Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Public Works 1993-08-26
4 1 .4, PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA August 26, 1993 1. Water easement Little Prospect Mountain Addition - Request vacation. 2. Hwy. 36 Churches location sign - Installation request. 3. Hike and Bike Trail Master Plan - Plan presentation and support request. 4. Habitat for Humanity - Request to waive a water tap fee. . 5. Pedestrian crosswalk light at S. St. Vrain and Pine Knoll - Citizen request for installation. 6. Proposed EVRPD Land Grant playground - Land Grant requirements concerning the Town. ~60' : '--/- 7. 1993 Water line project - Request to sign a Change Order. ; REPORTS: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Reports 3. Hwy 7 and Hwy 36 CDOT projects 4. ISTEA workshop Sept 8 The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary. 9- 3, 4 f- 3-6UU XM:I C.JL 4 iCLeo , % 6uk 0 4 k . *5¢Jk©NPER©SA REALT-y ~ AND MANAGEMENT, INC. Pin (303) 586-3331 1-800-324-4149 1. August 20, 1993 Department of Public Works Water Department Town of Estes Park I Re: Lots 13 and 14, Little Prospect Mountain Addition Gentlemen: This letter is a request for the Water Department to allow a right of 1 way across the above captioned lots to be vacated. This right of way was granted in 1938 for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and replacing a water pipe line and storage reservoir. The reservoir has been abandon for years and serves no purpose at this time. Thank you for your consideration of this request. : YoOrs very truly, 4»-4.0 122-0 6 \ Gerrie Babion, acting in behalf of John L. Bridges and Elsie Jean Bridges, present owners of the property. Attachments: Copy of original Right of Way Sketch of the subject site i 1-1 0-. n . A i i ,-r I , r, A I A i i A A I r- - n r. n,-, v 4 A n e . er,-rce• nAnt/ An anc 4-7 SENT BY:TRANSAMERICA TITLE ; 8-19-93 2:55PM ; 30322654540 303 586 8043; N 2 1 ., I '':/ ,...M . /-/1,0...0-Ir ,-1 , 1. /**6.--*£9... 0.-44**,4* ........ .4 .0 ,- 4 - wi,6*11.=1 11 Z Ill„- VL 1 A,4 0- 01 C¥.r.d•, 01 18• in. ..A. ..1 - ~ u ' ' ' w ont , lili'-I.--I'. I. <'i 0/9..0.-.-I-- ./LI/./..9 .....1//144 0/2/".M/d pl•4 WIU %..4 :. mom=.046, h.1 * id FL~.4 #h, 0„*lz - 1.0-18-U= obbe Ia. d ''; 0""1*4/&'bA,1.1 1,•p•• 1•han,1 1.14»th*/Idp.t.*A. 4 //.-d p.rl. th...d,1 46...1 1,h..4...1...1..4.0-~• , 61} 3.'. •10*4 #446,6/1/4 4-4 -14, -Imd ¥11 001.01.1-d, 804 by th- Pe•00•9 40/4.-100, #M•, •041, 04**97 4 0.1,·ail. .d,1. -I W .18 p.,L¥.-4 u. --1 IMNX#u.W„-bel» .d ..1.. 10,1-, 60 Lb• Iigh# Ult•, In-•16 11•tal •d t'#SWASP/Et W»to c.. ...1- ..h,5,•U.J. 8.4 1. u. !00.{mt 4-b,4... ., ....,.,.,.... _.,......... ......_ ...,__,....., _.alt.4 4 1~FL ...4.*doolon*#*M" - 7.1.:. I i 2 z,.£+-, 1.=.zu: 222111,2.'rt- . ... w_--u.y.*:4.,e /6- £.275~ 3·- 4 .4:adu.21.u,£4£. .....4-U€.5. 313 ta d....... :4:'t ZI~_.---*40. 6.7. I. 1,1 4--4- ALL.....61.J 64.4<.4.*,24.4 146-4 . ..... I. ·d==toed='"~'~°-·,U.U. 7/bilp. 4:1-uAU--Nt \ 32' ~00,"Ill.'ll/0...4"841'.4...f.4/4.•he••- 01%• MId»,L,•-.d U•kdp•rs*al•10' WIP"h •01b,-4 AM-11 M. 1 #21 ,>.11 1, I ' -B u.. .2.. '4 .''/..:' 0 ......1 • . . ~ .At.Of ~ I 14 ¢ 2.4... . M-, r.*m .t 1. 1 -AW Er. ¢ 1 'J.-0.... 1 . ...-. . I I -L--„„.0.4 .... , 1 - 164* b. hil//4 14 /*)'..4/4 1444.- 7/: /4'ill-_0~4 -•4 .4 40~~Nd &~ - b.h.*"1 4 Al,t.,1 1,-0 ---34542.-h -*- 1.9*,-r,gb. W ,-=1/1,-4, 4... - h,4 1261•. C.- -.1 -7 )-1 -L---=-l, 164 -4-™4 -'---4""~-_ A. 4 1•_AL , f(U A.4_ 21 # ~ -"- .£...../. 1 #49 6* A N nA 8 4 1.4.7 r.bot. - ™4 h R- *-L~-Al,L-~k, A. D, IdiL, AL.£~-4.kl~M. r 1 1-2 1 ..hr 244#oloaticir.1 1 l rsifiL/Eff'OC, ef.-3 , 1 , r .l \Vt/,j . | M/3 .. 22 ?i . 1 ...... ..7 1. ...·11·111 ~1•r..19%tttl.t.»s......4 -1 C ; I fs'~ '' L I €. 168 ' ! i .1 i I •i. 1 '1 , / 1 4 , 1 , 1 t. 0 4 . 2% i f \ Ct 6 4 4 14 1 1 ''\ \\ e, \%1\ \\1 . 1-3 . N'ViNAO'/\1 -1.33C499.,CL ,ocl~114·LI 1 bl U' U, 1 c :, ,Ii'2•2 3 .00.05.€O N 19• i r--a ' O 0 1 0 . 1.V· .-20 .0 00· , C -, M. 061 &4 2 '1 1' I M roe . 0%. . 0.9,35 : 1 .4.-3 s ~ " ----, u: 2 ~ 14 'L 1 , I w, . 6 /0 - 0 i.a ™ 2 1 I . 9 0m 211. V i \ W \ :Wl 1 1 4 1 lt'\ \\ m Ul '. 0 \72% \111 \\ \ B . 4 1 NE Ree \9 ~ Fil. 4 -1 01 \ \ 11I, Al \ JO \:\ 1 1 4 1., '\ 6, cm 1 C\\·- ' r' 1/ ' 03 . , • 4 -1 -~ ~ -- -- - - - - - - - -- "- - 9Nil AtjvoNn68 .-dimt,0., 11- 41 W . 2 3,4 :11 P >.3. 14 t.. I, Cn 9 ·' O 1 cr '. 3 . .0 41>\ 8 6 . 11,11 3-" c?] lu 4 ·.~41>, - m 11 \ 0 (11 0 4 49\ 1\ \' %\. 1 \ \ 1.1 . . 48 .9 / hi 1 + \ Tri ip I ' 1,/. .\ . / .2 +C: O.. w . f lyj , i 0, 19 10 I \ , 0, rn -- , -1-7-"1 \ 9 \ 1 1,1 11, = P r ., U' r . C, tri--. 20\l \ 11 \ *\\ L... . f!.c LE 2 2.E .4- Un ·K = N %E C 8= \ Ul I= Ul,E 11.1 \\ \\\\ F DiE- \ f.12 r.\ \ .' n . 1 ZE r 2Eu M M;. Er) al Z k N 2 kIEZ 0 ,§33 . It, \ Al n o= K. , 1-4 '. 9 \ - W. . E ": . i,1 ---J , 50 4· 20.00 IN71 ARK V r L.:.·. E W / ESTA T E S LOT 10 LOT 11 9 2 5 0 P SEF &31 -lic -i i 1 , F-71 l.11_*J l_EL-J \ING-&1 1 ..tyoh'+ 4, / , . 1,\ 1 r--r-r-r-r'E I b , 1 " 1-1-1 \ r-L F n ' In",1 1, '11„00.,xh.,1.u.tu ..... I.U. ·- - , 1 1--9 ;18'·,1,„„r Z. ' ~ A|M| A| M~ K y~.f'% l.- tdvr: . ailvuo I gill 1 f ~ 1. 1 , A F \, al . 35\ . Vf #2 le// -74*,f. <~5~~ // 1 9 g -777*60- ' N ff f i f 1, ¥£ 1+4 - U 0 a 4 i E-1-1-J .-t .- I / - --1- -*- ./.--*..i I. e - 14 1 Ir, ri, 0, r...: *- ~ , 1\ W 41- /94>»t, M 1 I . , . , 79) 1.,1 . , 1 - I. i f 1 -N /1 1 - ~11=":61.1/ 2 + .... t, ./ . , d,%40 - 2 . 14= ./ f . 24 lif 4 C - 11.--1--I "' - :72'/-4.64-tr:t,i&-1 - 25 u 2. - --::9:,M:...:: 2 Ptl 1 -11 44\ // 1 50 - -21 1 S 07 \\\, C 0~ lu ., .4.-Flt>f,%/1-- 1 Z Mat: 44-1/.b .O . - c·r -i-LI- , W: I < -/* El RE [ @1 : R /Lf LO¢/ : LK&{ i) I]/LI. 1 I 19 EA : 1 ,54 - 1 z . I Er#FIC. M \\/-3 M 0 le' 81 3/41-H 1 6 RA ~'k»\1, 741 - 11~ 8 1 44Jt~ A Z Kg - 4+95 ~ ..... .n: 1':317-Ti - 1 2 - A - -r\- --> 1 H . fly--4 1 -| . 212-~ -117 4 i \ B W 47 \.... 