elkhorn Avenue (downtown) overlay shall take place at night between 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Periodic detours will be expected. During July, the downtown overlay shall take place at night between 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Both: 10. No construction on holidays from 6:00 p.m. the preceding day to 8:00 a.m. the day after. No construction the morning of parades. No construction on July 5th. 11. CDOT will maintain the project engineer's project office in Estes Park during construction to answer questions and concerns. Citizen concerns will be directed to this office. A centralized location for the office has been requested. 12. Public notices, Town Hall bulletin board, radio, telephone recorded messages and the newspaper will be used to hilp inform the public of. construction schedules. ~& 9 9 tr CD O 14? a c >, am 8 9Illf'-'-:1:-'i-i--i. *- - S E ~ 966 L - 1 V-z,-,:f-.45~*4eu~ t66 L 'I I Â·t -' - ..1.Â·' Â¥Â·Vi.FE~.I~.74-vi~4,#wKÂ»â€¢<:u#Â»Â¢%E;**;&*61;*mrf:*Â¥447.Â¥22**t.:4*9~ i . 99442Ertk#%3*X Â£66 L i ~ '41>-3*fai*i* 266 L - = ~ - V.#991#01**f, L 66 L , 1 4~5*90#B#8 066L i Wy,6,0*,w.Â·.Â·o.6 696 L ' + 1 y f/th-Â· '0/Â·f'/4/'Y- f 44*ja~ 996L 1 996L 4 .ge--~2. . 1 . J ._ , 4-73%&9<fÂ¥â€¢~4-:=.IN/&7234?21Â·,2.1*422169 4*4:'R*r.- ~: . 1 ' 9 '1 2*f 4 496 L ' ' 'lze/#592*9>7Â»24*MÂ»Â·4".Â·Â»02?lmâ€¢ d ; . l.h-92'4 '7.44 Â£86 L . 1 *Zi~ â‚¬ud 1-- 1 ~-,Â·.482%Â¥:1* Zes L 4 0 AUGUST & YTD GALLONS BILLED k!V3A 250,000,000 -.7-k.Â· Â·t 4 X. 3 9 200,000,000 -/ , -- - 000'000'OOL 150,000,000 - . - 000'000'09 ~ GALLONS 32 Mn E ,%1 46 (0 a m 2 5 0 2&= ci ... 8-R>. m m i ... 1 ... X! to 1 : 8 kwsâ€¢*i*42Â·40: 466 k r- i - - ..i -,97-r - 61. '" -'-i LU 15,37 .. 4AaeÂ» 066 L Z .,5 696L LU -2.; -hf' ~~I- f:- 1-4Â«U--u â€ž:- CE 0 .1 - t. - - 1 - ...1, 99**20&.**92#*07#r,y2~~ . i. 41,9**=424 986 L D CD -- I ... i Â·< 4*E 986 L D 1 - 1 -, .4.- ...8 .3492:94)2:A,t=* -Â· Â· ' tied&- . -2. 6%194/CVYX*<04*4469357# . i 1 <1*747 Â£861. 1 1. Ut-*te?h*J ZE6 k . 1... - 1,. . V>-4, 1 Â· Â· Â·,1 1 - e I 4-*,~82***i 886 L -- R2-6 Change from previous yea~ blvaA --- _/ 00.000'001 700,000.00 -/ 1- 800,000.00 - ,.. -. ; 600,000.00 -/ 500,000.00 -- REVENUE 400,000.00 -/ ..1/- 00.000'00Â£ ,- 00000'OOL - 0.0 NUMBER OF WATER ACCOUNTS Year Urban Residential Urban Commercial Rural Residential Rural Commercial TOTAL 1990 1405 503 1067 81 3056 1991 1488 516 1029 96 3129 1992 1519 529 1054 99 3201 1993 1562 539 1091 107 3299 1994 1708 524 1141 87 3460 1995 1801 538 1149 86 3574 Urban Residential Number of Rural Residential Number of Accounts Accounts 2000 1160 1140 01 1 1 - t.../i gn 1500 ' .. 11â€¢SI )' tin Wi WI' IN# 1100 RN 01 1080 1000 -i-=i' =912--:I:~''ll"- 0% --- *3*61. .1. 1.1,4 1060 Em Â·, + .,Â·. '' Â· . ~f JAN''. IM,i:' .Â· *~ 1040 - 48=1 , '- Â·awl Â· 'Â· Â· meâ€¢! Â· ' 19=1 1020 500 1000 . 1~ Â· 4. ..2 , * 9.1 - 0 --'11 1, 1 1 960 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Â·i YEAR YEAR Total Number of Accounts 3600 3500 â€žÂ· . ./ .'MWA '.7/y.+ 19" 3400 .i:t.. MB::St Z .10 3300 . t. Â·Â·, Â£251 4 393- 3200 . 3100 ~14-Â° 4 :2 2900 2700 , + n h >10= 1 1 1 ga.1.~ 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 YEAR R2-7 1990 1991 *m 1994 1995 2 h %0 DOC\U - R 4 00 -5 44 u =r 5 2 h 0O U M h re U 2 N b S:3 U .t Ch 0\ E-4 -5 24 UÂ© bR R2-8 Urban Residential 1,405 1,412 1,488 1,499 1,519 1,539 1,562 1,636 1,708 1,759 1,801 TOTAL 3,056 3,087 3,129 3,160 3,201 3,253 3,299 3,389 3,460 3,512 3,574 Urban Commercial 503 513 516 526 529 533 539 544 524 531 Rural Residential 1,067 1,072 1,029 1,038 1,054 1,072 1,091 1,124 1,141 1,136 1 Rural Commercial 81 90 96 97 109 107 85 86 WATER DEPARTMENT CONSUMER DATA OWN OF ESTES PARK NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS . I TOWN OF ESTES PARK FUELING SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY I r h PREPARED FOR: TOWN OF ESTES PARK P.O. BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 PREPARED BY: ~, - .- .Â· Â· ~~.* .' ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 437 S. ST. VRAIN ESTES PARK, CO 80517 AUGUST 1995 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. . ) INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND September of 1988 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the enactment of le 40 Part 280 of the code of Federal Regulations for the regulation of Underground Storage iks (UST). Regulations concerning UST's are also mandated under Title 8 Article 20 & 20.5 he Colorado revised statutes 1986 as amended July 1, 1995. The purpose of these regulations o reduce damage to the environment, and risk to the public caused by leaking petroleum rage tanks and to mitigate such damages effectively when it occurs. An