The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Public Works, Utilities and Public Safety 2012-02-09Preparation date: January 30, 2012 * Revision date: February 2, 2012 NOTE: The Public Safety, Utilities and Public Works Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC SAFETY, UTILITIES & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE February 9, 2012 8:00 a.m. Board Room, Town Hall 1. PUBLIC COMMENT 2. PUBLIC SAFETY a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD i) None. b) REPORTS i) Estes Valley Victim Advocate Report. Director Mary Mesropian. ii) 2011 Year End Statistics. Sergeant Kenney. iii) Current Staff Levels. Chief Kufeld. 3. UTILITIES a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD i) None. b) REPORTS i) Future Water Quality Regulatory Requirements. Director Bergsten/Lab Technician Beehler. ii) Sungard System Installation Overview. Director Bergsten. 4. PUBLIC WORKS a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD i) Reassignment of Contract with The Engineering Company to Farnsworth Engineering. Interim Town Administrator Richardson. ii) Change Order for Steamer Drive Overlay Consulting Services with The Engineering Company. Director Zurn. iii) Bond Park Master Plan Phase V Design Consultant. Director Zurn. b) REPORTS. i) Moraine Avenue Pedestrian Crossing – Director Zurn. ii) Estes Park Business Recycling Project. Director Zurn. 5. ADJOURN * * * ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 2011 ANNUAL STATISTICS & Information 11822 12357 13421 5000 8000 11000 14000 Total CAD Incidents (EPPD) 2011 2010 2009 EPPD total incidents are down 535 incidents from 2010. 46% of the total incidents are initiated through our Dispatch Center. 54% is Officer Initiated. Investigations 30 29 24 9 98 34 21 5 8 68 131 9 18 46 38 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Cleared by Arrest Cleared by Exceptional Means Cases Inactivated Other Incidents Total Cases 2011 2010 2009 Cases Reported and Cleared A and B Crimes 222 249 236 231 206 204 254 219 178 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2011 2010 2009 Group A Crimes Reported Group B Crimes Reported Total Clearances (Arrest/Except. Cleared) Our clearance rate for Group A (Felony) crimes (64%) is above the national average. Our 2011 overall clearance rate including both A and B crimes is 48% compared to 40% in 2010 - and 56% in 2009. Arrests 236 161 75 203 150 53 233 187 46 0 50 100 150 200 250 TOTAL ADULTS: TOTAL JUVENILES: TOTAL ARRESTS: 2011 2010 2009 EPPD Communication Center 2009-2011 Total Calls 157361416914750 402043134051 62852 54958 59690 66872 59009 64003 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 2011 2010 2009 EPCC total calls for service 911 Calls Administrative Calls Total Phone Calls 2011 2010 2009 14169 14750 15736 10000 12000 14000 16000 EPCC total calls for service 2011 2010 2009 New Projects for 2012 ¾Ongoing – Dispatch Network Cabling Cleanup ¾February 2012 – Installation of New Dispatch Console furniture ¾April 2012 – Next Generation 911 capable telephone equipment installation Network Cable Cleanup Project Cost – $7,681 Paid by Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority Dispatch Console Furniture Cost – $14,565 Paid by Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority Current Next Generation Capable 911 Telephone System Cost – $215,000 Paid by Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority Ethernet for NG911 Cost – $56,235 Paid by Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority Annual Ethernet & microDATA Support Cost – $38,234 Paid by Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority Annual Investment Provides $21,000 annually through the $.46 911 monthly surchargefor equipment, staffing, overtime, and mostly training. Chief is on the Board of Directors QUESTIONS JAMES D. KENNEY Sergeant Estes Park Police Department SRO Statistics, 2011-2012 First Semester (No School Resource Officer in the last 2 weeks of November or month of December) Cases 28 Charges Filed 17 Harassment 3 Alcohol 2 Controlled Substance 4 Criminal Mischief 8 (Not on school property, student-involved) Marijuana/Paraphernalia 2 Domestic Violence 1 Sexual Assault 2 Medical Assists 4 MIP-Tobacco 1 Probation Violations 2 Classes Taught Administrative Assistance Student Rights and Responsibilities 12 Interviews/Meetings 30 Search/Seizure 4 Expulsion Hearings 0 Civics 6 Non-Criminal Incidents 12 (2 Hands-On) Self Defense 2 Critical Incident Team 1 Internet Safety 2 (School Changed Days, No Longer Able to Attend) Constitutional Law 4 Child Protection Team 4 Restorative Justice Circles 6 Truancy Checks 4 (No Longer Assisting) Special Programs Elementary School Traffic Assistance 20+ Colorado Rockies Stay in School Colorado Eagles Overcoming Adversity Bike/Walk to School Day Report Utilities Department To: Public Safety, Utilities and Public Works Committee Interim Town Administrator Richardson From: Jeff Boles, Water Superintendent and Diana Beehler, Laboratory Technician Date: January 30, 2012 RE: Future Water Quality Regulatory Requirements Water quality is regulated by a network of government agencies including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Colorado State Department of Public Health and Environment through the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA). These acts set limits for contaminants in drinking water and limit pollutant discharges into waterways. The EPA has established contaminant-specific testing schedules for Public Water Systems requiring frequent, sometimes continuous, monitoring for certain contaminants to ensure our water meets the high standards set by the SDWA and CWA. These acts are not static and are continuously being reviewed and revised as new critical environmental criteria are established and technological advances in detection of contaminants increase. The existing drinking water regulations the Town of Estes Park must follow include: 1. Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR): Purpose is to control microbial contaminants through continuous monitoring of chlorine and turbidity at the treatment plant; setting minimum log-removal percentages for cryptosporidium, giardia and viruses; and assessing filter performance through microscopic particle removal ratios between raw and treated water. 2. Disinfectant/Disinfection By-Products Rule (DBPR): Purpose is to control carcinogenic compounds formed in drinking water as a by-product of chlorine reacting with naturally- found organic carbon. 3. Total Coliform Rule (TCR): Purpose is to improve public health by reducing fecal pathogens to minimal levels through control of total coliform bacteria, including fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli (E. coli). 4. Lead and Copper Rule (LCR): Purpose is to minimize lead and copper levels in drinking water, primarily by reducing water corrosivity. Lead and copper enter drinking water largely through corrosion of plumbing materials. 5. Organic Chemical Rule: Purpose is to monitor and minimize exposure to 55 synthetic and volatile organic chemicals including herbicides, pesticides, and PCB’s. 6. Inorganic Chemical Rule: Purpose is to monitor and minimize exposure to metals, fluoride, and nitrate. 7. Radionuclides Rule: Purpose is to reduce the risk of cancer by reducing exposure to radioactive particles and photon emitters. 8. Consumer Confidence Report Rule: Purpose is to provide educational materials to allow customers to make educated decisions regarding any potential health risks pertaining to the quality, treatment and management of their drinking water supply. 9. Public Notification Rule: Requires all public water systems to notify their customers any time a system violates a national primary drinking water regulation or has a situation posing a risk to public health. 10. Point Source Discharge Monitoring Permit: Testing required through the National Discharge Elimination System of the Clean Water Act for water released into Glacier Creek from filter backwash. The EPA currently has water regulations for more than 90 contaminants. The SDWA includes a process that the EPA must follow to identify and list unregulated contaminants which may require future regulation. Approximately every five years the EPA must publish this list of contaminants and decide whether to regulate at least five or more contaminants (called a Regulatory Determination). The SDWA also requires the EPA to review each national primary drinking water regulation at least once every six years and revise, as appropriate. From 2012 to 2016, eight new Regulatory Determinations, revisions and second stage monitoring requirements of current regulations will be initiated or finalized. There are also three new Regulatory Determinations or revisions listed but are yet to be determined as to proposal dates. These include: 1. Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR): Proposal July 2010; Final November 2012. 2. Third Regulatory Determination: Proposal mid-2012, Final July 2013. 3. Revised Long-Term Lead and Copper Rule (LTLCR): Proposal October 2012, Final 2014. 4. Carcinogenic Volatile Organic Chemicals Rule (CVOC): Proposal 2013, Final 2015. 5. Perchlorate Rule (CClO): Proposal February 2013, Final August 2014. 6. Third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR3): Proposed March 2011, Final March 2012. 7. Round 2 of Long-Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR): Begins 2016. 8. Fourth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR4): Proposal 2013, Final October 2014. 9. Revised Fluoride Maximum Contaminant Level: TBD. 10. Hexavalent Chromium Rule: TBD. 11. Epichlorohydrin and Acrylamide Rule: TBD. In conclusion, the EPA has scheduled four major regulatory proposals in the next 18 months as well as finalizing the UCMR3 and RTCR. All Water Utilities will be impacted to varying degrees. Because Estes Park is fortunate to have high-quality source water, much of the impact will primarily be in managing the proposed regulations. We anticipate increased labor costs due to the additional sample volume that these rules will create as well as the associated cost for both internal and external laboratory analysis. Water regulations have increased almost exponentially since the passage of the Safe Water Drinking Act in 1974 and the EPA is mandated by law to make