The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1994-08-18rk PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE August 18, 1994 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Gary Brown Town Court Procedures 2. Marshall & Carole Hesler Lexington Lane & Northbound Lexington Lane - Discussion FIRE DEPARTMENT Hazardous Material . Update - Budget REPORTS 1. Correspondence Summary 2. Monthly * The committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate business not available at the time the agenda was prepared. I . Â¢j~ ,# ~ ~ TOWN OF ESTES PARK 491. Gary F. Klaphake , 1 Town Administrator '4SS'G-S?Â¥245. -Gr...fAI .3 â€¢:.t*,4, 0 *Â¥*IT f U-- 31...firfij.+FERGi*uv .-/-1, -re....4 . lififf=/4 4\Q-19%'~ A ('1 ,Â· A ,--Â· 3 -,-6.Â·'A 9'' 10,14 ALIE : #74,- lagepip 93. Ry Â· i. - 2-Â·07 >Ff /34'im~i ip 9/, 2,... - 4--ov#Ta . 0, 4 3/,PM'.41 4* K *42...3-3,274*-4 9#t- , .- 74Â·*4 - / --*?2%244'.14 3LtfrmÂ»4 -1. Estes Park, Colorado 80517 August 15, 1994 TO: Public Safety Committee , FROM: Gary Klaphake (r,k- Town Administrator RE: MUNICIPAL COURT CASES Staff has been reviewing our previous history of court cases. We held meetings with the Judge, City Attorney, Police Chief, and Police Officers to review Municipal Court operations. We think that most cases can be written into Municipal Court. This will provide better access for citizens and be more cost effective for the Town. I have asked Judge Brown to attend as a resource to answer any questions. Recommendation The Committee recommends to Town Board the following policy: The Police Department shall write summons on the Municipal Code when applicable. Reasonable exceptions, due to special circumstances, are hereby acknowledged. *} j Dritict MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 1 FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS .. P. S. C. Er. Dive Racine, -hairÂ·ma Iublic Safety Â·:ommittee 10box 1200 Estes Park, CO., 80517 A- 0 1266Â»111.5 0 Per my -tel/con with Dill I.inname on Au.gist , i. _. 1.t , 10 1 00 4 Please put the traffic problem at the corner of Lexington Lane and. Northbound Lexington I are on the a-fenda :it the next meeting of tte Public Safety Committee ir, Estes 1 ark. tey wife and I have personally been i-nvolved in two -very close .nills at this intersection and feel that a stop sign or at least a yield sign is appropriate at that corner on the, northbo-iind I.exing-con corrier. harchall & Carole Yesler - 1005 lexington lÂ·arie 14Â·0-1-Â£30 7 -LJ OILâ€¢J rark, 00., 80517 c86-8081 A-~~ h 0 0 1\ A /=â‚¬+ e r 9 4/ 00 00- .K HOL~OW CT. ~ P 43 0> V . i f * 0 Â·9 40 5,500 /O . CORRESPONDENCE SUMMARY April 18. 1994 - Letter from the Adams County Corrections Program thanking the Police Department for our cooperative assistance. May. 1994 - Letter from Dr. & Mrs. Thomas M. Krapu commending Officer David Zuehlsdorf for his professionalism. June. 1994 - Card from Tasha Maxwell thanking the Police Department for a guided tour. . Letter from Raymond Saperstein, Director of the Children's Hospital Courage Classic, thanking everyone for a successful 1994 Courage Classic. July. 1994 - Letter from the Scandinavians of Estes Park, Colorado, thanking everyone for their support of the festival. August. 1994 - Letter from Cheryl Poedesta, thanking Officer Mike VanDeutekom for his polite and caring attitude, followed by a thank you letter to Officer VanDeutekom from Chief Racine. - Letter from Deputy Bruce G. Walters, commending Dispatcher Peter Gouge for his professionalism and level headedness during a stressful situation, followed by a thank you letter to Dispatcher Gouge from Chief Racine. * Copies of letters are available through the Secretary at the Estes Park Police Department.nn c k Z ' 6 f- 3 1 4 6 'ww.* p>LTS meÂ«bu F.*,"a . >va 44 1 . 5 i i 1 1 =fc.,Am K.,<=:'.. 74.-at= r= 4 .' b Crime Data * 1 . 4.-, :*-Â£; r i--' * . r . ria tr.70 ... 4-2.# PUSE, 1 '1 ....â‚¬ 44 , 31.33 vi,~1 Puvic. ..,-075 Ut:Ell yÂ¥:e . 0 4 ki , 1. : t - ~Â·-, ~ Crime Decreases in 1993 TUA P"* According to preliminary Uniform Crime Â£ Reporting figures, the number of serious crimes 0 reported to law enforcement agencies decreased 3 percent in 1993 when compared to 1992 data. ' ~ This decrease continued the trend from 1992, when overall crime was down 3 percent from the previous year. A Crime Index composed of violent and property crimes measures serious crime. Last k Â¢ i W.1- - ' % F"l~-*s , year, violent crime dropped 1 percent, while i i,j i , property crime decreased 3 percent. Among the individual violent crime offens- CiPal , 1 3, -: es, only murder registered an increase from the f e.z.:.b , 1992 level, one of 3 percent. Forcible rape fe]14 1 + percent, robbery dropped 2 percent, and aggra- . .9 1 :-lii ./4 , Â· vated assault remained unchanged. For property i. 1, 1 1 4 Â· 4 Crimes, arson and burglary each declined 6 --i percent, motor vehicle theft dropped 4 percent, and larceny-theft fell 2 percent. te:â€¢ Â· . -6. Declines in overall Crime Index totals .49>..... r r 1% occurred in all regions of the country. The .9-.. mâ„¢ - -IÂ· i.Â·. 1> :=32=3,1 ... I . Northeast registered a 5-percent decline; the r -4,< v Midwest, a 3-percent drop; and the South and West, a 2-percent decrease each. M -0.C Z f- - **:xs,ilf I .2 - .1 4 4 - All population groupings experienced Crime : 7:. 2 + Index decreases during 1993. Cities with ~' ~ 1: <F - 4 populations over 1 million recorded the greatest -f I , - 7 decline, one of 5 percent. The decreases reported -7- F'* 1 17* #-2 by rural and suburban county law enforcement '~~ Â·; L r-Tmt agencies were 3 percent and 2 percent, .i UL. ' - 9- +7' 1 respectively. + ...& 7.uu 4- --4 2 U . Source: FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program, 2, Press Release, "Crime Trends, 1993 versus 1992," t. - Drd May 1,1994. , 4 yle 1 + R- I . 1 Ii, E A I. ~ 4 - .1 1 -....4.. ' â‚¬ â€¢c ..... 1Faerâ€ž-t N 1 ,1 1 k. Â¥ N - 0 .., ' '21 â€ž14% trt.. --*{ra~--T. 5::,.:E~*2. pt- , m 'Ji~.:6.Lr 4. r , , k.' # I . . 2-417*.- $ 1 1 4) 9-- i * .c.~ 1 4.4-i g.. 4 r 4 / FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin . . j we:r,t, -Â·-4. ~t'yrr'KÂ·6 â€¢.'2'4â€¢ - ,~41~.Â·r. C ' 03*L4 - ' 7Â»144-1-=3 10 '.0 1 . . 1 - - Â·.. p r 3:1-=.f a :*=114... L -- t -1 41 . U~ Â»Al *'c~ Au,66'J r .. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA July 28,1994 9:30 AM 1. Lot 1 Valley Vista Addition - Easement Vacation request by owner. 2. Mountain Golf Villas - Easement Vacation request by owner. 3. Stanley Historic District - Street name approval. 4. Neighborhood Mail Delivery, Phase 2 - Request to bid and award. 5. 1994 Water Dept. Water Line Project - Request to award. 67 -- 6*.fie. REPORTS: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Reports . 