The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Community Development 2001-06-28 (2)Town of Estes Park - - - - -- -Community Development Committee _ _ June 28, 2001 SENIOR CENTER FUND RAISING ACTIVITIES United Way A grant request for $5,000 was submitted to the Loveland/Berthoud/Estes Park United Way in February, 2001. Director Jody Thompson and Board President Walt Richards met with United Way Panel 5 in Loveland on May 2, 2001. Notice was received last week that the Senior Center will receive a United Way Allocation of $2060.00, Donor Designations totaling $600, and Colorado and Federal Campaign Designations of 235.24 for Total Funding of $2,895.24. The notes attached to the Panel 5 findings were: Estes Park Senior Center 0 The EP Senior Center seems to have very broad-based support in Estes Parks including substantial City Funding. â€¢ Goodjob. Kenneth Kendal King Foundation Board President Walt Richards submitted a grant request to the King Foundation for assistance in landscaping for the Senior Center, including the Heritage Garden. A check for $2,500 was received in May, 2001 from the King Foundation. El Pomar Foundation Board President Walt Richards also submitted a grant request to the El Pomar Foundation in May, 2001 for assistance in subsidizing the meal programs at the Senior Center. On June 13, 2001, the Board was notified of a total award of $10,000; $5,000 to be received in 2001, $2,500 in 2002 and 2003. Breakfast Buffets The first of four summer Breakfast Buffets was on Saturday, June 9. Approximately 90 people were in attendance. The event is a Board sponsored activity and is accomplished with all volunteer labor. The net amount realized from the first Buffet was approximately $300. Garage Sale The Friends Boards of the Museum and Senior Center are planning a joint venture Garage Sale at the Fair Grounds on September 22. This will require extensive planning and significant effort from volunteers. Special Summer Activities The Estes Park Car Club hosted the members for a barbecue followed by a program telling about the cars on June 19. This was followed by vintage car rides and thoroughly enjoyed by the Seniors. Summer Residents Association (SRA) will be having weekly daytime bridge and evening bridge twice a month at the Center. Plans for outings include theatre (The Mikado at Colorado University and La Boheme at Center City), a luncheon and tour of Grand Lake, and Rockies games. A July 4~ celebration is being planned by the Seniors. It will include a potluck dinner and watching fireworks from the Senior Center deck for members and their guests. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Inter Office Memorandum June 25,2001 To: Honorable Mayor Baudek and Towr ;Wes From: Linda Hinze , Dave MaliG Subject: 2001 Special Events Department Eq ases Background: The Special Events Department has requested the replacement of a 1993 John Deere 4x2 Gator Utility Vehicle (G-115) with another 4x2 Gator. The trade-in vehicle is 8 years old with 1782 hrs, this vehicle is within the parameters of the vehicle replacement policy for usage of 10 years or 800-1000 hrs. (usage only - and increased operating costs in 2000 & 2001). Also replacement was originally requested for a 1988 Ford Tractor (G-103), 13 years old with 1720 brs. This vehicle is within the parameters of the vehicle replacement policy for time of 12-15 years or 6,000 hrs. The Special Events Department