The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1992-03-19PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA March 19 , 1992 1. MacGregor Widening - Request to solicit bids. 2. Water Dept. Computers - Request to purchase. 3. Marys Lake WTP - Request to approve Change Orders. 4. Marys Lake WTP - Request approval of payment to UTSD for sewer contract line. 5. Glacier Creek Water Plant Rehabilitation Project, Phase II - Request approval to bid. 6. Fall River Water Main Project - Request approval of RMC Scope of Services for design and construction management. 7. Devils Gulch Water Main Project - Request approval of RMC Scope of Services for design and construction management. 8. Corrosion Control Program - Request approval of RMC Scope of Services for monitoring the Program. 9.. CDOT Highways - Request approval to fund epoxy striping and be reimbursed. 10. 75th Anniversary Historic Plague Project (EPURA Project) - Requestue- --spend'Natu_ 2 r~~ijimi*Wi6IBaiE3-fWRj~iliEYZEZZE=~ REPORTS: 1. Customer Service Response 2. Monthly Water Reports 3. Water Consultant Update 4. Transfer Station Rates The Public Works Committee reserves the right to add or delete items from the agenda as necessary. //4 /7Â»1.j â‚¬=:9 ~ '.t / 94 1, , ' 0 , 7/ -5 3 - 1 ~ ~ ./ . Jr'<_ - 1 /7, ~ RÂ¢~69 8,Â¢T/~,~A REA IL Â«IÂ·~)~,J _~Uj~ ,.A~Di-tio.~,1~Li--i-~AzAAÂ»-2_~ARKING X \ j. - 1 1/ 1 1 41--1 *4 -4<4.). '9 t~ '~90~ \ dir?c/ i < ~4 ' ADi).ITION: ' 'Â·.Â· -2. 2. i'~'1~ ~ m.04/f \ \\1- , r 1 1 13'r )5372~0997/) f h--1\<\"-PÂ· - up VI, I/fltiVC CCÂ¢ 2- El \\ j 11) iii, k' 1 sof - M \1 1 1/1 1 , f. 1!1 </ 7* \ , 1,3 \ 1 1 1 (/ /, 4311 ji . , ,% 41 / 1 1 \ 11 41 f f 1 \ \ \Ii 1,11 11 \ 1./ 01'll \ \1 \ BLOC<< ~ , rid T \\ I ; 11 .\ , <1 \ C i - ' ~ I flc ~ ~ ,)/f 1,1 1 . 1 ty 1 1 C 4 U // 1 1 \1 I *41 1 4 '1 220 .. L.-- f / 1 -1.#Yl I I j" Ifi~-31' j \\1 1 A / ..0 1\ \ \'\1 t:14 111 \1 (,Mi - NAi-if# c j ,/234 2 / 4.,lb .1+ 6 l\,fat 'l , 0 \ ~4/1 f/,1 j\-1 --/.-9. |8 1:\\\ \ L 4- O / 0- \:21,Â· 5/ iS.Ul~\)4/ 2\' 9 4 41.1 1 4 U l ' \~1\ . -- 3 / 1 , 1 1 1 4 \ 14 \, L)$)4- ;,5 f-i:4 -4-*-fit -' 1 5 --- Â»st--7 / 461 ' 1, 1 1/Vi 9 1/ 01\ - L -- .. 62--- 4 1 //09[4\1,14 8\\ 4. V - 11 -Â·~~3;.- 3.b .IEE- 1. I 1/,1 d 2,5 1/N (\/// N-/21-. fiyiÂ·i<Â·t_)i ~ , b uu: . 'I,/ vi i \ -4 .\ 0 1, 1 \A ..//0 1 N 00 4\ 33 -/- 40*----2 iÂ· 24-Â»Ii73Â¥ 4/41=1 / 75241x \ 444 11 1%(/1 // d- 205?.- 1 \04.r< \39Â¥ ~ ~AL.l- -1/fts- 4 IBL 1 11 .. \/12/ //.11- -90 pl, \ 44/1-3 1/i -/ f..f // -2./6 . 3 111 HEdli.-' 1-_-, 4%9471-7 f / /4< 11 \44\ 4 --/ - lili MAGGREGOR AVENUE WIDENING 1--- 1-1 i 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum March 16, 1992 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Robert Goehring L ~_ 13.4. SUBJECT: Purchase of Two Computers and One Printer for Water Department Five bids were received for the budgeted equipment mentioned above. The following is a list of the bids: Companv 2 Computers 1 Printer TOTAL Amisys $3,305.00 $489.00 $3,794.00 BizMart $3,637.98 $359.00 (not per spec) $3,996.98 GTSI $6,486.00 $476.85 $6.962.85 Compatible Computer $3,940.00 no bid $3,940.00 Longs Peak Computers $4,926.00 no bid $4,926.00 I recommend that the equipment be purchased from Amisys (Government Access, Inc.) with the low bid of $3,794.00, which is within the budgeted amount. RG:ck 2-1 ' ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9mC 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 March 13, 1992 Metro (303) 825-8233 FAX (303) 825-8912 Bill Linnane Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Riverside Avenue PRV Vault Dear Bill: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Tne. (RMC) has received bids for work related to the Riverside Avenue PRV Vault. The work entails automating existing PRV's in the vault. The changes will bring the Riverside PRV Vault to a level of automation similar to vaults located at Strong Avenue and Fall River Lane. Bids were received from Timberline Electric & Control Corporation (TLECC) and Littleton Electric, Inc. (LEI). TLECC was low bldder at $9,616., LEI bid $10,534. on the work. RMC recommends using TI,ECC for the work. RlvIC compared to Riverside Vault costs with the Fall River Vault costs to determine if TLECC's price is economical. The Fall River Vault, installed in 1991, had a total cost of $54,597. The Riverside Vault, installed in 1988, had a cost of $36,690. Adding a 5% per year cost for inflation for 3 years (1988-1991) brings this cost to $42,473. Adding $9616 to this price brings the total for the Riverside PRV Vault to $52,089. This compares favorably Lo the price of the Fall River Vault. R.MC. feels t.he costs provided by 'fLECC are economical and the Town should proceed with the work. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, ] NE. Kevin P. Kielb Civil Engineer KPK\wjk 1-1 CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING A- 44 J CONTRACT CHANGE ORDIER CO[,OILA])0 Order Number Stat. e 3/13/92 LARIMER Date County Contract for: MARY'S LAKE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY Owner: '1'OWN OF ESTES PARK To: Jerinison Construction Company (Contractor) You hereby requested to, comply with the fo].lowing changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes Decrease Increase Supplemental plans & specs attached Contract Price Contract Price 3A . 4 $ 586.00 3B $ 9148.00 OC $ 2553.00 3D $ 503.00 3E : $ 852.00 TOTALS $ $13,642.00 NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE $ $11,Â§3.22_-(20 JUSTIFICATION: See attached Change Work Request forÂ·ms '1'he Amount of the Contract, w.i. 1.1 be (increased) by the sum of $13,642.00 DOLLARS. The Cont,ract '1'obil including t,his and previous orders will be: $3,017,446.28, DOLLAI?.8. The Cont.ract Period pr'ovidc.cl forÂ· completion will be (-iÂ·-111+4,+wH+e+14 l.unchanged ) days. 3-2 Contract Change Order No. 003 Cont,inued, page 2 This document will become n supplemen i Lo Lhe. contruel and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: . TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO OWNEIZ By , Title Date Recommended: ROCKY Mot-144'8.1.0 KONRPH''I'AN'I'S, INC. OWN jUP Â§ ilitjjifT;iii'.O;i'/1~14(1.1.NEER (i Vul/ By Title r u o,F.â‚¬r /1 AÂ©) MSâ‚¬ L- Dat. e 3 ~17/1 L Accepted: JENNISON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACTOR By 7-2(741,Â». Title LAi~ Date 3 c 9-1. L-- 3-3 I' 2 CIIANGE WORK REQUEST PROJECT: MARY'S LAKE CHANGE IN WORK REQUEST NO. : HA 'I'REATMENT FACILITY EN(;1NEERS PROJECT NO:9-0223.018.00 OWNER: TOWN OF ESTES PA UK INITIATION DATE: 3/13/92 ESTES PARK, COLORADO TO: .IENNISON CONSTRUCTION CO. REQUESTED BY: TOWN OF ESTES PARK 8122 S. PARK LANIE SUITE 210 LITTLETON, CO 80120 AUTHOR[ZED BY: TOWN OF ES'rES PARK PLEASE FURNISH CHANGE IN CONTRACT SUM FOR THE CHANGE TN WORK DESCRIBED REI,OW. DO NOT 01?.1)17,1?, MATERI AL 01?. STANT ANY WORK UNTI L APPROVAL I. S RECEIVED. EVERY EFFORT WILL RE MADE TO INCORPORATE THIS CHANGE INTO THE WORK WITHOUT AFFE(;TING THE CONTRACT DATE. 24 Volt Power Source reclu.ired by Mol,orol,1 for cont.rol. Not included in ori.gi.nal bid. 1 agree to change the work deser.i bed above for the change i n prices shown be]-ow. T have ntlnehed n breakdown which lists all costs of labor, materials, taxes, overhend, profit, and all. other changes nnd/or charges involved. Signature of the contractor i.ndi.cates hi.s agreement herewith, including any adjustment .in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The Cont.ract Time will be (unchanged). No change in Contract Sum (Initial if rio change) N/A . ADD to the Contract Sum $586.00 DEL)UCT from the Contract Sum N/A This informal.ion shal.1 be va.lid for thirt.y (30) calendar days from the date of signature bel.owl CONTRACTOIPS S.