The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1988-01-21L 44 0 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE 1, AGENDA JANUARY 21, 1988 . . 1. BILL VAN HORN - Request to discuss Town's consultant selection process. 2. FISH HATCHERY PROPERTY - Request to sell a parcel of land around existing cul-de-sac. 0 A , 3. 257 EAST RIVERSIDE - Request to purchase property. g.. 4. PAY TELEPHONE CONTRACT - Review. ./(/~ 5. TELEPHONE CONSULTANT'S REPORT - Discussion. 6. JANITORIAL SERVICES BIDS - Review. A. PUBLIC RESTROOMS B. MUNICIPAL BUILDING C. POLICE BUILDING 7. TRASH SERVICES BIDS - Review. 8. ELDERLY/HANDICAPPED SNOW REMOVAL POLICY - Discussion. 9. SHOP EQUIPMENT - Request to purchase budgeted hose reels. 10. PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES - Referral from Public Safety Committee. Reports: Customer Service Response Snowplowing to Date Residential Building Permits Municipal Building Carpet . -~10=assin_-Sae/13,1,1/illÂ·GUFÂ¥ey-i-ng- Library Design Workshops Mechanic Certifications m t \ -:$5551$91Â¢4 ... *h /7 . /-0%410>~~*ng~,7/9,1'- 14 ~ *,1 '1 3 d Klst 4 Â¢04â€¢ I.' q / ''* St 1 ,/i,4 ' 4 '. ' 4\ -4/ 4 494 dilâ€¢~cÂ· .1499Â·41~1 Itt LAND SURVEYS - _ ----233' Â£-Â« Ef@Â¥15 SUBDIVISIONS 11 1 ... DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IMPROVEMENT PLATS j.4 VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SANITARY ENGINEERING 0 6William G. VanHorn, PE & LS 9485 â€¢ Paul H. VanHorn, PE & LS 532 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING f / 1/ 7 Mayor and Board of Trustees January 19, 1988 Town of Estes Park P. O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Sirs: Due to an emergency, I will not be able to attend the Public Works Committee meeting of January 21, 1988 at which I had requested to be on the agenda and so I am submitting this letter instead. My coming before you is the result of actions of the Town and its staff which have placed you in a precarious position. On July 20, 1987, the Town issued a "Request for Proposals" to a number of engineering firms for surveying services for the proposed Moccasin Saddle Bypass. The scope of work was for the surveying to be provided by a private firm and the design to be accomplished by Town staff. This was a logical approach since the Town has two Registered Engineers on salary and several major Town design standards could not be met. Van Horn Engineering had previously done work in the area and was able to propose the work at the lowest not-to-exceed amount. After the proposals were opened and it was learned who was to get the job, Estes Park , Surveying approached the Public Works Department with the request that the Town not go under contract but instead increase the scope of work to include the design and put it out to bid again so they could have another chance. The Town called me after they had told me that we had the job and said they had changed their minds and that they were going to request proposals for the new scope of work. No mention was made about going under contract with us and then negotiating additional services to include design. I objected for two reasons, the first being that the decision was made after the proposals were opened and that this was obviously being done to give a losing competitor another chance after the first proposals were public. The second reason was that it did not make sense in terms of public expense to have a private engineer do the design when so many variances to Town standards would have to be made and the extent of these variances had to be 1043 Fish Creek Road â€¢ P.O. Box 456 â€¢ Estes Park, Colorado 80517 â€¢ 303-586-9388 - h /gb 1 "J decided by the Town and not the design engineer. Some examples include: 1) Alignment standards cannot be met and the amount of variance impacts the amount and number of owners of condemned land. It also impacts the grade which also has to vary from standards which is again a Town decision. It also significantly impacts the project cost which is also a Town decision. Proxi- imity of the traveled way to existing dwellings would signifi- cantly impact the disturbance of the owners due to sirens, etc. 2) The intersection grade cannot be made to standards and the amount of variance impacts safety, access to adjoining properties, and grades on the balance of the project. While pondering the above problems during the preparation of a proposal for the revised scope of wolk, I realized that a new alignment that would line-up with Crags Drive and eliminate the lower portions of Moccasin Circle would result in a much more functional bypass and greatly reduce the disturbance of the existing neighborhood. From the information supplied by the Town, I knew that land acquisition was being minimized and assumed this alternative had not been considered because it involved the purchase of the entire right-of-way. I contacted Mr. Heron with whom I have had a close relationship for many years. At first he was skeptical as would be anyone who would be giving away that amount of land but after several phone calls and a meeting, he gave preliminary approval to the