The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1993-09-234,[ 4, 9 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA September 23, 1993 10 AM 1. RMC 1993 Water Line Proj ects Scope of Services - Change Order request. 2. Riverside Plaza Banner - Installation request. 3. US West - Request for an easement from Town. REPORTS: 1. Hike and Bike Trail Master Plan 2. Churches sign location 3. Customer Service Response 4. Monthly Water Reports The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary. t . ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 437 South St. Vraln September 3, 1993 Estes Park, CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 Bill Linnane Metro (303) 825-8233 P.O. Box ]200 Fax (303) 825-8912 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: 1993 Water Line Loop Projects Dear Bill: Please find enclosed an invoice for work perfc,rmed in relaLion to the Town of Estes Park 1993 Water Line Loop Projects. The invoice is for design und construction management services for the EnsL Riverside Drive prc,jerl: :tri (1 :1 I)(i r 1. i ori ~1 f 1.lit., R <,Vr] 1,1/ne Interconnection. The total consl.ructlori costs of the additional projects was $38,100. A brief history of' the two project.s follows: 1) EnHt Riverside Drive Upon easement negotiaLion breakdowns on n portion of the Roy<] Lane 1111.er'(:orillect.inris arir] t,}re 1,6.wist.orl ('f)11(1()1111.11111111 WaLer Loop projec L , Town of EsLes Park persinnuil und RMC personnel agreed upon pursing thi4 project. A plan sheet was prepared and negotiations with AT Construction hegan Vi,r completion of the projecL. The project was eventually constructed as one of Lhe 1993 Wa.ter Loop Projects above and beyond the orÂ·.igirial Scope of Engineering Servines. 2) Boyd Lane Tril.erÂ·connection Anadditional 170 lineal foot portion of this project was designed during the construction of Lhe main project. An easement was negotiated with a 1.11 11(lowner af I.er 1. he projects had been bid arifl a ct ontzn.arel.-aÂ·s_- sig ned for cons t,ruc 1- i on . The Hdr] i t. i onal. 1~0 1 i rir.al f(.Jib r, f water -main replaced ;in exist. ing 1 " niti,iR---am- 17[17. area. tÂ®NAL <Per nur 3*PIÂ·ember 2, 1993 meeting, R.MC h:is fig t'fifitd t.i, ;1(t:(:,Aft a / $4,Â·000 [plyment. for the worÂ·k prÂ·eformed. This is our net.11;11 nost,s in I th 11,cifj e c 1. and does noL contain profit for the job. If you have any questions, please do not hesitaLe to call. s i rl~:erÂ·el j;,7/ / ROEI{Y MO~4'VAT,14 CONS Ill,TANTS, ING. d.'' j iln â€¢u-trÂ·Ky M. Prochaslf :1 , P.E. Probect Mannger KMP/ 14 j k 1-1 t.. ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9mc 437 South St. Vraln September 3, 1993 Estes Park, CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 Fax (303) 825-8912 Town of Estes Park Attn: Bill L.innane P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: 1993 Water Looping Project. RMC JOB NO: 9-0223.033.00 INVOICE NO. 2 DESCRIPTION Principal 4 hrs @ $90/hr $ 360.00 Project Manager 32 hrs @ $70/hr $2240.00 Construction Observer 40 hrs @ $45/hrÂ· $1800.00 Drafting 16 hrs @ $30/hr $ 480.00 Clerical 24 hrÂ·s @ $20/hr $ 480.00 TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,360.00 Agreed to amount per 9/2/93 meeting ......,..