would like to request keeping this tractor and adding a Skid-Steer Tractor with Forks and Rake attachments. Both of these purchases are 2001 Budgeted Items. â€¢ Special Events Departments 2001 budget includes $7,800.00 for replacement of John Deere Gator and includes $29,500 for Skid Steer purchase. Budget / Costs: Gator Bi-State Machinery Co : Longs Peak Equipment: $ 6,341.42 Gator $ 7,493.42 Gator - $ 1.395.00 Less Trade-in (1993 John Deere, G-115) - $ 2,200.00 Less Trade-in(G-115) $ 4,946.42 Bid Price $ 5,293.42 Bid Price Costs: $4,946.42 Budget: $7,800.00 Skid Steer Bids were only received from one Skid-Steer vendor, standardizing fleet and eliminating need for attachment adapters (can use attachments from Parks) and to obtain annual rollover agreement. Colorado Machinery Co. : Bids for Bobeat Skid-Steer $ 23,200.00 Skid-Steer Bid Price $ 23,200.00 Skid-Steer -$ 7.400.00 Less Trade-in (G-103) Attachments $ 15,800.00 Bid Price IfG-103 is Traded $ 4,506.00 Landscape Rake $ 1,376.00 Pallet Forks â€¢ $ 29,082.00 Bid Price Skid-Steer w/attachments / $ 21,682.00 Bid Price Skid-Steer w/attachments and NO TRADE-IN and TRADE-IN OF G-103 Cost: $29,082.00 Budget: $29,500.00 This Bid includes Annual Rollover Agreement of less than 300 hrs ($10/hr over 300 hiÂ·) and $0.00 Annual Exchange Cost. Recommendation: The Special Events Department requests approval for these vehicle purchases. The Special Events Department / Fleet Department recommends approval of the bid from Bi-State Machinery and requests approval to purchase a new Gator 4X2 Utility Vehicle for the cost of $4,946.42 from Bi-State Machinery, and recommends approval of the bid from Colorado Machinery and requests approval to purchase a new Bobcat Skid-Steer Loader w/attachments for a cost of $29,082.00 from Colorado Machinery without trading existing tractor G-103. 1122Fn...EE Reasons to Retain the Ford Tractor 1. Fairgrounds has only had one tractor and bucket for loading and removal of manure during the horse shows. It takes two during large shows. We have had to rely on borrowing the additional equipment from the Street Department during the major shows in order to keep up. Retaining the Ford with the bucket would give the fairgrounds two. 2. Retaining the Ford and bucket would save us if one of breaks down. 3. Would cut down on wear & tear on borrowed equipment from Street Department. 4. Ford tractor provides additional box scrapper for clearing manure. 5. Low HRS, Low maintenance - user friendly for seasonals. 6. Can't count on Street's loader for backup incase of emergency. Would save time in down time, when picking up and returning equipment. 7. Ford is the only tractor we have that has an enclosed cab for weather. 8. Ford's box scraper compliments large scraper in old barn area with narrow alleys. 9. Purchased the Ford for $25,000, trade-in value is only $7,400. . BOBCAT VS. TRACTOR COMPARISONS BOBCAT TRACTOR * Continuously under warranty * Not under warranty - Service agreement from factory - no service assistance - EASY to get parts as it is new equip- - tractor is only getting older and it takes ment and parts are readily av,ilgble. longer to get out-dated parts Parts availability may save down time - down time has already been experienced and time is money. when a hydraulic hose blew Ut took over - For $500.00/year the Bobcat can be three weeks to get hose from Ford. replaced except for tires. - Cost for new