Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Park Board of Adjustment 2023-05-02BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT – TOWN OF ESTES PARK 170 MacGregor Avenue – Town Hall Board Room Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:00 a.m. Estes Park, CO 80517 The meeting will also be live-streamed on the Town’s Youtube Channel and recorded and posted to YouTube and www.estes.org/videos within 48 hours. AGENDA AGENDA APPROVAL. PUBLIC COMMENT. (Please state your name and address). CONSENT AGENDA: 1.Board of Adjustment Minutes dated April 4, 2023 ACTION ITEMS: 1.Variance Request 1895 Fall River Road Senior Planner Woeber Two variance requests to increase allowable square footage for employee housing 2.Variance Request 160 S St. Vrain Ave Planner I Washam Request of 16.4 foot and 6.9 foot front setbacks in lieu of 25-feet required 3.Variance Request 281 W Riverside Dr Planner I Washam Eliminate the Front and Side Setback in lieu of the 8 and 10 feet required REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1.Upcoming meeting items ADJOURN The Town of Estes Park will make reasonable accommodations for access to Town services, programs, and activities and special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call (970) 577-4777. TDD available. April 26, 2023 1 2 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, April 4, 2023 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the ESTES PARK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. The meeting was held in said Town of Estes Park on April 4, 2023. Board: Chair Jeff Moreau, Vice-Chair Wayne Newsom, Board Member Joe Holtzman Attending: Chair Moreau, Board Member Holtzman, Community Development Director Jessica Garner, Planner I Kara Washburn, Recording Secretary Karin Swanlund Absent: none Chair Moreau called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved and seconded (Holtzman/Newsom) to approve the agenda. The motion passed 3-0. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Holtzman) to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion passed 3-0. ELECTION OF OFFICERS It was decided that Chair Moreau and Vice Chair Newsom would continue their positions for 2023. The vote was unanimous. VARIANCE REQUEST 510 Moraine Avenue Planner I Washam Planner Washam reviewed the staff report. The applicant requests approval of a variance to allow a reduced side setback of eight feet (8’) in lieu of the twenty-five foot (25’) setback required in the CO (Commercial Outlying) Zoning District under Section 4.4.C.4. of the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC). If approved, the applicant intends to construct a partially open pavilion. Public Comment: Chuck Scott, owner of Coffee on the Rocks, spoke on the floodplain issue and stated that there was no water on the site during the 2013 flood. The adjacent property owners to the south and west contacted him and had no problem with the variance. Discussion: none It was moved and seconded (Moreau/Holtzman) to approve the variance request for a reduced side setback of eight feet for the subject property addressed as 510 Moraine Avenue in the Town of Estes Park, with the findings as outlined in the staff report. The motion passed 3-0. VARIANCE REQUEST 281 W Riverside Dr. Planner I Washam It was moved and seconded (Moraue/Holtzman) to continue this item to May 2, 2023, Board of Adjustment meeting. There being no further business, Chair Moreau adjourned the meeting at 9:20 a.m. Jeff Moreau, Chair Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary draf t 3 4 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Chair Jeff Moreau Estes Park Board of Adjustment Through: Jessica Garner, AICP, Community Development Director From: Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner Date: May 2, 2023 Application: Variances for Total Square Footage and Cumulative Square Footage for Employee Housing 1895 Fall River Road Kinley Built LLC, Owner/Applicant David Bangs, Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers, Representative Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board of Adjustment approve the variance requests, subject to the findings described in the report. Land Use: 2022 Estes Forward Comprehensive Plan Designation: (Future Land Use): Mixed-Use Centers and Corridors Zoning District: CO (Commercial Outlying) Site Area: 2.3 Acres PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: Conduct a public hearing to consider and make a decision on a request from the Applicant for two variances. The first variance request would allow employee housing units to exceed the maximum allowable 800 square feet per unit. The second request would allow the total cumulative square feet of employee housing to exceed that of the total square footage of the commercial use. 5 Background The 2.3-acre subject property is in a CO (Outlying Commercial) Zone District and contains an existing structure, previously used for office and retail space. The current owner intends to continue the commercial/office use, add additional commercial/office area, and eight new employee housing units. Employee housing units are allowable as an Accessory Use under Section 5.2.C.2 of the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC). The Applicant submitted a Development Plan for the project, which relies on the requested variances in order to proceed. Variance Description: The Employee Housing use is subject to certain limitations under the standards within the EPDC. The applicant is requesting variances to the following two development standards: 1. EPDC Section 5.2.C.2.a.1.b., Additional Requirements for Specific Accessory Uses in Nonresidential Zoning Districts – Employee Housing, to allow individual dwelling units used for employee housing to exceed 800 square feet of gross floor area. Eight, two-bedroom employee housing apartment units are proposed, each 1200 square feet in size. 2. EPDC Section 5.2.C.2.a.2.b., Additional Requirements for Specific Accessory Uses in Nonresidential Zoning Districts – Employee Housing, to permit total cumulative square footage of the employee housing units to exceed that of the principal use. Existing and proposed commercial/office square footage would total 8470 square feet. The total, cumulative square feet of the proposed employee housing is 9680 square feet, 1210 square feet more than allowed. Location and Context: The subject property is legally described as All of Binns Addition to the Town of Estes Park and is located on Fall River Road, approximately ¾ mile west of the intersection of Fall River Road and West Elkhorn Avenue. This area has a variety of zoning and established uses, including single-family and multi-family residential, accommodations and commercial. This area is a mixture of Town and unincorporated Larimer County, which includes properties adjacent to the subject property to the north, east and west. The unincorporated property to the west (on the north side of Fall River Road) contains an accommodations/lodge use. The unincorporated parcel to the east contains two single-family residences. Properties to the south across Fall River Road are within Town boundaries and contain single family residences and accommodations/cabins. 6 Vicinity Map Zoning Map 7 Zoning and Land Use Summary Table Subject Site Mixed Use Centers & Corridors RM (Residential) Commercial/Office North Undeveloped South Suburban Estate E-1 (Estate) Residential East Neighborhood Village Residential West Lodging Project Analysis Review Criteria: The Board of Adjustment (BOA) is the decision-making body for variance requests. In accordance with EPDC Section 3.6.C., Variances, Standards for Review, applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein. The Standards with staff findings for each are as follows: 1. Special circumstances or conditions exist (e.g., exceptional topographic conditions, narrowness, shallowness or the shape of the property) that are not common to other areas or buildings similarly situated and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with this Code’s standards, provided that the requested variance will not have the effect of nullifying or impairing the intent and purposes of either the specific standards, this Code or the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding: Special circumstances exist, although not with the physical condition of the property. Employers in Estes Park and the Estes Valley have long faced serious challenges in hiring and retaining employees due to the lack of housing in the Estes Park area. The eight proposed employee housing units can alleviate these circumstances somewhat. The requested variance will not nullify or impair the intent and purposes of the employee housing standards, the EPDC, or the Comprehensive Plan. 2. In determining "practical difficulty," the BOA shall consider the following factors: a. Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance; Staff Finding: There may be beneficial use of the property without the variance. 8 b. Whether the variance is substantial; Staff Finding: The variance to exceed the 800 square foot maximum to 1200 square feet is 50 percent more than allowed. The variance to allow the employee housing to exceed the commercial square footage by 1210 square feet is somewhat substantial, 14 percent greater than what is allowed. The two- bedroom, two-bathroom apartments are more desirable and provide more flexibility than what is possible with the 800 square foot limitation, according to the applicant. c. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; Staff Finding: The character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered. There would be minor impacts to this area with the employee housing units being larger than allowable. However, adjoining properties would not suffer a substantial detriment if the variance is approved. Parking is adequate for the proposed uses. d. Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Staff Finding: Public services such as water and sewer will not be adversely affected by the variance. e. Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement; Staff Finding: The applicant was aware of the employee housing size requirements when the property was purchased. f. Whether the Applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. Staff Finding: The applicant could add employee housing that is smaller, and meets the square footage requirements of the EPDC. There is no method other than the variance to establish the employee housing at the size that is proposed. 3. No variance shall be granted if the submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the Applicant's property are of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. 9 Staff Finding: The conditions affecting the Applicant’s property are not general or recurrent. 4. No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision, pursuant to the applicable zone district regulations. Staff Finding: N/A 5. If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff Finding: The proposed variance would be the least deviation from the EPDC regulations. 6. Under no circumstances shall the BOA grant a variance to allow a use not permitted, or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district containing the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Finding: The proposed variance is for a use permitted as an Accessory Use in the CO Zone District. 7. In granting such variances, the BOA may require such conditions as will, in its independent judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standard so varied or modified. Staff Finding: Staff does not recommend conditions. Reviewing Agency Comments: This request has been referred to all applicable review agencies staff for review and comment. There was no objection to the proposed variance. The Upper Thompson Sanitation District “…has no concerns with the Variance Request pertaining to square footage.” Public Works “…supports approval of the variances to facilitate the construction of new workforce/employee housing.” Town of Estes Park Utilities “…has no objections.” Staff notes there may be additional agency comments regarding the Development Plan application for the project. Public Notice Staff provided public notice of the application in accordance with EPDC noticing requirements. • Written notice was mailed to adjacent property owners on April 12, 2023. 10 • Legal notice published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette on April 14, 2023. • The application was posted on the Town’s “Current Applications” webpage on February 20, 2023. Advantages: • Approval of the variance will allow development of more and larger employee housing units, which is needed in the Estes Park area. Disadvantages: • There may be a slight increase in traffic on Fall River Road when the employee housing is fully occupied. Action Recommended: Staff recommends approval of the variance request. Level of Public Interest: Low. To date, no public comments have been received for the variance application. Sample Motion: I move that the Board of Adjustment approve the variance requests, in accordance with the findings as presented. I move that the Board of Adjustment deny the variances, finding that [state findings for denial]. I move that the Board of Adjustment continue the variances to the next regularly scheduled meeting, finding that [state reasons for continuance]. Attachments: 1. Application Form 2. Statement of Intent 3. Proposed Site Plan 4. Proposed Architectural Plans 11 ESTES PARK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION Lot Size Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service OTown Proposed Water Service C Town Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Existing Gas Service XceI Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? Town Water,UTSD,xcet Town Water,IJTSD,XceL Name of Primary Contact Person Nathan Kinley Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is Owner Applicant Townãf Esles Park .P.O.Box 12W..W0JJOcGregor*ehuè .Estes Park,CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone:(970)577-3721 .e.Fox:(970(586-0249 -e.w’w.estes.org/CommunityDevelopment 2 \,\Revised 2020.4&)ks 1lSubmittal Date:2/15/2023 Record Owner(s):Kintey Built LLC Street Address of Lot:1895 Fall River Road Legal Description:Lot: ___________ Block: Subdivision:Alt of finns Addition to tile Town of Estes Park Parcel ID #:3522105001 4.58 Tract: Commercial/Office Commercial/office,Wockfocce housing Zoning Commercial C C Well 0 Other (Specify) Well 0 Other (Specify) C EPSD 0 UTSD o EPSD 0 UTSO o Other C None No wetLands O Septic o Septic 0 Yes 0 No ‘Variapce Desired (Develoument Code Section #)‘___________________________________________________________increase worn torce nousing fry111 800 yIft to 1200 n.1/ft.EPDC S.Z.cl.l I nathan@kinLeybuilt.com C ConsultantlEngineer I Application fee (see attached fee schedule) Statement of intent (IlL!I standards in Section 3 r,f ILit I I copy (folded)of site plan (drawn aa scale of 1”=20’)** Z 1 reduced copy of the site plan (II X 17’) Z Digital copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF format emailed to planning©estes.org IThe site plan shall include information in Estes Park Development Code Appendix B.Vll.5. The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the Board of Adjustment variance application schedule).Copies must be folded. ri) 12 KinLey Built,LLC 970-227-4865 Contact Information Cell Phone Fax Email nathan@kinLeybuilt.com Applicant Nathan KinLey Mailing Address 351 Moraine Aye,Unit A,Estes Park CO 80517 Phone 970-227-4865 Cell Phone Fax Email nathan@kinteybuiLt.com ConsultantlEngineer Davki Bangs,TraiL Ridge Consulting Engineers Mailing Address 2191 Larkspur Ave., Estes Park,CO 80517 Phone 970-308-8221 Cell Phone Fax Email dbangs@trailridgece.com DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL UNDER REVIEW FOR THIS PROPERTY 970-577-3721 Record Owner(s) Mailing Address Phone 351 Moraine Aye,unit A,Estes Park CO 80517 APPLICATION FEES See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: www.estes.org/Qlanninciforms All requests for refunds must be made in writing.All fees are due at the time of submittal. Revised 202004.01 ks 13 OWNER &APPLICANT CERTIFICATION As Owner,I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and C am the record owner of the property. fr As Applicant,I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. “In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement,I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC). I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EPDC,and that,prior to filing this application,I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Park Development Code is available online at: https://www.municode.com/library/CO/estes_valley/codes/development_code I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EPDC. I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete,inaccurate,or submitted after the deadline date. I understand that a resubmittal fee may be charged if my application is incomplete. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Park Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void.I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. I understand that I am required to obtain a “Development Proposal Under Review”sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road.I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked.I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10)business days prior to the Estes Park Board of Adjustment hearing. I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request,“Failure of an applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval of the variance may automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void.”(Estes Park Development Code Section 3.6.D) Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT:Nathan KinLey Applicant PLEASE PRINT:Nathan KinLey Signatures: Record Owner L L Date 2—)‘fZ? Applicant LAAZT Date l I t’t Revised 2020.04.01 ks 14 PAGE 1 OF 3 February 15, 2023 Community Development Department Town of Estes Park 970-577-3729 RE: Statement of Intent for 1895 Fall River RD Variance To Whom it May Concern: Applicant is pleased to submit this Application for variance request for the property located at 1895 Fall River Road. This letter is to serve as the Statement of Intent for the proposed project and will provide general descriptions regarding compliance with the key applicable standards for review as defined in the Estes Park Development Code. Please refer to the Site Plan submitted herewith for specific details regarding the proposed project. Project Information The subject property is located at 1895 Fall River Rd. with approximately 2.3 acres of land area. The parcel is currently developed and contains an asphalt driveway/parking area and a commercial use building. The property is zoned CO- Commercial Outlying per the Estes Park Zoning District Maps. The project proposes the re-development of the property including new mixed use office space, 8 new residential units and preserving the existing building on the property under the same commercial/mixed use. The proposed residential units will be approximately 1,200 sq/ft. to accommodate two bedroom/2 bath floor plans. Construction will also include a new 29-stall parking lot, new utility services and improvements to the existing access driveway and parking lot.  Existing Commercial: 3,280sf; Proposed Commercial: 5,190sf Total Commercial: 8,470sf.  Proposed Residential: 9,680sf. The variance request is for 5.2.c.2.a  (1)(b) Individual dwelling units for employee housing shall not exceed 800 square feet of gross floor area.  (2)(b) In no case may the cumulative square footage of the employee housing units and accessory areas exceed that of the principal use. To accommodate the multiple needs as well as the challenge of a steep site, the building is grouped into a series of two-unit clusters, perhaps echoing a larger ‘townhome’ style of design, that step up in elevation from west to east. Each of the clusters is roughly scaled to match the 15 PAGE 2 OF 3 massing of the existing building on site. Eight residential workforce housing units appear to be four, reducing the apparent density, while still providing for individual entries. The commercial space is designed to be flexible to meet varying demands, from a space as small as 650sf up to the entire floor. Access to all commercial doors is via an accessible route. Apartment units are designed with a ‘main’ floor living (a story above the commercial) with access to grade on the north side. Second level of the apartment provides for two bedrooms which could be utilized by a couple, small family or two friends looking to share living expenses. The footprint of the top level is reduced to provide scale reduction at the roofline as well as maximize privacy. Materials are traditional to Estes Park, stone, and wood-appearance fiber-cement siding, to be painted in darker earth tone colors. Roofing will be primarily gray-brown asphalt shingle with some metal accents. Special Circumstances: The steepness of the lot, configuration of access and existing building make it difficult to provide two-bedroom ‘flats’ before quickly running out of space. Valley wide it understood that there is a significant need to provide affordable workforce housing. The two-bedroom apartment is by far the most sought after configuration. This configuration is very difficult to provide in under 800sf. Practical difficulty: Opportunities to provide employee housing with new developments should be encouraged within the Estes Valley. Provided housing to Employees is an essential item in support of a healthy business. Beneficial use without: The additional 400 Sq/Ft allows for practical living standards for working families in Estes Park. Substantial variance: The variance would be from a max of 800sf to 1,210sf in order to provide 2- story, 2-bedroom units. The steepness of the lot lends itself to the two-story solution, and 1,200sf is not an unreasonable size for a two-bedroom unit. Greater variances have been allowed in past for this type of use. Essential character/detriment: No negative effect. The character of the surrounding area is primarily accommodations, so the workforce use would not be incompatible. The buildings have been designed to bury into the hillside to reduce bulk and impact. The upper floor has also been designed to fit within a stepped roofline to further reduce massing. 16 PAGE 3 OF 3 Compliance with General Development and Subdivision Standards Zoning District Standards: Zoning is to remain unchanged. Zoned CO-Commercial Outlying Transportation: Transportation impact will not be affected by variance request. The 1895 Fall River Rd Development proposes an improved access route to Fall River Rd. Electric- Town of Estes Park The proposed variance will not affect existing electric services. Water- Town of Estes Park The proposed variance will not affect existing water services. Sewer- Upper Thompson Sanitation District The proposed variance will not affect existing sewer services. Natural Gas- Xcel Energy The proposed variance will not affect existing gas services. Communications/Broadband- TDS or Century Link The proposed variance will not affect existing communications services. Access Applicant proposes improving existing access drive to the site to provide two-way traffic and pedestrian access to the Fall River RD. Mapped Hazard Areas: The subject property is located within the mapped Steep Slope Hazard Area and Wildfire hazard area. The proposed variance will not impact the mapped hazard area. Proposed units to be built outside of the geologic steep slopes area and comply with all wildfire prevention according to EPDC. We thank you for time and consideration of the requested variance. 17 ∆ NEW 6 " D I P WATER S E R V I C E NEW B U R I E D P O W E R / C O M SER V I C E NE W 6 " S D R 3 5 SA N S E R V I C E NEW 18" ADS NE W G A S SE R V I C E PROPOSED MULTI-USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING ARCH 100'-0"=7830.0' 781 0 7820 78 3 0 189' DISTRICT LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15 TREES 21 SHRUBS 192' FRONTAGE LANDSCAPE BUFFER 8 TREES, 19 SHRUBS PROPOSED PROJECT SITE OVERHEAD UTILITY OVERHEAD UTILITY POLE LEGEND SEWER MANHOLE TREE (SIZE NOT NOTED) CONCRETE SURFACE FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENTATION EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE WILDFIRE HAZARD BOUNDARY MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR GEOLOGICAL HAZARD BOUNDARY ELECTRIC METER SCALE: 1" = 30' 60'30'0 WATER MANHOLE 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com© 2022 DAB WATER MAIN LINE DRAINAGE FLOWLINE WATER SERVICE LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACE 1895 FALL RIVER ROAD DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTES: 1. THIS SITE PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY NOR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. 2. EASEMENTS AND LOT LINE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM A WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 20220037232 AND WAS THE ONLY SOURCE USED FOR LOT LINE DETERMINATION AND EASEMENT RESEARCH. NO FURTHER RESEARCH WAS COMPLETED FOR THE CREATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 3. CONTOURS SHOWN ARE AT A 1' INTERVAL AND ARE BASED UPON OBSERVED GPS ELEVATION AND 2013 LIDAR MAPPING. 4. ENGINEER DOES NOT WARRANT THE LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREAS. THOSE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR/OWNER. 5. CONTACT INFORMATION: APPLICANT KINLEY BUILT, INC 351 MORAINE AVE ESTES PARK, CO 80517 CONSULTANT/CONTACT PERSON DAVID BANGS, P.E. TRAIL RIDGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE ESTES PARK ,CO 80517 970-308-8221 6.LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ALL OF BINNS ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO, AS KNOWN AS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER THAT IS NORTH 00 DEGREES 55 MINUTES EAST 169.66 FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID DIVISION (THIS CORNER BEING SOUTH 88 DEGREES 58 MINUTES EAST 1301.0 FEET FROM THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER); THENCE SOUTH 73 DEGREES 58 MINUTES WEST 42.12 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 34; THENCE ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID HIGHWAY NO. 34 NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE RADIUS IS 804.0 FEET A DISTANCE OF 386.91 FEET (RESULTANT CHORD BEING NORTH 48 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST 383.19 FEET); THIS POINT BEING 62.0 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE CURVE (P.C.); THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST 239.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 05 MINUTES EAST 227.07 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THIS LINE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 55 MINUTES WEST 449.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. 7.STATISTICAL INFORMATION: ZONING DISTRICT - CO-COMMERCIAL OUTLYING SETBACKS - 25' FRONT, 15' SIDE, 15' REAR GROSS PROJECT AREA - 100,093.8 SF/2.30 AC PROJECT AREA IN FLOODPLAIN - N/A NET PROJECT AREA - 100,093.8 SF EXISTING COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE - 3,280 S.F. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE - 5,190 S.F. PROPOSED EMPLOYEE HOUSING - (8) 2 BEDROOM UNITS PARKING REQUIRED - 1 SPACE PER 400 SF BUSINESS SERVICES USE + 2 PER UNIT WORKFORCE HOUSING 8,470 S.F. / 400 S.F./SPACE + 8 UNITS * 2 SPACES/UNIT = 37 SPACES REQUIRED PARKING PROPOSED: 1 SPACE PER 400 SF BUSINESS SERVICE + 1 DEDICATED/1 SHARED SPACE PER WORKFORCE UNIT TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED - 27 SPACES (2 ADA) ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE - 80% PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE - 18,475 SF PAVING/WALKS + 7,948 SF BUILDINGS = 25,132 SF / 100,093.8 SF = 25.1% 8. ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED OR GUARANTEED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 9. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE A.D.A. AND U.B.C. 10. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL COMPLY WITH EVDC CHAPTER 7.9. 11. APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN CREATES A VESTED RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 68 OF TITLE 24, C.R.S., AS AMENDED. OWNER'S CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING THE OWNERS OF THE REAL PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO PERTAINING THERETO. __________________________________________________ KINLEY BUILT, INC - NATHAN KINLEY APPROVAL APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR ON THIS _____ DAY OF ____________________, 20_____. __________________________________________________ ______________________, PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 1000' LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO NATURAL-APPEARING LAND FORMS, WITH CURVES THAT BLEND IN WITH ADJACENT UNDISTURBED SLOPES. ABRUPT ANGULAR TRANSITIONS AND LINEAR SLOPES SHALL BE AVOIDED. 2. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITHIN ONE GROWING SEASON AFTER CONSTRUCTION USING A SUBSTANTIAL MIXED STAND OF NATIVE GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS. THE DENSITY OF THE REESTABLISHED GRASS VEGETATION AFTER ONE GROWING SEASON SHALL BE ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND INVASION OF WEEDS. 3. ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE EXISTING VEGETATIVE COVER IS DAMAGED OR REMOVED, THAT ARE NOT OTHERWISE COVERED WITH NEW IMPROVEMENTS, SHALL BE SUCCESSFULLY RE-VEGETATED WITH A SUBSTANTIAL MIXED STAND OF NATIVE OR ADAPTED GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS. 4. ON MAN-MADE SLOPES OF 25% OR GREATER, PLANT MATERIALS WITH DEEP ROOTING CHARACTERISTICS SHALL BE SELECTED THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION AND REDUCE SURFACE RUNOFF. ALL MAN-MADE SLOPES GREATER THAN 50% WILL BE MULCHED AND NETTED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION AND RE-VEGETATION. 5. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE, TOPSOIL THAT IS REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STOCKPILED AND CONSERVED FOR LATER USE ON AREAS REQUIRING RE-VEGETATION OR LANDSCAPING, SUCH AS CUT-AND-FILL SLOPES. 6. NO TREES OR VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED OUTSIDE THE APPROVED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. 7. CONIFER TREES SHALL BE SIZED AS 50% EIGHT FEET TALL AND 50% AT SIX FEET TALL AT PLANTING. DECIDUOUS TREES SHALL BE SIZED AS 50% AT FOUR INCH CALIPER AND 50% AT TWO INCH CALIPER PLANTING. SHRUBS SHALL BE 5 GALLON CONTAINER OR LARGER AT PLANTING. 8. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN SPECIFICATIONS FOR NUMBER 1 G0RADE AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE QUALITY STANDARDS OF THE COLORADO NURSERY ACT, TITLE 35, ARTICLE 25, C.R.S., AS AMENDED. 9. ALL LANDSCAPES SHALL INCLUDE A PROPERLY FUNCTIONING AUTOMATED SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH INDIVIDUAL DRIP LINES FOR NATURAL AREAS. SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE TEMPORARY FOR PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE IN PLACE FOR A MINIMUM OF 18 MONTHS. 10. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY, GROWING CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULAR IRRIGATING, PRUNING, WEEDING, MOWING, FERTILIZING, REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS IN POOR CONDITION AND OTHER MAINTENANCE OF ALL PLANTINGS AS NEEDED. 11. ALL TREES SHALL BE STAKED, GUYED AND FENCED TO PROTECT FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. NO CHAIN LINK FENCING SHALL BE ALLOWED TO PROTECT LANDSCAPING FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. 12. DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE BY WILDLIFE. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: DISTRICT BUFFER: 8 EVERGREEN TREES AND 11 SHRUBS PER 100 FEET PROPOSED DISTRICT BUFFER REQUIREMENTS - 189 LF DISTRICT BUFFER, 15 TREES AND 21 SHRUBS REQUIRED STREET FRONTAGE BUFFER: 1 EVERGREEN TREE PER 25 FEET AND 1 SHRUB PER 10 FEET PROPOSED STREET FRONTAGE BUFFER - 192 LF STREET FRONTAGE BUFFER, 8 TREES AND 19 SHRUBS REQUIRED PARKING LOT BUFFERS: N/A COVERED BY DISTRICT BUFFER AND FRONTAGE BUFFER IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE BUFFER: 1 TREE AND 3 SHRUBS FOR EVERY 1000 SF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS - 25,132 SF = 25 TREES AND 75 SHRUBS TOTAL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 38 TREES AND 115 SHRUBS EXISTING LANDSCAPE: 15 TREES AND 0 SHRUBS NEW LANDSCAPE: 23 TREES AND 115 SHRUBS TOWN ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER OR ESTES PARK COLORADO ON THIS _____ DAY OF ____________________, 20_____. __________________________________________________ ____________________, TOWN ENGINEER 18 BAS1S.com Estes Park, Colorado 80517 1692 Big Thompson Ave, Ste 100 A1Sheet No:970.586.9140 Sheet Title: Date: Architecture, P.C. Issue: © BASIS D-Plan Architecturals Kinley Built Mixed Use/Workforce Housing 2/15/2023 Develpmt Plan A R C H I T E C T U R E P. C. UP UP UP UP UP UP 36 ' - 0 " 160'-8" 2' - 0 " 40'-0" 100'-0"100'-6"101'-0"101'-6"102'-0"103'-0"103'-6"104'-0" 100'-0"100'-6" 101'-0"101'-6"102'-6"103'-0" 103'-6"104'-0" FDW F DW FDW F DW FDW F DW FDW F DW DN DN DN DN DN DN UP UP UP UP UP UP UP UP 115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0"115'-0" W/D W/D W/D W/D W/D W/D W/D W/D DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN 12 8 12 8 128 128 ASPHALT SHINGLES WEATHERED WOODFIBER CEMENT VERTICAL CHANNEL SIDING, DARK BROWN FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, DARK BROWN FIELDSTONEBALCONIES BLACK METAL RAILINGS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT AT COMMERCIAL SPACES METAL ROOF, VERTICAL WEATHERED WOOD AT UNIT ENTRIES FIBER CEMENT BOARD + BATTEN DARK BRONZEDARK SKY LIGHT FIXTURE, TYP 1212 124 29 ' - 6 " ASPHALT SHINGLES WEATHERED WOOD FIBER CEMENT VERTICAL CHANNEL SIDING, DARK BROWN FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, DARK BROWN FIELDSTONE RAILING BALCONIES BLACK METAL RAILINGS APPROX LINE OF EXISTING GRADE Ridge + 140'-6" Lower Grade + 100'-6" Upper Grade + 115'-0" T.O. Wall + 134'-0" 12 8 12 8 128128 ASPHALT SHINGLES WEATHERED WOOD FIBER CEMENT VERTICAL CHANNEL SIDING, DARK BROWN FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, DARK BROWN DARK SKY LIGHT FIXTURE, TYP 3/32" = 1'-0" Ground Floor 3/32" = 1'-0" Apartment Main Level 3/32" = 1'-0" Apartment Upper Level 3/32" = 1'-0" South Elevation 3/32" = 1'-0" West Elevation 3/32" = 1'-0" North Elevation 5,190 SF COMMERCIAL 680 SF/UNIT 5,440SF TOTAL 530 SF/ UNIT 4,240SF TOTAL EA UNIT 680 SF/MAIN 530 SF/UPPER 1210 SF TOTAL 19 20 Board of Adjustment, May 2, 2023 Variance Request, Total Square Footage and Cumulative Square Footage for Proposed Employee Housing Located in a CO (Commercial Outlying) Zone District Kinley Built, LLC (Owner/Applicant) Trail Ridge Consulting and Basis Architecture (Representatives) Vicinity Map Zoning Map Variance Request Variance Description: The Employee Housing use is subject to certain limitations under the standards within the EPDC. The applicant is requesting variances to the following two development standards: EPDC Section 5.2.C.2.a.1.b., Additional Requirements for Specific Accessory Uses in Nonresidential Zoning Districts – Employee Housing, to allow individual dwelling units used for employee housing to exceed 800 square feet of gross floor area. Eight, two-bedroom employee housing apartment units are proposed, each 1200 square feet in size. EPDC Section 5.2.C.2.a.2.b., Additional Requirements for Specific Accessory Uses in Nonresidential Zoning Districts – Employee Housing, to permit total cumulative square footage of the employee housing units to exceed that of the principal use. Existing and proposed commercial/office square footage would total 8470 square feet. The total, cumulative square feet of the proposed employee housing is 9680 square feet, 1210 square feet more than allowed. Site Plan Architectural/Elevation Drawings Site Photograph Standards for Review 1. Special circumstances or conditions exist. 2. In determining "practical difficulty," the BOA shall consider the following factors: Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance; Whether the variance is substantial; Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement; Whether the Applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. 3. No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision, pursuant to the applicable zone district regulations. 4. Under no circumstances shall the BOA grant a variance to allow a use not permitted, or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district containing the property for which the variance is sought. 5. If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. 6. Under no circumstances shall the BOA grant a variance to allow a use not permitted, or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district containing the property for which the variance is sought. 7. In granting such variances, the BOA may require such conditions as will, in its independent judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standard so varied or modified. Review Agency Comments The Upper Thompson Sanitation District “…has no concerns with the Variance Request pertaining to square footage.” Public Works “…supports approval of the variances to facilitate the construction of new workforce/employee housing.” Town of Estes Park Utilities “…has no objections.” Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the variance application. Advantage: Approval of the variance will allow development of more and larger employee housing units, which is needed in the Estes Park area. Disadvantage: There may be a slight increase in traffic on Fall River Road when the employee housing is fully occupied. 21 Community Development Memo To: Chair Jeff Moreau Estes Park Board of Adjustment Through: Jessica Garner, AICP, Community Development Director From: Kara Washam, Planner I Date: May 2, 2023 Application: Setback Variances for Front and Arterial Road 160 1st Street, Estes Park EPCO Properties LLC (Mark & Jean Rissmiller), Owner/Applicant Jacob Gruver, Van Horn Engineering, Representative Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board of Adjustment approve the variance request, subject to the findings described in the report. Land Use: 2022 Estes Forward Comprehensive Plan Designation: (Future Land Use): Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors Zoning District: Commercial Outlying (CO) Site Area: 0.99 Acre PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: The applicant requests approval of a revised variance to allow a reduced front setback (1st Street) and a reduced arterial road setback (S. Saint Vrain Street) in order to construct a deck for outdoor seating at the El Mex-Kal Family Restaurant. Background: The subject property is located at the northern end of a strip mall owned by EPCO Properties LLC. The commercial center shares a large parking lot northeast of the building with on-street parking along CO-7 to the west, two spaces along the south side of the building, and four spaces along the northwest side of the restaurant. The proposed deck would eliminate the four parking spaces along the northwest side of the building and would accommodate up to thirty-two people or eight tables with four chairs. 22 2 The applicant requested a similar variance for reduced setbacks in 2022 and received approval from the Board of Adjustment on January 3, 2023 with conditions to remove all four parking spaces and install bollards (Attachment 4). The applicant is requesting the setbacks be further reduced by one and four-tenths feet (1.4’) along 1st Street and six and one-tenth feet (6.1’) along S. Saint Vrain Street in order to expand the proposed deck footprint closer to the sight visibility triangle, as depicted on the Site Plan (Attachment 3). Variance Description This is a request to approve a variance to allow a front setback of six and nine-tenths feet (6.9’) and an arterial road setback of sixteen and four-tenths feet (16.4’) in lieu of the eight and three-tenths feet (8.3’) and twenty-two feet six inches (22’-6”) variance approved by the Board of Adjustment on January 3, 2023 . The prior variance request is in lieu of the fifteen feet (15’) and twenty-five feet (25’) respective setbacks required in the CO (Commercial Outlying) Zoning District under Section 4.4.C.4. of the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC). The table below is provided for clarity, and Table 1 lists the requested setbacks (from the property line to the edge of the proposed deck) and the amount that the required minimum setbacks would be reduced if the variance request is approved. TABLE 1: SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST Min. Setback per EPDC Previously Approved Setback Variance Request Amount Setback Reduced By (from EPDC): New Subject Setback Variance Request Additional Amount Setback Reduced By: Total Setback Reduction (from EPDC): Front Setback 15.0’ 8.3’ 6.7’ 6.9’ 1.4’ 8.1’ Arterial Road 25.0’ 22.5’ 2.5’ 16.4’ 6.1’ 8.6’ 23 3 Location and Context: The 0.99-acre lot is located at 160 1st Street, at the southeast corner of the intersection of 1st Street and S. Saint Vrain Street in Estes Park. The subject property and adjacent properties to the north, east, and south are zoned CO (Commercial Outlying). The property to the west, known as the Estes Park Convention Center, is zoned A (Accommodations). This area has a mixture of uses, including restaurants, retail, office, hospitality, and other services. 24 4 Vicinity Map Zoning and Land Use Summary Table Comprehensive Plan (2022) Zone Uses Subject Site Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors CO (Commercial Outlying) Commercial North Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors CO (Commercial Outlying) Gov/Organization South Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors R-2 (Two-Family Residential) Residential East Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors CO (Commercial Outlying) Commercial West Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors A (Accommodations) Hospitality 25 5 Zoning Map Project Analysis Review Criteria: The Board of Adjustment (BOA) is the decision-making body for variance requests. In accordance with EPDC Section 3.6.C., Variances, Standards for Review, applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein. The Standards with staff findings for each are as follows: 1. Special circumstances or conditions exist (e.g., exceptional topographic conditions, narrowness, shallowness or the shape of the property) that are not common to other areas or buildings similarly situated and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with this Code’s standards, provided that the requested variance will not have the effect of nullifying or impairing the intent and purposes of either the specific standards, this Code or the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding: Special conditions exist, due to the location of the existing four parking spaces along the northwest side of the building. Eliminating these parking spaces could provide a safety benefit to the community as vehicles currently have to back up onto 1st Street. The requested variance will not nullify or impair the intent and purposes of the setback standards, the EPDC, or the Comprehensive Plan. 26 6 2. In determining "practical difficulty," the BOA shall consider the following factors: a. Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance; Staff Finding: There may be beneficial use of the property without the variance if the area remains as existing, with four parking spaces. However, the design and utility of the proposed deck would be constrained without the variance. b. Whether the variance is substantial; Staff Finding: The variance of the front setback is substantial due to the proposed setback being just over half of what is required by code. The arterial road proposed setback variance is minor when compared to the existing setback between the arterial road and the face of the building, which is substantially less than the twenty-five feet required by code. c. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; Staff Finding: Staff does not find that the mixed-use character of the immediate neighborhood would be altered, nor would adjoining properties suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance. d. Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Staff Finding: Public services such as water and sewer will not be affected by the variance. The proposed deck will not obstruct the manholes used to access the grease interceptor. e. Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement; Staff Finding: The Applicant purchased the property years ago and prior plans to request a variance for constructing a deck are unknown. f. Whether the Applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. Staff Finding: There is no alternative to mitigate the Applicant’s predicament aside from a complete redesign of the Project. 3. No variance shall be granted if the submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the Applicant’s property are of so general or recurrent a nature as to 27 7 make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. Staff Finding: Not applicable. 4. No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision, pursuant to the applicable zone district regulations. Staff Finding: Not applicable. 5. If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff Finding: The proposed variances would be the least deviations from the Development Code. 6. Under no circumstances shall the BOA grant a variance to allow a use not permitted, or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district contained the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Finding: The applicant requests a setback variance in order to construct a deck for outdoor seating. Outdoor seating or food service is permitted by right in the CO (Commercial Outlying) zoning district per Table 4-4 of the EPDC. 7. In granting such variances, the BOA may require such conditions as will, in its independent judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standard so varied or modified. Staff Finding: Staff recommends that if the variance is approved and the deck constructed, temporary encroachment in the sight visibility triangle is prevented through design features. The applicant suggested a landscaping element and provided a sketch of a planter in the subject area (Attachment 2). Planning staff and Public Works staff find this proposal to be acceptable. 28 8 Proposed Planter Review Agency Comments The application was referred to all applicable review agencies for comment. Public Works requested additional information pertaining to how intersection visibility would be maintained. The resubmitted documents provided clarity and subsequent submittals were not required. No other agencies had concerns or comments. Public Notice Staff provided public notice of the application in accordance with EPDC noticing requirements. As of the time of writing this report, no written comments have been received for the variance request. • Written notice mailed to adjacent property owners on April 12, 2023 • Legal notice published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette on April 14, 2023 • Application posted on the Town’s “Current Applications” website on April 12, 2023 Advantages This variance would allow El Mex-Kal to construct a deck that would be beneficial to the community of Estes Park by creating expanded business opportunities with outdoor seating. The proposed construction of the deck would eliminate the four parking spaces on the northwest side of the building. These spaces have posed a safety concern due to vehicles backing up directly onto 1st Street. The proposed deck will not encroach on the sight visibility triangle; design shows approximately 0.8’ of clearance. Design features will be in place to prevent temporary encroachment. 29 9 Disadvantages The proposed variance and deck construction would eliminate four parking spaces from the property. An informal traffic study provided by Van Horn Engineering suggests that existing parking remains sufficient for the property’s needs. Action Recommended Staff recommends approval of the proposed variance described in this staff report, with setbacks consistent with the El Mex-Kal Project plans provided in Attachment 3. Finance/Resource Impact N/A Level of Public Interest Low. Sample Motions I move to approve the variance request for reduced front setback and reduced arterial road setback for the subject property addressed as 160 1st Street in the Town of Estes Park, with findings as outlined in the staff report. I move to deny the requested variance with the following findings (state reason/findings). I move that the Board of Adjustment continue the variance to the next regularly scheduled meeting, finding that [state reasons for continuance]. Attachments 1. Application 2. Statement of Intent 3. Site Plan for El Mex-Kal Setback Variance 4. Variance BOA Approval Letter (1-3-2023) 30 ISubrnittal Date: ESTES PARK PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION Project Name Droject Description Project Address Legal Description Parcel ID # EPCO Properties -160 S.St.Vram Setback Variance We want to build a concrete deock on the north side of the building for outside dining. 160 S.St.Vram Ave.,Estes Park,CO 80517 Lots 8-12,Block 2,REclamation Subdivision,Estes Park,CO 80517 2530206008 Septic Q Septic Li Application fee Q Statement of intent C 2 copies (folded)of plat or plan It’X 17’reduced copy of plat or plan 1043 Fish Creek Rd.,Estes Park,CO 80517 Please review the Estes Park Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements,which may include ISO calculations,drainage report,traffic impact analysis,geologic hazard mitigation report, wIldfire hazard mitigation report,wetlands report,andior other additional information._r-:’c\ —r V’ Town of Estes Part -P.O.Box 200 4.170 MacGregor Avenue-c.Estes Part. Community Development Deportment Phone:(970)577-3721 .e.Fox:t970)586-0249 4. € 8 0 0 8 Pre -App Development Plan Special Review Preliminary Subdivision Final Subdivision Plat Minor Subdivision Plat Amended Plat Plat o Boundary Line Adjustment 0 ROW or Easement VacationoStreetNameChangeTime O Rezoning PetitionoAnnexationRequestpExtension _____ tOthnr:_PH’’”’cifv IS Condominium Map o Preliminary Map O Final MapoSupplemental Map iflriP —J Lot Size 0.99 Acres Existing Land Use Commerical:Retail Area of Disturbance in Acres /Restaurant Commercial:Retail /RestaurantProposedLandUse Existing Water Service ETown Proposed Water Service ETown Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Is a sewer lift station required? Existing Gas Service C Xcel Existing Zoning Commercial Outlying Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? C Well C Well C C None C Other (specify) C None C Other (specify) EPSD Q UTSD EPSD C UTSD Yes C Other C None Proposed Zoning Commercial No C None Yes Outlying Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted.Complete? No Name of Primary Contact Person Jacob Gruver,Van Horn Engineering and Surveying Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is C Yes F]No C Owner C Applicant E ConsultantIEnqineer LI Digital Copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF format emailed to planningestes.org C Sign Purchase ($10) 31 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. 0 In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement.I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC). 0 I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EPDC,and that,prior to filing this application,I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Park Development Code is available online at: htth:/fwww estes.ora/DevCode 0 I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EPDC. 0 I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete,inaccurate,or submitted after the deadline date. 0 I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. 0 I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. 0 I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Park Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void.I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT:Mark D.RissmitLer Jean P.Rissmitter Applicant PLEASE PRINT Mark 0.Rissmiterr Record Owner L>i ftti4_4_JQ_<_Date S-b 7/i-i-- Applicant s9 I L4._14,_iEe..L:8/ti /‘L Signatures: Date Revised 2020,04.23 ks 32 33 34 35 B TOWN OF FIST ES PARI January 5,2023 Mark Rissmiller EPCO Properties ;‘wt -, P.O.Box 2192 Estes Park CO 80517 Sent via email:mark.rissmiller@jepconroperties.com RE:Setback Variance -El Mex-IKal Family Restaurant,160 Pt St Dear Mr.Rissmiller, Please be advised that the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment,at its public hearing held on January 3,2023,voted to approve the variance request for reduced front setback of eight and three-tenths feet (8.3’)and arterial road setback of twenty-two feet six inches (22’-6”). This approval was made with the following conditions: 1.AlL four (4)parking spaces in the subject area along the northwest facing side of the property must be eliminated. 2.Bollards must be installed in the area adjacent to the proposed outdoor seating deck in order to prevent vehicles from parking in this area.In lieu of bollards,other similar features may be considered at the discretion of Staff,provided that the proposed features will accomplish the intended objective. The building permit must be obtained within one (1)year of this approval or the approval will be null and void. Please contact me at (970)577-3729 or kwashamiestes.ore if you have any questions. Regards. Kara Washam Plnner I cc:Jacob Gruver,Van Horn Engineering,iacobg@vanhornenuineering.com 170 MACGREGOR AVE.P.O.BOX 1200,ESTES PARK CO.80517 WWW.ESTES.ORG Community Development Department 970-577-3721 Pianning Division planning@estes.org 36 37 38 Board of Adjustment May 2, 2023 El Mex-Kal Setback Variance Presented by Kara Washam, Planner I Vicinity Map of Subject Area Zoning Map SITE LOCATION Key Points •The Property is known as El Mex-Kal Family Restaurant and is owned by EPCO Properties LLC. •The Property is addressed 160 1st Street and is located in the CO (Commercial Outlying) Zoning District. •Northern end of a large commercial center. •Applicant requests approval of a revised variance to allow a reduced front setback of 6.9’ along 1st St. and reduced arterial road setback of 16.4’ along S. St. Vrain/ CO-7. •Applicant requested a similar variance for reduced setbacks in 2022 and received approval from the BOA on January 3, 2023 with conditions to remove all four parking spaces and install bollards. •Applicant is proposing to eliminate parking spaces on NW side of the building to construct a deck for outdoor seating. •Outdoor seating is permitted by right in the CO Zoning District per Table 4-4 of the EPDC. Revised Variance Request From Previously Approved Subject Site Plan Proposed Setback Variance Plan Proposed Deck Location Arterial Setback Location Standards for Review Review Criteria #1: Special conditions exist, due to the location of the existing four parking spaces along the northwest side of the building. •Eliminating these could provide a safety benefit to the community as vehicles currently have to back up onto 1st Street. Review Criteria #2.b: The variance for the front setback is substantial due to the proposed setback being just over half of what is required by code. (6.9’ vs. 15.0’) •The variance for the arterial road setback (16.4’) is minor when compared to the existing setback between the arterial road and the face of the building. •Substantially less than the twenty-five feet required by code. Review Criteria #2.c: The mixed-use character of the immediate neighborhood would be not be altered, nor would adjoining properties suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance. Review Criteria #6: The applicant requests a setback variance in order to construct a deck for outdoor seating. •Outdoor seating or food service is permitted by right in the CO (Commercial Outlying) zoning district per Table 4-4 of the EPDC. Review Agency Comments Public Works: Requested additional information pertaining to how intersection visibility would be maintained. •Use of landscaping design features to prevent temporary encroachment in the sight visibility triangle. •The applicant resubmitted documents and provided a sketch of a planter in the subject area. •Planning staff and Public Works staff find this proposal to be acceptable. •No other agencies had concerns or comments. Proposed Planter Staff Recommends APPROVAL of the Request Advantages: •Approval allows El Mex-Kal to construct a deck that would benefit the community. • Creates expanded business opportunities through the use of outdoor seating. • Construction of the deck eliminates 4 parking spaces on the NW side of the building. •Spaces pose a safety concern due to vehicles backing up directly onto 1st Street. •Deck should not encroach on the sight triangle. •Design shows approximately 0.8’ of clearance. •Design features (landscaping planter) will be in place to prevent temporary encroachment. Disadvantages: •Variance and deck construction would eliminate 4 parking spaces from the property. •Informal traffic study suggests that existing parking will remain sufficient. 