idea if it were properly engineered. He specifically brought up that he would be more comfortable if we did the design as he and I have worked together as engineers on other projects in the past. When I submitted our proposal for round two of the project, I told Dick Gerstberter of my ideas, my conversations with Mr. Heron, and of his tentative agreement to give the Town the land. I also told him that I knew we could work well with Heron and that we wanted an opportunity to propose the work in the event the Town agreed with the idea. He told me he would discuss it with Rich Widmer. The next I heard from the Town was that Estes Park Surveyors had the low amount on round two and that no decision had been made regarding the new alignment. What I learned next from reading the Trail Gazette was that the Town had negotiated the engineering for the new alignment with Estes Park Surveyors for more than $8,000.00 (significantly more than the whole contract including design). When I asked Rich Widmer what had happened, he said that there wasn't time to allow us to submit a competing proposal. In 1982, Estes Park Surveyors originated the idea of realigning Virginia Drive and was given the engineering and design work with no competing proposals because it was their idea and they were -2- most familiar with it. I did not object to the Town doing that then nor do I object to it now. I believe it was a reasonable reward for them advancing time and effort in the public interest. I did not expect to receive the same consideration for doing the same thing now but to be black-balled and not even given a chance to compete on an even basis is no right in any sense of the word. If it is the Town's policy to go under contract and then negotiate additional work, why were we not awarded the contract in the beginning? If the opposite is true and it is the Town's policy to rebid when the work is changed (as they did when we were low bidder) why did Estes Park Surveyors get a contract when the Town knew that a different alignment was being considered? Rich Widmer has said there was no time to get a competing proposal for the new alignment, but there was time for one firm to prepare a proposal and take it through regularly scheduled meetings for approval. Two firms proposing this work would have taken no more time. How much taxpayer money has been wasted on doing two alignments? It appears that one of two things has happened. Either the Town is showing preference to a single firm or else there is some incredibly sloppy administration going on. As you may know, all of the engineering firms in Estes Park are experiencing slow times and $14,000 worth of work in the winter time is indeed an important matter. Your response to this letter will determine my course of action from here. Sinc #t V William G. Van Horn -3- 4 . 1/ TOWN OF ESTES PARK f. ic_ ti 47 *C ' . '4' AY w'J Public Works Department C.44 â‚¬24 7 14964,1 Stephen L. Stamey -- - f U t'!4.1 ,& , f.tL __ t-Narl,&412.- Planner â€¢'#.4.. *,@ Â· 14.*4 /7 Â¢R<li'jÂ·:. ;9 Ar,%4,2, - /' 45.94**02,2146 *10,74Kfre,y:Â·af~... E-*A . i>bt ,-=flig.,MÂ¥ i., w - - 1 0 74 .-3$.. W.biR <-4 46~.* rvisJ->Â«312Â¢ ..9#*41* ~4 " *g,~ ~ F- ~~4= ffi:~-(Â·Ct Â£.7.i:~ .; 41 5 'cut,Il,p . Â·Â·: ,, 5, %&%Â·,,f)7,~4519.. ..33Â¥ -vu.eu~Â·' Â·'*v 343*:03 04~ 7 5=W~ ~_ - _<9343*4 k.f : *itt*44 1.Â·t..v, 5 -22 -- 1.- A ..It --Â·41.1 ...80~0~2 r --- , i ..VN Aft.- 461Â»imjt Estes Park, Colorado 80517 MEMORANDUM TO: Rich Widmer FROM: Steve Stamey M~ DATE: December 18, 1987 SUBJECT: Fish Hatchery Lot Split I have discussed this project with Al Kadera, Larimer County Planning Department. A boundary line adjustment would be necessary to transfer a 100 ft. wide strip of land to the adjoining property owner. Other options that I see include: o Town could grant an easement over the travelled cul-de-sac. o Town could sell or divide only enough land to incor- porate a properly designed cul-de-sac. o Town could dedicate a right-of-way for the cul-de- sac, although this might not be feasible because of its location at the end of a private drive. I did not detect any "opposition" to a land division. SLS:cj P. 0 ;to, 12(i,0 -.'. . .,jllt' f J ~~130 -------0-2---Lix-t254.1~57/5428*/ 6-5/ /- -N 389,0120 0-3/ Â»5' . -2.8119.49\ #- ;535 23-SIGN.' / I. 8/20 34 -42 Ni7--__ Â»12* 30< ~N 22=cz -22 ------12 .-T=myr-8110 - . 10 8 100 - i -/FO - 09 1*<i-- 8070 I 9=r=---7--~.Fri==--8060 -- \<2 1 - 1 - 8980 . <-- 8020 4 ----r--- - --I=.i....0 - 7-80*2~.~Â© ~c 7 2.4 L j J - 4 \ | ''C I 0- /73 N 388,50[ -0/Â«I-Â«\ Â» 1 ARIAâ€¢ / 1 87~5 Â« -. 5*001,4 I , 1 L 3*< t ----- /3 7/ \\ 1==557 7 0 re 0 // C I. / 41 .. 1) .. / I / ./Ii, ----2,/I- 0-777~--1TZ,0 983, 4.- - -3)(r .../... \L ~5-295<~f i-2 -~17< 0 ** --- 4Â«46=324 4 2- =Â¥50.- 3 f 4 1 -1= dboo...2 < iERY - -229--_,... ROAD ~442:Z~:Â©x *-----0 - - -=====11 * \ (COUNTY ROAD 20 0 01 1 3 0 > x - Pes,ale Ne*, Lr O f,JA HATCHER1, PROPâ‚¬-271 0 ,)%8 24â€¢-0 1 i, 3411 .. 9.05\ T . 892 t., 2,1/ L-, 4 21 \ r, ed li~:,9 . f 5 W - 24 9' C\11 1 9 1. / \4 I 14 M,ZE.OO S 01 .fog %~1,1 -/ 1 4, F z G , in 11 - %\1 t.. . . li 4 1 r .93 . r. 41,1 0 6 -4- U Â· Z 6,4 1 . 