3. Augmentation Plan Update 4. Water Conservation 5. Hwy. 7 and 36 Projects Update 6. Lake Estes Path Update 7. Riverwalk Update The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary. July 26, 1994 W.O. 2640 LO -LO 2 5.2 Mr. Bill Linnane a,m'-9 ti -,Â£ W Town of Estes Park D coo P.O. Box 1200 U) Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Easement Vacation Lot 1, Valley Vista Addition Dear Mr. Linnane: Mr. Nick Stanitz is the owner of the above mentioned property. Several years ago the Town installed a new water line in Moccasin Circle Drive which borders this site on the north. At this same time an existing 2 inch water line, that runs east & west across this lot, was abandoned. Therefore the easement for this abandoned water line should be vacated to allow Mr. Stanitz more flexibility in the development of his property. The easement is shaded in red on the enclosed Valley Vista Annexation plat. If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact us. Respectfully yours, Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. ~a,1 01~ FOL Z- Paul M. Kochevar, P.E. & P.L.S. 15760 President 1-1 g X d ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, Inc. ;tes Park, Colorado First Nat'I Ba )517 (303) 5 W.0. 2640 July 26, 1994 EXHIBIT A A portion of Lot 1, Valley Vista Addition to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado located in Section 25, T5N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado which is more particularly described as commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1, as monumented by a 1/2" rebar with plastic cap number 6499; thence N 00Â°29'00" E a distance of 123.00 feet along the East line of said Lot 1 to a point on the centerline of a 20 foot wide utility easement as shown on the plat of record of said Valley Vista Addition, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: thence lying 10 feet on each side of, parallel with and adjacent to the following described centerline: thence N 68Â°26'19" W a distance of 294.30 feet to the West line of said Lot 1 and the POINT OF TERMINUS; excepting therefrom the 10 foot wide utility easements that parallel the West and East lines of said Lot 1 as shown on the plat of record of Valley Vista Addition. (Description prepared by Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc., Estes Park, Co. 80517) 1-2 - 11 11 . A June 17, 1993 W.0. 2451 J &' C: ent.r, Mr. Steve Stamey -16 0 C co Town of Estes Park . to M P.O. Box 1200 R Estes Park CO 80517 RE: Mountain Golf Villas Dear Mr. Stamey: Last fall construction began on Units 1, 2, and 3 in Block 1 of Mountain Golf Villas Subdivision. Our firm staked the sidelines and front corners of each building in accordance with the approved development plan. After the development plan was approved and ownership changed, new floor plans for the golf course units were prepared which lengthened the structure by two feet. We were unaware of the change and the builder did not know the plan was second generation. Now to the problem this mix-up has created. Units 1 and 2 are partially located upon the easement along the south side of the building as shown on the enclosed copy (portion of) of the recently completed condominium map. We would like to ask the Town to vacate a portion of this easement to eliminate the building encroachment. There are no utilities within the easement at this time and the bicycle path falls within the southerly ten feet of the easement. We would only need to vacate the north 2 feet of the easterly 35 feet. The owner would fund the attorney fees, etc. to accomplish this task. Please let us know how to proceed and thank you for your continued support and cooperation. Respectfully yours, ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. A 0 A-1 11,1. Ary- 13 b Paul M. Kochevar, P.E. & P.L.S., 15760 30 President 7 Â£- 2-1 butt Z D First Nat'I B w ~ 5 111'W" 0~-10 g z 6 toi o 00 Â· u) O rn m â‚¬ IRA . 2 1, g O 13018 *30 NOLLHOd V) 0.2 0-WID ao 0 loP 8 101100 . OP - $ 00, . .-7 4 T-â‚¬) 1".W.311 1 3.99.90.10 N 1 1 - f 1 't '.1 ~ 1 2 /1 1 W34 014 k 1 1 013 1 1 ' IL 1-7 1 r di ic3 wit 1 1 82 2 3 â€žgg.29.00 N - -,tiv -11 ~ b . 1 11 6 1 1 - 3 ..St,.19.OO N lig 91.- 1 31 b 1 843 63 ida r Â·EJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 h 1 1 10 1 X . 0. 1 1 . R - - U I z c 1 0 . 1 a O 0 0 ' 1 =Â» C .+1 3 C - C 00 -1 1 feN Ocm 2-2 c 1 g =- acoe 1 CIO O 1 Â»:eÂ®R 1 1 CCO C 1 2 C 2 5 N St;gcg Â®C Â® C L.-4 O . L ,-1 0 a d e N 09Â£91 _Ziaa,4.~s ULLE)-= .3, 200.00 too.00 10' UTLITY EASEMENT ONOO 30*gl ?406 <'ONOO (911Â¥ld SV - Eve E)NIHV38 MATTHEW C RCLE S 89'02'36'E 584.52 8;44 4941Â· UMOUS 91 ew aAOJ W.0. 2451 July 6, 1994 EXHIBIT A A portion of Outlot B, Block 1, Mountain Golf Villas Subdivision located in Section 30, T5N, R72W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado being more particularly described as commencing at the Northeast corner of said Outlot B, as monumented by a 1/2" rebar with plastic cap number 15760 ; thence S 84Â°13'28" W a distance of 30.16 feet along the Southerly right-of-way line of Matthew Circle; thence S 00Â°06'19" W a distance of 90.01 feet; thence N 89Â°02'36" W a distance of 14.00 feet along the North line of said Outlot B to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: thence S 00Â°57'24" W a distance of 2.00 feet; thence N 89Â°02'36" W a distance of 29.00 feet; thence N 00Â°57'24" E a distance of 2.00 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence S 89Â°02'36" E a distance of 29.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND ALSO Commencing at the aforementioned "Point A"; thence N 89Â°02'36" W a distance of 13.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. thence S 00Â°57'24" W a distance of 2.00 feet; thence N 89Â°02'36" W a distance of 29.00 feet; thence N 00Â°57'24" E a distance of 2.00 feet; thence S 89Â°02'36" E a distance of 29.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (Description prepared by Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc., Estes Park, CO. 80517) 2-3 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 20, 1994 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Greg Sievers RE: 1994 NBU Mailbox installation The 1994 budget includes $23,000 for the construction and installation of various NBU locations. This value matches the 1993 project quantity. Staff has met with postal personnel for the concept stage of Phase 11. Eight sites have been selected and comment mailers have been sent out and returned. We plan to continue with installations to the south along the Highway 7 corridor. This is where the Postal Service think the most continuity will be maintained. Staff requests to proceed with bidding, letting and construction of this project without further committee meeting reviews if the unit prices and project costs can be kept at or near the 1993 Phase I values without exceeding the budget. This will help to expedite the project and allow construction of Phase 11 by November of this year. The 1993 Phase produced seven locations which have the capacity to serve approximately 650 residents. Phase I is complete and awaits to be fully occupied by residents. We hope to match this quantity in 1994. 