bobcat is $21,000 as of * In 1988 the tractor was on my list of 24,738 1-3-2000. * Tractor does not fit all the way through U Barn, * Bobcat can fit through Barn U height wise, so the operator must back all the way through Eliminating the need for backing all the way T and U Barns to clear animal waste. Through Barns T and U to clean out manure. * Has less than desired visibility out of cab for * Bobcat can turn around in its own radius. being in tight situations. Big bucket sticking - excellent for bullpens and steer pens out in front makes it hard to see how close - great for all of other tight situations which you are to things. Not a safe situation for occur on a re gular basis over the year. inexperienced seasonal employees. - cuts down on need for backing up all the time. * Attachments for tractor are mounted on the rear on a 3-point arm'system and some things * All attachments for bobcat are attached to the require P.T.O. shaft. front and are very easy and efficient to install - to hook up a 3-point implement one person on or off. backs up the tractor and another person has - 1 person can change attachments alone to hook up the arms standing between the saving time and personnel tractor and implement - not safe and also - Bobcat uses a quick connect very time consuming for two people - Hydraulic system is used to operate all equipment. No exposed shaft belts or * P.T.O. shaft is a rotating shaft at the rear of the gears for a safety plus. tractor (mower, rock rake, and other things that rotate - also not safe. * All equipment is directly in front of operator and controls are at operators fingertips and * On rear-mounted equipment the user has to toes. compromise his attention to front and rear which is not as easy to concentrate on direction * Equipment is user friendly. o f movement or operation of implement. no clutch no brakes * Controls are not ergonomically placed for - all controls can be used without operator operator use. having to change his focus of attention - no gear shifters * Takes a more experienced operator to operate - clutch * Has a training video and easy to operate. - left and right brakes . 112!M:al-Cant. IÂ£25:151LCQIZL * Can use attachments from Rent All and from - two gear shifters Park Shop: - hydraulic levers and 3-point levers. Loader - control also P.T.O. control are located in Jackhammer different places in the cab. Hole digger Rock picker * No video for operation instruction Back hoe Forks * Not as simple to use (takes a lot of coordina- Plow blade tion and takes more time to train employees for use). * Not as versatile or as efficiently versatile. . I Community Development Committee Advertising Committee Report June 28, 2001 1. Requests for Information A. Total Requests as of 5/31 are up by 6.5% (2,063 requests) compared to the same period last year. Graph attached. B. 800 Calls as of4/30/01 are down by 10.3% (1,319 calls) compared to the same period last year. Graph attached. C. E-mailed requests as of 5/31/01 are up by 50.3% (2,273) compared to the same period last year. Graph attached. 2. 