HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Public Works 1992-07-23'4./ 1 - 1 . PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA July 23, 1992 1. Crystal Water Plant - Request to approve sale of filters. 2. Centralized Mail Delivery - Town Letter of Commitment for USPS budget purposes. 3. Marys Lake WTP - Request approval to 1) Accept Insurance Co.Total Damage Settlement 2) Release Fire Damage Retainage 3) Extend Project Completion Date to Sept. 15. 4. 1992 Overlay Project - Request approval of bid. 5. CDOT 5 Yr. Program of Projects - North E-470 to new Airport issue. REPORTS: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Reports 3. Water Consultant Update 4. Park and Ride The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary.
i Pingwood Springs Water District Box 3248 Lyons, Colorado 80540 , July 15, 1992 Town of Estes Park Water Department 170 MacGregor Ave. Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Sale of Water Treatment Equipment Attn: Bob Goehring/Bill Linnane Gentlemen: The Pinewood Springs Water District would like to submit a bid for the water treatment equipment offered for .sale in The Daily Journal. It is our understanding that this equipment includes the following: 1. M-48 Dual Train, Two Stage, Pressure Filter System with ancilliary equipment. 2. Interior piping & 4 valves 3. Inlet Strainer 4. 3 in. Turbo Flowmeter 5. In-Line Static Mixer 6. HTH Tank & Pump We propose to assume the task of removing all of the above described equipment and piping from its current location for shipment to Pinewood Springs and assumption of all liability related to this action. Our bid for the above described equipment is in the amount of Fourteen Thousand Two Hundred Nineteen Dollars($14,219.00). Re°' an,-F"lly Sul;mitted, ¥. K *411 6 Lo ling -4 Pr iministrator Pi ;prings Water District Ap 9 0 Douglas Jimison President, Pinewood Springs Water District 1-1 1 0 .
1,ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS; INC. 9mc 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 July 16, 1992 Metro (303) 825-8233 FAX (303) 825-8912 Bill Linnane Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Mary's Lake Treatmen L Faci l iLy Dear Bill: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) has corresponded with Jennison Construction Company (JCC) on the following issues related to the Mary's Lake Treatment Facility (MLWTF) fire damage: 1 ) Contractually the total re tainage that will be required for the project is 5% of $3,035,382.28 ($151,769.14) and 10% of $1,201,000.00 ($120,100.00) for a total of $271,869.14. JCC currently has $200,000 of securities in lieu of retainage in Town holding for the project. This is approximat.el.y 6.6% of the Project Cost to date. JCC has requested that $200,000.00 be deemed adequate re t.ainage for t.he project. 2) Per the Contract Documents Liquidated Damages for the project are $1000 per day beginning June 13, 1992. JCC is anticipating completion of the pr·oject on Sept.ember 15, 1992. This is a 95 day delay' in completion of t.he project., or $95,000 in potential Liquidated Damages. JCC is requesting a time extension be granted for the project to September 15, 1992. The value of the work has neither inc:reased or decreased as a result of the Cir'e. RMC feels that a 5% retainage on the contract total of $3,035,382.28 along with JCC's Performance Bond will serve as adequate monetary protection to the Town. RMC recommends that the Town accept. $200,000 as adequate retainage for the project. 3-1 . CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING - PLANNING
gmc Further, RMC recommends granting 1.he request.ed time exi,ension. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. S inek rel Rof]RY ~IN'14 101 CONSULTANTS, INC. 4. Prochaska, P.E. Prc~ c :c L Man ager KMP/wjk 3-2
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. -1/11& 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 July 16, 1992 FAX (303) 825-8912 Bill 1, iririnne Town of Estes Park P:O. Box 1200 Esl.es Park, CO 80517 Dear Bill: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Tne. (RMC) is enclosing n change order which will hring Lhe ConErneL Sum I.(, DaLe, for fire related damages at the Mary's Lake Treatment Facility (MLWTF), to $1,201,000.00. The change order is intended Lo be a formal agreement, between al 1 contractual parLies, to I.he necei~tance of $1,201,000.00 ns a final loss due Lo Lhe fire. '1'his will be made part of the original contrac:L as signed June 12, 1991. The project value and the contract sum to date will differ by the amount of this change order. FuLure pay requesls will include both fire und non-fire rel:~t.ed work in pl a (.e. RMC will include a letter with these pay request.s noting the amount of each. Tf you have uny quesl.ions, please do not hesit.al.e to call. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTATN CONSULTANTS, INC. ----7 - /7 '77 'In / /21---=En / - .ErS-z~ Kevin P.Kielh Civil Engineer KPK\wjk J=* 3-3 CIVIL AND ENVII?ONMENTAL ENGINEERING • PLANNING