4-1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum July 25, 1994 TO: Public Works Committ, FROM: Bill Linnane 12/& Public Works Director SUBJECT: 1994 Water Looping Project Three bids were received for the 1994 Water Department Looping Project. BT Construction is the low bidder with a bid of $141,910. This price is $16,395 lower than the next lowest bid. BT constructed large water line projects for the Town in 1988, 1991, and 1993, and has an excellent record. The budget is $142,000. Contingencies for possible change orders may be financed from the $16,500 account for a carbon feeder at Marys Lake Plant. This feeder will not be purchased due to a recent change to the treatment process. The Town recommends accepting the BT bid of $141,910 and requests that possible change orders be financed from the deleted carbon feeder budget item. The staff will request approval of the Public Works Committee for any change orders. 5-1 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9mc 437 South St. Vraln Estes Park, CO 8051 7 (303) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 Fax (303) 825-8912 July 26, 1994 Bill Linnane Town of Estes Park P.O. BOX 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: 1994 Water Looping Projects Dear Bill: Please find enclosed a Bid Tabulation for the Town of Estes Park 1994 WaterÂ· Looping Projects. Rocky Mountain Consultants, Tne.(RMC) received bids 1' r. (1111 three contractorÂ·s t'or the projects. B'r Construction wa >i low bidder at. $141,910. The budget for the project is $142,000. BT Construction has proven to be a reliable contractor through past project.s per forÂ·med forÂ· the Town of Estes Park. RMC recommends awardirig l,he contract to 13'1' Construction. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 1/ lt:.4-Ut- 03< 4449 Michael S. Todd Civil Engineer MST/mas 5-2 CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING 0000 0000000 0000 0000000 â€¢ ........... 0000 0000000 OLOU-30 0000%030 E8 4--*.... - - -- .i - OCNIP-O CO CON C-' r-, [-9 - LO - - - N -â€¢CO - 4.4/ 40 - 0000 00Â©ornoo 08110 0 0 010,-3 N O-'U-, Sm - M -- O 1-0 co%Â¢N- -rn 165& 0000 0000000 0000 0000000 ....... 2~~ gg@;2! *gggggg 000LO 0000000 =0 --- ON M ----- -rn - ----- 25!20 8=22288 0 ir,m C=Zâ„¢ rn - W= 2 =u *8*z =!t:jocs 0-301.-I- 0000 22=gg~00 2!th;3 0000 01,11,7 0 01.r,00000 mmug z 1 44 o rn â‚¬N O 0â€¢..or--e-1000 r. N t,1 09 01---CNI-- b. -4 LU - H 1 O cj - I- O&-Ed= O 1 - 4#01 - 04# 4~ 4* -- Ul â‚¬9 - - N *Sm= 2 1 - 0i g: 0-11-30 Or-1090 SU22:322 C â‚¬N N - Ul LE] 0--- N 91- m:58 2222 2222=22 ...... 01700 g~~~~00~ %3 E-3-93%- CO - ul on t.flroul - Â» =5 9 -- - - - ornoo 0000â€¢~000 000tr,eÂ·Â·11-11,1 m-Irl - - N -- -Ul-â‚¬N ---LOOâ‚¬NW .... CO L'* 0 â€¢ CO CO U] 0 6. . .J .J W LLI .J ..J-JWJWW --1 + r ME EW Ewma 0- 50 Suletil .--Z 0-<ELLI Z ON--IZ ov,otj=cid -Ul <EC ZOID--W > EWEEm==EGGE~ 0,1.-â€¢-to -dmW LUEn. W. . Wa misEE 4-6%55,466&I 5-4 -(ve-Ul K CION En --- TOTAL EAGEL CLIFF ROAD $37,715.00 $37,615.00 $56,306.00 $53,560.00 KITCHEN & COMPANY U.S. CONTRACTORS, INC. ENGINEERS TOTAL FOR THE 1994 WATERLINE PROJ ------------ $158,305.00 --------- $141,910.00 --------- $234,571.00 --------- 1184,857.00 1994 WATE ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS QTY ECTION 000000 0000000000 0 00000 000000000 000000 0000000000 0 00000 000000000 ................ a~ ts 00000(0 0000000000 00 d tE 0000-a- 000000.100 00-00ul 0000uou-,ornâ€¢.00 - 00000 000ul--00,0 &6 8 01-wOON 0.--cur-riaor-- - -0 orn-oxr -Lor---0,1-- - - 00 -- tr, 0 1-0 - ri 1,1 -- 0 - u-,O-rn - 0- ~ ..7- 4- 40 - - 2 8 00000â‚¬N 0000000rnoo OMOON 00000--00 OHYOON 0000 tr, 10-3 - (9 0-, U-3 SA -- W ~~ ~lf)~~N ~~~~~Mâ„¢EA - rn me =8 000000 0 00000 00 00 0 - 1 0 000 0 000000000 000000 0000000000 0 M 1 Jâ€ž- 00000 000000000 ................. 2-=gge 0000000000 M 0.001-0 000000000 Nou-300-Mur,00 rn crin or-0-in 0000â„¢0~0000 00,-000' t--CO h- O LO LO F-rl CNI LO * -1 -0 Ocochlooul Nul 40 0 04 0 - M 40 00 ------ -------- - O - rn - rn,r, --- Ul - - Ch 0120 OU-3-N - --4- M --- --- CO --- - --- - 8 1 - B 0-0Â·,00 Lr, 000000*U-700 0-0-Ul 00000-â„¢00 001--ornâ„¢ 2!222*grregs Cm 2- 00 0 Log - - - rn --- 9 30 i~0-â„¢ 0000(NEÂ¥3rnoo hâ€¢-1611(\10â€¢1 0- ES - CO j 0 BEWZ 500% tnockz.- 000000 0000000000 0 :SE=:2 00000 000000000 LUIC 0/0 000000 0000000000 0 00000 000000000 ming a M= 410Â£1%*g -O.-J .............. 0000000000 m 000'r,00-00 000,0-,LONâ‚¬9000 1- W:25@ m 1 5'0 20*20 Â°Â°â€¢0-'CV-o-r-0 W c'-1 CO ch, rn - Lf-) IN CO - M 1.0 (-9 1-- LO -x CO C-9 ---4 1-- 6-=- C =0 - - A - 0 - - & ......... -- - - LA_ -4 0 + -4 1 0 U - - - .* =*22 g A - 1-- U-3 - N Ul -rn N -- O OA-0 - 1 - -/9-rn N A N ------ --- - In 0 0 01 - ZOO- =1 =--1=00 - =Jâ€¢-m U I 04 0 .-1 A-OCLU C.0 1 0 0 ir, rn O 0 <9 000U1-- Cuoul ce: 0 1 Ori wioN 00 Lr) el *44 b,1--Ul LUZÂ» Z 1 0â‚¬91(400- 000000-000 0 1 01,100- 0001,300-00 Cm C - 1- Ch'COCON-- â„¢ r =.0 h I ED; - M 40~31-- -- -9,- 1- .O0 -N -rn cy m mg 3; m (= Im8 000000 0000000000 0 00000 000000000 000000 0000000000 0 00000 000000000 ......... d m 00000- 0000000000 - a #ti 0.00000 000U-)00000 1-,LO-00- O 0 0 0 w-) O- AN c> A 0-NO- tr, Lr-3 Or- crâ€¢ c) CN t.r] O :58 40 1-- LO -1 U, 1,1 1,1 ul L.O 91- 91- 40 0 in tr] co C--1 @E GS LOAU-,LO- -0 LD CO - tr) r - Ul ....- - O LO - (N . --- - u.7 - N 0 ,- -LO-N - C> -N---- -- - - m 00000- 00000004*g 6 ED; 0-000, EE = -N --- - 20 - - U.,LO-00- 0000U,0 OU-)LOO- #;22~22NN~~ - 1-3 Ullr]LO--N - rn 1- Z O .0 f-:8 -0--- -M ----rnrÂ·,g~*t - 40â‚¬N- M ---1,1-OU,-W rn- eN - CN M 01 93 .. . ... .. 0 6- L.- â€¢ . >- 1.0 En CO to . - L. 4. â€¢ - 0 U. 0 â€¢Â» .n CO tr, â€¢ . L,- L._ . â€¢ I . - Â«ZO: J--1--ILLI WU, .--1.Ju--11.,1 1-U j j W U.1 , --,Juiwt,3 --IUJw~j--JUJW -6 - BE - 5 ~ -1. AE . -J g Li ~3 &2 E W . r. 56 :Ng LO - :M g m w IMwwdE aWM &=~~em BSES.0 W 4 0-0- cr LU Z 01 J-Ockf Z LULU =~28 2 ZO#!Â»5&' m (1 Z Otrl Wâ‚¬IX- OODCOOUU=rk:C- 04 Z ON J Z 1.- o.oattl Ch=[1:C- CJ .- n>ocroir----ew > m 0 -Ulcqczo -- - 1-U LU LU > E- tr, ~ 0- --+ + + ,->>I 0-L,-1 0, ~,4 HI >OCD-~+ +t-~00-0-1-LIEkS C tr) c.r, LU ~ 00-*CC)ZC<)-O-ZW Z C tr, a com<[Ch<-O-0.Zw 2: C39Â¢*torqccmth':M~onn g 5; 52:12WMS~ 1--1.LI>00-Ul 0/ .-1 0-J-wg~ ti t; 6; 18 . . '. gi m z .==22% mÂ°Â°do< 5-3 g =. 0 . 01,0- /- CO ul co - L> -- C, CD LU X LU u) U) LU - Ul i WW W CJ N I N -â€¢ tr) e . . .Lu NA > -Â·-<re - I- 40 -4 L. c ZE H .O U 04 In EX) a. C, DI ZI CO W ~662556 JiwMLAL&225 -J 8 4.4,446,4,~;,4 ele,Si:itiviE @ 8 .4.44404 14445!dele! - u KITCHEN & COMPANY U. S. CONTRA CTORS, INC. ENGINEERS 00'6t8'iL$ 00'0EB~88$ 00.ZZ&'ES; 00'6IE~89$ 3AI36 3NIHW0100 01 3AI30 HBIH 1Vlm. 1994 WATE UNITS QTY N0I103N TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT JUNE 1994 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION - MAIN 71.00 64.50 13 UTILITY LOCATION - SERVICE 15.00 19.50 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 16 TAP REQUEST 8.00 21.00 17 WATER QUALITY - TASTE 18 WATER QUALITY - ODOR 19 WATER QUALITY - COLOR 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: HIGH 1.00 0.50 21 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: LOW 3.00 3.00 22 FROZEN LINES: MAIN 23 FROZEN LINES: SERVICE 24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN 1.00 6.00 25 LINE BREAKS: SERVICE 2.00 7.00 30 METER REPAIR 23.00 32.75 31 FINAL INSPECTION 3.00 2.50 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: WATER 41 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: PARKS 42 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: STREETS 44 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: OTHER 50 STREET REPAIR 2.00 1.25 ' 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 5.00 6.75 54 STORM DRAINAGE 4.00 5.00 55 TRAFFIC HAZARD 60 OTHER 9.00 18.75 TOTALS FOR JUNE 1994 147.00 188.50 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 147.00 141.00 89.