The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1992-04-16r' PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA April 16 , 1992 1. Home Mail Delivery - Review Post Office Proposal. 2. 1991 High Dr. Loop Project - Request approval to sign a Change Order. 3. CDOT Highway Striping - Request to ask Town Board for approval of bids. 4. MacGregor Widening - Request to ask Town Board for approval of bids. 5. National Public Works Week - Request to proclaim the week of May 17th to 23rd as Public Works Week. 6. Clean Up Week - Request to implement program in May. REPORTS: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Reports 3. Water Consultant Update 4. Fleet Dept. Update 5. Water Dept. Flushing Program The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum I . ... . I . April 13, 1992 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Linnane Public Works Director SUBJECT: Centralized Mail Delivery The Postal Service has submitted a centralized mail delivery proposal to the Town that I have attached for your review. To summarize: 1. In lieu of delivery to rural route boxes, the USPS would provide centralized delivery to neighborhood delivery and collection box units (approximately 32 to 48 homes per site). 2. The proposal is to accomplish centralized mail delivery in phases (see the attached Phase 1 sketch - future phases to be determined). 3. The Town would share in the costs (Phase 1 Postal Service cost is approximately $13,000 and the Town cost is approximately $21,000). In order to accomplish centralized mail delivery, the Town must decide whether or not to incur a portion of the cost. The Phase 1 cost to the Town would be approximately $21,000. Centralized mail delivery to the entire Town limits would cost the Town approximately $87,000. The USPS will also need to approve their estimated cost prior to centralized mail delivery in Estes Park. The costs involved will probably make it necessary to implement the program in phases. I anticipate at least four phases - one per year - if Town costs were limited to approximately $20,000 per year, and the work load can accommodate one phase per year. There are other factors that will affect scheduling of each phase. Among a few of these factors are staff manpower to implement the project, number_of neighborhood group meetings to - -determine NBU location, and possible neighborhood resistance tocentralized~ihail delivery. I have attached a copy of-a USPS questionnaire that will be sent to Town residents to determine whether or not they are in favor of centralized mail delivery. 1-1 Centralized Mail Delivery April 13, 1992 Page 2 To summarize this memo, the following steps need to occur to receive centralized mail delivery: ~71. Based upon available funding, the Town must approve the cost estimate of $87,000.00 for all of the phases. L 2. USPS approval of their costs. 7,Â»/ i/*06 yik 3. USPS questionnaires sent to all Town residents. 4. Establishment of the phasing needed to bring centralized mail delivery to all interested residents. 5. Establish neighborhood group meetings to get feedback on NBU locations, and finalize NBU locations. 6. Bid the project out in phases and begin construction, phase by phase. If the above steps are successful, the Public Works Department estimates that construction of Phase 1 or a portion of Phase 1 will begin the fall of 1992 or the spring of 1993. subject to budget approval. Future phases will be a function of available Town funds, available staff hours, and neighborhood feedback. BL:ck 1-2 1 Â· DELIVERY PROPOSAL .1 1 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 6; JAN 1 6 1392 2 i i ti 1 . 