. t CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 1 007 Colorado Order Number Slate 7/15/92 Larimer Date County Contract for: MARY'S LAKE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY Owner: TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO To: JENNISON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (Contractor) You hereby requested t..0 comply· wi th LIre Following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes Decrease Increase Supplemental, plans & specs attached Contract Price Contract Price General Conditions - Para. 5.7 $1,201,000.00 final settlement of fire related Insurance claim.* TOTALS $ $1,201,000,00 NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE $ $1,201,000.00 JUSTIFICATION: See attached 6-page document from JCC dated July 6, 1992. The Amount of the Contract will be (increased) by the sum of ($ 1,201,000.00 ) One Million Two Hundred One Thousand and 00/100 DOLLARS The Contract Total including this and previous orders will be: ($ 4,236,382.28 ) Four Mill.ion Two Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Three Hundred Eighty Two and 28/100 DOLLARS 3-4
11. : . , 1*NNI#-0* CONSTRUctioND¢iMPANT 8122 SouthPark Lane, Suite 210 • Littleton, Colorado 80120 • (303) 797-3042 • FAX 797-1453 July 6, 1992 Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 1649 Estes Park, CO 80517 Attn: Kerry M. Prochaska, P.E. , t Ref: Mary's Lake Water Treatment Plant CPR-990R (Revised) FIRE CLAIM SETTLEMENT Dear Kerry: In keeping with the contract documents paragraph 5.6 Receipt and Application of Proceeds of Insurance:, I request a change order as per Change Proposal Request-990 REVISED (CPR-990R). The request is based on the attached document, Fire Claim Settlement, that identifies the scope of work. With the completion of this scope of work, all components of the project shall be fully warrantable as per the two year correction period of our original contract . agreement. , ' It is expressly understood that the Town of Estes Park is not liable for payment of any amount of this change order unless it is # fully funded by the proceeds of the insurance claim. As a result of this fire and change order request, I request a time extension to September 15, 1992. CPR-990R is requested in the one lump sum amount of $1,201,000.00.(One million two hundred one thousand dollars.) Note the enclosed Sworn statement in Proof of Loss. ! Your very prompt response in this matter is appreciated. Sincerel~, '-7gco&*2~L-,- Tfm Waner Vice President encl 3-5
_,4 u,ov) r -rof -<luce·37 C'.P : 4 N U KIBEf 1 .1 Littr ¥:hAL,/.%:an_- ./C:f AT TIUE Oft LOGS r'RE"AN·|1 •UND IN,U/ANC- COU/AH¥ 1 #61,!CY t-,U,4,EX rug Ah•~11•N IN•UNAM& 10•'AN¥ ~ MAT,6/•l| OURCI ¢ C*/1/OMATICIP~ <~ATF'IMUED 1 ...09'.7~o INOCHNI.. CO..4.ArION 1 AGENCY At S AMEMICA~ AUTO•o•IL• 1/*Uwar•CM COMPaNY /'-1~AYS- 6»1165 1 AGANT - ft.ul__- _ Fl,t...72-, s 'Pr j,4,2 -IC,£424·t~" u. G->tt,a..t« ' JL--1 , AA 0/26,2,4 , f At *imlial loss, by the above indicated policy 01 insurance youinsured ~Ui-4/M ftix.) ~('1~>1-,d ~4•,e·1707,_, - i - ! igaind |c|61 by att ,/fat< _to the properly de:crib@ vids, Sch•dule '7·," •,ccording 10 he term; lind condilicns 01 thepaid prilicy and all forms, endorse -enti. transfers and assigrmorh attached :hereto. I. limaidnd Origin: A VAI, - ios; cocurred abcul :he hour of- .......o'ciocil-=ehA., (.4,0 0,0 jn :h:*,1.~_day oi -£*2-- .19_52. The cgl:59 and crigin of ihe soid loss wer e :... -·na ur d. 1)0XFD ...17(1€UMU . 7. Occuplancy: The building gercribwd, cr centainir:p;~the prpoel·,·,logc.ibgd, t.=1 CC=Jpird 01 the timG c{ 144 kw c, Ir:14,wi ind lok no o:her purpose whatever: 0-AACFA · O 0,4,&*-1 1 9-F~ I 1 1 .--- 1. lilli cild Interesl: 4t *e time 05 the icir the interesr of pur in:,red k rke property described :h•ra, wn.. , .'riu:nbra~c" 1~Nt,2p,1 'c-i;U:< li 51' '44 · d.,f - ·ff 'c'/nt 744.- c.2-74123£4ut An 934.r rer<n~,M Re,$00, hpi any in'or•i, thereir. or U 1. /. !V l. Choriget: Sinr.,• 14. r.ciir! pr.Gr·/ wr,·: :Qu.JA It·„•,·, 4., bee, no oic:gn,r ent *n,r.;~· 5f c:o,g¢. DI irrirci•, .sz, 04.:i,F Jn:y, 0144$9;Cni 1.,00'Lon •.r wxpe,·,f, c,t ·he proper'y :1.:c,7¤02 9:uepr ·'')1pl-0 -ZI.~A:ZHJ'*C.' .....- i . 1, . Tital 1,!wrandet ·:,6 7-712! •:Irr,1,·,nt ot iii:•,ranco cpon Ihc F'iparty .09,0,;bed b-:· t·*:s ,•u; u' 11't' i:ng u· :h. Igis. -I.-1 ' 0 , 01 mor# por·b:;v!*•1)· 3;>ec,;ied k I|le apporric,•·:,te,·il unudie·i l:·61.1· SJ~edw;5 - "C," bes,12.9 '0•1--Ici: . ,cra wdit n.5 polp:ry or orbor co.·.Ircc: of :i-'ar,cv, w,ille,1 u,· or„1, 'uiid or ;i:volid. . Full RJ,plocentent CoNT o' :he 60•3 propery· 01 the Tine cr rie 'ors wit . . 0 . . , i. 0 1 /7111;~ -vt,·v,u a/' . The Pvll Goit el Rapair or Replaciment !0 . . . . D . . . . . . . . . . M. . $ ,. *Ma. (300 -' . Appll¢ble D•priciation h . . . . . . · ................. - . 