HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board Study Session 2023-04-25 April 25, 2023
4:45 p.m. — 6:45 p.m.
Board Room
EP JOINT TOWN BOARD 4:30 p.m. Dinner
® STUDY SESSION
AGENDA
No public comment will be heard
This study session will be streamed live and available on the
Town YouTube page at www.estes.org/videos
4:45 p.m. Estes Park Housing Authority Roles, Responsibilities, and
Decision-Making Authority with Respect to 6E Funds.
(Deputy Town Administrator Damweber& EPHA Director Moulton)
6:35 p.m. Trustee & Administrator Comments & Questions.
6:40 p.m. Future Study Session Agenda Items.
(Board Discussion)
6:45 p.m. Adjourn for Town Board Meeting.
Informal discussion among Trustees concerning agenda items or other Town matters may occur before this
meeting at approximately 4:30 p.m.
Page 1
F
A
fP
TOWN OF ESTES PARI
Report TOWN ADMINISTRATOR
To: Honorable Mayor Koenig
Board of Trustees
Through: Town Administrator Machalek
From: Jason Damweber, Deputy Town Administrator
Date: April 25, 2023
RE: Estes Park Housing Authority Roles, Responsibilities, and Decision-
Making Authority with Respect to 6E Funds
Purpose of Study Session Item:
Provide the Town Board with an opportunity to discuss the Estes Park Housing
Authority's role, responsibilities, and authority to make decisions vis-a-vis the Town with
respect to implementation of housing strategies using 6E funds.
Town Board Direction Requested:
Staff requests direction regarding the role and responsibilities and the level of decision-
making authority it wishes to delegate to the Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA)
related to the implementation of housing strategies and expenditure of 6E funds to
address workforce and attainable housing. The direction provided will inform the content
of a new agreement with the Housing Authority.
Present Situation:
The passage of Ballot Issue 6E is expected to produce millions of dollars a year that
can be used only to address workforce housing and childcare issues in the Estes
Valley. Per the adopted Annual Workforce Housing and Childcare Funding Plan, the
Town intends to "enter into agreements with partners, where funds may be transferred
for particular purposes, including for administrative costs associated with program
management." The Funding Plan specifically notes that EPHA will be the Town's key
partner when it comes to addressing items related to workforce and attainable housing.
EPHA was created by the Town and exists specifically for this reason, and it has the
staff expertise and programming to carry out the strategies outlined in the plan. The new
funding source will allow for added staff, expansion of existing programs, and creation
of new ones.
The main questions now are the extent to which the Town wishes to delegate
responsibility to EPHA to implement housing strategies as outlined in the 2023 Housing
Needs Assessment and Strategic Plan (HNA/SP), and the extent to which the Town
wishes to retain decision-making authority with respect to expenditure of 6E funds (and
Page 3
possibly other funds reserved for workforce and attainable housing) to implement the
strategies.
Roles and Responsibilities
Regarding the question about EPHA's role and responsibilities for implementation of
housing strategies, the HNA/SP's recommendations for who should be the "lead
agency" on each strategy are outlined in the table below. These recommendations from
Root Policy Research, the housing consultant that prepared the HNA/SP, are based on
the current missions and roles and responsibilities of each agency:
Strategy and Action Lead
Agency
Preservation
1 Property acquisition EPHA
2 Asset Plan Housing Authority Portfolio EPHA
3 Deed restriction buy down EPHA
4 Renovation, Rehab, Weatherization
Energy
Resource Ctr.
New Supply
5 Current Project Success TOEP/EPHA
6 Partnerships EPHA
7 Land Acquisition EPHA
8 Employer Collaboration TBD
9 ADU incentives TOEP/EPHA
10 Fee Incentives TOEP
Funding and Policy
1 1 Program Development for Local TOEP
Sources
12 Leverage Outside Sources TOEP/EPHA
13 Development Code Updates TOEP
Community Engagement and Client Support
14 Home Purchase Assistance EPHA
15 Rent Assistance EPHA
16 Equity and Inclusion TOEP/EPHA
17 Education, outreach, and housing hub TOEP/EPHA
Organizational Capacity Building
18 Increase staff TOEP/EPHA
19 Systems development TOEP/EPHA
In short, the HNA/SP recommends that EPHA be the lead agency in implementing most
action items directly related to the preservation and creation of housing and
administration of programs for rent and home buying assistance, and that the Town be
Page 4
the lead agency on development of the funding plan and items related to policies and
fees.
