Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPECIAL REVIEW 90-5 Fall River Addition Lodging 1991-08-27APPLICATION FOR: [level opment Plan Special Review Planned" Unit Development TOWN OF ESTES PARK PLANNING DEPARTMENT Application No.: Date: 8-27-91 ❑ Subdivision ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ Final Plat ❑ Annexation Plat Project Name Traeger Development Plan General Location• Fall River Toad near Placid Lake Le ia1r,Description: Lot 1. Traeger Subdivision Applican Gerald A. & Lois H. Traeger Telephone: 586-0910 Address: P.O. Box 487 , Estes Park, CO 80517 Property Owner: same Telephone: Address: Engineer: ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Architect: Telephone: Telephone: 586-5175 SITE DATA Size of Site: 3.0 A - 130,755 sf Smallest Lot: 3.0 A Largest Lot: 3.0 A Water: Town of Estes Park Sewer: Upper Thompson Sanitation Dist. Average Slope: 3% Area of Site - 30% slope or greater Area Open Space: Common: Private: DEVELOPMENT DATA Existing Use: Proposed Use: R-M Residential vacant Total Floor Area: Existing (Used): —0— New (Developed): Floor Area Ratio (Bulk): rnmmPrr-ia1 arrnmmnaatinns - 16 rentals, 2 managers units 13,300 sf Impervious Surface Coverage: Building Coverage: Other Paved Areas: Mew Streets: 12,960 sf 17,200 sf Public: Private: 500' Lineal Feet: Lineal Feet: Right -of -Way: Right -of -Way: Application Page Two Parking: Existing: 2 ea. mgrs. un 2 ea. 2-bedoon -0- To Be Provided: 1 ea. 1-bedroom' Building Height: Building Setbacks: Front: 30' max. per Municipal Code Side: 10' min. Rear: 10' min. River: 10 Phasing (Development Schedule): ATTACHMENTS Written Statement of Intent (21 Copies) Mylar and 21 copies of Concept or Development Plan (3 mylars if P.U.D., Annexation Plat or Final Plat) Floor Plans, Architectural Elevations at I" = 1'0" (1/16" = 1'0" for Concept Plan) Storm Water Management Plan Application Fee Applicant's Signature: Date: Date: Gera d A. Traeger by Paul M. Kochevar, Agent Owner's Signature: NOTE: ,27 c/7J Pursuant to the Municipal Code, applicants shall also be responsible to reimburse the Town for legal, engineering and planning costs incurred by staff necessary for project review. and consultants ACTION (For Planning Commission Staff Use Only) Planning Commission: Approval: Disapproval: Remarks: Town Board: Approval: Disapproval: Remarks: CU F—I P4 w aki z I--1 z on September 25, 1990 Mr. Steve Stamey Community Development Director P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Traeger Development Plan Dear Mr. Stamey: Mr. and Mrs. Traeger are proposing a commercial accommodations project adjacent to Fall River and just southeast of Placid Lake. The property totals 3.0 acres in size and is currently within 4 separately described parcels. Frontage along Fall River Road is about 550 feet in length, which is about the same length of river frontage. Four buildings, of four rental units each, shall be constructed along the south and west side of the river. Each unit is oriented toward the river so that views from the interior and use of outdoor decks are enhanced. Each unit will have at least one bedroom, a full or partial kitchen, full bath, private entry and outdoor deck. Some two -bedroom units will be built by utilizing the area developed beneath the peak of a 6 to 12 roof pitch. Parking has been initially spread in the development to avoid unsightly large expanses of asphalt. The location of the cul- de-sac meets this same goal by being placed around an existing tree grouping. Each one-becroom unit shall have a designated space; each two -bedroom unit shall have two spaces; and for every eight units an additional space shall be provided for guest parking. Respectfully yours, ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Paul M. Kochevar, P.E. & P.L.S. 15760 o President 6 X Y Q m N O N in PMK:kk August 27, 1991 Mr. Steve Stamey Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO RE: 80517 Traeger Development Plan - Amended Dear Mr. Stamey: Since the Traeger development plan was approved last year, they have completed most of their construction drawings and are at a point where a review by the Planning Commission is needed before starting construction this fall. They have selected or designed a nice one -level four-plex to be placed near the bridge and skewed/staggered to miss trees. An eight -plea, two-story, is now being designed to replace the two southerly four-plexes, which, again, will save trees and open a common area between buildings. This common area will eventually be improved with landscaping and a wood deck with a hot tub. From this deck a walk bridge will lead across the river to a pool site. This site was chosen for its seclusion from other units and a greater potential for higher solar gain. The primary technical change shown