1 -I-- . Actuel~ Cash Volu. lost ,& ilifte / min•.t lino 8) . . . . . . .. . . 0 . . .|. . ~5~-/• atage)6)0 - o. Les, Boductible: and/cr poitic:purior. by !he irsured . ..........!.. 7 .9 Ven) - ¤ Pan}01 payme:i: D Final payment : i. Actu*l Cash Value Claim h 'Li:10 4 mirtut L,no 10) .............. I 3, a0 A e),Zwil - 1 Z. =:SUFFIer'nt,I rl.Im, 40 6. r •d ;.· 0,·c·o,Aincg wili I|-, 1,rrfir 048 cer,driort, of th, Rgo*poer· 134 . J- -Coft Fol,drogo •,ith:n. -- .---.do··· fran :15'c cL lar. 1,• 4,0-. 0'-iou„ wil! •ot e-:co~.,; . S.. /:-2td€91... .-. ,iT_A Ifi~,rp v,?11 h. 11•n,. r~rti·,1 Al '4a nmnii,•1, dw,...• An I ;, * fl ~,·€ 11) ,"hich it r·„eyer=641 * - 1 ... --I-......-. .0 . ... ...0..1- I.- ./ .. 0 -5 4.1, 4,4 NCT orig,ic,• 3*, ar, O:1, O,19, O- p:&~vic.01,1 or, Iii por, 01 Ir, ;•5.(93 0! r i :Hion,· r y·.30 41, b,•, rent c. 1 -,11, 1,• 94·.irr' 9, 4,·1,1••1.01 • A·,•id L¥ 1••. 42=•i• •u -;.•1·.•i 1. .7·1·,~;1;ut. %; 10·• 1,v&9. w, ••1,v,l 11 •w'·J. •,v 9'1'll•& c•i ,··.;lei.3 r..71 :i In; M•,ge:] scruili, D.:f l.:9 01 ••·* :1 'f•t Z~-11(1• i e.rrege, or .nt,c..L! c„7 r.ing..7 ·0. 13:,d .r, reit,:i;oe 01 l,• up.J lu.·•,0 0, h,•, 11 la·: bw w pl:19·4 .11•,c '01 2•n k en, mo ·,na, 1,)'·,4·>'P4, 94 4 0-3/ 14·:,e.,0 „e 1,9, ce·r:onr, c. H •1%• i.,c,Ii m lula lon. not 'r 04 -04•• • C.w rr:e.· 5, ''~0,1,;Cll,lk,:• 59!,lee *mnil, 9,92:40 11• Ii.hifid 9•f·.3, Dvt,re],1,3 ' u"·N'·'1 4 4tl .:,1,•. 1,•!, 04 42/·t,7 Ir cir to a YOD,·r, 1¢1 -,;ih clutr, 11 41 1 -1,c: 'c, 1•, bal,r,1 4 ;40 cornini. 11=r 11~00 In[:r•n:-toM :4" r.0 b. :.2,& .·.C:D- 1·.Mi.h.a ii :all incs :.,4.klirle a per. 01 ·44,1 P,004 It 11 22.PRE 4361 ..lf<DEbrC,C J •NU AUA#c. 1,·Al .-1: r Jr.fit)'1!NU Cr irHIb 1&A;14 1(; 14 11$0111~ 01 1,55 PaS:A.KING 37 ;COOFS 57 Al; ADJUSTU, Of. ANT AGENT OP THZ =2•,!,ANY NAL·ED XEW·4• :$ NOT ,0 7-'A,/EK .2/ ~Nv ll-At,TS O; SAil JurAN¥. 'i 001• 01: 1.. -.. : 1 5%32.0--A gew '7719(7'·)25...~6 0 ' i /1 1 / 0*7--9-051 ,/. V196£5 , .nty,11 /-411.643/4,5•e> · X.#07/1~-~ 74*#g,rt/vv~/ -p 41 ! INSCRED 1 . ub,cribid and,worn to 606- mn 114, 02- dey .1 il) 1 l J * ~~;~22.. ~ /4-7,165...AN£,/ -2 Nuury Fubk 3-6 | 0503361-70 -e«
t J 4 i 3 'i 1,I= W IS 0 0 •0 0 9 9 0 0 ......... tgA .- g r. .- p .--r.-I- U, 22 IE Eg J LU 1 Q IE u, Z ¤ _0 J R ~ mENZE = i m m w H, , J s =BREN Ze=E r ,- 49< ' 6, M MagE' 5 , ww 0 2 *UM 5~iueam~ c S I= S U) U, O !0 d 6 0 0 0 0 N 04 n. n. a. 0, g EMEE -M 77H=20*E CEEE i =man- t. N S w S > w 00,9.-0, 33-5*REW°ERE Bg#%;~28 6 12 E E E K Q,Q~E E W E E E M M M M 0 9 5 m J 22:15: ... Imml 1- ,- D- mn: Int· zoz=t: 00-0.1:,£ n: 02 02 -1~Exl~~~~~O¢0¢c~i §9 §§9!- 2.9 §§' § Eg § 0 e q 'A .n .0 N 0 . EMNISON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PAGE 1 L-€ QUANTITY I 100 GENERAL CONDITIONS 3.00 MO CTL THOMPSON 1.00 LS EMPIRE LABS 1.00 LS .00 LS WH I TE ATTORNEY - - LS-t- PLATFORM 00 LS OD PLATFORM 1.00 LS 1.00 LS Sl 00'L 13dVHVd H]1Vd-AN 51 00'L Sl 00-1 DN I G1311 1¥ZI3N39 - Sl¥13W ¥3 00-9 31 00'52, 51 00.1 Sl 00-L SZ!300V1 11¥1SNI -33 'N¥310 SJd 00-5 51 00 - L as 00 '18 SWOOM W3HJ Sl 00 SS¥1Dn00-3NVHSW3W Sl 00 1 30 10¥H'3NYMBW3WT NOI1410SNI 3A0W Sl 00 3NVBSW3W , N011¥lnSNI 30 Sl 00 lS¥11¥8 30¥ld33 7 BA Sl 00 3003 MIVd33 01 DNIHS¥13 REPLACE CITY'S CHAIN HOIST ESTIBASE 2.2 E CLAIM SETTLEMENT SEP 15792 P 2!0IMadnS -SlnOd MARY'S LAKE WTP Sl 00 . NOI 33dnS -DNIHS¥1
. 2< $J= I. 2€1 il i imi W O% O -4- 5ge J C EW R 8 5 =4 & § /J 5 55 MCi 0 0 00 0 E FlifIEzA ww M99 6:' M .0 / . - E 4 <W 8 -1 I W ~ N~ b LL 0 < 1 5 5 N 1 O. a. 1 .6 3 tu UJ wn.&85 · 6 6 0 ck:Ofo:Oed-,u,UDZZJ== maa 1 1,•I'-«le,»--0,1,0- 12 9.61 ,., LU UJUJUJu.O-JUD-Jmto 8888 88:22 •O h 0000 0000 0 0 W . C S U S SE :4 EHI SON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PAGE 2 ITEM ESTES PARK, Co QUANTITY I KYLITES-PLASTICRAFTS 32.00 EA 7007 INSULATION IN WALLS 00 LS 8000 DOOR HARDWARE 00 SET 00 EA 00 LS PAINTING- UNIVERSAL 00 LS 00 LS -SEAL UNPAINT NON EXPOSED AREAA 00 LS INT THROUGHOUT 00 LS Sl 00 L OSdWVS 31809-S13NSVD Sl 00 SH90031 11¥ NV Sl 00 S331113S Sl 00 NOSdWVS 31809 18 SNOI103 Sl 00 dWOO 010] AS dWOJ HIV - NO Il] Sl 00 Sl 00 S3SOH 1¥0IlIBWn 'Sadld 330 Sl 00 S3SOH 3DanlS Sl 00 SlINn H108 303 SONI11Id 31 00 L 3801 ]VA ]3¥21 Sl 00 Sl 00 31809 1VH 18 NO Sl 00 0333 WEH] 01 39¥WVO ONIM 02011, 80138/M :S13¥d G39VWV0 3]Vld33 Sl 00'1 ¥3 1 Sl 00*1 INTERIOR CJ @ FIRE-RSI NOSdWVS 31809 331113-33M018 NV Sl 00' ¥3 2 -.33ddOH 33ddn BID MARY'S LAKE WTP SHDROZ!1 119
3 M Id J AJ -1 JJ -J -J UJ UI J 0 00000000000 0 O 0000 0000000 0 ........... N N r e r r .-V- e r r 0 B P .- - r- .-/-/- ... .. p. r- 3 » 0 I < D8 E E K 0 02 W h utiv -W E 53 ..E Z - Jz- S a.i I. EMERS .1250 §3 0> em- et a. 3 2 260<£WKERM .EguJ te . 3-<JJ- CL -4 W 0 2 d 5 -0 a - 0 r 2- .90<Th- , 0%*MAE *m e 6/ .°05% W Ill = ul «00 < > 2 - & U 0 I ZI - 0 H w U - 0 E/ 0 00 < W' r - ul 3 0 !6' 6 0 :my-MME=Em=W= 1 1 ·- ==WOR 2%5#&WMEME'MN ,. 0 2 5 & 0 & -ZI/46 MSWN liu,Wa u. z UU.C. I i a. r 9§92@Gg t. e , 8 s m ¥] 19 n n n r~ ENEISON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 24-Jun-92 NOW PAGE 3 6-€ Sl 00 CNO] 1SIOr 3¥8 U ...... A.64 4../.LAA.,AA.6.6.6.....6..A A .LAA.J. 4.6 4 A 4.6 .6.4.6 A.LAA....4 4 BID MARY' S LAKE WTP 20:34 N ITEM ESTES PARK, CO QUANTITY I P-52226 STRAP - 1 EA 1.00 LS 11020 WIND DAMAGE INSPECTION 1.00 LS 00 EA ;1023 SLIDE GATE TUBES- WHIPPS 00 EA 00 EA Sl 00 Sl 00 Sl 00 13NVd Sl 00 Sl 00 Sl 00 Sl 00 Sl 00 82dd 9 ¥tdd S13NVo * . Sl 00 ¥3 00 L 1. ¥3 00 21 ¥3 00 -£1, Sl 00 L TWO (2) 40" LG. CLEAR PLASTIC (LEXA 2 00 EA -MCPHEE 31VlSIkll-3 SM31V3H JI313313