$4 ,000.00 TERMS: PAYABLE UPON RECEIPT. THANK YOU ! PLEASE REMIT TO: ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. RMC JOB NO. 9-0223.033.00 P.O. BOX 1649 ESTES PARK, CO 8051.7 1-2 CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING ICL T ~C\ib-\204_, L.3 MEMORANDUM TO: Urban Renewal - Art Anderson Parks Department - Dan Speedlin FROM: Special Events Department - Linda Hinze DATE: August 12, 1993 RE: Riverside PlazaÂ·'- Banner Provision 1* 1 I ,!ec The Special Events Department has, for the past two years, been responsible for entertainment programs at Riverside Plaza. This summer (1993) we have arranged for twenty-two (22) entertainment days. Most all of the groups have some type of banner which they would like displayed during the performance. The performance area does not have a designated banner area, they are therefore using rocks, trees, etc. We. are requesting that a banner holder be erected for their use, specifics to be worked out between Urban Renewal, Parks Department and Special Events Department. Suggested Use: 1. Banners would.be displayed only during the performance time, not as an advertisement of an upcoming event. Most performances last only 45 minutas to 1 hour. This lets the group be recognized while performing. 2. Banners would be limited in size by size of holder. 3. Banner holder does not need to be: 1. Large - could be removable by use of sleeves. 2. High - visible only to those watching the performance. Please contact me so that we can discuss this matter in detail. Thank you for your consideration. c -INXÂ»Â«ki 2-1 U S WEST Communications Daniel P. Haley Manager 111:11(ESM- I Right-of-Way Department COMMUNICATIONS @ 12121 Grant St. Ste Bl I Thornton, CO 80241 Office (303) 451-2670 Digital Pager (303) 821-6758 Facsimile (303) 451-2420 September 13, 1993 Town of Estes Park % Bill Linnane P. O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Request for easement on the west end of the rodeo grounds. Dear Bill, We are requesting the Town of Estes Park to grant US West Communications an easement for the purposes of adding and upgrading telephone service to and around the "Reclamation Subdivision" area. The enclosed information should giveyou apretty good idea ofwhat weare after. Upon approval, I will order a survey of this request and use it as ati exhibit to an easement that I will send you for execution. I believe you said this request could be considered at this months meeting, September 23. Thanks for your help and I'll wait to see how your meeting goes. Sincerely, I v (Â»'Lw Dan Haley ' 3-1 3-a . W. . . kilbvf / -. 414.I -.- * 4/>..3,20 146 1 0 LEE--fis-Z.i-~14*'~0~. ,/ unrrn f d q ,Â»* r 1 - ' ''' \ :C 4 l -1 0 U-/t,4 2/ - :Â§lZ V ./ 0 U \ 111 \ j Ir. - -- 'A, 11: 4.9 h. Â»47. =C / \ 1- ~â€¢%â€¢â€¢ 1,1 â€¢,1 - .11 R g 1 jt-1--1----r-- A-TnÂ· .Trrr, j/ * w " S g q Kin 142 111 1.1-:llA . 1 N R n A4=di'IlvIi -cdvuu Ae r=== 1 %3 I - -0 8,41 4 x'0127. S v V A 60 6 64 7 n /\ . - f * 3Â« / AP - - W g li 4 3 -0 Â¥ 1 J 0 4 WR . Fi . U .\E- : i 0 V 't :0.* ~ - 1 1 -O = ---. FFTl-f- -i a R " i a 3 9%21736- -1 V :S h U -*b:i:1.*.\ 6 // En / /tt=:1 2 111 - d, 4 /7 421:5.Val 4. 7/' 2&11:48 --n f, I. i./'.f Â·7~<Â°Â·' t--2- ) 2/ 2 < L_,f~ f;-.; 1., 4/, 64: 3 4 , C I ., j#JW,Y: - l ....,-,- 1 . - I :1 i< 1 U E#6- -9' .- m â€ž. f#TjlEFEE,#n'fiel PpiWEd 17 V C - - :AE- 14 , Ateelrv-Vi . 4 i ,~,PR@Pi@t~ ce .0- 1 A\ I fat- 3402=233 t 8>04@42Â» 33 ry-/rlÂ·'4,,4,1,4/ ' 2-1 - ~ Â· F't :49% 4*84 . %00 - A C L ' 151, u.. 3,* 1Â«42/Utpo''jt.rls,=12 -9~ . 0Â¥*244- 1,41 n S . , 9, .. I- -LAO,A, f;:tt, 0'41' -RÂ·;.3L// E-1â€¢ 3 + = ~ ~ ..: 1 1-111.i t.0 El-1 Its-L i.[N - . .4, Iti 31 f - R. i: 1 1 ' 1 ' -1. Â·Â· 1 r 1-1 1 1..Pill H I 1 1 1} i. 08*5'a...6**4.4 'At*~1DLAA m y R:i A $ 1. -0 --*~- 12~EEP /5 1 I 9 11 N . P C. I 9%42 i k 4/ a r . Irr-ner,- 40 AN w . 