8 9 0 r. 9 23 - WlIIll 2 114 + _L- it_l,L-il ! I-·.rl ./\ t 1 I - 1 ~ !1/7-fir-Aft·>~'C„P."dT-L-- 1,1.111 1 i f /5200\». r.*?60'i'..9 3 - \7.-1 . // /le \™/pi>r*ZLPAP frE !. /\1-il~, n.'..3.- 81.I At N ~33!JO ~ ....4/ i I..i 1/ vy·· , 1 +1 '· I· · r- -1 "»Cl~ ; . l--3- r----1€-7 6.31 7.:.::..U···-1 c<An 6.--- d ·f i , . 9 'O 1.-\\ 21.1 1 1 : 1 3 1 7 1740/: ~t]>/ , , * A\/·01- | E ; -. k.7.1-6-971(21/ 1 -=~r- , ri U 0, \ ... I. 1 2 -'V: - \ t';1 U·-1 (73\. f\/C _~ _al . 1 1\9 \ u-4 V j -A>E- f-- R TV 7 \\Il,~,31~31N¥1$ /--1 <~AVENUE h i F 9--9 . : 1/n Tk yu~ 0, U , 2 tx 4/ ™ E A 17- \ 41- A--1 [2 '/ t : m 9 6 %44*,9 0 Z ~ r.- 4 1 k w , .1... \ r 1 ~ t .' /0 2 13)019 'OCr (1]810*. 1 A-- k Imt '(22 1 II. < 5 ~-f 0 1 / .' hwa 1 , . K '. .. 2 7 c :19 0 \ .2 t ' *#Ar..+ ital'* 1.- r .1, E Ul#IMYM 1 f 1 A . -- i ' 0 1 . .I e - Eks * S R . W X 'a . 1 -, 1 .1 \Em -- 1 -A A.dia WA &%> · 1 2 i T l;r 1 / i.\\ ---:2, z\ .\ \ --. O 0. ./ , / --p LIE-4.514~-I. 7-i<#l~(l-i.~ft Vil© --ra_ b O - &\ Bl 4 21. 5. '~ N 1.W/5.1$#Ft)-,~1 1 -CZE.-1/ c 63 - f I \\BA. Maj z » aff£ 9 ta't ~1~~~~- -- 1 . 1- |,5.. t ,--: 8--,-ftif~1-3h -t-Trjifil 111)8Ill It&3111~ ·. . - ..11 ~ 1 74 ------1 - - FIJ[[i'i' 9 30/ 1 1--7- 1 ,-9'. C.3 31 t... r 0 13/.El 12_\8 :Ld EF / 5 9/Nic.40 11>J'.6 33-3/4/.-91#1 ?:*:%16-i! 1,--1 3 , j ...V -7 L--/1 1 , , 7 -&-·J 1--17-- 77 * . 3 .Ar?E\ E_Vil« n 41 p- 1 -'/1, n t....2-1 7 8: IA|Jt;;Lil,-\ 1 . I , I'l f a -UN -2--22#Tr6FI\.glzU,j O i,hz,i ~_0A fie=-i«7.» ..4,))Al-HEL--~ 1 * /4 -1,«tuota ~~03--~---61. 9-149~-kir ,, .1--1--~ s 2, 9\1 4 5 ]MIn -- i i - - ~ -7 - ,& -. ~4~t t_JI--9<14-2 rh.. 0 L-10- - f I 12 / -15 3/ -31'412.0\~~D~ .-- Ult - 1 1 --- Al 1 U,~ 1 0 5 Jim al 4 -.-2\ 934 §-83 0 · 1-5 = - 121_:l<111~ c..~42-3/1 , i«/ 3 . 4 "f . B .-1- STCRER RANCH STCRER RANCH ~ ' 08 HUID.•31*J OURSE , CIOUn 31 17,10 '00¥1¥.LidSO 30013 '100. :~-7 Y 1 zi 13019 5 ADDITION 06~3311. ~'~~~ANITE- - - 6 91019 k -3Nn *31*1.Sli AU G 1 7 1993 My name is Shad Reeves and I am currently working to earn my Eagle Scout rank in Boy Scout Troop 8. One of the requirements for this rank is to complete an Eagle project which involves , leadership skills and manual labor· For my Eagle project, I am i working with the Estes Park Interfaith group and erecting a sign I that represents all of the town's churches. The sign Will be similar to an existing sign, which is located across from the Chamber of Commerce on Highway 36, that contains all of the service groups. Ideally, I would like the Interfaith sign to be located next to or near this existing serv- ice sign. This sign would have a frame of 9' 2.5" in width and 12' in height. There would be 15 locations for individual signs that would contain information about each church. These individ- ual signs would be 44" wide and 18.5" high and would be hung on chains so that there would be three columns and five rows. Each sign would be forest green and would contain the denomination (printed in 3" lettering), address (printed in 2" lettering) , and phone number (printed in 2" lettering). There would be a three inch gap between each sign, as well as a three inch gap between the frame and each sign. Part of the Eagle project requirement states that I would have to show leadership, so I have decided to complete this requirement by including Troop 8 in the construction of the sign. The actual printing'would be done by the Estes Park Sign Company, which was requested by the Interfaith Group. All else, such as the erection and construction of the sign, would be completed by Boy Scout Troop 8. 2-1 . 1·• " r - .. 4 t + I. 4. -* I 6 - D . - - I. - -- 1 - . I . -. t .. 0 -- ! , , u ~ Habitat for Hurnanity of Estes Valley Box 3133 - Estes Park, Colorado 80517 1 July 1,1993 . Mr. Gary Klaphake Estes Park Town Administrator 4 31 0/0 )>f 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, CO. 80517 , Dear Gary, With this letter and the brochures enclosed we would like to define Habitat for Humanity of Estes Valley's program and to ask the city to help us meet our goals. Habitat for Humanity of Estes Valley is one of approximately 700 affiliates of Habitat for Humanity International . Habitat is,a non- prof it organization whose mission i.s to build low cost, well designed and. constructed homes for families living in inadequate shelter because of the ' ·,~ lack of decent affordable housing in their community. Unfortunately. there '· ,-vt are many hard working families in Estes Park who are forced to pay astro- nomi.cal rents to live in what can be defi.ned as poverty housing. With ' 3 11 03,· local, regional and federal support which includes; at cost and donated materials, public and private donations, volunteer labor and management, private and : federal grants (CDBG) we hope to eliminate this problem. 3'he: city of Estes Park can also help by waiving or reducing tap fee requirements on our ', property at 509 Columbine Street. , Ilabitat homes benef.i.t the community by providing low cost, stable environ- ments for Estes Park's labor force. As the tourism industry expands from seasonal to year round, this labor force can be a reliable asset in building - 3:.': ',, the local economy. The· low cost of owning a Habitat home gives families ' ' more disposable income to spend in Estes Park. It also enables them to., save money for emergency situations and basic needs without having to 4-1 <AX r . 1. 3, . 5 .., r..ini r../...1."V'Vi·•07.