7 Steps the Committee has taken to address economic softness A. Added 4-color ad in May issue of Sunset Magazine - $2,025. B. Added 4-color ad in June issue ofBetter Homes and Gardens Magazine - $12,000. C. Added new Internet Test with Engage Media during the month of July concentrating on the 13 Midwest States plus Colorado and Texas - $5,000. D. Expanded the Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News Summer Action ad schedule (example of ad attached) to start last week instead of late July. E. Added a television buy to July and August on Channel 4 and Channel 7. This $20,000 schedule is to be funded by EPIC. F. Added a 4-color ad to AAA Colorado Motorist Magazine in September and October issues - $4,199. G. Added September to our existing 4~h quarter television schedule with Channel 4 and 7 - $10,000. 3. Economic news from the rest of Colorado 4 . Estes ParkY-T-D Planner Requests 60,000 49,398 50,000 41,100 40,000 -' Â· 'i: ~ -. 36,145 36,188 35,614 33,521 32,513 3 1.458 ./.5.6 30,000 -r. / - 20,000 - ' - Â· - 10,000 -c - -- - v#;W: ".-1.1......,4 - Â· ).-:*2(i :::4: -:12);~133*6399 ~- - . 1 1 1 , 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 May 31 . Estes Park Wats Line Calls 25000 20179 19480 - 20000 18316 U,*ME 18015 08* 4 15366 15049 15000 1.#RE , 1 1 1 #' Â·)*9Â·;:FÂ· ~ : ... , .xÂ·Â·:Â·:Â·:Â·:+:Â·>.Â·:Â· 12794 11475 10000 ;Â·Â·.Â·Â· ~:M>Â·,~>...~: -. -:'Â·.:>..9.2>.::Â·:?- ae : :'::. 1 1 8.11 5 .:.:390 g ad: ...:Wpl: 5000 4%* .Â»./.:11>:1:111: 1 '. 1 -..............1~ -.1............. ........................ >WittyÂ»@ :t:>'9. 8%32* 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Y-T-D April 30 .. Estes Park E-Mailed Requests for Information 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4515 . 4,000 ..... ... .... 3094 ... 3,000 2537 ..... 2,000 905 .. . . 1,000 ' 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Year-To-Date May . Get into the Real Rockies ... â€¢mtzil~. T;!Â¥.Ji ~ti ~'' I 96*El.-~1 y W * .Â·t~2*1Â· 8 :444 . :Â» ..1.42"liup/.alÂ·.1221 *â€¢r -1 --4.- .T-- r 6;MAT#Wil./7/RE'H #.71*2 m#51% A#U = 1 1 11,1./1.. I. I 3,{1 -11 211 .....4 *1/:<92,9~ . 346./0/1- 11Â¢1!1 .luN~ 1 -11. . 1,4 . j..1 -.g..1- .. 1 f -1. +- A-- 1,4 f 729*#)1NW f 2>/3// 6.valÂ».11,-im- 1 -2,; . vit*'*4 10,~ 1 1.2 . .1 , + -21:1/$44 1/44341/LA ./ 7,-I- .. .1 V InT! il I I ~'4& I T -.. - 4, 1 1 -14 -3 - **11 , 4/62, 1 .4 9 11 A# VVe#*ha"Al&lt& -/ ./9 . --1 : ~ 2 29'iN'i. ~ 12 4 .14..1 r -9,r. .'/Rif~-11.. 1119- . 1 14 1- 11 4, 1 19411 - 1 44*, -0.9..==L A , 1 --=.E 4= .' I /79"-R AL, r.-1/Vil.7/,9 . i 3 14 I -74 /41 - 1-i . i.3-* ~*li'. J 'll .-~I # 0 . 41 4.14 - ..4%- ..N.. .1 tr er: - $ 14Uj~ . 90#ft. Aâ€¢ 14/// $. 4* {*UER + I 1 I 1- R. .... -12.e -12/'. Whether it's lying around the pool or fly-fishing a quick stream, playing with the kids or hiking with friends, you can do it all right here, in Estes Park and Rocky Mountain National Park ... the Real Rookies! Planning a few days is easy, too! Try our lodging referral system at 1-800-44-ESTES or use our "lodging availability" button at www.estesparkresort.com. You'll ELexactly what you want, so you can Â®.exactly what you want. But, remember to take more than a day ... you'll be glad you did! ESTES PARK- COLORADO AWorld Above Calll-800-44-ESTES or www.estesparkresort.com splompa l aBioaD 'a:Jazi}9-1!04 4'141 50;q O folotld LETTER OF AGREEMENT This Agreement is between Special Transportation ofBoulder County Inc. referred hereinafter as Special Transit, and the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. This Agreement shall be in effect from January 1,2001, and shall continue in force through December 31, 2002. The Town of Estes Park agrees to purchase and Special Transit agrees to provide door- through-door, demand-response