4 - . ....41.- 01£ 9 2,# kttljah=fi l 4 11/ 1 2 t•LWILE; %64 0 1 UJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . €n . h J J J-JJ -1 -J J -J JJ -J J J.J _,!3!8999~Syuw 0 gg8gggg8ggg0 °°°°°°°°8gg8m 0000 000000 .... . . .... ..0 LU Z 0 Z .. 2 1 / &8 - f /4 . %¥. 1 Ng W 4 ··W a *90 , M i . C N . . .. ESTIBASE 2.2 06/24 U 20:34 N QUANTITY I AD, CPR, P.S., MB (6 SL 1. 0 S ZID33N3 -10313 3100W 0/0-9t S & SWITCHES CONTROL CONSOLE ' TOOL REPLACE LEC W AH BATTERY 10 JISVS .61 31nCOW 1ndNI 901¥NV-9 lIX JISVS i,61 31n0OW lf'IdNI 1V1IDI0-91 318YJ N0ISNVdX3 CONDUITS 31nGOW kid] 318¥3 LLVCP 0-at 1 ... . 4,
' <.I TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum July 20, 1992 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Greg Sievers dt-. * 12 SUBJECT: 1992 Street Improvement Program The Public Works Department received bids for the 1992 Street Improvement Program on Thursday July 16th. Attached are the bid tabulations for your review. The bids are summarized as follows: Companv Bid Coulson Excavation Loveland $72,750.00 Western Mobile Boulder $55,250.00 The low bid is from Western Mobile at $55,250.00. The budget is $75,000.00. Additional expenditures of $18,000.00 are proposed for street striping, additional curbing, and shouldering. The Public Works Department requests approval to accept the low bid and award the project to Western Mobile. Other work associated with this project and voluntarily supervised by the Public Works Department will be the reconstruction of the Golf Course Road and paving a parking lot and basketball court on the south end of Stanley Park. The Estes Valley Recreation and Park District will arrange those expenses on their own. GS:pvs 4-1
. .... lo 0 r- ------ 0 -- lu % <b r. 9 78 E 1 & r D 4 O r- N (1 4- 1.0 (D h 00 01 0 r N M H t.O (D N CO 01 O 4-2 r™M *Lf} (D hoo air- t-r-,-rv- ¥- rerNNCVNNN™N N NM f: BID TABULATION Bid Date: Thursday, July 16, 1992, 2 p.m. Item I Item Descriotion Quant® 1Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension IUnit Price Extension Contract Time: 20 Davs Project: 1992 Street Improvement Project Project Engineer: Greg Sievers 11/z" Street Overlay '1400 Ton I 35.00 49.000.00 38.00 53.200.00 44,100 00 Street Patching 600 SY i 12.00 7,200.00 12.00 7,200.00 0.00 6.000 00 1 Reintorcing Fabric 3000 SY I 1.50 4.500.00 -2.50 7,500.00 1.00 3.000 00 djustment 13 1 100.00 1,300.00 200.00 2.600.00 50.00 650 00 1 500 LF 1 3.00 1,500.00 4.50 2.250.00 3.00 1, 500 00 1 1¥101~ -Iv1O1 00093'699 1¥101 00'09£'ELS 14101 00009'895 171Oll IEngineers Estimate Coulson Western Mobile
TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum July 21, 1992 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane Public Works Director SUBJECT: E-470 and CDOT Five-Year Program of Projects Funding for the 4th part of E-470 is short of construction costs (Refer to map for project location). The IE-470 Authority has asked the CDOT for financial help. If CDOT assists the Authority, it would be through funds generated through cutbacks on the CDOT five-year program of projects. Estes Park has two large projects on that five-year plan: the Highway 7 project and the Highway 34 project. The Board of County Commissioners meets on August 3 to receive input from interested cities and counties. Estes Park needs to state whether or not we would be willing to have our two projects cut from the program for the benefit of IE-470 funding. If the projects are cut, there is no guarantee that they will again be added to the five-year program in the future. It is my opinion that foregoing our two major CDOT projects is too large of a sacrifice to save 10 to 20 minutes on a drive to the new airport. In other words, the two Estes Park projects will cause a more economical benefit than the proposed E-470 time savings. In order to prevent any short sightedness on my part, I am requesting your input. BL:ck 5-1