1 .7 % i /4-re f .Â·'d /,9.89 1._zj:sÂ·,Â·,Â· , ,, .16.982 I :1--7 14 . 1 /ft ...... 4...- 4 h./ i N LuÂ«Â»>- y - g - â€ž2 - , 4 -> C n L 0 / .1 \ 0 i' /1 - , 21 * A.ou j . . P <~<,0Â·57,2 JOI 0 2/ 0 3 '41 4/ - J - /Â¢' 1 A â€¢ 1 D 1 1 1 I , 1 I , 0 . 3 1 isthil . illif.' , 3 4 - - ./. o. ttic I -- 9.60/ C im. 913 0 10 0 1. a .19 4/ -1 F// U D -1 - - *0 '6 2 3 5.. # /42 0 '. 4 ,9.4?ear.4/ 97 + 1/ VÂ¢ /9 3.... .1 / 9 ;lit 9 -> ,3'68 3 . 00'903 1 . .i., ff , 9%,A . 4.. 1 (O Ll - M--CE)-1:. d I Â·lp _[R..1 ! â„¢1,*' ~ 1Â£4 11- i_-1 d . l Â· 1% . '410,9 ,60 23 6 19 , 1 - 1 4---4 \\ l - 0 -9 P.<Por ,97/9 .1...: 8 1 .'... 44- tilt 1 y 1 NE:.4 " ...9 91 4.5 1 s,4 . \42>4~ I 0,/9 61- --1.. ' 9.9, 0.9,:99-1 i23 0 00.6/9 L :. 1 A ,Â£.Oii /&3 0- '- , 64,'403 Â·0Â·7~ .2./92/. Al.ZE.UO S 6 iz .t f s.7/ 0 4. 1 1.-1 . , 4 Q Z d E ,1 4 - -- 27-4- - -- 2,10(,JOO Po~i.io'Y uu:,4 00 elqts'A 21,1.1 5u!110 IS - 41 0 U L . K. /3â€ž14 .:r ' -- . 1 C. .L : NESTLED IN THE TOWERING PINES ALONG FALL RIVER (303) 586-3664 mountain 4-05) u 1520 FALL RIVER ROAD ESTES PARK. COLORADO 80517 4 CORNER SEC. 16; 75N; R73W; 6P.M. LAMIMCA Dw,VIT, 4/G/144* 611.70 1 State Hw . R.O. . , H"i. S 79.49'E .l i . MEMORANDUM DATE: January 7, 1988 TO: Dale Hill FROM: Rich Widmer RE: Julia Spencer Property County records for the property at 257 East Riverside belonging to Julia Spencer show a valuation of $7,160 for the land and improvements. At 18% assessment, this translates to a value of $39,778 for the property. According to the appraisal on the property done in 1974, there are approximately 2,750 square feet in the parcel. The value would therefore be $14.46/sf. The appraisal in 1974 listed the value gif the parcel at $9,500. The county parcel record is attached. f- 1 39 - - -RIMER COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE JANUARY 7, 1988 PARCEL: 35251-21-059 SCHEDULE: 1146360 TAX DISTRICT: 3309 SUBDIVISION: 3063 SPENCER, JULIA S PO B X 903 ESTES PARK CO 80517 TAX ROLL VALUE: 7,160 MILL LEVY: 63.65000 PROPERTY TAX: $455.74 WEED: 5.00 WATER: $.00 AMT DUE: $455.74 DEED TYPE: RIT DEED DATE: 08/72 BOOK: 1516 PAGE: 286 DOC FEE: 0.00 1279 LAND: 6580 IMPS: 58C) ACRE: 0.00.TYPE:UTILITY ON VACANT LAND **********VALUATION DATE: 08/21/87***CERTIFICATION CODES: L87 ******** EEG AT PT WH BEARS S 6 .11 1/2' W 206.2 FT FR SW COR OF LOT 23, RIVERSIDE, ESTES PK, TH S 73 58' W 60 FT M/L TO C/L OF BIG T RIV, TH SRLY ALG SAME TO ITS INTSEC WITH S LN OF NE OF SD SEC, TH ERLY ALG SD S LN TO W SIDE OF E RIVERSIDE PKWY, TH NRLY ALG SAME TO POB RIVERSIDE, ESTES PK (SPLIT FROM 35251 21 021) 1/AL UE = -3122_- 39778 - . 12 34,9536- IMP j 3/122 TELEPHONE LOCATION AGREEMENT This Telephone Location Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between MOUNTAIN TELECOM, INC., a Wyomi ng corporation ("MTI"), and RICHARD D. WIDMER. DIRECTOR doing business as TOWN OF ESTES PARK and known, for purposes of this Agreement, as "Business Owner". Business Owner represents and MT I hereby rel ies on Business Owner's legal authority to enter into this Agreement. Business Owner Kereby grants to MTI, for the term of thjs Agreement, and at MTI's option as to the appropriate date of installation, if at all, the right to install and operate / coin-operated teleohone(s) for public use upon and/or in the premises of Business 0,ner, which premises are corimonly knownas TOWN OF ESTES PARK P. 0. BOX 1200 Eblbb TAKE, LULUKAUU 80)17 (address) (city, state, zip) The exact physical location of the telephone(s) to be irstalled erd opented will be specified by MTI. asiness Cwer will provide ful l publ ic access to the telephone(s) during the Business Ch,rer's nornal business holrs, provide 24-har electricity to the phone so as to make it/them operable -at al l times, ard provide reasonable coin change to telephone customers during regular business hours. All installation, service and maintenance costs will be performed and paid, by MTI or its agent. Business Owner hereby grants permission to MTI to contact any telephone company currently providing pay telephone service to the Business Owner in order to arrange for an effect the removal of the existing telephone equipment and installation of any necessary telephone line(s), which costs will be paid by MTI. At MTI's option, and at MTI's cost, the pay telephone(s) to be installed may provide for private local or long distance service of its choosire. It is uÂ·derstood ard mreed that only )ITI Imy open, adjust, r-ove, disconnect, replace, repair or alter the telephone(s) in any way. The telephone(s) and all telephone equipment are and will continue to be owned by MTI. MTI shall have the right to make all replacements, updates, additions, modifications and connections which are reasonably necessary to the successful operation of this telephone Agreement. Business Owner's responsibilities are limited to those set forth in this agreement. MTI shall conply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the installation and operation of such pay Welephones, and will hold Business Owner harmless against any fire, penalty or damage for any actual or