on this amended plan relates to the construction of the project access drive: 1. They would like to leave the drive with native decomposed granite surfacing, as was approved for a very similar project--Streamside Cabins. The Traeger's site is topographically more level than Streamside Cottages and affords better side -to -side dispersal of storm water run-off. 2. As was approved for the Gilfillan site, they would also like to eliminate the large turn -around previously required and utilize the old road bed to the south through Gilfillan's as a secondary or emergency access. Stamey, Steve Page 2 - W.O. 2307 August 27, 1991 We believe this request for changes to the driveway construction is justifiable in view of similar approvals given to projects that emulate the Traeger project in intent and design. In order to be financially stable, this project's infrastructure must be as good as the competition. The decision to invest more in this drive should be the owner's choice. Respectfully yours, ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Paul M. Kochevar, P.E. 15760 President cc: Mr. Gerald A. Traeger PMK:kk October 11, 1990 TITLE: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Gerald A. and Lois H. Traeger Special Review 90-5, Addition S phen Il..., Starney DIrectorl Manner Estes Park, Colorado 80.517 Tracts 92-95, Fall River Road, near Placid Lake Fall River I. SITE DATA Engineer: Number of Lots: Size of Site: Existing Zoning: Existing Land Use: Water: Sewer: Access: II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers 4 existing, 1 proposed 3.0 Acres R-M Multiple Family Vacant Town of Estes Park UTSD U.S. Highway 34 The proposed commercial accommodations development consists of manager's quarters (2 units in 1 building) and 16 rental cabins (4 buildings). Fall River divides the site. The four rental buildings will be constructed on the south and west side of the river. The manager's building will be on the highway side of the river. Access is provided from Highway 34, across an existing bridge to the interior of the site. III. PROJECT REVIEW 1. Parking. Adequate per development plan. 2. Surfacing. Adequate per development plan. 3. Access. Adequate per review agency comments, with the roadway to be constructed to town standards. P, 0, Box 1200 Telephone (.30:3) 586-5331 October 11, 1990 Page 2 4. Fire. A fire hydrant will be installed and located in the cul-de-sac. 5. Utilities. Adequate per review agency comments. A 12" water line crosses the site under proposed road. This water line is scheduled for replacement in 1991 or 1992. Street paving should be coordinated with water line construction. An overhead electric distribution line crosses the site. All new electric service to each building should be placed underground. Developer should also examine the feasibility of placing the distribution line underground. 6. Drainage. Adequate per review. 7. Landscaping. The site contains a substantial number of mature trees. Additional landscaping will be provided at the site entrance. A landscape schedule should be provided for the new landscaping. 8. Other. a. An improvement guarantee is required for utility and street improvements. b. Approval should be conditioned upon submittal of an amended plat that combines all four lots. As the density calculation has been based on the overall site area, a note should be placed on the development plan that states the area between the highway and Fall River is not a separate lot and will not be sold separately. c. Show 200 year floodplain and base flood elevation. IV. COMMENTS OF REFERRAL AGENCIES See attached correspondence. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of Special Review 90-5, with the following conditions: 1. Add proposed notes to development plan. Modify water note, per Public Works. 2. Property owner submit an amended plat to combine Tracts 92-95. Plat to be submitted and approved prior to issuing a building permit. 3. An improvement guarantee be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit, and note placed on plan. 4. The 100 year floodplain be identified. October 11, 1990 Page 3 5. Add note to plan which states that the area between Fall River and the highway is not a separate lot and will not be sold separately. 