The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Community Development 2001-08-234. , 'da./7 , AGENDA Town of Estes Park - Community Development Department Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:00 a.m. 1. Museum a. Mini-Van Bids b. Capital Campaign Feasibility Study c. Bi-Monthly Report 2. Senior Center a. Bi-Monthly Report 3. Advertising Program - Report 4. Special Events Department a. Summer Rodeo Proposal b. *ENes Cycling Challenge -=iuc_ 94 10-7 32 33*01 â‚¬,- Atid - <tk- 5. Community Development Department - Report a. Vehicle Bids b. Municipal Code Revisions Prepared August 17,2001 *Revised August 20, 2001, 11:05 a.m. The Community Development Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the Agenda was prepared. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 13, 2001 To: Honorable Mayor Baudek, and The Town Board of Trustees From: Betty Kilsdonk, Dave Mahany Subject: Museum Department Vehicle Replacement (G-27) Background: This vehicle a 1984 Ford Ranger Pickup (G-27) has been in the Town Fleet since new in 1984. This vehicle is within the vehicle replacement parameters of 80,000 to 90,000 miles or 10 years. This Vehicle (G-27) has 76,514 miles and is 17 years old. Budget / Costs: Burts Arapahoe Ford : 2002 Ford Windstar Mini-Van $22,160.00 -$ 600.00 Less Trade-in (1984 Ford Pickup G-27) $21,560.00 Bid Price Estes Park Auto Mall : 2002 Ford Windstar Mini-Van $22,761.00 -$ 500.00 Less Trade-in (1984 Ford Pickup G-27) $22,261.00 Bid Price ***** ( $21,815.00 w/2% Local Bid Consideration) ***** Phil Long Ford : No Response The 2001 Museum Department budget includes $22,000.00 for replacement of this vehicle. Costs : $21,560.00 Budget: S22,000.00 Reconunendation: The Museum Department / Fleet Department recommends approval of the bid from Burt's Arapahoe Ford and requests approval to purchase a new Ford Windstar Mini-Van from Burt's Arapahoe Ford for a cost of $21,560.00. Museum/Senior Center Services Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Betty Kilsdonk Date: August 10,2001 Subject: Feasibility Study for Capital Campaign Background. In past years the museum has received three federal grants for surveys of the facility by outside consultants. In each instance, the surveyor reported that the facility was inadequate in size to support the spatial needs of a museum, such as storage space, public meeting space, and exhibit preparation space. Since 1995, the Museum's strategic plan, which is developed by the Advisory Board, Friends Board, Town Administration, and staff, has included a site expansion objective. In 1997, Town trustees agreed to fund a facility study. As a result of the study, the trustees increased the Museum's transfer in 2000 by $39,000 as a match for Friends of the Museum facility expansion fundraising efforts. For various reasons, including the extensive fundraising taking place at the time to support Stanley Hall, the Friends decided not to proceed with the capital campaign at that time. This year they have revisited this project. The Friends have solicited a proposal from H. Benjamin Duke (attached). On August 7 they held a special Friends Board meeting and agreed on the following motion: To hire Ben Duke to perform a feasibility study with an added focus on identifying possible grant sources and on creating a planned giving plan. The cost will not exceed $18,000, for which one half of the funds will come from the Town. Budget. The study would cost the Town of Estes Park not more than $9000 as an additional transfer to the Museum's budget in 2002. Action Request consideration of the Friends of the Museum's proposal to contribute half the cost toward a capital campaign feasibility study, not to exceed $9000. 0 0 Â·r '-â€¢,r= Â·1~-imz Museum Attendance 4000- 02001 0002 I 666 L â€¢ ,-000Â£ 866 L â€¢ 266 L â€¢ '997-2 ea oN 30 as nv nri=~n~ evu dv evu e=' er 0 6000- 5000+ ,-0001 t U) C - 0 CD lf) 0 08 0 0 .9 - O -5 0g I 0 - 0 1- LU 4 - 0 982'Â£$ rk Area Historical Museum Admissions (2001 Admissions are through July and don't include car show, dance & camp) $6.771 1 001 86~ Z6, LO, 00, 66, 86, Z6: $5,899 1997 - 2001 9 LSL 9439 2099 11721 1.ZED E O M _ U) C) O H C) lf) 1 - 0 0 C.,I C ME C) Lo i .9 4/ C\1 .6 I.. - 2 1 0 . al 8 ~2 0 1- 0 0 W060 E 16 e 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 " r Ga~l~%5~~~fi~i~:mragnrcoe-p3~o0~|~52 2*Zoo, History Camp-18 5093 100. 00. 86. Â£6. June 1997- 2001 4417 t'91â€¢Z Lt'EE %91 Estes Park Area Historical Mu gallery visits, 4368 program attendees) LÂ£8 ndance, July 2 %89 E 5 Qtr) - 3 10 =l 0 0 -0 0 0 Uf 2 8 U) E o 1 0 CD Â¤) 0 E - 2 CD (D 01* on- 3 B 0 6 LU 'C 0 T- a) 1- .- . m Lf) 12 ~ J.. 32 0 C >.2 32 3 3 32 m.c 0 0 22 C N - C c\1 I . p 0 6 .12 16 W > E ro 0 6. a. 9,9 %8. ejeis .W. -Wa Your Photos; Textile Care; Living with Art and Antiques June 1997- 2001 732 us tour, teacher free day, camp counselors 17.9 Estes Park Area Historical program attendees) ployee orien at' n slide show on EP history Out of 649 Attendance, June 763 %'Z S 0 & i E 5 9 CD 25 0 1 to O cr; 1 66 N E C & S S C es E ~ 0 1.0 O)20 1 JO (ri U U).b: 66 0 S C & S 0 efRER:5%(1) C >,OQI DIL a < 6 4 -1 < u) Cl Total Cl C2 Total Cl C2 Total Cl C2 Total 656 515 1171 705 403 1108 791 424 1215 727 315 1042 439 437 876 558 393 951 689 350 1039 674 349 1023 965 560 1525 795 427 1222 794 352 1146 853 281 1134 uoneuop peise66ns uoneuop UO 00 *S Month 1998 1999 2000 2001 563 331 894 573 566 1139 603 215 818 591 220 432 318 750 599 514 1113 616 236 852 560 248 476 429 905 695 491 1186 627 305 932 598 264 862 463 484 947 513 461 974 656 227 883 527 294 821 L16 L 0Â£9, Â£02Â£ 18,8 9/9, Â£6ZZ 0699 069Z slejol E-3 9 L-3 U.104 paseeJOU! Estes Park Senior Center 1017 593 1610 851 347 1198 1026 397 1423 Â£90X 8ZZ 908 800L Zgz 942 LOâ‚¬L 18* 6Le Jeqlual Meal Counts 1998 - 2001 926 *61 Z89 0Z6 Z9Z 899 XgLL 9Lt' gEL JeqOPO ZÂ£6 t'LE 8b9 zzz 09Z Lks 090L 92* 989 JequlleAON 988 . Lâ‚¬ 9Zg ZZ8 6Â£1 Â£89 060L 099 0*9 Jeqltlesea 99 L'EL 9Lf'EL 093'â‚¬ L ewa m Jee* r-t 0 0 l - *6**1**al#laa***0 Estes Park Senior Center Meal Counts 1998 - 2 oDa AON 100 des 6nv Inr unr XeIN 'dv Jew qe=1 uer Cl (Congregate) Meals Senior Center 966 L-- 666 L -1,- 0001 - L001 -9*- ~ 9... 0 0 - 888880 Lo M M 01 - es Park Senior Center al Counts 1998 - 2 000 AON PO des Snv ,nr unr Xen Jdv Jeri god uer Senior Cente C2 Meals (Me n W Is) ~ 8661-- 6661- 0002 - LOOZ--46--~ Community Development Committee ~ Advertising Policy Committee Report August 23, 2001 1. Requests for Information A. Total Requests for Vacation Planners as of 7/31 are up by 6.4% (2,475) compared to the same period last year. Graph attached. B. 800 Calls as of 6/30 are down 17% (4,006 calls) compared to year-to-date 2000. Graph attached. C. E-mailed requests as of 7/31 are up 29.9% (2,400) compared to the same period last year. Graph attached. D. Advertising Generated requests for Vacation Planners as of 7/31 are up 8.3% (2,185). 2. Internet Advertising Test Program A. Comparative results - table attached. B. Where do we go from here? Estes ParkY-T-D Planner Requests 70,000 62,574 60,000 --- P. 51,638 48,729 50,000 - :- 47,034 :.3:Â§:i:*st 45,491 43,482 41,193 4*%.i *FFE.?I 38,718 : 40,000 - Â·. :- i - Â· 13%34 4%49 2 5 .0@%(: Glji.: . -. .............0,1.....1,1 :4#.4. ' - 98%3% ~Â© 2:5$. .5 ~ . <...:...5Â§ %*@%.. :1:.:i:iiNWN *Emai 3%%%% }40*% L I %*m: 3**: Â·';~~~~:;~;~5~::59,tk~ .&/:Â·x 4*...$4 Z ~*51%42 33:~:#:.:.: - .'..:~ & : f. - :s::5::asM:G:* BKc:*82:i:iME ,%*444%:Â§ 30,000 - - ..1 ...>....,11'.* 1.>:1:1>:.:.:...>:::.: :....:........:..... '544*9 . Â·.. i.Â·.i ~*Mi-:{*â‚¬11% ..~%~./11 1:14/*//-/:-:11 -22*Â«E ' -* m#*Mii:ii*#': .?Â·p*im - 1 .~ a*Â»'.: â‚¬%@4,9 .:.6"'t'.1,Â£5. "~"~5 i.' 1 Â»a/:9 *E:Aek- M ... - : ,Â¢Â·WÂ·<(Â«f0:3~: *VEREF=*~C~-~& EF:E&~E~~~E,**0â‚¬~E ~111%*26925i ..a~iaj . L E~: '..~ ~ %0% 4.1.1'. 1.8~%.:1 ~j~~::~.jit~:1. ....../'*1â€ž,1:1 - -- 7,04/4 L 244*% 309Em ~fli:MME ARd#-- i 1 1 . 2%*4% *8* *%5* m/9 *ff/- 3- - L 10,000 -- 9 - : O 3%* 31/5 238% 321% :1*3344 ?:*fÂ·56&1 - .,.7.g::@f45Â·;5:Â· . 46&::C':: ::::~.:m %*42 E.: .4 984*:5 4*6::':: :.:46 442*0* *SSM" H 4 1 .1 4 33% 491 41%12% :1:-:.7 : 0 1 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 July 31 Estes Park Wats Line Calls 45,000 40,000 1%~640 39,198 12'h17 RZ~ 77= 34,992 35,000 4.--*. 7,3.-.â‚¬5.1 .1. .,lili: :el':193 .1/1 Â·.â€¢'Utt~te 95" a:&: . 1 . .''..1.' K::05& 29,644 30,000 -{93%-f '~ -- t.'%?A-1,~~' 7% 697 9 -7 tu*::: 23387 - - '3Â·..::>t~~% ~ :l~~bj; i::~*Ebit - - - %,1 /: Mnmail" *225/ ..1 -- 2 I...42*lfâ‚¬,4@i E.:2-:2%-3,~Ii :prge: 19,381 NOW-..i- 4/ - -77-'~6*-Ill"- . 1 "ma . 117 1141 k .1 V,lili -::..4. . , - -- 1 1:/::'ll.' ~ ' i.:0%~f:i -0 z.>:.:0m:>:+ 14%1%-- -' -:1 1 im: 9*bik:f.-9;i:BS~*R . 123~ - - - 420;2 : 5%9230 / 6?94*ji . - 1 . > .X.'.11,1 ......1 ... Qi*;Ef 4* 2,2:/0,9 ..... L : 3>. U. 9:; - 2%31 im**3 : - - Â· Â· .'..... :Â· im/#Yawm - #Muk : :/ 440 ::&/:.:Ii:i: - 1. 1 1.. ey** i ' '.:'4/.,/'::/>9. .0% 5,000 .>: .,1 :.:1 :1 -:::,<4:.i:9.Â»3 T:* 4122:-: M:'14 {Â§#:{fe@'2;'E - ::::Â·'55$SS:S.:S: - r ."I...,>>."â€ž - I - Â»4*m .. 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Y-T-D June 30 Estes Park E-Mailed Requests for Information 12,000 10407 10,000 8007 8,000 6,000 5322 :1:~61?: St:.Mli iIi *111*litill * 3963 Â·i.,4. 1 :1: 3~ ~: 4,000 ........ Â·iÂ· Â· 4Â·1Â· 4Â· DilimiN 14Â·bÂ· 4Â· Â·Â·Â· Â·tÂ· 2,000 , â€¢,Â·$Â·1Â· Â·1Â· Â·Â·Â· Â·tÂ· ........... 1411Â·HÂ·Â·Â·Â· Â·1Â· :1:...:2:1:r,~:1:A1:ir :i:1:1:lir#:~~ird:1: .2.1.4.... 1. :51:1111: :::1: ---I----'--- :,FrM.r....V ........... 1 1Â·tlq....1 ........... '7.-7'P..." ........... 3:!HN"13:":El:i: i:Ill::1::::1: Â·PrK.*Pbh#. 111Â·sÂ· Â·eÂ·Â·Â·../. ....................... 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Year-To-Date July R 2 2 0. 