2 7 1.f.'. A +â€¢ 1) Presently, residents may petition to the post office for delivery to a rural box on the line of travel of an existing Highway Contract Route (liCR) . 2) In lieu of delivery to rural route boxes the USPS is agreeable to offering centralized delivery through Neighborhood Delivery & Collection Box Units (NBU's). 3) NBU's would be placed throughout the delivery area to accommodate each subdivision in locations approved by the USPS. 4) The USPS would provide the following: -- All NBU and parcel locker equipment -- Issue keys and change locks -- Maintenance of equipment 5) The city of Estes Park would provide the following: -- Concrete slabs and installation of equipment per USPS specifications -- Surrounding surface areas where necessary to provide for adequate turn-outs -- Snow removal and general maintenance around the area of equipment -- Notify citizens of assigned address 6) Centralized delivery will be provided in eight phases. It will be necessary for all customers currently receiving delivery in rural type boxes to agree to receive delivery in an NBU. All addressing will conform to the addresses as assigned by the Town of Estes Park. 7) Phase I would include the following locations: Section 1. Section 2. Total possible deliveries - 80 Total possible deliveries - 146 One central location Two central locations Five (16 unit) NBU'B Ten (16 unit) NBU's Two parcel lockers Four parcel lockers Section 3. Section 4. Total possible deliveries - 96 Total possible deliveries - 148 Two central locations Two central locations Six (16 unit) NBU's Ten (16 unit) NBU's Four parcel lockers Four parcel lockers 1-3 Delivery Proposal, Estes Park 'Page Two . Section 5. Total possible deliveries - 153 (Total possible deliveries - Two central locations all sections - 623) Ten (16 unit) NBU's Four parcel lockers These are estimated costs values: 41 NBU's x $207.00 = $ 8,487.00 18 Parcel Lockers x 222.00 = 3,996.00 100 Extra Locks plus Arrow Locks = 300.00 d $12,783.00=PogrAL 6 6/2.4, ca This figure does not include HeR costs. 609-r 8) The last phase would include the establishment of a city delivery route for the downtown business district. This would impact all box rent fees to a higher rate structure. 9) This is a preliminary agreement, contingent on approval Of the complete delivery plan that will be developed. <1 do CALGE-- JIMSE W. DAVIS CARL T. JANUARY, JR. 01*ector, Operations Support (A) Director, Field Operations 1600 E. 53rd Place, Rm. 2246 7500 E. 53rd Place, Rm. 2204 Denver, CO 80266-9993 Denver, CO 80266-9992 4Â¢ -1- Ow,4 C- 0 5-r s = 1 1 1 2 0 u # 7 - 1.4 1 5 1 % A M E: 6-1- 1 M Al- E- 2, At ED ON Ar h),4 341 rA L, 01 08 03> C It, u,-4 ; T') r-18 J '5 pc e. 6 ,-r'E . C 0,1- i b thi A (-COADA +ACE W 17-t-1 542,1 A L. 5 Ene.J, ce -DE.61 (ord 51ANT>An--DE. 1-4 * .;:r 4#tm'/=-L------- :- 1 f 27/_.27-- \, h 99 I h: 0 1 lili r . 1.9 -1 1. Yl ---4,1-=2~...~. 7, 1 A ~i~'i~~ titft~flt~'<~ *lz Â£ ti 1 , 1/ 1 1/4\ D 1,21 - - - ~ '- " 1~ 1 T~+~-Â·424*0-!99"4 -~ 1 . . Â· it l â„¢b- , 4 ~ i i 1/ :ft 1 - 7/f 1 - Al ... '7 J . 4 6 Â·~ - .9 1 - - - %.- 1 4-6.66--4,21. ----- ..1.-7,71- â€¢4 - - --- O- â‚¬.1- - .1 1,1 1 .p 'All : ' / Â·2Â«i j .i i , iÂ· 2 i 1. 1./ 4 . T li. 1 ' - Â·Â·'~ ; 1\ ~ i ' ifj ~ 2' -11 'IER'IZZ1 1 0 1:1 1 = 5 fi)Â¥-'f =-- ~.2~ 1 1 . 1 +11 . 10 .i ~ *%-s<-vtÂ· 1 â‚¬u 1 11 -f /// /f--6 7 ~ & .-,fla.:1, 11\ r . .i" . 7--1 â€¢- i /*l~~~. f~ lip .11,â€žti - t 18 1. A LA.,5...Nik z % 1 Â·<Pm ' . ..... ... 