-,1-11.'r ./. ~ 1flf' 11 -1~ Habitat for Humanity of Estes Valley- i Box 3133 - Estes Park, Colorado 80517 sacrifice food, clothing, health or rely on community services to.provide, -0,, ,,·': for them. By paying property taxes, families becane part of the cities· tax base. Habitat is not a handout. We provide capital, not charity. Because of volunteer labor and donated materials, home building costs are kept:at,a 1 , minimum. Acceptance to the program focuses on the families needs and their ability to make monthly payments (principle, taxes, insurance). In addition, selected familj.es are requi. red to j.nvest 500 hours of "sweat equity" into the construction of their home and the one that follows. Because families applying for Habitat homes are already on the financial edge, Habitat works hard to minimize monthly payments. EXISTING CONDITIONS (COLUMBINE STREET) Existing conditions indicate there are cleanouts from the neighboring, 4 property (507 Columbi.ne) on our property. We assume this is because our. ~· ,· Lf,;,·. parcel of land was once part of the adjacent property. We do not feel ·. their location was meant to be an infringement onto someone elses land . . ' 1 The cleanouts are made of PVC and are es t.imated to be about 10 years old . , . ~ 217·' :' There are no records at the Estes Park Sanitation District offices to con- firm this, however they gave us a similar estimate. Because the cleanouts exist below the area we propose to build on, they will. have to be moved. The Estes Park Sanitation District will.be holding a board meeting on July 13 at 1:30 pm. At this meeting they will discuss giving permission for us to share our sewer line with our neighbors. If approved the E.P. Sanita- tion District will provide us with an agreement to be signed by our board and the residents of 507 Columbine Street. This agreement will allow our. 4-2 ~ ~ Habitat for Humanity of Estes Valley Box 3133 - Estes Park, Colorado 80517 neighbors access to the sewer line for repairs. Since this type of agree-,!. . ,...1. ment has been enacted in Estes Park before, we will not be setting '21 f' t J.l.: ' ~ ~i-- precedent. Habitat for Humanity does not want to place unneccessary hard- ·· '' ., 1 ship on our neighbors and would hope to avoi.d any 1 i.tigation because of t- · . 1 . 4 . this situation. A waiver of tap fees will allow us to move the · 4 ',0 i ' existing lines on our property more cost effectively. We will begin construction j.n mid August wi thout being fu] ly funded. Any and all assistance in waiving additional tap fees (water and electric), will help us expedite the building process by providing us with additional ' funds to buy materials and labor as needed. We hope with this project .we ·, can form a partnership with the city of Estes Park and together build t'' ' ' . 1,6-· ·. affordable housing and a better community. Sincerely, Gerald Swank .#- 4-3 <70 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 25, 1993 TO: Public Works Comm~ke FROM: Bill Linnane (L ~- Public Works Dirictor SUBJECT: Hike/Bike Trail Master Plan At the May Public Works Coinmittee meeting, Gregg Filsinger, Jr. requested the committee to consider more bike trails in town. This sparked a lot of interest, and the committee requested that staff form an advisory committee of citizens to put together a hike/bike trail system master plan. We put together a wide cross section of people as the committee - the YMCA, National Park Service, Larimer County Parks Department, Estes Valley Recreation and Parks District, Police Department, avid bikers and hikers were all represented. We met twice a month for three months and put together the following which we would like to present to you today: 1. Hike/Bike System Master Plan - long term. 2. The highest priority trails of the Master Plan. 3. Engineering cost estimates to be considered for upcoming budgets. The May Public Works Committee meeting and the formation of this committee both occurred prior to the Talmey Report results. As you know, over 70% polled supported an expenditure of $400,000/year. This tells us that the Public Works Committee had a good handle on the public interests and the Talmey Report just reassured your position. We now ask for your support of our Master Plan and priority hike and bike projects. BL:ck 3-1 08/24/93 LAKE ESTES HIKE/BIKE TRAIT PHASE I COST ESTIMATE LOCATION: Chamber of Commerce to Wapiti Meadows TYPE: Concrete 10 feet wide COST: Concrete + subgrade 11,000 feet @ $35/LF $385,000 Tallant Park Bridge Rehab LS 20,000 36" culverts 2 @ $3,000 EA 6,000 Bridges 2-80' spans @ $60,000/EA 120,000 Special Site Prep LS 30,000 Erosion Control LS 10,000 Contingency 10% 47,000 Eng/C.M. 10% 47,000 TOTAL $665,000 NOTE: New Stanley Road: $120/ft Lake Estes Trail: $60/ft 3-2 08/24/93 FISH CREEK IHKE/BIKE TRAIL COST ESTIMATE LOCATION: Iligliway 36 to Ilighway 7 via Carriage Drive TYPE: Concrete 10 feet wide COST: Concrete + subgrade 14,400 LF @ $35/LF $504,000 Culverts 2 @ $3,000/EA 6,000 Special Site Prep LS 20,000 Miscellaneous LS 10,000 Contingency 10% 54,000 Eng./C.M. 10% 54,000 Contingency 10% 47,000 TOTAL $648,000 NOTE: New S tanley Road: $120/ft Lake Estes Trait: $60/ft Fish Creek Trail: $45/ft 3-3 HIKE/BIKE TRAIL FUNDING OPTIONS ' The Hike/Bike Trail Committee is asking the Town to take a leadership position in funding the establishment of a trail system. However, the Committee has also sought other supplemental sources of funding in an effort to extend the Town's investment. The following is a list of those sources. 1. Bureau of Reclamation There are matching grants available through the federal · government for projects on Bureau of Reclamation properties. 2. Outdoor Recreation Land and Water Conservation Fund This fund is also federally funded and managed by the state. Funds are available for recreation projects. 3. G.O. Colorado The funding guidelines have not been established yet for the distribution of "G.0. Colorado" lottery money. HoweVer, the Committee believes that the Town (and its project partners) can be prepared to submit a request for funds as soon as the criteria is announced. 4. Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act ( "ISTEA" ) Once again the federal government is offering grant money. The only restriction for "ISTEA" funding is that the project be associated with a federal highway. With two federal highways running through Estes Park, there are several opportunities for qualified projects. 