UST system include lerground storage tanks, connecting pipe, underground ancillary equipment and containment tem. A]1 existing petroleum UST's are required to fully comply with new UST standards hin ten years after the effective date. All new petroleum UST's systems, those installed after effective date, must be installed in accordance with new regulations. The UST regulation zctive as of December 22, 1988 require that all applicable UST systems must have corrosion tection, spill and overfill prevention equipment, leak detection equipment and if cathodically tected it must be regularly tested and inspected. Regulations for UST's have been expanded include above ground storage tanks. All petroleum storage tank systems must be in npliance with the new standards by December 22, 1998. The storage tanks and fueling tems are registered with and monitored by the State of Colorado, Division of Labor, Oil )ection Section. 3 Tawn of Estes Park currently operates a fleet fueling system at the Town maintenance shops itedÂ·at 575 Elm Road. The existing Town fueling system is comprised of four tanks ranging n 19-21 years old, a pressure type distribution system, dispensers and Personal Identification nber (PIN) control system. The PIN control system needs a credit card along with the PIN nonitor and record fuel usage. The PIN control system information is directly clown loaded I the fleet maintenance facilities computers for record keeping. The existing Town UST's rently consist of one 4000 gallon unleaded tank , one 6000 gallon regular gasoline and two 0 gallon diesel tanks. The average monthly Town fueling consumption is 2100 gallons of 3aded gasoline, 1000 gallons of regular gasoline and 850 gallons of diesel fuel. In general ry facet of the Town system will have to be modified by 1998 to comply with the new UST idards. The dispensers and PIN control system are adequate and could be incorporated into :w system. Town fleet currently consists of 22 diesel and 56 gasoline (78 total) vehicles which fuel on gular basis. Approximately, one half to two-thirds of the Town fleet are based at the Town )s on Elm Road. An average of 15 to 16 fuel transactions occur each day at the existing ing facility. Federal Government is proposing mandatory mini]num requirements for vehicles utilizing mative fuels. Alternative fuels are dominated by two main types at the present time. Due conomics, efficiency and availability the two alternative fuels are liquid propane gas (LPG) compressed natural gas (CNG). LPG can be fueled in about the same time as conventional 1 OPTION 2: Town fuel to be provided by a private fueling system. Alternative 5: Investigate the Town utilizing the existing Park R-3 School District fueling system. The fuel system currently complies with the EPA and State regulations. Alternative 6: Investigate the Town utilizing the existing Rocky Mountain National Park Service fueling system. The Park Service system currently complies with the EPA and State regulations. Alternative 7: Investigate the Town utilizing the new proposed Larimer County fueling system. The new fueling system will comply with EPA and State regulations. Alternative 8: Investigate the Town utilizing a commercial vendor for supplying fuel. 0 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS .... 1 OPTION 1 TOWN OWNED FUELING SYSTE]\I ith a majority of the Town fleet based out of the shop area, placement of the fueling system or near the Town shops would provide tile most convenient location. The number of users )uld be limited to the Town Fleet, therefore reducing traffic congestion at the pumps. ; owner and operator of the fueling system the Town is liable for any release which may occur d is required to meet the financial responsibility for the release of any petroleum products. ie owner is also responsible for inspection, monitoring, testing and the record keeping for the eling system. A large capital cost of upgrading will be required for the existing system or stallation of a new system. 1.1 Alternative 1: Retrofit the existing below ground fuel storage tanks and piping. lur fuel tanks are currently in the ground at the Town shops. The 4000 gallon unleaded soline tank would be upgraded and used for diesel fuel. The 6000 gallon regular gasoline tank )uld be upgraded and used for unleaded fuel. The two 1000 gallon diesel tanks would be andoned and require closure. mtinued use of tile existing fueling system will require upgrading the system to comply with 3 new UST standards. The existing steel tanks, being greater than 10 years old, must either lined or a combination of cathodically protected and lined for corrosion protection. Placing 3 iels. Two methods are used for fueling with CNG, the slow fill system and a cascade system. lie slow fill system for CNG requires about 12 to 16 hours to refuel. The cascade fill system ,r CNG require about the same time as conventional fueling systems but is very expensive. resently the Town operates no alternative fuel vehicles. 