[ GNATURE -1 -90 61 d Â»12/4 DATE 3 -1?-1 1-- Contractor shall ret.nfn g{;~0(1) copy and return ORIGINAL to Engineer. APPROVED BY ENGINEIgI?. ,~~~- DATE 3llillu- l rt AUTHORIZED BY OWNER DATE ACCEPTED CHANGE IN WORK REQUEST W.[ LI, 1111 INCLUDED IN A FITURE FORMAL CHANCE ORDER. 1?9 Nf?'!'.Bll,11 FOI?. THIS CHANGE UNT[.6 A FORMAL CHANGE ORDER HAS BEEN EXECUTED HY ALL PARTIES. ACeEPTANC',E 18 DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH THE WORK DESCULHED HEREIN. NO'I' VA Ij 1 I) UNLESS SIGNED BY THE OWNER, THE EN(]1.NEER AND THE CONTRACTOR. 3-4 1 CHANGE WORK REQUEST PROJECT: MARY'S LAKE CHANGE IN WORK REQUEST NO.: 38 TREATMENT FAE 1.1,1'1'Y , ENGINEERS PROJECT NO:9-0223.018.00 OWNER: TOWN OF ES'rES PARK 1.Nl'rIATION DATE: 3/13/92 ESTES PARK, COLORADO '1'0: JENNISON (CONSTRUET.ION CO. REQUESTED BY: TOWN OF ESTES PARK 8122 S. PARK LANE SU I TE 210 LITTLETON, CO 80120 AUTHORIZED BY: TOWN OF ESTES PARK PLEASE FURNISH CHANGE 1-N CON'l'RACT SUM FOR '1'11]E CHANNE l N WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT ORDER MATER I A L OR START ANY WORK UNT] L APPROVAL LS RECEIVED. EVERY EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO INCORPORATE THIS CHANGE INTO THE WORK WITHOUT AFFE(:TING THE CONTRACT DATE. 16" RWI line changes include: Wet '1'zip, 16" gate valve and 28 LF of additional piveline. I agree to change the work described above fc, r theÂ· change in prices shown be]. ow. 1 have attached n breakdown which lists n.11 costs of lai-)or, materinis, 1.lixes, overhend, profit,, and al 1 01,tier changes and/or charges involved. Sign:,1.nre of the contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any ndjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The Con t.mic L T i.nie wil l be C Itiu.h:i,11-ted ). No change in Contract Sum (Inilial if no change) N/A . ADD to the Contract, Sum $9148.00 DEDUCT from the Contract Sum N/A l'his i.riformation shall be val id for th.irt,y (30) cal.endar days from the date of signature below. ~ CONTRACTOR'S S.1(:NATURE 1 2:-71 1, I I ) -7 1 \' 1 ' l, A. DATE 25 '//'~ ~- 1. 1 j A. i Contractor shall rel, ) cop,y yind iÂ·el,urn 012 -IGINAL to Engineer. APPROVED BY ENGINEER 21 1) ATE AUTHORIZED BY OWNER DATE ACCEPTED CHANGE IN WORK REQUEST W 1 1,1, BE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL CHANGE ORDER. pu-NOT Blbb FOR THIS CHANGE UNTIL A FORMAL CHANGE ORDER HAS BEEN EXECUTED HY ALL PARTIES. ACCEPTANeE IS DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH THE WORK DESCRIBED HEREIN. NO'I' VAL.1.1) UNLESS SIGNED BY THE OWNER, THE ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR. 3-5 41- CHANGE WORK REQUEST PROJECT: MARY'S LAKE CHANGE IN WORK REQUEST NO.: 'ic.' '1'IZEA'l'MENT FAE].1-,1 '1'Y ENGINEERS PROJECT NO:9-0223.018.00 OWNER: TOWN OF IES'1'ES PARK INITIATION DATE: 3/13/92 ESTES PARK, COLORADO TO: ARNNISON CONSTRUETION CO. REQUESTED HY: TOWN OF ESTER, PARK 8122 S. PANIC LANE SUITE 210 LITTLETON, CO 80120 AUTHORIZED HY: TOWN OF ESTES PA1ZK PLEASE FURNISH CHANGE IN CON'1'1?ACT SUM FOR '1'IllE CHANNE IN WORK DESCR IBED BELOW. DO NOT 01?.DER MATER I AL OR START ANY WOR,K UN'1'1 L APPROVAL IS RECEIVED. EVERY EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO INCORPORATE THIS CHAN(52 1 N'1'0 THE WORK W I.'EL!11[7'.1' -AF-!ilic;'1'ING-yult-JJON'1'1?Af:'1' 1.)-ATE. Buse Mul,erin.1 l'or LItc linekwash Recycle Tank w,in inst.iiI led 111. t.he con trÂ·actors reques t.. Base Course wna Lo be installed per the Project Manual but weather constraints deemed this unsuitable at the Lime. 1 - 1/2" washed rock waH ins Lalled in lieu or the. roadbase. I agree 1,0 change the work described al,ove for |,he (311#inge i 11 prices shown below. T have aLLnehed n breakdown which l isLs n11 costs of labor, materials, taxes, overhead, profit, und all other chnnges and/or charges involved. Sign:i L u re of the contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including tiny adjusl.ment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The Contradt Time will be (une}tanged). No change in Contract Sum (Inil.inl if no change) N/A Al)11 1.0 Lhe Contract, Sum *25_01...00 DEDUCT from Lhe Contract, Sum N/A '1'hist information shall be valid For th.i.rt.y (30) cal unclar clays from the date of signal,ure below.~ CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE _~313_(v,-.2 Â·Ae,--Â· - DATE 3./7 f- Con I,rÂ·ne lol' shill. L re |,p/''lj~~f;~~411 ) copy und return ORIGINAL to Engineer. APPROVED HY ENULNRIEIZ~00~jft _. _ _ 1) A '1' R ---~ AUTHORIZED BY OWNER / 1)ATE ACCEPTED CHANGE IN WORK REQUEST WILL BE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL CHANGE ORDER. DO NOT lill,1, FOR TH TH CHANGE UNT 11, A FOR.MAL CHANGE ORDER HAS REEN EXECUTED HY Al,1, l'Alt.'1' 1 ES . AeCEPTANC'.F, IS DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH THE WORK DESCRIBED HEREIN. NOT VAL, i I) UNLESS SIGNED BY THE OWNER, THE ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR. 3-6 , CHANGE WORK REQUEST PROJECT: MARY'S LAKE CHANGE ]N WORK REQUEST NO.: ND TREATMENT FACILITY ENGINEERS PROJECT NO:9-0223.018.00 OWNER: TOWN OF ESTES PARK INITIATION DATE: 3/13/92 ES'I'ES PARK, COLORADO , TO: JENNISON CONSTRUCTION CO. REQUESTED BY: TOWN OF ESTES PARK 8122 S. PARK LANE SUITE 210 LI'l"l'LE'l'ON, CO 80120 AUTHORIZED BY: TOWN OF ES'l'ES PARK PLEASE FURNISH CHANGE 1.N CONTRACT SUM FOI?. THE CHANGE IN WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT ORDER MATERIAL OR STAIR' ANY WORK UNT I L APPROVAL 18 RECEIVED. E V ERY E F FORT W 1 L L D E MA DE TO I N CORPORATE THIS CHANGE INTO '1'1[IE WOR.K WITHOUT AFFECTING THE CONTRACT DATE. Miscel ],ineous interior piping ch,inges, 111. 1.he owners recitiest, were performed. 1/2" Ai.r line added to Polymer Room. I agree to change the work described above for the change in prices shown below. I have attached a breakdown which lists all costs of labor, material s, Laxes, overhead, prof i L, and al.1 other changest and/or charges involved. Signature of the contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjusLment in the Cont,ract Sum or Contract Time. The Contract Time will be (unclianged). No change in Contract Sum (Initial if no chunge) N/A . ADD to tire Cori tract Sum _95(1_L (U) Â· DEDUCT from the Contract Sum N/A This information shall he valid for thirty (30) calendar days from the date of sigriature below. CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE _ 1)A'rE EdÂ·/_6.92--. f -1 I /1 1 Contractor shall retain 047 r j copy und return Oltl (.LINAL to Engineer. f </li APPROVED BY EN(1]NEER -~'~i104 41- ~ DATE 3 ~1 71~1_- AUTHORIZED BY OWNER DATE. ACCEPTED CHANGE IN WORK REQUEST W]LL HE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL CHANGE ORDER. DO NE)'1' 11.1 1,1, FOR '1'l l I S CHANG E UNT 1 1, A FORMA L CHANGE ORDER HAS BEEN EXECUTED HY ALL PARTIES. ACCEPTANCE IS DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH THE WORK DESCRIBED HEREIN. NOT VAL L D UNLESS S.