Engineering Department , A Coininitinent To Progress 498-5700 # / Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 LARIMER COUNTY COLORADO Operations and Planning Engineering Elaine W. Spencer July 9, 1992 Design and Construction Engineering Ross W. Shaw Mr. Rick Widmer Assistant to Town Administrator JUL 1 0 1992 Town of Estes Park P. O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FIVE YEAR PROGRAM OF PROJECTS Dear Mr. Widmer: Attached is a letter from Homer L. Bruton, Secretary to the Transportation Commission of Colorado. This letter explains the process the Transportation Commission will be using this year to develop a list of projects to be included in the FY 1999 Program. The first public hearing will be a joint hearing with the Board of County Commissioners and Transportation Commissioner Bill Neal. This meeting will be held at 2:00 PM on Monday, August 3, 1992, in the Hearing Room of the Larimer County Courthouse, 200 West Oak in Fort Collins, Colorado. You are encouraged to attend this meeting and present your requests to the Board and to Commissioner Neal. To help you in preparing your requests, I have included a copy of the prioritized list Larimer County took to the regional meeting in 1991 and a copy of the prioritized list developed at the regional meeting in the fall of 1991. In addition to reviewing these two lists, the Board of County Commissioners ask that you consider the'issue of access to the new Denver airport. Most of you are aware of the fact that the airport is scheduled to open in 1993. For several years we have all discussed and debated the merits and cost of the north section of E-470 from I-25 south and east to the airport entrance. It appears at this time that the E-470 Authority is short of funding and completion of this project is many years away. We in northern Colorado are still looking at additional, shorter access to the airport other than via I-25 to I-270 to I-70 and Airport Road. The Transportation Commission has been approached about funding either the northern section of the E-470 project or an alternate route that would provide more expedient access from both Larimer County and Weld County. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Courtlyn W. Hotchkiss M.J. "Moo- Mekelburg 5-2 Daryle W. Klassen District I District 11 District 111
Mr. Rick Widmer / Tgwn of Estes Park + July 9, 1992 Page 2 The Transportation Commission is very committed to the current 5-Year Plan developed, in part, based on our input provided through the County hearing process each year and they have indicated that if E-470 or an alternate access route is a high priority for inclusion in the 5-Year Plan, this can only be accomplished if we are willing to "give up" or delay other highway projects in Larimer County on the current 5-Year Plan. With this in mind, as you review your requests and the current 5-Year Plan, please consider your position on this issue. Specifically, the Board of County Commissioners would like to know: 1. What priority do you give to a northern Colorado access to the new airport when considering maintaining the current 5-Year Plan? 2. Should Larimer County be willing to delay or delete some of our 5-Year Plan State highway projects in Larimer County in order to facilitate financial participation by Colorado Department of Transportation to provide a northern access to the airport. In addition to comments presented at the public hearing, I would appreciate written comments and recommendations on future projects either prior to the public hearing or within one week after the hearing. Requests for recommended projects should include the type of project, limits of the project and justification for the project. This will enable the Board of County Commissioners to evaluate the merits of each project when developing the prioritized list to be submitted at the regional meeting and in defending the priority of each project when combining lists from Larimer County, Weld County and Morgan County. For your information, the regional meeting is scheduled at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, September 22 at the Greeley office of the Department of Transportation. Any questions should be directed to Rex Smith at 498-5740. Sincerely, 9 A + OX 0-LU 7 Elaine W. Spencer, Manager Engineering Operations and Planning C: Board of County Commissioners Doug Rames, CDOT 5-3
~ Relocated BRIGHTON Baseline-Rd. Washington 85 76 1-25 (N Street 160th Ave. t-4,10_ --- Colorado 0 > Boulevard c 144th Ave. Quebec _ ADAMS COUNTY (1) . Street i ® US 85 0- 0 4 BROOMFIELD 0 m 1- /-Vt.-~ 120th Ave.0 0 0 -0 120th A #enwT | ..: . NORTHGLENN -3 %0 CY{ Mt 36 104th Avenue 0 104th Ave. 8„0. r 3 Future Denver International THORNTON 0 96th Avenue :, Airport Site 88th Ave. 881h Avenue ~ Lky Mountain Arsenal :f Airport B.gulevard J . ARVADA ~ COMMERCE CITY ~ 270 n 64th Ave~ue WESTMINSTER % 56111 Ave. I 56th AUQue ·d -1 -- Gun Club Road Stapleton 32nd Avenue 0 225 DENVER Airport 1 | Colfax Ave. al-70 00..#. 6111 Ave. AURORA Relocated --- -I- -- -= ==E E e Gth Avenue ----- -~-- Alignment i Mississippi Ave 0 Interchange Location .< - Adopted Alignment 0 -8 Buckley ,« Jewell/Iliff Avenue '0 m -ci . Field (29 C U) m L 1> al)>m . = 4, Hampden Ave. E I N ---7--itzy 3% 3 . ~ ENGLEWOOD 0 m f Quincy Ave 0 Quincy Avenue C Belleview Ave. 04 Belleview Avenue \0· 01 - LITTLETON \% -0 ~ Arapahoe Rd. \* % ARAPA %) -0 \ 8. COUNTY moky Hill Road ~Centetinial 94 0 Airport \ A Point Between m ··.' Parker Road and I C-470 - Stnoky Hill Road 1-25 (S) Parker Road Jor n Road -4 Peoria Street Lincoln Ave. 83 DOUGLAS COUNTY 75 25 / , Potomac/Chambers 5-4 Rev. 7/89
TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT JUNE 1992 TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS UTILITY LOCATION - MAIN 21.00 38.75 UTILITY LOCATION - SERVICE 2.00 4.00 SERVICE LINE INSPECTION 1.00 1.00 TAP REQUEST 7.00 8.25 WATER QUALITY - TASTE 1.00 1.50 WATER QUALITY - COLOR 3.00 5.00 PRESSURE PROBLEMS - LOW 3.00 6.00 ' LINE BREAKS - MAIN 1.00 5.00 LINE BREAKS - SERVICE 4.00 6.50 METER REPAIR 15.00 72.50 FINAL INSPECTION 16.00 18.00 SIGN REQUESTS 2.00 2.00 STORM DRAINAGE 1.00 5.00 OTHER 10.00 16.25 -------- TOTALS FOR JUNE 1992 87.00 189.75 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 87.00 88.00 72.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 189.75 169.50 162.25 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) +35.38%/-1.60% -1.14%/+11.95% +20.83%/+16.95% Rl-1
ESTES PARK JUNE& YTD WATER BILLED 120,000,000 j 0 6.8% e - 100,000,000 c 0 17 9 9 11 2 .4 1 27 1 lily - . 71- 4 1 80,000,000 - 2 1' ~ il.r ' r lit R - GALLONS 60,000,000 -11 - r -1. u--;.:. - i.: ·--< - 31. - ti. -3 - 4 -li>- W: t. R: r.i. ·t ...A 1 4> 41 4 ./1 I ., I '· ~ W : 5 ·· · 1- / k 7 M : 41 1 0 40,000,000 -, f - 4,-f ' ' J - 5 - E - r. :1 1.1 - 0 4 5 >41 3 F 3~11 '. 411 4. 44'~ : 214 .1 U. i ? 43 11 3.13 1-- 2 3111 3 u 9 48.9 .~~. 11 4. ··· h ¢/3 ·· : /261 .,11 ;. 4 ~il ..'. lim -:i~ I - »k».. II,1,,I 1 1 m E g Cy) Cl 9 1 YTD YEAR M JUN ESTES PARK JUNE & YTD WATER REVENUE 450,000.00 -' 0_ 3.9% 400,000.00 - £7 4 Cl. 0 i , 350,000.00 -- £37· · I ./ 300,000.00 - 0. ··i ': 250,000.00 -' 627.- 11 , 79 . ·r A• I DOLLARS 0 cr 0 200,000.00 -'i: --*7771. -< -ii -f 7..: -'~ -t &--2 -;fi-5.87% 7 1 L t.' 150,000.00 -,) -i o 100,000.00 -':. F I . 50,000.00 -' ; a f.m-* 1 0011 0 r - r --- T r 01 .7 4 CO CO 00 :St€UEERS;&: 01 01 cy> al cy) cy, c) 07 C-, c-> 01 U YTD e M - e v-- - YEAR I JUN R2-1 1982 ¤,1 ~ 3. 1984 ¢],0..1.~~ -- -' 1985 w.-4 -2 2 ' f'"- 696 L ' 33" ' 0661
ADJUSTMENTS JUNE, 1992 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 110,000 2.) Bleeders a. Stanley Heights, Fall River 1,999,770 b. Metered plus Mize 97,300 TOTAL BLEEDERS (Gal.) 2,097,070 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 20-May Clean Crystal Raw Line 120,000 b. 1-Jun Flush Crystal Line 60,000 c. 3-Jun Marys WTP Clear Well 120,000 d. 8-Jun Flush Arapaho Meadows Line 40,000 e. 10-Jun Flush Arapaho Meadows Line 60,000 f. 12-Jun Flush Timberline 10,000 g. 12-Jun Flush Ramshorn 7,500 h. 1. j. k. 1. m. TOTAL FLUSHING, MISC. (Gal.) 417,500 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) 2,624,570 R2-2
TOWN OF ESTES PARK JUNE, 1992 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for May 14,1992 through June 13,1992: May 14 to 31 Water Treated: Black Canyon -43,000 *Fall River O Glacier Creek 22,568,000 *Big Thompson 3,295,497 *Crystal 0 June 1 to 13 Water Treated: Black Canyon -9,000 *Fall River O Glacier Creek 15,833,000 *Big Thompson 3,261,215 *Crystal 0 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 44,905,712 Gal. 2) Water accounted for from May 14 to June 13: Adjustments: 2,624,570 Billing: 29,718,770 *Backwash 327,836 Total Water accounted for: 32,671,176 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 73% R2-3
TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS JUNE, 1992 1 DATE BLACK FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL < :. BIG CRYSTAL SUBTOTAL $.3 TOTAL CANYON RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS THOMP. (GAL) CFS 1.~ (GALI 1 -1,000 0 1,053,000 1,052,000 1.64 132,622 0 132,622 0.21 H 1,184,622 2 -1,000 0 1,596,000 1,595,000 2.48 { 134,251 0 134,251 0.21 ~ 1,729,251 3 -1,000 0 1,113,000 1,112,000 1.73 166,510 0 166,510 0.262 5: 1,278,510 4 -1,000 0 1,542,000 1,541,000 2.40 : 164,881 0 164,881 0.26% ~ 1,705,881 5 -1,000 0 895,000 894,000 1.39 270,457 0 270,457 0.42}4 1,164,457 6 -1,000 0 1,258,000 1,257,000 1.96 279,907 0 279,907 0.43 j : 1,536,907 7 -1,000 0 1,232,000 1,231,000 1.92: 290,008 0 290,008 0.45 1 4 1,521,008 8 -1,000 0 1,178,000 1,177,000 1.83 251,672 0 251,672 0.39} i 1,428,672 9 -1,000 0 1,465,000 1,464,000 2.28. 345,403 0 345,403 0.53 & { 1,809,403 10 0 0 1,073,000 1,073,000 1.67 263,940 0 263,940 0.41 ~ 1,336,940 11 0 0 1,384,000 1,384,000 2.15 : i 298,480 0 298,480 0.46: 1,682,480 12 0 0 858,000 858,000 1.34 i . 343,930 0 343,930 0.53 1 1 1,201,930 13 0 0 1,186,000 1,186,000 1.85 i: 319,154 0 319,154 0.49 1,505,154 14 0 0 1,205,000 1,205,000 1.88 258,401 0 258,401 0.40 ; f 1,463,401 16 0 0 944,000 944,000 1.47 485,519 0 485,519 0.75H 1,429,519 16 0 0 1,503,000 1,503,000 2.34: 309,234 0 309,234 0.48 § 1 1,812,234 17 0 0 1,405,000 1,405,000 2.19f 331,066 0 331,066 0.51: 1,736,066 18 0 0 1,564,000 1,564,000 2.44 319,009 0 319,009 0.49: , 1,883,009 19 0 0 1,369,000 1,369,000 2.13'. 