2 g N U Z 1 i RE ~2% 1 its %01 4l W Â£ %2 â‚¬ 2 1 -61 ..46 ~0 6 92 *biss 0 14 b= '224 2 1 -0 < p 8 0 Z 4 & U i i g = Publisher/Network Campaign Description Period orTest Cost Ads Served CPM Throughs C-T-R Co:Uelick % or C-T Completed Acquisition Google t Banner Ads 9/1/00- 12/1/00 $13,500.00 298,486 $45.00 2,068 0.69% $6.53 15.00% 310 $43.52 Frommch Budget Tinvct s~.5215'yin;;UNCJTZOnter 4/1/01 -4/30/01 $18.500.00 500.000 $37.00 728 0.15% $25.41 14.42% 105 $176.23 Better Homes & Gardens i state filter 4/1/01 -4/2410] $1,194.60 39.820 $30.00 69 0.17% $17.31 17 $70.26 Non Targeted Run of Network Buy 7/3/0 1 - 7/27/0 I $5,000.00 1,176.471 $4.25 2.318 0.20% 147 $34.02 Ran on Table of Contents, Page 2 3/00 - 12/00 N/A 11,818 287 2.43% N/A 25.00% N/A 98 DS 9/.DO-51 Iris 5%Et'~Z LE Z9*6ZS 813't I 00'05ES }Ndo @tqwuoseou polulro[UD XemÂ¥ ly OUKOH Internet Completed Forms Cost Per el Web Sight - 15 state filter - ROS 4/1/01-5/15/01 $8,993.66 211,466 $42.53 1,013 0.48% $8.88 25.86% 262 Note: this is still running in July on National Park pages Summary of Internet Advertising Tests from September, 2000 though July, 2001. , Newsletters The tests above were based on this model SPECIAL EVENTS DEPARTMENT MEMO To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Special Events Department Director Hinze Date: August 20, 2001 Background Several years ago the proposal of a weekly rodeo was presented to the Town by an independent contractor. It was discussed and declined because of the disruption of other events at the fairgrounds. Trustee Barker asked that the Special Events Department again look at the possibility of a trial rodeo series for 2002. Tourists are looking for evening entertainment. Additional entertainment is an enticement for the tourist to spend an additional day in Estes Park. The Trial Summer Rodeo Series would be held on Mondays, Tuesday and Wednesdays during the weeks of June 3rd, 10% 178, and 248. The Series would not be associated with the Rooftop Rodeo, nor is it intended to take its place. Attached is the Estimated Income & Expenses for both 12 performances and 24 performances. Budget 12 Rodeo Performances - possible subsidy of $36,000 per year 24 Rodeo Performances - possible subsidy of $71,500 per year Action Staff recommends a trial period of two years to break even. This series can work only with the cooperation of the Chamber Resort Association and the individual accommodations selling this Series to their customers. 00 0 000000 00 0 04.00 N CO O e CO 0 h 0~ M.Q.C.M.2. .. NN W * M W 04 - Cl Ch - 00 000 00 %0 01 O 00 0 W 1 0 co r. 0. 014 e 00 â‚¬ -- a 00 64 *) I @E U 82& 1% 3 4 * =t C 400 - U 0 --0 .0 .2 > *;e'd 6. 2 u In M G /9 04 C. h 04 .Â¤ Cl â€¢- ,.4 26@ b 8 =5 oct 0.911 11% 0 *==11 05 8 . g , z IM & A M @3)9% O 5 U 0 t 532*e 2% u CO 1 0.9.2 2 2 Â·c o u 0 0 1 M 5 4 04 I W U CO W < E- E-U Lid 4 U Ar* 4 Weeks 8 Weeks 12 Rodeos 24 Rodeos s - Based on 500 per night $ 40,500 $ 81,000 $42,940 $ 85,880 2,000 4,000 0171,' I OEE'LgI$ 0 9'8LS SDISAIJIJX'il 1VIOJL (Off'IL-) (OEL'9Â£-) MATED INCOME/EXPENSES 01717' I 09 I'Z 008'9I uollotuoid loj oiu!1 luouniedoa sl 3 IED@ds :Opnpu! lou op sosuadxs[ oiuI loqureqoflsoj BUISTUDAP Iguose@S MER RODEO SERIES 1 I (13 1 9) XEH/P $ 79 ooKOIduIE[ SPECIAL EVENTS DEPARTMENT MEMO To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Special Events Department Director Hinze Date: August 21, 2001 Background The Estes Cycling Challenge was organized and run by Todd Plummer of Estes Park on June 23rd & 24rd, 2001. The two day bicycling event was well received by the 450 participants. When the 2001 race was approved by the Community Development Committee, they asked that the dates for any future races be changed to early June. Attached, from Mr. Plummer, is a 2001 Event Review and proposed plans for 2002. The dates chosen are June 12 thru 14th (extended to 5 days from 2 days), which are the same dates as the Estes Park Wool Market. Mr. Plummer is asking that you approved the dates and extended days at this time, so that his planning for 2002 can continue. There was one auto accident as a result of the event at Hwy 7 & Carriage Drive. No other accidents or disturbances occurred. Budget Neither the Special Events Department or the Police Department has monies budgeted for this event in 2002. The Event maybe required to pay for or share in the cost of Police Services. Action Special Events Staff and Police Department recommend date approval for 2002. We would continue to urge Mr. Plummer to pursue a weekend without an established event earlier in June. With this recommended event approval, it is understood that the race routes, times, etc. need further approval from Police Staff. Un#41(09* 7/ : ..4.-. --..--- f (I 4/15 ,Â«r71.-. ' r X19/ f~Itengv L,ycling LA 2002 2001 Review We had a very successful race in 2001. With over 450 racers participating in the E.C.C., I was very happy with the first year turnout. Without exception. the racers were very appreciative ofthe quality of racing that Ihey found at the 2001 Estes Cycling Challenge. I have enclosed copies of some of rider comments with this submittal. O f primary interest should be the fact that there were no injuries more serious than some road-rash. The efforts ofthe Estes Park Police Dept., Colorado State Patrol, Larimer County Sheriff's Department, Estes Park Sunrise Rotary and many others, combined to make this a safe and challenging event that the Colorado racing community has been talking about since the race ended. The 2001 E.C.C. did have some areas that could use some improvement. More course marshalswould benefit both Saturday and Sunday's Road Races. I have had some preliminary discussions with the Sunrise Rotary Club to try to identify ways that we can improve on next year' s race. The traffic disruptions on Sunday's Devil's Gulch Road Race can be improved upon in future years. In addition, I didn't provide the Steamer Drive/Black Canyon Hills residents with enough pre-race information about traffic impacts ofthe race in their neighborhood. Improvements for 2002: I am requesting a change of date to one week earlier. This is in part to reduce the traffic conflicts by moving to a weekend with less traffic. In addition, I wish to grow the race and the weekend ofJune 15* and 16th does not conflict with any major North American race. I looked at the weekends of June 7/8 and June 22/23. Each of these weekends conflicts with an established high dollar race on the National and International race calendars. The proposed race schedule for 2002 will be expanded and modified, All the race categories will have at least three days ofracing. The Saturday evening Time Trial ofthe 2001 race schedule will be moved to Friday evening. In addition, the Pro/1/2 Men will have two additional days of racing with a Wednesday evening Prolog, a Thursday point-to-point Road Race and a Friday morning Time Trial in Rocky Mountain National Park. I am requesting some minor course changes for the Devil's Gulch Road Race. The requested changes are intended to improve vehicular traffic flow in the vicinity ofHighway 34 and Lone Pine Drive I will be developing an informational flyer for the Steamer Drive/Black Canyon Hills residents to communicate the traffic restrictions caused by the race and how to best deal with those restrictions. kJ . - r .11 I ,-1 Direct Town Impacts: I am requesting permission to have The Estes Cycling Challenge in Estes Park on June 12 - 16, 2002. Specific race schedule is as follows Race Date Time Course Pro/1/2 Men Prolog 6/12/2002 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM Dry Gulch Road Pro/1/2 Men Pt.-Pt. RR 6/13/2002 9:00 AM - 9:30 AM Inn at Estes Park, Hwy. 34, Mary's returning approx. 1:00 PM Lake Rd., Hwy 7, Allenspark, Lyons, Hygene, Loveland, Drake, Glen Haven, Top on the Switchbacks Pro/1/2 Men RMNP TT 6/14/2002 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM Fall River Visitor Center to Rainbow Curve Other Categories Prolog 6/14/2002 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM Dry Gulch Road All Categories Fish Cr. RR 6/15/2002 8:00 AM - 2:00 PM Fish Cr. Rd., Hwy. 7, Community Dr., Brodie Ave. All Categories Devil's Gulch 6/16/2002 8:00 AM - 2:00 PM Raven Ave., Lake Shore, Hwy. 34, RR Steamer Dr. Black Canyon, Devil's Gulch, H Bar G Rd., Dry Gulch I will need the assistance of the Estes Park Police Department for traffic control on Saturday the 15111 and Sunday the 168. The remainder ofthe race schedule will need minimum Estes Park Police support. The majority of the expanded race schedule police support will be provided by the Colorado State Patrol, Larimer County Sheriff's Dept., Boulder County Sheriff's Dept. and the Rangers of Rocky Mountain National Park. In addition I will be requesting support from the Estes Park Public Works Dept. on a variety of small road related safety issues including road sweeping, sign and cone loan and potentially cooperation on paving, patching and sealing schedules. Attachments: Course maps, racer comments from 2001 1-17--- ~ 6,13,2 1 -1 -1 .,1 1 1 1 0-% 121 f 1 '1 f , O CO 1 ,-f o r b ), 2..2 ,- O 2 03 013Ai ~i frii # 7 ' -: 3.-11 3 /1 ~ A fo I l.. 0 *--- 5 MC) ri A ' G â€¢49 -- -------- ~ < /~ p f==1--9-" -- - ~~ -3~:~,- ' -, 7 - ~- Â·Â¥ ~Â·~ ~~ ~9 M:!14'IMÂ¥-1 2 - . 17- 11 -c .2 %31 *T/ E 3 ~ ) / i SAM 1 - 1- -_-,-- tchr#,40\,t C 1 k : 1141"1 ./ 03 Â¥ -, =: 2: 1 .r _Â£Â£EL .. - I , 114 1 1 4412, 1. : 631 v -Fc,-1 i .I- . r e: % 0 1.1, 11 -t J - - W':.1 0 -g a j Z 1 1 10 . 1 4 : 0 Ept --------- , - N ' + . c . .,0 1;,745) -~-W---aÂ¢t"F- I - hi /el\ . 17 '1 14- 9 34 . , 4 ~ ~01- _ ~~1 4 Â· ace)* 4 I K., 4 i L, 1 3 F .1 / I I ' â€¢ /8\ 2 o , OF P J flf. ~Â»L -cr -- -1- E 0 - / _ 0~''X rzo 1*4112 4 V - 9 32 -73 42 <-j--i. O- S f 5//35/. ., 1 1 2-- , -- ---/22 . -13-2 /7 /,AI :,-ih:- F C -g L o ' 4 -<10 \ E f-7 1 --- 1%1Â£Â§- = 1 N. 4 11 0.1 < .1 A 4.-7 P 3 -~ 43 11 Â· Â·1 i{ 0-!35 -u.= ta i '~ 1 # f 1 #- Vi' Z ~ * -75~Vl j 1'.11 1/1 I - -- --- .,r- - T# Y-7 *,1 fa Â·p : 7 47 ..' . - : - L__--=- .... I - . / de) . 4. M. ' 3 29 U Bow 0 . , 1- -Z 46=5:74â€¢.., '13 Lake b 1. v.j, ' - 01 C.i 4~1 tip.-AW I -. 1 r-JÂ»Â·fitur - dj ) 1 ,-/7--2,13 .121% IL , n ' .c , c.. '.1 ..a9 .....]A . i :2 *. 1 CÂ¥ 11 , -,/ 1 I~. -_(42\17-6. 4* (mi o .*\3& ifFT 4. - 2 + 1_... .. K I c/ 1 1 1 v ov,/ ~A ib) cr~jA~ * I. 1~ 1 ! 0.1 %,d 0,..A..0 4 1; /,L 11/ 1 1 1. 1 - M? i 4-~r~,#Â°16----51~~i=TAL#11.-7~11'1 7â€ž. i,"8,1, r4 - 4 O.r' T,HNI~!3714 -0-7Â°ir," 0 0/ 1 1 , '4 1 aeu 2 1 { -CO ... 9 2 8 71 f--4 8 l~I utlir I'~IMbl~ 2 -4 8 j2- 'Ag' 1 ili E -#Luv,127 $1 ' Â¥ 1 ; 06 1 144 - 1 3 -t 1 4 1 rl.Ul-*A~*gl 2\2/2- 6 - f 4, f ~,"*, 1~ 11 .Ill ..W,/1.0.1 ~â€ž J.-lir - - 1/ f %7 5- 70"" R . 2 rE t ...1 I 0 4 9/ - - f _ I. " ..1 '70' -Il- 1 4 r./ 1 2 0~; v~~~td_~,~ SB . :cll.19-916 --*AEEFaalil*M* 48 -Ili- i *rt \ Â« 3)\ 4: 1 --I-{ 1 4 - r-,tru'+2-3--4- 7/lt-6.U +Â·*r. -euta.* 11 0 1-- â€¢- c, -32*iddz -14-1" :' i \ (3Â¢ i â€ž\.... $ 1 1 E H (f c,f- m~ W i.802'Whf !3'k: .,4., r)1-.-L,' - .1 -- 01 01 , ho>l i 14 0 6-7, ' â€¢El ~,EFil~ -3 Â£ coa 4 --03,1,~14 -@al, 4 g b i- / . I Â©1 ' - a.4/ 9 4; if?- 1 1 1 21*11 I VE *Alj) - e, 4.14 28, v,/ 1 m f -n, * - li k . 