5. Project Partners The Estes Valley Recreation and Parks District, Larimer County Parks Department, and Rocky Mountain National Park are all involved in projects (currently or in the future) that could be incorporated into this plan. EVRPD already has plans for a trail at Lake Estes. Larimer County has been involved in the establishment of trails throughout the Estes Valley and has indicated a willingness to participate in future projects as a partner. Finally, RMNP is planning improvements at the Fall River Entrance which could include new bike trails. These are just a few of the many potential sources of assistance in pursuing a first-class trail system. However, a project of this size needs a strong leader. The Committee hopes that the Town will take the initiative to lead in this effort. 3-4 / Summit County Community Development DOpartment ~- -' 1989 Recreational Pathway User Survey Rage 2 , SURVEY RESULTS The demographic profile of the typical weekend trail user in Summit County can be described as follows: - 84% own their bike, while 1696 rent a bike for the day - 53% ride for individual recreation and fitness and 36% ride for family recreation 32% were between the ages of 35 and 44; 26% were between the ages of 25 and 34; and 20% were between the ages of 45 and 54 - 40% ride together (couple); 27% ride with a group of 5 or more people; and 20% ride with their family 54% planned to ride between Breckenridge and Frisco; 41% planned to ride between' Frisco and Copper Mountain Resort; and 21% planned to ride between Copper Mountain and Vail Pass. (some respondents planned to ride a combination of these routes, which is indicated in the percentages) - 28% planned to ride between 10 and 20 miles; 22% planned to ride between 20 and 30 miles; and 20% planned to ride between 30 and 40 miles - 57% were from the Denver metropolitan area; 16% from out of Colorado; 16% from within Colorado (excluding Denver-Metro and Summit County); and 11% from Summit County Questions #14, #16, #17, and #18 asked for responses regarding the respondent's recreational preferences and attitudes. The responses are summarized as follows: - 70% of the respondents indicated they would be interested in riding on a public transportation system equipped to carry bicycles - 74% of the respondents indicated they would prefer State Lottery proceeds be spent in Summit County, rather than on trails along the Front Range; 25% of the respondents chose not to answer this question or indicated they favored funding in both areas 80% of the respondents indicated a willingness to make a contribution in a donation tube/mailer at trailheads; of the respondents that indicated a willingness to contribute, 66% would contribute between $1.00 and $5.00 - 57% of the respondents indicated that expansion of trails was the improvement they most desired; 28% favored trailhead construction; 26% favored construction of rest stops; and 22% favored more interpretive signage; (respondents could indicate more than one preference for desired improvements) 'The economic data responses are summarized as follows: -, 45% of the non-resident respondents planned to spend the weekend in Summit County; 32% were visiting just for the day; and 23% planned to spend 3 or more days in Summit County - 48% of the non-resident respondents that remain overnight stay at overnight accommodations (condominiums 34%, hotels/motels/lodges 14%); 2593 stay in second homes; 15% stay with friends or relatives; and 12% stay in campgrounds - 55% of the respondents use the Summit County trails 1 to 5 days annually; 29% use the trails 10 or more days annually - on a per day, per person basis, an average of $50.65 is spent by the respondents 3-5 / Summit County Community Development Department 7 1989 Recreational Pathway User Survey Poge 3 ti 4 - 46% of the respondents have household incomes of $50,000 or more; 19% have incomes of $30,000 to $40,000; 13% have incomes of $40,000 to $50,000 and 12% have incomes of $20,000 to $30,000 ~ The life-style data responses are summarized as follows: £ i - j - 33% of the respondents walk; 32% ski; 29% hike; and 18% run or jog > Data from the open-ended questions generated the following responses in regard to safety and general comments: # of Respondents Comments 27 Trails are too crowded 21 More awareness needed of proper safety, education and etiquette 20 Bicyclists ride too fast 15 Highway 9 crossing is dangerous 14 Trails are too narrow 12 Do not allow motorized users on trails 10 Conflicts between different types of users 8 Children using trail unsafely 6 Improve maintenance of trail 5 Develop more dirt trails 4 Bicyclists not wearing helmets 1 2 Inability to respond to medical emergencies 2 Tight curves with poor visibility 2 Lack of availability to food and drinking water 1 Don't overdo signage 1 Remove thistles from edge of trail 1 Construct Dillon to Frisco trail 1 Improve trail map 1 Designate more shared roads CONCLUSIONS The typical weekend trail user is a couple between the ages of 35 and 40 years, frOm the Denver Metropolitan area that stays overnight in Summit County. The couple bicycles for personal recreation and fitness between 10 and 20 miles along the Breckenridge, Frisco or Copper Mountain sections of the trail system. They own and transport their bicycles to Summit County for the 1 to 5 times they annually use the trail system. The couple has a household income of $50,000 or more and spends just over $100.00 a day while in Summit County. They would be willing to make a donation of $1.00 to $5.00 that could be used to assist in constructing more trails. Furthermore, they would prefer seeing State Lottery proceeds used to construct trails in Summit County, rather than to construct more trails along the Front Range. If public transportation, capable of carrying bicycles, was available between specific trailheads, they would be interested in using the system. 