[UNED BY THIE OWNER, THE ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR. 3-7 CHANGE WORK REQUEST PROJECT: MARY'S LAKE CHANGE IN WORK REQUEST NO.: 31Â£ TREATMENT FACI1, I'l'Y ENG.INEERS PROJECT NO:9-0223.018.00 OWNER: TOWN OF ESTES PARK INITIATION DATE: 3/13/92 ESTES PARK, COLORADO TO: JENNISON CONSTRUCTION CO. REQUESTED HY: TOWN OF ESTES PARK 8122 S. PARK LANE SUITE 210 LITTLETON, CO 80120 AUTHORIZED BY: TOWN OF ESTES PARK PLEASE FUR.WISH CHANGE IN CONTRAr:'1' SUM FOR '1'liE CHANNE IN WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT 01?.DER MATERIAL DIt START ANY WORK UNTI 1, APPROVAL 1, S RECEIVED. EVERY EFFoler W [LL liE MADE TO INCORPORATE THIS CHANGE INTO THE WORK WITHOUT AFFECT.I.NG THE CONTRACT DATE. Addilionul lube seLLIers ndded lo the Sedimenintion hisins. This will increase the efficiency at Lhe Treatment, Faci.1.ily. I agree to change the work described above for t,he ehange in prices shown below. I have at,Lached a breakdown which lisLs all costs of labor, materials, taxes, overhead, profit, and all other changes and/or charges involved. Signature of the contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in Lhe Contract Sum or Contract Time. , The Contract Time will be (unchanged). No change in Contract Sum (Initial if no change) N/A ADD l.0 1,he Contract. Sum _$852_:-00 DEDUCT from the Contract Sum N/A This; information shall he valid for thirty (30) calendar days from the datie of signature below. CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE 7 76/0(6,(11.6--- DATE b Â·(7 Â·9-z.U /1 /1 Contractor shall re blint /4 6) cop,y :ind return OR [G.[NAL to Engineer. A ,I/11 n APPROVE D BY E N G 1 N E E R . -011FM.-]l / DATE Bl17~11- AUTHORIZED BY OWNEIZ DATE ACCEPTED CHANGE IN WORK REQUEST WILL HE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAI, CHANGE 01?,DER. DO NOT BILL FOR THIS CHANGE UNTIL A FORMAL CHANGE ORDER HAS REEN EX ECUTED- BY ALL PART LES. ACCEPTANCE IS DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH THE WORK DESCRIBED HEREIN. NOT VALID UNLESS S I.GNED BY THE OWNER, '1'11 E ENN I NKIN?, AND THE (X)N'1'I?.ACTOR . 3-8 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANIS, INC. :Imc 137 South St. Vialn Esles Patk, CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 November 4, 1 991 Mello (303) 825-8233 FAX (303) 825-8912 Ron Duell, Mannger Upper Thompson Sartil.al,ion Distriel P.O. Box 568 Estes Park, CO 805 t 7 Re: Mary' s Lake Wit Ler Tren.1,iitent Plittil. Dear Ron: I appreciated the opportunity to meet with Ron Witt. and yourself ott October 22, 1991 to discuss the Upper Thompson Sanitation Distriet rebate policy and how the poli.by effects the new Mary's Lake Water Treatment Facility. The wai,er trefitment facility cut'rently under construction luis as an antici.paled completion date of May, 1992. The new facility will replace the Crystal Water '1'real,ment Plant and Big Thompson Water Trefil.ment Pl.,int. The new waterÂ· 1.reniment fuicill Ly wl.11 ,uti.li,ze an ni.r scour process during hne|twash und al .l backwash wal.er wil I be r'ec:.lri:131:lt.ed through the Itic.i lity, This process will minimize the nmount o[' discharge Lo the sanit.nry sewer. CurtÂ·ently, we arÂ·f. unlicipal.ing diselinrging 3000 UPI). Based on the rebate policy and the parameters associated with the Artipulto Mea'dow Extelision Line the rel.m.Le to Sam Luce would be approximately $33,005 (see nt.tacherl calcul.ations). If you have :iny questions, please do nol hesitate to call. D S i Iigerel >â€¢17 4 CONSULTANTS, INC. j l 6\4 het ' i /, 7 *015(/ / Ke#'f Mt' Pr'ochaska, P. E. P]#ject Matinger ]Ul[)\14jk ec: Hi.11 1.,i.}111:itie, Town of Estes Park 4-1 * " gmc 1 November 4, 1991 ARAPAHO HEADOW EXTENTION LINE UPPER THOMPSON SANT'I'A'1'1ON DISTRICT Total Footage = 4,697.9 ft. at $128,800.00 Town of Es 1.(:s Park Ustige 3,864.6 ft. or 82% Aritpalio Mendows = 3 3 EI)1J ' s Town of Estes Ph. = 15 EDU' s ifi-Ebuis TO'l'AL COST 11.2 0-,-890...00 = 2,683.33 per\EI)U 4 8 El)l) ' s Arapalio Meadows = 33 EDU's X $2,683.33 = $88,549.89 town of E.P. Waker 15 El)[Ps X $2,683,33 = $19.,-23!4115 $128,799.84 '1'own of Estes Park 82% X $40,249.95 = $33,004.96 Rebate to Sam Luce ............. .......... $33,004.96 4-2 I. I *1\'i:\ 7[T')1 â€ž>u'gg' r--Ti.i 71Â£: fl. 4~- 12-~--- 1-~_unfittiLilit*~11.--1--~1] VE - til.-4-' li, El'4:~z'? r . 21'31 4,9 4.-"11 jitiFA:m.ria: AlfÂ·Â»,2./22:2414.1 . . a569919 -1 1/0.1 *1'.'-2.'~.-H. 1-Li.11--1.1,4 :It,:, 1 -=z-- TI , 1 /~\964%f Adet "ill\'/1 li ; 2-7 :5 -ilt.flikâ‚¬34-Lie/:~qffi-43Â¢ #-1 ibti~~ -Â· re - -n k. , *-- 1,1..1 1. 9 T .120- -~~444*1.1 n19: t .--d 112<. 4%11 itÂ«47-./ /11 -2 449~ t---11 iridistlhkii*ji f~FS<Al*%20-2 ~~~U/ECF[~-Pr n.1 m ..1 3&4WÂ». 0 1\1]~(4:17,49/f:[i 1:11#Ii,62.4,s : Fir(. 514;r~ts J,,2 . |.I.I Y :/.12Â·.. -|: 1 - I;M.*le I :Aill! iift /:\9;/i=h~-' Vt ' A J, 1.14' Â· 1 IiÂ·~l~'fi,]... ; w;:*Â·4>~b,: f . -~44):.1 fj> 1... t.f-,2,97.'09 E.HM : 14:/:/4814 -Â·, 1:1,(,94,9,1>\C 4.1 ~ - Â·bte*,i* - ~[A&4~,431:*=/.4/4*l:j:Evine/Â·mid r .. 97Â·i~3~~ fmt-.15 FF]i\-1,87.\ Â·7431-111/Wi -~%<2:-AfÂ£- -' '"'~ NA- E.<7- --- ...3'At.\.rh N,ipi'312--49:JE~-AIill_91 9// 5 - D . r Â· e 31 -\ 11(-9-44*LA/\\Â·--\ t\I\---$4~tv 4 L "\Â»h.4.11-J --6.-- . , . 1. h-J . I 76EJ :. 1 - ' -- / ' \-99*11-- Abi tt.5~_-1- ~tll_ 1 4,1,1 A ------ f i 1 . //77 - --liti 97/lf--- - 1. ' 1-Z~I:4~fI---.1 ril , 4%~14 -4 \ - \~,/\. ...\ .Trdipndis52-91,[,lzlil. -1- ' ~ -'Â·, 'Trâ€¢ A ./." I PX ~ -5/99964/ / 1 - 1.\-1 1 It 1 T I I Z < z _L.1- lel.....1<r ..Eg, w --12- .0-/ 2.--- <-- --5- xy,27*3- t--rt'~1717-7-1-1--#X--2-rED./PRIL.C. . 1 1 - v:A /*Â£...2-~-~fr:.41rbe *311IV\-1- \9 106 13 .im \>klgi. -':4'-: f:O-~ Â·~b' t 2 7 1 . 8 , Â©:*A ji#11+4- - 2- - t , . lit 4 4 \:\Â£ 1.41 v... ... -lay g iiI .-13 k t.... >t,<1.6 // , 'Â·'fdud'_{ P :-967:965$r :j Â¥49:,v.v . \ / r\ / -\, ri Nf TRI ' - r. r . ... .~,xÂ«h.. A/iZZz-- .. . I S , - 10 z 51 ,1 - ---- -Ii.- dr c 'g~.~.i; 4 - 1 '' . 11 dili~ L. i -= 1 . 4 . 1 . â€¢ â€¢ 7 ...1 - 1-_.1___N / 4/ 1 K A . ~ Id 4 - 14 P rl I A#131 h.. I . i JKÂ© 3 + 1 , , 5 4 ----- 1211 ENT-1-:11---- -- , r.l\:61'11-1 5 e l-,-'t~ 2%:1-4-1 8 CEÂ» I 4%?f.,1 71 U') 1 . 37. \2 lie - 0 :1-=]11 j-- i .. '.-lf-Â§>.Arb- ; . 1% bÂ·. 7/4 ~ , 3 \\ 5- / -1 .N t. 1 ti - /:F- E Â· # Al e .<f I AL>. 1\ 1 / .i - <ZESÂ· â€¢Â·'c / t\=19\- , : --1:42>42; 499%32-- M '0 1-Ftl...1- - 1---- ,-' -*- : I I \/:\ ~44 A 1 1 . ! 9., , . / X.â„¢4 - /\ il 1 le Â»f A ,#A A.*I-%-*+*Ki9' 12 4 P 1 _ 4 19 ..L 1 -74 tw : - : ~ 2 1 e ~ ~ Ill .4 2 1\ : 1:- r. 4 --~1 . Â· - 1 ,L~_t ~ :_.11.~540 --71-99<2033-\-~\\14' I /4 4*55 1 '. lori 1 1.,4,1 1 , 1 â€¢ 21-31-514 ..1 W . Ill i i 1 m F: 111 44*ah 11 PX , 1 / U- I . 1 .14 < ,Â¥: U r-4~-1- /7 1 W 1 \ 7 rÂ© *. ---U TEL)'rg--'-- 'A,5 #:tti., 1 . 40 - . I.1111 =i=48-4 -I-1-Â· 1 lv.(f : 4 3~7 99 4 Â· IN f: Â¥-1/- : C :,1 ---1 34\ =11 1Wd Q iLE :4-F'..