6. Roadway to be constructed to town standards. SLS:cj TOWN OF ESTES PARK TO: Steve Stamen MEMO Bill Linnane, PE Assistant Director Estes Park, Colorado 80517 4,16)61Z4‘4AJL.d, FROM: Public Works Department; Rich Widmer, Bill Linnane SUBJECT: Development Plan 90-4, Tracts 92, 93, 94 & 95, Fall River Addition The Public works Dept. has reviewed the above Plan and has the following comments: o Private roadways should be constructed to the Town's standards, 24' roadway width, 2% crown, etc. o The water main along the proposed private roadway is tentatively scheduled to be replaced in the Fall of 1991 or 1992. Schedule the asphalt work after the water line is replaced. o A fire hydrant shall be installed Scheduling should attempt to connect to the rather than the existing water line. o The 100 yr. floodplain should be having the correct setback/freeboard. near the cul-de-sac. proposed water line shown with buildings o The following sentences should be added to the General Notes, Utilities section of the Plan: "The water main along the proposed roadway is scheduled to be replaced. Prior to the installation of underground utilities, the owner shall contact the Water Dept. and get a location of the proposed water line." P, 0 Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586 5331 LYNN A. HAMMOND ROGER E. CLARK GREGORY A. WHITE HAMMOND, CLARK AND WHITE LAW ❑FFICES FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING, SUITE 41$ 200 EAST SEVENTH STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO B0537 303-667-1023 TELEFAX 303-669-9380 October 1, 1990 Mr. Steve Stamey Town Planner Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Development Plan 90-4 Tracts 92, 93, 94 and 95, Fall River Addition Dear Steve: ALFRED P. DAVIS OF COUNSEL In accordance with your memorandum of September 26, 1990 regarding the above Development Plan, I have reviewed the same and have the following comment. 1. The Development Plan does not contain a location drawing. truly yours, (A ry A. White GAW:jc DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O. Box 850 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (303) 353-1232 STATE OF COLORADO October 3, 1990 Larimer Co. - SH 34+ Fall River Addition (Fall River Road near Placid Lake, Estes Park) Mr. Steve Stamey, Planner Town of Estes Park Community Development Department P. 0. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Stamey: We have reviewed the Fall River Addition proposal, and we have the following comments: Projected traffic on SH 34 indicates the need for a 150-foot total right of way, 75 feet each side of highway centerline. Since the existing width along this property appears to be less than the 75 feet desired, south of the centerline, additional width to meet the projected need should be protected by reservation or, preferably, dedication, as permitted by Town regulations. Access to the property will require an Access Permit that must be issued by this office. A preliminary assessment of the site revealed potential sight distance problems to be addressed prior to the issue of the permit. ;f possible, some relief to the impaired sight distances to both east and west must be given either by clearing of brush and trees or by the construction of auxiliary lanes. Our comments on state highway access are based on information presented for this property only. If the property owner has any interests or ownership in adjacent property along the highway, this information should be provided since it may affect our comments. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal Please contact me at 350-2163 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Evan A. Hooper, Ji'. Development/Access Coordinator EAH:par xc: L. D. Yost G. Sisson File: Hooper via Crier Light and Power Department Richard E. Matzke, P.E. Electrical Engineer Estes Park, Colorado 80517 October 6, 1990 OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Stamey FROM: Richard E. Matzke SUBJECT: Development Plan 90-4 Tracts 92, 93, 94 & 95, Fall River Addition The Light and Power Department requests that a ten foot utility easement be provided along the centerline of the existing overhead power line. Electric service must be extended into the project at developer's expense. Electric service may be placed underground at the developer's expense. REM P, 0, Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586-5331 UPPER THOMPSON SANITATION DISTRICT ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 October 4, 1990 Mr. Steve Stamey, Town Planner TOWN OF ESTES PARK Post Office Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 RE: TRACTS 92, 93, 94, and 95 Fall River Addition — Traeger, Gerald and Lois Dear Mr. Stamey: Please find the Upper Thompson Sanitation District's comments regarding the above referenced development. Upper Thompson Sanitation District does have the capacity to serve this development. Sewer service to this development is feasible. To serve this development, the District will require the developer to construct an eight inch collection line, to District specifications, from the District's existing line to a terminal point within the development. Upon completion of a satisfactory inspection, the District will accept ownership and maintenance of said collection line. The developer will be required to purchase plant investment fees, i.e. taps for the development. The property posesses a $200.00 tap agreement, which the District assumes will be used for the developer's residence. The manager's unit tap fee will be $2,450.00. The sixteen motel units will be $818.00 per equivalent dwelling uunit. Plus, the tap fee for the swimming pool will be $2,450.00. The residence and manager's service charges will be $170.00 each, and the sixteen units will be $136.00 per unit. Service charges for the swimming pool will depend on the square footage of the pool. If you should have further questions, feel free to contact the district office. Very truly yours, please UPPER THOMPSON SANITATION DISTRICT P. O. Box 568 Phone 586-4544 RDW:jr Ronald D. Witt, Lines Superintendent WORK TO END POLLUTION Public Service® October 3, 1990 Town of Estes Park P. 0. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Public Service Company of Colorado Post Office 1668 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Attention: Steve Stamey, Town Planner Dear Steve: In response to the preliminary plats recently sent us for review, the following comments are offered: 1.) Developer's of "Tract 2, The Perrys Exemption" and "Tracts 92,93,94 and 95, % Riv r'Addition" both will have to provide utility easements for natural gas lines (as well as other utilities). They have several options in this regard: a.) If it is most feasible (because of terrain or other) for utilities to be installed in roadways, the developers can have access/utility easements corresponding to roadways/parking areas platted on their final plats. b.) If it is more uncertain where utility lines might best be installed, the developers can establish and plat the location of all building envelopes and then make a statement on the final plat that "all areas outside of building envelopes are dedicated as utility easements". c.) The developers can also wait until they make application for natural gas service at which time the exact alignment of natural gas lines will be designed by Public Service Company and staked in the field. The developers could then have their engineers conduct field surveys of these alignments and provide legal descriptions to Public Service Company so that these descriptions could be transferred to Public Service Company easement forms for signatures and recording. All options will require close coordination with all utilities by the developers. 0f particular concern would be things like delay of paving until after installation of utilities. 2.) The preliminary plat of "Lots 6 & /, Amended Plat of Elkhorn Club Estates" is acceptable as submitted. If there are further questions on this matter, place call. Sincerely, tluctr" GH:hr Gary fluett TITLE: LOCATION: APPLICANT: September 12, 1991 Special Review 90-5, Amendment to Dev. Plan Fall River Road, Near Placid Lake Gerald & Lois Traeger The Planning Commission and Board of Trustees approved Special Review 90-5 and development plan on October 16, 1990 and October 23, 1990, respectively. The proposed amendments to this development plan consists of the following: 1. A two-story, eight -unit building replaces two, four -unit buildings on the southern portion of the site. 2. The swimming pool has been relocated from the western edge of the site to a building envelope between Fall River and the highway. 3. A foot bridge crossing Fall River has been added. 4. A deck/hot tub is proposed. 5. A turn -around area has been eliminated. 6. A living unit has been added over the garage. 7. The roadway and parking areas would not be paved. STAFF COMMENTS The major issue associated with the proposed amendment relates to the surface of the roadway and parking areas. Section 17.24.010, B. 3. provides: (303) . l6-.5331 s IP,O. I3OX 1200 » ESTES PARK, CO a:rIu. 117 • FAX (303) 5 6.m2 a:16 ADMft.1 eSTRATIOIN • FAX (30.3 & 6909OTHER September 12, 1991 Page 2 3. Surface. Off-street parking areas, loading areas, and access drives, if involving six or more parking spaces, shall be surfaced with at least two inches of bituminous paving material or four inches of concrete unless the planning commission approves an alternative surface which, because of only seasonal or periodic use, will adequately prevent dust, erosion, water accumulation, and unsightly conditions. I would recommend that the drive and parking area from Highway 34 to the bridge be paved within one year of issuance of the first building permit, and that the remaining drive and parking area south of the bridge be paved with issuance of the last building permit. Information from the Institute of Transportation Engineer indicates the following trip generation rates: Resort and Recreational Rental Housing - 12 trips/unit/day Hotel or Motel - 9.6 trips/unit/day The other proposed amendments are not in conflict with the