regulatory determinations every five years on new contaminants. This increasing regulatory trend will continue due to these determinations, combined with advances in technology that now allow us to detect contaminants in concentrations of parts per trillion. Attachments: Regulatory Timeline Power Point Handout 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2020 2019 2018 UCMR 3 Monitoring (1/2013-12-2015 Round 2 LT2ESWTR Monitoring (10/2016-12/2018) Total Coliform Rule (15 samples/month) Stage 2 DBP Rule (8 samples/qtr) Stage 1 DBPR (4 samp/qtr) Annual Monitoring for Inorganics, Fluoride, Nitrate, VOCs ( 1 sample each/plant/year) NO2-GCWTP 9 yr cycle Radionuclides 9 yr cycle 1/plant MPA-MLWTP 6 yr cycle LCR 20 sites LT-LCR Proposal (10/2012) SOCs 2/plant in seperate qtrs SOCs 2/plant in seperate qtrs SOCs 2/plant in seperate qtrs SOCs 2/plant in seperate qtrs ClO4- Proposal (3/2013) ClO4– Final (3/2015) LT-LCR Final (10/2014) Carcinogenic VOCs Proposal (10/2013) Carcinogenic VOCs Final (10/2015) Consumer Confidence Report Rule (report prepared and distributed annually by July 1) Revised TCR Final (Summer, 2012) Revised TCR Effective (Summer, 2015) LCR 20 sites LCR 20 sites LCR 20 sites LCR 20 sites As yet unassigned: fluoride revisions, acrylamide, epichlorohydrin, and total chromium/Cr (VI) 12/2011 CCL4 Proposal CCL4 Final (10/2014) Regulatory Timeline TOC-DBPR (1 set /month GCWTP) NPDES DMR (9 samples/month) MPA– GC (1 set/year) CCR Review Water Department Regulations and Testing: Current and Future ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Water Quality is regulated by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Colorado Department of Health and Environment under the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Clean Water Act In addition to online analyzers that test the water continuously for chlorine, pH and turbidity, our plant operators run 35 tests every day from all stages of the purification process? Between the tests required for compliance by the agencies listed above and those run for the purpose of monitoring our process and the water quality in the distribution system, we ran over 14,000 tests last year. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ y Originally passed in 1974 y Purpose was to protect public health by regulating the nation’s public drinking water supply y Authorizes the EPA to set national health‐based standards for drinking water y Sets limits for nearly 100 contaminants and considers regulation of thousands of others. y The EPA, states, and water systems work together to ensure these standards are met. The Safe Drinking Water Act SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT • 1974-2004 • PROTECT OUR HEALTH FROM SOURCE TO TAP ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Long Term Lead and Copper Rule (LT-LCR): Proposal Oct. 2012 9 Will affect most systems 9 EPA is considering revisions to sample site collection criteria to include schools and hospitals and tap sampling protocol. 9 Will also tighten ranges for optimized corrosion control and water quality parameters 9 Ramifications will be significant time spent on participant education and increased source water and distribution sampling and analysis ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Chemical Contaminants Rule ¾Provides protection through the reduction of chronic risks from cancer, organ damage, and circulatory, nervous and reproductive system disorders. 1. Inorganic Chemicals (IOC) •Asbestos •Cadmium •Chromium •Fluoride •Mercury •Nitrate/Nitrite •Cyanide •Selenium •Barium •Antimony •Thallium 2. Synthetic Organic Chemicals (SOC) •Alachlor •Atrazine •PCB’s •Diquat •Dioxin •Toxaphene •Picloram 3. Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOC) •Benzene •Carbon Tetrachloride •Vinyl Chloride •Styrene •Toluene •Trichloroethylene ¾Consist of 65 chemicals broken down into three contaminant groups: Sampling Requirements: IOC & VOC ‐1/year from each plant at EPDS SOC –2/year every 3 years from each plant ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Chemical Contaminants Rule 3rd Regulatory Determination– Proposal mid-2012, Final July 2013 9Focuses on a subset of 32 contaminants that the EPA has deemed important. 9Will likely contain discussions for 10-15 new contaminants to be regulated in the future: Nitrosamines Additional VOC’s Additional DBP’s Organophosphates: Basis for many insecticides and herbicides Carbamates : Insecticides Cyanotoxins: toxins produced by blue- green algae ! ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR3)- Proposed March 2011, Final March 2012 9Requires monitoring for 30 contaminants for a 12 month period during 2013-2015. 9Proposed contaminants include 3 estradiols, estrone, testosterone, 8 VOCs, 1 SOC, chlorate, perfluoridated compounds (found in teflon, Scotchguard, and fire fighting foams) and 4 new metals. 9Major changes from UCMR2 include reduced PWS approval and laboratory reporting times. 9Ramifications will be increased costs for sampling and outside laboratory analysis. Chemical Contaminants Rule: ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Carcinogenic Volatile Organic Chemicals Rule and Perchlorate Rule-Proposals 2013 9Perchlorate was included on the first, second and third Contaminant Candidate list and this Regulatory Determination reverses a 2008 decision not to regulate. 