Decision-Making Authority
Because EPHA is a governmental organization created by the Town and because the
Town relies on the Housing Authority to address workforce and attainable housing
issues in the community, one option could be to simply work together each year on the
annual funding plan to outline expectations and the purpose of the funds and, once
approved by both the Town and County, transfer the funds to EPHA to carry out the
agreed upon objectives (the actual timing of the transfer(s) would depend on the timing
of remittance of funds to the Town from the Local Marketing District). While granting
authority to EPHA when it comes to making specific decisions, the Town Board would
still play an important role in determining which strategies would be funded on an
annual basis.
On the other end of the spectrum, while it would not be an efficient approach and may
even beg the question why we need a Housing Authority, the Town could retain all
decision-making authority for 6E expenditures. Under this option, EPHA could be
required to request funds for each individual program and/or seek approval for specific,
individual expenses.
Another option is a middle ground of sorts, where the Town could define thresholds for
decision-making authority. This could be broken down by the various purposes of the
funds, including administrative costs, but would presumably be primarily applied to
property acquisition. For example, the Town could authorize EPHA to make property
acquisition decisions — whether as part of a "cash-buyer" program, when purchasing
existing dwelling units, or for land-banking — up to a certain dollar amount without the
need for Town approval on each transaction. In these cases, the Town could still
stipulate certain requirements through an ongoing agreement with EPHA, such as deed
restrictions placed on units purchased or constructed. If the Town Board finds it
acceptable to grant property acquisition authority but wishes to impose a threshold, we
would need direction on the dollar amount and whether there are other desired
restrictions.
The Town could also require approval of individual programs, both existing and new
ones, that utilize 6E funds and then permit EPHA to carry them out as agreed upon.
This could apply to strategies like rental and home purchase assistance. Regardless of
whether or not the Town Board wishes to approve programs or specific components of
programs (such as eligibility), it is the Housing Authority's intention to keep the Town
apprised of programs as they are honed and/or created. In fact, this will be necessary
so that informed decisions can be made each year as the annual Funding Plan is
developed.
Conclusion
Regardless of the agreed upon roles and responsibilities and decision-making authority
the Town is willing to grant EPHA, there will surely be property acquisition opportunities
Page 5
and/or programs that we will have to work directly together on. For example, when the
need arises to bond for certain purchases or when only a municipality is legally able to
apply for certain grant opportunities or enter into certain agreements. In any case,
EPHA would be required to keep the Town informed of all expenditures made using 6E
funds even when approval of individual actions are not required. This would be done
through regular reporting and accounting as outlined in the new agreement.
It is important that guidance on these questions be provided so that a new agreement
can be developed, giving EPHA the assurances it needs to begin adding staff and
developing new programs.
Proposal:
Staff proposes that the Town Board provide guidance so that staff can prepare a draft
agreement for consideration by the Town Board and Housing Authority Board.
Advantages:
• An agreement is needed so that EPHA can begin hiring new staff and developing
new programs.
Disadvantages:
• None.
Finance/Resource Impact:
To be determined.
Level of Public Interest
High
Attachments:
None
Page 6
4/26/2023
ToEP and EPHA:
Roles, Responsibilities, and Decision-Making
Authority with Respect to 6E Funds
Joint Study Session
April 25, 2023
Estes Park
Housing Authority
1
• Per the adopted Annual Workforce Housing and
Childcare Funding Plan,the Town intends to
"enter into agreements with partners,where
funds may be transferred for particular purposes,
including for administrative costs associated with
program management."
• The Funding Plan specifically notes that EPHA
will be the Town's key partner when it comes to
Overviewaddressing items related to workforce and
attainable housing.
• EPHA was created by the Town and exists
specifically for this reason, and it has the staff
expertise and programming to carry out the
strategies outlined in the plan (the new funding
source will allow for added staff and creation of
new programs).
ab . lam' }.um -n Esau mu am■ sum ■ns ■
2
Page 7
4/26/2023
• There are two distinct but interrelated
questions that we seek guidance on:
o The extent to which the Town Board
wishes to delegate responsibility to the
Housing Authority to implement housing
strategies; and
Guidance o The extent to which the Town wishes to
retain decision-making authority with
Requested respect to the expenditure of 6E funds
(and other funds reserved for workforce
and attainable housing).