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 188.50 168.25 236.75 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) +4.25%/+12.04% +235%/+94.5% +65.17%/-20.38% Rl-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK JUNE 1994 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for May 14,1994 through June 13,1994: May 14 to 31 Water Treated: * Fall River O Glacier Creek 8,657,000 Marys 21,781,000 June 1 to 13 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 13,940,000 Marys 12,845,000 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 57,223,000 Gal. 2)Accountable Water Adjustments: 2,483,700 Billing: 37,237,940 *Backwash 0 Total Water accounted for: 39,721,640 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 69% 4.) 12 MONTH AVE. PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 77% R2-1 t WATER.XLS JUNE, 1994 ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 136,000 2.) Bleeders TOTAL BLEEDERS (Gal.) 2,327,700 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 16-Jun Morgan St. abandon 20,000 b. C. d. e. f. g. h. 1. j. TOTAL FLUSHING, MISC. (Gal.) 20,000 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) 2,483,700 R2-2 TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS) 1993 1993 1994 1994 MONTH YTD . MONTH . YTD . 56 96 MONTH TOTAL TOTAL ~ TOTAL TOTAL ~ CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) ~ i (GAL.) (GAL.) (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 26,042,370 26,042,370: 26,254,900 26,254,900 1% FEBRUARY 21,131,280 47,173,650: . 23,570,900 49,825,800 12% MARCH 26,485,160 73,658,810 25,802,800 75,628,600 -3% APRIL 22,764,110 96,422,920 25,339,400 100,968,000 11% MAY 40,059,420 136,482,340 41,750,328 142,718,328 4% JUNE 54,127,530 190,609,870 63,441,300 206,159,628: 17% 8% JULY 71,039,000 261,648,870 AUGUST 62,554,600 324,203,470 SEPTEMBER 42,196,410 366,399,880 OCTOBER 31,229,400 397,629,280> NOVEMBER 23,165,000 420,794,280 DECEMBER 28,057,300 448,851,5803 TOTAL 448,851,580 AC - FT 10,304 R2-3 fgggE TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS JUNE, 1994 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL MARYS . TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS (GAL) CFS (GAL) 1 0 638,000 638,000 0.99 1,224,000 1.91 , 1,862,000 2 0 666,000 666,000 1.04 802,000 1.25 1,468,000 3 0 641,000 641,000 1.00 , 881,000 1.37 1,522,000 4 0 275,000 275,000 0.43 1,236,000 1.92 1,511,000 5 0 247,000 247,000 0.38 1,422,000 2.21 ' 1,669,000 6 0 1,548,000 1,548,000 2.41 893,000 1.39 . 2,441,000 7 0 1,597,000 1,597,000 2.49 580,000 0.90 2,177,000 8 0 1,167,000 1,167,000 1.82 757,000 1.18 1,924,000 9 0 1,161,000 1,161,000 1.81 1,279,000 1.99 ~ 2,440,000 10 0 1,172,000 1,172,000 1.82 1,081,000 1.68 : 2,253,000 11 0 1,513,000 1,513,000 2.36 890,000 1.39 2,403,000 12 0 1,679,000 1,679,000 2.61 917,000 1.43 2,596,000 13 0 1,636,000 1,636,000 2.55 883,000 1.37 2,519,000 14 0 1,519,000 1,519,000 2.37 734,000 1.14 } 2,253,000 15 0 1,571,000 1,571,000 2.45 742,000 1.16 1 2,313,000 16 0 1,669,000 1,669,000 2.60 880,000 1.37 : 2,549,000 17 0 1,722,000 1,722,000 2.68 821,000 1.28 2,543,000 18 0 1,797,000 1,797,000 2.80 866,000 1.35 2,663,000 19 0 1,645,000 1,645,000 2.56 907,000 1.41 : 2,552,000 20 0 1,060,000 1,060,000 1.65 703,000 1.09 1,763,000 21 0 1,049,000 1,049,000 1.63 752,000 1.17 Â· 1,801,000 22 0 1,072,000 1,072,000 1.67 625,000 0.97 1,697,000 23 0 1,077,000 1,077,000 1.68 619,000 0.96 1,696,000 24 0 1,283,000 1,283,000 2.00 675,000 1.05 * 1,958,000 25 0 1,562,000 1,562,000 2.43 626,000 0.97 2,188,000 26 0 1,527,000 1,527,000 2.38 969,000 1.51 2,496,000 27 0 1,760,000 1,760,000 2.74 1,000,000 1.56 2,760,000 28 0 1,799,000 1,799,000 2.80 842,000 1.31 2,641,000 29 0 1,837,000 1,837,000 2.86 857,000 1.33 , 2,694,000 30 0 1,871,000 1,871,000 2.91 702,000 1.09 : 2,573,000 31 0 - - 0.00 - 0.00 0 TOT. 0 39,760,000 39,760,000 1.98 26,165,000 1.31 65,925,000 AF 0.00 122.03 122.03 80.30 202.33 CFS 0.00 1.98 1.98 1.31 3.29 BL(-) N/A N/A N/A N/A -2,483,700 GAL 0 39,760.000 39,760,000 26,165,000 63,441,300 AF 0 122.03 122.03 80.30 194.71 1st-13 0 13,940,000 12,845,000 14 - 31 0 25,820,000 13,320,000 R2-4 1 .1 1 ....... Â·iÂ·Â·Pili,iÂ·Â·Â·i'r iÂ·rÂ·Â·'Â·1~~viTTIrl~1Â·1 .....Il ....,1 'u'la! *66K 1 1, ~444,41 11 11 1.1 7 1.1111 1.11 111 ! 1 . 1 I 1661. 9 ' 1.El â€ž lili e- i 11 1 11:111" 1 066L 25 - -,1. 1.111, 1 1 -1 1 1.1 111 1 1. 1 ..r.14 ~ 1 ~ M I ~11 ~ 1111 t 111 11,1 U 111111111, I l l 11 1,1,11 1111 1,11, l t 11 ~ , ~,1 ~ , t, ~ 11,1,11,11,1 11,11,1,1111â€ž,11,11,11,1,1 I l l * w w, . j &11 -111 111 1 11 1. 1 I I lili-~ lilli 1 111111 lili 11 1 9961, -- 4 1, IIi ~miti,imti,Ii,1,1,Ii,littimit'i, 11,1,111'11,11 1,11Â·,1,â€¢,|1111;,1, hit''ilm Ill'11Â·'114.. ~~ ~ "~ ~ 4 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ 296K " 1 till. 9861 1 996 J I 11 11- 1 VL,LE,L~ t,861. 4...1 1- I'z Â£96 K f jqi:/, I w E86L 1 Â· 1 4- 11 1 1 N- 0 R2-5 - 120,000,000 -r 100,000,000 -, 80,000,000 -7 GALLONS 60,000,000 Lf /-- 000'000'01, T- 000'000'01 32 CIO I sy 4. i Â· Â· i i :: 1% 114.imf-"7- Tift--arr r.'.'" 7 ....... 1"''"I.'-f 1-~ Â·'-Â·p~'4Â· ),~ .~,1~ 11 1 1 11 1 : 1, 1 1 1 - '16 111.1111111111111'11 1 lili .. 1111'....... 11'...1. 1 1 1 1. &~i i AL i, wm i 4%, i. irni, i, iii ,â€¢41 1, ii, in~ i.,ii,ii,â€¢iÂ·i,â€¢i,ii,ii,ii,ii,ii,ii, A i n i,i,~i6.0,.0,â€ži ihi, i6 â€¢i â€¢ i~. i,ii,16Â»,iâ€¢t 4 ......11,1 10\ \ \ i :: 1 VL ~':~~~~,0,r - i . . 19 1.111.111" .1, ..'.L F lili 11 1- .. ~, i,i ,â€ž, ,i,â€ž,i, ,6, iâ€ž~,?i â€ž,i â€ž'V), i ,~,~)'i i',6, A l,i; ;lumiilli 111 ~| Ill I~ 64 . 44+~~+~m++~4~+*+*+11+~+11 1 111111.1111. 1.1 lilli ,1.1.. lili.1 1 . It 41111.111111"lilli r~11,1,1,111",milk"'111,1,1 1,111,11,1,1 iii"10,11 '11,1, 11'kili';11'J 1 11,11 '1 1~,1111, 11"k" 1,~ - q 1 ..1.1 -- Â·: ill'111Â¢-111,11,1111:11111111,1,111'1111,111::liti,111'11't,1111â€¢111'1111:1111.- . ~1111,11,11,111,1,111,1,11 11,11,1,1,1 111Â£1,111! i.,1,111'ilim '1 11 -1 1 1 -77-2 . 1 11 . V lili .1. 11'lili .1 1 up'1111,111,111,11,1 1~11 1 11'ill'11,1,1,11 ~ 1 11~1 1 1,10 '1. 11 1 .44.112 11 3nN3A3hl R2-6 JUNE & YTD REVENUE 9.4% NArm al* m *66 L Â£66/ 166L L66L 066k 696L 996L 296L 996L 996K *96 L Â£96k 1961. LZE.ME- Â·Â· Â· .o:. 500,000.00 - hIVEA 450,000.00 -r 400,000.00 -1 350,000.00 -f 300,000.00 -1 250,000.00 j 2- 00 000'001 r- 00'000'09X .*- 00'00WOOL 7.,-- 00 000'09 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER CONSERVATION EFFORT Free Water Saver Fixture Kits In an effort to assist Estes Park residents in water conservation, the Town is providing free water conservation plumbing fixture kits to its Water Department customers. The water saver kit contains the following: 1 low use shower head which limits usage to 2.5 gallons per minute 2 low use sink aerators which limit usage to 2 gallons per minute 1 toilet dye tablet packet to check for leaks One free kit will be allowed per family and motels may have kits equal to the number of units. The water saver fixtures will cut shower and sink usage by as much as one half - saving our valley residents precious water and money and controlling the consumption of our natural resouces. Kits may be picked up at the Public Works Department in the Engineering wing on the east end of the first floor of the Municipal Building at 170 MacGregor. R4-1 JUN-25-1994 00:37 P.02 SHARED SAVINGS APPROACH based on a shared savings concept. The WASCOs compare the result- ing lower water tv- ith baseline data, and take- â€ž150 percent of the mer: ,~S@f savings over SELLING WATER after the initial repayment retiod- sevr- ~~*d- ray back its capital in~ e.0.