465,854 0 465,854 0.72: 1,834,854 20 0 0 1,508,000 1,508,000 2.35: 375,552 0 375,552 0.58 E 1,883,552 21 0 0 1,649,000 1,649,000 2.57 323,897 0 323,897 0.50: 1,972,897 22 0 0 1,271,000 1,271,000 1.98: 469,879 0 469,879 0.73: 1,740,879 23 0 0 1,204,000 1,204,000 1.87 243,196 0 243,196 0.38i 1,447,196 24 0 0 1,315,000 1,315,000 2.05 411,086 0 411,086 0.64} 1,726,086 25 0 0 1,199,000 1,199,000 1.87 : 323,571 0 323,571 0.50 ~§ i 1,522,571 26 0 0 1,347,000 1,347,000 2.10 381,246 0 381,246 0.59:<1 1,728,246 27 0 0 1,288,000 1,288,000 2.01 s i 305,975 0 305,975 0.47 14 1,593,975 28 0 0 1,027,000 1,027,000 1.60 301,413 0 301,413 0.47} ~ 1,328,413 29 0 0 1,286,000 1,286,000 2.00 419,236 0 419,236 0.65, 1,705,236 30 0 0 1,283,000 1,283,000 2.00. 314,773 0 314,773 0.49 1,597,773 31 0 0 0 0 0,00 i ~ 0 0 0 0,00 0 0 TOT. -9.000 0 38,200,000 38,191,000 9,300,122 0 9,300.122 47.491.122 f § 44 X < t:+ j AF -0.03 0.00 117.24 117.21 { 28.54 0.00 28.54 K i ,... 145.75 2.37 CFS 0.00 0.00 1.91 1.91 4 0.46 0.00 0.46 t..3 B. .E A ii {.+ j BWI-) N/A 0 N/A 0 'f -452,100 0 -452,100 -452,100 BLI-) N/A N/A N/A N/A i i N/A N/A N/A -2,624,570 %:....: GAL -9,000 0 38,200,000 38.191.000 8,848.022 0 8.848.022 i.~ - 'M.414,452 AF -0.03 0 117.24 117.21 27.16 0.00 27.16 ·§ 136.31 1st-13 -9,000 0 15,833,000 3,261,215 0 14 - 31 0 0 22,367,000 6,038,907 0 R2-4
1 c.-1 62, r-- G.1 1- «-1 1-0 ir:, 1-- -- M -0 00 r» co co ,=1 -- crl cs, 5, 4- 0- 0-· -4- FI •r ,-1, B r 1 .r r-. r..1 M• -0 e=, r- Lrl ric,cor-4----A*-*,4-*--.4.--,-r,-- €2 Gl C.1 •SI CS, Z '11 - 1,1 2-== 7 :li 9* BE ME~ %29 m 54 2*12 r, •r 1,1 -4 r-·- C.O 0- U -• G.1 10 - 11-1 1.0 r.9 (r, D- rs• - 777'7177 -T/,1 -TTTiTTTr T C ---1 1- -• 1- G~ 4.13 0 61 r-9 •=r --4 ~1- ·-0 --0 0· CO CID -O / 0 CD Gl -• FC, 10 F> 04 -4 *>1 G, IN - --1 r·I GI C-4 134 IN C>.4 00-OC.,0000 --•F->0- -4,-0-0-r-•ENC>le,74/20]or·. --4 1=1 to r-1 1-- r -4 •12 1,-1 5.1 eg €10 10 -O -1- r. Cr· --4 1, 1 0- -4 t·9 0- 10 1--- -1- ro ci:. Cr- ZI GL ·-O JO O- - p- CO {24 --• C~ --1 0.-- -1............1. .. l<, 02, 04| C- F> •- A ES S, CD li A U-3 LIE; EN -1 ·.0 IN tIa --1 • Fi ir] r- c, cr, fl 0, ro s, 6, r>4 -- En g· CS@ Ii-3 -4 -r -r t,-3 IJ IN ..r LO IN -*23 •-1 --4 cs, - t/> La o t'i -1-- 0-1 0- 03 1-9 L.1 es, r -0---1------ .. -4 1 - - ..1 -+ .. - 1 -• A - O-· 1· ) ta til 1,1 .74 •4- A 9 ·-O A •-O -1 1-·-- 100 0 t«J L cs {-4 -- ro p- LO D- cr r-- 0- [I} I] 8-1 /71 III --4 -O la --4 F) I r·.t<• S r-aor:,LOCOJOLOT-- =rel·F,COIN•,1-1.NU-,COL 4- 0,1 ··AD Ul ·r Ch• D-, # ri - -- IN -Ob- F) 0- -JO Ul 01 K cr t,9 •r Ir-3 -r -1- ,/EL, C., rp) ro C·# I 4 1·9 149 t-9 11 -·11 1» F) I -0 es• 1-1 71 10 - r-· CD 20 eg Lf-) 1, 117 Ulty --4 -0 -9 CD ..4 . (0073=,01 1-fie9=,eor~ 30]-rc,u-1-1-1--ruit, c-l to l- ,-1 F) - ·4- rs, 37 ·rr Cri zo r.9 «r po 0- 00 74 1,1 -O r U- 01 - el -0 -O 05, CU -9 -4 •0 » CO E- t- r- r- Mr U-3 --1 ; O-·cia zor--LO .727/···110 -UF)CN-loc·#cocr- M)--Fort-o• . - U-] -0 m CO :13 -r - 33 0- - v, t·9 to - co co zo .r ,.9 L 62 -- 0 0-- c-J - -4 r- :r· i.9 13- 9 -=r c.~1 9 -• to -0 P) O Z 01 kry,0 988 5,80 -ar€-18 Sle,2190•92 /1 -r,-0 120521~0 500 ZEJIS,CS3 SIC-Unt~=02 0-7/ 4/45/-16/CO j Gapq-1-09/J,/f/-2 -9 - ./. .... - - - - - - - ..- .. - -I ./1- - 00 N ul 00 -O 11-3 ,=r :r CO /-4 -0 CO 10 il cr --1 2- ·cr CO J D-] 20 C-1 - 11 -4 0· l· 0- -O s. cr- 1-9 Il --1 r-1 -0 u-3 -- I C) 1 -4 -0 =1 EN 130 22 ·-0 CD --1 -v ol > CO U-3 0 --1 -0 1 -4 - - - r - - - - - - - r - - - - r (4 -1 6-1 01 -r g- r-- in rg ..0 za .- r.. 20 r-I r-- - r·, 00 - 9 .4- r.. 9 Cy IN N 04 -- :9 0, .4 - •>I IN -4 0,4 -4 O «3 263 62 CS 9 0 /2 39 :32 €52 il Cr- CSG ZZI C;1 S S~ FO .» t-9 9 1-4 10 0- -O CO 20 r., r- -• - r - -* - - C. 2-0031® * 64 9 0- '11 149 .-1 -r F: ..9 20 01 f--4 - --- ED €En GJ 152 ,= CD-2082053:210 9(20 9 G; SI C) a S;1 G• IS) 9 61 1 1 r I gacs,=2 -Uees-Wse ---- - - I. - - - - - - - OF-10-0403 ble- /1 <2 11 3 (9 - 4 Cr• f.- 7-0-Cr·- .'r re 0- 13 r- - » er r- --1 [CO N . D r- r/, 0.- CE:1 -- 19 F) Er· G, 0- -4 -r CON-- --- - -1 04 .4 1·9 0-1 -4- 11 -1 1<1 ---1 >4 C•·1 --1 -W v C_;'CP'Sles10=6161•2019 1-31,111-30LOKEDZ;!t~lm: -- co ..1· -h /1 U.: S GJ CLI Z 00,9 -er 0 1,-3 ,-·) 1- -- r ..-- - r 170-[NOM) Il"-00--0 1 9- M; -1 > --1 00 -0 0-1 co UT -0 Co zil t·Oul- r-,-0 - r . . ..r- C-1 -9 C.1 1-9 -9 IN to ~9.-r,- G, 1-0 r·-1 1--9 - 1- £521 12 CS, G.1 2-3 CED CS, 1 -0,-0 N CO --1 c CS, rn R CO -9 CO eS g CS, CS:, 50 G;3 e N -4 --O -r q- tr] M » 1 1 10 1-- .r Gl Sh er •DO S, G, r:1 -4 •i- -r 9 -t li-~ + . - T - . - - I - 0 -, 4.- - ./ - I r.* - /3 -0 a W 0 -9 -1 10 -0 0 - 1.1 7.1 .1. 09 O Ill 0. CO 0 1-- u-3 0 EN tn ··4 1-9 19 - in r-- 179 F, O CO IiI -1-0 -OCOO-, Jarr--1 130--e»-01,7--01/14-0-or- -- - r ./ - - . - 11- - ..1 - .. - ./. - I. 0- -10-Or-,-r- Ly-MI-··.-~-4 O% CD O -- c.:,le,2, Slci:le:Irge=legrop,S eg :ges,co 0 02 rs, WOG,-50(10&1£50€.2981121 ./ C..1 CSJILICACE~·s}Gle.J :Uts,gge=le=~ CGIC=, . I - -.. ./ - 1-- ./ -, I- r - ~ <. -• . -4 1·9 CS~ 00:]r-9 -0 --4 ---,7 11 t.1- f.