.I�-n-Ari7Irli�i ��(-/i'taidwi7�m-t: I�r •
r—��Un ❑❑ ■v■�'.!■MINIM iiE3�s��111O111 f6■
3
Ballot MEeasure • Options
o Retain decision-making authority
with respect to funds for housing?
Local Marketing
District o Maximize funds transferred to EPHA
Operating Plan to execute the strategic plan to the
extent permissible (consistent with
P ,
the approved annual funding plan)?
Annual 6E o Somewhere in between?
Funding Plan
J
Implementation
of Programs&
Associated
Expenditures
4
Page 8
4/26/2023
Strategy and Action Lead
Agency
Preservation
1 Property acquisition EPHA
2 Asset Plan Housing Authority Portfolio EPHA
3 Deed restriction buy down EPHA
H NA/S P 4 Renovation,Rehab,Weatherization Energy
Resource Ctr.
New Supply
Recommended S Current Project Success TOEP/EPHA
6 Partnerships EPHA
7 Land Acquisition EPHA
Lead Agencies 8 Employer
entiv Collaboration TBD
TOEP
/EPHA
ADU incentives
10 Fee Incentives TOEP
Funding and Policy
11 Program Development for Local TOEP
Sources
Does the TB find this acceptable? 12 Leverage Outside Sources TOEP/EPHA
13 Development Code Updates TOEP
If not,what would you like to see different? Community Engagement and Client Support
14 Home Purchase Assistance EPHA
15 Rent Assistance EPHA
16 Equity and Inclusion TOEP/EPHA
17 Education,outreach,and housing hub TOEP/EPHA
Organizational Capacity Building
18 Increase staff TOEP/EPHA
19 Systems development TOEP/EPHA
5
Strategy and Action Lead
Agency
Pres
Decision-Making 2 Asse _. • • A
3 Deed restriction buy down EPHA
Authority f o r 4 Renovation,Rehab,Weatherization Energy
Resource Ctr.
New Supply
5 Current Project Success TOEP/EPHA
Expenditures 6 P PHA
7 Land Acquisition EPHA
8 C L'
9 ADU incentives TOEP/EPHA
10 Fee Incentives TOEP
Will budget funds in "buckets" on an Funding and Policy
annual basis through the Funding Plan 17 Program Development for Local TOEP
Sources
12 Leverage Outside Sources TOEP/EPHA
In what areas does the Town Board want to 13 Development Code Updates TOEP
be directly involved in decision-making Community Engagement and Client Support
with respect to expenditures versus 14 Home Purchase Assistance EPHA
dele atin to EPHA? 15 Rent Assistance EPHA
g g 16 Equity and Inclusion TOEP/EPHA
17 Education,outreach,and housing hub TOEP/EPHA
Organizational Capacity Building
18 Increase staff TOEP/EPHA
19 Systems development TOEP/EPHA
6
Page 9
4/26/2023
• Is there a dollar amount threshold below
which EPHA could make specific
decisions unilaterally?
• Any circumstances that would require
Town approval when not already
Town Board required?
• Other?
Desired
Parameters?
loptethiiiithweigarauflatamaholintroggimei
immlinummiumunsormaw=uniluunms
7
• EPHA has demonstrated success in
addressing housing issues in the Estes
Valley to the extent resources have
allowed.
• The EPHA Board of Directors, as
EPHA Making the appointed by the Town Trustees, are
housing and community experts who can
Case for Decision- execute through EPHA Staff our
community's housing goals.
Making Authority • Decision Making Framework
o Must be nimble, operate in grey area,
ability to react quickly
o Match opportunity to need
o Financial feasibility
o Barriers
8
Page 10
EP
AL
TOWN of ESTES PARK
Future Town Board Study Session Agenda Ite
April 25, 2023
May 9, 2023 Items Approved — Unscheduled:
• Electrical Vehicle Infrastructure and • Bed & Breakfast Code Update
Readiness Update • Proposition 123 Introduction
• Planning Fee Schedule • Governing Policies Updates
• Stanley Park Master Plan
May 23, 2023 Implementation
• Seasonal RV Housing in Commercial • Downtown Loop Updates as Necessary
Zones
Items for Town Board Consideration:
None
Page 11
i�
f