39 Community Development Memo To: Chair Jeff Moreau Estes Park Board of Adjustment Through: Jessica Garner, AICP, Community Development Director From: Kara Washam, Planner I Date: May 2, 2023 Application: Variance Request for Front and Side Setbacks 281 W. Riverside Drive (Formerly 281 Moraine Ave), Estes Park Terry Bogener, Owner/Applicant Brian Brinkman, LAT40, Consultant Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board of Adjustment approve the variance request, subject to the findings described in the report. Land Use: 2022 Estes Forward Comprehensive Plan Designation: (Future Land Use): Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors Zoning District: Commercial Downtown (CD) Site Area: 0.07 Acres (+/- 3,201 SF) ☒ PUBLIC HEARING ☐ ORDINANCE ☐ LAND USE ☐ CONTRACT/AGREEMENT ☐ RESOLUTION ☒ OTHER QUASI-JUDICIAL ☒ YES ☐ NO Objective: The applicant requests approval of a variance to eliminate the front setback (Moraine Avenue) and side setback along the north property line in lieu of the eight-foot (8’) and ten-foot (10’) respective setbacks required in the CD (Commercial Downtown) Zone District under Section 4.4.C.4. of the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC). Background: The subject property is in the Riverside Subdivision and was previously a residence. The small house on the property was demolished after the lot was purchased by the Applicant in 2022. On the west side of the property (Moraine Ave), there is a retaining wall with a 10’-12’ vertical drop in elevation. The Applicant intends to open a bar with food service utilizing prefabricated shipping containers with mezzanine access off 40 2 Moraine Avenue (Attachment 4). The conceptual site plan shows a patio with access off W. Riverside Dr. and an accessible restroom adjacent to the bar (Attachment 3). Subject Property Prior to Demolition Variance Description The Applicant requests a variance to allow a zero-foot (0’) front setback (Moraine Avenue) and zero-foot (0’) side setback along the north property line in lieu of the eight-foot (8’) and ten-foot (10’) respective setbacks required in the CD (Commercial Downtown) Zone District. The EPDC requires setbacks to be measured from the platted lot lines. The deeded property lines of this parcel differ from the platted lot lines (Lot 14). The Applicant requests a zero (0’) side setback along the north property line but maintains ownership of approximately four feet (4’) of the platted lot to the north (Lot 13), as described in the Legal Description: S 4 FT OF LOT 13 & ALL OF LOT 14, RIVERSIDE, ESTES PK Table 4-5 under Section 4.4 of the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC) states that the ten foot (10’) minimum side setback only applies if the lot abuts a single- family residential property whose use at the time of the subject application is residential. The property to the south of the subject property (286 Moraine Ave) is used as a short-term vacation rental and is considered a commercial use. Therefore, the zero-foot (0’) side setback along the south property line is permitted by the EPDC and is not subject to this variance request. The property to the north of the subject property (271 W. Riverside Dr) currently has a pending Vacation Home License application under review at the Town Clerk’s office. 41 3 Proposed Site Plan Location and Context: The 0.07-acre lot is located at 281 W. Riverside Dr. with double frontage along Moraine Ave. on the west side of the property and is located diagonally from Baldwin Park to the east. The subject property and all adjacent properties are zoned CD (Commercial Downtown). The property to the north is single-family residential with a pending vacation home license and the property to the south is a short-term vacation rental with an active license (Attachment 5 and 6). Directly across from the property to the east is a small parking lot on Town-owned land. 42 4 Vicinity Map Zoning and Land Use Summary Table Comprehensive Plan (2022) Zone Uses Subject Site Downtown CD (Commercial Downtown) Commercial (Proposed) North Downtown CD (Commercial Downtown) Residential (Pending VHL) South Downtown CD (Commercial Downtown) Short-Term Vacation Rental East Downtown CD (Commercial Downtown) Parking West Downtown CD (Commercial Downtown) Parking 43 5 Zoning Map Project Analysis Review Criteria: The Board of Adjustment (BOA) is the decision-making body for variance requests. In accordance with EPDC Section 3.6.C., Variances, Standards for Review, applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein. The Standards with staff findings for each are as follo ws: 1. Special circumstances or conditions exist (e.g., exceptional topographic conditions, narrowness, shallowness or the shape of the property) that are not common to other areas or buildings similarly situated and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with this Code’s standards, provided that the requested variance will not have the effect of nullifying or impairing the intent and purposes of either the specific standards, this Code or the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding: Special conditions exist, due to the topography on the west side of the property (Moraine Ave). There is a retaining wall with a 10’-12’ vertical drop in elevation. By allowing a zero-foot front setback, the proposed shipping container bar can be positioned near the retaining wall so that the mezzanine can be directly accessed from the sidewalk at Moraine Ave. 44 6 2. In determining "practical difficulty," the BOA shall consider the following factors: a. Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance; Staff Finding: There may be beneficial use of the property without the variance . However, the Applicant’s site plan would need to be redesigned and would decrease useable concrete patio space for outdoor seating. b. Whether the variance is substantial; Staff Finding: The variance request for eliminated front and side setbacks is moderately substantial. Side setbacks of zero feet are typical in the CD (Commercial Downtown) zoning district and are permitted by right, with exception to properties that abut a single-family residential use. c. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; Staff Finding: The Commercial Downtown character of the immediate neighborhood would not be altered, nor would adjoining properties suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance. The proposed use of a bar with food service is permitted in the neighborhood and exists in the subject vicinity. Zero-foot (0’) side setbacks are also consistent with other businesses in the neighborhood (i.e., Snowy Peaks Winery at 292 Moraine Ave.). d. Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Staff Finding: Public Services of water, sewer, electric, and communications are all readily available at the site location and will not be affected by the variance. e. Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement; Staff Finding: It is unknown whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of setback requirements. f. Whether the Applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. Staff Finding: There is no alternative to mitigate the Applicant’s predicament aside from a complete redesign of the Project. 45 7 3. No variance shall be granted if the submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the Applicant’s property are of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. Staff Finding: Not applicable. 4. No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision, pursuant to the applicable zone district regulations. Staff Finding: Not applicable. 5. If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff Finding: The proposed variance would be the least deviation from the Development Code. 6. Under no circumstances shall the BOA grant a variance to allow a use not permitted, or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district containing the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Finding: The applicant requests a setback variance in order to construct a bar with food service and outdoor seating. These uses are permitted by right in the CD (Commercial Downtown) zoning district per Table 4-4 of the EPDC. 7. In granting such variances, the BOA may require such conditions as will, in its independent judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standard so varied or modified. Staff Finding: If the variance request is granted, Staff would like to condition the owner to provide a privacy fence between both properties to the north and south for noise and security screening, and a condition to screen all garbage receptacles. Review Agency Comments The application was referred to all applicable review agencies for comment. No comments or concerns were received. Public Notice Staff provided public notice of the application in accordance with EPDC noticing requirements. As of the time of writing this report, three (3) written comments have been received for the variance request (Attachment 7). ● Written notice mailed to adjacent property owners on February 15, 2023. 46 8 ● Legal notice published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette on April 14, 2023. ● Application posted on the Town’s “Current Applications” website on February 15, 2023. Advantages This variance would allow the Applicant to open a bar with food service and outdoor seating. This business would be beneficial to the community and contribute to the vitality of the Commercial Downtown area. Disadvantages There are no known disadvantages of the variance to allow zero -foot (0’) front (Moraine Ave) and zero-foot (0’) side (north) setbacks for the subject property. Action Recommended Staff recommends approval with conditions of the proposed variance described in this staff report, with setbacks consistent with the Site Plan for Bogey’s Bar (Attachment 3). Finance/Resource Impact N/A Level of Public Interest Medium. Sample Motions I move to approve the variance request for zero-foot (0’) front setback along Moraine Ave and zero-foot (0’) side setback along the north property line for the subject property addressed as 281 W. Riverside Dr. in the Town of Estes Park, with conditions aforementioned above and with findings as outlined in the staff report. I move to approve the variance request for zero-foot (0’) front setback along Moraine Ave and zero-foot (0’) side setback along the north property line for the subject property addressed as 281 W. Riverside Dr. in the Town of Estes Park, with alternative conditions [state conditions] and with findings as outlined in the staff report. I move to approve the variance request for zero-foot (0’) front setback along Moraine Ave and zero-foot (0’) side setback along the north property line for the subject property addressed as 281 W. Riverside Dr. in the Town of Estes Park, without conditions and with findings as outlined in the staff report. I move to deny the requested variance with the following findings [state reason/findings]. I move that the Board of Adjustment continue the variance to the next regularly scheduled meeting, finding that [state reasons for continuance]. Attachments 1. Application 47 9 2. Statement of Intent 3. Site Plan for Bogey’s Bar 4. Conceptual Shipping Container Plans 5. Vacation Home License for 286 Moraine Ave. 6. Certificate of Occupancy for 286 Moraine Ave. 7. Public Comment Letters . 48 49 50 51 Page | 1 Town of Estes Park, Planning Department PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dec. 22, 2022 Re: Front and Side Zero Setback Variances Bogey’s Bar 281 Moraine Ave. Estes Park, Co. 80517 Owner: 3684 Hike LLC. To Board of Adjustments Statement of Intent: The owners of the parcel intend to open a Bar with food service by utilizing two converted shipping containers with a concrete patio adjacent to the bar on the lower level, or the West Riverside access. On top of the bar there will be a mezzanine with direct access off of Moraine ave. EPDC Standards for review 3.6.C The requested zero setback along Moraine ave. has special circumstances of existing topography. Just adjacent to the existing sidewalk along Moraine ave. there is an existing retaining wall with a 10 to 12 feet drop off. Eliminating the front setback allows for the public sidewalk to have a continuous connection to the new Bar along this frontage. The owner has contacted CDOT and they have no objection to this setback variance. See attached letter from CDOT. The setback variances are consistent with other business along Moraine ave, Side setbacks of zero feet are typical in the “CD” Commercial Downtown zone district. Granting the setback variances does not substantially alter the character of the neighborhood. The use as a bar and food service is in accordance with the EP Downtown plan. Public Services of water, sewer, electric and communications are all readily available in Moraine ave. and West Riverside Drive. A Bar is a permitted use in the “CD” district. TWBECK Architects ❖ PO Box 57 ❖ Estes Park CO 80517 Phone: 970-586-3913 Email: thomas@twbeckarchitects.com Architecture Planning & Interiors 52 Parcel: 3525121015 286 Moraine Avenue Owner: Joseph P Hladick Parcel: 3525121013 271 West Riverside Drive Owners: Russell / Cary Abbott 281 Moraine Avenue Owner: 3634 Hike LLC Parcel No. 3525121014 0.07 Acres (±3,201 sq.ft.) -SUBJECT PROPERTY- MO R A I N E A V E N U E WE S T R I V E R S I D E D R I V E Bo g e y ' s B a r 28 1 M o r a i n e A v e . Es t e s P a r k , C O 8 0 5 1 7 © 2022 TW BECK ARCHITECTS, PC EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF TW BECK ARCHITECTS, PC. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS. TW BeckArchitects, Architecture, Planning and Interiors 215 Park Lane PO Box 57 Estes Park CO 80517 (970) 586.3913 phone SHEET NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: 2220 SCALE: 1 Inch = 10 feet 5' 10'0'20' PLAN NORTH S1 OF - 1 SITE PLAN © 53 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S 01 RE V I S I O N S DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB CO V E R P A G E PROJECT NUMBER 2027 DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 LEFT HAND BREWINGBEER GARDEN EXPANSIONBEER CANCONSTRUCTION TYPE – VB, NON-SPRINKLEREDOCCUPANCY GROUP TYPE– BOCCUPANT LOAD: SERVING AREA: MERCANTILE- 1:60 sf = 250 sf / 4.166 > 5OccupantsCOOLER AREA: Commercial Kitchen - 1:200 sf = 70 sf / 200 = .35 > 1 OccupantTOTAL OCCUPANTS: 6BASIC ALLOWABLE AREA – 9,000 SF ACTUAL AREA – 320 SF ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT – 40’-0”, 2 STORIES ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT – 9’-6”, 1 STORY PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF A 320 SQ. FT. PERMANENT MODIFIED SHIPPING CONTAINER FOR SEASONAL USE. THE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE THREE STRUCTURALLY FRAMED OPENINGS AS SERVING WINDOWS ON THE 40’ CUSTOMER FACING SIDE AND WHIC MAY ACT AS POINTS OF EGRESS. THERE SHALL BE AN 8’ GLASS WINDOW ON BACK 40’ SIDE. THE BAR AREA SHALL BE A NON-CONDITIONED SPACE AND HAVE A 36” STEEL DOOR FOR AN EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE. THE BAR AREA WILL INCLUDE A 32” COOLER DOOR FOR ACRESS TO THE WALK-IN COOLER. THE CARGO DOORS SHALL REMAIN FUNCTIONAL AS THE MAIN ENTRANCE INTO THE WALK-IN COOLER. ELECTRICAL WILL BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT THE STRUCTURE. REGULATORY AND NON REGULATORY AGENCIES LONGMONT BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF LONGMONT FIRE DEPARTMENT T.R. ARNOLD & ASSOCIATES MINIMUM NUMBER OF EXITS OR ACCESS TO EXITS EXITS REQUIRED MINIMUM: 2 EXITS PROVIDED: 4 MINIMUM EXIT WIDTH EXIT WIDTHS PROVIDED: 36” MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE EXTINGUISHERS FIRE EXTINGUISHERS REQUIRED: 2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER TYPE: 2A-10BC FIRE SPRINKLER CRITERIA DOES NOT MEET THRESHOLD CRITERIA FOR FULLY SPRINKLED SPACE RESTROOMS ACCESABILITY WILL BE PROVIDED ON-SITE BY OTHER WITHIN 500 FEET ENVELOPE COMPLIENCE C403.10.1 - MEETS ALL SECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR WALK IN COOLERS EMPLOYEE WORK SPACE IS A NON-CONDITIONED SPACE FOR A SEASONAL STRUCTURE AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE INTERIOR FINISHES FINISHES ON FRONT CUSTOMER FACING WALL AND ENTRANCE DOOR WALL ARE PAINTED 16 GA. CORRUGATED CORTEN STEEL. REAR WALL, COOLER WALL, AND CEILING WILL BE FRAMES AND INSULATED WALL WITH PAINTED GYPSUM WALL COVERING. FLOORING IS PRIMED 1” MARINE GRADE PLYWOOD WITH 1/4” THICK RUBBER COIN FLOORING TILES. ACCESSABILITY CONFORMING REQUIRMENTS ELEMENTS • DOORS AND OPENINGS MIN. WIDTH 36” YES • CONFORMING INTERIOR PANIC BAR WITH YES EXTERIOR LEVER LATCH HANDLES • ADA SERVING WINDOW YES • CONFORMS TO EXEMPTIONS LISTED IN YES 2018 IBC 1103.2.2, AND 1103.2.14 FOR EMPLOYEE WORK AREAS ACCESSIBILITY EXEMPTIONS GENERAL NOTES 1. STEEL BAR AND COOLER STRUCTURE WILL BE PERMANENT AND WELDED TO EMBED PLATES LOCATED IN CONCRETE PIERS OR FOUNDATION 2. BAR WILL HAVE A 36” EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE DOOR WITH A COOLER DOOR TO THE COOLER ACESS. THE WALK IN COOLER WILL BE ACCESSIBLE FROM THE EXTERIOR CARGO DOORS AND THROUGH THE BAR COOLER DOOR. 3. THERE SHALL BE THREE STEEL FRAMED SERVING WINDOWS ON THE CUSTOMER FACING SIDE WITH ONE MEETING ADA SERVING WINDOW REQUIREMENTS. 