The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1986-10-164 1 1 :r 7 4 -, â€¢11 1 40 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTE~/6, AGENDA \OCTOBER 16, 1986 1. 1987 Public Works Budget - Review. 2. Mocassin Circle Drive Right-of-Way - Discussion of attorney's opinion. 3. Elm Road Sewer - Report on UTSD reimbursement policy; discussion. 4. Park Equipment - Review of bids on compact 4WD tractor. 25. Tranc>pe,-et+em--De*el-opmentÂ·--P+aÂ·m--'-1M-5cus ist~Â¤rrof--si,op.e._gf work..â€ž 6. Larimer County - Annual project requests for CSHD. 7. Prospect Mountain - Request for additional radio antenna and road maintenance. 8. EVRPD - Request for Town to assume ownership and maintenance of golf course entrance road. Reports: 1. Fish Hatchery Restoration 2. Assistant Public Works Director 3. West Riverside Park Reconstruction 4. Employee Resignation -3 3 - 4 k . p. -,thriikt#:25'7Â¢1,7....1. ry?MFJR~0~1,PT749%2~77%7J. ..A' S .f 'el 7Â£2 2,02-224 4/-26/22 -73 , tÂ» VaN TPWif#U n rpy rre,-iÂ·<,c Â·ijiff-f LNEX-1 \1:7 Â·t .i . 1 - ty.t" *' ~ / ./.#16. r,SCK .:i.-4, 1 Dealing fora road #-tw' 4 ..... 01 . ..1 k . - Outsiders may view Estes Park as rushing push 20 minutes to get from oneside of town to the -4./..2 - 4, e ..P 1 - - c headlong into progress with a steamroller attitude, other.. g ,-, p .,2, IiÂ·Â·Â·-1.Â£.9**f.,.i@i~ toward private property rights, as evidenced by Repeated attempis by z the . town to~' hegotiate - - urban renewal and the current debate0 over the :rights-of-Way for the road have beenstymied by the rewrite of the residential zoning code. , 4 six residents who cherish the isolationism *e road But insiders know a fardifferent story of minor'Pprovides. :i~tr~ : ' .:L?.,-93:'.4 'fl:,1 Â·24 im ,. skirmishes, of give and take, and of the need for k. The most recent overture by the town was greeted constant persuasion to accomplish what is,loosely With several strong -rebuffs, and a few ridiculous defined as the "common good." . - 1 compromises asking that the entire properties be - purchased to secure the 50-foot rights-of-way. With the precedents that have already been set The road is a surveyor's nightmare: town - r while accomplishing Â· the Elkhorn streetscape ownership is rrlixecl with I~rivate ownership which is project and the ongoing work on the Dark Horse . . Â· .4 mixed with county ownership. r ' - 1 Plaza riverscape project, we're hopeful that town , The spirit of compromise can't be' one-sided. -- 2 12 officials will bring to bear whatever pressure is vt If Condemnation ' is nescessaIy, the "common necessary to reopen the hospital saddle. r good" seems easily justifiable. Such an action may Before private property owners closed the road, not win many friends with the current property - c Moccasin Drive served as a convenient east-west owners, but judging from the owners' previous link which enabled the locals to avoid summer stance they're not in a courting mood anyway. - C traffic congestion by bypassing Elkhorn Avenue. The town has the leverage. If Estes Park is ever to I - The connection between Riverside Drive and develop a workable, alternative east-west route, it' s - Highway 7 took no less than five minutes, instead of time to play all the cards and let the strongest hand 1 - the summertime stop-and-go on Elkhorn which can claim the pot. . c-" 91 4 1 i 1 1 e.~p< t:'lit{3 .,707*t. 1/ .I /,0 1 -I- i .. 2 ,=4'.-13 . Q 1 :!1 3 JRT% .z.J 0 1 i /2 VE-RE' 1 1 14 rO~4 N , . / 12 4 1 ' 1:2/ + I I . 1 /1 i; I ,5 1 J td 1 re/<< 41:1%4.Ila ~ /k / h C / i# ::' 1 71 \ 1 3 * . *-2 \44 f Â·454 1.-i lue: 3.9 4 - Vel 1 2- / A- 99, dirÂ£ ,;,>'~ 4 46 Â£ i' ,2 :1 / . , 1- /1 1/ I t r - -4- f *, 2 2/ / I-h â€¢objÂ· r 1 , 1 , 4l - l t ~ , --9 1 - 1 Â·- Ill /5 f 4 -L : ..2 Â» /4,Â· r//j 8-11 \ EIS'95,5uO 2 -5.- i /, Â«977214%.3442 -2-2.mÂ»/. lk,1 1~ / 3 .///1,1--1/ 1 -ZZZIZE -N. ki'' ' E-- - /*... In , - ----1 4 11 M / -~ 1- --:.- 1 ,~ifit~~~:--2~222/MIS- 1 /' /3/5 - h A , /1 j 11; .KJ -1... 1- , , , . 0 244.,Tuf~ - ~ -4-24-2.420-2A -io-/0 1 / / 7 -.-- * - ...693.4. Â·Â·-Â· 9.~44(*cs -==af ..01 r 4 00 - .- C 0 7/2 f v .3:0/ Â·,12,5~ ..9.9 4 0-,-/1 5229 0 .2.0/ - ==:4 \A-==1 - ::t, 0/#14/ / ,. 