*1â‚¬ and profit, leaving the ren- of the savings-and all of it ! EFFICIENCY spent on energy for water heating is for the water customer. Addition- ally, most do not take credit for energy savings, so the money not kept by the customer. Reprinted from In Business, (215) 967-4135 SHARED SAVINGS BENEFITS 419 State Ave The shated savings concept B Emmaus PA 18049 bortowed fwin the enetgy seivice N 1988, half of the fee assessed Investing in company (ESCO) field. By hinging to owners of the Pinewood Hill term performance of the water effi- the company's profits on the long- Condominiums in Ft. Washing- ciency niensures, the WASCO 1133 a ton, Mao,land, was for water residential water great incentive to install and main- use-a whopping 387 gallons/ tain reliable technologies. To ensure unit/day. Neighbors were tat- (0715ervatiO71--~etter the payback, WASCOs find it cost. tling on each other for washing effective tO visit a building to Qx their cars too often, slid weren't toilets, showerheads, any leak or to invest in a more thrilled with the extra $60 per unit expensive and well engineered part. the association had to charge to fixing leaks-is "We want to fu leaks because we cover water bills. know it's out money going down the Diane Sakadales, administrator of the condominiums, resolved to cut blinging profits to a dtain," says Totly Foxen, of Water Management, Inc. water use. Volunteers and hired plumbers nied to inspect units for that the key to water efbciency is handful of savvy Several companies have noted leaks, but homeowners were not not a quick teclmological fix, but a enthusiastic. 'Illey would have to elltl-(3~TelleUTS. longer-term cortunitment to nwinte. pay for repairs, and would open nance and business integrity. Individ- themselves to peer pressure if they uals signing contracts with WASCOs turned out to be a water waster. As Andrew Jones should beware of language that does the annual homeowners' meeting not commit them to long tenn diew near, and water use continued maintenance. to escalate, the Board of Directors The greatest challenge for these anticipated a rebellion. Management Inc. grossed two.thirds companies has been metering and Fortunately, a revolt was avoided. that much. The water utility, con measuring the savings. Recouping Water Management inc. of A[exan- vinced that the tonda association one's investment and earning profits dria, Virginia offered them a unique could not pos#ibly save so much depend on the quantity of the . deal. The water service company water, replaced the complex's meter savings, so water service companies would fix leaks and install water twice. must go to great pins to ensure efficient equipment for free, ancl Across the country, water service accuracy in measurement. Inaccu- take 50 percent of the water savings companies (or WASCOs) are har. racy is largely a function of the Inige as payment. It was a win-win deal nessing the power of the market to number of relevant but not always for the condominium association accomplish important environmenÂ· cont,ollabic variables: occupancy can and {he environmental entrepre- tai tasks. They have discovered a fluctuate; droughts or rains can neur. lucrative niche-investing iii water affect behavior: weather can change The approach 6ucceeded. New efficiency. In A,izona, California, lawn watering; leaks can skew re- washers, toilet flush valves, water Florida, Colorado, and Virginip, Stdt5. In One sense, this natural efficient showerhead;, and faucer WASCOs are writing contracts for variability increases the installer's aeratots dropped per unit water use apartment buildings, schools, and gamble. In artother, it gives an by 54 percent (from 387 to 180 housing developments, to retrofit incentive for retrofits to cover niote gallons per unit per day) after a them with water efficient equipment water-using techilolegies so as to year. And their continuing mainte (ultia low flush toilets, high eff- diversify and thereby reduce the nance has kept the use that low. ciency showerheads, faucet aerators, overall risk. For example, if a hot Pinewood Hills has saved over etc.) 2nd fix leaks for free. spell would increase rhe load on a $ 100,000 in six years, and Water Thc financial arrangements are building's cooling towers, a WASCO 51 IN BUSMSS MAY/JUNE 1992 COURTESY OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE, SNOWMASS, CO R4-2 JUN-25-1994 00:40 P.01 I Conservation Solutions, Inc. of 1 J.S., has been iniplementing water ffÂ»F:ilf,22Â·;2eg:,t~t,~*;,",,:",~64,2:11:3:3Â· Santa Monica, California (213.458. efficiency through a shared savings ..,0.Â·idi?:,Â· i., 75=5Â·â€¢=,.,.~ 6119) and Medway, Massachusetts plan fur four years. 1ts primary qg* funds water emciency mensuref rang. customer has been apartment build- , - ,.'4' ing in cost from $25,000 up to ings, where it claims 30 - 52 pcrcent fs- 0.Â· several miltion dollars. The corn. reduction in water and sewer bills, 91Â¢26.-f:%40?-I.; 21. pany currently has projects in vari- but they are also expanding into r.4",-4.;Â·idlii:labUm*,Illllllin *i'i.' ous stages ofdevelopment for several nursing homes, college dormitories, 949.2.ag=.-==---- 4,-4.1.4.5 , school districts, universities, and shopping centers, and H.U.D. hous- HUD housing products, k is also ing ptojects. Boulder/Den- 4:Â·, 4,4: t developing projects involving irriga- WaterTek Water Conservation tion and water recycling and reuse. Systems. Inc. of the . r:.14 ; :4:ifly J 447Â·iÂ· .iÂ·Â·Â·:,~- Strategic Planning Gioup of Phoe. ver, Colorado atea (303-499.7336), y, ,,' FLÂ·:; nix, Arizona (602-840-7010) does focuses largely on commercial. .. ...Â·:.,.~Â· : 7.... ,Â¢;Â·: whole system retrofits for apartment residential customers such as hotels, rit.,6.20327:::6099:.}il.2Ii;.7-+13.'-: and office buildings. Its original apartments, condos, etc, but also ,â€¢6*4*416Â·04 1.Â·&4,d Â»6 *9 15 46,41~'1 *,â€¢Di'uÂ·dâ€¢4* 1,Â·*I41[Â·4Â·.21:5.Â·Â·Â·4 + Â· work with water-efficient techno[0- has services for agricultural and Ultra-low-flush loilels can help sove gies has expanded into energy em- industrial water users. They offer over 30 percent of Indoor water use. ciency (particularly lighting) and water conse,vation activities, includ. even waste separation for recycling- ing computer analysis, system de. might consider ensuring that che Its shared savings contract originally sign, and product supply as well as tower is using water as efficiently as apportioned 70 percent of the sav- shared savings plans. 