-1; :1.61-'.I~'41.-2-1.N,n 1 1 ~ 4 WgiL*944#W~% 91]371,8-- d . I. - 1 4/ . *48Â«20 1 ' . 4. IN '1 1= 1 2 : '' 0 " :!i-ir= =,i; - =1- 5 / ': 1 2' 8 1 ]Irer,nt, 115~1 k 1. ' Â· Id 'AL , 1 -11 11 337: 1 8% F:17Â¥1:! [1'4 i ; 4-3 - Â£1.11'J:-31 i- -111-: . , 1 1 " 1 1, , 4.,1 .0...1 -12 9 -zurÂ·.t o o , ESTATES ..... I -OSPECT A-"HO -9 741 -1 35136 30â€¢ 5 - '' TOWN OF ESTES l'ARK 1992 BUDGET FUNI) WATIC R FUNCTION ENTERPRISE FUND DIVISION WATER AC'1'1VITY WA'l'Elt ACTIVITY Provide water service to residents of Estes Park and adjacent areas. BUDGET COMMENTS 1992 budget allows for the completion of Mary's Lake Treatinent Plant, completion of the Glacier Plant rehabilitation, continuation of the water distribution system. The 1992 budget creates one full- time Municipal Service Worker position and eliminates the need for one seasonal employee. l'El(SONNEL LEVELS 2/5 Public Works Director 1/3 Accountant 1 Water Superintendelit 3 Water Plant Operators 1 Water Maintenance Supervisor 3 Municipal Service Worker 2/5 Dam Proc/Comp Operator 1/5 Town Clerk 1/4 1:imince Officer 1/7 Secretary 1/5 Engineering Technician 4/5 Administrative Clerk 1/4 Town Administrator 1/3 Meter Specialist F o re,iia 11 2/3 Meter Specialists 1/4 Asst. Town Administrator 1/5 Deputy Town Clerk I CAPITAL OUTLAY 55,000 - Fall River (portion)** 6,900 - Mary's Lake/shop computer - SCADA* 300,000 - Mary's Lake Plant** 5,000 - I.,aboratory Equipment 50,000 - Devils Gulch** 2,200 - Communication Equip. - pressure transmitter 120,000 - Glacier Plant** 3 , 500 - Purification Equip. - (12 analyzer BT tank 30,000 - Mary's Lake UTSD tap fee 707000 - Arapahoe sanitation seker 150,000 - Distribution** 10,000 - Structilles (2 tank cages)* 17,000 - Meters 16,500 - Tools: 7,500 contained space 2,500 cones/barticades 2,200 locator 800 wand 3,500 hand tools | * - Items to be returned to committee for further action ** - Items to be returned lo committee fur pre-autliorization to bid. Cont'd. Next Page 10-1 33 7'OWN OF ESTES PARK 1992 BUDGET FUND WATER ~ FUNCTION ENTERPRISE FUND DIVISION WATER ACTIVITY WATER ACTIVITY Provide water service to residents of Estes Park and adjacent areas. BUDGET COMMENTS 1992 budget allows for the completion of Mary's Lake Treatment Plant, completion of the Glacier Plant rehabilitation, continuation of the water distribution system. The 1992 budget creates one full- time Municipal Service Worker position and eliminates the need for one seasonal employee. PERSONNEL I,EVELS 2/5 Public Works Director 1/3 Accountant 1 Water Superintendent 3 Water Plant Operators 1 Water Maintenance Siipervisor 3 Municipal Service Worker 2/5 I)ata Proc/Comp Operator 1/5 Town Clerk 1/4 Finance Officer 1/7 Secretary 1/5 Engineering Technician 4/5 Administrative Clerk 1/4 Town Administrator 1/3 Meter Specialist Foreman 2/3 Meter Specialists 1/4 Asst. Town Administrator 1/5 Deputy Town Clerk CAPITAL OUTLAY 55,000 - Fall River (portion)** 6,900 - Mary's Lake/shop computer - SCADA* 300,000 - Mary's Lake Plant** 5,000 - Laboratory Equipinent 50,000 - Devils Gulch** 2,200 - Communication Equip. - pressure transmitter 120,000 - Glacier Plant** ___1,_5110=-Purification Equip. - (12 a,0yzer BT tank 30,000 - Mary's Lake UTSD tap fee C_70,009 - Arapahoe sa@ation sewer 150,000 - Distribution ** 10,000 - Structures (2 tank cages)* 17, 000 - Meters 16,500-Tools: 7,500 contained space 2,500 cones/barricades 2,200 locator 800 wand 3,500 hand tools * - Items to be returned to committee for further action ** - Items to be returned to committee for pre-authorization to bid. Cont'd. Next Page 33 4-4 TOWN OF ESTES PARK I 1 1992 BUDGET FUND WATER FUNCTION ENTERPRISE FUND DIVISION WATER ACTIVITY WATER ACTIVITY Provide water service to residents of Estes Park and adjacent areas. BUDGET COMMENTS 1992 budget allows for the completion of Mary's Lake Treatment Plant, completion of the Glacier Plant rehabilitation, continuation of the water distribiltion system. The 1992 budget creates one full- time Municipal Service Worker position and eliminates the need for one seasonal employee. PERSONNEL LEVELS 2/5 Public Works Director 1/3 Accountant 1 Water Superintendent 3 Water Plant Operators 1 Water Maintenance Supervisor 3 Municipal Service Worker 2/5 Data Proc/Comp Operator 1/5 Town Clerk 1/4 Finance Officer 1/7 Secretary 1/5 Engineering Technician 4/5 Adininistrative Clerk 1/4 Town Administrator 1/3 Meter Specialist Foreman 2/3 Meter Specialists 1/4 Asst. Town Administrator 1/5 Deputy Town Clerk CAPITAL OUTLAY 55,000 - Fall River (portion)** 6,900 - Mary's Lake/shop computer - SCADA* 300,000 - Mary's Lake Plant** 5,000 - I.,aboratory Equipment 50,000 - Devils Gulch** 2,200 - Communication Equip. - pressure transmitter 120,000 - Glacier Plant** 3,500 - Purification Equip. - (12 analyzer BT tank 30,000 - Mary's Lake UTSD tap fee 70,000 - Arapalioe sanitation sewer 150,000 - Distribution** 10,000 - Structures (2 tank cages) * 17,000 -Meters 16,500-Tools: 7,500 contained space 2,500 cones/barricades 2,200 locator 800 wand 3,500 hand tools * - Items to be returned to committee for ftirther action ** - Items to be returned to committee fur pre-allthorization to bid. Cont'd. Next Page 33 5-1 3 Bi:XEROX TELECOP1ER 7010 1 2-20-92 2:55FM i 1-,1.-1 - - 1- - - 6699380-3 3035865333;4 2 d,El{T BY:HA!Â·11Â·101 ID CLARK WHI T ' 2-20-92 2:5521 ; DRAFT FOR DISCU@8ION PUAFO88# u:ILY February 20, 1992 Mr. Gregory A. Whitâ€¢ Hammond, Clark & White lat National Bank Suite 418 200 East Seventh Lovuland, CO 80537 Re: Windy Gap Water Dear Grâ€¢gl on January 24, 1992 Superior Metropolitan Diatrict No. 1 ("Dimtrict 1") received ati invoice in the amount of $705,621.13, pursuant to the provision of Paragraph 5.1.d.1. of the Fourth Amendment to Contract to Purchase Windy Gap Water. As digcuesâ€¢d, District 1 would like to revide the terma of thig payment al follows: 2819 Principal Intâ€¢rest 1 7. 5 4 3/1/92 $100,000.00 $69,686.93 4/1/92 75,000.00 3,413.83 5/1/92 73,000,00 2,041.38 6/1/92 75,000.00 2,490.35 9/1/91 73,000.00 1,916.72 8/1/92 75,000.00 1,302.87 9/1/92 75,000Â·00 1,025.13 10/1/92 83,934.70 519.73 Total $635,934.20 $83,374.94 Algo, as agreed upon, Diâ€¢trict 1 currently haB euttlcient funde and will makâ€¢ the April 1, 1992 payment in the amount of $739,543.44 to the Municipal Subdintrict of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District am detailed on thâ€¢ attached invoice. -- ttf~ c' 9*Â¢Â·rÂ·ft 5-2 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9mc 437 South St. Vrain March 5, 1992 Estes Park, CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 Melro (303) 825 8233 FAX (303) 825-8912 Mr. Bill Linnane Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Fall River Water Main Replacement Dear Bill: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) is submitting the following scope of services and cost of engineering service for the Fal]- Ri.ver 12" water main replacement. The length of project is approximately 1200 feet and includes a crossing of Fall River. The Scope of Services for the project is as follows: I. DATA COLLECTION 1. Determine horizontal and vertical locations of existing surface and subsurface features in the area. 2. Determine existing and proposed rights-of-way, easements, and other relevant project boundaries. II. PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1. Determine horizontal and vertical alignment for the pipelines to minimize utility crossings, right-of-way or easement acquisition, and local inconvenience to neighborhoods during construction. 