The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works 1986-04-17PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE 6 AGENDA APRIL 17, 1986 1. Estes Park Golf Course Boundary - Update on meeting with Recreation District. 2. Transportation Program Funding - Review of application. 3. Newspaper Rack Ordinance - Review. 4. Rowe Heating - Offer to sell land to the town. 5. Tregent Park - Discussion of dedication. 6. Fish Hatchery House - Request .for town to fund additional repairs to house #3. 7. National Public Works Week - Request for designation & use of Parking Lot # 1. 8. Rocky Mountain Fleet Managers Association - Request to send fleet manager to annual meeting. 9. Pickup Trucks - Review of bids. 10. Tregent Park - Field Trip (time and weather permitting). Reports: 1. Tregent Park 2. Prospect Mountain (NE) Drainage Project 3. Public Restroom Remodel 1 ... - i -1Â» -- i 1 - LAND SURVEYS - -ZEE'- 92:Pi~ --=6-22.44 :9*'6%Â§2& 'z- -- SUBDIVISIONS - --=-- 1~4 -n.-1-- a 7, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IMPROVEMENT PLATS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ~ VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING SANITARY ENGINEERING ~7~.~-*,~~\William G. VanHorn, PE & LS 9485 â€¢ Paul H. VanHorn, PE & LS 532 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING \,\\ r--I--- f? \\ 11 1 B C r r U = 2 22 EJEE. . ,1 March 1, 1986 ! 33:a-ORE.aER 1 .11 il 0-~03 Se885< I ,;J OC I Â·E Ja ai li JI 1% I% 5& 21 JM Ill Honorable H. Bernerd Dannels . Mayor, Town of Estes Park L f *111111 ,1 liE Post Office Box 1200 ~-n Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Re: Certified Mailed letter #961 941 dated January 23, 1986 Dear Bernie: We and our attorneys have researched the history, facts, and 1 egal status of the fence referred to in your letter as thoroughly as possible in the short time given. The fence was in its current position when Paul Van Horn purchased the property from The Estes Park Development Company. Carl B. Sanborn was president and owner of Estes Park Development Co. both at the time the ~ company sold the land to the Estes Park Golf and Country Club in 1917 and when the company sold to Paul Van Horn in 1961. The fence was evi- dently erected by or at the direction of Carl Sanborn some time before 1961. Judging from the depth that the trees have grown over the wire and the apparent age of some of the lichen covered posts, the fence is con- - siderably older than 25 years or 1961. The Estes Park Golf & Country Club was a private corporation that began as a not-for-profit corporation in 1917 and changed to a profit corporation a few months later. We cannot find that it ever changed back to a non-profit corporation. That fact would not seem to be material to the boundary but might be important to a significant unpaid tax liability that the Town may have assumed along with the land from the Estes Park Golf and Country Club. The Golf and Country Club corporation did not have the immunity against adverse possession that the law affords municipal and quasi-municipal corpora- tions. The fact that the Town was a majority stock holder of the corporation and the Recreation District a lessee of the land, did not transfer their - immunity to the owner of the land. The Golf and Country Club has not paid taxes on the disputed land. 1043 Fish Creek Road â€¢ P.O. Box 456 â€¢ Estes Park, Colorado 80517 â€¢ 303-586-9388 k Honorable H. Bernerd Dannels March 1, 1986 Page Two 7,Â·' The fence, in our attorney's opinion, meets all of the test of C.R.S. 38-41-101 to establish a legal boundary. I cannot help but believe that the people perpetrating this dispute are the same ones who tri edÂ· to ma ke an i ssue o f my pl acement o f f il 1 on the prop- erty last year and that the real problem is my involvement with Stanley Village. Anyone familiar with the golf course has been aware of the fence. It is a strange coincidence that now is the time that the issue is being brought up. It is discouraging from a private point of view to see how the Town quickly issues 30-day ultimatums to a private land owner regarding these. issues (the case of the alleged flood plain violation at the same time the Recreation District was pushing trash into the river) and then is so slow to follow through when it is proven that they erroneously took land by a faulty flood plain designation (re: my letter of July, 1985). I am tired of litigation that I have to pay for as an individual and also pay for as a taxpayer. In an effort to avoid such litigation, we offer to trade the Van Horn land along Fish Creek adjacent to the Community