1.4 L ~1 Al ,:1 dfiki@ , - t -- IR; = 1 .yi:..::-f . ... 11/4.\11.1/1 VE 1.- 6/'314 41: :3 4 . a. i,1 .1.:'j j #.. c bc i V)AS<G-3-392,&-3,9328#-1 ir . I K i .4 i i./.1 ~ 1 - t . A . /(11 1 .., i 1:.1 11? ili:li! , fli-14: 11 1 J. .. - . b 'l ' -7. 1 ::::,2-,1 -jil .. 1'.,8 6,1~14:= 1 Y. 1 -\Li , /~1 #.,Â·~~r:,r:LU. 1~11~11~11~1 *hATP-'.. .'Â· ji jMmuHmlll~1#fi,; j c:'' 1 1 c . t. C / Â· ~ t' /C .' wl'1111111 hillif #c..:1>;Â·jilt 1 .4 . 1'41 . 5 6.1 :Â§ i, 1 --- ~IL .1-1 1 -L-1 -11=tikilir?{-mi>M-/61%11 /V-/I-1 *f-b~, .1:w.AFO-:111?311~YIIMiu.211]~1~ :f -)1. Ill *i31 --11 '1:j:iÂ·:.,Fi,i,- 5./-14).LS&$449-6 .., z 0 2 .1 1 -:21/7. \9 9 F lzr'A ~ 17... ...4 1 --, -- - 11 / - t 7/ L 1 .61'5\ I.-1 1 14 i\- u &1 < 0 fl i 1 F f th ... - 4911 : 2, 3 </if-fll''t i . Â»,r 'Pi \}Lz-li )fil - 1. 11 7 <A)- -LO. 1.~ - >. {h h 0 -4 el 4. i 1.1 1 1 '14/ bii.__ t-- -_/ 4 0 r 'iwi'ry:2 4 3 1. 1.1 11 1 71 &1 11 Ar . III,il.1 It/Â· 5- 2 1- f 1 f . f: !!~:.: All /3 1 ... .. â€¢Â· Â·â€¢ il ': t.~|~~34, : ~ 1, Â£ 1 1; ..DA:Ft' T '\ s fr 1 1;41 . 1 1 ./. 1 . 3-4.4- 2 ./ t': ' j f ~ 4 ~/~~' ~~10-~ -i; :fi. 1( \-1~6 2, i e.fil Jt -~,4 i.-1-,~,<.~. ~~1-ili ..t, 1 jo 11 1 ..lk'. t.:injd .'4 gi , I.} 11 l.l , I .â€¢ 1 i s Eu.I ~ '-9 143?fll i u *41\:r/bl J I # z.% 0 1-4 7 ''B 4_11 44*.:- '5.4Â£* :: 1 4941-/ 3/4 1:i \41.:..f~.3-t 1 11 CX.! i * 4â€ž Hi . . 1 Â· :4 1 44:' 7 hÂ¢Dmil. . -2 1.1. ,F1:11 -!;51-42.{11.-lif~% . r ... -7.-0 jiÂ».% 1 1 i ,/\. ~ , -;4[itittlfl.:. 1.1 1, I *thÂ«[jit - 1 2 1 T 1/ 1 / 1/: 1 1.4 . 1. '-\\ ibi L 1-5 1,0.1. .....I-V fs'.Frs 1.... 1., or i C r ' 'pit ........... ........ ..... f - 2 \,f/Â«Â« 39 r- - --1 , 1 , ' tl , 1 / --, 1, 1 . . 4 04, - 6 /tthJ 2 -27 , --7- . lAI 1 -, - -DY' EN Â· Y JI --7.i -" I V T,*-~_--41>\ 111 1, \ 0 1 r--- 1/ f 1 /4 1/ \ 0\ 1 < 1 12 : 51 1 14)9XA3(56249.L 1 E ..... 7 f. 1 1 /--1 Et. rÂ«- -=====ze-r--_J - - , 1.1 . \1 3;, 0 1 6 -21 i :1111/---fut-Vr=- . 4 / I . tj. 2 12 . - - l.",~.- - 1 - El 1.h / 4 0 6 1'Â· '1 V- 1 3-3; p.jW)' / 4 f Â· Â· 17' â€¢, â€¢,â€¢ " U1I Uâ€ž.i,â€¢'â€¢ 11 ------Tr, ... -3---CEN 7 \ Il ' e t. 4 1 (1 2,=I-il*1 w ; ~29176 4Â·Â·':ip-=i-=-# i i 9 //li EF . 8 /1 i-J -FE:~ Ifil : '/ -1!4 i i:/tutrfri-& i #W - 1 - . 1 i 11 E / 11'i:jgoL -c -~v---Ir-kli ' ~ ~%;~ 1~~~5C-*0I~5 1- 1 .m ./' 4 - /1 â€¢\ '7- ZZEZZI NERM,I==7 -- 1 1 , ?f r :U :: /liML~--63.~-t -65 ./ v i 1 (, 1-1'. 3- 11 - 2 " 1, r . 0 P / 0 - t 4 : 7 :: /, 4..1,-:4_-Till~ -i"2 1 , 1 5 r U- - - / A LiC/>WitÂ«/ 4 W " Ir. .1 / . 1 /Id 1 0- 1 jill/: M . -Hi 4//9.-l (714 - .~ . 1 ts . ~~f - i 1 - . 2 - 10 1 -2 10>clul - . 1 M R. N -. '.%51 , 0 . 1 I - fl. f.?97 --74.fip:lt .//41,-Rly :1 i:I:1: flif-f]It:~1- - : .1 E tr t Lâ€¢24 - . .. , j Â¢ WA Lut .409iÂ·,~fl~~P. 'Â©/ I ll 11 \\.\ - 1~1\1 Â· 1 ...1 .I_ 1 . A., r- i - . I - - 77=/4- - - . 1 /-1?:I~1<Â·2, -U:~9 1.. '.1 7/ Sy,1 -,1 i t libeli 449 811 :: ji/ nli?.32. 11 ;~67>~ /{)!iltict-!i'.rifi #dil-4 . , - , .,r \ Ll- w " 1-#3_1 1â€¢Fl__221_l I!1 i : / , . :t|. =:+AH+liP-!11; 1' 1.1.711 r >7\ .: 1. 1 -1 C :'r 1 il ~- ' .1 11 . t ./ 1 =1/149 ] 1 I W. O - - ~01! i 4-3 3 X /6/1 w .-' '/16 :W]'*-ii,int.,1 ilit 12 - - 2 --I- 1.11: \..1434&01 1 \Wi)'\.7,01%... ' -1 -~ z.-L. c < i â€¢r W. 1 l . /1 - 1 7 1 -n I -4]!Ht i 111. 21 1 , 111/'1-Int (11 In:'*: Jr-/I,I: -- * RY;-Itgum:#41-1 -_--~ ..1.131.2 1 271, till-./ O Â· -1, Â¢ T-j '' , 1 ---In~1111,1-~7~ 1 4. tâ€¢â€¢ 'â€¢t~\ . ~Ti 4 - 1 Nk - 1-4 -3:% 09 I ..\ .