1 B-- 4 paÂ¢ Fl 11 30 21 '11.0 n 1 09=-*r ' O ' 18 4 ;11 4~ rli<11629 . r- 5 1 ul i 1 ~4* -h r . - \ M-Â·r- Â· 'h./, i 4 -4 B lit, Â¥-0- F=%/ M'Tz< - f i~)1 9'i,~ 4~ 11.41 1. S . I , 4 ; .1.11 32'/ 1 9/ \ .11 "*WI ' SE.214=.9 g: 1 9 n- -4-d -- r .jt=3.-- -9.11~ - - - 51 -120 , ' . Lir vÂ· 1 i 'Mt' 5 g . |. 0'â€¢ I 1!~ C.,- -- c. I , 11 ' 6 U~ 1 â€¢ -4 ..FA- .1-7L . ' 4 EBA~ 612~-4 ~01 11. \6 i. 11 . , 01 /- ' 10 -3 4-6- #te Â¢ 1: VA, 6 ,- p j /BRM>4-, .:, r,~1; a 74'~ Sivll -.~81-~ LJ D-4- t///--,9, , , N.\ 1 I 1- 1 14. ,-1/<b : A- 21 n.Â¥, 1 1 ~3*,-bt f 1../ b.. F Lg 41~l d' 1 . I :,L , - , N .. I .. ' l , , 3~ 2%\ 1.j; "n~ 8/2 V,/ . â€ž leT â€¢ A ' t J . -1 1 1 4 2 1 ' - 2, rva -73>~- --1 t .0,/rr. 411,ill-\70: 011 / /,/'/n .te / // 1 -- -A -t--- . ) ' !0) 1 1. i r 11.- f -in- u =1) 1 0 12 / 1 , ,/ ..1 /1 \ , t. :3- 6.: ' 1, ..% , I %_t - --- 0: 1/ -~ 1 .:,u ,--uc.- 3 5104 If (:AillÂ£6* 1411 ..Pri.) - A â€ž Ai' ~ 4 -- i i ..rw T 4 , 11 a 1 - - - 45 ' 'cg LiC' C '' 14!7 . I. C : f C 1 2 0 . 1-141 + h 1 â€¢ -r,, 2 1 2- ; Â· v.r----4 1 / 0- , --; 4 ) / /- --2 /3 -1 p *<ir'% 1 _CE i - --44 1 21 19' 4 . i /1 / P . 11 - =:-4" 4 631,9 (r" 1 --i-3 :' %=2- 4Â·-- ~~->97 Â»a-_~ i-f---- -- --Â£2~~ - ---, ~E~,0~0'0~~L 7244--<p 4, 4/4 -, 1 -- - 1Â£ J , 1 i I 30 1 1 - ef N ,- , 4 . 01 11 1 -1 . / - 1 / : 8.*H ; h 1 -Â§\ 6 .2-54- :9, 1 V g . -2 - I Tlt . 1 (7.- L.:,â€ž -,14 4/& 441 n Mi -:1 - Utti-' *.' 0\ & 0 1, - 2-i '<Viks-Y--~-~tr~ 7- r: . I .*In /9 1 < 7 1 d '0=0.. / , . iii b / r. ) . 41. 40 l ' 43 4* 3 - ~ -i>->laticv~i+2-=~6%1: 1# 4# -- . 0, Â·--%.i=-8 - U,-' -9:-r.1 I 4.3411%- -1 I 10 .4.-1 -' --. 1 : ----- \ 1.imp.,' ' . N 1--11 - / 4 -# .-K , -* -=' --rn, E.125-Â·-4 \: 1 1 141 : -3 1 -El; 4 1 r - -- ---- c- (29 â€ž 6 2%5% , C i *f < '5.i -- , - 1.8 /. C 4, , %: ; & L 1.---*--4-64--4 1 4 ---- , ' A. 1., Â¥ 1 . - 1 '1111 C i i i E , 1 --_ 5 6. 100, 11 3 Â£.10,/--3 6--7 1% " .- . '3{-- 5 ! 2- J < 3%4: 1 11 - -/ 1 74. IE 1 1 \1 -7.. 1 1-/-- I M /1 :- Ii 'â€¢2'G;3 0 4 ' JIm, 1 1 ' r ' - .LF .3 ; Â«ms-Ur--f- 1 1/ i % .., 3 & 1. 3 42. 1 1 ; 31 9Â°, VT: 3 -- a , 1.- 1 , r-'-RT-1 , 60 - v 33 u i %2 9 ' ,</ 1, : . 15 -* 01, , , 1 0 - 5. I 'l U - -4.I 1 Lb- 4- C " m ![26* - . 1= r >*,: 1 Â»1,8. --lf j Ci A : ' f$ .r .010 U eÂ·-- I - 11 t"Â» -- 4,":.-.11 --9'' M _79 ,;2 3 ''~ - 1. I_fic'149'10-427'.1-1, f 7 .1 4,14 6 - - - ./. 1 I . .... e . O ./ it :8 4 f I. ' l.- - r 3 . ' IN U 4 - - I / , Al -24- %11. e. 11 : Up q 9-J .9 +1+ ~ A Li ti . ULâ‚¬ 4 , -6- -,1 *% 2 r,3 : ------------- " *tz.'36 < a ~ -CÂ¥ I 4741- 4.d, F r ug Q ' 1 .5 , r ~-9' 8 3 710,3,1 4 - e % 0, 2 f !- 1 - -- 4 1 r ... I. | ' -02Â·EMLA.F :* - <---, W - .I--il--*. C h.- - le .--- ../~S : - 102.-. - 8 , 11 . ti e X Â£ 4--7 /02 1 ..~CE' 01 , 1 + r. ..h â€¢41% ~Â§ , En r j t=Lj 1 7-; cr - 11 - 1 1-- , 4 f Bj ~ rfÂ·~ Mi â€¢Â· - *2 , 1, 1 1 1 - 3 = -- -~- - (~ ~ 5 ! ' -t If-1 -4 -*' V . p j - 0 -0..1,4,4 010 : h i L.1- -â€¢.â€¢Trrop. â€¢ C.- ,1 0 L <63,12 t---1 f E. , 7 ty, i - 1 10 ~< ~ ..':,-f~ -r. f ----w4: 6 1 i '~'~ 56 \ - Trh , fk * 5 9 ~- 1 -1 .,f &: # 9Â°i f jilt & 3 7 4/ #2 4 : _~~ _ --/ 11 - s 2 L _23~L ----1 5 r.5.- . -~-- r , . P /1 1// , 4 -6 '/ - 4 . f 7 1.' ,/ 7 3 1 , 5 -7 . k .. 1 1. cz #64 , 7* ci r#\ - 1* 65, ~ : ' 4 59/' - A ,-0 4 #f ' 0 42 f 'f. I 04/--1-4 ,'.; ~ 4 r & 4 . 1 - -..1 -1 , 4 1 L w -f--2, ~ 4 L ' .--, 7.-6,1 2 . 1 Z Ul :r 0- - 1 6 & "1 11 1, *,le' 4 /' .' '/ 2 -- 'JLF -t ; I. , * 1--3-'r~-Fy- f Ka 1\It' U, I J f. 3) . r ~~Ir# ~ 7-' ', 'f , 11 r~ c~ I'f~11~, 9 p- - . --'., i J,,3~~ ~ 3-~0(: .' t ; ..: 11 1. , < -46 3 2 2 - r = ' ', - 12 2 < : 1 34 , , 11 \),-, ':' .2343% 7~-d~.,91 $ L ,f & 1,11 I. 71 , i 1- Â»1 - Â» C--- 11 PC >.1 , : 1,91-2 ., , L r - , P Ix-* rYz Â£ 1 1 03 2 '4.I' ~ ire ~~ *~~~~\d\'1,~~ w !1 - 1 : 4 dE. *24 1', 1 : f~ ~, ---74~~ COU#'O. 1 Gulch '.4 -*k ---4 I ~ 2 \ 0 , 1 11,- 11 9 1. , 4-6 -1 Pol.Cri.. 11 I -t_ z i _ -jt .1 22 41 -/4.4 1 9434, ,-~4 -4Â»7' F /Â·Â· ~ ~, 'li t/,------ L A-' 2 - L g 9/trl . . 1 F.4 2 1 , - v .1>kh<.h r .. - "' 7 \ \-18'r 1 9 ty , i , .: .' El ht -' Ir-I 0\ < 111 , Cy, 7 3 4. 11 % i 1 nk 1--a -,6 1111 = -l i 11/ C /l '46. '24 -3.f M .4' 47 j z ; , , .--1 11.'- h â€¢1' - -~ 0, ~ 1 . 11 * ..4 - 1 -2 .- 1 h , 141. A j )1 4 1 ,1 4 E C.- .SL- -, : 51 a -~~-'-- --- I -Im h / 1 -1--~ 4 2 7 -1, * I - ,9 ' . : .2- Â¥ 1.1, , t- - TT I , I I. '11* 1,1 - . r ' , I'l.' * , \ , --.4. Mt_ /2- . 4 at /,//FON-X..17â€¢ - e.ris , *...0 ' ,,4 133 44@/" Â· ~~ -'b---2'+$----~---Tle.â€ž'.. â€¢ ~ r. ' 1 -t:7;M - . ._ - - 1,1 '1 Y J , b u -7- '.* 1 . j R R 0 3% + -/11- Â° , 4 21~ 5 /. ' r - . . 5b ~~~ 1. I -- #t- j . .i~,W Li r-Â¢ ,8 i' 7 - 1,1 - 4 1-1 2 iht (â‚¬4 11 . .4. / i. I . , .' A-NEL --- --Â· f d...Cli- (b~ -~'~'~ ~ '4..,Â» 2 1 42 c 1 ./ f / ~ 1 <iti _._ - - == , 7-Ek-Eldr~ . 2, I 4 I I ..: 1 .3 1'Â· P, --tf N.- 27 f VIT r'llit ~ -->t 2 11 r \*. 2 0 9 1 6 / 23 1 5 rj- ' 7 4/rhvit. . pj# ~,~,4 51,0&F~?[ ;1 --5/ e p j 1 8,6, 1 4 3 7 V . , lA ..9 11,5 , -- I - I. f, 711: 1 4. , , L- - iF Â»E v P 1 .7, ''' Si,2 ; " Ll A-,--- . /6 1 1 . 1- I 4 - 11 -ig. fi -' I I Â¥0 â€ž- ... . - , k. /1 '*-04 - 1 - -1 4 4 - -7--br- 1, 1 7 . , 4 - .- 3/ 1 . 4 9 . 1 - .2 id,4 - 1% 1 9 : -1,/1;rd 1 y I'.-4 - 1 . : i i..i...41 r 91 , - )[7-3 reÂ»7 -7 1 3 611 * -J. ii - Vt, 4 . 1 ' /1 1 . 1/1 - I 2 2% / 52 p - 4$-prâ€¢ 1,4.-, % , U J h.- I 1 f I t il/' $- 1% 9 - 16 'ft . 3,2 L â‚¬ 5 -- _-f - ~ , 2--- 1 - 12' / 4, , 2 1.9* IIi R + ' ,- M- 3;'-....11 ' A 2.Â«64 2 : -8.1.- \1 - 2 .I M #2 e + Â·, 4/ ' 6-1 :4 11,1.4 - .1.4 / ' elf 1 Is #10.. 1 1 a '9,1 Â·~ 1 'tr i W,44*['' 5 W3 > 1 /v, a< 1 8 4 1 3, 4, -' 4 i d r t, Al 02.1 \ 1 )24#. - I. â€¢34. ' l/l '1% I / gn ' , *71 ; 4 1 + f U 3:- 1 / 1 31/7 F /1 -; tkil. 1 :--14.1 60' 4.. 11 - 1 - " 95% 0 ''' Â· 4 i, ; 3 < 4 2 - Â·-' 25 . M g-, .,,f i. 1>yÂ»:1 '.n 0, , ~ ~'5,~,1~~11 A 11 ''~ 1 , 11 13 - , '.5 =, :11 -01 1, C Z= CL ----1>= e.eo .& 1 .,2 2 b k J 4 4 <' 13 l '43\ i. i v .2 i ' 'Of ,; 1 ./ -1- L ? 1 W $ d - ' 02 e ' , 19'J jif - - 44'0 1 -i 7 9 1 I N b , i.5 )#. Z UlL Â·1 h \0 r ticM 1 0,; '< C, 21 i< JAAe,&' Eff<Af. ---*i.'t . fi-/Maitaim':u, 6 *'' .44 '* 9 1 Al &99 94& 9 _I 1 39 2-4 v ape-RA f A . ./ I. Â«, 1 . Z} . 1/ 1 .2 ' al- i :- '4 - 4.,1, 1% /1 4 ) j -1 '44;la4-4-t..,tÂ· n: 1= ~t A tw 1, 1- i - ,-2 91 4-'' 4 1 ' 11 8.,Mr, r. -~ ,/ 1 i- r j. 571 % m 0 ~ 0 . 3 40 luÂ«Â« 2 ta. 2 zi~; 111(3 44- t.j %:fl F acke i.:1 -1 01 243 5.1~4 2 \6 0Â¥;- ed~ Et'j i. 1 0 1 : 02 '' ~ ''8Â¥ ~(( 4.*~~*~,1 -#11 4 &* C.2~ 343 3â€ž4f- ,)*, H~ 49% 9 1, 4 - n =+ / p-1 1,3 ' rv#~C.â€¢ ~11..... WILI }ERN! 5 9 X . M 'W-- ,t!.2.574 . Â· Ounrave,â€¢ ,//, Imf -i-Â·-- v,Â·2- -n J-fÂ©444-'0>34: Nt-â€ž - 6 U <11,831) AckinBOn ~ , (13.5560) ~~fr' , / I rt:Elift:,1 .pi, 44AJ Saddle c - 'E COMANCHE PEAK < E Mâ€žinmy . -/ -1 11. ff f. (13.4:-J) .Wouf,f.#â€ž; . I m 1,41 1 Mount.un '14 - - - 44 ng \ 'f. - 3Â· WILDERNESS .4 .\ $ 410 ) 3,,,eniia c Zjf.i -1~1,2j9~:~ ntl- - .-s ; 22 1.jin 614> Lake \13. '24 , I. F.Ils Glen Â¥iwit,n (13,514)|~ FOON,12Zr A-f- Mcti,irain ---0 B CÂ¥' '.ROV Ut ./3 1 Ii' WH < *S '1 - Spectocle CA Wount \ â€¢ r\.Lic Lakes 5 .Â«441\ /1 t.:54) r,/.scon ~ - - +W" A - - ~ - 1,1./dow' 'i/iii. . . Piper SCitiquO bj ) ' f9*- < 0 t.uke Sheep ne. j Alotint.tw c 1 0, FOUS 2\ // 99- 7 /A .MOU D."k (10.859) 0/ 4/ou/f.lin -/1 Bighern 1~ rig>+2 PACK. r ' ' 8.'42. c _. ~.g..7 Cho 1 1 8,#7* Fall River Road Â· 5 '.~ . 04 The f 10.0693 | i / 10 \._ 1.1.corego, 1 0, 48/li) ~ Netâ€¢Wes , '2 Eagle j Mountain f ,,~ 1 1 1 Fail, IZI~ Lawn Lake Trail Faus -- 757*79*315-- A r ...â€¢ Rock r f -ping - 7,11 River -C. 2 4,R-C 74 TI,1, F O 0Â«K-6-Y F,Dish 4-1,4,4.-- ~,.~-~I~d~-y'.~.~~ -/ -' 0.40Â« -- Twin Owls I ,\e,5 Â«4169 1,12..~Bt 1/'-6 A 2.4.-F~igar ZJ-- 1 34 -L 3 [â‚¬4Â« f 13 - GIll Cl 11 JEER 'Â·tri, -. ---Â·:~]\~ - . . PACK '. 1L -1- '~ ..4 - Fle. i 6 0,0 ./. ' 0 >./....V-/ " "k j a _ i ' tâ€¢Â·Iqn h 151 :r .%4=.S/--3.-ex !.561,4 -'--- iY.'.7 . ,/ ' . 4 Ski Estes Park Dee'f , . ', Moun,Jin ' - 7~1,10'E -I\ 7-1/Â£75 Mli' I. :,tÂ·'Â·' .wounr 1 //1/71 'f,ul 0,6 /7449-Â»9Â«2> Olymous .2 i PISS 4 I. Thâ€ž 1 95024 HIGH OR . Notch 8ejver . ..JO: ,- 90:â‚¬ t~ ~Â·0~ ,. Mount Mounlain Bear L ake Road-cgi--le.,ver v,023*~~3~..1'>!/6'435 - ; i--1:- 11 4 TRA/L . Â· 44-5.=IÂ«LI- Pisq.it, FR i:: - '28:43 2=4 - 'L /Ch r '4 10 4, . C I N ' Â·. ..Alur-lia )"Il 1 . A CER-Eugh, C.'iff - - I Mountain . -- -I'PN - - Â·,Â· -'o) ~ 1 ) U N P. A I N ~48CO3-:U-.--*,2.--2-2 1.e. u r- 6 --- .r 45 30 -1_.Â· r t.- - | - 1 I. C .1.1 . - 3.3 ThornpiRB--fli,8 -- ;9<7 ---]R-1---9 44*, / 1 - - .40*, â€¢,eN j f f / /t, '4 IGi.initi,,Â·Al 4.-1 - - Sr,â€¢el <~ I. jA t ---,- ~~ Â· ~{L.~L- 4 1'0{"wÂ·'"1 -7:Â©AM.rvs Suum i 4,~fer.U Ajoi.,1,7, l~'d: 'EEp/~ -Â·-/4.--1-4 . . 4 0% 1 LuIe .Wf),1/,4,/â€ž 21.4 1 Hermit Â°/,44x , -1 H nie .</ mef P.k 2â€¢ phi'is 1'.- ,\1> Fâ€ž,cle, Rock , RUM 01 - . Luke "CU/lf A - 1---3 36/5,1.184$3<LLJ'gyâ‚¬~,q-/HTEI j - ~ 2.02=15 -I Jacal \ fl Od...1 j fO. 761) i Mount,i.n 7--- 1 1 /0-2. 1 1 sp..g Â· e V lutre 44 /.1 / ' , tÂ· /9/. 3 Joi Mills .- \ _1-/ 431'Ir/,4/11 --7Â·f . 1 9...rlit <It' 1 1.....'.'Vrd"le /t'.,3'. ' V /2/,73" , obtop i , Min / 2 46 -- - -\ wi't.1.1.Faai - -crrul. i?rue. . '' .f<220.4 _.- - -11 Lily . Luke Fern Uke Traill, p y/- - - - - J .4 M- Min 1 / 1, , 2, 1:- .*t~,~iti),Jn 'C ,...Asm/Gtols;Â«1 - -,Â«-, >72' -- Ve , ) I Â·.94 Finemi .3 ' '~) f 9- 6/v 1 + ' blin \ Â· 1. nk , 110,"1 4 - 1.JIC- /_14 imack L.ue 'rrall 00,1,61 ~~ L-43 4-4 Twift 5,5:erq 9 --~Â·1Â· - ---- T;â€ž, * SW.Â·\ 2Â· +40â€ž '.â€žI 1427 4.#RELUT'# cascodl=th Lont? 1,e.# rrail ~ 4 : C...ls . 1."A - Pier':91 q Fads Wouni.,ii, ROC tli,/+Ajil. 1.31 -I lu,+ 1PARK .0 4/1- 1 ..1... wiA,1 R.ver f b. i 4 pas,1 '4; 5% >,pring, _;,uoer 3 -4Â£4*4,2 ., 1 t 11 006) Elles -t I r U.,Â·09/ 2 j 2')TA r"~~ ~,~1.:(I-EL:.2 P,ls A --4 ' :1 . .'.,1,/1 -1 20 Sfo,-ni 0,1. - 2 6/The \1. Mins A/,f '4'~EAK 4. 1.Ue'OU' , P.'85 1 - a , l.- A h r..vin S,shâ€¢,s 1 V '.Vible. Wrr; -5 E...Ax:?a;------------=37---*CILIJ)--2 -i---:~~iLJ ' -0 3, C. SC/r 3 0 ...1. 1 2 - E. , I 1 4 4 U - 3 1 :2....,4 la!: Â·â€¢ 'Â·191 2 1 3. 1 .0 + 1 --,3.. 4/ I aircnion - I 1 0 ~9~ - .3, i ' \ - - --4% 3...gs 1 - ----/ f. 7.,9,0,\ ~Â¢,AÂ·-1 ,cond 1 6,Â·in,w East Long, Peak Trailll>Z'h,f'~~~TT-*~Â© -~ ~ Ak-1 x 6Â·-iÂ· . 4 - 2.;.4S - So'ZI:'' -8~'Et \ ; - Eugeni'a Mine,Inid-4.<~--4-2, 8 4 1 4 -110. Ta - \'A '/- 1 1 0 Â· 4*7.... ' ' .4 'c 1 2 ., \ 12 1 ~ y <8 - '.4. Hen.vsÂ©fli; Po." 6 :'41-Â· ~.el . Ruc. Â·I 11,ii,ii< I 9 ~ Â·4' Â·' L\RlMER CO 6 l.,/v Was/1 0, l C> 3--AAE----RiiÂ£37-1-fi,Y-- 41---~~---*----- - 74,:7875[imaf--ay -712':5 PC(56= na*-35 4 1 U .. KI7 lon,;s ..'ke Â·t'. 