transportation services to individuals in the Estes Valley who cannot access or afford other modes of transit. Transportation will be provided with a 14-17 passenger, wheelchair lift-equipped vehicle, and be available from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays (except national holidays) within the Town of Estes Park and throughout the Estes Valley. Individual requests for service are the responsibility of the passengers and will be provided on a space available basis. Special Transit does not guarantee that all trip requests can be provided, however, every effort will be made to accommodate trip requests that are made in a timely manner. Transportation will automatically be cancelled if the Park R-3 School District is closed due to inclement weather. Special Transit may cancel service independent of school closure if it is determined that passenger safety might be jeopardized by hazardous road or weather conditions. Special Transit agrees: â€¢ To assume all costs related to the vehicles used in connection with this Agreement including maintenance, fuel, taxes, licensing and annual inspection requirements, and $5,000,000 liability and personal injury insurance coverage; â€¢ To provide a driver that will reasonably insure the safety and welfare of all passengers, and provide necessary assistance to passenger's exiting/entering their homes, the Special Transit vehicle and other locations. The driver will have completed Special Transit's extensive driver training program, including defensive driving, empathy and diversity training, proper care for passengers with disabilities, and emergency procedures. The driver will possess a valid Class C- Pl Colorado commercial driver's license. The Town ofEstes Park agrees: â€¢ To help make residents of the Estes Valley aware of the availability of Special Transit's services via the Estes Park Senior staff, the senior center newsletter and other outlets as appropriate; â€¢ To provide an overnight parking space for the Special Transit vehicle at the Estes Park Senior Center parking lot; â€¢ To provide $11,232 in funding in 2001 and $11,700 in funding in 2002 to support Special Transit's services to the community during the term of this Agreement. 1 Attached hereto is Exhibit A which is incorporated herein by this referrence. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day of ,2001. John Baudek, Mayor Town of Estes Park Lenna Kottke Executive Director Special Transit 2 . EXHIBIT A TO LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPECIAL TRANSPORTATION FOR BOULDER COUNTY, INC. AND THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK 1. Special Transit shall include the Town of Estes Park as an additional insured on its insurance policies and provide the town with certificates of insurance showing said coverage. 2. The parties understand and agree that the Town is relying on and does not waiver by any provisions of this Agreement, the monetary limitations or terms ($150,000 per person and $600,000 per occurrence) or any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, 24-10-101 et-seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or otherwise available to the Town or any o f its officers, agents or employees. 