8 5 -- L M . t + 4**up ...- . I g , 1 1 ./1 1 -amtrnor1193,Rm , ,- - ;1/LI/,4 k-H.1*1.101â€¢10102: ...414.1:+ ~~ jAIDgi NOANV ,~Ap?43-lf91*'fmt<ji *#3 Fnaj 33. . 4 i:4,41-:4 '#Ibl R .,~, N 0 + W r= 4 U r' 1 8137%411:,3.1 ..2. 1,-1. 1-, ,."42.11111Â£41*; 4'll 1.~Â·'Â·' 1~\ AN-/ EC â„¢ 2 .2 -M. ...4 AllNÂ¥15 r 8 1 1.---. I 'd--â€¢f :40*Â·,4,14 0...\C,â‚¬,1<14. L. 32 4%94... VE.f'.t.--,!i'lu ' ~~-Â·WÂ·'.%~A\El' W 2 - 1 1 r-1 2 9, 19 1 '3 1,t.,44\ s'*, : 11 -1 .. :4--- - In = 8 1 .... ., 1 -- Avnt-Â»,fli J....t 1*54= 4 - ,- 9 0 - \ftÂ·-41-\ \%?ia r- Fl ---4, - - 4 - ~ - A .: . t i. I. 4 Â· 7,0:.'~â€¢,AN*i L/N/- /33- fâ€¢ i Uttto.E 1 H .\ \;4j#** kÂ»-6-e I ._ 0 . TE.,-719-â€žf - - : lili-I . Â· Â·., Â·: 3 940%.* \ *~'Â·/- 2-3 . I. : W "84;'CEf i 2 - W#, . 1., / r-*Ld , i . 11\ 95 0 ---065,4#i p:*~* 4*'*4' i . .1 1 5 0 .13,Lr].171 I 1 / 1 .-%1'jilt,i:.ri..1 ~- i --LifiJil*RATiZvojach,hiE"Fit, i.. a / R 0,1 4#tÂ«Fei'ZE251 .0 ~ ~ M 4 4, o l f -1-4 - .. 1 -*A -- l 4Â·.73411Ift' 1 1/1/,./j' //i ~ . - I 1 01197+Cit115 2L-, -WjiN .. 3 -02- 2 9.0/ lir?Wh - 11 -1- . 7.7 "b'.4.1 1 2 1..... P 41,,;.,..z . *i Liv<V -: Ca .| 1 li{'A A-'014nv 177- J & Rilk'lErm'Mithill-PANtyly'fRA i'.'I 3AIHC HARRISON ~~~ER )third 53153 10 STAHL.Y HEIGHTS 38 SAO(]Â¥3â€¢ AnNÂ¥15 Â· 01 100Â¥ MIÂ¥.N 1Â¥lldS EGOR RANCH - 111 Â«24==a=a< J / / 7 /-< -- . -3. -71.v i: u 1 LA KE ESTa 2, l . 0 Â£11 1 1 2 01 UL7 . , C) 1 - 1 1 JI L- 04.24 61 - - - - STATE 66 0 N. ST . VRAIN 2: - -- - $ d r-7 49: 5, 0*74 /0 1\01 C 4. el K - -1\29 We>. 6 /4 1 "\. 0 ///kk /0,127* <4, DR. 1* 14 S-EN LE ~ PARK COMMANCHE CL f< A o '6 I 2 ' 20 0 20 1,40 V.00.*t 7UIyETg) 0 - 11 .4 - -9Â« â‚¬ Al[- 6 , n UL7C-2 2 4 MANFORD O -, X /1 - CO 1-9 4 04 Â»A.ti iâ€¢ WOODSTOCK 44:) 1* \34 , ~ \Et 1250~ â‚¬4 Iii CO 411 \ 0 9 9 - 1 .1 - A - 0 - - I 1 191/---_-1 8 \NT VRAIN LN. . GRAVES 1 r.:4 -=EZZ=t:Z~ AVE. : 0 5 2=E.EMEN/| 0 2% 0 \ i 31 . TX \ \$\ I â€ž40 - 117'A- - 1 \\\\ k-_mgoDIE UNB:3-1- f COMMUNITY UL7CÂ·2E UL7C \ \ \ \. ./ \ \ \ \\ W 1 e> - 4 5 - /flf 71 3 92 \ l \ u/ // , f \ C /7/ \ 40 0 4 1 0 \v / 1 1 e \ \ 41 / 7 - 66" P-K rbi / \ 0- \ \\,f /0. / / / / / Page' 2 The Trail-Gazette, Friday, July 17, 1992 co.Ma-WTE_A ilÂ»View *012 Â»Â© % .,1-fifIE 1 44 A'fly Voices going nowhere Welcome to the 1990s, where Frank and rate increase proposal now pending before the Myrtle's extra-marital affair is gossip fodder for ' Colorado Public Utilities Comniission. 411-lAi - whoever happens onto the line. Town officials, also frustrated by the absence of IF eSTâ‚¬ Or,where an important message to the boss Ims local services to all residents within the town limits gAEs io be delayed until Lucille finishes telling Ruth (not to mention Uiose poor unfortunate souls who L-Â·-1 0 Ann all about her latest recipe for orange Jell-0 live in the Ilinterlands of the telephone frontier), A,-'f Ilf molds. have asked US West for an explanation of why Thanks to US West and its "Estes Park doesn't single-party service is so hard to acquire. need modernization" philosophy, we are truly in Many residents have been waiting for a simple the back woods of communication. residential line for more than seven months, yet Then again, perhaps the caller waiting to contact ate still receiving the busy signal from US West. the boss should be grateful. There are dozens of And tile town's request for an explanation, now local residents who simply can't get telephone nearly two months old, has also gone unanswered. service at all. Public relations is obviously not one of US . A MeNT Mountain