1 443/--~'--Â·/'' Soeignead AL t J...'. 14 2553 , :t. / W...f./. 14â€¢fiâ€¢er - C=b* 4 F.) i .Â·,ep:iii, ,: r 1 0-3/,eluccu /L.:â€¢:,2 0. 1 -3Â¥221-- 711~ 7 1 'i 96{11. , D '- 1 ~/r-:4 14, \,(4~1Â¢,eker'~ ~Â·'Z~ _ " ~~~~ 4235. i Park Â·fÂ· .4.secti.]un h -. e '22'0 ..,..Â· PHot le.1. 'iÂ·ads '' -44 41 Y Spint . '10,715) Lookout - frfl" .Wi~~inf.li,1 ! .... Boub.,tir-t;rinir ' Â· . '.'. 7,3 : Â· 'Â· Â·low _-ltqi 7 . Course Map f. I Fish Creek Road Race: = OÂ»vneofvn Esâ€¢es Park .....lill' b @Ould- NOTE: ~ ~ 7 ~823. ** 7 I ..SUg After completing your race, riding backwards on Brodie â„¢di Dz r Â° Avenue will be prohibited. Commonly Tldlilloal Co.1,â€¢f Marshals will direct racers MAe 7 U- Caltioâ€¢d! to safely return to the High School by alternate routes. MeD,â€¢ ul Please cooperate with the marshal' s safety instructions. /-7 Peaky- Di ' MAte 1 MOB 6 Fish Câ€¢Bel< Ad. koct A. A %44 7 11% DE- â€¢1,3 L.---2 04 2 4 /\ C.frage Lale lk, 4436* Wh tx f Uttle'hley Rd legal 6463 .Ret to A.d Zone .AshC-k Rd. Profile: HW 7 & Fish Creek -1 8100' HW 7 & 6.896 ~ Marys Lake Rd 8000' An"li//9/imm""MA 7900' 2.896,~ HW 7& HW 7 & Community 7800' . Carriage_Hills -3.296 gommunity & Brodie 7700' Finish Line 1 1.996 f , 1 -49 - 1 . â€ž*,9. 7600' 1/an Hofn , It - . '. 1,4." I~'. l '21-6.11.7 * ingineerinc A - V I *. 12 1 1 7500' -All . 1 0 mi. 1 mi. 2 mi. 3 mL 4 mi. 5 mi 6 mi. 7 mi. ,itt;/' 1 1 .... Course Map Dry Gulch Time Trial: CR 61 Finhh l/ - F F Mile 2 rÂ« Gukh Dry Rd Gulch Rd. , Mile 1 ii Y 1 6/ 4 f Of--1{\ 0 Sort l 1 90 34 Down~**=*<b*/'W _ to 0364nd / Emipah--~ Fort Catf 1 griff f A41 Rd- 14 HWY 7 ' HWY 36 to Al;enspark Creek Rd. to Bouider Profile: 7900' 7800' 7700' 23% 7600' ~'. jr'-A?.*i,rÂ¢.Ip,7/am=1=,miwi=-R/~/a-~=-,~,~~-==~~ 3.696__00~ 7500'- 0 mi. 1 mi. 2 mi. 2.&246*2 '6+*?eSGUEjUik.-AdÂ·U*Â£- Â·~1â€¢ -:Â· â‚¬~~ l. . -,-p Â· . â€¢ Course Map Devil's Gulch Road Race: / C.R. 61-,- l t Mile 5 Mtl@6 Mile4 Sprint Hot Spot Speed Li,ntt S#,11 Devil's Mie 3 04 G~,]ch Gukh Rd. 94. Â£ Mile 7 Mile 2 .'.# ...1 Black Callyor, ZO.1.-' 1 :-n u_. 1 --1 / 41 2-#-2 1 2/ 4 i /.37 HWy 34 MItea '1 . , W WL &* 1-9 Mile 1 i HWY 34 U-1 to loveland / :4 + 1 Fort Colins Estes **4.44 ~~~ ~-2 _- 1 - - 14*!'. u '2 :-~:~~ L 71 61 - Inke EFIE - -Ii -0, .....- -- 4, --2-50.1 1 '42='- Mall Rd. , X HWY> HiVY 36 to Allenspark Creek Rd. to Boulder Profile: De\Ofs gulch_.. __ 7900' Black unyon 4.33*c~Mâ‚¬ZiER 61 Finish Line & Devil's Gulch / :94':-Â·' Â· 4%7~-- Dry Guich ,--2.7.-57*Â·-22.%.4- & CR 61 - 7800' - Lone Pine 0':JA --71Â·,i.â€¢ 4Â·Â»cÂ·Â·,1â€¢. i ~ &HW 34 ti tt*â€¢DÂ·Wi r T# '. Â·. . , ir: 3Â·.r 9Â·~ ~Â·Â·Â·3â€¢~.!'â‚¬,-~â‚¬~â€¢riÂ·1~Â· Â·Â·'Â·Â·Â·â€¢r'ic,Â·m' "Â·0 i,- Â·%â€žÂ· Â· r , ' 7600' .,2- 2-2-2.,-OE-2.4*1Â£.LE=Lignmijak#.*t AUSSÂ©'2~1:.-~LIâ‚¬+4.Â»794- -3.096 r.:tâ‚¬ 9447Â¥~4*I. *%:*.-.-..44*t~~.M?f 7%:ipÂ·i~44-:947%:itt/::i~~24A2i fe4Li-~~-- 7500' .-,1 -,Â£41â€¢, 1' -Â·i, 42 "~ r r P'-t. 59 :1-, 1-,4-4.'-- â‚¬5 - i'*Â·2M3-24'Â·.Â·Â· AÂ·%'494 I}:3 U'.ey.;':Â·;> ter'.'~ -rt ~.' ~2 .::RÂ·.~Â·:.9'::, Â·Â· ; f :1:51.4-:u, '?.6,2%'tâ‚¬Â¢-fÂ·â‚¬:" '. ~ 2Â·t ' 7.Â·.ii'X'.'*t~ 3 -1~ -1 -2'.: 2~,i~ ~Â· '1Â· ' ~ ~.7 0 mi. 1 mi. 2 mi. 3 mi. 4 mi. 5 mi. 6 mi. 7 mL 8 mi. . Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:12:02 -0600 - From: "Beth Wrenn-Estes" < bethwrennestes@qwest.net > To: trogers@snowsports.org Subject: Re: Estes Park Challenge Hey thanks. I appreciate you taking the time to send some feedback our way. Beth > Dear ACA, . > Thanks for the opportunity to provide feedback which I will do but the > purpose of this e-mail is to salute those involved with the Estes Park > Challenge. It was a fantastic event that was a pleasure to participate in. > >On the behalf of the Pro Peloton Cyclist who participated we want to thank > the Colorado State Police, Estes Park Police, Volunteers, Race Officials, > the Sponsors and Community that did a excellent job putting on the event. > It *as will-run, superbly marshaled with timely results. There is nothing > more to say, thanks again. > > The event name is appropriate. I hope we can have more events as > challenging to continue the development of regional racing. Multiple days > of hard racing is the best way to bring yourself to the next level. > > Tom Rogers >ACA Member > From: Chris McGee < cmcgee@gartsports.com > To: "'todd.plummer@minolta-qms.com"' <todd.plummer@minolta-qms.com > Subjecr: Estes Stage Race Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:46:04 -0600 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ---- = NextPart 001 01C0FF20.45F6C350 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hey just wanted to express our appreciation for promoting such a high quality event. We couldn't believe the great courses and organization for a first year race. excellent choice for the State road championships. thanks a ton! Jamba Juice Cycling Team chris Chris McGee Promotions Coordinator Gart Sports Company 1000 Broadway, Sixth Floor Denver, CO 80203 303-863-2638 p 303-863-2229 f cmcgee@gartsports.com < mailto:cmcgee@gartsports.corn > . 1 , Subt estes park race Date:. 6/29/01 12:52:33 PM Mountain Daylight Time Â· From: steve_archambault@hp.com (ARCHAMBAULT,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ext)) To: EstesCycling@aol.com CEstesCycling@aol.com') Great job on the race, it was one of the BEST races put on in Colorado in the last 10 years!!!!!! thanks, steve Page 1 of 1 Subj: Great Weekendl Date: 6/26/01 9:31:07 AM Mountain Daylight Time From: pam_leamons@agilent.com (LEAMONS,PAM (A-Loveland,ext)) To: EstesCycling@aol.com ('EstesCycling@aol.com') - - Todd, I just wanted to say, as a participant in the Estes Park challenge, that the race your club sponsored was one of the best that I have been to so far. 1 was very impressed with the course for all three races and the fact that you are in a tourist location yet provided the cyclists with an extremely safe environment. The whole weekend was excellent and you and your army of volunteers deserve a big pat on the back. I did not hear one negative comment from any of the other cyclists. Thanks again, I had a great time and respect and appreciate your efforts. Pam Leamons Page 1 of 1 Subj Thank you for the Great Race Date: 6/25/01 5:15:13 PM Mountain Daylight Time From: jeffrey_homan@agilent.corn (HOMAN,JEFFREY (A-Loveland,exl)) To: EstesCyding@aol.com ('EstesCycling@aol.coml editorial@americancycling.org ('editorial@amencancycling.org') Dear Todd and Beth, I competed in the ECC races this weekend. It was a great experience. The races were very well organized and well run. The results were timely and accurate. I really enjoyed the courses and the intense competition. I spoke personally with some of the Officials and Police who directed traffic thanking them for their time and effort. Thank you for putting on such a great race. I really appreciate it and I hope to participate again in the future. I hear rumor of a 4 stage race next year, that sounds great..... how about a TT up the Devil's Gulch Switchbacks!? ..... well .... it sounds great until I would have to do it. Again, thanks. Regards, Jeff Homan, FCRC Cat. 4, 31 st in the GC .... not great . I need to get faster Page 1 of 1 Subj: Estes Park Challenge - Thank you Date: 6/26/01 12:16:44 PM Mountain Daylight Time From: mduncan@coreintegration.corn (mduncan) To. EstesCycling@aol.corn, eswrennestes@macconnect.corn Beth and Todd, I wanted to thank you for an excellent race. I know there are many people to thank but I wanted to tell you and you can pass on my thanks. I was able to thank some of the police support at the race and they all said they were having a good time as well. I had a great weekend at the race. All the events were great courses and well marshaled. You did a great job. Stage races for all categories have all but disappeared from Colorado and it was great to be able to participate in one. Page 1 of 1 Subj: Thanks! Date: 6/25/01 10:32:54 AM Mountain Daylight Time From: ccoyle@schwinn.com (Chuck Coyle) To: EstesCyding(Gaol.com Todd and Crew, Thank you so much for the race this weekend. I know that myself and my whole team had a great time racing this weekend. The courses were well though out and challenging, and the organization was top notch! I hope that this race will continue for years to come. Thanks for all the hard work! -Chuck Coyle THF Racing Page 1 of 1 Subj race Date: 6/25/01 7:52:36 AM Mountain Daylight Time From: jhamilton16@hotmail.corn (John Hamilton) To: estescycling@aol.com Todd and Company - I just wanted to say what a great race you put on this weekend. I was only able to do Saturday's race, but it was excellent. It was clear that the logistics of putting on that race (not to mention two more!) were incredible. Ever'yone did an outstanding job - Thanks for a great event. John Hamilton Pro Peloton Velo Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http:Uexplorer.msn.com Page 1 of 1 e . Subf Estes Cycling Challenge Date: 6/28/01 12:44:57 AM Mountain Daylight Time From: mbeaty@csci.net (Mark Beaty) To: EstesCycling@aol.com Todd, I just wanted to say that you and everyone involved put on a great race this past weekend in Estes Park. This was my first ever stage race (1'm a newbie to racing this year) and 1 hope it's not my last. I'm hoping for and looking forward to this race every year in Estes. I heard nothing but good comments from the other racers. Good job! Let's make sure we make this an annual event! Mark Beaty Page 1 of 1 SUN: (no subject) Date: 6/25/01 1:47:53 PM Mountain Daylight Time From: Gathack To: EstesCycling Thanks for putting on a great race. It's not often we get two great road courses and a time trial in one weekend(and no crit!) Can't wait to do it again next year. Gary Thacker ' From: "gelight" < gelight@gateway.net > To: < tplummer@boulder.qms.com > Subject: Estes cycling challenge Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:45:36 -0600 Todd I just wanted to say a quick thank you from myself and the people at Red Rocks Velo. The races were fun, and everything seemed very well organized, especially for a first time event. All of the officers out on the course were great, and as a racer I felt very safe, even on busy roads at a busy time of year. This is certainly one of the best events I've done in this state in a long