- In 11 --IN]jilfilit 14 \ ovf Â·g: r 0 6 :' k . . -1 1 - Â· >- LE,2 -'44Â© "' C - \ 1 1 : i/jMKils:Ja~\23 - i kil $ 2, - L I .... -It - ' 6, 5 1, 2 I I . -7 41-1. /FL , - tz 1 -1 --1 uzzr_--1-1--1-- -T-Â»-,(32-\ _3â‚¬215 -7 1: 2,1.16 6 1 4> l., i ./.ju/ ~th-* T' 9,1 r 4 i \~4 f-- 1-rt 4---1 . 0 r . I . 1 \*Ato-19 4 .r,fi M-\14\~ E -0 . i 1 â€¢ 0 .... 1-- w 0 -.1-1 : I.fl - ~ Â· n :1 - _A'11 C 0 1 Â· r-4 4, 1 U313-1~- ~~ 91- 3 - i ,/ 4 j RE o a l Â·- : -i- \ 1 . . r :. 01 ~i*%-14Â· Â°o 'ji t 1 1 1. 1 - 1 : 3 ): 1 1- : 4 - 14,1-he jj ij\ '1 2 R; c i Â·:, f 1,11;'lli;, lÂ·Â· 11'.; 7/41 - 2 - 1 /13 r 1 ): lt:'r / - .1 ,3,(,9<~1 I~; ~~~~-~ ~/ 't.1 14_tz,Ji,Ji / f 11 - . 1 fr' Le- 7~ 7 2 - : . i,-2. 1 ~12 A -JU-c/V,1~ -2'. -5,1~ittigjit.j'P)9;L~21#Jt kÂ» UL--Of J- -5.4 9.31 42: 1 I 2- =25&Â«S>1 g .1 'R 1. 9 ..Ok.-~.41]~ I 1- ,nrirritlilm)1-1 477/xei- if :. ' - I [75 -f 11 :Bilk. vij f. \' * 1 v i : 8-f: - f -- 1. 4/ _ 11 , - : 3 9 â€¢ I,LE nÂ·' r h' '1 :1] TY~ fif>,I E tw 7~ I & 2-.\ 11 . 21 f ( 11 49. ~~..f//?/, ''.4, 4 - -1 1,/4,2. 1..=,tl;< El-':1:,9 -. -4,--:~~1~.{--~itio~- i.tiff~%.-1- :/ )Â·< 6-7 4''_19--CE , &1. :hi#-41_-f 1 . 014Â· 1 1 1441; 1. , 5 . -f l r . j - --- 8-=4*9:1:-1.. I 3% I--Â·7, 1 ; Vi: A-1 * 1.4 9 \I- 11 . 1 1.Q:~ , 12.L Lj - f 9 -1 - C ..(3 Z it 4-1- 5, 1 p.1.1- ..f-/1 \,c: \..\ i <-j81:2 73 1-6 4310/ 1 1 7 -, -%21 1 ge'.1 'Er- 2 /50â€¢â€¢ .... .......' 10 S. 1 Â·475.-m ..0,11. / Noulocv 8 TOWN OF ESTES PARK \\1 044,41, 4< '9 4, 4. 4112 V \ft. 'Viot,31 7 TAre >44*6 4-{i?# lis''licifer/tzjphti,4.4. ... 4.31* 72,'*: .2 - #ftythg#.1 Â»c*#'<91,Apst/: 0,4.1 - 4 5-3,:'rL,ilw:*Mi,f liIA#~PR,VA - 4 . -,diN N~, 4.9 '13,1; Ci. - r V/'46 / .:bt Â¢ A t'Â¥. / , i ?16* i - effi'Â·34 Â»*11Â·Â·Â· .LAE'- 344#53}41. '. 0%\,f,;V, .16 -- ./ ,--4.... Estes Park, Colorado 80517 January 21, 1992 Becky Glowacki Postmaster Estes Park, Colorado 80517-9998 Re: Centralized Mail Delivery for Estes Park Dear Becky: Thank you for the delivery proposal received on January 16, 1992. I have discussed it at length with Town staff members Mr. Steve Stamey, Community Development Director, Mr. Bill Linnane, Public Works Director, and Mr. Gary Klaphake, Town Administrator. We have the following comments: 1. Regarding paragraph 5 of the proposal, Town staff does not agree the Town would provide "concrete slabs and installation of equipment per USPS specifications". We believe the Town's role is to provide adequate turn-outs, if needed, and' snow removal. We would agree to require developers of all new subdivisions to provide NBU's and installation as part of their development costs. 2. Regarding paragraph 7 of the proposal, Town staff believes no more than three (16 unit) NBU's and attendant parcel lockers should be provided in any one location in existing subdivisions or developments except for multi-family projects. As an example, Section 1 would have a minimum of two locations, with three (16 unit) NBU's at one and two (16 unit) NBU's at another. Section 3 would have three locations with three (16 unit) NBU's in each location. We believe any more than three (16 unit) NBU's in one location, except as noted above for multi-family projects, creates unacceptable aesthetic and traffic problems. 3. We would like to see a Master Plan of all eight phases, including tentative NBU locations and scheduling. This would help us understand the budgetary needs for the entire project, and enable us to explain the project completely to the Town Board and Town of Estes Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Becky Glowacki/Postmaster - January 21, 1992 - Page 2 public. We are hopeful the issues described above can be worked out before the proposal is taken to the Public Works Committee, so we can present a united front and avoid debating the issues publicly, but that is your option. The Public Works Committee meets everÂ¥ month on the third Thursday, at 2:00 P.M. here in the Municipal Building. Mr. Linnane should be contacted no later than the Friday before the meeting so he can include you on the agenda. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposal at this stage. I am confident that with continued communication and cooperation we can agree on a proposal acceptable to everyone. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK UL 14#4 1% 111- - Richard D. Widmer Ass't. Town Administrator RDW/dh Copy to: Gary Klaphake Steve Stamey Bill Linnane ta 1-2 .. ANIES POSL, f Al Ar,. n r s .:Â·.~i, 3 1992 -/ 1 == 5 . v ******* Unv.1 41 r....7 5(,2 .1.f United States c C, C,R 3/5 Postal Service March 3, 1992 Richard D. Widmer Assistant Town Administrator Town of Estes Park P. O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Richard: We are in receipt of your letter dated January 21, 1992 with respect to your comments on the proposal for street delivery service. We, too, are encouraged that with continued communication through a cooperative spirit, an agreement can be reached which will be to the benefit of your community. our response to your comments are as follows: 1) Presently, the opportunity is available to the community to request street delivery service through a rural box if it would be on the carrier's line of travel; or customers may petition for consideration of delivery which would be outside of the carrier's line of travel. The customer would then be required to purchase, install and maintain a rural box. The total expense for the purchase of a small box ($7. 99), post ($7.99), 20 letters for address identification ($7.35) and tax (7%) plus installation and concrete ($15.00) for a rural box would be approximately $39.96. The Postal Service is willing to bear the cost of the NDCBU's which offer many benefits in comparison to rural boxes, e.g., aesthetics, security, safety, and a locked compartment for outgoing mail. For these reasons, NDCBU's are in the best interest of the community. The approximate cost Of installation is $250.00 for one 16-compartment unit. This translates into a cost to the residents of Estes Park of $15.63 per delivery. That cost per delivery for installation decreases with multiple units at one location. 2) We agree to your stated preference of the maximum number of units per location. As you indicated, multi-family projects would be the exception. 1-1 * UNITED S L.G: Richard D. Widmer March 3, 1992 Page Two 3) Becky Glowacki, Postmaster, Estes Park is in the process of developing a master plan of all eight phases. We expect to have that information available to you prior to your next Public Works Committee meeting. We are available to attend your next meeting; however, we agree it would be in the best interest of all parties to reach common ground on this proposal prior to our attending the next scheduled meeting. Thank you for your comments to the proposal. We look forward to receiving your response to this most recent communication. We are confident we are very close to reaching a final agreement. Sincerely< . â‚¬4242-- JÂ¢sse W. Davis /'Wirector, Operations Support V CC: Director, Field Operations Postmaster, Estes Park A/Manager, Delivery & Retail Programs Delivery Service Analyst Associate Office Coordinator 4* 1- ID 4, Â·Â·-31 I Â£ 1 , 't 4. 