Bell/US West shut down its Estes Park West's strciigtlis. customer service office in the early 1980s. Maybe The glaring avoidance is timed especially KekDOr we should have known then that we were being poorly because PUC commissioners will be in delisted from the areas in which user-friendly was town Aug. 12 to determine local residents' atti- still an operative command. tudes toward US West's telephone service. In tlie meantime, of course, we've continued to The hearing is a prelude to the company's rate Â«, pay ever-escalating telephone rates, justified in the request, and Estes Park's 1995 upgrade is being name of efficiency, technological advances, cost of used as leverage. operation, etc. It's too bad so few of those advances have Apparently, if we don't embrace the telephone found tlieir way to Estes Park. company with all 10 dialing fingers, we may have 1=~ To underscore the disdain with which Estes Park to wait until the turn of tile century to catch up < 0 is held in US West circles, our town is last on a list with the rest of tile state. of statewide upgrades intended to eliminate multi- Our message to the PUC should be straightfor- party lines. ward, aggressive and to the point. Not coincidentally, the need to extend outreach All together now, in the manner of Lily Tom- programs to far-flung towns such as Estes Park is lin's telephone operator, Ernestine: "One ringy- Ho " being used as jusUfication for another US West dingy, two ringy-dingys ... LE'"0-- 4 #;Â·Â·' â€¢Â·*St M [FLf E KE g. pi.51"/m pt,1~4#F Fro Ah. ves. 01 STATE OF COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Department of Regulatory Agencies ,<flfÂ¥=k #4'-2 Steven V. Berson g./. Arnold H. Cook, Chairman Executive Director Gary L. Nakarado, Commissioner 9. Christine E. Alvarez, Commissioner Bruce N. Smith, Executive Secretary Â· Roy Romer Governor July 7, 1992 Mr. Richard E. Matzke, PE, Director Estes Park Light and Power Department P O Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Your Letter About U S WEST Communications Dear Mr. Matzke: I have received today a copy of Don Garcia's response to your June 4 letter to the company and June 11 letter to the Commission. It appears you were given the standard company response concerning upgrading of service to private lines and the Rural Facilities Improvement Program. I expected that response when we forwarded your letter to the Regulatory Affairs office. However, I'm sure you were as disappointed as I to see no response to your concern about the lack of service to Saddleback Lane. As the company did not respond to that issue, I would remind you that you have the option of filing a formal complaint with the Commission. You might recall that our June 18 mailing included the materials you will need for the formal complaint process. Sincerely, w 6/&FLZ~li #â€ž:--) Greqi'Williams Public Information Specialist External Affairs Enclosure 1580 Logan Street, Office Level 2, Denver, Colorado 80203 FAX (303) 894-2065 TELEPHONE NUMBER (303) 894-2000 CONSUMER AFFAIRS (303) 894-2070 PERMIT AND INSURANCE 1-800-888-0170 CONSUMER AFFAIRS 1-800-456-0858 #SEE@b ':.. 