2. Prepare complete base mapping drawings for the alignment of the pipelines. The maps will be ink on mylar photographic plan and profile at a 1" = 20' horizontal and 1 " = 5 ' ver t ical scale. 3. Establish soil classification, gradation, moisture and density. 4. Establish requirements for future water line relating to the Water Master plan. 5. Apply for and obtai.n State Highway Right-of-Way and Army Corp of Engineers permit. III. FINAL DESIGN 1. Perform design analysis to evaluate and determine all requirements for the installation and operation of the pipelines. 6-1 CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING 2. Prepare complete, final ink on mylar plan and profile drawings and all other detailed drawings. 3. Prepare complete project specification documents using Town supplied documents as required. 4. Prepare final cost estimate. 5. Final review of plans and specifications with Principal- in-charge and Project Manager. IV. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION 1. Provide assistance during pre-bid phase, review submittals and answer all contractor questions. 2. Provide surveying, inspection and quality control prior to and during construction. 3. Perform soil compaction tests as required. 4. Conduct final inspectional job walk in conjunction with Town staff, and prepare a "punchlist". 5. Prepare "As-Built" drawings. The cost of engineering services for the project is as follows: Cost of Engineering Services Fall River 12" Water Main Replacement Design Personnel Rate/Hr Hours Cost Project Manager $65/Hr 8 $ 520.00 Engineer $46/Hr . 16 $ 736.00 Engineer Tech. $35/Hr 32 $1120.00 Survey Crew $61/Hr 10 $ 610.00 P.L.S. $40/Hr 1 $ 40.00 Drafting $31/Hr 40 $1240.00 Clerical $27/IIrÂ· 8 $ 216.00 Subtotal Design ...................................... $4482.00 6-2 gmc CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Project Manager $65/Hr 4 $ 260.00 Construction Engineer $46/Hr 56 $2576.00 Survey Crew $61/Hr 6 $ 366.00 Drafting $31/Hr 8 $ 248.00 Clerical $27/Hr 8 $ 216.00 Subtotal Construction Management ..................... $3666.00 TOTAL PROJECT ..........,.,,,,,,0 . $8148.00 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sinc/rely, ~~//A ROCkÂ¥ MOU><*AljOEONSULTANTS, INC. < KEfry M. Prochaska, P.E. PObject Manager KMP\wjk 6-3 1 . 1 1 - -- ~ ' '~ ~~ - - .__~ __"~_._.--'~~--~~~~~i~~~ r m = - -,t eâ€¢,VAre L RIVER 1 'C'ITO*4' 0â€¢ ENT LL 3 , / 4 k . --- L I . .. <>044. 4, . 1 4\144?fi \ : f ,5 N Â·T. S . 1, 4 1 , 1 100,000 GALLON TANK J .1Â¥f HWL 8135* I Â»HEmal , -- ," /;,14 '... \ ~ ~-PRV 8 PUMP STATION :.): I \ ' ' fALL- 1 \: .,t ' ' //1/ I AINN 1 Al'I.ilieN i 12 /402- . \ 1 , i * 1-...i' ' STUDY AREA 1 '.1 / 132 -..'.,p L. 0 1%\, rz -ntÂ»,6422.724- ii;Câ‚¬ 1~'i' 1~- -400,0001 GALLON TANKI 41 ~1 1 1 -~ HWk '7978 . 1 \ f--1:410 I 6, L L FTUA,J f (1.62--74 C--I!1 /1 \1~ I 1 i r. -1 f .,F+44 1 1, i / 4 t It 8/ r , 1 1 1 . 1 7./Wrfirj i , Â· / I ./. 11-- 4 0 1 .,1 : i /9/1- 1 ' , 1 ../. .- 1 -I Â£ -4-3124/ 3' 1-71- , Ii' , *A-L--~L--ilk 1 1 111 2.-41- '. 1 --1 1 T ./' ~64 11,J-. . 1 1 1 . . 1.4-1 1 - 1 .. ~~,u,9 U,inihi . .t 1 1 1 -' 1 1 1 1 0 1 il 22 1 1,1 27 1 2 7 -6 1 U 0 . " 1- -1 1 1 1 - -- -~ - - C-K .F , 1 1 1 1 1\ i 1 1 1 ' 1 . l , . 1 1 , MASTER METE PUMP STATIOr . 1 1 It 1 6-4 i .1 11 11â‚¬VR 1 1 1 1 1 1 bl : 1 . .... 1 1 WATER DEPARTMENT EXPENSES 1992 1990 1991 1992 Actual Estimate Budget ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL 03-508-00-03-920-6001 Salaries 91,536 94,895 97,065 03-508-00-03-921-6200 Office Supplies/Postage 2,262 2,500 2,500 03-508-00-03-923-6333 1 Professional Ser. - Consultants 27,822 274,500 63,000 1 Devils Gulch Des/CM 7,500 Loop Des/CM 22,500 Fin. Plan 4,000 Glacier Plant 6,000 Contingency 15,000 i Fail River (pbrâ‚¬rbnr '8,000 ---------- 63,000 03-508-00-03-923-6335 Professional Ser. - Legal 23,623 20,000 20,000 03-508-00-03-924-6320 Insurance 18,886 24,193 22,400 03-508-00-03-926-6020 Employee Pensions & Benefits 76,732 90,815 98,100 03-508-00-03-928-6450 Contingency 0 0 14,400 03-508-00-03-929-6219 Miscellaneous 55,647 43,870 3,000 03-508-00-03-931-6351 Rent (p. 130) 48,220 48,220 48,220 03-508-00-03-933-6376 Vehicle Allowance 3,029 4,368 4,368 Continued On Next Page 21-Nov-91 124 6-5 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. lilli. 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 March 10, 1992 (303) 586-2458 Metro (303) 825-8233 FAX (303) 825-8912 Mr. Bill Linnane Town of Est.es Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: North Lane to Devil-s Gulch 12" Water mai.n Extension Dear Bill: Rocky Mounta.in Consultant,s, Inc. (RMC) is submitting the following scope of services and cost of engineering service for the extension of a 12" water main from North Lane to I)evils Gulch. The water main will be approximately 1050 feet long. The Scope of Services for the project is as follows: I . DATA COLLECTION 1. Determine horizontal and vertical locations of existing surface and subsurface features in the area. 2. Delerm.ine existing and proposed rights-of-way, easements, and other relevant project boundaries. II. PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1. Determine horizontal and vertical alignment for the pipelines to mini.mize utility crossings, right-of-way or easement. acquisition, and local inconveni.ence to rie i.ghborhoods during construelion. 2. Prepare complete base mapping drawings for the alignment of the pipelines. The maps will be ink on mylar photographic plan and profile at. 11 1" = 20' horizontal and 1" = 5 ' vertical scale. 3. Establish soil classificalion, gradation, moisture and density. 4. Establish requirements for future water line relating to the Water Master plano 5. Easement Research & Review III. FINAL DESTGN 1. Perform design analysis to evaluate and determine all requirements for t,he installation and operation of the pipelines. 2. Prepare comp.let.e, fi.nal ink on Inylar plan and profile drawings and all other detailed drawings. CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING 7-1 =tmc 3. Prepare complete project specification documents using Town supplied documents as required. 4. Prepare final cost estimate. 5. Firial review of plans and specifications with Principal- iri-charge and Project. Mariager. IV. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION 1. Apply for and obt.nin I,arimer Count,y permit 2. Stake easements 3. Prepare As-Huil.t Dr#lwingS ~ The cost of engineering services for the project is as follows: Cost of Engineering Services Devils Gulch 12" Water Main Extension Design Personnel Rate/Hr Hours Cost Project Manager $65/Hr 8 $ 520.00 Engineer $46/Hr 8 $ 368.00 Engineer Tech. $35/lir 30 i $1050.00 Survey Crew $61/Hr 14 $ 854.00 P.L.S. $40/Hr 1 $ 40.00 Drafting $31/Hr 40 $1240.00 Clerical $27/Hr 8 $ 216.00 Total .....................................,* * $4288.00 The project would be completed 4 weeks from notice to proceed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. S i ,)63 r f. \41 <A ROOKY M61490;~IN CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 tiÂ» /11<91. ty M.. Prochaska, P.E. P~oject Manager KMP\wjk 7-2 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CDNSULTANTS, INC -F DENVER- LONGMONT -ESTES PARK MAY 1, 1 1 85 . Or 01 1â‚¬ 0 JAM, 1 . M. - -DATE OF WATER SYSTEM MAPPING: RE VISED JANU OCTOBER 1984 .il i ' W' 1 / h ~ // 11/VVLS 6 040 14 I 1 W.M It 5 4 600 '2) - i. g pe - 1 :EW. 1 ,-6 1 1 1 1 1 ..0. 1 : /1-1 1 0 â€¢ . 'I 1 I. H.T. S. i r I .. .0 1 1 11 1 I Â· .. ~p..Ir . 1 4 .. .0 6 . 1 1 1 ./ 1 I .1,1 A,K ..1 1 ---. 11 1 . 1 .. 'ANY,14 % ' Â·Â· t. , , 1, .Â· ' Â¥ 3 44 I "â€¢'/16â€¢ir' ' , 1. , F M Â· 1.1.1,1. $ \ lilli 1 . . 1 1 - 1 Â¢93 1 ..2.-flkag,:44. 0. 1 .. , -er--79 -r,4 -1 , 6.1,1./0 ,"7' k,A:1.-' 41 , M Â·1 I 1 Anotr,ON .] 1 R , 1 ./ I #~e~ 1 f 4 ./.'I ....... GÂ»/40 U,[ ,/.'. La ...4 I "..2 f~â€žIL[-9 1 â€¢ 4 1 , 1 ' '..,1. , fl . 'V 1 Â»*Â·-1 1 .1 I . 11 0.,0 ' Â· t, , ' \---17-:r- ..IA#, fue r,,. , 7 // - 1 Llti*- '9 -0 - - i ..b. 1 11 1. 1.: . k 0/iâ€¢ 1.--- ' 11 11.:A- 1.- .k 0 . 3 ..' 6 1 , ",r. 1 1 ... 3 4-/gl ./ 4. HAKE, 7 *144.1 .'AN'f' . f 4,2 Ai ... hilll/, 1 2l Â· ~Â· j I'l' D-9 1 1 - 14 .* 4% . 1. . 7 - , i trts P 1 " 4> . .... 1 1 -, :1 .<4040 JL)L .' - i- - .6-27- â€¢ ' I ./ f r t=.--- 0.... I I. 1 ... - :1 4 . \ 0 1 , 704 â€ž .1 ~ 9 Yrttt;tfull ; 4. \0/. . - S-- Â» t urrÂ»-4- ; '.0/2-344,90+~&A';2 44<t) -*- .:. IR 0 C.- ===Sph , --- 77-i 1 0,1 -* *-11Fv-i#:jilbli~2 14 *HI,liRL 4 - r' 7 Lu_ ~ ~ i ......, f I 7-3 4 '~ '1 1 ''' 111 11' ''1 0 J. L , , U . ' 1 - ltÂ·X. 6-Â· tiÂ·Â·..- -7 WATER DEPARTMENT EXPENSES 1992 1990 1991 1992 Actual Eetimate Budget ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL 03-508-00-03-920-6001 Salaries 91,536 94,895 97,065 03-508-00-03-921-6200 Office Supplies/Postage 2,262 2,500 2,500 03-508-00-03-923-6333 1 , Professional Ser. - Consultants 27,822 274,500 63,000 1 Devils Gulch Des/CM 7,500 Loop Des/CM 22,500 Fin. Plan 4,000 Glacier Plant 6,000 Contingency 15,000 Fall River (portion) 8,000 ---------- 63,000 03-508-00-03-923-6335 Professional Ser. - Legal 23,623 20,000 20,000 03-508-00-03-924-6320 Insurance 18,886 24,193 22,400 03-508-00-03-926-6020 Employee Pensions & Benefits 76,732 90,815 98,100 03-508-00-03-928-6450 Contingency 0 0 14,400 03-508-00-03-929-6219 Miscellaneous 55,647 43,870 3,000 03-508-00-03-931-6351 Rent (p. 130) 48,220 48,220 48,220 03-508-00-03-933-6376 Vehicle Allowance 3,029 4,368 4,368 Continued On Next Page 21-Nov-91 124 7-4 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS. INC. iliIC 437 South St. Vrain Estes Park, CO 80517 (303) 586-2458 March 6, 1992 Metro (303) 825-8233 FAX (303) 825-8912 Bill Linnane Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Corrosion Control Program Dear Bill: Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) is submitting the following engineering scope of services and cost of engineering services for monitoring of the corrosion control program. The Scope of Services for the project is as follows: 1. Consol idate and anal yze dat.,i gathered from the corrosion con|.ro.1 program. Dat.n will include but, not be ] i.mited to influent, effluent, pH, and sludge analysis from the Sanitation Districts and corrator and pH data from the Town of Estes Park. 2. Attend meetings as requested with Town and/or sanitation district personnel and others regarding results and conclusions of the monitoring. 3. Prepare intermin reports, as requested detailing the results of the monitoring program. The reports would summarize the data and provide conclusions and recommendations. The cost of Engineering Services are as follows: MONTHLY DATA PREPARATION Personnel Rate/Hr Urs Cost Project Manager $65/Hr 3 $195.00 Drafting $31/Hr 2 $ 62.00 Clerical $27/Hr 1 $ 27.00 $284/month x 12 months Total ........................................... $3408.00 8-1 CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING â€¢ PLANNING 1-9 1 -ea MEETINGS (1/month) Personnel Rate/Hr H r s Cost Project Manager $65/Hr 2 $130.00 x 12 months Total ....................................,..,,. $1560.00 REPORT PREPARATION Personnel Balle/11 r H rs Cost Project Manager $65/Hr 12 $780.00 Drafting $31/Hr 4 $124.00 Clerical $27/Hr 16 $432.00 Total .......................................... $1336.00 TOTAL (12 MONTHS) ............... $6304.00 If you have any questions, please c\7~J hesitate to call UntÂ».re-W ,/ Y # '10!07~fi cONSULTANTS, INC. /'Ke 1/y M./Prochaska, P.E. / P i<) jec t. Manager KMP\wjk 8-2 L . WATER DEPARTMENT EXPENSES 1992 1990 1991 1992 Actual Estimate Budget ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL 03-508-00-03-920-6001 Salaries 91,536 94,895 97,065 03-508-00-03-921-6200 Office Supplies/Postage 2,262 2,500 2,500 03-508-00-03-923-6333 1 Professional Ser. - Congultants 27,822 274,500 63,000 1 Devils Gulch Des/CM . 7,500 Loop Des/CM 22,500 Fin. Plan 4,000 Glacier Plant 6,000 Contihgency 15,000 Fall River (portion) 8,000 ---------- 63,000 03-508-00-03-923-6335 Professional Ser. - Legal 23,623 20,000 20,000 03-508-00-03-924-6320 Insurance 18,886 24,193 22,400 03-508-00-03-926-6020 Employee Pensions & Benefits 76,732 90,815 98,100 03-508-00-03-928-6450 Contingency 0 0 14,400 03-508-00-03-929-6219 Miscellaneous 55,647 43,870 3,000 03-508-00-03-931-6351 Rent (p. 130) 48,220 48,220 48,220 03-508-00-03-933-6376 Vehicle Allowance 3,029 4,368 4,368 Continued On Next Page 8-3 21-Nov-91 124 1 TOWN of ESTES PARK liiter Office Memorandum March 13, 1992 TO: Bill Limiane, Public Works Director FROM: Greg Sievers (f~Â· d S UBJECT: Epoxy Traffic Markings Downtown Request To Bid Please refer to the May 9, 1991, memorandum (copy attached) alid the May 16, 1991, Public Works Committee meeting minutes. Last montli I resumed efforts to renew this project. Karla Ilarding, the Colorado Departitient of Transportation Traffic and Safety engineer for tliis district, has acquired appropriations to proceed willi tliis job. CDOT drafted an agreement which delineates the scope of work by the Town. Greg Wliite is currently reviewing it. In summary tile agreement states: â€¢ Slate has appropriated and encumbered a not-to-exceed amount of $25,948, which is 100% of this project. â€¢ Project includes various traffic markings. Gee attached proposed bid schedule) â€¢ Town shall prepare plans and specifications. â€¢ Town shall monitor performance, completion , and provide general construction management, including advertising, bidding, billing and documentation. â€¢ Town shall temporarily expend Town budgeted street it tiproveinent monies and be reimbursed 100% by tile state. Final agreement and identification of low bidder will be brought to tile April 16, 1992, Public Works Committee meeting for acceptance. Work to begin tio later than May 13 and completed prior to May 22, 1992. 9-1 GS:ck MEMO May 9. 