original special review approval. The drawing should be modified to eliminate the building encroachments into the river setback and to show the pedestrian/bike path easement. Stephen L. Stamey, Director Community Development Dept. oradl MEMORANDUM September 12, 1991 TO: Steve Stamey Community Development Director FROM: Bill Linnane Public Works Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Special Review 90-5, Lot 1, Traeger Subdivision (Amended Development Plan) The Public Works Department has reviewed the above project and has the following comments: • The Town's Water Line Project may be postponed two to five years, dependent on future budgets. • Prior to the Town's considering acceptance of this private roadway as public right-of- way, the owners must pave the roadway and construct a cul-de-sac at the south property line in accordance with Town standards. The statement should be added to the plat or Development Plan. • The roadway should be protected from drainage and erosion with a system of roadside ditches, roadway swale crossings and/or culverts. Rip rap should be placed in areas of higher drainage concentration such as the south end of the roadway and at the sump area near the proposed fire hydrant. These changes should be added to the Development Plan. BL:ck P 0... f3 :y x "1 2 )0 FAX 0 LYNN A. HAMMOND ROGER E. CLARK GREGORY A. WHITE HAMMOND, CLARK AND WHITE LAW ❑FFICES FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDWG, SUE 4113 200 EAST SEVENTH STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO B0537 303-667-1023 TELEFAX 303-669-9380 September 11, 1991 Mr. Steve Stamey Town Planner Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Amendment to Special Review 90-5 Lot 1, Traeger Subdivision Modification of Access Dear Steve: ALFREO P. DAVIS OF COUNSEL Pursuant to your memorandum of August 30, 1991 regarding the above, 2 have reviewed the same and have the following comments. 1. The note regarding emergency access to the south should be specific in that it should indicate that said emergency access exists at the southern end of the roadway. Also, it should be determined that the physical characteristics of the site allow emergency access from the property located directly south of this development. 2. The amended development plan shows buildings numbered 2 through 8 to be encroaching on the river setback. Such encroach- ments need the approval of the Board of Adjustment. Also, it should be noted that the deck with hot tub extends into the river easement. Extension of any decking 3011 above grade will require approval of a variance by the Board of Adjustment. Very truly yours, Q. Gregory A.VWhite GAW: j c Estes Par September 7, 1991 ColioN:ido 80517 OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Stamey FROM: Richard E. Matzke,k:2— SUBJECT: Amendment to Special Review 90-5-1 Lot 1, Traeger Subdivision Modification of Access The Light and Power Department concurs with the subject amended development plan. REM ii Fi DFii 1":.3 03 .15 tlp 3 3'11 UPPER TIC JMPSON SANITATIOL DISTRICT P.O. Box 568 Estes Park, CO 80517-0568 Phone (303) 586-4544 September 4, 1991 Mr. Steve Stamey Community Development Director Town of Estes Park P. 0. Box 1200 Estes Park, Co. 80517 Dear Steve: Re: Amendment to Special Review Lot 1, Traeger Subdivision The modification of access will not change the serviceability or sewer requirements of the above Subdivision. The District has no further comments than were stated in the May 9, 1991 letter, a copy of which is enclosed. RDW:pj Encl. as above Yours very truly, UPPER THOMPSON SANITATION DISTRICT Ronald D. Witt, Lines Superintendent cc: Estes Park Surveyors Gerald & Lois Traeger WORK TO END POLLUTION a e: fl STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O. Box 850 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (303) 353-1232 Larimer Co., S.H. 34 Fall River Addition (Fall River Road near Placid Lake, Estes Park) September 9, 1991 Mr. Steve Stamey Community Development Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Stamey: We have reviewed the proposal for modification of the access to the Traeger development, and feel that the change in surfacing should not present a problem. We refer you to our letter of October 3, 1990, a copy of which is attached, for our comments regarding this overall development. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. Please contact me at 350-2163 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Evan oop=r Jr. Development/Access Coordinator EAH/cm Attachment cc: L. D. Yost M. D. Fanning File DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O. Box 850 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (303) 353-1232 STAT October 3, 1990 F COLUiv\11 La.rimer Co' Fall River Addition (Fall RiVer Road near Placid Lake, Estes Park) Mr. Steve StameY, planner Town of Estes Park Department Community Development P. 0 . Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Mr. Stamey� and we have the following Dearro osal, We have reviewed the Fall River Addition p P right of comments: 0-foot total SE 34 indicates the need for a 1 0- existing width alongf traffic on Centerline. Since the centerline, Projected highway feet desired, south of way, 75 feet each side of be than the 75 desired, byo reservation property appears meet less should be protected this P to the projected need i°� regulations• additionalrefer widthpermitted by or, preferably, dedication, as P t that must be issued by require an Access Perms potential sight the permit- If Possible, Access to the A pxeli� �'Y assessment of the esissuee of the dtistance office addressed prior to both east and west must be sibs distance Problems to be sight distances to tion of auxiliary to the firing of brush trees or by the construction presented some relief clearing of bras highway access are based on info wneesent given either by on state hig s any interests or ° Our property o owner has tion should be Provided lanes' only• If the property this informs hip for this prOPer along the highway, in adjacent property since it may affect our comments. Please contact me at Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal 350-2163 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, ':par 74„ D. Yost Sisson e: Hooper via Evan A. Hooper, J Coordinator Development/Access raer,�� r'ot Of Publication STATE OF COLORADO :OUNTY OF LARIMER T. rpnr•P K T.i nenr•P Being duly sworn, deposes and says: I. That he is the publisher of the Estes Park trail Gazette. a semi -weekly newspaper print - id and published in the Town of Estes Park, :ounty of Larimer and State of Colorado. Z. That the said Estes Park Trail -Gazette is srinted and published at regular intervals, wo times each week, Wednesday and on 'ridgy, and that it has a general circulation in he County of Larimer, and elsewhere. I. That the said Estes Park Trail -Gazette was •stablished and has been printed and pub- ished in said County uninterruptedly end continuously. during a period of at least fifty- wo consecutive weeks next prior to the first ssue thereof containing.said mended Development Plain — Rraeger copy of which is hereunto attached. I. That the Estes Park Trail -Gazette is a semi- reekly newspaper of general circulation, and " s printed and published in whole .or part in he said Town of Estes Park and County of .arimer in which said Notice — Traeger Legal Notice s required by law to be published, a copy of ohich is hereunto attached. That the said Estes Park Trail -Gazette is a smi-weekly newspaper within the meaning of n act concerning Legal Notices and Adver- isements being Chapter 109 of the Colorado !incised Statutes of 1953. . That the said annexed Notice — Traeger Legal Notice • vas published in the regular and entire dition of the Estes Park Trail -Gazette, a duly udlified semi -weekly newspaper for that urpose, within the terms and meanings of he above named acts. That the said annexed Vnti cei — Traenr Legal Notice a full, true and correct copy of the riginal which was regularly published in each f the regular and entire issues of said news- aper, a legally qualified paper for that pur- ose, once each week, on the same day of ach week for one (1) successive weeks by zp (1) insertions and that the first pub- ication thereof was in the issued da d Friday, August 30 ,19 t}�j nd that the last publication was in the iss aced Frida Au. St 30 ,19� - ube�tribed and sworn to me this 3(Thh ,19 91 otary Publie- commission expires Maroh 22.19_ 2,,. (Published In the Trail- Gazette Fr Aug, 30, 1991) NOTICE 1,` hope is hereby given that on 17, 1991, et 120 P.M. In the Board Room i (Room 103) of the Municipal Guiding, 170 MacGregor Avenue. Estee Park, Colorado. `the Planning Coo sdon will hold a pubic f hearing lot the purpose of considering an amended dawlapmem plan tar Special Review 90.5. for the property and purpose described below, approval of which may cre- ate avested property right pursuant to °Dior.. De�rlp1iQ11P i iR'r,�w' Lot 1. Traeger Subdivision ool,,Fall Rivet Road, near Placid Type and ty el Use: m�u1''„ ot 16 commercial; d 4 iso �rtidatlon unite' and mane ger'a`"quartets Modikatlont aoceaa ,� �uV'Applllcent: 'N w, „ Gerald & 1 Traege w r k person irey appeal el ei ch`t ailiig and prawn evidence upon any natter to be oilaelbered„ For more Intormetion, contact Slave Stanley „Munlcdpal Building, 586-5331. FUND ACCT. ' AMT. ri Proof Of Publication STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF LARIMER TERENCE K. LICENCE being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. That he is the publisher of the Estes Park Trail Gazette, a semi -weekly newspaper print- ed and published in the Town of Estes Park, County of Larimer and State of Colorado. 