2 9 1 ,/ Â¢ -- - -1 -341/ l 1I jil ,Â·b, \4\ Er-E=c I,~4 ff..9---7 3 U . $Â® - 5= ---Â°22,Â« < < j J If //1 1 Z - ,/ 11 F /144 .26=3*53#-o 4/4 /1 1 \11 -r ., \./.- 0 6 4,>0.6 -41 OU f , (1 , n I -3*94 \\ t 4 1 - 1 91 , 1 / --/4 , \1 2 23. U-=75b//4 .i ----~--xxj . q\4\/INÂ¢\ , r \ 1 A----/44~ 14<\4:_ 3/4 V i \ 1: it ,{1'7~'ff, - - ),41%. 11 1; :9 14$ f , *--7 A 3 . , F /(r { $, ri Zi:-a,.tt" 1 i i - 941:244.~9~24~al 1461\ r. .. A ,// :Id, /)1:,/f h a Wrip,69 i "41 f 11\j MIlÂ·:1 ' reST <~C-43:11/7.f -*1#06<x1407Â·. - 1 1 Al \,1 1 4/1 . Nt-it ; 1 Itit#In /fl 1 . CE:.Â·lht 1 1 1,/ 11 4 111 1 1:14.?111 lili/,/ 1. B. 811, k \,1911 E,,995000 ~ Â·' 4~'201, 4Â· Y 'l ..L-l 1 ; ! rÂ· 11 i'11 - 1 11 1 11 111 1 A U 11. 1 4 / / . dklit" 1 .\\/ 11 111 11111 14 1 ''11,1,1 1.1 11 't #10-/fl :/41~~ 1 ,',1,r .,ni , 4, p-,i' H - *- * \\1 Ill 1 lili :11,11.1.11 4. 4 13. %-- %. + Â»L__ I -Zza==9 lilli 1 lilli 11 ~1 i.. /18 l '1.Qux*PK-NT ,/ 1 j i \\\ Ill\ 1'11 11 11 1 # \ M-**fu #44-<f3*4-)404/1,0/{/ \ 11 2 * 344Â» Â» 43*WA 7Â¥\\1.1\\,1.Â·â€žr'Â·r 2,/:. ' -~E22 -02~- Â·--464%*47-3- 2 1 4 Â»A \ 1. 1 N \ Â·..j? \% 1:1 1191 i $ 0- -i*ig_ ~ - -32~ j*Â·4 7:\ \:ttlic 'YA.I,1 \\.1 \ 1\\\\\ LL,1 30',~,5 - S' 1 1~~/, 6807. t./.i-,/- 'f/,ffi 1~ -r(f ,-i~f,\ 4~\11: jtij--~,~,fill 9 9 -1 ,, w,~~ p,Ji~Â·r. #f / .1-,144.-0321/j (5jj ' 4<i{- -~,/~03 ~E\\ ~-~,1,1 11'3%24 ,â€žt,,I 1 --1-2-2--- 1 />ft 'r_fifi.-1 /-1 , A -<\0Â«4 je -i -\\1Â»93\\\3Â«6 ./ , i,j'J // L\ , <432 1 ,/,1- -, 96<...42*494Â» -34 '- ~9 --= ~ 2 p. ..7. E-- -,//f ) , f ' i i /4.,f./1 / /2, / 1 Ct . .. 1--- 47 , I. 1 1Â·, ,1 '; Â·Alt illi ,; f 1 1, N - 1--\ 0 0-34 <>4= 6- . -, HAMMOND, CLARK AND WHITE LAW OFFICES FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING, SUITE 418 LYNN A. HAMMOND 200 EAST SEVENTH STREET ALFRED P. DAVIS ROGER E. CLARK LOVELAND, COLORADO 80537 ' OF COUNSEL GREGORY A. WHITE 303-667-1023 JENNIFER J. STOCKER p'l *ru'l c.,1 fl.47 ' i C.4 1-9 - .2. 6 :. i, .1 =1 1 41 4 1111 October 9, 1986 ji OCT 131986 1 H uUI TOWN OF ES, ES PARK p'JEUC WORKS DEPT. BY.---- ~4Â£41 Mr. Rich Widmer Town of Estes Park Post Office Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Moccassin Bypass Dear Rich: This letter is written pursuant to your request that I summarize in writing our discussion concerning the Moccassin Bypass. 1. In order to comply with the requirements of 31-12-101 et seq., C.R.S., 1973, at least 50% of an area to be annexed needs to sign the annexation petition. The 50% requirement is determined by actual land area, not ownership. In looking at the plat, it appears that through the use of town property, property owned by individuals who would sign an annexation petition, and property owned by individuals who or whose predecessors have signed recorded water tap applications, there is enough property to meet the 50% requirement. It should be noted that there is also a one-sixth contiguity requirement but that appears to be met by any possible configuration of lots to be annexed. 2. In reviewing the appropriate water tap applications, it became apparent there are two different applications. The two applications signed by Mapp and recorded on February 14, 1975 and that signed by McFarlands recorded January 20, 1975 contain language requiring the petitioners to sign annexation petitions if the town so desires. However, said applications do not contain any language allowing the town to sign for the landowners. The application executed by the Tjossems recorded July 14, 1976 contains a provision that allows the town clerk to execute the petition on his behalf if he refuses to do so. It is my opinion that if the individuals on the two earlier petitions do not voluntarily sign the annexation petition, it will be necessary for the town to go to Court to force the h4- Mr. Rich Widmer Town of Estes Park October 7, 1986 Page 2 landowners to sign the annexation petition. Section 31-12-121, C.R.S., 1973, provides that any agreement to annex, such as the two earlier applications, shall be enforceable by an action for specific performance in the District Court. It is my opinion that the later agreement signed by the Tjossems can be enforced, after proper notice, by the Town Clerk signing the annexation petition. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Ve~y truly yours, ~ f Q -uu- Grdgory A. White 1 . UPPER THOMPSON SANITATION DISTRICT ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 - September 11,' 1986 P. 0. Box 568 1 F f>Zlll.12-1 IYEFil Orone 586-4544 Illl SEP 13 1986 1ld U IOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Mr. Rex Smith Director of Public Works LARIMER COUNTY Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 RE: Sewer Collection Line - Elm Road Area Dear Rex: As a follow-up to my letter of September 2, 1986, I wish to submit the following additional informati*n. The total length of the sewer line discussed, from the District's present line to the entrance of the State of Colorado Shops on Elm Road, is approximately 2,688 feet. Our best estimate of the cost of the line construction is $67,000.00. If an agreement should be reached by the four govern- mental agencies involved, whereas each agency shares an equal cost for the line, the cost per agency would be approximately $16,750.00. If you have any questions, or if I may be of further assistance, please feel free to call me at the District Office. Respectfully, UPPER THOMPSON SANITATION DISTRICT Bob Cheney, District Manager BC:jr cc: A. Mr. Richard Widmer, Town of Estes Park 2. Mr. Max Fanning, Colorado State Highway Department WORK TO END POLLUTION 83 0 Z E-4 w >1 Dll i-tzmmE-â€¢ E < 05 M Ell Z Ze<aszk K,<000 03308- 04 0= D>-1 0 U[110 A H < 6-1 4 Z Z , W Â£41 K WOMM 05 00< (4 0 &4 1 3 g M Z= Al Wu to )-1 < DS m A . 4 - . O w Z Â£94 O 10 -1 ~C gm. .Z OC = 14 U (0 0 > 0 0. M E- 0 1-1 0 4) 22 ' 05 Ill C=3 m 6 u 6 O 4 U Â· 1 1Â¥,Â· ~ -*.-----I- . W. .kg.,4.-â€ž1Â¥Â»â€ž.1-.- .- & Cab $9,210.00 $2,110.00 $7,100.00 None Yes 16!s $8,620.00 None Cab Included Yes Yes TRADE-IN EXCEPTIONS ALLOWANCE TO BID SPECS. (Estimate $2000.00 or Less) Prepared by: Gary Shanafelt Greenline Equip Collins Date: Longmont Sekich Equip. LARIMER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS P.O. Box 1190, Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 Courtlyn W. Hotchkjss District I 221-7001 221/7733 fail.. C. Howard Zollner . District Il 221-7002 Engineering Department Dc]ryle W. Klassen District Ill 221-7003 General Services Engineering Elaine W. Spencer September 15, 1986 Design and Construction Engineering Ross W. Shaw Mr. Rich Widmer Department of Public Works Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Rich: The State Highway Commission has scheduled hearings on November 19, 1986 to receive annual project requests from counties. All counties are asked to solicit input from cities and towns for inclusion in the request. Attached, for your review, is a list of last years requested projects, the 1995 and 2010 Recommendations from the recently completed North Front Range Corridor Study and a copy of the 1986-1990 Department of Highways Five Year Plan for District 4. Please review this information carefully and advise this office regarding projects on the State Highway system that you would like to see included in future 5 year plans. Any additional description of work or justification for proposed work will help me to complete the necessary forms for each project. In addition to the submittal to the State, I am preparing for update of Larimer County's Short Range Highway Improvement Program and would like input from you. I have enclosed a copy of the current plan (1986 to 1989) for your information. Your input and requests will be considered in prioritization of projects for coming years. In order to allow time for preparation of requests to the State, I need your input no later than October 30th. Thanks for your time and I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, ketal t Elaine W. Spencer Director of General Services Engineering EWS/lk Enclosures *7153"1 n.-kj TOWN OF ESTES PARK 47 - -14'UY 1 44Â£'* .Ni b a. 942 3, , ..AE:,181 44Â·14' 0 1 /2%1*Â« .Â»09 6.1217, r r . th 1 .4 3 --G#fAL 37Â· lf.IiÂ»av -u--Â·, 47 -11 }*6*ge.-7 fLAÂ·i:le:<~~~;-~ -9 1 - 2.Q..112322,~ MAY ,9. Lt#T:74 trâ€¢Â·Â·DPL -1-1 f':2 3'2~~*~1.lta~~ 7 t F#41Â¢,0~?.4Nkfif~t~ .- 1.2 - 2%.3..:.\ ..1 : * . 1.# 7 -,- Â·5:Z~.