0 pos. ible. ings for the company. More recently it has restructured contracts to di. Andicw Jolles is a research auociate itt HOW MUCH CAN BE SAVED? rect 100 percent of the first dollars the Water Program at Rocky Mouncairt Retrofitting a typical home with to pay off the capital cost. with a I,istiture, a FIC,*YOF< CO*Craticit ultra.low.flush toilets, high.effi. 50/50 cut thereafter, for tile length founded in 1 982 17 energy ana!,sts ciency showerheads, and faucet aeraÂ· of the contract (usually around 10 Hunter and Amou Lovins. For a free tots and repairing leaks regularly years.) water program publication list unite Co can easily save over 30 percent of American Water and Energy Sav the fruticute at 1739 Snowmass Creek indoor water 'use. Using national ers of Miami, Florida (305-378- Read, Snotenwlss CO 81654.9199. averages for a family of four, that is 8923), as well as other parts of the (303) 927Â·3851. worth $54 each year. With a 50/50 split of the savings, the WASCO gets $27 (minus costs) and the DO SOMETHING REALLY GOOD customer gets $27. The stronger incentive for the customer could bc the energy sav- FOR THE ENVIRONMENT....AND ingE. Retrofitting just the oidinary showerheads with the high-elli. FOR YOURSELF ciency Sort wit[ save the customer $36 per year through water heater Own your own recycling business! energy savings. Faucet aerators will bring a bit more. This is straight Over 200,000.000 gationt of toxic, u<cd There are dozens of auto dcEterships, saving for the customer, ar least for ,nti-freeze ate Jumped down drains and gitages. trvice slitio,15. corponte and now. In time, more service comp. onto the ground elch year' Strict nov laws government owned flects, truck lines. ionÂ· nies will realize the interconnected in many aie.3$ require 11,11 p-1 antiÂ·Fieeze ftniction companies and miny others in nature of resources and will most be recycled or dibrx,3ed of as loxic waile your lieâ€¢ tbal need this servict You can likely offer whole system retrofits Licensed toxk wiste dicpoul companier tecyrle usâ‚¬d anti-fircre Onlitt. quickly using the shared savings plan are charging up to $6.00 per Mtion to ,nd timply. by using our system and dispose of it. Recycling li the obviouc restore it to goed u ntâ€¢ coodloot The following are some examples answer! of water service companies: Water Management, Inc. of Alexandria, You un make rÂ·nor. ti,oâ€žey iti.n you e ver clie.rird pti-,blc. Virginia (703-658-4300) serves the Contact ti, quickly before you, 1,0 4 uken' metropolitan Washington, D.C. area, which lias close to the highest water Call Or Write Today! rates in the country. Since 1980, this company has serviced over 120,000 units, averaging 33 percent 4*1 water savings. It works on a variety ECOSYS-1-EM of payment plans, including shared 71 'Nt. savings, emphasizing continued rein. P.O. Box 1893. Thomasville, Ga 3 I 799 9!2-228-6888 spections and repairs as the key to sustained water savings. MAT/JUNE 1*92 53 IN IUSINESS 00URTESY OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE, SNOWMASS, 00 R4-3 'hcloccutes* c, vee, A/trnoemer, 1 1 JUN-25-1994 00:37 P.01 . 1 -ir Fax Note 7671 Date 7/Dr- 686. 14 1 -AE the. k~ 190,â‚¬ Â»rlÂ« 81-4 +Â£ Water Efficiency Sampler 'e N enone N 40 7 -343-( t &6/594.4901 I Scott Chaplin 'Fax 0 1,2 7 - 34,2, 1 Rocky Mountain Institute Water Program j December 1991 , A revolution is occurring among water management planners as their focus turns away \ from large s*Fly-side projects such as dams and canals and toward demand-5ide ) projects including residential retroft programs, irrigation efficiency programs. and commercial and industrial reuse and efficiency projects. The following case studies i provide just a few examples of the many water eficiency projects actually underway, More detailed information on the5â‚¬ and many other case studies, as well as general inforination on water efficiency, is available from Rocky Mountain Institute Water Program, 1739 Snowmass Creek Road, Snowmass CO 81654-9199. Water and Energy Utility Partnerships - Two Connecticut water utilities have formed an alliance with a local electrical utility to promote residential water and energy efficiency. In a pilot program of 1,100 home audits, contractors visit hornes to install water- and energy-e fficient hardware. The utilities split installation cost in an innovative way: if the home has an electric water heater, the electrical utility pays for the labor, and if the home has a gas Water heater, the utilities share thc labor costs. (Bruce Wall, Northeast Utilities, Box 270, Hartford CT 06141). Irrigation Improvements - In Lubbock, Texas, utility-financed irrigation efficiency PIOjeCIS have led to savings between 25% and 40% and a reduction in the annual aquifer depiction rate from 1.4 million to 0.2 million gallons per year. These projects include replacing unlined ditches with pipelines, shortening furrows and watering them in surges, recirculating tailwater at a faster rate to reduce evaporation, using soil moisture monitoring devices such as gypsum blocks (which can also increase yields),and switching from high to low pressure sprinkler systems. (Wayne Wyatt, High Plains Water DistliCt, 2930 Ave. Q, Lubbock 1X 79405) Composting Toilets and Graywater Systems - In New Jersey, the need for a sewer hookup or a septic system was avoided in tile construction of two public resnoom facilities which were equipped with composting toilets and graywater systems. Ihe graywater from one of the facilities is used in a solar greenhouse. OVilliam Clothier, "Using Composting Instead of a Septic System: It Works In New Jersey,"P&R Magazine, June 1987) Rebate Programs - In Mesa, Arizona, local officials developed a rebate program for landscape water efficiency improvements. As a result, some participants use 40% less water than their turf- intensive neighbors. (Bill Bates, Water Conservation Office, Box 1466, Mesa AZ 85211) Dual Plumbing Systems - In St. Petersburg, Florida, the local utility developed a dual distribution system to use reclaimed water for non-potable needs, providing approximately 18-21 million gallons per day (1/3 of total city consumption) for ilse in irTigation and dooling. This system will eliminate the need for new water sources and expansion of water facilities until 2030 - 2050. (Joe Towry, Public Utilities Department, 290 16th St. North, St. Petersburg FL 33713) Centralized Treatment and Reuse - Sanitation districts iii and around Los Angeles, California supply an annual average of 63 million gallons per day of reclaimed water to local customers. This tertiary-treated effluent, which meets or exceeds bacterial and otlier drinking water standards and is virus-free, is retailed at 45%-85% of the potable water rate, and is used for almost all non-potable purposes, such as irrigation of paiks, golf courses, and other landscaped areas, irrigation of food crops, livestock, recreational impoundments, industrial processes, cooling towers, construction, and groundwater recharge. (Chuck W. Carry, Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, Box 4998, Whittier CA 9()607) ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE WATER PROGRAM SNOWMASS, CO R4-4 JUN-25-1994 00:38 P.03 1 Onsite Treatment and Reuse - In Essex County, New Jersey, the Roseland III office park development, a 360,000 square foot project serving over 1,100 people, uses approximately 6290 less Water