alleged failure on the Opart of MTI to comply therewith. MTI will pay all installation and license fees with respect to such pay telephone(s). In exchange for the right granted to MTI to install and operate (a) coin-operated telephone(s) upon Business Owner's premi ses, the Business Owner will be given 12% of the coin and 12% of the credit card receipts from the telephone(s) operation(s) for the duration of this Agreement and while the telephone(s) is/are on the Business Owner's premises. This percentage fee will be paid to Business Owner by MTI on a monthly basis. Business Owner agrees to use MTI telephones exclusively or, the premises for the term of this Agreement. The term of this Agreement is 5 YEARS ~r~~t~ date of acceptance by MTI with a(n) option(s) to renew for an additional 5 YEARS at the end of each term by MTI and the Business Owner, at their respective option. MTI and its assigns may terminate this Agreement at any time, provided the Business Owner is notified of MTI's intention to terminate in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to the termination of this Agreement. Should Business Omer fail to satisfy the terms of this Agreement, MTI may hold the Business Nner liable for all danages and associated costs. Pending final regulatory approvals by goverrmental agencies and/or other factors beyond the control to MTI, no specific installation date is promised by MTI. In the event that all necessary approvals have not been obtained by MTI for a period of one (1) year from the date of the execution of this contract by MTI, said Agreement will be null and void, and it will be necessary to enter into a newly executed Agreement, at the option of either/both parties. In no event will MTI assume any liability nor may this Agreement be terminated for any delay in installation and/or interruption of service for whatever reason, except as above described. MTI makes no warranties, expressed or inplied, in connection with the operation of this (these) telephone(s) or related operaticrs. MTI will use its best efforts to install said telephone(s) within a ninety (90) day period from the execution of this agreement. It is understood and agreed that MTI may at any time, sell, assign or transfer its right(s) and interest(s) ulder this Agreement, in which event, MTI shall have no further responsibilities, liabilities or rights hereunder. In the event of sale, assignment or transfer of MTI interests hereunder, MTI's successor-in-interest shall have all the rights, responsibilities and liabilities which MTI previously possessed hereinder. It is understood and agreed by the Business Owner that this Agreement wil l become a part of his ownership or leasehold interest, as applicable, upon the subject premises, such that any sale, transfer or assignment ,of his business interests will include in said transfer, this Location Agreement. Any transferee, or successor in interest to the premises of the Business Owner shall be bound to the Agreement as if he were the original party hereto for the term of this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed that the operation of this Agrement is subject to and contingent upon State Public Utilities Commission laws and regulations permitting said ownership and operation of (a) pay telephone(s) at the above described location(s). This Agreement constitutes the only Agreement between MTI and Business Owner in connection with the operation of (a) coin- operated telephone(s) upon the Business Owner's premises. Any like Agreement entered into with another individual and/or company is agreed by the parties hereto to be null and void, whether entered into prior to, concurrent with, or subsequent to this Agreement. This Agreement will become binding on MTI only when this Agreement has been executed by an authorized MTI representative at the Home Office of MTI. No local MTI agent/representative is authorized to sign for or on behalf of MTI. BUS IINESS â‚¬1IER - MOUNTAIN TELECOM. INC. By: 1120 E-1 9 84-+ P.O. 80,1 336~ Date: i Title: *CRQ.{024 BY: ; t' 1 7,1 Telephone No. /T, Date: ./,X Existing pay telephone(s) nullbers: li Title: ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE Telephone No. (307) 577-0722 Universal 9/87 - MTN Mountain Telecom, Inc. THE PAY PHONE COMPANY P.O. BOX 3354 CASPER, WY 82602 (307) 577-0722 ADDENDUM This is an addendum to the Telephone Location Agreement between Mountain Telecom, Inc. and the Town of Estes Park dated /2 -/7- 8 7 Should the Town of Estes Park become dissatisfied with the pay phone service by Mountain Telecom, Inc., the following procedures will apply: Upon receipt of written request, Mountain Telecom, Inc. will remove their phones within 30 days. The Town of Estes Park agrees to Mountain Telecom, Inc. disconnect the Fairground payphones during the off-season months of Oe-/8 6 Â£97/ 7 /*/1%-l' 4- MOUNTAIN TELECOM, INC. BUSINESS OWNER BY : ~1 4-2 4/ a 4/1 BY: N j11 ju // 61 DAWE: DATE: TITLE: ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE TITLE: -i L .Â·d -,; me n C 4 - A Trâ€¢',7 2 2 1 1 .R 144 4 r Al . d . i LA V i 1.11.U lu , lut nTC ""i'AT T ATTAW Ule CONjECTION AND/OR INj ihLJ.11U11 . 