(/)'/*lipdogge.4/'/-/42- 3,*Er-/2**AMB/-8...V,/-1- 5-*447 - t.*9SmÂ».,Â®*â€žSlk 2 . -,a/;,"- 4----t %1'* -:- H. BERNERD DANNELS MAYOR / 4.. -Â· .,it>i 1'2'.,4' -Â· n Estes Park, Colorado 80517 October 25, 1985 LARIMER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Gentlemen: In reply to your letter regarding Estes Park's State Highway requests, we submit the following as our priorities for sub- mission to the State Highway Commission: 1. Reconstruct State Highway 7 from U. S. Highway 36 to the Town Limits. 2. Widen U. S. Highway 34 East of Estes Park from the existing three-lane section to the Inter- section of U. S. Highways 34 and 36. 3. Re-design U. S. Highway 36 and the State Highway 7 Intersection. Thank you for considering our request for State Highway Depart- ment Improvements. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK H. Bernerd Dannels Mayor HBD/vo CC: Mr. Al Chotvacs, Colorado State Highway Department P. O. Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586-5331 PROPOSED 1986 PROJECT REQUEST TO STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION LARIMER COUNTY November 7, 1985 1. Fort Collins Expressway 2. US 34 from Monroe Avenue to Lincoln Avenue 3. US 34 from Morning Drive to Glade Road 4. US 287 from Loveland to Boulder County Line 5. County Road 32 from I-25 to US 287 6. Miscellaneous bridge replacements on SH 14 in Poudre Canyon 7. Prospect Street Interchange with I-25 8. Redesign Intersection at SH 1 and US 287 (p ~9. SH 7 from US 36 to Este Park Town Limits -0- f 10. US 34 from east of Estes Park to the Intersection of US 34 and US 36 Ro,u~~ Intersection of US 36 and SH 7 12. I-25 from CR 26 north 13. Resurfacing of US 34 from Monroe Avenue west to Estrella Avenue 14. US 36 from Lyons to Estes Park 15. SH 7 from Meeker Park to Estes Park 16. US 34 from Colorado Avenue to West Shore Drive 17. Overlay US 287 from 29th Street to 57th Street 18. Overlay US 34 from Fremont Drive to Morning Drive 19. AifnLIRION OD UA 287 at Trilby Road (CR 34) 20. Medians on US 287 from Horsetooth to 1/2 mile south of Harmony Road 21. Signalization of SH 14 at Link Lane .DATE 19 MAR 86 08:00:21 RID 5 19 DEC 85 PU8WRK SHORT RANGE HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1987 *MAP PROJECT LENGTH TYPE OF COUNTY MTRLS TOTAL PRSNT 20 YR OVALL *NO. DESCRIPTION (MI.) IMPROVEMENT CNTRCT (FA) COST ADT ADT RTG REMARKS ------ ---0-------0- - 0------ --- ---- ------- 0---- ---0- ----- 1 CULVERT NO 15-0.24-58 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 5000 8000 900 1700 NA NORTH F'OUDRE CANAL .. 2 BRIDGE NO 15-1.0-60 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 40000 114000 900 1700 NA PROJECT NO. 85. SUFF RATING = POUDRE VALLEY CANAL 24.5. 3 CO RD 17 (N SHIELDS) FROM CO RD 0.452 RECONSTRUCTION 174000 174000 3400 6500 62 PROJECT NO. 83 DOES NOT 48 (VINE DR) TO BRIDGE NO , INCLUDE WIDENING BRIDGE 17-0.5-48 OVER POUDRE RIVER 4 CO RD 18 FROM CO RD 23E TO 1.509 RECONSTRUCTION 150000 500000 800 1600 44 PROJECT NO. 81 RATING SHOWN IS CO RD 21 FOR UNPAVED SECTION. PAVED SECTION IS 68. FORCE ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION WITH PAVEMENT BY CONTRACT. 5 CULVERT NO 23-0.07-14 OVER NA REHABILITATION 30000 30000 50 100 NA PROJECT NO. 80 HOME SUPPLY DITCH 6 CO RD 23E/6 FROM CO RD 4 TO 1.45 RECONSTRUCTION 440000 440000 600 1200 44 PROJECT NO. 78 POTENTIAL SID CO RD 23 WITH COUNTY PARTICIPATION 7 CULVERT NO 30-0.3-5287 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 100 190 NA PROJECT NO 76 REQUIRED BY LOUDEN DITCH FINAL FLAT OF BRUNS PUD. DEVELOPER PAYS $35000 WHICH IS ESTIMATED TOTAL COST. 8 CULVERT NO 36-0.4-9 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 30000 85000 100 200 NA PROJECT NO. 66 INCLUDE UNNAMED STREAM APPROACH ROADWAY WORK. 9 CULVERT NO 36-0.11-7 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 100000 100000 130 250 NA PROJECT NO. 71 FOSSIL CREEK INLET 10 CULVERT NO 40-0.98-5 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 30000 85000 120 230 NA PROJECT NO. 72 LAKE CANAL 11 BRIDGE NO 52E-0.8-27E OVER NA REHABILITATION 20000 20000 600 1200 NA PROJECT NO. 30 CANDIDATE FOR CHARLES HANSEN CANAL STATE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FUNDS NO CONSTRUCTION IF NOT FUNDED 80000 ANTICIPATED FUNDING R12 CO RD 698 FROM YMCA ENTRANCE TO 0.606 RECONSTRUCTION 131000 131000 2300 4400 57 PROJECT NO. 79 37500 IN ROAD STATE HIGHWAY 66 DEVELOPMENT FUND BY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT. 13 8RIDGE NO 70-0.6-17 OVER NORTH NA REHABILITATION 30000 30000 300 600 NA SUFF RATING = 30.1 POUDRE CANAL 14 CO RD 74E (RED FEATHER LAKES) 1.030 RECONSTRUCTION 300000 300000 650 1250 80 PROJECT NO. 82 FROM MILEPOINT 6.840 TO MILE- POINT 7.870 (BOY SCOUT RD) .. . I Â· 15 CULVERT NO 92-1.08-5 OVER NA REPLACEMENI 20000 56000 20 40 NA PROJECT NO. 84 COND]lION UNNAMED STREAM RATING = 3 16 BRIDGE NO 904-0.2-6Â£ OVER NA REPLACEMENT 60000 60000 375 700 NA PROJECT NO 56 SUFF RATING = LITTLE THOMPSON RIVER 38.5. APPROVED FOR 240000 FED BRR FUNDS IN 1985 17 MISCELLANEOUS SMALL CULVERT NA REPLACEMENT 25000 25000 NA NA NA MISCELLANEOUS CULVERT REPLAC - REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ' ' * MENT PROJECTS AS YET 10 BE DETERMINED NA SEAL COAT PROGRAM 50.00 NA 100000 100000 NA NA NA **** MAINTENANCE **** NA PAVEMENT MARKING PROGRAM 100.00 NA 100000 100000 NA NA NA **** MAINTENANCE **** .TOTAL COUNTY CONTRACT AMOUNT 1,575,000 .TOTAL FORCE ACCOUNT (MAJOR MATERIALS) 210,000 .TOTAL COST TO COUNTY (INCLUDES LABOR, EQUIPMENT, FORCE ACCOUNT MAJOR MATERIALS AND CONTRACT AMOUNT) 2,358,000 .COSTS BY OTHERS: STATE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FUNDS 80,000 FEDERAL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FUNDS 240,000 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES 72,500 . .TOTAL COSTS BY OTHERS 392,500 . .TOTAL COSTS 1987 HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2,750,500 END REPORT ..... .DATE 19 AUG 86 15:37:43 RID 6 18 FE8 86 ROSS SHORT RANGE HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 *MAP PROJECT LENGTH TYPE OF COUNTY MTRLS TOTAL PRSNT 20 YR OVALL *NO. DESCRIPTION (MI.) IMPROVEMENT CNTRCT (FA) COST ADT ADT RTG REMARKS 1 BRIDGE NO 9E-0.4-S402 OVER NA REPI.ACEMENT 118000 590000 700 1330 NA SUFF RATING = 17.5. CANDIDATE Â¥ BIG THOMPSON RIVER FOR FEDERAL BRIDGE REPLACEMEN1 * FUNDS ESTIMATED AT 472000. NO * CONSTRUCTION IF NOT FUNDED. 2 BRIDGE NO 21Â£-1.0-S287 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 200000 . 200000 800 1520 NA SUFF RATING = 73.3. * LARIMER COUNTY CANAL 3 CO RD 23 FROM CO RD 6 TO STATE 1.020 RECONSTRUCTION 400000 400000 350 570 43 INCLUDES STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT * HIGHWAY 56 4 CULVERT NO 50E-1.30-23 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 30000 85000 850 1620 NA * PLEASANT VALLEY & LAKE CANAL 5 CO RD 52E FROM MP 6.650(STRAT- 1.620 RECONSTRUCTION 130000 400000 230 440 48 CONSTRUCTION BY FORCE ACCOUNT * TON PARK) TO MP 8.270 (SRF CHG) PAVING BY CONTRACT. 6 CULVERT NO 60-0.12-125 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 20000 58000 85 160 NA * BOXELDER CREEK 4:7 CO RD 63 FROM LITTLE VALLEY 1.440 RESURFACING 120000 120000 750 1430 75 INCLUDES PROVISION FOR HORSE/ * RD TO COUNTRY CLUB RD PEDESTRIAN TRAIL 8 CULVERT NO 66-0.3-9 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 100000 100000 65 120 NA * BOXELDER CREEK 9 BRIDGE NO 70-0.8-15 OVER NORTH NA. REPLACEMENT 40000 40000 400 760 NA SUFF RATING = 20.3. CANDIDATE * POUDRE CANAL FOR STATE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT * FUNDS ESTIMATED AT 160000. NO * CONSTRUCTION IF NOT FUNDED. 10 CO RD 74E FROM MP 7.870 (BOY 1.000 -RECONSTRUCTION 300000 300000 750 1430 82 * SCOUT RD) TO MP 8.870 11 CULVERT No 76-1.59-15 OVER NA REPLACEMENT 20000 58000 65 120 NA * BOXELDER CREEK 12 CULVERT NO 904-0.60.12 OVER NA REHABILITATION 20000 58000 10[I 190 NA * HANDY DITCH 13 CULVERT NO 904-0.70-12 OVER NA REHABILITATION 20000 58000 100 190 NA * HOME SUPPLY DITCH 14 CO RD 179 FROM RED FEATHER 1.020 RESURFACING 80000 80000 120 230 85 3" OVERLAY AS REQUIRED BY * LAKES TO FOX ACRES AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEVELOPER & BCC 15 MISCELLANEOUS SMALL CULVERT NA REPLACEMENT 30000 85000 NA NA NA MISCELLANEOUS CULVERT REPLAC- * REPLACEMENT PROJECTS MENT PROJECTS AS YET TO 8F * DETERMINED NA SEAL COAT PROGRAM 50.00 NA 100000 100000 NA NA NA **** MAINTENANCE **** NA PAVEMENT MARKING PROGRAM 100.00 NA 100000 100000 NA NA NA **** MAINTENANCE **16* .TOTAL COUNTY CONTRACT AMOUNT . 1,660,000 .TOTAL FORCE ACCOUNT . 140,000 .TOTAL COST TO COUNTY ( INCLUDES LABOR, EQUIPMENT, FORCE ACCOUNT MAJOR MATERIALS AND CONTRACT AMOUNT) 2,332,000 .COSTS BY OTHERS: STATE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FUNDS 160,000 FEDERAL 8RIDGE REPLACEMENT FUNDS 360,000 .TOTAL COST BY OTHERS 520,000 .TOTAL COST 1988 HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2,852,000 ****** NEED TO CONSIDER MOVING BR NO 56-0.0-21C UP 1 YEAR ON PLAN. ****** ****** THIS STRUCTURE IS GETTING IN POOR CONDITION DUE TO INCREASED ****** ****** TRUCK TRAFFIC. (860611, RWS) ****36* ..... END REPORT ..... 1<ULL-C..- .4 ROBERT HERON SEP 2 9 686 Consulting Engineer /,râ€¢~,AÂ·. 3Â¥ Ellis P:974 5 South Monroe Street f. 'U,6,1 1Â¢AIR ;'.O@itiC>iMM&ler, Colorado 80210 Phone (303) 756-6921 October 27, 1986 Mayor B. Dannels Town of Estes Park P. 0. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Sir: Chief Robert Ault, of the Police Department, has requested permission to use my road and install a radio station on Prospect Mountain. He advised me that the station is for the National Law Enforcement (NLEC) frequency. I would be pleasedÂ·to cooperate with the Town in this matter, however problems have developed in connection with the Town's present use of the road, which I believe will require a new agreement concerning the maintenance work. On July 20, 1981 I permitted the Town to continue use of the Town's radio base site on Prospect Mountain in exchange for grading the road, cleaning or "pulling" drainage ditches and removing sand, rock and debris from culvert heads; however, for the past five years, following the Town's annual maintenance work, I have inspected the work and found that no work was done on cleaning the drainage ditches and removing debris from the culvert heads. Also, about two years ago the Town built a large concrete water tank on the uphill side of the road. On at least two occasions, the Town drained this tank and wasted thousands of gallons of water which ran down the road and caused a large amount of erosion to the road surface, drainage ditch and also filled two of the culverts with sand and gravel. I discussed these problems with Mr. Richard Widmer on August 8, 1986; however, I have not yet been advised as to what work, if any, will be carried out by the Town. I realize that the Town of Estes Park has a number of different Departments; however, in view of past inaction, I would prefer to carry out negotiations with a single representative of the Town rather than two or more Departments. It is my obinion that the Town is in a position to carry out reasonable mainten- ance work in exchange for use of the road and radio base stations. I would beÂ· pleased to enter an agreement with the Town covering this subject. Sincerely, / Robert Heron 4- RH/gmc ROBERT HERON Consulting Engineer 2135 South Monroe Street Denver, Colorado 80210 Phone (303) 756-6921 Oydber 27, 1986 Chief Robert Ault Estes Park Police Department P. 0. Box 1287 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 I hereby grant permission for you to install a base station for the National Law Enforcement (NLEC) frequency at Prospect Mountain. This would be subject to the additional approval of the National Park Service. I understand the only people that would be using the road would be the Motorola people for maintenance purposes. This permission is granted subject to a new agreement being negotiated concerning maintenance on the road up the mountain. I understand that this maintenance agreement will be finalized within sixty days from now. Sincerely, t Robert Heron c ...\ RH/gmc 1 1 m ROBERT HERON Consulting Engineer 2135 South Monroe Street Denver, Colorado 80210 Phone (303) 756-6921 6 August 12, 19~Â¥ Mr. Richard D. Widmer, P.E. Director, Public Works Department Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Widmer: Reference is made to our discussion in your office last Friday (August 8, 1986) regarding maintenance work on the road up Prospect Mountain. This will confirm our agreement that no maintenance work should be carried out by the Town until after Gavell Excavating has completed their contract of installing the sewer line down the mountain. Although a firm contract covering this maintenance work was never executed, it has been my understanding that the work covered in the March 14, 1979, letter from Mr. Robert Dekker to Joseph P. Jenkins was agreeable to both parties. A copy of this letter is enclosed. In the past the Town's maintenance crew has confined their work to the road between my gate and the radio base station. Since the new Town reservoir has been installed, there has been occasional drainage of the reservoir which has resulted in some erosion along that road. Also two of the culverts have filled up with sand and gravel. I would appreciate your consideration of extending the maintenance work to include this section of the road. Please advise me if you would be agreeable to carrying out this additional work. Best regards, 96*ln#ir Bob Heron BH/psh Enclosure Va b Â· . -- . i March 14, 1979 Mr. Joseph P. Jenkins Attorney Post Office Box 1990 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Joe: - Enclosed please find a list of items authorized to be - put into an agreement between the Town and Mr. Heron in return for the continued use of the Town's radio base site on Big Prospect Mountain. If this meets with approval, please advise. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK Light and Power Department Robert L. Dekker Director 4 RLD/vo Enclosure 3( )L . .. I . * f /42Â«f TOWN OF ESTES PARK '9 -4465; 90/ ' 44'i Â» 4 02 4. -~17>N:*19 Â·7 .,92Tki~,1 <,I *4.-'4 /%*29- <- : A*ST <.~41~0&)kE 23 X 1~16Â«3Â«u/3-/ - / Â«4,1 24.Â£4 : i'RÂ¥ 6*7-4 #F 31,647541 f Zi>*11~~~bi *- k~Â· '#" 0,-4, / Â· -1Â§. ~tr -Â· -42~ 5/4444 - t-, .-, *rÂ«.2.1,1/& 2:-4:fircriA:~+- - 6221*,7. -Â· Â·. :. ' 4 Â· 1%4Â»<4| A J.*~--'' /, 0 YL)#9%Â·:RA' W'... - Estes Park, Colorado 80517 PROPOSAL FOR MAINTENANCE OF PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ROAD In early May of each year, weather permitting, the Town of Estes Park will furnish a grader and truck with crew for one (1) day to perform the following road maintenance functions: 1. Grade road. 2. Clean or "pull" drainage ditches. 3. Remove sand, rock and debris from culvert heads. P. O. Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586-5331 4. 2 I " I ... - i iF," ~"Â· fA â€¢'~ ( ~~ " + Â·1Â· =-4 . I 'r -- 9 . -- Â· 1 , " .. , t' . / r..7,/A . Al ....4.... ..'* a ..1 + . . 2 44 r -F :1 11 t,i t # ' -'I. I 'Lt . . 1 - $ 4. F 1 '. , - , . - . . 4 .' '-f.. .il , .I . 6, , '. 1. . . a 1 -- - . * & -.n,. 14 . BOARD OF DIRECTORS I t 1 2 ' St-von L P/trlok : .4 1 i Torn Hyland * - - Connie R. Phipp. . â€¢ Billy 8. Carlin - 01 .f, Ed Grueff 2 ESTES VALLEY~ . I /â€¢4'dli- . .' i RECREATION and PARK DISTRICT i 9-i, ' EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Post Office Box 1379 0 Estes Park, Colorado 80817 - : Richard P. Castleberry 690 Big Thompson Avenue â€¢ [303] 586-8191 ..: I . t. ifir - ..... .8 , October 1, 1986 ' ' ' ' ~Â·Â·i : r - - - -, . .4/- 4 . - -. h .- 12 7 1 4<0 -, 4 ,/ '' . - -4 - I - . -. ... i 4 4â€¢0 4 - - 4-1 . 4 17 13 Mayor Bernerd Dannels . P.O. Box 1611 .... I ....,< r- . - Estes Park." CO 80517 - .-- ...,- ..1. I .. 1, 1. ....1 1 - --. -:r -2.- - - , -~ 3 4, Honorable Mayol- Dannels: - -41 r I - .The homeowners of the Fairway Club Development that runs along Highway 7, just to the west of the 18 hole golf course, have recently deeded the entry . driveway over to the Recreation District. This was done so as to guarantee future access to the course by the public. No money exchanged hands. . .t , .... - It is our request that the City take over the ownership and maintenance : : of this property. Mr. Widmer has been contacted on this matter and has =" advised the District to make our request to you. -Â·: i -Â· ' #.: -' C, # .- If the City is in favor of this request we will instruct our attorney to arrange for the transfer of this property. .. Sincerely. , f .- i â€¢ - I. p . I ..A .7 Kicnara P. Castleberry Executive Director 1 1 1 *C</ 1 1 1/ 1/ 11 ,. - 3 f 11 -I ' 024 ,L --12 / ~ ~ -1 - ~ 0. ill 1 11 1 i / Ill ~ 1030 ~ 1 Fi 11 r- -3 1 RL O 11 10 2 1// 2 Ill ~ 6 - -Fol )-- ---i- --1~ : -c-- /f 4 1 i036 A PR6 111 - L i Ew*44' 90"*6 7 / . J " 1 1 @ i i N- -- . 