2 PURPOSE y 1998 the Town will have to totally renovate their fueling system. The purpose of this report to identify the most feasible alternative to comply with EPA and State regulations and provide fueling system for the Town of Estes Park. wo general options exist for the Town fueling system: ption 1 is for the Town to own and operate the fueling system, and option 2 is for the Town el to be provided by a non-municipal off site source. For Option 2 the possibility exists for e Town to utilize an existing private fueling system such as school, county, state or U.S. overnment, or to utilize a commercial vendor for supplying fuel. he alternatives for the two options RMC has analyzed as part of this study includes the 11owing: OPTION 1: Town to own and operate the fueling system. Alternative 1: Retrofit the existing below ground fuel storage tanks and piping to EPA and State standards. The fueling system would remain at the Town shop. Alternative 2: Provide new below ground fuel storage tanks and piping. The fueling system would comply with EPA and State regulations and would be located at the Town shop. Alternative 3: Provide new above ground fuel storage tanks and piping. The new fueling system would comply with EPA and State regulations and would be located at the Town shop. Alternative 4: Provide new above ground fuel storage tanks and piping. The new fueling system would comply with EPA and State regulations and would be located near the existing Town landfill. 2 n interior lining in the tank would require visual inspection of the tank interior prior to lacement to ensure soundness. Once the liner is in place the tanks interior must periodically e visually inspected within 10 years and reinspected every 5 years there after to assure that the ning is still structurally sound and performing in accordance with the original design. During eriodic interior inspection the fueling system will not be operable and require an alternative Jeling source. -he tanks can also be internally lined in combination with cathodic protection. Cathodic rotection is a technique to prevent corrosion of a metal surface by making the surface the athode of an electrochemical cell. With this method periodic inspection of the liner is not squired. Cathodic corrosion protection may have been installed with the tanks in 1976 but has ot been verified at this time. Tpgrading of the existing tanks is based on the assumption that they are structurally stable for ontinued use. The tanks have been tested annually since 1991 and no leakage in the system has een detected. he existing piping is a pressure type system and was installed in 1976 with the tanks. Even lough there has been no observed problems with the existing piping, replacement with a coated nd cathodically protected steel or fiberglass piping will be required for corrosion protection. lew UST standards require that no release occurs due to spilling or over filling. Currently no jill or overflow protection exist on any of the Town tanks. A spill most often occurs at the fill ipe Â·bpening when the delivery truck's hose is disconnected. Over fills occur when a tank is ver filled and fuel is released through untight fittings or vent pipe. UST regulations require ie use of mechanical devices, such as spill catchinent basins and overfill alarms to prevent their :lease. pill containment manholes should be placed around the filler pipes to provide a catchment asins. Either automatic shutoff devices, overfill alarms or bell float valves would be required )r the overflow prevention. eak detection devices must be installed which can detect a release from any portion of the tank nd the connected underground piping that routinely contains product. No leak detection devices re currently in place at the existing fueling facility. The tanks will require monthly monitoring ) inspect for any kind of petroleum release. The monthly monitoring is either done by atomatic tank gauging, vapor monitoring, groundwater monitoring or interstitial monitoring. n automatic tank gauges would offer the most economical solution for tank leak detection. Ionitoring wells should also be placed around the tanks and checked on a periodic basis. /ith a pressurized piping distribution for the fueling system an automatic line leak detector is :quired. Along with the automatic leak detector either an annual line tightness test on monthly ionitoring is also required. If the automatic gauge is used for the tank then annual line ghteners test would be recommended for the piping. 