1. 0I ?AY TELEPHONES f- AGEJT COMPENSATION INECR:Â·1.1:I,ON: We au:Zerize M..t:r.:Jin Bell to release to >VUNIC..11:1 le; 2, O,11, I ULâ€¢ 20 Box 3334 22-Der. XY S2602 the amount of cempensation and/or any other information relative to the pay telephone located en our premises. The pay telephone numbers and their locations are provided below. 3--- DISCONNECTION AND/OR INSTALLATION OF PAY TELEPHONES: Ke authorize Mountain Telecom, Inc. to act in our behalf in placing service orders for the disconnection and/or instollation of any pay telephone located on our premises. The pay telephone numbers or name of the business and locations are provided below. NUMBER Cl BUSINESS NAME LOCATION 303-586-9751 303-586-9973 303-586-9802 TOWN OF ESTES PARK 303-586-9803 303-586-9846 P. 0. BOX 1200 (NO STREET ADDRESS) 303-586-9772 303-586-9958 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 This authorization will remain in effect until further notice is received. DATE CUSTOMER SIGNATURE CUSTOMER TITLE N.elE OF COMPANY SP TOWN OF ESTES P /\ n 1/ n 11 1\ - I / Public Works Department l.4 424 7 -,; -17 Richard D. Widmer 41-. _ Director QiAT= 0 3 4â€¢12. 43<4148 ' R27*7 :04?'19* 9pbr ~41 tffri~w* .,Â·tr,sp*z'- .,6 9-- -08.3: Estes Park, Colorado 80517 MEMORANDUM TO: Dale Hill FROM: Rich Widmer DATE: December 30, 1987 SUBJECT: Telephone Consultant Attached is a copy of the telephone consultant's report. He indicates we could save at least $2,000 per year by implementing his suggestions. His fee for implementation would be $550; however, we can implement them ourselves by dealing directly with Executone and Mountain Bell. The bulk of the savings is in the elimination of four off-premise extensions: two of which serve water plants and two which serye substations. Elimination of the two water plant extensions would save $660 per year; eliminating the substation extensions would save $882 per year. Our long . distance traffic does not justify a WATS line at this time; however, he has suggested changing the way our trunks are billed for a savings Of $450 per year. This Will take some reprogramming of our telephone system. He indicated the remainder of our telephone services need no changes at this time, and we should feel,good about the telephone decisions we have made in the past. RDW:lm Attachment 00 E- LO Ln 'r . r.1 q E 01,-1 Colr.- g g 4 2 2 -1 01 . I m O In U In M 0 Â·r-1 Un V 4.1 Â·r-1 8 -- m 'C 0 0 00 0 O 0 Or'' -- r-- m 01 . .4 CD sa 0 4 4 W 64 0 4 â€¢* W CO C Project: PUBLIC RESTROOM CLEANING SERVICE ~ Project Engineer:Greg Siewers TABULATION Bid Date: January 20, 1988 Contract Time: Two Years Existing Costs WATSON VIP E P JANTTORTA, ' Item Item Descript on Ouantitv Unit Price Extensio Un ice t Price Extension Unit Price Extension t $2,200.00 ,162.37 $8,64 9.48 1,122.00 $4,488.(0 Cleaning (Winter) 8 Months 340.00 . . 12,356.40 5.00 3,880.00 00'899'89 TE=:oK 88-900'ZES -[2-1.Om UOISUal.XS earld CITUO UOTSUS:;.XE ~ aorad 3.TUD uorsue=kxl aol:=<I uorsuaq.XS 60-Fid 9.Tufl AR.IR.Ueno uoj=:djaosiia UIa,JI UIal.I - Tuao Ip-log Iti~J Te#al ~ 1 Cleaning hs 850.00 IE:10:L 4 1 I 1 1 0 <D r - g h C . C Ch U a E 0 V 4 41. tf~ W -1 i r.-1 fi g W r,n BID TABULATION Bid Date: January 20, 1988 Project: MUNICIPAL BUILDING CLEANING SERVICES Proje ~~r: Greg Siewers 'Item Item Description Quantity Unit Price x ension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension L ice le Extension ~ 715.00 8580.00 809.55 745.00 $8,940.00 715.00 $8,580.00 ~ 00'086'89 IWZIOLL 00-0*6'89 Ie-4OLL 09'D'IL'69 -re=-Orn 00'0898 TE:joj uotsu/3.xs earid UTun UOTsual.XN aorid R.Tun UOISual.X3 eorid 3.Tun UOISUaq.XE aorid #Tur-1 AlÂ·FluenD uoIR'd-:aasaa uiaqI 11Ial.I Contract : 2 Years ACPS (Watson) TE:lou Ie-401 00'OOZ'07$ Ie=loj (0'096'ETS ~ Te:,OE TITIOZI.TUEr d 3 dIA 00'002'0It 00'068 )0 096'ETS 00'080'I iluoW xed 3[J[OM I 2 Entrance Mats 20.00 00'OE 00'9Â£ va slew eoues[R.ul Z Existing en 1 Work Per 6.â€¢* 0 42 9 161 ID 4 * 71 (N t. b 1 3 U . U. 41 CX L M 5 - C -k U': BID TABULATION Bid Date: January 20, 1988 00'OOL'59 Igiou 00'09E'ES -re=Jou 00-166'19 Ie=:O'L 00'09EE IP:lo.L uotsuenxs aorad :11-un UOTsua=:x) aorad 4.-Eun uor-sue-4.Xa 80Â¥Id 4.-Fun UOTSUeAX) 82 L.Id 4+un A#-p#ueno uo+403/usea ule#I ule#I Contract Time:Two Years Project: POLICE DEPARTMENT CLEANING SERVICE Project Engineer:Greg Siewers ofegsional Triple C VIP Item Item Description Ouantity Unit Price ension Un ce Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price ~ Extension 1 Cleaning Per Month Year 280.00 3360.00 $2,592.00 280.00 $3,360.00 475.00 $5,700.00 i (uosteM) SdDV Ier:toq.Tuer d a -I- ,-1 r-1 In lo 1 to i'> 00 le " 01 LD al co Ln 8 0 CO [0 . BID TABULATION Bid Date: January 20, 1988 Contract Time: Two Years Project: TRASH COLLECTION SERVICES - Project Engineer:Greg Siewers Item Item Description Quantity Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension UOISUBJXS aotid :ITUR uorsua:xs aorld #Tun UOTSuaq.XE aorid 3.Tun uorsual.xa aoT.Id 4Tun ARÂ·TlÂ·uenD UOT:'dTiosea Ula#I lue# I ' Ie:,0,L 00'026'89 TE=:OM ES-S8E'LS IE-40M IX/ZO'869P TE#ol Summer 81 L.R. 60@ 8.71/mo. . 9.71 . Â·13.23 $1,071.84 Winter 59 L.R. 38@ 3.25/mo 123.50 4.25 250.75 3.04 179.35 Winter 13 P.B. 12@ 1.43/mo 17.16 2.43 31.59 2.44 31.65 Winter TOTAL 7 Months 984.62 1,976.38 1,477.00 Muni. Dumpster Year Â· 47.20/mo 566.40 57.30 687.60 52.00 624.00 Library Year 8.50/mo 102.00 9.50 114.00 10.00 120.00 4 Te-joI ZE:;OL Te=:OM Existina Costq S &M Total ~ 25 P.B. 24@ 3.60/mo Â· 4.60 115.00 10.72 267.96 , er TOTAL 5 Months 3045.00 4,507.55 6,699.00 SHAWNEE, KANSAS FREE SNOW REMOVAL POLICY Shawnee's free snow removal policy for senior, handicapped, and infirmed citizens has been a tremendous success for four winters. The City Fire Department maintains a master list of all citizens who have requested the service. This list is updated each year beginning in September when the Fire Department publicizes the service in local newspapers and sends letters to those citizens on the master list. The letter verifies that the person on the list is a senior citizen or is otherwise unable to safely remove snow himself. The letter also verifies whether or not the person requesting the service still resides at the address listed. The snow removal program utilizes the Fire Department's building inspectors each of whom are equipped with a Ford Bronco II truck that has snow removal equipment attached to it to remove snow from the driveways of those people on the list as well as those senior, handicapped or infirmed citizens who call the Department during the snow storm. The Fire Department has found this program to be very successful. It allows the Building Inspectors to continue their 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. inspection duties as well as respond to fires and remove snow from driveways. After 5 p.m. the Department continues the snow removal service by employing its 24-hour firefighters. The rotation continues until all citizens on the master list have been assisted. The snow policy operates in two phases. The first phase is during the snow storm. The second phase begins once the snow has stopped falling. PHASE I: During the snow storm, the Bronco trucks are dispersed to assist Public Works by plowing all city facilities. This includes City Hall, the Safety Center parking lots and other city-owned facilities. Once that is accomplished, the Broncos then proceed to plow the City's cul-de-sacs. This is of tremendous assistance to Public Works as the large snow plows are not able to maneuver in many of the cul-de-sacs. This process continues throughout the snow storm. PHASE II: Once the snow has stopped falling, the Bronco trucks then begin the driveway snow removal service. Again inspector/firefighters clear driveways during the day and after 5 p.m., the 24-hour firefighters continue the plowing until all driveways are clear. This program has been very successful for the City of Shawnee and has resulted in a reduction of emergency calls among the elderly. Further, it has reduced the level of stress among Public Works employees and has resulted in a more efficient use of city fire and public works employees. The program cost is minimal because the policy uses on duty fire employees and existing equipment. The only out-of-pocket costs are gasoline and wear and tear on the Broncos. Since the program inception, there have been no accidents or damage done to the vehicles. The only start up cost involved is the purchase of the Bronco vehicles. i 9 1 00*4:~69 .W TOWN OF ESTES PARK *484-. r. v 4 - -il - 7:D' lt~Fee teic A *~744~Fr22J-letrAT :#R"~f +92- 40 -2:>1.- i,4111<QY~~,4FGA-w /-1.3--->A/*FCAM~RATEfET#,46(M3fi tr,elt,Â£ it ~~f~...GR/X*-_ , tpr,4,3'.4 ir#&*j.&7*Â·.i.*.,C.~tf~ y rk- 4 046 6* p ,ce.4.--i->9*qi:*4>ffEM-~P . 34\3*6 t.j~il> ~ti'-f:*.74 --. - 2 U J 1.. Â» el?j . diE -- / 79 /-' Estes Park, Colorado 80517 January\14, 1988 MEMORANDUM TO: Rich Widmer FROM: Gary Shanafelt (336 SUBJECT: Purchase of Additional Lubricant Hose Reel System Budgeted for 1988 The total cost of the additional hose reels, pumps, materials and labor for the shop, as budgeted, will come to a total of $4,879. This price will be good until February 1st, at which time a 3% price increase will become effective on the Graco equipment, which will amount to $160.00. After this estimate was completed last fall, our master lube oil survey was completed and I became aware that we have one other oil that should be dispensed and metered to accurately keep tract of usage and inventory. This would result in an overun of approximately $300, or a total of $5,900. $5,600 was budgeted for this expenditure. GS:cj i i ) i ii ): 1 2 f d I \~ '1?:47 TOWN OF ESTES PARK /12%7 I '3 - - - :41_-00*t? 1 0 ' - --- 1 244#tzv-26Tlyf .9961*fj/92,4~-.: . - -----d\%'rÂ¥.Ab&L --- -4- 1>2Â»*r-<9-~**10 I f /-0.0./.- ,42. C MUNICIPAL FACILITY STUDY Final Report 1 1 1 September 1985 - 1576 Sherman Street Denver. CO 80203 303-832-5599 1 38 - SECTION III PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 The Police Department now occupies 3,700 net useable square.feet in the North Wing of the Municipal Building. Another 4,100 square feet is devoted to the Vehicle Bay for fire trucks and an ambulance. 1 To meet the growth needs of the department through the next ten years, an additional 1,266 square feet will be needed. Expan-- Eimrspace will be used primarily for the following functions: - Improved Dispatch Center - Provision of a Training Conference Room - Provision of Adequate Record Storage Space - Provision of a Second Interview/Interrogation Room It is also anticipated that any expansion of Police Facilities would include space for the County Sheriff functions, now housed in the Park Lane Building. For a de#,artment of this size, it is generally most effective if all department functions are located on one floor. This relationship improves interaction among the patrol and detective staff and the efficient sharing of resources. Based on this premise, a 2,000 square foot expansion to the __~, northwest of the existing building would be the most functional. It would also be possible to expand the Vehicle Bay at the same time. An addition at this location, however, would have significant 1 impact on traffic flow and parking at the north end of the lot. Issues which would needs to be addressed include: - Closure of public traffic flow from MacGreger Avenue to the lot behind the Town Hall. - Relocation of Police Vehicle Parking Spaces in close proximity to the Building. - Relocation of some vehicle entrances into and out of the Bay so they face on to MacGreger Avenue. - More detailed analysis of Vehicle Bay requirements. An expansion/remodel project for the Police Department would cost between $200,000 and $240,000. based on $95.00 per square foot for a new construction and $20.00 per square foot for remodel. . 90 1 I.1 rLANNING Gul DED_ I NE FDA ?- REMODE. OF THE POLICE AND FIRE WING - BASED 0,4 THE FOLLOWING OCCUPANTS Mon Aug 12-Â· 19ED ---- 1998 ---- ---- 1990 ---- ---- 1995 ---- Ey:ST:NG EXISTING PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED LOCATION SPACE SPACE SDACE Smâ€¢ZE LAI i rk>Â· COJ,4 . i :21'.7. 4.ENT Sneriff'I OFf:ce Par/Lan/ 330 525 705 703 POLICE AND FIRE DEPAPTMENT Policâ€¢ anc F:'â€¢ Facilities Polic.Wi 3700 4516 459t 4966 -- 1 TOTAL DEPT OSF 4030 5041 DEPT GSF S29e 3/71 ; Plut Remodel Pl,nning Factor (O 1 0/ Dept 057): O 0 0 BUILDING NET USEABLE 5041 /LDO NSF 5296 5671 REQUIREMENT EXISTINGÂ· BUILDING NET USEABLE: 3700 Fir.t Floor DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXISTING BUILDING -1341 -1396 -1971 NET AND PROJECTED NEED. NoteÂ· A remodil factor ha, bion adord to thi Total Dipt OSF to adjuit /or planning inifficlinclâ€¢i which -8~ c=cur a; e reiwlt of 011:ting buildin; Etructural element, and corridors Building Nâ€¢t U...01. ..cluoi. t 00. , portions of thâ€¢ bulletng co-mitted *to g,neral circulation. restroo/â€¢. and mechanical and /lect,lcal 9105/ts Remodel / Expansion of the Police V.'ing ./. TOWN OF ESTES PARK - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 01/12/88 CITIZEN SERVICE RESPONSE REPORT DECEMBER, 1987 PAGE 1 TYPE OF CALL NO. OF CALLS HOURS UTILITY LOCATION - MAIN 3 6.75 UTILITY LOCATION - SERVICE 4 3.50 UTILITY BILLING QUESTION 7 3.30 TAP REQUEST 2 2.25 WATER QUALITY PROBLEM - COLOR 5 7.45 LOW PRESSURE PROBLEM 2 1.50 FROZEN SERVICE LINE 4 2.70 MAIN LINE BREAK 2 1.50 . SERVICE LINE BREAK 3 0.45 METER REPAIR OR SERVICE 2 0.70 PROBLEM WITH OTHER TYPES OF 2 2.50 CONSTRUCTION SNOW REMOVAL CONCERN 8 6.90 OTHER TYPES OF CONCERNS 6 2.70 ======== TOTALS FOR DECEMBER, 1987 50 42.20 HISTORICAL DATA THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR TOTAL CALLS 50 44 - TOTAL MAN HOURS 42.20 52.85 - % CHANGE(CALLS/MHS) --- +14%/-20% - /.22 0 6 5 9 1~ 3& 4 4 ~ -l:&.1/ D KI ; ft>1 . n Vihlk 'WV,WL- 0 RESIDENTIAL PERMITS:YEAR-TO-DATE (DEC) T.:wq oF Eutas Pork 120 4 G 109 ; 110 100 t - f 90 - ~ 88 80 - 70 - *1/ 60 - \ 56 50 - 40 40 - 30 - 20 - 15 10 - ~ ~ 4 \0 1 0 0 -2--1---0 . O [f i l ' 1 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 O DECEMBER + YEAR-to-DATE BUILDING PERMIT VALUATIONS:YTD (DEC) Town of Estes Park 11 10,%04,093 10 - ll 9 - il 8.127.579 8- T Ii.,- 11 7 33.,h 4* 4 19 7 5,779.627 6~' 5,728.791 $~ 7 -// 6 - jj 4'm*J iij- j~i' , :i~ '~t 4.788,305 - 1111 j; 4, 4. 4 // 7/ 4 *f ' 4 3,045,057 7/11 f< /3 ~ ~ F ~ 3,385,638 3-~ 77 2 /> /2 / lit j 2- 11 U i 1, U i 1 , il /1 it ii 4 ! 1 - /9. ./,7 /5/ t-' 4 0 . 1979 1980 1 981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1.--7 |9~1 DECEMBER [.7 ,i YEAR-TO-DATE K Â·Â» i,n,ri Â·r,WZ I 4.rÂ· aM ... .1!tâ‚¬. - r~KJ, '.t -=r -. -'.:.,-+.1~-... 1*_e*_0.-. -7~/f'-f- 11'.'..17.-. hâ‚¬~- '~7~1~:p~ --.Â·li'~ '7-4- - - .2 -*-'+ ~ 12,4..1;,1 4<fga _TE . / ,- 24*1 1 tuttl - .1 i ..4 -3 h .5& 1 1 .,1 3.- 47- ..: ..3Â»7 21 U = 000--O-'40 )992-Â· 1( , .1 O,000â€¢FC,Câ€¢0~0' .dpa=* i -W E E B M M B F B B --m. 2 9- 0 -1 - -p*-4* .ImeM i * 40:Dry. I , -7 >< U .J u J u -1 -1 -1 4 i L = 23 000000* M -C U. 1-,-,7-,1-,->*Z . O 4 t.*~ 1 - % 25 73 2 k'*64 6 0 > . ne= f. A-4 1 3@ it S kx, A Z \.r . U,Z=g==W/. *tr \ *UJ re z Â¥5~ I j " .- / W< *971*NI F A C E >2*2.- 1[ Ill Ul J Â§ 2 LLI * A \ \,M M '-,BP?*22) 1 76313 i I * 0 1 [2 2- 1 :2Â·, a o ,- 111 - - . 