3-6 MAY 25 1993 11 · 7- M/. 6-- · +1-,-<-- Nh 4/,I . 711£~012,/993 O--ean. 374 ki£·cp-ka-,6- 0 0 61-«)1/ A-c * U£,£lot} 44. »n-<uta,Uali ow ef- a- p-ZC~(--d-0.~0£1-+•L' OLO-0- »cd-·le 1--cjkt W-Aic.U a.* p,uc~ju j.u.,itmt, 0-pe,u,-41 - al Obu. Lu>-U- Bid ANLEL S. )11 -al*LU . 7 -) 1 4-vi1- 03-f --Ud JLLifi,1 1. al P..£412 k.ozo-U, loko le l,+olk, , Au- Lou ~0006 1,4 ~(Lti-do i i /0/0-¥7-eut -~ber- -,dtz-c.p , 6% 9,0 1 84 60'14 le,V ~4 2/uha.* 51.6. 46#t a.*uk 11-9 DLL>'21126; t/Le. 2Xit.~*2, 79.1.4,$624 _1 17 L-LO'FLe-dit •IA ~Plt (61/A-4- GZA+~ ~Ll 6~L ~ ~p- ~ -~-cl 4.t- , El/)14( .Cd-Cy),710£3~ tuAn., -2.-1,LO~,4-4 . ~10 0#A-e, a,ue~ Cu~.-C.t.>d.,~AD -tp© --~0-it,·20.. k>~-o-ty,6 , T}u, 01-tru-,Lu-cil-Jt 1~Jit Le-aLU -le-· 16© wtta..J- Ce-<CLO.p ,Luil--9 160 /0.-0-424 0.6 -P/ta 6 6-1 'u , li'~ CU--L Gn-pe'lia·~ib ~an-~2 0-~ 6-1UU JLLL>€U , ~LC€,4.6.·~- f itlj,<~6-c.,24 ff(-+~u~pi.£-4 v 1/ 55 5 . 31- \/ra-in A-3 5-1 JUN 1 1993 'Al V m£-7.;A=72,1-'.111 9-111 1-1.7-r. t...™Eal'. ESTES VALLEY RECREATION and PARK DISTRICT Post Office Box 1379 • Eeten Park, Colorado 80517 690 Big Thompson Avenue • [303] 586-8191 May 28, 1993 -13: P. W. (L,--. Ti-*:--4- M-ll~ . l./ Gary Klaphake, Town Administrator Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Gary: Estes Valley Recreation and Park District applied for a Land and Water Conservation Grant to construct playground equipment at Stanley Park. The grant application was submitted to the Colorado State Parks Department in December 1992 for the amount of $32,350. We have been advised verbally that we are a recipient of the grant and that construction may begin once all the details are worked out. One outstanding detail that has been brought to our attention is the agreement with the Town of Estes Park and replacement responsibilities. The Town of Estes Park owns the park property and has a lease with Estes Valley Recreation and Park District to manage the property through the year 2017. To comply with Land and Water Conservation Fund Grants Manual item 4 B, the Town can jointly sponsor the grant or supply a memo of understanding outlining replacement responsibilities in the event of conversion of the management agreement. I would like an opportunity to visit with you about the best approach to solving this problem. Please give me a call to arrange a meeting to discuss this item. Sincerely 921] CU--/ Stanle C. Gen€).er Attachment: State of Colorado letter dated May 6,1993 Land & Water Conservation Fund Grants Manual, Page 2 6-1 STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO STATE PARKS 1313 Sherman Street, Room 618 A Denver, Colorado 80203 r--nn, Phone (303) 866-3437 FAX (303) 866-3206 --- May 6,' 1993 Roy Roiner Governor Stanley Gengler, Executive Director Ken Salazar Estes Valley Recreation and Park District Executive Direclod P.O. Box 1379 Departmenl of Natural Resources Estes Park, CO 80517 Laurie A. Mathews Director/ RE: Ownership/Control of Stanley Park Property Cbloraclo State Parks Colorado Board of Parks Dear Mr. Gengler: and Outdoor Recreation I met with representatives of the National Park Service larnes M. Robb Chairman concerning the Stanley Park lease between the Town of Estes Park and Estes Valley Recreation and Park District. Kathleen M. Farley Vice Chairman I have found that we will still need to get an assurance from the Town of Estes Park that they will assume Cl ark L. Scriven responsibility for the perpetual use requirements Secretary associated with the LWCF Program for that property in the Patricia B. McCIearn event of a default by the Estes Valley Recreation and Meniber Park District, the expiration of the lease, or if for lose G. Trujillo some reason the reversionary clause in the deed to the Member property is invoked. In any of the above mentioned scenarios, the LWCF investment outdoor recreation would be lost. Enclosed are copies from pertinent pages in the LWCF Grants Manual outlining ownership and .control of land being developed or in this case re-developed, with LWCF funds. Joint sponsorship or a memo of understanding outlining replacement responsibilities in the event of a conversion between the Town of Estes Park and the Estes Valley Recreation District should be sufficient. Please contact me if you have any questions or if I can help in resolving this issue. Sincerely, 4-j . 14 1 Ef? w-~_4 Christophdr R. Childs Grant Administrator 6-2 printed on recycled paper CHAPTER 640.3 L&WCF GRANTS MANUAL designed in conformance with: 1) the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (ABA) (P.L. 90-480) and the "Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards" as published in the Federal Register of August 7, 1984; or 2) the Department of the Interior regulations of July 7, 1982 on Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (43 CFR Part 17) and the "Minimum Guidelines and Requirements for Accessible Design" as issued by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (ATBCB), 36 CFR Part 1190. The "Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards" meet or exceed the requirements in the ATBCB's Minimum Guidelines. 4. Ownership or Control of Project Lands. Facilities may be developed on land and water owned in fee simple by the participating agency or where ownership of less-than-fee interests such as easements provides permanent controlof the property commensurate with the proposed development. No approval will be given for the development of facilities on leased land except for property either: A. Leased from the Federal Government for 25 years or more (though some time on the lease may have elapsed); or, B. Leased from one public agency to another for 25 years or more, provided that safeguards are included to adequately ensure the perpetual use requirement contained in the L&WCF Act. Su'ch safeguards may i include joint sponsorship of the proposed project or other agreement whereby the lessor would assume compliance responsibility for the grant-assisted area in the event of default by the lessee or expiration of the lease. In case of a Forest Service Term Specail Use Permit, where the Forest Service reserves the right to revoke the use permit at its discretion, the grant agreement between NPS and the State will expressly recognize the possible termination of the permit by the Forest Service and the State will nonetheless obligate itself to provide substitute lands in that event (Solicitor's opinion October 28, 1980). 