1991 TO: Public Works Committee FROM, Public Works Department; Bill Linnane SUBJECT: Epoxy Striping of CDOH Downtown Roadways The Colorado Department of Highways has historically striped the downtown highways with normal oil-based paint. These roads require annual painting since oil-based paint does not wear very well on high use roadways. During the past couple of years, epoxy-based paint has been found to outlast oil-based paint with the epoxy paint lasting approximately 4 years. The epoxy paint also has a higher reflectivity than oil paint. Therefore, the Public Works Dept. has requested that CDOH stripe the downtown highways with epoxy. Since CDOH does not have the necessary equipment to epoxy stripe in-house, they requested that the Town prepare a preliminary cost estimate to get an idea of the costs involved. We prepared a preliminary cost estimate of approximately 320.000 which included crosswalks, arrows and all lane striping - refer to the attached sketch for the location of the proposed epoxy work. CDOH has reviewed the preliminary cost estimate and site sketch and their response has been very positive. They will epoxy stripe, at their cost, if the Town abides by the following conditions (in chronological order): 1) The Town shall prepare a Final Cost Estimate which will be a "not to exceed" cost. This cost estimate will be reviewed by CDOH and, hopefully, verbally agreed to by CDOH. COMPLETION DATE: MAY 24, 1991 4%-1 'f 1\01 9 4 1/ 29 4 e 9 9-2 2) Upon a verbal agreement by CDOH, the Town will publicly advertize and solicit bids from private contractors to have the streets epoxy striped. ADVERTIZEMENT COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 7. 1991 3) The Town and CDOH enter into an agreement whereby the Town will administer the project with the (sejected' private contractor. The agreement will require the Town to issue payment to the contractor with Town funds, with the Town being reimbursed for the payments, up to the "not to exceed" amount mentioned in it 1 above. CDOH will reimburse the Town within 45 days of contractor payment. The Town Attorney and the PWC will be involved prior to the Town and CDOH entering into an agreement. AGREEMENT COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 26, 1991 Based on the above schedule, the epoxy project is estimated to be completed by the first week of July. The painting and associated work will last approximately 3 days, with no work being performed during the July Fourth hol iday or weekends. Please remember that all communication with CDOIÂ·1 to this date has been verbal. Hopefully, communication between the Town and CDOH will continue to be positive, resulting in a contract as mentioned above. The Public Works Department and the Police Department feel that this joint venture is a very positive step to increasing the downtown area's traffic safety. Our plan is to present an agreement to you, for your review, at next month's Public wbrks Committee. We request approval to proceed with negotiations. 9-3 BlD SC11EDULE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Town of Estes Park Project: 1992 PAVEMENT MARKING I'ROJECT (various locations) 1 Item M&P DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT EXTENSION No. No. QUANTI'l'Â¥ UNIT PRICE $ 1 EPOXY STRIPING 88 gal. $75 $6600 4" YELLOW 2 EPOXY STRIPING 20 gal. $75 $1500 4" WHITE 3 PREFORM ARROWS 18 ea. $150 $2700 left, right, straight 4 PREFORM ARROWS 4 ea. $150 $ 600 cot]Ibitiation 5 THERMOPLASTIC STOP BARS 39 ea. $72 $2808 1.5' X 12' 6 THERMOPLASTIC CROSSWALK 168 ea. $64 $10,752 BARS 2' X 8' 7 SANDBLASTING 700 $ .30 $ 210 (existing markings) SF 8 GRINDING 500 LF $1.50 $ 750 (existing markings) SUBTOTAL $25,920 9 PAINT STRIP1NG 5000 LF $ . 12 $ 600 All preform markings shall be Stamark brand (3M) or owner aI)proved equal. #5730 Contractor Statement: Epoxy coverage 9-4 One Gallon shall cover 100+ SF. TOTAL $26,520 -=T.-T~421\70 3 1% : \ 1 4 - . . 81 / 24 91/2</35~ . 2/ 4 /(v,sa-300/\ I </ trA/k \ e - *- \ VA' .,4 0 4 G : Lu~ \ 4 tiv-2 =4 1 2 , 44<3?2532<(0.-_1- FM: d /P-1 1 - \J fti 1- â€¢ x - 1 l .r: ,-til!â€¢---~ e \ .AC E '7 , . 2 0 43 1 -- 1.- - 1 --cza wj* 01 2- .4 \ -' 6 v . . ", ' 3â‚¬ 3 - *23 M w \94 e '' -8-23 v /11 1 3-- i. -00 h 1- q n- 0 \ 0- . 4 Z Â·,AF -3112;Ir 9 6\ 1.- .\ 0 \ 0 1 1 11 1 r N \ g.\ - /7\ 1 0 ./ 0 11 1 N 11 2=2n. di. \ \\ 0 wk, r \\\ C 60==la ----1.1 $71 1 . A.' 4--Ul@-1!E-3 N %%- 5' w la- a: 1 E 11 5.21 t 0 NO153%Â£ ~ N ~/ Zld Z N Z . 496\IlvwÂ« J 1-2>91 NU/.,1452.-~i 24/-/ '. 01 :C 0 .\ /N 0 1 \ 1 TA . L . /C-/--- Ul -Ajiv% \-9.hol Vt. ic> k .' W 73 \ ,0 / O :ikEER- U St \414 . r / a , L N. ~ O 0 -- .A / -LEE=-11 4 m (0 11 / 3 2 'm 0- 1- 1 5 \ 12 - Ul \ 32>1---- 11- 54 L--_. - 00 - 1 1 1 U) 4 '0 9 = 1 .. -Z 1 01Â£ dr--29 - J -hi m k â€¢ux - 0 . t , 4, t -/ ,-1/ 1 2 * 1 , .2/( \9\. 0- M=, 1 2 k Irc __61-tr--L -21-1 - â€žS 1 ,7 1 ; 19/116 1 15 2,1- ~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ' 6 1 d .9/ / 01 1 n; / //. 0 -1-\ ; , rÂ¥ /NI . - u I ,/ Z- *> IN i -J / ~ N A J â„¢p _ r-1 , \\ N'*.1 6 v, r .T; 1 13% / N .1 NE+.APA- 43 1#! )5,40 - l-- 0 Â«/ f Ti/-'7' 7 gi~ Â·110% C 93/2 ESEADÂ£Â¥24Â¤1141 fuiwl O C' rp:-1- 1 El 1 \W:Â¥*241 l1 /---10 4 . (: L.----7.-./1 4 th, -3.3*mll 0 X #li=Mikill-lh~Z~~4---râ‚¬1 WS / / v, 0 l- 1 - L.. t.2.= I, 9/ 9 0 e \El f FAA-' 1.7 -0/41 -- 7 ---r/3 2, >Ey 3 A , .2 t!.Lr~ 211=-,-1 1-1 'g.1 1*. 1 /.:Upi=-1.L]-/-A -z {GILÂ£<21 i lilal*I - 314 \â€¢â€¢ 4 0 /.04-- M 4 /7 ~-S--ilbâ€¢,1 ---- -1 1 -53/ET#) amiltimâ‚¬ M z g L;- ~'54 ' 52 HEM--, 3-7 '31 Â£ -- I - 0-8/ 1 12 a B E Bu,9 U /7; 9/0--2? P f ,--3-: 53~E *p~+ 13/f--I-ia- -3--1-\l-23 1 19'L-51-4-103 4 1 1,- L MR |-B -Lp~,u r 3-4 - // >-WN,--01.9,0 - ''n 514\1 \\N\=14,= 1 2 1 - 13#3.4490 Di D'.1 27 Rv--i~I~g \~~i-1-_-L~i-,-79-- = / 0 / m *t tNt[ k Iffrf-2- E-iÂ»-1- 9 2 = 3 2.21 M - pr/- 3/1 8-3 p 1 *7 /7/ -3,5 0 6/l z %1-4 4:4-g =12,4 ./ /t > Em '71- 2/ \,6 tio-- w //<:2 N &t / t. - 1 k-- 1-i--01 ---,-1*/Tl C 9. ~ Flc <r-- -- -, - 4.- 4-r-- O 4:64%191,3 . ~ il Aft Q If - -- - J '151~0- \- f ~ H - 4 17 I]211 1-7 _,~ 8 & ' 2 - L. I \Oxi - - j,1- 2'219 - IN 10< tte --2- -r i '' ~ -1 -~/ JSE - -~ 1 1 4 1 . 1 1 - i ,-- -c- al- 1_214~i~- 0 ci b -2 0.- O Z \ 1 r O 1 . >1 1 4 1 0 1 k 0 N 0 q -r U I 'r & J \ 2 W q > 1- 4 -- 0 -rt \4 $ N 1 *L 1 \--/ f 111_ft81171*Atril ) f J -4 -79 <,Alâ€žl.noo s'AVO-lL__1_1 ~ 0 U. ' 01 1 1 I ; tz, 1 .' 1 1---1 ' -3/ b! 9-5 k S *13â€¢Od 131NV19 illd:Ot#d ION of EPOXY VEMENT MARKING 21 ir 531<~153 diwoâ€¢Ul R 0\E~ 1 f -30!Sh!3A 8 CHIQUITA '19 incy 0 7130~ r 591 1 h Â« 13 1 34 Â¥ ~ C\\-\Â»/ - . . t t .. . I . U. 1.-- . . 01\ 1 1 - 0,9=.74- 000 . 01 ... . . 2,71 ... 4 1 1 1 .. ... . . I .. k ) $- :B. . -. I--- i ' . 4. -I AE_-_-5 2~ 1 ./ ./ % i /0 I 1 ' 1 1 1. tÂ·' .,1 23 ' \4 .. - Â»1 - 4 4~L d \\\ .. 1 I '. 1, 1 I I . . I. ., I. 41- -b-f ~ 11 129 %*21 - 4 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT FEBRUARY 1992 TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS UTILITY LOCATION - MAIN 15 51.00 UTILITY LOCATION - SERVICE 4 8.00 TAP REQUEST 2 4.00 WATER QUALITY - COLOR 3 3.50 FROZEN LINES - SERVICE 2 11.00 LINE BREAKS - MAIN 3 7.00 LINE BREAKS - SERVICE 1 1.00 METER REPAIR 28 32.00 FINAL INSPECTION 7 10.00 CONSTRUCTION RELATED - WATER 2 7.00 OTHER 6 4.00 ======== TOTALS FOR FEBRUARY 1992 73 138.50 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 73.00 54.00 63.00 TOTAL MAN HOURS 138.50 196.71 164.75 %CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) +35.19%/-29.590/0 +92.86%/+391.78% +15.87%/-15.93% Rl-1 . ESTES PARK FEBRUARY & YTD WATER REVENUE 140,000.00 ' 4,_ r. _ -0.7% 120,000.00 - c. f. j 4 3. A 100,000.00 - ZI,7 11:1 . - : - 9 -, . I 4 . 