9Will affect a small number of systems but the EPA will discuss lowering the original 4 µg/L MCL set in UCMR1 which may impact more systems. 9Carcinogenic VOC’s also affect a small number of systems but all will be required to test for them. 9 The rule will likely lower the MCL’s for trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene and set a new standard for 1,2-trichloropropane. 9Estes Park ramifications will largely be increased analytical costs. Chemical Contaminants Rule: ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection By-products Rule: August 2013 •In 2008-2009 we were required to complete an Initial Distribution System Evaluation (IDSE) to characterize DBP levels in our system and identify locations for increased monitoring. •Basically increases the number of locations that have to be monitored. (Starting in Aug. 2013 we will have to monitor 4 sites/quarter) •MCL’s will now be based on locational running annual averages. We will no longer be able to average all the results together from all over the system but will report the average from each location. •New “Operational Evaluation” Requirement: Requires the PWS to average the last two quarters with the current quarter x 2 •Ramifications are costs associated with increased sampling, analysis and reporting. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Round 2, Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR)-2016 9Will piggyback off of and supplement Round 1 data to confirm and ensure correct bin classifications and set recommendations for improved and upgraded treatment for minimum 4-log removal of pathogens. 9Ramifications are increased costs for sampling set-up, and internal and external laboratory analysis. 9New 2 year monthly sampling program for turbidity, giardia, cryptosporidium and E. coli ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR)– Final, November 2012 9 Will apply to every drinking water system 9 Changes required actions to be taken if a positive result is obtained. 9 Tier 1 Assessment (conducted by utility personnel) for ≥ 2 Total Coliform positive samples in a month or a failure to collect required repeat samples. 9 Tier 2 Assessment (to be conducted only by the State or State approved employee) for an E. coli MCL violation or a second Level 1 trigger in a rolling 12 month period. 9Ramifications are the necessity for increased upfront distribution testing and much more intensive investigation and reporting of positive results and probable State involvement for level 2 triggers. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Yet to be determined….. 9Forth Contaminate Candidate List (CCL4)-Proposal 2013 Still undetermined what contaminants will be listed 9Epichlorohydrin and Acrylamide Rules-Of concern because acrylamide is a coagulant used in drinking water treatment, epichlorohydrin is used to make glycerin and an ingredient in plastics and polymers used in water supply systems. 9Fluoride Revision-Proposed lowering of recommended levels to 0.7 mg/L from 1.0 mg/l and tightening the MCL. 9Hexavalent Chromium PWS’s are required to test for total Chromium at the entry point to the distribution system (EPDS). EPA has completed a draft assessment to determine if a new Cr-VI standard needs to be set and is currently providing guidance for PWSs recommending monitoring for Cr-VI at both the EPDS and in the system at DBP monitoring sites. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Utilities Department REPORT To: Public Safety, Utilities and Public Works Committee Interim Town Administrator Richardson From: Reuben Bergsten, Utilities Director Date: February 9, 2012 RE: SunGard System Installation Overview Background: On January 22, 2011, the Town Board approved the upgrade of the Town's financial software package. The existing software is 18 years old and the upgrade will require the new and old systems to operate in parallel. The first phase of the upgrade to SunGard’s One-Solution® is the addition of the Community Development module, a module which we currently do not have in the existing NAVILINE version. An implementation timeline of the remaining modules is attached. Page 1 of 1 Utilities Department Page 2 of 2 ENGINEERING Memo To: Public Safety, Utilities & Public Works Committee Interim Town Administrator Richardson From: Scott A. Zurn, PE, CFM, Public Works Director Date: February 9, 2012 RE: Change Order for Steamer Drive Overlay Consulting Services with Farnsworth Group (TEC) Background: Town staff has negotiated a scope and fee with Farnsworth Group (TEC) for design, specifications and construction management services for the Steamer Drive Overlay Project. This project anticipates that the installation of a box culvert along Devils Gulch Road will route traffic down Black Canyon Drive and Steamer Drive. Resurfacing of this roadway is expected to be needed to compensate the additional traffic. The scope for this effort includes a redesign of the Steamer Driver/Big Thompson Avenue intersection just east of the Safeway Fueling Facility north to the Safeway business entrance. If approved, the design effort will begin in February and complete Final Construction Documents in March. By moving forward with the project now, staff will be able to combine the Virginia Drive Rehabilitation Project with this Steamer Drive Overlay Project and create one larger construction contract that will increase interest and bid competition. Budget: The negotiated fee with Farnsworth Group (TEC) is $23,337. This total does include construction management services. With a 10% contingency, our budget for the Steamer Overlay Project is $25,670.70. Staff Recommendation: Public Works recommends initiating a design and construction management contract with Farnsworth Group (TEC) to develop contract documents for the Steamer Drive Overlay Project. Page 1 ENGINEERING Memo To: Public Safety, Utilities & Public Works Committee Interim Town Administrator Richardson From: Scott A. Zurn, PE, CFM, Public Works Director Kevin Ash, PE, Public Works Civil Engineer Date: February 9, 2012 RE: Bond Park Phase V Design Consultant Selection Background: At the direction of the Bond Park Stakeholder Group, Town staff has negotiated a scope and fee with Chroma Design for the design, specifications and construction management services for the Bond Park Phase V Improvements. This effort will focus on completing the hardscape along Elkhorn Avenue. If approved, the design effort will begin in February complete Final Construction Documents in May. The project will advertise and bid for construction in June. Material ordering and fabrication will occur between July and September. Construction of the Bond Park Phase V Improvements is scheduled to begin in the fall 2012 and finalize in the spring of 2013. Budget: The negotiated fee with Chroma Design is $43,873. This total does include $4,000 for construction management, once construction is underway. With a 10% contingency, our budget for design and construction management for Bond Park Phase V is $48,260.30. Staff Recommendation: Public Works recommends initiating a design and construction management contract with Chroma Design to develop contract documents for the Bond Park Phase V Improvement Project, within the Town’s purchasing policy. Page 1 ENGINEERING Report To: Public Safety, Utilities & Public Works Committee Interim Town Administrator Richardson From: Scott A. Zurn, PE, CFM, Public Works Director Date: February 6, 2012 RE: Moraine Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Update: Town Staff has been working with McDowell Engineering and CDOT to finalize the scope and plans for the Moraine Avenue Pedestrian Improvements. To date, plans and specifications have been completed to a 95% level. Through public meetings, the direction for removal of the Riverwalk Crossing has met with the scrutiny from local businesses surrounding the crosswalk. Originally, this removal had been directed by CDOT. This past November staff met with CDOT officials and communicated the concerns the business district raised with removal of this crosswalk. An option to signalize this crossing was discussed and CDOT agreed to update their modeling for this area and make a recommendation on the warrant of a traffic signal. The need for a traffic signal would impact the budget and not allow a significant portion of the sidewalk improvements to be funded. On February 8th, staff is scheduled to meet with CDOT and discuss the results of the modeling effort. Recommendation: Should the results show that a traffic signal is not warranted, staff would like a recommendation to finalize the contract documents for the Moraine Avenue Pedestrian Improvements and go out to bid for construction this spring. Page 1 ENGINEERING Report To: Public Safety, Utilities & Public Works Committee Interim Town Administrator Richardson From: Kevin Ash, PE, Public Works Civil Engineer Date: February 9, 2012 RE: Estes Park Business Recycling Project Background: Town staff was approached by the Community Recycling Committee of the League of Women Voters to consider a proposed business recycling project. A priority for the League this year is to increase the recycling efforts in the Estes Park community and creation of a partnership between the League, the local businesses and the Town would be a strong start. The Recycling Committee has approached several businesses with the concept of sponsorship of a recycling bin and received favorable support. Discussions continue with the Recycling Committee on the number of businesses in the sponsorship plan, the location of the recycling bins and the type of recycling bins the Town would allow. Budget: Each recycling bin would be paid for entirely by the business sponsorship (approximately $500-$600). The Town’s contribution to this recycling effort would be in the form of incurring installation costs and additional weekly pick-up fees from our current disposal service. Public Works estimates $200/can for installation. Currently the Town is charged $5.77/per can/per week for our recycling service. On an annual basis, each can added to the Town’s contract would add an additional $300. Page 1