5. Development Project Selection. In selecting development projects for submission to the Service, the States should carefully review and evaluate the project applications to filter out ineligible proposals. A special effort should be made to eliminate questionable, elaborate or borderline projects which raise serious questions concerning the project's cost, use, priority, competition with the private sector, or inclusion of ineligible facility types (see Chapter 660.4). In addition, boat and fishing access facilities and related support facilities which are eligible for funding under both L&WCF and the Dingell-Johnson Act (also known as the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act and Manual Release 151 Replaces all preceding 6-3 L&WCF GRANTS MANUAL CHAPTER 640.1 7. Assistance from Q.ther Agencies. Project proposals submitted to the Service for L&WCF assistance may also be submitted to other public agencies for aid. The State or local matching share of an approved project may consist of other Federal financial assistance only where the statutory provisions of the subsequent Federal grants program explicitly allows recipients to use such assistance to match other Federal funds (see Section 670.1.5). The application to the Service should describe any such ' submissions, and the Service should immediately be notified if these result in assistance or the promise of assistance by another organization. 8. Control and Tenure. For lands included in a project proposal, the project sponsor must have title or adequate control and tenure of the project area in order to provide reasonable assurances that a conversion under Section 6(f)(3) of the L&WCF Act will not occur without Service approval. Copies of the property titles, leases, easements, or other appropriate documents must be on file at the State level and available for Federal inspection. A. Property that is proposed for acquisition and/or development and which is subject to reversionary interests upon discontinuation of the recreation use may be eligible to receive Fund assistance. The r, ,·; Service's determination in this regard will rest on the compatibility of uses proposed by the project sponsor with that stipulated in the reversionary clause and receipt of satisfactory assurances from the f State that the property so assisted will be replaced in accord with specific Section 6(f)(3) provisions applicable to such future conversion should the reversionary interest be exercised. Such assurances are contained in the General Provisions of the Project Agreement and may also apply to termination provisions included in leases and special use permits, provided such revocation is not at the sole discretion of the lessor except in the case of Forest Service Term Special Use Permits. (see Section 640.3.4) B. Properties subject to outstanding interests, such as mineral rights that, if exercised, may not be compatible with the continued viable use of the area for outdoor recreation, may also be agreed to under certain specific conditions. The Service will agree to such a future conversion based upon a State's present agreement that these lands '... will be replaced in accord with Section 6(0(3) provisions. *This k specific assurance provision is contained in the General Provisions of the Project Agreement (i.e., Attachment 660.3B). It should be noted the above paragraphs A and B ·are only concerned with those reversionary rights or outstanding interests that, should they occur or be exercised, would result in the project area not being viable for , ------0-0----............I-------I . Manual Release 151 Replaces all preceding manual releases 6-4 f CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 1 1 Col ora.do Order Number State 7/21/1993 1.,arimer Date County Contract fort 1993 Water Loop Projects Own*tr: TOWN OF ESTES PARK l t To: BT Construction, Inc. (Cdnt.ractor) You hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and speclfications: Description of Changes Decrease Increase Supplemental plans & specs attached Contract Price Contract Price Acldi tional $ .$ Riverside Drive $ .00 $ 398.20 Boyd Lane Interconnection $ .00 $12,159.88 Webster Resubdivisi.on * $ 478.00 $ , 0.00 West Wonderview Ave nue $24,190.00 $15,963.85 TOTALS. $24,668.00 $28,521.93 NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE $ NA $ 3,853.93 JUSTIFICATION: Additional. work to be performed by contractor as i requested by Town Represent,ative/Bob Goehring. The Amount of the Contrnet will be (increased) hy the sum of Three Thousand Eight 1|1111(]red Fi El-.y 'I'hi·en nrid 93/100 T)OI.,LARS 7-1 ($ 3853.93 ) Contract Change Order No. 1 Continued, page 2 The Contract Total including this and previous orders will be: One Hundred Thirteen Thousiand Five Hundr·ec] Thir·teen and.93/100 Dollars ( $ 113,513.93 ) The Contract Period pro*ided for completion will be unchanged. This document will become a supplement. Lo the contract and all provisions will apply'hereto. Recommended: ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. OWNER'S ARCHITECT/ENGINEER By Kevi n Kiel b,. P. E. 134-1-=n~ /f' E~g~ Ti I. 1. e. _..C i.vi.1 Jug i neer Date Accepted: CONTRACTON By 1 0 Title f go, er /MAVIOU Da t.e 8 -6 -92=_ Approved by: -FQMN..3).F.-_ESTFS PARK OWNER By William F. Linnane Tit]A Public Works DirecLor Date 7-2 . 1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT JULY 1993 1 1 CODE TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS 11 BLEEDER MAINTENANCE 12 UTILITY LOCATION - MAIN 22.00 51.00 13 UTILITY LOCATION - SERVICE 4.00 9.00 15 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION. 16 TAP REQUEST 4.00 8.00 17 WATER QUALITY - TASTE 18 WATER QUALITY - ODOR 19 WATER QUALITY - COLOR 3.00 3.50 20 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: HIGH 21 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: LOW 3.00 5.50 22 FROZEN LINES: MAIN 23 FROZEN LINES: SERVICE 24 LINE BREAKS: MAIN 4.00 64.00 25 LINE BREAKS: SERVICE 4.00 11.50 30 METER REPAIR 28.00 68.50 31 FINAL INSPECTION 4.00 3.50 40 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: WATER 41 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: PARKS 42 CONSTRUCTION RELATED: STREETS 50 STREET REPAIR 51 SNOW REMOVAL 52 STREET SWEEPING 1.00 0.50 53 SIGN REQUESTS AND REPAIR 1.00 0.25 54 STORM DRAINAGE 1.00 2.00 55 TRAFFIC HAZARD 60 OTHER 8.00 32.50 ======== TOTALS FOR JULY 1993 87.00 259.75 HISTORICAL DATA. THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 87.00 88.00 115.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 259.75 242.50 246.50 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) -2.250/0/+9.71% +1.14%/-2.370/0 -24.350/0/+5.38%. Rl-1 -- - TOWN OF ESTES PARK JULY, 1993 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for June 14, 1993 through July 13,1993: June 14 to 31 Water Treated: Black Canyon 0 *Fall River O Glacier Creek 25,828,000 *Big Thompson O *Marys 9,026,000 July 1 to 13 Water Treated: Black Canyon 0 *Fall River O Glacier Creek 20,887,000 *Big Thompson O *Marys 10,468,000 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 66,209,000 Gal. 2) Water accounted for from June 14 to July 13: Adjustments: 2,569,000 Billing: 44,032,810 *Backwash 0 Total Water accounted for: 46,601,810 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 70% R2-1 . ADJUSTMENTS 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 0 2.) Bleeders a. Stanley Heights, Fall River 2,289,000 b. Metered plus Mize TOTAL BLEEDERS (Gal.) 2,289,000 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 1-Jul Flush Boyd Ln. 30,000 b. 2-Jul Boyd Ln. leak 20,000 c. 6-Jul Flush Boyd Ln. 30,000 d. 13-Jul Cleave St. leak 200,000 e. f. g. h. 1. J. k. 1. m. TOTAL FLUSHING, MISC. (Gal.) 280,000 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) -2,569,000 R2-2 TOWN OF ESTES PARK 4 1 WATER USE RECORDS B JULY, 1993 DATE FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL BIG MARYS SUBTOTAL : TOTAL RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS I THOMP. (GAL) CFS i : (GAL) 1 0 1,650,000 1,650,000 2.57:1 0 795,000 795,000 1.23: 2,445,000 2 0 1,688,000 1,688,000 2.63: 0 807,000 807,000 1.25 2,495,000 3 0 1,207,000 1,207,000 1.88: . 0 858,000 858,000 1.33: 2,065,000 4 0 1,303,000 1,303,000 2.03 E; 0 806,000 806,000 1.25: 2,109,000 5 0 1,577,000 1,577,000 2.46 0 808,000 808,000 1.25 2,385,000 6 0 2,136,000 2,136,000 3.33 } 0 802,000 802,000 1.24: 2,938,000 - 7 0 1,741,000 1,741,000 2.71 j 0 796,000 796,000 1.23 2,537,000 8 0 1,512,000 1,512,000 2.35 : 0 795,000 795,000 1.23: 2,307,000 9 0 1,419,000 1,419,000 2.21 J 0 810,000 810,000 1.25 2,229,000 10 0 1,650,000 1,650,000 2.57, 0 815,000 815,000 1.26 2,465,000 11 0 2,009,000 2,009,000 3.13 i. 0 811,000 811,000 1.25: 2,820,000 12 0 1,661,000 1,661,000 2.59ii 0 780,000 780,000 1.21 3 2,441,000 13 0 1,334,000 1,334,000 2.08 . 0 785,000 785,000 1.21 2,119,000 k B 14 0 1,130,000 1,130,000 1.76} 0 785,000 785,000 1.21 i 1,915,000 15 0 1,390,000 1,390,000 2.16: i 0 792,000 792,000 1.23: 2,182,000 16 0 1,428,000 1,428,000 2.22: 0 794,000 794,000 1.23 5 2,222,000 17 0 1,557,000 1,557,000 2.42:{ 0 796,000 796,000 1.231 2,353,000 18 0 1,523,000 1,523,000 2.37 J 0 801,000 801,000 1.24: 2,324,000 19 0 1,544,000 1,544,000 2.40 {1 0 808,000 808,000 1.25: 2,352,000 20 0 1,435,000 1,435,000 2.23 0 799,000 799,000 1.24 2,234,000 21 0 1,434,000 1,434,000 2.23 0 795,000 795,000 1.23 : 2,229,000 22 0 1,564,000 1,564,000 2.44. ' 0 797,000 797,000 1.23: 2,361,000 23 0 1,570,000 1,570,000 2.44: . 0 787,000 787,000 1.22: 2,357,000 24 0 1,509,000 1,509,000 2.35, J 0 798,000 798,000 1.23: 2,307,000 25 0 1,519,000 1,519,000 2.37. 0 798,000 798,000 1.23 E 2,317,000 26 . 0 1,708,000 1,708,000 2.66:{ 0 793,000 793,000 1.23: 2,501,000 27 0 1,744,000 1,744,000 2.72 0 798,000 798,000 1.23 2 2,542,000 28 0 1,859,000 1,859,000 2.89 0 799,000 799,000 1.24: 2,658,000 29 0 1,767,000 1,767,000 2.75 } 0 793,000 793,000 1.23 2,560,000 30 0 1,634,000 1,634,000 2.54 5· 0 791,000 791,000 1.22? 2,425,000 31 0 1,616,000 1,616,000 2.52 · 0 798,000 798,000 1.23: 1 2,414,000 TOT. ' 0 48,818,000 48,818,000 0 24,790.000 24,790,000 73,608,000 AF 0.00 149.83 149.83 , 0.00 76.08 76.08 . 225.91 CFS 0.00 2.44 2.44 : 0.00 1.24 1.24 * : 3.67 BWN O WA O . O 0 0 ' O BL(-) N/A N/A N/A j N/A N/A N/A -2,569,000 GAL 0 48,818,000 48.818,000 ~' 0 24,790,000 24,790.000 71,039.000 ~ AF 0 149.83 149.83 ) 0.00 76.08 76.08 5 218.03 1 st-13 0 20,887,000 0 10,468,000 14-31 0 27,931,000 0 14,322,000 R2-3 I. 1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS) 1992 1992 1993 1993 MONTH YTD , MONTH YTD % % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ,.1 CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) : : (GAL.) (GAL.) (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 22,227,168 22,227,1683 26,042,370 26,042,370:~ · 17.16% 17.16% FEBRUARY 18,753,245 40,980,413 21,131,280 47,173,650 12.68% 15.11% MARCH 22,019,445 62,999,858 26,485,160 73,658,810 20.28% 16.92% APRIL 24,054,701 87,054,559: 22,764,110 96,422,920: -5.37% 10.76% MAY 39,232,054 126,286,613: * 40,059,420 136,482,3401 2.1196 8.07% JUNE 44,414,452 170,701,065: 54,127,530 190,609,870 21.87% 11.66% JULY 58,684,781 229,385,846 71,039,000 261,648,870 21.05% 14.06% AUGUST 54,405,908 283,791,754 SEPTEMBER 46,502,599 330,294,353: OCTOBER 31,968,183 362,262,536 8 =E NOVEMBER 23,475,870 385,738,406 E DECEMBER 27,329,460 413,067,866 : TOTAL 413,067,866 AC - FT 9,483 R2-4 ESTES PARK JULY & YTD WATER BILLED 180,000,000 - 6.8% 160,000,000 -' , 0 - ZE" Cr 140,000,000 - 0 ------- 00 120,000,000 -'- 0 0 100,000,000 - GALLONS 15.3% 80,000,000 - 60,000,000 -' I , 40,000,000 -' - - - - - 99" « fe , tint €S O - 1... 1 \*- 2 8. 43 }1 =1 2 31 cn YEAR O YTD 0 JUL R2-5 ad, « Z661 0.,..7. [66[ 1982 r 1983-~ ... 7 1985 .gr.. w 1986 . '" :4 L961 ' ' 996 1 "' 0661 l66[ a t~ ESTES PARK JULY & YTD WATER REVENUE 600,000.00 -' 4.7% CD =_22_ - 500,000.00 - Cl 0 400,000.00 - C, C7 DOLLARS 300,000.00 -4:7 00 0 10.5% 200,000.00 - 100,000.00 -' - - - - - a fr- lf- ~- ill- 'fl- lit Ull iIi iiI, 24 ~M ' kn HM 47? 271 -+M fal .If 11 .;:1 1 94. St;li~ 2 *U 2 U 1 Al M-> r M LD . 00 01 0 - 04 CO 00 00 00 co 00 00 co O, cr) cy) 01010-10101,0-30-)O-1010) 01 --- - M - - YEAR U YTD OB JUL R2-6 -" ; ~ [66 1 JUN 1 1¤3 J Board of County Commissioners ' AVA A Commitment To Progress 498-7010 FAX 498-7006 Post Olfice Box 1190 Loillaillillillillillililiai~limilililliall. Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 LARIMER COUNTY COLORADO May 27, 1993 H. Bernerd Dannels, Mayor Town of Estes Park PO. Box 120() Estes Park, CO 8()517 Dear Mayor Dannels, Thank you for your letter expressing Estes Park's concern for the Highway 34 and Highway 7 Colorado Department of Transportation projects. : Our County Engineer, Elaine Spencer, is not aware of any shifts iii priority regarding either of these 11ighway projects. She will verify this through Colorado Department of Transportation, and we will keep you informed if any changes affecting these two projects are detected. In the meantime, the Board of Cominissioners continues to support the completion of the Highway 34 and Highway 7 projects in Estes Park. As you know, we also are working to support the longer-term project of Highway 287 through Bet-thoud. We are working to maintain funding and high priority listing for both Estes Park and Berthoud Colorado Department of Transportation projects. Sincerely, // 14 4979 »a--Bi Q,9-~ 1 & 4't.OI 1/ C #Court],1221@cadids ~ lanet Duvall Chair@in Disu-ict I istrict II ~~Ommissioner JD/dh , R3-1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' A.....,1.... 'Al 1 1-'-1.1.1.. 1---. ......-11 il . . jil I - w U) 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 M O 3Z 1- D D U. U. ' Or-01-LAr-0&0 OOOOOUDO WOOMNOOr- =FOONNAOI- 000001-0 16 - W W .0 0 CON,O 10 W O co 0 00 N ro r M 00 r- r LA 00 r- 4 ~O O Ne N ze r- r * LA 1- 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 u O CO 00000000 00000000 000001-0 Ch 0, 0 co CO 11- W N N M . U 00000000 00000000 00000000 00©000,00, 00000000 0 00 co >1 r- r- Li- LA r. 1- 61) Ch $ »IC e , In '. 0 0 0 0 0 h 0 5 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 00000000 00000000 r- r- (n LA N N .- Z O - W - W -00011,noON ZOOOOOOOO COOMNOOLA 0-=fOONNOO©O >00000000 00\3Ccorl N C O CON LA ZWO M 4 1- >- 1, 0< r. O e r-<r N 01...m ./ - 1 t; OCAL W 0 04 > U} r 0 1- m WOr-000001- 1-00000000 ~0000000~0 JOO000000 00000000 0. 1- 1- r- 4 4 - 9 I *r U) 1 B 05 1~ O 0 M N 00000000 00000000 Ir-0000001- 000000000 00000000 - 1- h Z I Ch r- 1 e - 0 : 5 CE 1 6 0 I M 1 Of ZZZZ 0 1-- W.-1 OZZ=Z 0 1-W J Z.Z.ZZ 0 1--WJ ZZZZU)1--WJ 0ZZ=ZU)1-WJ a:OUOOWU)O< COODOOW U) 04 (DODOOLUU)04 OOOOOWl/)04 CODOOW.04 1 W-----2-1- a.-----Z-1- 00(01-1-1-O>O 00(01-1-1-O>O 1-001-1-1-0>0 tou)1-1-1-0>0 >Uju)1-1-1-0>0 Cle Z Wwk--00:1- \WWC--00:1- (Oww,<--Oarl- ·Wid 4 --O OZI-- DOLUW<--00=1- 00 0000(OJ W ZOOU M _1 W LA.|0000_1 W 00000_1 W 000(0.1 W 0- 1- O-- 0 O-- 0 - O-- 0 Of O-- 0 , 0-- 0 e U) I-1-131- IJ_-IDI- I _1 -131- I JUDI- WIJJOI- a as 0-<(WOD Q-<WCD W-<WOD w - <C W O 3 -1-<WOD er,JZ/0 M .1 Z of 0 re)_JZOSO 0-IZ/0 Ld_IZOCO >> W- 4 Ill- 4 W- 4 «W- 4 WW- 4 U} a: u. 3 (0 05 t... ) U)/U-1 -1 af L. ) afacu-Ir ,% 8 3 0- 03 D a. 03 3 a. 03 0 0- 03 O a. O 3 . 0 O: O H O e 0 05 0 0 1- M 05 a: 01 M - a. ZO W WWW 1 -1 -1 -1 00 - ZOO - ZOO - 00 - 00 00 I 00 I 00 I 00 I 00 00 In 00 0, 00 00 O 0 M 00 r r a m m Z Z Z 1 al Z D CL D Z 3 Z f 8 0 0 8 Z 0 0 LA Ch CO J 1 · · CE . ac . M •O O U W N W 0 6-1 N O =10 QI co I · 0 W e· J a. N n - a. 1- co a LAM r. 0 a O A < v e J C =f O a: C 11 N a: 4-0, J 4Nul .• P. O 0·•a< O••=r< O.· =t W .. \00 \Or m J \ Or- co J -r- r 11 3 \00 I I W 12 1 .-1 -1- \ O - 09 0 0 > Z > > O- 0 ,- - 0 - LA-3- - -LACi <0 5- - a LA -00~0 -ON 00(Oho\ W 00(ONJ O <[W 000•-h 0001.-=f gg:21 0. Coa • • z 00& · · . 0<z 00(. · · *Oa · - CO Co N ro < N ON N ro O 19 m ro W r CO «> LA O\ to =p co 19 -1 r m 1 0-J 00 N 00 h C\I (4 r- r- 2= .3 0 Z 1,1 r r- L. 0 0 OC 0 O ac O 4 0 Z 11 ZD It , -3 11 Z U) It Z 11 0 - H O *-ti- H O - O - 0 ' Z W 0 0 0 to I . m D D -1 1 Z 1- 1- ZOO Z E-H-ZOO .ILL Hk-ZOO ZI 1-1-ZOO Z 1-1- ZOO LUZ 00-NU W 1- 00-NU V <1- 00-roco La ¤0-N -0 W Ul 00- rod a Of 4 4 X O11- 4 <C =C H LL <(«14 00 4<24 OW C < 14 -3 0 -W O 1-W O -O: O -Z O 3 1- 1- a: 4 3 -1 1-a:< -J 1-- CIS « 3 b_J 1-=4 DE <C 1- 02 4 Z < 05 1- 1- 0, Z << 0= 1- 1- 0 >- z<act--1- O 0 Z«CEI--1- r U Z<OCI--1- 0 4 r OZ 1-- WWOU)(O 0 < 1- wwolf)(0 ,-1-1- W liJ O to U) r- Crl -J WWOU)(/) ros WWOU)Ul Z O 0 0 U} > W W 000 U) > WW O t.-1 in 0 > WW 000 U)> W 111 000= U) > WW 31- .Crzz W 3: r -UZZ W )I d LL Z W 3I .cr Z O W 3= UnD W IkI U.0 8-0 050 00 r--O CEO 00 ON•<O H O 00 r--I CO 00 .-40 CE O 00 - ODIO O-N J- BIO a N J - COU)O O- N J - GIU) a. W J - 8/u- a-N J- wai III I te M Ul h 73-2 8 5 5 LL - 17 39¥d 2898 1.294 LE917 ATED DOLLAR X 1000 DEGL SM¥1100 966 L 01 G31VljN I SI ONI 0Nn 3 3Wnind 93-97 FIVE YEAR AM OF PROJECTS e OcT g:F- C N - ef. 0 4 -®00 7 - 00 PREVIOUS FUNDS 2.3 MILES IAGE DR. (E PARK) EAS VOLUME C P ACIJY HAZARD INDEX AC I TY HAZARD I DEX X30 1 03¥ZVH All OV X30N I OWVZVH Alto¥ X30NI OWVZVH 11!OV 0 3WnlOA LANE(S) LARIMER COUNTY ED (CY)