80,000.00 - A k i DOLLARS 47 47 /7 97 :. â‚¬ 2 4 + 1 / 4 60,000.00 - - i-, - ,- A .860/ ' 04 F Â· - 40,000.00 f - i 2 1 - 72 f ./ 20,000.00 -f 1!1 i ~ ~ â€¢ffâ€¢*0111- T- - 83 "-1 -4- LO 0 -ON 00 cO 00 8%0801 01 01 0 C) m 0 01 W W m 0 01 O YTD YEAR ~ FEB ESTES PARK FEBRUARY & YTD WATER BILLED L I I. / t~ 40,000,000 ~ 35,000,000 - C.7 30,000,000 - c 1 '~~ - 2CZ7 -- - - CÂ¥ 0 25,000,000 - C - 1 -. _ ' _ _ GALLONS 20,000,000 - i,: - - -f -Â· - 0,1 ,CÂ¥, :1,1 15,000,000 - 1 - 41 4171 ' 1 ...1 5.-,r,4 9~ , 491 f ./.- I I .2/2( I 10,000.000 - 3: . 3 id Z / -13.34% 5,000,000 : N 41 4. 14 4 44 1 - u %11 3-i:1 -2 rn .2 ~Â£7 0 h co 01 0 -- rv CO 00 CO 00 00 CO CO 01 01 01 0, 01 0) 01 C. 01 01 01 01 C) D YTD M - M --- YEAR O FEB R2-1 1982 L TOWN OF ESTES PARK FEBRUARY, 1992 ACCOUNTABLE WATER REPORT I) Treated water for January 14,1992 through February 13,1992: January 14 to 31 Water Treated: Black Canyon -13,000 *Fall River O Glacier Creek 6,802,000 *Big Thompson 6,810,447 *Crystal 2,149,200 February 1 to 13 Water Treated: Black Canyon -13,000 *Fall River O Glacier Creek 5,544,000 *Big Thompson 5,057,779 *Crystal 1,546,100 Total Water Treated in Billing Period 27,883,526 Gal. 2) Water accounted for from January 14 to February 13: Adjustments: 6,563,400 Billing: 15,706,840 *Backwash 778,176 Total Water accounted for: | 23,048,416 Gal. 3.) PERCENT ACCOUNTED FOR: 83% ? R2-2 . ADJUSTMENTS February, 1992 1.) Water Dispenser TOTAL WATER DISPENSER (Gal.) 150,000 2.) Bleeders a. Stanley Heights, Fall River 3,681,200 b. Metered plus Mize 837,100 TOTAL BLEEDERS (Gal.) 4,518,300 3.) Flushing/Leaks/Misc. a. 14-Jan Fire Elkhorn Lodge 1,000 b. 16-Jan Big T. maintenance 75,000 c. 20-Jan Woodstock W. M. 35,000 d. 21-Jan Woodstock W. M. 100 e. 22-Jan Creekside & Woodstock 10,000 f. 24-Jan Creekside 24,000 g. 26-Jan B. Canyon Inn leak 252,000 h. 27-Jan Marys WTP 16,000 i. 28-Jan Big Horn leak, Marys WTP, C.side 263,000 j. 29-Jan Creekside 21,000 k. 31-Jan South Ln. flush, Moccasin leak 18,000 1. 5-Feb Marys WTP 180,000 m. 13-Feb Fill Marys WTP Tank 1,000,000 TOTAL FLUSHING, MISC. (Gal.) 1,895,100 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (Gal.) 6,563,400 R2-3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK ' WATER USE RECORDS FEBRUARY, 1992 DATE BLACK FALL GLACIER SUBTOTAL BIG CRYSTAL SUBTOTAL } { TOTAL CANYON RIVER CREEK (GAL) CFS THOMP. (GAL) CFS E (GAL) 1 0 0 395,000 395,000 0.62 409,921 121,900 531,821 0.82 926,821 2 0 0 387,000 387,000 0.60 462,920 155,200 618,120 0.96 1,005,120 3 0 0 396,000 396,000 0.62 : 394,281 121,300 515,581 0.80: 911,581 4 -4,000 0 379,000 375,000 0.58 303,694 138,300 441,994 0.68: 816,994 5 -3,000 0 561,000 558,000 0.87 338,714 122,900 461,614 0.71: 1,019,614 6 -1,000 0 561,000 560,000 0.87 i . 407,966 122,600 530,566 0.82 1,090,566 7 -2,000 0 422,000 420,000 0.65 299,268 110,600 409,868 0.63 829,868 8 0 0 388,000 388,000 0.60 385,332 107,100 492,432 0.76 880,432 9 -1,000 0 419,000 418,000 0.65 362,838 105,800 468,638 0.73: 886,638 10 -1,000 0 348,000 347,000 0.54: 391,200 111,900 503,100 0.78 850,100 11 -1,000 0 413,000 412,000 0.64 336,758 101,600 438,358 0.68 850,358 12 0 0 411,000 411,000 0.64 469,879 111,500 581,379 0.90 992,379 13 0 0 464,000 464,000 0.72 495,008 115,400 610,408 0.94: 1,074,408 14 0 0 218,000 218,000 0.34 390,222 137,900 528,122 0.82 746,122 15 0 0 335,000 335,000 0.52: 466,832 136,100 602,932 0.93: 937,932 16 0 0 353,000 353,000 0.55. 439,774 142,400 582,174 0.902 935,174 17 0 0 292,000 292,000 0.45 j 487,370 128,000 615,370 0.95 907,370 18 0 0 306,000 306,000 0.48 424,585 140,500 565,085 0.87 871,085 19 0 0 281,000 281,000 0.44 406,011 126,900 532,911 0.82: 813,911 20 0 0 221,000 221,000 0.34: 399,494 109,900 509,394 0.79 730,394 21 0 0 336,000 336,000 0.52: 436,967 109,900 546,867 0.85 882,867 22 0 0 285,000 285,000 0.44E 465,968 89,600 555,568 0.86: 840,568 23 0 0 310,000 310,000 0.48 433,709 86,400 520,109 0.806 830,109 24 0 0 240,000 240,000 0.37 : 416,439 120,000 536,439 0.83 : 776,439 25 -1,000 0 562,000 561,000 0.87:! 206,916 125,500 332,416 0.51 893,416 26 -1,000 0 378,000 377,000 0.59 : 370,168 122,000 492,168 0.76 869;168 27 -1,000 0 464,000 463,000 0.72 2 243,737 111,300 355,037 0.55 818,037 28 -1,000 0 475,000 474,000 0.74 444,338 108,000 552,338 0.85 1,026,338 29 0 0 481,000 481,000 0.75 356,156 121,900 478,056 0.74: 959,056 30 0 0.00 0 0.001} O 31 0 0,00 0 0.00 0 0 TOT. -17,000 0 11,081,000 11,064.000 Â·: 11,446,465 3.462.400 14.908,865 : 25,972,865 AF -0.05 0.00 34.01 33.96 35.13 10.63 45.76 79.71 CFS 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.55 . 0.61 0.18 0.74 1.30 BW(-) N/A 0 N/A 0 -,: -483,100 -173,120 -656,220 -656,220 BLI-) N/A N/A N/A N/A , N/A N/A N/A -6,563,400 GAL -17,000 0 11,081,000 11,064,000 10,963,365 3,289,280 14,252,645 ~ 18,753,245 AF -0.05 0 34.01 33.96 Â© 33.65 10.10 43.74 57.56 1st-13 -13,000 0 5,544,000 5,057,779 1,546,100 14-31 -4,000 0 5,537,000 6,388,686 1,916,300 R2-4 I .j L I , TOWN OF ESTES PARK TOTAL WATER PLANT PRODUCTION (CALENDER MONTH MINUS BLEEDERS) 1991 1991 1992 1992 MONTH YTD j MONTH YTD: % % MONTH TOTAL TOTAL : TOTAL TOTAL i CHANGE CHANGE (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) (GAL.) ' (MONTH) (YTD) JANUARY 25,753,376 25,753,376 22,227,168 22,227,168: -13.69% -13.69% FEBRUARY 20,818,236 46,571,612 { i 18,753,245 40,980,4131 -9.92% -12.01% MARCH 23,065,946 69,637,558 : APRIL 23,868,231 93,505,789 3 MAY 33,828,478 127,334,267 JUNE 47,550,123 174,884,390 JULY 61,171,426 236,055,816 AUGUST 54,753,043 290.808,859 . SEPTEMBER 45,080,259 335,889,118 OCTOBER 29,400,590 365,289,708 NOVEMBER 21,662,560 386,952,268 DECEMBER 21,290,647 408,242,915 TOTAL 408,242,915 AC - FT 1,252.94 R2-5 r 6 Department of Natural Resources 6 01't N A Commitment To Progress Frank T. Lancaster, Director ./ , 4 '1,4. 4. . 74 4, 5 498-5760 Lf:Â¢,5-1 .+A 94 Post Office Box 1190 , I ,f Â· :,Â·. g22Â·?*; :A 1 -1:44. . . 111 /4 t.,.. -')'.LS:16,1*\' 3'9Â·14 .C, ....,r-*:-Â·/ ...'.'/- ../ Â· i 8.i 1 1 Af Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 ,-4. f : ... ' 0 LARIMER COUNTY COLORADO Board of County Commissioners Courtlyn W. Hotchkiss, District I M.J. 'Moe' Mekelburg, District 11 February 21, 1992 Daryle W. Klassen, District Ill FF P 2 4 :382 -:i Mr. Rich Widmer r. > ~41 . 11 0 - Town of Estes Park 170 MacGregor Ave. Estes Park, CO. 80517 Dear Rich: I have reviewed the Estes Park Transfer Station rates, and the proposed 1991 budget from A-1 Transfer. I have recommended no change in the tipping fee for 1992. Since no change is anticipated there will be no public hearing this year on this matter. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 9Â»-10 Frank T. Lancaster Director R4-1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER