Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Stanley Park Committee 1986-10-29STANLEY PARK COMMITTEE Wednesday, October 29' I986 - 2:00 P. / I. L1ndO Clark (Boettcher & Company)/Mary Ann BFOy0er (Lamm, EdSt[00 Q BrOy0er) - F1nODC1Ol presentation C0OCern1Dg IOUOOr Arena. 2, Stanley Park Sub -Committee - Report. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Stanley Park Sub -Committee October 22, 1986 Committee: Chairman Aldrich, Trustee Habecker, Manager Scott, Public Works Director Widmer, Finance Officer Vavra Attending: Chairman Aldrich, Trustee Habecker, Manager Scott, Public Works Director Widmer Also Attending: Clerk O'Connor Absent: Finance Officer Vavra Chairman Aldrich called the meeting to order. Chairman Aldrich and Members of the Committee identified the responsibilities of the Sub -Committee as follows: 1. The Sub -Committee will not act as a "policy -making" committee. 2. The Sub -Committee will act as a "fact-finding" committee for construction of an indoor arena/multi-purpose building, gathering information such as building layout, financing, etc. for presentation to the Stanley Park Committee. INDOOR AREA/MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING - DISCUSSION: The Committee reviewed the following concepts for construction of a building: 1. A full architectural service approach. 2. Specifications and bidding process prepared by an architect. 3. Design/build. 4. Soliciting proposals from the manufacturer. Following discussion, the Committee recommends (1) Trustee Habecker and Public Works Director Widmer prepare and submit a report listing the advantages and disadvantages for each of the aforementioned concepts; and (2) Manager Scott submit a range of project costs, including costs for items such as landscaping and parking, submitting the report to the Stanley Park Committee October 29, 1986. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk OF ESTES PARK Estes Park, Colorado 80517 MEMORANDUM TO: Stanley Park Committee FROM: Dave Habecker and Rich Widmer DATE: October 24, 1986 SUBJECT: Stanley Park Indoor Arena - Design Alternatives The following descriptions are a brief review of some of the different ways that a large project such as an indoor horse arena can be designed and constructed. FULL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES/BID ARCHITECT SELECTION - Usually by Request for Proposal (RFP) process. An RFP is sent to a group of architects detailing the scope of work to be provided, the time schedule, and a description of the project. Architects are chosen on their past records, expertise in the project area, project team proposed, and fee proposed. DESIGN FEE - The fee may be set by negotiation, but is usually based on a cost curve. This fee may be about 8% for a project of this size. DESIGN PROCEDURE - Architect prepares design drawings and specifications according to time specified in contract. Probably would take 4 to 5 months minimum for this project. BID PROCESS - Advertise, open bids, award contract. Process takes at least a month. No guarantees as to project cost. CONSTRUCTION PROCESS - Architect may act as project manager if owner desires. Project constructed according to constraints in contract and specifications. P. O. Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586-5331 -lawn at Estes Park Estes Park. Colorado 80517 Stanley Park Committee Memo Page 2 PARTIAL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES/BID ARCHITECT SELECTION - Same as for full services or as desired by owner. Scope of services much less detailed than for full services. DESIGN FEE - Less than for full services; depends upon scope of work. DESIGN PROCEDURE - Same as for full services; end product is less detailed. Time required would be less. BID PROCESS - Same as for full services. No cost guarantee. Bid time the same. Builder provides detail design. Owner must review bids carefully with architect to ensure compliance with specifications. CONSTRUCTION PROCESS - Same as full services. BUILDING MANUFACTURER PROPOSAL ARCHITECT SELECTION - No separate architect involved. Building supplier provides design services, usually limited by specific type of building supplied. DESIGN FEE - Part of total building price. DESIGN PROCEDURE - As specified by contract for building. BID PROCESS - Proposals requested from building suppliers. Price negotiated or firm depending upon owner's desires and detail of RFP. CONSTRUCTION PROCESS - Same as full services or as owner desires. MODIFIED DESIGN/BUILD ARCHITECT SELECTION - Normal RFP process. DESIGN FEE - Negotiated during architect selection. DESIGN PROCEDURE - Contractor selected during separate RFP process, put together with architect as team early in design. Design is done with heavy contractor input. BID PROCESS - Negotiated, RFP process with guaranteed maximum. Amount under contract split between owner and contractor, or as specified in contract; amount over contract is absorbed by contractor. CONSTRUCTION PROCESS - May begin during design phase. Usually shortens total project design/construction time. (p.vn ot Estes Park Estes Park. Colorado 80517 DESIGN/BUILD ARCHITECT SELECTION - Architect and contractor selected as a team using RFP process. DESIGN FEE - All basically the same as modified design/build. DESIGN PROCEDURE - BID PROCESS - CONSTRUCTION PROCESS - Full Arch Services Partial Arch Sery ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Unique design Detailed design Designer involvement Less design time Less arch fee More alt at bid Unknown prebid costs Higher design costs Longer project time Unknown prebid costs Complicated bid review Building Mfg. Proposal Simple admin Limited final product Less expensive design Unknown prebid costs Modified Design/Build Design/Build Guaranteed max price Shorter project time Flexibility Public perception - "fair" price? Higher architect fee? Team selection Same as modified Same as modified WINDOW & DOOR DISTRIBUTORS 1050 South Jason, Denver, Colorado 80223 (303) 744-3338