Church for clear title to the land within the Van Horn fence at the Van Horn Engineering office property. Some of the advantages to the Town of the trade besides avoiding litigationÂ· - "' would be to have title to both sidesof Fish Creek for nearly 600' allowing it to be improved for a trail or pond as indicated to us by Dick Castleberry and Jim Beauchamp last summer. The Town would also gain 580~ of frontage along Fish Creek Road at a location that would provide easy access to the Country Club land should it ever be desirable. If the trade is not acceptable to the Town, we will file suit to quiet the title of both properties to the historic fence lines. If, at that time, the Town has not acted to amend its erroneous fl ood designation on the Van Horn property, we will seek legal relief Â·on that issue also. We await your reply. Sincerely/7 0 ill.lob - F. YA . William G. Van Horn A TOWN OF ESTES PARK 43,7- -*402, <of"~~4-. --,te#f Ar*- 0 - 9 9, mt M 1 ' -Â· 4 -7Â« 5491 + 42>-4-erÂ®t,w,1, - tL -#: â‚¬2. *:0...04 < 4,# .3-'9Â·42**ffil' Â· H. BERNERD DANNELS MAYOR l.1 . 4Â»: 49: T, th . Estes Park, Colorado 80517 April 18, 1986 Ms. Tara Bartee COLORADO DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS Room 225 4210 East Arkansas Avenue Denver, Colorado 80222 Re: TDp - Letter of Application Dear Ms. Bartee: This request will serve as the Town of Estes Park's letter of application for Section 8 funds for the preparation of a Transit Development Program. The following information is provided: 1. Nature of the Project and its Purpose. The purpose of the TDP would be to examine the feasibility of providing a local public transportation system. The TDP would analyze potential management options, including the private sector, system operation, capital requirements, suitable equipment and the economic parameters of a system. A five year operating/implementation schedule would be prepared. The TDP would specifically address the needs of year- round residents, as well as the unique demands created by the summer influx of tourists. 2. Timetable for project completion. It is estimated that the TDP would be completed within 10 months from date of grant award. 3. Cost estimate. It is estimated that the TDP could be prepared within a program budget of $20,000. P. O. Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586-5331 Town of Estes Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Ms. Tara Bartee COLORADO DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS April 18, 1986 Page 2 4. Local match documentation. 30% local match will be provided upon grant award. See copy of Town Board Resolution attached. 5. The Town is a first time TDP applicant, although a draft TDP was prepared for the Town by the Larimer Weld Council of Governments in 1980. Due to the projected costs involved in the proposed system, a final TDP was never adopted by the Town. a. Current transportation services. The Town does not currently operate a public transportation system. The Estes Park Senior Citizens Center operates one van, Monday through Friday, generally from 10:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. The van delivers senior citizens to and from the Senior Center, provides trips for personal services (i.e. medical), and makes one trip to Loveland/Fort Collins each month. There is one privately operated taxi service within the Town. This service, Rocky Mountain Park Taxi, operates one vehicle. b. Why is the Town requesting a TDP at this time. The Town of Estes Park has a significant transportation problem from May through September. These problems include traffic circulation, congestion and parking. For example, the Town's main street, Elkhorn Avenue, has an average daily traffic volume of 26,000 vehicles per day in the summer. The capacity of the existing street system does not meet peak demand, resulting in severe congestion. The congestion and parking problems are particularly evident in the Central Business District. The Town and its residents are faced with decisions of either funding substantial parking and street system improvements, or looking at a transportation system which is more economically feasible. It is believed that a transit system, linking outlying areas with the CBD, would significantly reduce summertime congestion. Development of a transit system is viewed as an important component of the Town's economic redevelopment program. Town of Estes Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Ms. Tara Bartee COLORADO DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS April 18, 1986 Page 3 c. Dependency of constituents on transportation services. Constituents dependent upon transportation services include local residents, employees, tourists and merchants. Currently, there are only limited transit services available. Most transportation needs are met through the use of the private automobile. The factors of congestion, a street system without adequate capacity, inadequate parking and lack of transportation alternativds are hav ing an adverse effect on the Estes Park economy. A transit system would strengthen the.Town's economic base, promote the Town's pedestrian environment, improve community land. use and lend a community image of a town meeting its problems. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this important project. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK H. Bernerd Dannels Mayor HBD:ca Enclosure tj 4-Is -26 PROPOSED NEWSRACK ORDINANCE Sections 1. Declaration 2. Definitions 3. Registration 4. Location of Newsracks 5. Standards for Newsrack Installation and Maintenance 6. Violations 7. Appeals 8. Abandonment 9. Severability 10. Repealer 1. Declaration The Town of Estes Park hereby finds and declares: (1) The primary intended use of the streets and sidewalks of the town is the movement of people and property. Generally speaking, the town considers its streets and the real property interests therein to be a valuable asset, one which it intends to control by regulation and will not allow to be appropriated by private enterprises. (2) The town has an obligation to the general public to ensure reasonably safe and unobstructed passage over the public ways in Â·a clean and orderly manner. (3) The town has an obligation to protect the health and safety of the public. (4) Inappropriately and randomly located newsracks can pose a significant safety hazard and annoyance to pedestrians, abutting landowners, vehicles and the maintenance of public improvements. (5) The uncontrolled construction, placement, and maintenance of newsracks unreasonably interferes with the public's right to safe and unobstructed passage and tends to physically and visually clutter the public rights-of-way and required setbacks. Such placement, construction and maintenance of newsracks has been reviewed in relationship to the above noted purposes and safety concerns relating to the primary use of streets and sidewalks, the proximity and design and use of other existing or proposed street improvements and furniture of the streetscape, including, but not limited to sign and lamp posts, benches, planters and, traffic devices, bus stop areas, loading zones, and landscaped areas. (6) The town's downtown area is a particularly congested and important area due to the fact that the town serves, attracts and depends heavily on the tourism industry, both for direct revenue and for its contribution to the general tax base. The town has sought to maintain the appearance and impressions created by its unique geographical environment by its careful designing and maintenance of the streetscape. The aesthetically pleasing and functional design and regulation of the use of the streets and sidewalks in the town is extremely important in developing and maintaining order for the public good. Outdoor newsracks, as part of the streetscape furniture, should be designed, constructed, and placed in the downtown area according to the proposed pattern to carry out those objectives. (7) Use of the streets in commercial districts for the distribution of newspapers to accommodate convenient dissemination of the news to encourage an informed citizenry should not be absolutely denied, but is subordinate to the sidewalk's and street's use for the reasonably safe and unobstructed movement of people and property. This private use of the sidewalk, affording certain constitutional protection under freedom of expression, is being regulated to ensure subordination to public purposes and protection to the town and its residents by indemnifying the town against any liability arising out of the use of public property. (8) Newspapers of general local circulation within the Estes Valley provide the most comprehensive and detailed information regarding local news and local advertising, which is of greatest interest to those in the downtown area. It is not inappropriate to give daily publications of general local circulation priority when sites within the downtown area are limited. Nor is it inappropriate to require relinquishment of a multiple rack to a newcomer in the event of localized saturation to achieve dispersal and non-proliferation. (9) The noted strong compelling governmental interests in view of the public purpose and public good, compete against public interests in freedom of expression and the private commercial interests of distributors. The town desires, in this ordinance, to balance those interests. Therefore, it requires registration to reasonably regulate the use of the streets and sidewalks by newsracks as to time, place and manner, and to -2- 4. provide for the efficient and reasonable administration and enforcement of regulations. These regulations are clearly and narrowly drawn in order to effect the interests in public safety, protection and good order while avoiding any arbitrary and unnecessary curtailment of freedom of speech and freedom of the press. 