181;WES,- COMMUNICATIONS @ Fort Collins, Colorado July 3, 1992 Mr. Richard E. Matzke Estes Park Light and Power P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Mr. Matzke, The purpose of this correspondence is to respond to your June 4, 1992, letter regarding telephone service availability in Estes Park. For many years, our standard service in rural areas has been four-party service. Today, many customers in outlying areas are requesting one- party telephone service. To meet that demand, we are in the process of adding facilities to upgrade all four-party customers in the state, and installing facilities to enable us to provide one-party service to the customers we serve. However, in some areas, we are not able to meet the demand for one-party service at this time. This is the situation we have in Estes Park. We recently filed a proposal with the Public Utilities Commission to complete the upgrades over a four-year period. It is our intent to upgrade Estes Park in the course of that plan. Until this plan is approved and implemented, we will continue to work with customers to meet their needs to the best of our ability. If I can be of further assistance please call me on 229-5000. Sincerely, dw 2%4__. Don Garcia Area Manager u s West Communications r I .\ 0 ,if Â£94:kt TOW1\1 C--) F [5rES PARK - Â¢k.i>:5,5 13Â·~?LE#P# , ' i.)'4:i.1. 4 Â·Â·Â°:.- +0~444.m:Â¥11'iy,k:.,4,2*,~f.fÂ¢Â¢~k'Â· ,T ,; 8 I 0 k 4.34.72,84 .4 9 '416*.Ng .. 1-:*424.{rilikr 4 i, rt'~#&,*' .';~.* . Le/*97,- Â·Â·--~ ,< *<44;Â·i r: s,iffdy,YkE- 4 :, >941,0*.: ' Â·tgl-4411$.1,1 3 r 1,1%3444154414WQEIVA/M: ~- .M...416;.,Â·..Â·,Â£048,0'tpit54:k"%. . . June 11, 1992 4. i . 11*0:.4 + . 1. /1 Mr. Bruce Smith Executive Secretary The Public Utilities Commission Logan Tower, Office Level 2 1580 Logan Street Denver, CO 80203 Dear Mr. Smith: Enclosed is a copy of a letter from the Town of Estes Park to U.S. West regarding our concerns about telephone service availability and response in the Estes Park area. In the letter to Mr. Garcia, I listed several areas in the Estes Park Base Rate Area or Suburban Rate Area where individual line phone service is not available. In the Brook Drive area, a Town employee purchased a house where I understand individual line service had been provided in the past, and was offered only four party service. This employee now has two ~ party service in a residence located in the Suburban Rate Area. The Saddleback Lane area, located at the southern end of the Suburban Rate area has residences which have had outstanding service requests since December of 1991 and still have no telephone service whatsoever. These examples cause us concern about the lack of planning and upgrades to the telephone system in the Estes Park area. I have requested that U.S. West provide the Town of Estes Park with their plan for resolving these service deficiencies. I would also request the Public Utilities Commission determine if U.S. West is providing the level of service claimed in their tariff sheets on file with the commission. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Sincerely, t TOWN OF ESTES PARK i Light and Power Department i i 1 72.~-c,'LL 23 ~27-Li~v- Richard E. Matzke, PE Director ENCLOSURE 81*}11<,P,h,:,1 - 11,14Â«10,1,0 - 111,,1.\1.,( f),t!'*.1, - 1./C,:Piti,.9. '210.'14.;11,11'.IPÂ·\11(41 . 1/V<(10.1)5111,Â·Â·69()90111[R I .1 49 1 1(0 )\/1/11,1 i )1 1.f, 1 4., l'ARK &5,/ J. Â·- Â·Aitt,*f,..1 )F : !(lf r ,) . 07 i :i) ...,-iÂ·!.96,91'5;4 /7 - brl-*ir' ,Â· Â·5'. i; .0 -. r 2 g,69 ,Â·:1 i/1.'~ - 4 41'f..\.2, 9 3 \1}14,44# ~; ~ 4 <fktL?alÂ¥~ 2-'~: 4. k~11:-/d.1,1 1 12'. i.9 (â€¢,1.Y * I , --'. 'fÂ·t : r.1 Â·,0.6 i44Â· Â·Â·jtj, .'iti,tÂ·..i .4 f,44#i k'Lj' 2 . '~A.x,<)#~Â·~:~. '.. k ' :ir''-i, '. 