The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1995-02-23AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 23, 1995 8:00 A.M. 4. 4712 Crags Subdivision Easement vacation K /0 14, 200â‚¬2 ,~ 66zbkc.., 4 Request to vacate an utility easemehtfc _.--- ___ - -- Â£ 61. Proposed US West Equipment in Town ROW Request to locate a large cabinet in Gelf Course Rd. ROW /0.- . i -1-,0 & -Â· N~n Residential Annexation Policy -- (~BL+â‚¬>ett:,5,70 CldlÂ® "1 f P t v Request approval to adopt ~~~-==rzz__-------- 7 .4: Peak View Dr. Speed Limit -7-5 62 (bto/0 Â£;Og~j / 4 Request approval to change the current 25 mph speed limit to 35 mph g / ,5:' Municipal Parking Lot Request approval to designate parking spaces for citizen users ofthe Town Hall and the Library 1995 Water Line Projects Request approval to bid ..3 7< 1994 Water Line Projects Request approval to amend contract for change orders -441 .85 Water Dept. Budgeted Purchases Reauest to purchase 1.)Water Dept. utility truck 2.) GIS/CAD system -0fd.4Â£-_24.*â€ž ~ U . 10 0. Executiv, Session Property acquisition negotiations ~1 Reports: 2 X. Customer Service Response 2. AIonthly Water Report 3. Lake Estes Path update 4. Hwy. 7, Hwy. 34, Elkhorn Overlay projects update 5. Augmentation Plan update 6. Proposed closing of 5tlt St. access onto Manford Ave. - Announcement of April PWC discussion Note: The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary. TO: BILL LINNANE/BOB GOEHPING FROM: GARY SHANAFE!.1 SUBJ: WATER TRUCK BIDS DATE: 2 FEBRUARY 1995 PLEASE FIND BELOW BIDS RECEIVED FOR ONE 0/4 TON TRUCK AND UTILITY BODY. THE BID PRICES ALSO INCLUDE THE TRANSFER OF THE UTILITY BODY FROM OUR TRADE-IN VEHICLE TO A WATER DEPT PICKUP TRUCK. RAINS MOTOR COMPANY 1-23,188.10 HERITAGE FORD $25.281.00 SPRADLEY-BARR FORD NO BID GARNSEY/WHEELER FORD NO BID DAVE TAYLOR FORD NO BID 8-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum February 21, 1995 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane Â£5(/A- SUBJECT: 1995 Budgeted GIS/CAD System for Water Department Staff received bids from two large GIS hardware/software companies and the results are as follows: GIS Inc. GTAC Software and Calcomp Digitizer $8,061 *$7,621 *Upgrade to an Altek Digitizer 164 TOTAL $8,061 $7,785 Staff is recommending approval of GTAC bid with the Altek upgrade for total of $7,785. Staff is also requesting approval to purchase a Gateway computer system with software for a total price not to exceed $5,400. The total request will not exceed $13,185. The budget is $12,000. The excess would be funded from the office equipment budget. BL:ck 8-2 February 15, 1995 W.O. 2799 Mr. Bill Linnane Public Works Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Easement Vacation Dear Mr. Linnane: We have determined that no utility lines exist within the utility easement that crosses the southeast portion of Lot 13, The Crags Subdivision. In addition, the utility lines required to serve the lots in this subdivision have been placed. All of the utility providers have been contacted to verify that this easement is not needed. Our clients goal is to receive the Towns approval for vacating this easement. They will then proceed with plans for constructing their drive and garage in this area of the lot. The lot owners will be responsible for Town staff costs, recording fees, etc. associated with this request. A description of the easement to be vacated is attached as "Exhibit A". If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us. Respectfully yours, Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. 0 A n I/ 4 .ciAA, \ 1 -1â‚¬ f 1 : \ --0-1>/vu- Paul M. KocheÂ¢ar, President P.E. & P.L.S. No. 15760 encl. 1-1 February 16, 1995 W.O. 2799 EXHIBIT A An easement on, over and across a portion of Lot 13, The Crags Subdivision, located in Section 25, T5N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Town of Estes Park, County of Larimer, State of Colorado being more particularly described as commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 13; thence S 11Â°10'00" E a distance of 51.38 feet along the Easterly line of said Lot 13 to the centerline of a 15 foot wide easement lying 7.50 feet on each side of , parallel with and adjacent to the following described centerline: thence S 45Â°00'00" W a distance of 72.28 feet; thence South to the Southerly line of said Lot 13 and the POINT OF TERMINUS of said easement centerline. The above description was prepared by Paul M. Kochevar, P.O. Box 3047, Estes Park, Colorado 80517. 