2. Definitions For purposes of this chapter, the following words shall have the following meanings: (1) "Newsracks" mean any outdoor self-service of coin-operated container, rack storage unit, dispenser or structure used or maintained for the display, distribution or sale of newspapers, news periodicals or other printed material. For the purpose of spacing and location restrictions, every 30 linear inches of the width of a newsrack, shall constitute one newsrack without regard to the number of supporting pedestals, dispensing units, bases or coin mechanisms. For zoning purposes each newsrack shall be considered a retail sales use. (2) "Distributor" means the person or entity responsible for placing and maintaining a newsrack. (3) "Street" means all that area dedicated to public use for public street and parking purposes and shall include, but not be limited to, roadways, parkways, alleys, sidewalks, loading zones, parking areas and parking lots. (4) "Roadway" means that portion of a street improved, designed or ordinarily used for vehicular travel. Where curb improvements exist, it extends from back of curb to back of curb. (5) "Sidewalk" means any surface provided for the primary or exclusive use of pedestrians. (6) "Designated Area" means that area of downtown Estes Park as noted on the appended map. (7) "Board of Trustees" means the Board of Trustees of the Town of 'Estes Park. (8) "Building Inspector" means the building inspector of the Town of Estes Park. 3. Registration A. Newsracks Required to Register It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to operate, erect, install, maintain or place any newsracks for the display, sale or distribution of printed material contrary to the standards of this chapter, and without registering each such -3- newsrack location prior to and obtaining a certificate of registration under the provisions of this Chapter, within the Designated Area. B. Registration Procedure (1) Requests to register newsracks regulated by this chapter shall be filed with the Town Clerk on a registration agreement form provided by the Town. (2) Information. The information to be supplied by the applicant shall include the following: (a) The name, address, telephone number and current occupation license of the registrant or distributor. (b) The name of the publication (s) to be distributed from each newsrack, the type of publication, the number of times published per week, its average circulation number per publication in Estes Park, the requested location for placement and the assignment priority claimed. C. Conditions for Application Approval Approval of applicant's registration statement does not and may not involve any discretion on the part of the Building Inspector as to approval or denial. Only these objective, content-neutral criteria are to be considered and form the basis of the registration determination. (1) Agreement to indemnify: As an express condition of the acceptance of such application, the applicant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town of Estes Park, its officers, directors and employees against any loss, liability or damage, including expenses and costs for bodily or personal injury and for any property damage sustained by any person or entity as the result of the installation, use or maintenance of a newsrack within the Town of Estes Park. Said indemnification shall include all reasonable fees and costs incurred by the Town under the terms of this paragraph. (2) Newsrack installation: Newsracks installation, use or maintenance shall be conditioned upon observance of the provisions of this ordinance and such reasonable rules and regulations as may be established by the Town of Estes Park. (3) Fees: Approval of applicant's registration shall be conditioned upon receipt of a non-refundable, annual fee of -4- $50.00 per requested newsrack. The initial fee shall not be prorated for the year in which it is received. Each annual fee shall be due on May 1 of each year thereafter. (4) Registration shall be valid for one year and is renewable on May 1 of successive years after initial registration, pursuant to the procedure for original applications referred to above and upon payment of the annual registration fee. (5) Nontransferability. Newsrack registration shall be valid only for the newsrack space, location and publication specified. Registration and renewals shall be personal and are not transferrable in any manner to other locations, publications or registrants. D. Certificate of Registration A certificate of registration shall be issued after review by the Building Inspector for location approval. Newsrack placement shall be made only in the manner as hereinafter provided. 4. Newsrack Placement at Designated Location No newsrack shall be placed, installed or maintained except at those specific locations designated on the appended map. (a) Prioritization. Approved registration applicants shall be assigned to requested locations for newsrack placement within the designated area according to their priority in time of application approval. In the event there is a conflict between eligible publications seeking the same space at an approved location and there are insufficient spaces from the reserved pools to accommodate requests, the Building Inspector shall assign locations guided by the following priorities: (i) First priority shall be given to newsracks used for the sale of newspapers of general local circulation within the Estes Valley which are published at least one time per week. (ii) Second priority shall be given to newsracks used for the sale of newspapers of general circulation for Larimer County. (iii) Third priority shall be given to newsracks used for the sale of daily publications which are not of local circulation, being published at least once per week. (iv) In the event there are eligible publications of the same priority competing for original registrations of the same newsrack spaces as at approved locations, the Building Inspector shall assign available spaces giving priority in the -4.1- following order to: (1) the earlier date of the completed registration form; (2) the highest comparative average daily circulation within Estes Park. 5. Standards for Newsrack Installation and Maintenance No newsrack shall be placed, installed or maintained except at those locations designated on the appended map and except as hereafter provided. (A) Within such designated locations, no newsrack shall be used or maintained which projects unto, into or over any part of the traveled way or curb line of any public street. (B) Within such designated locations, no newsrack shall be chained, bolted or otherwise attached to any town-owned fixture or public way, including but not limited to street signs and traffic control devices, concrete, brick or asphalt sidewalks within public right-of-way. Newsracks may be voluntarily attached or secured to one another. (C) No newsrack shall exceed five (5) feet in height, thirty (30) inches in width or two (2) feet in depth. (D) Each newsrack shall be of an unobtrusive neutral color of tan to blend into the streetscape and shall contain no other coloring. (E) No newsrack shall contain any advertisement or publicity information. A copy of the publication being offered may appear in the front window of any newsrack. (F) Each newsrack shall have affixed to it, in a readily visible place so as to be seen by anyone using the nerwsrack, a notice setting forth the name, address and telephone number of the distributor. Such information shall consist of black and/or white lettering and shall be limited to an area not exceeding six (6) by six (6) inches. (G) Each newsrack shall be maintained in a neat and clean condition and shall be kept in good repair at all times. It shall be reasonably free of dirt, grease, chipped, peeling or faded paint, rust and corrosion. There shall be no broken, cracked or dented structural parts of the newsrack. (H) Where multiple newsracks exist in a designated area, no newsrack may be placed or maintained in any position other than next to another newsrack. (I) Placement of newsracks within a designated area shall be done in such aÂ·way that access to publications is from the sidewalk side of the area and not from the street or curb side. (J) Upon removal of any newsrack, the distributor shall be responsible to restore the site. -5- . I 6. Violations of Ordinance Upon determination by the Building Inspector that a newsrack has been installed, used or maintained in violation of the provisions of this ordinance, a