4 02Â·Â·Â·Â·I. 74 7.: *,6'' ' VA L;.7.t ,, Â·n mie,'93: 9,40?!41. C. .0-t; ~ -i..7, 3 4 â‚¬9 - ,-==.,..., June 4, 1992 j?il:. . ...a,7... ,- 1. ,.,.,M:41,-14-. , /4#4 , 30 1 PaÂ· {r }' c ..1 Mr. Don Garcia Area Manager U.S. West 4620 South College Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Mr. Garcia: I am writing to follow up.our recent telephone conversation regarding telephone service availability in Estes Park. As we discussed, our office has been made aware of four areas within the Estes Park Base Rate or Suburban Rate Area Â· which have limited telephone service availability. These areas are Steamer Drive, Community Drive & Brodie Avenue, Brook Drive, and Saddleback Lane. The first three areas do not have single line service available and Saddleback Lane has no telephone service available. It is my understanding from the tariff sheets filed by U.S. West Communications with the Public Utilities Commission that individual line service is provided within the Estes Park Base Rate area and Suburban Rate Area #1. We are concerned that residents in these areas have been unable to receive the telephone service they applied for but we are further concerned about the prevalence of this problem in the Estes Park area. Please furnish the Town of Estes Park with a list of areas in the Estes Park local exchange which do not have single line telephone service available. Also, please provide your construction plans and time table for resolving these failures to provide service to Estes Park area residents. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK Light and Power Department PL-e,Gl- 2 770'-C~ 6 Richard E. Matzke, PE Director cc: Mr. Bruce Smith Executive Secretary Public Utilities Commission :, 1,1, 1.,1., . 111 11.!1 ''Irl,);1 .. 1 .hil,1.1,11"I, ''11, 1, U.,1.11.lt''ll - 1.7:(11~t)'Ilt,).{'11(,(H)11111~ e.Â·/ I*KE/BIKE TRAIL SYSTEM INTERGOVERNI\IENTAL AGREEMENT EVRPD, LARIMER COUNTY, TOWN OF ESTES PARK BACKGROUND and PURPOSE The Estes Valley Recreation and Park District, I.,arimer County and the Town of Estes Park have identified the need to plan and construct hike/bike trails in the Estes Valley. EVRPD has prepared a plan to construct a hike/bike trail system adjacent to Lake Estes. 1.arimer County Parks and Recreation Department has plans for trails in the Estes Valley. And most recently, the Town of Estes Park established an Estes Valley Hike/Bike Committee that made recommendations for a hike/bike trail system in the Estes Valley. Members on the committee included representatives from Larimer County, YMCA, EVRPD, Town staff and concerned citizens. The above-stated governmental entities have a common interest in an Estes Valley hike/bike trail system and propose to establish an intergovernmental agreement between the entities. Further, this agreement will focus on the number one priority of the Hike/Bike Committee - the Lake Estes Trail. SCOPE and BUDGET The projected cost of the Lake Estes Trail System from the Chamber of Commerce Building to the Marina area is $665,000. The project may be considered in two phases: I. Chamber to Lakefront Street - approximately $250,000 II. Lakefront Street to the Wapiti Meadows area below the dam - approximately $415,000 The intergovernmental agreement will focus on Lake Estes Trail System, Phase I. The proposed budget is as follows: Larimer County $50,000 EVRPD $ 50,000 Town of Estes Park $150,000 Rl-1 Hike/Bike Trail System Intergovernmental Agreement September 16, 1993 2 pages RESPONSIBILITIES and ASSIGNMENTS 1. Town shall prepare the intergovernmental agreement. 2. Town shall be responsible for sweeping and snow removal. 3. EVRPD shall be responsible for trail maintenance, patching, shoulders, weeds, trash, etc. 4. Town of Estes Park Public Works Department will be construction manager. 