4. SERVING WINDOWS SHALL HAVE FIXED STAINLESS STEEL COUNTERTOPS AND AWNINGS WITH LOCKING GAS STRUTS. 5. INTERIOR STAINLESS COUNTERTOPS WILL BE INSTALLED ON CUSTOM CABINETS. BEER TAP TOWER AND HEADS WILL BE INSTALLED INTO COUNTER 6. REAR WALL AND CEILING WILL BE INSULATED WITH SPRAY FOAM INSULATION AND SHEETED WITH PAINTED GYPSUM BOARD 7. LED TRACK LIGHTING WILL BE PROVIDED ON CEILING AND 12V LED ROPE LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNDER SERVING WINDOW BARS. 8. WALL OUTLETS WILL BE INSTALLED WHERE DESIGNATED 9. ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING WILL BE CONNECTED ON SITE BY LICENSED CONTRACTOR 10. WALK-IN COOLER SHALL HAVE A GLYCOL BEER TAP SYSTEM INSTALLED CONTAINER IDENTIFICATION MANUFACTURER NAME - PAN OCEAN CONTAINER SUPPLIES CO., LTD DATE MANUFACTURED - 09/2020 SAFETY APPROVAL NUMBER - GB/C 17752 LR/2018 IDENTIFICATION NUMBER - A20 06 3627 MAX OPERATING GROSS WEIGHT -( 30,480 KG) (67,200 LBS) ALLOWABLE STACKING LOAD - ( 192,000 KG) (423,280 LBS) TRANSVERSE RACKING TEST FORCE - 150,000 NEWTONS VALID MAINTENANCE EXAMINATION DATE - 09/2020 DESIGN LOADS: 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, ASCE 7-16 RISK CATEGORY II, STANDARD SNOW LOADS GROUND SNOW LOAD = FLAT-ROOF SNOW LOAD = SNOW EXPOSURE FACTOR, Ce = THERMAL FACTOR, Ct = ROOF LIVE LOAD = FLOOR LIVE LOADS BAR AREA= SEATING AREA = WIND LOADS BASIC DESIGN WIND SPEED V= ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN WIND SPEED, Vasd = WIND EXPOSURE INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT = GROUND ELEVATION FACTOR, Ke = SEISMIC CRITERIA: Ie = SS = ; S1 = Site Class: SDS = ; SD1 = ; Seismic Design Category: CS = VEQ,ASD = Light-Framed Walls with Shear Panels of Other Materials Response Modification Factor "R": Tabulated Overstrength Factor: Deflection Amplification Factor Cd: STRUCTURAL STEEL: HOLLOW STRUCTURAL SECTIONS (HSS) SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A500, GRADE C, 50 KSI YIELD ANGLES AND PLATES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A36, 36 KSI YIELD WELDING SHALL BE DONE BY A CERTIFIED WELDER IN ACCORDINATCE WITH AWS D1.1: STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE OF E70 ELECTRODES. WHERE NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED, MINIMUM WELD SHALL BE 1/8” FILLET x LENGTH OF CONTACT EDGE. SITE INSTALLED ITEMS: ALL ELECTRICAL ALL PLUMBING ALL HVAC LINE SETS CLOSED CELL FOAM INSULATION ALL WALL COVERINGS FINISHED FLOOR BAR TOP REV. 2.2 CARGO CONTAINER NOTES: -The use of shipping containers as building material is considered under provisions of CRC section 1.8.7.1 and 1.8.7.3 and CBC section 1.8.7.1 and 1.8.7.3 as "ALTERNATE MATERIALS, DESIGNS, TESTS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION -The container shall meet the standards set by the International Convention of Safe Containers (CSC) BO G E Y ' S B A R NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME Sheet 01 Cover Page Sheet 02 BLANK FOR INFO Sheet 03 OVERVIEW Sheet 04 SECTION PLANES Sheet 05 UNIT 1 PENETRATIONS Sheet 06 UNIT 1 FRAMES Sheet 07 ROOF CONECTION DETAIL Sheet 08 CONTAINER CONNECTIONS Sheet 09 UNIT 2 PENETRATIONS Sheet 10 UNIT 2 FRAMES Sheet 11 STUDS AND BLOCKING Sheet 12 ELETRICAL Sheet 13 ELECTRICAL CONT Sheet 14 MECHANICAL Sheet 15 PLUMBING Sheet 16 PLUMBING Sheet 17 FOUNDATION LOADS Sheet 18 EMBED DETAILS Sheet 19 WILDECK INFO S.E. TO COMPLETE THIS SECTION COVE BASE WINDOW TRIM HVAC HEAD UNITS (INTERIOR) ALL BAR EQUIPMENT LIGHTING DOOR TRIM TVS PENETRAIONS FOR LINE SETS ROXBOX SCOPE: TO DELIVER A "SHELL" UNIT: ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL WINDOWS DOORS STUDS AND BLOCKING IN STUDS WHERE NECESSARY STUDS IN CEILING AC UNIT FRAME WITH MINI SPLIT INSTALLED TO FRAME (LINE SETS BY OTHERS. COOLER WINDOW UNIT SHIPS LOOSE) STEEL STRAPPING FOR HOLDING EQUIPMENT TO WALLS (ELECTRICAL CONDUIT, TVS, BAR EQUIPMENT) EXTERIOR PAINT CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM UNDER FLOOR FINAL CONNECTION TO FOUNDATION CONNECTION OF UTILITIES CONNECTION OF MODULES AND WEATHER SEALING INSTALL OF "WILDECK SYSTEM" OVER UNITS. NOTE: CLIENT TO INSTALL "WILDECK SYSTEM" OVER TOP BOTH UNITS TO ACT AS A SECONDARY ROOF STRUCTURE. SEE PAGE 18 FOR NOTES RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 54 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S 02 RE V I S I O N S DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB IN F O RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 55 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S 03 RE V I S I O N S OV E R V I E W 1 FRONT 3 END CAP END 4 BACK CA R G O D O O R S CA R G O D O O R S DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 2 CARGO DOOR END CA R G O D O O R S UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 2 UNIT 1UNIT 2 UNIT 2 UNIT 1 UNIT 1 PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R NUM BER QUANT ITY MANUFACTUER MODEL TYPE SIZE R.O.NOTES D1 1 TBD COMMERCIAL GRADE GLASS STORE FRONT DOOR. LEFT HAND OUTSWING 3'x7'3'x7'NEED TO SELECT ACTUAL DOOR D2 2 TBD STANDARD HMD. RIGHT HAND OUTSWING 3'4X6'10 3'4X6'10 LEVERED HANDLE, DEADBOLT (KEYED ALIKE), CRASHBAR, WIND CHAIN, WEATHER STRIP KIT, THRESHOLD. W1 3 JELD-WED V-2500 LEFT OPERABLE VINYL NEW CONSTUCTION SLIDING 71.5X35.5X2.9 72X36 SCREEN INCLUDED DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 56 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S 04 RE V I S I O N S SE C T I O N P L A N E S DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 1 NORTH WALL - UNIT 1 2 UNIT 1- SOUTH WALL 3 ISO VIEW UNIT 1 ROOM USE: BAR 4 ISO VIEW UNIT 2 UNIT 1 UNIT 2 5 UNIT 2- NORTH WALL 6 UNIT 2- SOUTH WALL ROOM USE: SEATING PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 57 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S S 05 RE V I S I O N S UN I T 1 P E N E T R A T I O N S 3 UNIT 1 - SOUTH WALL- EXTERIOR 4 CARGO DOOR SIDE PENETRATION 1 UNIT 1- BACK PENETRATION DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB CA R G O D O O R S 2 END CAP REMOVE LOCKING BARS ON LEFT DOOR. WELD DOOR CLOSED RIGHT DOOR REMAINS OPERATIONAL FOR COOLER ACCESS VERIFY SIZE WITH AC UNIT. ALLOW FOR A 1X2X1/8" FRAME NO EXTERNAL MODS CA R G O D O O R S 33'-6 1/4" CUT TO CORNER FLANGE REMOVE CORRUGATE SAND SMOOTH REMOVE CORRUGATE LEAVE ONLY THE OEM WELD CA R G O D O O R S WELD DOOR CLOSED REMAINS OPERTIONAL 1X1/2" SHIM13'-4 1/16" 26'-8" 10"10"1X1/2" SHIM PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 1'-7 15/16" RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R 2'-4 1/4" 1"X1/4 STRAP. BLOCK TO BLOCK 1"X1/4" STRAP UNDER LIP OF LOWER CORD 1"X1/4" STRAP. FULL LENGTH OF CORD LOWER CORD 8'-8 1/4" 38'-5 13/16" 1"X1/4" STRAP DIM +/-8'-8 3/4" L2 X 2 X 1 / 4 " 3/4" CLOSE END WITH SHEET METAL CLOSE POCKETS WITH SHEET METAL DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 58 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S S 06 RE V I S I O N S UN I T 1 B A C K W A L L A N D C A R G O F R A M E CA R G O D O O R S DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 1.2 UNIT 1 MAN DOOR FRAME 1 UNIT 1 - NORTH WALL 2.1 AC UNIT SUPPORT 2 AC FRAME WELD 3 SIDES 3/16 TYP AT TOP AND BOT HSS CONX 4x2x1/8" HSS TYP 2" 2" 2" 82" 1'-7 15/16" VERIFY SIZE WITH AC UNIT. ALLOW FOR A 1X2X1/8" FRAME 4x 2 x 1 / 8 " H S S 4x 2 x 1 / 8 " H S S 4x2x1/8" HSS HMD FRAME HM D F R A M E HM D F R A M E 103-1/4" L 2x2x1/4" 2x1 / 4 " S T R A P 2X 1 X 1 / 8 " H S S 2X1X1/8"HSS 17-11/16" 2" VERIFY WITH A C 19-15/16" 45 DEG 2.2 AC UNIT SUPPORT ISO 4X 2 X 1 / 4 H S S STIFFENERS BELOW3UNIT 1 - SOUTH WALL VERIFY 6'-10 1/4" AFF CA R G O D O O R S CAP CORRUIGATE WITH 4X2X1/4 HSS 2'-4 1/4" 2'-2 1/4" 2x2x1/8 HSS L 2X2x1/4 L 2X2x1/4 2x 2 x 1 / 8 H S S HOLES FOR LAG BOLT ATTACHEMT TO WALL 7/16" HOLE FOR LAG/ TEK SCREW ATTACHMENT TO FLOOR 1/4" HOLE FOR TEK SCREW ATTACHMENT TO LEG (THIS ALLOWS FOR HEIGHT ADJUSTMENT AFTER FINISHED FLOOR) 3'-6 1/2" 2'-10 5/8" 1'-6" 2" 1'-6" 2'-10 5/8" 2" 3'-6 1/2" 4 UNIT 1 - BAR FLIP SUPPORT LEGS 1'-5 15/16" 2'-1" 1'-7 15/16" 2"2" 4" PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R 2'-4 1/4" THIS LEG LANDS ON THE STEEL GOOSENECK TUNNEL. REQUIRES SELF TAPPING SCREW. NO 14 THIS LEG LANDS ON OEM PLY WOOD. REQUIRES 3/8"X 1.5" LAG BOLT . TEST FIT AND SHIPS LOOSE TO SITE. PAINT BLACK. BAG AND TAPE HARDWARE TO LEGS. PAINT BLACK 5 UNIT 2 - MINI SPLIT FRAME 4x2x1/4" HSS 2x2 x 1 / 4 " H S S 1'-7 3/8" 2'-1/2" VERIFY LENGTH WITH HIGH HATS 2'-4 7/16" 1'-7 3/8" 1"X1/4" STRAP1X1/4" STRAP TO CLOSE GAP WHEN UNITS JOIN TOGETHER 3'-10" DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 59 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S S 07 RE V I S I O N S RO O F C O N N E C T I O N D E T A I L S DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 4X 2 X 1 / 4 " H S S 4X 2 X 1 / 4 " H S S 4"0"380-3/8" CONNECTION TUBE TBD 1 UNIT 1 - FRONT WALL 2 UNIT 1 - CONNECTION TUBE DETAIL 2 COPE ENDS AROUND CORNERS CAP ENDS 1/2" HOLE 36" O.C. PATTERN ENDS ARE 1" OFF EDGES COPE, CAP AND MATCH DRILL BOTH PIECES OF CONNECTION TUBE. BOLT TOGETHER AND WELD IN PLACE TO ENSURE PROPER FITMENT. MAKE SURE CONTAINERS ARE BUTTED PROPERLY BEFORE WELDING. 3" 1" CONTAINER CONNECTION TUBECONTAINER CONNECTION TUBE 0" CONTAINERS MEET HERE ONE TUBE PER CONTAINER THAT JOINS THE TWO IN THE MIDDLE 3X1X1/8" HSS 3X1X1/8" HSS BREAK METAL FLASHING CAP 2-5/8" 3-3/16" 15/16" SEALANT APPLIED HERE FULLY WELDED AND SEALED SEALANT BETWEEN GASKET TEX SCREWS HERE BREAK METAL CAP TO CONTAINER FASTNER. 12" OC PATTERN QTY 16 EACH BOLTS, NUTS, QTY 32 WASHERS 40'-0" 40'-0" BUETYL TAPE UNDER CONNECTON TUBE HARDWARE BUETYL TAPE HERE 2 UNIT 1&2 - CONNECTION TUBE SECTION 3 FLASHING CAP BREAK METAL DETAIL 4 CONNECTION TUBE LOACTION CA R G O D O O R S PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R 3/16 TYP.CONT. 3/16 2-12 STITCH INSIDE WELD. 2-12 DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 60 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S S 8 RE V I S I O N S CO N T A I N E R T O C O N T A I N E R C O N N E C T I O N DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 BO G E Y ' S B A R UNIT 1 UNIT 2 2'-0" 8'-8 3/4" L2X2X/14" CONTINIOUS FROM BLOCK TO BLOCK FOR CONTAINER BOLT ATTACHMENT. 24 O.C. DRILL PATERN. 5/8-11 BOLTS- GRADE 8 X1.5" DRILL 24O.C. HOLE PATTERN INTO CARGO DOOR FLANGE POCKETS FOR 5/8" BOLT ATTACHMENT. QTY 12 BOLTS AND NUTS QTY24 WASHERS UNIT 1UNIT 2 DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 61 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S S 09 UN I T 2 P E N E T R A T I O N S DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 3 UNIT 2 - NORTH WALL- EXTERIOR 4 UNIT 2 END CAP SIDE CA R G O D O O R S WELD BOTH DOORS CLOSED CLOSURE TUBE THIS SIDE 1 UNIT 2- SOUTH PENETRATION 2 UNIT 2 CARGO DOOR END H-FRAME STYLE ON ALL FRONT PENETRATIONS PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R CLOSE END WITH SHEET METAL CLOSE POCKETS WITH SHEET METAL DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 62 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S S 10 RE V I S I O N S UN I T 2 F R A M E S DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 4 UNIT 2 - NORTH WALL EXTERIOR 1 UNIT 2- SOUTH WALL FRAMES 2 UNIT 2 WINDOW FRAME 4X2X1/8"HSS TYP 4X 2 X 1 / 8 " H S S T Y P 3'-0" VERIFY 3'-0" 7'-0" 4X 2 X 1 / 8 " H S S T Y P 3X2X1/8"HSS TYP 2" 2" 3X 2 X 1 / 8 " H S S T Y P 6'-0" 3'-0"3X2X1/4"HSS TYP VERIFY 3 UNIT 2 DOOR FRAME 4" 40'-0" 6" 0" 3X1X1/8" HSS X 6" & 8"STUBS. THESE HOLD THE BAR TOP. **WELD WITH A TOP BRACE TO AVOID DEFLECTION** 5 UNIT 2 - BAR ISO 6 UNIT 2 - BAR SECTION 7 UNIT 2 - NORTH WALL - INTERIOR CA R G O D O O R S CA R G O D O O R S CA R G O D O O R S 3X1X1/8"HSS 3'-4 3/4" PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 2" 2" RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R 4X2X1/4"HSS TYP 4X2X1/4"HSS TYP3X2X1/4"HSS TYP3X2X1/4"HSS TYP DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 63 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S 11 RE V I S I O N S WO O D S T U D F R A M I N G DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 2 UNIT 1 NORTH WALL STUDS AND BLOCKING 1 UNIT 1&2 END CAP STUDS AND BLOCKING 5 STUDDED WALLS - PLAN VIEW MAP 3 UNIT 2 - SOUTH WALL STUDS AND BLOCKING WOOD 2X4 STUDS 16 O.C. HOLD STUDS OFF WALL 1/2" WOOD 2X4 STUDS 16 O.C. HOLD STUDS OFF WALL 1" IN COOLER 3/4" PLY WOOD 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 4 UNIT 1&2 - CARGO END STUDS AND BLOCKING WOOD 2X4 STUDS 16 O.C. HOLD STUDS OFF WALL 1/2" DIMS PULLED FORM INSIDE CORNER BLOCK PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R 3/4" PLY WOOD BLOCKING FOR TVS DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 64 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S 12 RE V I S I O N S EL E C T R I C A L DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 1 UNITS 1&2 WEST END CAP ELECTRICAL 4 UNIT 2- SECTION PLANE 4 2 UNIT 1 NORTH WALL INTERIOR ELECTRICAL 5 5/8" TV GFCI GFCI 240-V 1'-6" 240-V GFCI 4'-11 1/4" 10'-10 5/8" 16'-10 11/16" 2'-9 1/8" 0" 3'-2 13/16" 6'-2 3/4" 6'-2 3/4" GFCI 5 PLAN VIEW MAP 1 2 1 23 4 