than comparable commercial buildings. These savings are accomplished through the use ' of an onsite wastewater recycling system which treats the building's wastewater and reuses the reclaimed water for flushing toilets and urinals. Similar projects have resulted in watcr savings as great as 90%. (John Irwin, Thetford Systems, Inc., Box 1285, Ann Arbor MI 48106) Low.Income Housing Retrofits - The Lower Colorado River Authority in Austin, Texas, has completed a demonstration project at several low-income public housing sites, retiofitting 1.6 gallon-per-flush toilets in place of 5.0 gallon-per-flush toilets. Water use reductions Ianged from 23.0 to 27.5 gallons per person per day at various sites. (Nora Mullarkey, Lower Colorado River Authority Water Efficiency Department, P.O. Box 220, Austin TX 78767) Commercial and Institutional Efficiency Programs - In Massachusetts, water use audi!s were conducted for a variety of facilities, including universities, laboratories, hospitals, and businesses. Savings of 10% to 73% were anticipated via fixture modifications, better maintenance practices, flow and pressure controls, and cooling system recirculation. On average, it was found that a facility could reduce water use by 20% to 30% with a SiTI]ple payback for the investment of 1.3 years. (Laura MÂ¢Grath, Demand Management for Industry: Clearing the Hurdles to Implementation, Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, 100 First Ave., Charlestown MA 02129, 1990, pp.2,3) Hotel Retrofits - The Lenox Hotel in Boston reduced its avenlge water demand by about 40% (3.6 million gallons per year water savings and $15,000 annual cost savings) by replacing conventional plumbing fixtures in its 220 rooms with high-efficiency fixtures. These savings have been achieved with no reduction in fixture performance or customer satisfaction and with no problems with wastewater flow. (Amy Vickers, Amy Vickers & Associates, 100 Boylston St., Suite 702, Boston MA 02116) University Efficiency Programs - At Edinboro University in Pennsylvania, dormitories were retrofitted with high-efficiency showerheads, faucet aerators, arid other retrofit devices, which led to savings of approximately 11 million gallons per year, or 20% of the University's previous consumption. Utility costs - water, sewer, and energy - were reduced by $52,000 per year, at a total program cost, including labor, of $ 11,000. (Tom Fidler, State Water Plan Division, Dept. of Environmental Resources, Box 8761, Harrisburg PA 17123-8761) Agricultural Transfers - Casper, Wyoming obtained 2,000 acre-feet of water per year for municipal use in return for repairing and lining parts of local irrigation canal and lateral systems to reduce seepage. (David Hilt Board of Public Utilities, 200 N. David St., Casper WY 82601) Hookup Fee Incentives - Builders in Morro Bay, California are given the option to save, in existing structures, twice as much water as they need, or pay the standard hookup fee. As a result, private builders have retrofitted 50% of all homes and businesses with high-efficiency plumbing fixtures. (William Farrell, City of Morro Bay, 595 Harbor St., Morro Bay CA 93442) Repairing Leaks - In New York City during fiscal year '90-91, 26 fullÂ·Â·tillie workers surveyed over 90% of the city's 57,000 miles of water mains. With a budger of $1.5 niillion for labor and equipment, they fixed 66 bireaks and 671 leaks, yielding an estimated Savings of 49 million gallons per day. (Ian Michaels, New York City Department of Environmental Protection, Room 2454, Municipal Building, 1 Center Street, New York NY 10007) Comprehensive Programs - In Goleta, California, over 17,000 ultra-low-flush toilers have been installed in the last few years, most with a $50-$80 rebate from the local Utility. 1-he utility has also distributed 35,000 high-efficiency showerheads, implemented rate structure changes, and conducted onsite water use surveys. These measures, in addition to some emergency dIought measures, led to a reduction in water use of 50% and nduction in sewage flow of over 50%, thus eliminating, for now, the need for a multi-million-dollar treatment plant expansion. (Larry Farwell, Dept. of Water Resources, Box 942836, Sacramento CA 94236) Rocky Mountain Institute Water Program Snowmass, 00 R4-5 e eR,ra- July 26, 1994 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: . Art Anderson --7~ Executive Diredfor RE: RIVERWALK PROJECT-PHASE 3 UPDATE Location The Riverwalk-Phase 3 project will be located in the area from the Nagl Walkway bridge to the east side of the Park Theatre Mall. It involves approximately 150 feet of the Fall River. The Authority has received easements for the area of construction. Design Features This section of the Riverwalk will continue the design features found in the adjacent Riverside Plaza. The riverwall on the north and south banks of the Fall River will be stacked sandstone. The walkways will be structurally supported because of the limited space the Authority has to work in. The walkway will be constructed to ADA standards. A public bridge will'be constructed adjacent to the Park Theatre Mall to complete the circulation pattern. The south side of the River will have a platform area to provide views of the North side and the river. The Nagl bridge will have a new railing installed to match the existing bridges in the Plaza. Time Table Construction is anticipated to start in late September and work in the river completed in November. The walkway work will start as the riverwall is completed. Project will be completed in May 1995. Conclusion This project completes the redevelopment and improvements to the Riverside Plaza area. R7-1 ' U ' ' .. 1 -i I t.5 + I. .'L 1 .Â©t 4- 1. ,\4 5 24, ?, 1 , It. :,1 4 t,>1 4 .f .1 '. \ .p. 791 5. L ..> .. i. . I , U I ./ ... . 4 I .:./. 00 0 . 6. I -- I .= .. I I I .. ..1 .4 . W I . 2 . . . I I A. 0 A A AD. 0 0 ~ .A- A ... 0 0 b. i. 0 0 . .. A- . -. . . 4 . ..- I " .. 0 0 0-AD. DD4. el . - I i' . . D . . . . . ..... ...... *. . . ... . ... I . . - . . I . I . 6 I .#- I-/ 4 . .- 0 0 - . :2. 4 0 .. ..... 1 - .. . . - - I . .. . t - 4 . .4 . - ..1 -1 -/ . ... I I ... - e . -./ #. . . 11. I Â§1 I . . . . - I - - 0, . 4 . - 4 1, 40 - - I ..': ' ' - I . :.1 2, I . W ..4. I 4,Â¥ 0 - ) . I Z . 1 4 -- I -40 0..... - -- . . .. 0 . I ?. W - ... S . 4 . 4 . - .r b. 4 ... . ...8. el - 4*.a r F.' I . ... 0 - 4 . I. ... 4. ./ --...... . I -4 ... . . .- .0 0 : I It. 0 reMPT . A - -..... 344 . f .. ....... I - I . -1 . . . - I . I A-- ..... 4 . P ..... .. ..... *... - . - D . .. 0 - . .... ... Â· i N. 8 . . 0 1. . . -I . I . ./.- ... 9 .. 6/b - -I/* I- .. , . r.. - 0 ... ... ..... . .. Â· .fit * p Â· Â· :'. - -0 4 : 92 3 .1 1 -1 1 4/ . . -4- , . 4 9 Â· I. , I f .-. I el .... - . ft*.-1 - I .. .1 - . I *.- .. -. ... . n. . ./. O 0 . .. ... . .- . S .. . a . D. â‚¬ . a - -/ I - ' I + . 3*, " 2 1 M . 0 . . 0 ....t . A . 0 .. . .. .. .. 0 I .#.- - ./ 0 . . Ar /& b . , . .. '. 4 . I 0 0 0 .0 . D. e . . . - 4 0 I. 4 . " 4 .... 0 , D .. . . 1 : I .... =0.-, 0 - - . 4. 0 - . . . . .. - 0 . .. a . . Â¢ 1. . G . . 0- 0 . I . 0. 1 + . 0 V * 2 I . B. 41 4 .. I . . 