7 -- 0 '1 1982 1 : i i .r 'Â·' i SURVEY TO ALL RESIDENTS MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE ESTES PARK, CO 80517 The Town of Estes Park has requested the Postal Service consider the possibility of street mail delivery service within the city limits. Neighborhood Delivery & Collection Box Units (NDCBU's) which have Fl bfw) be installed in your neighborhood. individual locked compartments and a slot for outgoing mail could 24*tay We would appreciate your response to this survey in our effort to identify your mail delivery needs and expectations. We encourage your comments. You may refold this survey to show the return address, staple or tape it and drop it into any collection box. de70Gl.66,*0~-2 I LAU 16(4044Â£#170 1) If you we re of fared 4-1+ee-W delivery service rre-37 your tiome, would you choose to accept it? YES NO -------- 2) If you were to choose street delivery service, would you also choose to keep your post office box? YES NO -------- 3) If you currently have a rural box would you be willing to relinquish service and accept delivery to an NDCBU located in your neighborhood? YES NO -------- 4) What street do you live on? (You may give your address if you choose to do so.) 5) Do you receive your mail: part of the year in Estes Park ------ all year in Estes Park ----- not at all in Estes Park ------ 6) If you had a choice, would you prefer: street mail delivery service to a rural box ------ street mail delivery service to an NDCBU ----- Please return this survey by (date) to: United States Post Office Becky Glowacki, Postmaster Estes Park, CO 80517-9998 Thank you for taking the time to answer this survey. Your response is very valuable to us. 1 -11 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 001 Colorado Order Number State 3/23/92 Larimer Date County Contract for: HIGH DRIVE WATER LINE PROJECT Owner: '1'OWN OF ESTES PARK '1'O : KITCHEN & COMPANY (Contractor) You hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes Decrease 1.ric: refise Supplemental plans & specs attached Contract Price Contract Price Addi. 1. i o mil: 24 LF of 8" DIP @ $38.80/LF $ 931.20 4 LF of 6 " DIP @ $ 35.50/LF $ 142.00 6" Gate Valve $ 460.00 Delete: (3) 6" Fittings @ $185.00/EA $ 555.00 TOTALS $ 555.00 $t533.20 NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE $ ------ $ 978.20 JUSTIFICATION: See altached Change Work Request forms and itemization continuation sheets. The Amo.unt of I.he Contract will be (increasgiL) by the sum of Nine Hundred Seventy Eight and 20/100 DOLLARS ($ 978.20 ) The Contract Total including this und previous orders will be: Forty Three Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Eight and 20/100 ----- DOLLARS ($ 43,678.20 ) 2-1 Contract Change Order No. 001 Continued, page 2 The Contract Period provided for completion will be (unchanged) /6>14 days. - 'I'his document, wi.].1 become 11 supplement. 1.0 1.he contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Recommended: ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. OW N ER ' S A RC H I 't' le(]'1' / E NG 1 N RER By Kevin Kielb Tille Civil Engineer Date â€ž~Ay------- Accepted: KITCHEN & COMPANY CONTRACTOR By ~~ j / 79 o f J ,L -2/62.--/ Title ' Â£ 2190 . / /0-~Â·-4,Â£Â£Z-, f Approved: TOWN OF ESTES PARK OWNER , By William F. Linnane Title Public Works Director Date 2-2 ' Â·...,AE#k I ..a.4.111 '.,t ..... 'fu rA:,~k*ALS â€¢ , I '..:...1 1, b, Of'.1,11, . I 1. )4 e 'llil, . sealis. *IL:&,4 .- .Id I . 1.. 41... . 