3 SECTION PLANE 3 TV GFCI PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R E TV TV TV DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 65 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S 13 RE V I S I O N S EL E C T R I C A L DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 2 UNIT1&2 EAST WALL INTERIOR ELECTRICAL 1 UNIT 2 SOUTH WALL INTERIOR ELECTRICAL 3 SECTION PLANE MAP 1 21 2 TV USB OUTLETS ON THE EDGE OF EACH WINDOW SILL S 4 PLAN VIEW - LED CAN LIGHTS 240-V 240-V 5 PLAN VIEW - OUTLETS SEE PREVIOUS PAGE FOR LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS S 240-V PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R E ELECTRICAL ENTRANCE ELECTRICAL BOX DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 66 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S 14 RE V I S I O N S ME C H A N I C A L DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 2 UNIT 1 SOUTH WALL EQUIPMENT 3 PLAN VIEW MECHANICAL 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1314 15 16 11 12 10 18 13 14 15 1 UNIT 1 NORTH WALL EQUIPMENT 9 8 NUMBER QTY ITEM MANUFACTUER MODEL # VO L T S WA T T S AM P S PH A S E HE R T Z RP M / H P PL U G NE M A NO T E S 1 3 CONDIMENT DISPENCER TBD TBD 2 1 FROZEN DRINK MACHINE 2 BAY BUNN ULTRA NK 120 1440 12 1 60 X 5-15 26.5D, 32.4H, 16.5W 3 1 CHEESE DISPENSER STAR HPDE1 120 750 6.75 1 75 X 5-15 9.5W, 20.5D, 26.75H 4 1 PRETZEL MERCHANDISER WINCO 51012 120 1480 12.3 1 50/ 60 X 5-15 33W, 22H, 19D 5 1 HOT DOG ROLLER GRILL STAR 30STBD 120 1150 9.6 1 60 X 5-15 23.75W, 12.5H, 20.6D 6 2 BAR REFRIGERATOR MOTAK MBB-3D-90-G 115 3.6 1 60 1/4 X 5-15 90W, 27.75D, 30.6 H 7 1 REFRIGERATED GLASS DOOR MERCHANDISER TRUE GDM-HC-LD 115 2 1 60 1/6 X 5-15 25W, 23D, 53H 8 1 AC CONDENSER (COOLER)LG LW2516ER 230/208 2330/230 11.8/10.9 1 X 26W, 17-11/16"H, 28-1/8"D 9 1 COOLBOT PRO COOLBOT CC-S0HV-MOUT 120 1 1 X 5-15 6.5W, 3.5H 1.5D 10 1 TAP HOUSE 8 PORT TBD TBD 11 1 ICE MAKER W/ BIN SCOTSMAN CU303SA-1 115 6.25 KW 15 1 60 X 5-15 30W, 30D, 39H. 313 LB DAILY. AIR COOLED 12 1 HOT WATER HEATER RHEEM RTEX-18 240 18 KW 75 1 X 3/4 NPT. 7 GPM 14.5W, 18.25H,3.5D 13 1 UNDER BAR 3 COMP SINK JOHN BOOS UBS3-1860- 2D12 12" DRAINBOARDS 1.5"NPS. 60L, 18W, 32.5H 14 2 ICE WELL ADVANCE TABCO SLI-12-30 30W, 18D, 33H. 1"IPS DRAIN 15 1 BAR REFRIGERATOR MOTAK MBB-2D-70-G 115 1 60 x 69W, 27.75D, 39.6H 16 1 HAND SINK ADVANCE TABCO CR-HS-12 1.5"NPT. 12W, 21D, 32.75H 17 1 ELECTRICAL PANEL TBD 18 1 MINI SPLIT LG LMU240HHV 208/230 2120 25 60 33H, 37W, 13D. 24000 BTU 19 1 AC HEAD 9K LG LSN090HSV5 12.125H, 33W, 8.25D 20 2 AC HEAD 7K LG LMN079HVT 12.125H, 33W, 7.5D NUMBER QTY ITEM MANUFACTUER MODEL # VO L T S WA T T S AM P S PH A S E HE R T Z RP M / H P PL U G NE M A NO T E S 20 19 14 NUMBER QUANTITY MANUFACTUER MODEL TYPE SIZE R.O.NOTES D1 2 TBD COMMERCIAL GRADE GLASS STORE FRONT DOOR. LEFT HAND OUTSWING 3'x7'NEED TO SELECT ACTUAL DOOR D2 1 TBD STANDARD HMD. RIGHT HAND OUTSWING 3'X6'8 3'4X6'10 LEVERED HANDLE, DEADBOLT (KEYED ALIKE), CRASHBAR, WIND CHAIN, WEATHER STRIP KIT, THRESHOLD, DRIP EDGE, CLOSER. W1 3 JELD-WED V-2500 LEFT OPERABLE VINYL NEW CONSTUCTION SLIDING 71.5X35.5X2.9 72X36 SCREEN INCLUDED W1W1 W1D1D1 D2 D2 ALL EQUIPMENT IS AS SPEC'D OR SIMILAR PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 W1 D1 W1 D1 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R M 20 20 20 19 18 14 17 1616 DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 67 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S 15 RE V I S I O N S PL U M B I N G DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB BLANK FOR MEP PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R P DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 68 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S 16 RE V I S I O N S PL U M B I N G DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB PLUMBING NOTES 1 PLUMBING PLAN 2 PLUMBING WASTE PLAN HW HOT WATER CW COLD WATER HWH HOT WATER HEATER GW GREASE WASTE W FRESH WATER INLET MV MANUAL VALVE MAU MAKE-UP AIR UNIT HS-1 HAND SINK 3CS 3 COMP SINK VTR VENT TO ROOF CM COMMERCIAL MODULAR HCD CALIFORNIA DEPTARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DAA DESIGN APPROVAL AGENCY (APPROVED BY THE HCD) QAA QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY (APPROVED BY THE HCD) LEA LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY ABBREVIATION KEY NOTE: -UNIT IS NOT EQUIPPED WITH A WASTE HOLDING TANK. UNIT WILL BE CONNECTED TO EXISTING WASTE LINES -UNIT IS NOT EQUIPPED WITH A FRESH WATER HOLDING TANK. UNIT WILL BE CONNECTED TO EXISTING FRESH WATER LINES - HEAT PRODUCING APPLIANCES SHALL NOT BE CONVERTED FROM ONE FUEL TO ANOTHER UNLESS COVERTED IN ACCORANCE WITH THE TERMS OF ITS LISTING. -EVERY APPLIANCE SHALL BE SECURED IN PLACE TO AVOID DISPLACEMENT AND MOVEMENT FROM VIBRATION AND ROAD SHOCK. -AFTER APPLIANCES ARE CONNECTED, THE PIPING SYSTEM SALL BE PRESSURIZED TO NOT LESS THAN 10 INCHES OR MORE THAN 14 INCHES WATER COLUMN AND THE APPLIANE CONNECTIONS TESTED FOR LEAKAGE WITH SOAPY WATER OR BUBBLE SOLUTION. -ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS AROUND PIPING, TUBING, DUCTS, PLENUMS, CHIMNEYS AND VENTS SHALL BE SEAED TO RESIST THE ENTRANCE OF RODENTS. -ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT INSTALLED IN COMBINATION WITH GAS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LISTED FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED. GAS PIPING SHALL NOT BE UNSED FOR AN ELECTRICAL GROUND. -A commercial modular equipped with a water distribution system designed for connection to an outside source shall have a water-supply connection which shall terminate within 18 inches of the outside wall of the commercial modular and shall be equipped with a watertight cap or plug, which shall be permanently attached to the unit for use during transportation or movement. -Each horizontal drainage pipe shall be provided with a cleanout at its upper terminal, and each run of piping, that is more than 100 feet in total developed length, shall be provided with a cleanout for each 100 feet, or fraction thereof, in length of such piping. An additional cleanout shall be provided in a drainage line for each aggregate horizontal change in direction exceeding 135 degrees (2.36 rad). A cleanout shall be installed above the fixture connection fitting, serving each urinal, regardless of the location of the urinal in the building. 3 PLUMBING ISO VIEW MEP TO COMPLETE THIS PAGE HWH 3CS HS W W PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R P DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 69 17 REV. 2.10 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S RE V I S I O N S FO U N D A T I O N L O A D S DR A W N B Y : SB DE S I G N E D B Y : SB 40'-0" 16'-0" 40'-1 1/2" 13'-3/4" 26'-4 3/4" 39'-5 1/2" 12'-8" 1'-2 1/4" 8" 6'-9 5/8"7'-8 3/4" 8" 8" 15'-5 7/16" 6'-9 5/8" 12'-4 15/16"16'-1 1/2" 12'-4 15/16" S.E. TO COMPLETE THIS PAGE PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R S DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 70 TH I S D R A W I N G H A S N O T B E E N P U B L I S H E D B U T R A T H E R H A S B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S F O R U S E B Y T H E C L I E N T N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K S O L E L Y I N R E S P E C T O F T H E C O N S T R U C T I O N , O P E R A T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E OF T H E F A C I L I T Y N A M E D I N T H E T I T L E B L O C K A N D S H A L L N O T B E U S E D F O R A N Y O T H E R P U R P O S E S O R F U R N I S H E D T O A N Y O T H E R P A R T Y W I T H O U T T H E E X P R E S S C O N C E N T O F R O X B O X C O N T A I N E R S RE V I S I O N S DR A W N B Y : DS DE S I G N E D B Y : DS 18 FOOTING, SEE ENG. PLAN FOR SPECIFIC PIER/ FOUNDATION PLAN 3/16” TYP. EMBED PLATE, SEE PLAN 2” TYP. 6” TYP. 18” 1 EMBED TO FOUNDATION- OPTION 1A EMBED PLAN- DETAIL FR O S T D E P T H P E R R E G I O N 8” 8” 1/2” TYP. 2” TYP. 6” 3/4” DIA. TYP. 3/16”TYP. SHIPPING CONTAINER FLOOR CORNER ISO BLOCK 6.25 1” TYP. 3/16”TYP. SHIPPING CONTAINER FLOOR CORNER ISO BLOCK 6.25 3 SIDE VIEW SIDE ANCHOR TO CONCRETE SLAB- OPTION 3A CORNER ISO BLOCK 3 1/16" 1 1/16” 6 3/4” 3” 1 1/2”1 1/2” L 3x3x3/8 - 6 3/4” 3/4” Ø - 6” WEDGE ANCHORS 2” TYP. 2” TYP. CONCRETE SLAB SEE. FOUNDATION PLAN FRONT VIEW SIDE ANCHOR TO CONCRETE SLAB- OPTION DRAWINGS ARE FOR REFERANCE USE ONLY. SPECIFICATIONS ARE DETERMINED BY ENGINEERING AND SCOPE. VERIFICATION OF SITE ATTACHMENT ARE RESPONSABILITY OF LOCAL AHJ EM B E D D E T A I L S PROJECT NUMBER 2027 NO T A P P R O V E D FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N RO X B O X 56 9 0 L O G A N S T . S T E A DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 1 6 RO X B O X 12 2 2 3 F M 5 2 9 R d , Ho u s t o n , T X 7 7 0 4 1 BO G E Y ' S B A R S DA T E : 3/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 3 REV. 2.2 71 Es tes PARK vacation Home LICENSE LICENSE #: FEE: Permission is hereby given to: to engage in vacation home operation inside Estes Park Town limits in accordance with the terms of the ordinance enacted therefore. This will serve as the Business License for homes located within town limits. Town Clerk’s Office By Authority of the TOWN OF ESTES PARK Call 970-577-4777 if no longer operating. License expires December 31, 286 Moraine Ave 2023 $350.00 HLADICK 2023 6058 72 Certificate of Occupancy 286 Moraine Avenue This Single Family Dwelling has been inspected for compliance with Section R327 of the 2015 International Residential Code as amended by the Town of Estes Park and is hereby issued a Certificate of Occupancy for use as a Vacation Home. Building Permit Number: VHLS-037-21 Special Conditions: None Maximum Occupant Load: 8 Number of Bedrooms: 3 Additional Designated Sleeping Areas: Name and Address of Owner(s): Joe HladickPOBox2067 Estes Park, CO 80517 Chief Building Official: _________________________ Date: ________________________________________ January 21, 2022 73 Town of Estes Park Planning Department April 25,2023 P0 Box 1200 Estes Park,CO 80517 Attn:Board of Adjustment Comments:Front and Side Zero Setback Variances In reply to the Statement of Intent Submitted by TWBeck for Terry Bogerty: The Comprehensive Plan addresses Stewardship of preserving our historical and ei iironmental surroundings though out the Plan and Estes Park Code. •The construction of a slab bar using Container Vans is counter to character for the historical neighborhood of the West Riverside subdivision(established in 1905)and adjoining neighborhoods.The submitted plans are inadequate in portraying the code concerns and hardship put on my property and the property to the North.Including the park and adjoining neighborhood.The proposed Bogey’s Bar would be in the charter Area 3:Artisan and Craft Industries.It is the intent of Estes Park Downtown Plan to develop artisans involvement and communities in the down town area. •The patio mezzanine creates an infringement of privacy,noise,and lighting on my property Chapter 7.9 Exterior lighting,.., •There are no buffer zones shown in the plan.7.5.Its impossible to hide a 10 foot container van behind a 6 foot fence.Shipping containers are 8 6”high and a “high” cube is 9’6”.With out Buffer Zones there is no way to adequately ensure privacy for a residential dwelling. •Storage ,trash containers are not shown.For a zero lot line build this foot print plan seems to be incomplete. •Elevations are not incorporated in the drawing(Mezzanine height??)plus the average height of a pedestrian puts the overhead view and shadow exposure at 15 feet above my property presenting privacy code concerns for my property,the neighbors and the neighbor who lives below the Hands Down Therapeutic. •There is no copy of the CDOT letter displayed along with the Architects letter veri’ing CDOTs approval of the variance request on the Moraine lot line. •The proposed easement and access from Moraine Avenue creates more traffic problems with the increase in Pedestrian right of way and the bar crawl crowd. •The request for a zero set back along Moraine Ave.isn’t a special circumstance.Snowy Peaks Winery building is 11’8”from the East Edge of the sidewalk.Hands down Therapeutic Massage building is 11’1”from the East edge of the public sidewalk. •286 Moraine ave.on the South and 271 Riverside are registered as single family residences by the Larimer County Accessor,the set back variance proposed by Terry Bogerv does not guarantee that the health.noise.and barrier ordinances will be upheld. The complaints of the Davis Hill community and the Baldwin Park area,and the Clatworthy neighborhoods are already verified.With out a 10 foot set back to the 74 ‘Tbwn of Estes Park Planning Department April 25,2023 PU Box 1200 Nes Park, CO 80517 Attn:Board of Adjustment neighbors on either side our privacy and quality of life are compromised without adequate barriers. •Bars are permitted in the CD district,yet the out door activity of a slab bar along with the influence of Alcohol are harder to control in an open air atmosphere.It seems that a building aligned in the style of the neighborhood is entirely feasible given the lot size and expertise of IWBeck Architecure.The town already has three slab type bars there is no permanence to these investments,nor a perminant contribution to the arts. Joe Hladick Owner,286 Moraine Ave. PU Box 2067 Estes Park Colorado 8051? X’O-21 7-2225 75 91 If - --. - E it’ I. 76 April 24,2023 Town of Estes Park Planning Department P0 Box 1200 Estes Park,CO 80517 Ann:Board of Adjustment Re:Front and Side Zero Setback Variances Bogeys Bar 281 Moraine Ave. Estes Park,C0 80517 Owner:3684 Hike LLC This is an evaluation review report that seeks a denial from the Board of Adjustment on this application for any Front and Side Zero Setback Variances for the proposed Bogey’s Bar Project at 281 Moraine Ave. The Estes Park Development Code Standards have not altered since the ovneri’applicant purchased the property on 7/27/2022 and the owner/applicant cannot expext to deviate from those existing standards. It is agreed that public services such as water,sewer,gas,electric and communications are all readily available at the site.It is also agreed the a bar is a permitted use in the L.cD district.However,these are points that don’t relate directly to this variances. Table 4-5 Density and Dimensional Standards Nonresidential Zoning Districts clearly states front setbacks are 8 ft.minimum and 16 ft.maximum,and side setbacks are 10 ft.if the lot abuts a SF resdential property.and the rear setback is 10 ft.it’the lot abuts a SF residential property.These setbacks are measured from platted property lines.Footnote [11]of this table also applies and Section 4.4.C.1 states”Other regulations of this code or site-specific conditions may further limit development on a site. The owner/applicant presented a Statement of Intent,dated Dec.22 2022,and a Sketch Plan,dated March 17,2023,to the Estes Pack Planning Depatment requesting zero front setback along Moraine Ave and zero side setbacks on both side property lines.The reasons given for the zero setback variance along Moraine Ave.: 1.An existing retaining wall with a 10 to 12 feet dropoff (substantial hardship and practical difficulties.implied). 