-I 1--· - U h 1,1 -1 0- Gl n 0- Fi -O r-- C l 0 1.1-, IN 0- 70 ··r C 4 -0 C.2 -4 --4 -4- r. 9 --4 0- ,-1 0- 117 -0 -1 u-1 t/, r -1 --4 •r r 31 04 0 jo t·9 h - F) 2.7 -1 1-· - r·, re 1 r- 04 IN -- 01 r# -9 K.4 -1 1. r-- 00 •r e=, es, 9 e e:, 51 tz. c=, 52 Cz, C.Z: =, 19 e=• S c=.1 es• r -rirl¢rieges,zzlcues:•=Dege#n 0 =2 0 r. O-· -1,0 0- F) I· 41 G, --• c.l CO =11 ./ 4.. I . 4- - - -I ... I - .1.. 0- I. a u·3 #-9 ··r •r (·4 1/> 1.-1 0 1.-i ,-9 03 21 CU „1 CLI -- t- 1,-3 C=, C-4 •-r 1·9 -• £313 --0 1 l» :-2 M I.- LI-3 -4 • r *0 # -r --1 1-~ 0- C-1 1-9 3 03 -tr- CO €21 le -O -4 1.-I C·-4 1-9 q- 1,1 4 h- [.0 0- W -• EN 9 -7 10 -0 r-- 0, -r· Cil --· r--- 1--- r-· 1--- 1--- 1--. th ,- cO Co rri C] Crl al -r. rri m =11 1>- 0- 0-- O- (r cr-cr·{r- 3 1»0- 0- cr· 7- O- Ir-·Cr~cr• CH -r·O-0- 1 1 ·42 <I <-IZ <12 •gr €1: elI •rIE ·I <T <12 -In •=1: CI ZI ,=r <I~ 41.: <1= •rE Z r JC *ZE IC XE Z I= r C~~21.=m .21=,C C 22: 32 1 R2-5 4,286 34,506, 47 i-May-72 .00 --· ..W 1 .P + e ..61,2 -6.. 1-- .11'. '1:1~ lillili . -1 1 I . 11 .„:71 i.. n :.Tin. BLP,0 {000 '91 000' 900) (000466 100) 118,025 (1,317,000) e 0121 'II 002
TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS) 1991 1991 1992 1992 MONTH YTD f 3 MONTH YTD % % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL 1 ? TOTAL TOTAL i < CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) i ~ (GAL.) (GAL.) (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 25,753,376 25.753,376 ' 22,227,168 22,227,168' 2 -13.69% -13.69% X FEBRUARY 20,818,236 46,571,612 18,753,245 40,980,413: i -9.92% -12.01% MARCH 23,065,946 69,637,558 i 22,019,445 62,999,858 # 1 -4.54% -9.53% APRIL 23,868,231 93,505,789 j 24,054,701 87,054,559' 0.78% -6.90% MAY 33,828,478 127,334,267 39,232,054 126,286,613 15.97% -0.82% JUNE 47,550,123 174,884,390 i { 44,414,452 170,701,065: -6.59% -2.39% JULY 61,171,426 236,055,816 AUGUST 54,753,043 290,808,859 . SEPTEMBER 45,080,259 335,889,118 OCTOBER 29,400,590 365,289,708 :' NOVEMBER 21,662,560 386,952,268 f i DECEMBER 21,290,647 408,242,915 i j TOTAL 408,242,915 AC - FT 1,252.94 R2-6
L - . TOWN OF ESTES PARK PARK & RIDE STATISTICS JUNE 14 - JUNE 20 1992 T ,- TROLLEY 0 - OTHER P - PARKED AT WORK SMTWTFS 06/14 06/15 06/16 06/17 06/18 06/19 06/20 TOTAL TOWN OF T-0 T- 2 T- 2 T- 2 T- 3 T- 3 T- 2 T- 14 ESTES PARK 0-0 0 - 20 0 - 20 0 - 20 0 - 20 0 - 20 0 - 24 0 - 124 P-0 P- 4 P- 4 P- 4 P- 4 P- 5 P- 5 P- 26 ALL OTHER T-0 T-29T-23T-35T-26T-28T-22T- 163 BUSINESSES TOTAL T-0 T-31T-25T-37T-29T-31T-24T- 177 0-0 0 - 20 0 - 20 0 - 20 0 - 20 0 - 20 0 - 24 0 - 124 P-OP- 4 P- #P- 4 P- 4 P- 5 P- 5 P- 26 R4-1
L ./ TOWN OF ESTES PARK PARK & RIDE STATISTICS JUNE 21 - JUNE 27 1992 T - TROLLEY 0 - OTHER P - PARKED AT WORK SMTWTFS 06/21 06/22 06/23 06/24 06/25 06/26 06/27 TOTAL TOWN OF T- 9 T - 14 T - 11 T - 10 T - 7 T- 9 T- 5 T- 65 ESTES PARK 0- 8 0 - 24 0 - 24 0 - 19 0 - 21 0 - 18 0 - 6 0 - 120 P- 4 P- 8 P- 5 P- 6 P- 9 P- 9 P- 4 P- 45 ALL OTHER T - 21 T - 36 T - 35 T - 34 T - 28 T - 23 T - 21 T - 198 BUSINESSES TOTAL T - 30 T - 50 T - 46 T - 44 T - 35 T - 32 T - 26 T - 263 0- 8 0 - 24 0 - 24 0 - 19 0 - 21 0 - 18 0 - 6 0 - 120 P- 4P- 8 P- 8 P- 6 P- 9 P- 9 P- 4 P- 45 R4-2
0 b - TOWN OF ESTES PARK PARK & RIDE STATISTICS JUNE 28 - JULY 04 1992 T - TROLLEY 0 - OTHER P - PARKED AT WORK SMTWTFS 06/28 06/29 06/30 07/01 07/02 07/03 07/04 TOTAL TOWN OF T- 2T-lOT-lOT-lOT- 5 T- l T-4 T- 42 ESTES PARK 0- 00-200-220-210-230-120-7 0 - 105 P- OP- 5 P- 4 P- 7 P- 8 P- 5 P-2 P- 31 ALL OTHER T - 19 T - 40 T - 27 T - 32 T - 43 T - 33 T - 32 T - 226 BUSINESSES TOTAL T - 21 T - 50 T - 37 T - 42 T - 48 T - 34 T - 36 T - 268 0- 0 0 - 20 0 - 22 0 - 21 0 - 23 0 - 12 0 - 7 0 - 105 P- OP- 5 P- 4 P- 7 P- 8 P- 5 P- 2 P- 31 R4-3
I . TOWN OF ESTES PARK PARK & RIDE STATISTICS 07/05/92 - 07/11/92 1992 T - TROLLEY 0 - OTHER P - PARKED AT WORK SMTWTFS 07/05 07/06 07/07 07/08 07/09 07/10 07/11 TOTAL TOWN OF T- 2 T- 5 T- 8 T- 4 T- 4 T- 4 T- l T- 28 ESTES PARK 0- 3 0 - 25 0 - 23 0 - 23 0 - 26 0 - 21 0 - 5 0 - 126 P- 3 P- 9 P - 10 P - 10 P - 8 P- 9 P- 3 P- 52 ALL OTHER T - 28 T - 29 T - 36 T - 30 T - 37 T - 30 T - 25 T - 215 BUSINESSES TOTAL T - 30 T - 34 T - 44 T - 34 T - 41 T - 34 T - 26 T - 243 0- 3 0 - 25 0 - 23 0 - 23 0 - 26 0 - 21 0 - 50- 126 P- 3 P- 9 P - 10 P - 10 P - 8 P- 9 P- 3 P- 52 R4-4
/- . 1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PARK & RIDE STATISTICS JULY 12 - JULY 18 1992 T - TROLLEY - 0 - OTHER P - PARKED AT WORK S M T W T* F* S 07/12 07/13 07/14 07/15 07/16 07/17 07/18 TOTAL TOWN OF T- 2 T- 6 T- 7 T- 7 T- 4 T- 4 T- l T- 31 ESTES PARK 0- 7 0 - 25 0 - 26 0 - 30 0 - 30 0 - 22 0 - 6 0 - 146 P- 6P-lOP-lOP- 5 P- 5 P- 5 P- 3 P- 44 ALL OTHER T - 15 T - 31 T - 30 T - 18 T -*35 T -*32 T - 36 T -*197 BUSINESSES . TOTAL T - 17 T - 37 T - 37 T - 25 T -*39 T -*36 T - 37 T -*228 0- 7 0 - 25 0 - 26 0 - 30 0 - 30 0 - 22 0 - 6 0 - 146 P- 6 P - 10 P - 10 P - 5 P- 5 P- 5 P- 3 P- 44 *Trolley totals for 071692 & 071792 based on a one month average (Did not recieved tickets from Trolley Company for those days)