1 . I 4Â·4 4 9Â·â€¢.'A#:4.42 I. lilli. MT 0 4 4 4 ' .f . .D 14 , , 1 . h t .1 I:2.'it h I 1.,d 'll'll 44, Â£449* '14.Wit, . *'*9,8 .2.,i.t?;;Â·29 ,~42/f.t J 0 ' . . ,, 46 LiPÂ· Yt. ~r,4 47Â·;f\' 4 if: "'ta 2.14 1, r 7.'.1 V ' 21 1"93;'6&'1.' ' *:11,0.. 14 ..}R:Â· T.& 1* '.,1 j..if,? C.1. '. 9% ,;'~.*ttobte'*ED~ 41#4444: p,+55*%Â£6~ ' ' 4 ,~Â· Al ./.Â¥6 W. 41, E 46.1 4 44. 4 .<4'J(* tt-. '4, 10. -41Â· . . TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORI<S DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT MARCH 1992 TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS UTILITY LOCATION - MAIN 20 39.25 UTILITY LOCATION - SERVICE 4 6.00 TAPREQUEST 3 6.00 WATER QUALITY - TASTE 1 4.00 WATER QUALITY - COLOR 2 2.00 PRESSURE PROBLEMS: LOW 1 0.25 LINE BREAKS - MAIN 2 7.00 LINE BREAKS - SERVICE 2 5.00 METER REPAIR 10 21.25 FINAL INSPECTION 8 10.50 CONSTRUCTION RELATED - WATER 2 8.00 SNOW REMOVAL 1 2.00 OTHER 3 4.00 ======== TOTALS FOR MARCH 1992 59 115.25 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 59.00 73.00 48.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 115.25 138.50 118.25 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) -19.18%/-16.79% +35.190/0/-29.59% +22.92%/-2.54% Rl-1 .. TOWN OF ESTES PARK MARCH, 1992 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT 1) Treated water for February 14,1992 through March 13,1992: February 14 to 31 Water Treated: Black Canyon -4,000 *Fall River O Glacier Creek 5,544,000 *Big Thompson 5,057,779 *Crystal 1,546,100 March 1 to 13 Water Treated: Black Canyon -8,000 *Fall River O Glacier Creek 5,352,000 *Big Thompson 4,552,655 * Crystal 1,288,000 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 23,328,534 Gal. 2) Water accounted for from February 14 to March 13: Adjustments: 4,015,260 Billing: 15,164,780 *Backwash 622,227 Total Water accounted for: 19,802,267 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 85% R2-1 . ADJUSTMENTS March, 1992 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 141,000 2.) Bleeders a. Stanley Heights, Fall River 2,302,200 b. Metered plus Mize 932,300 TOTAL BLEEDERS (Gal.) 3,234,500 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 14-Feb Leak Picadilly Sq. 120,960 b. 26-Feb Flush 1-ligh Dr. 24,000 c. 27-Feb Flush High Dr. 5,000 d. 2-Mar Marys Tank/High Dr. 265,000 e. 3-Mar High Dr./Park V. Ln./Rodeo Gr. 89,800 f. 5-Mar Marys WTP 80,000 g. 11-Mar High Dr. 5,000 h. 13-Mar High Dr. 50,000 i. j. k. 1. m. TOTAL FLUSI-IING, MISC. (Gal.) 639,760 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) 4,015,260 R2-2 TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER USE RECORDS .. MARCH, 1992 DATE BLACK FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL ~ ) BIG CRYSTAL SUBTOTAL TOTAL CANYON RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS THOMP. (GAL) CFS (GAL) 1 0 0 522,000 522,000 0.81 j 368,539 117,200 485,739 0.75: 1,007,739 2 0 0 442,000 442,000 0.69 405,360 121,100 526,460 0.81E 968,460 3 -1,000 0 392,000 391,000 0.61 312,166 119,500 431,666 0.67 822,666 4 -1,000 0 565,000 564,000 0.88 334,324 92,200 426,524 0.66 990,524 6 -1,000 0 372,000 371,000 0.58 308,908 92,100 401,008 0.62 772,008 6 -1,000 0 398,000 397,000 0.62. 