4 4 ie PIN control system is currently in place with dispensers for the existing system. -ovided the tanks are still in structurally adequate condition they could be upgraded to meet the :w UST standards. Based on upgrade cost and liability associated with the tanks ages it is commended that all existing tanks and piping be removed from the site. iNK CLOSURE epending on the fueling system alternative chosen, part or all of the existing fuel system will quire closure. Before permanent closure the area surrounding the tanks must be checked for e presence of a release where contaminant may exist. If contaminated soils are discovered, , rrective actions must be taken to mitigate the problem. Annual pressure tests have revealed , defects to the tanks which would cause any leaking. If any contamination was present it ould presumably be due to spills and overflows. 1 permanently close a tank, it must be emptied and cleaned by removing all liquids and cumulated sludges. The tank must either be removed from the ground or filled with an inert lid material. To effectively close a tank and remove any future liability or environmental ncerns it is highly recommended that the tanks and piping be completely removed. Any inificant soil contamination present on the site will require remediation. Provided no free oduct was present or groundwater contamination the site could be simply remediated by moving the soil, stirring and venting it inside the fenced facilities. Once the petroleum oducts have dissipated from tile soil it would be placed back in the ground from where it was moved and covered over. 1.2 Alternative 2: Provide new below ground fuel storage tanks and piping. The fueling system would be located at the Town shops. ternative 2 would involve replacing tile existing fueling system with a new fueling system to Bet the new UST standards. Closure of the existing fueling system will be required prior to acement of the new system. Closure will include removal of the existing tanks with mitigation any contaminated soil. ith the liability associated with ownership and operation of a fuel storage system the optimum safety precautions is recommended. For optimum safety and life expectancy a double walled ik is recommended. A double wall system would consist of a steel primary tank with a high , nsity polyethylene (HDP) secondary containment jack. The piping should also be of double illed system. The primary pipe is fiberglass with a secondary piping and fittings of high nsity polyethylene. i automatic tank gauge which can be used for inventory and leak detection would provide the nplest and most economical method of monitoring for leak detection along with an interstitial )nitoring device between the tanks. During excavation for the tanks placement it would also advantageous to install monitoring wells on both sides of the tank system. Assuming that 5 istribution would remain on a pressurized piping system, either an automatic flow restrictor or utomatic shutoff device will be necessary along with annual line testing. he tanks should have spill containment manholes for catchment basins and also be equipped ith overfill prevention. ank sizing would consist of one 6000 gallon tank for unleaded fuels and one 1500 gallon tank ir diesel fuel. These storage volumes would provide an approximate six week fuel reserve. izing of the tanks is based on information compiled and fuel reserves recommended by Gary hanafelt of the Town. The regular gasoline supply will be discontinued. The regular gasoline ehicles are being phased out and the existing regular gasoline vehicles can be operated on nleaded gasoline. At the present time the existing fueling dispenser island with dispensers, ump controls and PIN control system are adequate and could be incorporated into a new ystem. .1.3 Alternative 3: Provide new above ground fuel storage tanks and piping. The new fueling system would be located at the Town shops. his alternative would place the tanks along the west side of the compound against the cut bank. he approximate area required for the unleaded and diesel fuel tanks would be 10'x 20' and 8'x 4' respectively. The area needed for the tanks along with the proposed location should' not iterfere with daily operations or traffic around the shops. a he tdchnical specifications for the tanks and piping system would be much the same as for .lternative 2 except the tanks would be placed above the ground. Piping would be run from ie tanks to the existing dispenser island. Closure of the existing fueling system will be required ith removal of the tanks recommended. . small rubber lined concrete catchment