notice to correct the offending condition will be issued to the distributor of the newsrack. Such notice shall be telephoned to the distributor and confirmed by mailing a copy of the notice to said distributor. The notice shall specifically describe the offending condition and specify actions necessary to correct the condition. Failure to properly correct the offending condition within ten (10) days after the mailing date of the notice shall result in the offending newsrack being summarily removed. Upon removal, the location shall be available for reassignment. Any newsrack removed and stored pursuant to these provisions shall be released to the Distributor, if claimed within 45 days after removal and upon the payment of reasonable removal and storage charges. Upon failure of the Distributor to claim and pay the reasonable charges of a removed newsrack, such newsrack is deemed to be unclaimed property in possession of the Town of Estes Park, and may be disposed of by the Town without compensation to the distributor. The Distributor may by written notice within ten (10) days of notice of said violation request an informal meeting with the Building Inspector with regard to resolution of the order referred to herein in which case said meeting shall be held within five (5) working days from the date of said request and the appeal time referred to in section 7 herein shall commence and begin to run as of the date of said informal meeting. 7. Appeals Any person or entity aggrieved by a finding, determination notice or action taken under the provisions of this ordinance may appeal to the Board of Trustees. An Appeal must be perfected within ten (10) after mailing of the notice by filing with the Town Clerk a letter of appeal briefly stating therein the basis for such an appeal. A hearing shall be held on a date no more than thirty (30) days from the receipt of the letter of appeal. Appellant shall be given at least ten (10) days notice of the time and place of the hearing. The Board of Trustees shall give the appellant, and any other interested party, a reasonable opportunity to be heard, in order to show cause why the determination of the Building Inspector should not be upheld. At such hearing the appellant shall have the right to examine the evidence upon which the Building Inspector acted, to cross examine any witness who may have appeared before it and to offer any evidence which may tend to show that the subject newsrack does not violate any provision of this chapter. In all such cases, the burden of proof shall be upon the appellant to show that there was no evidence to support the action taken by the Building Inspector. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board of Trustees shall make a final and conclusive determination. -7- . The perfection of an appeal to the Board of Trustees shall stay the removal of any newsrack until the Board of Trustees makes its final determination unless said newsrack presents a clear and present danger of imminent personal injury or property damage. Nothing contained in this chapter shall be interpreted to limit or impair the exercise by the Town of its police power, in the event of any emergency, to remove any such newsrack. 8. Abandonment In the event a newsrack remains empty for a period of fifteen (15) continuous days, the same shall be deemed abandoned and may be treated in the manner provided in Section 6 for newsracks in violation of the provisions of this ordinance. 9. Severability If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections of the ordinance or of said standards; the Town of Estes Park declares that it would have passed the ordinance and adopted such standards in each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more of the parts, sections, subsections, clauses, sentences or phrases be declared invalid. 10. Repealer All ordinances, resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance of the Town Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, are hereby repealed, provided that such repealer shall not repeal the repealer clauses of such ordinances thereby. INTRODUCED as a bill at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town pf Estes Park on the day of , 1986. Secretary -8- J '''No buo V lot J-J ROVVE HEATING & SERVICE COMPANY HOT WATER & FORCED AIR HEATING SYSTEMS L P AND NATURAL GAS SERVICE ~ 24 HOUR SERVICE P. 0. Box 2838 COMPLETE PLUMBING SERVICE ' Phone 586-4671 ESTES PABL CO 80517 RECEIvtw MAR 2 4 1986 Ma/tch 20, 1986 li ,~:, . F ESTES PARK Town Boa/td 06 Tbusteâ‚¬,6 ' lup:Ii 80&,INI,i RMOR P.O. Box 1200 Este Park, CO 80517 Attn: Mayok Beknie DanneÂ£6 Dean Magok Danneh, Oepping-McPhee, Inc., doing bcuineas a,6 Rowe Heating 5 Service, pke ently owns a piece 06 pbope,tty on Um Road ac#066 6/Lom the tanddiU Jite and neak other pieces 06 town pkopetty. It had been held as a future bulk p.Cant Ute 604 ouk p/topane opekation but we have acquiked other indubtkiat zoned propellty and have this tot avallabte 604 sate. Since the town Â£6 one 0 6 the maiok tandhotduu in this akea, we 6ett gou might consider this acquisition to meet any expansion ptans you might have. We woutd 066)A .thÂ£6 paked (dee tegat debekiption attached) at a cost 06 $40,000.00. We have not put thiA piece 06 pkopertg on the market a.6 06 thi-6 Ume and woutd ke.644Â£n 6/tom doing 60 untit a*UL Youk Apkit board meeting. We kupectiutty kequat th,ut You con*ider th.8 066ek at youk next meeting and adv.Ue us 16 there Â£6 any blte/Let. Thank you 604 your time. SincULetf, V~* Oepping -- LLPâ‚¬ m . 3 -Vavid E. McPhee - Mulanne 0 e.pping " 0 End. V . \PU V \1\~ \Ph, 3,#oP rl, i Al rt+TZ+++0*00-0-01< , y ff.Ffff/// - 3Â» 1 3rl.--, / 2/ X 7721.3 Zlf ;.OP << J 1 11 /4 0 3 Â«4-(\ t\IC C ~1 - FÂ»/~ 1 1 7710.3 ~ E E 43{1 i'~lj 44Â» - 11 1 f / /1 1 01 1 -\ 1 1/ 41 j~ ~ /*toÂ« f// /Â«6 f1 r--r Â»u 7- / / - - Rowe PRopotlY ' li-J -d * 7-\ x / - /6/00' 3/56 040386 Tb Richard Widmer Public Works Committee Rich, In reference to the North house at the Fish Hatchery, I was allotted $200 for repairs-materials. I did go over that aniount as indicated by the reciepts that I turned in to you. The materials that were required exceed- ed what I expected mainly in the electrical and the bathroom flooring. I have enclosed a list of what has been accomplished at the residence. I would further ask your consideration in furnishing insulation for the main part of the house-attic area-as there is presently no insulation in that portion of the attic. I obtained prices for the 6" insulation batting that we discussed at $30 a roll. Each roll will cover approximately 75 square feet. The square footage involved is about 480 square feet, requiring 7 rolls for the total of $210. Thankyou in advance for anything you can help me with. Si~cpely, 44 u~-g-yl yt~9pger go .. ,, COMPLETED REPAIRS AT THE NORTH HOUSE--Fish Hatchery replace flooring and subflooring in bathroom remove and rebuild shower- (primary cause of floor rot) replace both exterior doors and locksets install 3 interior doors-bedrooms- (where none existed) internal tank parts-toilet caulking of cracks to the interior-corners, window frames etc. retape and rejointing of drywall seams in walls and ceilings install interior 220 voltage repair 4 electrical outlets install 2 interior light fixtures-(which were absent) install 1 electrical outlet interior repaint-in progress caulking of windows-still in progress inside and out install 2 light switches 4 TOWN OF ESTES PARK 1 Y *ic#+ 7 Public Works Department Richard D. Widmer Director I A .3.- 409:2Â¢+FA. 2 N 12921\: 32874' 01. -,\ X14 * 12*. Estes Park, Colorado 80517 BuÂ« 0' A ' *. MEMORANDUM TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Richard D. Widmer Director of Public Works DATE: April 17, 1986 RE: Bids for Two Pickup Trucks Attached is a bid tabulation for the two pickup trucks authorized at the April 4, 1986 Public Works Committee meeting. The amounts budgeted are shown below: Amount budgeted for trucks including radio $23,300 Radio allowance 1,400 Budgeted amount 21,900 Amount budgeted for crack sealer 5,000 Total for trucks, crack sealer 26,900 Truck bids + crack sealer bid 26,421 AMOUNT UNDER BUDGET $ 479 I recoinmend that the bid for the two pickup trucks be awarded to Rains Ford in the amount bid of $23,131.14. RDW: ca Attachment P. O. Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586-5331 1,/ em>. i ZmmE-1 NNE - i 000 W , D >1 : X.04 U WO Al-<E--1 CIZ Z WELl < MO 05 0< M ODS [14 68 [L. r< 3: U] 0 U Z 01 O = .-1 0 1 r.7 C;GZ :Rgtg :9:9g E-1 U d:fig dds z os m,~:-: 282. EEE . A . .. A p-4 CO, -4 N M -4 + CO . -4 -" C\J pi-N 0444 44 22# â€¢9-* ZO ; H Z 14 81 81 01 C 44 Mi *i 21 21 m, :R:R 5 W ! WO 00 LO LO 0 H 1-0 1.0 0< 04 IN N 00 . 1 mo. . - .. 1 4- NN . t,4 *.4 .64 64 0 t.4 4 6 I al a, al i 4 IN >> W 0I . 1 0I 01 1 CO i BIDDER DESCRIPTION LOWA - E TO BID WORK ECHS INOR Date: April 17. 1986 TWO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PICKUP TRUCKS P==RMA Vehicle "A" NONE YES NONE YES tehi c~le ~'' NONE NO NO VEHICLE EXCEPT Prepared by: Gary Shanafelt 1986 Pickup Trucks RAINS FORD Estes Park Terry Day CANYON FORD 1 "" Loveland Dan Matthews DAVE TAYLOR FORD Longmont Gordon Brown paliejUO) SJOpuaA 9 skiday ON 2