1 - l. h J ./. .1 ' : *Ar FN ./. . C 94 . li 1; 1 + 1*,I .,Â·, ./.A 221*,/ 6 -ke - - h â€ž%:31,42 1, -tft ''4~ ..:04,piy~'.i~ .1;INÂ· *19' 1,0.6 -47 4 -r /5 1 :r $ COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY MAP OF *14 STEEL MOUNTAIN GOLF VILLAS OF ESTES PARK, A CONDOMINIUM PIN S 87'07'18"E 246.41 PaC 15760 - -01" PIPE 110 CD 3/8 OUTLOT A STEEL 1- PIN S 89'57'46"E PBC !5760 0 0 A/' - NOTES: OUTLOT A IS AVAILABLE FOR ALL 1. Boundary dimensions and property N 78 19'45" W UNDERGROUND PUBLIC UTILITIES ' ~''0 - :m description shown hereon are based 4/0 1% COMMUNITY DRIVE upon the plat of Mountain Golf Villas 0 Subdivision ( PUBLIC STREET ) 2. All utility and access easements shown V y. , hereon are as created in the plat of COP ' Mountain Golf Villas Subdivision. â‚¬ 0 d Pac 15760 N 89'57'46"W 463.26 P8 C 15760 68.23 N 83'49'36"W 4.42 1 19' 0 recorded August 26, 1993 at 01 N .- 0 4321 83 1 | PC 15760 111 -- \\</0.-- * 3. The name of the common interest Reception No. 93061713. 0 ---=15760-30.63 / 007 1 ~ I community is Mountain Golf Villas | | of Estes Park, a condominium. 40.00 1 1 el - _106- - *** 4. The following Units are fully 0 4 * *gb I 1 1~ 1 -27- - - described and defined in this map: - 1 a.2 - --Â»1 i Units 1, 2. 3, 8, 9 and 10, Block 1, 1 It ' 9 32 1 11 1- 47 121 1 111 and Unit 6, Block 2. 111 | I '4 ' ' The other Units identified on the N 68Â°46'45" E -- P8C 9485 1 1 |- General Schematic Plan contained herein 9 1 3.42 4 I | will be more fully described and PBC 6499 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 defined on a supplement or supplements fl -%O-~- p. 15,1 -1 -1 - / /33 to this map to be hereafter executed 1 5.L - , %>39â‚¬ / -00 - - 15'151 and recorded. -1 19 I: %44;i~?Yfe / 1 19. j 19. 1 r--J L--1 5. The Development Rights and Special 50' ___ PaC 15760 I r-- J L -- cr*fJO~U~T, / iL - . 20:3~1~trf. Ee> 19. 19. Declarant Rights set forth in PaC 15760 -- - - 1 0 u B 1 N / Â«1(L / 1 W h Section 7.1 (a) of the Declaration are 0 U! | | reserved in the areas so identified on r ' JU- %<M 1 I I the General Schematic Plan. The | I I Development Rights and Special 1 1 I Declarant Rights set forth in Sections 7.1(b), 7.4, 7.5, 7.6. 7.7 and 1 1 7.8 of the Declaration are reserved I within all areas shown on this map. 1 1 1 0 -./ 1 01 0 1 0 1 1 I 8 8 1 % 4 k 1 9 XI V 5 ZR 1 1 5 1 6 1 12 + 1 bl 1 k 14 k 0 4 0 1 4 % 1 1 1 2 -t i 1 8 4 9* 1 I h zk- 1 1 *1 % 1 9 2 19 9 2 1 -1 k I INEI Â·;6" ~ASPHAL b I ly I , DRIVE OUTLOTS 88 C ARE RESERVED FOR J -~ 1 / 19. Ck - 12 19. 1 ~ f<L.C.E. 1 UTILITIES 8 ACCESS ( PUBLIC ) ) 19 k 19 0 / 1*\ \ Ck: 0 ~ ~ ef \ ) 19' -@ igÂ· l ~ J UNIT 6 N 1 9 L.C.E. = LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT U / C\ \ Â¥'3\ ~ BLOCK 2 r L~\ / CONC. / / BENCH MARK NO. 3325 SET IN CONC. 1 136' /,-h \ \ 1 NOTE: ALL ELEVATIONS RELATIVE TO USGS BRASS OWNER'S CERTIFICATE ' /9\ \ \ \ WALK EAST OF HWY NO. 7 AND 125' WEST OF COMMUNITY DR. 0\ \ L.C.E. / ~ j ELEVATION OF BM. 7657.12 Martin Exploratien Management Company, a Colorado \ PATIO . 10 limited partnership, in its capacity as the Declarant L.C.E. 1 / 0\ \\ by ratification of that certain Declaration of P8C 15760 87.96 ~/ 1 10 UTILITY -1---------------- 1 / 6267 -- Mountain Golf Villas of Estes Park dated August 26. 1993. 200.00 EASEMENT ht, 200.00 N.1 t-100.00- _Â®P8C 15760 0 90' 35'1- \ 1 and recorded in the real estate records in the Office ,~ Â·,~ of the Clerk and Recorder of Larimer County, Colorado % 58.25' j PBC 15760 30.03 S 89'02 36"E 587.96 - (the "Records") on September 24, 1993, at Reception -:, N 88Â°02'55" E No. 93070093, as amended by Ratification, Transfer of N 24'38'13" W ''RJ Special Declarant Right and First Amendment dated 1.45 exe P8C 15760 ASPHACT DRIVE L.C.E. 4 MATTHEW CIRCLE 80 485 % ASPHALI DRIVE L.C.E, -â€¢- April __ , 1994, and recorded in the Records on 12 1, ( PUBLIC STREET ) < 4.\, ~ N l ~~i| ratifi,edl:E, alln~:~eption No. the "Declaration"), and ~ / PaC 1576Ot---- // l -------~ ~ N 8413'28" E being the owner in fee simple of all the real property 10 UTILITY EASEMENT /0' UT/L/TY EASEMENT ~ and improvements situate in the Town of Estes Park, 4 -- _30.25Â® PaC 15760 l County of Larimer. State of Colorado. described as , l ~Pac 15760 PBC 9485 1 -r - - r - - - - 1-- - - - - ------ --- follows: ~_ CONC. 1 CONC. - WALK -v L WALK CONC.- Block 1 (which includes but is not limited to Outlot B). -\ L.C.E. CONC. Z O 11 L.C.E. WALK 'Â· 1 Block 2 (which includes but is not limited to Outlot C) S %11 LL and Outlot A. Mountain Golf Villas Subdivision, 'w L.C.E. /,< WALK ~-*; - Z according to the recorded subdivision plat thereof, Eli Ki - 1 ...2 1- - ' L.C.E. Larimer County. Colorado: 8 3 h liU Liu 0 does hereby certify that this Common Interest Community N. M O 2.L- Pl O 9 Map of Mountain Golf Villas of Estes Park is executed BLOCK I BLOCK I J BLOCK 1 0 0 BLOCK I - N 6 UNIT 9 b z UNIT 8 , UNIT 3 b b UNIT 2 UNIT I g m~ ii gi o arft! recorded in conjunction with, as a part of and = Z pursuant to the provisions of the Declaration. Â£ 3 ~ 1- BLOCK 1 3 ~ . CONC. z z 1 PATIO MARTIN EXPLORATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY, 4 0 1 E~~-= L.C.E. r=- CONC. b Z am a Colorado limited partnership m 1 QI-1 PATIO By: MEMCO MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, 1 General Partner ho OUTLOT B . e ~CONC L----lt . 30 20 10 0 30 60 90 ~~~ ~ 900 j8 06 (A PORTION BLOCK 1) 91.93 900 SCALE IN FEET 12.35~,1 90. (A PORTION OF Bl_~5 ~ '75 N n 3 OUTLOT B *. -1 1 PATIO ~- ~NCR{~CHMENT~, ~ 3 65' 92.76 90* L.C.E. By: PaC 9485 1" PIPE N 89 06'01"W 550.71 1" = 30' STATE OF COLORADO ) 90Â° P8C - 30.00 8C 15760 BEARING BASIS - AS PLATTED 15760 N 89Â°01'00" W ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE )SS COUNTY OF ) - PLATTED AND ACTUAL The foregoing Owner's Certificate was acknowledged Â· ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. before me this day of April 1994 by P.O.BOX 3047 FIRST NAT'L BANK BLDG SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ESTES PARK, COLORADO SUITE 205 as president of Memco Management Corporation, as General Partner of Martin Exploration Management 80517 (303)586-5175 Company, a Colorado limited partnership. The undersigned hereby certifies that this Common Interest Community Map of Mountain Golf _ Villas of Estes Park is true, correct and complete as laid out and shown hereon, that this Witness my hand and official seal. map is based upon a land survey performed by me or under my direct responsibility, PROJECT: MTN GOLF VILLAS supervision and checking subsequent to substantial completion of the improvements shown EASEMENT DRAWN BY: MB CHECKED BY: PMK hereon, and that this map contains all of the information required by My commission expires: \/AcAT/Ok) MARTIN EXPLORATION MANAGEMENT CO. Notary Public Section 38-33.3-209. C.A.S. DATE: 3-7-94 2 ' X 29 EA<-4 REV: 3-15-94. BOULDER 60.80361 2300 CENTRAL AVE. SUITE A Paul M. Kochevar. Date P.E. and P.L.S. No. 15760 SHEET: 1 OF: 3 PROJECT NO: 2451 2%1 ./. : ' > 3/&%-1 S 00'21'58"W Y EASEMENT S 00'21'58"W B*)72 56.77 9% GL ' 002 M. t'G. c 43. 00257'24" E 225.6 '822 3.D,2 t'9'LBI Â£9.00 (2 >0018 30 NOI18Od V) 9F Bi2 3.6F.90.00 N *6 2LT Mâ€ž6;,90.00 S DRIVE 00 LL 98'k'9F 3.60,20.LO S 80-It,I 3.60.20.Â£0 S 33619 31-VA kid Le. 11,2, 19. â‚¬,1,2,