time, and it is great to have a couple of road races on challenging courses to provide some selection and fun racing. We see enough group sprints with 75 riders going for a win. Couldn't have picked a better setting. I hope all went well for you, and we sure appreciate all of your hard work - I know it can be extremely stressfull and thankless. Thanks again, and I hope this is an event that can continue in the future, but if not, I really enjoyed the weekend of racing. Glen Light, Red Rocks Velo TOWN OF ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum August 13, 2001 To: Honorable Mayor Baudek, and The Town Board of Trustees From: Bob Joseph, Dave Mahany, Subject: Community Development Vehicle Replacement (G-52A) Background: This vehicle a 1988 Jeep Wrangler (G-52A) has been in the Town Fleet since new in 1988. This vehicle is within the vehicle replacement parameters of 80,000 to 90,000 miles or 10 years. This Vehicle (G-52A) has 101,257 miles and is 13 years old. Budget / Costs: Estes Park Auto Mall : 2002 Jeep Wrangler $19,000.00 -$ 3,000.00 Less Trade-in (1988 Jeep Wrangler G-52A) $16,000.00 Bid Price Pro Chrysler Jeep : 2002 Jeep Wrangler $19,719.00 -$ 1,500.00 Less Tmde-in (1988 Jeep Wrangler G-52A) $18,219.00 Bid Price Ferrero Auto Center: No Response The 2001 Community Development Department budget includes $20,000.00 for replacement of this vehicle. Costs : $16,000.00 Budget: $20,000.00 Recommendation: The Community Development Department / Fleet Department recommends approval of the bid from Estes Park Auto Mall and requests approval to purchase a new Jeep Wrangler from Estes Park Auto Mall for a cost of $16,000.00. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ESTES PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCORPORATE CURRENT REFERENCES TO THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: Sections 5.35.010, 5.35.030, and 5.35.070 shall be amended as follows: 5.35.010 Applicability. This Chapter shall apply to any accommodation existing in the RE-1, RE, E, R, R-1, R-2 and R-M Zoning Districts of the Town. 535.030 Restrictions on rentals. Each accommodation subject to this Chapter shall be restricted in the leasing, rental or furnishing of any accommodation unit as follows: (1) Renters. The number of renters using each accommodation shall be no more than twice the number of bedrooms located within each accommodation plus two (2) persons. (2) Renter vehicles. Renter motor vehicles allowed on the premises shall be no more than one (1) vehicle per each bedroom of the accommodation or three (3) vehicles, whichever is less. (3) Recreational vehicles and tents. No recreational vehicle, as the same is defined in Chapter 13 of the Estes Valley Development Code, tent, temporary shelter, canopy or teepee shall be used by any renter on the accommodation premises for living or sleeping purposes. 5.35.70 Exceptions. " Delete this section" Section 2: Section 7.08.070 and 7.08.080 shall be amended to read as follows: 7.08.070 Conditions required for permit for horses. The Town Building Official shall authorize issuance of a permit to keep and maintain horses on certain described premises within the Town upon his or her determination that the following conditions or requirements are met: (1) Permits may be issued to resident owners or resident lessees of real property located within the RE-1, RE, and E-1 Estate residential district for their personal horses provided the minimum lot size is five (5) acres or more and the number of horses shall not exceed four (4). Any real property included in a permit issued hereunder shall not be included in any other permit. (2) Permits may be issued to owners and lessees of property located within C-D or C-0 districts, provided that the minimum lot size is fifteen (15) acres or more and the number of horses shall not exceed four (4). (3) Any shed, shelter or corral in which horses are kept or maintained shall not be closer than twenty-five (25) feet to any building occupied as a residence or used for human habitation or use and fifty (50) feet from any street or property line. All property where horses are to be kept or maintained shall be fenced by a lawful fence as defined by the state statutes, which fence shall be constructed at least fifty (50) feet from the outside boundary line of the property described in the application for a permit. (4) The construction of feeding facilities and the construction, drainage, flooring, ventilation, waste removal and fly screening of all sheds or other shelters shall be governed by any regulations adopted by the Board of Trustees. 7.08.080 Exception regarding horses. The area requirements or proximity of enclosures to residences, property lines and streets as provided in this Chapter shall not be applicable to the display of horses by entrants in any show or fair authorized by the Town during such show or fair. Section 3: Section 8.04.080 shall be amended as follows: 8.04.080 Disturbance - sound, noise, odor or light. (a) No vibration, odor or flashing light (except for warning devices, temporary construction or maintenance work, parades, special events or other special circumstances) shall be observable without instruments more than two hundred (200) feet from the boundaries of the originating premises at locations within a A, O, C-O, C-H or I-1 zoning district, or more than forty (40) feet from the boundaries at locations within any other zoning district. However, the Board of Trustees may authorize an activity not meeting these standards in cases where the Board of Trustees determines that no objectionable conditions will thereby be created for other properties because of the specific characteristics of this location or circumstance of this use. (b) No sound or noise shall exceed the maximum noise levels as the same are defined, regulated, and measured pursuant to the provisions of Sections 25-12- 101 et seq., C.R.S. However, the Board of Trustees may authorize activity not meeting these standards in cases where the Board o f Trustees determines that no objectionable conditions will thereby be created for other properties because of the specific characteristics of this location or circumstances of this use. Section 4: Section 10.16.010 shall be amended as follows: 10.16.010 Regulations. (a) No recreational vehicle, as the same is defined in Chapter 13 of the Estes Valley Development Code, shall be parked on any of the streets, alleys, highways, parking lots or other public ways of the Town in violation of any parking regulation of the Town. In no event shall ally recreational vehicle be parked on any of the streets, alleys, highways, parking lots or other public place of the Town for a period greater than eighteen (18) consecutive hours. (b) No recreational vehicle, as the same is defined in Chapter 13 of the Estes Valley Development Code, shall be used for living or sleeping purposes or as a store, office or place for the carrying on of a business, trade or profession within the Town, unless it is located in an approved or legal non-conforming RV park pursuant to the applicable terms of the Estes Valley Development Code. (c) A recreational vehicle, as the same is defined in Chapter 13 of the Estes Valley Development Code, may be parked for a period of greater than eighteen (18) consecutive hours and used for living or sleeping purposes in an approved or legal non-conforming RV park pursuant to the provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code. (CD No tent, temporary shelter, canopy or tepee, including all or any part of the supporting framework, shall be used for living or sleeping purposes or as a store, office or place for carrying on a business, trade or profession within the Town except as follows: (1) As an accessory use to a residential dwelling so long as the use is temporary and does not exceed a period of seven (7) consecutive days. (2) As an accessory use to a commercial use so long as it is not used for living or sleeping purposes, the use is temporary and the temporary use does not exceed thirty (30) days in any calendar year. (3) The use does not occur within the C-D Downtown Commercial District. (4) As an accessory use to any Town-sponsored or approved event. (5) As an accessory use on any Town-owned or occupied property. (6) The use is located in an approved or legal non-conforming campground/RV park pursuant to the applicable terms of the Estes Valley Development Code. Section 5: Section 14.12.030 shall be amended as follows: 14.12.030 Grading permits. Section 3306 of Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code Appendix, 1997 edition, shall be amended by the addition of Section 3306.3 to read as follows: "No grading or excavation for projects which require development plan approval or subdivision approval under the provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code shall be done without a grading permit. A grading permit may be issued following final approval of a development or concept plan if the applicant desires to grade or excavate a project prior to the issuance of a building permit." Section 6. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO THIS DAY OF , 2001. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor Proposal for a Feasibility Study The Town of Estes Park Museum Department In partnership with The Friends of the Museum For a possible $1,500,000 Capital Campaign For the Estes Park Area Historical Museum Prepared by H. Benjamin Duke III June 18, 2001 Background The Estes Park Area Historical Museum is a department o f the Town o f Estes Park and collects, preserves, interprets, and exhibits area history for both residents and visitors. An Advisory Committee appointed by the Town's mayor governs the Museum, and it is supported b y the Friends of the Museum, a 501(c) 3 organization that raises funds and helps with Museum outreach. The Museum's operating budget is approximately $150,000 a year with two full-time and one part-time staff. Additionally, the Friends have a part-time staff person who assists with membership, the gift shop, and volunteers. The Museum is testing the feasibility o f conducting a $1,500,000 campaign for expansion of its present facilities. The current facilities limit the Museum's ability to hold public programs, prepare and display exhibits, and properly house artifacts. It is anticipated that funds for the project will come from local and out-of-town individuals, foundations, businesses, and Friends members. Government support also is a possibility at some level. Proposed Feasibilitv Study The study would involve several steps: â€¢ The first step would involve a review of current funding sources. â€¢ Next would be review (and/or development) o f the Case for Support for the Museum's capital campaign. â€¢ A series of confidential interviews with both affiliated and non-affiliated community leaders, including select Board members, current and prospective donors, foundations, businesses, and political/civic leaders. Individuals selected for interviews should come from one of the following groups: a. Potential Campaign donors (those with the capacity to make larger, multi-year gifts). b. Individuals with strong centers o f influence, knowing or having access to others who could contribute significantly to such a project. They also may have important information pertaining to specific philanthropic opportunities in the Estes Park area. c. Appropriate city, county, or state officials. All interviews would be designed specifically to assess - Image and Reputation of the Museum - Strength of the Case for Support - Potential donors, including larger prospects - Available Volunteer Leadership for participation in the campaign - Management and Development Resources available to support the campaign - Confirmation of the Campaign Goal - Timing and Sequence of the Campaign, and - Overview and Recommendations for the Campaign . V , 11 4 : Al I ' An interview request letter would be sent by the Museum to those we would wish to interview. I could help draft the letter, but the museum's leadership would approve its final content. The Board Chair and/or Museum director letter would sign it. The confidential interviews would be conducted by me either in person, or, if necessary, by phone. I would send a thank you letter to each interviewee. â€¢ Following the interviews, I would prepare a final written report summarizing my findings and outlining my recommendations relating to the proposed campaign. I also would present the final study results to whichever group the Museum deems appropriate. â€¢ At the conclusion of the study, I also recommend a letter be sent to all interviewees highlighting the study's findings and results, along with any plan of action approved by the Museum's leadership. Timetable The study would take place in August and September 2001. Campaign Master Plan Following the Feasibility Study, I could work with the Museum to develop a Campaign Master Plan, including organizational structure, final case statement, timelines, committee structures, budgets, and any other factors deemed necessary. Fees Depending on the number of interviews for the Feasibility Study, the range of fees would be from $5,000 (ten interviews) to $12,000 (thirty interviews). Expenses, such as travel, phone and supplies would be additional. Should we decide to move forward with the Campaign Master Plan, we would establish an appropriate fee, depending on the scope o f the plan, and the time necessary to complete it. It would probably be in the range of $2,500 - $5,000 r /4. ~ INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC. 111 NORâ„¢ CANAL STREET SUITE 950 CHICAGO, ILUNOIS 60606Â·7270 (312) 930-0070 (800)444-4554 FAX: (312)930Â·0017 August 15,2001 Richard Widmer, Town Administrator Estes Park 170 MacGregor Ave P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado Dear Mr. Widmer: We wish to thank you and Will Birchfield for the cooperation given to our representative, June Zepp, during our recent survey. We have completed our analysis of the building codes adopted by your community and the efforts put forth to properly enforce those codes. The resulting Building Code Effectiveness Grading Classification is 4 for 1 and 2 family residential property and 4 for commercial and industrial property. The Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) is an insurer-supported organization with the primary mission ofproviding advisory insurance underwriting and rating information to insurers. There is no requirement that insurers use our advisory material. Insurers may have adopted, or may be in the process of adopting, an ISO insurance rating program that will provide rating credits to individual property insurance policies in recognition of community efforts to mitigate property damage due to natural disasters. These insurers may use the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Classification we have recently developed for your community as a basis for the credits used. While individual insurers may use different credits or different effective dates, the ISO program will apply credits to new construction within Estes Park that has been issued a Certificate of Occupancy in the year 2001 and fonvard. We have attached a copy of our report which provides additional information about our classification process and how we have graded various aspects of your community's building codes and their enforcement. We want to highlight the fact that the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule is an insurance underwriting and information tool; it is not intended to analyze all aspects of a comprehensive building code enforcement program nor is it for purposes of determining compliance with any state or local law or for making property/casualty loss prevention and life safety recommendations. . 1 Mr. Richard Widmer August 15,2001 Page 2 I f you have any questions about the Classification that was developed, please let us know. Additionally, if you are planning on any future changes in your building codes or their enforcement, please advise us as these changes may affect our analysis and your community's grading classification. Sincerely, 26Â¢d* 804 De#Â»te,te Building Code Department (312) 930-0070 Ext 6208 Enclosure cc: Will Birchfield w/enclosure . BUILDING CODE EFFECTIVENESS GRADING SCHEDULE INTRODUCTION The purpose o f the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule is to review the available public building code enforcement agencies and to develop a Building Code Effectiveness Classification for insurance underwriting information and rating purposes. The Schedule measures the resources and support available for building code enforcement. It also evaluates how those resources apply to the mitigation ofthe natural hazards common to the specific jurisdiction. These measurements are then developed into a Building Code Effectiveness Classification number on a relative scale from I to 10, with 10 representing less than the minimum recognized protection. The Schedule is an insurance underwriting information and rating tool. It is not intended to analyze all aspects of a comprehensive building code enforcement program. It is not for purposes of determining compliance with any state or local law or regulation, nor is it for making property/casualty loss prevention or life safety recommendations. It should not be used for purposes other than insurance underwriting information and rating. The Building Code Effectiveness Classifications developed through the use of this Schedule are only one of several elements used to develop insurance rates for individual properties. Other features specifically relating to individual properties such as construction, occupancy, and exposures have similar importance in the development of these rates. The Schedule is divided into 3 sections: Administration of Codes: This section evaluates the administrative support available in the jurisdiction for code en forcement. It looks for adopted building codes and modifications ofthose codes through ordinance, code enforcers qualifications, experience and education, zoning provisions, contractor/builder licensing requirements, public awareness programs, the building department's participation in code development activities and the administrative policies and procedures. Plan Review: This section assesses the plan review function to determine the staffing levels, personnel experience, performance evaluation schedules, review capabilities, and level of review of construction documents for compliance with the adopted building code for the jurisdiction being graded. Field Inspection: This section evaluates the field inspection function to determine the staffing levels, personnel experience, performance evaluation schedules, review capabilities, and level of review of building construction for compliance with the adopted building code for the jurisdiction being graded. The attached "Classification Details" identify the subject matter, maximum points achievable and the points obtained in the review of your community. This information is provided to you without recommendation and is for your use in understanding the details ofthe measurement ofyour building code enforcement activities in relationship to the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule. . 1 Estes Park, Colorado SECTION I ADMINISTRATION OF CODES 100. GENERAL ~~/1 v :--te- .-1- --fi:~-fÂ·wi,*1:'Â·Â·4 --9 ,--- :'44'3Â·:t Â·>râ€¢P -;Â·9:Â¢.1.Tx,-'â‚¬5'49Ktrt,(. 3-_--t-:':Â·~~-- ,-rr This section evaluates the administrative support for code enforcement within the jurisdiction - the adopted building codes and the modifications ofthose codes through ordinance, code enforcers , qualifications, experience and education, zoning provisions, contractor/builder licensing requirements, public awareness programs, the building department's participation in code development activities, and the administrative policies and procedures. 105..SADOP:TED~ODES~%13-4320-:f)*l:)..,--,~-,p-,.-.--z:~~ .24 ~..:1.~~-4-(Ni~ ".,3.3.6630}...y~Â·jilk-L-:4 -2.23 .*,--1=Ue-*Rz#AÂ·Â·.70*.v...~~.~ Mixirh~AgOibtKE,**1Â£331499300,0tig. - 1. =.Â· #..:irÂ·-4:;: ci:Â·-.i2â‚¬-FÂ·44Â¢Â· i:ivi:btnE'<~:t ier:~:~fifti-f-Jfff.::Â·tkfF;*ifi'tfiÂ·IRCArgilitil .0100?Poillt(49 1 The latest edition o f the model codes should be adopted and enforced by the jurisdiction. Use of codes other than the model codes, the National Electric Code, or the CABO 1&2 Family Dwelling Code may prorate the points available in Item 105. If the latest edition of the listed codes were adopted within 1 1/2 years ofthe published date, and the published date of the listed codes is within 3 years ofthe date ofthe grading Column A applies. If the above does not apply, or the previous edition of the listed codes is adopted, and the published date of the listed codes is within 5 years of the date ofthe grading, Column B applies. If the next previous edition of the listed codes is adopted, and the published date ofthe listed codes is within 10 years of the date ofthe grading Column C applies If an earlier edition of the listed codes is adopted Column D applies. Points Possible CODES A B C D Points Scored Building 7.75 pts. 4.65 pts 3.60 pts 1.70 pts 7.75 pts. Electrical 0.75 pt 0.45 pt 0.30 pt 0.15 pt 0.75 pt. Mechanical/Gas 0.75 pt 0.45 pt 0.30 pt 0.15 pt 0.75 pt. Plumbing 0.75 pt 0.45 pt 0.30 pt 0.15 pt 0.75 pt. 1 & 2 Family Dwelling 4.00 pts* 2.40 pts* 1.60 pts* 0.80 pt* 0.00 pt(S). * If a building code is adopted and enforced this value will equal 0.00 points. 