2.A letter from CDOT claiming It has no objection to this variance. 3.The setback variance is consistent with other business along Moraine Ave. The claim that the setback variance is consistant with other business along Moraine Ave.,is simply untrue.The front porch at the Gaslight Square shops is 12 II.from the east edge of the public sidewalk. the front of the Hands Down Therapeutic Massage building is 11 ft.1 inch from the east edge of the public sidewalk and the front of the Snowy Pikes Winery building is II ft.8 inch from the east edge of the public sidewalk.Clearly these buildings overcame the substancial hardship and practical difficulties and maintained the required mininum 8 ft building setback from the front property line without a variance. 77 The letter from CDOT states “Setback as part of zoning or building requirements is controlled by the local jurisdiction”.The letter doesn’t comment on the owner/applicant’s setback variance request. The owner/appliant has not shown the terms of an agreement with CDOT to construct a walkway from the east edge of the public sidewalk to the front property line along Moraine Ave.following CDOT Roadway Design Guides Chapter 14 Bicycle ans Pedestrin Facilities. The Estes Park Public Works Department,Engineering Division,Development Review &Floodplain Administrator has indicated that the 281 Moraine Ave.address will be changes to 281 W Riverside Dr. Thus,the principal access will be from W Riverside Drive negating any need for a front setback variance on Moraine Ave. In the Statement of Intent the owner/applicant’s only arguements for side setbacks of zero is that it is “typical in the “CD”commercial Downtown zone District.Granting the setback variances does not substantially alter the character of the neighborhood”. Neither the Statement of Intent or sketch plan have addressed the Specific Use Standards 5.1 .M for Outdoor Seating Areas and Outdoor Food Service,General Development Standards,Section 7.5.f.2.c- Service Areas.Section 9 -Exterior Lighting,Section 10—Operational Performance Standards,and Section 7.13 -Outdoor Storage Areas,Activities (as defined in Section 13.3.0)and Mechanical Equipment,which will have a significant impact on the adjoining SF residential properties and the neighborhood.A bar with food service utilizing converted shipping containers with a patio/mezzanine on top of them is hardly “typical”and will substancially alter the character of the neughborhood. Both the adloining SF residential properties,271 W.Riverside Dr.,and 286 Moraine Ave.,which are both listed as single family residences by the Larimer County Accessor,could suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the setback variances.These owners are very concerned that the proposed Bogey’Bar will be operated and maintained no differently than the other existing three shipping container bars in the “CD’zoning district,two of which are just across Moraine Ave.from their properties.All three of these establishments are in violation of multiple unenforced Estes Park Title 8 Codes which include Health,Sanitation.Nuisances and Desturbance regulations.6 attached photos of the three existing shipping container bars show various Code violations.Ask yourself,if you or anyone else would want to live beside this eyesores surrounded by a hazardous,shabby,unsanitary mess! Certainly the two adjoining neighboring property owners don’t!They already deal with loud music from the two container bars across Moraine Ave.Maintaining the 1 0 ft sideyard property line setback from SF residential property provides some measure of relief from the proposed Bogey’s Bar. It is contended that the owner/applicant has failed to address the above mention Development Code Standeads and hasn’t established any substantial hardship or practical difficulties that warrant any setback variances and that there is reasonable economic use of the subject property within the required building setbacks. The Statement of Intent mentions the Estes Park Downtown Plan and Bogey’s Bar would be located in the middle of the Character Area 3:Artisan &Craft Industries.It is the intent of the Estes Park Downtown Plan to infuse art into the downtown fabric and raise the cultural lever of the community. TWBECK Architects is capable of developing an alternative classy upscale project for the owner/applicant that could be a jewel in the neighborhood.A project that complies with all the required Development Code Standards.Go for it! 78 Respectfully submitted by Paul F.Brown Concept DesignlBuild 254 Solomon Dr. Estes Park,CO 80517 970-586-8257 paulbrown08l3@out1ook.com 79 The following photos were provided for reference only. They are not photos of the subject property or proposed development. I .. , (f t :- fL 80 i 3’ —. P r A/ I 4 I 1 81 ,: -F -. 82 :$ 83 r 84 I I — 85 To Whom it may concern. RE: Development proposal review: 281 Moraine Ave, Estes Park AKA 281 W. Riverside I am a property manager for a vacation rental next door to the property at 281 West Riverside Ave. 286 West Moraine. Some of the existing practices of the Riverside property owner has me concerned for future guests staying at the home. And the integrity of the property owner’s word. I have witnessed the following. · Unpermitted demolition of a home that may have had asbestos. · Removing property (fence) that has been between the properties for decades establishing property lines without documented permission from the court system or a state licensed surveyor. · Using the electricity at the home at 286 Moraine to demo the property at 286 Moraine. If this Variance/Plan is granted to the property owner of 281 West Riverside please consider the following issues: · Proposed business building up to the property lines at the location between homes that have families in them now and for future use if not a vacation rental. · Across from a playground and park provided by the town. · In an area that is now part of the New Loop with little or no parking for our current guests with construction blocking access. · Increasing foot traffic through neighborhoods If the Variance/plan is granted could the following items be part of the requirement. · Owner erect a privacy fence for noise. · Erect a privacy fence for security. · Fence all garbage and bar storage (not to turn Riverside/loop area into an alleyway atmosphere) Thank you Renee McCauley 86 87 88 Board of Adjustment May 2, 2023 Bogey’s Bar Setback Variance (281 W. Riverside Dr.) Presented by Kara Washam, Planner I Vicinity Map of Subject Area SITE LOCATION 281 W. Riverside Dr. Zoning Map SITE LOCATION CD RM E-1 CD CD RM E R E CO CO Key Points •Property is known as Bogey’s Bar and is owned by Terry Bogener (3634 Hike LLC) •0.07 acres (3,201 SF) and is approx. 55’ wide x 60’ deep. •Addressed 281 W. Riverside Dr (previously 281 Moraine Ave) and is located in the CD Zoning District. •Lot has double frontage along Moraine Ave. and W. Riverside Dr. •Applicant requests approval of a variance to eliminate the front setback (Moraine Ave) and side setback along the north property line in lieu of 8’ and 10’ required per EPDC. •Applicant is proposing to construct a bar with food service and outdoor seating by utilizing prefabricated shipping containers. •Mezzanine access off Moraine Ave. and patio access from W. Riverside Dr. •Permitted by right in the CD zoning district per Table 4-4 of the EPDC. •Subject property was previously a residence. •Small cabin was demolished after the lot was purchased in 2022. •Permit #22-EP-00434 for demolition applied for 8/11/22 and completed 10/21/22. Subject Property Prior to Demolition Subject Property facing West (on W. Riverside Dr.) Subject Property facing East (on Moraine Ave.) Proposed Setback Variance Plan •EPDC requires setbacks to be measured from the platted lot lines. •Deeded property lines of this parcel differ from the platted lot lines (Lot 14). •Applicant requests a 0’ side setback along the north property line. •Maintains ownership of approx. 4’ of the platted lot to the north (Lot 13). Legal Description: S 4 FT OF LOT 13 & ALL OF LOT 14, RIVERSIDE, ESTES PK LOT 13 LOT 15 LOT 14 Conceptual Shipping Container Bar Note: If the proposed variance request is granted, the applicant will be required to apply for building permits. The site plan and shipping container plans will be referred to review agencies for comments as part of the standard review process. Table 4-4 Permitted Uses: Nonresidential Zoning Districts Setback Applicability •Table 4-5 under Section 4.4 of the EPDC states that the 10’ min. side setback only applies if the lot abuts a SF residential property whose use at the time of the subject application is residential. •The property to the south of the subject property (286 Moraine Ave) is used as a short-term vacation rental (VHL #6058) and is considered a commercial use. •0’ side setback along the south property line is permitted by the EPDC and is not subject to this variance request. •The property to the north (271 W. Riverside Dr) currently has a pending VHL application under review at the Town Clerk’s office. •0’ side setback along the north property line is subject to this variance request. Table 4-5 Density and Dimensional Standards Nonresidential From EPDC §4.4 -Nonresidential Zoning Districts: [11]For purposes of these cells, the term "SF residential property" means any property whose use (whether occupied or vacant) is in accord with §13.3.92 of this Code at the time the relevant building permit(s) are issued for development of the subject CD-zoned property, provided that the relevant building permit(s) entail a change in the setback distance adjoining the single-family property use. §13.3.92 = Dwelling, Single-Family shall mean a detached dwelling designed to be occupied by one (1) household. Standards for Review Review Criteria #1: Special conditions exist, due to exceptional topographic conditions. •Retaining wall on west side of property (Moraine Ave.) with a 10-12’ vertical drop in elevation. •By allowing a zero-foot front setback, the bar can be positioned near the retaining wall and directly accessed from the sidewalk at Moraine Ave. Review Criteria #2.a: There may be beneficial use of the property without the variance. •Site plan would need to be redesigned and would decrease useable concrete patio space. Review Criteria #2.b: The variance request is moderately substantial. •Side setbacks of 0’ are typical in the CD zoning district and are permitted by right, with exception to properties that abut a SF residential use. Review Criteria #2.c: The CD character of the immediate neighborhood would not be altered, nor would adjoining properties suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance. •The proposed use is permitted and exists in the subject vicinity. 0’ side setbacks appear to be consistent with nearby businesses (i.e., Snowy Peaks Winery at 292 Moraine Ave). Review Criteria #6: The applicant requests a setback variance in order to construct a bar with food service and outdoor seating. •These uses are permitted by right in the CO zoning district per Table 4-4 of the EPDC. Review Agency Comments The application was referred to all applicable review agencies for comment. Public Works: Concern for proposed work being done in the ToEP/CDOT ROW. The application was referred to CDOT and no concerns were received. Public Works concerns were therefore satisfied. Estes Park Sanitation District: No concerns or comments for the proposed variance request but wished to remind the applicant of the grease interceptor requirement for food preparation. No additional concerns or comments were received. Staff Recommends Conditions of Approval: If the variance request is granted, Staff would like to condition the owner to provide a privacy fence between both properties to the north and south for noise and security screening, and a condition to screen all garbage receptacles. Public Comment: Three (3) written comments were received and have been included in the Staff Report. Staff Recommends APPROVAL with Conditions of the Proposed Variance Request Advantages: •Variance would allow the Applicant to open a bar with food service and outdoor seating. •This type of business would be beneficial to the community and contribute to the vitality of the Commercial Downtown area. Disadvantages: •No known disadvantages of the variance request. 89 NOTICE On Tuesday, May 2, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., a meeting will be held by the Estes Park Board of Adjustment, 170 MacGregor Avenue, to consider variance applications for the properties and purposes described below. Legal Description: S 4 FT OF LOT 13 & ALL OF LOT 14, ESTES PK Type and Intensity of Use: A Variance is proposed to eliminate the front setback (Moraine Ave) and side setback (north lot line) in lieu of the 8 feet and 10 feet respective setbacks required in the CD (Commercial Downtown) Zone District. This property is located at 281 W. Riverside Drive and was readdressed from 281 Moraine Avenue on October 6, 2022. Owner/Applicant: Terry Bogener Legal Description: LOTS 8 THRU 12, BLK 2, RECLAMATION, ESTES PK Type and Intensity of Use: A Variance is proposed to allow a front setback (to Highway 7/S. Saint Vrain Avenue) of 16.4 feet in lieu of the 25 feet required and a front setback (to 1st Street) of 6.9 feet in lieu of the 15 feet required in the CO (Commercial Outlying) Zone District. The property is located at 160 S. Saint Vrain Avenue, Estes Park. Owner/Applicant: EPCO Properties LLC, Mark Rissmiller Legal Description: All of Binns Addition to the Town of Estes Park Type and Intensity of Use: Two variances are proposed. One variance would allow employee housing units to exceed the maximum allowable 800 square feet per unit. The second would allow the total cumulative square feet of employee housing to exceed that of the total square footage of the commercial use. The property is within a CO (Outlying Commercial) Zone District located at 1895 Fall River Road, Estes Park. Owner: Kinley Built LLC For more information, please visit www.estes.org/currentapplications or contact the Community Development Department at planning@estes.org or 970-577-3721. 90