2 F) 4Â»*) +44 44 5 j ) 11 itt *-6 j// I â‚¬ 1 1 / (((ff i Ar- .j $120 lili 11 1. im 11 f ~99/I / 11 1121 ~ 1 11 1 .\i l f 11 11 ~.5 " 7687.0 ~ '' C., C 1131 ~- ~ ~ <~~ X lilli I \ 1 1/1/Ic 4 L--\ 11'llf 1 \ \\ d % \ 1 c lili j \C r 3 I14I \ J ill 11 1 1 bil FAIR 1 /RESUBDIVASI N~ ~ j \79Â£51 1 , lili t. 1 GAA GuRSE ENTRANCE Reno 11 19/7 1 H /0/94 )4 1 /10,0 1 il / ..~a ..t;Â·Ml . F Â·:2'1 I . f Ift, , .. tAÂ· Ill .... 'r:Â·j ..39 ?25>11 J. *.4-4.:. - f AfFÂ¢Â°0' 6466</01. 65- 12.rni-id 1 46 gALL ll 14 2 't -4-'---- --*--- -// I - F :\ f 9 - *.4.6 --I---I.&- ...... Â·Â·Matt, . 1 . \ 1 iii . 1 *,7 A,:4 / \ 14 \ . . j. i C / */446 WIPTÂ» 1(14Â¢6(Al 3 -\~ __F I --1 f 2-1 Â· --. - 194 -THOk'rod 4/14*- 14.4.02 -- , ; 1%. .0 .* I , I.+ I ' I.,4 - I. 4.- .:141 L / . .. I .1 .04, , 1.-- / -6/:1. --.. =1 - *)(192,14 .r , \206!U/Wr V. 1 ' / 41#*,Aitl douggi ~/ , // "' . 0 C â‚¬174 -- ..1-- - ~EW '011' Alf #ZETAIXIOf Fft.*# : 3*: ....1 al - 'Rr M Ott*n . \, #A+Le .440 4,.. 9, . I.ti Â·:-Â·~ ~:' ~ . .9 11,1 I K-, I, 1, 1 ./1 ..2.42. i. 2521 . 1 4 , n.li .1.'- ..P4 W# COM,HIC 01 ' 1 / , 4 , * t 1 , , -Z W.0.-: : 1 , , . " 1 / 'A 1 , 1 .' 1,Â·rÂ·.4 ' I 1*164% / , / , 1 - Â¥ IN - W---N'*Ck.k 4-/ F... 1 ,/,1 % 1 / t . 4 F / 11#UN- 4%01 , f .fI,~44 - ty' J , 1 ' I 2,1 VERâ‚¬lta 'Ut 4 JecM V+A i LED#44 ;t 1 Th | t yauti -- 44-- Â·'-IGÂ»- Â° -' '1 1 "a." 1. e Â£' i. Â· 4 2 t , 'W,â‚¬.W (17 U ' I lilli. 1 3.9 1 1 :74 . I . , 1 ;P % 41. D 1 Â· - \ 1 I - ' I. ..1 . I I ..4 - 40 4,-, , , I I .,9 , 4 , 1 '' , I I / I , L - / 44, // ew l' e d . Cli 1 F, 7 . A ' /7 a - + --" , j 1(,t,0,ot,4;g '*<t; '' t .. 1 1 -p . - I ' 1~ Cort,l \,I Â©,t> 3 Â· ' ' ' Al 4. r .k . 0 ' , 4 ..234 1 .1 L U â‚¬44 1, , f , 4 Â®tj/% idjlia</ 1/ . 1' ' ' i / /1 4 - \X-ter"7~ '1> ' 9,5Â¥tl ~ ) i u ..1075 1 -~ Â· Â·Â· ~ .' A .. l i - 0 . ' . / 1 .. . S t ..2 , b. -4. ... i.1 MeÂ«,41-,3 (*%~1% 4,<At ,-4--pyn 4-,4 /F- ---~t==---9--*1-_ . ---* , Â· ,- 5%-2-2.4.-/ Â«1 \ , , 6,; VourLET -/' ~~ f t#~ J:#A ~ , - 7. * J L.0,1 - :A 12 Â·- ' 29 , I '.4,9 174Â£UM*l r-' / .7.4 e .2 r \ 4 , 4-21 'Upj 11Â¢401* 08;-F, 4 KE{Al,|ida'- nÂ· : d hed ... -ll &1.2. Â¢1 -â‚¬R 03.2 1,0 i s.t., ;9*.1 -47 :.4.- 1 - ' -EUM'Al'*rel 1 , 48? 2 - --I -:I , --- N r --1 r ~-C~~f f NE GT 'kil l~12'215> I L> EL -13>w:~ 46 â‚¬Â£1 UE' 1 6% , 4.'#. ~,4, 7.3 . 9 b L Â»4% 1.1 1 9 Â· Ked(Nmi iod 00 45 4.,sit:e I \ 54 U In=rrit ly \\1 Â£ . .1 ':'.4 'Â·arl ' '. 24 4, :dip43 4:14 '% 42 '-Â· 1..... . 1 -r ... 1 .1 . . lim er.,1 â‚¬1,2 r.Â·r .1 --7-1 r ~, -"LE=~7,1.7 4 -- 5.5122.7 - .fli:P" .U 5 t Â· -'~*~p ~ ~ .7,4 1 . .Td J OCT 25 988 t. October 24,1988 p~ 626-6~JUUÂ«Â£ â‚¬735,/4* Dear Mayor Dannels, "mu-.4- 6 /Â£? AG. 04%0,1Â« We are writing this of concern about the deteriorating conditions of the sidewalks and curbing in the Reclamation Subdivision. We understand there is a law making the property owners responible for the maintance and upkeep of the curbing and sidewalks. Bve to the facto this Subdivi/on is the only one with sidewalks and curbing, we feel this law is unfair to the land owners. We are asking that you and your Committee consider this law so this problem can be .564*ed. Respectivly Yours, NAME ADDRESS TOWN n i. 011% 1. uo- 26.4 E.ste st,Aldc 2 4,22 4.JI-,) 90O3L -01~1 6.61,4 41,05 4 - Aâ‚¬ 4 -44 t '5- l yâ‚¬ 12.a_, 7-R hxauf / 4 i - 3 -61~ 6412-4-, ~U c#,-*E 'Eul-â€¢- /69'-' 71 %5= 10.,2 you~ 0. Llz%42 2 I2 3.9 ga anÂ® ~ 634, /1 / I ./I At A *Ab. CO-K.Â£ 390 ),4 0 U d.ea J / 9)24 2 19+UL- 413/70>cl E- P,/ dr I Â»Us-LIX- 01 2 Â« 0 3,-2 51 00, L * 94 k CL 4.43 L 4 (Co â‚¬ ocuÂ£'- E. 0, (1. Â¢2460~aÂ« 5 d i '50, iug.Â« iÂ®Â« 46# 2 4 0 2 , Omt_~ 23 - f ul 1 t e, '14' lu-<Q- 0-9-câ€¢t/L &Â» -1 6 I 24. c.-uhl aftwo W. 1 6 a -54 st 2524 Ad. go, 442> (u Â·,1) 9 57: Jr Aid eg (1/~1130 *k -1 Â¢JÂ»i.~ul.-K#. 9-40 +.Pal) (Ze-1035 QjjiÂ© fed. , (10 . 4\\ 11 Afle leâ€ž.A 26* Cs/15 it- E C o V A 00 p o n Â£2Â£ -Ir , ~-~j ~~C!~ ~ 0. ill 0-9Â» U u..w.Â»s-, 2.14 3.'Â»Â£ 3,2 o â‚¬1'k 05 64112. o c,1 04- .7 j j 444 2.-1 16 t A. C a.uk 24. L Pe, Â£1 6 4 497 /~. R q f -14 1 jtma KE , 41 4*,/3,AL LO