1 8/15/2001 A 110. MODIFICATION TO ADOPTED,CODES - k..sÂ».4.4 r U- 7 3Â·2 129-333%.4,*43Â·...94Â·.I)-3.-6.MA'*Whdrn~ Rdints- Possibld fiÂ·5.00 poin'tÂ¢f,Â·ti 44- /ft.Â·- -~ ~*,~'3Â·1'.-3~~,-*Ai)#*t:tÂ·-;Pi~ 37' . There should be no modifications to the structural design provisions of the adopted codes and referenced standards that would weaken the intent for construction mitigation of natural hazards as defined in the model codes and referenced standards. No proration is permitted in this item. ** Maximum allowable points = (points credited in item 105) x 0.1 x 5.0 -. -r . 4 - . . -8-- :I:'~/ 4-*-1.3 -1.. 'fi, 44. 62 " .9 : 3: w.-- c - - AÂ·-t.:.Et U,t ru-flvit Maxit~iumÂ·Â·Roiftta. Potsible"J 13.0.0 306ibts. - .?236, u. W N.ibly#6'tlts. Scofed '>f:5.52500161(4)4\.IÂ· Amount of expenditures for training equaling at least 2% of the annual operating budget for all building department related activities. Pts Poss. Scored 3.00 points 2.22 point(s) Each code enforcement person receiving the following amount of training per year: Pts Poss. Scored Administration 12 hours ................................. 1.25 points 0.48point(s) Legal 12 hours 1.25 points 0.42point(s) Mentoring 12 hours . 1.25 points 0.84point(s) Technical 60 hours 4.25 points 0.99 point(s) Incentives provided by the jurisdiction for continuing education, outside training, certification and certification maintenance. Pts Poss. Scored Community paid certification exam fees 0.50 point 0.50 point Community incentive - outside training/certification 0.50 point 0.00 point Community paid continuing education 0.50 point 0.00 point Education of elected officials or governing authorities in building codes and building code enforcement a minimum of 3 hours per official per year. Pts Poss. Scored 0.50 point 0.10 point 2 8/15/2001 1 120. CERTIFICATION .'C'NO.,. ,,tifittlÂ·Â·fidcZi-li~-,25,'~3~<~~.,r~22't~=$':2'~-~.:-.:.2 -â‚¬.iC#>:fjit...:- - ... .4 "44 Â·..0 19Â·~~ ...f-;?.-:41*46*.444*x/~AtÂ·:t-3 *.iÂ·'43=~Â·ifav::---*:00.72'Gr.Â·1.2-:-p Â·r: 4<0 Â»49*229*24**fâ‚¬nt#:thisible -f '320.ipoints:-0 t.:=-:, 1 30).... 73.:...#1,~~,v.1053.:,.1.-e.-pigk~.t-:- ft.:35: 1.>F?010.ts.Sc6red-TE8.30'iloirit(Â§)..f ~ The credit for certification is as follows: Certification of code enforcement personnel (applicable to the position requirements) through a comprehensive examination representative of the performance area for which certification is sought. Pts Poss. Scored 8.00 points 4.94 point(s) State or local jurisdiction mandated program for certification. Pts Poss. Scored 1.00 point 0.85 point State or local jurisdiction mandated program ofcertification maintenance through continuing education at least once every 3 years. Pts Poss. Scored 2.00 points 1.70 point Program of employee certification in the field they are employed (prior to employment or within one year of date of hire or advancement). Pts Poss. Scored 1.00 point 0.85 point 3 8/15/2001 I '. 125. BUILDING,~FFICIAEAQU*I]FICâ‚¬rIPN/EXPERIENCE?/jEDUCATION t.:44.,:LLY>Â·Â· Â· ::1~Â· 9 :R-:.i~' t-,-- .f.it< 14*9-~rf..:.2:illitiff##imu~toi~ts Fossible.IF#-.86:bKihts:r-: - i. -. --Â· I,. r'-- 2.-Â·.:.s--Â».:Â·~2.--f:..Â·--3Â·:14~.:..6. A;'IÂ·Po)liW~568;eci- 'I2.60-'pbint(6) The following is reviewed: Licensed Architect or Engineer Pts Poss. Scored 0.60 point 0.00 point Certification as a building official Pts Poss. Scored 0.60 point 0.60 point High School diploma Pts Poss. Scored 0.10 point 0.10 point College degree Pts Poss. Scored 0.50 point 0.50 point Masters degree Pts Poss. Scored 0.40 point 0.00 point Construction related experience Pts Poss. Scored none 0.00 point less than 2 years 0.10 point or two to five years 0.20 point or more than five years 0.60 point 0.60 point Code enforcement experience Pts Poss. Scored none 0.00 point less than 2 years 0.10 point or two to five years 0.20 point or more than five years 0.60 point 0.60 point Building official experience Pts Poss. Scored less than 2 years 0.10 point or two to five years 0.20 point or more than five years 0.60 point 0.20 point 4 8/15/2001 k' 1 130. SELECTION PROCEDURESFOR BUILDING pFFICIALÂ© At,Â« .2-- 7..,7 ---.Â·*Ir- 1 . .3 ' , . 'tâ‚¬-Â·19*k'# off 3 9.513'MAximorA Points Rodible ; 0.581.Poifits If--: Â·Â·Â· *:~~-7.-2,-1.511,Np-'.5..iA:.:.~>..432-* iflÂ»>P@titdbcore-8 -~~0.25.Spbints- 09, ~ The selection process for a building official is designed to select the most qualified candidate. Pts Poss. Scored Selection through examination. 0.25 point 0.25 point Selection through peer review. 0.25 point 0.00 point 135. DESIGN PROFESSION;~S;*94*tri:-372:53.:7:4*14..'~..4%%136.Ji.Dit:Â¢.:EffbffiN,-9.i:j'4>1:>.Â£Â· 7:Ki :is.4.i... i.2.: *...cÂ·.-<,}-,iÂ·TYCU 6625*fffE.:2**thAA*jituAI~*4; Aods-i616*166.46ints AfÂ· Â· .x I.,.Â·4' 1-: 3 -Â·-- .-3. --.f.4Â·:de, -3:9:3-0.-1*~5,~I;Â·23&71~,2â‚¬ J~74 Â·Â·Â·0 2 0.:4~}f:2:3Â£*{Pjibid-82-oted ~~ fl point(grf : The credit for design professionals is as follows: If supervisory plan review staffare graduate or registered architects or engineers. Pts Poss. Scored 2.00 points 0.00 point(s) If non-supervisory plan review staffare graduate or registered architects or engineers Pts Poss. Scored 1.50 points Â· 0.00 point(s) If supervisory field inspection staffare graduate or registered architects or engineers. Pts Poss. Scored 0.50 point 0.00 point 140. :-ZON,ING PROVISIONS29Â»li~EjetN*62.'4**Rtil?**494%-547914132Â¢:AÂ·F - - f j...3.i,-6...... -'. 'J,Â·..22.-:r~~:~'fL: <.:~~'~~Lf-41~~~-'.2:*.2'4~2E#:2?fE',*~.93'.'2.SeÂ¥-%'Sita"v ....~,22. Â· E.:~19% 25';:Â·7Â·NUSâ‚¬4 3: ' 'a :...-.:-34124Â£f*.' -:fl'r.:JM.14.m,Em#MARimuM;Roliita Po'ssible 61:00Edoint k.Â·.:u. 2, 7.;..':29.2...1...49.).1.-:.*3.f.%92.-9732Qg~394*rff.92*342- f:&**wâ‚¬oints-Â·Scored--:21600*bint:1:P.'fo Where possible, special (through ordinance or code amendment) zoning provisions that address mitigation measures for buildings subject to local natural hazards. 5 8/15/2001 t t:Â·ri, '' 145. CONTRACTOR/BUILDER LICENSING AND BONDING 93 3-'14. UÂ·'"16., ' ..; 0 2.. - 9. 9719*423 I.fR.NE?~~Maki?Rum Points Paskibial -1.00 -boint .FR.- e ./ Me='37*f 27.4 - f :<: Points~Scdred t: O.23.,Wintâ‚¬i-<; Contractors/builders licensed and bonded to work in the jurisdiction being graded. The licensure dependence upon examination and experience. Licensing requirement for contractors and builders Pts Poss. Scored 0.10 point 0.10 point Licensing by examination Pts Poss. Scored 0.50 point 0.08 point Licensing by experience Pts Poss. Scored 0.30 point 0.05 point Bonding requirements for contractors Pts Poss. Scored 0.10 point 0.00 point 150.5 DESIGNERLICENSING-NR*:ATION.REPORyING Q..'.1344:222*4Â·~ -4.1-r6329.1--14:-:094.: - .: ,Â· 3 - -212'21 ~ ti'.4.}134*20 jopprt'-3.kii?}MakirÂ®m Pbints Ros,ible't:..0.50-jointÂ°*--~ - -ff .1.-0 Roints .Scored go;50 f point (: 1-6 7 2.4 e.. Reporting of licensing violations in contract documents to the appropriate state professional licensing board. 155. :cPUBILIC AWARENE#S.PROGRAMS,4.91AZI)(r{iffi.1â‚¬2*43.9.; r.:Â·6~14*22~2'--Â· 9-Â·'~ i 2<2:'' . ~ Â·46914Â·54**tiff*%Â¥*iftiom~Phi.ots-86#siblfqi,go.jpojâ‚¬i-fidj. L'-Â·.:Â· t :.:...,~ 'â€¢ .â€¢.-?.''at.i.l.'-r--4-4-~ks'*Ad kite.**biAts':Â§66fad y.S41.0-0 >bkintts) 3.-1-1 The amount of expenditures for public awareness programs equaling a minimum of 0.5% of the annual operating budget for all building department related activities. Pts Poss. Scored 1.00 point 0.00 point The amount of hours spent by code enforcers on public awareness programs, equaling a minimum of 3 hours per code enforcement employee per year. Pts Poss. Scored 1.00 point 1.00 point 6 8/15/2001 160. PARTICIPATION IN CODEEDEVELOPMENT.ACTIVITIES*Â» i, 9 -- ",.54 1,;43-3.14 -'v- :. 14-2. '+- 'Â·i:g.*:3 --: Â·55Â·â‚¬799 ,+Ibil'-4.-:9 Â·< " ..2 ...."t .....r, C 1 - - - 1 1 ./. 6 1 - .... 7... C....L . 2,3 .,....Li.Maximum Raints Possible-- O,5*tpoiN}60-4 *1-.IxÂ· Â· , ,*2..393443â‚¬f-'?ttdi,di.fÂ¢:il--3:17*Ik'.~.1~:~00,dirits Scored ;0.58 ,#Â¢iriti-,f,4..... The building department involvement in code development activities and associations with groups or organizations that assemble building enforcement personnel for the purpose of education and advancement of effective building codes. Participation in code change activities Pts Poss. Scored 0.25 point 0.25 point Participates in code association/chapter meetings Pts Poss. Scored 0.25 point 0.25 point 165.:t'.Â·A*INIS,~,~~~SyÂ®<44}Â·;4~Iiâ‚¬e, 11:fi'C-,3.,1.22&0*:g* ri .vvici- ...-4.9.Â·9-72.Â·Ze&911*E-3:12Â·itÂ·tt*&5Â·bl:Maki.610hi:Raidtiff.0Â§4Â£16'.44*52.0ki,itiefpilit .,# .442-3... 4..19.- ---~-~~~.24&2~Â£%6:.â‚¬342.i<%<9Â¢ifffâ‚¬,f,ff .<Â·':6..-c 4 1. ...'6Â· Poi~ti<&86729.'(6.06)6oinE*P . The credit for "Policies and Procedures" is as follows: A formal appeal process that a-contractor/builder or architect/design professional can utilize as recourse to a building official's interpretation of the adopted building code/zoning regulations. Pts Poss. Scored 0.30 point 0.00 point A policies and procedures guide for employees. Pts Poss. Scored 0.10 point 0.00 point The policies and procedures guide covers technical code requirements (such as approved products listings) that would assist a designer or builder. Pts Poss. Scored 0.05 point 0.00 point Publicizing the policies and procedures guide as available to the public. Pts Poss. Scored 0.05 point 0,00 point - 7 8/15/2001 I . SECTION II PLAN REVIEW 200. GENERAL v,n Â« ~< . .32:0:=Â·Â·Â· - t. 42 6'Y'i.-â€¢cÂ·LRy .('80- de,Â· 7 -Â· Â· ' Â· Â· This section evaluates the plan review function to determine the following: Staffing levels Personnel experience Performance evaluation schedules Review capabilities, and level of review of construction documents for compliance with the adopted building code for the jurisdiction being graded 205. EXISTING STAFFING Fic.