3. The parties understand and agree that Special Transit is an independent contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As such, Special Transit is not entitled to employment or insurance benefits through the Town. Also, Special Transit understands and agrees that it is solely responsible for all Federal and State Income Tax, FICA taxes, and employment insurance taxes. Special Transit also understands and agrees that it shall carry appropriate workers' compensation coverage and taxes for itself and any employee. 3 , NEWS4 Netlink Coverage Measurement Definitions: Station County Coverage: KCNC County Coverage includes station net weekly circulat on within ' Denver DMA, NSI Area and Total Survey Area. 5% -Ir,9-?rEBBI'll Net Weekly Circulation: NWC represents the est mated number (%) of unduplicated TV households that viewed a station for at least five minutes in a week, at least once during the survey period. Denver DMA: The exclusive geographic area of counties in which Denver TV stations hold a domi- NEWS23 nance of total hours viewed. The DMA (Designated Market Area) is used for media planning, buying and evaluating TV audience. Colorado's News Channel ,[ '] I k'irm] .,I-i7711 ,] .f :I ,-7.7.~ Denver Market Profile *. I * Station Att Ch.# National Flee. Owner I ** ' 0 * *4 * KeNC CBS CH. 4 CBS SPOT CBS O&0 OR VIACOM KUSA NBC CH. 9 BLAIR GANNETT BROADCASTING * I. ... e KMGH ABC CH. 7 HRP McGRAW-HILL BROADCASTING ... KDVR FOX CH. 31 FOX TV SALES FOX TELEVISION I ./ ** 0 KTVD UPN CH. 20 PETRY CHANNEL 20 TELEVISION COMPANY I I . ** * KWGN WB CH. 2 TELEREP TRIBUNE BROADCASTING * -* I * ** *** ~ Demographic Profile: I I * * ' TV HH Market Rank #18 % Race/P 18+: White 93.1 ... I ./. TOTAL DMA TV Households 1,268,230 Hispanic 11.6 * 4 . .. I ./ I % of Total U.S. 1.258 Black 3.8 I . . I. . In-Tab Meter Sample (Avg.) 368 Asian 2.4 . * * In-Tab Diary Sample (Avg.) 1351 Other 0.7 * % Cable HHs 61 Median HH Income: $35,501 Â°/o Multi-Set HHs 75 % HH Income: $10,000 - $20,000 26 % VCR HHs 89 $20,000 - $35,000 23 I * * * % Education: H.S. Graduate 31 $35,000 - $50,000 19 0 * Some College 37 $50,000 + 32 College Graduate 26 % Occupation: Prof/White Collar 64 % Age/Head of HH: Under 35 33 Blue Collar 19 35 - 54 40 Service Workers 14 Â· *6 t 55+ 27 Agriculture Workers 3 =I 0 -MA - -1 0 4/ 1 - 1 -/.A' 4 / 1 12 1 SOURCE.Â· 1999 DMA TEST MARKET PROF/LE,Â· JULY 1999 RTG BOOK,Â· 2000 N/ELSEN TV HH AND UN/VERSE ESTIMATES. ~ i Q p ILL ' -- m ..1 .2. 1 I- I %3 Â«7 . NA .1 ,"11; m C~ i r- 14 3 +1- L - .... 11 - 11 NSI Area: The total group of counties including Denver DMA counties, plus any viewing reported from ~ other counties assigned to adjacent DMAs (where Denver station viewing is high, but does not domi- ' 4, tat'. W ...&0).,1 Le //.1.Â«a,k nate), that account for 95% of total Denver station viewing. 4 J----mii~a 'll, surement period, station total audiences are based on viewing data obtained from diary samples both 6. ZED.0 I.V.D Station Total Area: During the three Nielsen all-market measurement periods, plus the July DMA mea- a. A.b ././.1 'a. within and outside a station's NSI Area regardless of location within the continental U.S. ~ 1 I 1 /'.1 Station Netlink Coverage: Netlink is a nation-wide service that provides broadcast TV programming to ---2.1 .All---IM-~1.41 â€¢1 IL , 44c homes that cannot receive the local DMA stations. Cable orsatellite dish subscribers can order Netlink and receive the Denver 6, a group of Denver stations that includes KCNC/NEWS4. fl~------ ~~7111 lilli * Nielsen County Coverage 1 L-1 )AN,F. 9 %11EfliDAM .p.