2. That the said Estes Park Trail -Gazette is printed and published at regular intervals, two times each week, Wednesday and on Friday, and that it has a general circulation in the County of Larimer, and elsewhere. 3. That the said Estes Park Trail -Gazette was established and has been printed and pub- lished in said County uninterruptedly and continuously. during a period of at least fifty- two consecutive weeks next prior to the first issue thereof containing said NOTICE (Traeger) a copy of which is hereunto attached. 4. That the Estes Park Trail -Gazette is a semi- weekly newspaper of general circulation, and is printed and published in whole •or part in the said Town of Estes Park and County of Larimer in which said NOTICE (Traeger) Legal Notice is required by law to be published, a copy of which is hereunto attached. 5. That the said Estes Park Trail -Gazette is a semi -weekly newspaper within the meaning of an act concerning Legal Notices and Adver- tisements being Chapter 109 of the Colorado Revised Statutes of 1953. 6. That the said annexed NOTICE (Traeger) Legal Notice was published in the regular and entire edition of the Estes Park Trail -Gazette, a duly qualified semi -weekly newspaper for that purpose, within the terms and meanings of the above named acts. 7. That the said annexed NOTICE (Traeger) Legal Notice is a full, true and correct copy of the original which was regularly published in each of the regular and entire issues of said news- paper, a legally qualified paper for that pur- pose, once each week on the same day of each week for one ('i) successive weeks by one (1) insertions and that the first pub- lication thereof was in the issued dated Friday. September 28 ,1990 and that the last publication was in the issue dated Friday. ,>e t tuber 28 19 90 Sub, cribed da., • f and Terence K Licence sworn to me this 28th 19_9p 1,.:t' Notary Public. 1R��}�Ir 0 /22 ,19 92 i4i r published N the Tra1I.Garene Fri.. Sept. 26, 1990) NOTICE Nolte Is hereby given that on Oclobe► le, 1990 at 130 P.M. In the Board Hoorn of the Municipal Bulllding, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estee Park Colorado. the Planning Commis- sion MI hold apublcheating for the purpose of considering a development plan for the properly and purpose desor bed below. approve! of which may create a vested prop- e rty right pursuant to Colorado law. Legal Description: " iTr cts 93. 94 & 95, Fal Mier ion Type and Intensity or Use: f)eveiopfrnenl ol s commercial t n1- rnodatllon unite and related site Improvements Applicant: Gerald A. & Lois H. Traeger My person may appear at such hearing and present evidence upon any matter to be considered. For more Information. contact Steve Stamey. Municpal Buid4ng. 568-5331. ACCT. oJ-,24•aa-4a, 6.Z4 -62/ AMT. 4.Z . u0 U.K. BY _¢� P.O. Box 487 Estes Park, CO 80517 September 27, 1990 Mr. Steve Stamey Community Development Director P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Traeger Development Plan Dear Mr. Stamey: The property shown on our development plan is currently divided into four lots --two on each side of the river. All of the lots are owned by Kanemoto Farms, and we have a contract to purchase the property. It is our intention to proceed with the purchase of the property following the development plan review hearings by the Planning Commission and the Town Board, assuming a reasonable approval for developing the property is obtained. We would like the Town Board to consider a condition of approval that would require the submittal of a final plat to combine the existing four lots into one lot; or, if need be, into two lots with the river being the common lot line. If the sequence of events could follow this schedule, we will own the property and can sign the subdivision plat accordingly. The Kanemoto's would have no interest in combining their lots when they have no plans for development. Therefore, it is essential that we acquire the property following development plan approval, and then submit the plat on our own behalf. On a related matter, we do not wish to become bogged down with ordinance jargon relative to the choice of making one lot or two lots out of the entire property. We can see no logical reason for placing a lot line down the center of the river, other than it is stated in the Municipal Code as a requirement. Our taxes would probably be higher; and an undesirable potential of the lots having separate ownership would exist. It appears to us that the first part of the subdivision ordinance allows the Town Board to make exceptions on such matters. We respectfully request that they do so in this case. Sincerely yo„urs, Gerald and Lois Traeger COMME13.