1-2 i S 90'00'00'E 1330.98 1 180.12 15C.86 tri t 1 19. .~ . 432 / h o R bo UTILITY -4 1-1: 4 0 1 4 LOT 12 LOT 13 2-U e L EASEMENT e / 1 03 - t -! L.1.5 1 4,# \ e z 11 4~ \\ III I L-146.20 ~ 1 e\ (36 9 LOT 11 \ 4\ 0 \ %..0 0 0... 0 9 49.30 v \ EAST \ 0014 , 1 1% . \ / S. 9% 1% 44>,/Â»-4 1 4/9 0'. . 00/00 LOT 10 , G< 2/*. / A = 202'39'21" 44 .4 \ 4,/ N / R =50.00 \ e 6 / ~ S 6~87:07 41 E ~ A = 122'49+58 01 ' 98.05 R =70.00 L : 150.OT 2 = 77'3910 C : S 69'350 R = 47.50' , 122.94 L. 64.38 C â€¢ N 87'4935" E 5 59.56 IM 4 N 81*49'58" E 0.42 t ROAD TO Â£ CUL-DE-SAC . 1-3 L3 L -68.06 0 .~ 5,1.38 /'~~4 00'00'00"E 161.16 11'1 '0 "E 147.27 ,/ 26.48 60.00 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, extended discussions have taken place over the years concerning expanding the Town limits to include the entire Estes Valley; and WHEREAS, the potential costs of providing services to residential annexations far outweigh the expected revenue from property taxes; and WHEREAS, the Town recognizes the importance of all residents of the Estes Valley being able to participate in their local government; and WHEREAS, the Town believes that an orderly process of future residential annexations will avoid costly duplication of services, provide a higher quality of life, and provide for the general health and safety of both existing and future Town residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: The Board hereby adopts the following Residential Annexationiolicy for existing subdivisions: 1. GENERAL: The Town intends to take a reactive position with regard to residential annexations of existing subdivisions; i.e., it will react to desires for annexation by existing subdivision residents, but will not aggressively seek annexation of existing subdivisions. The Homeowner's Associaticn or other representatives of the residents of existing subdivisions desiring annexation will be expected to meet with Town staff to obtain information of possible annexation, circulate petitions, hold informational meetings, and keep other residents informed of the progress of the annexation. 2. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING: Prior to annexation, the residents of the proposed annexation and the Town will sign a Memorandum of Understanding to set forth the understandings of the parties with regard to the annexation. Issues to be discussed in the Memorandum include, but are not limited to, proposed zoning and land use, building permits and inspections, street right-of-way and geometry, paving, and maintenance, water, electricity, property taxes, use tax, police services, street lighting, and miscellaneous. 97 3. ANNEXATION MAPS, PETITIONS, AND LEGAL WORK: Sub-j-ect to the Memorandum of Understanding referenced in (â‚¬ctip_n)2 above, the Town will pay the engineering and ~3legal costs of preparing the annexation maps and petitions necessary to meet the terms and conditions of the "Municipal Annexation Act of 1965." 4. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: The street right-of-way will be dedicated to the Town pursuant to the annexation process. If existing street right-of-way is undedicated, or does not meet adopted Town standards, the Town will require formal dedication of sufficient right-of-way, at no cost to the Town, to meet said standards, or as specified in the Memorandum of Understanding. 5. STREET CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE: If the construction of the existing street system in the proposed annexation does not meet adopted Town standards at the time of annexation, maintenance of the existing street system will continue to be performed by the property owners after annexation. Once the streets are brought to Town standards 3-1 .I. through formation and financing of a Special Improvement District or by other means, the Town Will assume responsibility for all maintenance work, including snow removal, asphalt patching, and overlay, and will perform such maintenance in accordance with the regular street maintenance programs of the Town. 6. WATER LINES: As detailed in the Memorandum of Understanding, extension of water mains to the proposed annexation or purchase of existing water systems shall be in accordance with Resolution 19-91, adopted by the Town Board on September 24, 1991. Maintenance of existing water systems that do not meet Town standards will continue to be performed by the property owners following annexation. Once the water lines are brought to Town standards through formation of a Special Improvement District or by other means, the Town will assume maintenance responsibilities. 7. SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS: Subject to the Memorandum of Understanding, the Town will pay the legal costs and staff time for formation of a Special Improvement District (SID) for design and construction of streets, water lines, or any other public improvement required by the Memorandum. The Town will pay one-half of the asphalt portion of the paving costs, subject to the Memorandum of Understanding and the availability of funds for this purpose within the Town's normal budget process. The property owners are responsible for all remaining costs, including surveying, preliminary design, final design-* and construction inspection and management, as determined during the formation of the SID. l (t,hefilt e,EUU INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED THIS DAY OF , 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: ATTEST: Mayor Town Clerk 3-2 BT CONSTRUCTION, INC. UTILITY CONTRACTORS ~ 11605 WADSWORTH BLVD. Â· BROOMFIELD, COLORADO 80020 Â· PHONE: 469-0199 1994 WATER LOOPING PROJECT FOR BIG HORN DRIVE WORK ORDERS 1. $343.00 2. $1436.00 3. $768.00 4. $612.20 5. $697.00 6. $672.00 7. $432.58 8. $211.50 9. $1161.00 10. ------- 11. $984.00 12. $984.00 ..~,4.0/ 13. $134.50 - PAP 14. $63.00 15. $121.20 16.$1755.76 17. $203.00 18. $4078.63 Aoet. 19. -$166.48 7-2 ~APPLICATION AND CERTIFICAT~OR PAYMENT ~~~ TO: RMC, INC. PROJECT: 1994 WATERLOOPING APPLICATION: 3 437 S. ST. VRAIN PROJECT PERIOD FROM: 12/13/94 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 TO: 01/18/95 FROM: BT CONSTRUCTION, INC. PROJECT NO: CONTRACT DATE: CONTRACT FOR: CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ...................... $141,910.00 Net change by change orders ....................... $14,4903900' CHANGE ORDER ADDITIONS $14,657.37 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ....................... $156,406.0, CHANGE ORDER DEDUCTIONS $166.48 TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE ....................... $150,130.89 NET CHANGE ORDE,RS $14,490.89 RETAINAGE: . 10% OF TOTAL COMPLETED $0.00 TOTAL RETAINAGE ....................... $0.00 1 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .............. $150,130.89 LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES .................. $113,970.60 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE ....................... $36,160.29 BALANCE TO FINISH PLUS RETAINAGE ...... $Â§,276.00 The undersigned-lontractor dertifies that f) all information contained in this application is true and correct; 0 \G, 2) that all monies previously paid to the undersigned on behal f of third parties who have performed work/supplied materials on this project has been paid to those parties and undersigned, upon request, will provide lien releases from those third parties; and 3) undersigned waives and releases all right to claim any mechanic's lien for labor, services, machinery, tools, equipment and materials furnished through the date of this application when paid, for the construction of improvement on the project here-in billed / specified above. COMPANY: BT Construction, Inc. / , / tt , 1/19/9) 11 ./' 1,(IJAN, State of: County of: ......................... Subscribed and sworn to before me this ............... day of ......................... , 19...-. Notary Public: Â·Â·Â·Â· My Commission expires: ..... ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with tile Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that the work has progfe;sed to the point indicated: that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, the quality of the work is iKa#o#lance with the contract documents; and that the Contractor is entitled to the payment of the amount~ertif~~,~' 1,1 12 DATE: AMOUN-1- CER-rIFIED s.39,-14Â©:.A? ARCHITECT: ~..gÂ·Â»o.' 1 ~17 195 7-1 ... MEMORANDUM DATE: February 10, 1995 TO: Bill Linnane FROM: Greg Sievers RE: Peak View Drive Speed Limit CC: Dave Racine , As requested by Trustee Dekker at the 1/19/95 P.S.C. staff has conducted an engineering and traffic investigation of Peak View Drive for adjustment of the existing speed limit. The MUTCD and State Statute CRS-42-4-1002 has been referenced and documented for my findings. 1. Road Surface Characteristics: This road is a two lane paved Collector with centerline and edge striping. It has no passing zones. It has four foot maintained shoulders and drainage control. It collects local traffic from ten (10) sides streets and approx. 550 residences. All side streets have Stop signs. Curves are gentle, in rolling type terrain. CDOT Design Manual, table 102.1 identifies a " minimum design speed for volume" approx. 1700ADT is 40MPH. 2. The 85th Percentile Speed: Three one hour study periods were recorded with a , \( portable Radar Unit (8:00am, 1:30pm, 5:00pm) the average speed of the 137 vehicles clocked was 36.8mph. Eighty five percent of all vehicles were doing 35mph or more. 3. Roadside Development: This area of Town is all residential, no commercial businesses exist or are planned. There has been no major roadside development which may alter the safety of the motorist. All intersections have sight visibility in excess of 415' as identified in table 1101.11 for 40mph roads. 4. Parking and Pedestrians: No on street parking is allowed on any part of Peak View Drive. There is moderate pedestrian use on the easterly portion of this street. 5. Accident Reports: No traffic accidents or speeding violations have been logged for 1 this road over the last twelve months. 6. Hazardous Curves: None of the curves on Peak View can be considered hazardous by reference to accident data or design. The first curve west of Highway 7 has a radius of approx. 225' and meets design criteria for a 30mph curve. The next curve west has a radius of approx. 525' and meets design criteria for a 40mph curve. Other curves have greater radii. With the specifications identified and referenced to the MUTCD, CRS 42-4-1002 and - Standard Engineering Design as adopted by the CDOT and the Town Of Estes Park it is the opinion of the Public Works staff that Peak View Drive be signed for 35mph traffic with the first curve signed as a 25mph curve warning. Also note that beyond the Town limit Larimer County has not signed their portion of the road which identifies it as 40mph in accordance with State Statute for open mountain roadway. 4-2 , . " A 0/0.0/Uk.MING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS . j Public Safety Committee, January 19, 1995 - Page 3 Proposed Fire Station Site: Chief Rumley reported that feedback from citizens on the proposed fire station location has been negative. Rumley suggested an open meeting be scheduled for citizens to voice their concerns and for Staff to explain the decision to locate the station on Town property at 4th and Manford. The Committee recommends a citizen meeting to discuss location of the new fire station be held January 31, 7:00 p.m., in the Board Room, with fire personnel, Town staff, and Town Board in attendance, and announcement of the meeting be done through radio a'nd newspaper coverage of this committee meeting, and word of mouth. Member Dekker commended the fire department personnel for their continued service which is a significant plus to this community and needs to be reiterated to the citizens. REPORTS. The Committee reviewed the year-end Summary Report. Chief Racine explained that the updated dispatch equipment documents all officer calls which has inflated the numbers from last year's report. However, the incident report does not include dispatch calls handled for the county. Member Marshall acknowledged importance of the non-criminal incidents which confirms the Police Department is "user friendly". 7 At Member Dekker's request, the 25 m.p.h. speed limit on Peak View 1 (Highway 7) will be reviewed and a report submitted at the February ~ meeting. Chairman Gillette commended the Chief for assigning officers to monitor heavy traffic/pedestrian loads at the school complex and reported the parents are appreciative. There being no further business, Chairman Gillette adjourned the meeting at 8:56 A.M. TL-- 14-20 Tina Kuehl, Deputy Town Clerk 4_Â£Â» 7 \A) L O%-4-6 4-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT JANUARY, 1995 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION - MAIN 40.00 89.25 13 UTILITY LOCATION - SERVICE 4.00 9.50 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 16 TAP REQUEST 2.00 4.00 17 WATER QUALITY - TASTE 18 WATER QUALITY - ODOR 19 WATER QUALITY - COLOR 1.00 5.00 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: HIGH 21 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: LOW 1.00 2.00 22 FROZEN LINES: MAIN 23 FROZENLINES: SERVICE + 4.00 4.00 24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN 1.00 2.00 25 LINE BREAKS: SERVICE 6.00 10.50 30 METER REPAIR 27.00 22.50 31 FINAL INSPECTION 4.00 3.50 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: WATER 1.00 6.00 41 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: PARKS 1.00 1.00 42 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: STREETS 44 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: OTHER 50 STREET REPAIR 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 54 STORM DRAINAGE 55 TRAFFIC HAZARD 60 OTHER 6.00 19.00 TOTALS FOR JANUARY 1995 98.00 178.25 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 98.00 88.00 61.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 178.25 127.50 99.50 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) +11.36%/+39.80% +3.53%/-22.37% +60.66%/+79.15% R-1-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK JANUARY 1995 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for December 14,1994 through January 13,1995: Dec. 14 to 31 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 12,529,000 Marys 6,604,000 Jan. 1 to 13 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 8,520,000 Marys 4,779,000 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 32,432,000 Gal. 2)Accountable Water Adjustments: 3,208,600 Billing: 0 21,859,528 *Backwash Total Water accounted for: 25,068,128 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 77% 4.) 12 MONTH AVE. PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 76% R-2-1 WATER.XLS JANUARY, 1995 ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 124,000 2.) Bleeders TOTAL BLEEDERS (Gal.) 3,006,600 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 19-Dec Flush Eagle Cliff 25,000 b. 9-Jan Fill 6" Ute Ln. 10,000 c. 12-Jan Whispering Pines Leak 40,000 d. 12-Jan Service line leak Cleave St. 3,000 e. f. g. h. 1. j. TOTAL LEAKS, MISC. (Gal.) 78,000 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) 3,208,600 Page 1 R-2-2 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS JANUARY, 1995 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL i. MARYS l . .~~ TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS } f (GAL) CFS (GAL) 1 0 713,000 713,000 1.11 lA 337,000 0.52 1,050,000 2 0 709,000 709,000 1.10 310,000 0.48 : 1,019,000 3 0 697,000 697,000 1.09 34 443,000 0.69 : 1,140,000 4 0 667,000 667,000 1.04 234,000 0.36 : 901,000 5 0 665,000 665,000 1.04 549,000 0.85 i } 1,214,000 6 0 657,000 657,000 1.02 : 369,000 0.57 i 1,026,000 7 0 649,000 649,000 1.01 H 264,000 0.41 8 913,000 8 0 634,000 634,000 0.99 E 405,000 0.63 1 1,039,000 9 0 619,000 619,000 0.96 . i 279,000 0.43 898,000 10 0 637,000 637,000 0.99 2 455,000 0.71 P : 1,092,000 11 0 611,000 611,000 0.95 f 352,000 0.55 963,000 12 0 639,000 639,000 0.99 , 436,000 0.68 1,075,000 13 0 623,000 623,000 0.97 346,000 0.54 969,000 14 0 735,000 735,000 1,14 I 525,000 0.82 1,260,000 15 0 626,000 626,000 0.97 t. > 333,000 0.52 959,000 16 0 656,000 656,000 1.02 j. 339,000 0.53 995,000 17 0 610,000 610,000 0.95 1 253,000 0.39 863,000 18 0 688,000 688,000 1.07 607,000 0.95 2Â· Â·: i 1,295,000 19 0 646,000 646,000 1.01 371,000 0.58 1,017,000 20 0 672,000 672,000 1.05 i : 537,000 0.84 : 1,209,000 21 0 602,000 602,000 0.94 i : 478,000 0.74 t : -3 1,080,000 22 0 632,000 632,000 0.98 319,000 0.50 i 951,000 23 0 595,000 595,000 0.93 i 457,000 0.71 P 3 1,052,000 24 0 567,000 567,000 0.88 356,000 0.55 923,000 25 0 608,000 608,000 0.95 : 449,000 0.70 9 Â·u 4 1,057,000 26 0 681,000 681,000 1.06 i Â° 607,000 0.95 L 1,288,000 27 0 756,000 756,000 1.18 419,000 0.65 : 1,175,000 28 0 815,000 815,000 1.27 680,000 1.06 + 1,495,000 29 0 862,000 862,000 1.34 t 364,000 0.57 1,226,000 30 0 577,000 577,000 0.90 i. 310,000 0.48 887,000 31 0 642,000 642,000 1.00 2. 309,000 0.48 951,000 TOT. 0 20,490,000 * 20,490,000 1.02 : 12,492,000 0.63 32,982,000 AF 0.00 62.89 62.89 38.34 101.22 CFS 0.00 1.02 1.02 - 0.62 1.65 ?> I 6 i BL(-) N/A N/A N/A N/A -3,208,600 GAL 0 20,490,000 20,490,000 12,492,000 f 129.773.4002 AF 0 62.89 62.89 38.34 91.38I 1st-13 0 8,520,000 4,779,000 14 - 31 0 11,970,000 7,713,000 R-2-3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS) 1994 1994 1995 1995 % MONTH YTD L. :: MONTH YTD :Â·1 % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL R j TOTAL TOTAL 1 1 CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 26,254,900 26,254,900R ~ 29,773,400 29,773,400?Â· :.1 13% 13% FEBRUARY 23,570,900 49,825,800: MARCH 25,802,800 75,628.600: APRIL 25,339,400 100,968,0001 MAY 41,750,328 142,718,328~ JUNE 63,441,300 206,159,6283 JULY 76,468,746 282,628,3741 AUGUST 58,651,900 341,280,274: SEPTEMBER 46,454,520 387,734,7941 OCTOBER 33,144,140 420,878,934: NOVEMBER 27,853,010 448,731,944: DECEMBER 29,341,400 478,073,3441 TOTAL 478,073,344 AC - FT 1,467 R-2-4 ZO E ZM 5 tz ~010 2 & N. mm --4- E-- - =11Â·P--TEEEWI . : 966k r...T =2.- ....1 4 , 1 ~, â€ž,0 , HI ~ ~ !1'L'11111 11 11 11 ~ - Â£661. 1 . .. 1.: ;,4.m 21:.Â·. ;41*~4>:4:6>%6**Misu,&4UÂ·B#84>>9U j8&;9 64.Â·!4. ?ii ~ ! ~6 kÂ·2186&8Â·MÂ·283~~~Â§888!~ Â·1 i 1 1 lilli I i 066K :1Â· : 1 tÂ·Iff,2-235*0Â§*55Â§0*Emb'/-1:23*22 'AZI-/---552*- .-: >r .:Â·>fÂ·f' 6961. p=T.,ait" -'MI,"â€¢m-'9mhi FL ; 996L ' i>, - 11-- 3.-.,1711,li,Â·17'Iil~ lili Illf L96X -- - -- t..: - ' - 996k 996 L Â· 'Yii .-Iinlill,lil ' ' . *96 k . '2]Urn-;-;T;-.i .:~Â· z ~Â·Â· Â·al-ffT i-f:DY;DDN~;*0~XffzmmE##Â£ Â£96/ 1/ I.t..... :Pl ! I , ,5 5;.1...; ii-D:,5"H kli~211.211 n :12% ., 17 1'296k 0 1 1 . N R-2-5 06ueli hIV3A ACT,04 Z' 1:t -* 5 15,000,000 - 1 Â·Â· - 000'000'9 10,000,000 GALLONS 2.0% ious &#W&*1*1*Ull#11111#.#6118Â·11:64 ZO a SE K mm ::tÂ· 4 4- -1Â· 1 : ..~!111111,11,11,111,1â€¢111 1 .1,1 11, i Il 1'1'111. Il Il l Ill, 11 1, 1 1 1 11 1~1111 11111111,11,1,1,111~1l. 1 9661 :1 : t. 21... E ~1111,11111,11111111'm--I I n~~1111111111111 1,111111,1,1,1,111 11,111 1,11 1 11111,11111,11111,1,1~1/1,11'l. CO . - C-S 1 Â·Â·t .th .1 1: 21 ..... Â£66k 1 Â· :1: 21: ..~ 1: 4: Â·:t.1 . : 1% 1 ~ Â·-=Â· 'Â·Â·Â·tr"ravil:-1-Â·~-Â·Â·0 - wÂ·~Â»:; 766 k bt. ht: .Ut : tÂ· 1 .: ' EL_ ~=m==1",r====7==8â€žmi=11111 t661. : ..: 3 .... :.1 ' ~~~h 1:.Â· Â· 1 Â· 0661 1 :.1 Â·Â·1:: Â· 1Â· ......1-Emp=4, .rr â€¢' '1111 696 1 -7- - 896 L Â· Â· i: Â·: 1 ' r-.--r.3.-16-9 1 1 H Â·" 1 liu,10 Z961. .w =Â« r ==- -==r - Â·I' I Ii Â·mmA'rrti?, fig t.- . 4 + Â· 'I~ 1 111 1 lili 11 1 9961. ~ , , 1 -7--- i ffi 74 1â€ž17,2Ati-~ r 4 4Â»+I'l .. 9 i - 1 1 :-0 Â· 1Â·Â·: 4- /:1: . : P d | E . 11 1 ...1 .1 296k *i IiÂ·l Â·.Â· .:.Â·.: ,X -40=,=4=66&*966666,1/- 1 R-2-6 0/08.Â£ 11* 5 Change sno!A@Jd Change om previous year JANUARY & YTD REVENUE 90,000.00 -Â« ZIV3A 80,000.00 --' 70,000.00 - ' - -- 60,000.00 j 50,000.00 - , EmÂ·': 3nN3A3U _ ' :.,Â·- 00 000'0Â£ 18;' 00 000'OL 1 - 00'000'01,