[E . Be-TINEAU NEWS4/KCNC County Coverage B G~EA loc~ 1*ERTÂ¥ HU I v*ue' ! Â· 't, ; 41-11---~~ _ r~ d - i f 'Â· ROOSEVECE- WILLI#0' 4 County, State, TV HHs, Net Weekly Circulation (5% or greater): (ranked alphabetically by state) Average Average Average *t~44111211-~--~~- MCI(ENZ' FIA.'__ MaEAN RICHI-AND AMI[age - Average Average Cume Cume Cume Cume Cume GARFIELD : ~ DAWSON k, -- ~- -N NO TH Cume County State HH Week County State tlti Week County State HH Week County State HH Week County State HH Week -I EE -1 7.J-- -.J\hv j J=w -r/4-1 1 Juneau-Plus AK 22 990 18% Huerfano CO 2 830 58% Tattnall GA 6,040 6% Meagher MT 670 5% Humboldt NV 6,340 15% Natrona WY 25,160 8% A- ,<v~- 1 m,-~ ~ 4 .uszÂ»~A06EBuo r 7*toN Greene AL 3,400 14% Jackson CO 590 99% Adams ID 1,340 15% SLOPE 1 .Tâ„¢GEA -9-41 1 Mineral MT 1,360 9% Lander NV 2 570 33% Niobrara WY 1 070 52% _,1 JEFFEASON 1 1-1 ~~%44-44/4 '-~ =~TILLWAJ4*7Â«Â«-11.6 CUSTER -// 0Â¤WMAN A A- Wilcox AL 4,320 8% Jefferson CO 194,950 77% Benewah ID 3,580 5% Powell MT 2,160 6% Lincoln NV 1,340 50% Platte WY 3,280 52% CORSON MT 480 2,600 13% WY 10,240 20% *'- Apaches AZ 3,440 5% 2 870 ID 1,080 Richland MT 3,830 5% Nye NV 11,060 11% Sublette WY 2,100 36% IWUNG .... 4-- Fulton AR 4,180 5% Kiowa CO 630 44% Boise ID 2,090 5% Prarie 5% Mineral NV Sheridan m 4UDGON 1~ ~ ~f~-7-- Kit Carson CO , 62% Butte 29% - ~ 4 - 3 Â£ <I I'll 4Ill-_ r'Ty"fnw~~*;..| a ~ 1 BUTTE La Paz AZ 6,780 8% La Plata CO 15,030 19% Clearwater ID 3,570 5% Sanders MT 4,450 5% Storey NV 1,260 6% Uinta WY 6,500 10% Alleghany 41 SHERIDAN 2 .04 ~-~~~ ~ T~~~. ,~~IAI~ i JOHNSON ~ -141 I I.KON HUG!4ES Calaveras CA 14,590 8% Lake CO 2,360 78% Custer ID 1,430 5% NC 4,040 5% Caddo OK 11,000 5% Washakie WY 3,310 45% CAMPBELL -= PENNINGTON ~-1. F Mariposa CA 5,950 Â° Larimer CO 86 710 68% Idaho ID 5,550 0 Cavalier ND 2 080 7% Harney OR 2 600 10% Weston WY 2,420 15% 3 - ~121_- 8/0 ' 56 WESTON 9% Harding SD 570 25% 329 24EET~ Â« _A . *302-J, CUSTER 3,720 36% Lincoln CO 1,730 72% Lemhi ID 3,270 8% Golden Valley ND 790 Modoc CA 6- - 1 ---r K -y----- + 1 C = 1 1 Irr WYOMNG 1 - * 'Eptlyila~ Arthur NE 190 41% Marshall TN 10,150 5% Mono CA 3,740 5% Logan CO 7,160 57% Cheyenne KS 1,460 12% Roulette ND 4,900 8% Walworth SD 2,360 6% 1-1 0 1 1 NIOBRARA ~ ~ ~ ~TT FC TODO~ NATRONA GONVERSE ~ *higg, . Sierra CA 1,140 12% Mesa CO 44,840 25% Greeley KS 690 15% $:*7/_.ti C .Bou < B' FREMONT tÂ·Q DAWES iii 1 1 4'44 0 -~1 L SU~Er~& 10: 1 ~, i i---F*33* ,.* 1.~ --_ SHERIDAL CiltHAY I rinity CA 4,930 8% IVIUI Idl -t,dow U , /U ,-Wh".. E ..,-, .,- CO ..O. C-loi I n.an 10(Q 1 970 RÂ°4 Banner NE 300 13% Brewster TX 3,240 5% Source: Nielsen 1999 Diary County Cesâ€¢ a__r 6-4.-f-3 -I L. -_ Wi , 14Â·Â·Â· -' GOSHE L B~IE NE*B_RASI~~ 1 BAOWN Adams CO 120,040 77% Montrose CO 12,240 38% Ness KS 1,670 18% Box Butte NE 4,860 48% Karnes TX 4,590 5% Coverage Study. -----37-- PLATTE~ kâ€žE,=,1 Alamosa CO 5,170 48% CO 9,500 88% Phillips KS 2,640 10% Chase NE 1,680 17% Kimble TX 1,520 7% Morgan Cherry NE 2,460 12% San Augustine TX 2,910 14% CACHE i SwEETWATE' CARBON ALBANY -- "-- -'Â·- BANNER GARDEI~ AATI~JA 1.1(:plâ‚¬ASON ~ OeN ~ aOX ELDER Arapahoe CO 189,690 76% Ouray CO 1,160 47% Ottawa KS 2,370 10% /-; I:, 71 UINTA F LARAMIE ~ICHEYENN~ KEITH | 8,iDGWIC . PERKINS KS 1,810 Custer NE 4,900 6% Yoakum TX 2,450 11% Chi*ne â€¢ KIMBALL ~ Archuleta CO 2,970 51% Park CO 4,830 44% Rush KS 1,490 6% Cheyenne NE 3,840 30% Terrell TX 480 37% UNCIN - 1 \ LARIMER WELD ~ LOGAN P '- '- CO 102,380 69% Phillips CO 1,770 74% Stevens 27% MOFFAT ~ROUTT 771 :fortCollins~ ---A ,............ft'ILLI!~3 c~.se HAÂ¥ES _71'elri Boulder %= -1 |MORGAN ~rTCHCOCK Chaffee CO 5,900 77% Pitkin CO 6,100 55% McCreary KY 5,850 5% Dawes NE 3,340 73% Iron UT 9,370 17% OUNDÂ¥ RED WILLOyl GRAND 'BOULDÂ¢R YUMA i | RIO BLANCO + x GI~P#[~"ER ADAMS__1 ~ Cheyenne CO 810 67% Prowers CO 5,330 49% Spencer KY 3,270 7% Deuel NE 890 30% San Juan UT 3,220 7% HUMBOLDT Upe'wer WASHINGT~ DEYEN. - I -1 15% I. -I-W..f .- Garden NE 980 50 /0 Uintah UT 7,840 r.-LT Jr-â€¢A 1Â«..: 2-. El - 1 GARFIELD ~ EAGLE 4MPEg4866A- i 8948*.HOE;.-_- SHE~ THOMAS ~ SI~ AM| Clear Creek CO 3,560 69% Pueblo CO 51,640 5% St. James LA 6,890 5% nbUGL* ELBERT~ 1 KIT CARSON Waod "K-" AN[ ~ ( 1 1 1 LINCOLN Conejos CO 2,790 34% Rio Blanco CO 2,420 99% Montmorency MI 3,740 5% Grant NE 290 60% Nelson VA 5,050 5% PERSâ€¢No ' ELPASO ' ' -p ' 1 - -- biu~ir-,4 - ~ - Cl~~eâ‚¬ TALLÂ¢ .colorado Spnngsâ€ž~ CHEYENNE 444 *DER EUREI~ ~- GUNNISON (t Costilla CO 1,230 33% Rio Grande CO 4,520 40% Cook MN 1,800 9% Hitchcock NE 1,390 12% Skamania WA 3,410 6% 7 + CH-CHU /T 1 7-706~[R01, r--~94~~~ADO. _9- 67 -'Al =1 -1 Custer CO 1,260 7% Routt CO 7,060 69% Clearwater MN 3,390 5% Holt NE 4,530 5% Stevens WA 13,000 5% 33 SA~ MIGUEL'l.h ,2 HINSDil* SAGUACHE 7Â«-- 111 0,~ 1 -, PHOWERS '~-MI- 41- FINNEY MN Keith NE 3,450 47% Hampshire WV 7,060 6% 2 . --ri@VADA~_ - 6.-,BAN,> 1 + Delta CO 10,730 31% Saguache CO 1,930 38% Kittson 2,360 12% HUERFANO~-~ \..a f. yDOLORES ,'JU*>!~ 1,~IINER#L RIO 1 1Â» MONTEZU~ ~ -~ ~ GRANDE~ALAMet,A **;: 1/ b *9383%4~~ - SIANI(Â»1| al,Nr HAg(Ell~ 1 Denver CO 227,990 72% San Juan CO 200 99% Benton MS 2,750 12% Kimball NE 1,600 49% Albany WY 11,720 56% -i / LA PLATAI ENG.,AD COSTILLA ~ LA#496 h~ BACA -ON| STEVENS SE-D~~1- Dolores CO 660 50% San Miguel CO 2,120 32% Sharkey MS 2,050 5% Loup NE 300 33% Big Horn WY 4,270 36% a j ARCHULETA~'-J71 ***c : 1 11 LINCOLN Douglas CO 45,920 73% Sedgwick CO 1,070 99% Broadwater MT 1,340 10% Morrill NE 2,050 8% Campbell WY 10,840 47% ,.i -N; N Al...1. & T./ 2 CO[F.. ~~~~T~~S Pawnee NE 1,360 12% Carbon WY 5,640 78% 4 2- DALLAM UNON -.-.-- Eagle CO 12,300 66% Summit CO 7,640 59% Carter MT 580 13% El Paso CO 183,430 7% Teller CO 7,760 29% Daniels MT 880 25% Perkins NE 1,390 18% Converse WY 4,680 25% .ADING HUTCHINSC:1 NE 2,640 32% Crook WY 1,900 28% 1 L HARTLEY .00AE AOBER' HEMPHILL 50% Garfield MT 530 25% Sheridan , SANDOVAL Elbert CO 6,610 67% Washington CO 1,750 SWTAFE SAN 1,~GUE' ~ Thomas NE 290 21% WY 12,720 23% 2- 0/Â»m' Pin= CAnSON OF%~Â¥ WHEELEA Fremont CO 15,060 6% Weld CO 57,480 81% Granite MT 1,060 7% Fremont -- 4- 2 C- Eli. MÂ¢* -- / BERNAULO QUAY Garfield CO 15,000 53% Yuma CO 3,750 92% Lake MT 9,700 5% Catron NM 830 13% Goshen WY 4,820 9% Denver NEWSE! -LT-Â«1-9711â„¢Â»- 8RISCCE HALL Â·CH1LOAFE Gilpin CO 1,330 75% Hamilton FL 4,560 8% Lincoln MT 6,770 8% De Baca NM 870 29% Hot Springs WY 1,820 64% ( 01<1111.11,~ h-.nnrl - ..~ OEHACA 1 MT NM 1,370 8% Johnson WY 2,350 34% SOCOA. MÂ¢XICO i - -j -11 .0(*EVELT MJ~Â¥ - * - ~UY - Grand CO 3,690 50% Brantley GA 4,620 7% Madison 2,910 6% Guadelupe CATNON * Metro Denver Gunnison CO 4,730 67% Oglethorpe GA 4,040 5% McCone MT 770 Union NM 1,610 9% Laramie WY 30,470 50% 1 111Â£001 21% HOCKLEY ..OCK CAOSBY DICKENS KING DMA Denver - C.,WES 9-1 ....' "I. .r,N I NSI G~ea ,/r ... r \ | LEA 1 I/1 MAGELLAN Geographix w Sanla Bart}aia CA All.*1