5. Team composed of Larimer County Parks and Recreation Director, EVRPD Executive Director, and Estes Park Town Administrator will direct project. 6. EVRPD shall be responsible for planning, permits, grants, etc. 7. Project slated for 1994. EVRPD may provide 1993 funds for engineering which shall be credited against the 1994 budget commitment. f DATES Project to be completed by August 1,.1994. â€¢ Intergovernmental outline reviewed by Larimer County October meeting, EVRPD October meeting and Town Public Works Committee meeting September 26. â€¢ All.commitments to Intergovernmental Agreement shall be in place by November 1, 1993. 0 1 Hike/Bike Trail System Rl-2 Intergovernmental Agreement September 16, 1993 2 pages TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT AUGUST 1993 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION - MAIN 27.00 58.00 13 UTILITY LOCATION - SERVICE - 5.00 8.50 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 16 TAP REQUEST 1.00 2.00 17 WATER QUALITY - TASTE 18 WATER QUALITY - ODOR 19 WATER QUALITY - COLOR 6.00 2.50 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: HIGH 21 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: LOW 4.00 2.50 22 FROZEN LINES: MAIN 23 FROZEN LINES: SERVICE 24 LINE BREARs: MAIN 1.00 1.00 25 LINE BREAKS: SERVICE 3.00 7.50 30 METER REPAIR 7.00 12.00 31 FINAL INSPECTION 3.00 2.00 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: WATER 1.00 5.00 41 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: PARKS 42 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: STREETS 44 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: OTHER 1.00 1.00 50 STREET REPAIR 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 54 STORM DRAINAGE 1.00 1.00 55 TRAFFIC HAZARD 60 OTHER 10.00 15.50 ======== TOTALS FOR AUG UST 1993 70.00 118.50 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 70.00 87.00 50.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 118.50 259.75 136.75 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) -19.54%/-54.38% -2.25%/+9.71% +40.0%/-13.16% R3-1 ESTES PARK AUGUST & YTD WATER BILLED 250,000,000 - 13.0% V 200,000,000 -s -- O 9 40. O O o t. 0 2 4; r a 1/ 150.000,000 -'0Â· 9 34 311 . R: 1 1, 4 + '4 GALLONS 1 1 9 3 4 34.9% p 4,411 , 1 .4 f 1. & 4 t,~ 100,000.000 -' N:, 0 4 Â£ i qi lk. 1 50,000,000 -'~ t- 0 LO C.0 - 00 00 0, 0 0 Cm YEAR [3 YTD . 1 AUG R4-1 1982 Â»3 1983-~'I" - ~ 9,4.t t96 1 124 LE6 1 4 4 79 996 1 ,-41 696 1 C661 ESTES PARK AUGUST & YTD WATER REVENUE 700,000.00 -' â‚¬7 7.9% - C.-27- 4,- 600,000.00 - CI I * 500,000.00 - 1 > 14. s 1 4 4.. 400,000.00 -' DOLLARS 07 4% al i b IL 300,000.00 -'i-~-fi-i#2-*r-k, -4' - )- -, -+ -5 -22.6% Â¢ 2 4' ~'' 7.r , ; 3.., F 2, lf, ~} 229 4/ r, fi 02 6 27. A 4 4, 200,000.00 - 1 - :1 --6 -1 4-34 -11 --3 -f# - - g. fti m , i t., I' c 9 4 4 % b ' -' 4 100,000.00 -j - -44-*-~I: YEAR E YTD . AUG R4-2 1982 1983 ~ 141 1984-<Cap- 1986 -6#v- L961 . 9861 12*-- 1+13*'rÂ».u.... 0661 -t, i . . -0; ~~ 1661 - 26 3; 1:~~, I66 1 + . - rce/-'ll/'ll-9661 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS AUGUST, 1993 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL } BIG MARYS SUBTOTAL TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS THOMP. (GAL) CFS E (GAL) 1 0 1,412,000 1,412,000 2.20 N o 802,000 802,000 1.24 : 2,214,000 2 0 1,536,000 1,536,000 2.39.{ 0 870,000 870,000 1.35 2,406,000 3 0 1,295,000 1,295,000 2.02.1 0 769,000 769,000 1.19 2,064,000 4 0 1,323,000 1,323,000 2.06: 0 780,000 780,000 1.21 E } 2,103,000 23 5 0 1,241,000 1,241,000 1.93 ~} 0 750,000 750,000 1.16. 1,991,000 6 0 1,451,000 1,451,000 2.26 li 0 658,000 658,000 1.02 j 2,109,000 7 0 1,347,000 1,347,000 2.10'1 0 701,000 701,000 1.08 I y 2,048,000 8 0 1,240,000 1,240,000 1.93} f 0 728,000 728,000 1.13 1,968,000 k k: 9 0 1,233,000 1,233,000 1.92 i { 0 740,000 740,000 1.15 i 1,973,000 10 0 1,280,000 1,280,000 1.99 E - 0 737,000 737,000 1.14 2,017,000 11 0 1,342,000 1,342,000 2.09 0 712,000 712,000 1.10 : 2,054,000 12 0 1,298,000 1,298,000 2.02 i{ 0 700,000 700,000 1.08 1,998,000 13 0 1,347,000 1,347,000 2.10 i 0 782,000 782,000 1.21 : 2,129,000 14 0 1,448,000 1,448,000 2.25 : 0 773,000 773,000 1.20 2,221,000 15 0 1,433,000 1,433,000 2.23 - 0 737,000 737,000 1.14: 2,170,000 16 0 1,569,000 1,569,000 2.44 0 967,000 967,000 1.50: 2,536,000 - 17 0 1,490,000 1,490,000 2.32 { 0 811,000 811,000 1.25 2,301,000 18 0 1,405,000 1,405,000 2.19 {{ 0 792,000 792,000 1.23 2,197,000 19 0 1,379,000 1,379,000 2.15 j 0 869,000 869,000 1.34 : 2,248,000 20 0 1,260,000 1,260,000 1.96: { 0 997,000 997,000 1.54 Â·} 2,257,000 21 0 1,236,000 1,236,000 1.92f i 0 853,000 853,000 1.32 : : 2,089,000 22 0 1,323,000 1,323,000 2.06: 0 847,000 847,000 1.31 2,170,000 23 0 1,361,000 1,361,000 2.12} 1 0 865,000 865,000 1.34 2,226,000 24 0 1,432,000 1,432,000 2.23 1 0 802,000 802,000 1.24 : 2,234,000 25 0 1,276,000 1,276,000 1.99 : 0 848,000 848,000 1.31 2,124,000 26 0 1,333,000 1,333,000 2.08:{ 0 845,000 845,000 1.31 2,178,000 27 0 1,255,000 1,255,000 1.95{ { 0 815,000 815,000 1.26 2,070,000 28 0 1,323,000 1,323,000 2.06 f{ 0 855,000 855,000 1.32 i 2,178,000 29 0 1,206,000 1,206,000 1.88 i j 0 828,000 828,000 1.28 2,034,000 30 0 1,288,000 1,288,000 2.01 j 0 811,000 811,000 1.25 : . 2,099,000 31 0 0 0 0.00:: 0 0 0 0.00 0 TOT. 0 40,362,000 40.362.000 0 24,044,000 24,044,000 64.406.000 AF 0.00 123.87 123.87 0.00 73.79 73.79 197.67 CFS 0.00 2.01 2.01 0.00 1.20 1.20 3.21 BW(-1 0 N/A O 0 0 0 >> 0 BL(-) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1,851,400 GAL 0 40,362,000 40.362.000 ~< 0 24,044,000 24,044,000 ~ 62,554,600 AF 0 123.87 123.87 0.00 73.79 73.79 3 191.99 1st-13 0 17,345,000 0 9,729,000 14-31 0 23,017,000 0 14,315,000 R4-3 , ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 317,000 2.) Bleeders TOTAL BLEEDERS (Gal.) 12,400 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 21-Jul Carriage Dr. Service leak 432,000 b. 23-Jul Flush Marys Lake Rd. 150,000 c. 27-Jul Flush Strong Ave. 100,000 d. 5-Aug Flush Th. Mtn./D.Gulch/Vista 775,000 e. 10-Aug Chasm leal</Th. Mtn. overflow 25,000 f. 12-Aug Vista Ln. 40,000 g. h. 1. j. k. 1. m. TOTAL FLUSHING, MISC. (Gal.) 1,522,000 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) -1,851,400 R4-4 > TOWN OF ESTES PARK AUGUST 1993 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for July 14, 1993 through August 13, 1993: July 14 to 31 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 27,931,000 *Marys 14,322,000 August 1 to 13 Water Treated: *Fall River O Glacier Creek 17,345,000 *Marys 9,729,000 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 69,327,000 Gal. 2) Water accounted for from July 14 to August 13: Adjustments: . 1,851,400 Billing: 58,157,480 * Backwash 0 Total Water accounted for: 60,008,880 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 87% R4-5 4 4 4 144 44344 3 314 41 jf~tj-j~f-ti ~ttif i - 0 (Â¥) C) 03 f.- 00 1 F 1 ,%14 14,4 y ~~ 3 a. U % 41 9.114 4 - 1- â‚¬ 0 le E-24.Â© ~ r Â·nut f-33 41 1 C. .r-\- Â£444 1 Aftti ~1141 14-9 + 1 1-1 } 4 4 1 -1 1 k 3- 76 p (31 4 W