basin would be placed under the tanks for additional rotection. The catchment basin would have 6"-10" high walls around the perimeters for ontainment of any spills. lacement of above ground tanks would be less expensive then below ground tanks and remove ie requirements for monitoring wells. .1.4 Alternative 4: Provide new above ground fuel storage tanks and piping. The new fueling system would be located near the existing Town landfill. dternative 4 would be similar to Alternative 3. For alternative 4 the tanks piping and dispenser ystem would be located in the area north of the old landfill by the Town shops. The system ould be set in the northeast corner of the present bone yard area. Since the landfill area is uilt up on fill, settlement of tanks and piping would be a design constraint. The tanks would ave to be placed on piling or caissons. The piping would have to be supported to prevent reakage due to differential settlement. The existing dispensers and PIN control system could 6 . : utilized but would have to be relocated to the new fueling area. A fencing system would be quired to prevent public from using the fueling system. At this time the surface is gravel and rt. A roadway which could handle the increased traffic would be needed. An asphalt roadway ould be recommended. The PIN control system could be hard wired back to the fleet aintenance facility computers. The landfill location would be a convenient location for the ajority of the vehicle fleet based out of the shop area. Locating the fueling system at the ndfill area would have little benefit over Alternative 3, aside from freeing more usable area ound the shops. This alternative would occur higher costs due to the necessary foundation abilization. 2 OPTION 2 PRIVATE, FUELING SYSTEM ption 2 would involve the Town using an outside source for their fuel supply. Removing the el storage from the shop area and relieving the Town as owner and operator would greatly duce the Towns liability. However, moving the fueling location from the Town shop area ould reduce convenience for the vehicle fleet based out of the shop area. 2.1 Alternative 5: Investigate the Town Utilizing Park R-3 School District fueling system. he Park R-3 School fueling system was upgraded to new UST standards in 1989. They irrently have the storage capacity for 8000 gallons of diesel fuel and 4000 gallons of unleaded isoline. The majority of the schools fuel usage is diesel with minimal usage of unleaded isoline. The fueling system is located at the southeast corner of the school complex at the ain.*nance facilities. he feasibility of the Towns vehicle fleet fueling at the Estes Park Schools was discussed with ony Paglia the schools Director of Auxiliary Services. Currently three outside public service itities utilize the schools fueling systems: Estes Park Sanitation, Upper Thompson Sanitation id the Estes Park Recreation Department. The outside entities are charged an additional one int per gallon above the schools wholesale fuel cost to help cover electricity and other overhead )st. Each vehicle is issued a key to the gate in order to provide access to the pumps on a 24 )ur basis. Each entity is billed monthly for the fuel used with invoices to be remitted to the Mroleum supplier. Billings include itemized listing of each vehicle and gallons used for easy cord keeping. The distribution is currently run off a credit card PIN system which has almost ached its full capacity. In order to put addition vehicles on the system the key pad would have , be extended. Cost for an expanded key pad could be split between the outside entities. Based i current daily fuel transactions the Town fleet would increase daily average traffic by 15 or 5 vehicles. The school foresees no logistical problems with the Town using the fueling system. he diesel supply would adequately handle the addition of the Town but the unleaded system ay require intermediate refueling which could increase fuel cost for a partial load. The c.troleum distributors serves enough stations in the area that they could split a load with another ation to help keep cost down. Using the schools fueling system would be less convenient for .e vehicles based out of the shop area. Convenience for the vehicles not based out of the shop -ea would probably remain the same. 7 ~ ie Town would still be responsible for the cost of closure of the existing tanks at the Town ops. Use of the school facilities could offer a very economical and simple system for the ,wns future fueling system. ke Towns existing PIN control system could be incorporated into the schools system to help nimize cost. The Towns PIN control system is capable of being interfaced from the school their computers through phone lines. ie school would like to add 3-4 vehicles using alternative fuels over the next couple of years, t have no long range goals. They are currently looking at the addition of a CNG slow fill stem with the addition of their new shop facility. 2.2 Alternative 6: Investigate the Town utilizing Rocky Mountain National Park fueling system. mky Mountain National Park was also contacted as a possibility an off site fueling location. :ve Iobst the facility manager and Dan Cundell the vehicle shop foreman both expressed erest in working with the Town to provide an off site fueling location. The Parks fueling stem is located at its maintenance shops south of the visitors center/headquarters. The Parks zling system has been upgraded to the new UST standards. Usage of the Parks fueling system )uld be similar to using the schools system. There would be a one to two cents charge.per . Ilon above the fuel cost to cover overhead. The Park would need to increase their keyjng ' stem to support the additional vehicles. The Town would be responsible for any qost cess#ry for upgrades to handle the extra vehicle load. Once again the Towns existing PIN ntrol system could be relocated to the Park Service location. e Park Service is mandated to increase their alternative fuel vehicles by 30% of their new hides purchased each year. With this mandate they are expected to decrease their useÂ· of nventional fuels with an increase in alternative fuel consumption. The alternative fuels the rk has been working with CNG and LPG, Currently the Park has only slow fill system for 4G. As a trade off for using the Parks fueling system they may request that the Town provide location for an alternative fuel system or some similar cooperative agreement. The Park .-vice fueling system would be available on a 24 hour basis. There are no gates which would ve to be opened to gain access to the fueling dispensers. le Parks fueling system is located on tile same side of Estes as the Town shops, approximately 1/2 miles further west of the Town shop area. The Park location would be more convenient r the vehicles based out of the shop area but less convenient for the vehicles based in Town. )ntractual agreement with a Federal Government Agency could become more cumbersome than )rking with the school system or the County. 8 .3 Alternative 7: Investigate the Town utilizing the new proposed Larimer County fueling system. z Larimer County Maintenance Facility in Estes Park, located at 543 Elm Road, is preparing ipgrade their current fueling system. The upgrade is to take place in AugusUSeptember 1995. er the upgrade Larimer County will have one 2000 gallon diesel and one 2000 gallon eaded above ground fuel storage tanks. The new fueling system will comply with all EPA i State regulations. 3 feasibility of the Town's vehicle fleet fueling at the Larimer County facility was discussed h Len Bammer, Larimer County's Director of Fleet Services. The State Highway partment in Estes Park currently use the County's fueling system on Elm Road. The Fort 1Iins school system also has an agreement to use the County's fueling system in Fort Collins. s County places a 1 cent a gallon internal markup on fuel prices to help cover repairs and 3rhead for the fueling system. An additional 1 cent a gallon markup is added for a surcharge help pay for any additional upgrade as required. For the County to adequately handle the litional supply requirements of the Town of Estes Park an additional unleaded fuel storage k would be necessary. The County's new proposed fueling system has been designed where econd above ground unleaded fuel tank could be connected through a manifold system for nimal capital cost. The County would split the cost with the Town of Estes Park for the jition of the second unleaded fuel tank. The Town could either pay out right their share of additional fuel tank or the County could charge them a one to two cent a gallon surcharge fuel until the cost was recovered. The County's fuel rates are fixed based on an annual dicted fuel cost from their supplier. The County's supplier is selected through a bidding )cegs based on their forecasted fuel cost throughout the year. Using the forecasted prices the unty sets a fixed rate based on the average price in order to offer a consistent rate to the irs. The County's annual fuel prices were approximately ten to fifteen cents a gallon higher n the Park R-3 School District. This would result in an additional annual fuel cost of $6,000 $10,000. wn Vehicles would have 24 hour access to the County's fueling system. Convenience to the wn would be the same as using their existing Town system with the County facility located t north of the Town shops. The County currently used a key system for record keeping iilar to the Towns PIN control system. The Town's existing PIN control system could be orporated into the County's fueling system. By using the Towns existing PIN control system, : fueling data could be directly down loaded into the fleet services computers for ease of :ord keeping. e County has been in contact with Ferrellgas of Estes Park for the implementation of an ernative fuel LPG system. Ferrellgas has suggested placing an LPG fueling system on there )perty with key/card charge system with 24 hour access. If the LPG fueling system was not up by Ferrellgas the County would install a LPG fueling system at their shops. e Town would still be responsible for the cost of closure of the existing tanks at the Town Ops. 9 2.4 Alternative 8: Investigate the Town utilizing a commercial vendor for supplying fuel. ueling the Town vehicles with a private commercial vendor would involve utilizing one of the ,cal service stations. The Town would have the option of competively bidding the service to e different local stations on a periodic basis or negotiating a contract with a single vendor. he vendor would have to assure that the Town had 24 hour access to the fuel system. Also the indor would have to provide itemized records of each vehicle and fuel usage. ary Mitchell of Tiny Town Texaco at 860 Moraine Avenue was contacted about interest in :oviding fuel for the Town of Estes Park. They were very interested in the possibility of being )le to provide fuel to the Town. The Town could expect to be charged in the area of 5 to 10 znts a gallon over wholesale cost for fuel. Texaco is currently investigating installing a credit ard system which would allow the user to purchase fuel on a 24 hour basis. The credit card /stem would also provide an itemized inventory. Texaco would offer a convenient location for oth the shop based and Town based vehicles. The Texaco station and the area surrounding it in become fairly congested during the summer months. The Town would still be responsible ir closure of the existing fueling system. .0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION he following table summarizes the cost related to each alternative. The itemized costs for each ternative are located in Appendix A. 'TABLE 3.1 i COST SUMMARY DESCRIPTION COST .lternative 1 - Retrofit Existing Tanks $175,000 .lternative 2 - New Below Ground Tanks $155,000 .lternative 3 - New Above Ground Tanks $140,000 .lternative 4 - New Above Ground Tanks at Landfill $225,000 dternative 5 - Town to Utilize Park R-3 System ' $ 55,000 .lternative 6 - Town to Utilize National Park Service System $ 55,000 .lternative 7 - Town to Utilize Larimer County System $ 62,000 Jternative 8 - Town to Utilize Commercial Vendor $ 55,000 ased on review of the alternatives, RMC would recommend utilizing the existing Park R-3 chool District fueling system or the proposed new Larimer County fueling system. 10 .. irrently both the school and the County successfully provide fuel to outside entities in similar pacity as would be required by the Town. The capital cost to implement utilization of either stem would be minimal and probably limited to the addition of a PIN control system at the hool, or a PIN control system and addition of a second unleaded fuel tank at the County. :location of the Towns PIN control system to either the school or County would minimize cost d enable the Town to down load the usage records directly to their computer. ie Larimer County facility would offer a more convenient location relative to the Town shops. iwever, the schools base fuel cost were considerably lower than the County at the time of the port preparation. The County offers a fixed rate for fuel for the year. Annual cost at one cent gallon over whole sale cost would also be minimal compared to the capital cost and annual eration and maintenance cost of a Town owned system. The Town of Estes Park would not an owner/operator of a fueling system on Town property which will greatly reduce Town bility. Environmentally it is much safer to limit fuel storage to as few locations as possible. tilizing one fuel system by multiple public service facilities would provide citizens with the ost efficient use of their tax dollar. ior to selection and implementation of an alternative the Town of Estes Park will need to make formal request to the Park R-3 School Board or Larimer County Commissioners. ir permanent closure the tanks must be emptied and cleaned by removing all the liquids and cumulated sludges. If the Town is to completely end their history as owners or operators for el storage we recommend that the existing system be completely removed. ioult! the Town of Estes Park prefer to maintain their own fueling system, Alternative 3 is commended with above ground storage tanks located at the Town shops. Placement of the )rage tanks at the old landfill area would be very expensive to ensure stable foundations for e tanks and piping. Above ground tanks would be less expensive, easier to monitor and the .isting fuel system would be operable during construction of the new system. With the new el system located next to the shops, the existing fuel dispenser system could be utilized with inor modifications. 11 APPENDIX A )pendix A includes an outline of the necessary work with associated cost for each alternative. ie work is based on RMC's preliminary assessment of each alternative. ternative #1 Retrofit existing underground storage tanks Description Cost Demolition and disposed of the two-1000 gallon diesel tanks and associated items. $50,000 Corrosion protection a 4000 gallon and 6000 gallon fuel tank. $15,300 Install Geomembrane lining in the 4000 gallon and 6000 gallon fuel tanks. $26,700 Install new double walled piping. $19,000 ... M Install monitoring wells $ 8,300 .t'Install overfill and spill prevention system. $17,700 Install electronic gauging system for detecting leaks. $38.000 timated Cost for Alternative #1 $175,000 12 ' i~t Â£/ 7 I I. ternative #2 New below ground fuel storage tanks and piping at the Town shops: Demolition and disposal of two-1000 gallon diesel tanks, one 4,000 gallon unleaded tank and one 6000 gallon regular gasoline tank, all existing piping and associated items. $50,000 Install one-1500 gallon and one 6000 gallon jacketed steel tanks below ground. $42,000 Install new double wall piping. $19,000 Install monitoring wells $ 5,000 Install overfill and spill prevention system. $13,000 Install electronic gauging system for leak detection. $26.000 timated Cost for Alternative #2 $155,000 ternative #3 New above ground fuel storage tanks and piping at the Town shops: /Demolition and disposal of two-1000 gallon diesel tanks, ' one 4,000 gallon unleaded tank and one 6000 gallon regular gasoline tank, all existing piping and associated items. $50,000 Install one-1500 gallon and one 6000 gallon jacketed steel tanks above ground. $28,000 Install concrete catchment basins below tanks. $ 2,000 Install new double wall piping. $21,000 Install overfill and spill prevention system. $13,000 Install electronic gauging system for leak detection. $26.000 timated Cost for Alternative #3 $140,000 13 ' ernative #4 New above ground fuel storage tanks and piping at the old landfill area: Demolition and disposal of two-1000 gallon diesel tanks one 4,0400 gallon unleaded tank and one 6000 gallon regular gasoline tank, all existing piping and associated system. $50,000 Install one 1500 gallon and one 6000 gallon jacketed steel tank above ground. $28,000 Install concrete caissons foundation below the tanks for stabilization. $45,000 Install double wall piping system. $19,000 Install soil reinforcement matting for piping system. $34,000 Install concrete catchment basin below tanks. $ 2,000 Install over fill and spill prevent system. $13,000 Install electronic gauging system for leak detection. $26,000 Relocate discharge system (pumps, card reading system, .imeters, etc.,) to the new fueling location. $ 3,000 i Install 8' chainlink fence around perimeter of fueling area. $ 5.000 imated Cost for Alternative #4 $225,000 14 Brnative #5 Town to utilize the existing Park R-3 fueling system: Demolition and disposal of two-1000 gallon diesel tanks one 4,000 gallon unleaded tank and one 6000 gallon regular gasoline tank, all existing piping and associated system. $50,000 Relocate Towns card reading system from the Town shops to the school. $ 3,000 Arrange an agreement between the Town and school system for use of their fueling system. $ 2.000 imated Cost for Alternative #5 $55,000 ernative #6 Town to utilize the existing National Park Service fueling system would be the same as Alternative 5. imated Cost for Alternative #6 $55,000 ernative #7 Town to utilize the proposed Larimer County fueling system in Estes Park. Items from Alternative 5 $55,000 Addition of a second 2000-4000 gallon unleaded fuel tank. $ 7.000 $62,000 ernative #8 Town to utilize a commercial vendor for supplying fuel: Demolition and disposal of two-1000 gallon diesel tanks one 4,000 gallon unleaded tank and one 6000 gallon regular gasoline tank, all existing piping and associated system. $50,000 Selection of a commercial vendor. $ 3,000 Implement a contractual agreement between the Town and the commercial vendor. $ 2.000 imated Start up Cost for Alternative #7 $55,000 imated annual expense above wholesale fuel cost would fuel cost would range from $2,500 55,000. 15