400,002 97,600 497,602 0.77 894,602 7 -1,000 0 424,000 423,000 0.66 285,119 92,200 377,319 0.58 800,319 8 -1,000 0 416,000 415,000 0.65: 312,817 90,000 402,817 0.62 817,817 9 -1,000 0 310,000 309,000 0.48: 625,301 106,700 732,001 1.13 1,041,001 10 0 0 330,000 330,000 0.51 235,265 85,000 320,265 0.50 650,265 11 0 0 360,000 360,000 0.56 390,045 97,300 487,345 0.75 847,345 12 0 0 369,000 369,000 0.57 276,654 92,200 368,854 0.57:: : 737,854 13 -1,000 0 452,000 451,000 0.70: 298,155 84,900 383,055 0.59 834,055 14 -1,000 0 416,000 415,000 0.65 303,042 91,700 394,742 0.61 809,742 15 -1,000 0 491,000 490,000 0.76 363,650 92,700 456,350 0.71: 946,350 16 -1,000 0 320,000 319,000 0.50 332,695 91,900 424,595 0.66 743,595 17 0 0 390,000 390,000 0.61 : 290,334 90,700 381,034 0.59 771,034 18 0 0 356,000 356,000 0.55 361,370 91,500 452,870 0.70: : 808,870 19 0 0 365,000 365,000 0.57 341,648 94,200 435,848 0.67 800,848 20 0 0 485,000 485,000 0.76 Â· 300,761 85,300 386,061 0.60 871,061 21 0 0 475,000 475,000 0.74 329,109 88,500 417,609 0.65 892,609 22 -1,000 0 493,000 492,000 0.77. 381,573 89,800 471,373 0.73 963,373 23 0 0 384,000 384,000 0.60 : 279,907 89,000 368,907 0.57 i + 752,907 24 0 0 361,000 361,000 0.56 377,337 96,700 474,037 0.73 835,037 25 -1,000 0 371,000 370,000 0.58 300,761 81,900 382,661 0.59: . 752,661 26 -1,000 0 472,000 471,000 0.73. 295,548 90,400 385,948 0.60 856,948 27 -1,000 0 450.000 449,000 0.70 : 325,852 84,700 410,552 0.64 859,552 28 -1,000 0 450,000 449,000 0.70 386,962 102,600 489,562 0.76 938,562 29 0 0 431,000 431,000 0.67 356,808 90,200 447,008 0.69 878,008 30 0 410,000 410,000 0.64{ 365,606 89,700 455,306 0.70 865,306 31 0 326,000 326,000 0.51. 283,817 37,100 320,917 0.50~ .. 646,917 TOT. -16,000 0 12.798.000 12.782.000 10,529.435 2.866.600 13,396.035 26.178.035 AF -0.05 0.00 39.28 39.23 32.32 8.80 41.11 80.34 CFS 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.53 0.14 0.67 1.31 BW(-) N/A 0 N/A 0 0 -143,330 -143,330 -143,330 BLI-) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A : -4,015,260 GAL -16,000 0 12,798,000 12,782.000 10,529.435 2.723.270 13,252,705 22.019.445 AF -0.05 0 39.28 39.23 32.32 8.36 40.67 . 67.58 1st-13 -8,000 0 5,352,000 4,552,655 1,288,000 14-31 -8,000 0 7,446,000 5,976,780 1,578,600 R2-3 .. TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS) 1991 1991 1992 1992 MONTH YTD : MONTH YTD % % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) 1 (GAL.) (GAL.) (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 25,753,376 25,753,376 22,227,168 22,227,168 -13.69% -13.69% FEBRUARY 20,818,236 46,571,612 : 18,753,245 40,980,413 -9.92% -12.01% MARCH 23,065,946 69,637,558 22,019,445 62,999,858 -4.54% -9.53% APRIL 23,868,231 93,505,789 MAY 33,828,478 127,334,267 JUNE 47,550,123 174,884,390 : JULY 61,171,426 236,055,816 AUGUST 54,753,043 290,808,859 SEPTEMBER 45,080,259 335,889,118 OCTOBER 29,400,590 365,289,708 : NOVEMBER 21,662,560 386,952,268 : DECEMBER 21,290,647 408,242,915 TOTAL 408,242,915 AC - FT 1,252.94 R2-4 . ESTES PARK MARCI I & YTD WATER BILLED 50,000,000 0.8% 45,000,000 - - - -- - -- - -.- .-14 - r'--2.7 - 7 --.- 40,000,000 22*-- -" * -Z' 29 Z7 ZE' ' 35,000,000 ~ r 30,000,000 GALLONS 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 .. 1 1 16.15% 10,000,000 462: 41 it i } FF f 5,000,000 Â· f ' 3 ' 1 " 1 - '"'-1 - -"' f r.0 1 10 co h 00 01 0 - 01 00 OC) 00 (X) (C) co OC) OC] CJ1 0 1 Cl O-) O) CI) O) cy) 0, CI) cn Cl 01 01 O YTD YEAR El MAR ESTES PARK MARCII & YTD WA-IEI1 REVENUE 200,000.00 180,000.00 Ct D 160,000.00 47 140,000.00 - - - - Ii--- .*- EL 7 120,000.00 -- --- -- - - .C7â€¢ DOLLARS 100,000.00 3 4-7 80,000.00 ~ _- -~ ~'' ~~ -_ 8.31 % 60,000.00 40,000.00 - ' 411 .671 991. dul le . i 1 4 JI' fl - 1 11 :? 1 20.000Â·0Â° U !11 Ill' Fl' lill h 1 P tt 4 Eli it,- 0.00 Chi M-1 4- U 1 cr-> r-- LID 01 CD .-- CN CO CO CO CX) C./ CK) Cle) CXI] CJ1 0-) CJ) 01 (71 0, 01 0 1 <J' CD ) CJ) CJ ' 04) 0, [J YTD YEAR M MAR R2-5