Â·.-- 1. 9..1 ---3. e.. 2--z'<Â·Â·( -93Maxi.MohiP@Ats 'P6ssible?t.---'Ego ~bintitty 1 -2----~ -i-:.f Â·.--*-p:Â·3.-.1Â·~-Â·-:.-Jr-:---2.?.39:- :34.-PolhtslSÂ®* 2*00 poiritti).IfI Staffing levels sufficient to assure comprehensive reviews of construction documents for compliance with the adopted building codes. ** Maximum allowable points = points achieved in item 215 x item 205 points possible in item 215 210. EXPERIENCE OF-PERSONNEL ....1't,7-Â·11 3:Â¥:y,Yl-?:1:- -{9; i-YtQ%2~4,2:,-,~44324ff 0 0,-:.;~13< L. Â· r â‚¬ 7,- g. '.' 3-,7-- u.3-JU.:,;*~ ,Â·r'. Â·-,Â·1:'MAximum Rowits RosÂ§ibleÂ·371:50 fi;bintaÂ·:~ a. . I .,. - 9.2 '423Â·,,- - 7. 14.5-'4~'i:: "...4 '(t,8.'- 1,9.: C'.s--3.-V=p*it#*6*#fi,47.goboint<i)~ffk 5 years or greater experience in plan review ofplan review staff. 215. DET**'OF PLAN **y.Â¥439334#83-9.116; 0,'-44-"ritiblii*i*bip.iÂ·it-*'.-#,4-2.:39:Â·2 2.Maximum Floints Possibie :10,11.50 p'oints j.- The credit for the comprehensiveness of plan review is as follows: Plan reviews conducted on all proposed 1&2 family dwelling construction or dwelling additions/modifications. Note: When plan reviews are ngl being conducted, the community classijication will bea Class 99 for 1 and 2 family dwellings and the " Pts Scored" will default to the maximum possible in order to determine the community classificationfor commercial/industrial property. Pts Poss. Scored 5.00 points 5.00 point(s) Comprehensive review of plans performed even if they were prepared and sealed by a registered design professional certified in the appropriate field of work. Pts Poss. Scored 1.50 points 1.50 point(s) 8 8/15/2001 ' Structural plan reviews conducted for all proposed building construction or building additions/modifications including a review of engineering calculations. Pts Poss. Scored 2.00 points 2.00 point(s) A means to evaluate, or reference evaluation service reports, for substitute products and/or materials for conformance with the intent of the structural portions of the adopted building codes. Pts Poss. Scored 1.00 point 1.00 point A detailed checklist used with each plan review to assure all pertinent building code issues have been considered. Pts Poss. Scored 1.50 points 1.50 point(s) The checklist becomes a part of the permanent record ofthe project address. Pts Poss. Scored 0.50 point 0.50 point 5742.4>p.:-:7;MakimiftnÂ·PointsIPossible'JÂ¢lf[!0:point*Ii# Credit for quality assurance programs for plan reviewers is as follows: Annual employee performance evaluations. Pts Poss. Scored 0.50 point 0.50 point "Follow-up" plan reviews by a different plan reviewer conducted semiannually. Pts Poss. Scored 0.50 point 0.50 point 9 8/15/2001 SECTION III FIELD INSPECTION 300. GENERAL, ...'-,1- -~ -':,EL'-'.,"94--3-20,' f..1 *...F.22 . L., 2,:.2-- : .u This section evaluates the field inspection function to determine the following: Staffing levels Personnel experience Performance evaluation schedules Review capabilities and level of review of building construction 305. EXISTING STA*~G Â·~ ~' t -: 4.:4'92-..:Â·Â·:7.7. :ti,Â·-,1.,":.1..11'i f:c ili ;ic[-Â®c'z::7.)'1>Â·â‚¬.r~:*'67?Â·'.,~.i~ I J'>e /. ,-:- 69%342.-1.i ...:32.-1326-.. 3Â·Â· 34@@*~4*44*486: 66*di{-- . Â· -: -Â·Â·~-Â·~ "-Â·Â·Â· ~':~ ~=fÂ·Â·Â·-20:f -s)+44Â·2~;fir,%1*{Phiht.d'.Schfad 4-5:80.~point(s) i.'4; Staffing levels sufficient to assure comprehensive reviews of building construction for compliance with the adopted building codes. 310. 'EXPERIENCE OF-PERSONNEL,%710,12 â‚¬Â¥Â·t.'~33.7:,1~13'11Â·<6Â·h..,:U:,92*.0(Lk-:Â·,-t,rf.:A/~37%*04;- : f~- :i- :. : (4,.2*314%' * 2 449~%.2,:-Â·'~2-9â‚¬94ax@om eoint* Poisibl@-6'45.b# phiMOff-4 :-'. C z '2... 1.-fri.E-23;.5-3Â·::.. Â·:384:ASpil .INÂ·.:.41:-4 Ic-Â·%;.f.-. ~%Â·Points Sc:6168 4:30*@As) *3 5 years or greater experience in field inspection. Pts Poss. Scored 1.50 points 1.50 point(s) 2 years or greater of construction related experience. Pts Poss. Scored 1.50 points 1.50 point(s) 315. CORRECTION NOTICES AND'SToP WORK ORPERS.P.Â·12-34?-ff#*4945% f ik-Â»3,1Â»DX--PLI .Â·. -19 03)576.-61ilfÂ·9}.2 - 6Â·).ZiS~~:*.- '2:*;14.Ma.#itÂ®Â®Pkints-Pos'sibldliti ~Â¢bo 158int - ~Â·Â·Â· F J Â· 1 Â·Â· 3 -1 3225-Â·i:_42::32It :8-39-:Â·...4Â·11.:,I:f>49'53):2?334**ht#.$8*83*Q.30 'joititlftiÂ· Building department authority to issue correction notices and stop work orders for non-compliant construction. 320. :INSPECTION Â©BECI~IST Â·3*4:~42;4' 4;.',401: 3'1~i -Â®Â·'-Litt~1:OMI?j-?*Â¥42%4-13*.5;Nf#;4244Â·ti :qi: Â·1Â· .-5Â·. }f N.E- Â·:~ '71*'li:.4 -:Â·.3. tALM#ximum-FointijPoshiblet,12.00_*bints : t: Â·.1 -1 49Â·-O-3, 3*fe. 32*ji?Nftiiâ‚¬Eft.-if ,:...1-i:-foilts :sdated.:.co:00-tii)410{Cs)-#,.p,-. A detailed checklist completed for each building construction project to assure that all pertinent building code issues have been considered. Pts Poss. Scored 1.50 points 0.00 point(s) 10 8/15/2001 The checklist becomes a part of the permanent record of the project address. Pts Poss. Scored 0.50 point 0.00 point 325. SPE~JAL INS~EO,I,ONSÂ· ,Â©6242,2 ,-~11,-CIL>~.-fr-Â·- :>E, 42 ' :10~~~~ < ~'~~~2.TÂ©6~.;.~:'t:iÂ·.f~ ~ , , Loi.:Â·:t; Maximum Points Pogsible 1-1.50 bdint; 9 1.4... fot.... 929;-2- - '04- 3-70-10Â«444*taints SEdfed :F-1.25 point(s)-f- Where necessary to assure structural integrity, the building department requirement for special inspections for specific structural elements conducted by professional inspectors who have been certified for such work. Pts Poss. Scored 0.75 point 0.75 point The certification being obtained by a combination of: Examination Pts Poss. Scored 0.25 point 0.25 point Experience in the field of inspection they will be performing Pts Poss. Scored 0.25 point 0.25 point An_interview by the building official to assess qualifications Pts Poss. Scored 0.25 point 0.00 point 330. : INSPECTIONS FORNATUR. -9t***.%89,Â·499*~3.*i it.JU k~k?Â·4*3~f.<.~' 7..4,10 09; iat*.-frÂ·Â·Â·-,AÂ·. .- :-,3 . 959.--:rÂ·-~ 1-3.i.....4:U*4.-3..3-t{*.:iw?c#*41.9*094.i,p,.I~,gts.,1*16â‚¬si6.Cd~:.412L602e6oiifiâ‚¬* -.#~. t: - ---1.iÂ· i.-i?it.:it8E33*3Â·Â·i:.13;9it*?6 24,Â·:>.4t-*43'----Et.Dj,F?EPAints Scored 27*1-50 po'iAf(s) tr p When there are construction mitigation measures defined in the adopted building code for the natural hazard(s) peculiar to the area being graded, special inspections that focus on compliance with the provisions ofthe code. 335. 4 -9Â£FIN*%IN.f%~,-~~'Sv J~,&:?531%19-.23 ~34*~~Iâ‚¬8*1*%43*4.dÂ·f:}R-FA%*4Â·,t- : A:'.*~Â·Â·Â·32:..~.ff:2@41*Â·i-uf<e:- fs}-5-9 13.'24.*aM.aximllmttioints Rossible:k-3.-2.80 boints,i ift ..1 '1 ...1374(4. i.>.PirÂ¥42.Â·i*3Â«F?ff{*834328.ft<*Po,int;'384*4iÂ·*f-49*.6.jht(,)43-- Final inspections performed on all buildings after the construction is completed and the building is ready for occupancy. Final inspections performed for 1&2 family dwellings. Pts Poss. Scored 1.25 points 1.25 point(s) Final inspections performed for all other buildings. Pts Poss. Scored 1.25 points 1.25 point(s) 11 8/15/2001 I 5 340. CERTIFICATE OF.OCCUPANCY- *,4-'.Â· .9-j:,2-Â·' .'. Â«--'-Â· ft* f. g.- 21{33~iI:(f>.-5..4;245 *.<'--f- 4. ai<ilur;?Â©AL~ pldsÂ©iA#6-Aihd-~ ~ - *6* . : 1 '92~:f,-,~-~,+4#28.Poibts Scored -9.-2:60 pdint(si Certificates of occupancy issued by the building department after the construction is completed and prior to the building being occupied. Certificates ofoccupancy issued for 1&2 family dwellings. Pts Poss. Scored 1.20 points 1.20 point(s) Certificates of occupancy issued for all other buildings. Pts Poss. Scored 0.80 point 0.80 point 345. PERFQRMANCE EVALUATIONS.FOR-QUALITY ASSURANCEtâ‚¬-1023*59333.2Â·y;f~ tic *-(9 23-~:-Â·fift.43*I-.Â·1,93--ti~i-'q ti*'94*~8---~~~2~-a,ki0â‚¬2'.0~~.ti'~~1~.~RAi#14Â»*jrietÂ· : k c.Â· ..M. 52 -2.v: .1 .1. A ..yfl. .Â·-7Â·5 -- :*#-.f-?.7.-Â·602{-EU#A: .Â·Â·i...PofntiSÂ¢.ordd..33.:tioo p.~Â®t 7. 2 Credit for quality assurance programs for field inspectors is as follows: Annual employee performance evaluations. Pts Poss. Scored 0.50 point 0.50 point "Follow-up" field inspections by a different field inspector conducted semiannually. Pts Poss. Scored 0.50 point 0.50 point 12 8/15/2001 1.. = Jurisdiction: Estes Park Total points:Â·.75.52 State: Colorado Classification: 1 & 2 Family Dwellings - 4 All Other Construction - 4 Survey Date: April 20, 2001 FINAL SCORING Section 1 34.97 Section 2 23.00 Section 3 17.55 --------- Subtotal 75.52 Item 105 10.00 The final score is determined by a relationship between Item 105 and the balance of the scoring. Points achieved in Item 105 [{(Section 1 + Section 11 + Section 111) - Item 105} x points possible in Item 105 ] + Item 105 [{( 34.97 + 23.00 + 17.55) - 10.00} x (10.00 / 10.00] + 10.00 - 75.52 Classification Point Spreads Classification Point Spreads 1 93.00 - 100.00 6 51.00 - 60.99 2 85.00 - 92.99 7 39.00 - 50.99 3 77.00 - 84.99 8 25.00 - 38.99 4 69.00 - 76.99 9 10.00 - 24.99 5 61.00 - 68.99 10 0.00 - 9.99 13 8/15/2001 .. RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, on July 23, 1991, the Board of Trustees adopted Ordinance 15-91 pertaining to "containment" within the C-D District, and subsequent adoption of the Estes Valley Development Code (Chapter 4, Zoning Districts, specifically paragraph a. Outdoor Sales, Use, Storage and Activity in the CD Zoning District, Number (3) Exceptions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: That the following guidelines shall be adopted for the "Surprise Sale Days" being sponsored by the Special Events Department that is scheduled October 6 and 7, 2001: 1. Hours of operation shall be from 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. 2. The Sale Weekend is available to all Estes Park businesses. 3. The Sale Weekend will be held rain or shine. 4. Businesses will be allowed to sell merchandise in front of their store only during the hours specified above. 5. Each business will be allowed one (1) outside selling space. 6. Sidewalk displays shall provide a minimum clearance of 4' for pedestrian ways and handicapped accessibility. Displays and/or merchandise will not be allowed in any street. 7. Those merchants without sidewalk frontage may reserve a space in Bond Park by contacting Linda Hinze at 586-6104. 8. Advertising posters will be provided. 9. All participating businesses must possess a current Town Business License. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that every business is urged to participate in this Surprise Sale Days annual event. DATED this day of ,2001. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk