Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Public Works 1993-11-19
j PUBLIC WORKS AGENDA PACKETS ---/ C- 1988 & 1991 - 1993 MADE IN LETTER AND LEGAL SIZES expanding GI,te<> file pockets expand as papers are added ALVAH BUSHNELL COMPANY .Ikty.,71= 925 Fllbert St. Phila., Pa. 19107 t Standard logal Size 34~ Inch Expa-ioe P-1526 '1; PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA November 19, 1993 10 AM 1. Water Rate Study - Request approval to adopt. REPORTS: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Reports 3. Lake Estes Pedestrian and Bike Path 4. Estes Park Senior Center The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary. Report oil WATER RATE STUDY Prepared for TOWN OF ESTES PA It IC 111.ACK & VILATCH Pwgi-CSS by Design November 16,1993 *"*.3/*1 -,3/111711 ' 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Introduction 7'llc 'lown (11' LESICS I':Ilk, Cl)1()1'11(10 ('1'(,Wil) provi(Ilts witterselvice. 10 111(,Ic {11;111 3,200 customers. The Town's water operations ill'c IiI lillicially sell-slillicil:lit with fulll|ing for capital alld operating requircments derived j)tilll:Ilily from water niles. In order to cc)litillue to provide reliable water service, the Town is cominencing a major capital program that will upgrade the tnuismission and distribution System over the next six years. The Town, recognizing the illiportance of financially planning for these capital improvements, authorized Black & Ventch to perform a comprehensive rate study. '1'lie procedures, filidings and recommendations of the Study are summarized ill this report. TIle witter nile Study includes the lk)]Ii)wing clements: • Projection of water sales 1-evellue needed to meet revelille requirements for the Six-year study pei-iod, 1994 till-ough |999. • Analysis of cost of providing water service to customer classes. • IDesign of cost of service I iltes. B. Study Findings The priticipal filidings of the water nile study are as follows: • Revenue under existing rates is inadequate to meet projected revelille requirements and lilailitain all adequate operating reserve. The following revenue increases are projected to meet these criteria for 1994 through 1999: 1-1 Annualized Waler .Illil[ Saks Revenue Increase (90) 1994 5.() 1995 7.() 1996 9.() 1997 9.() 1998 5.() 1999 5.() • A coinprehensive cost of scrvice :111:ily,sis Ims lieet i pitilt)i*ined 1*(ir tile 1999 test ye:11' to de|Crillitle ench CliNtollier CIASS' S|1111'c of wi Ill:I' SCI vice Cl)Sts. The 111]illysiS is docillilented ill Chapter 3 mid Slillill}ill ized in '1'~ible 3- 10, Page 3-16. • Cost of sci-vice rates have been designed for 1994 throligh 1999 which will increase revenue by the percentages indicated above. Two rate structures, minimum charge and service charge, have been developed. Comparisons of existing and cost of service rates are shown in Tables 4-3 and 4-4 for mininium charge and service charge structures, respectively. • Alternative rates for each year were also designed for 1994 thic„Igh 1999 that produce the same total revenlic as cost of service rates and provide 21 smooth transilion from existing rates lo cost of service rates over the sludy period. Tables 4-5 and 4-6 show comparisons of existing mid alternalive Titles for Illillinillill cli:tige and Service Charge Slructures, ret;~)ectively. 1-2 .O .O .O .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 O. O. 0/ O. 0. O. 0- O' O. 01 N 7- 01 (D h - N co 4 6,6 0 K cd K to N Ef lf) C\.1 LO 00 LO <9 1 1 0 0000 00000 0 O 0 0 0 00000 H LU a) CD h (O h O .4. 9) 0 11) (\1 1- J 9 1- 0 cd e 06 cd 1 0 0 h. [9 0 N O 10 T- 10 00 ,-- C\1 0 a)-0 -D; 4.69 CO (9 (D e) ,- SBECC CD 00 Z F 0000 000(DO 0000 00000 0) C) .1 (O ,- C\1 (D (L) 1,) - 0) 2 0 0 0 4. 0 Iii O 1 4 05 CD (U Mg 8 05; 2 89 4 to 0 9. r- (-0 (D (9 (0 01 '- CAl to .- 0 01 Fdd .r- m to (0 (1) (1) E E 0 12 Th W 1 3 0 0 >c k al 2 -O ~ 1.L 3 '~8 U-{1) 2 c a) M JO E M. 21 (1) Cwe CCOO- 0r02OO_m go -Ne# 10(DACOO) 21 Z Indicated Revenue Increase 52'217 00 LZ le;01 0 L COMPARISON OF ADJUSTED COST TABLE 3-10 WITH REVENUE UNDER Test Year 1 Urban esidential E. Typical Monthly Water Bills A comparison of typical monthly url):111 resideliti:11 waler I)ills 1 )1'0(liice.d by the existing mill Cost of service wiles (Illillimilm C|litlge Stl'lletill'e) is Showll ill '|':1|)|e 4-7, Table 4-8 compares residential bills under existing and cost of service rates (service charge structure). A similar comparison is shown for monthly bills under existing and Alternative A and Alternative B rates in Tables 4-9 and 4-10, respectively. The typical residential customer uses an average of 60,000 galkms of water annually or about 5,000 gallons per nionth. Proposed rates will increase the typical urban residential monthly water bill as follows: Typical Urban Residential Monthly Ilill Based on 5,000 Gallons Water Usage Minimum Charge Structure Cost of Service Altern:itive A Year Amount Increase Amount Increase ($) 1993 15.17 15.17 1994 15.35 0.18 15.83 ().66 1995 16.28 0.93 16.80 ().97 1996 17.83 1.55 18.10 1.3() 1997 19.40 1.57 19.6() 1.5() 1998 2().35 ().95 2().45 ().85 1999 21.38 1.03 21.38 ().93 Service Charge Structure Cost of Service Alternative B Year A inoillit Increase Amimt Ine Tense ($) 1993 15.17 15.17 I994 16.40 1.23 19.77 /1.(,() 1995 17.40 1.()0 2().27 ().5() 1996 19.()() 1.60 2().92 ().65 1997 20.7() 1.7() 2 1.62 ().7() 1998 2].75 1.()5 22.()2 ().4() 1999 22.85 1.10 22.47 ().45 4-3 El 83 agi ~,3 8 4 031 . 2 .8 -21 g:SARSR 213 21 28&0308 GEEE 222 6 il te 58 Sm *8 ..i IA •A . (4 01 1- €O 1/1/1/inono 4 4 tri od «j e) ul SI Ly -Ly -2 ziy -„-p.--M.' 0 0 0 0 4/1 0 0 -9 2922223 PS 62 02 1.ZA 4 NUNGNME 4 8 8 8 4 F r C f m #0 Cr! :iw ~R r- 29{~Cli)hil in /1 11, If, 1 £1 11 :A DI .. ...... r.'.1 11 ri ./ 1. N •2 1 0 44 0 W w . •4 1 I M 0 15 1 9 .0 in in u in o € € b (4 i.) 64 1.) 10 -1 na 1/2 1.2 S ... (,1 1" 19: ., "' 8 8 FEE e e · ~ 1~ §81 419 - i~ 59&~78ES Di -D! deirl•dr<d- .. lai 8 2 8 R - 1 99988RS d li €1 4 lA •1 01 21 0, 2 0 2 9 m U, U) e, u, £0 U~ U, .51 '61 .2 •- •- (~1 W . •1 lA 8688 0 % 51 en em &8 eig ' ~ 5 oo·,00:810 §81 *81 M 4 5 4 Ne02§% 40 . 0 44 44 0 0 14 6 & 0 .1 2 E 1 "8 4 5 -2 . .1 . 4, t., .- 1-, 6 •0,0 0 0 '9,0 10 col= U ~ :1 G Di . M . W - •- •- t. N " i ri to N 3 N •C •j --: €4 €11 EX > r 21 1. M .t &8gg 11. W E E E „ on illy£111113,2 g 8 - 0 2 0 8 d, 0, th in . 4. 15 *= 6/8 - n n n o In ti In G ~ d d W r! 0 4 N - I I 0 14 -' 0 1 32 to LOW,00,00,0 h h (0 00 10 . 0 3 2,2 d,d#dr'N- oc . 2=* 2.a EDS DI ==G==St= 6 6 6 6 6EEE p; 2 i 1 10,00 In on 9 a d .2 0 0 /1 W 44 60 . - un - 0 13 - 2 0, 0, 1» 01 1» 1, 01 !!' N 1~ U. U, .1 u, 1,} . Ul 3 5%55%55 6 Un M V) U} U) 0 VI E E 0, ee llc .C 1,4 1 0: El iR . N N h . h N 2 F. 8 10 0 to co m I •0 f~ ddededd 9%1 - 8 " - - t 40 -r-„ Mv,v),4,/l M VI 66 86 g g & g ad id - 1 0 .1 11 11 ., t„ .11. (,11,1 .1 ¢ h 1§ MN #§ 712 192 In {9 r NN N N , /4 N N N MW /BW Afd -M" h O .0 il (, U. di. t, p 1,3 6 E F M A e Rates ! 1998 1999 M~inufn C>.arce COMPARISON O AND COST OF SERVICE RATES FOR 1994 THR OUGH 1999 hege - $ per 1,000 galons R esid entni M 99 99 & Di 81 3 -21 51:182=89 32 12 22 22 4*WdrEN 4 Gaabli'23; Re Re 09 - i 99882:19 0022 282 19 19 CP U 6 -m St202272 /1 3 £ 3 3 W 0 it N 2~ 2222Nlg 88 581 *24 . 51 AR@;9822 &101 BIBI SDI :181 ~ *SgiNg#* G - 13 2 4 4 19 19 14 14 4,6 -2 X 14 :32 ;tX N 22 22 =Li 22 .. ...-.- ... m elr·14«joleld 14 ,/} V, 14 10 44 17' ~ 99 851 PIM 191) - e 8892222 g 8181 8181 :*51 0181 j 8' *SitiSNN 0. El 0 0 K K 80 3 83 29 M un 'n to u) in to an 01 0 M 91 4 / h V 21 #2 22 13 51$1 11 3| 9!9!952*~ & 4 4,40"Un.U, 2 0 g CD £ E f DIC' 082 3 a es, 03 Al 2 211&31 81 19 91 8 N N 1919 I 00 8 .0 & O,/,ininli .O 121 2 0 N s :43 21!91 2 EME,Ii,Elig -al M M t; t; W $9 81 N O, i iii .1 N N . I,1 4,1 f * 8 -R U. d M M g g g " Cl p 12 88 g~ aa aa as, == - s EEZESE - u, 0 0.- Ung b /3 tf) Ul 88 12 12 -31 3§~~95,2 dit 33 al NN ~ 223,9,33 m m .- 5 81 81 D b; Wi WI RR - E 229&1882 r- 8161 dd S **#0383 8 -14 0. 2 82 MR 1 Bear»Mina 00 . M . . 10 t. U U UN, 5 1<N,<r<KNK I M 0 M 44 4/1 M + fl ' 6 le 52 ER ZNNZNNN - -- 5.gil !6 •) „--"rer C .. .. v),nt/,v),nva,n .6 j I BE Em 56 56 P. 1 11" A 8, 1 4, MM §§ H Q w o . r) 4 10 4 M M Na el N , el N 01 N Ewk Le: -& 01£ 6 0 LE o U. E 6 b & 8 E1 lail A -7 Rual Rual R tral Rual Kisting Rates I 1997 1999 COMPARISON O COST OF SERVICE Vokrne Chuge - $ 1,000 gallons RATES FOR 1994 05 DES irrturn 0.;r~;8 imcm Charge 14 . M . H -21 2 2 2 8 t'J S 2 IS 02 163% ert 21 22&01806 688 EEE ed e E *1 - S =m :2 12 =0 m w, 10,0,0,0 000 10 LA (9 0,1 0, h 10 1 4 1,1 0 4 0 Id 44 44 40 44 44 64 0 2 -14 0,2 M.N il 99MWN!88 m 002@NIN as 6g8 E E 0.4 2 ' m 50 52% #PI - 88=192=91 -bil 4 4 4 N .4 4 4 GGGGG31 E e. m c. N c. m C. ZI -* 8082898 Q UNOWN SP a 6 6 6 5 r I d A ' 81 - 0 0 14 " 1,) 1, 1,1 r. lil k :1 ki'y EN Kn " 0 'h ,/1 o •- „) ·· 4, gl :1 (1 -2 81 aGGEOUR ri el •f ,1 41 t. id 0 111 9 2 niA E NAZAngS rt il 0/1 /1 •f -f 3 2' 2 .2 .3 92 -6 4 DC & g i P,tor u. u, 0 0, u) W) u, 9 F 6 6 El mc ga M B h R : 1* 4 0 0 0 001/0 1,6 16 , i •1 1- 1- lA 11 91 k L! g N ' 11 e - 'I N {4 0 ·f ·f . ,4 11 81 G GS G G W W 0 g t= 8 91 2 2 -1 01 (1 0, d U N N 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 I /},ir)•0 1.tio 2 muk .51 .-•·•- (' 14 {4 C' 1,1 1,1 X m m 6 6 6 E E E W, 2 . 0 g 16 l. r 10 4, 10 1 J In '9 0 a) In ¢ j •f, I, 1,1 1 .- .' N .1 N 41 ' 1 a 6 6 14 60 to . to un U} 0, In In no 12 3 .3 5 -3 8 88. b /1 ek 5 6, ~ 0, {j in 52 1,1 3 3 W «1 X «1 d G el 4- W U m GaNG,Gilil 8 8 8 E E E 1 20 m - 5 1990*02*31 W - W - r d 4 G s M . ---rer-r 440144/}M440 . 12 . Fe 80 R R 1 un to un in to tnul 5 11 S' 12 8 81 2 Dj S rz # N N K N N 66+ E E d N N C O 62 UZZ:ZZZ - p ddoddod 44 1 40 ---p--- 0 44 14 40 u, 40 ta g X 2 111 8 55 56 ER 4 -2 0 -2 M -0, 01 En (11 01 ED P.rs ... 1 42 ·n n - O,1 N 01* , t,1 01 01 "1 pa EE; 5"* Bm LE O n LL i.2 0 Z·-6 ~ LL 1 @ LL E 9 1 822 A_R ga,torts ·:Twn O.age Mnirrum Charge Memum Charce ~~r>g Rates Ruajl 1994 : 1 995 ' ~ 1 997 Voline Charge - $ per 1,000 gallons R ual Mnirrum Char e R esid ential El K K 19 11 AN N N -al mlams:Eg 0 UN aa Pipt 2 2 , 32*UNS& 0 0 ., i u Z m 8 2 m 2 bibi :181 01:1 DISI UNG,Gul ddd€•1¢1(MiN C; 14 = U 5 5; 2 2 -21 SIBBRAst: 512 23 13 513 '1 5 5 5 N r W :1 u,u,u)*,0,hv) p %1 13 A th 0; bb 88 M i :Z:282'4 81 11 #51 8181 S """ dddN¢·14,·11< 14 .4 44 4/) 44 11 2 -9 7 1 WI MI 171 18 0 0 a' "1 "19 n '9 7 'i ~ DIN NDI 11 UN 21 Deem UN W h ~ i 19,1 9 9 M Lt ij j m " 3 •, ., M W h; H;'1 , S 11 81 & 11 W 11 A '/ I///cq (4 .7 15 G & G AD; a 2 ~ j Wil WE R-2 20 ' ' 11~ ;,14,YLY,"iMWN S N i. i. (,1 {,1 •· r 4 GOUGGEJ C) 91 . 01 4 hA N n 0 1/ 10 66 81 N W Cl WA £ 1 J| .-: ) -*:'V m m I 1}1 14 4) 1- IN ." 81DJ bY:i Dju d /10 -; Naiwl & 1 5 0,4,4,4,4,non Z A 78| 55 :,tr JA 08 88 1- 4 ad :id Mu „ r< i r< ed ed 1,1 d U, u' in r) tb - 10 r--•-•-tim 44 10 44 40 14 44 . LL Co Lin 10 8 g 2 8 SS G N 88 - . N - 10 0 0 in co 00 0 4 u h O addpr-ulci -- U.= D]Dj 64 44 0 44 44 44 4/, 4/, ,/,u} v, 4/, 11 8 8 51 61 -h -- E St:912282 51 f, 2 81 El 33 33 - p .- f r. (I N r<r<r<Er<dN 99. 44 M. M . 0 0 w -1 h b N own in o 22 82 SS 2 9 - bl -- r. .- I.- li m ddd.4.:Nd . 0 V) 4/) 4,) In . 0 --p----- ..M.,n,av, - R R 82 peR 9 0B.°'°'m'» 10 10 Ul In in . 10 re"rer- ....... 14 0 Unt/, 44 0 0 6 + il - Om q *ft eq gE~%1 3333%33 h h N h h h 0 44 40 40 4/1 44 44 2 . 0 . 0 ES _86 .6 6 0,2, 01 01 01 01 -a i 76-2 ,/1 er-SNe>. §§ §§ §§ 52§ , a § U, .7 - 4/4 4/4 .™N BIN -2 7&2 2&2 Ing S :-1 @ 15 2- 0 £ m I ./ l.*ban Rtral Utan Rual Rual COMPARISON O AND ALTERNATIVE TABLE 4-6 TES FOR 1 94 THROUG Kisting Rates I Mnirrum Charge gallons ga;lens PIPE UNE REPLACE MENT COST ANALYSIS "Budget avg cost/pei Il altioul il leplaced in feel/por pr $ 150,.000.00 :1;toi.).Ii)(J 1 1300 - 13~100 1..121) t 1.00. UU 1 0 7 17 liur J $7{100• 0 1 ·13 C.-' $60.LJO 2,500 $50.00 3..000 123,000 fl steel replacement rate number of yeals lo pipe iii between per yl leplace 123..00011 1940 & 1967 1.500 82 1 667 73.8 avg life span 1.875 155. 6 30 - 50 years 2,143• 57.4 2..500 49.2 1000 41 '-- i-7 .1 1/944\ 54-2- N- *7556.8 / SCHOOL ~ AVENUE ~ ~ ~ ), , 3 -1 - .-. h ~ ~ --7570 260 1- POOL 0 -ZET.ZIETh'.'*1(1-' -..2..Irr. 1< \ 1 ---- \\4 A Doti:TOA- - / / 1262 - - l ---- --- 1 1 / - ~ X 7577.0 7 51 1-7580 x 75 78.0 x 7577.0 24<412 - 1 -tjn--«Int - X 7578.0 -12\«32245R2- -- - Wi~~~<~~~~~'~~ -- DITION ~\~- ---, -2=1-Nzr~««731--.i«7 - hun - -\----21.Ck N «) 2-2 BRODIE --M UNTAIN »794 «*.90 11 -- ~ - ~O~~Ri~---~ , 1 ---1//'i_/ i -- 1, 3 254 -1 1 1431 1436 1440 N - FAI AY ISTING PATH ~ 2 1447 1445 '4 5/ 1455 -4 X 7628.4 /453 1 1 1--1 \\41 -1=37- f It It 11 1 1,1\\2 1 1 1 11 4- F CIRCLE £ 1 - 1+ •-I ~2=p-i n 1-* 1 W L.1 1 1 <1/ '4 Oil 1 282 '4 511 i 1 73 L.-1 l--- 900--4----4----Mft)-5 3 ZIta- --7-3- 3 / SUBDIVISIO \f, '4=£521> 3Nh - 6-x 7626.d# Lir 1 (/ 7636 A X 1 ) NI \. f ~RIVE ~ I,»1*¥S' p. ./.A .t ·Il •·-» ·hi NOV 1 9 1993 COMMO»'-ry -212)VE 01* E- PA-T-H ADD)-ri 0,4 F}ZeAA /MA -It+)E~] Clacie_ To 56*60 6<FOoL- L-07 650 LF x 12' wIDEE = -7800 sin (8101,9~ Allows MAFIAO.k 5€EPAR-Al-1 DA 09 0» 1 LD 2 64 F./20,-4 T72,4 PF, c.. 8-70 sT = 100 TORS ASPHAL-1- 9 4 56 ~ -Tor& 46=D 500 -rous ROADDASE ~ * 12 ~ -roN *3600 * CAP/TAL (. -lae~,4 / 4 /.16 6 o Da 121- *6780 +~ 4-3-TA L #P 84 - D 0 EDBE- -5-/RIFE Po A VISUAL- S€p,4,2,)1-1 0,4 Co,1 6-r 20 -r, 0 14 4,4-1-2. /WA q - -1 uN e '994- . 46@BAL- . APP /2©VA L F-20 AA. S,ll Fk/*ES 56+100 L aa 9 wl st-+ -re> 7 'As/BACk Pfa 61 NG, FOrE -r ME IR A c.4655 891-94 S . 2-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT OCTOBER 1993 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION - MAIN 16.00 46.00 13 UTILITY LOCATION - SERVICE 3.00 4.50 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 1.00 0.50 16 TAP REQUEST 1.00 2.00 17 WATER QUALITY - TASTE 18 WATER QUALITY - ODOR 19 WATER QUALITY - COLOR 1.00 1.50 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: HIGH 21 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: LOW 2.00 3.50 22 FROZEN LINES: MAIN 23 FROZEN LINES: SERVICE 24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN 25 LINE BREAKS: SERVICE 4.00 11.50 30 METER REPAIR 44.00 59.75 31 FINAL INSPECTION 5.00 6.00 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: WATER 1.00 3.00 41 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: PARKS 42 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: STREETS 44 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: OTHER 50 STREET REPAIR 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 54 STORM DRAINAGE 2.00 3.50 55 TRAFFIC HAZARD 60 OTHER 8.00 10.50 ======== TOTALS FOR OCTOBER 1993 88.00 152.25 HISTORICAL bATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 88.00 101.00 76.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 152.25 207.25 231.50 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) -12.87%/-26.54% +44.29%/+74.89% 11.39%/-64.72% Rl-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK OCTOBER 1993 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for September 14,1993 through October 13,1993: September 14 to 31 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 17,501,000 *Marys 5,210,000 October 1 to 13 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 15,545,000 *Marys 0 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 38,256,000 Gal. 2) Water accounted for from September 14 to October 13: Adjustments: . 2,352,600 Billing: 28,363,990 *Backwash 0 Total Water accounted for: 30,716,590 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 80% R2-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK .. WATER USE RECORDS ' OCTOBER, 1993 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL : BIG MARYS SUBTOTAL > TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS THOMP. (GAL) CFS (GAL) 1 0 1,285,000 1,285,000 2.00:1 0 0 0 0.00: 1,285,000 2 0 1,495,000 1,495,000 2.33 · 0 0 0 0.00 2 } 1,495,000 3 0 1,429,000 1,429,000 2.22 i. 0 0 0 0.00: 1,429,000 4 0 1,326,000 1,326,000 2.06.' 0 0 0 0.00: 1,326,000 5 0 1,251,000 1,251,000 1.95i 0 0 0 0.00 1,251,000 6 0 1,179,000 1,179,000 1.84+ 0 0 0 0.00 1,179,000 7 0 1,125,000 1,125,000 1.75 0 0 0 0.00 1,125,000 8 0 1,019,000 1,019,000 1.59i 0 0 0 0.00> 1,019,000 9 0 1,146,000 1,146,000 1.78 i 0 0 0 0.00 1,146,000 10 0 1,133,000 1,133,000 1.76· I 0 0 0 0.00: 1,133,000 11 0 1,071,000 1,071,000 1.67i , 0 0 0 0.00: 1,071,000 12 0 1,036,000 1,038,000 1.61 i 0 0 0 0.00 1,036,000 13 0 1,050,000 1,050,000 1.63 i 0 0 0 0.00 . 1,050,000 14 0 1,074,000 1,074,000 1.67: } 0 0 0 0.00> ' 1,074,000 15 0 1,206,000 1,206,000 1.88 . 0 0 0 0.00 1,208,000 16 0 1,178,000 1,178,000 1.83 i 0 0 0 0.00 1,178,000 17 0 1,116,000 1,116,000 1.74:~'« 0 0 0 0.00 1,116,000 18 0 1,122,000 1,122,000 1.75: 0 0 0 0.00: 1,122,000 19 0 1,045,000 1,045,000 1.63 0 0 0 0.00: 1 1,045,000 20 0 1,195,000 1,195,000 1.86: i 0 0 0 0.00 1,195,000 21 0 1,087,000 1,087,000 1.69 0 0 0 0.00 1,087,000 22 0 1,097,000 1,097,000 1.71 > 0 0 0 0.00: 1,097,000 23 0 1,260,000 1,260,000 1.96> 0 0 0 0.00 1,260,000 24 0 1,030,000 1,030,000 1.60> 0 0 0 0.00 1,030,000 25 0 983,000 983,000 1.53 } 0 0 0 0.00 } 1 983,000 26 0 918,000 918,000 1.432 : 0 0 0 0.00: 918,000 27 0 945,000 945,000 1.47 · : 0 0 0 0.00 945,000 28 0 985,000 985.000 1.53 4i O 0 0 0.00 j 985,000 29 0 821,000 821,000 1.28 : 0 0 0 0.00 · 821,000 30 0 975,000 975,000 1.52: 0 0 0 0.00: 975,000 31 0 0 0 0.00 ? 0 0 0 0.00 €. 0 TOT. 0 33,582.000 33,582,000 0 0 0 33,582,000 AF 0.00 103.07 103.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 103.07 CFS 0.00 1.68 1.68 ' E 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' 1.68 BW(-) O N/A 0 0 0 0 0 BL(-) N/A N/A N/A ' N/A N/A N/A -2,352,600 GAL 0 33,582,000 33.582,000 : 0 0 0 ... ~ 31,229,400 AF 0 103.07 103.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 95.85 1st-13 0 15,545,000 0 0 14-31 0 18,037,000 0 0 R2-2 ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 297,000 2.) Bleeders TOTAL BLEEDERS (Gal.) 1,874,600 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 15-Sep Fall River Ln. flush 3,000 b. 16-Sep Fall River Ln. flush 2,000 c. 20-Sep Fall River Ln. flush 2,000 d. 21-Sep A. Meadows flush 40,000 e. 22-Sep A. Meadows flush 14,000 f. 25-Sep Strong Ave. flush 40,000 g. 5-Oct Raven Ave. flush 5,000 h. 7-Oct Raven Ave. Tie-in 75,000 1. j. k. 1. m. TOTAL FLUSHING, MISC. (Gal.) 181,000 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) -2,352,600 R2-3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS) 1992 1992 1993 1993 MONTH YTD MONTH YTD v % % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL : TOTAL TOTAL CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) : 1 (GAL.) (GAL.) : : (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 22,227,168 22,227,168 ; : 26,042,370 26,042,370: 17.16% 17.16% FEBRUARY 18,753,245 40,980,413 21,131,280 47,173,650 E 12.68% 15.11% MARCH 22,019,445 62,999.858} 26,485,160 73,658,810 20.28% 16.92% APRIL 24,054,701 87,054,559, 22,764,110 96,422,920 -5.37% 10.76% MAY 39,232,054 126,286,613 40,059,420 136,482,340 2.11% 8.07% JUNE 44,414,452 170,701,065, 54,127,530 190,609,870 21.87% 11.66% JULY 58,684,781 229,385,846 71,039,000 261,648,870: 21.05% 14.06% AUGUST 54,405,908 283,791,754 i i 62,554,600 324,203,470: 14.98% 14.24% SEPTEMBER 46,502,599 330,294,351 42,196,410 366,399,880 -9.26% 10.93% OCTOBER 31,968,183 362,262,536 31,229,400 397,629,280 -2.31 % 9.76% NOVEMBER 23,475,870 385,738,406 DECEMBER 27,329,460 413,067,866 TOTAL 413,067,866 AC - FT 9,483 R2-4 ESTES PARK OCTOBER & YTD WATER REVENUE 900,000.00 - c' 6.1 % 0 I 800,000.00 - 0 700,000.00 - € 3 _.t,_'. _' _2 - f '1' i · i I. 4 3 600,000.00 -' &, 1 ~. 4. 4 ' A 500,000.00 - 47 I DOLLARS 400,000.00 -'7-0 6. 7 4 ¥ f . 300,000.00 -t ; '4 - 1 -4 -6 -. -f -·1 -2 -4 - - i 4; t, . T 4 '' .4 · P 1 k 0.00 . ,-47 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 edi n * M 10 P- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 cn 03, 01 0-> C~ 01 YEAR [3 YTD m OCT R2-5 - p. 6961 -.- . ~ 066 1 ~ 1 66 L ~-1661 ~ £66 1 ESTES PARK OCTOBER & YTD WATER BILLED 300,000,000 -/ 0 9,096 0 4. 0 250,000,000 - , -0-0- 7 -1 - 4,4 :11 1 6 1 0 0 1? e 4, b 1 , ¢ f 1 GALLONS 150,000,000 -4 -F--f -~ -3 -i. -:.5 t-1* -1.- ~ -I -4 - -1 6.3% 4. It W C 1. '' 31 ¢ 1, 4: 7 100,000,000 -r , 4· £ ft · 1 I O 1- 3- 7 1 0 C.,1 g g YEAR E YTD ¤ OCT R2-6 1982 2 ---: 1983 ...3-6' 1984 _< 1985 3,--9 9, 1986 ~ .r i.~ _ L96 1 2.7 996 1 . s~-696 1 7 166 1 f 1 . Presentation on PRELIMINARY WATER RATE STUDY FINDINGS Prepared for TOWN OF ESTES PARK BLACK & VEATCH Progress by Design November 19, 1993 . f . . .. IG,2-y.T~,------I--=~ IJF **_ .. 1. -I- i -- :1 I : I. 1 41 ill - »4 E .- i. i-In I'-4 -4 Rate i 9.11 1 Design 4. Cost of Service Analysis Financial Plan - 1 3 L = 1 ~ -2-1~ 1 ..1.6 =1 'F--11 Water Rate Study is Building Process i '' I I'l~ , i,1*m·li f.k~ . •4---ill =11 t' 1¢J l . 4 - s. lip 1. 11 1-11+ 4- 1 11 -t-14. 4 11 1 FINANCIAL PLAN FINDINGS • 0000000*0 I 00000 00 0-0-0-0-0-W-, Ul 001000 0!10 10 07 77 010 00 OO 1. Ul w. 00 1. 1- 1- 000 1. 888 OON OLOO cy to - 1- F 'c ; 4 4 oi: 0 F C C .5 588 JE 35 ->C== 0 09 0 0 69 Ve@29 c62 00 03 ~ ®E;E El Ailk®~®®_ 26====to IC.000002 i<jazzzZ 521 -010.10(ON, 0 2-7 Proiect Name 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Total Water Looping P 145,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 1,645,00 0001 10'£ 000'629 000'019 000'994 000'904 000'696 000'941. (e) slsoo pele'lul Inol 140,000 000'06* 000'0» 000'06£ 000'Z£6 000'94 1 MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 140,000 140,000 TABLE 2-3 Located i e Green Zone nderview uqweuuo 'lueoled inobio uone#ul lenuue uo peseg (e) 1994 Cost Levels TABLE 2-1 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS COMBINED SUMMARY OF FUNDS Une Budget Projected No. 1994 1994 1995 1996 1997 1999 1998 $$$$$$$ 1 BEGINNING BALANCE 2.359,900 2.359,900 2.326,500 1.577,200 1,487,800 1 .409,900 1,355.500 SOURCES OF FUNDS Wa- SIWI RI-ue 2 Rovenue from Ex:iang Rat= 989,100 998,100 1,019,000 1,039,800 1,060,500 1,081,400 1,102.200 Rovenuo mom Indicaled Increas- Pli'Int Months Incre-* Effecllve 3 1904 5 00% 12 49.900 51,000 52,000 53,000 54,100 55,100 4 1995 7.00% 12 74,800 76,400 78,000 79,500 81,000 5 1996 9.00% 12 105,200 107,200 109,300 111,500 0 1-7 9.00% 12 116,900 119,200 121,500 7 1908 5.00% 12 72,200 73,500 8 1990 5.00% 12 77,300 9 Cumulative Incroui 47.17% 10 Total Wati, Sales Rivenue 989,100 1.048.000 1,144,800 1.273,400 1,415,600 1 ,515.700 1,622.100 11 Bulk W-r Surcharge Revenue 13,800 13,800 13.800 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 12 Bulk Wa- Disponser Rovinue 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 13 Matefial Sal- 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 14 M-f Sale~ 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 15 Misc/Other 2.000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 16 Fire Protiction - Gen Fund 94,400 94,400 96,300 98,200 100,100 102,000 103,900 17 Tap FI - Plant Devolopment 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 18 Tap F- - Water Rights 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 19 Bond Procied: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Sale of Windy Gap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Nonopefang Revinue 3.200 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 3.200 3,200 22 In-*st 90,000 114,300 100,500 86,100 85,400 85,100 85,800 23 Total Soure- of Funds 1,489,000 1,572,800 1,857.700 1.773,800 1,917,200 2,018,900 2,127,900 USES OF FUNDS Ope,don & Maintenance 24 Source of Supply 98,100 98,100 98,200 98,300 98,400 98,500 98.600 25 Wati Tr-m,nt 273,200 273,200 284,100 295,500 307,400 319,500 332,200 28 Distribullon 253 200 253,200 253,300 273,900 284,800 296,100 307,900 27 Customer Accounts 97,300 97,300 101,200 105,200 109,300 113,700 118,200 28 Administrative & G,n-1 298,000 298,000 310,000 322,500 335,300 348 800 362,700 29 Total Op-atim & Mai-n-- 1,019,800 1,019,800 1,050,800 1,095,400 1,135,200 1,176,600 1,219,800 Debt S-vice 30 Existing 316,100 317,300 321,200 319,400 317,000 319,200 320,700 31 Proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 Total Dibt Sm•le, 310,100 317,300 321.200 319,400 317,000 319,200 320,700 33 Routble Capid Impnmi,IMVI 124,100 124,100 60.000 62.400 64 900 67,500 70,200 34 61/10' Capital Imp•-0/'ll 145.000 145,000 969.000 406,000 458.000 510,000 529,000 35 Bond lisuance Cosh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Total Us- of Funds 1,605,000 1,800,200 2,407,000 1,883,200 1,975,100 2,073,300 2,139,500 37 Annual Surplus (Dificit) (115,400) (33,400) (749,300) (109,400) (57,900) (54.400) (11,600) 38 ENDING BALANCE 2.244,500 2,326,500 1,577,NO 1,467,800 1,409,900 1,355,500 1,343,900 2-5 COST OF SERVICE FINDINGS 32 32 32 32 32 2 32 32 32 MA-N <CIA- (Ve Wai Lri O A d # 16 N 91· to N LO CO to (9 4- 91· 0000 00000 0000 00000 A <0 1•-O *MOLOW c€ CD- . u- U, ON- 99-d- 01.0-1~ O 0 -CV % Cag. (9 cD (0 M - 91' ®DR= O UJ 0000 00000 C)- el 11 (CL ncy. (0 (O Ifl 0000 00000 - 0 00 O-MLO Ohaic,-(O X a COWN- N 10 -O LU ® ..2 - .,0 0- 4.- (0 ez O 0 0 ® U.1 m Z- 4/ § 3 0 C -2 2 13 UL A lE - ®EEN - 0 4 E :* 09002 1®033 9.00.. 0 - Cy M * LOWN®C) 0 ZI 3-16 - 963'Zt, 002'got't 001'229' 1 11401 01 WITH REVENUE U STING RATES Adjust Indicated ne Revenue Increase OMPARISON OF ADJUSTED COST TABLE 3-10 SJGUIOJSr'13 MOI sidential Urban ential Imol fm Cl 0 SUMMARY OF COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS JeleAA AAOI:1 pedUInd le!O'le le!;uep!sel 30!/LIes JO ;SOO 666L E--1 sejet' ls!)(3 ll]OJ:I A3&1 ~ Thousand Dollars 1,000 800 - 600 - 400- -002 RATE DESIGN FINDINGS -- 11 .: 12 :2 . :1222:g 31 21 . 31 9...0.1 8 g- 5- 2- N. Al N (9.-1 9, ------- EEGE ilifi -il /2 59 51 = • egamism 2-- 22=2222 1 2222<22 2 9,88&35'1 6 6 6 6 GEEE 10/00 1 -il il is iw in - i 22mt:20 eles.KN ----- .....21 11 11 .1 .4 .0 - MS..2. rr 02 3 3/ailii N. hi. 1, 6 2 -51 988*828 81=92 /l 2221235 41-:I ~ .: .2 &2 . 9 22.22,22 8 8 1 29/28:C= aiaig..1.d 198 5528 11. 002022: EEEE Bil 1 5: /2 #11 *0 -1 2222222 32* 1 0 15 & 8- -- ~&3 1 ll e .a e vi ll 222&830 BB8i ..92 41=2 881 8 532 U.11- 1 08. 11111 1 05 -11 51 i: 51 81 -, ./9/331 S =====92 - liz 0 -e 2 -1 32 10= '12 'Si li SEE 3 9 1 E =18888 M ======= 1 11 i i 1 1 iN ig *R *R 9 =1 2 5 -----Me, mi EZE.3/1 ~ 88 22 1 St==St=== as :Int .----,4.4 + = 1 1.L! 1 1, 2 2 16 11 =0===== gg22229 - ii i~ 11 11 15 11 /1 ii lilli $3-2.0. N N N N . C.(41 NN 4-6 i fi COMPARIS N SERVICE TABLE 4-3 - 11 9 9 91 6-0 33 , 11 :682:89 '1 == == .I <9. .- 131 IZER:WZ 9: 0 111 Z n 22 2- 22922)N 22 9* ~ 1~ 99882:9 ---22 9 9 8 11 22 66 1 5522298 SS SS =12 22 , eless/2 iiI 00 88 88 8" R *2 51*1822 al -9 -= 22 32 SS2S2&i - I 11 == 8 8 8 91 6 0 11 82:1228g 21 92 21 == 22 ~I ===:=21 •1 *401. C. 1 & .. SIS RN "-6 201 4 , iwimlit . 1 a 00 22 33 1-,1 2=:===: 22 22 IS == M 29!252*51 1 - .: § il ?mil :: 9191 MM 88 Jill 2292:28 22 22 22= 8 =:12233 008 & lize a mal i 1-11 „ „ „ „ -* 5252111 88 -4 99 SS 88=== m 0 18 -- D- 122 88 it .ENS==a =G ==i == == s~ ••==Maa 8 8 u,w, 88 1212 1# SEmBEWR 22 33 11 22 0 1252181 i i - 51 81 81 , S 00 22 -11 288@822 2 == =: == == 8~ gs'*288 11 B: t: i: :: . h .-h.N h 01 ....... 1 i i. i 11 0!I 1111111 - 11 11 11 11 11 1,0 1-1 81 ii ii 1 all SA-/Ne. r r P r 9 m 4-7 l•b Bund COMPARISON SERVICE . - 11 % .51 .2 .8 11 00222=g 92 21 ,31 EEZi:ge: gagg lii ~1 5: '8 NA 551 ..#.000 -323 - 1 5 96 2% ag ------- 11 - -11 22#t:*28 21 9383511 =18888 E E E mi2ii in im *5 *33 - - 2 - 1 1 1 1222222 08 .2 11 8222298 92 es 9, 90 0 522=115 8888 i ki-i i 8: 2282*28 11 12 1 1,1 51 0 2211238 i 1-11 i: 11: 11: i. i 21 SS8S3i1 .8 - 11 2228#128 mil il. 18 1, blo fill 82 892:251 N .ri 99 u ~ 81 222ZZGS 0~& U! A . 0 5 9 1-11 888@288 0 881 1 11 &1 J &* 0 4 ZZ28S&3 p-,69 1 8838 2, lilii i i 1 -11 4 - is 14 is -,1 928<g:8 I 2 2 S=9!22!SE 3 8 11 1153588 gl -a===== 8888 E il li 8 •9 11' 9983£~9 ------- I ..1.- E !: b "41 22 ------- 2 8. 22 1 Sts!$23!22 6 + = 1 1 j. 1 1 - N N N N - A N 1 333;;62 111 2 2 id dis il il ii li 00 0. li ii *§ §§ 1 11 3,1-2... N N AN . INN BU.m 4-8 1900 Rwal | -Rum!-~ l.bal COMPARISON O - 11 K- R R Aa Ba 38 1 923:2889 St : 2 .. 10 M a. 91 -- ~ ======0 m '1 ---00. *ll £1" me aa ?• - 6 0.00-a =01 22 000 04 04 0 ----- Si *G; 0, 66 28 . I ..WAI 22 22 S= 22 ; 2 Z Z Z 2 Z 9 ===== - M 88 88 .9 Ze;222* -- -* 22 == 9229!9%% 22 9191 88 -11 2222.28 22 2 2 33 22 4 2222332 h 99 ble &14 1-1 ===9=88 -11 6: . 1 9229!9!%* ¥ S ------- a 1- 1-11 1, 1111 *1 == & 21 22222/E RI RI 91@1 88 28 & 11 3191@18:1,8 fill 65 88 ZAS 88 ili il Stogge:e 92 22 32 32 229=20:1 21 22 22 =2 22 '1 ~5:..WIR -.- 1.- 00 -- ZA = 88 11 2231:2851 91 ======- 5 0 Z:1 - il „ 88 0=2& 83 - 9 ===:208 m m -- -- ON -- ded--ulai ---- 1 ------- 88 == SE -1 2282222 == == == 99 =======1 9 ....... ill :2 -- -- -- 99 88 48 - -1 - N . 0..0 ------- ly , 02 81 R R 1 Sts!@!Sts!2% 2 2 5555%55 = iii 11 9 '9 22 Es 000®900 -N----- + - lit -*__- ddedded - 1- ------- 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 .11 81 1,1 53-2... 12 7/2 €22 2/1 0 6 4-9 Rual Ub R-1 R...1 012• 96691 COMPARISO O NG AND ALTERNATIVE TABLE 4-6 TE FOR 1994 Existing 11-, 1 Residlntial .Ing [.1 Typical Urban Residential Monthly Bill Based on 5,000 Gallons Water Usage Minimum Charge Structure Cost of Service Alternative A Year Amount Increase Amount Increase ($) 1993 15.17 15.17 1994 15.35 0.18 15.83 0.66 1995 16.28 0.93 16.80 0.97 1996 17.83 1.55 18.10 1.30 1997 19.40 1.57 19.60 1.50 1998 20.35 0.95 20.45 0.85 1999 21.38 1.03 21.38 0.93 Service Charge Structure Cost of Service Alternative B Year Amount Increase Amount Increase ($) 1993 15.17 15.17 1994 16.40 1.23 19.77 4.60 1995 17.40 1.00 20.27 0.50 1996 19.00 1.60 20.92 0.65 1997 20.70 1.70 21.62 0.70 1998 21.75 1.05 22.02 0.40 1999 22.85 1.10 22.47 0.45 110 4 - J 0 m: LL >- 4 - I Z 0 - 4 - C CO O.- X 2 LU 666L 866L 266L 966L 966L *66L COMPARISON RESIDENTIAL SOO - 640 Jes + SOO - 640 U!01 - 8 11¥ - 640 Jes - ¥ 11¥ - 640 U!141 --O-- (5,000 gallon $25 $20- - 9 L$ 0 - 0- 10 6 - C\1 . LO 666L 8661. Z66L 966L 966L t'66L 6u!;s!x3 COMPARISON OF COMMERCIAL MONTHLY BILLS 00 gallons usage) SOO -640 189 + SOO - 640 l'!IN - 8 11¥ - 640 Jes -*- V JIV - 540 U!IN --O- $85 $65 - PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA October 28, 1993 10 AM 1. Proposed Lake Estes Hike and Bike Trail - Request approval of an Intergovernmental agreement with Larimer County and EVRPD. REPORTS: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Reports 3. Water Rate Study 4. Nov. and Dec. PWC Date Changes The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary. .. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, dated this day Of _, 1993 by and between the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, hereinafter referred to as the ("Town"); the ESTES VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as the ("District") and the BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO, hereinafter referred to as the ("County") 1 WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Section 29-1-201 et. seq., C.R.S., provides that political subdivisions of the State of Colorado may contract with one another to provide functions, services and facilities lawfully authorized to each of the political subdivisions; and WHEREAS, each of the above named political subdivisions has the authority to acquire, construct and operate recreational trail systems; and WHEREAS, the parties have determined to contract and agree, pursuant to the provisions of this Intergovernmental Agreement to plan, construct, operate and maintain a certain hike/bike trail in the Estes Valley; and WHEREAS, the parties have received from a group Of interested citizens known as the Estes Valley Hike/Bike Committee recommendations for a hike/bike trail system in the Estes Valley. The number one priority of said Committee is the Lake Estes Trail; and WHEREAS, the Lake Estes Trail is consistent with the Larimer County Estes Valley Trail Plan; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Intergovernmental Agreement have determined that it is in the best interest of the Town, the District and the County to plan, construct, operate and maintain a portion of the proposed Lake Estes Trail pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Intergovernmental Agreement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the applicable statutes of the State of Colorado, the parties are authorized to enter into this j Intergovernmental Agreement for the above stated purposes. I NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING AND FOR i OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The parties hereto agree to plan, construct, operate and maintain Phase One of the Lake Estes Trail, more particularly the portion from the Chamber of Commerce Building to Lake Front Street. For the purposes of this Agreement, this portion 01 the Lake Estes Trail System shall be known as Phase One as more fully described and set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. The Town agrees as follows: A. The Town shall budget and appropriate in its 1994 budget the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($150,000.00) for this project. B. Following preparation Of the plans and specifications by the District and receipt of any necessary governmental approvals including, but not limited to, approval of the Bureau of Reclamation, the Town shall proceed to construct Phase One according to the plans and specifications. All contracts and agreements necessary for the construction of Phase One shall be the sole responsibility of the Town and the Town shall be the sole contracting party. C. Following completion of the construction of Phase One, the Town shall transfer Phase One to the District. D. Following transfer of Phase One, the Town shall be responsible for periodic sweeping and snow removal from Phase One. E. During construction of Phase One, the Town •hall maintain public liability insurance with respect to the activities to be undertaken in connection with the construction of Phase One in an amount not less than the minimum amount required by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. The District and the County shall be named as additional insureds on the policies. The public liability insurance required by this section may be by blanket insurance policy or policies. If the Town insures against similar risk by self insurance, the Town may provide for public liability with respect to Phase One, partially or wholly, by means of an adequate self insurance fund. 3. The District agrees as follows: A. The District shall obtain all necessary rights-of-way, Bureau of Reclamation permits or approvals, and all other federal, state, or local government permits Or approvals for Phase One. Said rights-of-way, permits or approvala shall also include neceggary temporary construction easements for construction of Phase One. Said rights-of-way, permits and approvals shall be obtained by March 1, 1994. B. The District shall plan and engineer Phase One. Said engineering shall include preparation of all necessary plans and specifications, including final construction drawings and bid specifications. The District shall consult with the Project Administration Team in the planning and engineering of Phase One. -2- C. The District shall budget and appropriate in its 1994 budget the sum of $50,000.00 for this project. However, the District may credit against said $50,000.00 any funds expended by the District Eor planning and engineering of Phase One in 1993. D. Following completion of Phase One, the District shall be responsible for maintenance of the trail including, but not limited to, patching, shoulders, weeds and trash removal. The District shall manage the trail and be responsible for all rules and regulations governing usage of the trail. E. Following the completion of construction and transfer of Phase One to ,the District, the District shall maintain public liability insurance with respect to the operation Of the trail in an amount not less than the minimum amount required by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. The Town and the County shall be named as additional insureds on the policies. The public liability insurance required by this section may be by blanket insurance policy or policies. If the District insures against similar risk by self insurance, the District may provide for public liability with respect to Phase One, partially or wholly, by means of an adequate self insurance fund. 4. The County agrees as follows; A. The County shall budget and appropriate in its 1994 budget the sum of $50,000.00 for this project. 5. The District and the Town shall be responsible for the investigation and application for any grants from any potential entities for Phase One and shall submit all necessary information in an attempt to obtain said grants. 6. The parties understand and agree that once construction bids have been received by the Town for construction of Phase One, and in the event that said constructions bids are in excess of the amount budgeted by the entities by completion of Phase One, the parties shall immediately meet and determine whether or not construction of the project shall commence. It shall be the sole discretion of each party whether or not to agree to the continuation of the project as to the amount for the continued participation in the project. The parties agree to amend this Agreement to reflect each party's decision. 7. In the event that after the start of construction, change orders and/or other costs of the construction of Phase One increase the cost over the budgeted amount, the parties agree to meet and determine how to allocate said increased costs. It shall be the sole discretion of each party whether or not to agree to the continuation of the project as to the amount for the continued participation in the project. The parties agree to amend this Agreement to reflect each party's decision. -3- 8. Following construction of Phase One and final acceptance of the construction by the Town, the Town and the County shall transfer any and all interest in Phase One to the District and the District agrees to accept said transfer. 9. If there are excess funds remaining after payments of all costs associated with the construction of Phase One, the funds shall be disributed pro-rata to the parties based on the amounts contributed by each party. 10. The parties understand and agree that all parties, individually and severally, are relying on, and do not waive or intend to waive, by any provision of this Intergovernmental Agreement, the monetary limitations presently ($150,000.00 per person and $600,000.00 per occurrence) or any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the Colorado Immunity Act, 24-10-101 et seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended or otherwise available to the parties or any of their officers, agents or employees. 11. The parties hereby name the following individuals as their representative on the Project Administration Team. Said Team shall direct the project. The Team shall be composed as follows: Town: Town Administrator, Larimer County: Parks and Recreation Director District: Executive Director 12. For the purpose of complying with applicable provisions of the Colorado Constitution with regard to revenue and spending limitations more commonly referred to as the Tabor Amendment, the parties agree that monies budgeted by each individual party shall remain the funds of said party and disbursal of said funds to a third party shall result in spending to the applicable individual party. In no event shall the co-mingling of any funds for the purposes of this Agreement result in revenue or spending by an entity which has not budgeted the individual funds. 13. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties and may be amended only in writing and said amendment being executed by all parties to this Agreement. The parties understand and agree that it may be necessary to amend or supple- ment this Agreement in order to adequately effectuate the construction of Phase One. In that event, the parties agree to use their best efforts to amend or supplement this Agreement. 14. In the event of default by a party to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the non-defaulting party shall give the defaulting party written notice of said default. The non- defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days after the mailing of said written notice to cure said default. in the event that said default is not cured within that period, the non-defaulting party -4- may terminate this Agreement. In the event of termination of the Agreement, the non-defaulting party shall be entitled to all damages incurred by reason of said default, including, but not limited to all reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees and court costs incurred by the non-defaulting party. In the event the non-defaulting party does not terminate this Agreement for said default, but determines to keep this Agreement in full force and effect, the non-defaulting party shall have the right of an action for specific performance against the defaulting party. In that event, the non-defaulting party shall be entitled to all damages incurred by reason of said default, including all reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees and court costs incurred in enforcing the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 15. All notices, demands or other documents required or desired to be given, made or sent to any party, under thi6 Agreement, shall be made in writing, shall be deemed effective upon mailing or personal delivery. If mailed, said notice shall be mailed, postage pre-paid, certified mail, return receipt requested as follows: TOWN OF ESTES PARK ESTES VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT Gary Klaphake Stan Gengler, Town Administrator Executive Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1379 P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Estes Park, CO 80517 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS LARIMER COUNTY Larimer County Parks Department John McFarlane, Director 1800 S. County Rd. 3 Loveland, CO 80537 16. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and venue for any civil action with respect thereto shall be proper in Larimer County, Colorado. 17. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This Agreement may not be assigned by either party hereto without the written consent of the other parties. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: -5- F IN · ESTES VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT By: - Executive Director BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS LARIMER COUNTY By: r . -6- f 10/27/93 PRELIMINARY RANKING OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS 20-YEAR LIST OF PROJECTS UPPER FRONT RANGE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Estimated . Cost Rank Highway Projects Improvement ($ Millions) HIGH PRIORITY 1 48. US 85 Corridor ~ Access Management Plans 0.25 - 0.5 SH 7 in Estes Park Minor Widening 2.3 3 3. US 34/US 36 Intersection in Major Widening (Bridge) 1.5 - 2.0 Estes Park Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM -,- 4 2A. US 34 East of US 36 in Minor Widening 1.8 Estes Park 5 55. US 85 at SH 256 Safety/Traffic OperationsITSM 0.15 6 36. US 34 Between Kersey and Major Widening to 4 Lanes 11.9 Hardin 7 49. US 85 in Platteville Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 3.0 7 56. US 85 in Gilcrest Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 2.0 9 42. SH 52 in Fort Lupton Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 4.0 10 28. I-25/SH 119 (Del Camino) Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 10.5 Interchange Reconstruction 10 18. US 34 Between Dearfield Minor Widening 11.0 and Wiggins 10 17. 1-76 (Bijou) Interchange Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 8.6 Reconstruction SUMMARY OF COSTS High Priority Subtotal $ 57.0 - 57.75M Moderate Priority Subtotal $195.4 - 208.4M Low Priority Subtotal $189.25 - 207.75M All Projects Total $441.65 - 473.9M Interstate $272.6M Non-Interstate $169.05 - 201.3M 10/27/93 Estimated Costt Rank Highway Projects Improvement ($ Millions) MODERATE PRIORITY 13 39. SH 66 Between 1-25 and Minor Widening 6.0 US 85 14 57. US 85 Between SH 52 and Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 14.0 CR 18 15 16. SH 71 Approaches to South Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 2.0 Plane River Bridge 16 2B. US 34 East of US 36 in Major Widening to 4 Lanes 4.0 Estes Park 17 15. SH 39 Approaches to South Minor Widening 1.6 Platte River Bridge 18 5. US 36 to Estes Park Major Widening/Passing Lane 3.0 - 6.0 19 6. US 287 at County Road 74E Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 0.3 to Red Feathers Lake (Turn Lane) 20 27A. 1-25 Between SH 7 and Major Widening to 6 Lanes 141.5 SH 66 Include Interchange at Erie 20 50. US 85 at CR 6, CR 16, Intersection Improvements 1.0 CR 22, CR 22.5, CR 28 22 29. 1-25/SH 52 Interchange Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 4.0 Reconstruction 22 21. SH 71 Between Washington Minor Widening 5.0 - 10.0 County Line and Brush 22 58. 1-76 at Wiggins New Rest Area 3.5 22 9. US 36 to Mary's Lake Road Minor Widening (Pedestrian 1.0 (Estes Park) ~ Trail) 22 20. US 34 East of Brush Minor Widening 3.5 22 22. SH 71 Between Brush and Minor Widening 5.0 - 10.0 Weld County Line 10/27/93 Estimated Cost Rank Highway Projects' Improvement: ($ Millions) LOW PRIORITY 28 7. SH 14 at Old Fort Collins Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 1.0 Water Treatment Plant 29 45. SH 60 Between US 85 and Geometric/Safety/Traffic 3.5 SH 256 Operations/TSM 29 278. 1-25 Between SH 66 and Major Widening to 6 Lanes 100.0 MPO Boundary Include Interchanges at Mead, SH 56, SH 60 31 46. SH 52 in Hudson Railroad Grade Separation 4.0 32 31. 1-25/SH 66 Interchange Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 4.0 Reconstruction 33 41. SH 52 Between Fort Lupton Minor Widening/Safety/Traffic 4.0 and Hudson Operations/TSM 34 47. US 85 Business Route in Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 3.0 Fort Lupton 35 8. Lake Estes Causeway Minor Widening (Pedestrian 2.0 - 3.0 (US 36) Trail) 36 40. SH 52 Between 1-25 and Major Widening to 4 Lanes 24.0 Fort Lupton 37 23. 1-76 Frontage Road Between Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 0.5 - 1.0 County Road 27 and SH 71 38 24. SH 52 Between County Minor Widening 6.0 - 12.0 Road T.5 and SH 14 38 25. SH 52 Between Weld Minor Widening 4.0 - 8.0 County Line and Wiggins 40 37. US 34 Between Hardin and Minor/Major Widening to 4 20.0 1-76 Lanes 41 12. I-25/SH 1 (Wellington) Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 4.0 Interchange Reconstruction 42 43. SH 263 Between MPO and Geometric/Safety/Traffic 1.0 - 2.0 SH 37 OperationsITSM 43 44. SH 37 Between SH 263 and Geometric/Safety/Traffic 2.0 - 3.0 US 34 Operations/TSM 44 26. US 6 Through Wiggins Safety/Traffic Operations/TSM 1.0 45 10. Northern Bypass from 1-25 Feasibility Study 0.25 to US 287 46 4. US 34 to Estes Park Major Widening/Passing Lane 5.0 - 10.0 - TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT SEPTEMBER 1993 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION - MAIN 25.00 · 43.00 13 UTILITY LOCATION - SERVICE 17.00 45.00 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 2.00 3.00 16 TAP REQUEST 2.00 1.50 17 WATER QUALITY - TASTE 1.00 2.50 18 WATER QUALITY - ODOR 19 WATER QUALITY - COLOR 5.00 4.50 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: HIGH 21 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: LOW 1.00 2.00 22 FROZEN LINES: MAIN 23 FROZEN LINES: SERVICE 24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN 1.00 3.00 25 LINE BREAKS: SERVICE 3.00 4.00 30 METER REPAIR 12.00 22.50 31 FINAL INSPECTION 6.00 4.50 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: WATER 3.00 9.50 41 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: PARKS 42 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: STREETS 44 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: OTHER 50 STREET REPAIR 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 2.00 1.50 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 1.00 1.00 54 STORM DRAINAGE 4.00 39.50 55 TRAFFIC HAZARD 60 OTHER 16.00 20.25 ======== TOTALS FOR SEPTEMBER 1993 101.00 207.25 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 101.00 70.00 76.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 207.25 118.50 231.50 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) +32.89%/+11.70% -19.54%/-54.38% +44.29%/-10.48% Rl-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK SEPTEMBER 1993 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for August 14, 1993 through September 13,1993: August 14 to 31 Water Treated: * Fall River O Glacier Creek 23,017,000 *Marys 14,315,000 September 1 to 13 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 12,740,000 *Marys 9,037,000 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 59,109,000 Gal. 2) Water accounted for from August 14 to September 13: i Adjustments: 2,291,590 47,965,620 Billing: 0 * Backwash Total Water accounted for: 50,257,210 Gal., 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 85% . R2-1 ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 153,000 2.) Bleeders TOTAL BLEEDERS (Gal.) 1,988,590 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 18-Aug Golden Eagle line 15,000 b. 24-Aug Golden Eagle line 5,000 c. 27-Aug Golden Eagle line 35,000 d. 31-Aug W. Wonder. / Strong / Golden Eagle 55,000 e. 2-Sep Golden Eagle / Big Horn 20,000 f. 13-Sep Big Horn 20,000 g. h. 1. j. k. 1. m. TOTAL FLUSHING, MISC. (Gal.) 150,000 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) -2,291,590 R2-2 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS SEPTEMBER, 1993 DATE FAU GLACIER SUBTOTAL ?} BIG MARYS SUBTOTAL 2 j TOTAL $ i: ; RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS : THOMP. (GAL) CFS (GAL) 1 0 944,000 944,000 1.47 i ~ 0 699,000 699,000 1.08 E } 1,643,000 2 0 907,000 907,000 1.41 i { 0 397,000 397,000 0.61 1,304,000 3 0 892,000 892,000 1.39 {1 0 635,000 635,000 0.98: 1,527,000 4 0 1,218,000 1,218,000 1.90E j 0 559,000 559,000 0.86: 1,777,000 5 0 1,103,000 1,103,000 1.72{ { 0 922,000 922,000 1.43 j § 2,025,000- 6 0 1,055,000 1,055,000 1.64 } i 0 737,000 737,000 1.14 1,792,000 7 0 946,000 946,000 1.47 i < 0 739,000 739,000 Lit § 1,685,000 8 0 845,000 845,000 1.32 i i 0 682,000 682,000 1.06 : 1,527,000 9 0 892,000 892,000 1.39 t { 0 566,000 566,000 0.88: 1,458,000 10 0 1,034,000 1,034,000 1.61 : i 0 786,000 786,000 1.22 1,820,000 11 0 1,100,000 1,100,000 1.71 {t 0 827,000 827,000 1.28 : 1,927,000 12 0 1,131,000 1,131,000 1.76{ j 0 695,000 695,000 1.08 ? 1,826,000 13 0 673,000 673,000 1.05 j j 0 793,000 793,000 1.23 1,466,000 14 0 766,000 766,000 1.19 i i 0 639,000 639,000 0.99 : 1,405,000 15 0 763,000 763,000 1.19} i 0 689,000 689,000 1.07 1,452,000 16 0 767,000 767,000 1.19t } 0 719,000 719,000 1.11 1,486,000 17 0 906,000 906,000 1.41 2 0 608,000 608,000 0.94 1,514,000 18 0 906,000 906,000 1.41 i { 0 484,000 484,000 0.75 1,390,000 19 0 957,000 957,000 1.49 id o 474,000 474,000 0.73 1,431,000 20 0 829,000 829,000 1.29 { { 0 510,000 510,000 0.79 1,339,000 21 0 839,000 839,000 1.31 } j 0 473,000 473,000 0.73 1,312,000 22 0 817,000 817,000 1.27} s 0 455,000 455,000 0.70 : 1,272,000 23 0 1,166,000 1,166,000 1.82} i 0 159,000 159,000 0.25 1,325,000 24 0 1,562,000 1,562,000 2.43 }} 0 0 0 0.00 1,562,000 25 0 1,406,000 1,406,000 2.19{ ~ 0 0 0 0.00 1,406,000 26 o• 1,536,000 1,536,000 2.39 ~> 0 0 0 0.00 1,536,000 27 0 1,320,000 1,320,000 2.06:{ 0 0 0 0.00 : 1,320,000 28 0 1,464,000 1,464,000 2.28 . { 0 0 0 0.00 : 1,464,000 29 0 1,497,000 1,497,000 2.33 i j 0 0 0 0.00: 1,497,000 30 0 0 0 0.00 i: 0 0 0 0.00 j 0 31 0 0 0 0.00:.} 0 0 0 0.00 } i 0 TOT. 0 30,241.000 30.241.000 >§ 0 14,247,000 14,247,000 44.488.000 i AF 0.00 92.81 92.81 136.54 0.00 43.73 43.73 CFS 0.00 1.51 1.51 ?: ~ 0.00 0.71 0.71 : 2.22 BW(-1 0 N/A O } O 0 0 {4 0 S k BL(-} N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -2,291,590 * 5.-1 GAL 0 30,241,000 30.241,000 >: 0 14,247,000 14.247.000 ~ 42.196.410 ~ AF 0 92.81 92.81 : : 0.00 43.73 43.73 R ..%? 129.50 1 st-13 0 12,740,000 0 9,037,000 14-31 0 17,501,000 0 5,210,000 R2-3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS) 1992 1992 1993 1993 MONTH YTD M j MONTH YTD F-§ % % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL i j TOTAL TOTAL ~ * CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) & i (GAL.) (GAL.) (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 22,227,168 22,227,1681 4 26,042,370 26,042,370 17.16% 17.16% FEBRUARY 18,753,245 40,980,413~ :~ 21,131,280 47,173,650 12.68% 15.11% MARCH 22,019,445 62,999,858 26,485,160 73,658,810 20.28% 16.92% APRIL 24,054,701 87,054,559 22,764,110 96,422,920 -5.37% 10.76% MAY 39,232,054 126,286.613ts 40,059.420 136.482,340. 2.11% 8.07% 5:. > JUNE 44,414,452 170,701,065 54,127,530 190,609,870 21.87% 11.66% JULY 58,684.781 229,385,846 71,039,000 261,648,870: i 21.05% 14.06% AUGUST 54,405,908 283,791,754: 1 62,554,600 324,203,470 f 14.98% 14.24% 6 * SEPTEMBER 46,502,599 330,294.353> i 42,196,410 366,399.880 -9.26% 10.93% OCTOBER 31,968,183 362,262,536{ NOVEMBER 23,475,870 385,738.406{ DECEMBER 27,329,460 413,067,866 TOTAL 413,067,866 AC - FT 9,483 R2-4 ESTES PARK SEPTEMBER & YTD WATER BILLED 300,000,000 -' °_ 12.5% 250,000,000 - C #=/ 9 0 C' 200,000,000 -' - - --- - - /7 0/7 1 GALLONS 150,000,000 -' - - - - - - - - - - - - 10.3% 100,000,000 -' - - - - - - - - - - - - 50,000,000 -' - - - - - - - ·- 6@F - dii f¥ 01 M> * UD CO - 00 0 0 - 01 MD 00 co 00 00 00 00 00 00 0, 01 01 CD 3 YTD C> C) 03 0-> CD C) 01 C") O-·]C')C) ---9- YEAR 6 SEP R2-5 ESTES PARK SEPTEMBER & YTD WATER REVENUE 900,000.00 - 800,000.00 - .. 8.1% 700,000.00 - - £- --- C. 600,000.00 -' - - - - - - 0 500,000.00 - ----- DOLLARS 400,000.00 - .1-0- - - 9.0% 300,000.00 -' - 200,000.00 -'=-~ - 100,000.00 - 10 * LO C.0 - 00 0 0 -- Od rn Co co 00 00 00 00 00 00 0-) 03 C-) CD U YTD C) a) 01 CDC) C) 01 0-) 07 CD CD YEAR ~ SEP R2-6