1 - cuse'R -Â· 1 C. C 1-LI A H ~Â¥E~SE~ >C C= Ch 111-= 72: 28 --1- * =rl=.1 I 1 mÂ«â‚¬2002: 1 ; 2 5>4-& * 31 -1 6 LU X~7' 5 f m , - %3 * LU ~9'Z~ , 1 ..:ee--c f 1 k % O 1:i: iii i & V 0 -0 Ul - - U.1 0*-C.....% 1 0 C C -- = 21 . - , - *9 1 2 L - -D - * 0.- *- . 16 i ! * Â·. 2.. M & 9 f Â·Â· r -...... -- , 111 X 5 4 ,- 4 ~IT; f LL. E = U, -J < C X CD M. K k- Z â€¢C- 1 ' r- M E w Â· = 40= 1- - . Z 4. ...<I 5 1 ..... f CO f Z BU Cle; 8 A. 4 - W. 2 1 -==Z 1., 0 2 Ul Z - s z i -:,:-~ 21 - 05 Z W 0 0 LU ZOO 0 < 0 lu Z X - , M O U.1 . M M/ ~/4 - 7 1 , A Z B- A ... (n IC. _. 11 2 t -4 0 ' 13 2 <C E 5 M Ul & Z CZ. 2. .. 0 0 * W C. = 'ee'l~-':% 1 i A LL- * > 1 2 A ,imnaas, 7 , <<U-1 0 -3 ~ L.> L---3 & o N Z U Z Cd 1.n = . ...=L . i 0 0-* 4 . 7: - 0 8 -BE M Â·- * = 3 12 2 10 E E N * ' ~4"~ 1 - Ur, - 00-EOA-* J Zul<LU<CD* .AM&{1 ..- 1 tu-et. .-....... - -E LIL fit :m<*RZ/NE . './.4 Â·12 1 ! - i.ft@t= 1 i If 4&411 JUkâ‚¬i. ' 1 1 \*Cal ! ......,9=- 41 Â· /50*t 44*33â‚¬2*~~:~01&9& *----,gr~~*4pi#~r~*~471:,073-5*p=~4350.â‚¬39:t<â‚¬3;J.b):.I'Fip:1 041 55 '.2 4'2430:V.EL ' z: - I.- -C,z. - L- - -': 1 1 e Â·i, /88,2 t- '6.. DV 9' 39--44'Â·.~u ;peÂ· 0, ...28 4. 093 .'. ,5,4~ =z_3,4Â·~0 1. '14 ' 14,1 :54 Â· ..IÂ·-0 --.- -a__ ':- 38.._ 4 insel,Elrzifi kl ** . - - m-,2 1-i:â‚¬ -'r'.r.â‚¬ -,X.-1,rm,\-,Ff-,1,,J: :--r- -U -rb t.-- .~ 1....24% 11:32..tÂ¥.14+2.-*121..4.; 41--.<41:*,fl~E'.11--~31.J..(11 1,~:~ ...:i-~4. O<=90Â»09Â»Â«71Â».Â«~2 - -= -- ~0 kL:Â·,1 '7 Ar.; T 4,Â·.1~4 ~7' i;k.Â£,~ Â·r.. .,9 ... -- *fi~VE-~~p*-Arwiad:;-*Â»*i-O.U-62>-Eltj &4.?fj-â‚¬1:-tr@ls<Â©1&44346,~:.-:faz.Â¢.-1-7 :i --~: .f 0 . .. I. 4 1.- f 3 - . k -Â· INC 14 33%4*.31 'IÂ· 7%411-1 4%3. -Li t.%4L,- i :, *9-dt.A ..0- *MEA i - D#/233*Â·Â· . i U C POMMMFOMâ€¢OM ;*d:.2 J l L,u Eg==B 040,040% 0. 0. B 0. 04 -41*BleTES c tp4-4-1--14-4* ~4 rr.Â· Â·-z. 1 . . 2 2 z I -1-1-J-1-1 < 03371=13 - '123â€ž 435*. 1 , 91-111/9 Z 1 4/M . 4 02 - 1 2 0 >@94 . 1 ' :2: 5 -1 14& 4 .5 - : E Wi :/-5 H o Itl Ill >- Â§5 LI.1 * h *00 LLJ Ch U 1 - -9265-1. C k Zo -1 * 0-74&732.--Â· 1 * N .,4/5:, l X y- - 2 LU Z E rn 4-,ttwELI,1 z iktll fet E J :M 0 W /2.IÂ·Â·Â·: 1 4 ; %0111U1 N Â° LU itz a / f 0 52 0 U. 0 4 < cD i Â« L 4 Z H 7-1â€¢ ]X m> il im w 58 -J - tux Z Z 4 Ill x 0 Z Cl M E w 0 k- 4 . & <m= A M Z 9 M E , *Surr 8 g : 22 -4 4 O 2 W Z - < u LU w .ZLU MOLLI - , 00 lYN * . -m =ta A E U = Di r 0 0 - H L LU Z Z M 1 ~-0Â£< ..0 44) C = 2 9 0 - Z 1 1 lat C.%2 tf .4 Z Z M -0511.1< O * W W OIL*> 1 lieâ‚¬:S L MI Z -J=Of - -1 -- U.IONO < < U.1 CD O 12*2*2% A- 0 1 * In u - -CD f'.f,fi,41. C 8# Li.I <-leula,ZLLIK 3,9 la~Â® 3.9 -021120#-* ZZ<LLILIJA-Z 4---Em-. 1 -- (DEZM<U.1<0* :.t.3:i&-4-1p> 1 9..7 r .2= 1 1 â€žEN. V - -= 2 3 < 2 0Â¢ u LU Z 1,1<Ze,CQUJZUJ ; 114&6(61 1 1 .cy:*. i Â· -,419. 1 A qh/- 22& 1 V 4#.*es. C -,gac- 412 M - >:Â«Â«-Â«r- 2 -107;WPI- 1*ff.' S ZtÂ·<*-Â·UÂ·,LP S 1 VE,ve- Tri ~REÂ·* b lf: ... .LAE?1 7-7 #19 - =-- J : . r 21(JERT ** :18 IN AN N 01.LVJI:m N :Ill I ence of CO AREAS OF DFMONST i 3*,rAMrÂ¢53>lmvliFTY-j!w~~- .Â»~0*Jr'.Ii!*~t~~3~-IÂ·.1;*jiJ~34,i,~2*m#v,#~: .01#tr :,,,.,.i.*~= - < ~** â€žmmT~,4rp,mx, * N 4,-1 . ..: - ,&'r . f./ 5:~..,J MA-~ 0 M:tr' . 7~0f~9&1**,94f ~*M-1*f Â§492?~*?2~%;*~~*W~*Â·Â·Â·4:im*:Â·14,4jf43 .1-2.:,4%5kc*e*4333*43~ -ft<.i f 1 a?ZE=mr- Vier Â·./â‚¬23:2~- \ , 8 9*82.-Fn \ Â·Â·t t r - . Ft- :ify.. 1 mwr.- 1 - ' , : ~84 << u c -. 14 M PO M 14 '/- . ' M :21 VIES 41-- 3 M 04 R -9- C 2 w <c. -0 z E E .4 - : UU -1 -1 -1_-1 4 3 â‚¬m U. ED==)* ..1 N 0 - 4 >K Z- - 3 , 0 E-1 ..1// * . .: 'Iâ€¢ â€¢- fal. 07+ F _ A: 1- -4 9 - *-r ... ./ I 4~44 M .. . 4- I .1 I:<.. M ' Ill , ..'.1 ,' E E , .: E : i, uJ E.r: 0 4 I LLI'. .3 - . - -. ...:' . "..2 cr Jd . .. . .Â· -:I ..1==ty- I- - - -:..+- ... - - 1*i |~| f |11 91 Lj p M . . - .....7 .*. 0 ' -I. Z " ' Â»t - h -- tr Â· 1 Mr 2 1 ; O *16 .90% /*:- 0 = ' 0 - 0 W -. 6 ' *. 7- . ip./. 1 .. . 5 -6/5 1 3 M (11 ill C -Z U u - ' -1 2.4 , I ..0 0-, .... 0 ...... V 1..03:t .'... .- O.Itt Ck: 1. . 11,1 - -- 3 1 , r US.f. t. il li 90 -o w s H-~Il-:4:.3 Â£1 0 lulu - I . . 1.-4, - 97...7 0 1 k ....1 0 ..6 43 1-0]U -- I 7- -:r *./.- -i&p 9, . - ~ i. ..t' 40 -7 / '# 4 f -4 >Ki .. 91 . ./. - -Â·,1, 1-: X sm->21-11<., . 4 4.9 - - . k . ... clirt .g.& 3 ... n q I. . . 4 2 Z. ..4. - . -eÂ· I -- - .'. M / :11. Â· ~ ~ 14 , 4 - 1, 4- 4 ,:,-C OZ .-1- O-. .Â·.. LU 6 1 I - ,- M:-I r . I. -.: ... Â·- 3, i''.,.Â·'Â·.lt./ < LU ..- '. ;uÂ· g $ Â·Â·Â· - u.l 01 7- N d 4- 6ff VT M- *. . M w * . Â· 5 i - t=r~' - : O Wâ€¢ /1/... C U,1 -.-/. A * . .. 4 '-... 51 3 4 61.- 6- Z 0 M ~91. - a Z Â» 1.,- 4- M , 43Â» = A ~ Â· 1 $- -txu 1.-I- ts m 5 Z -1 - * â€¢-1 Â· In F .i i h , k .2 *- 0 6 tu M - 0 *. 14 0< O 00 U - <f Z H 0-* AR 1 828 ..1 LU U.1 LU # - (nze - Eleil.w!.1-al .. 3 g 5 2_ , 4 -~4/1 1 (0-<CCOUJ* :Ah , <CE.D-J O A M V LU f3340 1.- I V . V.!-51*lik Gli&*m i I f ..1311 >99 4.a - dimrivi. .. ' .. 1 *412'k y 0 ki 4&142*Ph. 4.42, 1 .1 ..4.1 , "13'*i- *Cre, 1 92, 1/*r Â·4 - 6,*.. t 12..1... 93 , .420.- 1 1 C:.138:EYM*mt. ' .Â«2*# .1-- =&'r. - rd $Â·*rÂ« " Â·-1... + .ir % .ail.-I - I--..t= r.. -.... 5,1~ 15%-249134;EL= f*:r'l~otioul:Â«aÂ·Â·. '1Â«~Â·.-2,* .i_Â¥*Â«+8*~~if,Â«Â·: Â·, 3 1 AREAS OF EXPIR A 'N0IS3kl 19 0 Ava f SIH1 N3A 1. }13*WAN NO IV,)11 %3(11